Case 3:11-cv CRS Document 1 Filed 03/08/11 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY AT LOUISVILLE NO.

Similar documents
Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/26/18 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case: 3:11-cv TMR Doc #: 1 Filed: 11/07/11 Page: 1 of 13 PAGEID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 10/11/16 Page 1 of 8 : : : : : : : : : : :

Case 2:15-cv SVW-AS Document 1 Filed 02/12/15 Page 1 of 15 Page ID #:1

Case 3:16-cv CRS Document 1 Filed 10/19/16 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1

Case 1:18-cv TWP-DML Document 1 Filed 01/06/18 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1

CAUSE NO CV ANNA DRAKER IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF VS. MEDINA COUNTY, TEXAS

Case 3:17-cv DJH Document 3 Filed 02/06/17 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 13

Case 3:17-cv LB Document 1 Filed 07/17/17 Page 1 of 11

Case 2:10-cv WOB-JGW Document 1 Filed 04/29/10 Page 1 of 6

IN UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA PHOENIX ARIZONA DIVISION. Plaintiff, pro se )

Case 2:10-cv HGB-ALC Document 1 Filed 04/20/10 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA JANET DELUCA CIVIL ACTION

Case 1:19-cv PAB Document 1 Filed 01/04/19 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Case 3:16-cv WHB-JCG Document 4 Filed 05/31/16 Page 1 of 8

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 06/20/16 Page 1 of 9 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

1. The Plaintiff, Richard N. Bell, took photograph of the Indianapolis Skyline in

Case 8:14-cv VMC-AEP Document 1 Filed 11/19/14 Page 1 of 26 PageID 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Case 6:14-cv JDL Document 1 Filed 01/21/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

Case 1:16-cv PGG Document 1 Filed 09/26/16 Page 1 of 9

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ROME DIVISION

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/15/ :39 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/15/2015

Case 6:14-cv JDL Document 1 Filed 01/15/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

Case 6:14-cv JDL Document 1 Filed 01/21/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 1:11-cv JBS-AMD Document 37 Filed 06/27/12 Page 1 of 16 PageID: 223 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 11/30/18 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1

Case 2:10-cv GCS -VMM Document 1 Filed 12/14/10 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

PlainSite. Legal Document. Florida Middle District Court Case No. 6:10-cv Career Network, Inc. et al v. WOT Services, Ltd. et al.

Case: 1:12-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 10/02/12 Page 1 of 5 PageID #:1

Case: 3:15-cv JJH Doc #: 1 Filed: 08/07/15 1 of 20. PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Case 1:14-cv WTL-MJD Document 1 Filed 02/12/14 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1

Case 3:10-cv B Document 1 Filed 09/10/10 Page 1 of 6 PageID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Courthouse News Service

Case 5:16-cv Document 1 Filed 09/12/16 Page 1 of 16 Page ID #:1

Case 3:14-cv ST Document 1 Filed 02/14/14 Page 1 of 13 Page ID#: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY FAYETTE CIRCUIT COURT FOURTH DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO. 94-CI-2671

PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL PETITION

Case: 1:16-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 12/15/16 Page 1 of 15 PageID #:1

Case 3:17-mc Document 135 Filed 02/24/17 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 6426 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY AT BOWLING GREEN

Case 1:17-cv JCB Document 5 Filed 02/15/17 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS CIVIL ACTION NO.

3:18-cv MGL Date Filed 07/31/18 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA COLUMBIA DIVISION

Case: 1:17-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 04/04/17 Page 1 of 12 PageID #:1

Case 9:16-cv RLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/15/2016 Page 1 of 6

3:17-cv MGL Date Filed 06/29/18 Entry Number 55 Page 1 of 8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES WITH JURY DEMAND

Case 2:12-cv JRG-RSP Document 1 Filed 08/02/12 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/04/ :40 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/04/2016

Case 1:17-cv DLC Document 1 Filed 08/28/17 Page 1 of 10

Case 2:07-cv CM-JPO Document 1 Filed 07/30/2007 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND

Case 8:17-cv VMC-MAP Document 28 Filed 09/28/17 Page 1 of 3 PageID 437 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

The Law Offices. John S. Morgan, Esq.

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 06/05/16 Page 1 of 7

Case 6:17-cv EFM-GEB Document 1 Filed 07/03/17 Page 1 of 15 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS

Case 1:16-cv S-LDA Document 3 Filed 04/22/16 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 15

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT INDEPENDENCE

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 09/22/16 Page 1 of 6

thejasminebrand.com SO SO DEF PRODUCTIONS, INC., thejasminebrand.com

Case 3:14-cv TBR Document 1 Filed 07/28/14 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1

USDC IN/ND case 1:18-cv TLS-SLC document 1 filed 11/29/18 page 1 of 6. Defendant. COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 1:17-cv VEC Document 1 Filed 02/15/17 Page 1 of 6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case: 4:17-cv Doc. #: 1 Filed: 07/19/17 Page: 1 of 14 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND

USDC IN/ND case 4:18-cv JVB-JEM document 1 filed 09/16/18 page 1 of 7

Case 1:17-cv JCB Document 1 Filed 02/13/17 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Case 5:17-cv Document 2 Filed in TXSD on 01/17/17 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LAREDO DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN. v. Civil Action No. COMPLAINT

COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES. 1. Plaintiff Deanne D. Hubbard ("Dee Dee Hubbard") is a natural person and a resident

Case 2:12-cv TC Document 2 Filed 12/10/12 Page 1 of 16

Courthouse News Service

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 12/09/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1

Plaintiff SCOTT STEPHENS (hereinafter Plaintiff ) through his attorney respectfully alleges: INTRODUCTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Case 1:11-cv CMA -BNB Document 1 Filed 04/07/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Case 3:14-cv L Document 1 Filed 06/18/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID 1

Case 3:19-cv GPC-LL Document 4 Filed 03/22/19 PageID.16 Page 1 of 10

Case 3:17-mc Document Filed 08/08/17 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 23597

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND

Case: 1:15-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 01/23/15 Page 1 of 10 PageID #:1

Case 1:11-cv NLH-KMW Document 19 Filed 06/01/12 Page 1 of 19 PageID: 196 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Case 2:18-cv JTM-MBN Document 1 Filed 06/04/18 Page 1 of 22 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

IN THE DISTRICT COURT FOR ROGERS COUNTY STATE OF OKLAHOMA PETITION

Case 2:18-cv Document 1 Filed 06/22/18 Page 1 of 9

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 01/29/18 Page 1 of 14

Case: 1:17-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 05/12/17 Page 1 of 13 PageID #:1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CASE NO:

STATE OF OHIO IN THE MENTOR MUNICIPAL COURT CIVIL DIVISION. Case No. Hon. PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT (JURY DEMAND ENDORSED HERON)

Case 6:18-cv Document 1 Filed 01/31/18 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 1

Case 8:19-cv SCB-JSS Document 2 Filed 03/04/19 Page 1 of 7 PageID 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA DIVISION

Case 1:13-cv MKB-RER Document 1 Filed 01/04/13 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1. Plaintiff, Defendants. REYES, M.J PRELIMINARY STATEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA-SOUTHERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

JEFFERSON CIRCUIT COURT DIVISION JUDGE. -Filed Electronically- A.A., a minor by and through her mother and next friend, MARY AMES

Case 5:15-cv RWS Document 1 Filed 07/14/15 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1

Case 0:10-cv KMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/10/2010 Page 1 of 7

Transcription:

Case 3:11-cv-00142-CRS Document 1 Filed 03/08/11 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY AT LOUISVILLE NO. 3:11cv-142-S TYSON MIMMS ) ) Plaintiff ) v. ) COMPLAINT ) Electronically Filed A&E TELEVISION NETWORKS, LLC ) Serve: The Corporation Trust Co. ) 1209 Orange Street ) Wilmington, DE 19801 ) ) Defendant ) *** *** *** *** *** The Plaintiff, Tyson Mimms, by and through counsel, and for his Complaint against the Defendant, A&E Television Networks, LLC, states as follows: I. PARTIES 1. That Plaintiff Tyson Mimms is, and at all relevant times hereto has been, a citizen and resident of Louisville, Jefferson County, Kentucky. 2. That the Defendant A&E Television Networks, LLC (hereinafter A&E ), is, and at all times relevant hereto has been, a Delaware LLC in good standing, located and doing business at 235 East 45th Street, New York, NY 10017. A&E transacts business in Kentucky and other states through cable television and the internet, by domain names that include but are not limited to www.aetv.com and www.aetn.com.

Case 3:11-cv-00142-CRS Document 1 Filed 03/08/11 Page 2 of 6 PageID #: 2 II. JURISDICTION AND VENUE 3. The Court has subject matter jurisdiction over this lawsuit pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1332, because there is complete diversity of citizenship of the parties and the matter in controversy, exclusive of costs and interest, exceeds seventy-five thousand dollars. 4. Venue is proper in the Western District of Kentucky and this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1391 because the Defendant has committed and continues to commit tortuous acts in the Commonwealth of Kentucky and this district. III. FACTS 5. That Defendant is a television network that reaches more than 96 million homes... [and] offers a diverse mix of high quality entertainment... including the hit series... The First 48. Website of A&E Television Networks, http://www.aetn.com/about_aenetworks.html (last visited February 4, 2011). 6. That The First 48 takes viewers behind the scenes of real-life investigations as it follows homicide detectives in the critical first 48 hours of murder investigations, giving viewers unprecedented access to crime scenes, interrogations and forensic processing. Website of A&E Shows, http://www.aetv.com/the_first_48/about/ (last visited February 4, 2011). 6. That Episode 160 of The First 48, titled Eye For An Eye / Dead End (the Subject Episode ) originally aired on or about April 1, 2010, and continues to air periodically on A&E. Additionally, the episode is available to watch on the internet using the instant streaming feature of Netflix. 7. That the Subject Episode was filmed, in part, in Louisville, Kentucky, and revolves around the investigation of the shooting death of Alfred Smith. 2

Case 3:11-cv-00142-CRS Document 1 Filed 03/08/11 Page 3 of 6 PageID #: 3 8. That in the Subject Episode, an individual with a damaged eye is initially identified as the main suspect in the shooting death of Mr. Smith, and that Mr. Mimms, who has a damaged eye, is later identified by full name and photograph as the main suspect in the shooting death of Alfred Smith, and that a large portion of the Subject Episode revolves around videotaped interrogations of Mr. Mimms. 9. That the episode s title, Eye For An Eye, reflects the investigating officer s mistaken belief that Mr. Mimms murdered Mr. Smith because Mr. Smith previously injured Mr. Mimms eye. 10. That immediately after at least one interrogation, an unidentified producer of The First 48 repeatedly requested that Mr. Mimms sign a release to appear on The First 48, and that this conversation appears on a videotape of the interrogation. 11. That Mr. Mimms refused to sign a release that would allow him to appear on The First 48, and that despite Mr. Mimms refusal to sign this release, his full name and likeness repeatedly appeared on the Subject Episode. 12. That at the end of the Subject Episode, Mr. Mimms is arrested and charged with first-degree murder, and that a text message on the screen states Tyson Mimms has been charged with first-degree murder and is currently awaiting trial. 13. That Mr. Mimms did not murder Alfred Smith, and that on March 31, 2010, before the Subject Episode was initially aired, all charges against Mr. Mimms were dismissed due to a lack of evidence. 14. That the undersigned made a sufficient demand for correction relative to this false and defamatory publication, and that Defendant has failed to correct the explicit and implicit false and defamatory statements in the Subject Episodes. 3

Case 3:11-cv-00142-CRS Document 1 Filed 03/08/11 Page 4 of 6 PageID #: 4 IV. CAUSES OF ACTION Count 1 Invasion of Privacy 15. That all preceding paragraphs are incorporated as if set forth fully herein. 16. That A&E committed the tort of invasion of privacy by, among other things, unlawfully appropriating Mr. Mimms name and likeness for its own benefit. The use of Mr. Mimms damaged eye as a motive for the murder necessarily enhanced the credibility of the show and increased viewing of the Subject Episode, thereby directly financially benefiting A&E. 17. That A&E committed the tort of invasion of privacy by, among other things, unreasonably placing Mr. Mimms in a false light before the public. A&E placed Mr. Mimms in this false light by, among other things, indicating throughout the Subject Episode that Mr. Mimms murdered Mr. Smith and falsely stating that Mr. Mimms is currently awaiting trial for first-degree murder. 18. That as a direct and proximate result of the aforementioned invasion of privacy, Plaintiff has permanently lost the exclusive right of control over his likeness and image and has otherwise sustained damages, including pain and suffering and past and future lost wages, in excess of the jurisdictional limits of this Court. 19. That A&E acted with oppression, fraud, malice, or gross negligence in committing the invasion of privacy described above, and that Plaintiff is entitled to punitive damages. Count 2 Defamation 20. That all preceding paragraphs are incorporated as if set forth fully herein. 4

Case 3:11-cv-00142-CRS Document 1 Filed 03/08/11 Page 5 of 6 PageID #: 5 21. That the Subject Episode contained defamatory language regarding Plaintiff that injured and harmed the reputation of Plaintiff by lowering him in the estimation of the community and to deterring third persons from associating or dealing with him. 22. That the Subject Episode was published, and continues to be published, both on television and on the internet. 23. That the defamatory language regarding Plaintiff contained in the Subject Episode constitutes libel per se, because the language clearly and unequivocally indicates that Plaintiff committed the high crime of murder. 24. That as a direct and proximate result of the aforementioned defamation, Plaintiff has sustained damages, including pain and suffering and past and future lost wages, in excess of the jurisdictional limits of this Court. 25. That A&E acted with oppression, fraud, malice, or gross negligence in defaming Plaintiff, and that Plaintiff is entitled to punitive damages. WHEREFORE, the Plaintiff respectfully demands relief from the Defendants as follows: 1. Judgment against the Defendant in an amount calculated to fairly and reasonably compensate the Plaintiff for the damages sustained by him herein; 2. Pain and suffering damages in an amount not to exceed $1,000,000.00; 3. Punitive damages in an amount not to exceed $1,000,000.00; 4. Past and future lost wages in an amount not to exceed $1,000,000.00; 5. Pre-judgment interest; 6. Its costs herein expended, including reasonable attorneys fees; 7. Trial by jury; and 8. Any and all other relief to which it may otherwise be properly entitled. 5

Case 3:11-cv-00142-CRS Document 1 Filed 03/08/11 Page 6 of 6 PageID #: 6 Respectfully Submitted, JAMES M. BOLUS, JR. BOLUS LAW OFFICES 600 West Main Street, Suite 500 Louisville, Kentucky 40202 (502) 584-1210 (502) 584-1212 Facsimile bo@boluslaw.com A. NICHOLAS NAISER NAISER LAW OFFICE 600 West Main Street, Suite 500 Louisville, Kentucky 40202 (502) 882-5183 (502) 584-1212 Facsimile nick@boluslaw.com /s/ A. Nicholas Naiser 6