Bar&Bench (

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Bar&Bench ("

Transcription

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND FOR THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH Between: W.P.(P.I.L)No. of 2017 Telangana State Panchayat Raj Civil Engineers Forum Govt. Reg. No.76 of 2013 Zilla Parishad Compound, Kharatabad, Hyderabad Rep. by its President, Er.Kodati Shyam Sunder Dy. Executive Engineer, PIU Sub Division, Kodad, Nalgonda District SBI Bank Account No , Kodad Branch ID :: Mobile No Petitioner A n d 1] State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary to Govt., General Administration (Services) Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad 2] State of Telangana, Rep. by its Chief Secretary to Govt., Secretariat Building, Hyderabad 3] State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary to Govt., Panchayat Raj & Rural Development Dept, Secretariat, Hyderabad 4] State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary to Govt., Irrigation and Command Area Development Secretariat, Hyderabad 5] State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary to Govt. Roads & Buildings Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 6] Telangana Public Service Commission, Rep. by its Secretary, Prathibha Bhavan, M.J.Road, Nampally, Hyderabad... Respondents

2 A F F I D A V I T I Kodati Shyam Sunder, S/o Lukkas Kodati, aged 57 years, President, Telangana State Panchayat Raj Civil Engineers Forum,Govt. Reg. No.76 of 2013, Zilla Parishad Compound, Kharatabad, Hyderabad, do hereby solemnly and sincerely affirm and state as hereunder: 1] PARTICULARS OF THE CAUSE/ORDER AGAINST WHICH THE PETITION IS MADE: SUBJECT MATTER IN BRIEF I respectfully submit that I am filing the present Writ Petition (PIL) as Public Interest Litigation challenging the Rule-4 of AP State and Subordinate Service Rules in so far as it relates to providing appointment into Government service as public Servant on contract/agreement/re-employment as one of the methods of appointment into Government service and also seeking direction not only restraining the State to make any appointments on contract/agreement or re-employment method and also discontinue of such appointees in filling up those posts which are included in the cadre in respective departments as per the procedure prescribed under the relevant service rules ie., either by direct recruitment or by promotion or appointment by transfer in protecting and enforcing the fundamental rights of Government civil servants who are in service and who are expecting promotion opportunity to higher post whenever such posts are available and whenever the concerned authorities intended to fill up those posts, in as much as all the posts in the cadre in respective departments supposed to be filled up following special rules as well as general rules. But because of making such appointments on contract/agreement/re-employment basis as provided in the impugned rule the promotional opportunities of the in-service candidates are being affected which and which is nothing but

3 depriving of the fundamental rights of the in-service candidates but also contrary to the method of appointment prescribed under the special rules in as much as there is no provision for appointment on contract/agreement/re-employment basis in special rules where the rules prescribed required qualifications, eligibility, service etc., either for making direct recruitment or making promotions /appointments by transfer and admittedly there is no such qualifications eligibility prescribed under the special rules for making appointment on contract/agreement/re-employment basis as provided under the impugned rule 4 of AP State and Subordinate Service Rules and similarly even there are no guidelines in exercising the extraordinary power available under Rule-4 of AP State and Subordinate Service Rules for making such appointment on contract agreement/re-employment basis. 2] PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONER: I respectfully submit that I am working as Dy. Executive Engineer, PIU Sub Division, Kodad, Nalgonda District and I was elected as President of Telangana State Panchayat Raj Civil Engineering Forum which was registered vide Registration No. 76 of 201, dt which is having is office at Zilla Parishad Compound, Khairatabad, Hyderabad. 3] Declaration and Understanding of the petitioner: I, Kodati Shyam Sunder, S/o Lukkas Kodati, aged 57 years, President, Telangana State Panchayat Raj Civil Engineers Forum,Govt. Reg. No.76 of 2013, Zilla Parishad Compound, Kharatabad, Hyderabad, having temporarily come down to Hyderabad do hereby solemnly affirm and state on oath as follows:

4 3.1] That the entire litigation costs including Advocate s fees is being borne by the petitioner. The PAN Number of the petitioner is AUIPK1443K 3.2] I respectfully submit that in recent days, the state without filling up the vacant posts either by way of promotion/appointment by transfer or direct recruitment, adopting in making appointments on contract/agreement/re-employment basis even though the posts in the cadre are not only civil posts and officers reappointed to that posts are public servants and not only special rules provide for appointment by way of direct recruitment or promotion/appointment by transfer but not other methods ie., contract/agreement/re-employment basis and even though the State framed the rules invoking either Article 309 of the Constitution of India or proviso to Article 309 of the Constitution of India as well as Article 320 of the Constitution of India; but not for making appointment on contract/agreement/re-employment in as much as the State is not having any such power to prescribe any rules invoking under Rule 309 of the Constitution of India as well as Article 320 of the Constitution of India. Therefore, prescribing for making appointments to civil posts under the State on contract basis or agreement or reemployment basis in as much as those appointees cannot be treated as public servants and there cannot be any disciplinary power vested with the State/concerned authorities in as much as the AP Civil Service Rules are not applicable to such kind of appointees who committed any misconduct while they are working on contract/agreement/reemployment basis. Therefore, making such appointments that too framing impugned rules is nothing but unconstitutional and against the sprit and concept of framing the rules for regulating the service conditions for Government employees/civil servants in the State. 4] FACTS IN BRIEF ::

5 4.1] I respectfully submit that it is the obligation on the State to fill up the posts existing in the cadre under respective departments as per the special rules prescribed by the State invoking the power vested under proviso to Article 309 of the Constitution of India ie, either by way of direct recruitment or by promotion or by appointment by transfer. 4.2] I respectfully submit that it is well settled principle of law that the State shall provide some promotional opportunities to the existing employees to enable them to develop their career as well as to see that employees shall not be subjected to dissatisfaction and providing promotional opportunities to employees is one of the duties of the State, in other words, enforcing fundamental rights of employees working in the state ie., Article 16 and 14 of the Constitution of India. 4.3] I respectfully submit that of course, it is always open to take the service of experienced, efficient and knowledgeable officers after their retirement for the purpose of taking them up as Advisors etc., in creating such a ex cadre post or any posts ad deemed fit by the respective departments but not appointing them against regular post in the cadre after their retirement or appointing any persons on contract or agreement basis in as much as the constitutional provisions not authorize the concerned states to fill up the regular posts in the cadre under the Government services which are treated as public servants either by way of contract/agreement or re-employment in as much as the relevant provision under the constitution relates to Government services ie., Article 309, 320 and 311 of the Constitution of India which only deals with the regular public servants under the State; but not other posts like contract, agreement or re-employment or newly invented outsourcing method. Therefore, there cannot be any rules prescribing method of appointment to the post under the cadre in the

6 Government services which are treated as public servants by way of contract/agreement/re-employment or outsourcing basis. 4.4 I respectfully submit that once the State created a post under the cadre, based on the requirements of such post and prescribed certain qualifications with regard to functions and duties attached to the said post, which is having nexus to the objective sought to be achieved in performing the duties, those posts shall be filled up only based on methods provided under special rules ie., direct recruitment, promotion/appointment by transfer which is the general and universal method of filling up the post under the cadre; but not by any other method. It is respectfully submitted that if the Government created any temporary posts for temporary work under temporary schemes or any other such temporary purpose, of course, it is open to the State to fill up such posts for temporary purpose on the aforesaid method that too after issuing executive instructions prescribing such method of appointment even on contract/agreement/re-employment basis to see that there cannot be any arbitrariness even for such appointments and without giving any scope for favoritism, bias or discriminating any candidate. Therefore, looking from any angle of the case, providing method of appointment by regular post under the cadre in the State service other than the method of appointment ie, direct recruitment, promotion/appointment by transfer is nothing but unconstitutional in as much as there is no constitutional provisions authorizing /enabling the State to permit the services to fill up the posts under the State on contract/agreement/re-employment basis. Therefore, any such provisions like the impugned provisions is nothing but not only unconstitutional but also violating article 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India in as much as the impugned provision is taking

7 away the right to consider the eligible candidates for such posts by way of either direct recruitment or appointment by transfer which is nothing but violating Article 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India. 4.5] I respectfully submit that after bifurcation of State of Andhra Pradesh in pursuance of AP Re-organistion Act, 2014 which came into effect from , the State of Telangana made several appointments in following impugned rule ie., either on contract basis/agreement/re-employment basis thereby existing employees in the State in respective departments, who are supposed to get promotional opportunities/appointments by transfer to higher posts, which is the reasonable expectation in the Government service by employees and who got such right under Article 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India, deprived of such promotional opportunities in as much as the State of Telangana is continuing officers/employees, who retired from services after attaining the age of superannuation ie., 58 years by way of adopting one of the methods prescribed under the impugned rule 4 of AP State and Subordinate Service Rules, ie., by way of re-employment thereby even though the officers retired from service as per the rules but not otherwise back door method they are continuing in service at the discretion of the State ie., one year, two years and three years or so. Similarly, they are discharging duties and functions attached to the regular post, in other words, which duties they perform prior to retirement and thereby the other employees who are expecting promotion as per their seniority and qualifications, deprived of their promotional opportunities and retiring from service without having promotion.

8 4.6] I respectfully submit that in so far as the Petitioner is concerned, the following officers were re-appointed invoking the impugned Rule after retirement of attaining the age of superannuation of 58 years. a) Sri I.Ganapathi Reddy, b) Sri P.Ravinder Rao, c) Sri Nazeer Ahmed d) Sri S.Ashok e) Sri Keshav Sadanand f) Sri Bala Narsaiah 4.7] I respectfully submit that I also reliably learnt that so many other officers who got similar benefits from Government; but I could not trace their names and orders. 4.8] I respectfully submit that the Petitioner is not concerned with the other appointments made against various posts in the State instrumentalities and the Petitioner is concerned only with regard to the posts in the State Government that too with regrd to the posts which are included in the cadre in various departments where the State framed special rules prescribing method of appointment to fill up such posts included in the cadre in respective departments under the respective special rules. 4.9] I respectfully submit that the concept of providing retirement age may be one of the reasons ie., to give promotional opportunities to all the employees but cannot allow such employment without having any promotion opportunities. It is respectfully submitted that in so far as my knowledge is concerned, there is no retirement age only to higher judiciary in the United States of America; but not anywhere, more particularly, in the State service. 4.10] I respectfully submit that allowing retired employees to continue in service by way of re-employment in the guise of impugned rule is nothing but increasing the age of superannuation to particular employees. It is respectfully submitted that if the State wanted to

9 increase the age of superannuation from 58 years to 60 years as was done in the State of AP, it is always open to the State of Telangana to increase the age of superannuation from 58 to 60 years invoking the authority and power vested either under Article 309 of the Constitution of India or proviso to Article 309 of the constitution of India in making enactment or framing any rules respectively which will be applicable uniformly to all employees without having any scope for arbitrariness, favoritism or discrimination. 4.11] I respectfully submit that it is also very pertinent to mention that there are no guidelines prescribed for making method of appointment as prescribed under the impugned rule, more particularly, filling up the post by way of re-employment in giving opportunity to all retired employees and following same procedure and prescribing some eligibility conditions as well as prescribing qualifications that too out side the post in the cadre. 4.12] I respectfully submit that because of such power vested with the government under the impugned rule, the State made so many such appointments to higher posts, more particularly, appointing retired officers on re-employment basis which is one of the methods prescribed under impugned rule thereby depriving of the right of other officers who topped the seniority list and who reasonably expected to get promotion whenever existing officers retired from service after attaining the age of superannuation in the State of Andhra Pradesh. 4.13] I respectfully submit that such appointments are being made more in the Engineering Services. It is not known why state making such appointments more only in the Engineering department even though higher officers in Engineering department got discretionary power to allow the works which are having higher value. There is a scope to

10 commit any irregularities, even misappropriation. It is respectfully submitted that in such an event under the statutory rules, there is no power and authority vested with the State to take any disciplinary action against such retired employees who got re-employment, in other words, there is no disciplinary jurisdiction vested with the State against retired employees for the misconduct committed by them after their retirement and during re-employment time in as much as they are not public servants and similarly, even Prevention of Corruption Act also may not be applicable for any criminal misconduct committed by officers after their re-employment in as much as they are not public servants under the definition in Prevention of Corruption Act and therefore, the State ought not to have allowed the retired employees or candidates who are appointed on contract/agreement basis to discharge the duties and functions when required posts are created in the cadre and which are supposed to be held by public servants under the State; but not other than the public servants. Therefore, looking from any angle of the case, the State shall not adopt such method but the State on various reasons, which is not in the interest of the Public, adopting such method, invoking or exercising the power vested in the impugned Rule-4 of AP State and Subordinate Service Rules. 4.14] I respectfully submit that of course, if there is no eligible, qualified and competent officer available in the department, it is always open to the State to take the services of any officer even retired officers services but not giving appointment outside the cadre in giving any other kind of designation but allow them to occupy the posts existing in the cadre. Similarly, the State cannot come to a conclusion or presume that there is no eligible candidate to occupy the posts which are vacated by officers after the retirement on attaining the age of

11 superannuation of 58 years, more particularly, in Engineering Services. It is respectfully submitted that without giving such opportunity to officers where they are competent to hold the said post or giving impression that the State acting without bias or malafide intention other than the purpose sought to be achieved in giving such re-appointment apart from following constitutional provisions. 4.15] I respectfully submit that some of the appointments made by the State of Telangana ie., appointing retired employees/officers by way of re-employment/contract/agreement are enclosed along with the Writ Petition ie., in Engineering department and I also came to know that the State is going to make some more such appointments in place who are going to retire shortly depriving of the rights of existing in-service employees/officers who got reasonable expectation of getting promotion to higher post before retirement as per the special rules as well as in the fundamental rights available to them under Article 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India. Therefore, the Petitioner approached this Hon ble Court in filing the present Writ Petition as Public interest Litigation invoking the jurisdiction of the Hon ble Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the impugned rule to the extent as stated above in as much as the state is appointing retired officers by way of re-employment/ contract agreement basis invoking and exercising the power available under the impugned Rule even without framing any guidelines to exercise such power. 4.16] I respectfully submit that the Hon ble Supreme Court in catena of decisions, categorically held that any such rule without issuing any guidelines to exercise that power is arbitrary, illegal and unconstitutional violating Article 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India. Therefore, the Petitioner is compelled to challenge that Rule.

12 4.17] I respectfully submit that it is also very pertinent to mention that when the Government issued G.O.Ms.no. 55, Finance Department, dt wherein the Government advised to categorically review re-appointment/re-employment of the retired personnel already permitted in their department with reference to their expertise and examine necessity to continue them as consultants/osds and advisors observing that certain departments in the secretariat are appointing retired personnel as officers on special duty on contract basis and giving regular posts depriving of the appointments of regular employees and the said OSDs are entrusted no special duty but only retained the work which they used to attend prior to their retirement in respective departments, stating that these appointments are hampering promotional avenues of regular employees and preventing them to learn work and gain some experience in some focal areas and also noticing that certain departments are recommending such appointments in a very routine manner without establishing any expertise or skills; but allowing retired employees appointing against regular posts included in the cadre on contract basis is nothing but arbitrary, illegal, discriminatory etc., and hostile discrimination in as much as the Government even not allowing such appointments of retired employees even against the post of Advisors and Consultants but allowing to appointment against the regular posts on contract basis instead of directing the authorities not to make such contract employment against the regular posts and also directing concerned authorities to replace such contract appointees against the regular posts in the cadre by regular officers in service as per the rules is nothing but arbitrary and discriminatory violating Article 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India.

13 5. SOURCE OF INFORMATION: I am able to get the aforesaid information being President of the Association as the orders issued by the Government in appointing retired employees on re-employment basis is very much available and accessed in the Telangana Government online. 6. NATURE OF EXTENT OF INJURY CAUSED / APPREHENDED :: I respectfully submit that in the event of not granting relief as sought in the present Writ Petition, not only the eligible and qualified senior officers in the department will deprive of their promotion opportunities for which they are entitled as per the special rules issued under proviso to Article 309 of the Constitution of India but also the officers who enjoyed various posts as public servants in the Government services are again getting such position at the cost of existing employees and therefore, it is appropriate to seek relief restraining the State from making any appointments by way of contract/agreement/reemployment basis invoking the power under impugned Rule-4 of AP State and Subordinate Service Rules and restraining the Respondents from allowing officers/employees, who were appointed on contract/agreement/re-employment basis to continue in service to enable the concerned appointing authorities to fill up all the existing posts as per the rules provided under special rules read with general rules in protecting and enforcing the fundamental rights of the existing employees in the State of Andhra Pradesh as well as enforcing their legal rights available under various provisions under special/general rules. 7. ANY REPRESENTATION MADE: I respectfully submit that the Petitioner not made any representation in as much as the Petitioner challenged the rule issued by the State under

14 proviso to Article 309 of the constitution of India which is the basis for making such appointments as stated above. 8. DELAY IF ANY: It is respectfully submitted that there is no delay in filing the present Writ Petition in as much as the Petitioner challenging the Rule issued by the State under proviso to Article 309 of the Constitution of India which is the basis for making such appointments as stated above. 9. DOCUMENTS RELIED UPON ARE: 1) G.O.Rt.no. 14, dt ) G.O.Rt.no. 574, dt ) G.O.Rt.no. 634, dt ) G.O.Ms.No. 55, dt ) G.O.Rt.No. 603, dt ) G.O.Rt.No. 114, dt ) G.O.Rt.no. 115, dt ) G.O.Rt.no. 116, dt ) G.O.Rt.No. 621, dt ) G.O.Rt.No. 620, dt ) G.O.Rt.No.609, dt ) Copy of Pan Card 13) Copy of Bank Pass book 14) Copy of Aadhar Card 15) Copy of Elector Photo Identity Card 10. I respectfully submit that I have no other efficacious alternative remedy except to approach this Hon'ble Court for relief under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. 11] I further submit that I have not filed any other suit, writ or any other proceedings for the same relief in any other Court, Tribunal or authority in India. 12. MAIN RELIEF PRAYER IS AS FOLLOWS: In the circumstances, it is therefore prayed that this Hon ble Court may be pleased to grant appropriate relief more in the nature of Writ of Mandamus under Article 226 of the Constitution of India declaring Rule-4 of AP State and Subordinate Service Rules in so far as it relates to 4 th method of appointment ie., contract/agreement/re-employment as arbitrary, illegal, discriminatory and unconstitutional violating Article 14, 16 and 21

15 of the Constitution of India apart from violating proviso to Article 309 of the Constitution of India and set aside the same and issue consequential and further directions restraining the Respondents from making any appointments on contract/agreement/re-employment basis against the regular post in the cadre of respective departments and further direct the Respondents to forthwith replace such appointees by promoting eligible and qualified officers as per their seniority as per the sub rules as well as general rules and pass such other order or orders as this Hon ble Court deems fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. 13. INTERIM PRAYER: i) In the circumstances, it is therefore prayed that this Honorable High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents not to make any appointments by way of contract/agreement/re-employment as provided under Rule-4 of AP State and Subordinate Service Rules against the regular posts included in the regular cadre strength in respective departments in the State of Telangana pending disposal of the Writ Petition. ii) In the circumstances, it is also prayed that this Hon ble High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents to forthwith replace the appointments made by way of contract/agreement/re-employment basis as provided under Rule-4 of AP State and Subordinate Service Rules against the regular posts included under regular cadre in the respective departments in the state of Telangana by regular candidates by way of making promotion/appointments by transfer as prescribed under sub rules read with general rules pending disposal of the Writ Petition.

16 14. Caveat : It is submitted that no notice has been received of lodging a caveat by the Respondents. 15. I submit that, I had no faced Contempt of Court proceedings under the Contempt of Courts Act, I have not been ordered by the Honorable High Court or any other court not to file Public Interest Litigation cases. 17. I submit that, I am not involved in a Civil, Criminal and Revenue cases which have any nexus with present Public Interest Litigation. 18. I hereby solemnly state under oath affirm and declare that the writ petition is being instituted purely in public Interest and not at the instance of any other person or organization other than the petitioner. 19. I hereby solemnly state on oath and affirm and declare that the question raised in the Writ Petition has not been raised or agitated earlier and that there are no other case(s) or Petition(s) filed or that are pending before this Hon ble Court or any other forum or court to the best of my knowledge and, research and belief. Sworn and signed before me on this the day of October 2017 at Hyderabad Before me, Advocate/Hyderabad VERIFICATION I, Kodati Shyam Sunder, S/o Lukkas Kodati, aged 57 years, President, Telangana State Panchayat Raj Civil Engineers Forum,Govt. Reg. No.76 of 2013, Zilla Parishad Compound, Kharatabad, Hyderabad, being the Petitioner/person acquainted with the facts of the case, do hereby

17 declare that the contents of paras 1 to 19 are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief and legal advice tendered by my counsel with I believe to be true and correct. ADVOCATE Hence verified the same on this the day of October, ANNEXURE-7A IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND FOR THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH (RULE 4 (e) OF THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA Public Interest Litigation Rules, 2015 Between: W.P.(P.I.L)No. of 2017 Telangana State Panchayat Raj Civil Engineers Forum Govt. Reg. No.76 of 2013 Zilla Parishad Compound, Kharatabad, Hyderabad Rep. by its President, Er.Kodati Shyam Sunder Dy. Executive Engineer, PIU Sub Division, Kodad, Nalgonda District SBI Bank Account No , Kodad Branch ID :: sunder299@gmail.com Mobile No Petitioner A n d 1] State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary to Govt., General Administration (Services) Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad 2] State of Telangana, Rep. by its Chief Secretary to Govt., Secretariat Building, Hyderabad 3] State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary to Govt., Panchayat Raj & Rural Development Dept, Secretariat, Hyderabad 4] State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary to Govt., Irrigation and Command Area Development Secretariat, Hyderabad

18 5] State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary to Govt. Roads & Buildings Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 6] Telangana Public Service Commission, Rep. by its Secretary, Prathibha Bhavan, M.J.Road, Nampally, Hyderabad... Respondents AFFIDAVIT FILED UNDER RULE 7 A OF WRIT PROCEEDINGS RULES I, Kodati Shyam Sunder, S/o Lukkas Kodati, aged 57 years, President, Telangana State Panchayat Raj Civil Engineers Forum,Govt. Reg. No.76 of 2013, Zilla Parishad Compound, Kharatabad, Hyderabad, do hereby solemnly affirm and state on oath as follows: 1. I hereby affirm and state on oath that the petitioner herein have no personal interest in the subject matter of the petition. The petitioner hereby undertake to pay exemplary costs and / or compensatory damages as directed by this court in the event of a contrary finding upon adjudication by the court that the Writ petition is filed for extraneous / personal considerations or with an oblique motive. Verify in my presence at Hyderabad on this the day of October Advocate VERIFICATION I, Kodati Shyam Sunder, S/o Lukkas Kodati, aged 57 years, President, Telangana State Panchayat Raj Civil Engineers Forum,Govt. Reg. No.76 of 2013, Zilla Parishad Compound, Kharatabad, Hyderabad, being the Petitioner/person acquainted with the facts of the case, do hereby declare that the contents of paras 1 are true and correct to the

19 best of my knowledge and belief and legal advice tendered by my counsel with I believe to be true and correct. Hence verified the same on this the day of October Advocate Before me Advocate for Petitioner ANNEXURE 10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND FOR THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH (RULE 4 (e) OF THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA Public Interest Litigation Rules, 2015 W.P.(P.I.L)No. of 2017 Between: Telangana State Panchayat Raj Civil Engineers Forum Govt. Reg. No.76 of 2013 Zilla Parishad Compound, Kharatabad, Hyderabad Rep. by its President, Er.Kodati Shyam Sunder Dy. Executive Engineer, PIU Sub Division, Kodad, Nalgonda District SBI Bank Account No , Kodad Branch ID :: sunder299@gmail.com Mobile No Petitioner A n d 1] State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary to Govt., General Administration (Services) Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad 2] State of Telangana, Rep. by its Chief Secretary to Govt., Secretariat Building, Hyderabad 3] State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary to Govt., Panchayat Raj & Rural Development Dept,

20 Secretariat, Hyderabad 4] State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary to Govt., Irrigation and Command Area Development Secretariat, Hyderabad 5] State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary to Govt. Roads & Buildings Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 6] Telangana Public Service Commission, Rep. by its Secretary, Prathibha Bhavan, M.J.Road, Nampally, Hyderabad... Respondents AFFIDAVIT FILED UNDER RULE 7 A OF WRIT PROCEEDINGS RULES I,. Kodati Shyam Sunder, S/o Lukkas Kodati, aged 57 years, President, Telangana State Panchayat Raj Civil Engineers Forum,Govt. Reg. No.76 of 2013, Zilla Parishad Compound, Kharatabad, Hyderabad, do hereby solemnly affirm and state on oath as follows: 1. I state that I have no personal gain or private oblique motive in filing the above writ petition/p.i.l. 2. I, hereby undertake to pay exemplary costs and / or compensatory damages as directed by this court in the event of a contrary finding upon adjudication by the court that the Writ Petition is filed for extraneous / personal considerations or with an oblique motive. 3. I submit that all the information based on which the writ petition has been filed based on personal research and contacting the aggrieved persons. I undertake to furnish any additional information as may be directed by the Hon ble Court. 4. I undertake that if I seek permission to withdraw the above writ petition or if I do not attend the hearing of the case either by myself or

21 my advocate, I shall bear the costs incurred by the respondents and any such additional costs as may be imposed in the discretion of this Hon ble Court. 5. I undertake that in the event of I wish to withdraw the above writ petition after the same is admitted, I shall do so only by filing an appropriate petition and not by any other method except with the leave of this Hon ble Court. Hyderabad Date : 15 th day of October 2017 Advocate VERIFICATION I, Kodati Shyam Sunder, S/o Lukkas Kodati, aged 57 years, President, Telangana State Panchayat Raj Civil Engineers Forum,Govt. Reg. No.76 of 2013, Zilla Parishad Compound, Kharatabad, Hyderabad, being the Petitioner/person acquainted with the facts of the case, do hereby declare that the contents of paras 1 to 5 are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief and legal advice tendered by my counsel with I believe to be true and correct. Advocate Hence verified the same on this the day of October Before me Advocate for Petitioner

Bar & Bench ( SYNOPSIS

Bar & Bench (  SYNOPSIS SYNOPSIS That the petitioner is approaching this Hon ble Court seeking a writ in the nature of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, and thereby defer the implementation of Notification published in

More information

Bar&Bench (

Bar&Bench ( 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Rule 4(e) of The High Court of Judicature at Hyderabad for the State of Telangana and the State

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD DISTRICT: AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO OF 2008 AND AND AND AND AND. In the matter between;

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD DISTRICT: AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO OF 2008 AND AND AND AND AND. In the matter between; IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD DISTRICT: AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 14664 OF 2008 In the matter of a petition under Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India; AND In the matter

More information

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) PRINCIPAL SEAT AT GUWAHATI (EXTRAORDINARY WRIT JURISDICTION) WP(C) No.2855 of 2010 Ramesh Goswami Writ Petitioner

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO: OF In the matter:

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO: OF In the matter: IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD DISTRICT: AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO: OF 2018 In the matter: i) Article 226 and 14 of the Constitution of India. ii) The Advocates Act, 1961 iii) The

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI WP( C ) NO (IN THE MATTER OF PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI WP( C ) NO (IN THE MATTER OF PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION) IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI WP( C ) NO.. 2017 (IN THE MATTER OF PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION) IN THE MATTER OF : JOGINDER KUMAR SUKHIJA S/o Sh.Prabhu Dayal Sukhija R/o 174, IInd Floor, Avtar

More information

Rio. Koniki Village, Pedapadu Mandal,

Rio. Koniki Village, Pedapadu Mandal, IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD FOR THE STATE OF TELANAGANA AND FOR THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH Contempt Case No.1003 of 2017 IN WP.No.41794 of 2016 Between: l.yelamanchili Sri Chaitanya Dev,

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS (Special Original Jurisdiction) Versus

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS (Special Original Jurisdiction) Versus IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS (Special Original Jurisdiction) W.P. No.1366 of 2018 E.Vijay Anand, S/o. Aranga Ellangovan, Advocate, No.5/3, Pranav Apartments, Seethammal Main Road, Alwarpet,

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL WRIT JURISDICTION I.A NO OF 2012 WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. OF 2012 ASSAM SANMILITA MAHASANGHA & ORS

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL WRIT JURISDICTION I.A NO OF 2012 WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. OF 2012 ASSAM SANMILITA MAHASANGHA & ORS IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL WRIT JURISDICTION I.A NO OF 2012 IN WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. OF 2012 IN THE MATTER OF: ASSAM SANMILITA MAHASANGHA & ORS PETITIONERS VERSUS UNION OF INDIA &

More information

Bar & Bench (

Bar & Bench ( IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRL.) NO OF 2018 (WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF) (ARISING FROM THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT AND FINAL ORDER DATED 05.01.2018

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 4 TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2015 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE K.N.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 4 TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2015 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE K.N. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 4 TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2015 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE K.N. PHANEENDRA W.P. Nos. 63936/2012 & 64365/2012 (S-REG) BETWEEN: 1. RAMA S/O. NARAYAN

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS (Special Original Jurisdiction) W.P. No. of 2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS (Special Original Jurisdiction) W.P. No. of 2018 MEMORANDUM OF WRIT PETITION (Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS (Special Original Jurisdiction) W.P. No. of 2018 Revenue Bar Association New No. 115

More information

GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH ABSTRACT

GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH ABSTRACT GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH ABSTRACT PUBLIC SERVICES - Revision of Pay Scales - Recommendations of the Pay Revision Commissioner -Orders- Issued. FINANCE & PLANNING (FIN.WING PRC.I) DEPARTMENT G.O.Ms.No.288

More information

Draft of Public Interest Writ Petition Against Restrictions on Withdrawals from Bank Accounts

Draft of Public Interest Writ Petition Against Restrictions on Withdrawals from Bank Accounts Draft of Public Interest Writ Petition Against Restrictions on Withdrawals from Bank Accounts By Anil Chawla Law Associates LLP We are of the opinion that Government of India and Reserve Bank of India

More information

RESPONDENTS. Article 14 read with Article 19 (1) G. Article 246 read with entry 77 list 1, 7 th schedule.

RESPONDENTS. Article 14 read with Article 19 (1) G. Article 246 read with entry 77 list 1, 7 th schedule. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA (EXTRAORDINARY CIVIL JURISDICTION) CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. ------------OF 2010 IN THE MATTER OF : Fatehpal Singh Singh R/o Panchkula PETITIONER VERSUS 1. Union of

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No. 298 of 2013 ------- Md. Rizwan Akhtar son of Late Md. Suleman, resident of Ahmad Lane, Azad Basti, Gumla, P.O, P.S. and District: Gumla... Petitioner

More information

Bar & Bench (www.barandbench.com)

Bar & Bench (www.barandbench.com) DISTRICT : KOLKATA IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE W.P. No. (W) of 2017 In the matter of :- An application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India ;

More information

2 4. RahulRaj Mall Notice to be served upon its Authorized Representative Notice to be served its Authorized Representative Dumas Road, Magdalla, Sura

2 4. RahulRaj Mall Notice to be served upon its Authorized Representative Notice to be served its Authorized Representative Dumas Road, Magdalla, Sura 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD DISTRICT: SURAT WRIT PETITION NO. OF 2018 (PIL) (EXTRA ORDINARY JURISDICTION) Ref: In the matter of Public Interest Litigation related to collection and levy

More information

SYNOPSIS. By this present Writ Petition under Article 32 of the Constitution of. India, the Petitioners are seeking to challenge the manner in which

SYNOPSIS. By this present Writ Petition under Article 32 of the Constitution of. India, the Petitioners are seeking to challenge the manner in which SYNOPSIS By this present Writ Petition under Article 32 of the Constitution of India, the Petitioners are seeking to challenge the manner in which electoral rolls have been prepared and maintained by the

More information

THE ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNALS ACT, 1985 ACT NO. 13 OF 1985 [27th February, 1985.]

THE ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNALS ACT, 1985 ACT NO. 13 OF 1985 [27th February, 1985.] THE ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNALS ACT, 1985 ACT NO. 13 OF 1985 [27th February, 1985.] An Act to provide for the adjudication or trial by Administrative Tribunals of disputes and complaints with respect to recruitment

More information

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) PRINCIPAL SEAT AT GUWAHATI (EXTRAORDINARY WRIT JURISDICTION) WP(C) No.2171 of 2017 Moizuddin Ahmed.. Petitioner

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS OF 2019

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS OF 2019 1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 73-74 OF 2019 HIGH COURT OF HYDERABAD FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, THROUGH ITS REGISTRAR

More information

WP(C) No.810/2015 BEFORE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE UJJAL BHUYAN

WP(C) No.810/2015 BEFORE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE UJJAL BHUYAN 14.05.2015 WP(C) No.810/2015 BEFORE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE UJJAL BHUYAN Heard Mr. SK Goswami, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. P Roy, learned Addl. Advocate General, Assam assisted by Ms. B Hazarika,

More information

Writ Appeal No.45 of 2014

Writ Appeal No.45 of 2014 IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, ARUNACHAL PRADESH AND MIZORAM) Writ Appeal No.45 of 2014 Appellant: The State of Assam represented by the Commissioner and Secretary to the

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION 1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REPORTABLE CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 10583-10585 OF 2017 [@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) NO(S). 36057-36059 OF 2016] MUNJA PRAVEEN & ORS. ETC. ETC....

More information

Bar & Bench (

Bar & Bench ( IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA (CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION) 1 I.A. NO. OF 2018 IN WRIT PETITION (C) No. OF 2018 [UNDER ARTICLE 32 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA] BETWEEN: DR. G. PARAMESHWAR & ANR. PETITIONER(s)

More information

790 THE PUNJAB LAW REPORTER (2018)1 SCeJ

790 THE PUNJAB LAW REPORTER (2018)1 SCeJ 790 THE PUNJAB LAW REPORTER (2018)1 SCeJ (2018)1 SCeJ 790 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Present: CJI Dipak Misra, Justice A M Khanwilkar and Justice Dr D Y Chandrachud, JJ. ASOK PANDE Petitioner, Versus SUPREME

More information

under the Right to Information Act about action taken if any on the complaint/representations made by him to the Governor of Goa against Advocate

under the Right to Information Act about action taken if any on the complaint/representations made by him to the Governor of Goa against Advocate SYNOPSIS AND LIST OF DATES DATES DATES 29.11.2010 Respondent No.3 herein sought information under the Right to Information Act about action taken if any on the complaint/representations made by him to

More information

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. Judgement delivered on: 12 th January, W.P.(C) 7068/2014

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. Judgement delivered on: 12 th January, W.P.(C) 7068/2014 $~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgement delivered on: 12 th January, 2016 + W.P.(C) 7068/2014 RAJINDER PAL MALIK... Petitioner Represented by: Dr. Jose P. Verghese and Mr. Jawahar Singh,

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 9 TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2014 B E F O R E THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 9 TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2014 B E F O R E THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 9 TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2014 B E F O R E THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N. VENUGOPALA GOWDA WRIT PETITION NO.58968/2013 (LB-RES) BETWEEN: K.J. Basavaraj,

More information

COURT NO. 2, ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI O.A. NO. 140 OF 2009

COURT NO. 2, ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI O.A. NO. 140 OF 2009 COURT NO. 2, ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI O.A. NO. 140 OF 2009 O.A. No. 140/2009 IN THE MATTER OF:...Applicant Through : Mr. P.D.P. Deo with Ms. Monica Nagi, counsels for the Applicant

More information

Facts leading to filing of OA No. 514/2002 before Hon,ble CAT, Patna Bench for grant of the benefits of the ACP scheme of 1999

Facts leading to filing of OA No. 514/2002 before Hon,ble CAT, Patna Bench for grant of the benefits of the ACP scheme of 1999 Facts leading to filing of OA No. 514/2002 before Hon,ble CAT, Patna Bench for grant of the benefits of the ACP scheme of 1999 1. The posts of Engineering Assistant (EA), Senior Engineering Assistant (SEA),

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE ON THE 24 TH DAY OF MARCH, 2014 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR JUSTICE K L MANJUNATH AND THE HON BLE MR JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH Writ Petition No. 20807 of 2010 (S-KAT)

More information

Bar & Bench (

Bar & Bench ( In the High Court of Judicature at Madras Dated : 06.11.2017 Coram The Honourable Mr.Justice T.S.SIVAGNANAM W.P.No.28181 of 2017 & WMP.No.30311 of 2017 Mr.Thiagarajan Kumararaja...Petitioner Vs 1.Union

More information

, W.P. No of2016

, W.P. No of2016 IN THE HON'BLE HICH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD f FOR THE STATE OFTELANCANAANDTHE STATE OF *. ANDHRA PRADESH Between:, W.P. No 31352 of2016 1. Bongu Papa Rao, S/o.B.Chinna Appala Swami, aged about

More information

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) WP(C) 1140/2015 & WP(C) 2945/2015. Sri Vidyut Bikash Bora

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) WP(C) 1140/2015 & WP(C) 2945/2015. Sri Vidyut Bikash Bora IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) WP(C) 1140/2015 & WP(C) 2945/2015 Sri Vidyut Bikash Bora -Vs-...Petitioner M/s. Indian Oil Corporation Ltd.

More information

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. + ARB.A. 5/2015 & IA 2340/2015 (for stay) versus

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. + ARB.A. 5/2015 & IA 2340/2015 (for stay) versus * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ARB.A. 5/2015 & IA 2340/2015 (for stay) Judgment reserved on February 05, 2015 Judgment delivered on February 13, 2015 M/S VARUN INDUSTRIES LTD & ORS... Appellants

More information

Objections to the Nominations sent by Telengana Kabaddi Association (TKA) for the Electoral College of AKFI

Objections to the Nominations sent by Telengana Kabaddi Association (TKA) for the Electoral College of AKFI Objections to the Nominations sent by Telengana Kabaddi Association (TKA) for the Electoral College of AKFI O R D E R State of Telengana came into existence with the bifurcation of State of Andhra Pradesh

More information

Date and Event. 22/12/2008 The Information and Technology Act, 2000 was. 22/12/2008 The Information and Technology Act, 2000 was

Date and Event. 22/12/2008 The Information and Technology Act, 2000 was. 22/12/2008 The Information and Technology Act, 2000 was 3 Date and Event 22/12/2008 The Information and Technology Act, 2000 was amended by Information Technology (Amendment) Bill 2008 and was passed by the Lok Sabha. 22/12/2008 The Information and Technology

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU PRESENT THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE H.G.RAMESH AND THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK G.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU PRESENT THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE H.G.RAMESH AND THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK G. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13 TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2018 PRESENT THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE H.G.RAMESH R AND THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK G.NIJAGANNAVAR WRIT PETITION NO.45916/2018

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE B.S. PATIL WRIT PETITION NO OF 2012 [S-R]

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE B.S. PATIL WRIT PETITION NO OF 2012 [S-R] IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 28 TH DAY OF MARCH 2016 BETWEEN BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE B.S. PATIL WRIT PETITION NO.72291 OF 2012 [S-R] SRI RAMADAS S/O. DURGAPPA SIRSIKAR

More information

HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE H.N.DEVANI. KANUBHAI M PATEL HUF - Petitioner(s) Versus

HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE H.N.DEVANI. KANUBHAI M PATEL HUF - Petitioner(s) Versus IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No. 5295 of 2010 WITH SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO.5296 OF 2010 AND SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO.5297 OF 2010 HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA

More information

- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 2 nd DAY OF JULY, 2012 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR

- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 2 nd DAY OF JULY, 2012 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR - 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 2 nd DAY OF JULY, 2012 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR W.P.NO. 45305/2011 (L-PG) BETWEEN: C.D ANANDA RAO S/O SRI DALAPPA AGED

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION. WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.933 OF Dr. RAM LAKHAN SINGH. PETITIONER

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION. WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.933 OF Dr. RAM LAKHAN SINGH. PETITIONER 1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.933 OF 2014 Dr. RAM LAKHAN SINGH. PETITIONER VERSUS STATE GOVERNMENT OF UTTAR PRADESH THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY.

More information

W.P.(C) No of 2013

W.P.(C) No of 2013 W.P.(C) No. 3177 of 2013 BEFORE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE MANASH RANJAN PATHAK 31.07.2017 Heard Mr. Bhaskar Dev Konwar, learned senior counsel assisted by Ms. Sheema Bhuyan, learned counsel appearing for the

More information

Prof. Krishnapada Dash & Ors. -Versus- The State of West Bengal & Ors. Mr. L. C. Bihani, Mr. N. C. Bihani. For the petitioner.

Prof. Krishnapada Dash & Ors. -Versus- The State of West Bengal & Ors. Mr. L. C. Bihani, Mr. N. C. Bihani. For the petitioner. 1 11th June, 2014 (Sm) W. P.26356 (W) of 2013 Prof. Krishnapada Dash & Ors. -Versus- The State of West Bengal & Ors. Mr. L. C. Bihani, Mr. N. C. Bihani. For the petitioner. Mr. Sadananda Ghanguly, Mr.

More information

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM; NAGALAND; MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM; NAGALAND; MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Page 1 IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM; NAGALAND; MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Writ Petition (C) No. 1961 of 2010 Smt. Padma Rani Mudai Hazarika - Versus - - Petitioner Union of India

More information

GOVERNMENT OF TELANGANA ABSTRACT

GOVERNMENT OF TELANGANA ABSTRACT GOVERNMENT OF TELANGANA ABSTRACT MINES & MINERALS The Telangana State Sand Mining Rules, 2015 Amendments Orders - Issued. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

More information

MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT(G1) DEPARTMENT G.O. Ms. No. 17, Dated : Read the following :-

MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT(G1) DEPARTMENT G.O. Ms. No. 17, Dated : Read the following :- GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH ABSTRACT ESTABLISHHMENT Andhra Pradesh Municipal Ministerial Subordinate Service (APMMSS) Andhra Pradesh Municipal Ministerial Subordinate Service Rules Orders Issued MUNICIPAL

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO(s). 9921-9923 OF 2016 (Arising out of SLP (Civil) No(s).10163-10165 of 2015) GOVT. OF BIHAR AND ORS. ETC. ETC. Appellant(s)

More information

Tamil Nadu Association For The... vs The Principal Secretary on 9 January, 2013

Tamil Nadu Association For The... vs The Principal Secretary on 9 January, 2013 Madras High Court Tamil Nadu Association For The... vs The Principal Secretary on 9 January, 2013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 09.01.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.HARI PARANTHAMAN

More information

GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH ABSTRACT SOCIAL WELFARE (SW.ROR1) DEPARTMENT

GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH ABSTRACT SOCIAL WELFARE (SW.ROR1) DEPARTMENT GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH ABSTRACT Social Welfare Department Public Services Representation of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes categories in the State and Sub-ordinate Services Policy of providing

More information

THE WEST BENGAL LAND REFORMS AND TENANCY TRIBUNAL ACT, 1997 (WEST BENGAL ACT 25 OF

THE WEST BENGAL LAND REFORMS AND TENANCY TRIBUNAL ACT, 1997 (WEST BENGAL ACT 25 OF THE WEST BENGAL LAND REFORMS AND TENANCY TRIBUNAL ACT, 1997 (WEST BENGAL ACT 25 OF 1997) [Passed by the West Bengal Legislature] [Assent of the Governor was first published in the Calcutta Gazette, Extraordinary,

More information

RESPONDENT: D.S. Mathur, Secretary,Department of Telecommunications

RESPONDENT: D.S. Mathur, Secretary,Department of Telecommunications SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CASE NO.: Contempt Petition (civil) 248 of 2007 PETITIONER: Promotee Telecom Engineers Forum & Ors. RESPONDENT: D.S. Mathur, Secretary,Department of Telecommunications DATE OF JUDGMENT:

More information

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (The High Court of Assam, Nagaland, Mizoram and Arunachal Pradesh) Small Industries Development Bank of India ( SIDBI)

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (The High Court of Assam, Nagaland, Mizoram and Arunachal Pradesh) Small Industries Development Bank of India ( SIDBI) Review Petition No. 73/2013 (Arising out of Misc. Case No. 705/2013 In FAO 6/2013) IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (The High Court of Assam, Nagaland, Mizoram and Arunachal Pradesh) Small Industries Development

More information

THE MAHARASHTRA EMPLOYEES OF PRIVATE SCHOOLS (CONDITIONS OF SERVICE) REGULATION ACT, [3 of 1978] 1. (Amended upto Mah.

THE MAHARASHTRA EMPLOYEES OF PRIVATE SCHOOLS (CONDITIONS OF SERVICE) REGULATION ACT, [3 of 1978] 1. (Amended upto Mah. THE MAHARASHTRA EMPLOYEES OF PRIVATE SCHOOLS (CONDITIONS OF SERVICE) REGULATION ACT, 1977 [3 of 1978] 1 (Amended upto Mah. 9 of 2012) [20th March, 1978] An Act to regulate recruitment and conditions of

More information

Case :- SERVICE BENCH No of Hon'ble Shri Narayan Shukla,J. Hon'ble Sheo Kumar Singh-I,J.

Case :- SERVICE BENCH No of Hon'ble Shri Narayan Shukla,J. Hon'ble Sheo Kumar Singh-I,J. -1- Court No. - 2 Reserved Case :- SERVICE BENCH No. - 1345 of 2014 Petitioner :- Junaid Ahmad Respondent :- Visitor Interal University Lko./His Excellency The Governor Counsel for Petitioner :- Santosh

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION TRANSFERRED CASE (CIVIL) NO(S). 11 OF Versus

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION TRANSFERRED CASE (CIVIL) NO(S). 11 OF Versus 1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION REPORTABLE TRANSFERRED CASE (CIVIL) NO(S). 11 OF 2017 LT. CDR. M. RAMESH...PETITIONER(S) Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. RESPONDENT(S) (WITH I.A.

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI L. P. A. No. 511 of 2009

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI L. P. A. No. 511 of 2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI L. P. A. No. 511 of 2009 1.State of Bihar 2.Secretary, Home (Special) Department, Government of Bihar, Patna Appellants Versus 1.Ravindra Prasad Singh 2.State of

More information

In the High Court of Judicature at Madras

In the High Court of Judicature at Madras In the High Court of Judicature at Madras (Special Original Jurisdiction) W.P. No. of 2017 H. Navas Basha 24/21, Bharathidasan Street Nehru Nagar Velachery Chennai 600 042 vs 1. The Bar Council of India

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 7843 OF 2009 CHAIRMAN, BOARD OF TRUSTEE, APPELLANT(s) SRI RAM MANDIR JAGTIAL KARIMNAGAR DISTRICT, A.P VERSUS S. RAJYALAXMI

More information

(BY SRI D.N.NANJUNDA REDDY, SENIOR COUNSEL FOR SRI L M CHIDANANDAYYA, ADVOCATE) A N D

(BY SRI D.N.NANJUNDA REDDY, SENIOR COUNSEL FOR SRI L M CHIDANANDAYYA, ADVOCATE) A N D IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 24 TH DAY OF JUNE 2014 PRESENT HON BLE MR. D.H.WAGHELA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND HON BLE MR. JUSTICE H.G.RAMESH WRIT PETITION Nos.11940 & 19975 / 2014

More information

A.F.R. Judgment delivered on

A.F.R. Judgment delivered on A.F.R. Judgment delivered on 19.12.2014 Court No. - 1 Case :- WRIT TAX No. - 478 of 2014 Petitioner :- M/S Sandeep Bulk Carriers Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Ors. Counsel for Petitioner :- M.K. Pandey

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF J HARKHAND AT RANCHI. W.P.(C) No of Rajendra Tudu 2. Ramesh Turi 3. Prafulla Chandra Das...

IN THE HIGH COURT OF J HARKHAND AT RANCHI. W.P.(C) No of Rajendra Tudu 2. Ramesh Turi 3. Prafulla Chandra Das... IN THE HIGH COURT OF J HARKHAND AT RANCHI. W.P.(C) No. 7472 of 2013 1. Rajendra Tudu 2. Ramesh Turi 3. Prafulla Chandra Das..... Petitioners Versus 1. State of Jharkhand 2. Principal Secretary, Ministry

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO 147 OF 2018 VERSUS J U D G M E N T

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO 147 OF 2018 VERSUS J U D G M E N T 1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO 147 OF 2018 ASOK PANDE..Petitioner VERSUS SUPREME COURT OF INDIA THR.ITS REGISTRAR AND ORS...Respondents

More information

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MEGHALAYA, MANIPUR,

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MEGHALAYA, MANIPUR, IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MEGHALAYA, MANIPUR, TRIPURA, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) WP (C) No. 3522/2000 1. Dhansiri Valley Project Oil and Natural Gas Commission

More information

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH : JABALPUR. W.P. No.750/2017. Bar Association Lahar, Dist. Bhind -Versus- State Bar Council of M.

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH : JABALPUR. W.P. No.750/2017. Bar Association Lahar, Dist. Bhind -Versus- State Bar Council of M. HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH : JABALPUR W.P. No.750/2017 Bar Association Lahar, Dist. Bhind -Versus- State Bar Council of M.P and another Shri Sameer Seth, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri R.K. Sahu,

More information

ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW. Original Application No. 113 of Monday, this the 17 th day of April, 2017

ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW. Original Application No. 113 of Monday, this the 17 th day of April, 2017 1 ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW A.F.R. (Court No. 1) List A Original Application No. 113 of 2016 Monday, this the 17 th day of April, 2017 Hon ble Mr. Justice D.P. Singh, Member (J) Hon

More information

IN THE COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

IN THE COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY 1 IN THE COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY (APPELLATE SIDE) (Rule 4(c) OF THE BOMBAY HIGH COURT PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION RULES 2010) DISTRICT: MUMBAI PIL PETITION NO. OF 2016 In the matter of Articles 12,

More information

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT 1 IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM, AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) WP(C) No. 357 of 2016 Lakhi Rani Das, Wife of Late Subhash Das, R/o village- Salpara, Molandubi, P.S.- Krishnai,

More information

THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % Judgment delivered on: M/S MITSUBISHI CORPORATION INDIA P. LTD Petitioner.

THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % Judgment delivered on: M/S MITSUBISHI CORPORATION INDIA P. LTD Petitioner. THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on: 30.07.2010 + WP (C) 11932/2009 M/S MITSUBISHI CORPORATION INDIA P. LTD Petitioner - versus THE VALUE ADDED TAX OFFICER & ANR... Respondent

More information

I have had the benefit of perusing the judgment of my. esteemed learned brother, Hon ble Justice Shri S.B. Sinha,

I have had the benefit of perusing the judgment of my. esteemed learned brother, Hon ble Justice Shri S.B. Sinha, TELECOM DISPUTES SETTLEMENT & APPELLATE TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI DATED 18 th JULY, 2011 Petition No. 275 (C) of 2009 Reliance Communications Limited.. Petitioner Vs. Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited..... Respondent

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAN.M. SHANTANAGOUDAR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAN.M. SHANTANAGOUDAR 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 22 ND DAY OF OCTOBER 2013 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAN.M. SHANTANAGOUDAR WRIT PETITION Nos.14307-14309 OF 2009 (GM-RES) C/W WRIT PETITION

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI : NEW DELHI. SUBJECT : Bihar Shops and Establishment Act, W.P.(C) No. 5114/2005. Judgment decided on:

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI : NEW DELHI. SUBJECT : Bihar Shops and Establishment Act, W.P.(C) No. 5114/2005. Judgment decided on: IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI : NEW DELHI SUBJECT : Bihar Shops and Establishment Act, 1956 W.P.(C) No. 5114/2005 Judgment decided on: 14.02.2011 C.D. SINGH Through: Mr Ranjan Mukherjee, Advocate....Petitioner

More information

THE HIGH COURT OF SIKKIM : GANGTOK. (Civil Extra Ordinary Jurisdiction) DATED :

THE HIGH COURT OF SIKKIM : GANGTOK. (Civil Extra Ordinary Jurisdiction) DATED : THE HIGH COURT OF SIKKIM : GANGTOK (Civil Extra Ordinary Jurisdiction) DATED : 29.11.2018 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ SINGLE BENCH : HON BLE

More information

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND,MEGHALAYA, MANIPUR, TRIPURA, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) WP(C) No. 157(AP) of 2012 M/S JORAM MPCS LTD. - Vs... Petitioner STATE OF ARUNACHAL

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 3 RD DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2014 B E F O R E THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 3 RD DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2014 B E F O R E THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 3 RD DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2014 B E F O R E THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N. VENUGOPALA GOWDA WRIT PETITION NOS.3873-3874/2014 (LB-RES) BETWEEN: 1. Smt.

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BANGLADESH HIGH COURT DIVISION ( SPECIAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BANGLADESH HIGH COURT DIVISION ( SPECIAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BANGLADESH HIGH COURT DIVISION ( SPECIAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION ) WRIT PETITION NO. OF 2015 IN THE MATTER OF : An application under Article 102 of Constitution of the People s Republic

More information

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. Judgment Reserved on: August 02, 2016 % Judgment Delivered on: August 08, W.P.

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. Judgment Reserved on: August 02, 2016 % Judgment Delivered on: August 08, W.P. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: August 02, 2016 % Judgment Delivered on: August 08, 2016 + W.P.(C) 446/2016 SURENDER SINGH DALAL & ORS... Petitioners Represented by: Mr.Jyoti

More information

PART II Procedure and Practice CHAPTER VI. General Rules regarding Applications and Affidavits

PART II Procedure and Practice CHAPTER VI. General Rules regarding Applications and Affidavits 14 PART II Procedure and Practice CHAPTER VI General Rules regarding Applications and Affidavits 1. Every application to the High Court shall be a petition written in the English language. 2. Every petition

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU PRESENT THE HON BLE MR.H.G.RAMESH ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU PRESENT THE HON BLE MR.H.G.RAMESH ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S. - 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9 TH DAY OF JANUARY 2018 PRESENT THE HON BLE MR.H.G.RAMESH ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE R AND THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.DINESH KUMAR WRIT PETITION

More information

ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW COURT NO 2. OA 274/2014 with MA 1802/2014. Thursday, this the 16th of Feb 2015

ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW COURT NO 2. OA 274/2014 with MA 1802/2014. Thursday, this the 16th of Feb 2015 1 RESERVED ORDER A.F.R ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW COURT NO 2 OA 274/2014 with MA 1802/2014 Thursday, this the 16th of Feb 2015 Hon ble Mr. Justice Virendra Kumar DIXIT, Judicial Member

More information

SOCIAL, WOMEN AND SC S WELFARE DEPARTMENT. NOTIFICATION Shimla-2, the 9 th August, 2002

SOCIAL, WOMEN AND SC S WELFARE DEPARTMENT. NOTIFICATION Shimla-2, the 9 th August, 2002 [Authoritative English Text of this Department Notification No. Kalyan-A(3)-5/96-IV dated 9-8-2002 as required under clause (3) of Article 348 of the Constution of India]. SOCIAL, WOMEN AND SC S WELFARE

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR.D.H.WAGHELA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE B.V.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR.D.H.WAGHELA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE B.V. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 11 TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2014 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR.D.H.WAGHELA, CHIEF JUSTICE BETWEEN AND THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE B.V.NAGARATHNA WRIT PETITION

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS OF A. RAJAGOPALAN ETC...Appellant VERSUS

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS OF A. RAJAGOPALAN ETC...Appellant VERSUS IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REPORTABLE CIVIL APPEAL NOS.251-256 OF 2015 A. RAJAGOPALAN ETC....Appellant VERSUS THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, THIRUCHIRAPALLI DISTRICT & ORS. & ETC....Respondents

More information

PUBLISHED UNDER THE AUTHORITY OF THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE ORISSA NOTIFICATION The 20 th April 2010

PUBLISHED UNDER THE AUTHORITY OF THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE ORISSA NOTIFICATION The 20 th April 2010 PUBLISHED UNDER THE AUTHORITY OF THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE ORISSA NOTIFICATION The 20 th April 2010 No.270-R- In exercise of powers conferred under Article 225 of the Constitution of India, and as per

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION ACT BAIL APPLN. 444/2012 Reserved on: 30th March, 2012 Decided on: 10th April, 2012 SUMIT TANDON Through: Mr. Ajay Burman, Advocate....

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION (C) NO. OF 2017 IN Writ Petition (Civil) No.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION (C) NO. OF 2017 IN Writ Petition (Civil) No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION (C) NO. OF 2017 IN Writ Petition (Civil) No. 131/2013 AND IN THE MATTER OF: ASSOCIATION FOR DEMOCRATIC REFORMS AND ANR. PETITIONER

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BANGLADESH APPELLATE DIVISION (CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION) CIVIL PETITION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL NO OF 2010.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BANGLADESH APPELLATE DIVISION (CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION) CIVIL PETITION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL NO OF 2010. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BANGLADESH APPELLATE DIVISION (CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION) CIVIL PETITION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL NO. 2274 OF 2010. IN THE MATTER OF: An application for acceptance of additional grounds

More information

Special Appeal No. 390 of 2018

Special Appeal No. 390 of 2018 Reserved IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Special Appeal No. 390 of 2018 Paresh Tripathi Appellant Versus Mahesh Chandra Sharma and others. Respondents Mr. C.K. Sharma, Advocate for the appellant.

More information

THE PUNJAB EMPLOYEES EFFICIENCY, DISCIPLINE AND ACCOUNTABILITY ACT

THE PUNJAB EMPLOYEES EFFICIENCY, DISCIPLINE AND ACCOUNTABILITY ACT 1 of 9 17/03/2011 13:53 THE PUNJAB EMPLOYEES EFFICIENCY, DISCIPLINE AND ACCOUNTABILITY ACT 2006 (Act XII of 2006) C O N T E N T S SECTIONS 1. Short title, extent, commencement and application. 2. Definitions.

More information

FLAG PRIMER ON THE WRIT OF AMPARO

FLAG PRIMER ON THE WRIT OF AMPARO 1. Origin of the remedy: FLAG PRIMER ON THE WRIT OF AMPARO The writ of amparo (which means protection ) is of Mexican origin. Its present form is found in Articles 103 and 107 of the Mexican Constitution.

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU BEFORE THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH WRIT PETITION NO OF 2010(MV)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU BEFORE THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH WRIT PETITION NO OF 2010(MV) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU ON THE 10 TH DAY OF AUGUST 2015 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH WRIT PETITION NO.37907 OF 2010(MV) BETWEEN: MR.MEHABOOB SHERIFF S/O LATE MR.P.LALA

More information

Dt : Dr. Subbaramaiah, MOTHER INDIA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION (MICDA) PUTTUR Chittoor Dist.,A.P.

Dt : Dr. Subbaramaiah, MOTHER INDIA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION (MICDA) PUTTUR Chittoor Dist.,A.P. Dt : 09-01-2004 From Dr. Subbaramaiah, MOTHER INDIA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION (MICDA) PUTTUR Chittoor Dist.,A.P. micda2000@yahoo.com Dear Sowmya, NEW YEAR Greetings from MICDA for your and all

More information

W.P.NOS. 5380, 5385, 5359, 5360,5383 AND 5384 OF 2017

W.P.NOS. 5380, 5385, 5359, 5360,5383 AND 5384 OF 2017 HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERAS4D FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA THE STATE OF ~RA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUS SEVENTEEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE

More information

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) WP (C) No of 2015

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) WP (C) No of 2015 IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) WP (C) No. 2842 of 2015 Md. Sahid Ali, S/o. Late Akbar Ali, R/o. Village- nmerapani Fareshtablak, P.S.- Merapani,

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 184 OF

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 184 OF IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 184 OF 2011 Federation of SBI Pensioners Association & Ors....... Petitioner(s) Versus Union of India & Ors...............

More information

Bar and Bench (

Bar and Bench ( 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI (ORIGINAL (C.) WRIT JURISDICTION) WRIT PETITION (C.) NO. OF 2017 [Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India] IN THE MATTER OF : A Public Interest

More information

(BY SRI GANGADHAR SANGOLLI, ADVOCATE)

(BY SRI GANGADHAR SANGOLLI, ADVOCATE) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 3 RD DAY OF NOVEMBER 2015 PRESENT THE HON' BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAN M. SHANTANAGOUDAR AND THE HON' BLE MR. JUSTICE B. VEERAPPA WRIT PETITION No.

More information

ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA Nirvachan Sadan, Ashoka Road, New Delhi

ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA Nirvachan Sadan, Ashoka Road, New Delhi ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA Nirvachan Sadan, Ashoka Road, New Delhi 110 001. No. 3/ER/2003/JS-II Dated : 27 th March, 2003 O R D E R 1. Whereas, the superintendence, direction and control, inter alia,

More information