IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION

Similar documents
ALBC PLAINTIFFS EXPLANATORY BRIEF IN RESPONSE TO AUGUST 28, 2015, ORDER

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION

Alabama Legislative Black Caucus, et al v. The State of Alabama, et al (PANEL)(LEAD), Docket No. 2:12-cv (M.D. Ala. Aug

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION

Sully District Fairfax County. Prepared by Ralph Hubbard Sully Supervisor Representative Fairfax County Redistricting Committee 3/23/2011

AMENDED COMPLAINT OF ALABAMA LEGISLATIVE BLACK CAUCUS et al.

Redistricting 101 Why Redistrict?

Guide to 2011 Redistricting

Overview. League of Women Voters: The Ins and Outs of Redistricting 4/21/2015

ST. TAMMANY PARISH SCHOOL BOARD 2010 CENSUS/2014 ELECTION REDISTRICTING DECEMBER 1, Presentation by REDISTRICTING L.L.C.

ALBC PLAINTIFFS OBJECTIONS TO ENACTED REMEDIAL HOUSE AND SENATE PLANS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT CQJI.,T. FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALAAM* U C I NORTHERN DIVISION

TX RACIAL GERRYMANDERING

ALBC PLAINTIFFS REFILED MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IN COMPLIANCE WITH SUPREME COURT MANDATE

CITIZENS REDISTRICTING COMMISSION PROPOSAL EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

REDISTRICTING REDISTRICTING 50 STATE GUIDE TO 50 STATE GUIDE TO HOUSE SEATS SEATS SENATE SEATS SEATS WHO DRAWS THE DISTRICTS?

The Very Picture of What s Wrong in D.C. : Daniel Webster and the American Community Survey

Summary of the Fair Congressional Districts for Ohio Initiative Proposal

GIS in Redistricting Jack Dohrman, GIS Analyst Nebraska Legislature Legislative Research Office

Redistricting in Louisiana Past & Present. Regional Educational Presentation Baton Rouge December 15, 2009

ILLINOIS (status quo)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division. v. Civil Action No. 3:14cv852 MEMORANDUM OPINION

Case 2:12-cv WKW-MHT-WHP Document 263 Filed 07/24/15 Page 1 of 178 DEFENDANTS BRIEF ON REMAND

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION. v. Civil Case No. 1:17-CV TCB

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA THIRD EXTRA SESSION 2016 HOUSE BILL DRH30015-LU-3 (12/13)

ILLINOIS (status quo)

LEGAL ISSUES FOR REDISTRICTING IN INDIANA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2017 HOUSE BILL DRH10050-BK-2 (02/13) Short Title: Nonpartisan Redistricting Commission.

IUSD ELECTORAL PROCESS UNDER CONSIDERATION. March 27, 2018

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2017 S 1 SENATE BILL 702. Short Title: Independent Redistricting Commission. (Public)

APPORTIONMENT Statement of Position As announced by the State Board, 1966

Come now the parties jointly and in compliance with the Court's order of January

Case 5:11-cv OLG-JES-XR Document 95 Filed 08/01/11 Page 1 of 11

WHERE WE STAND.. ON REDISTRICTING REFORM

Case 5:12-cv KHV-JWL- Document 231 Filed 05/29/12 Page 1 of 16 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

No In the Supreme Court of the United States. ALABAMA DEMOCRATIC CONFERENCE, et al. Appellants, v. ALABAMA, et al. Appellees.

Redistricting in Louisiana Past & Present. Regional Educational Presentation Monroe February 2, 2010

Case 2:12-cv WKW-MHT-WHP Document 301 Filed 11/24/15 Page 1 of 37

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2005 H 1 HOUSE BILL 1448

House Apportionment 2012: States Gaining, Losing, and on the Margin

Case 5:12-cv KHV-JWL- Document 229 Filed 05/29/12 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS

Case 3:13-cv REP-LO-AD Document 222 Filed 09/17/15 Page 1 of 7 PageID# 5133

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division. v. Civil Action No. 3:14cv852 MEMORANDUM OPINION

Case 1:11-cv DLI-RR-GEL Document 182 Filed 03/05/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 2214

Reading Between the Lines Congressional and State Legislative Redistricting

Submitted by: ASSEMBLY MEMBERS HALL, TRAIN!

H 7749 S T A T E O F R H O D E I S L A N D

Case 2:12-cv RJS-DBP Document 441 Filed 12/21/17 Page 1 of 39 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF PENNSYLVANIA SENATE BILL

DRAWING LINES: RACIAL GERRYMANDERING IN BETHUNE- HILL V. VIRGINIA BOARD OF ELECTIONS

AN AMENDMENT TO ESTABLISH THE ARKANSAS CITIZENS' REDISTRICTING COMMISSION

New York Redistricting Memo Analysis

Redistricting Virginia

Cooper v. Harris, 581 U.S. (2017).

In The Supreme Court of the United States

Case 1:17-cv TCB-WSD-BBM Document 94-1 Filed 02/12/18 Page 1 of 37

THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF PENNSYLVANIA SENATE BILL

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA SPECIAL MASTER S DRAFT PLAN AND ORDER

H.B. 69 Feb 13, 2019 HOUSE PRINCIPAL CLERK

Putting an end to Gerrymandering in Ohio: A new citizens initiative

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA. TOM SCHEDLER, in his official capacity as The Secretary of State of Louisiana, COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO. and No. 1:12-CV-00140

WHAT IS REDISTRICTING. AND WHAT IS THE IMPACT ON MY COUNTY?

CITIZEN ADVOCACY CENTER. Congressional Redistricting What is redistricting and why does it matter? A Moderated Discussion

REDISTRICTING commissions

Citizens Union and the League of Women Voters of New York State

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION

Case 5:12-cv KHV-JWL- Document 160 Filed 05/25/12 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 2:12-cv JLH Document 18-7 Filed 02/22/12 Page 1 of 20

(132nd General Assembly) (Substitute Senate Joint Resolution Number 5) A JOINT RESOLUTION

Citizens Union and the League of Women Voters of New York State

Supreme Court of the United States

Legal & Policy Criteria Governing Establishment of Electoral Districts

Elections by Trustee Area Informational Session on Transition to Trustee Areas. June 25-26, 2018

ESSB H COMM AMD By Committee on State Government, Elections & Information Technology

Local Opportunities for Redistricting Reform

Case 1:13-cv JKB Document Filed 01/27/17 Page 1 of 8 EXHIBIT B

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) UNIFORM SCHEDULING ORDER

CITIZEN ADVOCACY CENTER

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS GALVESTON DIVISION

Redrawing the Map: Redistricting Issues in Michigan. Jordon Newton Research Associate Citizens Research Council of Michigan

cause of action in challenging an apportionment plan, id. at 237).

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA. ) ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) 1:15-CV-399 ) ) ORDER

Realistic Guidelines: Making it Work

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

Case 1:03-cv CAP Document 148 Filed 01/06/2004 Page 1 of 93

at New York University School of Law A 50 state guide to redistricting

ASSEMBLY CONCURRENT RESOLUTION No. 60 STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 218th LEGISLATURE PRE-FILED FOR INTRODUCTION IN THE 2018 SESSION

The Journey From Census To The United States Supreme Court Linda J. Shorey

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR MARYLAND GREENBELT DIVISION

Case 5:11-cv OLG-JES-XR Document Filed 08/22/13 Page 1 of 17 EXHIBIT 1

Regulating Elections: Districts /252 Fall 2012

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND

IN THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA IN AND FOR CARSON CITY

Transcription:

Case 2:12-cv-00691-WKW-MHT-WHP Document 283 Filed 08/28/15 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION ALABAMA LEGISLATIVE BLACK CAUCUS, et al., Plaintiffs, CASE NO. 2:12-CV-691 v. (Three-Judge Court THE STATE OF ALABAMA, et al., Defendants. ALABAMA DEMOCRATIC CONFERENCE, et al., Plaintiffs, CASE NO. 2:12-CV-1081 v. (Three-Judge Court THE STATE OF ALABAMA, et al., Defendants. ORDER The Court orders the Alabama Legislative Black Caucus and Alabama Democratic Conference plaintiffs each, or jointly, to file a new statewide redistricting plan. Each plan, or a joint plan, must follow the Reapportionment Committee Guidelines adopted by the Alabama Legislature, Def. Ex. 420, specifically:

Case 2:12-cv-00691-WKW-MHT-WHP Document 283 Filed 08/28/15 Page 2 of 5 (1 The 2010 census must be used to determine the total Alabama resident state population and the population of defined subunits; (2 Each individual district population must be within plus or minus one percent of the ideal population; (3 The plan must comply with the Voting Rights Act of 1965 as amended and Alabama Legislative Black Caucus v. Alabama, 135 S. Ct. 1257 (2015; (4 To comply with section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, no district may have the purpose or effect of diluting minority voting strength; (5 To comply with section 5 of the Voting Rights Act, no district may have the purpose or effect of denying or abridging the right to vote on account of race, color, or membership in a language minority group, which includes diminishing on account of race, color, or membership in a language minority group, the ability of any citizen of the United States to elect his or her preferred candidate of choice; (6 No district may be drawn in a way that subordinates race-neutral districting criteria to racial considerations; (7 There must be exactly 35 Senate districts and 105 House districts; (8 Except as required by the Constitution or laws of the United States, each district must be composed of as few counties as practicable; 2

Case 2:12-cv-00691-WKW-MHT-WHP Document 283 Filed 08/28/15 Page 3 of 5 (9 Except as required by the Constitution or laws of the United States, every part of a district must be contiguous with every other part according to the Reapportionment Committee Guidelines; (10 Except as required by the Constitution or laws of the United States, each district must be compact; (11 Except as required by the Constitution or laws of the United States, the plan must respect communities of interest. A community of interest includes racial, ethnic, geographic, governmental, regional, social, cultural, partisan, and historic interests. It also includes commonality of communications, as well as county, municipal, and voting precinct boundaries. Def. Ex. 420 at IV(7(b. Each plan submitted by the Caucus and Conference must also match the plan adopted by Alabama in the following respects: (12 Each plan must contain at least 27 majority-black districts in the House of Representatives and at least 8 majority-black districts in the Senate; (13 Each plan must not split more counties overall than the plan adopted by Alabama; (14 Each plan must not split more precincts overall than the plan adopted by Alabama; (15 Each plan must contain no incumbent conflicts, except those conflicts in the plan adopted by Alabama. Those conflicts were between former 3

Case 2:12-cv-00691-WKW-MHT-WHP Document 283 Filed 08/28/15 Page 4 of 5 Representative Demetrius Newton and Representative Juandalynn Givan, and between Representatives John Knight and Joe Hubbard. The plaintiffs shall file, separately or jointly, a plan and explanatory brief within 28 days of our Order. If the plan splits a precinct that is currently whole, restores a precinct that was split by Alabama, or moves a precinct out of its current district, the brief for that plan shall identify the precinct by name and number. The joint brief or separate briefs shall also contain charts with statistics on (1 the total black population and black population percentage of each proposed district, (2 a comparison of those two figures to the current plan, and (3 the population of each district and its deviation from the ideal. They shall also file, separately or jointly, two sets of overlay maps: one with the proposed plan superimposed on the current district lines, and one with the proposed plan superimposed on the 2001 district lines. These sets of overlay maps should include detailed images of districts in Jefferson, Madison, Mobile, and Montgomery counties. If the plaintiffs file a joint plan, the state defendants shall respond within 28 days of the service of the plan. They shall also have the option to depose the person most knowledgeable about the plan within 21 days of the service of the plan. If the plaintiffs file separate plans, the state defendants shall respond to both plans no later than 28 days after the service of the second plan. The state 4

Case 2:12-cv-00691-WKW-MHT-WHP Document 283 Filed 08/28/15 Page 5 of 5 defendants may choose to file a single response or separate responses to each plan. They also shall have the option to depose the person most knowledgeable about each plan within 21 days of the service of that plan. DONE this 28th of August, 2015. /s/ William H. Pryor Jr. UNITED STATES CIRCUIT JUDGE PRESIDING /s/ W. Keith Watkins CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 5

Alabama Legislative Black Caucus, et al v. The State of Alabama, et al (PANEL(LEAD, Docket No. 2:12-cv-00691 (M.D. Ala. Aug General Information Court Federal Nature of Suit Docket Number United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama; United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama Civil Rights - Voting[441] 2:12-cv-00691 2015 The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Service // PAGE 6