Examination Procedure. Japan Patent Office

Similar documents
Understanding and Utilization of the ISR and WOISA. Shunsuke YAMAMOTO Examination Standards Office Japan Patent Office

THE IP5 OFFICES AND THE PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT)

THE IP5 OFFICES AND THE PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT)

Drafting, Filing and Processing of PCT Applications

Topic 1: Overview of Search and Examination under the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT)

PATENT COOPERATION TREATY. Non-establishment of opinion with regard to novelty, inventive step and industrial applicability

PCT developments. U.S. Bar-EPO Partnership for Quality meeting

Outline of PCT International Search and Preliminary Examination PCT Workshop Tokyo February 27-March

Raising the Bar and EPC changes as from 1 April 2010

PCT procedure before the EPO as International Authority. Camille-Rémy Bogliolo Head, Department of PCT Affairs

Chapter 1 DEFINITION OF TERMS. There are various types of IP rights. They can be categorized as:

Functions of the receiving Office

Criteria for Patentability

Training Module for Chapter 18 of the MPEP. NOTE: The provisions of Chapter 18 have not been changed by the AIA.

Chapter 1800 Patent Cooperation Treaty

Part I PPH using the national work products from the JPO

EUROPEAN PATENT OFFICE IP5 GLOBAL DOSSIER: SCOPE, CONTENT, AVAILABILITY AND PERFORMANCE

exclusively in electronic form (no paper notifications will be sent). address: State (that is, country) of nationality:

Patent Cooperation Treaty Procedural Aspects & Recent Trends. PG Diploma In Patents NALSAR University of Law, Hyderabad Contact Class; 2017.

PATENT COOPERATION TREATY PCT. INTERNATIONAL PRELIMINARY REPORT ON PATENTABILITY (Chapter II of the Patent Cooperation Treaty)

Strategic Use of the PCT:

Procedures to file a request to the JPO (Japan Patent Office) for Patent Prosecution Highway Pilot Program

Procedures to file a request to the Federal Service for Intellectual Property (Rospatent) for Patent Prosecution Highway Pilot Program

3. TITLE OF INVENTION (Must agree with the PCT publication document if applicable.)

Guide to WIPO Services

Obvious mistakes and other corrections. Isabel Auría Lansac, Lawyer PCT Affairs Susana Ruiz Pérez, European Patent Attorney, COAPI

Speed of processing at the EPO. Timely delivery of quality products

C.PCT August 6, Madam, Sir, Proposed new and modifications of certain Forms of the International Bureau

Filing Requirements for a U.S. Patent Application. Emphasis on National Stage Applications 2017 BIRCH, STEWART, KOLASCH & BIRCH LLP

PCT DEMAND. For International Preliminary Examining Authority use only. International filing date (day/month/year)

Patent Administrators Course 2015 Final Examination Answers

Part VIII International Patent Application

Introduction to Patent Prosecution Highway JAPAN PATENT OFFICE

Table of Contents I INTERNATIONAL PHASE BEFORE THE RECEIVING OFFICE AND INTERNATIONAL BUREAU.. 14

Annual Index. Subject Index. Subject Issue Page Subject Issue Page. [Index of Countries and Offices follows]

QUESTION PAPER REFERENCE: FC3 PERCENTAGE MARK AWARDED: 51%

PCT/GL/ISPE/1 Page 154 PART V WRITTEN OPINION/INTERNATIONAL PRELIMINARY EXAMINATION REPORT

Table 1: General overview of the PCT procedure Legend:

Patent Prosecution Procedures under the Japanese Patent Law. Sera, Toyama, Matsukura & Kawaguchi

Practice Tips for Foreign Applicants

IP: Patent law & prosecution

GLOSSARY of patent related terms in the IP5 STATISTICS REPORT 2015 EDITION

Aug.2014 JAPAN PATENT OFFICE

GLOSSARY of patent related terms in the IP5 STATISTICS REPORT 2016 EDITION

AGREEMENT. between the Spanish Patent and Trademark Office and the International Bureau of the World Intellectual Property Organization

PRACTICE TIPS FOR PATENT PROSECUTION BEFORE THE USPTO

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): Latest Trends & Strategies for Applicants

Part 1 Current Status of Intellectual Property Rights

The request form is available online on the NBPR website at

BIMI G B ASSISTANT CONTROLLER OF PATENTS INDIAN PATENT OFFICE NEW DELHI Bimi G B

CA/102/17 Orig.: en Munich, Amendments of the Rules relating to Fees. President of the European Patent Office

AGREEMENT. between the National Institute of Industrial Property of Chile and the International Bureau of the World Intellectual Property Organization

Inventive Step. Japan Patent Office

Novelty. Japan Patent Office

EUROPEAN PATENT OFFICE (EPO)

Annex 2 DEFINITIONS FOR TERMS AND FOR STATISTICS ON PROCEDURES

IPO PCT-PPH Guidelines for Chinese applicants

AGREEMENT. (as in force from January 1, 2018)*

Foundation Certificate

Topic 1: Challenges and Options in Substantive Patent Examination. Lutz Mailänder Head, International Cooperation on Examination and Training Section

Requirements and Procedures to File a Request to CIPO for the Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH)

CIPA Introductory Certificate in Patent Administration Syllabus

Part II PPH using the PCT international work products from the JPO

AGREEMENT. between the Government of Israel and the International Bureau of the World Intellectual Property Organization

Examination Guidelines for Patentability - Novelty and Inventive Step. Shunsuke YAMAMOTO Examination Standards Office Japan Patent Office 2016.

FC3 (P5) International Patent Law 2 FINAL Mark Scheme 2017

JETRO seminar. Recent Rule change and latest developments at the EPO:

TABLE OF CONTENTS. CHAPTER 1: THIS GUIDE AND ITS ANNEXES Introduction CHAPTER 2: WHAT IS THE PCT?

and Examination Reports

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) Working Group

PATENT PROSECUTION HIGHWAY

The purpose of my presentation is to consider the effects of the recent. changes to the PCT, and the proposed changes that have been suggested for the

United States Patent and Trademark Office and Japan Patent Office Collaborative Search. AGENCY: United States Patent and Trademark Office, Commerce.

Inventive Step in Japan Masashi Moriwaki

Internal Process for Substantive Examination of International Registrations and National Applications. March 2016 Design Division Japan Patent Office

PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT)

EUROPEAN PATENT OFFICE (EPO)

IP5 Statistics Report 2011 EDITION

GLOSSARY of patent related terms in the FOUR OFFICE STATISTICS REPORT 2010 EDITION

Agreement. (as in force from July 1, 2012)*

REGISTRATION DIVISION, DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS (SEYCHELLES)

Procedures to file a request to the SPTO (Spanish Patent and Trademark Office) for Patent Prosecution Highway Pilot Program

Intellectual property defense and

IP Part IV: Patent prosecution

OFFICIAL NOTICES (PCT GAZETTE)

Global Dossier

PATENT. 1. Procedures for Granting a Patent

Cognitive Distances in Prior Art Search by the Triadic Patent Offices: Empirical evidence from international search reports

The Role of IP in Economic Partnerships

Chapter1. Examinations. 1. Patent Examinations

Outline of the Patent Examination

The application which is filed with the KIPO and on which the applicant files a request for the PCT-PPH must satisfy the following requirements:

1996 Annual Index. Subject Index. Subject Issue Page Subject Issue Page

MARCH 1994 No. 01/1994

Part IV. Fees payable on entering the European regional phase. Fees - general remarks

PRV fees valid as from 1 april 2018

DIFFICULT EPO ACTIONS TO DOCKET uithe Reliability of your IP Data your IP Data Integrity: How to Ruin the Reliability of your IP Data

The European patent system

Patents: Utility Models Overview of requirements, procedures and tactical use in Europe and Japan

2015 Noréns Patentbyrå AB

Transcription:

Examination Procedure Japan Patent Office 0

Outline I. Overview II. First Action (FA) III. Second Action (SA) 1

Outline I. Overview II. First Action (FA) III. Second Action (SA) 2

I. Overview A. General Flow of Patent Examination Filing Examination Publication Notification of reasons for refusal Amendment & Opinion Decision to grant Decision of refusal 3

I. Overview B. Flow of Patent Examination (JP) Within 3 years JPO Filing Publication Request for examination Examination Notification of reasons for refusal Amendment & Opinion 18 months Decision to grant a patent Decision of refusal

I. Overview C. How about your country? Filing Within years Request for examination needed? Publication months Examination Notification of reasons for refusal Amendment & Opinion Decision to grant a patent Decision of refusal 5

I. Overview D. Flow of Examination of PCT Application PCT IA Filing to RO e.g. JP, EP, US PCT: Patent Cooperation Treaty IA: International Application RO: Receiving Office ISR established by ISA e.g. JP, EP, US Publication with ISR by IB ISR: ISA: IB: International Search Report International Search Authority International Bureau (WIPO) If requested IPER established by IPEA e.g. JP, EP, US IPER: International Preliminary Examination Report IPEA: International Preliminary Examining Authority Country A Country B Country C Examination Examination Examination Notification Notification Notification Amendment & Opinion Amendment & Opinion Amendment & Opinion National Phase Grant Refuse Grant Refuse Grant Refuse 6

I. Overview E. Sample PCT Publication with ISR Cited from WO 2013/019268 A1 7

Outline I. Overview II. First Action (FA) III. Second Action (SA) 8

II. First Action (FA) A. Flow of FA 1/2 Understand the application & the claim Filing Examination Notification Amendment & Opinion Grant Refuse [0001] [0002] 1. 2. Fig.1 Sample Patent Application Cited from WO 2012/029692 A1 9

II. First Action (FA) A. Flow of FA 2/2 Filing Understand the application & the claim Examination Notification Search for prior arts Select the closest prior art Amendment & Opinion Compare the closest prior art with the claim Grant Refuse Determine whether any reasons for refusal exist? Draft a notification 10

II. First Action (FA) B. Flow of FA - Search DB in JPO - Understand the application & the claim Search for prior arts Select the closest prior art Compare the claim with the closest prior art Determine whether any reasons for refusal exist? Internal Databases - Domestic Patent DB search key: IPC, FI, F-term, Text (Ja.) - Foreign Patent DB search key: IPC, CPC (ECLA), USC, Text (En.) - NPL DB (NPL: Non Patent Literature) Papers in science journals, etc. External Databases - IEEE Xplore, ACM-DL, JDreamIII, STN on the Web, Google Scholar, etc. Draft a notification Internet - Web pages 11

Outline I. Overview II. First Action (FA) III. Second Action (SA) 12

III. Second Action (SA) A. Flow of SA Any reasons for refusal exist? Yes FA Notification of reasons for refusal SA Filing No Amendment & Opinion Examination Notification Amendment & Opinion Have the reasons been resolved? Yes No Grant Refuse Other reasons for refusal exist? Yes No FA SA SA Grant Refuse 13

III. Second Action (SA) B. Criteria for Final Decision or Another Notification (JP) FA SA Notification of reasons Amendment & Opinion * In some cases, neither amendment nor opinion is made. Have the reasons been resolved? Grant Yes Other reasons for refusal exist? No SA No Yes SA Refuse Criteria for choosing Refuse or notification of new reasons: The reasons stated in FA are deemed not to be resolved. Refuse (draft unresolved reasons) The reasons stated in FA are resolved, but other new reasons for refusal are found. Notification of New Reasons 14

III. Second Action (SA) C. Examples of Refuse or Notification of New Reasons Amended part of a claim is mentioned in the prior art document cited in FA Addition of a well-known art to a claim Addition of a commonly used art to a claim The reasons are deemed not to be resolved Refuse Against the amended claim, a new prior art document is found other than the well-known art and the commonly used art Amendment made the claim or description unclear Amendment added a new matter to the claim or description The reasons stated in FA are resolved, but other new reasons for refusal are found Notification of New Reasons for Refusal 15

III. Second Action (SA) D. Examples of Refuse 1/2 Amended part of a claim is mentioned in the prior art document cited in FA Prior art doc D1 cited in FA [A] [B] Original application [A] [B] 1. [A] Fig. 1 * [A]: feature A [B]: feature B AMENDMENT D1 cited in FA [A] [B] Current application [A] [B] 1. [A] + [B] Fig. 1 The reasons are deemed not to be resolved Refuse 16

III. Second Action (SA) D. Examples of Refuse 2/2 Addition of a well-known art to a claim Addition of a commonly used art to a claim Prior art doc D1 cited in FA [C] * [C]: feature C D1 cited in FA [C] Original application [C] [well-known art] [commonly used art] 1. [C] Fig. 1 AMENDMENT [C] [well-known art] [commonly used art] 1. [C] + [well-known art] Fig. 1 Current application or [C] [well-known art] [commonly used art] 1. [C] + [commonly used art] Fig. 1 The reasons are deemed not to be resolved Refuse 17

III. Second Action (SA) E. Examples of Notification of New Reasons for Refusal 1/2 Against the amended claim, a new prior art document is found other than the well-known art and the commonly used art Prior art doc D1 cited in FA [D] Original application [D] [E] 1. [D] Fig. 1 * [D]: feature D AMENDMENT The reasons stated in FA are resolved, but other new reasons for refusal are found Notification of New Reasons for Refusal New D1 (will be cited in SA) [D] [E] Current application [D] [E] 1. [D] + [E] Fig. 1 * [E]: feature E 18

III. Second Action (SA) E. Examples of Notification of New Reasons for Refusal 2/2 Amendment made the claim or description unclear Amendment added a new matter to the claim or description Prior art doc D1 cited in FA [F] Original application [F] [G] 1. [F] Fig. 1 * [F]: feature F * [G]: feature G AMENDMENT [F] [G] 1. [F] + unclear [G] Fig. 1 The reasons stated in FA are resolved, but other new reasons for refusal are found Notification of New Reasons for Refusal D1 cited in FA [F] Current application or [F] [G] 1. [F] + [new matter] Fig. 1 19

III. Second Action (SA) F. Points to consider Opportunity for amendment The applicant s opportunity for amendment may not be unreasonably limited. Suggestion of amendment In a notice of reasons for refusal, the examiner may suggest an amendment, which enables applicants to easily respond and thus contributes to prompt and precise examination. Communication When it is considered to contribute to prompt and precise examination, examiners could communicate with the applicant through an interview, by telephone, or by facsimile. 20