vs. ) Case No. CIV Pursuant to [insert Settlement Act citation] (hereinafter the Settlement Act ),

Similar documents
vs. ) Case No. CIV JOINT MOTION BY PLAINTIFFS AND ALL DEFENDANTS FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

Exhibit 6: State of Oklahoma, Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma, Chickasaw Nation, City of Oklahoma City Water Settlement

Case 1:10-cv FJS Document 24 Filed 11/18/11 Page 1 of 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

Case 1:18-cv LY Document 43 Filed 09/17/18 Page 1 of 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA : : : : : : : : : : : PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ERNEST TAYLOR CIVIL ACTION THE CITY OF BATON ROUGE, ET AL. NO.

Case 5:12-cv C Document 6 Filed 11/15/12 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

Case 5:12-cv C Document 15 Filed 01/07/13 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL THIRD DISTRICT CASE NO.: 3D LT. CASE NO.: CA-13

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:14-cv ADB Document 527 Filed 09/05/18 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS BOSTON DIVISION

Case 5:07-cv C Document 27 Filed 12/19/2007 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

Case AJC Doc 250 Filed 10/17/18 Page 1 of 3. UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DVISION

Docket Number: SHOVEL TRANSFER & STORAGE, INC. William G. Merchant, Esquire CLOSED VS.

PlainSite. Legal Document

Case 1:08-mc PLF Document 300 Filed 08/17/12 Page 1 of 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case4:13-cv JSW Document112 Filed05/05/14 Page1 of 3

Case 1:17-cv JPO Document 47 Filed 05/23/18 Page 1 of 5

COUNSEL JUDGES. Donnelly, C.J., wrote the opinion. WE CONCUR: C. FINCHER NEAL, Judge, PAMELA B. MINZNER, Judge AUTHOR: DONNELLY OPINION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ANSWER AND COUNTERCLAIMS

IN UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Docket Number: Philadelphia Suburban Water Company. Keith E. Gabage CLOSED VS. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA Department of Transportation

Case 1:15-cv SCY-KBM Document 2 Filed 01/21/15 Page 1 of 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

1IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

HOROWITZ LAW GROUP PLLC

Case 5:08-cv D Document 71 Filed 03/24/2009 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

This Agreement, originally entered on the 15 th day of June, 2010, as amended this. day of,, is entered into by and among the City of Oklahoma

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR CALVERT COUNTY, MARYLAND

Case 2:15-cv JCC Document 28 Filed 04/06/18 Page 1 of 9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI SOUTHERN DIVISION. CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:08cv600-HSO-LRA

Case 1:15-mc CKK Document 188 Filed 09/21/17 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

v. No. D-202-CV

Case 5:14-cv HE Document 1 Filed 10/20/14 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Section 1: Recitals. Section 2: Purpose and Scope.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

Case 1:11-cv NLH -AMD Document 61 Filed 01/24/13 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 211 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

8:11-mn JMC Date Filed 04/23/15 Entry Number 154 Page 1 of 6

UnofficialCopyOfficeofChrisDanielDistrictClerk

IN THE COURT OF THE QUAPAW TRIBE OF OKLAHOMA (THE O-GAH-PAH) ) In re Petition for Change of Name of: ) ) ) Petitioner. ) ) )

COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT By and Between the. And the UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA ) ) ) Case No TRC AGREEMENT BETWEEN LIQUIDATION ESTATE AND OWNER-OPERATORS

dob Doc 72 Filed 06/19/17 Entered 06/19/17 14:58:29 Page 1 of 12

Case MFW Doc 71 Filed 11/29/18 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Motion for New Trial and Plaintiff's Brief in Support of Motion for New Trial.

2:12-cv PDB-PJK Doc # 22 Filed 10/02/12 Pg 1 of 3 Pg ID 1020 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

NATURE OF THE ACTION. enforcement of the Arbitration Award entered November 24, 2015 styled In the

Case 2:13-cv Document 995 Filed in TXSD on 02/22/17 Page 1 of 6

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS JOINT PRELIMINARY STATUS REPORT

Case 1:17-cv DAD-SKO Document 37-1 Filed 03/19/18 Page 1 of 8

Case 1:17-cv TSC Document 13 Filed 09/08/17 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Nos & IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

(c) Real Estate Tax Assessment Appeals Petition shall be formatted and contain the following :

GENERAL ORDER FOR LUCAS COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION. damages for alleged exposure to asbestos or asbestos-containing products; that many of the

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. Case No.:

Once the application has been deemed complete by Planning Services, a Technical meeting will be scheduled within three to four weeks.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

LAKE FOREST PARK CITY COUNCIL. Agenda Item Cover Sheet Meeting Date: August 14, 2014

Case 1:04-cv DAB Document 569 Filed 12/02/10 Page 1 of 8 SOUTHERN DISTIUCT OF NEW YORK..

FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 06/16/ :02 PM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/16/2017

PETITION FOR INSTRUCTION

ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT, DIRECTING NOTICE, AND SCHEDULING FINAL APPROVAL HEARING

Case 4:16-cv ALM Document 10 Filed 10/18/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 779

Case 1:10-cv PLF Document 17 Filed 08/04/11 Page 1 of 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:18-cv AJN Document 6 Filed 09/29/18 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 1:13-cv BB Document 42 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/18/2016 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case 0:16-cv WJZ Document 31 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/18/2016 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case 2:16-cv SWS Document 218 Filed 04/06/18 Page 1 of 4

STIPULATION AND ORDER AUTHORIZING ELECTRONIC SERVICE OF DOCUMENTS

GREATER ATLANTIC LEGAL SERVICES, INC.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 5:07-cv C Document 34 Filed 08/28/2008 Page 1 of 2 NO. CIV C. Plaintiff, ) ) CAMPBELL, YOST, CLARE & NORELL, P.C.

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI. SAMUEL M. BROTHERS and LORA BROTHERS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

IN THE IOWA DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR DUBUQUE COUNTY. Plaintiffs, Case No: PETITION THE PARTIES

Page 1 of 13. Case 1: 05-cv-003-LY Document 23 Filed 01/2006 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION OS CV-923

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE CHOCTAW NATION OF OKLAHOMA P.O. Box 1160 P.O. Box 702 Durant, OK Talihina, OK (580) (918)

v. No. D-101-CV-2014-

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT. Defendants/Appellants.

Case 1:15-md AJT-TRJ Document 1524 Filed 06/15/18 Page 1 of 12 PageID# 17458

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA WESTERN DIVISION

Case 2:14-cv RJS Document 67 Filed 11/03/16 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF UTAH

Case 1:06-cv JR Document 25 Filed 02/01/2008 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA. Richmond Division

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

Case 2:15-cv DN-BCW Document 111 Filed 11/04/16 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION

U.S. District Court Southern District of New York (Foley Square) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:17-cv VSB

HAMILTON MUNICIPAL COURT 345 HIGH STREET, HAMILTON, OHIO Hamiltonmunicipalcourt.org EVICTION PROCEDURE CLERK OF COURTS

Case 2:10-cv TSZ Document 174 Filed 08/13/14 Page 1 of 14 THE HONORABLE THOMAS S. ZILLY

Case 3:15-cr BAS Document 166 Filed 03/02/17 PageID.752 Page 1 of 8

Docket Number: 1866 CLOSED. Jennifer A. Stiller, Esquire VS. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WELFARE

Transcription:

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 Exhibit : State of Oklahoma, Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma, Chickasaw Nation, City of Oklahoma City Water Settlement IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA OKLAHOMA WATER RESOURCES BOARD, Plaintiff, vs. Case No. CIV-1- UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., Defendants. PLAINTIFF S MOTION FOR DISMISSAL Pursuant to [insert Settlement Act citation] (hereinafter the Settlement Act, approving the State of Oklahoma, Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma, Chickasaw Nation, City of Oklahoma City Water Settlement ( Settlement Agreement, and Fed. R. Civ. Pr. 1(a(, the Oklahoma Water Resources Board ( OWRB or Plaintiff respectfully moves this Court to order the dismissal of this action: (1 without prejudice as to the rights and claims of the United States as trustee for the Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma and the Chickasaw Nation (hereinafter United States, subject to the conditions set forth below and in the proposed order accompanying this Motion; and ( without prejudice as to all other parties. Plaintiff requests the dismissal become effective on the Enforceability Date as defined in the Settlement Act and Settlement Agreement subject to the conditions set forth herein and in the proposed order unless the OWRB notifies the Court that the Enforceability Date has not occurred and moves to vacate the order of dismissal on that basis. Plaintiff shall provide notice to the Court of the occurrence Version: 01-0-0

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 of the Enforceability Date within sixty (0 days of the Enforceability Date. As grounds for this Motion, the OWRB states as follows: 1. This case was stayed by order of the Court on March, 01, along with a concurrent stay entered in Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma and Chickasaw Nation v. Fallin et al., CIV -, to allow settlement negotiations to proceed as among the Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma, the Chickasaw Nation (collectively the Nations, the State of Oklahoma (Governor Mary Fallin and the OWRB (collectively State, the City of Oklahoma City ( City, and the United States to resolve the issues raised by the respective actions. Settlement negotiations proceeded thereafter, and upon request of the State, the Nations, the City, and the United States, the Court has extended the stay in both cases multiple times to allow settlement discussions to progress.. After almost five years of negotiations, the State, the Nations, the United States, and the City reached a settlement that was executed by the State, the Nations and the City in August 01, enacted into federal law on as [insert Settlement Act citation], and executed by the United States on 01.. The Settlement Agreement and the Settlement Act settle and determine the water rights and rights to water of the Nations in the State of Oklahoma. The Settlement Agreement and the Settlement Act constitute a final determination of the Nations rights to water and water rights in the State of Oklahoma and are binding on the State, the United States, and the Nations. Accordingly, notwithstanding the dismissal of the instant action without prejudice as to the State and the United States, the Settlement Agreement shall be binding on the United States and the Nations in any future stream adjudication in the State of Oklahoma as to the water rights and rights to water of the Nations. Page of

. Dismissal of the instant action should be without prejudice as to all other parties. WHEREFORE, for the reasons set for herein, OWRB requests dismissal of the instant action without prejudice as to the United States as trustee for the Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma and the Chickasaw Nation, subject to the conditions set forth herein; and without prejudice as to all other parties. Date: Respectfully submitted, 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 OKLAHOMA OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL DRAFT Patrick R. Wyrick, OBA #1 SOLICITOR GENERAL 1 NE 1st Street Oklahoma City, OK Phone: (0 - Patrick.Wyrick@oag.ok.gov Michael Hunter FIRST ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL 1 NE 1st Street Oklahoma City, OK 1 (0-1; (0-0 Fax Service email: fc.docket@oag.state.ok.us -and- MODRALL, SPERLING, ROEHL, HARRIS & SISK, P.A. DRAFT Maria O Brien (NM Bar No. 1 00 th Street NW, Suite 00 Albuquerque, NM Phone: (0-0 mobrien@modrall.com Page of

1 1 -and- V. Glenn Coffee, OBA # Glenn Coffee & Associates, PLLC 1 N. Robinson Oklahoma City, OK -0 0-0- gcoffee@cox.net Counsel for Governor Mary Fallin, State of Oklahoma and Counsel for OWRB Page of

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on the day of, 01, I electronically transmitted the attached document to the Clerk of Court using the ECF System for filing. Based on the records currently on file, the Clerk of court will transmit a Notice of Electronic Filing to the following ECF registrants: Page of

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA OKLAHOMA WATER RESOURCES BOARD, Plaintiff, vs. Case No. CIV-1- UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., Defendants. ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF S MOTION FOR DISMISSAL Upon review of the record and consideration of the Plaintiff Oklahoma Water Resource Board s Motion for Dismissal Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. l(a(, the Court FINDS as follows: 1. This case was stayed by order of the Court on March, 01, along with a concurrent stay entered in Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma and Chickasaw Nation v. Fallin et al., CIV -, to allow settlement negotiations to proceed as among the Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma, the Chickasaw Nation (collectively the Nations, the State of Oklahoma (Governor Mary Fallin and the OWRB (collectively State, the City of Oklahoma City ( City, and the United States to resolve the issues raised by the respective actions. Settlement negotiations proceeded thereafter and upon request of the State, the Nations, the City, and the United States, the Court has extended the stay in both cases multiple times to allow settlement discussions to progress.. After almost five years of negotiations, the State, the Nations, the United States, and the City entered in to State of Oklahoma, Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma, Chickasaw Nation, City of Oklahoma City Water Settlement ( Settlement Agreement, which was approved Version: 01-0-0

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 by Congress and enacted into federal law in [insert Settlement Act citation] ( Settlement Act.. The Settlement Agreement and the Settlement Act settle and determine the water rights and rights to water of the Nations in the State of Oklahoma. The Settlement Agreement and the Settlement Act constitute a final determination of the Nations rights to water and water rights in the State of Oklahoma and are binding on the State, the United States, and the Nations. Accordingly, notwithstanding the dismissal of the instant action without prejudice as to the State and the United States, the Settlement Agreement shall be binding on the United States and the Nations in any future stream adjudication in the State of Oklahoma as to the water rights and rights to water of the Nations.. The dismissal of the instant action should be without prejudice as to all other parties.. Plaintiff requests that dismissal of the instant action shall be effective as of the Enforceability Date as defined in the Settlement Act and the Settlement Agreement unless the Plaintiff notifies the Court that the Enforceability Date has not occurred and moves to vacate the order of dismissal on that basis. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion be and hereby is GRANTED pursuant to the terms of this ORDER: 1. Effective on the Enforceability Date as defined in the Settlement Act and Settlement Agreement, the above-captioned action is dismissed without prejudice as to the United States as trustee for the Nations, the Nations claims, and the State subject to the conditions set forth herein;. The Settlement Agreement and the Settlement Act settle and determine the water rights and rights to water of the Nations in the State of Oklahoma. The Settlement Agreement Page of

1 1 1 1 1 1 and the Settlement Act constitute a final determination of the Nations rights to water and water rights in the State of Oklahoma and are binding on the State, the United States, and the Nations. Accordingly, notwithstanding the dismissal of the instant action without prejudice as to the State and the United States, the Settlement Agreement shall be binding on the United States and the Nations in any future stream adjudication in the State of Oklahoma as to the water rights and rights to water of the Nations;. Effective on the Enforceability Date as defined in the Settlement Act and Settlement Agreement, the above-captioned action is dismissed without prejudice as to all other parties;. Dismissal shall be without further action of the Court or notice to the parties, unless the Plaintiff notifies the Court through a motion to vacate the order of dismissal that the Enforcement Date has not occurred; and. Within thirty (0 days of the Secretary of the United States Department of the Interior s publishing in the Federal Register a Certification stating that the conditions precedent to the Settlement Agreement s Enforceability Date, the OWRB shall file a notice with the Court that includes a copy of the Certification. ENTERED this day of, 01 1 1 0 1 DRAFT LEE R. WEST UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Page of