No.MCI-5(3)/2001-Med./ MEDICAL COUNCIL OF INDIA EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE

Similar documents
No. 5(3)/2001-Med./ MEDICAL COUNCIL OF INDIA EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE

1. The petitioner No.1 Dr. Jagat Narain Subharti. Charitable Trust, Dehradun, made an application to the

PART D: BILL OFFICE Responsibilities of Bill Office- The items of work for which this Section is responsible mainly consists of: -

THE READJUSTMENT OF REPRESENTATION OF SCHEDULED CASTES AND SCHEDULED TRIBES IN PARLIAMENTARY AND ASSEMBLY CONSTITUENCIES BILL, 2013

THE READJUSTMENT OF REPRESENTATION OF SCHEDULED CASTES AND SCHEDULED TRIBES IN PARLIAMENTARY AND ASSEMBLY CONSTITUENCIES (SECOND) BILL, 2013

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM; NAGALAND; MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

Ministry of Corporate Affairs. The LLP Bill, 2006 was introduced in the Rajya Sabha on 15 th December,

Kerala Legislature Secretariat 2008

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : ADMISSION MATTER W.P.(C) 5941/2015 DATE OF DECISION : JUNE 12, 2015

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : IMC ACT, 1956 Date of Decision: W.P.(C) 4223/2013

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION (C) NO. OF 2017 IN Writ Petition (Civil) No.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : THE ARCHITECTS ACT, 1972 Date of decision: 4th January, 2012 WP(C) NO.8653/2008

RESPONDENTS. Article 14 read with Article 19 (1) G. Article 246 read with entry 77 list 1, 7 th schedule.

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. versus. % Date of Decision: 9 th February, J U D G M E N T

I have had the benefit of perusing the judgment of my. esteemed learned brother, Hon ble Justice Shri S.B. Sinha,

THE NATIONAL INVESTIGATION AGENCY BILL, 2008

LEGISLATIVE PROCEDURE IN THE RAJYA SABHA RAJYA SABHA SECRETARIAT NEW DELHI

THE REPRESENTATION OF THE PEOPLE (AMENDMENT AND VALIDATION) BILL, 2013

KERALA GAZETTE ticf Kkäv. EXTRAORDINARY Akm[mcWw PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY B[nImcnIambn {]kn²s Sp p Xv. Thiruvananthapuram, Monday Xncph\ ]pcw, Xn Ä

FRIDAY, THE 4 TH MARCH, 2005 (The Rajya Sabha met in the Parliament House at a.m.)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. W.P.(C) 2877 of 2003 & CM APPL No. 4883/2003

THE INDIAN MEDICAL COUNCIL (AMENDMENT) BILL, 2013

The Indian Medical Council (Amendment) Act, 1993 No. 31 of 1993 (2nd April, 1993)

COURT NO. I ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI M.A NO OF 2018 & M.A NO OF 2018 IN O.A NO OF 2018

WP(C) No.810/2015 BEFORE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE UJJAL BHUYAN

RESPONDENT: D.S. Mathur, Secretary,Department of Telecommunications

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.RAJENDRAN. W.P.No.35881/2016 & WMP.No.

THE NATIONAL MEDICAL COMMISSION BILL, 2017

Government of Rajasthan Food,Civil Supplies & Consumer Affairs, Department, Rajasthan. No. F 13(10) (05) Food.Deptt./Rules/2013.

NOW IT IS AGREED BETWEEN THE PARTIES HERETO AS FOLLOW:

GOVERNMENT BILLS LEGISLATIVE PROCESS

BILLS REQUIRING SPECIFIED MAJORITY

MEMBERS' REFERENCE SERVICE LARRDIS LOK SABHA SECRETARIAT, NEW DELHI LEGISLATIVE NOTE. No.18/LN/Ref./July/2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. Civil Appeal No.4278 of 2018 (Arising out of SLP (Civil) No.

MINUTES OF THE SECOND MEETING OF FIFTH NATIONAL COMMISSION FOR SCHEDULED CASTES HELD ON AT NOON.

THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on: versus

Draft Minutes of the 20 th Finance Committee

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT

THE STATE BANK OF SAURASHTRA (REPEAL) AND THE STATE BANK OF INDIA (SUBSIDIARY BANKS) AMENDMENT BILL, 2009

THE RIGHT OF CHILDREN TO FREE AND COMPULSORY EDUCATION (AMENDMENT) BILL, 2017

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. Judgement delivered on: 12 th January, W.P.(C) 7068/2014

The Committee on Health & Family Welfare deals with Ministry of Health & Family Welfare which consists of two Departments namely:-

GOVERNMENT OF INDIA MINISTRY OF TRANSPORT AND COMMUNICATIONS Department of Transport (Transport Wing) NOTIFICATION

AS INTRODUCED IN LOK SABHA

WP(C) No of Mr. Shamsul Hoque Hazari, S/O Hazi Safiqur Rahman Hazari, Vill & PO-Krishnapur, PS-Silchar, Dist.-Cachar, Assam.

THE AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS ON CENTRAL TAXES BILL, 2007

THE TRANSPLANTATION OF HUMAN ORGANS (AMENDMENT) BILL, 2009

HIGH COURT OF DELHI : NEW DELHI NOTIFICATION. No. 431/Rules/DHC Dated :

THE REPRESENTATION OF THE PEOPLE (AMENDMENT) BILL, 2010

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI WP( C ) NO (IN THE MATTER OF PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION)

ALL ABOUT LOK SABHA AND RAJYA SABHA

THE COMMERCIAL COURTS, COMMERCIAL DIVISION AND COMMERCIAL APPELLATE DIVISION OF HIGH COURTS (AMENDMENT) BILL, 2018

9. COMMITTEE SECTION (H.A)

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO OF G. Sundarrajan.

THE RIGHT OF CITIZENS FOR TIME BOUND DELIVERY OF GOODS AND SERVICES AND REDRESSAL OF THEIR GRIEVANCES BILL, 2011

HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. No. 41/Rules/DHC Dated : PRACTICE DIRECTIONS

THE COMMERCIAL COURTS, COMMERCIAL DIVISION AND COMMERCIAL APPELLATE DIVISION OF HIGH COURTS (AMENDMENT) BILL, 2018

THE CENTRAL GOODS AND SERVICES TAX (EXTENSION TO JAMMU AND KASHMIR) BILL, 2017

THE HIGH COURT AND THE SUPREME COURT JUDGES (SALARIES AND CONDITIONS OF SERVICE) AMENDMENT BILL, 2015

THE NATIONALISED BANKS (MANAGEMENT AND MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS) SCHEME, 1970

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION TRANSFERRED CASE (CIVIL) NO. 126 OF Ajayinder Sangwan and Ors...

HEMWATI NANDAN BAHUGUNA GARHWAL UNIVERSITY SRINAGAR, GARHWAL (Uttarakhand) (A Central University)

CENTRE FOR COMMUNICATION GOVERNANCE AT NATIONAL LAW UNIVERSITY, DELHI

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD DISTRICT: AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO OF 2008 AND AND AND AND AND. In the matter between;

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE IA No.13139/2011 in CS(OS) 1163/2011 Date of Decision : July 05, 2012

Act, with the objective to serve as a post-graduate school for advanced. teaching and research in Economics and allied subjects and to admit students

(in short RSKA) for the Electoral College of AKFI O R D E R. Rajasthan State Kabaddi Association (RSKA) affiliated to AKFI was invited to

CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION

CONSTITUTION. As amended on Nov. 21, Article I. Name and Location

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

Govt. of India National Commission for Minorities Lok Nayak Bhawan, Khan Market, New Delhi-3

14. DISTRIBUTION SECTION Main Functions: The Distribution Section deals mainly with the following items of work:

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI REHABILITATION MINISTRY EMPLOYEES CO-OPERATIVE. versus

THE LOKPAL AND LOKAYUKTAS AND OTHER RELATED LAW (AMENDMENT) BILL, 2014

Bar&Bench (

EXPUNCTION OF UNPARLIAMENTARY EXPRESSIONS FROM PROCEEDINGS

Mr. Mukesh Gupta, APP for the State. Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Adv. for R-2. Coram: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA

Objections to the Nominations sent by Telengana Kabaddi Association (TKA) for the Electoral College of AKFI

THE NATIONAL ENVIRONMENT APPELLATE AUTHORITY ACT, 1997

The Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993 [As amended by the Protection of Human Rights (Amendment) Act, 2006 No. 43 of 2006]

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

THE DISPUTED ELECTIONS (PRIME MINISTER AND SPEAKER) ACT, 1977 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS

THE GOVERNORS (EMOLUMENTS, ALLOWANCES AND PRIVILEGES) AMENDMENT BILL, 2012

16. DISTRIBUTION SECTION Main Functions: The Distribution Section deals mainly with the following items of work:

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.571 OF 2017

APPENDIX-FORM. (See Rule 3) (Appeal for Information under Right to Information Act 2005)

ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS

THE PAYMENT OF GRATUITY (AMENDMENT) BILL, 2017

THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT, 1961

ORDER. Between. In re :

EXTRAORDINARY PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY No. 491, CUTTACK, TUESDAY, MARCH 15, 2016/ FALGUNA 25, 1937 FOOD SUPPLIES & CONSUMER WELFARE DEPARTMENT

THE DELIMITATION ACT, 2002 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS

$~43 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 9663/2015 RKDF MEDICAL COLLEGE HOSPITAL AND. versus

No.F.1-18/2001-NVS(Admn) 30 May, 2008 NOTIFICATION

Notification PART I CHAPTER I PRELIMINARY

CONTEMPT APPLICATION No. 09 OF Ram Gopal Sharma. Applicant. Versus. Sh Sanjay Mitra IAS (WB:82), Defence Secretary, 101-A, South

1. Warrant of Precedence. 2. Circular No. 33-GAD of 2009 dated Circular No. 26-GAD of 2012 dated

APPENDIX. National Commission for Minorities Act, 1992

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL NO Of 2011 SRI MAHABIR PROSAD CHOUDHARY...APPELLANT(S) VERSUS

Transcription:

No.MCI-5(3)/2001-Med./ edp2/min.ec.march,04.2002/my doc MEDICAL COUNCIL OF INDIA EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE Minutes of the meeting of the Executive Committee held on Monday 4.3.2002 at 11.00 a.m. in the Council at New Delhi, based on the earlier decision taken on 18/2/2002 that the next Executive Committee meeting is to be held on or before 4/3/2002. Present: Dr. P.C.Kesavankutty Nayar Dr. P.M.Jadhav Dr. S.K. Sinha Dr. C. Das Dr. K.S. Chugh Dr. Ushal Sharma The Executive Committee members requested for an appointment with the Administrator, who declined to meet the members and sent words for the Vice-President alone. The Vice-President preferred to meet the administrator along with the members of the Executive Committee for which the latter refused. Following the refusal it was decided to request the Vice-President to Chair the meeting. The Vice-President asked for secretarial assistance which was also declined. So the entire meeting is recorded and written by hand by one of the members. It is noted with regret that the above refusal is being done deliberately with a view to disable the Executive Committee from discharging its duties in accordance with the law and also in compliance with the orders of the Hon ble Supreme Court and Hon ble High Court of Allahabad. The Executive Committee observed a minute silence to condole the sudden demise of Hon ble Speaker of Lok Sabha Mr. C.M.C. Balayogi. 1. Minutes of the last meeting of the Executive Committee meeting Confirmation of. Since the reasons explained and recorded, the minutes of the meeting for the last meeting of the Executive Committee held on 18/2/2002 were got prepared by the Executive Committee themselves and were signed on the 1

same day, was processed and conformation of the minutes of the meeting of the last meeting of the Executive Committee is, therefore, not necessary in this case as the Executive Committee members had confirmed the same after the minutes got prepared by them only on 18/2/02 and were signed on the same day. 2. Co-operative Medical College, Kochi renewal of permission for admission of 2 nd Batch of students. Read: The communication dated 11/2/2002 received by the Council from the Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, requesting to send the comments of the Council whether the present infrastructure available with the Co-operative Medical College, Kochi can be permitted for admission of 2 nd batch of students with reduced intake of 50 students. The Executive Committee considered the above mentioned communication from the Central Govt. and after examining the infrastructural teaching and other facilities available with Co-operative Medical College, Kochi, as per the compliance verification inspection report (22-23 rd Nov. 2001) it is decided to recommend to the Central Govt. that the infrastructural teaching and other facilities available at this college is sufficient and adequate for 50 students and the Central Govt. may permit the admission of the 2 nd batch with the reduced intake of 50 students in this college. 3. Recognition of Academy of Medical Sciences, Pariyaram Kannur for the award of MBBS degree granted by Calicut University. Read: The compliance verification inspection report from the Principal dated 5/2/2002 and also letter from the Director of Medical Education, Govt. of Kerala, Kerala State, and sent by the Academy of the Medical Sciences, Pariyaram, Kannur for the award of MBBS degree granted by Calicut University. Also Read: The letter dated 1/3/02 addressed by the Director of Cooperative Academy of professional education established by the Govt. of Kerala addressed to the Secretary, Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, Govt. of India, Nirman Bhavan, New Delhi and copy whereof sent to the Executive members of the Council. In this letter the said Director has relied upon the decision of the Hon ble Supreme Court dated 18/1/02 in IA Nos. 7-8 and 9-10/2001 in SLP(C) No. 22042-43/01-Union of India Vs. Harish Bhalla of others. The attention has been invited to the direction of the Hon ble Supreme Court that a decision will be taken on the applications of State of Kerala within a fortnight. 2

It has been further stated in the said letter dated 1/3/02 that although it is about one and a half months since the decision of the Supreme Court, no decision regarding the approval of these two colleges established and controlled by the Govt. of Kerala have been communicated. The Executive Committee considered the above mentioned communication dated 1/3/02 decided to recommend to the Council for recognition of Academy of Medical Sciences, Pariyaram, Kannur for the award of MBBS degree granted by Calicut University. 4. Subharati Medical College, Meerut Renewal of Permission for admission of 2 nd Batch of Students. Read : A copy of the order dated 22/2/02 passed by the Hon ble Allahabad High court in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No.774/2002 Subharati K.K.B. Charitable Trust, Samarat Palace, Crash Road, Meerut Vs. MCI and others, wherein it has been recorded that the Council for the respondents had no objection in regard to convening of meeting and thus the respondents I and II, namely, MCI and Executive Council of MCI while directed to hold the meeting of the Executive Council within 2 weeks from the date of production of the certified copy of this order. Read: The communication dated 1/3/2002, some of the members including Dr. Nayar & Dr. Jadhav stated that they did not receive communication addressed by the Secretary, MCI seeking its recommendation regarding K.K.B. Subharati Medical College. The Executive Committee felt it appropriate to refer to the relevant regulations of the MCI which are as under: - The Medical Council of India Regulations, 2000 4. Time and place of meeting of the Council (1) The meetings of the Council shall ordinarily be held in Delhi on such dates as may be fixed by the Council: Provided that the President may call a special meeting at any time after giving 15 days noticea) To deal with any urgent matter requiring the attention of the Council:- b) For the purpose referred to in the proviso to clause (b) of Subregulation (1) of regulation 8: 3

c) On a requisition signed by not less than fifteen members for a purpose which is within a scope of the Council s functions, not being a purpose referred to in clause(b). Regulation 39 reads as under: 39 Meetings of Executive Committee: - The meetings of the Executive Committee shall be ordinarily governed by the regulations applicable to the meetings of the Council. The above mentioned regulation of the MCI clearly lay down that the meeting of the Executive Committee of the Council is to be fixed by the Executive Committee itself. In compliance with the orders of the Hon ble Supreme Court the Executive Committee had met on 31/1/2002 and since all the cases were not considered, some of the items of certain colleges were deferred, it was decided by the Executive Committee to hold its next meeting on 18/2/2002. A meeting of 18/2/02 was held when with regard to Subharati Medical College the following recommendation was made by the Executive Committee : Read: The Council inspector s report (7 th 8 th Jan. 02) carried out for renewal of permission of 2 nd Batch of students at Subharati Medical College, Meerut. The Executive Committee considered the Council inspector s report (7 th 8 th Jan. 2002) and decided to recommend to the Central Govt. to renew the permission for admission of 2 nd Batch of students at Subharati Medical College, Meerut. The above mentioned recommendations of the Executive Committee was sent to the Central Govt. in this view of the matter, and without repealing the unfortunate and impermissible functioning of the office of the Council, it is found, that the communication dated 1/3/02 which the Secretary has sent on some direction is not only contrary to the statutory regulations of the MCI but is also contemptuous in the light of the order of the Hon ble Supreme Court and also the above mentioned orders passed by the Hon ble Court Allahabad. The Committee is thankful to the Central Govt. for issuing letter of renewal of permission. 4

5. Establishment of New Medical College at Karakonam, Kerala by C.S.T. Sought Kerala, South Kerala Medical Mission, Kerala under Section 10A of the IMC Act, 1956. Read: The communication dated 28/2/02 sent by the Secretary addressed to the Executive Committee and the so called inspection report stated to have been conducted on 12 th - 13 th Feb. 2002 by the Administrator and by a retired inspector of MCI namely Dr. J.K. Tandon, the Executive Committee considered the communication dated 28/2/02 Dr. Jadhav, Dr. Nayar & Dr. Sinha informed that they have neither received the letter 28/2/02 nor a copy of the inspection report dated 12 th & 13 th Feb. 2002. The inspectors of any college are required to be conducted as per the provisions of the Act and the Regulations. The inspection teams are required to consist of inspectors appointed by the Executive Committee of the Council as per section 17 of the Act Regulation 69(4) provide that no person shall be appointed as an inspector unless he has taught students in one or other of the subjects for the relevant public examination or in cognate subjects for 5 years and has acted as examiners at examinations on such subjects. The Executive Committee observed as under:- (a) That there was no inspection team which was appointed by the Executive Committee of the Council for conducting the inspection of this private Medical College at Karakonam, Kerala. (b) The Administrator does not possess the necessary qualification as laid down by the regulation of MCI. (c) Dr. J.K. Tandon, at the time of so-called inspector was retired and no mere on 12 th & 13 th Feb. 2002 in the employment of MCI and has been superannuated prior thereto. He is also not a member of the MCI from any constituency. (d) It was also quite intriguing that the case of the Govt. College at Kochi, the observation of the Central Govt. is not circulated for which there is an order by the Hon ble Supreme Court and the Administrator has found it to be preferable to circulate a case of a private Medical College for which no inspector as required under the rules and regulations and to be appointed by the Executive Committee was a part of the inspection team. The Executive Committee had considered the inspection report dated 14 th & 15 th Feb. 2002 and had noticed that there are no beds allotted to Paediatrics and Obst. & Gynae. In view of this position the Executive Committee had decided to recommend to the Central Govt. not to issue Letter of Intent for the above medical college. 5

The Executive Committee to recommend to the Central Govt. to issue Letter of Intent for establishment of medical college at Karakonam, Kerala considering the fact that there was some mistake in the counting of distribution of beds in the inspection report and the actual beds available in different departments in the Hospital. However, the Executive Committee decided that this factor be clearly verified and confirmed again by the inspection team constituted by the Executive Committee at the time of conducting the inspection for the purpose of recommending to the Central Govt. for grant of Letter of Permission. 6. Any other item with permission of the chair: (a) The Executive Committee decided to hold it s next meeting on 8/4/2002 at 11.30 a.m. in the Council office, New Delhi. (b) The Executive Committee further directs the Secretary MCI to intimate the Hon ble High Court Allahabad and the legal advisor MCI about the decision taken about Subharati Medical College, Meerut during the meeting held on 18/2/2002. It appears that this decision has not been intimated to all concerned yet which is highly objectionable. The office will be held responsible in case of any contempt. 6