SIXTH AMENDMENT TO DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR. PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AREA No. 78 SEAPORT SQUARE PROJECT SOUTH BOSTON. Dated, 2015

Similar documents
#962 AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE ZONING ORDINANCE OFTHE BOROUGH OF OCEANPORT, MONMOUTH COUNTY, STATE OF NEW JERSEY TO ESTABLISH THE RMW ZONE DISTRICT

O2-CD Zoning. B1-CD Zoning. O2-CD Zoning. RZ-1: Technical Data Sheet CHARLOTTE ETJ LIMITS 75' CLASS C RIGHT-IN / RIGHT-OUT, LEFT IN ACCESS POINT

4.0 ZONING. 4.1 IMP Uses

ORDINANCE NO Ordinance No Page 1 of 7. Language to be added is underlined. Language to be deleted is struck through.

PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT #1

TECHNICAL DATA SHEET - MUDD DEVELOPMENT AREA RZ1 SITE DEVELOPMENT DATA DEVELOPMENT AREA A DEVELOPMENT AREA B

21. ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA. County Board Agenda Item Meeting of December 15, DATE: December 6, 2018

ORDINANCE NO. WHEREAS, this ordinance covers the following residential neighborhoods, the boundaries of which are delineated below:

2018 MEETING DATES AND FILING DEADLINES

ARTICLE 3 ESTABLISHMENT OF ZONING DISTRICTS

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA. County Board Agenda Item Meeting of May 19, 2018

ALPHABETICAL ORDINANCES

ORDINANCE NO. Z REZONING NO

3620 PARK RD. MULTI-FAMILY REZONING PETITION No RZ-1 SITE DEVELOPMENT DATA VICINITY MAP NTS TECHNICAL DATA SHEET CHARLOTTE SITE PARK RD.

DIVISION 21. OVERLAY DISTRICTS

AGREEMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT OF LAND AT 3801 HARRISON BOULEVARD, OGDEN CITY, UTAH

CITY OF TORONTO. BY-LAW No (OMB)

General Urban, Urban Center and Downtown Neighborhood Context: URBAN CENTER NEIGHBORHOOD CONTEXT

City Council Adoption Draft September 25, 2014

RESOLUTION NO CITY OF MAPLE GROVE

(JULY 2000 EDITION, Pub. by City of LA) Rev. 9/13/

BY-LAW NO NOW THEREFORE the Council of The Corporation of the City of Kingston hereby ENACTS as follows.

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

Year BRIDGER PINES II PUD. City of Fishers Planned Development Ordinance No.

TENTH AMENDMENT TO SOUTH WATERFRONT CENTRAL DISTRICT PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT

Lane Code CHAPTER 12 CONTENTS

Attachment 2. Planning Commission Resolution No Recommending a Zone Text Amendment

REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION

ORDINANCE NO. Z REZONING NO

RESOLUTION NO. R

ARTICLE 1: Purpose and Administration

Kent Studebaker, Mayor Members of the City Council. Paul Espe, Associate Planner. Ordinance Annexing Property at 5022 Upper Drive (AN )

Table of Contents. Title 1: Administration. Table of Contents. gwinnettcounty Unified Development Ordinance Updated July 2015

RESOLUTION NO. A. Pursuant to the Public Streets, Highways and Service Easements

CITY OF ROCKWALL ORDINANCE NO SPECIFIC USE PERMIT NO. S -138 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

SECOND AMENDMENT TO GRAND HAVEN PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) AGREEMENT

CITY ORDINANCE NO. 585

FIRST AMENDMENT TO DECLARATION AND COVENANTS, CONDITIONS, RESTRICTIONS AND EASEMENTS FOR MONTREUX

CITY OF SURREY BY-LAW NO A by-law to amend Surrey Zoning By-law, 1993, No , as amended....

Physical Planning CAP

ANNEXATION 28E AGREEMENT

ARTICLE 1 BASIC PROVISIONS SECTION BASIC PROVISIONS REGULATIONS

LOCAL LAW NO.: OF 2016

REGULATORY PERMIT APPLICATION

FIRST AMENDMENT TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF BURBANK AND THE WALT DISNEY COMPANY

NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GENEVA

SPECIAL SECTIONS 500.

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA. County Board Agenda Item Meeting of June 15, 2013

ORDINANCE NO SECTION 2. IMPLEMENTING ACTIONS.

ORDINANCE NO. 553 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SEVERAL CHAPTERS OF

I. ROUTINE BUSINESS. With the absence of a minister, the Council held a moment of silence.

PEDESTRIAN ACCESS AGREEMENT

ORDINANCE NO NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MIAMI SPRINGS:

ORDINANCE NO. WHEREAS, Article 2. Section 1 of the Ashland City Charter provides:

CITY OF WEST LAKE HILLS. AMENDMENT No. 252 BUILDING HEIGHT

ITEM 5 EXHBIT B RESOLUTION NO

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

CITY OF TORONTO. BY-LAW No (OMB) To adopt Amendment No. 9 to the Official Plan for the former Borough of East York.

FIRST AMENDMENT TO CITY PLACE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT

SECTION 2. CREATION OF INTERMUNICIPAL OVERLAY DISTRICT.

CASE # JSE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY SPECIAL EXCEPTION STAFF CONTACT: MIKE TERTINGER

ORDINANCE NO. 735 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HEDWIG

ORDINANCE NO. BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the City of Waukee:

PEMBROKE HAMILTON CLUB REDEVELOPMENT (MIDDLE ROAD) (WARWICK PARISH) SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT ORDER 2003 BR 5/2003 DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING ACT 1974

WHEREAS, Elite Developments, Inc., applicant and property owner, filed Application

RESOLUTION NO. R

PRE-ANNEXATION DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT

Ordinance No. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARLINGTON, TEXAS:

BY LAWS OF GLEN PARK ASSOCIATION P.O. BOX SAN FRANCISCO, CA ARTICLE I ORGANIZATION NAME

ORDINANCE NO (2011)

SITE PLAN REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA

RESOLUTION NO. WHEREAS, both cities have an ETJ which extends three and one-half (3-1/2) miles beyond the corporate limits; and

City Attorney's Synopsis

38 Estate Drive Zoning Application Final Report

DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (CAR )

For the purpose of this Article, unless the context clearly requires otherwise, the

BE IT ORDAINED, by the Township Council of the Township of Livingston in the County of Essex as follows:

DATE: PROPERTY ADDRESS: CITY: STATE: ZIP CODE: LEGAL DESCRIPTION* (LOT, BLOCK & SUBDIVISION):

APPLICATION FOR OFFICIAL PLAN AMENDMENT

ULA and the City shall be referred to as the Parties and individually as a Party. RECITALS AND REPRESENTATIONS


ORDINANCE NO. An ordinance amending Section of the Los Angeles Municipal Code by amending the zoning map.

Federal Realty Investment Trust 1301 South Joyce Street Arlington, Virginia 22202

ORDNANCE NO. An ordinance changing the zoning classification on the following property:

CITY OF SURREY BY-LAW NO THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Surrey, in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS:

6.1 Planned Unit Development District

Determination 2018/018

And: Council No: 14 - Huizar CPC GPA-ZC; CPC SN; and CPC DA-CU-MCUP-CUX-SPR

WHEREAS, the Township has elected to exercise these redevelopment entity powers directly, as permitted by Section 4 of the Redevelopment Law; and

BY-LAW NO BEING A ZONING BY-LAW AMENDMENT TO BY-LAW NO AFFECTING LANDS THROUGHOUT THE TOWNSHIP OF LEEDS AND THOUSAND ISLANDS

State: Zip: State: Zip: Home No.: Cell No.: Home No.: Cell No.: Work No.: Fax No.: Work No.: Fax No.:

CITY OF DELAND FLORIDA REQUEST FOR COMMISSION ACTION MAY Attachments for Acres X Ordinance. Approved by.

State: Zip: State: Zip: Home No.: Cell No.: Home No.: Cell No.: Work No.: Fax No.: Work No.: Fax No.:

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT

2300 North Jog Road West Palm Beach, Florida Phone: (561) County Administrator: Robert Weisman Fax: (5612)

FROM: General Manager, Planning and Development FILE: (Kwomais Point Park)

ARTICLE 4 APPLICATION REVIEW PROCEDURES AND APPROVAL CRITERIA 3

AMENDMENTS TO CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF GARFIELD ZONING ORDINANCE

WHEREAS, the Board of Commissioners adopted the restated Pasco County Land Development Code on October 18, 2011 by Ord. No.

Transcription:

SIXTH AMENDMENT TO DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AREA No 78 SEAPORT SQUARE PROJECT SOUTH BOSTON Dated, 2015 Pursuant to Section 3-1A and Article 80C of the Zoning Code for the City of Boston (the Code ), this plan constitutes the Sixth Amendment to Development Plan for Planned Development Area No 78 (the Sixth Amendment ) 1 Development Plan Background On September 21, 2010, the Boston Redevelopment Authority ( BRA ) approved an amendment to the Boston Zoning Maps to create Planned Development Area No 78 and also approved a Development Plan for Planned Development Area No 78 (the Original Development Plan ) On October 13, 2010, the Boston Zoning Commission (the Commission ) approved the map amendment and the Original Development Plan, which became effective on October 13, 2010 On November 15, 2012, the BRA approved the First Amendment to Development Plan for Planned Development Area No 78 (the First Amendment ), and on December 12, 2012 the Commission approved the First Amendment, which became effective on December 20, 2012 On December 5, 2013, the BRA approved the Second Amendment to Development Plan for Planned Development Area No 78 (the Second Amendment ), and on January 8, 2014 the Commission approved the Second Amendment, which became effective on January 22, 2014 On August 14, 2014, the BRA approved the Third Amendment to the Development Plan for Planned Development Area No 78 (the Third Amendment ), and on September 3, 2014 the Commission approved the Third Amendment, which became effective on September 5, 2014 On, 2015, the BRA approved the Fourth Amendment to Development Plan for Planned Development Area No 78 (the Fourth Amendment ), and on, 2015 the Commission approved the Fourth Amendment, which became effective on, 2015 On, 2015, the BRA approved the Fifth Amendment to Development Plan for Planned Development Area No 78 (the Fifth Amendment ), and on, 2015 the Commission approved the Fifth Amendment, which became effective on, 2015 (the Original Development Plan, as amended by each of the First Amendment, Second Amendment, Third Amendment, Fourth Amendment and Fifth Amendment, is referred to herein as the Development Plan ) The Development Plan provides for the redevelopment of an approximately 33 acre area of land (the Site ) in the South Boston Waterfront District for a mixed-use project (the Project ) Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meanings assigned to such terms in the Development Plan Since the adoption of the Development Plan, MS Boston Seaport, LLC (the Master Developer ) has completed construction of the Innovation Center on Block F, the Block Q EAST\1050205512

Recreation Area, and the ICA/Fan Pier Interim Pedestrian Connector, all of which are Early Action Public Benefits under the Development Plan Construction on Block A, Block B, Block C, Block H, Block J, Block K, Block L-1 and Block L-2 have also commenced Design review for construction of the improvements on Blocks M1, M2 and certain adjacent areas (collectively, the Block M Project ) has also commenced, and drawings have been submitted to the BRA by the owner of Blocks M1 and M2, Boston Seaport M1&2 Land, LLC ( Block M Owner ) 2 Purpose of Sixth Amendment to Development Plan This Sixth Amendment amends the Development Plan to permit certain design changes with respect to Blocks M1 and M2 (such Blocks referred to together herein as Block M ) Except as expressly stated otherwise, exhibit references set forth below shall refer to exhibits of the Development Plan and shall amend or supplement such exhibits to the Development Plan, as appropriate Other relevant sections or exhibits of the Development Plan shall be deemed modified in a consistent manner in order to effectuate the provisions of this Sixth Amendment to the extent necessary 3 Amendment Provisions The Development Plan is hereby amended as follows: a M Way Pursuant to BRA design review of the Block M Project, Block M Owner has reconfigured the layout of the pedestrian way known as M Way from a southeast connection (connecting E Service Road at Autumn Lane and the southeast corner of Block M at the intersection of B Street and Congress Street) (as shown in the original Development Plan, the Old Layout ) to a northeast connection (maintaining the E Service Road connection at Autumn Lane but running to the northeast corner of Block M at B Street and Seaport Boulevard) (as generally shown on Exhibit A attached hereto, the New Layout ) The Development Plan is hereby amended (i) to permit construction of M Way in accordance with and subject to the matters shown on the New Layout, (ii) such that, to the extent that the Old Layout is depicted on any exhibits to the Development Plan, such exhibits shall hereafter be deemed modified to reflect the New Layout, and (iii) such that, to the extent that the Old Layout is depicted on any exhibits to the Development Plan as a boundary for Block M1 and/or Block M2, such exhibits shall hereafter be deemed modified to reflect (A) that, where the Old Layout served as such boundary for such Block, the New Layout now serves as such boundary and (B) that the respective sizes and configurations of each of Block M1 and Block M2 have accordingly been changed to the New Layout b Public Realm Improvements and Benefits Although public parking at Block M shall continue to be permitted in accordance with the Development Plan, Exhibit E to the Development Plan is hereby amended by deleting the requirement that each of Block M1 and Block M2 provide public parking as a public benefit c Podiums; Design Pursuant to BRA design review of the Block M Project, Block M Owner has reconfigured podiums to the north and south of M Way and on the southwest corner of Block M to be constructed as generally shown on Exhibit B attached hereto The Development Plan is hereby amended (i) to permit the construction of such podiums and the Block M Project as generally shown on Exhibit B attached hereto and (ii) such that, to the extent that such podiums or the Block M Project are depicted on any exhibits to the Development Plan, such exhibits shall hereafter be deemed modified to reflect reconfiguration of such podiums and the revised design of the Block M Project as generally shown on Exhibit B attached hereto EAST\1050205512 2

Development and construction of the Block M Project consistent with the Development Plan, as modified by this Sixth Amendment, shall constitute compliance with the underlying provisions and regulations of the Code d Tower Setbacks In order to create diversity at the podiums within the Block M Project, Block M Owner has agreed to lower the facades of the towers being constructed on Block M to the respective bases of the towers The Development Plan is hereby amended (i) to permit the construction of the Block M Project with tower setbacks and tapering as generally shown on Exhibit B attached hereto and (ii) such that, to the extent that setbacks and tapering of the Block M Project are depicted on any exhibits to the Development Plan, such exhibits shall be deemed modified to reflect setbacks and tapering as generally shown on Exhibit B attached hereto e Block Boundaries The Block M Project may encroach on, through, over and/or under areas within the Site that are not part of Block M1 or M2 (including, but not limited to, M Way), provided that (i) Block M Owner has title, easements or other rights to such areas and (ii) the design of the Block M Project has been approved by the BRA pursuant to the applicable provisions of the Development Plan f Plans The plans entitled Exhibit D Block M1 and Exhibit D Block M2 within Exhibit D to the Development Plan are hereby deleted and replaced with the plan attached hereto as Exhibit B, and the dimensions and setbacks of the buildings on Block M shall be consistent with such plan Notwithstanding anything to the contrary shown on the plans for Block M1 and M2 within Exhibit C, Exhibit D and Exhibit E to the Development Plan, on the plans for M Way or the streets and sidewalks adjacent to Block M1 and M2 within Exhibit H to the Development Plan or the parking and loading locations for Block M shown on Exhibit I to the Development Plan, the Block M dimensions, roof plan and landscape, the dimensions of M Way and the streets and sidewalks adjacent to Block M and the parking and loading locations for Block M shall be generally consistent with the plans attached hereto as Exhibit A and Exhibit B 4 Development Plan, as Amended Except as amended by this Sixth Amendment, the Development Plan remains unmodified and is in full force and effect If there are any conflicts or inconsistencies between this Sixth Amendment and any other agreements between the Proponent and/or Block M Owner and the BRA in effect as of the date of this Sixth Amendment, this Sixth Amendment shall govern EAST\1050205512 3

Exhibit A [See attached] EAST\1050205512

Y SEA P BOU ORT LEV ARD 40-90 M WA N M1 M1 M WA Y M2 M2 KEY PLAN B ST B ST CONGRESS ST CONGRESS ST MASSING ENVELOPE AXON BUILDING MASSING SEAPORT BOULEVAR D +42 +258 Max Bldg Height +174 +162 AY MW +42 M1 B ST 40-90 MINIMUM OF 80% OF STREETWALL TO BE BUILT ON BUILDING LINE EAST SERVICE RD 1,012,000 GFA Street Wall Heights +186 +209 BLOCK M1 and M2 Proposed Max GFA +254 +250 +258 +143 +178 +156 +166 +255 +154 + +222 +42 M2 SS +210 ST RE G ON C MASSING ENVELOPE ROOF PLAN BUILDING MASSING ROOF PLAN SEAPORT EXHIBIT A - BLOCK M1 and M2 BOSTON DECEMBER 1, 2015 BOSTON, MA

Exhibit B [See attached] EAST\1050205512

SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS SEAPORT BLVD PARKING LOADING DOCK MINIMUM OF 80% OF STREETWALL TO BE BUILT ON BUILDING LINE SEAPORT BLVD SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS IMPROVEMENTS EAST SERVICE RD M-WAY MIN 35 WIDTH PEDESTRIAN PASSAGE SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS CONGRESS ST PARKING G IN AD K LO OC D SEAPORT EXHIBIT B - BLOCK M1 and M2 BOSTON DECEMBER 1, 2015 BOSTON, MA