Written Testimony of Francesca T. Grifo, Ph.D. Senior Scientist with the Union of Concerned Scientists Scientific Integrity Program
|
|
- Darrell Osborne
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Written Testimony of Francesca T. Grifo, Ph.D. Senior Scientist with the Union of Concerned Scientists Scientific Integrity Program Before the Appropriations Subcommittee on Legislative Branch U.S. House of Representatives Hearing on 2011 Appropriations February 24, 2010 This testimony is presented by Dr. Francesca Grifo, Senior Scientist with the Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS), a leading science-based nonprofit working for a healthy environment and a better world. The full testimony is submitted for the record. Dr. Grifo will summarize her statement for the Committee on the need for Refunding of the Office of Technology Assessment (OTA). This written testimony provides (1) a brief introduction, (2) a summary of why Congress needs the OTA, (3) the unique qualities of the OTA, (4) the weaknesses of the arguments against the OTA, (5) what an OTA might look like today, and (6) recommendations for next steps. Madame Chair, Ranking Member Aderholt, and members of the Subcommittee, the Union of Concerned Scientists appreciates the opportunity to testify today on an extremely important issue appropriations for the Office of Technology Assessment (OTA). In order for Congress to responsibly manage the taxpayer s money and to enact laws that keep our nation secure and healthy, Congress must ensure that it has a source of credible and timely advice on science and technology. Such an organization would look very much like the OTA, which was defunded in 1995 but never eliminated. As the world grows ever more complicated and as global challenges mount, the time has come to bring the OTA back. I. Introduction With the Technology Assessment Act of 1972, Congress created a new agency the Congressional Office of Technology Assessment, known as the OTA to provide unbiased information concerning the physical, biological, economic, social, and political effects of technological applications. 1 From 1972 to 1995, the OTA helped Congress to assess complex issues and make wiser legislative choices. OTA reports addressed issues before almost every Congressional committee, and through those reports, legislators could better understand new technologies and their policy implications. The reports helped set the terms of debate and increased understanding of the risks and implications of policy options. Because these reports were designed to frame issues and assess multiple policy alternatives, they were often cited by both sides during the same Congressional debate.
2 During its 23 years of operation, OTA produced about 750 studies. 2 At the time of its demise, the OTA was the government s smallest agency with fewer than 150 permanent staff but it exerted an outsized influence in the policy world and had many admirers from all parts of the political spectrum. France, the Netherlands, Sweden, and a dozen other countries established 3 science and technology information agencies based on the OTA model. Although funding for the OTA was eliminated in 1995, the legislation that created it was never repealed. Congress should renew funding for the OTA to restore the legislature s ability to understand the implications of policy choices surrounding complex issues. II. Why Congress Needs an OTA OTA is a Credible Source of Information. Washington, D.C. is a city awash in reports, white papers, fact sheets and other bits of information. The challenge for Congress is to separate the valuable information from the spin. This process is time consuming and often requires a level of expertise that even the best and most well-trained staffers will not always have. Members of Congress certainly do not lack for input, but in many situations they do lack accurate and nonpartisan information that is structured in a way they can easily use. OTA was uniquely structured to provide credible information in the following areas: Unnecessary expenditure of taxpayer money on unproven technologies or other policies that are scientifically indefensible Early identification and analysis of technological issues before they became national crises Evaluation of Executive Branch science and technology initiatives to aid Congress in its oversight duties. While the analysis produced by OTA did not always drive congressional decision making, it did set boundaries to the debate, rule out some scientifically incorrect arguments, and help to frame political decisions in technically defensible ways. The National Academies, the Congressional Research Service (CRS), and the Government Accountability Office (GAO) all have important and related missions and do them well, but as we describe below, they cannot meet these needs and replace what the OTA was able to do. OTA Can Save Taxpayer Money and Save Lives. When OTA was operational, it more than earned its keep by identifying wasteful and ineffective programs and suggesting improvements to others. We provide a few relevant examples: A 1988 OTA study, Healthy Children: Investing in the Future pointed out the vulnerability of low birthweight infants to a variety of physical and mental disabilities. Its research concluded that expanding Medicaid eligibility to all pregnant women living in poverty would cost much less than the cost of $14,000 to $30,000 to treat the health problems of each low birthweight infants. 4 That study helped change Medicaid eligibility - 2 -
3 rules by expanding access to prenatal care to millions of women in poverty. A 1987 OTA study predicted that Medicare coverage of mammograms for senior women could cut breast cancer deaths by 22 percent by the year Likewise, a 1990 OTA study concluded that older women undergoing routine pap smears were much less likely to develop cervical cancer than unscreened women. 6 Both of these reports were instrumental in expanding Medicare coverage to include routine mammograms and pap smears, thus saving lives. A 1992 OTA study, Special Care Units for People with Alzheimer s and Other Dementias, was instrumental in helping federal and state governments achieve cost savings totaling $14 million annually. 7 A number of OTA reports also proved to be years ahead of their time on many of the critical issues Congress is debating today from weapons proliferation to genetic discrimination. On the topic of renewable fuels, a 1995 OTA report Renewing Our Energy Future had already identified the drawbacks of corn ethanol and the potential of second-generation biofuels such as switch grass. 8 Finally, in recent years Congress has approved a number of expensive yet troubled programs that could have been identified and averted by a timely OTA assessment. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) spent three years pushing for a costly radiation detection system for smuggled nuclear material that did not work as billed, while it neglected to upgrade existing equipment that could have helped improve security. The DHS had already awarded billions of dollars in contracts for deployment of the detectors before a series of critical GAO reports and Congressional outcry caused the agency to reconsider. 9 III. The Unique Qualities of OTA There are a number of possible ways to structure technical advice to Congress, but a successful technology assessment organization should incorporate the following features: The ability to access the highest levels of expertise on a given subject and the ability to utilize external peer review in finalizing its reports The ability to assess information in an unbiased manner that would gain the respect of both parties A focus on serving the needs of Congress and framing the issue in a way that is useful to legislators and their staffers An institutional culture conducive to asking hard questions and clearly communicating the answers The ability to be forward thinking and to address emerging issues, not just current crises An institutional commitment to transparency The capacity and resources needed to complete reports in a timely fashion
4 Fulfilling all of these qualities is a challenge but the former OTA was quite successful at doing just that. Other researchers have considered similar parameters and concluded that any feasible alternate proposal for a technology assessment organization would end up looking quite similar to OTA. 10,11 The National Academy of Science (NAS), the Congressional Research Service (CRS) and the Government Accountability Office (GAO) are three other entities that are also in the business of providing information to Congress. These three organizations are all good at what they do, and they should continue to do it, but none of them satisfactorily fills the important role that OTA played. The NAS provides excellent consensus recommendations from groups of the nation s most respected scientists and experts. But advising Congress is not its primary function and while it tries to be responsive to congressional requests, it can and does say no at times. NAS does not have any capacity for post-study follow up. Furthermore, the NAS is not always attuned to the needs and timelines of legislators and its reports are very expensive to produce. Not being a government agency, the NAS lacks the automatic and high-level access to other parts of the federal government that OTA would have. The CRS is highly respected for its rapid response, but it is not accustomed to making its reports public, or working with stakeholders or outside experts. It lacks a culture of transparency. It does not have the technological or analytical capacity of the OTA, nor does it have experience with external peer review. Historically CRS has responded to requests from members not committees. The GAO has very recently begun to undertake technological assessments of the type formerly done by OTA, but that program is bound by the rules and culture of a financial auditing agency. While the GAO has extensive access to all parts of the federal government and has produced numerous reports that have proven extremely useful for oversight, it has little experience with forward-looking assessments. Given the GAO s core mission, it is unlikely that technology assessment will find a permanent home at GAO. The Structure of OTA. The Congressional environment is highly political and hence technical analysis for Congress is very different from research or analysis conducted in academic or other settings. The OTA s unique value derived from its ability to frame problems, to distinguish topics of importance from non-issues, and to identify the important policy choices available. By leaving out the value judgments and prescriptive recommendations, OTA was able to be both authoritative and credible. OTA was overseen by a Technical Advisory Board (TAB) which was composed of six Senators and six Representatives, evenly split between the two parties. OTA worked primarily on studies requested by Congressional committees and did not issue recommendations for action. Because OTA was a part of Congress it was adept at communicating with politicians but was also sufficiently insulated from politics that its findings were seen as credible
5 OTA studies were technically accurate, analytically sound, and while balanced with respect to stakeholder interests, were not watered down by requiring consensus amongst those stakeholders. The reports were highly influential outside of Congress and were often best-sellers at the Government Printing Office. For example, GPO sold 48,000 OTA reports in 1980 alone. 12 All major OTA studies relied on advisory panels of experts who served as sources of information, guidance, and critical review. These panels included top substantive experts, who helped assure the studies technical and analytic quality, and individuals representing the different interests at stake. Finally, it is clear that the presence of OTA raised the level of discourse in Congress. In its reports, OTA made no policy recommendations, but rather presented a range of policy options that were consistent with its technical findings. There were instances when a member of the TAB would vote to approve the release of a study and moments later issue a statement critical of some aspect of the report recommendations. Often the same OTA report was cited by both sides of a debate. OTA also informally aided members and their staff in how to think about an issue, by inquiring into the foundations of claims made by a technology and paying close attention to its consequences IV. The Arguments Against OTA are Weak Numerous arguments were made in favor of eliminating OTA in 1995, and have been repeated by some in the years since. Speed. Some criticized OTA for having a report schedule that was too slow for Congress s needs. While OTA could move quickly when necessary, the organization s primary value came in the preparation of more complex reports where the speed of response was less important than getting the analysis right. The niche filled by OTA was that it could undertake longer more complex studies than CRS, which specializes in fast turn-around reports, and it could better tailor its findings to the needs of Congress than could the NAS. Indeed, many of OTA s reports have proven to be years ahead of their time, and stand as the definitive first analysis of emerging issues years before Congress moved to legislate. Political bias. A high-profile dispute between OTA and the Reagan administration about the technical feasibility of proposed missile-defense systems gave fuel to the idea that the organization was politically biased. However, the OTA approached even the most controversial topics with objectivity and balance, and in doing so won numerous supporters from both sides of the aisle. OTA s governing structure in particular, the strictly bipartisan TAB helped ensure non-partisan analysis. In addition, the OTA restriction on issuing recommendations kept the reports focused on technical issues rather than politics. Appropriations language urging that OTA give priority to requests from Committee chairs and their respective ranking members would reinforce OTA s position as the provider of unbiased objective information to Congress. Redundancy. One argument made in favor of ending OTA was that members of Congress could directly contact any needed experts, rather than using OTA as a middleman. What s more, in the years since OTA s demise the Internet has radically transformed how Congress and the - 5 -
6 public access information. Google and Wikipedia are now the first stop for many people in searching out needed information. But none of this can replace the value of credible, peer-reviewed technical reports, such as those provided by OTA. Members of Congress can of course seek advice from anyone they wish, but the danger there is that members will only seek out expertise they are already familiar with and not have the resources or time to look further. Furthermore, most of the pressing questions put before Congress simply cannot be decided by information found on a Wikipedia page; as the OTA expert Christopher Hill put it, Congress is not particularly interested in the melting point of bismuth. 13 V. What would OTA look like today? The world has changed since 1972 when the OTA first opened its doors, and undoubtedly the OTA that might open in 2011 would also have to be different. The bicameral bipartisan congressional board, the focus on framing issues and looking to the future, the mix of internal and external expertise, and the attention to the needs of its congressional client are all essential elements that should be retained in any technology assessment organization, no matter its name. Some recommendations for bringing a revitalized OTA into the 21 st century would be: Take full advantage of the Internet and electronic communication to boost the public service and education aspect of OTA work Greater flexibility in the speed of response to allow some simpler reports to be issued on a shorter timeframe Find ways to expand OTA s service to more Members of Congress, not just committee chairs and leadership. This might be S&T training for Congressional staff, smaller reports for individual members or other outreach. Establish strong working relationships with similar agencies such as NAS, CRS and GAO. VI. Conclusions The OTA model, honed over 23 years of serving the needs of Congress and the nation, has been proven. Nobody would argue that OTA was perfect, however, the Technology Assessment Act has turned out to be an amazingly flexible document, and any needed improvements can be done within its scope. The agency s structure, as defined in 1972, remains appropriate today. We see the OTA as an important tool to help the United States face the challenges ahead. We call on Congress to reopen the OTA and we look forward to working with members of Congress to achieve this important goal. We are in the process of engaging the best thinkers on OTA to guide us in the development of a common-sense proposal for re-starting OTA that takes into account our fiscal reality. We will submit a detailed proposal and recommendation of a FY11 funding level within the next two weeks to your office for your consideration. We realize that starting up OTA is a multi-year project, but we do not believe the taxpayers and American families should wait any longer for this effort to begin
7 1 The Technology Assessment Act of 1972, 471, 2 U.S.C. (1972). Online at 2 The OTA Legacy. Online at 3 Vig, Norman J. The European Experience. In Science and Technology Advice for Congress, edited by Morgan, M.G. & Peha, J.M Washington, DC: Resources for the Future. 4 U.S. Office of Technology Assessment. Healthy Children: Investing in the Future. OTA-H-345, February U.S. Office of Technology Assessment. Breast Cancer Screening for Medicare Beneficiaries. November U.S. Office of Technology Assessment. The Costs and Effectiveness of Screening for Cervical Cancer in Elderly Women. OTA-BP-H-65. February M. Granger Morgan and Jon Peha, Science and Technology Advice for Congress, Washington: Resources for the Future, 2003, p U.S. Office of Technology Assessment. Renewing Our Energy Future. OTA-ETI-614. September O Harrow, R Report criticizes nuclear detectors. Washington Post, June Epstein, G.L. & Carter, A.B. A Dedicated Organization in Congress. In Science and Technology Advice for Congress, edited by Morgan, M.G. & Peha, J.M Washington, DC: Resources for the Future. 11 Blair, P.D Scientific Advice for Policy in the United States: Lessons from the National Academies and the former Congressional Office of Technology Assessment. Paper presented to Symposium on Quality Control and Assurance in Scientific Advice to Policy. Berlin, Germany January 12, Houghton, Amo. In Memoriam: The Office of Technology Assessment, Congressional Record, Extension of Remarks - September 28, 1995, Page E Epstein, G.L Restart the Congressional Office of Technology Assessment. Science Progress, March 31. Online at
CRS Report for Congress
CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web Order Code RS21586 Updated May 20, 2005 Summary Technology Assessment in Congress: History and Legislative Options Genevieve J. Knezo Specialist in
More informationScience and Technology Advice for Congress: Past, Present, and Future
Renewable Resources Journal, Vol. 24, No. 2, pp. 19-23, Summer 2006 Science and Technology Advice for Congress: Past, Present, and Future Jon M. Peha 1 Carnegie Mellon University Legislation Blowing in
More informationHealth Reform Law - Advisory Panels, Boards, Commissions, & Stakeholder Involvement
Reporting Requirements 1001 adding 2717 of the PHSA Health Information Transactions 1104(g) State Exchange Operations 1321(a)(2) CO-OP Advisory Board -experts in health care quality and relevant stakeholders
More informationA Budget Investigation into the Legislative Branch: Congressional Joint Items
A Budget Investigation into the Legislative Branch: Congressional Joint Items May 16, 2011 In a continuance into the investigation of the federal budget in regards to the legislative branch it is important
More informationU.S. Anti-Corruption Experience: A View from the Government Accountability Office
U.S. Anti-Corruption Experience: A View from the Government Accountability Office Presentation to Visiting Fellows George Washington University May 3, 2010 Loren Yager, Ph.D. Director International Affairs
More informationA GOVERNOR S GUIDE TO NGA
A GOVERNOR S GUIDE TO NGA www.nga.org A GOVERNOR S GUIDE TO NGA e The National Governors Association (NGA), founded in 1908, is the collective voice of the nation s governors and one of Washington, D.C.
More informationThe Role of the U.S. Government Accountability Office
The Role of the U.S. Government Accountability Office Presentation to Visiting Fellows George Washington University November 11, 2009 Loren Yager, Ph.D. Director International Affairs and Trade U.S GAO
More informationThis presentation is the third in DPH s post election series of presentation on the postelection
This presentation is the third in DPH s post election series of presentation on the postelection environment. 1 2 What we know now is that no changes have been implemented as of yet. We do not know what
More informationIMPLEMENTING SOLUTIONS: THE IMPORTANCE OF FOLLOWING THROUGH ON GAO AND OIG RECOMMENDATIONS
Bridging the gap between academic ideas and real-world problems TESTIMONY IMPLEMENTING SOLUTIONS: THE IMPORTANCE OF FOLLOWING THROUGH ON GAO AND OIG RECOMMENDATIONS HENRY R. WRAY, JD Senate Committee on
More informationLEGISLATIVE GLOSSARY
LEGISLATIVE GLOSSARY Act An act is the term for legislation passed by Congress and signed into law by the President, or passed over his veto. Amendment A member of Congress proposes an amendment to alter
More informationOPENING STATEMENT OF SENATOR CHRISTOPHER S. BOND; (as prepared)
OPENING STATEMENT OF SENATOR CHRISTOPHER S. BOND; 11-13-07 (as prepared) Introduction Thank you, Mr. Chairman for holding this hearing today. You received a letter from all the Republican members of the
More informationGAO MANAGING FOR RESULTS. Enhancing the Usefulness of GPRA Consultations Between the Executive Branch and Congress
GAO For Release on Delivery Expected at 10:00 a.m. EST Monday March 10, 1997 United States General Accounting Office Testimony Before the Subcommittee on Management, Information and Technology Committee
More informationTESTIMONY BY SCOTT SLESINGER LEGISLATIVE DIRECTOR OF THE NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL
TESTIMONY BY SCOTT SLESINGER LEGISLATIVE DIRECTOR OF THE NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL The Federal Permitting Process for Major Infrastructure Projects, Including the Progress made by the Federal Permitting
More informationTestimony of Steven Aftergood Director, Project on Government Secrecy Federation of American Scientists
Testimony of Steven Aftergood Director, Project on Government Secrecy Federation of American Scientists Before the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform U.S. House of Representatives Hearing on
More informationREPORT OF THE COUNCIL ON MEDICAL SERVICE. Financial Impact of Immigration on the American Health System (Resolution 235, A-06)
REPORT OF THE COUNCIL ON MEDICAL SERVICE CMS Report - A-0 Subject: Presented by: Referred to: Financial Impact of Immigration on the American Health System (Resolution, A-0) William A. Dolan, MD, Chair
More informationSenior Advocates Coalition Muskegon, Ottawa & Oceana Counties MEMORANDUM. Save the Date
Senior Advocates Coalition Muskegon, Ottawa & Oceana Counties To: Senior Advocates Coalition From: Pam Curtis, Facilitator Date: August 24, 2017 Re: September 11, 2017 Senior Advocates Meeting MEMORANDUM
More informationLegislative Advocacy Guide
Legislative Advocacy Guide Voices For Virginia's Children Public Policy Advocacy: Influencing state government policymaking Public policy can greatly impact children and families, yet too often, policies
More informationTestimony of. Before the. United States House of Representatives Committee on Rules. Lobbying Reform: Accountability through Transparency
Testimony of Dr. James A. Thurber Distinguished Professor and Director, Center for Congressional and Presidential Studies American University Washington, DC Before the United States House of Representatives
More informationHealth Policy Briefing
Congress Continues Appropriations Work; Will Not Meet Reconciliation Deadline Health Policy Briefing July 20, 2015 Reconciliation to be Addressed After August Recess House Budget Committee Chairman Tom
More informationThe Federal Information Technology Acquisition Reform Act (FITARA): Frequently Asked Questions
The Federal Information Technology Acquisition Reform Act (FITARA): Frequently Asked Questions (name redacted) Specialist in Internet and Telecommunications Policy June 1, 2016 Congressional Research Service
More informationSUPPLEMENTAL NOTE ON HOUSE BILL NO. 2066
SESSION OF 2019 SUPPLEMENTAL NOTE ON HOUSE BILL NO. 2066 As Amended by House Committee of the Whole Brief* HB 2066, as amended, would establish the KanCare Bridge to a Healthy Kansas Program (Program).
More informationIndustry Influence on Drug and Medical Device Safety at FDA $700 million in lobbying buys significant access March 29, 2012
Industry Influence on Drug and Medical Device Safety at FDA $700 million in lobbying buys significant access March 29, 2012 2012 is crucial for the Food and Drug Administration, as Congress votes on legislation
More informationSTATE OF KANSAS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES. I move to amend House Substitute for SB 179 on page 1, following line 6, by inserting:
fa_2018_sb179_h_4025 STATE OF KANSAS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES MR. CHAIRMAN: I move to amend House Substitute for SB 179 on page 1, following line 6, by inserting: "New Section 1. Sections 1 through 13,
More informationHouse Offset Amendments to Appropriations Bills: Procedural Considerations
House Offset Amendments to Appropriations Bills: Procedural Considerations James V. Saturno Specialist on Congress and the Legislative Process November 30, 2016 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov
More informationILSI RESEARCH FOUNDATION BYLAWS ARTICLE I: GENERAL
Inclusive of Amendments through 23 January 2016 ILSI RESEARCH FOUNDATION BYLAWS ARTICLE I: GENERAL SECTION 1. The name of this non-profit organization shall be ILSI Research Foundation (hereinafter the
More informationHow an Afghanistan-Pakistan Study Group Could Help
POLICY BRIEF How an Afghanistan-Pakistan Study Group Could Help BY JORDAN TAMA SEPTEMBER 2011 In June 2011, the House Appropriations Committee unanimously approved an amendment introduced by U.S. Representative
More informationIntroduction to the Federal Budget Process
Introduction to the Federal Budget Process This backgrounder describes the laws and procedures under which Congress decides how much money to spend each year, what to spend it on, and how to raise the
More informationState Contracts by the Numbers: Longstanding Contract Oversight Authority Serves Taxpayers
OFFICE OF THE STATE COMPTROLLER Thomas P. DiNapoli, State Comptroller State Contracts by the Numbers: Longstanding Contract Oversight Authority Serves Taxpayers January 2014 Introduction For over 100 years,
More informationRegulation in the United States: A View from the GAO
Regulation in the United States: A View from the GAO Presentation to Visiting Fellows George Washington University March 25, 2011 Loren Yager, Ph.D., Director Chloe Brown, Analyst International Affairs
More informationEarly, Often and Clearly: Communicating the Nuclear Message 10447
Early, Often and Clearly: Communicating the Nuclear Message 10447 Eliot Brenner and Rebecca Schmidt U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555 ABSTRACT Communication is crucial to those in
More informationSIDE BY SIDE COMPARISON OF BUDGET BILLS
SIDE BY SIDE COMPARISON OF BUDGET BILLS February 6, 2017 Issue Governor McAuliffe s Proposal (December) House budget (February 5, 2017) Senate Budget (February 5, 2017) The Arc s Message to Legislators:
More informationGENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2013
GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION H D HOUSE BILL Committee Substitute Favorable // Committee Substitute # Favorable // PROPOSED SENATE COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTE H-CSME- [v.] // :: PM Short Title: North
More information36 USC NB: This unofficial compilation of the U.S. Code is current as of Jan. 4, 2012 (see
TITLE 36 - PATRIOTIC AND NATIONAL OBSERVANCES, CEREMONIES, ANDORGANIZATIONS Subtitle II - Patriotic and National Organizations Part B - Organizations CHAPTER 1503 - NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES 150303.
More informationTestimony of Scott Amey, General Counsel Project On Government Oversight (POGO) before the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform
Testimony of Scott Amey, General Counsel Project On Government Oversight (POGO) before the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform Protecting Taxpayers from Banned and Risky Contractors and
More informationCRS Report for Congress
Order Code RL32531 CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web Critical Infrastructure Protections: The 9/11 Commission Report and Congressional Response Updated January 11, 2005 John Moteff Specialist
More informationThe Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA) passed in
History and Evaluation of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act History and Evaluation of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act Abstract - The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA) made two important changes
More informationImmigration. Immigration and the Welfare State. Immigrant and Native Use Rates and Benefit Levels for Means-Tested Welfare and Entitlement Programs
Immigration RESEARCH AND POLICY BRIEF May 10, 2018 Number 6 Immigration and the Welfare State Immigrant and Native Use Rates and Benefit Levels for Means-Tested Welfare and Entitlement Programs By Alex
More informationIndependent Scientific Advisory Board
Independent Scientific Advisory Board Northwest Power Planning Council National Marine Fisheries Service Columbia River Basin Indian Tribes Preface Terms of Reference August 20, 1996, amended December
More informationCHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION. 1.1 Introduction to Citizenship
Naturalization & US Citizenship CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION This chapter includes: 1.1 Introduction to Citizenship... 1-1 1.2 Overview of the Basic Requirements for Naturalization... 1-3 1.3 How to Use This
More informationRecommendations of the Symposium. Facilitating Voting as People Age: Implications of Cognitive Impairment March 2006
Recommendations of the Symposium Facilitating Voting as People Age: Implications of Cognitive Impairment March 2006 1. Basic Principles and Goals While the symposium focused on disability caused by cognitive
More informationCRS Report for Congress
CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web Order Code RS20748 Updated April 5, 2006 Protection of Classified Information by Congress: Practices and Proposals Summary Frederick M. Kaiser Specialist
More informationGuidance for Organisers of an IRPA Regional Congress
Guidance for Organisers of an IRPA Regional Congress Incorporating a Model Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) Introduction The IRPA International and Regional Congresses are a well-recognised flagship of
More informationGENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2015 H 3 HOUSE BILL 372 Committee Substitute Favorable 6/11/15 Committee Substitute #2 Favorable 6/18/15
GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 01 H HOUSE BILL Committee Substitute Favorable //1 Committee Substitute # Favorable /1/1 Short Title: 01 Medicaid Modernization. (Public) Sponsors: Referred to:
More informationGovernment Accountability Office The Congressional Watchdog. Office of Congressional Relations (202)
Government Accountability Office The Congressional Watchdog 1 Office of Congressional Relations (202) 512-4400 congrel@gao.gov What we will cover today 2 What is GAO? Mission, authority, and scope of work
More informationDesigning Congressional Commissions: Background and Considerations for Congress
Designing Congressional Commissions: Background and Considerations for Congress William T. Egar Analyst in American National Government October 2, 2018 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov
More informationImplementing Bills for Trade Agreements: Statutory Procedures Under Trade Promotion Authority
Implementing Bills for Trade Agreements: Statutory Procedures Under Trade Promotion Authority Richard S. Beth Specialist on Congress and the Legislative Process August 8, 2016 Congressional Research Service
More informationCRS Report for Congress
Order Code 97-684 GOV CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web The Congressional Appropriations Process: An Introduction Updated December 6, 2004 Sandy Streeter Analyst in American National
More informationAugust 29, VIA ELECTRONIC SUBMISSION
August 29, 2016 VIA ELECTRONIC SUBMISSION www.regulations.gov Office of Medicare Hearings and Appeals Department of Health & Human Services 5201 Leesburg Pike Suite 1300 Falls Church, VA 22042 RE: Medicare
More informationOverview of GAO work on Nonemergency Medical Transportation
Overview of GAO work on Nonemergency Medical Transportation International Conference on Demand Responsive Transportation September 28, 2016 THIS PRELIMINARY WORK OF GAO IS SUBJECT TO REVISION AND SHOULD
More informationLegal Services Program
Legal Services Program May 29, 1998 Revised September 5, 2014 Standards & Guidelines Table of Contents I. Mission Statement... 5 II. Governing Structure... 7 A. Statutory Authority... 7 B. Governing Committee...
More informationStatement of. Keith Kupferschmid Chief Executive Officer Copyright Alliance. before the SENATE COMMITTEE ON RULES AND ADMINISTRATION
Statement of Keith Kupferschmid Chief Executive Officer Copyright Alliance before the SENATE COMMITTEE ON RULES AND ADMINISTRATION September 26, 2018 The Copyright Alliance, on behalf of our membership,
More informationLecture Outline: Chapter 10
Lecture Outline: Chapter 10 Congress I. Most Americans see Congress as paralyzed by partisan bickering and incapable of meaningful action. A. The disdain that many citizens have for Congress is expressed
More informationPreliminary Analysis and Observations Regarding the Budget Control Act of 2011 August 8, 2011
Policy Alert Preliminary Analysis and Observations Regarding the Budget Control Act of 2011 August 8, 2011 The Budget Control Act of 2011 (BCA, or Act ) (see related policy alert for an overview of the
More informationGENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2015 SESSION LAW HOUSE BILL 372
GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2015 SESSION LAW 2015-245 HOUSE BILL 372 AN ACT TO TRANSFORM AND REORGANIZE NORTH CAROLINA'S MEDICAID AND NC HEALTH CHOICE PROGRAMS. The General Assembly of North
More informationCongressional Franking Privilege: Background and Recent Legislation
Congressional Franking Privilege: Background and Recent Legislation Matthew Eric Glassman Analyst on the Congress April 10, 2013 CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress
More information21st Annual Health Sciences Tax Conference
21st Annual Health Sciences Tax Conference : budget realities, legislative risks and a maze of new regulations 5 December 2011 Disclaimer Any US tax advice contained herein was not intended or written
More informationPOLICY AND PROCEDURES OFFICE OF THE CENTER DIRECTOR. Drug Safety Oversight Board (DSB) Table of Contents
Reprinted from FDA s website by EAS Consulting Group, LLC POLICY AND PROCEDURES OFFICE OF THE CENTER DIRECTOR Drug Safety Oversight Board (DSB) Table of Contents PURPOSE...1 BACKGROUND...1 POLICY...2 RESPONSIBILITIES...3
More informationServing on the Advisory Committee on the Medical Uses of Isotopes (ACMUI): A Member s Guide
NUREG/BR-0309 Serving on the Advisory Committee on the Medical Uses of Isotopes (ACMUI): A Member s Guide U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards Washington,
More informationCongress Outline Notes
Congress Outline Notes I. INTRODUCTION A. Congress as the center of policymaking in America. 1. Although the prominence of Congress has fluctuated over time. 2. Some critics charge Congress with being
More informationFDP Administrative Policies
FDP Administrative Policies Overview The Federal Demonstration Partnership (FDP) is a cooperative initiative among federal agencies and institutional recipients of federal funds. The FDP s purpose is to
More informationFederal Update NCSL Standing Committee on Health & Human Services. Joy Johnson Wilson NCSL Washington Office
Federal Update NCSL Standing Committee on Health & Human Services Joy Johnson Wilson NCSL Washington Office KEY ENACTMENTS Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015 (H.R. 2; P.L. 114-10) The
More informationScheduling a meeting.
Lobbying Lobbying is the most direct form of advocacy. Many think there is a mystique to lobbying, but it is simply the act of meeting with a government official or their staff to talk about an issue that
More informationMaking Government Work For The People Again
Making Government Work For The People Again www.ormanforkansas.com Making Government Work For The People Again What Kansas needs is a government that transcends partisan politics and is solely dedicated
More informationCRS Report: Welfare Spending The Largest Item In The Federal Budget
CRS Report: Welfare Spending The Largest Item In The Federal Budget Ranking Member Sessions and the minority staff of the Senate Budget Committee requested from the nonpartisan Congressional Research Service
More informationBrookings Personnel: Collectively, all Brookings employees, contractors, and affiliates when conducting
Policy Title Research Independence Policy Policy No. OGC-17 Responsible Office Responsible Officer Office of the General Counsel Issue Date 2.13.2015 General Counsel Revised 6.20.2017 1.0 Summary The Brookings
More informationISSUE BRIEF I. FEDERAL WORKFORCE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY OF FMA LEGISLATIVE RECOMMENDATIONS
I. FEDERAL WORKFORCE MANAGEMENT - 2015 The federal workforce is regularly used as a means to reduce the federal deficit. This was seen in the three-year pay freeze, yearly reductions to federal agencies
More informationKey National Indicator Systems: An Opportunity to Maximize National Progress And Strengthen Accountability. By The Honorable David M.
United States Government Accountability Office Washington, DC 20548 Comptroller General of the United States Key National Indicator Systems: An Opportunity to Maximize National Progress And Strengthen
More informationDECISION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 20.7.2012 COM(2012) 407 final 2012/0199 (COD) Proposal for a DECISION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCILestablishing a Union action for the European Capitals of
More informationIndependent Payment Advisory Board (IPAB)
Independent Payment Advisory Board (IPAB) Summary: Creates an independent, 15 member Medicare Advisory Board tasked with presenting Congress with comprehensive proposals to reduce excess cost growth and
More informationFederal Policy Update
Federal Policy Update Ohio Association of Area Agencies on Aging Conference November 15, 2017 Amy Gotwals, Chief, Public Policy & External Affairs Planning and Capacity Bdg. Federal Policy Update: Budget
More informationTESTIMONY OF SENATOR CURT BRAMBLE PRESIDENT PRO-TEMPORE UTAH STATE LEGISLATURE President-elect, National Conference of State Legislatures
TESTIMONY OF SENATOR CURT BRAMBLE PRESIDENT PRO-TEMPORE UTAH STATE LEGISLATURE President-elect, National Conference of State Legislatures ON BEHALF OF THE NATIONAL CONFERENCE OF STATE LEGISLATURES REGARDING
More informationPreliminary Outline of Draft Forensic Reform Legislation 5/5/10
Preliminary Outline of Draft Forensic Reform Legislation 5/5/10 Accreditation All laboratories that receive federal funds or are funded by an organization that receives federal funding or performs services
More informationStatus of Health Reform Bills Moving Through Congress
POLICY PRIMER ON HEALTH REFORM What is the Status of the Health Reform Bills? On November 7, the House of Representatives approved H.R. 3962, the Affordable Health Care for America Act, putting major health
More informationA Nonprofit s Guide to Lobbying and Political Activity
A Nonprofit s Guide to Lobbying and Political Activity 2017 D.C. Bar Pro Bono Center This guide is for informational purposes only. You should not rely on this guide as a substitute for, nor does it constitute,
More informationThis cartoon depicts the way that -- all too often -- evidence is used in the policymaking process. Our goal is to do better.
The Role & Use of Evidence in Policy Welcome to the Role and Use of Evidence in Policy. Does this sound familiar? This cartoon depicts the way that -- all too often -- evidence is used in the policymaking
More informationUPDATE ON INDIGENT DEFENSE SERVICES
UPDATE ON INDIGENT DEFENSE SERVICES IDS PRESENTATION TO NC COURTS COMMISSION Presented by Thomas K. Maher, IDS Executive Director W. James Payne, IDS Commission Chair Christine Mumma, IDS Commission Member
More informationFederal Funding Gaps: A Brief Overview
James V. Saturno Specialist on Congress and the Legislative Process September 13, 2017 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov RS20348 Summary The Antideficiency Act (31 U.S.C. 1341-1342, 1511-1519)
More informationWhere Congress Stands on ESEA and IDEA Reauthorization. ESEA Reauthorization. 110 th Congress: Second Session: ESEA Reauthorization
Where Congress Stands on ESEA and IDEA Reauthorization Leigh Manasevit, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Spring Forum 2011 lmanasevit@bruman.com ESEA Reauthorization 2 110 th Congress: Second Session: ESEA
More informationTestimony. Douglas W. Elmendorf Director Before the Subcommittee on the Legislative Branch Committee on Appropriations United States Senate
Testimony CBO s Appropriation Request for Fiscal Year 2016 Douglas W. Elmendorf Director Before the Subcommittee on the Legislative Branch Committee on Appropriations United States Senate March 10, 2015
More informationThe views expressed are my own and do not necessarily reflect those of staff members, officers, or trustees of the Brookings Institution.
1 Testimony of Molly E. Reynolds 1 Senior Fellow, Governance Studies, Brookings Institution Before the Select Committee on the Modernization of Congress March 27, 2019 Chairman Kilmer, Vice Chairman Graves,
More informationCongressional Advisory Commissions: An Overview
Order Code RS22725 September 18, 2007 Congressional Advisory Commissions: An Overview Summary Matthew E. Glassman Analyst on the Congress Government and Finance Division A congressional advisory commission
More informationDon t Let the Door Hit You on the Way Out : A Primer on Revolving Door Restrictions
Don t Let the Door Hit You on the Way Out : A Primer on Revolving Door Restrictions May 21, 2018 Election and Political Law The scenario is all too common: After months of searching for the right candidate
More informationBrexit and immigration: Preparing for any outcome
Brexit and immigration: Preparing for any outcome 24 January 2019 1 On 15 January 2019 the UK Government lost a historic vote on the Prime Minister s Brexit deal, that was agreed with the European Union.
More informationMEASURES TO IMPROVE THE IMMIGRATION COURTS AND THE BOARD OF IMMIGRATION APPEALS
MEASURES TO IMPROVE THE IMMIGRATION COURTS AND THE BOARD OF IMMIGRATION APPEALS On January 9, 2006, the Attorney General directed the Deputy Attorney General and the Associate Attorney General to undertake
More informationFurther Strengthening the Review Process of the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons
The 2010 Review Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons May 2010 Original: English NPT March 16, 2010 Further Strengthening the Review Process of the Treaty
More informationMay 16, 2017 Volume 23, No. 5 ***PRIORITY*** Bi-Partisan Accountability Bill Introduced
***PRIORITY*** The Government Relations staff is still looking for stories about problems that our members have experienced during air travel. Please visit www.airaccess30.org and share your story. Bi-Partisan
More informationHealth Care: What to Expect from the Obama Presidency and the Next Congress
: What to Expect from the Obama Presidency and the Next Congress by David C. Main, Edgar D. Bueno and Melissa Starry December 5, 2008 During the presidential campaign, President-elect Obama spoke frequently
More informationImproving the Way State and Federal Co-Regulators Communicate about Risk -9400
Improving the Way State and Federal Co-Regulators Communicate about Risk -9400 Earl Easton (earl.easton@nrc.gov) U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mail Stop 6003 EEB, Washington, DC, 20555-0001 Lisa R.
More informationPromoting Excellence And Fairness In The Civil Justice System
Promoting Excellence And Fairness In The Civil Justice System LCJ Membership Provides Multiple Benefits LCJ members include senior corporate counsel from some of the nation s leading companies and experienced
More informationGUIDELINE 8: Build capacity and learn lessons for emergency response and post-crisis action
GUIDELINE 8: Build capacity and learn lessons for emergency response and post-crisis action Limited resources, funding, and technical skills can all affect the robustness of emergency and post-crisis responses.
More informationThe Congressional Appropriations Process: An Introduction
The Congressional Appropriations Process: An Introduction Jessica Tollestrup Analyst on Congress and the Legislative Process February 23, 2012 CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees
More informationGSA Federal Advisory Committee Act Fundamentals
GSA Federal Advisory Committee Act Fundamentals Table of Contents Welcome... 3 Lesson 1 FACA Policies and Procedures... 5 Introduction... 5 Purpose... 7 Users... 10 Committee... 11 Exceptions... 16 Review...
More informationStudent Choice IN YOUR STATE. A Lobbying Guide ABOUT THE HSUS. [ Promote Cruelty-Free Research ]
[ Promote Cruelty-Free Research ] ABOUT THE HSUS The HSUS is the nation s largest and most powerful animal protection organization, backed by 10.5 million Americans, or one in every 30. Established in
More informationPresentation to the. Mexico City. Phillip Herr. April 18, 2012
Perspectives of a SAI Unauthorized to Impose Sanctions: The Experience of the U.S. Government Accountability Office Presentation to the International Forum on Supreme Auditing Mexico City Phillip Herr
More informationNANASP RESOLUTIONS Labor-HHS Appropriations
Labor-HHS Appropriations WHEREAS: Congress has begun work on the Labor-HHS Appropriations for FY 2009. WHEREAS: The President s budget proposal called for an overall decrease of $28 million dollars from
More informationThe American Health Care Act: Overview
The American Health Care Act: Overview The Congressional Republican leadership has unveiled its long-awaited ObamaCare Repeal Bill. While it has several good elements, it does not live up to the GOP leadership
More informationHOW CONGRESS WORKS. The key to deciphering the legislative process is in understanding that legislation is grouped into three main categories:
HOW CONGRESS WORKS INTRODUCTION Our representative system of government places a special responsibility on each of us to make ourselves heard in Washington. In fact, no more important source of information
More informationChildren s Coverage: Opportunities and Challenges NCSL Critical Health Areas Project (CHAP) Fall Meeting October 4, 2007
Children s Coverage: Opportunities and Challenges NCSL Critical Health Areas Project (CHAP) Fall Meeting October 4, 2007 John McInerney Program Manager National Academy for State Health Policy (NASHP)
More informationTestimony of Naomi Karp, J.D., Senior Strategic Policy Advisor AARP Public Policy Institute. On behalf of AARP. Submitted to the
Testimony of Naomi Karp, J.D., Senior Strategic Policy Advisor AARP Public Policy Institute On behalf of AARP Submitted to the Senate Judiciary Committee - Subcommittee on Administrative Oversight and
More informationChanges to Senate Procedures in the 113 th Congress Affecting the Operation of Cloture (S.Res. 15 and S.Res. 16)
Changes to Senate Procedures in the 113 th Congress Affecting the Operation of Cloture (S.Res. 15 and S.Res. 16) Elizabeth Rybicki Specialist on Congress and the Legislative Process March 13, 2013 CRS
More information