UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

Similar documents
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

2:10-cv MDL Date Filed 06/06/10 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 22 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA CHARLESTON DIVISION

Case 2:10-cv Document 1 Filed 06/25/10 Page 1 of 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) C.A. No.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ) ) ) ) ) ) FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY, ALABAMA ) CASE NO: CV-2014-

Case 2:10-cv ILRL-DEK Document 1 Filed 04/21/10 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR AUTAUGA COUNTY, ALABAMA

Deepwater Horizons (BP) Oil Spill April 20, 2010

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES WITH JURY DEMAND

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF GILES COUNTY, TENNESSEE

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR LEE COUNTY, ALABAMA

FIRST AMENDED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT. Plaintiffs, Eliezer Cruz Aponte and Magdalena Caraballo ( Plaintiffs ), individually

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 01/11/ :00 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 40 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/11/2017 EXHIBIT 1

Case 1:10-cv Document 1 Filed 06/03/10 Page 1 of 29 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION

Filing # E-Filed 12/22/ :53:20 PM

3:18-cv MGL Date Filed 07/31/18 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA COLUMBIA DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS GALVESTON DIVISION

NEGLIGENCE. All four of the following must be demonstrated for a legal claim of negligence to be successful:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/26/ :49 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 8 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/26/2015

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/06/2010 INDEX NO /2010

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TWELFTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, IN AND FOR MANATEE COUNTY CIRCUIT CIVIL DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 06/07/ :33 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 49 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/07/2016

FILED: BRONX COUNTY CLERK 01/26/ :43 AM INDEX NO /2018E NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/26/2018

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, the United States of America, alleges upon information and belief as

Case 2:12-cv Document 1 Filed 06/08/12 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF MADISON COUNTY, ALABAMA. Plaintiffs, v. Case No.: CV15-

Call for Action: Voters React to Explosion and Oil Spill in Gulf of Mexico

FILED: ONEIDA COUNTY CLERK 01/23/ :02 PM

AMENDED COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

Case 4:12-cv Y Document 28 Filed 08/29/12 Page 1 of 7 PageID 179

NOTICE OF ELECTRONIC FILING

6.1 Jones Act - Unseaworthiness General Instruction (Comparative Negligence Defense) The Plaintiff seeks to recover under a federal statute known as

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/04/ :53 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 17 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/04/2016

Constitutional Challenges to of Alabama s Medical Malpractice Statute: The Plaintiff s Perspective

Case 1:13-cv RJJ Doc #1 Filed 12/27/13 Page 1 of 7 Page ID#1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Case 2:13-cv SM-MBN Document 417 Filed 11/20/15 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

For Preview Only - Please Do Not Copy

Case: 1:17-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 03/09/17 Page 1 of 6 PageID #:1

Filing # E-Filed 12/01/ :28:55 PM

Case 7:16-cv NSR Document 5 Filed 12/29/16 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 2:16-cv KOB Document 1 Filed 09/23/16 Page 1 of 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/17/ :47 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 61 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/17/2015

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/02/ :13 AM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 14 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/02/2016

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 04/25/17 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1. Plaintiffs, COMPLAINT

Case 2:14-cv PD Document 16 Filed 05/15/15 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

PLAINTIFF DEMANDS A TRIAL BY JURY IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE CITY OF ARCADIA

1:15-cv JMC Date Filed 04/06/15 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA

3:17-cv MGL Date Filed 06/29/18 Entry Number 55 Page 1 of 8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISION. CASE NO: 1:15-cv RNS

FILED: BRONX COUNTY CLERK 02/14/ :36 PM INDEX NO /2014E NYSCEF DOC. NO. 269 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/14/2017

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed 11/14/17 Page 1 of 23 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISION CASE NO. COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION. Case No. 3:18-CV FDW-DSC

THE STATE OF ALABAMA S RESPONSE TO BP S MEMO IN SUPPORT OF FINAL APPROVAL

Case 2:11-cv WKW-WC Document 1 Filed 07/01/11 Page 1 of 15. IN THE UNITED STATES MIDDLE DISTRICT OF AL&BAMA," NORTHERN ifmi1jt ) )

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/20/ :37 PM INDEX NO /2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/20/2014

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/28/ :04 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 55 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/28/2016

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS. v. Case No.:

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ROME DIVISION

led FEB SUPERIOR COURl l.h '-.. irornia BY DEPUTY 1. GENERAL NEGLIGENCE 2. WILLFUL MISCONDUCT 3. WRONGFUL DEATH 4.

CASE 0:12-cv PJS-TNL Document 15 Filed 08/14/12 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION

Case 4:10-cv XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/03/2010 Page 1 of 41

Case 2:15-cv AJS Document 50 Filed 10/20/15 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Law School Discussion Guide

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION. Case No. COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES, RESTITUTION AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF

Case 4:14-cv RAS Document 1 Filed 09/23/14 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1

UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL on MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION TRANSFER ORDER

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 06/07/ :32 PM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 164 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/07/2018

E-FILED 2017 MAY 11 3:00 PM DELAWARE - CLERK OF DISTRICT COURT

Case 2:12-cv JRG-RSP Document 1 Filed 08/02/12 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

Case 4:17-cv D Document 1 Filed 08/02/17 Page 1 of 25

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/08/ :32 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/08/2016

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION

Case 3:10-cv B Document 1 Filed 09/10/10 Page 1 of 6 PageID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

The Tines of Neptune s Trident

Recent Developments in Punitive Damages

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

IN THE QUEEN'S BENCH JUDICIAL CENTRE OF REGINA. -and-

Case 3:16-cv WHB-JCG Document 4 Filed 05/31/16 Page 1 of 8

2:14-cv RMG Date Filed 02/25/14 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 19 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 5:14-cv DAE Document 4 Filed 11/10/14 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION

Case 2:10-md CJB-JCW Document Filed 02/15/17 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

Case 1:16-cv MJW Document 1 Filed 02/09/16 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLORADO

4. Plaintiff, Valerie Battle-Dugger, is an adult individual, residing at all times relevant

DEFENDANTS' VERIFIED ANSWER

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Motion for Judgment filed August 18, Letter Opinion of the Honorable. William R. Shelton dated January 11,

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 11/04/16 Page 1 of 23

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/28/2011 INDEX NO /2011 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 4 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/28/2011

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/15/ :24 AM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 12 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/15/2016

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/26/ :23 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 18 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/26/2015

Case 2:10-cv TS Document 2 Filed 11/15/10 Page 1 of 9

Transcription:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA WAYLON C. CALLAWAY; * * Plaintiff, * versus * CASE NO. * BP, plc; BP PRODUCTS NORTH * AMERICA, INC.; BP AMERICA, INC.; * HALLIBURTON ENERGY * SERVICES, INC.; and CAMERON * INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION * f/k/a COOPER CAMERON * CORPORATION, * JURY DEMAND * Defendants. * I. INTRODUCTION COMPLAINT 1. Plaintiff, Waylon C. Callaway, ( Plaintiff ) brings this action against the defendants identified below ( Defendants ), and avers as follows: 2. This is an action to recover damages suffered by Plaintiff as a result of the oil spill that occurred from the explosion and fire aboard, and subsequent sinking of the oil rig Deepwater Horizon (hereinafter Deepwater Horizon or Oil Rig ) on April 20, 2010, at about 10:00 p.m. central time in the Gulf of Mexico (Latitude 28 45.23 N; Longitude 88 18.89 W) less than 100 miles from the Alabama coast. Following the sinking of the Oil Rig, between 1,000 and 60,000 barrels per day of crude oil have been released from the oil well upon which the Deepwater Horizon was performing completion operations, and from the pipe connected to it (drill stack). The fast-moving oil slick, which has grown exponentially since the date of the spill, has caused detrimental affects upon the Gulf of Mexico s and Alabama s marine environments, coastal environments and estuarine areas. Further, the spill has damaged and will continue to

damage the value of Plaintiff s real and personal property, his earning capacity, business income, and/or use of natural resources. II. JURISDICTION 3. This Court has jurisdiction over this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1332 because the matter in controversy exceeds $75,000, and because the requisite diversity of citizenship exists between Plaintiff and Defendants. 4. Prosecution of this action in this district is proper under 28 U.S.C. 1391(a)(2) because a substantial portion of the events or omissions giving rise to the claims asserted herein occurred in this district and/or a substantial part of the property at issue in this action is situated in this district. III. PARTIES 5. Plaintiff, Waylon C. Callaway, is a resident of Alabama doing business within this district in Gulf Shores, Alabama. Plaintiff earns income as a licensed commercial fisherman that conducts fish harvesting operations in the Gulf of Mexico, and whose income is significantly derived from the marine health and access to open fishing waters in Alabama and the Gulf of Mexico, and as a result of the events described herein, has suffered damages that are more fully described below. 6. Defendants herein are: a. BP, plc ( BP ), a foreign corporation doing business in the State of Alabama and within this district; b. BP Products North America, Inc. ( BP Products ), a foreign corporation doing business in the State of Alabama and within this district; 2

c. BP America, Inc. ( BP America ), a foreign corporation doing business in the State of Alabama and within this district; d. Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. ( Halliburton ), a foreign corporation doing business in the State of Alabama and within this district; and e. Cameron International Corporation f/k/a Cooper-Cameron Corporation ( Cameron ), a foreign corporation doing business in the State of Alabama and with this district. IV. FACTUAL ASSERTIONS 7. BP, BP Products and BP America (collectively BP ) are the holders of a lease granted by the Minerals Management Service that allows BP to drill for oil and perform oilproduction-related operations at the site of the oil spill, and on April 20, 2010 operated the oil well that is the source of the oil spill. 8. Upon information and belief, Cameron manufactured and/or supplied the Deepwater Horizon s blow-out-preventers ( BOPs ) a series of valves/seals that failed to control pressure and prevent the explosion and resulting release of oil. The BOPs were defective because they failed to operate as intended. 9. Halliburton was engaged in cementing operations of the well and well cap and, upon information and belief, improperly and negligently performed these duties, increasing the pressure at the well and contributing to the fire, explosion and resulting oil spill. 10. At all times material hereto, the Deepwater Horizon was manned, possessed, managed, controlled, chartered and/or operated by BP. 3

11. The fire and explosion on the Deepwater Horizon, its sinking and the resulting oil spill were caused by the negligence of Defendants, which renders them liable jointly and severally to Plaintiff for all his damages. 12. The injuries and damages suffered by Plaintiff were caused by Defendants negligent, willful, and/or wanton failure to adhere to recognized industry standards of care and safety practices. 13. Defendants knew of the dangers associated with deep water drilling and negligently, willfully, and wantonly failed to take appropriate measures to prevent damage to Plaintiff. 14. The oil spill has damaged and will continue to damage the value of Plaintiff s real and personal property, his earning capacity, business income, and/or use of natural resources. V. COUNT I NEGLIGENCE AND/OR WANTONNESS 15. Plaintiff repeats, reiterates, and realleges each and every allegation set forth above with the same force and effect as if copied herein. 16. Defendants owed a duty to Plaintiff to exercise reasonable care in the construction, operation, inspection, training, repair and maintenance of the Deep Water Horizon and oil well. 17. Defendants had a heightened duty of care to Plaintiff because of the great danger and environmental concerns associated with the drilling of oil. 18. Defendants breached their legal duty to Plaintiff by failing to exercise reasonable care and acting with reckless, willful, and wanton disregard for the Plaintiff, in the construction, operation, inspection, training, repair and maintenance of the Deep Water Horizon and the oil 4

well. The fire, explosion, and resulting oil spill was caused by the concurrent negligence of the Defendants. 19. Upon information and belief, Plaintiff avers that the fire, explosion and resulting oil spill was caused by the joint negligence and fault of the Defendants in the following nonexclusive particulars: a. Failing to properly operate the Deepwater Horizon and oil well; b. Operating the Deepwater Horizon and oil well in such a manner that a fire and explosion occurred onboard, causing it to sink and resulting in oil spill; c. Failing to properly inspect the Deepwater Horizon and oil well to assure that its equipment and personnel were fit for their intended purpose; d. Acting in a careless and negligent manner without due regard for the safety of others; e. Failing to promulgate, implement and enforce rules and regulations pertaining to the safe operations of the Deepwater Horizon and oil well which, if they had been so promulgated, implemented and enforced, would have averted the fire, explosion, sinking and oil spill; f. Operating the Deepwater Horizon and oil well with untrained and/or unlicensed personnel; g. Inadequate and negligent training and/or hiring of personnel; h. Failing to take appropriate action to avoid and/or mitigate the accident; i. Negligent implementation of policies and/or procedures to safely conduct offshore operations in the Gulf of Mexico; 5

j. Employing untrained or poorly trained employees and failing to properly train their employees; k. Failing to ascertain that the Deepwater Horizon, oil well and their equipment were free from defects and/or in proper working order; l. Failure to timely warn; m. Failure to timely bring the oil release under control; n. Failure to provide appropriate accident preventive equipment; o. Failure to observe and read gauges that would have indicated excessive pressures in the well; p. Failure to react to danger signs; q. Use of defective BOPs that were improperly installed, maintained, and/or operated; r. Conducting well and well cap cementing operations improperly; s. Acting in a manner that justifies imposition of punitive damages; and t. Such other acts of negligence and omissions as will be shown at the trial of this matter. 20. Defendants knew or should have known that their negligent, willful, wanton and/or reckless conduct would foreseeably result in the disaster, causing damage to Plaintiff. 21. The injuries to Plaintiff were also caused by or aggravated by the fact that Defendants failed to take necessary actions to mitigate the danger associated with their operations. 6

22. In addition, the fire, explosion, sinking and the resulting oil spill would not have occurred had the Defendants exercised the high degree of care imposed on them and Plaintiff, therefore, pleads the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur. 23. Plaintiff is entitled to a judgment finding Defendants liable to Plaintiff for damages suffered as a result of Defendants negligence, willfulness, recklessness, and/or wantonness and awarding Plaintiff adequate compensation, including punitive damages therefore in amounts determined by a jury. VI. PRAYER FOR RELIEF follows: WHEREFORE, Plaintiff demands judgment against Defendants, jointly and severally as a. Economic and compensatory damages in amounts to be determined at trial; b. Punitive damages; c. Pre-judgment and post-judgment interest at the maximum rate allowable by law; d. Attorney s fees and costs of litigation; e. Such other and further relief available under all applicable state and federal laws and any relief the court deems just and appropriate; and f. A trial by jury as to all Defendants. Respectfully submitted by, s/jere L. Beasley Jere L. Beasley (BEASJ1981) Rhon E. Jones (JONE7747) David B. Byrne, III (BYRN2198) John E. Tomlinson (TOML4095) Christopher D. Boutwell (BOUTC1941) J. Parker Miller (MILLJ7363) A. Brantley Fry (FRYA5302) BEASLEY, ALLEN, CROW, METHVIN, PORTIS & MILES, P.C. 7

Dated: June 21, 2010 218 Commerce Street Montgomery, AL 36104 (334) 269-2343 (334) 954-7555 (facsimile) 8

DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL Plaintiff hereby demands a trial by jury as to all issues and causes of action stated herein. Respectfully submitted, s/jere L. Beasley Jere L. Beasley Rhon E. Jones David B. Byrne, III John E. Tomlinson Christopher D. Boutwell J. Parker Miller A. Brantley Fry BEASLEY, ALLEN, CROW, METHVIN, PORTIS & MILES, P.C. 218 Commerce Street Montgomery, AL 36104 (334) 269-2343 (334) 954-7555 (facsimile) 9