Misconceptions about the Sunshine Act abound, Part 1
|
|
- Dayna Haynes
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Misconceptions about the Sunshine Act abound, Part 1 PNA's legal department receives hundreds of hotline calls each year about public access to government meetings and records. Every day a novel problem or question seems to arrive on our doorstep, thanks to the resourcefulness of reporters and the seemingly limitless imagination of public officials and gadflies. On the other hand, the legal department receives many hotline questions that are distressingly familiar, particularly with respect to the Sunshine Act. Some of the questions refer to technical requirements of the Act that are difficult to remember or understand. The repetitiveness of these questions is understandable; most reporters need not commit the Act's finer points to memory. Other questions reveal patterns of misconception about the Sunshine Act's basic requirements. Reporters who regularly cover local government meetings have probably encountered some or all of these misconceptions, some of which have become routine in certain quarters. The PNA legal department has addressed some of the most common misconceptions with regard to the Sunshine Act, and there's no better way to begin than to address the most common and insidious one of all. It's the one we call, "It wasn't a meeting, it was a (insert any other noun here)." When an agency as defined in the Act (for example, a school board or a board of supervisors) has a prearranged gathering attended or participated in by a quorum of its members, the gathering is a meeting. You can call it a work session or a conference or getting together at the diner after the meeting, information gathering, or a fact-finding session, but it's nonetheless a meeting in the eyes of the law. The gathering place is a matter of complete indifference under the Sunshine Act's terms. A meeting can happen anywhere inside or outside a government building; what matters is whether a quorum of the agency is present. A quorum is the number of public officials necessary to take official action, typically one more than half the total number of public officials serving on the agency. Meetings may or may not be open to the public. Whenever a meeting occurs for the purpose of deliberation or taking official action, it must be open to the public and all the formalities associated with a public meeting - notice, public participation, minute-taking, etc. - must be observed by the agency. Deliberation is broadly defined in the Act as discussion for the purpose of making a decision about agency business. Official action is also a defined term, and it encompasses a broad range of activity including making recommendations or decisions, creating policy and voting. The Act also gives agencies the authority to hold "executive sessions," which are meetings open only to agency members and, in some circumstances, other people whose presence is necessary to conduct the business of the meeting. Training programs arranged by State or Federal agencies for local agency members, called "conferences" in the Act, are also meetings that do not have to be open to the public. Although the Act clearly defines the elements that combine to create a "meeting," hotline calls reveal a widespread misconception that an agency may avoid the requirement of the Act by calling a gathering of its members something besides a meeting. Reporters who learn of an evening gathering at an agency member's house are told that it wasn't a meeting, it
2 was a "pre-meeting planning session." When members meet unannounced and in private with a contractor to discuss agency building or procurement plans, they defend their action by calling the event a "discussion session" that is outside the scope of the Sunshine Act. The definition of "meeting" is the most important element of the Sunshine Act. For that reason, it is too important to be misunderstood or dismissed with wordplay. Moreover, the definition is the foundation on which all other elements of the Act stand. If there is a quorum of an agency discussing agency business, it is a meeting for purposes of the Sunshine Act. Misconceptions about the Sunshine Act abound, Part 2 The Sunshine Act generally requires agencies to hold meetings open to the public whenever they take official action and conduct deliberations. However, the open meeting requirement is subject to some exceptions. Conferences - training programs or seminars designed solely to inform agency members about their official responsibilities - may be closed to the public. Caucus and ethics committee meetings of the state House and Senate may also be closed to the public. A board of auditors does not have to open its working sessions to the public as long as the board's official action with respect to the records being audited is taken at an open meeting. The exception that generates the most litigation and frustrates more reporters and citizens than all other exceptions combined is the executive session exception. The Act defines an executive session as "[a] meeting from which the public is excluded, although the agency may admit those persons necessary to carry out the purpose of the meeting." Based on PNA legal hotline calls, the greatest misconception about the executive session is that it can be invoked whenever agency members believe it would be in their best interest to resolve a matter in private. After watching some agencies at work, one could be forgiven for assuming that executive sessions are the meeting norm and open meetings are, in fact, the exception to that norm. Fortunately, the Sunshine Act clearly establishes that the legitimate purposes of an executive session are fairly limited. First and most importantly, official action on matters discussed at an executive session must always take place at an open meeting. In other words, an executive session at which agency members take a vote, establish policy, decide agency business or make official recommendations is an unlawful meeting. Given the incidence of hotline calls regarding decisions made during executive sessions, it seems that many officials are unaware of this limitation as well as the statutory admonition that an executive session shall not be used "as a subterfuge to defeat the purposes of [the open meeting requirement]." The other important limitation is that an executive session may be held only for the reasons stated in the Act. The Act does not give agency members the discretion to hold a meeting behind closed doors because they, the members, have some reason of their own for believing a private meeting would be best.
3 Misconceptions about Sunshine Act abound, Part 3 The most prominent exception to the open meeting requirement concerns the executive session, which is defined as a meeting from which the public can be excluded. This article will focus on misconceptions about the reasons for an executive session and the statutory requirements for holding an executive session. The Act states unequivocally that an agency may hold an executive session for one or more of the following reasons: - to discuss personnel matters, including the hiring, promotion, disciplining or dismissing of "any specific prospective public officer or employee or current public officer or employee employed or appointed by the agency," but not including filling vacancies in any elective office; - to hold information, strategy and negotiation sessions related to collective bargaining agreements or arbitration; - to consider the purchase or lease of real estate up to the time an option or agreement is obtained; - to consult with its attorney or other professional advisor about information or strategy regarding litigation or issues as to which identifiable complaints are expected to be filed; - to review and discuss agency business which, if reviewed or discussed in public, would lead to the disclosure of information recognized as confidential or privileged under law, including the initiation and conduct of investigations of possible violations of the law and quasi-judicial deliberations; and (for committees of the governing board of a state-owned, state-aided or staterelated college or university or community college or the Board of Governors of the State System of Higher Education only) to discuss matters of academic admission or standings. The first reason, commonly called the "personnel exception," is one of the two most frequently cited as justification for holding an executive session. This reason applies whenever an agency meets to discuss a personnel action (hiring, firing, promoting, etc.) regarding a specific person who is a current or prospective employee or official of the agency. The "personnel exception" does not cover discussions that relate to a general class of public officers or employees or any other matter that does not affect a specific person or persons. For example, by its terms the Act does not authorize an agency to hold a private discussion about creating new jobs or budgeting for general personnel expenses. Also, the Act does not apply when an agency meets to discuss the appointment of someone to fill a vacancy in an elective office. When, for example, a township board of supervisors meets to discuss the selection of someone to fill a mid-term vacancy on the board, it may not hold an executive session under the "personnel exception." The public officer or employee who is the subject of discussion has the right to request, in writing, that the matter be discussed at an open meeting. Although the Act does not expressly say so, it implies that the agency should defer to the officer's or employee's
4 preference for an open meeting. Some agencies, citing liability or individual privacy concerns, have denied a request for open meeting discussion, but the courts have not definitively ruled on their authority to do so. However, the Act does state that an agency shall not discuss a personnel matter in executive session if that serves to deny any public officer or employee the due process rights granted by law. The Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court has ruled that the "personnel exception" does not apply when an agency meets to discuss an independent contractor or consultant. Such persons, the court said, are not "appointed by the agency" in the sense that the legislature intended. Therefore, the "personnel exception" does not permit an agency to meet in executive session to discuss the engagement of an independent contractor, or the termination or extension of an independent contractor's agreement. Somewhat related to the "personnel exception" is the Act's provision for information, strategy and negotiation sessions related to labor relations. The courts have said that the Act does not require an agency to negotiate a labor contract in public session. Therefore, an agency may meet in executive session to receive information and conduct discussions about the negotiation of a collective bargaining agreement with its employees. The exception also applies when an agency meets to hold discussions regarding a union grievance or labor relations arbitration. It is particularly important to recall a point touched on earlier: An agency may not, under any circumstances, vote or take any other forms of official action during an executive session. In the context of "personnel exception" cases, the courts have repeatedly enforced this point of law. For example, a school board's executive session vote to increase its superintendent's salary was declared illegal by the Commonwealth Court. The same court has said that while an agency may meet in executive session to discuss and narrow the field of candidates for a specific job, it must meet in public to decide which candidate to hire or appoint. The court has struck down an employee promotion decision that an agency discussed and then voted on in executive session. In regard to both the personnel and labor relations matters, the principle is equally valid that discussion and only discussion is authorized at an executive session. Misconceptions about Sunshine Act abound, Part 4 Based on PNA's experience, after personnel matters, agencies most often cite litigation or anticipated litigation as justification for an executive session. The Sunshine Act states that an agency may meet in executive session to consult with its attorney or other professional advisor regarding litigation or issues as to which identifiable complaints are expected to be filed. The courts have held that an agency which is the defendant in a lawsuit related to a services contract may meet with its lawyer in executive session to discuss the allegations of the plaintiff's complaint.
5 In regard to the "litigation exception," the authorized purpose of an executive session is for the agency members to have a discussion with their lawyer or another professional advisor. Any official action resulting from the discussion or otherwise related to the lawsuit must occur at a meeting open to the public. One court held that an agency violated the Sunshine Act when it met in executive session to discuss the filing of litigation, and ended the meeting by voting to take that action. The court ruled that the agency should have convened in open session to conduct the vote on the filing of its lawsuit. This exception exists because if an agency were required to consult with its lawyer in open session, the discussion would be quite limited, if not impossible, unless the agency were prepared to waive attorney-client confidentiality. Furthermore, the agency, and ultimately the public, would be severely prejudiced in court proceedings or settlement negotiations if it were forced to discuss openly with its lawyer all the information relevant to a lawsuit. PNA's legal hotline calls reveal that many agencies and their solicitors misconceive that any hypothetical possibility of a lawsuit justifies a closed-door discussion. Although the Sunshine Act speaks of "litigation" and "issues on which identifiable complaints are expected to be filed," many local government agencies treat the exception as though it applies to every situation in which a lawsuit could imaginably arise. Most issues faced by government agencies can conceivably invite or involve litigation. If the General Assembly intended this exception to be interpreted as broadly as it is by many agencies, there would be little justification for any public discussion of agency business. The only reasonable interpretation of the Sunshine Act is that an agency may discuss, in private, information or strategy related to an active lawsuit or a matter as to which an expectation of specifically identifiable litigation by, against or on behalf of the agency exists. Once litigation commences in open court, the agency can still rely on the litigation exception to discuss strategies or exchange information with its lawyer. However, if a discussion of the litigation does not involve the lawyer or another professional advisor, there is no justification for the agency to meet in closed session. What does the statute mean by "other professional advisor?" Agencies can seek assistance and advice from a professional other than a lawyer. For example, if the subject of a lawsuit or an expected lawsuit involves a disputed property line, the agency may confer with a civil engineer, registered surveyor or certified property appraiser regarding the facts of the dispute or litigation strategies. There is no reason to suppose that the General Assembly meant to treat agency employees differently than non-employees in regard to the litigation exception. The agency's lawyer or other professional advisor may therefore be an "insider," such as the agency solicitor, or a professional retained exclusively for the purposes of litigation. Misconceptions about Sunshine Act abound, Part 5 Executive sessions are the most common exceptions to the Act's requirement that agency meetings involving official action or deliberation be open to the public. We continue to examine executive sessions, with a focus on some of the issues less commonly encountered
6 by journalists. Their experience is reflected in the body of judicial opinions that interpret the Act, among which there is little reference to these reasons for a private agency meeting. The Act allows an agency to "consider" the purchase or lease of real property in executive session. Real property is land or things erected or affixed to land, as opposed to personal property, the broad category of other things that are subject to legal ownership. Although the term "consider" is not defined in the Act, it's reasonable to assume the legislature intended it to mean, "discuss." Elsewhere in the executive session provision of the Act, the legislature expressly allows "negotiation sessions" (with respect to labor agreements). It does not give agencies similar latitude with respect to the purchase or lease of real property. The legislature apparently chose not to permit agency members meeting as a body to negotiate privately the acquisition of real property. This conclusion is reinforced by the fact that the "real property exception" does not contemplate the participation of non-members in the executive session. The "litigation exception," expressly permits consultation between the agency members and their lawyer or other experts during an executive session. The "real property exception" does not authorize persons other than agency members to participate in the executive session. The Act limits the time period during which an agency may meet in private to consider real property acquisition. It states that such consideration may occur "up to the time an option to purchase or lease the real property is obtained or up to the time an agreement to purchase or lease such property is obtained [if no option is involved]." An option is simply an agreement that gives a person the right to buy a property, if he wishes, at a fixed price within a specified time period. The apparent purpose of the real property exception is to allow agency members to discuss the purchase of property prospectively without alerting the owner or possible competitors who would otherwise gain a negotiating advantage. If an agency has already purchased a property (or the right to buy it), the rationale for private discussion no longer exists. Confidentiality of another sort is the rationale for the next type of executive session. The Act allows an agency to "review and discuss" agency business that, if discussed in public, would violate "a lawful privilege or lead to the disclosure of information or confidentiality protected by law." The Act includes within the scope of this open meeting exception "matters related to the initiation and conduct of investigations [of law violations]" and "quasi-judicial deliberations." The purpose of this exception is to allow agency members to discuss information made confidential by law that is pertinent to the agency's business. Pennsylvania and Federal laws make a wide variety of information confidential, including income tax returns, medical records, and public assistance grants. If discussion or quasi-judicial deliberation of such information is required, an agency may hold an executive session for that purpose. "Quasijudicial deliberations" refers to the consideration of evidentiary facts and legal principles in preparation for the issuance of a ruling regarding someone's rights or liabilities. For example, an agency would engage in such a process after a hearing in order to decide whether to issue or revoke a license or grant or deny a zoning variance. In order to hold an executive session pursuant to this exception, the agency must have a need to discuss information recognized as confidential, such as its referral of a possible criminal offense to an investigative agency or the medical records of an employee. Many
7 times, such information does not routinely come under the scrutiny of local government, or, if it does, it is dealt with at the administrative level or as part of an executive session called for a different although related - reason. The final reason for an executive session is really self-explanatory. The Act states that "duly constituted committees" of the governing bodies of state-owned, state-related and stateaided institutions of higher education may meet in executive session to discuss matters of academic admission or standing. Since a student's academic performance is generally regarded as a private matter under current law, it is not surprising that the legislature would allow a college admissions or academic standing committee to discuss such a matter in private.
Sunshine Act. 65 Pa.C.S. Chap ter 7
Sunshine Act 65 Pa.C.S. Chap ter 7 Sunshine Act 65 Pa.C.S. Chapter 7 CHAPTER 7 OPEN MEETINGS Sec. 701. Short title of chapter. 702. Legislative findings and declaration. 703. Definitions. 704. Open meetings.
More informationIN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA James M. Smith, : Appellant : : v. : No. 1512 C.D. 2011 : Township of Richmond, : Berks County, Pennsylvania, : Gary J. Angstadt, Ronald : L. Kurtz, and Donald
More informationFREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS KANSAS OPEN MEETING ACT (KOMA) RULES Revision date: May 2009
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS KANSAS OPEN MEETING ACT (KOMA) RULES Revision date: May 2009 1. WHAT GROUPS ARE SUBJECT TO THE KOMA? How do you determine if a particular group is subject to the Kansas Open
More informationCURRENT ISSUES UNDER THE BROWN ACT
CITIES CONFERENCE LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITY ATTORNEYS MAY 1-3, 1996 CURRENT ISSUES UNDER THE BROWN ACT DOES A PUBLIC EMPLOYEE HAVE THE OPTION TO REQUEST A PUBLIC SESSION FOR ALL TYPES OF PERSONNEL MATTERS
More informationORGANIZATION, PHILOSOPHY AND GOALS Policy 0110
ORGANIZATION, PHILOSOPHY AND GOALS Policy 0110 Legal Status District Name and Identification Codes The School District is organized under the authority of the State Legislature and exercises powers delegated
More informationPENNSYLVANIA BAR ASSOCIATION LEGAL ETHICS AND PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY COMMITTEE RESOLUTION
PENNSYLVANIA BAR ASSOCIATION LEGAL ETHICS AND PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY COMMITTEE RESOLUTION WHEREAS, it is the charge of the PBA Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility Committee to review and
More informationBY-LAWS. of the LONG ISLAND POWER AUTHORITY. As amended October 24, 2018
BY-LAWS of the LONG ISLAND POWER AUTHORITY As amended October 24, 2018 Long Island Power Authority 333 Earle Ovington Blvd., Suite 403 Uniondale, New York 11553 BY-LAWS of the LONG ISLAND POWER AUTHORITY
More informationNo NORTH SC MEETINGS. a meeting. Sunshine. The Open. Revised, 65 Pa. C.S.A. Sec. 701 et seq. vacancies. Officer. in the.
No. 0066 SECTION: BOARD PROCEDURES TITLE: MEETINGS NORTH ALLEGHENY SCHOOL DISTRICT ADOPTED: 11/18/15 REVISED: 006 - MEETINGS SC 271 A meeting of the School Board iss a prearranged gathering of the Board
More informationCHAPTER 16. FOREIGN LEGAL CONSULTANCY RULE RULE PURPOSE RULE GENERAL CERTIFICATION REGULATIONS
CHAPTER 16. FOREIGN LEGAL CONSULTANCY RULE RULE 16-1.1 PURPOSE The purpose of this chapter is to permit a person who is admitted to practice in a foreign country as an attorney, counselor at law, or the
More informationFinancial Oversight And Management Board For Puerto Rico. Bylaws
Financial Oversight And Management Board For Puerto Rico Bylaws ARTICLE I. POWERS AND BYLAW INTERPRETATION....1 1.1. Powers.....1 1.2. Interpretation of Bylaws...1 ARTICLE II. OFFICES AND OFFICE LOCATIONS....1
More informationBOARD AND COMMITTEE HANDBOOK TOWN OF SOUTH HADLEY, MASSACHUSETTS
BOARD AND COMMITTEE HANDBOOK TOWN OF SOUTH HADLEY, MASSACHUSETTS Approved JULY 31, 2001 As Revised August 18, 2009 CONTENTS PAGE Purpose 1 Additional Publications 1 Committee Formation 1 Committee Vacancies
More informationThe Open Meetings Law: Understandings and Implications
The Open Meetings Law: Understandings and Implications Prepared by: Maureen Brown Heffernan Berenstein, Moore, Heffernan, Moeller & Johnson, L.L.P. MHeffernan@berensteinlawfirm.com 501 Pierce Street, Suite
More informationChapter RCW: Open public meetings act. RCW Sections. Notes: Drug reimbursement policy recommendations: RCW 43.20A of 7 05/16/2008 1:41 PM
1 of 7 05/16/2008 1:41 PM Chapter 42.30 RCW Open public meetings act Chapter Listing RCW Sections 42.30.010 Legislative declaration. 42.30.020 Definitions. 42.30.030 Meetings declared open and public.
More informationMAYORS COUNCIL ON REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION RULES OF PROCEDURE FOR THE CONDUCT OF MEETINGS. In these Rules of Procedure for the Conduct of Meetings:
MAYORS COUNCIL ON REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION RULES OF PROCEDURE FOR THE CONDUCT OF MEETINGS 1. DEFINITIONS In these Rules of Procedure for the Conduct of Meetings: Act means the South Coast British Columbia
More informationSENATE SUBSTITUTE FOR SENATE COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTE FOR. SENATE, No STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 215th LEGISLATURE ADOPTED NOVEMBER 29, 2012
SENATE SUBSTITUTE FOR SENATE COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTE FOR SENATE, No. STATE OF NEW JERSEY th LEGISLATURE ADOPTED NOVEMBER, 0 Sponsored by: Senator LORETTA WEINBERG District (Bergen) Senator JOSEPH PENNACCHIO
More informationCORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Property Valuation Services Corporation CORPORATE GOVERNANCE MANUAL Approved: April 27, 2007 Version Revised as of: September 7, 2012 1 Introduction... 1 1.1 Background... 1 1.2 Corporate Governance Manual...
More informationThe official, corporate name of the School District shall be Reorganized R-IV School District of Buchanan County.
ORGANIZATION, PHILOSOPHY AND GOALS Policy 0110 Legal Status District Name and Identification Codes The School District is organized under the authority of the State Legislature and exercises powers delegated
More informationGuidelines for Advocacy: Changing Policies and Laws to Create Safer Environments for Youth
Guidelines for Advocacy: Changing Policies and Laws to Create Safer Environments for Youth A Guide to Allowable Lobbying Activities for Nonprofit Organizations STRATEGIZER 31 INTRODUCTION: The purpose
More informationIN-HOUSE COUNSEL AND PRIVILEGE ISSUES. B. John Pendleton, Jr. DLA Piper LLP (US) 21 September 2012
IN-HOUSE COUNSEL AND PRIVILEGE ISSUES B. John Pendleton, Jr. DLA Piper LLP (US) 21 September 2012 Objective The goal of the company is to take maximum advantage of the attorneyclient privilege and related
More informationlegal ethics opinions
LEGAL ETHICS OPINION 1783 IN CONTEXT OF (A) FORECLOSURE SALE OR (B) A COMMERCIAL CLOSING, MAY ATTORNEY DISBURSE TO LENDER COLLECTED ATTORNEYS FEES IN EXCESS OF THOSE NECESSARY TO REIMBURSE LENDER FOR PAYMENT
More informationProper Business Practices and Ethics Policy
Proper Business Practices and Ethics Policy Synopsis 1. Crown Castle International Corp. ( Crown Castle ) and its affiliates 1 strive to conduct their business with honesty and integrity and in accordance
More informationMaryland State Laws Applicable to Harford Community College Updated 11/12/2017
Maryland State Laws Applicable to Harford Community College Updated 11/12/2017 This document presents selected portions of Maryland state law (the Annotated Code of Maryland) that are most directly applicable
More informationCITY ATTORNEY MODEL RETAINER AGREEMENT. By and Between THE CITY OF ******* and **************
CITY ATTORNEY MODEL RETAINER AGREEMENT By and Between THE CITY OF ******* and ************** TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents Using this Agreement....4 CITY ATTORNEY RETAINER AGREEMENT...5 1. RETAINER
More informationALBERTA INFORMATION AND PRIVACY COMMISSIONER
ALBERTA INFORMATION AND PRIVACY COMMISSIONER Request for Authorization to Disregard Access Requests under section 55(1) of the Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act Alberta Justice and Solicitor
More informationOpen Public Meetings
POLICY AND LEGAL SERVICES Open Public Meetings A Guide for School Board Members and Superintendents WASHINGTON STATE SCHOOL DIRECTORS ASSOCIATION Open Public Meetings Table of Contents Introduction...1
More informationBY-LAWS OF THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF AUBURN UNIVERSITY CHAPTER I THE UNIVERSITY
BY-LAWS OF THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF AUBURN UNIVERSITY CHAPTER I THE UNIVERSITY SECTION 1. General Provisions 1.1 Auburn University is a public corporation and instrumentality of the State of Alabama, created
More informationABINGTON SCHOOL DISTRICT ABINGTON, PENNSYLVANIA. BOARD POLICY STATEMENT REGARDING: Procedures for Board Meetings
ABINGTON SCHOOL DISTRICT ABINGTON, PENNSYLVANIA BOARD POLICY STATEMENT REGARDING: Procedures for Board Meetings Section: Board Governance Approved: September 27, 2016 Supersedes/Amends Policy See Also:
More informationBroward College Focused Report August 26, 2013
Broward College Focused Report August 26, 2013 3.2.3 The governing board has a policy addressing conflict of interest for its members. (Board conflict of interest) Non-Compliance The institution has policies
More informationOpen Public Meetings. A Guide for School Board Members and Superintendents WASHINGTON STATE SCHOOL DIRECTORS ASSOCIATION POLICY AND LEGAL SERVICES
POLICY AND LEGAL SERVICES The Washington State School Directors Association provides leadership and advocacy, and empowers its members with knowledge and skills to govern with excellence. 221 College Street
More informationTEXAS COUNCIL Board Training: Trustee Roles and Responsibilities
TEXAS COUNCIL Board Training: Trustee Roles and Responsibilities MAY 30, 2012 Presented by: Carvan Adkins, Legal Counsel Taylor, Olson, Adkins, Sralla, & Elam LLP 6000 Western Place, Suite 200 Fort Worth,
More informationApproved-4 August 2015
Approved-4 August 2015 Governance of the Public Utility District NO.1 of Jefferson ( JPUD ) Commission PUD #1 of Jefferson County 310 Four Corners Road, Port Townsend, WA 98368 360.385.5800 Contents GOVERNANCE
More informationCLAY COUNTY HOME RULE CHARTER Interim Edition
CLAY COUNTY HOME RULE CHARTER 2009 Interim Edition TABLE OF CONTENTS PREAMBLE... 1 ARTICLE I CREATION, POWERS AND ORDINANCES OF HOME RULE CHARTER GOVERNMENT... 1 Section 1.1: Creation and General Powers
More informationBoard of Trustees Bylaws
Board of Trustees Bylaws Revised June 16, 2015 Table of Contents Preface... Page 4 Article I. Legal Basis. Page 4 Section 1. Establishment by General Assembly Section 2. Corporate Name Section 3. Office
More informationTERMS OF REFERENCE FOR LOCAL GOVERNING BODIES ACADEMY NAME: ONE
TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR LOCAL GOVERNING BODIES ACADEMY NAME: ONE 1 THE ROLE OF THE LOCAL GOVERNING BODY 1.1 The Local Governing Body is a committee of the main board of the Trust. Each Academy has its own
More informationGOLDEN ENTERTAINMENT, INC. AUDIT COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS. CHARTER (as of February 9, 2016)
GOLDEN ENTERTAINMENT, INC. AUDIT COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS CHARTER (as of February 9, 2016) I. Purpose. The primary purpose of the Audit Committee (the Committee ) is to assist the Board of Directors
More informationINTERNAL RULES OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS (approved by the Board of Directors on January 24, 2017)
INTERNAL RULES OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS (approved by the Board of Directors on January 24, 2017) CONTENTS 1. MISSION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS... 2 2. THE DIRECTORS' CHARTER... 2 3. COMPOSITION OF THE
More informationBYLAWS THE CHILDREN S TRUST OF MIAMI-DADE COUNTY
BYLAWS THE CHILDREN S TRUST OF MIAMI-DADE COUNTY Preamble The Children's Trust is established pursuant to 1.01(A)(11) of the Miami-Dade County Home Rule Charter, Article CIII of Chapter 2 of the Code of
More informationCORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND NOMINATING COMMITTEE CHARTER
PURPOSE CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND NOMINATING COMMITTEE CHARTER The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee is a standing committee appointed by the Board of Directors of DataWind Inc. The Committee
More informationChairs Taniguchi and Dela Cruz, Vice Chairs Kahele and Slom, and members of the committees:
Testimony Presented Before the Senate Committee on Higher Education and Senate Committee on Economic Development, Government Operations and Housing March 21, 2013 at 2:45 pm by Glenn Shizumura Director,
More informationHO-CHUNK NATION CODE (HCC) TITLE 2 GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 2 OPEN MEETINGS ACT ENACTED BY LEGISLATURE: JUNE 22, 2004 CITE AS: 2 HCC 2
HO-CHUNK NATION CODE (HCC) TITLE 2 GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 2 OPEN MEETINGS ACT ENACTED BY LEGISLATURE: JUNE 22, 2004 CITE AS: 2 HCC 2 This Act supersedes HCC 95-015, of 1996. Last Amended and Restated
More informationSection 1: Definitions and Interpretation Section 2: Mission and Objectives of the College... 7
Bylaws under the Optometrists Profession Regulation, Health Professions Act Approved at the September 30, 2006 Annual General Meeting (AGM) and amended at the October 18, 2012 AGM, the October 22, 2015
More informationCENTRAL MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY BOARD OF TRUSTEES BYLAWS
CENTRAL MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY BOARD OF TRUSTEES Adopted: 05-0714 Amended: 07-1206 Amended: 08-0214 Amended: 08-0717 Amended: 09-0917 Amended: 10-0715 Amended: 10-1202 Amended: 11-0217 Amended: 13-0411 Amended:
More informationLEHIGH-NORTHAMPTON AIRPORT AUTHORITY BYLAWS
LEHIGH-NORTHAMPTON AIRPORT AUTHORITY BYLAWS ARTICLE I - OFFICES Revised and Adopted December 23, 1997 Amended June 25, 2002 Amended September 24, 2002 Amended April 26, 2011 Amended January 24, 2012 Amended
More informationSchool Law for Board Members
2012 Summer Board Conference School Law for Board Members Presented by: Morgan Smith, OSBA Attorney John Stellwagen, OSBA Attorney July 14, 2012 P.O. Box 1068, Salem, OR 97308 1201 Court St., NE, Salem,
More informationPART III - CALIFORNIA PENAL CODES
PART III - CALIFORNIA PENAL CODES Sections Applicable to Grand Jury Activities ( http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/calaw.html) Page: 1 Page: 2 TITLE 4. GRAND JURY PROCEEDINGS CHAPTER 1. GENERAL PROVISIONS 888
More informationSection 5. Pursuant to subdivisions 4 and 8 of Section 2824 of the PAL, an Audit & Finance Committee is hereby formed, being comprised of:
RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE ST. LAWRENCE COUNTY INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AGENCY CIVIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ( CDC ) ADOPTING CERTAIN POLICIES, STANDARDS AND PROCEDURES OF THE CDC IN CONNECTION
More informationFinancial Oversight and Management Board for Puerto Rico. Bylaws
Financial Oversight and Management Board for Puerto Rico Bylaws ARTICLE I. Powers and Bylaw Interpretation.... 3 1.1. Powers.... 3 1.2. Interpretation of Bylaws.... 3 ARTICLE II. Offices and Office Locations....
More informationETHICS FOR THE PROBLEM-SOLVING COURT JUDGE: THE NEW ABA MODEL CODE *
ETHICS FOR THE PROBLEM-SOLVING COURT JUDGE: THE NEW ABA MODEL CODE * LOURAINE C. ARKFELD Being a judge in a problem-solving court looks very different from what has been the judge s traditional role. As
More informationThe Corporation of the County of Peterborough. By-law No
The Corporation of the County of Peterborough By-law No. 2013-20 A By-law to adopt the Land Division Committee procedures and guidelines and to repeal By-law No. 2009-05 Whereas the Planning Act, R.S.O.
More informationRING POWER CORPORATION GLOBAL ANTI-CORRUPTION POLICY
Effective Date 4/12/2012 Approved by David Alban RING POWER CORPORATION GLOBAL ANTI-CORRUPTION POLICY Statement of Policy. It is the policy of Ring Power Corporation ( Ring Power or the Company ) to conduct
More informationOPEN MEETING LAWS IN CALIFORNIA: RALPH M. BROWN ACT
OPEN MEETING LAWS IN CALIFORNIA: RALPH M. BROWN ACT December 2011 401 Mendocino, Suite 100 Santa Rosa, CA 95401 707.545.8009 www.meyersnave.com TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. INTRODUCTION, PURPOSE, AND SCOPE
More informationWESTFIELD STATE UNIVERSITY
BYL AWS WESTFIELD STATE UNIVERSITY BOARD OF TRUSTEES BYLAWS ARTICLE I. Board Authority and Responsibilities Section 1. Statutory Duties and Responsibilities. The governance of Westfield State University
More informationBoard Standing Orders Revised version December 2013
Board Standing Orders Revised version December 2013 Board Standing Orders Page 1. INTRODUCTION 3 2. INTERPRETATION AND DEFINITIONS 3 3. THE BOARD: COMPOSITION, TENURE AND ROLE OF BOARD MEMBERS 5 3.1. Appointments
More informationTerms of Reference. For. Local Governing Bodies
Terms of Reference For Local Governing Bodies CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION... 3 2. CONSTITUTION OF THE LGBs... 4 3. PROCEEDINGS OF THE LGB... 5 4. RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE BOARD AND LGB 6 5 DELEGATED POWERS....8
More informationLOBBYING OVERVIEW. The following abbreviations apply:
LOBBYING OVERVIEW The guidance provided in this Overview is applicable to Governmental Affairs Agents, Represented Entities and Persons Communicating with the General Public ( Grassroots Lobbying ). The
More informationOPINION Issued June 8, Settlement Agreement Prohibiting a Lawyer s Disclosure of Information Contained in a Court Record
OPINION 2018-3 Issued June 8, 2018 Settlement Agreement Prohibiting a Lawyer s Disclosure of Information Contained in a Court Record SYLLABUS: A settlement agreement that prohibits a lawyer s disclosure
More informationRegulations of the Audit, Compliance and Related Party Transactions Committee of Siemens Gamesa Renewable Energy, S.A.
Regulations of the Audit, Compliance and Related Party Transactions Committee of Siemens Gamesa Renewable Energy, S.A. (Consolidated text endorsed by the Board of Directors on 23 March, 2018) INDEX CHAPTER
More informationTHE PUBLIC INTEREST DISCLOSURE (WHISTLEBLOWER PROTECTION) ACT
THE PUBLIC INTEREST DISCLOSURE (WHISTLEBLOWER PROTECTION) ACT Provision PART 1 PURPOSE AND DEFINITIONS Purpose of this Act 1 The purpose of this Act is (a) to facilitate the disclosure and investigation
More informationThe Maine Freedom of Access Act
Chapter 6 6 Maine law embraces the concept that the actions of public entities should be a matter of public record. With the enactment of Maine s Freedom of Access Act in 1959, the Legislature put into
More informationDear Bob, That said, I think you have replied off point.
From: Gartner, Michael [mailto:michaelg@iowacubs.com] Sent: Friday, April 20, 2007 3:17 PM To: Bob Downer; amir arbisser; Jenny Rokes; Mary Ellen Becker; vasquez.rose@principal.com; Ruth Harkin; Teresa
More informationCh. 11 GENERAL PROVISIONS CHAPTER 11. GENERAL PROVISIONS
Ch. 11 GENERAL PROVISIONS 51 11.1 Sec. 11.1. Definitions. 11.2. Construction. 11.3. Statute of limitations. CHAPTER 11. GENERAL PROVISIONS Source The provisions of this Chapter 11 adopted April 23, 1993,
More informationAMENDED AND RESTATED BYLAWS THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY. Adopted May 6, Amended July 21, 2017
AMENDED AND RESTATED BYLAWS of THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY Adopted May 6, 2016 Amended November 4, 2016 Amended July 21, 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ARTICLE I NAME AND PURPOSE... 1 Section 1.01 Name...
More informationDRAFT FOR CONSULTATION
DRAFT FOR CONSULTATION Incorporated Societies Bill Government Bill [To come] Explanatory note Consultation draft Hon Paul Goldsmith Incorporated Societies Bill Government Bill Contents Page 1 Title 9
More informationADMINISTRATION AND GOVERNMENT. Part 1. Subpart A. Board of Supervisors. Subpart B. Tax Collector. Subpart C. Manager. Part 2.
Subpart A. Board of Supervisors CHAPTER I ADMINISTRATION AND GOVERNMENT Part 1 Elected and Appointed Officials Section 101. Compensation of Members of Board of Supervisors Subpart B. Tax Collector Section
More informationBy-Laws SVAI. Specialty Vehicle Appraisal Institute of Alberta
By-Laws SVAI Specialty Vehicle Appraisal Institute of Alberta Specialty Vehicle Appraisal Institute Bylaws Table of Contents By-Laws... 1 SVAI... 1 Specialty Vehicle Appraisal Institute of Alberta...
More informationBYLAWS OF DISABILITY RIGHTS FLORIDA, INC. A FLORIDA CORPORATION NOT FOR PROFIT. As Amended and Restated on September 21, 2012 ARTICLE I
BYLAWS OF DISABILITY RIGHTS FLORIDA, INC. A FLORIDA CORPORATION NOT FOR PROFIT As Amended and Restated on September 21, 2012 ARTICLE I 1.01 Name. The name of the organization shall be DISABILITY RIGHTS
More informationCollege and Association of Respiratory Therapists of Alberta. Bylaws under the Respiratory Therapists Profession Regulation, Health Professions Act
Bylaws under the Respiratory Therapists Profession Regulation, Health Professions Act Section 1: Definitions and Interpretation 2 Section 2: Member Resignation and Expulsion 5 Section 3: Governance of
More informationRegulations of the Board of Directors of Abengoa, S.A. Chapter One. General Provisions
Regulations of the Board of Directors of Abengoa, S.A. Chapter One. General Provisions Article 1. Purpose and scope of the regulations These regulations were approved by the board of directors of Abengoa,
More informationSexual Assault and Other Sexual Misconduct
The University of British Columbia Board of Governors Policy No.: 131 Approval Date: April 13, 2017 This policy comes into effect on May 18, 2017 Title: Responsible Executive: Vice-President, Students
More informationMEALS ON WHEELS ASSOCIATION OF TASMANIA INC CONSTITUTION
MEALS ON WHEELS ASSOCIATION OF TASMANIA INC CONSTITUTION 1. NAME : 1.1 The name of the Association shall be Meals on Wheels Association of Tasmania Incorporated (hereafter called the Association ). 2.
More informationChapter 29. Meeting Procedures and the Freedom of Information Act
29-100 Introduction Chapter 29 Meeting Procedures and the Freedom of Information Act This chapter examines the requirements for conducting meetings under the Virginia Freedom of Information Act. The Virginia
More informationReport of the Unauthorized Practice of Law Committee
Ohio State Bar Association Council of Delegates November 2005 Meeting 19 Report of the Unauthorized Practice of Law Committee To the Council of Delegates: The OSBA Unauthorized Practice of Law Committee
More informationB 3 BOARD OF REGENTS MEETING. Open Government Training. For information only BACKGROUND
BOARD OF REGENTS MEETING B 3 Open Government Training For information only BACKGROUND The Open Government Training Act was enacted by the 2014 Washington State Legislature and became effective on July
More informationWashington, DC Washington, DC 20510
May 4, 2011 The Honorable Patrick J. Leahy The Honorable Charles Grassley Chairman Ranking Member Committee on the Judiciary Committee on the Judiciary United States Senate United States Senate Washington,
More informationUpcoming League Events:
Thank You for registering for the three-part Elected Officials Webinar Series. Welcome to Session Two: Open Meetings Act (OMA) Upcoming League Events: The Medical Marihuana Act & Your Community February
More informationXYZ Co. shall pay $200 per hour to each of Lawyer A and Lawyer B for additional time (including travel) spent beyond the initial eight hours.
LEGAL ETHICS OPINION 1715 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT; FUTURE CONFLICTS; RESTRICTION OF LAWYER'S PRACTICE. This responds to your letter dated December 15, 1997, requesting an advisory opinion that addresses a
More informationBoard of Regents. Bylaws Articles I IX. Article I Powers. Article II Officers of the Board
Board of Regents Bylaws Articles I IX Article I Powers Article II Officers of the Board Article III Meetings of the Board Article IV Committees of the Board Article V Officers of the University Article
More informationGovernors Handbook
Governors Handbook 2017-2018 C O N T E N T S SECTION PAGE ONE GOVERNANCE STATEMENT OF PRINCIPLES 2 TWO INSTRUMENT OF GOVERNMENT 5 THREE ARTICLES OF GOVERNMENT 15 FOUR STANDING ORDERS Including: Governor
More informationThe name of the incorporated association is 'Nick Xenophon's SA-BEST Incorporated'.
- 1 - NICK XENOPHON'S SA-BEST INCORPORATED CONSTITUTION 1. NAME OF ASSOCIATION 1.1 The name of the incorporated association is 'Nick Xenophon's SA-BEST Incorporated'. 1.2 The Association is incorporated
More informationINTERNAL REGULATIONS O F T H E BOARD OF DIRECTORS
KORIAN French Société Anonyme with a Board of Directors Registered office: 21-25, rue Balzac- 75008 Paris, France 447 800 475 - RCS Paris INTERNAL REGULATIONS O F T H E BOARD OF DIRECTORS V A L I D A S
More informationFACULTY SERVICE OFFICER AGREEMENT
UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA FACULTY SERVICE OFFICER AGREEMENT July 2017 Pursuant to the Memorandum of Understanding Concerning Comprehensive Collective Bargaining and Strike/Lockout Activity reached between
More informationM E M O R A N D U M. Deirdre Brennan, Executive Director Reaching Across Illinois Library System. To: Julie A. Tappendorf. From:
A Professional Corporation 140 South Dearborn Street, Suite 600 Chicago, IL 60603 www.ancelglink.com Julie A. Tappendorf jtappendorf@ancelglink.com (P) 312.604.9182 (F) 312.782.0943 M E M O R A N D U M
More informationOmbudsman Report. Investigation into complaints about closed meetings held by Council for the City of London on May 17 and June 23, 2016
Ombudsman Report Investigation into complaints about closed meetings held by Council for the on May 17 and June 23, 2016 Paul Dubé Ombudsman of Ontario Complaint 1 In June 2016, my Office received two
More informationACCESSING GOVERNMENT INFORMATION IN. British Columbia
ACCESSING GOVERNMENT INFORMATION IN British Columbia RESOURCES Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act (FOIPPA) http://www.oipcbc.org/legislation/foi-act%20(2004).pdf British Columbia Information
More informationSTATE OF NEW JERSEY OFFICE OF THE STATE COMPTROLLER PROCUREMENT REPORT
STATE OF NEW JERSEY OFFICE OF THE STATE COMPTROLLER PROCUREMENT REPORT BOROUGH OF EDGEWATER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACTS A. Matthew Boxer COMPTROLLER June 8, 2011 PR-3 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION...
More informationNew York State School Boards Association 2009 Annual Convention, NYC October 15-18, 2009
New York State School Boards Assoc. October 16, 2009 State of New York Department of State Committee on Open Government Camille Jobin-Davis, Assistant Director camille.jobin-davis@dos.state.ny.us state
More informationRPC RULE 1.5 FEES. (3) the fee customarily charged in the locality for similar legal services;
RPC RULE 1.5 FEES (a) A lawyer shall not make an agreement for, charge, or collect an unreasonable fee or an unreasonable amount for expenses. The factors to be considered in determining the reasonableness
More informationARIZONA S OPEN MEETING LAW. Christina Estes-Werther, General Counsel April 29, 2015
ARIZONA S OPEN MEETING LAW Christina Estes-Werther, General Counsel April 29, 2015 Overview Purpose/Foundation Legislative history, meeting, public body, legal action, etc. Meeting Requirements, Notices
More informationRECOGNITION AND PROCEDURAL AGREEMENT A COLLECTIVE AGREEMENT ENTERED INTO BETWEEN
RECOGNITION AND PROCEDURAL AGREEMENT A COLLECTIVE AGREEMENT ENTERED INTO BETWEEN THE UNIVERSITY OF CAPE TOWN (Hereinafter referred to as The University ) AND UNIVERSITY OF CAPE TOWN EMPLOYEES UNION (Hereinafter
More informationAgricultural Futures Trading Act B.E (1999) BHUMIBOL ADULYADEJ, REX. Given on 9 th October B.E. 2542, Being the 54 th year of the present reign.
Agricultural Futures Trading Act B.E. 2542 (1999) BHUMIBOL ADULYADEJ, REX. Given on 9 th October B.E. 2542, Being the 54 th year of the present reign. Translation His Majesty King Bhumibol Adulyadej graciously
More informationTOWN OF SANDWICH. Town Charter. As Adopted by Town Meeting May 2013 and approved by the Legislature February Taylor D.
TOWN OF SANDWICH Town Charter As Adopted by Town Meeting May 2013 and approved by the Legislature February 2014 Taylor D. White Town Clerk 1 SB 1884, Chapter 22 of the Acts of 2014 THE COMMONWEALTH OF
More informationTOWN OF RIDGEFIELD, CT CHARTER AS APPROVED 2010
TOWN OF RIDGEFIELD, CT CHARTER AS APPROVED 2010 Town of Ridgefield, CT Charter as Approved 2010 Page 1 of 44 ARTICLE I. THE CHARTER... 5 Section 1-1. The Charter.... 5 ARTICLE II. THE TOWN... 6 Section
More informationNew Jersey State Board of Accountancy Laws
45:2B-42 Short title 1. This act shall be known and may be cited as the "Accountancy Act of 1997." L.1997,c.259,s.1. 45:2B-43 Findings, declarations relative to practice of accounting 2. The Legislature
More informationP L A N N I N G B O A R D B Y L A W S
Department of Community Development P L A N N I N G B O A R D B Y L A W S Adopted on January 20, 2015 1. ORGANIZATION & ADMINISTRATION 1:1.Annual Organization; Elections; Meetings 1:1-1. Organization Meeting.
More informationThe Enforcement Guide
Contents list The Enforcement Guide 1. Introduction Overview 2. The 's approach to enforcement 3. Use of information gathering and investigation powers 4. Conduct of investigations 5. Settlement 6. Publicity
More informationInternational Guaranties
International Guaranties By Sidney G. Saltz In this age of globalization, many companies domiciled in other countries have created subsidiaries to do business in the United States. Often, those subsidiaries
More informationAUDIT AND FINANCE COMMITTEE TERMS OF REFERENCE
AUDIT AND FINANCE COMMITTEE Reviewed and approved by the Governance Committee: May 20, 2014 Reviewed and approved by the Audit and Finance Committee: May 20, 2014 Reviewed and Approved by the Board of
More informationCOMPILATION OF THE ACQUISITION REGULATION OF THE PANAMA CANAL AUTHORITY 1
IMPORTANT NOTICE: Spanish is the official language of the Agreements issued by the Panama Canal Authority Board of Directors. The English translation is intended solely for the purpose of facilitating
More informationamendments shall become effective on January 1, 1998, at 12:01 a.m. It is so ordered.
Supreme Court of Florida AMENDMENTS TO THE RULES REGULATING THE FLORIDA BAR -- CHAPTERS 6 AND 16. No. 91,405 [December 18, 1997] PER CURIAM. The Florida Bar ("the Bar") petitions this Court to amend chapters
More informationPrinciples of Corporate Governance
Principles of Corporate Governance (As amended August 1, 2015) Bio-Techne Corporation (the Company or Bio-Techne ) is committed to strong, forwardlooking corporate governance practices as one means of
More information