TRIPS Article 15 Protectable Subject Matter

Similar documents
Paris Article 2 National Treatment

TRADEMARK FILING REQUIREMENTS SINGAPORE

First Council Directive

REPUBLIC OF LITHUANIA LAW AMENDING THE LAW ON TRADEMARKS AND SERVICE MARKS. No of

Act No. 8 of 2015 BILL

CHAPTER 416 TRADEMARKS ACT

The Trade Marks Act, 1999 (No. 47 of 1999) [30 th December, 1999] CHAPTER I Preliminary

TRADE MARKS ACT 1996 (as amended)

UNITED KINGDOM Trade Marks Act Last updated on 27 April 2017.

CZECH REPUBLIC Trademark Act No. 441/2003 Coll. of December 3, 2003 ENTRY INTO FORCE: April 1, 2004

Legal Supplement Part C to the Trinidad and Tobago Gazette, Vol. 53, No. 152, 4th December, No. 22 of 2014

ACT ON TRADE MARKS PART ONE TRADE MARKS CHAPTER I GENERAL PROVISIONS

Hohmann & Partner Rechtsanwälte Schlossgasse 2, D Büdingen Tel ,

Trade Marks Act 1994

OFFICIAL GAZETTE OF THE PROVISIONAL INSTITUTIONS OF SELF-GOVERNMENT IN KOSOVO / PRISHTINA: YEAR II / NO. 14 / 01 JULY 2007 Law No.

NORWAY Trade Marks Act Act No. 4 of March 3, 1961 as last amended by Act No. 8 of March 26, 2010 Entry into force of last amending Act: July 1, 2013.

PROVISIONAL INSTITUTIONS OF SELF GOVERNMENT ON TRADEMARKS

BELIZE TRADE MARKS ACT CHAPTER 257 REVISED EDITION 2000 SHOWING THE LAW AS AT 31ST DECEMBER, 2000

Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94

IPPT , ECJ, Merz & Krell (Bravo) It is immaterial, when that provision is applied, whether the signs or indications in question are descriptive

IRELAND Trade Marks Act as amended up to and including the February 2, 2016

Intellectual Property Law in the Information Society

Article 4. Signs, registered as trademarks The following signs may be registered as trademarks:

Council of the European Union Brussels, 28 October 2015 (OR. en)

Trade Marks Act* (Act No. 11 of 1955, as last amended by Act No. 31 of 1997) ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS

Trade Marks Act No 194 of 1993

EUROPEAN UNION Council Regulation on the Community Trade Mark No. 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 ENTRY INTO FORCE: April 13, 2009

TRADE MARKS ACT (CHAPTER 332)

The Ministry of Justice March 5, 2013 Stockholm

having regard to the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council (COM(2013)0161),

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Second Chamber) 24 June 2004 *

The Geographical Indications of Goods (Registration and Protection) Act, 1999

The Consolidate Trade Marks Act 1)

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Sixth Chamber) 12 February 2004 *

TRADE MARKS ACT, 1999

COALITION PROVISIONAL AUTHORITY ORDER NUMBER 80 AMENDMENT TO THE TRADEMARKS AND DESCRIPTIONS LAW NO. 21 OF 1957

CAMBODIA Trademark Law The Law Concerning Marks, Trade Names and Acts of Unfair Competition as amended on February 07, 2002

THE TRADE MARKS ACT, 1999 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS

The Consolidate Trade Marks Act 1)

Law on Trademarks and Geographical Indications

COMMUNITY TRADE MARK ORDER 2014

CHAPTER II Registration, transfer and cancellation of trade marks

THE TRADE MARKS ACT, (Act No. 19 of 2009 dated 24 March 2009)

ORDINANCE OF THE STATES OF DELIBERATION

Law on Trademarks and Indications of Geographical Origin

Benelux Convention on Intellectual Property (trademarks and designs) 1

Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property 1

Coalition Provisional Authority Order Number 80

Adopted text. - Trade mark regulation

Official Journal of the European Union. (Legislative acts) REGULATIONS

Pakistan. Contributing firm Khursheed Khan & Associates. Author Zulfiqar Khan. World Trade Organisation Agreement and the Paris Convention.

Trade Marks Ordinance (New Version),

Venezuela. Contributing firm De Sola Pate & Brown

Navigating Uncertainty in the Face of Descriptive Marks

Case T-402/02. August Storck KG v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

EU Trade Mark Reform. Consequences in Latvia

Act 17 Trademarks Act 2010

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Second Chamber) 16 September 2004*

ON TRADEMARKS LAW ON TRADEMARKS CHAPTER I GENERAL PROVISIONS

BASIC FACTS ABOUT REGISTERING A TRADEMARK

Central Government Act The Trade And Merchandise Marks Act, 1958

ETHIOPIA Trademarks Law Trademark Registration and Protection Proclamation No. 501/2006 ENTRY INTO FORCE: July 7, 2006

NC General Statutes - Chapter 80 Article 1 1

The Trans-Pacific Partnership

EUROPEAN UNION Council Regulation on geographical indications and designations of origin

REAL STUPIDITY ALWAYS TRUMPS AI : REGISTRABLE & ENFORCEABLE?

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT 4 May 1999 *

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT. 4 May 1999 (1) (Directive 89/104/EEC - Trade marks - Geographical indications of origin)

IC 24-2 ARTICLE 2. TRADEMARKS, TRADE NAMES, AND TRADE SECRETS

3 Tex. Intell. Prop. L.J. 85. Texas Intellectual Property Law Journal Winter, 1995

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Third Chamber) 25 January 2007 *

Trademark Law of the People's Republic of China. Decision on Revising the Trademark Law of the People's Republic of China adopted at.

Law On Trade Marks and Indications of Geographical Origin

TREATY SERIES 1970 Nº 13. Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT 18 June 2002 *

SUMMARY OF THE SPANISH TRADE MARK LAW

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT. 18 June 2002 (1)

OPINION OF ADVOCATE GENERAL RUIZ-JARABO COLOMER delivered on 31 January

UK (England and Wales)

PROTECTION SYSTEMS & EXAMINATION AUTHORITY

Date: 22 August Packaging Questionnaire. Questions

TRADEMARKS IN POLAND PROTECTION AND ENFORCEMENT

AIPLA Overview of recent developments in Community trade mark law

GUIDELINES FOR EXAMINATION OF EUROPEAN UNION TRADE MARKS EUROPEAN UNION INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OFFICE (EUIPO) PART C OPPOSITION SECTION 0 INTRODUCTION

LAWSON & PERSSON, P.C.

ANNEX VI REFERRED TO IN ARTICLE 24 PROTECTION OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

Israel Israël Israel. Report Q191. in the name of the Israeli Group by Tal BAND. Relationship between trademarks and geographical indications

Supported by. A global guide for practitioners

European Union. Contributing firms Bureau Casalonga & Josse Casalonga Avocats

Note: When any ambiguity of interpretation is found in this provisional translation, the Japanese text shall prevail. Part III Patentability


France. Contributing firm Granrut Avocats. Authors Richard Milchior Partner Estelle Benattar Associate

COMPANIES TRIBUNAL REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA. In the matter between; PHINDA PRIVATE GAME RESERVE (Pty) Limited

ASEAN REGIONAL FILING FORM FOR TRADE MARK (FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY)

THE PEOPLE S REPUBLIC OF CHINA TRADEMARK LAW

Trademark Law of the People's Republic of China

TRADE MARKS TRADE MARKS

Zimbabwe Act To amend the Trade Marks Act [Chapter 26:04]

Draft Trade Mark Law of Myanmar

Case 2:08-cv JAM-DAD Document 220 Filed 07/25/12 Page 1 of 21

Transcription:

TRIPS Article 15 Protectable Subject Matter 1. Any sign, or any combination of signs, capable of distinguishing the goods or services of one undertaking from those of other undertakings, shall be capable of constituting a trademark. Such signs, in particular words including personal names, letters, numerals, figurative elements and combinations of colors as well as any combination of such signs, shall be eligible for registration as trademarks. Where signs are not inherently capable of distinguishing the relevant goods or services, Members may make registrability depend on distinctiveness acquired through use. Members may require, as a condition of registration, that signs be visually perceptible.

First Council Directive 89/104/EEC Article 2 A trade mark may consist of any sign [1] capable of being represented graphically, particularly words, including personal names, designs, letters, numerals, the shape of goods or of their packaging, provided that [2] such signs are capable of distinguishing the goods or services of one undertaking from those of other undertakings. Article 3 1. The following shall not be registered or if registered shall be liable to be declared invalid: (a) signs which cannot constitute a trade mark; (b) trade marks which are devoid of any distinctive character; (c) trade marks which consist exclusively of signs or indications which may serve, in trade, to designate the kind, quality, quantity, intended purpose, value, geographical origin, or the time of production of the goods or of rendering of the service, or other characteristics of the goods or service;

(d) trade marks which consist exclusively of signs or indications which have become customary in the current language or in the bona fide and established practices of the trade; (e) signs which consist exclusively of: the shape which results from the nature of the goods themselves, or the shape of goods which is necessary to obtain a technical result, or the shape which gives substantial value to the goods;... 3. A trade mark shall not be refused registration or be declared invalid in accordance with paragraph 1 (b), (c) or (d) if, before the date of application for registration and following the use which has been made of it, it has acquired a distinctive character. Any Member State may in addition provide that this provision shall also apply where the distinctive character was acquired after the date of application for registration or after the date of registration.

Paris Article 6 Conditions of Registration; Independence of Protection of Same Mark in Different Countries (1) The conditions for the filing and registration of trademarks shall be determined in each country of the Union by its domestic legislation. (2) However, an application for the registration of a mark filed by a national of a country of the Union in any country of the Union may not be refused, nor may a registration be invalidated, on the ground that filing, registration, or renewal, has not been effected in the country of origin. (3) A mark duly registered in a country of the Union shall be regarded as independent of marks registered in the other countries of the Union, including the country of origin.

Paris Article 6quinquies Protection of Marks Registered in One Country of the Union in the Other Countries of the Union B. Trademarks covered by this Article may be neither denied registration nor invalidated except in the following cases: (i) when they are of such a nature as to infringe rights acquired by third parties in the country where protection is claimed; (ii) when they are devoid of any distinctive character, or consist exclusively of signs or indications which may serve, in trade, to designate the kind, quality, quantity, intended purpose, value, place of origin, of the goods, or the time of production, or have become customary in the current language or in the bona fide and established practices of the trade of the country where protection is claimed; (iii) when they are contrary to morality or public order and, in particular, of such a nature as to deceive the public....

Problem 4 10 MegaFoods has applied to register various TMs with the USPTO using words from the language of the Togu tribe, who live contentedly with few material possession on an obscure and insular island nation in the South Pacific. No member of the tribe has left the island in over 30 years, and there is no Internet access or modern telecommunications system. The Togu tribe speaks an ancient language that is based on pictograms and uses no alphabet. The pictograms that MegaFoods would like to register as marks are the Togu pictograms and their transliterations for water, mineral, and spring for a new line of spring mineral water to be marketed as a sports drink in the United States. MegaFoods maintains that no one in the United States has heard of the Togu tribe, so these pictograms are arbitrary in the English language. 1. Should the USPTO issue the TMs? 2. Would your answer change if Togu had adopted English as its standard language and the ancient Togu language had become essentially dead in Togu such that it was understood and studied only by a few linguistic professors at Togu University?

TRIPS Article 16 Rights Conferred 1. [a] The owner of a registered trademark shall have the exclusive right to prevent all third parties not having the owner s consent from using in the course of trade [i.e. commercial activities] identical or similar signs for goods or services which are identical or similar to those in respect of which the trademark is registered where such use would result in a likelihood of confusion. [b] In case of the use of an identical sign for identical goods or services, a likelihood of confusion shall be presumed. [c] The rights described above shall not prejudice any existing prior rights, nor shall they affect the possibility of Members making rights available on the basis of use [i.e., unregistered marks].

First Council Directive 89/104/EEC Article 5 Rights conferred by a trade mark 1. The registered trade mark shall confer on the proprietor exclusive rights therein. The proprietor shall be entitled to prevent all third parties not having his consent from using in the course of trade:.... (a) any sign which is identical with the trade mark in relation to goods or services which are identical with those for which the trade mark is registered; (b) any sign where, because of its identity with, or similarity to, the trade mark and the identity or similarity of the goods or services covered by the trade mark and the sign, there exists a likelihood of confusion on the part of the public, which includes the likelihood of association between the sign and the trade mark.

First Council Directive 89/104/EEC Article 4 Further grounds for refusal or invalidity concerning conflicts with earlier rights 1. A trade mark shall not be registered or, if registered, shall be liable to be declared invalid: (a) if it is identical with an earlier trade mark, and the goods or services for which the trade mark is applied for or is registered are identical with the goods or services for which the earlier trade mark is protected; (b) if because of its identity with, or similarity to, the earlier trade mark and the identity or similarity of the goods or services covered by the trade marks, there exists a likelihood of confusion on the part of the public, which includes the likelihood of association with the earlier trade mark.