Congressional Debate. Speech. Evaluation. Speech 1 Topic: Side: Sponsor AFF NEG. Speech 2 Topic: Side: Sponsor AFF NEG

Transcription

1 Speech Evaluation ASDCA Winter Trophy Student Name: School Code: Session: Room: Chamber: Senate House #: Directions: Rate each speech 1-8 points, with one being the worst, eight being the best, providing comments to justify your rating, with constructive suggestions for improvement. At the end of the session, you will holistically and comparatively rank students, at the bottom and on a separate form. Criteria: When rating, consider the following elements and comment accordingly in the spaces provided. Originality of Thought (extent to which speech advances debate or merely repeats previously stated ideas; whether speaker refutes opposing arguments); Organization and Unity (while speeches that respond to other arguments advanced in the session are often spontaneous and extemporaneous, the speaker should attempt cohesiveness); Evidence and Logic (cites credible sources and warrants claims accordingly); Delivery (extemporaneous vs. reading a manuscript, seriousness of purpose, style and poise). A speaker may deliberately leave her/himself open to questions to demonstrate a grasp of the issues and ability to defend his/her position; how well the speaker answers should be considered. Speech 1 Topic: Side: Sponsor AFF NEG Explain your evaluation and justify your rating of both speaking and answering questions: High/Best (circle point rating) Low Speech 2 Topic: Side: Sponsor AFF NEG Explain your evaluation and justify your rating of both speaking and answering questions: High/Best (circle point rating) Low Speech 3 Topic: Side: Sponsor AFF NEG Explain your evaluation and justify your rating of both speaking and answering questions: High/Best (circle point rating) Low Questioning of Other Speakers (comment on relevance to debate, quality of clarification, etc.) At the end of the session, circle the overall ranking: High/Best 1 st 2 nd 3 rd 4 th 5 th 6 th 7 th 8 th None Print Judge Name:

2 Presiding Evaluation Student Name: School Code: Session: Room: Chamber: Senate House #: Directions: Award a rating of 2-8 points per hour of presiding, with two being the worst, eight being the best. You will rank students, holistically, at the end of the session, on the bottom of this page, and on a separate form. You may or may not include the presiding officer in your ranking. The presiding officer may also have an evaluation ballot for speaking please be sure to circle the same rank at the bottom of the speech and presiding forms. Auditions are not scored. Criteria: Knowledgeable of parliamentary procedure Clear in explaining procedures and rulings Fair and consistent in order of recognition and rulings Efficient and effective in moving chamber business along (avoiding unnecessary verbiage) Controlled the chamber and delegates (including willingness to rule dilatory motions/business out of order) Fosters a respectful, professional and collegial atmosphere Specific Comments (explain your evaluation and justify your rating, providing constructive suggestions for improvement): Circle point rating: At the end of the session, circle the overall ranking: High/Best Low X # of Hours = Total Points High/Best 1 st 2 nd 3 rd 4 th 5 th 6 th 7 th 8 th None Print Judge Name:

3 Master Ballot Session: Room: Chamber: Senate House #: Instructions: Please rank, in order of preference (1=most preferred; 8=least preferred) the top eight legislators in this session. Consider each contestant s holistic performance in the session, including an aggregate consideration of the quality of speaking or presiding. Did the contestant s actions enhance the chamber s ability to conduct legislative business, or did his/her focus on the minutia of procedures and competitive framework detract from time for others to speak? Rank Name (print legibly; use first initial if two in chamber have same last name) School Code Did you consider the Presiding Officer in your ranking? Yes No Print Judge Name:

4 Parliamentarian Ballot Session: Room: Chamber: Senate House #: Instructions: Please rank, in order of preference (1=most preferred) through the total number of legislators in your chamber. Consider each contestant s holistic performance in the session, including an aggregate consideration of the quality of speaking or presiding. Did the contestant s actions enhance the chamber s ability to conduct legislative business, or did his/her focus on the minutia of procedures and competitive framework detract from time for others to speak? Rank Name (print legibly; use first initial if two in chamber have same last name) School Code Did you consider the presiding officers in your ranking? Yes No Print Judge Name:

5 Amendment Form Legislation Title: Leg. #: Submitting Legislator: Session: Chamber: Senate House #: Line(s) affected Reviewed by Parliamentarian (Initial) Specific wording 1/3 Second: Tally Votes: Pass Fail ASDCA Winter Trophy Amendment Form Legislation Title: Leg. #: Submitting Legislator: Session: Chamber: Senate House #: Line(s) affected Reviewed by Parliamentarian (Initial) Specific wording 1/3 Second: Tally Votes: Pass Fail

6 Table of Frequently Used Parliamentary Motions Required Type Motion Purpose Vote 24. Fix time for reassembling To arrange time of next meeting Yes Yes-T Yes-T Majority Yes 23. Adjourn To dismiss the meeting Yes No Yes-T Majority No Second Required? Debatable? Amendable? May Interrupt? Privileged Incidental 22. Recess To dismiss the meeting for a specific Yes Yes Yes-T Majority No length of time 21. Rise to a question of privilege To make a personal request during No No No Decision of Yes debate 20. Call for orders of the day To force consideration of a postponed motion No No No Decision of Yes 19. Appeal a decision of the chair To reverse a decision Yes No No Majority Yes 18. Rise to a point of order or To correct a parliamentary error or No No No Decision of Yes parliamentary procedure ask a question 17. Division of the chamber To verify a voice vote No No No Decision of Yes 16. Object to the consideration To suppress action No No No 2/3 Yes of a question 15. Divide a motion To consider its parts separately Yes No Yes Majority No 14. Leave to modify or To modify or withdraw a motion No No No Majority No withdraw a motion 13. Suspend the rules To take action contrary to standing rules Yes No No 2/3 No 12. Rescind To repeal previous action Yes Yes Yes 2/3 No 11. Reconsider To consider a defeated motion again Yes Yes No Majority No 10. Take from the table To consider tabled motion Yes No No Majority No 9. Lay on the table To defer action Yes No No Majority No 8. Previous question To force an immediate vote Yes No No 2/3 No Subsidiary 7. Limit or extend debate To modify freedom of debate Yes Yes Yes-T 2/3 No 6. Postpone to a certain time To defer action Yes Yes Yes Majority Yes 5. Refer to a committee * For further study Yes Yes Yes Majority Yes 4. Amend an amendment To modify an amendment 1/3 Yes No Majority No 3. Amend To modify a motion 1/3 Yes Yes Majority No 2. Postpone indefinitely To suppress action Yes Yes No Majority No Main 1. Main motion To introduce a business Yes Yes Yes Majority No * No. 5 should include: Nos. 3 and 4 by: 1. How appointed T = Time 1. Adding (inserting) 2. The number 2. Striking (deleting) 3. Report when or to what standing committee 3. Substituting

7 Chamber Voting/ Election Record Candidate Names (list in alphabetical order by last name) Chamber: Senate Type: Single Ballot #: Session: Date: House Preferential Ballot Election for: Instructions: Enter the tally for each single ballot vote taken - or - each time preferential ballots were physically redistributed; each column s total must equal the number of ballots. #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #7 #8 #9 #10 #11 #12 Total (should be equal to # of ballots) Parliamentarian/Official Signature: Date: