Case 3:16-cr BR Document 1163 Filed 08/31/16 Page 1 of 12
|
|
- Raymond Gordon
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Case 3:16-cr BR Document 1163 Filed 08/31/16 Page 1 of 12 THOMAS G. HUNGAR, General Counsel, DC Bar # TODD B. TATELMAN, Associate General Counsel, VA Bar #66008 ELENI M. ROUMEL, Assistant General Counsel, NY Bar # SARAH E. CLOUSE, Attorney, MA Bar # Office of General Counsel U.S. House of Representatives 219 Cannon House Office Building Washington, D.C Phone: Thomas.Hungar@mail.house.gov Counsel for the Honorable Greg Walden, U.S. Representative for the 2nd Congressional District of Oregon IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Case No. 3:16-cr BR v. RYAN BUNDY, Defendant. MOTION OF NON-PARTY THE HONORABLE GREG WALDEN TO QUASH SUBPOENA, AND MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT MOTION OF NON-PARTY THE HONORABLE GREG WALDEN TO QUASH SUBPOENA Pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 17(c)(2), the Honorable Greg Walden, U.S. Representative for the 2nd congressional district of Oregon, by and through undersigned counsel, moves to quash the subpoena (attached to this Motion as Exhibit A) issued by defendant Ryan Bundy, which seeks to compel Congressman Walden to testify at defendant s trial and to produce a broad category of documents. For the reasons set forth in the Memorandum in Support below, 1 MOTION OF NON-PARTY U.S. REPRESENTATIVE GREG WALDEN TO QUASH
2 Case 3:16-cr BR Document 1163 Filed 08/31/16 Page 2 of 12 compliance with the subpoena would be unreasonable and oppressive, and the subpoena should therefore be quashed. Oral argument is not requested. CERTIFICATION OF CONSULTATION Pursuant to Local Rule 7-1, counsel for Congressman Walden attempted to contact standby counsel for Defendant Bundy, via and telephone, regarding the motion to quash and potential withdrawal of the subpoena, but received no response, necessitating this motion. MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF MOTION On August 24, 2016, Congressman Walden received a subpoena from Defendant Ryan Bundy that seeks to compel the Congressman s testimony at trial and the production of a broad category of documents. See Subpoena to Congressman Greg Walden (Aug. 19, 2016) ( Subpoena ) (Ex. A). Promptly after receiving the subpoena, pursuant to Rule VIII of the Rules of the U.S. House of Representatives, 114th Cong. (2015) ( House Rules ), available at Congressman Walden asked Mr. Bundy, via his standby counsel, to confirm whether the Subpoena encompasses matters within the Congressman s official congressional capacity and, if so, to explain with specificity (i) what testimony and documents Mr. Bundy seeks, and (ii) why such information would be material and relevant to his case. See Letter from Eleni Roumel, Ass t Gen. Counsel, to Lisa Ludwig, Esq., (Aug. 26, 2016) (Ex. B) ( Roumel Letter ). Mr. Bundy s counsel has not yet responded to this inquiry. The Court should quash the Subpoena for two reasons. First, with respect to the testimonial aspect of the Subpoena, the Congressman is a high-ranking government official who cannot be compelled to testify about his official conduct absent a showing of extraordinary 2 MOTION OF NON-PARTY U.S. REPRESENTATIVE GREG WALDEN TO QUASH
3 Case 3:16-cr BR Document 1163 Filed 08/31/16 Page 3 of 12 circumstances not present here. There is no basis to believe that Congressman Walden possesses any information relevant to Mr. Bundy s guilt or innocence and, under established law as recognized by this Court in its order quashing a similar subpoena to Oregon Governor Kate Brown, Order (Aug. 26, 2016) (ECF No. 1121) Mr. Bundy must seek any information he believes is relevant through other avenues. Second, with respect to the demand for the production of documents, the Subpoena should be quashed because it fails to demand documents with sufficient particularity and because Mr. Bundy cannot establish either the relevance or the admissibility of the demanded documents. I. Congressman Walden Cannot Be Compelled to Testify about his Official Activities Because Mr. Bundy Has Not Demonstrated that Extraordinary Circumstances Require Such Testimony. Long-settled federal common law makes clear that high-ranking government officials may not be forced to testify about their official actions, in litigation to which they are not a party, absent compelling or extraordinary circumstances. See United States v. Morgan, 313 U.S. 409, 422 (1941); Kyle Eng g Co. v. Kleppe, 600 F.2d 226, (9th Cir. 1979); Coleman v. Schwarzenegger, 2008 WL , at *2 (E.D. Cal. Sept. 15, 2008); Trunk v. City of San Diego, 2007 WL , at *6-7 (S.D. Cal. April 2, 2007) (denying motion to compel deposition testimony of Congressman absent exceptional circumstances). 1 The subpoenaing party bears the burden of proving extraordinary circumstances. In re United States (Bernanke), 542 F. App x 944, 948 (Fed. Cir. 2013); accord In re United States (Reno & Holder), 197 F.3d 310, (8th Cir. 1999). High ranking government officials have greater duties and time constraints than other witnesses. In re United States (Kessler), 985 F.2d 510, 1 See also In re F.D.I.C., 58 F.3d 1055, 1060 (5th Cir. 1995); Franklin Sav. Ass n v. Ryan, 922 F.2d 209, 211 (4th Cir. 1991); Simplex Time Recorder Co. v. Sec y of Labor, 766 F.2d 575, 586 (D.C. Cir. 1985). 3 MOTION OF NON-PARTY U.S. REPRESENTATIVE GREG WALDEN TO QUASH
4 Case 3:16-cr BR Document 1163 Filed 08/31/16 Page 4 of (11th Cir. 1993). If courts did not limit the compelled testimony of high-ranking officials, then such officials would spend an inordinate amount of time tending to pending litigation to the impairment of their official responsibilities. Lederman v. N.Y. City Dep t of Parks & Recreation, 731 F.3d 199, 203 (2d Cir. 2013) (quoting Bogan v. City of Boston, 489 F.3d 417, 423 (1st Cir. 2007)). 2 This rule applies in the criminal context as well as in the civil context. See United States v. Washington, No. CR M-DLC, 2012 WL , at *1 (D. Mont. July 26, 2012) (quashing subpoena by criminal defendant to U.S. Attorney General); Reno & Holder, 197 F.3d at , , 316 (quashing criminal defendant s subpoenas seeking to compel testimony of Attorney General Janet Reno and Deputy Attorney General Eric Holder in support of defendant s motion to set aside jury s death verdict); Kessler, 985 F.2d at (quashing criminal defendants subpoena seeking to compel testimony of FDA commissioner in support of motion to dismiss indictment on ground of selective prosecution); Bardoff v. United States, 628 A.2d 86, 90 (D.C. 1993) (affirming trial court s quashing of criminal defendants subpoenas seeking to compel testimony of Senators and Senate Committee counsel because, inter alia, defendants failed to proffer any reason why others present who did not hold such high office could not provide the testimony ). Members of Congress, as constitutional officers of the United States, are quintessential high-ranking government officials. See, e.g., Springfield Terminal Ry. Co. v. United Transp. Union, No , 1989 WL , at *2 (D.D.C. May 18, 1989) (refusing to compel 2 See also MINPECO, S.A. v. Conticommodity Servs., Inc., 844 F.2d 856, 859 (D.C. Cir. 1988) ( A litigant does not have to name members or their staffs as parties to a suit in order to distract them from their legislative work. Discovery procedures can prove just as intrusive. ); accord Buono v. City of Newark, 249 F.R.D. 469, 471 n.2 (D.N.J. 2008) (similar); Warzon v. Drew, 155 F.R.D. 183, (E.D. Wis. 1994) (similar), aff d, 60 F.3d 1234 (7th Cir. 1995). 4 MOTION OF NON-PARTY U.S. REPRESENTATIVE GREG WALDEN TO QUASH
5 Case 3:16-cr BR Document 1163 Filed 08/31/16 Page 5 of 12 ranking Minority Member of the House Appropriations Committee either to testify at deposition or to produce documents because such discovery would disrupt [his] work ); accord McNamee v. Massachusetts, No. 12-cv-40050, 2012 WL , at *1 (D. Mass. May 10, 2012) (quashing subpoena served on both Member and his former chief of staff seeking to compel testimony in state workers compensation action); Order Granting Mots. to Quash Subpoenas Ad Testificandum & Duces Tecum Served on Congressmen Berman, Filner, & Sherman at 2-3, Cano v. Davis, No. 2:01-cv (C.D. Cal. Mar. 28, 2002) (recognizing that exceptional circumstances are needed to compel discovery from Members of Congress) (Ex. C); Bardoff, 628 A.2d at 90 (recognizing that Senators hold... high office ). Accordingly, in order to demonstrate extraordinary circumstances sufficient to justify compelling a Member of Congress to give non-party testimony about his official activities, the party issuing the subpoena must establish that at least three conditions are present: (i) the provision of the testimony will not interfere with the Member s governmental responsibilities; (ii) the information sought is essential not merely relevant and material to the subpoenaing party s case; and (iii) the information sought cannot be obtained elsewhere. See Coleman, 2008 WL , at *2; Lederman, 731 F.3d at 203; Bogan, 489 F.3d at 423; In re F.D.I.C., 58 F.3d at ; Simplex, 766 F.2d at 587; McNamee, 2012 WL , at *1. 3 Here, as this Court has already held with respect to a nearly identical subpoena to Governor Brown, Mr. Bundy has not satisfied and cannot satisfy any of these requirements, let alone all three. Accordingly, the Court should quash the Subpoena to the extent that it seeks to compel the Congressman s testimony. 3 See also Marisol A. v. Giuliani, No. 95-cv-10533, 1998 WL , at *2-3 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 23, 1998) (collecting cases); Hankins v. City of Phila., No. 95-cv-1449, 1996 WL , at *1 (E.D. Pa. Sept. 12, 1996) (collecting cases). 5 MOTION OF NON-PARTY U.S. REPRESENTATIVE GREG WALDEN TO QUASH
6 Case 3:16-cr BR Document 1163 Filed 08/31/16 Page 6 of 12 A. Compelling Congressman Walden s Testimony Will Interfere with His Governmental Responsibilities. [S]ervice in the United States Congress is not a job like any other. United States v. Rostenkowski, 59 F.3d 1291, 1312 (D.C. Cir.), opinion supplemented on denial of reh g, 68 F.3d 489 (D.C. Cir. 1995). [T]he life of a congressman[,] as incumbent legislator and perpetual candidate for office, is one in which the Member s official day ends only after a round of nominally social events at which he is obliged to appear, and whose weekends and holidays are only an opportunity to reconnect with his constituents.... Id. This is as true for Congressman Walden as it is for his many House and Senate colleagues. When the House is in session, Congressman Walden is obliged by House Rules to be available to vote. See House Rule III.1 ( Every Member shall be present within the Hall of the House during its sittings, unless excused or necessarily prevented, and shall vote on each question put, unless having a direct personal or pecuniary interest in the event of such question. ). The House will be in session and votes are scheduled to be cast for the majority of September, including on the start date of Mr. Bundy s trial. See generally House Calendar, 114th Cong. (2d sess.) (2016), MONTHLY-CALENDAR.pdf. Beyond floor votes, Congressman Walden focuses on other important legislative business while in Washington, D.C., such as: (i) attending to the business of the House Committee on Energy and Commerce on which he sits; (iii) meeting regularly with House leadership to discuss votes on pending legislation; (iv) attending regular meetings of his party s conference to discuss legislative issues and policies; and (v) meeting with constituents and other stakeholders about pending legislation. 6 MOTION OF NON-PARTY U.S. REPRESENTATIVE GREG WALDEN TO QUASH
7 Case 3:16-cr BR Document 1163 Filed 08/31/16 Page 7 of 12 Congressman Walden s official duties also include many activities other than [his] purely legislative activities, such as a wide range of legitimate errands performed for constituents, the making of appointments with Government agencies, assistance in securing Government contracts, preparing so-called news letters to constituents, news releases, and speeches delivered outside the Congress. United States v. Brewster, 408 U.S. 501, 512 (1972). Indeed, when at home in his district, Congressman Walden frequently works with state and local government officials on issues important to the district, meets with local business leaders, and engages with constituents. Simply put, Congressman Walden s schedule is heavily booked with official activities. Thus, requiring him to appear to testify at Mr. Bundy s trial and thereby imposing the additional burden of preparing to do so necessarily would interfere with those official responsibilities. B. Mr. Bundy Has Not Shown That the Congressman s Testimony Would Be Essential to His Case. Mr. Bundy has not shown and cannot show how it is essential to his defense that Congressman Walden testify in this matter. See Reno & Holder, 197 F.3d at 314 (subpoenaing party must... establish at a minimum that the [high-ranking government officials] possess information essential to his case (emphasis added)); In re Ledvina, 210 F.3d 379, 379 (8th Cir. 2000) (per curiam) ( [S]ubpoena should not issue against high government official absent extraordinary circumstances, including showing that official possesses information essential to case.... (emphasis added; citing Reno & Holder, 197 F.3d at )). 4 4 Accord Warren v. Washington, No. 11-civ-5686, 2012 WL , at *1 (W.D. Wash. June 14, 2012) (subpoenaing party must show... the testimony is essential to the case at hand (emphasis added)); McNamee, 2012 WL , at *1 (similar); Dobson v. Vail, No. 10-cv- 5233, 2011 WL , at *2 (W.D. Wash. Sept. 21, 2011) (similar); Thomas v. Cate, 715 F. Supp. 2d 1012, 1049 (E.D. Cal. 2010) (similar); Murray v. U.S. Dep t of Treasury, No. 08-cv- 7 MOTION OF NON-PARTY U.S. REPRESENTATIVE GREG WALDEN TO QUASH
8 Case 3:16-cr BR Document 1163 Filed 08/31/16 Page 8 of 12 As explained above, Mr. Bundy so far has not responded to Congressman Walden s request, pursuant to House Rule VIII, that he explain with specificity how the Congressman s testimony would be material and relevant to his defense. See Roumel Letter, Ex. B. Accordingly, Mr. Bundy also has not even attempted to satisfy the more rigorous essentiality requirement for compelling the testimony of a high-ranking government official. In any event, this prosecution has absolutely nothing to do with Congressman Walden, and it is self-evident from Mr. Bundy s eleventh-hour subpoena to the Congressman and similar last-minute subpoenas that Mr. Bundy has directed to other public officials that his defense cannot possibly hinge on whatever attenuated matter Mr. Bundy may believe Congressman Walden could testify about from personal knowledge (if any). Indeed, if Mr. Bundy s interest in Congressman Walden is similar to his stated interest in Governor Brown, it appears that Mr. Bundy would seek to elicit generic information about the alleged events at Malheur National Wildlife Refuge and possibly inquire about public statements made by the Congressman on the issue. See Order, at 3 (Aug. 26, 2016); see also Def. s Resp. to Gov. Brown s Mot. to Quash Subpoena (Aug. 23, 2016) (ECF No. 1096). Such generic information may not even be relevant or material to Mr. Bundy s defense, and it certainly falls far short of satisfying the essentiality requirement. C. Mr. Bundy Can Obtain the Information He Seeks from Other Sources. Although Mr. Bundy has not meaningfully explained what testimony he seeks from Congressman Walden, it is self-evident that he can obtain what he needs from other sources. As this Court noted in quashing a similar subpoena directed to Governor Brown, information about the law enforcement response to the events at Malhuer National Wildlife Refuge is otherwise 15147, 2010 WL , at *3-6 (E.D. Mich. May 18, 2010) (similar); Buono, 249 F.R.D. at 471 n.2 (similar). 8 MOTION OF NON-PARTY U.S. REPRESENTATIVE GREG WALDEN TO QUASH
9 Case 3:16-cr BR Document 1163 Filed 08/31/16 Page 9 of 12 available from other sources, notably including the law-enforcement officials present at the time who actually directed and carried out such operations. Order at 3-4 (Aug. 26, 2016). * * * Because (i) compelling the Congressman s testimony about his official conduct would interfere with his governmental responsibilities, (ii) the information about which he would testify is not essential to Mr. Bundy s case, and (iii) that information is available from other sources, the Court should quash the ad testificandum aspect of the Subpoena. II. Defendant Bundy s Subpoena Should Be Quashed Because It Fails to Demand Documents with Sufficient Particularity and Because Mr. Bundy Cannot Establish Either the Relevance or the Admissibility of the Demanded Documents. Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 17(c) provides that the Court may quash a subpoena if compliance would be unreasonable or oppressive. Fed. R. Crim. P. (17)(c). Mr. Bundy s subpoena does not demand particular documents, and Mr. Bundy cannot establish the relevance and admissibility of the broad categories of documents demanded. Accordingly, the subpoena should be quashed. See United States v. Nixon, 418 U.S. 683, (1974) (party issuing subpoena in criminal case, in order to carry his burden, must clear three hurdles: (1) relevancy; (2) admissibility; [and] (3) specificity ); see also United States v. Eden, 659 F.2d 1376, 1381 (9th Cir. 1981) (defendant failed to meet burden where he failed to make any show of relevancy other than mere conclusory statements ); United States v. Layton, 90 F.R.D. 514, 516 (N.D. Cal. 1981) ( [W]here... the subpoena is directed to a coordinate branch of government, the court should be particularly meticulous to ensure that the standards of rule 17(c) have been correctly applied. (quoting Nixon, 418 U.S. at 702)). Here, the Subpoena lacks the requisite specificity because Mr. Bundy seeks to compel the production of a broad category of information encompassing any and all... correspondence... regarding the Malheur National Refuge Occupation, the staff, the occupants and visiting 9 MOTION OF NON-PARTY U.S. REPRESENTATIVE GREG WALDEN TO QUASH
10 Case 3:16-cr BR Document 1163 Filed 08/31/16 Page 10 of 12 citizens... from December 2015 to present[.] Subpoena, attached as Ex. A. Such a demand for any and all correspondence regarding the events at issue demonstrates that the Subpoena is not a particularized demand for specific documents material to his defense, but rather a fishing expedition. See Nixon, 418 U.S. at (expressly disapproving use of criminal subpoena for general fishing expedition ); see also Libby, 432 F. Supp. 2d at 31 ( [I]f the [subpoenaing] party cannot reasonably specify the information contained or believed to be contained in the documents sought but merely hopes that something useful will turn up, this is a sure sign that the subpoena is being misused. (quotation marks omitted)). Mr. Bundy s failure to specify particular documents admittedly makes the relevance and admissibility inquiries more difficult, but that only underlines the importance of the specificity requirement. See Libby, 432 F. Supp. 2d at 32 ( It is important to remember that one of the major purposes of the specificity requirement is to provide the subpoenaed party or other party having standing with enough knowledge about what documents are being requested so as to lodge any objections on relevancy or admissibility. (punctuation omitted)). Accordingly, Mr. Bundy has failed to establish that the demanded documents would be relevant and admissible at this trial both of which elements Mr. Bundy must satisfy to enforce his subpoena. See, e.g., Libby, 432 F. Supp. 2d at 30 ( Rule 17(c) may be used to obtain only evidentiary materials. The Rule is designed as an aid for obtaining relevant evidentiary material that the moving party may use at trial. (punctuation omitted)). For these reasons, Mr. Bundy s demand for the production of documents fails to satisfy the prerequisites for such subpoenas. CONCLUSION For all the foregoing reasons, the Court should grant this motion to quash the Subpoena. 10 MOTION OF NON-PARTY U.S. REPRESENTATIVE GREG WALDEN TO QUASH
11 Case 3:16-cr BR Document 1163 Filed 08/31/16 Page 11 of 12 Respectfully submitted, /s/ Thomas G. Hungar THOMAS G. HUNGAR General Counsel, DC Bar # TODD B. TATELMAN Associate General Counsel, VA Bar #66008 ELENI M. ROUMEL Assistant General Counsel, NY Bar # SARAH E. CLOUSE, Attorney, MA Bar # Office of General Counsel 5 U.S. House of Representatives 219 Cannon House Office Building Washington, D.C Phone: Fax: Thomas.Hungar@mail.house.gov Counsel for the Honorable Greg Walden, U.S. Representative for the 2nd Congressional District of Oregon August 31, Attorneys for the Office of General Counsel for the U.S. House of Representatives are entitled, for the purpose of performing the counsel s functions, to enter an appearance in any proceeding before any court of the United States or of any State or political subdivision thereof without compliance with any requirements for admission to practice before such court. 2 U.S.C
12 Case 3:16-cr BR Document 1163 Filed 08/31/16 Page 12 of 12 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that on August 31, 2016 a copy of the foregoing Motion of Non-Party The Honorable Greg Walden to Quash Subpoena, and Memorandum in Support, was filed electronically. Notice of this filing will be sent to all parties by operation of the Court s electronic filing system. /s/ Sarah Clouse Sarah Clouse
Case 3:16-cr BR Document 1160 Filed 08/31/16 Page 1 of 10
Case 3:16-cr-00051-BR Document 1160 Filed 08/31/16 Page 1 of 10 PATRICIA MACK BRYAN Senate Legal Counsel pat_bryan@legal.senate.gov MORGAN J. FRANKEL Deputy Senate Legal Counsel GRANT R. VINIK Assistant
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION. JANE BOUDREAU, Case No Hon. Victoria A.
Boudreau v. Bouchard et al Doc. 30 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION JANE BOUDREAU, Case No. 07-10529 v. Plaintiff, Hon. Victoria A. Roberts MICHAEL BOUCHARD,
More informationCase 3:16-cr BR Document 1067 Filed 08/18/16 Page 1 of 10
Case 3:16-cr-00051-BR Document 1067 Filed 08/18/16 Page 1 of 10 ELLEN F. ROSENBLUM Attorney General MARC ABRAMS #890149 Assistant Attorney-in-Charge Telephone: (971) 673-1880 Fax: (971) 673-5000 Email:
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Case :-cr-00-srb Document Filed 0// Page of 0 0 AnnaLou Tirol Acting Chief Public Integrity Section, Criminal Division U.S. Department of Justice JOHN D. KELLER Illinois State Bar No. 0 Deputy Chief VICTOR
More informationCase 2:10-cr MHT -WC Document 1265 Filed 06/13/11 Page 1 of 8
Case 2:10-cr-00186-MHT -WC Document 1265 Filed 06/13/11 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) ) v. ) CRIMINAL ACTION
More informationCase 1:12-cr ALC Document 57 Filed 06/30/14 Page 1 of v. - : 12 Cr. 876 (ALC)
Case 1:12-cr-00876-ALC Document 57 Filed 06/30/14 Page 1 of 23 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - x UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : - v. - : 12 Cr. 876
More informationINTERPLAY OF DISCOVERY AND THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT
INTERPLAY OF DISCOVERY AND THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT LYNDA A. PETERS CITY PROSECUTOR KAREN M. COPPA CHIEF ASSISTANT CORPORATION COUNSEL CITY OF CHICAGO DEPARTMENT OF LAW LEGAL INFORMATION, INVESTIGATIONS,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO. JOHN W. HICKENLOOPER, Governor of the State of Colorado, MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER
Case 1:13-cv-01300-MSK-MJW Document 82 Filed 09/25/13 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 13-cv-01300-MSK-MJW JOHN B. COOKE, Sheriff
More information[ORAL ARGUMENT HELD ON NOVEMBER 8, 2018] No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
USCA Case #18-3052 Document #1760663 Filed: 11/19/2018 Page 1 of 17 [ORAL ARGUMENT HELD ON NOVEMBER 8, 2018] No. 18-3052 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT IN RE:
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Charlottesville Division
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Charlottesville Division 04/20/2018 ELIZABETH SINES et al., ) Plaintiffs, ) Civil Action No. 3:17cv00072 ) v. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION
More informationCase 1:17-cv EGS Document 19 Filed 09/15/17 Page 1 of 22 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:17-cv-00827-EGS Document 19 Filed 09/15/17 Page 1 of 22 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA AMERICAN OVERSIGHT, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 17-cv-00827 (EGS U.S. DEPARTMENT
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LEROY BOLDEN ET AL. CIVIL ACTION VERSUS NO
Case 2:06-cv-04171-HGB-JCW Document 53 Filed 01/14/2008 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LEROY BOLDEN ET AL. CIVIL ACTION VERSUS NO. 06-4171 FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT
More informationTHE GOVERNMENT S MOTION AND MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF A PRETRIAL CONFERENCE PURSUANT TO THE CLASSIFIED INFORMATION PROCEDURES ACT
Case 1:17-cr-00544-NGG Document 29 Filed 09/12/18 Page 1 of 14 PageID #: 84 JMK:DCP/JPM/JPL/GMM F. # 2017R01739 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
More informationNo UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT. UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, Plaintiff Appellee,
USCA Case #16-5202 Document #1653121 Filed: 12/28/2016 Page 1 of 11 No. 16-5202 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, Plaintiff Appellee,
More informationCase 2:13-cv Document Filed in TXSD on 06/04/14 Page 1 of 18 EXHIBIT 5
Case 2:13-cv-00193 Document 315-6 Filed in TXSD on 06/04/14 Page 1 of 18 EXHIBIT 5 Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW 2:13-cv-00193 Document 315-6 Document Filed in 154 TXSD Filed on 06/04/14 05/28/12 Page
More informationCase 4:11-cv RAS Document 37 Filed 06/16/11 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION
Case 4:11-cv-00059-RAS Document 37 Filed 06/16/11 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION KAAREN TEUBER et al., v. STATE OF TEXAS et al., Plaintiffs, Defendants.
More informationCase 1:13-cv EGS Document 89 Filed 06/07/16 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:13-cv-01363-EGS Document 89 Filed 06/07/16 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JUDICIAL WATCH, INC., v. Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 13-CV-1363 (EGS) U.S. DEPARTMENT
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. CASE NO.: Civ-Martinez
Gainor v. Sidley, Austin, Brow Doc. 34 Case 1:06-cv-21748-JEM Document 34 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/09/2007 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MARK J. GAINOR, Plaintiff,
More informationCase 3:05-cv B-BLM Document 783 Filed 04/16/2008 Page 1 of 9
Case :0-cv-0-B-BLM Document Filed 0//00 Page of 0 ROBERT S. BREWER, JR. (SBN ) JAMES S. MCNEILL (SBN 0) 0 B Street, Suite 00 San Diego, CA 0 Telephone: () -00 Facsimile: () -0 WILLIAM F. LEE (admitted
More informationCase 1:13-cv MSK-MJW Document 87 Filed 10/08/13 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Case 1:13-cv-01300-MSK-MJW Document 87 Filed 10/08/13 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 13-cv-1300-MSK-MJW JOHN B. COOKE, Sheriff
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case :-cv-0-sjo-ffm Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0 BLAKELY LAW GROUP BRENT H. BLAKELY (CA Bar No. ) Parkview Avenue, Suite 0 Manhattan Beach, California 0 Telephone: (0) -00 Facsimile: (0) -0
More informationCase 1:16-mc RMC Document 26 Filed 09/13/16 Page 1 of 18 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:16-mc-00621-RMC Document 26 Filed 09/13/16 Page 1 of 18 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA SENATE PERMANENT SUBCOMMITTEE ON ) INVESTIGATIONS, ) ) Applicant, ) Misc.
More informationCase 1:18-cv ABJ Document 19 Filed 02/13/18 Page 1 of 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. Plaintiff, Defendants.
Case 1:18-cv-00011-ABJ Document 19 Filed 02/13/18 Page 1 of 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA PAUL J. MANAFORT, JR., Plaintiff, v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, ROD J. ROSENSTEIN,
More informationCase 2:17-cv MJP Document 238 Filed 04/30/18 Page 1 of 8
Case :-cv-0-mjp Document Filed 0/0/ Page of The Honorable Marsha J. Pechman 0 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE RYAN KARNOSKI, et al., v. DONALD J. TRUMP, et al., Plaintiffs,
More informationCase 1:14-cv FB-RLM Document 492 Filed 11/17/16 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 13817
Case 1:14-cv-04717-FB-RLM Document 492 Filed 11/17/16 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 13817 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ------------------------------------------------------------x
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI SOUTHERN DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI SOUTHERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 16-3024-01-CR-S-MDH SAFYA ROE YASSIN, Defendant. GOVERNMENT S
More informationCase 1:08-cv LAK-GWG Document 472 Filed 12/14/12 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Case 1:08-cv-05523-LAK-GWG Document 472 Filed 12/14/12 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK In re LEHMAN BROTHERS SECURITIES AND ERISA LITIGATION This Document Applies
More informationCase 1:17-cv MJG Document 146 Filed 04/25/18 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND
Case 1:17-cv-02459-MJG Document 146 Filed 04/25/18 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND BROCK STONE, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Case 1:17-cv-02459-MJG DONALD J. TRUMP,
More informationCase: 1:10-cv Document #: 22 Filed: 09/10/10 Page 1 of 9 PageID #:140
Case: 1:10-cv-05135 Document #: 22 Filed: 09/10/10 Page 1 of 9 PageID #:140 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION RHONDA EZELL, et al, ) Case No. 10-CV-5135
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. No IN RE: GRAND JURY INVESTIGATION. JOHN DOE; ABC ENTITY, Appellants
NOT PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT No. 14-4678 IN RE: GRAND JURY INVESTIGATION JOHN DOE; ABC ENTITY, Appellants On Appeal from United States District Court for the District
More informationCase 1:05-cr EWN Document 295 Filed 03/22/2007 Page 1 of 12
Case 1:05-cr-00545-EWN Document 295 Filed 03/22/2007 Page 1 of 12 Criminal Case No. 05 cr 00545 EWN IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Edward W. Nottingham UNITED STATES
More informationCase 2:12-cr JTM-SS Document 24-1 Filed 05/14/12 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Case 2:12-cr-00171-JTM-SS Document 24-1 Filed 05/14/12 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) ) v. ) No. 2:12-cr-00171-JTM-SS
More informationCase 2:17-cv JLR Document 179 Filed 04/07/17 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON.
Case :-cv-00-jlr Document Filed 0/0/ Page of The Honorable James L. Robart UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 0 STATE OF WASHINGTON, et al., v. Plaintiffs, DONALD TRUMP, in his
More informationCase 3:12-cr L Document 42 Filed 04/02/13 Page 1 of 6 PageID 148
Case 3:12-cr-00317-L Document 42 Filed 04/02/13 Page 1 of 6 PageID 148 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. BARRETT LANCASTER BROWN Attorney for Intervenor:
More informationCase 2:16-cv JAR-JPO Document 246 Filed 10/18/16 Page 1 of 6
Case 2:16-cv-02105-JAR-JPO Document 246 Filed 10/18/16 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS STEVEN WAYNE FISH, et al., on behalf of themselves and all others similarly
More informationCase 1:15-cr KAM Document 450 Filed 11/13/17 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: U.S. Department of Justice
Case 1:15-cr-00637-KAM Document 450 Filed 11/13/17 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 12246 U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Eastern District of New York AES/DCP/DKK 271 Cadman Plaza East F.#2014R00501
More informationTRUSTEE S MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF MOTION IN LIMINE TO EXCLUDE TESTIMONY BY ROBERT BLECKER
Pg 1 of 12 Baker & Hostetler LLP 45 Rockefeller Plaza New York, New York 10111 Telephone: (212) 589-4200 Facsimile: (212) 589-4201 Attorneys for Irving H. Picard, Trustee for the Substantively Consolidated
More informationCase 2:16-cv CDJ Document 29 Filed 08/09/17 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Case 2:16-cv-04249-CDJ Document 29 Filed 08/09/17 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA BALA CITY LINE, LLC, : CIVIL ACTION Plaintiff, : : v. : No.:
More informationCase MFW Doc 151 Filed 12/05/14 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
Case 14-50435-MFW Doc 151 Filed 12/05/14 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE In re: WASHINGTON MUTUAL INC., et al., Debtors Chapter 11 Case No. 08-12229 (MFW)
More informationCase 1:18-cv ABJ Document 18 Filed 02/06/18 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.
Case 1:18-cv-00011-ABJ Document 18 Filed 02/06/18 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA PAUL J. MANAFORT, JR., Plaintiff, v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, ROD J. ROSENSTEIN,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA CHARLOTTESVILLE DIVISION. No. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) INTRODUCTION
CLERKS OFFICE U.S. DIST. COURT AT CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA FILED IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA CHARLOTTESVILLE DIVISION JULIA C. DUDLEY, CLERK BY: /s/ J. JONES DEPUTY
More informationNo UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT. UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, Plaintiff Appellee
USCA Case #16-5202 Document #1709177 Filed: 12/15/2017 Page 1 of 3 No. 16-5202 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, Plaintiff Appellee
More informationCase 1:15-mc JGK Document 26 Filed 05/11/15 Page 1 of 10
Case 1:15-mc-00056-JGK Document 26 Filed 05/11/15 Page 1 of 10 United States District Court Southern District of New York SUSANNE STONE MARSHALL, ET AL., Petitioners, -against- BERNARD L. MADOFF, ET AL.,
More informationRelator, IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO. State ex rel. Summit County Republican Party Executive Committee, Case No Origipal Action in Mandamus
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO State ex rel. Summit County Republican Party Executive Committee, vs.; Relator, Case No. 08-0478 Origipal Action in Mandamus Secretary of State Jennifer Brunner Respondent.
More informationNo UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT. UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, Plaintiff Appellee,
No. 16-5202 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, Plaintiff Appellee, v. SYLVIA M. BURWELL, in her official capacity as Secretary of
More informationCase 3:16-cr TJC-JRK Document 31 Filed 07/18/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID 102
Case 3:16-cr-00093-TJC-JRK Document 31 Filed 07/18/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID 102 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JACKSONVILLE DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Case No. 3:16-cr-93-TJC-JRK
More informationPrivilege and Immunity: Protecting the Legislative Process
Privilege and Immunity: Protecting the Legislative Process Eric S. Silvia Senate Counsel Minnesota NCSL Legislative Summit Chicago, Illinois August 8, 2016 1 Legislative Immunity What is it? How did we
More informationCase 4:05-cv TSL-LRA Document Filed 12/06/2006 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI
Case 4:05-cv-00033-TSL-LRA Document 195-1 Filed 12/06/2006 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) CIVIL
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION
Mobile Billboards of America, inc., California Mobile Billboards, et...., Janofsky and Walker, LLP. Doc. 2 Case 5:07-mc-00037 Document 2 Filed 08/07/2007 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
More informationCase No. 2:13-cv-1157 OPINION AND ORDER
Duncan v. Husted Doc. 39 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION Richard Duncan, : Plaintiff, : v. : Secretary of State Jon A. Husted, Case No. 2:13-cv-1157
More informationCase 3:14-cv AET-DEA Document 9 Filed 10/17/14 Page 1 of 7 PageID: 117 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Case 314-cv-05655-AET-DEA Document 9 Filed 10/17/14 Page 1 of 7 PageID 117 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY In Re Application of OWL SHIPPING, LLC & ORIOLE Civil Action No. 14-5655 (AET)(DEA)
More informationCase 4:02-cv Document 661 Filed 11/01/2006 Page 1 of 6
Case :0-cv-0 Document Filed /0/00 Page of 0 JORDAN ETH (BAR NO. ) TERRI GARLAND (BAR NO. ) PHILIP T. BESIROF (BAR NO. 0) MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP Market Street San Francisco, California 0- Telephone:..000
More informationMotion to Compel ( Defendant s Motion ) and Plaintiff Joseph Lee Gay s ( Plaintiff ) Motion
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA LINCOLN COUNTY IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION 13 CVS 383 JOSEPH LEE GAY, Individually and On Behalf of All Persons Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, v. PEOPLES
More informationExcerpts from NC Defender Manual on Third-Party Discovery
Excerpts from NC Defender Manual on Third-Party Discovery 1. Excerpt from Volume 1, Pretrial, of NC Defender Manual: Discusses procedures for obtaining records from third parties and rules governing subpoenas
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
1 Gabriel S. Galanda, WSBA #01 Anthony S. Broadman, WSBA #0 Julio Carranza, WSBA #1 R. Joseph Sexton, WSBA # 0 Yakama Nation Office of Legal Counsel 01 Fort Road/P.O. Box 1 Toppenish, WA (0) - Attorneys
More informationCase 1:18-cr AJT Document 57 Filed 03/01/19 Page 1 of 8 PageID# 363
Case 118-cr-00457-AJT Document 57 Filed 03/01/19 Page 1 of 8 PageID# 363 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Alexandria Division UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. Criminal Case
More informationCase 1:15-mc P1 Document 21 Filed 06/22/15 Page 1 of 9
Case 1:15-mc-00081-P1 Document 21 Filed 06/22/15 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK IN RE APPLICATION OF REPUBLIC OF KAZAKHSTAN FOR AN ORDER DIRECTING DISCOVERY FROM
More informationCase 1:10-cv RMU Document 51 Filed 10/07/11 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:10-cv-00539-RMU Document 51 Filed 10/07/11 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA YASSIN MUHIDDIN AREF, et al. Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 10-0539 (RMU
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON. Plaintiff, Defendant.
Case :-cv-00-tor Document 0 Filed 0// 0 J. CHRISTOPHER LYNCH, WSBA # JEFFREY R. SMITH, WSBA #0 RHETT V. BARNEY, WSBA # 0 W. Riverside Avenue, Suite 00 Spokane, WA Phone: (0) - Fax: (0) - Emails: chris@leehayes.com
More informationCase 2:14-cv GMN-CWH Document 1 Filed 09/12/14 Page 1 of 17
Case :-cv-00-gmn-cwh Document Filed 0// Page of JONATHAN E. NUECHTERLEIN General Counsel LESLIE RICE MELMAN Assistant General Counsel for Litigation IMAD D. ABYAD Attorney FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION 00 Pennsylvania
More informationLegal 145b FINAL EXAMINATION. Prepare a Motion to Quash Subpoena.
A. Motion to Quash Assignment Legal 145b FINAL EXAMINATION Prepare a Motion to Quash Subpoena. Recently you prepared a subpoena. Look at the front of the subpoena where it tells you how to oppose a subpoena.
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) v. ) Crim. No GAO ) DZHOKHAR TSARNAEV )
Case 1:13-cr-10200-GAO Document 290 Filed 05/07/14 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) v. ) Crim. No. 13-10200-GAO ) DZHOKHAR TSARNAEV ) MOTION
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE NORTH ATLANTIC OPERATING COMPANY, INC.; and NATIONAL TOBACCO COMPANY, L.P., Petitioner, v. C.A. No. 18-mc-154-LPS DUNHUANG GROUP D/BA/ DHGATE,
More informationCase 1:10-cr RBW Document 164 Filed 05/18/12 Page 1 of 47 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:10-cr-00223-RBW Document 164 Filed 05/18/12 Page 1 of 47 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) ) v. ) Case No. 1:10-CR-00223-RBW ) WILLIAM
More informationCase 1:15-cv JEB Document 8-1 Filed 06/03/15 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:15-cv-00730-JEB Document 8-1 Filed 06/03/15 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MONTGOMERY BLAIR SIBLEY, Plaintiff, v. THE HONORABLE MITCH MCCONNELL SOLELY
More informationCase3:12-mc CRB Document93 Filed10/09/13 Page1 of 10
Case:-mc-0-CRB Document Filed0/0/ Page of 0 THEODORE J. BOUTROUS JR., SBN 00 tboutrous@gibsondunn.com ETHAN D. DETTMER, SBN 0 edettmer@gibsondunn.com ENRIQUE A. MONAGAS, SBN 0 emonagas@gibsondunn.com GIBSON,
More informationCase 6:15-cv AA Document 440 Filed 11/20/18 Page 1 of 10
Case 6:15-cv-01517-AA Document 440 Filed 11/20/18 Page 1 of 10 JEFFREY BOSSERT CLARK Assistant Attorney General JEFFREY H. WOOD Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General Environment & Natural Resources
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No (JEB) KIRSTJEN M. NIELSEN, et al.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ANSLY DAMUS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 18-578 (JEB) KIRSTJEN M. NIELSEN, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiffs are members
More informationCase 1:18-cv JMF Document 308 Filed 09/07/18 Page 1 of 11
Case 118-cv-02921-JMF Document 308 Filed 09/07/18 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
More informationCase 1:15-mc P1 Document 19 Filed 11/12/15 Page 1 of 16
Case 115-mc-00326-P1 Document 19 Filed 11/12/15 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Applicant, - against - No. 15 Misc. 326 (JFK) OPINION & ORDER AJD, INC., A MCDONALD
More informationCase 3:03-cv RNC Document 32 Filed 11/13/2003 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT. Defendants.
Case 3:03-cv-00252-RNC Document 32 Filed 11/13/2003 Page 1 of 7 WILLIAM SPECTOR IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT Plaintiff, v. TRANS UNION LLC C.A. NO. 3:03-CV-00252
More informationsmb Doc 373 Filed 05/10/17 Entered 05/10/17 20:38:30 Main Document Pg 1 of 11
Pg 1 of 11 BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP 45 Rockefeller Plaza New York, New York 10111 Telephone: (212) 589-4200 Facsimile: (212) 589-4201 Attorneys for Irving H. Picard, Trustee for the Substantively Consolidated
More informationCase 5:14-cv JFL Document 67 Filed 11/16/15 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Case 514-cv-04822-JFL Document 67 Filed 11/16/15 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA KATE LYNN BLATT, Plaintiff,. v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 514-cv-4822-JFL
More informationPlaintiff, : OPINION AND ORDER 04 Civ (LTS) (GWG) -v.- :
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------------------------------------X ANDREW YOUNG, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated, : Plaintiff,
More informationCase 2:17-cv MJP Document 217 Filed 03/23/18 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE. Defendants.
Case :-cv-0-mjp Document Filed 0// Page of The Honorable Marsha J. Pechman UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 0 RYAN KARNOSKI, et al., v. Plaintiffs, No. :-cv--mjp DEFENDANTS
More informationCase 2:15-cr SDW Document 52 Filed 12/16/15 Page 1 of 10 PageID: 1149 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Case 2:15-cr-00193-SDW Document 52 Filed 12/16/15 Page 1 of 10 PageID: 1149 NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, WILLIAM E. BARONI,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Lacy v. American Biltrite, INC. Employees Long Term Disability Plan et al Doc. 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA MATTHEW LACY, v. Plaintiff, AMERICAN BILTRITE, INC., EMPLOYEES
More informationCase 1:05-cr RBW Document 271 Filed 02/07/2007 Page 1 of 9 THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:05-cr-00394-RBW Document 271 Filed 02/07/2007 Page 1 of 9 THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) ) CR. NO. 05-394 (RBW) v. ) ) I. LEWIS LIBBY, )
More informationCase 1:12-cv JDB Document 45 Filed 09/23/14 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ORDER
Case 1:12-cv-01510-JDB Document 45 Filed 09/23/14 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JUDICIAL WATCH, INC., Plaintiff, v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Civil Action No.
More informationCase 1:12-cv RJD-RLM Document 89 Filed 10/24/14 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: Plaintiffs, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
Case 1:12-cv-04869-RJD-RLM Document 89 Filed 10/24/14 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1416 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ------------------------------------------------------------x
More information2:12-cr SFC-MKM Doc # 227 Filed 12/06/13 Pg 1 of 12 Pg ID 1213 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
2:12-cr-20218-SFC-MKM Doc # 227 Filed 12/06/13 Pg 1 of 12 Pg ID 1213 United States of America, Plaintiff, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION v. Criminal Case No.
More informationCase: 2:16-cv GCS-EPD Doc #: 84 Filed: 10/17/16 Page: 1 of 9 PAGEID #: 23383
Case: 2:16-cv-00303-GCS-EPD Doc #: 84 Filed: 10/17/16 Page: 1 of 9 PAGEID #: 23383 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION OHIO A. PHILIP RANDOLPH INSTITUTE, NORTHEAST
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Polaris Industries Inc., Case No. 10-cv-4362 (JNE/HB) Plaintiff, v. ORDER CFMOTO Powersports, Inc., CFMOTO America, Inc., John T. O Mara & Angela M. O
More informationCase 1:11-cv JSR Document 42 Filed 12/16/11 Page 1 of 18 SEC S MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION FOR STAY PENDING APPEAL
Case 1:11-cv-07387-JSR Document 42 Filed 12/16/11 Page 1 of 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK : SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, : : Plaintiff, : : 11 Civ. 07387 (JSR) v.
More informationCase 1:11-mc RLW Document 1 Filed 05/17/11 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:11-mc-00295-RLW Document 1 Filed 05/17/11 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA IN RE THIRD PARTY SUBPOENAS AD TESTIFICANDUM Case No. Nokia Corporation, Apple Inc.,
More informationCase 2:10-cv TFM-CRE Document 99 Filed 05/31/13 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Case 2:10-cv-00131-TFM-CRE Document 99 Filed 05/31/13 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ex rel. JASON SOBEK, Plaintiff,
More informationCase 1:08-cr EGS Document 126 Filed 10/02/2008 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:08-cr-00231-EGS Document 126 Filed 10/02/2008 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) v. ) ) Crim. No. 08-231 (EGS) THEODORE
More informationCase 3:10-cv VLB Document 109 Filed 06/20/12 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
Case 3:10-cv-01750-VLB Document 109 Filed 06/20/12 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT JOANNE PEDERSEN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Case No. 3:10-cv-01750 (VLB OFFICE OF
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case :-cv-0-svw-agr Document Filed 0/0/ Page of Page ID #: 0 0 Benjamin Heikali SBN 0 Email: bheikali@faruqilaw.com 0 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 0 Los Angeles, CA 00 Telephone: -- Facsimile: -- Richard
More informationCase 2:12-cv JFB-ETB Document 26 Filed 06/19/12 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 158 CV (JFB)(ETB)
Case 2:12-cv-01156-JFB-ETB Document 26 Filed 06/19/12 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 158 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -------------------------------------------------------------------------X
More informationCase 2:16-cv ER Document 55 Filed 11/16/18 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK : : : : : : : : : : : : : :
Case 216-cv-01251-ER Document 55 Filed 11/16/18 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, INC., v. Plaintiff, UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL
More informationCase 1:10-cr LMB Document 138 Filed 07/22/11 Page 1 of 11 PageID# 1267 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
Case 1:10-cr-00485-LMB Document 138 Filed 07/22/11 Page 1 of 11 PageID# 1267 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Alexandria Division UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JEFFREY
More informationCase 1:08-cv JEB Document 50 Filed 03/11/13 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:08-cv-01289-JEB Document 50 Filed 03/11/13 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DICK ANTHONY HELLER, et al., Plaintiffs, Civil Action No. 08-01289 (JEB v. DISTRICT
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA CEDAR RAPIDS DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA CEDAR RAPIDS DIVISION THOMAS SAXTON, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) Civil Action No. 1:15-cv-00047-LLR v. ) ) FAIRHOLME S REPLY IN SUPPORT
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ROME DIVISION
Case 4:14-cv-00139-HLM Document 34 Filed 08/31/15 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ROME DIVISION GEORGIACARRY.ORG, INC., and DAVID JAMES, Plaintiffs,
More informationCase3:12-cv MEJ Document5 Filed01/18/12 Page1 of 5
Case3:12-cv-00240-MEJ Document5 Filed01/18/12 Page1 of 5 JERROLD ABELES (SBN 138464) Abelesierr a)arentfox.com DAVID G. AYLES SBN 208112) Ba les.david a)arentfox.com A ENT FOX LLP 555 West Fifth Street,
More information2013 CO 31. No. 12SA156, People v. Brothers Subpoena Motion to Quash Preliminary Hearing Child victim Standing
Opinions of the Colorado Supreme Court are available to the public and can be accessed through the Court s homepage at http://www.courts.state.co.us and are posted on the Colorado Bar Association homepage
More informationCase 1:16-cv RJL Document 152 Filed 08/28/17 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:16-cv-00236-RJL Document 152 Filed 08/28/17 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF THE UNITED STATES, et al., v. BRIAN NEWBY, et al., Plaintiffs,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA. Alexandria Division
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Alexandria Division UNITED STATES OF AMERICA No. 1:10cr485 (LMB v. JEFFREY ALEXANDER STERLING GOVERNMENT S OPPOSITION TO THE DEFENDANT
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION
The Facebook, Inc. v. Connectu, LLC et al Doc. 0 Dockets.Justia.com 1 1 SEAN A. LINCOLN (State Bar No. 1) salincoln@orrick.com I. NEEL CHATTERJEE (State Bar No. ) nchatterjee@orrick.com MONTE COOPER (State
More information