PRACTICE DIRECTION ON LENGTH AND TIMING OF CLOSING BRIEFS AND CLOSING ARGUMENTS

Similar documents
Regulations of the Court

DECISION ON MOTION TO STRIKE PROSECUTION FINAL BRIEF

( G\f2_r-C(g-~4~1 2-G-og-'L.,o\O (51'bl-ll ~ SIZ3,S) TRIAL CHAMBER III. Dennis C. M. Byron, Presiding Gberdao Gustave Kam Vagn J oensen

RULE CHANGE 2015(06) COLORADO APPELLATE RULES. Rules 28, 28.1, 29, 31, 32, and 34

SPECIAL TRIBUNAL FOR LEBANON PRACTICE DIRECTION ON PROCEDURE FOR THE FILING OF WRITTEN SUBMISSIONS IN APPEAL PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE

THE PRE-TRIAL JUDGE STL July English. Public ORDER REQUESTING SUBMISSIONS ON WORKING LANGUAGES

RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE NOTICE

REQUEST FOR ARBITRATION

UNITED NATIONS NATIONS UNIES TRIBUNAL PÉNAL INTERNATIONAL POUR LE RWANDA

Court of Appeal of Alberta Criminal Appeal Rules Approved by the Court of Appeal April 16, 2018, Canada Gazette (2018) SI/ , 152 C Gaz II, 1050

IC'i~-~ J. II - f - 2 t:jt:'j t!:j {~-::;46 - '<~(!) ,..,., ' ... TRIAL CHAMBER III

International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda Tribunal pénal international pour le Rwanda TRIAL CHAMBER I

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PATENT CASE SCHEDULE. Answer or Other Response to Complaint 5 weeks

Budget for the International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals for the biennium

Case: Document: Filed: 09/04/2012 Page: 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. Filed: September 04, 2012

2018 MCBAINE COMPETITION Brief Evaluation Scoring & Comment Sheet. Instructions

APPENDIX B: BRIEF WRITING COMPETITION AMCA BRIEF WRITING COMPETITION RULES AMCA BRIEF WRITING COMPETITION CERTIFICATION FORM

SUPREME COURT - NASSAU COUNTY - IAS PART 56 PART RULES & PROCEDURES

42 nd Annual ROBERT F. WAGNER NATIONAL LABOR & EMPLOYMENT LAW MOOT COURT COMPETITION

PRACTICE DIRECTIVES FOR CONTESTED APPLICATIONS IN THE PROVINCIAL COURT OF MANITOBA

NOTICE OF APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL. Part 6, Criminal Procedure Act In the Court of Appeal of New Zealand

(1'Ll=J-- 72 icj. lc7 a -.'11--GI _.I 1~ JU1AOI.l. v. Pauline NYIRAMASUHUKO et al

Procedural Order (PO) No.1

Round of the Americas

Roster Lawyers Tariff of Fees

/:> ' It " i '14 =t ' \;2.S l - 2Lfif J

COURT OF APPEAL RULES TABLE OF CONTENTS

Appellate Division, Third Judicial Department Rules of Practice. Effective September 17, 2018

United States Court of Appeals For the Fourth Circuit

RULES OF PROCEDURE AND EVIDENCE

SASKATCHEWAN COURT OF QUEEN S BENCH RULES RESPECTING PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCES

INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR SETTLEMENT OF INVESTMENT DISPUTES. Claimant. Respondent. (ICSID Case No. ARB/xx/xxx) [DRAFT] PROCEDURAL ORDER NO.

FRANK A. SCHRECK GAMING LAW MOOT COURT COMPETITION

RULES OF COURT (1978) ADOPTED ON 14 APRIL 1978 AND ENTERED INTO FORCE ON 1 JULY PREAMBLE *

RULES OF COURT (1978) ADOPTED ON 14 APRIL 1978 AND ENTERED INTO FORCE ON 1 JULY

ONTARIO SECURITIES COMMISSION PRACTICE GUIDELINE

INDIVIDUAL PRACTICES IN CIVIL CASES Nelson S. Román, United States District Judge. Courtroom Deputy Clerk

SUPREME COURT - NASSAU COUNTY IAS PART 14 PART MATRIMONIAL RULES & PROCEDURES (revised 05/23/17)

International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda Tribunal penal international pour Ie Rwanda. IGa-OI-'~ _?r o~.. o,.~.2..0'0 TRIAL CHAMBER III

Be sure to look up definitions present at the beginning for both sections. RULES OF PROCEDURE IN TRAFFIC CASES AND BOATING CASES

RULES OF PROCEDURE AND EVIDENCE

IC 11t-GI~ 65-1 IS-01-- ~a

The Protection of Witnesses at the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia

International Criminal Tribunal 'for Rwanda Tribunal penal international pour le Rwanda

Anatomy of an Appeal By Michelle May O Neil

State of New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division Third Judicial Department P.O. Box 7288, Capitol Station Albany, NY

~- ~... 'l..dol_ (_ct1.6<6 -etu3)

International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda Tribunal pénal international pour le Rwanda TRIAL CHAMBER DESIGNATED PURSUANT TO RULE 11 BIS

NOTICE OF APPEAL BY PERSON CONVICTED. Part 6, Criminal Procedure Act In the Court of Appeal of New Zealand. [Name] v [R or Police or prosecutor]

International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda Tribunal penal international pour le Rwanda TRIAL CHAMBER II THE PROSECUTOR THARCISSE MUVUNYI

TRIAL CHAMBER VIII. Judge Raul C. Pangalangan, Presiding Judge Judge Antoine Kesia-Mbe Mindua Judge Bertram Schmitt SITUATION IN THE REPUBLIC OF MALI

RULES FOR ARBITRATION BETWEEN THE BANK FOR INTERNATIONAL SETTLEMENTS AND PRIVATE PARTIES

RULE 82 CRIMINAL APPEAL RULE INTERPRETATION AND DEFINITIONS

Case: Document: 20 Filed: 09/11/2014 Page: 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. Filed: September 11, 2014

Title 255 LOCAL COURT RULES

~ lv86~-c!)fd.'~ M ~dl~/~

BY-LAW NO. 44 ONTARIO COLLEGE OF SOCIAL WORKERS AND SOCIAL SERVICE WORKERS - RULES OF PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE OF THE DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE

Guide for applicants to the ICC List of Counsel and Assistants to Counsel

Mechanism for International Criminal Tribunals Date: BEFORE THE APPEALS CHAMBER. Judge Theodor Meron, Pre-Appeal Judge. Mr. Olufemi Elias PROSECUTOR

RULES FOR EXPEDITED ARBITRATION. of the Finland Chamber of Commerce

ICC-01/04-01/07-HNB-22

MEA Board of Reference Rules of Organization and Procedure

Tennessee Department of Labor and Workforce Development Bureau of Workers' Compensation

New York State Court of Appeals Rules of Practice. (22 NYCRR Part 500)

Arbitration Procedures Guide

COMPREHENSIVE JAMS COMPREHENSIVE ARBITRATION RULES & PROCEDURES

REVISED AS OF MARCH 2014

I. WORKSHOP 1 - DEFINITION OF VICTIMS, ROLE OF VICTIMS DURING REFERRAL AND ADMISSIBILITY PROCEEDINGS5

tan., 't~ul.,\ -l G\ - l 1.- '"').()o S" i) Tribunal penal international pour le Rwanda TRIAL CHAMBER Ill THE PROSECUTOR

.(.fa' International. "~A~gN1~~' (5~ 14-5Bl-OJ. \C\Q c-l 1 ~ - OJ-t ~ 'd--d \ l. ,. Cl ::X:

k.rll..-1t-i.h- :- Tribunal penal international pour le Rwanda.l~-d2.-~0d6 [~f:.j-of-- 26s~ s:) TRIAL CHAMBER I THE PROSECUTOR

PRE-TRIAL CHAMBER II SITUATION IN THE DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF THE CONGO IN THE CASE OF THE PROSECUTOR V. BOSCO NTAGANDA. Public

NOTICE OF ARBITRATION

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit Proposed Changes to the Rules of Practice. Federal Circuit Rule 1

LOCAL RULES OF THE DISTRICT COURT. [Adapted from the Local Rules for the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana]

LOCAL RULES of the COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CLARION COUNTY

RULES OF PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE. May 14, 2015

IN TRIAL CHAMBER I. Judge Alphons Orie, Presiding Judge Bakone Justice Moloto Judge Christoph Fliigge. Mr John Hocking PROSECUTOR PUBLIC

IMMIGRATION ADVISERS COMPLAINTS AND DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL

D12-1/50685 BIS 13 January 2011 AJ

ICA~-,~ -21-T 81&1~ TRIAL CHAMBER II THE PROSECUTOR. PAULINE NYIRAMASUHUKO and. Case No. ICTR T

Certificates of Rehabilitation in Fresno County Filing Instructions

,,_q_ 2 ~ TRIAL CHAMBER II. The PROSECUTOR. Pauline NYIRAMASUHUKO Arsene Shalom NTAHOBALI Sylvian NSABIMANA Alphonse NTEZIRYAYO Joseph KANYABASHI

REQUEST FOR ARBITRATION

(Exclusively for the use of the media. Not an official document) Appeals Judgement Summary for Ante Gotovina and Mladen Markač

APPEALS TO THE APPELLATE DIVISION, FOURTH DEPARTMENT HON. FRANCES E. CAFARELL

Article 6. [Exercise of jurisdiction] [Preconditions to the exercise of jurisdiction]

AMERICAN ARBITRATION ASSOCIATION

Agenda Item No. 6B August 9, Honorable Mayor and City Council Members Laura C. Kuhn, City Manager. Michelle A. Thornbrugh, City Clerk

Schedule A Review Board Rules of Procedure

SENTENCING HEARING TO CONSIDER THE IMPOSITION OF A LIFE SENTENCE FOR JUVENILE OFFENDERS

Streamlined Arbitration Rules and Procedures

(3) Briefs filed in paper format shall not be stapled or bound.

Round of the Americas

(Exclusively for the use of the media. Not an official document) The Hague, Arusha, 10 December 2014

Draft paper on some policy issues before the Office of the Prosecutor

L 172/4 EN Official Journal of the European Union

Section 19(b)(3)(A) * Section 19(b)(3)(B) * Section 19(b)(2) * Rule. 19b-4(f)(1) 19b-4(f)(2) (Title *)

RULES OF PROCEDURE OF THE DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE & FITNESS TO PRACTISE COMMITTEE

Protocol for Witness Statements

Transcription:

UNITED NATIONS NATIONS UNIES International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda Tribunal Pénal International pour le Rwanda Arusha International Conference Centre P O Box 6016, Arusha, Tanzania B P 6016, Arusha, Tanzanie Tel: 255 27 2504207-11 2504367-72 or 1 212 963 2850 Fax: 255 27 2504000/2504373 or 1 212 963 2848/49 PRACTICE DIRECTION ON LENGTH AND TIMING OF CLOSING BRIEFS AND CLOSING ARGUMENTS 1

In accordance with Rule 19 (B) of the Rules of Procedure and Evidence and having consulted with the Bureau, the Registrar and the Prosecutor, I issue this Practice Direction in order to establish a limit on the length of closing briefs and closing arguments and time standards for the completion of the final stages of trials and to ensure that uniform practices are followed and with a view to encouraging the parties as of the commencement of the trial to start preparing and, as the trial unfolds, to update their closing briefs and closing oral arguments in accordance with the standards set herein. 1. CLOSING BRIEFS 1.1 PAPER SIZE, FORMAT AND TYPEFACE (i) Briefs shall be submitted on A4 size paper. Margins shall be 2.5 centimeters on all four sides. All filings shall be paginated, excluding the cover sheet. (ii) The typeface of the main text shall be 12 point Times New Roman with 1.5 line spacing. An average page, excluding footnotes, shall contain no more than 300 words. The typeface of the footnotes shall be 10 point Times New Roman with single line spacing. 1.2 CONTENT OF BRIEFS (i) Briefs shall refer to relevant evidence by transcript references and to relevant case law by citations. Lengthy summaries of testimonies and exhibits and recitation in detail of applicable law should be avoided. (ii) Briefs shall include arguments on sentencing. 1.3 LENGTH (i) In single-accused trials, briefs shall not exceed 30,000 words. (ii) In multi-accused trials, Defence briefs shall not exceed 30,000 words each. The Prosecutor shall file a consolidated brief which shall not exceed 30,000 words for one accused and 20,000 words for each additional accused. (iii) In the event of site visits, the limit under (i) shall be expanded by 3,000 words and the limits under (ii) by 3,000 words for the Defence brief and by 2,000 words for each additional accused in the Prosecution Brief. 1

(iv) Headings, footnotes and quotations shall count towards the above word limits. 1.4 APPENDICES (i) An appendix shall not count towards the above word limits. (ii) An appendix shall not contain factual or legal arguments, but rather references, source materials, items from the record, exhibits, and other relevant, non-argumentative material. (iii) An appendix shall be of reasonable length, on average no more than three times the maximum number of pages of the brief. (iv) Appendices compiled in English or French shall not be translated into, respectively, French or English. However, if available, translations shall be attached to the original appendix and shall not count towards the limits under (iii). 1.5 WORD COUNTS Parties shall conduct a word count of their briefs and shall include this information in the form: Word Count: _, at the end of the brief before the signature line. 1.6 SIMULTANEOUS FILINGS A single time limit for filing briefs shall be set, requiring the parties to file their briefs simultaneously. 2. ORAL ARGUMENTS (i) In single-accused trials, the duration of a party s closing arguments shall not exceed three hours for the presentation, one hour for rebuttal and 20 minutes for rejoinder. (ii) In multi-accused trials, the Prosecutor shall have additional time equivalent to 2/3 of the time limits under (i) per additional accused. 3. TRANSLATIONS 2

(i) (ii) At the commencement of the trial or, in trials that have commenced, at the earliest opportunity each party shall indicate whether its brief will be filed in English or French. The other party or parties shall indicate whether a translation into French or English is required. When translation is required, decisions setting the dates for filing of the closing briefs shall be copied to the Language Services Section so as to facilitate early planning. 4. TIMING (i) In single-accused trials, closing briefs shall be filed no later than 60 days after the closure of the evidence phase. In multi-accused trials, the time limit shall be 90 days. (ii) In the event of site visits, the time limit under (i) shall be extended by 14 days. (iii) The closing oral arguments shall take place no later than 30 days after the date set for the filing of the closing briefs. (iv) If a brief is or briefs are to be translated at the request of a party, the time limit under (iii) shall be extended by no more than 21 days as of the receipt by the parties of the translation(s). 5. VARIATION FROM WORD AND TIME LIMITS (i) On application by a party or proprio motu, the Trial Chamber may vary the word and time limits in this Practice Direction if a legal recess or extraordinary circumstances necessitate a variation. (ii) A party seeking variation of the word and/or the time limits shall seek authorization from the Trial Chamber in advance and shall provide an explanation of the circumstances necessitating the variation sought. DATED IN ARUSHA, this 3 May 2010 Dennis Byron President 3

4