IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 5203/2016 R. RAJ PRADEEP & ORS. RESPONDENT(S)

Similar documents
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL NOS OF 2019 (Arising out of SLP(C) Nos of 2012)

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL No.5206 of SURESHCHANDRA BAGMAL DOSHI & ANR..

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL NO OF 2018 (Arising from SLP(C) Nos.28137/2018)

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL No of versus J U D G M E N T

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % Date of decision: WP(C) No. 416 of 2011 and CM Nos /2011. Versus

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION (CRIMINAL) NO. 2/2012 IN CIVIL APPEAL NO. 8398/2013

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : LAND ACQUISITION ACT, Date of decision: WP(C) No. 3595/2011 and CM Nos.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO OF 2018 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) NOS.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Date of Judgment: FAO (OS) 298/2010

% L.A. APPEAL NO. 738 OF Date of Decision: 13 th October, # UNION OF INDIA...Appellant! Through: Mr. Sanjay Poddar, Advocate

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO OF Kehar Singh (D) Thr. L.Rs. & Ors... Appellant(s) Versus

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION. WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) No. 129 OF 2015 VERSUS J U D G M E N T

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL NO.(s) OF 2018 (Arising out of SLP(C)No.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO OF 2019 MANTRI CASTLES PVT. LTD & ANR. WITH

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE DECIDED ON: W.P. (C) 8494/2014

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL NO OF 2018 (Arising out of S.L.P.(C) No.

PRADEEP KUMAR MASKARA & ORS. Vs. STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SERVICE MATTER. Judgment reserved on: Judgment pronounced on:

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL NO.4554 OF 2018 (Arising out of SLP(C)No.38618/2016)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SERVICE MATTER DECIDED ON: W.P.(C) 840/2003. versus. versus

$~R-1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. versus

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 3046/2019 (ARISING FROM SLP(C) NO(S). 4964/2019)

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) NO OF Vs.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS OF Versus E KRISHNA RAO & ORS ETC. ETC.

Through : Mr. A.K.Singla, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Pankaj Gupta and Ms.Promila K.Dhar Advocates. Versus

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. + FAO(OS) No.534/2010 & CM Nos /2010. versus. % Date of Hearing : August 25, 2010

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL Nos OF 2017 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (CIVIL) Nos.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 184 OF

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL No(s) OF 2019 (Arising out of SLP (C ) No.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : PROPERTY DISPUTE. LPA of Date of decision:

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO OF 2018 VOLKSWAGEN INDIA PVT. LTD & ORS.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SERVICE MATTER. Reserved on: Date of decision:

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS OF 2011 VERSUS AVM MAHINDER SINGH RAO...RESPONDENTS AND OTHERS

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS OF A. RAJAGOPALAN ETC...Appellant VERSUS

Bar & Bench ( IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL No(s) OF 2018 (Arising out of SLP(C)No(s) OF 2016)

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.3932 OF 2009 ASHIM RANJAN DAS (D) BY LRS.

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. Judgment delivered on: December 11, 2014

Through: Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Gurpreet Singh, Mr. Nitish Jain & Mr. Jatin Sethi, Advs. Versus

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO OF 2009 JHARKHAND STATE HOUSING BOARD APPELLANT

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SERVICE MATTER Judgment pronounced on: W.P.(C) 393/2012

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL CENTRAL ZONAL BENCH BHOPAL. Original Application No. 129/2013 (CZ)

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL/APPELLATE JURISDICTION. WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.521 OF Rajeev Kumar Gupta & Others Petitioners

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. Judgment Reserved on: August 02, 2016 % Judgment Delivered on: August 08, W.P.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL NO. 880 OF 2019 (Arising out of SLP(C) No of 2006)

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL NO OF 2018 (Arising out of S.L.P. (Civil) No of 2018) VERSUS

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. versus CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU O R D E R %

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO OF UNION OF INDIA & ANR. Respondent(s) JUDGMENT

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS OF 2019

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION TRANSFERRED CASE (CIVIL) NO. 126 OF Ajayinder Sangwan and Ors...

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI REHABILITATION MINISTRY EMPLOYEES CO-OPERATIVE. versus

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION TRANSFERRED CASE (CIVIL) NO(S). 11 OF Versus

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. W.P.(C) No.3245/2002 and CM No.11982/06, 761/07. Date of Decision: 6th August, 2008.

ITEM NO.5 COURT NO.7 SECTION IVA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

[Abstract prepared by the PCT Legal Division (PCT )] Case Name: TRYTON MEDICAL INC. V. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA FERANI HOTELS PVT. LTD..APPELLANT. versus THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSIONER GREATER MUMBAI & ORS..

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SUIT FOR POSSESSION Date of Judgment: RSA No.251/2008 & CM Nos.17860/2008 & 11828/2010

A FORTNIGHTLY VAT/GST LAW REPORTER 2003 NTN 22) [ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT]

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION. I.A. Nos of 2005 WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 202 OF 1995 VERSUS

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1177/2012. STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH. Appellant(s) VERSUS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : LAND ACQUISITION ACT DECIDED ON: W.P. (C) 4439/2013

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) Nos of 2007

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL NO OF 2017 {Arising out of SLP(C) No of 2016}

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT :CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. FAO (OS) No.178/2008. Judgment Reserved on : 30th September, 2008

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL NO of 2008 BHARGAVA & ASSOCIATES PVT. LTD.& ORS...

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. I.A. No.1167/2007 in CS(OS) No.2128/2006. Judgment Reserved on:

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 210 OF 2007 STATE BANK OF PATIALA APPELLANT MUKESH JAIN & ANR.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : RECRUITMENT MATTER. W.P.(C) No. 8347/2010. Date of Decision: Versus

APPLICABILITY OF JUSTICE PUTTUSWAMY VS UNION OF INDIA TO NON-STATE ENTITIES

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SERVICE MATTER. Through : Mr.Harvinder Singh with Ms. Sonia Khurana, Advs.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

Prof. Krishnapada Dash & Ors. -Versus- The State of West Bengal & Ors. Mr. L. C. Bihani, Mr. N. C. Bihani. For the petitioner.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. SUBJECT : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, OMP No.356/2004. Date of decision : 30th November, 2007

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : ARBITRATION & CONCILIATION ACT. Date of decision: 8th March, 2013 EFA(OS) 34/2012

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SUIT FOR PERPETUAL, MANDATORY INJUNCTION. Date of Judgment: CM(M) No.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS ACT, 1949 W.P.(C) 1345/2011 DATE OF ORDER :

Case :- SERVICE BENCH No of Hon'ble Shri Narayan Shukla,J. Hon'ble Sheo Kumar Singh-I,J.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT :MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL Date of Decision: 19th November, 2012 MAC. APP.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION. TRANSFER PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 567 of 2017 JANHIT MANCH & ANR...PETITIONER(S) VERSUS WITH

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO OF 2009 MOHAN LAL APPELLANT VERSUS NAND LAL RESPONDENT JUDGMENT

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % Judgment delivered on: EHTESHAM QUTUBUDDIN SIDDIQUE. versus

IMPORTANT TOEIC UPDATE. Directions given for all TOEIC cases in the Court of Appeal on 20 December 2018

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO OF 2017 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO OF 2015 VERSUS

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL No OF 2017 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) No.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL NO OF 2015 (Arising out of SLP (Civil) No.

COURT NO. 2, ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI O.A. NO. 140 OF 2009

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.631 OF 2016

NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI. Company Appeal (AT) No. 104 of 2018

THE ESSENTIAL COMMODITIES (AMENDMENT AND VALIDATION) BILL, 2009

Case No. 17 of Shri. V.P. Raja, Chairman Shri. Vijay L. Sonavane, Member. Reliance Infrastructure Ltd., Santacruz (E).

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: November 27, 2015 % Judgment Delivered on: December 01, CM(M) 1155/2015.

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MEGHALAYA, MANIPUR, TRIPURA, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) WRIT APPEAL NO.

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Co.Pet. 787/2015 BANDHU SYSTEMATIX PRIVATE LIMITED...PETITIONER. Mr. Anuj Kumar, Advocate.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE B.S. PATIL WRIT PETITION NO OF 2012 [S-R]

Transcription:

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION NON-REPORTABLE CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 5203/2016 ABDUL JAWAD M.F & ANR. APPELLANT(S) VERSUS R. RAJ PRADEEP & ORS. RESPONDENT(S) WITH C.A. NO. 5204-5205/2016 C.A. NO. 6055/2016 C.A. NO. 6059/2016 C.A. NO. 6057/2016 C.A. NO. 6056/2016 C.A. NO. 8460/2016 KURIAN, J. J U D G M E N T 1. The issue raised in all these appeals pertains to the irregular promotions granted to 97 Upper Division Clerks in the Kerala Panchayat Department to the post of Executive Officer, Grade-I. No doubt all those promotions were ad hoc but the problem arose when the Government sought to regularize them with effect from the date of ad hoc promotion. In respect of 61 1

persons, the Government order dated 19.07.2012 followed by the order dated 23.08.2012 were the subject matter of challenge before the Kerala Administrative Tribunal (for short, the Tribunal ). There were other issues pertaining to the seniority as well. The Tribunal vide order dated 06.03.2015 held that the regularization of 61 promotions were impermissible under the law, being in excess of the eligible quota. As far as regularization granted to 36 UDCs are concerned, they had already been eliminated by Government Order dated 17.06.2010. The order passed by the Tribunal has been affirmed by the Division Bench of the High Court as per the impugned order dated 11.03.2016. The said judgment is under challenge in these appeals. 2. When these matters came up before this Court, after extensively hearing the parties, the following order was passed on 29.03.2017:- On 13.05.2016, this Court inter alia passed the following order:- Leave granted. Status quo, obtaining as on today, shall be maintained by the parties. The order, as above, shall stand modified as follows: 2

The Government is free to take steps to implement the orders passed by the Kerala Administrative Tribunal dated 6.3.2015, as affirmed by the High Court in the impugned order dated 11.3.2016. But, in case reversion of any officer is to be effected in the process, the same shall be done only after obtaining orders from this Court. A Report on the steps thus taken shall be submitted before this Court, within three months. Post on 12.07.2017. 3. The said order was passed taking into consideration one of the submissions that in view of efflux of time the implementation of the judgment may not cause any serious impact on the existing incumbents, as far as reversion is concerned. 4. We have heard Mr. Gopal Shankarnarayan, learned counsel appearing for the appellants, in C.A. Nos.5203/2016 & 8460/2016, Mr. Jaideep Gupta, learned senior counsel appearing for the State and learned counsel for the other contesting respondents extensively today also. 5. There cannot be any dispute on the factual scenario that all the 97 promotions were in excess of the eligible quota. There cannot also be any dispute 3

on the fact that all the promotions given to the incumbents were ad hoc. Therefore, when a final seniority list is to be drawn up, a call has to be taken as to the fate of the ad hoc promotions. In our view, the view taken by the Tribunal, as affirmed by the High Court, cannot be faulted since 97 incumbents could not have occupied the positions on regular basis, since it was in excess of the eligible quota. 6. We have ascertained that there cannot be more than two incumbents out of 61 in office as of now. Having regard to the decades of service rendered by them, we direct that they shall not be reverted in the process of implementation of the judgment. It is also directed that the incumbents who have already retired from service shall not be disturbed as far as their pension is concerned. 7. We make it clear that in the process of implementation of the impugned judgment, in case any of the individual incumbents has any other grievance, it will be open to him/her to pursue the same in appropriate proceedings. 8. Subject to the above, these appeals are dismissed. 4

9. Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of. 10. There shall be no orders as to costs....j. [KURIAN JOSEPH] NEW DELHI; AUGUST 02, 2018....J. [SANJAY KISHAN KAUL] 5