Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 1 of 102 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Criminal No. 17-CR- V. BRIAN AUGUSTINE JOYCE Violations: 18 U.S.C. 371; 666; 1341; 1343; 1346; 1951; 1956; 1957; 1962(c); and 2; 18 U.S.C. 981(a)(1)(C); 982(a)(1); 1963 and 28 U.S.C. 2461(c) INDICTMENT THE GRAND JURY charges: At all times relevant to this Indictment, COUNT ONE (Racketeering -18 U.S.C. 1962(c)) The Enterprise 1. The Massachusetts State Senate consists of40 members, with each Senator elected to represent a district consisting ofapproximately 100,000 to 200,000 people. The Massachusetts Constitution requires the Senate to meet on a regular basis to consider legislation. 2. The Norfolk, Bristol, and Plymouth Senate district ofmassachusetts consists often towns: the towns of Avon, Braintree (four precincts). Canton, Milton, Randolph, Sharon (two precincts), and Stoughton, in the county of Norfolk; the town of Easton (four precincts) in the county ofbristol; and the towns ofeast Bridgewater (one precinct) and West Bridgewater in the county ofplymouth. 3. From approximately 1998 to 2017, Brian Augustine Joyce, a Milton resident, was the elected State Senator for the Norfolk, Bristol, and Plymouth district (the "District"). As State Senator, Joyce represented the interests ofthe District, as well as the Commonwealth, on a regular
Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 2 of 102
Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 3 of 102
Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 4 of 102
Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 5 of 102
Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 6 of 102
Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 7 of 102
Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 8 of 102
Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 9 of 102
Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 10 of 102
Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 11 of 102
Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 12 of 102
Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 13 of 102
Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 14 of 102
Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 15 of 102
Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 16 of 102
Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 17 of 102
Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 18 of 102
Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 19 of 102
Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 20 of 102
Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 21 of 102
Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 22 of 102
Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 23 of 102
Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 24 of 102
Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 25 of 102
Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 26 of 102
Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 27 of 102
Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 28 of 102
Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 29 of 102
Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 30 of 102
Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 31 of 102
Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 32 of 102
Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 33 of 102
Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 34 of 102
Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 35 of 102
Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 36 of 102
Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 37 of 102
Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 38 of 102
Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 39 of 102 Town Manager, intendingthat such advice would form the basis for an official act by the Randolph Town Manager, which official acts included the appointment ofthe Energy Broker Company as the exclusive energy consultant for the Town ofrandolph, and the Town ofrandolph's approval ofan energy contract that was brokered by the Energy Broker Company, as specific opportunities arose, in violation oftitle 18, United States Code, Sections 1951(a) and 2. #1C. From in or about early 2011 through 2014, in the District ofmassachusetts and elsewhere, the defendant, BRIAN AUGUSTINE JOYCE, did conspire to obstruct, delay, and affect interstate commerce and the movement ofany article and commodity in interstate commerce by extortion under color ofofficial right - that is, by agreeing to obtain a stream ofpayments from the Energy Broker Company, with its consent, in exchange for defendant Joyce's official action, which included using his official position to exert pressure on the Randolph Town Manager to perform an official act, and using his official position to advise the Randolph Town Manager, intending that such advice would form the basis for an official act by the Randolph Town Manager, which official acts included the appointment of the Energy Broker Company as the exclusive energy consultant for the Town ofrandolph, and the Town ofrandolph's approval ofan energy contract that was brokered by the Energy Broker Company, as specific opportunities arose, in violation oftitle 18, United States Code, Section 1951(a). 39
Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 40 of 102
Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 41 of 102
Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 42 of 102
Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 43 of 102
Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 44 of 102
Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 45 of 102
Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 46 of 102
Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 47 of 102
Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 48 of 102
Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 49 of 102
Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 50 of 102
Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 51 of 102
Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 52 of 102
Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 53 of 102
Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 54 of 102
Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 55 of 102
Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 56 of 102
Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 57 of 102
Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 58 of 102
Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 59 of 102
Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 60 of 102
Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 61 of 102
Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 62 of 102
Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 63 of 102
Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 64 of 102
Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 65 of 102
Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 66 of 102
Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 67 of 102
Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 68 of 102
Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 69 of 102
Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 70 of 102
Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 71 of 102
Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 72 of 102
Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 73 of 102
Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 74 of 102
Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 75 of 102
Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 76 of 102
Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 77 of 102
Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 78 of 102
Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 79 of 102
Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 80 of 102
Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 81 of 102
Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 82 of 102
Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 83 of 102
Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 84 of 102
Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 85 of 102
Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 86 of 102
Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 87 of 102
Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 88 of 102
Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 89 of 102
Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 90 of 102
Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 91 of 102
Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 92 of 102
Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 93 of 102
Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 94 of 102
Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 95 of 102
Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 96 of 102
Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 97 of 102
Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 98 of 102
Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 99 of 102
Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 100 of 102
Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 101 of 102
Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 102 of 102 A TRUE BILL FOREPERSON OF THE GRAND JURY DUSTIN CHAO WILLIAM F. BLOOMER ASSISTANT U.S. ATTORNEYS U.S. DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS; December 7, 2017. Returned into the District Court by the Grand Jurors and filed. DEPUTY ^LERK ^ r. 10 pi<^ i2-hln 102