appearing for the parties vide our order dated 25 th May,

Similar documents
BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI. Manoj MisraVs. Delhi Development Authority &Ors.

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL, PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL, PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI Original Application No. 148 of Mahesh Chandra Saxena Vs. SDMC and Ors.

2016 the District Magistrate of Gautam Buddha Nagar, Additional SP and CEOs of NOIDA Development Authority

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL, PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI. Application No. 06 of Manoj Mishra Vs. Union of India & Ors.

Vide our judgement dated 07 th May, 2016 the

in accordance with law.

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL, PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH NEW DELHI M.A. NO. 762 OF 2014 IN M.A. NO. 44 OF 2013 IN O.A. NO. 36 OF 2012.

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL, PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI. M.A. No. 841/2013 to M.A. No. 863/2013 In Original Application No.

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL, PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH NEW DELHI ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO. 34/2016

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL CENTRAL ZONAL BENCH BHOPAL. Original Application No. 264/2014 (THC) (CZ)

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. + FAO(OS) No.534/2010 & CM Nos /2010. versus. % Date of Hearing : August 25, 2010

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL, CENTRAL ZONAL BENCH, BHOPAL

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH NEW DELHI. ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO. 411 Of Versus

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL, PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL CENTRAL ZONAL BENCH BHOPAL. Original Application No. 16/2014 (CZ) (THC)

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. + ARB.A. 5/2015 & IA 2340/2015 (for stay) versus

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH NEW DELHI

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % Date of decision: WP(C) No. 416 of 2011 and CM Nos /2011. Versus

Original Application No. 88/2015 (CZ) Babulal Jajoo Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH NEW DELHI. Application No. 91 of 2012

*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % Date of decision: 29 th March, LPA No.777/2010

HON BLE DR. JUSTICE JAWAD RAHIM, JUDICIAL MEMBER HON BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P. WANGDI, JUDICIAL MEMBER HON BLE DR. NAGIN NANDA, EXPERT MEMBER

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI (PRINCIPAL BENCH)

NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI. Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 788 of 2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SUIT FOR RECOVERY Date of decision: 17th July, 2013 RFA 383/2012. Versus

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO OF 2019 MANTRI CASTLES PVT. LTD & ANR. WITH

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL, Circuit Bench at High Court of Meghalaya, Shillong

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL No.11249/2018 [Arising out of SLP (CIVIL) No.

Through Mr. Atul Nigam, Mr. Amit Tiwari, Advs. versus

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO OF 2018 VOLKSWAGEN INDIA PVT. LTD & ORS.

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL CENTRAL ZONAL BENCH BHOPAL. Original Application No. 129/2013 (CZ)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % Judgment delivered on: W.P.(C) 5568/2017 & CM No /2017

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO OF 2018 RAMESHWAR PRASAD SHRIVASTAVA AND ORS.

versus Through Mr. Saleem Ahmed, ASC for the State with SI Ravi Kumar. Mr. Surender Singh, Adv. for R-2.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE. Crl. M.C. No. 377/2010 & Crl. M.A. 1296/2010. Reserved on:18th May, 2011

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % Date of decision: 20 th May, Versus

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL CENTRAL ZONAL BENCH BHOPAL

Present: Mr. Arun Kathpalia, Senior Advocate assisted by Mr. Rudreshwar Singh, Mr. Swapnil Gupta, Mr. Ujjal Banerjee and Ms. Ankita Sinha, Advocates

ORDER (passed on 02/07/2015)

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 184 OF

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. W.P.(C) No.8693/2014. George. Versus. Advs. for UOI. HON BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL (WESTERN ZONE) BENCH, PUNE APPLICATION No. 91/2014(WZ)

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Co.Pet. 787/2015 BANDHU SYSTEMATIX PRIVATE LIMITED...PETITIONER. Mr. Anuj Kumar, Advocate.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI COMPANY JURISDICTION COMPANY PETITION NO. 406 OF 2009

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 925/2015 Reserved on: Date of Decision: versus

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : EXCISE ACT, 1944 CENTRAL EXCISE ACT CASE NOS. 48/2012 & 49/2012 Date of decision: 2nd August, 2013

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL (WESTERN ZONE) BENCH, PUNE M.A. No. 111/2014 APPLICATION No. 12(THC)/2014 (WZ)

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH NEW DELHI REVIEW APPLICATION NO. 22 OF 2015 (M.A. NO. 789, 790 & 791 OF 2015, 851 & 852 OF 2015)

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI. Satish Kumar Vs. Union of India & Ors. and Mahavir Singh Vs. Union of India & Ors.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INCOME TAX MATTER. Judgment delivered on: WP (C) 4642/2008

.. IN HIGH COURT OF DELHI:AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. I.A. No /2006 in C.S.(OS) No.795/2004

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, FEROZEPUR. C.C. No. 137 of 2017

Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 33 of Alongwith Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 34 of 2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : RECRUITMENT MATTER. W.P.(C) No. 8347/2010. Date of Decision: Versus

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. versus. % Date of Decision: 9 th February, J U D G M E N T

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. 1. Writ Petition (Civil) No of Judgment reserved on: August 30, 2007

THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : DELHI WATER BOARD ACT, Date of decision: 4th February, 2011.

*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. Versus. 2. To be referred to the reporter or not? No

Through: Versus. Through: 2. To be referred to the reporter or not? Yes. 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

BEFORE THE H.P. ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION AT SHIMLA

*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + WP(C) NO.4707/2010. % Date of decision: 6 th December, Versus MAHAVIR SR. MODEL SCHOOL & ORS.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INCOME TAX ACT W.P.(C) 7933/2010. Date of Decision : 16th February, 2012.

*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % Date of decision: 16 th February, Versus

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH NEW DELHI. Original Application No. 06 of 2017 (Earlier O.A. No. 136/2015)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SUIT FOR INJUNCTION Date of Judgment: RSA No.55/2009 & CM No.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. AA No.396/2007. Date of decision: December 3, Vs.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SUIT FOR PERPETUAL, MANDATORY INJUNCTION. Date of Judgment: CM(M) No.

Intelligent Communication Systems India Ltd. (ICSIL) TENDER NO: F.1 (ICSIL)/01/217/ 1D Barcode Reader Tis Hazari Court/ , Dated:

Grievances No.K/DOS/015/874 of and No. K/DOS/016/875 of

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL (WESTERN ZONE) BENCH, PUNE MISC. APPLICATION NO.17 OF 2015 APPLICATION NO.61 OF 2014 (WZ)

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % Judgment reserved on: 24 th April, 2015 Judgment delivered on: 08 th October, 2015

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU BEFORE. THE HON'BLE Dr.JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI. WRIT PETITION No.37514/2017 (T-RES)

NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH (DELHI)

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI

DVAT LATEST AMENDMENTS

$~12 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

15/27, National Chambers, Ashram Road, Ahmedabad Tel.No ,

$~30-33 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CM Nos , 24626/2017 in + W.P.(C) 8917/2015. versus

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. + CS(OS) No. 684/2004 % 8 th December, versus

DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL (PROCEDURE) RULES, (1) These rules may be called the Debts Recovery Tribunal (Procedure) Rules, 1993.

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. MICROSOFT CORPORATION & ANR. Through: Ms. Safia Said, Advocate. versus. Through:

MAHARASHTRA ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. Reserved on: % Date of Decision: WP(C) No.7084 of 2010

#1 $~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. versus. MR RAJBIR ORS... Defendant Through: Ex Parte

Ex Lt Col Kuldeep Chander Raina By Legal Practitioner for Applicant. Versus. Orders of the Tribunal

Case No. 295 of Coram. Anand B. Kulkarni, Chairperson Mukesh Khullar, Member. Adani Power Maharashtra Limited (APML)

IN THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL COMPANY APPELLATE JURISDICTION. Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 181 of 2017

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH NEW DELHI APPEAL NO. 60 OF 2013 (T HC )

BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA NATH SINGH, CHIEF JUSTICE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R. SEN

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : ARBITRATION & CONCILIATION ACT. Date of decision: 8th March, 2013 EFA(OS) 34/2012

IN THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL COMPANY APPELLATE JURISDICTION. Company Appeal (AT) (Insol.) No. 134 of 2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SERVICE MATTER W.P.(C) No.7886/2011 DATE OF DECISION : 15th July, 2013

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. CEAC No.6/2007 & CM No.8908/2008. Date of Hearing : April 16, Date of Decision : April 22, 2009

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU BEFORE THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE S. ABDUL NAZEER WRIT PETITION NOS.913 TO 914/2015 (GM-RES)

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % Judgment pronounced on: 20 th April, versus. Advocates who appeared in this case:

Transcription:

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL, PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI Appeal No.1 of 2015 (M.A. No. 12 of 2015, M.A. No. 13 of 2015, M.A. No. 74 of 2015, M.A. No. 241 of 2015, M.A. No. 410 of 2015 & M.A. No. 602 of 2015) Appeal No, 17 of 2015 Appeal No. 20 of 2015 Appeal No. 21 of 2015 Appeal No. 30 of 2015 IN THE MATTER OF :- Taurus International (Projects) Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Delhi Pollution Control Committee Hotel Chanakya Inn Vs. DPCC Hotel Ravin V/s. DPCC Hotel Swapnil International Vs. DPCC Vs. Hotel Global Radiance Vs. DPCC CORAM : HON BLE MR. JUSTICE SWATANTER KUMAR, CHAIRPERSON HON BLE MR. JUSTICE DALIP SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER HON BLE DR. D.K. AGRAWAL, EXPERT MEMBER HON BLE DR. A.A. DESHPANDE, EXPERT MEMBER Present: Appellant: Mr. Sanat Kumar, Adv. Respondent No. 1 : Mr. Sanjeev Rally and Mr. Sahil Sangar, Advs. along with Mr. Dinesh Jindal, LO and, Adv. Respondent No. 2 : Mr. Balendu Shekhar, Adv. for SDMC Respondent No. 3 : Dr. V. Bhagat, Dy. H.O. (SDMC, Najafarh Zone) Respondent No. 4 : Mr. Vivek Kumar Tandon, Adv. for NCT/ Revenue/Police. Respondent No. 5 : Ms. Mansha, Adv. for Ms. Sakshi Popli, Adv. Respondent No. 6 : Mr. D. Rajeshwar Rao and Mr. Charanjeet Singh, Advs. with ACP Rakesh For Police Licencing and Traffic Mr. B.V. Niren with Mr. Unit Gupta and Mr. V.V. Vardhan, Advs. for CGWA Date and Remarks Item No. 02-06 June 09, 2015 Orders of the Tribunal All the above Appeals and Misc. Applications were reserved for judgment after hearing the Learned Counsel appearing for the parties vide our order dated 25 th May, 2015. Thereafter, M.A. No. 602 of 2015 on behalf of Hotels and Guest Houses Association Mahipalpur (Registered) was filed praying therein that all the Hotels located in

Mahipal have resolved to assist the Tribunal and abide by the Order which may be passed in the Appeals or such other directions as the Tribunal may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case. Vide our order dated 08 th June, 2015, we issued Notice to the Respondents on this Misc. Application. Today, we have heard the Learned counsel appearing for Delhi Pollution Control Committee (DPCC), NCT of Delhi, Police Department, South Delhi Municipal Corporation (SDMC), Delhi Jal Board (DJB) and Central Ground Water Authority (CGWA). Learned Counsel appearing for Association has filed an Affidavit of Mr. Dinesh Khanna, the President of the said Association stating therein that they would be willing to file fresh Application before the DPCC as well as apply for permission to the different Departments and they would operate only after grant of permissions and would ensure that they do not cause any pollution. It is even stated that they would abide by all the directions that the Tribunal may pass in the interest of justice and environment. The Affidavit is taken on record. Having heard the Learned counsel appearing for the parties and in the interest of natural justice and to settle this multiple dispute by keeping in mind the principle of sustainable development with due regard to precautionary principle, we pass the following directions:- At the outset, we may notice that all the proposed directions in principle have been accepted by all the Learned Counsel appearing for the parties. This order in that sense would be treated as consent order.

Directions: 1. The closure or sealing order passed by the DPCC would continue to be in force subject to the directions contained hereinafter. 2. All the Hotels, Guest Houses, restaurants in that area agree that they would voluntarily close their activities and would not operationalise any Unit or part thereof till they satisfy the conditions and directions stated hereinafter. 3. We direct the SDM, Police Authorities, DPCC to ensure that none of these Units would operate commercially till the time they are granted consent to operate by the DPCC in accordance with law and more particularly subject to the compliance of the directions contained in this order. 4. All the Hotels without exception shall move a fresh application for consent to operate within two weeks from today or such other period as the Applicant may consider appropriate. Preferably the Applications should be accompanied by all the requisite documents and should be complete in all respects. 5. Within one week from the receipt of the Applications, the DPCC shall inform deficiencies or any other documents that the Applicants are required to file, which should be filed within two weeks thereafter. 6. The Applicants who have already filed Applications for consent to operate may be communicated by the Board within two weeks from today. Any deficiency

or further documents that the Applicants are required to file, if such communication is received which shall be the obligation of the Applicants to confirm from the office of the DPCC then they shall also comply with by submitting such documents within two weeks thereafter. 7. The applications would be considered and provisional consent to operate granted or refused by the DPCC in accordance with law within two weeks thereafter. In other words, the entire purpose should be completed within six weeks from today. 8. The applicants would be at liberty to move the SDMC, DJB, CGWA and the Police Authorities as the case may be for grant of NOC/Licence. If such applications are moved, we expect the concerned authorities to deal with them expeditiously. 9. We pass a specific direction that the Traffic Police while granting such permission shall ensure that there is no obstruction to free flow of traffic causing air pollution. 10. The consent shall be granted initially for a period of two months by the Board, once it is satisfied that all the anti pollution devices and other requirements have been satisfied, the Board thereafter would collect samples, analyse the same and then issue the final consent to operate which may be operated for a reasonable duration obviously subject to the right of the DPCC to inspect such units at their discretion. 11. It is an admitted case, where all the

applicants had operated for all this time in violation of all environmental laws without licence from the Corporation and permission from the CGWA and DJB, for having caused pollution and having operated illegally in violation of the provisions of the Environment (Protection) Act of 1986 or the Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981 and the Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974, we direct that all the applicants shall pay compensation in terms of Section 15 of the National Green Tribunal Act, 2010 as follows: (a) The hotels which have 50 or more rooms shall pay Rs. 5 Lakhs. (b) The hotels which have 25 or more rooms but less than 50 rooms shall pay Rs. 2 Lakhs. (c) The hotels which have 25 or more rooms shall pay Rs. 1 Lakh. 12. The compensation shall be paid to the DPCC for which a separate account will be maintained. This money will be used for restoration and restitution of the environment in Mahipalpur area in Co-operation with NCT, Delhi and SDMC. 13. The DJB shall consider the applications of the applicants for grant of commercial connection as running of a hotel cannot be called any other activity but a commercial activity. We hope that all the authorities would act expeditiously as the units of all the applicants are being directed to be shut down forthwith. Learned Counsel appearing for the applicants

submit that appeals filed before the Financial Commissioner shall be withdrawn by them immediately. The applicants are at liberty to apply for grant of regular electricity connections. If the electricity connection is already granted and disconnected, the same may be connected for installation of the devices but if any hotel is found to be violating any of the conditions afore-indicated or operating commercially prior to the grant of consent, the DPCC, SDMC and the Corporation shall seal the hotel forthwith and electricity connection of the entire building shall be disconnected. The hotels which have been sealed, their seal would be opened by the SDMC subject to the compliance of the above conditions. We further make it clear that each of the applicants shall submit their security bond to the DPCC within one week from today for complying with all these conditions unequivocally and without demur and default. They shall furnish security bond of atleast Rs. 5 Lakh each for a period of one year from today. With the above terms, Appeal Nos.1 of 2015, Appeal No, 17 of 2015, Appeal No. 20 of 2015, Appeal No. 21 of 2015 and Appeal No. 30 of 2015 stand disposed of without any order as to costs. M.A. No. 12 of 2015, M.A. No. 13 of 2015, M.A. No. 74 of 2015, M.A. No. 241 of 2015, M.A. No. 410 of 2015 & M.A. No. 602 of 2015 in Appeal No. 01 of 2015 These Misc. Applications do not survive for consideration in view of the fact that the main Appeal itself stand disposed of.

Accordingly, all these Misc. Applications stand disposed of....,cp (Swatanter Kumar)......,JM (Dalip Singh)......,EM (Dr. D. K. Agrawal)...,EM (Dr. A.A. Deshpande)