BOARD OF TRUSTEES. Sam R. Kottamasu, chair. Brian W. Fannon, vice chair. Marilyn French Hubbard. John D. Hurd. William R. Kanine. Patricia A.

Transcription

1 BOARD OF TRUSTEES Sam R. Kottamasu, chair Brian W. Fannon, vice chair Marilyn French Hubbard John D. Hurd William R. Kanine Patricia A. Maryland Sarah R. Opperman, vice chair Robert F. Wardrop II George E. Ross, ex officio Formal Session: July 12, 2012

2 LODGING RESERVATIONS NOT FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION Soaring Eagle Casino and Resort Arrival date: Tuesday, July 10, two nights Mr. Fannon CO: Dr. Hubbard CO: Mr. Hurd CO: Mr. Kanine CO: Dr. Kottamasu CO: Dr. Maryland CO: Ms. Opperman CO: (Wednesday, July 11 only) Mr. Wardrop CO: Soaring Eagle Blvd Mt. Pleasant, MI Hotel: (989) BDT:

3 MEETING SCHEDULE July 10-12, 2012 Tuesday, July 10 10:00 a.m. Meet at Bucks Run for 10:30 tee time (Ross, Fannon, Kanine, Rupe) 7:00 p.m. Dinner with Trustees, President and Consultant Isabella s Restaurant (Fannon, Hubbard, Hurd, Kanine, Kottamasu, (Soaring Eagle Resort) Maryland, Moore, Ross) Wednesday, July 11 8:00 a.m. Board of Trustees Retreat Pres Conf Room 4:45-5:45 p.m. Audit Committee (closed) Pres Conf Room (J. Hurd/chair, S. Opperman, R. Wardrop) 5:00-7:00 Friends of CMU Reception Chippewa Room Dinner at your discretion Thursday, July 12 7:45 a.m. Breakfast available Lake Ontario Room 8:30 Formal Session Pres Conf Room Box lunches available following the meeting BDT:

4 CMU BOARD OF TRUSTEES COMMITTEE ASSIGNMENTS for Fall Semester 2012 Academic and Student Affairs Committee Ms. Sarah R. Opperman, chair Mr. John D. Hurd Mr. William R. Kanine Audit Committee Mr. John D. Hurd, chair Ms. Sarah R. Opperman Mr. Robert F. Wardrop II College of Medicine Committee Dr. Marilyn French Hubbard, chair Mr. Brian W. Fannon Mr. William R. Kanine Dr. Patricia A. Maryland Finance and Facilities Committee Mr. Brian W. Fannon, chair Dr. Marilyn French Hubbard Mr. William R. Kanine Dr. Patricia A. Maryland Policy and Bylaws Committee Mr. Robert F. Wardrop II, chair Mr. John D. Hurd Dr. Patricia A. Maryland Trustees-Faculty Liaison Committee* Mr. William R. Kanine, chair 1) Dr. Jim McDonald, TEPD, chair/as Mr. Brian W. Fannon 2) Dr. Phil Squattrito, CHM, past chair/as Dr. Marilyn French Hubbard 3) Dr. Concha Allen, MHSA (term ends Aug 2014) Mr. John D. Hurd 4) Dr. James Scott, BIS (term ends Aug 2013) Trustees-Student Liaison Committee** Mr. Robert F. Wardrop II, chair Dr. Patricia A. Maryland Ms. Sarah R. Opperman 1) Mr. Justin Gawronski, president/sga 2) Mr. Killian Richeson, vice president/sga 3) Ms. Alyson Cole, president/rha 4) tbd Board members and chairs of standing committees and special committees are appointed by the chair. * Faculty representation on this committee is according to Board bylaws: academic senate chairperson and immediate past chairperson, two senate members elected by the senate to two-year rotating terms. ** The student body, according to Board bylaws, is represented by the student government association president and three students selected by SGA guidelines for the selection of liaison committee representatives. BDT:

5 A G E N D A July 12, 2012 I. Call to Order (8:30 a.m.) II. Public Comment: related to agenda items III. Report of the University President IV. Academic and Student Affairs Committee (S. Opperman/chair, J. Hurd, W. Kanine) A. Revisions to Student Code of Rights, Responsibilities and Disciplinary Procedures. (consent agenda) (pp 1-25) B. Faculty personnel. (consent agenda) (pp 26-28) C. Approval of modifications to collective bargaining agreement with the Union of Teaching Faculty. (consent agenda) (p 29) D. Research and Sponsored Programs (ORSP) quarterly report. (consent agenda) (pp 30-47) E. Clarke Historical Library Board of Governors. (consent agenda) (p 48) F. Public school academy activities. (consent agenda) (pp 49-73) G. Amendment to Public School Academy Administrative Oversight Fee. (consent agenda) (pp 74-75) V. College of Medicine Committee (CMED) (M. Hubbard /chair, B. Fannon, W. Kanine, P. Maryland) VI. Finance and Facilities Committee (B. Fannon/chair, M. Hubbard, W. Kanine, P. Maryland) A. Financial plan. (pp 76-79) Action requested: Motion approving the financial plan for B. Facilities update. (pp 80-98) i

6 C. Capital budget. (p 99) Action requested: Motion approving the capital budget for D. Planning design funds for CMED east building. (p 100) Action requested: Motion authorizing additional funding for CMED East design work. E. Contributions quarterly report. (consent agenda) (pp ) F. Endowments/awards/scholarships. (consent agenda) (pp ) G. Naming opportunities. (consent agenda) (pp ) VII. Audit Committee (J. Hurd/chair, S. Opperman, R. Wardrop) VIII. Policy and Bylaws Committee (R. Wardrop/chair, J. Hurd, P. Maryland) A. Traffic ordinance amendments / campus map. (consent agenda) (pp ) B. Traffic control orders. (consent agenda) (pp ) IX. Meeting Schedule Action requested: Motion extending meeting schedule through (pp ) X. Consent Agenda Action requested: Motion to adopt, approve, accept, or ratify items listed on consent agenda as submitted. A. Minutes of the April 12, 2012, formal session. B. Revisions to Student Code of Rights, Responsibilities and Disciplinary Procedures. C. Faculty personnel. D. Approval of modifications to collective bargaining agreement with UTF. E. Research and Sponsored Programs quarterly report. F. Clarke Historical Library Board of Governors. G. Public school academy activities. H. Public school academy administrative oversight fee. I. Contributions quarterly report. J. Endowments/awards/scholarships. K. Naming opportunities. L. Traffic ordinance amendments / campus map. M. Traffic control orders. XI. Other/New Business A. Campus Facilities Master Plan. (p 116) Action requested: Motion authorizing funding for campus facilities master plan. ii

7 B. Preliminary Goal Reporting President Ross. C. Board of Trustees Goals for XII. Public Comment: on any item/matter not listed on the agenda XIII. Adjournment BDT: iii

8 1 PROPOSAL FOR BOARD ACTION Project Description: Code of Student Rights, Responsibilities and Disciplinary Procedures Revisions The CMU Code of Student Rights, Responsibilities and Disciplinary Procedures is periodically reviewed and changed to reflect best practices in the Student Affairs field, and the needs of the Central Michigan University community. The Board s last revision occurred in December A summary of the significant changes is attached. Interim Assistant Vice President for Student Affairs Anthony Voisin and Coordinator of Student Conduct and Behavior Intervention Ben Witt are responsible for the proposed revisions along with Mary Roy, Assistant General Counsel who has reviewed the changes to ensure compliance with all legal requirements and regulations. Proposed by: Vice President Johnson PROPOSED RESOLUTION Code of Student Rights, Responsibilities and Disciplinary Procedures Revisions BE IT RESOLVED, That the changes proposed be adopted and the Central Michigan University Code of Student Rights, Responsibilities and Disciplinary Procedures be amended as such beginning with the Fall 2012 semester.

9 2 Proposed Code of Conduct Revisions Summary July 12, 2012 General: Changed all references to Dean of Students to Assistant Vice President for Student Affairs and all references to Provost to Vice President for Enrollment and Student Services to reflect changes in university leadership. 2.1 & 2.2.1: Added local ordinances to list of rights guaranteed for protection : Added group of students and registered student organization to those prohibited from disrupting university authorized and scheduled events. Also, that which constitutes a disruption is better defined under the changed language : Added authorized in order to better clarify who has control of certain facilities : Added CO2 - powered items to the list of items that forcibly emit projectiles. Also added black powder and various bladed items to the list of banned weapons, along with replicas of all weapons banned. Finally, added language that reinforces the State of Michigan s ban on concealed carry in residence halls and classrooms : Added uploading of copyrighted information to the definition of computer abuse : Added bullying to the list of behaviors students shall not engage in. Also added language regarding texting, social media, other forms of online contact, and a catchall regarding any other type of bullying and harassment not specifically mentioned & : Changed may be treated to shall be treated regarding violations by registered student organizations and violations of residence hall rules as offenses under the Student Code : Added retaliation to the list of regulations concerning student conduct. This protects students who file complaints or grievances; request administrative hearings; participate in investigations; appear as witnesses; and who oppose unlawful acts, discriminatory practices, or policies from retribution : Moved work or service projects to a possible condition of disciplinary probation as opposed to a standalone sanction to better reflect the spirit of such a condition : Added the possible requirement of an independent evaluation that CMU concurs with prior to a student or organization s return to campus following a suspension : Added death as a grave offense to which automatic suspension is mandatory & : Removed the signing of agreements by the student and Conduct Proceedings Officer to better reflect university practice on such matters. With our current software, the letter of mutual settlement is ed from the system and a paper copy is not generated. This is more efficient and reflects CMU s commitment to sustainability; but it does not allow for a letter that both parties can sign at the time the understanding is reached : Removed tape recorder and added audio recording device to the method used to make a recording of hearings. Also clarified that the Conduct Proceedings Officer, on behalf of the university, will be the person to maintain all copies of such recordings.

10 : Added the right to cross-examine complainants and witnesses to rights of students charged; however, the method of such cross-examination will be left up to the Hearing Officer : Added the right to cross-examine the student charged and defense witnesses to rights of complainants; however, the method of such cross-examination will be left up to the Hearing Officer & : Added language that does not allow for additional witnesses, witness statements, or other materials to be introduced during an appeal.

11 4 Code of Student Rights, Responsibilities and Disciplinary Procedures 1. Preamble The students, faculty, and staff of Central Michigan University constitute an academic community that is committed to the preservation, communication, and discovery of knowledge, and to the active pursuit of truth. Consistent with this purpose, the University recognizes its obligation to afford each student the opportunity to develop his or her educational potential while retaining free exercise of rights and freedoms as a citizen. Such opportunity should be limited only by the necessity of insuring equality of opportunity to all students, and by the corollary requirement of orderly operation of the educational processes. Each member of the Central Michigan University community assumes an obligation regarding self-conduct to act in a manner consistent with a respect for the rights of others and with the University's function as an educational institution. As guides for individual and group actions within this community, the University affirms the following general principles of conduct. These principles serve as the basis for regulations concerning student conduct. 1.1 The community requires a system of order supportive of the educational process that is the purpose of the University. Primary responsibility for preserving the system of order rests upon the individuals making up the community. Each individual must accept responsibility for his or her own actions and values and for recognizing that such actions and values affect the whole community. Implicit in the community's recognition of the rights of the individual is an obligation on the part of the individual to accept responsibilities toward the community. 1.2 Even though there is a diversity of opinion regarding many ethical and moral standards, each person should endeavor to maintain self conduct in a manner consistent with respect for others and thoughtful consideration for the needs of society. In social relationships generally, including relations involving the civil, property, and personal rights of others, each individual has an obligation to act in a manner consistent with these fundamental values. 1.3 The educational function depends upon honesty, integrity, and respect for truth. Any action not consistent with these principles is unacceptable. 1.4 As part of the democratic tradition, members of the community should be free to study and act upon social issues, including issues affecting the University. Each person ought to learn and practice the art of thoughtfully examining controversial issues, expressing views individually and as a group member responsibly, and in a manner that is consistent with the educational purpose of the University. 1.5 The University community recognizes the need for the development of personal ethics and philosophies. The members of this community should be committed to broad personal growth and development in society, realizing that each individual has both the freedom and obligation to make ethical choices and to accept the attendant responsibilities. 2. Student Rights Free inquiry and free expression are essential attributes of a community of scholars. The freedom to learn depends upon appropriate opportunities and conditions in the classroom, on the campus generally, and in the community at

12 5 large. The responsibility to secure and respect general conditions conducive to the freedom to learn is shared by all members of the University community. Students should strive to develop the capacity for critical judgment and the ability to engage in a sustained and independent search for truth, while endeavoring to exercise their freedom with maturity and responsibility. As students undertake to fulfill the obligations and duties outlined in this document, the University community of which they are a part undertakes to respect the basic freedoms of students. 2.1 Rights of Students In recognition of students' rights and dignity as members of the University community, Central Michigan University is committed to supporting the following principles and to protecting those rights guaranteed by the Constitution, the laws of the United States and the State of Michigan, local ordinances, and the policies adopted by the Board of Trustees Students have the right to free inquiry, expression and association Students have the right to editorial freedom in student publications and other student media, e.g. CM Life, Framework, WMHW, and MHTV Students have the right to representation on the appropriate, designated bodies Students accused of misconduct or of violating University policy have the right to have a determination of their violation or non-violation in accordance with University procedures Students have the right to protection against improper disclosure of their student records Students have the right of access to their personal educational records Students have the right to access all policies, rules and decisions concerning their continued enrollment, and to the required course materials and facilities necessary to pursue their studies Students have the right to educational programs that meet the objectives of the master syllabus, to teaching consistent with those objectives, and to a learning environment that encourages the students' engagement with their education Students have the right to be informed by the faculty near the beginning of each course about course requirements, evaluation procedures, and evaluation criteria to be used, and the right to expect that those criteria be employed. Faculty members have the authority to change a course syllabus after the beginning of the semester and are expected to inform students of these changes in a timely manner Students have the right to take reasoned exception to the data or views offered in any course of study; they are, however, responsible for learning the content of any course of study for which they are enrolled Students have the right to be evaluated solely on relevant academic criteria and to have protection against arbitrary or capricious academic evaluation as described in the "Grade Grievance Policy" in the University Bulletin Students have the right to request and receive timely assessment of their academic work by the instructor, or in the case of graduate students by their thesis/dissertation/plan B committee chairperson and committee members Students have the right to request and receive a reasonable and timely review of their grades by the instructor.

13 Students have the right of complaint about academic matters if they believe their rights have been violated. When not covered by another policy, a complaint is properly filed by presenting the issue first to the faculty member or thesis, doctoral research project or dissertation committee chairperson. If not resolved, the student may take the issue to the department chairperson. If not resolved at this level, the student may take the complaint to the office of the dean of the academic college or the Dean of the College of Graduate Studies. 2.2 Relationships with the University As citizens, students have the same duties and obligations as do other citizens and enjoy the same freedoms of speech, press, religion, peaceful assembly, and petition that other citizens enjoy. In all of its dealings with students, the University will respect the rights guaranteed to them by the Constitutions and laws of the United States, the State of Michigan, and local ordinances All registered student organizations are open to all students without respect to race, religion, creed, sexual orientation, gender, disability, or national origin except that certain organizations (e.g. social fraternities and sororities) are restricted as to gender, as allowed under Title IX of the Education Amendments of Students individually and collectively are free to examine and to discuss all questions of interest to them, including questions relating to University policies, and to express opinions publicly and privately. They are free to support causes by any orderly means that do not disrupt the operation of the University. 2.3 Responsibilities of Students and Faculty Students should conscientiously strive to complete course requirements as stated, and accept responsibility to contribute positively to the learning environment established by faculty. Proper evaluation of students in a course is based solely on performance in meeting appropriate standards established and communicated by the instructor for that course. Each course has a master syllabus approved through university curricular processes, which includes a description of the scope of the course and a list of the goals and objectives of the learning experience. Faculty members assigned to teach a course develop a course outline, based on the master syllabus, to provide students with greater specificity about how the course will be conducted in order to accomplish the intended goals and objectives. Proper evaluation of progress of graduate students in thesis or dissertation work or other research projects is based on attainment of objectives established by the chair of the student s committee according to written departmental guidelines. 2.4 Relationships with Law Enforcement Agencies In addition to filing complaints under these regulations, victims are encouraged to report crimes to the appropriate law enforcement agency. The CMU Police Department is the designated law enforcement agency for crimes committed on campus. As members of the local community, students are expected to cooperate with all law enforcement agencies. 2.5 Confidentiality of Information All information about students' views, beliefs, and political associations that members of the University acquire in the course of their work as teachers, administrators, advisers, and counselors is confidential. Improper disclosure of confidential information is a serious violation of the obligations of a member of this University community. Judgments of a student's ability and character, however, may be provided under appropriate circumstances. 2.6 Student Associations

14 7 Students are free to form and join associations that advance the common interest of their members. Activities of such organizations must be conducted in accordance with University regulations and public law. 3. Responsibilities of Students 3.1 General Regulations Concerning Student Conduct The Board of Trustees is responsible for promulgating policies regarding student conduct at Central Michigan University. The President, as its executive officer, is the final authority in all discipline cases. The Vice President of Enrollment and Student Services is the designated officer responsible to the president for conducting discretionary review of a decision of the Appeals Board to suspend a student for more than one week or to dismiss a student. The Assistant Vice President for Student Affairs is the designated officer responsible to the President for the administration of student conduct policies, with the exception of research misconduct or violation of academic integrity by a graduate student, which are delegated to the Dean of the College of Graduate Studies. All misconduct of students, except that governed by the Dean of the College of Graduate Studies, is reported to the Assistant Vice President for Student Affairs or to the persons designated by the AVP for Student Affairs to receive such reports The University shall take disciplinary action in cases concerning a student's actions or offenses occurring within or affecting people on property within the physical boundaries of Central Michigan University, on or affecting University owned or controlled property, or when the student is in attendance at a University sponsored event, or when the interests of the University as a community, are clearly involved. Only where the health and safety of members of this community, are clearly involved shall the special authority of the University be asserted in other cases. Students subject to the provisions of this Code are defined as all persons who have enrolled at the University, either full-time or part-time, pursuing undergraduate, graduate, or non-degree studies. Persons who have been enrolled at the University, and who have not withdrawn, are students even when they are not enrolled for a particular term. Students also include persons who have been admitted to the University and who, before their first attendance, participate in activities intended only for prospective students (e.g., orientation, leadership, band, or other camp, athletic training and practices). 3.2 Specific Regulations Concerning Student Conduct Academic Dishonesty. Written or other work that a student submits in a course shall be the product of his/her own efforts. Plagiarism, cheating, and all other forms of academic dishonesty are prohibited. Students are expected to adhere to the ethical and professional standards associated with their programs and academic courses. Copies of the Policy on Academic Integrity may be accessed at False Information. A student shall not furnish, or attempt to furnish, false or misleading information to University officials or on official University records. Furthermore, a student shall not forge, alter, or misuse the University name, the name of any University employee, documents, records of identification, or attempt to do the same Disruption of Learning. A student shall not obstruct, disrupt or interfere, or attempt to obstruct, disrupt or interfere with another student s right to study, learn or complete academic requirements. This includes acts to destroy or prevent or limit access to information or records used by other students in connection with their University responsibilities.

15 Disruptive Behavior During Class: A student shall not obstruct, disrupt or interfere, or attempt to disrupt or interfere with another student s right to study, learn, participate, or a teacher s right to teach during a class. This includes but is not limited to such behaviors as talking at inappropriate times, drawing unwarranted attention to him or herself, engaging in loud or distracting behaviors, or refusing to leave a classroom when ordered to do so Disruption of University Authorized and Scheduled Events. A student, group of students, or registered student organization shall not obstruct or disrupt, or attempt to obstruct or disrupt, teaching, research, administration, disciplinary procedures, or other University activities. This includes, but is not limited to: acts to destroy or prevent or limit access to information or records used by other students in connection with their University responsibilities or impeding classes, the carrying forward of the University s business, or the arrangements for properly authorized and scheduled events. A person attempts to disrupt when, with the intent to disrupt, that person does any act that constitutes a material step toward disruption Access to Facilities. A student shall not enter, or attempt to enter, closed University facilities or facilities clearly under the authorized control of another individual, e.g., student vehicles, rooms or apartments; disrupt or attempt to disrupt, the scheduled use of University facilities; block, or attempt to block, access to or from University facilities; or remain within, or attempt to remain within, University facilities after their closing unless authorized to do so by the President, or the President's designated representative, or the student authorized to and in control of said facility or facilities Threat/Endangerment/Assault/Sexual Assault. A student shall take no action that threatens or endangers the safety, health, or life, or impairs the freedom of any person, nor shall a student make any verbal threat of such action. This includes actions commonly understood to constitute assault, battery, or sexual assault. Sexual assault includes, but is not limited to, inflicting sexual contact upon another person or sexually penetrating any person without that person's consent. Conduct will be considered without consent if no clear consent is given, or when the inflicted person is unconscious or otherwise without the physical or mental capacity to consent. Inflicting sexual contact on someone under the influence of alcohol or drugs may be considered "without consent." Self-Injurious Behavior/Attempted Suicide. A student shall take no action, which threatens or endangers his or her own safety, health, or life, nor shall a student make any verbal threat of such action. This includes such behaviors as suicide attempts, cutting, refusing treatment for life threatening illnesses or conditions (e.g. eating disorders) Property Damage. A student shall take no action that damages or tends to damage property not the student's own Theft. A student shall not appropriate for the student s own use, sale, or other disposition, property not the student s own without consent of the owner or the person legally responsible for it. This includes embezzlement, misappropriation and/or theft of university and/or student organizational resources and theft of personal information Disorderly Conduct. A student shall not act as a disorderly person or engage in disorderly conduct or disturb the peace, as defined by state statute or local ordinance. This includes acts of indecent exposure or lewd conduct Controlled Substances. A student shall not possess, use, manufacture, produce, or distribute, or aid in the use, manufacture, production, or distribution of, any controlled substance except as expressly permitted by law and university policy. Violation of the Residence Life Alcohol and Controlled Substances Policy is a violation of this section. Controlled substances are defined in the Controlled Substances Act of 1971, as amended.

16 Violation of Alcohol Policy. A student shall not possess, consume or furnish, or aid in the consumption or furnishing of, alcoholic beverages except as permitted by law and University policy. Violation of the Residence Life Alcohol & Controlled Substances Policy is a violation of this section Firearms/Explosives/Weapons. A student shall not possess or use firearms; explosives (including, but not limited to, fireworks and black powder); dangerous chemicals; weapons; knives with a blade longer than three inches, hunting knives, fixed blade knives, switchblade knives, throwing knives, daggers, razors, other cutting instruments the blade of which is exposed; or items that forcibly eject projectiles (including BB, CO2-powered, pellet and air soft guns); and any other device that may be injurious to others, except as part of an approved university activity and under the supervision of a university official. Firearms (including BB, CO2-powered, pellet and air soft guns) may not be stored in university residences. Any replica of any of the foregoing weapons is also prohibited. Firearms used for hunting must be properly registered with the CMU Police Department and stored in compliance with University regulations. The state of Michigan has enacted a concealed carry law that prohibits carrying a concealed pistol into a dormitory (residence hall) or classroom of a university Complying with University Agents. A student shall comply with the directions of University agents acting in the performance of their regular or delegated duties and must identify him self or her self to these agents upon request Payment of Fines/Restitution. A student shall pay fines or restitution levied by a proper hearing body or University authority by the deadline established Misuse of Buildings/Facilities/Services. A student must observe rules and regulations concerning the use of campus buildings and other University owned or operated facilities, vehicles, equipment and services Computer Abuse. A student shall not abuse university computer time or equipment. Abuse includes but is not limited to: unauthorized entry or transfer of a file, unauthorized downloading or uploading of copyrighted information, unauthorized use of another individual's identification and password; use of computing facilities to interfere with the work of a student, faculty members or university officials; or use of computing facilities to interfere with normal operation of the university. A student shall adhere to the rules and practices promulgated by the University Office of Information Technology ( and the policies contained therein, including but not limited to the Copyright Infringement Responsible Use of Computing and Data Stewardship Policies Bullying/Hazing/Harassment/Stalking. A student shall not bully, haze, harass or stalk any person or group of persons. Telephone harassment, texting, , computer or online social media harassment, stalking, racial and sexual harassment are included under this policy, as are all other forms of bullying and harassment not specifically mentioned here Civil Disorder. A student shall not participate in a riot or civil disorder, which is defined as five or more persons, acting in concert, who intentionally or recklessly cause or create a serious risk of causing public terror or alarm Aiding Civil Disorder. A student shall not, intending to cause or aid or abet the institution or maintenance of a riot or civil disorder, act or engage in conduct which urges other persons to commit acts of unlawful force or violence or the unlawful burning or destroying of property or the unlawful interference with a police officer, peace officer, fireman or member of the Michigan National Guard or any unit of the armed services officially assigned to civil disorder duty in the lawful performance of his/her duty.

17 Participation in Riot. A student shall not assemble or act in concert with four or more persons for the purpose of engaging in conduct which creates a serious risk of a riot or civil disorder or be present at an assembly that either has or develops such a purpose and remain there after an order has been given to disperse Violation of Injunction. A student shall not violate the terms of any injunction regulating conduct in Isabella County or the terms of the Mt. Pleasant Nuisance Party Ordinance during and as part of a riot or civil disorder Discrimination. Violation of the CMU Nondiscrimination Policy or the Equal Opportunity and Affirmative Action protocol shall be treated as an offense under these regulations Violations by Registered Student Organizations. Violation by Registered Student Organizations of these regulations, and other rules pertaining to Registered Student Organizations as outlined in the Student Organization Operational Guide shall be treated as an offense under these regulations Violation of Residence Hall Rules. Violation of "Residence Hall Rules" shall be treated as an offense under these regulations Collusion. A student who shall with any one or more persons enter into a combination or agreement, expressed or implied, to commit a violation of any of these regulations, is in violation of the regulation. Students are responsible for the actions of their guests while present on CMU property or at university sponsored activities Aiding/Abetting. A student implicated in the violation of any regulation in this document, whether he or she directly commits the act constituting the violation or procedures in connection with it, or aids or abets in its commission, may be treated under the regulations as if he or she had directly committed such violation Violation of Federal/State/Local Law. Violation of federal, state or local law in a manner that affects the University shall be treated as an offense under these regulations Retaliation. A student, group of students, or registered student organization shall not retaliate against any student who files a complaint or grievance; requests an administrative hearing; participates in an investigation; appears as a witness in an administrative hearing; or opposes an unlawful act, discriminatory practice, or policy Violation of University Regulations. Violation of other university regulations, policies or established procedures shall be treated as an offense under these regulations. 4. Official University Sanctions 4.1 Sanctions. Sanctions that may be imposed for violation of University regulations include the following: Reprimand: A written reprimand, including the possibility of more severe disciplinary sanctions in the event of the finding of a subsequent violation of University regulations within a stated period of time Restitution: Reimbursement for defacement, damage to, or misappropriation of property. The person or body imposing this sanction may impose another allowed sanction as an alternative if restitution is not made within the time specified.

18 Fines: Fines may be levied. In no circumstance shall the fine levied exceed $1,000. Failure to pay a fine in the time limit prescribed shall result in further disciplinary action Removal from University Housing: Cancellation of contract and requirement to vacate university housing within a specified period of time. If housing is not vacated within the prescribed time, additional sanctions shall be imposed Campus Restrictions: Limitations on the times and/or places where a student may be present on campus. If said restrictions are not observed, additional sanctions shall be imposed Educational Programs: Participation in educational programs, i.e., workshops, seminars, or other educational activities may be required. The person or body imposing this sanction shall impose another sanction as an alternative if the specified program is not completed within the time stipulated and may impose additional sanctions Revocation of the Privilege of being a Registered Student Organization Disciplinary Probation: Subjection to a period of critical examination and evaluation of behavior. In addition to any of the sanctions set forth above, the student or organization may be placed on probation for a stated period. Placement on probation may include additional restrictions or requirements, including but not limited to the following: a) Withdrawal of the privilege of campus registration of a motor vehicle, b) Withdrawal of the privilege of membership in a campus organization, c) Withdrawal of the privilege of holding office in a campus organization, d) Withdrawal of the privilege of representing the University in any inter-university event e) Requirement to complete a specified number of credit hours with a specific grade point average during the current or subsequent academic session. f) Requirement to complete coursework related to the violation. g) Withdrawal of the privilege of using computing resources. h) Completion of work or other service to be provided to the University or other organization within a specified time. The person or body imposing this sanction may impose another allowed sanction as an alternative if the specified service is not completed within the time stipulated, and may impose additional sanctions. A condition of probation may be that automatic suspension or dismissal of a student or organization shall occur upon a determination (under the procedures set forth in Article 5 herein) that a violation of a condition of probation or any other violation has occurred Suspension/Dismissal from an Academic Program: Exclusion from an academic program as set forth for a definite or indefinite period of time Suspension: Exclusion from classes and other privileges or activities as set forth for a definite period of time. Suspension may include exclusion from the campus and property belonging to the University for a stated period of time and may require an independent evaluation supporting the student or organization s return, with which CMU concurs.

19 Dismissal: Permanent termination of student status. 4.2 Additional Sanctions Sanctions in addition to those listed in Article 4.1 may be established by the University. 4.3 Temporary Suspension The University reserves the right to suspend a student, summarily and without notice, if in the judgment of the President of the University or the President's representative a student's presence would constitute a continuing danger to the person himself/herself, other persons or property, or that the operation of the University would be seriously impaired. In the case of temporary suspension, the student will be given written notice of the charges against him or her and a hearing before a Hearing Officer will be held within three (3) business days. The hearing will be conducted according to procedures outlined in section of this document. 4.4 Automatic Sanctions for Grave Offenses Certain grave offenses require that the sanctions be stipulated in advance and imposed automatically. The following shall be breaches of the student conduct regulations for which the minimum sanction of suspension is mandatory: Bomb threat or knowingly false bomb warning Willful destruction of property worth more than $1, Willful disruption of scheduled University activities Violence against persons that results in bodily injury requiring substantial medical treatment or death Violence against persons that constitutes sexual assault Administering or causing to be administered to any person unknowingly or against the person's will any "Controlled Substance" as defined in the Controlled Substances Act of 1971, as amended Sale or distribution of, or aiding or assisting in the sale or distribution of, any "Controlled Substance" as defined in the Controlled Substances Act of 1971, as amended Possession of a firearm or any other dangerous weapon as described in Section Participation in a riot or civil disorder as described in Section or Urging other persons to commit unlawful acts during a riot or civil disorder, as described in Being present at a riot or civil disorder after an order has been given to disperse Violations of Sections (Threat/Endangerment/Assault/Sexual Assault) or (Property Damage) during a riot or civil disorder Violation of the terms of any injunction regulating conduct in Isabella County or the terms of the Mt. Pleasant Nuisance Party Ordinance during and as a part of a riot or civil disorder.

20 5. Student Hearing Procedures for Charged Violation of Student Conduct Regulations Intake Conduct Proceedings Officer A charge may be made to the Conduct Proceedings Officer by any member of the university community or may be brought by the Conduct Proceedings Officer on one s own initiative stating that a student has violated the Specific Regulations Concerning Student Conduct (3.2). Students subject to the provisions of this Code are defined as all persons who have enrolled at the University, either full-time or part-time, pursuing undergraduate, graduate, or nondegree studies. Persons who have been enrolled at the University, and who have not withdrawn, are students even when they are not enrolled for a particular term. Students also include persons who have been admitted to the University and who, before their first attendance, participate in activities intended only for prospective students (e.g., orientation, leadership, band, or other camp, athletic training and practices) One or more Conduct Proceedings Officers shall be appointed by the President or the President's designated representative. The Conduct Proceedings Officer will make, or cause to be made, an investigation of the charge If, from the investigation, the Conduct Proceedings Officer determines the matter may be reason for discipline under the student conduct regulations, the Conduct Proceedings Officer will notify the student that a charge has been made and will offer the student an opportunity to discuss the matter. If notified by either United States mail or by University , the notice will be mailed to the last address for the student on file with the University Office of the Registrar. The notice will be deemed received two (2) days following the date the notice is posted at facilities of the United States Post Office or electronically sent via . In the absence of mailing, personal delivery to the student cited, or delivery to the last address on file in the Office of the Registrar constitutes proper notice. If personal delivery to the student or delivery to the last address is used, the date notice is so delivered shall be deemed the date the notice is received. The student will have two (2) days from the date of receipt in which to respond to this notice. If the student has not responded at the end of this two-day period, the Conduct Proceedings Officer will set up a hearing, and cause to be delivered to the student a copy of this document The student may bring an advisor of the student's choice to the discussion with the Conduct Proceedings Officer. If the student s advisor is an attorney, the student must notify the Conduct Proceedings Officer of this at least three (3) business days in advance of the discussion. The advisor s role is limited to providing advice to the student. The advisor is not permitted to ask or answer questions or make oral arguments. Any case presented must be made by the student If the student chooses to discuss the matter, the Conduct Proceedings Officer will at the discussion inform the student of the charge(s) and the regulation(s) which are alleged to have been violated and will explain to the student the process outlined in this document If the charge is against a graduate student for a violation of the Policy on Academic Integrity, then the matter will be handled under Section Student Admits Violation If the student admits to the violation, the Conduct Proceedings Officer may: a) Issue a sanction

21 14 b) Order that the sanction be set by a University Hearing Officer, or c) Enter into a written, mutually acceptable, behavioral contract with the Student and/or d) Refer the student for counseling The student charged or the person or group who first brought the charge, or the university, may appeal the sanction (except the terms of a behavioral contract), by a letter delivered to the Office of the Conduct Proceedings Officer or University Hearing Officer within five (5) business days after the Conduct Proceedings Officer has set the sanction. Since admission of the violation by the student is a prerequisite to the Conduct Proceedings Officer acting under this section, such an appeal will only be as to the appropriateness of the sanction and not the fact of whether the violation occurred. Once a student admits a violation for which there is an automatic sanction, the sanction is automatically imposed and only the terms of a suspension may be appealed. The appeal is to the Appeals Board Student Does Not Admit Violation After discussion with the student, the Conduct Proceedings Officer may determine that the matter requires no further action. The Conduct Proceedings Officer will refer the matter for hearing if: The student denies the charge and the Conduct Proceedings Officer determines the matter may be reason for discipline The student chooses not to discuss the matter at the discussion offered by the Conduct Proceedings Officer. The student will be notified of the date and time of the hearing Alternative Resolution Mutual Settlement. In lieu of referral to a hearing, the Conduct Proceedings Officer may offer or accept mutual settlements of any charged violations under this code. Settlements shall be in writing and shall state the conditions of the agreement and any sanctions imposed. Mutual settlements may not be appealed. Cases not settled in a timely manner shall proceed to a hearing Counseling. In lieu of, or in addition to, a sanction or referral to a hearing the Conduct Proceedings Officer may refer the student for psychological counseling Behavioral Contract. In lieu of, or in addition to, a sanction or referral to a hearing, the Conduct Proceedings Officer may arrange a behavioral contract with the student. A behavioral contract is a mutually acceptable agreement between the University and a student that specifies certain behavior with which the student must comply, and specifies automatic sanctions that will be imposed if the contract is broken. If the contract is broken, as determined by a finding of fact under procedures set forth in Article 5 herein, the student may be suspended from the University as determined by the Conduct Proceedings Officer. In cases where suspension is automatic under the terms of a behavioral contract, a hearing to determine if the contract has been broken will be on fact only Referral to Behavioral Evaluation Team. In lieu of referral to a hearing, the Conduct Proceedings Officer and the student may agree to referral to a process provided by the Behavior Evaluation Team. This option is available in situations where the alleged conduct of the student appears to be related to a mental disorder or emotional problem.

22 Hearings There are two hearing forums: The University Hearing Officer and the University Hearing Body. The Conduct Proceedings Officer will assign a case to one of these forums, except that in cases where there is potential for a sanction of suspension or dismissal, the student may choose which hearing forum will hear the case. The student will have two (2) business days from the date of the meeting with the Conduct Proceedings Officer to make a final choice in writing to the Conduct Proceedings Officer. If no such timely choice is made, the Conduct Proceedings Officer will designate whether the case will be heard by a Hearing Officer or Hearing Body. The student will be notified of the time and date of the hearing University Hearing Officer One or more University Hearing Officers will be appointed by the President or the President's designee and must participate in the appropriate training sessions regarding the Code of Student Rights, Responsibilities and Disciplinary Proceedings The University Hearing Officer will be assigned by the President or the President's designee to hear the case The University Hearing Officer, based on the information presented at the hearing, determines whether the student charged violated the student conduct regulations, and sets the sanction, when applicable. Failure to complete the terms of the sanction may result in suspension from the university as determined by the Conduct Proceedings Officer. Certain violations have automatic sanctions imposed according to Section 4.4. In such cases, the University Hearing Officer will decide if a violation has occurred and, if so, the terms of a mandatory sanction University Hearing Body The University Hearing Body consists of one University Hearing Officer and two students The students will be selected from a pool of students who are selected by the President or the President's designee in consultation with Student Government Association and must participate in the appropriate training sessions regarding the Code of Student Rights, Responsibilities and Disciplinary Proceedings The University Hearing Body, based upon the information presented at the hearing, determines whether the student charged violated student conduct regulations, and sets the sanction, when applicable. Failure to complete the terms of the sanction may result in suspension from the university as determined by the Conduct Proceedings Officer. Certain violations have automatic sanctions imposed according to Section 4.4. In such cases, the University Hearing Body will decide if a violation has occurred and, if so, the terms of a mandatory sanction Hearing Procedures In all disciplinary hearings, the burden of proof rests with the Conduct Proceedings Officer, who must prove by a preponderance of evidence that a violation has occurred The student charged may have an advisor of the student's choice present at the hearing. If the student's advisor is an attorney, the student must notify the Conduct Proceedings Officer of this at least three (3) business days in

23 16 advance of the hearing. The advisor's role is limited to providing advice to the student. The advisor is not permitted to ask or answer questions or make oral arguments. Any case presented must be made by the student A record of the hearing, made by an audio recording device, will be kept by the Conduct Proceedings Officer at least until the appeal time is exhausted. The Conduct Proceedings Officer, on behalf of the University, will maintain all copies of these recordings A University Hearing Officer presides at all hearings Procedures at hearings will be communicated to the student charged at least twenty-four (24) hours before the hearing The Hearing Officer or Hearing Body will issue a written decision within three (3) business days stating if a violation has been found, what facts support this finding, and the sanction to be imposed if a violation has been found A copy of a decision by the University Hearing Body or University Hearing Officer will be mailed to the student within two (2) business days from the date the decision is made. The Conduct Proceedings Officer will coordinate procedures for communicating the decision The student charged has the right to cross-examine the complainant and any witnesses in the case against him or her. The Hearing Officer, however, has the right to determine the method the cross-examination will take (direct confrontation, submission of written questions, or any other method that, in the Hearing Officer s opinion, will elicit the desired testimony). 5.3 Complainant's Rights Central Michigan University recognizes that complainants have rights that need to be protected as well as those of the person who is cited The complainant has the right to have a person of his or her choice accompany him or her throughout the disciplinary hearing The complainant has the right to remain present during any disciplinary or appeal hearings The complainant has the right to submit an impact statement" and to suggest an appropriate sanction if the person cited is found in violation of the Code of Student Rights, Responsibilities and Disciplinary Procedures The complainant has the right to be informed in a timely manner of the outcome of the hearing regarding the findings and the sanction The complainant has the right to appeal either the findings or the sanction In cases involving sexual assault, the complainant has the right not to have his or her irrelevant past sexual history discussed during the hearing.

24 The complainant has the right to cross-examine the student charged and any defense witnesses in the case. The Hearing Officer, however, has the right to determine the method the cross-examination will take (direct confrontation, submission of written questions, or any other method that, in the Hearing Officer s opinion, will elicit the desired testimony). 5.4 Appeals The following matters may be appealed to the Appeals Board: The decision of a University Hearing Body or a University Hearing Officer as provided in Section 5.2. The appeal may be as to the facts found or the sanction set or both. If the sanction is automatic, then the appeal may only be made as to the findings, or the terms of a suspension. The appeals board may not reduce the sanction below the minimum imposed by Section 4.4 or by the terms of behavioral contracts or other disciplinary actions in which automatic sanctions are specified The sanction set by the Conduct Proceedings Officer after admission of violation by the student. Imposition of any automatic sanction after such an admission may not be appealed; however, the terms or conditions of the sanction may be appealed. See Section for more information regarding this type of appeal The Appeals Board consists of the Student Government Association President or designee, the Chairperson of the Academic Senate or designee, and the Assistant Vice President for Student Affairs or designee and must participate in the appropriate training sessions regarding the Code of Student Rights, Responsibilities and Disciplinary Proceedings An appeal to the Appeals Board may be made by the student involved, by the person or group who first brought the charge, or by the University An appeal is timely only if taken within five (5) business days of the decision appealed. An appeal not made within the time limit will not be heard unless the President or the President s designee makes an exception An appeal is made by submitting a written statement of appeal to the Conduct Proceedings Officer within the time limit. The written statement of appeal must state: the name of the person appealing, the basis of the appeal, the person or group making the decision from which the appeal is made, whether a decision as to fact or sanction or both is appealed, and the remedy that the person appealing is requesting from the Appeals Board The student charged may have an advisor of the student's choice present at the hearing of the appeal. If the student's advisor is an attorney, the student must notify the Proceedings Officer of this at least three (3) business days in advance of the hearing. The advisor's role is limited to providing advice to the student. The advisor is not permitted to ask or answer questions or make oral arguments. Any case presented must be made by the student The Conduct Proceedings Officer is responsible for notifying members of the Appeals Board of the appeal and for setting a time and place for holding a meeting of the Appeals Board. The Conduct Proceedings Officer will provide notice of time and place of the meeting of the Appeals Board to the student(s) charged, the charging party, and other University persons deemed appropriate by the Conduct Proceedings Officer.

25 The Conduct Proceedings Officer will assemble the documentary evidence introduced at the hearing, the record made of the hearing, and the administrative contact history made in connection with the matter and will make these materials available to the Appeals Board The Appeals Board may establish its own procedure for conducting any appeal appropriate to the circumstances designed to achieve fairness to the student charged as well as the interests protected by the Central Michigan University Code of Student Rights, Responsibilities and Disciplinary Procedures The Appeals Board makes its determination based solely on the record of the student's hearing, facts that are presented to the Appeals Board, and arguments before the Appeals Board. No additional witnesses, witness statements, or other materials may be introduced during the Appeal The purpose of the Appeals Board is to decide if the findings and/or the sanction of the Hearing Body were so incorrect that the decision should be changed. It is not the purpose of the Appeals Board to substitute its judgment for that of the Hearing Officer or Body. It is not the purpose of the Appeals Board to decide if it would have reached the same decision had it been the Hearing Officer or Body. It is not the function of the Appeals Board to rehear the charges against the student; it is an appeal of the findings and/or the sanction of the Conduct Proceedings Officer, Hearing Officer or Body only as requested by the person or persons making the appeal. The Appeals Board may: Find that there are not sufficient facts presented to warrant the findings of fact made at the original hearing and may set aside the finding or determine the facts differently Order that a new hearing be held Change the sanction Provide such further and additional relief or changes as dictated by fairness to the student and to the interests protected by the Central Michigan University Code of Student Rights, Responsibilities and Disciplinary Procedures The Appeals Board must hear the appeal within fifteen (15) business days from the date the appeal is made in writing and delivered to the Conduct Proceedings Officer A decision of the Appeals Board is final except that a decision to suspend for more than one week or to dismiss a student is subject to discretionary review by the Vice President of Enrollment and Student Services or the President (see ). Any student responding to a charge under these procedures, any person bringing charges under these procedures, or the Administration, may make a written application to the Vice President of Enrollment and Student Services to review such a decision made by the Appeals Board. The application must be received in the Office of the Vice President of Enrollment and Student Services within five (5) business days after the date of the Appeals Board decision. Failure to make application for review within the time limit ends the right to make application for review unless the time limit is extended by the Vice President of Enrollment and Student Services. The application for review must contain the following information: a) Name of the student(s) charged in the proceeding in which the Appeals Board has rendered a decision. b) Name, address, and telephone number of the person making application for review. c) A copy of the Appeals Board decision involved.

26 19 d) A statement as to what portion(s) of the Appeals Board decision the applicant wishes reviewed, and the reason(s) why the person making application for review considers the decision to be capricious, or the procedures followed to be fundamentally unfair. e) A statement of the relief requested from the Vice President of Enrollment and Student Services by the person making application for review. If the Vice President of Enrollment and Student Services elects to review a decision of the Appeals Board, either in part or entirely, the Vice President of Enrollment and Student Services may establish whatever procedures are deemed appropriate and consistent with fairness to govern the review The University reserves the right for the President or the President's designee to impose a different sanction after a determination of violation, than the sanction imposed by the Conduct Proceedings Officer, Hearing Officer, Hearing Body, Appeals Board, or others under these procedures. 5.5 Charges Involving Student Organizations All notices referred to in this document, when involving a Registered Student Organization, shall be sent to the president of the organization, at his or her last address on file with the Office of the Registrar, unless another representative of the organization is designated by the organization to receive such notices. When a Registered Student Organization is charged with a violation, the president of the organization shall represent the organization in the process described in Section 5, unless the Registered Student Organization designates some other representative. The representative of the student organization must be a registered student at Central Michigan University, and must be a regular member of that organization. 5.6 Changes in Procedures The procedures set forth herein shall apply throughout the calendar year. A University Hearing Officer may be appointed by the Conduct Proceedings Officer to hear a case at times when a University Hearing Body cannot be readily assembled such as when students are not in attendance at regular sessions, during exam week, summer sessions These procedures are subject to change by the President of the University or designee. If any change is deemed necessary, any new procedures shall guarantee a fair hearing with due process. 5.7 Clarifying Processes Clarifying processes that are consistent with the Hearing Procedures in this document may be proposed by the Office of Student Rights and Responsibilities. 6. Student Hearing Procedures for Graduate Students Charged with Violating the Policy on Academic Integrity If the charge is against a graduate student for violation of the Policy on Academic Integrity, then the matter will be handled under this section and not under section 5. If the charge is against an undergraduate student for a violation of the Policy on Academic Integrity, the procedures in the Policy on Academic Integrity shall be followed. 6.1 Intake Conduct Proceedings Officer

27 A charge may be made to the Dean of the College of Graduate Studies by any member of the university community stating that a student has violated Section of Specific Regulations Concerning Student Conduct One or more Conduct Proceedings Officers shall be appointed by the Dean of the College of Graduate Studies and must participate in the appropriate training sessions regarding the Code of Conduct. The Conduct Proceedings Officer will make, or cause to be made, an investigation of the charge If, from the investigation, the Conduct Proceedings Officer determines the matter may be subject to discipline under the policy on academic integrity, the Conduct Proceedings Officer will notify the student that a charge has been made and will offer the student an opportunity to discuss the matter. If notified by mail, the notice will be mailed to the last address for the student on file with the University Office of the Registrar. The notice will be deemed received two (2) days following the date the notice is posted at facilities of the United States Post Office. In the absence of mailing, personal delivery to the student cited, or delivery to the last address on file in the Office of the Registrar constitutes proper notice. If personal delivery to the student or delivery to the last address is used, the date notice is so delivered shall be deemed the date the notice if received. The student will have two (2) days from the date of receipt in which to respond to this notice. If the student has not responded at the end of this two-day period, the Conduct Proceedings Officer will set up a hearing, and cause to be delivered to the student a copy of this document The student may bring an advisor of the student's choice to the discussion with the Conduct Proceedings Officer If the student chooses to discuss the matter, the Conduct Proceedings Officer will at the discussion inform the student of the charge(s) and the regulation(s) which are alleged to have been violated and will explain to the student the process outlined in this document Student Admits Violation If the student admits to the violation, the Conduct Proceedings Officer may issue a sanction The student charged or the person or group who first brought the charge may appeal the sanction, by a letter delivered to the Dean of the College of Graduate Studies within five (5) business days after the Dean has set the sanction. Since admission of the violation by the student is a prerequisite to the Dean acting under this section, such an appeal will only be as to the appropriateness of the sanction and not the fact of whether the violation occurred Student Does Not Admit Violation After discussion with the student, the Conduct Proceedings Officer may determine that the matter requires no further action. The Conduct Proceedings Officer will refer the matter for hearing if: The student denies the charge and the Conduct Proceedings Officer determines the matter may be subject to discipline The student chooses not to discuss the matter at the discussion offered by the Conduct Proceedings Officer. The student will be notified of the date and time of the hearing.

28 Alternative Resolution Mutual Settlement. In lieu of referral to a hearing, the Conduct Proceedings Officer may offer or accept mutual settlements of any charged violations under this code. Settlements shall be in writing stating the conditions of the agreement and any sanctions imposed. Mutual settlements may not be appealed. Cases not settled in a timely manner shall proceed to a hearing. 6.2 Hearings There are two hearing forums: The Graduate Studies Hearing Officer and the Graduate Studies Hearing Body. In cases where there is potential for a sanction of suspension or dismissal, the student may choose which hearing forum will hear the case. The student will have two (2) business days from the date of the meeting with the Conduct Proceedings Officer to make a final choice in writing to the Conduct Proceedings Officer. If no such timely choice is made, the Conduct Proceedings Officer will designate whether a Graduate Studies Hearing Officer or Graduate Studies Hearing Body will hear the case. The student will be notified of the time and date of the hearing Graduate Studies Hearing Officer One or more Graduate Studies Hearing Officers will be appointed by the Dean of the College of Graduate Studies to hear the case The Graduate Studies Hearing Officer, based on the evidence presented at the hearing, determines whether the student charged violated the policy on academic integrity and sets the sanction, when applicable Graduate Studies Hearing Body The Graduate Studies Hearing Body consists of one Graduate Studies Hearing Officer, one graduate faculty member and one graduate student The graduate faculty member and the graduate student will be selected by the Dean of the College of Graduate Studies The Graduate Studies Hearing Body, based upon the evidence presented at the hearing, determines whether the student charged violated student conduct regulations, and sets the sanction, when applicable Hearing Procedures In all disciplinary hearings, the burden of proof rests with the Conduct Proceedings Officer, who must prove by a preponderance of evidence that a violation has occurred The student charged may have an advisor of the student's choice present at the hearing. If the student's advisor is an attorney, the student must notify the Conduct Proceedings Officer of this at least three (3) business days in advance of the hearing. The advisor's role is limited to providing advice to the student. The advisor is not permitted to ask or answer questions or make oral arguments. Any case presented must be made by the student.

29 A record of the hearing, made by tape recorder, will be kept by the Conduct Proceedings Officer, at least until the appeal time is exhausted. The Conduct Proceedings Officer, on behalf of the University, will maintain all copies of these recordings A Graduate Studies Hearing Officer presides at all hearings Procedures at hearings will be communicated to the student charged at least twenty-four (24) hours before the hearing The Graduate Studies Hearing Officer or Graduate Studies Hearing Body will issue a written decision stating if a violation has been found, what facts support this finding, and the sanction to be imposed if a violation has been found A copy of a decision by the Graduate Studies Hearing Body or Graduate Studies Hearing Officer will be mailed to the student within two (2) business days from the date the decision is made. The Conduct Proceedings Officer will coordinate procedures for communicating the decision. 6.3 Instructor s Rights Central Michigan University recognizes that instructors have rights that need to be protected as well as those of the person who is cited The instructor has the right to have a person of his or her choice accompany him or her throughout the disciplinary hearing The instructor has the right to remain present during the entire proceeding The instructor has the right to make an impact statement" and to suggest an appropriate sanction if the person cited is found in violation The instructor has the right to be informed in a timely manner of the outcome of the hearing regarding the findings and the sanction The instructor has the right to appeal either the findings or the sanction. 6.4 Appeals The following matters may be appealed to the Graduate Studies Appeals Board: The decision of a Graduate Studies Hearing Body or a Graduate Studies Hearing Officer as provided in Section 6.2. The appeal may be as to the facts found or the sanction set or both. The appeals board may not reduce the sanction below the minimum imposed by Section 4.4.

30 The sanction set by the Conduct Proceedings Officer after admission of violation by the student. See Section for more information regarding this type of appeal The Graduate Studies Appeals Board consists of a graduate student appointed by the Chair of the Graduate Council, the Chairperson of the Academic Senate or designee, and the Dean of the College of Graduate Studies or designee An appeal to the Graduate Studies Appeals Board may be made by the student involved, by the person or group who first brought the charge, or by the University An appeal is timely only if taken within five (5) business days of the decision appealed. An appeal not made within the time limit will not be heard unless the President or the President s designee makes an exception An appeal is made by submitting a written statement of appeal to the Conduct Proceedings Officer within the time limit. The written statement of appeal must state: the name of the person appealing, the basis of the appeal, the person or group making the decision from which the appeal is made, whether a decision as to fact or sanction or both is appealed, and the remedy which the person appealing is requesting from the Graduate Studies Appeals Board The student charged may have an advisor of the student's choice present at the hearing of the appeal. If the student's advisor is an attorney, the student must notify the Conduct Proceedings Officer of this at least three (3) business days in advance of the hearing. The advisor's role is limited to providing advice to the student. The advisor is not permitted to ask or answer questions or make oral arguments. Any case presented must be made by the student The Conduct Proceedings Officer is responsible for notifying members of the Graduate Studies Appeals Board of the appeal and for setting a time and place for holding a meeting of the Graduate Studies Appeals Board. The Conduct Proceedings Officer will provide notice of time and place of the meeting of the Graduate Studies Appeals Board to the student(s) charged, the charging party, and other University persons deemed appropriate by the Conduct Proceedings Officer The Conduct Proceedings Officer will assemble the documentary evidence introduced at the hearing, the record made of the hearing, and the file made in connection with the matter and will make these materials available to the Graduate Studies Appeals Board The Graduate Studies Appeals Board may establish its own procedure for conducting any appeal appropriate to the circumstances designed to achieve fairness to the student charged as well as the interests protected by the Central Michigan University Code of Student Rights, Responsibilities and Disciplinary Procedures The Graduate Studies Appeals Board makes its determination based solely on the record of the student's hearing, facts that are presented to the Graduate Studies Appeals Board, and arguments before the Graduate Studies Appeals Board. No additional witnesses, witness statements, or other materials may be introduced during the Appeal The purpose of the Graduate Studies Appeals Board is to decide if the findings and/or the sanction of the Graduate Studies Hearing Body were so incorrect that the decision should be changed. It is not the purpose of the Graduate Studies Appeals Board to substitute its judgment for that of the Graduate Studies Hearing Officer or

31 24 Graduate Studies Hearing Body. It is not the purpose of the Graduate Studies Appeals Board to decide if it would have reached the same decision had it been the Graduate Studies Hearing Officer or Graduate Studies Hearing Body. It is not the function of the Graduate Studies Appeals Board to rehear the charges against the student; it is an appeal of the findings and/or the sanction of the Graduate Studies Hearing Officer or Graduate Studies Hearing Body. The Graduate Studies Appeals Board may: Find that there are not sufficient facts presented to warrant the findings of fact made at the original hearing and may set aside the finding or determine the facts differently Order that a new hearing be held Change the sanction Provide such further and additional relief or changes as dictated by fairness to the student and to the interests protected by the Central Michigan University Code of Student Rights, Responsibilities and Disciplinary Procedures The Graduate Studies Appeals Board must hear the appeal within fifteen (15) business days from the date the appeal is made in writing and delivered to the Conduct Proceedings Officer A decision of the Graduate Studies Appeals Board is final except that a decision to suspend for more than one week or to dismiss a student is subject to discretionary review by the Vice President of Enrollment and Student Services. Any student responding to a charge under these procedures, any person bringing charges under these procedures, or the Administration, may make a written application to the Vice President of Enrollment and Student Services to review a decision made by the Appeals Board. The application must be received in the Office of the Vice President of Enrollment and Student Services within five (5) business days after the date of the Appeals Board decision. Failure to make application for review within the time limit ends the right to make application for review unless the time limit is extended by the Vice President of Enrollment and Student Services. The application for review must contain the following information: a) Name of the student(s) charged in the proceeding in which the Graduate Studies Appeals Board has rendered a decision. b) Name, address, and telephone number of the person making application for review. c) A copy of the Graduate Studies Appeals Board decision involved. d) A statement as to what portion(s) of the Graduate Studies Appeals Board decision the applicant wishes reviewed, and the reason(s) why the person making application for review considers the decision to be capricious, or the procedures followed to be fundamentally unfair. e) A statement of the relief requested from the Vice President of Enrollment and Student Services by the person making application for review. If the Vice President of Enrollment and Student Services elects to review a decision of the Graduate Studies Appeals Board, either in part or entirely, the Vice President of Enrollment and Student Services may establish whatever procedures are deemed appropriate and consistent with fairness to govern the review. The University also reserves the right for the President or the President's designee to impose a different sanction after a determination of violation, than the sanction imposed by the Conduct Proceedings Officer, Graduate Studies Hearing Officer, Graduate Studies Hearing Body, Graduate Studies Appeals Board, or others under these procedures.

32 Changes in Procedures The procedures set forth herein shall apply throughout the calendar year. A Graduate Studies Hearing Officer may be appointed by the Dean of the College of Graduate Studies to hear a case at times when a Graduate Studies Hearing Body cannot be readily assembled such as when students are not in attendance at regular sessions, during exam week, summer sessions These procedures are subject to change by the President of the University or designee. If any change is deemed necessary, any new procedures shall guarantee a fair hearing with due process. 6.6 Clarifying Processes Clarifying processes that are consistent with the Hearing Procedures in this Section may be proposed by the College of Graduate Studies.

33 26 PROPOSAL FOR BOARD ACTION: CONSENT AGENDA Faculty Personnel Project Description: The Board must approve recommendations for faculty tenure, promotion (to include the professor salary adjustment), and sabbatical leaves. Faculty personnel transactions are provided here for review by the academic and student affairs committee. The recommendations appear for approval as part of the consent agenda. Proposed by: President Ross PROPOSED RESOLUTION: CONSENT AGENDA Faculty Personnel BE IT RESOLVED, That changes in sabbatical leaves and tenure and promotion recommendations are approved as submitted.

34 27 PERSONNEL: Faculty: Sabbatical Leave: James Hill, Professor, Political Science, requests to change sabbatical leave from 2012 fall semester with full pay to the 2013 fall semester with full pay. Mary Senter, Professor, Sociology, Anthropology, and Social Work, requests to change sabbatical leave from 2012 fall semester with full pay to half-time for the academic year with half pay. Tenure: Tenure begins July 1, 2012 Dale-Elizabeth Pehrsson, Professor, Counseling and Special Education Tenure begins Fall 2012 John J. McGrath, Professor, School of Engineering and Technology Promotion and Professor Salary Adjustment: Professor Salary Adjustment effective Fall 2012 Mensah Adinkrah, Professor, Sociology, Anthropology, and Social Work Terry Beehr, Professor, Psychology William Brevda, Professor, English Language and Literature Elizabeth Brockman, Professor, English Language and Literature Jodi Brookins-Fisher, Professor, School of Health Sciences Sergio Chavez, Professor, Sociology, Anthropology, and Social Work Mean-Shang Chen, Professor, School of Engineering and Technology Kevin Corbett, Professor, Broadcast and Cinematic Arts James Damitio, Professor, School of Accounting Kiya Felix Famoye, Professor, Mathematics Mark Freed, Professor, English Language and Literature Susan Jacob, Professor, Psychology Lawrence Jenicke, Professor, Management Carl Lee, Professor, Mathematics Mark Lehman, Professor, Communication Disorders En-Bing Lin, Professor, Mathematics Robert Lindahl, Professor, School of Music Eileen MaloneBeach, Professor, Human Environmental Studies Alexandra Mascolo-David, Professor, School of Music John Mitchell, Professor, Finance and Law Sivaram Narayan, Professor, Mathematics Larissa Niec, Professor, Psychology

35 28 Hajime Otani, Professor, Psychology Peter Orlik, Professor, Broadcast and Cinematic Arts John Pfeiffer, Professor, English Language and Literature Debra Poole, Professor, Psychology Yae Roh, Professor, Marketing and Hospitality Services Administration Susan Schiller, Professor, English Language and Literature Andrew Spencer, Professor, School of Music Daniel Steele, Professor, School of Music Marcy Taylor, Professor, English Language and Literature Kennen White, Professor, School of Music J. Holton Wilson, Professor, Marketing and Hospitality Services Administration Promotion effective Fall 2012 Jeffrey Bean, Associate Professor, English Language and Literature Deborah Bailey, Associate Professor, Human Environmental Studies Michelle Bigard, Professor, Counseling Center Keith Clifton, Professor, School of Music Laura Cochrane, Associate Professor, Sociology, Anthropology, and Social Work Natalia Collings, Associate Professor, Teacher Education and Professional Development Cynthia Damer, Professor, Biology Lane Demas, Associate Professor, History Kathleen Donohue, Professor, History Robert Fanning, Associate Professor, English Language and Literature Tracy Galarowicz, Professor, Biology Thomas Greitens, Associate Professor, Political Science Catherine Hicks-Kennard, Associate Professor, English Language and Literature Anne Hornak, Associate Professor, Educational Leadership Hyungu Kang, Professor, Management Tibor Marcinek, Associate Professor, Mathematics Irene O Boyle, Professor, School of Health Sciences Janice Perkins, Professor, Physical Therapy Mark Reilly, Professor, Psychology Bradley Safnuk, Associate Professor, Mathematics Gregory Smith, Associate Professor, History Joshua Smith, Associate Professor, Philosophy and Religion Gregory Stahly, Associate Professor, Art and Design Cherie Strachan, Professor, Political Science Regina Umpstead, Associate Professor, Educational Leadership Jeanneane Wood-Nartker, Professor, Human Environmental Studies Promotion effective July 1, 2012 John Fierst, Associate Professor, Libraries Stephen Jaksa, Professor, Baseball John Lopes, Associate Professor, Physician Assistant Christine MacDonald, Associate Professor, Gymnastics Erik Olson, Assistant Professor, Volleyball David Zelenock, Assistant Professor, Volleyball

36 29 PROPOSAL FOR BOARD ACTION Approval of Tentative Agreement Modifying the Agreement between Central Michigan University and the Union of Teaching Faculty (AFT Michigan, AFL/CIO) Project Description: In 2011, Central Michigan University and the Union of Teaching Faculty ratified an inaugural collective bargaining agreement. Recently, the parties mutually agreed to make the following modifications to that agreement: Provide release time, equivalent to one course for fall and spring terms, for the Union of Teaching Faculty president Amend the recognition clause so that post-doctoral teaching scholars are included in the unit and faculty with primary appointments in the College of Medicine are excluded from the unit Clarify the voluntary nature of supplemental earning opportunities and apply the existing supplemental earnings cap to on-campus appointments only Proposed by: Provost Shapiro PROPOSED RESOLUTION BE IT RESOLVED, That the tentative agreement modifying the collective bargaining agreement between Central Michigan University and the Union of Teaching Faculty (AFT Michigan, AFL/CIO) is approved.

37 30 PROPOSAL FOR BOARD ACTION: CONSENT AGENDA Project Description: Research and Sponsored Programs (ORSP) Quarterly Report The research and sponsored programs awards report is presented for committee review; acceptance is requested as part of the consent agenda. Please note awards greater than $200,000. Awards during the quarter ended March 31, 2011, totaled $2,296,566. Proposed by: Provost Shapiro PROPOSED RESOLUTION: CONSENT AGENDA Research and Sponsored Programs (ORSP) Quarterly Report BE IT RESOLVED, That awards received during the quarter ended March 31, 2011, in the amount of $2,296,566 are accepted.

38 31

39 32

40 33

41 34

42 35

43 36

44 37

45 38

46 39

47 40

48 41

49 42

50 43

51 44

52 45

53 46

54 47

55 48 PROPOSAL FOR BOARD ACTION: CONSENT AGENDA Clarke Historical Library Board of Governors Project Description: Appointments to the Clarke Historical Library Board of Governors require the approval of the Board of Trustees. Susan Clarke was first elected to the Clarke board in the spring of 2007 and has been recommended for reappointment by the Clarke board for a five-year term beginning January 1, 2012, and expiring December 31, Susan Clarke is a former teacher who is active in Northern Michigan history, the president of the local library board, and is a key fundraiser for the Harbor Springs museum. Her most current northern Michigan project is to develop a publicly-funded district library for the Harbor Springs area and to raise funds for the construction of a new library building. Proposed by: President Ross PROPOSED RESOLUTION: CONSENT AGENDA Clarke Historical Library Board of Governors BE IT RESOLVED, That Susan Clarke is reappointed to the Clarke Historical Library Board of Governors for a five-year term ending December 31, 2016.

56 49 PROPOSAL FOR BOARD ACTION: Consent Agenda Public School Academy: Changes Project Description: The Board of Trustees must approve changes in members of boards of directors, and authorization of public school academies and appointment of initial boards of directors. Approval of the proposed resolutions which appear for committee review will be requested as part of the consent agenda. Proposed by: Provost Shapiro Changes in Members of Boards of Directors of Public School Academies A.G.B.U. Alex and Marie Manoogian School Southfield, Michigan Grades Served: K-12 Enrollment: 393 Central Academy Ann Arbor, Michigan Grades Served: K-12 Enrollment: 539 Eaton Academy Eastpointe, Michigan Grades Served: K-12 Enrollment: 503 International Academy of Flint Flint, Michigan Grades Served: K-12 Enrollment: 1,146 Mid-Michigan Leadership Academy Lansing, Michigan Grades Served: K-8 Enrollment: 223 ACE Academy Highland Park, Michigan Grades Served: 6-12 Enrollment: 147 Charyl Stockwell Academy Howell, Michigan Grades Served: K-12 Enrollment: 1,102 El-Hajj Malik El-Shabazz Academy Lansing, Michigan Grades Served: K-6 Enrollment: 331 Island City Academy Eaton Rapids, Michigan Grades Served: K-8 Enrollment: 215 Morey Public School Academy Shepherd, Michigan Grades Served: K-8 Enrollment: 104

57 50 Nataki Talibah Schoolhouse of Detroit Detroit, Michigan Grades Served: K-8 Enrollment: 360 Pansophia Academy Coldwater, Michigan Grades Served: K-12 Enrollment: 241 The da Vinci Institute Jackson, Michigan Grades Served: K-12 Enrollment: 295 West Village Academy Dearborn, Michigan Grades Served: K-8 Enrollment: 413 New Beginnings Academy Ypsilanti, Michigan Grades Served: K-5 Enrollment: 125 Plymouth Educational Center Charter School Detroit, Michigan Grades Served: K-12 Enrollment: 1,379 The Midland Academy of Advanced and Creative Studies Midland, Michigan Grades Served: K-12 Enrollment: 239 Woodland Park Academy Grand Blanc, Michigan Grades Served: K-8 Enrollment: 424 Woodward Academy Detroit, Michigan Grades Served: K-8 Enrollment: 705 Authorization of Public School Academies and Appointment of Initial Boards of Directors Nexus Academy of Lansing Okemos, Michigan Grades Served: 9-12 Enrollment: 250 Nexus Academy of Grand Rapids Grand Rapids, Michigan Grades Served: 9-12 Enrollment: 250

58 CHANGE IN MEMBERS OF BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF PUBLIC SCHOOL ACADEMY 51 A.G.B.U. Alex and Marie Manoogian School Recitals: 1. At its April 15, 2010, meeting this board reauthorized the issuance of a contract to charter as a public school academy to A.G.B.U. Alex and Marie Manoogian School. On July 1, 2010, the contract was effective. 2. This board appointed the initial board of directors of the academy, and has subsequently made changes in the membership of the board of directors of the academy. The current number of members of the board is nine (9). 3. The terms of Robert Stepanian and Janice Torosian expire August 30, The board of the academy and university president or designee have recommended Robert Stepanian and Janice Torosian for reappointment to terms which expire August 30, BE IT RESOLVED, That Robert Stepanian and Janice Torosian are reappointed to serve as members of the board of directors of A.G.B.U. Alex and Marie Manoogian School commencing the date upon which the oaths of public office are taken, but not prior to August 31, Robert Stepanian Bloomfield Hills, Michigan president/owner, Surplus Steel, Inc. (to fill a term ending August 30, 2016) Janice Torosian Brighton, Michigan treasurer/chief financial officer, Caidan Management Company, LLC (to fill a term ending August 30, 2016)

59 CHANGE IN MEMBERS OF BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF PUBLIC SCHOOL ACADEMY 52 ACE Academy Recitals: 1. At its April 15, 2010, meeting this board reauthorized the issuance of a contract to charter as a public school academy to ACE Academy. On July 1, 2010, the contract was effective. 2. This board appointed the initial board of directors of the academy, and has subsequently made changes in the membership of the board of directors of the academy. The current number of members of the board is five (5). 3. Barbara Rivers resigned January 29, 2012, therefore leaving a vacant position on the board of directors. The term of the vacant position expires July 12, The term of Dean Bach expires July 12, The board of the academy and university president or designee have recommended Christine Schechter for appointment to a term which expires July 12, 2013, and for an additional term expiring July 12, 2017; and Dean Bach for reappointment to a term which expires July 12, BE IT RESOLVED, That Christine Schechter is appointed to serve as a member of the board of directors of ACE Academy commencing the date upon which the oath of public office is taken. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That Dean Bach is reappointed to serve as a member of the board of directors of ACE Academy commencing the date upon which the oath of public office is taken. Christine Schechter Dearborn, Michigan sales manager, Macy s (to fill a term ending July 12, 2017) Dean Bach West Bloomfield, Michigan owner, Dino s Restaurant & Lounge (to fill a term ending July 12, 2016)

60 CHANGE IN MEMBERS OF BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF PUBLIC SCHOOL ACADEMY 53 Central Academy Recitals: 1. At its December 7, 2006, meeting this board reauthorized the issuance of a contract to charter as a public school academy to Central Academy. On July 1, 2007, the contract was effective. 2. This board appointed the initial board of directors of the academy, and has subsequently made changes in the membership of the board of directors of the academy. The current number of members of the board is seven (7). 3. The terms of Suzanne Baccouche and Ronald Jaworowski expired June 16, The board of the academy and university president or designee have recommended Suzanne Baccouche and Ronald Jaworowski for reappointment to terms which expire June 16, BE IT RESOLVED, That Suzanne Baccouche and Ronald Jaworowski are reappointed to serve as members of the board of directors of Central Academy commencing the date upon which the oaths of public office are taken. Suzanne Baccouche Ann Arbor, Michigan realtor, Real Estate One (to fill a term ending June 16, 2016) Ronald Jaworowski Ann Arbor, Michigan retired teacher, Ann Arbor Public Schools (to fill a term ending June 16, 2016)

61 CHANGE IN MEMBERS OF BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF PUBLIC SCHOOL ACADEMY 54 Charyl Stockwell Academy Recitals: 1. At its February 23, 2006, meeting this board reauthorized the issuance of a contract to charter as a public school academy to Charyl Stockwell Academy. On July 1, 2006, the contract was effective. 2. This board appointed the initial board of directors of the academy, and has subsequently made changes in the membership of the board of directors of the academy. The current number of members of the board is five (5). 3. Terrence Davidson s term will expire August 6, 2012, therefore leaving a vacant position on the board of directors. 4. The term of Gregory Spinazze will expire August 6, The board of the academy and university president or designee have recommended Neigatha Graney for appointment, and Gregory Spinazze for reappointment, to terms which expire August 6, BE IT RESOLVED, That Neigatha Graney is appointed to serve as a member of the board of directors of Charyl Stockwell Academy commencing the date upon which the oath of public office is taken, but not prior to August 7, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That Gregory Spinazze is reappointed to serve as a member of the board of directors of Charyl Stockwell Academy commencing the date up which the oath of public office is taken, but not prior to August 7, Neigatha Graney Canton, Michigan retired physician, Brighton Pediatrics (to fill a term ending August 6, 2016) Gregory Spinazze Northville, Michigan senior vice president, Cambridge Wealth Strategies (to fill a term ending August 6, 2016)

62 CHANGE IN MEMBERS OF BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF PUBLIC SCHOOL ACADEMY 55 Eaton Academy Recitals: 1. At its April 12, 2012, meeting this board reauthorized the issuance of a contract to charter as a public school academy to Eaton Academy. On July 1, 2012, the contract was effective. 2. This board appointed the initial board of directors of the academy, and has subsequently made changes in the membership of the board of directors of the academy. The current number of members of the board is five (5). 3. The term of Chariece Cylar expires August 19, The board of the academy and university president or designee have recommended Chariece Cylar for reappointment to a term which expires August 19, BE IT RESOLVED, That Chariece Cylar is reappointed to serve as a member of the board of directors of Eaton Academy commencing the date upon which the oath of public office is taken, but not prior to August 20, Chariece Cylar Farmington Hills, Michigan Consultant, Cylar Consulting (to fill a term ending August 19, 2016)

63 CHANGE IN MEMBERS OF BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF PUBLIC SCHOOL ACADEMY 56 El-Hajj Malik El-Shabazz Academy Recitals: 1. At its April 12, 2012, meeting this board reauthorized the issuance of a contract to charter as a public school academy to El-Hajj Malik El-Shabazz Academy. On July 1, 2012, the contract was effective. 2. This board appointed the initial board of directors of the academy, and has subsequently made changes in the membership of the board of directors of the academy. The current number of members of the board is seven (7). 3. The term of Cordree McConnell will expire July 20, The board of the academy and university president or designee have recommended Cordree McConnell for reappointment to a term which expires July 20, BE IT RESOLVED, That Cordree McConnell is reappointed to serve as a member of the board of directors of El-Hajj Malik El-Shabazz commencing the date upon which the oath of public office is taken, but not prior to July 21, Cordree McConnell Lansing, Michigan retired state administrator, State of Michigan (to fill a term ending July 20, 2016)

64 CHANGE IN MEMBERS OF BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF PUBLIC SCHOOL ACADEMY 57 International Academy of Flint Recitals: 1. At its April 12, 2012, meeting this board reauthorized the issuance of a contract to charter as a public school academy to International Academy of Flint. On July 1, 2012, the contract was effective. 2. This board appointed the initial board of directors of the academy, and has subsequently made changes in the membership of the board of directors of the academy. The current number of members of the board is seven (7). 3. Tovan Simpson resigned February 17, 2012, therefore leaving a vacant position on the board of directors. The term of the vacant position expires May 12, The board of the academy and university president or designee have recommended Wilma Mitchell for appointment to a term which expires May 12, 2013, and for an additional term expiring May 12, BE IT RESOLVED, That Wilma Mitchell is appointed to serve as a member of the board of directors of International Academy of Flint commencing the date upon which the oath of public office is taken. Wilma Mitchell Flint, Michigan director of admissions, Davenport University (to fill a term ending May 12, 2017)

65 CHANGE IN MEMBERS OF BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF PUBLIC SCHOOL ACADEMY 58 Island City Academy Recitals: 1. At its February 17, 2011, meeting this board reauthorized the issuance of a contract to charter as a public school academy to Island City Academy. On July 1, 2011, the contract was effective. 2. This board appointed the initial board of directors of the academy, and has subsequently made changes in the membership of the board of directors of the academy. The current number of members of the board is five (5). 3. Robert Clarke s term will expire August 15, 2012, therefore leaving a vacant position on the board of directors. 4. The board of the academy and university president or designee have recommended Gary Holbrook for appointment to a term which expires August 15, BE IT RESOLVED, That Gary Holbrook is appointed to serve as a member of the board of directors of Island City Academy commencing the date upon which the oath of public office is taken, but not prior to August 16, Gary Holbrook Eaton Rapids, Michigan business process development manager, SET SEG (to fill a term ending August 15, 2016)

66 CHANGE IN MEMBERS OF BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF PUBLIC SCHOOL ACADEMY 59 Mid-Michigan Leadership Academy Recitals: 1. At its April 12, 2012, meeting this board reauthorized the issuance of a contract to charter as a public school academy to Mid-Michigan Leadership Academy. On July 1, 2012, the contract was effective. 2. This board appointed the initial board of directors of the academy, and has subsequently made changes in the membership of the board of directors of the academy. The current number of members of the board is five (5). 3. Leah Perkins resigned December 13, 2011, therefore leaving a vacant position on the board of directors. The term of the vacant position expires July 28, The board of the academy and university president or designee have recommended Yukialove Winston for appointment to a term which expires July 28, 2012, and for an additional term expiring July 28, BE IT RESOLVED, That Yukialove Winston is appointed to serve as a member of the board of directors of Mid-Michigan Leadership Academy commencing the date upon which the oath of public office is taken. Yukialove Winston Lansing, Michigan chief executive officer, Complete Synergy Fitness (to fill a term ending July 28, 2016)

67 CHANGE IN MEMBERS OF BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF PUBLIC SCHOOL ACADEMY 60 Morey Public School Academy Recitals: 1. At its April 15, 2010, meeting this board reauthorized the issuance of a contract to charter as a public school academy to Morey Public School Academy. On July 1, 2010, the contract was effective. 2. This board appointed the initial board of directors of the academy, and has subsequently made changes in the membership of the board of directors of the academy. The current number of members of the board is seven (7). 3. The terms of Francis Hackett and Judy Moldenhauer expired June 30, The board of the academy and university president or designee have recommended Francis Hackett and Judy Moldenhauer for reappointment to terms which expire June 30, BE IT RESOLVED, That Francis Hackett and Judy Moldenhauer are reappointed to serve as members of the board of directors of Morey Public School Academy commencing the date upon which the oaths of public office are taken. Francis Hackett Mt. Pleasant, Michigan sales agent, General Agency Company (to fill a term ending June 30, 2016) Judy Moldenhauer Shepherd, Michigan postmaster, United States Postal Service (to fill a term ending June 30, 2016)

68 CHANGE IN MEMBERS OF BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF PUBLIC SCHOOL ACADEMY 61 Nataki Talibah Schoolhouse of Detroit Recitals: 1. At its December 7, 2006, meeting this board reauthorized the issuance of a contract to charter as a public school academy to Nataki Talibah Schoolhouse of Detroit. On July 1, 2007, the contract was effective. 2. This board appointed the initial board of directors of the academy, and has subsequently made changes in the membership of the board of directors of the academy. The current number of members of the board is nine (9). 3. Eric Jenkins resigned December 4, 2011, therefore leaving a vacant position on the board of directors. The term of the vacant position expires August 28, The terms of Walter Pookrum and Michele Samuels expire August 28, The board of the academy and university president or designee have recommended Timothy Petty for appointment to a term which expires August 28, 2014; and Walter Pookrum and Michele Samuels for reappointment to terms which expire August 28, BE IT RESOLVED, That Timothy Petty is appointed to serve as a member of the board of directors of Nataki Talibah Schoolhouse of Detroit commencing the date upon which the oath of public office is taken. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That Walter Pookrum and Michele Samuels are reappointed to serve as members of the board of directors of Nataki Talibah Schoolhouse of Detroit commencing the date upon which the oaths of public office are taken, but not prior to August 29, Timothy Petty Northville, Michigan capital and general ledger accountant, SMART (to fill a term ending August 28, 2014) Walter Pookrum Detroit, Michigan principal, The Law Firm of Walter Pookrum (to fill a term ending August 28, 2016) Michele Samuels Farmington Hills, Michigan vice president, Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan (to fill a term ending August 28, 2016)

69 CHANGE IN MEMBERS OF BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF PUBLIC SCHOOL ACADEMY 62 New Beginnings Academy Recitals: 1. At its April 12, 2012, meeting this board reauthorized the issuance of a contract to charter as a public school academy to New Beginnings Academy. On July 1, 2012, the contract was effective. 2. This board appointed the initial board of directors of the academy, and has subsequently made changes in the membership of the board of directors of the academy. The current number of members of the board is five (5). 3. Latasha Golden s term expired May 12, 2012, therefore leaving a vacant position on the board of directors. 4. The board of the academy and university president or designee have recommended Kala Parker for appointment to a term which expires May 12, BE IT RESOLVED, That Kala Parker is appointed to serve as a member of the board of directors of New Beginnings Academy commencing the date upon which the oath of public office is taken. Kala Parker Pontiac, Michigan attorney, Parker Law Firm, PLLC (to fill a term ending May 12, 2016)

70 CHANGE IN MEMBERS OF BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF PUBLIC SCHOOL ACADEMY 63 Pansophia Academy Recitals: 1. At its April 14, 2011, meeting this board reauthorized the issuance of a contract to charter as a public school academy to Pansophia Academy. On July 1, 2011, the contract was effective. 2. This board appointed the initial board of directors of the academy, and has subsequently made changes in the membership of the board of directors of the academy. The current number of members of the board is five (5). 3. Charlene Hudson resigned January 11, 2012, therefore leaving a vacant position on the board of directors. The term of the vacant position expires August 30, The term of Letha VanBlarcom will expire August 30, The board of the academy and university president or designee have recommended Michele Streets for appointment to a term which expires August 30, 2015, and Letha VanBlarcom for reappointment to a term which expires August 30, BE IT RESOLVED, That Michele Streets is appointed to serve as a member of the board of directors of Pansophia Academy commencing the date upon which the oath of public office is taken. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That Letha VanBlarcom is reappointed to serve as a member of the board of directors of Pansophia Academy commencing the date upon which the oath of public office is taken, but not prior to August 31, Michele Streets Coldwater, Michigan vice president/branch manager, PNC Bank (to fill a term ending August 30, 2015) Letha VanBlarcom Coldwater, Michigan realtor, Midwestern Realty (to fill a term ending August 30, 2016)

71 CHANGE IN MEMBERS OF BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF PUBLIC SCHOOL ACADEMY 64 Plymouth Educational Center Charter School Recitals: 1. At its April 14, 2011, meeting this board reauthorized the issuance of a contract to charter as a public school academy to Plymouth Educational Center Charter School. On July 1, 2011, the contract was effective. 2. This board appointed the initial board of directors of the academy, and has subsequently made changes in the membership of the board of directors of the academy. The current number of members of the board is seven (7). 3. The term of Darwyn Fair will expire August 30, The board of the academy and university president or designee have recommended Darwyn Fair for reappointment to a term which expires August 30, BE IT RESOLVED, That Darwyn Fair is reappointed to serve as a member of the board of directors of Plymouth Educational Center Charter School commencing the date upon which the oath of public office is taken, but not prior to August 31, Darwyn Fair Farmington Hills, Michigan president, Darwyn P. Fair & Associates (to fill a term ending August 30, 2016)

72 CHANGE IN MEMBERS OF BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF PUBLIC SCHOOL ACADEMY 65 The da Vinci Institute Recitals: 1. At its April 14, 2011, meeting this board reauthorized the issuance of a contract to charter as a public school academy to The da Vinci Institute. On July 1, 2011, the contract was effective. 2. This board appointed the initial board of directors of the academy, and has subsequently made changes in the membership of the board of directors of the academy. The current number of members of the board is seven (7). 3. Mindy Bradish-Orta resigned June 29, 2012, therefore leaving a vacant position on the board of directors. The term of the vacant position expires July 20, Brian Harrison resigned February 22, 2012, therefore leaving a vacant position on the board of directors. The term of the vacant position expires July 20, The term of Richard Holmes expires July 20, The board of the academy and university president or designee have recommended Mary Schuessler for appointment to a term which expires July 20, 2014; Brian Drummond for appointment to a term which expires July 20, 2012, and for an additional term expiring July 20, 2016; and Richard Holmes for reappointment to a term which expires July 20, BE IT RESOLVED, That Mary Schuessler and Brian Drummond are appointed to serve as members of the board of directors of The da Vinci Institute commencing the date upon which the oaths of public office are taken. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That Richard Holmes is reappointed to serve as a member of the board of directors of The da Vinci Institute commencing the date upon which the oath of public office is taken, but not prior to July 21, Mary Schuessler Jackson, Michigan accountant, Jackson County Chamber of Commerce (to fill a term ending July 20, 2014) Brian Drummond Jackson, Michigan account executive, Walton Agency (to fill a term ending July 20, 2016) Richard Holmes Jackson, Michigan retired, Jackson County Circuit Court Family Division (to fill a term ending July 20, 2016)

73 CHANGE IN MEMBERS OF BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF PUBLIC SCHOOL ACADEMY 66 The Midland Academy of Advanced and Creative Studies Recitals: 1. At its December 6, 2007, meeting this board reauthorized the issuance of a contract to charter as a public school academy to The Midland Academy of Advanced and Creative Studies. On July 1, 2008, the contract was effective. 2. This board appointed the initial board of directors of the academy, and has subsequently made changes in the membership of the board of directors of the academy. The current number of members of the board is five (5). 3. The term of Joseph Garrison expires August 6, The board of the academy and university president or designee have recommended Joseph Garrison for reappointment to a term which expires August 6, BE IT RESOLVED, That Joseph Garrison is reappointed to serve as a member of the board of directors of The Midland Academy of Advanced and Creative Studies commencing the date upon which the oath of public office is taken, but not prior to August 7, Joseph Garrison Mt. Pleasant, Michigan associate director, financial planning & budgets, Central Michigan University (to fill a term ending August 6, 2016)

74 CHANGE IN MEMBERS OF BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF PUBLIC SCHOOL ACADEMY 67 West Village Academy Recitals: 1. At its April 14, 2011, meeting this board reauthorized the issuance of a contract to charter as a public school academy to West Village Academy. On July 1, 2011, the contract was effective. 2. This board appointed the initial board of directors of the academy, and has subsequently made changes in the membership of the board of directors of the academy. The current number of members of the board is five (5). 3. Ryan Hershberger resigned May 21, 2012, therefore leaving a vacant position on the board of directors. The term of the vacant position expires May 12, Evelyn Crawford s term expired May 12, 2012, therefore leaving a vacant position on the board of directors. The term of the vacant position expires May 12, Kevin Barber resigned February 9, 2012, therefore leaving a vacant position on the board of directors. The term of the vacant position expires May 12, The board of the academy and university president or designee have recommended Michael Thomas, Sr. for appointment to a term which expires May 12, 2015; Geonisha Washington for appointment to a term which expires May 12, 2016; and Robert VanEvery for appointment to a term which expires May 12, 2013, and for an additional term expiring May 12, BE IT RESOLVED, That Michael Thomas, Sr., Geonisha Washington, and Robert VanEvery are appointed to serve as members of the board of directors of West Village Academy commencing the date upon which the oaths of public office are taken. Michael Thomas, Sr. Detroit, Michigan program manager, University of Michigan-Dearborn (to fill a term ending May 12, 2015) Geonisha Washington Inkster, Michigan medical coder/billing specialist, Physician Billing Services (to fill a term ending May 12, 2016) Robert VanEvery Novi, Michigan retired mental health therapist, CBC Services, LLC (to fill a term ending May 12, 2017)

75 CHANGE IN MEMBERS OF BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF PUBLIC SCHOOL ACADEMY 68 Woodland Park Academy Recitals: 1. At its April 23, 2009, meeting this board reauthorized the issuance of a contract to charter as a public school academy to Woodland Park Academy. On July 1, 2009, the contract was effective. 2. This board appointed the initial board of directors of the academy, and has subsequently made changes in the membership of the board of directors of the academy. The current number of members of the board is five (5). 3. Theodore Schmidt resigned November 10, 2011, therefore leaving a vacant position on the board of directors. The term of the vacant position expires December 21, The board of the academy and university president or designee have recommended Susan Peters for appointment to a term which expires December 21, 2012, and for an additional term expiring December 21, BE IT RESOLVED, That Susan Peters is appointed to serve as a member of the board of directors of Woodland Park Academy commencing the date upon which the oath of public office is taken. Susan Peters Goodrich, Michigan owner, ErEm Equestrian Estate (to fill a term ending December 21, 2016)

76 CHANGE IN MEMBERS OF BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF PUBLIC SCHOOL ACADEMY 69 Woodward Academy Recitals: 1. At its April 14, 2011, meeting this board reauthorized the issuance of a contract to charter as a public school academy to Woodward Academy. On July 1, 2011, the contract was effective. 2. This board appointed the initial board of directors of the academy, and has subsequently made changes in the membership of the board of directors of the academy. The current number of members of the board is seven (7) 3. The terms of Warner McBryde and Lucile Watts expire August 6, The board of the academy and university president or designee have recommended Warner McBryde and Lucile Watts for reappointment to terms which expire August 6, BE IT RESOLVED, That Warner McBryde and Lucile Watts are reappointed to serve as members of the board of directors of Woodward Academy commencing the date upon which the oaths of public office are taken, but not prior to August 7, Warner McBryde Detroit, Michigan retired professor, Bowie University (to fill a term ending August 6, 2016) Lucile Watts Detroit, Michigan retired judge (to fill a term ending August 6, 2016)

77 AUTHORIZATION OF PUBLIC SCHOOL ACADEMY AND APPOINTMENT OF INITIAL BOARD OF DIRECTORS 70 Nexus Academy of Lansing Recitals: 1. The Michigan legislature has provided for the establishment of public school academies as part of the Michigan public school system by enacting Act No. 362 of the Public Acts of The Michigan legislature has mandated that public school academy contracts be issued on a competitive basis taking into consideration the resources available for the proposed public school academy, the population to be served by the proposed public school academy, and the educational goals to be achieved by the proposed public school academy. 3. The Michigan legislature has mandated that public school academies organized under Act No. 362 of the Public Acts of 1993 achieve certain specific educational purposes. 4. The Michigan legislature has mandated that authorizing bodies establish by resolution the method of selection, length of term, and number of members of the board of directors. 5. According to this legislation, the Central Michigan University Board of Trustees, as the governing body of a state public university, is an authorizing body empowered to issue contracts to organize and operate public school academies. 6. The Central Michigan University Board of Trustees has requested applications for organizing public school academies and has reviewed the applications according to the provisions set forth by the Michigan legislature. 7. The Central Michigan University Board of Trustees has established chartering policies in addition to the policy titled Public School Academy Board of Directors: Method of Selection, Appointment, and Removal as required by the Michigan legislature. 8. The university president or designee has recommended the issuance of a contract to charter as a public school academy to Nexus Academy of Lansing for a term not to exceed five (5) years. 9. The university president or designee has recommended for appointment Brandy Johnson to a term which expire July 2, 2014; Linda Ryals-Massey to a term which expires July 2, 2015; Leslie Wilson to a term which expires July 2, 2016; and Beverly Knox-Pipes to a term which expires July 2, 2013, and for an additional term expiring July 2, Nexus Academy of Lansing s application has been submitted under Act 362 of the Public Acts of 1993, being part 6A of the Revised School Code, being sections to of the Michigan Compiled Laws. BE IT RESOLVED, That the University Board approves and authorizes the execution of a contract to charter a public school academy to Nexus Academy of Lansing and authorizes the chair of the board of trustees to execute a contract to charter as a public school academy and related documents between Nexus Academy of Lansing and the Central Michigan University Board of Trustees, provided that, before

78 execution of the contract, the university president or designee affirms that all terms of the contract have been agreed upon and Nexus Academy of Lansing is able to comply with all terms and conditions of the contract. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That the following individuals are appointed to serve as initial members of the board of directors of Nexus Academy of Lansing commencing the date upon which the oaths of public office are taken. Initial Members of the Board of Directors. The initial board of directors for Nexus Academy of Lansing shall consist of five (5) members. Brandy Johnson East Lansing, Michigan executive director, Michigan College Access Network (to fill a position ending July 2, 2014) To be filled at a later date (to fill a position ending July 2, 2014) Linda Ryals-Massey Grand Blanc, Michigan owner, The Ryals Massey Group (to fill a position ending July 2, 2015) Leslie Wilson West Bloomfield, Michigan chief executive officer, One-to-One Institute (to fill a position ending July 2, 2016) Beverly Knox-Pipes Perry, Michigan assistant superintendent, Genesee ISD (to fill a position ending July 2, 2017) 71

79 AUTHORIZATION OF PUBLIC SCHOOL ACADEMY AND APPOINTMENT OF INITIAL BOARD OF DIRECTORS 72 Nexus Academy of Grand Rapids Recitals: 1. The Michigan legislature has provided for the establishment of public school academies as part of the Michigan public school system by enacting Act No. 362 of the Public Acts of The Michigan legislature has mandated that public school academy contracts be issued on a competitive basis taking into consideration the resources available for the proposed public school academy, the population to be served by the proposed public school academy, and the educational goals to be achieved by the proposed public school academy. 3. The Michigan legislature has mandated that public school academies organized under Act No. 362 of the Public Acts of 1993 achieve certain specific educational purposes. 4. The Michigan legislature has mandated that authorizing bodies establish by resolution the method of selection, length of term, and number of members of the board of directors. 5. According to this legislation, the Central Michigan University Board of Trustees, as the governing body of a state public university, is an authorizing body empowered to issue contracts to organize and operate public school academies. 6. The Central Michigan University Board of Trustees has requested applications for organizing public school academies and has reviewed the applications according to the provisions set forth by the Michigan legislature. 7. The Central Michigan University Board of Trustees has established chartering policies in addition to the policy titled Public School Academy Board of Directors: Method of Selection, Appointment, and Removal as required by the Michigan legislature. 8. The university president or designee has recommended the issuance of a contract to charter as a public school academy to Nexus Academy of Grand Rapids for a term not to exceed five (5) years. 9. The university president or designee has recommended for appointment Chelsea Slocum and Adam Rogalski to terms which expire July 2, 2014; Kristen Plemon to a term which expires July 2, 2015; and Wayne Kuipers to a term which expires July 2, 2013, and for an additional terming expiring July 2, Nexus Academy of Grand Rapids application has been submitted under Act 362 of the Public Acts of 1993, being part 6A of the Revised School Code, being sections to of the Michigan Compiled Laws. BE IT RESOLVED, That the University Board approves and authorizes the execution of a contract to charter a public school academy to Nexus Academy of Grand Rapids and authorizes the chair of the board of trustees to execute a contract to charter as a public school academy and related documents between Nexus Academy of Grand Rapids and the Central Michigan University Board of Trustees, provided that,

80 before execution of the contract, the university president or designee affirms that all terms of the contract have been agreed upon and Nexus Academy of Grand Rapids is able to comply with all terms and conditions of the contract. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That the following individuals are appointed to serve as initial members of the board of directors of Nexus Academy of Grand Rapids commencing the date upon which the oaths of public office are taken. Initial Members of the Board of Directors. The initial board of directors for Nexus Academy of Grand Rapids shall consist of five (5) members. Chelsea Slocum Grand Rapids, Michigan teacher, Kentwood Public Schools (to fill a position ending July 2, 2014) Adam Rogalski Grand Rapids, Michigan political director, American Federation for Children (to fill a position ending July 2, 2014) Kristen Plemon Spring Lake, Michigan public relations account executive, C. Blohm & Associates (to fill a position ending July 2, 2015) To be filled at a later date (to fill a position ending July 2, 2016) Wayne Kuipers Holland, Michigan government relations, SAS Institute (to fill a position ending July 2, 2017) 73

81 74 PROPOSED RESOLUTION Project Description: Amendment to Public School Academy Administrative Oversight Fee Section of the Revised School Code establishes authorizer funding as an amount that shall not exceed a combined total of 3% of the total state school aid received by a public school academy. This administrative oversight fee is used to fulfill the authorizer s legal obligations under state law and is deducted from the monthly state aid distributions to the academy. The September 1998 Central Michigan University ( CMU ) Board of Trustees ( Board ) chartering policies stated, To effectively perform the university s oversight responsibilities, the charter schools office shall assess an annual oversight fee of three percent of the funds paid to each public school academy according to the terms of the State School Aid Act. In March 2001, and retroactive to October 2000, the Board upon the Center s recommendation amended their chartering policies to calculate the oversight fee only on the foundation grant used for general operations as opposed to all state aid as permitted by law due to the fact that "categorical" or non-general operating funds are intended for specific purposes in districts with unique needs. With this change in 2000, the academies authorized by CMU have retained $4 million to invest in the education of their students. With no increase in the foundation grant since FY , the Legislature passed a $470 per pupil reduction in FY This amounted to a reduction of more than $400,000 in the administrative oversight fee retained by the university. After realizing higher than expected revenues within the State for fiscal year , there was a change to the State School Aid Act that created a new best practices incentive that would provide $100 per pupil for academies that meet certain best practices that the schools could use for general operations. Because this was introduced as one-time funding for FY , the Center did not retain 3% from the best practices incentive funds. However, for FY , the Governor proposed and the Legislature agreed that in lieu of increases to the foundation grant directly, increased funds to be used for general operations would be available on an ongoing basis through the "best practices" funding as well as similar funding based upon a school s performance. Since these funds can be used for any purpose under Sections 22a and 22b and are a partial restoration of previous funding cuts, the Center recommends that they and any future funding provided for general operations should be included in the 3% oversight calculation. Due to the state of flux of how school funding is designated and in order to ensure the current and any future changes are considered in the administrative oversight fee calculation, the Center recommends the Board policy be amended to allow flexibility for the administrative oversight fee to be defined on an annual basis, calculated on the difference of total state aid less non-general operating funding. The administrative oversight fee will be determined annually by the Center within 30 days after the approval of the State School Aid Act. Proposed by: Provost Shapiro

82 75 PROPOSED RESOLUTION Amendment to Public School Academy Administrative Oversight Fee BE IT RESOLVED, That item F. of the chartering policies for public school academies adopted by the Board of Trustees at its September 18, 1998 meeting, and amended on March 16, 2001, is amended to read as follows: F. To effectively perform the university Board s oversight responsibilities, The Governor John Engler Center for Charter Schools shall retain an administrative fee of three percent (3%) of the difference of the total state aid less non-general operating funding, which will be determined annually by the Center within 30 days after the approval of the State School Aid Act. This amendment is effective beginning with the fiscal year.

83 NOT FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION

84

85

86

87

88

89

90

91

92

93

94

95

96

97

98

99

100

101

102 76 PROPOSAL FOR BOARD ACTION Financial Plan Project Description: Request approval of the proposed financial plan for Proposed by: Vice President Burdette PROPOSED RESOLUTION Financial Plan for BE IT RESOLVED, That the financial plan for is approved. The financial plan includes the general fund and non-general fund financial plans.

103 77 Central Michigan University Proposed Revenue Schedule July 12, 2012 General Fund Approved Proposed General General Fund Fund Budget Financial Plan Revenue Net State Appropriations $ 68,079,200 $ 69,545,600 Tuition and Fees - On Campus 204,596, ,640,790 Tuition and Fees - Global Campus 46,848,546 49,398,679 Departmental Activity 14,079,203 14,756,521 Tuition/Appropriation Shortfall - Reserve Accounts - 6,105,400 Total Revenue $ 333,603,212 $ 345,446,990 Non-General Fund Approved Proposed Non-General Non-General Fund Fund Budget Financial Plan Revenue Athletics $ 6,431,011 $ 6,850,260 Events Center 150, ,100 Parking Services 2,734,000 2,734,000 Public Broadcasting 3,913,525 4,069,834 Residences and Auxiliary Services 73,872,194 74,095,559 Telecommunications 5,695,330 5,476,100 University Health Services 2,030,073 2,030,073 University Recreation 737, ,000 Total Revenue $ 95,564,132 $ 96,420,926 Note: General Fund includes subsidy to non-general fund areas

104 78 Central Michigan University University Financial Plan Revenue and Expenditure Summary July 12, 2012 Approved Proposed University Budget University Financial Plan Revenues General Fund $ 333,603,212 $ 345,446,990 Non-General Fund 95,564,132 96,420,926 Total University Revenues $ 429,167,344 $ 441,867,916 Expenditures General Fund $ 333,603,212 $ 345,446,990 Non-General Fund 95,564,132 96,420,926 Total University Expenditures $ 429,167,344 $ 441,867,916 Total Net Margin $ - $ - Note: General Fund includes subsidy to non-general fund areas

105 79 Specific Expenditure Items Exceeding $1,000,000 Contracting Authority to be Approved With Acceptance of Budget Document ITEM/ACCOUNT/VENDOR NAME ESTIMATED AMOUNT Library Acquisitions $2,952,679 Purchased Electricity 2,999,175 Natural Gas Purchase 2,938,267 Wood Chips 2,100,000 Waste Management 1,100,000 Copier/Printer Equipment - Printing Services 1,250,000 Campus Business Bank Cards 1,250,000 Furnishings and Other Equipment - Res. Halls & Apartments 2,200,000 Furniture - Campus 3,000,000 Insurance Coverage 1,382,411 Employee Benefits and Insurance 29,524,081 Custodial Services 1,100,000 Line of Credit - Vendor Payments 5,000,000 Office Supplies - Campus 1,250,000 Student Technology 1,500,000 Marketing & Advertising for Global Campus & University Communications 6,600,000 Global Campus Property Leases 3,300,000 Software/Hardware Maintenance & Membership Fees 2,300,000 Software/Hardware/Consultant Service/Project Purchases 1,750,000 TOTAL $73,496,613 DATE: 07/12/12

106 80

107 81

108 82

109 83

110 84

111 85

112 86

113 87

114 88

115 89

116 90

117 91

118 92

119 93

120 94

121 95

122 96

123 97

124 98

125

126

127

128

129

130

131

132

133

134

135 99 PROPOSAL FOR BOARD ACTION Capital Budget Project Description: Request approval of the capital budget for fiscal year , including deferred maintenance projects. The list of deferred maintenance projects focuses on health, safety, security, building integrity, energy conservation, and academic program requirements. Proposed by: Vice President Burdette PROPOSED RESOLUTION Capital Budget BE IT RESOLVED, That the capital budget for fiscal year , including deferred maintenance projects, is approved.

136 100 PROPOSAL FOR BOARD ACTION CMED East Design Funding Project Description: In accordance with the university s Contracting Authority Policy, the President has previously approved the following planning amounts: January 2011 $ 95,000 Site Selection November 2011 $ 300,000 Programming Phase April 2012 $ 555,000 Schematic Design TOTAL $ 950,000 Each of these approvals was shared with the Finance and Facilities and CMED Committees of the Board of Trustees. This request is for $800,000 for the design development phase. This brings the total design fee committed to date to $1,750,000. The construction documents are the final design phase; that request for additional funding will occur later this year. Proposed by: Vice President Burdette Project Cost and Source of Funds: Cost: $800,000 Source: University Reserves PROPOSED RESOLUTION CMED East Design Funding BE IT RESOLVED, that the president or designee is authorized to contract for CMED East design work for an additional $800,000; total approved to date is $1,750,000. Funding to be from University Reserves.

137 101 PROPOSAL FOR BOARD ACTION: CONSENT AGENDA Contributions Project Description: The contributions report for the quarter ended March 30, 2012, is presented for committee review; acceptance is requested as part of the consent agenda. Proposed by: Vice President Wilbur PROPOSED RESOLUTION: Consent Agenda Contributions BE IT RESOLVED, That contributions received during the quarter ended March 30, 2012, in the amount of $3,499,799 are accepted.

138 102

139 103 PROPOSAL FOR BOARD ACTION: CONSENT AGENDA Endowments / Awards / Scholarships Project Description: Statements for establishing endowments/awards/scholarships and changes in previously established endowments are included for committee review; action is requested as part of the consent agenda. Alumni Gold Scholarship Robin Dilling Vatalaro Accounting Scholarship Proposed by: Vice President Wilbur

140 104 PROPOSED RESOLUTION: CONSENT AGENDA Endowments / Awards / Scholarships BE IT RESOLVED, That the following scholarships, awards and endowments are established or changed and the statements approved for publication as applicable: Alumni Gold Scholarship The Alumni Gold Scholarship was established in 1999 to benefit children and grandchildren of CMU alumni. Applicants must be freshmen or transfer students who meet criteria for admission to CMU. Recipients will be recommended by the CMU Alumni Association Board of Directors with final approval by the Director of Alumni Relations. Robin Dilling Vatalaro Accounting Scholarship Established in 2011 by Wendell and Marcia Dilling in honor of their daughter, Robin Dilling Vatalaro 88. Income from the endowment will support a renewable award for a senior enrolled in the College of Business Administration, with a major in Accounting. Preference will be given to students who have a GPA of at least 3.0.

141 105 PROPOSAL FOR BOARD ACTION: CONSENT AGENDA Naming Opportunities Project Description: Naming opportunities require Board of Trustees approval. The proposed resolution recognizes the dedication and contributions of the donors. Proposed by: Vice President Wilbur PROPOSED RESOLUTION: CONSENT AGENDA Naming Opportunities BE IT RESOLVED, That the following rooms in the College of Medicine be named in honor of the donor(s) in grateful recognition of their gifts to Central Michigan University: Name/Location Conference/Consultation Room (First Floor CMED 1430) Small Group Study Room (First Floor CMED 1419) Student Lounge (First Floor CMED 1406) Large Discussion Room/Auditorium (First Floor CMED 1404) Conference/Consultation Room (Second Floor CMED 2429) Study Room (First Floor CMED 1410) North Hallway Alcove (First Floor CMED 1400C) Donor(s) Deborah Biggs J. Shannon Dean Gary and Joyce DeWitt Mr. Bo Miller/ The Dow Chemical Company Foundation Brian and Jan Fannon Dr. Bob Fleischmann & Dr. Linda Perkowski Mr. John R. Harkins

142 106 Student Kitchen (First Floor CMED 1406A) Interview Room (First Floor CMED 1402) Conference/Consultation Room (First Floor CMED 1429) Medical Education Conference and Resource Room (Second Floor CMED 2405B) South Hallway Alcove (First Floor CMED 1400E) Discussion/Quiet Study Room First Floor CMED 1426 Administrative Conference Room Second Floor CMED 2405M Learning Commons First Floor CMED 1427 Faculty Office Wing First Floor Recreation Room First Floor CMED 1406B Staff/Faculty Lounge Second Floor CMED 2401 Michael and Debra Hayes William R. and Carla S. Kanine Kevin Karbowski Drs. Sam and Lakshmi Kottamasu Dr. Joel H. Lanphear Bob and Jeanne Long/ Summit Petroleum Bob and Jeanne Long/ Summit Petroleum Sarah and Daniel Opperman Dr. Michael and Monica Rao Dr. George E. and Elizabeth G. Ross Phillip and Kim Seybert

143 107 PROPOSAL FOR BOARD ACTION: CONSENT AGENDA Traffic Ordinance Amendment: Campus Map Project Description: Approval of the campus map for detailing motor vehicle and parking regulations is an amendment to An Ordinance to Govern and Control Parking, Traffic and Pedestrians at Central Michigan University, Mt. Pleasant, Michigan." Traffic ordinance amendments require Board approval. Proposed by: Vice President Burdette PROPOSED RESOLUTION: CONSENT AGENDA Traffic Ordinance Amendment: Campus Map BE IT RESOLVED, That the following amendment is made to the ordinance titled An Ordinance to Govern and Control Parking, Traffic and Pedestrians at Central Michigan University, Mt. Pleasant, Michigan : Section 8.26 of said ordinance is retained and shall continue to apply to violations occurring prior to 12:01 o clock a.m. on the date this amendment becomes effective, except to the extent altered by traffic control orders under this ordinance. Effective 12:01 o clock a.m. on the date this amendment becomes effective, said Section 8.26 shall read and be effective as to violations occurring on or after 12:01 o clock a.m. on said date as follows: 8.26 Attached hereto and made a part hereof is a map entitled Campus Map Central Michigan University, setting forth and locating parking lots on the campus of Central Michigan University, Mt. Pleasant, Michigan, and setting forth the persons who may use such lots and the time and manner of such permitted use. Violation of the provisions contained on the map and on the reverse side of the map setting forth persons who may use such lots and the time and manner of such permitted use is a violation of this ordinance. This amendment shall take effect August 27, 2012, at 12:01 o clock a.m.

144 108

145 109