Case 3:16-cv M Document 119 Filed 11/10/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID 9671 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
|
|
- Lizbeth Lynch
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Case 3:16-cv M Document 119 Filed 11/10/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID 9671 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FINANCIAL SERVICES INSTITUTE, INC., FINANCIAL SERVICES ROUNDTABLE, GREATER IRVING-LAS COLINAS CHAMBER OF COMMERCE, HUMBLE AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE DBA LAKE HOUSTON AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE, INSURED RETIREMENT INSTITUTE, LUBBOCK CHAMBER OF COMMERCE, SECURITIES INDUSTRY AND FINANCIAL MARKETS ASSOCIATION, and TEXAS ASSOCIATION OF BUSINESS, Plaintiffs, Civil Action No. 3:16-cv-1476-M Consolidated with: 3:16-cv-1530-C 3:16-cv-1537-N v. THOMAS E. PEREZ, SECRETARY OF LABOR, and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Defendants. CHAMBER OF COMMERCE PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF
2 Case 3:16-cv M Document 119 Filed 11/10/16 Page 2 of 6 PageID 9672 Plaintiffs CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FINANCIAL SERVICES INSTITUTE, INC., FINANCIAL SERVICES ROUNDTABLE, GREATER IRVING-LAS COLINAS CHAMBER OF COMMERCE, HUMBLE AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE DBA LAKE HOUSTON AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE, INSURED RETIREMENT INSTITUTE, LUBBOCK CHAMBER OF COMMERCE, SECURITIES INDUSTRY AND FINANCIAL MARKETS ASSOCIATION, and TEXAS ASSOCIATION OF BUSINESS ( Chamber of Commerce plaintiffs ) respectfully move this Court for leave to file a supplemental brief regarding the 92-page opinion of the district court in National Association for Fixed Annuities v. Perez, No (D.D.C.) ( NAFA ), which the U.S. Department of Labor ( DOL ) has filed with the Court (Dkt. 118). The proposed brief, which is less than five pages in length, is being filed concurrently with this motion. The NAFA decision upholds DOL s rule and elaborates on a number of arguments DOL advances in this Court. The Chamber of Commerce plaintiffs offer their proposed supplemental brief to respond to some of the points in the opinion DOL has lodged with the Court. Given the length of the NAFA decision, its relevance to issues presented in this case, and the support DOL presumably believes the decision lends to its position here, plaintiffs believe it is fair that they be permitted a brief, written comment on the decision. Plaintiffs also believe that their proposed brief will be helpful to the Court in its consideration of this case, because in plaintiffs assessment the NAFA court erred on certain key points and, with respect to other points, that court viewed NAFA as making materially different arguments than plaintiffs make here. Plaintiffs will, of course, be prepared to more fully address the NAFA decision at oral argument, as the Court deems appropriate.
3 Case 3:16-cv M Document 119 Filed 11/10/16 Page 3 of 6 PageID 9673 For the foregoing reasons, the Chamber of Commerce plaintiffs respectfully request leave to file the proposed supplemental brief. The Chamber of Commerce plaintiffs sought DOL s consent to this motion, but DOL had not responded with its position at the time of filing. Respectfully submitted, Dated: November 10, 2016 s/ Eugene Scalia James C. Ho, Texas Bar No Russell H. Falconer, Texas Bar No GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP 2100 McKinney Avenue Suite 110 Dallas, TX Telephone: (214) Facsimile: (214) jho@gibsondunn.com rfalconer@gibsondunn.com Eugene Scalia* Jason J. Mendro* Paul Blankenstein* Rachel E. Mondl* Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP 1050 Connecticut Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C Telephone: (202) Facsimile: (202) escalia@gibsondunn.com jmendro@gibsondunn.com pblankenstein@gibsondunn.com rmondl@gibsondunn.com Counsel for Plaintiffs Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, Financial Services Institute, Inc., Financial Services Roundtable, Greater Irving-Las Colinas Chamber of Commerce, Humble Area Chamber of Commerce DBA Lake Houston Area Chamber of Commerce, Insured Retirement Institute, Lubbock Chamber of Commerce, Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association, and Texas Association of Business * Admitted pro hac vice (continued on next page) 3
4 Case 3:16-cv M Document 119 Filed 11/10/16 Page 4 of 6 PageID 9674 Steven P. Lehotsky* U.S. CHAMBER LITIGATION CENTER 1615 H Street, NW Washington, DC Telephone: (202) Facsimile: (202) slehotsky@uschamber.com Counsel for Plaintiff Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America J. Lee Covington II* INSURED RETIREMENT INSTITUTE 1100 Vermont Avenue, N.W. Washington, DC Telephone: (202) Facsimile: (202) lcovington@irionline.org Counsel for Plaintiff Insured Retirement Institute David T. Bellaire* Robin Traxler* FINANCIAL SERVICES INSTITUTE, INC th Street, N.W. Suite 750 Washington, DC Telephone: (888) Facsimile: (770) david.bellaire@financialservices.org robin.traxler@financialservices.org Counsel for Plaintiff Financial Services Institute, Inc. Kevin Carroll* Ira D. Hammerman* SECURITIES INDUSTRY AND FINANCIAL MARKETS ASSOCIATION 1101 New York Avenue, N.W. 8th Floor Washington, DC Telephone: (202) Facsimile: (202) kcarroll@sifma.org ihammerman@sifma.org Counsel for Plaintiff Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association Kevin Richard Foster* Felicia Smith* FINANCIAL SERVICES ROUNDTABLE th Street, N.W. Suite 400 Washington, DC Telephone: (202) Facsimile: (202) richard.foster@fsroundtable.org felicia.smith@fsroundtable.org Counsel for Plaintiff Financial Services Roundtable * Admitted pro hac vice 4
5 Case 3:16-cv M Document 119 Filed 11/10/16 Page 5 of 6 PageID 9675 CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE I certify that on November 10, 2016, I discussed via telephone conference the above Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Brief with Galen Thorp, Trial Attorney at the Department of Justice. DOL had not responded with its position at the time of filing. s/ Rachel E. Mondl Rachel E. Mondl 5
6 Case 3:16-cv M Document 119 Filed 11/10/16 Page 6 of 6 PageID 9676 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned hereby certifies that on November 10, 2016, the foregoing document was electronically submitted with the clerk of the court for the United States District Court, Northern District of Texas, using the electronic case file system of the court. I hereby certify that I have served all counsel of record electronically or by another manner authorized by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5(b)(2). s/ Eugene Scalia Eugene Scalia 6
7 Case 3:16-cv M Document Filed 11/10/16 Page 1 of 2 PageID 9677 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FINANCIAL SERVICES INSTITUTE, INC., FINANCIAL SERVICES ROUNDTABLE, GREATER IRVING-LAS COLINAS CHAMBER OF COMMERCE, HUMBLE AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE DBA LAKE HOUSTON AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE, INSURED RETIREMENT INSTITUTE, LUBBOCK CHAMBER OF COMMERCE, SECURITIES INDUSTRY AND FINANCIAL MARKETS ASSOCIATION, and TEXAS ASSOCIATION OF BUSINESS, Plaintiffs, Civil Action No. 3:16-cv-1476-M Consolidated with: 3:16-cv-1530-C 3:16-cv-1537-N v. THOMAS E. PEREZ, SECRETARY OF LABOR, and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Defendants. [PROPOSED] ORDER Having considered the Chamber of Commerce plaintiffs Motion For Leave To File Supplemental Brief in Chamber of Commerce v. Perez, No. 3:16-cv M, consolidated with No. 3:16-cv C and No. 3:16-cv-1537-N, it is hereby ORDERED that plaintiffs Motion is GRANTED.
8 Case 3:16-cv M Document Filed 11/10/16 Page 2 of 2 PageID 9678 November _, 2016 BARBARA M.G. LYNN Chief United States District Judge 2
9 Case 3:16-cv M Document Filed 11/10/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID 9679 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FINANCIAL SERVICES INSTITUTE, INC., FINANCIAL SERVICES ROUNDTABLE, GREATER IRVING-LAS COLINAS CHAMBER OF COMMERCE, HUMBLE AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE DBA LAKE HOUSTON AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE, INSURED RETIREMENT INSTITUTE, LUBBOCK CHAMBER OF COMMERCE, SECURITIES INDUSTRY AND FINANCIAL MARKETS ASSOCIATION, and TEXAS ASSOCIATION OF BUSINESS, Plaintiffs, Civil Action No. 3:16-cv-1476-M Consolidated with: 3:16-cv-1530-C 3:16-cv-1537-N v. THOMAS E. PEREZ, SECRETARY OF LABOR, and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Defendants. CHAMBER OF COMMERCE PLAINTIFFS [PROPOSED] SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF THEIR MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
10 Case 3:16-cv M Document Filed 11/10/16 Page 2 of 8 PageID 9680 The Department of Labor ( DOL ) has filed with the Court the 92-page opinion of the district court in National Association for Fixed Annuities v. Perez, No (D.D.C. Nov. 4, 2016) ( NAFA ). See Dkt That decision upholds DOL s Fiduciary Rule and elaborates on a number of arguments DOL advances in this Court. The Chamber of Commerce plaintiffs offer this supplemental brief to respond to some of the more important points in the opinion DOL has lodged with the Court, and to illustrate that the NAFA court erred on certain key points and, with respect to others, it viewed NAFA as making materially different arguments than plaintiffs make here. Plaintiffs will, of course, be prepared to more fully address the NAFA decision at oral argument, as the Court deems appropriate. 1. The NAFA decision fails to meaningfully address the overbreadth of DOL s interpretation of fiduciary, which essentially covers all sales activity and fails to distinguish, as it must, between a fiduciary relationship and a sales relationship. The roles of fiduciary and salesperson are distinct; among other things, a fiduciary is prohibited from being a salesperson to a client. See Dkt. 61 at 14-15, 22; Dkt. 109 at 3. Yet, the final Fiduciary Rule essentially covers all sales activity that a broker or insurance agent might perform, deeming it fiduciary in nature. For instance, the Rule deems it fiduciary activity merely to present a customer with a select list of investment options, or to make a recommendation as any salesperson would that a customer buy a product. AR 52; Dkt. 61 at 20. In upholding the Rule, the NAFA decision relied heavily on the contention that advice need not (as provided in the 1975 rule) be regular for a fiduciary relationship to exist. 1 Plaintiffs here disagree (Dkt. 61 at 14-17), but even supposing that particular requirement of the 1 The court perceived DOL s omission of a regular basis requirement as NAFA s principal argument under Chevron step 1, referring to it six separate times. 1
11 Case 3:16-cv M Document Filed 11/10/16 Page 3 of 8 PageID rule might be altered, DOL was arbitrary and capricious and transgressed the statutory text by omitting any provision for ensuring the presence of a relationship of heightened trust and confidence, the essence of fiduciary status. Id. at 14-17, 22-23; Dkt. 109 at 3-8. DOL s failure to distinguish advisory from sales relationships with respect to IRAs is all the more arbitrary and capricious because it did recognize that distinction in its seller s carve-out for large ERISA plans. Dkt. 109 at DOL s reply had no intelligible response to this inconsistency, Dkt at 10, an inconsistency the NAFA court did not consider. In addition, although the NAFA court clarified that its analysis of ERISA s definitional provision was confined to construing the phrase renders investment advice, plaintiffs here also emphasize DOL s failure to account for the statute s requirement that the advice be render[ed]... for a fee. Dkt. 61 at 17-18; Dkt. 109 at The foregoing arguments were not directly presented to the NAFA court, and were not addressed in the court s decision. The court also was not presented with, and did not address, the First Amendment concerns presented by imposing the burdens DOL did on non-fiduciary, commercial speech, which is an added reason to withhold deference to DOL and reject its interpretation. Dkt. 62 at With respect to DOL s use of its exemptive authority, the NAFA court stressed its understanding that NAFA s argument was premised on Chevron step one only. NAFA Op. 49; see also id. at (repeatedly stating that NAFA must show DOL s approach to be unambiguously foreclosed, as required at Chevron step one). Plaintiffs here also base their challenge on Chevron step two and the Administrative Procedure Act ( APA ) (see Dkt. 109 at 23), and have placed significant emphasis on cases such as Whitman v. American Trucking Ass ns, 531 U.S. 457 (2001), and MCI Telecommunications Corp. v. AT&T Co., 512 U.S
12 Case 3:16-cv M Document Filed 11/10/16 Page 4 of 8 PageID 9682 (1994). Those cases were not cited by NAFA or the NAFA court; indeed, the court stated that NAFA had not framed its challenge to the BIC exemption on the principles embodied in these cases. NAFA Op. 54. In Whitman, the Court explained that Congress... does not alter the fundamental details of a regulatory scheme in vague terms or ancillary provisions it does not, one might say, hide elephants in mouseholes. 531 U.S. at 468 (emphases added). Quoting MCI Telecommunications, the Court added: Just as we have found it highly unlikely that Congress would leave the determination of whether an industry will be entirely, or even substantially, rateregulated to agency discretion and even more unlikely that it would achieve that through such a subtle device as permission to modify rate-filing requirements,... so also we find it implausible that Congress would give to the EPA through these modest words the power to determine whether implementation costs should moderate air quality standards. Id. (emphasis added and citation omitted). These cases illustrate that DOL s modest, ancillary authority to relieve entities from certain regulatory burdens cannot be wielded to erect a whole new regulatory scheme for IRAs, a scheme as dense and complex as Congress provided for employer-sponsored plans in title I of ERISA, yet which Congress purposely omitted for IRAs in title II. It is also a key part of plaintiffs argument here that such a radical change is especially inappropriate for an agency lacking oversight or enforcement authority in the area, as DOL lacks for IRAs. The NAFA decision which acknowledged the great economic and political significance of DOL s rule, NAFA Op. 54 made a significant error in that regard when it said that DOL has long exercised jurisdiction over IRA fiduciaries. Id. That is incorrect (which is why DOL used the Best Interest Contract, or BIC, to create a private enforcement framework). See also id. at 47 (erroneously referring to DOL s authority under title II to regulate IRA advisers ). 3
13 Case 3:16-cv M Document Filed 11/10/16 Page 5 of 8 PageID The NAFA decision also did not consider whether DOL s creation of a private cause of action is unreasonable under step two of Chevron, or arbitrary and capricious under the APA, as it viewed NAFA as making only a Chevron step one argument. In fact, the NAFA decision observed that [o]ne might reasonably ask... whether the Department of Justice could have responded to Sandoval by requiring that grant recipients enter into contracts creating an enforcement commitment to abide by the Department of Justice s disparate impact rule. NAFA Op. 60. But, the court stressed, that is not the challenge that NAFA has brought and [a]ccordingly the court need not address it. Id. at Plaintiffs here do make that precise argument. See Dkt. 109 at Moreover, on the question of the BIC private right of action, it was central to the NAFA decision that, in the court s assessment, NAFA had conceded that BIC claims would be governed by state law. NAFA Op. 56. Plaintiffs here make no such concession. 2 They also disagree that the concession has the import the court gave it. Rather, it is federal law that now requires IRA fiduciaries to enter contracts under the BIC exemption; that dictates the substantive terms of that contract; that specifies the forum for litigating alleged breaches; and that defines permissible limitations on available remedies all things it does, moreover, for the express purpose of establishing a viable enforcement regime. The Chamber plaintiffs cited multiple authorities indicating that such an end-run of Alexander v. Sandoval, 532 U.S. 275 (2001), is impermissible. Grochowski v. Phoenix Constr., 318 F.3d 80, 86 (2d Cir. 2003), cited approvingly in Astra USA, Inc. v. Santa Clara Cty., Cal., 563 U.S. 110 (2011); Dkt. 109 at Those authorities may not be brushed aside on the fiction that this federally-created, 2 At oral argument in the NAFA case, the government itself originally said that its regulation would preempt state law; it was only on the government s second trip to the lectern, after the court s questioning implied that it might be better for the government s position, that the government reversed itself and contended that state law would trump federal. NAFA Hr g Tr. at 75:25-80:19, 109:2-111:25 (D.D.C. Aug. 25, 2016). 4
14 Case 3:16-cv M Document Filed 11/10/16 Page 6 of 8 PageID 9684 federally-defined enforcement action is a creature of state law. Cf. Reliant Energy Servs., Inc. v. Enron Can. Corp., 349 F.3d 816, & n.5 (5th Cir. 2003) ( Although under Section 9 of the Netting Agreement, the parties agreed that the contract shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of New York, there is sufficient federal interest such that federal law governs the interpretation of this contract. ). Nor may the purposeful creation of an enforceable right with the central goal of creating a risk of liability so as to police compliance with federally-prescribed standards be likened to the references to contracts in certain other federal rules. Dkt. 109 at 21. In short, plaintiffs here do not use Sandoval standing alone to challenge the DOL private right of action, as the court evidently viewed NAFA s challenge. NAFA Op. 60 n.10. Rather, plaintiffs also rely on the APA s prohibition on arbitrary and capricious agency action and cases such as MCI Telecommunications and Astra. Dkt. 109 at 23. 5
15 Case 3:16-cv M Document Filed 11/10/16 Page 7 of 8 PageID 9685 Respectfully submitted, Dated: November 10, 2016 s/ Eugene Scalia James C. Ho, Texas Bar No Russell H. Falconer, Texas Bar No GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP 2100 McKinney Avenue Suite 110 Dallas, TX Telephone: (214) Facsimile: (214) jho@gibsondunn.com rfalconer@gibsondunn.com Eugene Scalia* Jason J. Mendro* Paul Blankenstein* Rachel E. Mondl* Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP 1050 Connecticut Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C Telephone: (202) Facsimile: (202) escalia@gibsondunn.com jmendro@gibsondunn.com pblankenstein@gibsondunn.com rmondl@gibsondunn.com Counsel for Plaintiffs Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, Financial Services Institute, Inc., Financial Services Roundtable, Greater Irving-Las Colinas Chamber of Commerce, Humble Area Chamber of Commerce DBA Lake Houston Area Chamber of Commerce, Insured Retirement Institute, Lubbock Chamber of Commerce, Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association, and Texas Association of Business * Admitted pro hac vice (continued on next page) 6
16 Case 3:16-cv M Document Filed 11/10/16 Page 8 of 8 PageID 9686 Steven P. Lehotsky* U.S. CHAMBER LITIGATION CENTER 1615 H Street, NW Washington, DC Telephone: (202) Facsimile: (202) slehotsky@uschamber.com Counsel for Plaintiff Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America J. Lee Covington II* INSURED RETIREMENT INSTITUTE 1100 Vermont Avenue, N.W. Washington, DC Telephone: (202) Facsimile: (202) lcovington@irionline.org Counsel for Plaintiff Insured Retirement Institute David T. Bellaire* Robin Traxler* FINANCIAL SERVICES INSTITUTE, INC th Street, N.W. Suite 750 Washington, DC Telephone: (888) Facsimile: (770) david.bellaire@financialservices.org robin.traxler@financialservices.org Counsel for Plaintiff Financial Services Institute, Inc. Kevin Carroll* Ira D. Hammerman* SECURITIES INDUSTRY AND FINANCIAL MARKETS ASSOCIATION 1101 New York Avenue, N.W. 8th Floor Washington, DC Telephone: (202) Facsimile: (202) kcarroll@sifma.org ihammerman@sifma.org Counsel for Plaintiff Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association Kevin Richard Foster* Felicia Smith* FINANCIAL SERVICES ROUNDTABLE th Street, N.W. Suite 400 Washington, DC Telephone: (202) Facsimile: (202) richard.foster@fsroundtable.org felicia.smith@fsroundtable.org Counsel for Plaintiff Financial Services Roundtable * Admitted pro hac vice 7
Case 3:16-cv M Document 44 Filed 06/24/16 Page 1 of 13 PageID 257 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
Case 3:16-cv-01476-M Document 44 Filed 06/24/16 Page 1 of 13 PageID 257 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FINANCIAL
More informationCase 3:16-cv M Document 121 Filed 11/14/16 Page 1 of 5 PageID 9688 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
Case 3:16-cv-01476-M Document 121 Filed 11/14/16 Page 1 of 5 PageID 9688 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FINANCIAL
More informationCase 5:16-cv DDC-KGS Document 14 Filed 06/30/16 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS
Case 5:16-cv-04083-DDC-KGS Document 14 Filed 06/30/16 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS MARKET SYNERGY GROUP, INC, v. Plaintiff, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR,
More informationNo IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
Case: 17-10238 Document: 00514475934 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/16/2018 No. 17-10238 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; FINANCIAL
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
CASE 0:16-cv-00844-PJS-KMM Document 83 Filed 09/16/16 Page 1 of 15 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA LABNET INC. D/B/A WORKLAW NETWORK, et al., v. PLAINTIFFS, UNITED STATES
More informationCase 1:18-cv LY Document 32-2 Filed 06/25/18 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION
Case 1:18-cv-00295-LY Document 32-2 Filed 06/25/18 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION COMMUNITY FINANCIAL SERVICES ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA, LTD., and CONSUMER
More informationCase 4:16-cv ALM Document 10 Filed 10/18/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 779
Case 4:16-cv-00732-ALM Document 10 Filed 10/18/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 779 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION PLANO CHAMBER OF COMMERCE, et al., Plaintiffs,
More informationCase: 1:17-cv JG Doc #: 87 Filed: 01/11/19 1 of 5. PageID #: 1056 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
Case: 1:17-cv-01516-JG Doc #: 87 Filed: 01/11/19 1 of 5. PageID #: 1056 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION STEPHANIE LYNN STEIGERWALD on behalf of herself and
More informationCase 4:16-cv ALM Document 8 Filed 10/17/16 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 770
Case 4:16-cv-00732-ALM Document 8 Filed 10/17/16 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 770 PLANO CHAMBER OF COMMERCE, et al., IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION PLAINTIFFS,
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. No (1:15-cv GBL-MSN)
Appeal: 16-1110 Doc: 20-1 Filed: 01/30/2017 Pg: 1 of 2 Total Pages:(1 of 52) FILED: January 30, 2017 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-1110 (1:15-cv-00675-GBL-MSN) NATIONAL COUNCIL
More informationCase 3:15-cv D Document 48 Filed 08/11/15 Page 1 of 6 PageID 310
Case 3:15-cv-00116-D Document 48 Filed 08/11/15 Page 1 of 6 PageID 310 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION IN RE: INTRAMTA SWITCHED ACCESS CHARGES LITIGATION
More informationCase 2:17-cv WB Document 85 Filed 12/10/18 Page 1 of 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Case 2:17-cv-04540-WB Document 85 Filed 12/10/18 Page 1 of 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Plaintiff, v. DONALD J. TRUMP, in
More informationCase 1:17-cv RJL Document 51 Filed 12/18/17 Page 1 of 8 THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:17-cv-02187-RJL Document 51 Filed 12/18/17 Page 1 of 8 THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BEAN LLC d/b/a FUSION GPS, Plaintiff, v. DEFENDANT BANK, Defendant, and PERMANENT
More informationCase M:06-cv VRW Document 613 Filed 05/07/2009 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Case M:0-cv-0-VRW Document Filed 0/0/00 Page of 0 BRUCE I. AFRAN CARL J. MAYER STEVEN E. SCHWARZ Attorneys for the Plaintiffs IN RE NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY TELECOMMUNICATIONS RECORDS LITIGATION This Document
More informationCase 7:16-cv O Document 68 Filed 01/19/17 Page 1 of 6 PageID 1790
Case 7:16-cv-00108-O Document 68 Filed 01/19/17 Page 1 of 6 PageID 1790 FRANCISCAN ALLIANCE, INC., et al., v. Plaintiffs, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS WICHITA
More informationCase 3:16-cv REP Document 24 Filed 07/01/16 Page 1 of 13 PageID# 447
Case 3:16-cv-00467-REP Document 24 Filed 07/01/16 Page 1 of 13 PageID# 447 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA RICHMOND DIVISION CARROLL BOSTON CORRELL, JR., on behalf
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Case: 17-80213, 11/09/2017, ID: 10649704, DktEntry: 6-2, Page 1 of 15 Appeal No. 17 80213 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MARLON H. CRYER, individually and on behalf of a class of
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Case 3:08-cv-02117-P Document 71 Filed 12/08/10 Page 1 of 11 PageID 954 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION TEXAS DEMOCRATIC PARTY; BOYD L. RICHIE, in his capacity
More informationCase 3:16-cv L Document 9 Filed 10/27/16 Page 1 of 7 PageID 48 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Case 3:16-cv-02430-L Document 9 Filed 10/27/16 Page 1 of 7 PageID 48 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION SHEBA COWSETTE, Plaintiff, V. No. 3:16-cv-2430-L FEDERAL
More informationscc Doc 908 Filed 10/05/12 Entered 10/05/12 15:30:16 Main Document Pg 1 of 8
Pg 1 of 8 Post-Hearing Brief Deadline: October 5, 2012 at 4:00 p.m. (prevailing Eastern Time) KRAMER LEVIN NAFTALIS & FRANKEL LLP Thomas Moers Mayer Adam C. Rogoff P. Bradley O Neill 1177 Avenue of the
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
American Navigation Systems, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., LTD. et al Doc. 1 1 KALPANA SRINIVASAN (S.B. #0) 01 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 0 Los Angeles, California 00-0 Telephone: --0 Facsimile: --0
More informationNo IN THE United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. HO-CHUNK, INC. et al., Appellant,
USCA Case #17-5140 Document #1711535 Filed: 01/04/2018 Page 1 of 17 No. 17-5140 IN THE United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit HO-CHUNK, INC. et al., Appellant, v. JEFF SESSIONS
More informationORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR APRIL 15, 2016 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
USCA Case #14-5243 Document #1601966 Filed: 03/02/2016 Page 1 of 6 ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR APRIL 15, 2016 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT PERRY CAPITAL LLC,
More informationCase 3:17-cv L Document 25 Filed 05/02/18 Page 1 of 6 PageID 171
Case 3:17-cv-03300-L Document 25 Filed 05/02/18 Page 1 of 6 PageID 171 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION MBA ENGINEERING, INC., as Sponsor and Administrator
More informationSECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C FORM S-8. FLUOR CORPORATION (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
Registration No. 333- SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM S-8 REGISTRATION STATEMENT UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933 FLUOR CORPORATION (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified
More informationCase3:13-cv SI Document39 Filed11/18/13 Page1 of 8
Case:-cv-0-SI Document Filed// Page of IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 0 0 STEVEN POLNICKY, v. Plaintiff, LIBERTY LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF BOSTON; WELLS FARGO
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. JOMAR OIL LLC, a Connecticut limited liability company, Plaintiff,
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION JOMAR OIL LLC, a Connecticut limited liability company, Plaintiff, V. CIVIL NO. 3-07-CV-1782-L ENERGYTEC, INC., a Nevada corporation;
More informationCase 3:17-mc G Document 1 Filed 03/06/17 Page 1 of 5 PageID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Case 3:17-mc-00016-G Document 1 Filed 03/06/17 Page 1 of 5 PageID 1 CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION Petitioner, v.
More informationCase 1:13-cv MMS Document 54 Filed 06/18/15 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS
Case 1:13-cv-00466-MMS Document 54 Filed 06/18/15 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS JOSEPH CACCIAPALLE, On Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated, Case No. 13-cv-00466-MMS
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND
CoStar Realty Information, Inc. et al v. Bill Jackson and Associates Appraisers Doc. 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND COSTAR REALTY INFORMATION, INC., 2 Bethesda Metro Center,
More informationCase 1:16-cv JDB Document 56 Filed 01/16/18 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:16-cv-02113-JDB Document 56 Filed 01/16/18 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA AARP, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Case No.
More informationUnited States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Case: 18-15068, 04/10/2018, ID: 10831190, DktEntry: 137-2, Page 1 of 15 Nos. 18-15068, 18-15069, 18-15070, 18-15071, 18-15072, 18-15128, 18-15133, 18-15134 United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth
More informationCase 1:09-cv JCC-IDD Document 26 Filed 03/08/10 Page 1 of 23 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
Case 1:09-cv-01149-JCC-IDD Document 26 Filed 03/08/10 Page 1 of 23 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Alexandria Division VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER ) COMPANY ) )
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA
Case :-cv-0-bhs Document Filed 0// Page of UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA 0 FRANK S LANDING INDIAN COMMUNITY, v. Plaintiff, NATIONAL INDIAN GAMING COMMISSION, et
More informationIn the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Case: 17-3752 Document: 003113097118 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/28/2018 No. 17-3752 In the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. DONALD J.
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Case 3:08-cv-02117-P Document 68 Filed 11/18/10 Page 1 of 5 PageID 943 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION TEXAS DEMOCRATIC PARTY; BOYD L. RICHIE, in his capacity
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF WYOMING
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF WYOMING WADE E. JENSEN and DONALD D. GOFF, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, Case No. 06 - CV - 273 J vs.
More informationCase 1:18-cv DLF Document 12 Filed 02/27/18 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:18-cv-00253-DLF Document 12 Filed 02/27/18 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA THE NAVAJO NATION, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 1:18-cv-00253-DLF )
More informationCase 5:14-cv JPB Document 50 Filed 10/09/14 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 267
Case 5:14-cv-00039-JPB Document 50 Filed 10/09/14 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 267 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA MURRAY ENERGY CORPORATION, et al., Plaintiffs,
More informationCase hdh11 Doc 639 Filed 11/21/17 Entered 11/21/17 13:18:18 Page 1 of 14
Case 16-33437-hdh11 Doc 639 Filed 11/21/17 Entered 11/21/17 13:18:18 Page 1 of 14 GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP Samuel A. Newman (admitted pro hac vice) snewman@gibsondunn.com Olivia Adendorff (TX SBN: 24069994)
More informationThe Federal Preemption Battle Has Just Begun
Portfolio Media, Inc. 648 Broadway, Suite 200 New York, NY 10012 www.law360.com Phone: +1 212 537 6331 Fax: +1 212 537 6371 customerservice@portfoliomedia.com The Federal Preemption Battle Has Just Begun
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA INTRODUCTION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA NORINE SYLVIA CAVE, Plaintiff, v. DELTA DENTAL OF CALIFORNIA, Defendant. Case No. -cv-0-who ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS Re: Dkt. No.,,
More informationCase 1:17-cv JAL Document 73 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/12/2017 Page 1 of 11
Case 1:17-cv-20301-JAL Document 73 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/12/2017 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISION CASE NO. 17-cv-20301-LENARD/GOODMAN UNITED STATES
More informationRECENT CASES. (codified at 42 U.S.C. 7661a 7661f). 1 See Eric Biber, Two Sides of the Same Coin: Judicial Review of Administrative Agency Action
982 RECENT CASES FEDERAL STATUTES CLEAN AIR ACT D.C. CIRCUIT HOLDS THAT EPA CANNOT PREVENT STATE AND LOCAL AUTHORITIES FROM SUPPLEMENTING INADEQUATE EMISSIONS MONITORING REQUIREMENTS IN THE ABSENCE OF
More informationIn the Supreme Court of the United States
No. 16-739 In the Supreme Court of the United States SCENIC AMERICA, INC., PETITIONER v. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, ET AL. ON PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON. Plaintiff,
Case :-cv-000-tor ECF No. filed 0// PageID. Page of UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 0 R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA, U.S. Secretary of Labor, v. Plaintiff, JAMES DEWALT; ROBERT G. BAKIE;
More information1:12-cv TLL-CEB Doc # 46 Filed 04/27/16 Pg 1 of 13 Pg ID 715 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION
1:12-cv-13152-TLL-CEB Doc # 46 Filed 04/27/16 Pg 1 of 13 Pg ID 715 BERNARD J. SCHAFER, et al. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION Plaintiffs, Case No. 12-cv-13152
More informationCase bjh Doc 109 Filed 05/02/17 Entered 05/02/17 14:28:07 Page 1 of 6
Case 16-03151-bjh Doc 109 Filed 05/02/17 Entered 05/02/17 14:28:07 Page 1 of 6 Jason M. Katz (SBN: 24038990) jkatz@hhdulaw.com HIERSCHE, HAYWARD, DRAKELEY & URBACH, P.C. 15303 Dallas Parkway, Suite 700
More informationCase 1:18-cr DLF Document 71 Filed 10/25/18 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:18-cr-00032-DLF Document 71 Filed 10/25/18 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. CRIMINAL NUMBER: 1:18-cr-00032-2 (DLF) CONCORD
More informationBefore the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of Implementation of Sections 716 and 717 of the Communications Act of 1934, as Enacted by the Twenty-First Century Communications
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ALASKA
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ALASKA CASTLE MOUNTAIN COALITION, et al., v. Plaintiffs, OFFICE OF SURFACE MINING RECLAMATION AND ENFORCEMENT, et al., Defendants, Case No. 3:15-cv-00043-SLG
More informationCase 1:17-cv KPF Document 39 Filed 10/04/17 Page 1 of 19 MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR AN ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
Case 1:17-cv-02542-KPF Document 39 Filed 10/04/17 Page 1 of 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK... x KATE DOYLE, NATIONAL SECURITY ARCHIVE, CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBILITY AND ETHICS
More informationCase 1:15-cv FDS Document 156 Filed 09/13/17 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
Case 1:15-cv-13290-FDS Document 156 Filed 09/13/17 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS HEFTER IMPACT TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, v. Plaintiff, SPORT MASKA INC., d/b/a REEBOK-CCM HOCKEY,
More informationCase 4:16-cv JSW Document 32 Filed 12/05/16 Page 1 of 7 NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case :-cv-0-jsw Document Filed /0/ Page of NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 0 0 DAVID R. REED, v. Plaintiff, KRON/IBEW LOCAL PENSION PLAN, et al., Defendants.
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA - Alexandria Division -
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA - Alexandria Division - IN RE: BLACKWATER ALIEN TORT CLAIMS ACT LITIGATION Case No. 1:09-cv-615 Case No. 1:09-cv-616 Case No. 1:09-cv-617
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN GREEN BAY DIVISION. Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN GREEN BAY DIVISION ONEIDA TRIBE OF INDIANS OF WISCONSIN, Plaintiff, v. VILLAGE OF HOBART, WISCONSIN, Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff v. UNITED
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. August Term, (Argued: January 30, 2015 Decided: June 30, 2015) Docket No.
14 781 cv Cohen v. UBS Financial Services, Inc. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term, 2014 (Argued: January 30, 2015 Decided: June 30, 2015) Docket No. 14 781 cv x ELIOT COHEN,
More informationPlaintiffs Allina Heal th Services, et al. ("Plaintiffs"), bring this action against Sylvia M. Burwell, in her official
ALLINA HEALTH SERVICES et al v. BURWELL Doc. 23 @^M セ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ALLINA HEALTH SERVICES, ) et al., ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) ) SYLVIA M. BURWELL, Secretary )
More informationCase 5:08-cv JW Document 49 Filed 02/05/2009 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SAN JOSE DIVISION
Case :0-cv-0-JW Document Filed 0/0/00 Page of MCKOOL SMITH, P.C. Gayle Rosenstein Klein (State Bar No. ) Park Avenue, Suite 00 New York, NY 00 Telephone: () 0-0 Facsimile: () 0- Email: gklein@mckoolsmith.com
More informationCase 3:17-cv WHA Document 193 Filed 03/28/18 Page 1 of 6
Case :-cv-00-wha Document Filed 0// Page of 0 0 Theodore J. Boutrous, Jr., SBN 0 tboutrous@gibsondunn.com Andrea E. Neuman, SBN aneuman@gibsondunn.com William E. Thomson, SBN wthomson@gibsondunn.com Ethan
More informationCase 1:15-cv GBL-MSN Document 31 Filed 07/31/15 Page 1 of 8 PageID# 317
Case 1:15-cv-00675-GBL-MSN Document 31 Filed 07/31/15 Page 1 of 8 PageID# 317 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Alexandria Division NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR ADOPTION,
More informationCase 4:12-cv Document 105 Filed in TXSD on 11/07/13 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
Case 4:12-cv-03009 Document 105 Filed in TXSD on 11/07/13 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS ) EAST TEXAS BAPTIST UNIVERSITY, ) et al., ) Plaintiffs, )
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE
1 1 MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE ) GABRIEL RUIZ-DIAZ, et al., ) ) No. C0-1RSL Plaintiffs, ) v. ) ) MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT UNITED
More informationCase 1:09-md LAK Document 333 Filed 08/30/10 Page 1 of 3
Case 109-md-02017-LAK Document 333 Filed 08/30/10 Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ------------------------------------------------------------X In re LEHMAN BROTHERS
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Case 3:10-cv-02033-FLW-DEA Document 242 Filed 07/03/13 Page 1 of 8 PageID: 7020 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY IN RE JOHNSON & JOHNSON DERIVATIVE LITIGATION Civil Action No. 10-2033
More informationCase 2:06-cv JCC Document 51 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE
Case :0-cv-00-JCC Document Filed /0/0 Page of 0 0 JAMES S. GORDON, Jr., a married individual, d/b/a GORDONWORKS.COM ; OMNI INNOVATIONS, LLC., a Washington limited liability company, v. Plaintiffs, VIRTUMUNDO,
More informationIn the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Case: 18-55667, 09/06/2018, ID: 11003807, DktEntry: 12, Page 1 of 18 No. 18-55667 In the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit STEVE GALLION, and Plaintiff-Appellee, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
More informationCase 1:12-cv CM Document 50 Filed 10/26/12 Page 1 of 12
Case 1:12-cv-04873-CM Document 50 Filed 10/26/12 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, SUCCESSOR TO WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., SUCCESSOR
More informationCaseM:06-cv VRW Document716 Filed03/19/10 Page1 of 8
CaseM:0-cv-0-VRW Document Filed0//0 Page of MICHAEL F. HERTZ Deputy Assistant Attorney General JOSEPH H. HUNT Director, Federal Programs Branch VINCENT M. GARVEY Deputy Branch Director ANTHONY J. COPPOLINO
More informationCase 2:10-cr MHT-WC Document 1907 Filed 10/14/11 Page 1 of 6
Case 2:10-cr-00186-MHT-WC Document 1907 Filed 10/14/11 Page 1 of 6 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) ) v. ) CR.
More informationCase sgj11 Doc 34 Filed 05/05/16 Entered 05/05/16 19:24:28 Page 1 of 4
Case 16-31854-sgj11 Doc 34 Filed 05/05/16 Entered 05/05/16 19:24:28 Page 1 of 4 Brian Smith, Esq. State Bar No. 24066101 HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLP 200 Crescent Court, Suite 1600 Dallas, Texas 75201 Telephone:
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case :-cv-00-wqh-ags Document Filed 0// PageID. Page of 0 0 Helen I. Zeldes (SBN 00) helen@coastlaw.com Andrew J. Kubik (SBN 0) andy@coastlaw.com COAST LAW GROUP, LLP 0 S. Coast Hwy 0 Encinitas, CA 0 Tel:
More informationCase 3:12-cv Document 99 Filed in TXSD on 04/07/14 Page 1 of 9
Case 3:12-cv-00044 Document 99 Filed in TXSD on 04/07/14 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS GALVESTON DIVISION VOTING FOR AMERICA, PROJECT VOTE, INC., BRAD
More informationCase 3:17-cv WHA Document 110 Filed 11/01/17 Page 1 of 4
Case :-cv-0-wha Document 0 Filed /0/ Page of 0 Julie B. Axelrod California Bar No. 0 Christopher J. Hajec Elizabeth A. Hohenstein IMMIGRATION REFORM LAW INSTITUTE Massachusetts Avenue, NW Suite Washington,
More informationNo IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT. ELOUISE PEPION COBELL, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees,
USCA Case #11-5158 Document #1372563 Filed: 05/07/2012 Page 1 of 10 No. 11-5158 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT ELOUISE PEPION COBELL, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees,
More informationCase No UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NINTH CIRCUIT
Case: 09-55513 11/18/2009 Page: 1 of 16 ID: 7134847 DktEntry: 23-1 Case No. 09-55513 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NINTH CIRCUIT FREEMAN INVESTMENTS, L.P., TRUSTEE DAVID KEMP, TRUSTEE OF THE DARRELL L.
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case :-cv-000-w-blm Document Filed // Page of 0 STUART F. DELERY Assistant Attorney General DIANE KELLEHER Assistant Director, Federal Programs Branch United States Department of Justice, Civil Division
More informationCase M:06-cv VRW Document 151 Filed 02/01/2007 Page 1 of 8
Case M:0-cv-0-VRW Document Filed 0/0/00 Page of 0 WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE AND DORR LLP John A. Rogovin (pro hac vice Randolph D. Moss (pro hac vice Samir C. Jain # Brian M. Boynton # Benjamin C. Mizer
More informationCase 4:15-cv CVE-PJC Document 32 Filed in USDC ND/OK on 07/31/15 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
Case 4:15-cv-00386-CVE-PJC Document 32 Filed in USDC ND/OK on 07/31/15 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA STATE OF OKLAHOMA ex rel. E. Scott Pruitt, in his official
More informationCase 1:10-cv RMU Document 8 Filed 04/15/10 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:10-cv-00196-RMU Document 8 Filed 04/15/10 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ELECTRONIC PRIVACY INFORMATION CENTER, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 1:10-cv-0196-RMU NATIONAL
More informationCase 1:17-cv KG-KK Document 55 Filed 01/04/18 Page 1 of 10
Case 1:17-cv-00654-KG-KK Document 55 Filed 01/04/18 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO THE PUEBLO OF ISLETA, a federallyrecognized Indian tribe, THE PUEBLO
More informationTHE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:18-cv-02837 Document 1 Filed 12/04/18 Page 1 of 14 THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA FRIENDS OF THE EARTH, 1101 15 th Street NW, 11 th Floor Washington, D.C. 20005, and
More informationCase 3:15-cv MHL Document 80 Filed 03/09/17 Page 1 of 3 PageID# 1262
Case :-cv-00-mhl Document 0 Filed 0/0/ Page of PageID# IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA RICHMOND DIVISION FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION, ) ) Plaintiff, )
More informationCase 9:11-ap PC Doc 99 Filed 03/09/15 Entered 03/09/15 16:45:21 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 8.
Case :-ap-0-pc Doc Filed 0/0/ Entered 0/0/ :: Desc Main Document Page of 0 JOHN P. REITMAN, SBN 0 LARRY W. GABRIEL, SBN ALEKSANDRA ZIMONJIC, SBN 0 STEVEN T. GUBNER, SBN COREY R. WEBER, SBN 0 0 Century
More informationNo IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT STEVEN MCARDLE, vs. AT&T MOBILITY LLC, et al.,
No. 09-17218 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT STEVEN MCARDLE, Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. AT&T MOBILITY LLC, et al., Defendants-Appellants. On Appeal from the United States District
More informationCase 5:16-cv LHK Document 79 Filed 01/18/19 Page 1 of 13
Case :-cv-0-lhk Document Filed 0// Page of 0 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION OCEANA, INC., Plaintiff, v. WILBUR ROSS, et al., Defendants. Case No. -CV-0-LHK
More informationCase 2:17-cv SVW-AFM Document 39 Filed 12/04/17 Page 1 of 15 Page ID #:653
Case :-cv-0-svw-afm Document Filed /0/ Page of Page ID #: 0 0 JEFFREY H. WOOD Acting Assistant Attorney General REBECCA M. ROSS, Trial Attorney (AZ Bar No. 00) rebecca.ross@usdoj.gov DEDRA S. CURTEMAN,
More informationCase 1:08-cv LMB-JFA Document 1179 Filed 03/19/19 Page 1 of 9 PageID# 29618
Case 1:08-cv-00827-LMB-JFA Document 1179 Filed 03/19/19 Page 1 of 9 PageID# 29618 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA SUHAIL NAJIM ABDULLAH AL SHIMARI, et al., Plaintiffs,
More information1900 M Street, NW, Ste. 250, Washington, D.C
Case 1:15-mc-01902-JO Document 31 Filed 03/11/16 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 820 1900 M Street, NW, Ste. 250, Washington, D.C. 20036 marc@zwillgen.com Marc J. Zwillinger (202) 706-5202 (phone) (202) 706-5298
More informationCase3:08-cv MEJ Document239 Filed10/21/14 Page1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA I.
Case:0-cv-0-MEJ Document Filed// Page of UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EDUARDO DE LA TORRE, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CASHCALL, INC., Defendant. Case No. 0-cv-0-MEJ ORDER RE:
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. JEFFREY K. SKILLING, and KENNETH L. LAY, Plaintiff, Defendants. Crim. No. H-04-25 (Lake, J. DEFENDANT
More informationUnited States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit No. 11-1460 Michael R. Nack, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant v. Douglas Paul
More informationCase 4:17-cv ALM Document 26 Filed 06/02/17 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 543
Case 417-cv-00336-ALM Document 26 Filed 06/02/17 Page 1 of 3 PageID # 543 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Plaintiff,
More informationCase4:14-cv YGR Document75 Filed07/17/15 Page1 of 13
Case:-cv-00-YGR Document Filed0// Page of 0 Eric D. Miller, Bar No. EMiller@perkinscoie.com Michael A. Sussmann, D.C. Bar No. 00 (pro hac vice) MSussmann@perkinscoie.com James G. Snell, Bar No. 00 JSnell@perkinscoie.com
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION. v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:12-CV-345
Case 4:12-cv-00345 Document 18 Filed in TXSD on 05/31/12 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION KHALED ASADI, Plaintiff, v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:12-CV-345
More informationCase 1:96-cv TFH Document 4043 Filed 05/23/14 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:96-cv-01285-TFH Document 4043 Filed 05/23/14 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ELOUISE PEPION COBELL, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 1:96CV01285
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT AT&T INC. S OPPOSITION TO FCC S MOTION TO HOLD CASE IN ABEYANCE
USCA Case #15-1038 Document #1562701 Filed: 07/15/2015 Page 1 of 18 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT AT&T INC., v. Petitioner, FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT ) INTERNATIONAL REFUGEE ASSISTANCE ) PROJECT, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs-Appellees, ) ) v. ) No. 17-1351 ) DONALD J. TRUMP, et al., ) ) Defendants-Appellants.
More informationpìéêéãé=`çìêí=çñ=íüé=råáíéç=pí~íéë=
No. 13-1379 IN THE pìéêéãé=`çìêí=çñ=íüé=råáíéç=pí~íéë= ATHENA COSMETICS, INC., v. ALLERGAN, INC., Petitioner, Respondent. On Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Case 3:08-cv-02117-P Document 15 Filed 12/19/2008 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION TEXAS DEMOCRATIC PARTY; BOYD L. RICHIE, in his capacity as
More information