IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Similar documents
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

Case 1:11-cv REB Document 1 Filed 12/15/11 Page 1 of 5

Case 2:06-cv SD Document 1-1 Filed 01/10/2006 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 2:16-cv RJS Document 2 Filed 09/29/16 Page 1 of 15

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE. Plaintiff, Civil Action No. COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION INTEX RECREATION CORP.,

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

Case 1:16-cv JMS-MJD Document 1 Filed 01/26/16 Page 1 of 15 PageID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

Case: 1:16-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 02/12/16 Page 1 of 16 PageID #:1

Case 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed 03/02/17 Page 1 of 21 PageID: 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN. v. Civil Action No. 2:16-cv-789 COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND. v. C.A. No. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT AND TRADE DRESS INFRINGEMENT. Nature of the Action

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

Case 2:16-cv MRH Document 1 Filed 10/19/16 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case 6:15-cv Document 1 Filed 04/06/15 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1

Case 2:11-cv ECR -PAL Document 1 Filed 02/25/11 Page 1 of 6

Case: 5:09-cv DDD Doc #: 1 Filed: 06/04/09 1 of 5. PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

Plaintiff Privacy Pop, LLC ( Plaintiff ) complains and alleges as follows against Defendant Gimme Gimme, LLC ( Defendant ).

Case 1:99-mc Document 689 Filed 12/01/11 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 1:10-cv Document 1 Filed 02/09/10 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 2:16-cv JRG-RSP Document 44 Filed 06/15/17 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 457

Case: 1:17-cv Doc #: 1 Filed: 11/15/17 1 of 12. PageID #: 1

Case 1:10-cv Document 1 Filed 06/22/10 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK COMPLAINT

Case: 1:16-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 11/15/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #:1

Case 3:14-cv RS-EMT Document 1 Filed 03/28/14 Page 1 of 11

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

Case 1:15-cv WMS-LGF Document 54 Filed 11/01/16 Page 1 of 8. COMPLAINT Plaintiff, v. Case No. 1:15-cv WMS

Case 2:14-cv JDL Document 1 Filed 08/13/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE

Case 1:07-cv MRB Document 6 Filed 11/06/2007 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Case 8:18-cv Document 1 Filed 08/07/18 Page 1 of 26 Page ID #:1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY LOUISVILLE DIVISION

Case 1:14-cv JMS-MJD Document 1 Filed 01/09/14 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1

Case 2:16-cv JRG-RSP Document 1 Filed 10/19/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

Complaint for Patent Infringement

Case 5:07-cv CLS Document 72 Filed 12/21/07 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHEASTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Courthouse News Service

Attorneys for Plaintiff Kirker Enterprises, Inc. Document Filed Electronically UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 2:15-cv MJP Document 21 Filed 02/11/14 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI KANSAS CITY DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, Defendants. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION, AKRON

Case 1:18-cv LY Document 1 Filed 03/20/18 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

Case 1:07-cv GEL Document 1 Filed 07/05/2007 Page 1 of 6

Case 1:17-cv VEC Document 1 Filed 02/15/17 Page 1 of 6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO.: 1:16-CV-165 ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. Civil Action No. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TEXARKANA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 1:17-cv LY Document 1 Filed 03/17/17 Page 1 of 22 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

Case 2:15-cv Document 1 Filed 04/14/15 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION : : : : : : : : : :

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION. Civil Action No: HON. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO.: 1:16-CV-381 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. Plaintiff, Civil Action No.

Case 2:15-cv Document 1 Filed 04/14/15 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION. Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. v. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

Case 1:99-mc Document 417 Filed 05/23/12 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 1:18-cv YK Document 1 Filed 06/07/18 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE. Plaintiff, C.A. No. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT THE PARTIES

Case 1:15-cv Document 1 Filed 02/27/15 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. COMPLAINT and Jury Demand

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY. Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. v. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT

Case 1:14-cv Document 1 Filed 02/18/14 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS VICTORIA DIVISION

Case 2:12-cv JCM-VCF Document 1 Filed 11/13/12 Page 1 of 10

Case: 1:13-cv Document #: 35 Filed: 09/13/13 Page 1 of 5 PageID #:130

Case 2:18-cv Document 1 Filed 05/09/18 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

Case 2:16-cv MMD-CWH Document 1 Filed 01/05/16 Page 1 of 5

Case 3:16-cv D Document 1 Filed 08/31/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN GREEN BAY DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Case 0:10-cv MJD-FLN Document 1 Filed 04/06/10 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. Court File No.

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION Case No: 5:15-cv-590 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 09/22/16 Page 1 of 6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 06/05/16 Page 1 of 7

Case 2:18-cv JAD-CWH Document 1 Filed 12/21/18 Page 1 of 17

Case 4:14-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 09/08/14 Page 1 of 6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No.

Case 2:14-cv Document 1 Filed 10/10/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION Case No: 5:11-cv ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1 COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLORADO ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: COMPLAINT

COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT. 1. This is an action for direct patent infringement of United States Letters Patent Nos.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Plaintiff Case No.: 1:17-cv-6236 COMPLAINT

Transcription:

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION SHINN FU COMPANY OF AMERICA, INC., a Missouri corporation; and SHINN FU CORPORATION., a Taiwanese corporation; v. Plaintiffs, RIDGEROCK TOOLS, INC., d/b/a NEIKO TOOLS USA, a California corporation; Defendant. Case No. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL COME NOW, plaintiffs Shinn Fu Company of America, Inc. and Shinn Fu Corporation (hereinafter collectively Plaintiffs for their complaint against defendant Ridgerock Tools, Inc., d/b/a Neiko Tools USA ( Defendant and state as follows: THE PARTIES 1. Plaintiff Shinn Fu Company of America, Inc. ( SFA is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Missouri, with its principal office located at 10939 North Pomona Avenue, Kansas City, Missouri 64153. 2. Plaintiff Shinn Fu Corporation ( SFC is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of Taiwan, with offices located at 9-16 Nan Kan Hsia, Nan Kan, Lu Chu Hsiang, Tao Yuan County, Taiwan ROC. Case 4:08-cv-00049-HFS Document 1 Filed 01/24/08 Page 1 of 6

3. Upon information and belief, Defendant Ridgerock Tools, Inc., d/b/a Neiko Tools USA (hereinafter Defendant or Neiko Tools, is a for-profit corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of California. Upon further information and belief, Defendant is in the business of selling products in interstate commerce, including sales in the State of Missouri and this District. JURISDICTION AND VENUE 4. The Court may exercise subject matter jurisdiction over the claims set forth in this complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1338. 5. The Court may exercise personal jurisdiction over Defendant in this action on the grounds that, upon information and belief: (a Defendant has committed acts of patent infringement in the State of Missouri; and (b Defendant does business in the State of Missouri through authorized distributors and dealers, including various third-party websites, and by offering products for sale through its website www.ridgerocktools.com. Civ. P. 4(h. 6. Service of process on Defendant in this action will be effected pursuant to Fed. R. 7. Venue is proper in this district pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1391(c and 1400(b. FIRST CLAIM FOR RELIEF (Patent Infringement 8. On August 30, 1994, United States Letters Patent No. 5,341,723 was duly and legally issued to Michael Hung for the invention Reciprocating Pneumatic Motor For Hydraulics (hereinafter the 723 Patent. (A true and correct copy of the 723 Patent is attached hereto as Exhibit 1. Mr. Michael Hung has assigned all rights, title, and interest in the 2 Case 4:08-cv-00049-HFS Document 1 Filed 01/24/08 Page 2 of 6

723 Patent to SFA. By virtue of the assignment, SFA is the owner of the 723 Patent and has the right to recover damages for past and future infringement thereof. 9. SFC is the manufacturer and supplier of products manufactured for the U.S. under the 723 Patent. 10. Defendant has infringed and continues to infringe the 723 Patent by making, using, selling, and/or importing products embodying the patented invention, inducing others to make, use, sell, and/or import products embodying the patented invention, and/or by contributing to the manufacture, use, sale, and/or importation of products embodying the patented invention. 11. Defendant s infringement of the 723 Patent has caused Plaintiffs monetary harm in an amount to be proved at trial. In addition, unless restrained, Defendant s continued infringement of the 723 Patent will cause Plaintiffs irreparable harm for which there is no adequate remedy at law. 12. Plaintiffs' products embodying the patented invention have properly been marked with references to the 723 Patent. 13. Upon information and belief, Defendant has known of the 723 Patent, but has continued to infringe the 723 Patent and thus has knowingly and willfully infringed the 723 Patent in disregard of Plaintiffs rights. Prayer for Relief for First Claim WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs pray for (a an order finding that Defendant has infringed the 723 Patent; (b an accounting for and an award of damages, including lost profits, resulting from Defendant s infringement, and/or reasonable royalties for such infringement pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 284; (c a trebling of Plaintiffs damages because of the knowing, willful, and wanton 3 Case 4:08-cv-00049-HFS Document 1 Filed 01/24/08 Page 3 of 6

nature of Defendant s conduct; (d an assessment of interest, both prejudgment and post judgment, on the damages awarded; (e a finding of this case to be exceptional and an award of attorneys' fees incurred by Plaintiffs in this action pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 285; (f a preliminary and permanent injunction against Defendant s continued infringement of the 723 Patent; (g an order directing that all goods in the possession, custody, or control of Defendants that infringe the 723 Patent be delivered up and destroyed within 30 days of entry of judgment; (h an award of Plaintiffs costs in bringing and prosecuting this action; and (i such other and further relief as the Court deems just and proper. SECOND CLAIM FOR RELIEF (Copyright Infringement 14. SFA owns the registered copyrights in a nondramatic, literary work entitled "Air Actuated Hydraulic Hand Jacks, Operating Instructions and Parts Manual" (hereinafter Manual. In particular, SFA has registered copyrights for six separate versions of the Manual dated from 1993 to 2001. Documents showing the Copyright Registrations for the six versions of the Manual are attached hereto as Exhibit 2. 15. Defendant has infringed and continues to infringe SFA s copyrights in the Manual a. directly by reproducing and distributing copyrighted work of SFA without the authority or consent of SFA and/or by preparing derivative works based on the copyrighted work of SFA without the authority or consent of SFA; b. vicariously by possessing the right to supervise the infringing conduct and by having a direct financial interest in the infringing conduct; or c. contributorily by inducing, causing, or materially contributing to the infringing conduct of another with knowledge of the infringing activity. 4 Case 4:08-cv-00049-HFS Document 1 Filed 01/24/08 Page 4 of 6

16. Defendant will continue to infringe directly, vicariously, or contributorily SFA s copyrights in the Manual unless restrained from doing so. 17. Defendant has knowingly and willfully committed acts of infringement. Prayer for Relief for Second Claim WHEREFORE, SFA prays for (a an order finding that Neiko Tools has infringed SFA s copyrights in the Manual; (b a preliminary and permanent injunction against Neiko Tool s continued infringement of SFA s copyrights as permitted under 17 U.S.C. 502; (c an order requiring that all infringing materials in the possession, custody, or control of Neiko Tools be delivered up and destroyed within 30 days of entry of judgment as permitted under 17 U.S.C. 503; (d an award of damages comprising SFA s actual damages and the profits obtained by Neiko Tools as provided in 17 U.S.C. 504(b, or statutory damages as provided in 17 U.S.C. 504(c; (e costs and attorneys fees as permitted under 17 U.S.C. 505; and (f such other and further relief as the Court deems just and proper. DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 38(b, Plaintiffs demand a jury trial on all issues triable by jury. Dated January 24, 2008. Respectfully submitted by, KUTAK ROCK, LLP s/ John M. McFarland John M. McFarland 1010 Grand Boulevard, Suite 500 Kansas City, MO 64106-2220 Tele: (816 960-0090 Fax: (816 960-0041 Email: john.mcfarland@kutakrock.com 5 Case 4:08-cv-00049-HFS Document 1 Filed 01/24/08 Page 5 of 6

Neil L. Arney (Pro Hac Vice Admission Pending 1801 California Street, Suite 3100 Denver, CO 80202 Tele: (303 297-2400 Fax: (303 292-7799 Email: neil.arney@kutakrock.com Attorneys for Plaintiffs Shinn Fu Company America, Inc. and Shinn Fu Corporation 6 Case 4:08-cv-00049-HFS Document 1 Filed 01/24/08 Page 6 of 6