MONTEREY COLLEGE OF LAW Michelle A. Welsh, Professor. Question No. 2 Final Examination Spring 2010
|
|
- Violet Griffin
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Question No. 2 Final Examination Spring 2010 MONTEREY COLLEGE OF LAW Michelle A. Welsh, Professor In response to a decision by the United States Supreme Court confirming the right to freedom of speech when exercised by a corporation, Congress held hearings and made findings that corporations in the United States unduly influence politics and threaten the voting rights of the United States citizens. Congress then enacted the "Corporate Personhood Act" prohibiting any state from permitting formation of corporations without an express waiver of rights secured to human persons by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. If any corporation exercises any rights secured to human persons by the First Amendment to the U.S.Constitution with the intent to influence the outcome of any federal election, the Corporate Personhood Act then prohibits that corporation from engaging in interstate commerce. Pursuant to the Corporate Personhood Act, the State of Columbia amended its Corporations Code statute as follows: "Section 100. One or more natural persons, partnerships or associations may form a corporation under this statute by executing and filing articles of incorporation which shall include an express waiver of any rights secured to human persons under the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. The corporate existence begins upon the filing of the articles of incorporation and continues perpetually, unless expressly provided by law or in the articles of incorporation. Section 101. Any corporation engaging in conduct pursuant to rights expressly waived in its articles of incorporation shall be subject to revocation of its corporate existence." The federal "Corporate Personhood Act" and the amendment to the State of Columbia Corporation's code are challenged in a lawsuit by two corporations: Tireco, a manufacturer of truck tires located in the State of Columbia, was formed after the amendment to the Columbia Corporations Code and included in its articles of incorporation a waiver of all rights secured to human persons by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. Tireco made a $100,000 campaign contribution to a candidate running in the State of Columbia for a seat in the United States Senate. After that contribution, Tireco was prohibited from exporting its products in interstate commerce under the "Corporate Personhood Act" and the State of Columbia revoked Tireco's status as a corporation existing under the laws of the State of Columbia. Reprorights, a nonprofit corporation in the State of Columbia, was formed after the amendment to the Columbia Corporations Code and included in its articles of incorporation a waiver of all rights secured to human persons by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. Reprorights was prohibited by the State of Columbia from erecting a billboard in an area zoned for billboards along a state highway. The Reprorights billboard advocated for reproductive rights and provided contact information for medical providers of abortion services. Another billboard by a corporation opposing abortion was permitted along the same highway. 1. What arguments should Tireco and Reprorights make to challenge the federal "Corporate Personhood Act" and how will the federal government respond? 2. What arguments should Tireco and Reprorights make to challenge the amendments to the Columbia Corporations Code, and how should the state government respond? 3. How is the Supreme court likely to rule and why? 3 ***************
2 Constitutional Law - Final Exam QUESTION 2- OUTLINE ANSWER I. Is the Corporate Personhood Act unconstitutional? A. Congress' Power 1) Commerce Clause: per Lopez and Morrison factors a) Tires sold and used in channels of commerce; effects of campaign contribution prohibition maybe too attenuated per Morrison- findings: corporate political influences effects voting rights, not commerce b) Repro Rights: nonprofit corporation not engaged in commerce, advocacy for rights has no effect on commerce, but highway billboard is on channel of commerce: effects too attenuated per Morrison 2) Congress' remedial power under 5 of 14th Amendment re voting rights violations a) Must remedy a violation: findings of corporate influence may not prove actual voting rights violations b) Must be congruent and proportional (City of Boerne): waiver of 1st Amendment and prohibition on interstate commerce is excessive, not congruent to violation or proportional to remedy B. State's Rights per 10th Amendment 1) Violates State's authority per police power to form and define corporations and to provide for general welfare 2) Congress cannot commandeer States to enforce federal law (NY v. U.S., Printz) C. Violates 1st Amendment Freedom of Speech 1) Even if waiver is valid, Act is vague and overbroad a) Vague: no clear notice re scope of 1st Amendment rights secured to human persons, no definition of "intent to influence" Federal elections 2) Overbreadth: encompasses more speech than necessary e.g. Reprorights advocacy for reproductive freedom
3 D. Act violates Due Process: prohibition on engaging in interstate commerce without notice, hearing or neutral decision maker II. Amendments to Columbia Corporations Code A. Requiring waiver of fundamental rights under U.S. Constitution as condition of incorporating is beyond State's police power: but specifically authorized by Congress B. Revocation of Tireco's corporate status: beyond State's power (per above) or preemption by Corporate Personhood Act occupying the field No due process: deprived of fundamental right of expressive conduct (campaign contribution) without notice, hearing or neutral decision maker C. Denial of Reprorights Billboard permit 1) Waiver of all 1 51 Amendment rights for a nonprofit corporation is beyond power of Congress or State's police power 2) Discriminatory application of law: violates free speech a) Content-based restriction on speech because of viewpoint requires strict scrutiny: no compelling interest to limit nonprofit's speech advocating reproductive rights, not narrowly tailored to government's interest in protecting voting rights b) Time, place and manner restriction in a public forum: highways zoned for billboards may be public forum, but denial of permit is content-based If billboard is commercial speech: Central Hudson test, content based restriction on speech not false or misleading Ill. Conclusions
4 2) 1. Challenges to the Corporate Personhood Act (CPA) Does Congress have the power to enact the Corporate Personhood Act? Congress has broad power to regulate interstate commere;e under Article 1, section 8 of the --- Constitution. Under Lopez, Congress has the power to regulate (1) the channels of interstate commerce, (2) the instrumentalities of commerce, and (3) activities that substantially affect interstate commerce. In Morrison, the court explained that an activity substantially affects interstate commerce if it regulates economic activities, the law contains a jurisdictional element, there are Congressional findings of a substantial affect on interstate commerce and that affect is not too attenuated. Here, the area Congress is regulating is unrelated to a traditional channel_of interstate commerce. There may be an argument that Corporations engage in business, which drive interstate commerce and such, corporations are an instrumentality of interstate commerce, just a phone or the internet may be deemed an instrumentality. Further, the government may argue that the law should be upheld because the corporations have a substantial effect on commerce, and thus, the law involves economic activities effecting commerce However, plaintiffs will argue that this argument is without merit because the findings indicate that Congress' intent was to prevent what it preceived to be injury to corporate influence in elections and impact on voting rights, neither of which ~re su!2!5!_nti~y re.@!e!l.cj.!qll}!llj:!~te commerce. Thus, it is unlikely the court will find that this was within Congress' commerce powers to enact. Since this law does not deal with either t~~ifl_f!_a.f19 ~[lelr1.9ln_ l. spending clause for the general welfare. it is not proper under the tax and The government may argue that Congress was exercising its remedial powers under section 5 r ~ ~ of the 14th amendment to protect individual's fundamental right to vote and participate equally in the process. However, Congress' power under the 14th amendment is not as broad as it is under its Article 1 powers, and instead the law must be congruent and proportional to the harm being sought to be remedied. Here, Congress is responding to a Supreme Court ruling that Page 1 of 5
5 (Question 2 continued) found corporations have the same freedom of speech as individuals. There was no long standing, wide-spread discrimination against individuals in exercising their fundamental right to vote that Congress needed to remedy. Thus, it is likely that the court could find that Congress was not properly exercising its 14th amendment legislative powers either. Thus, it is unlikely that Congress can articulate the source of power to enact the CPA in the first place. However, for the purposes of this essay, we will assume they did have such a powej" ) c?lt>\ \ (... rv t~~ ~ ~ 1 '/"r vv-...) Does the CPA violate separation of powers by impermissibly seeking to overrule a constitutional holding without passing a constitutional amendment? Separation of powers prevents one branch of government from usurping a core function of another branch of government. In Marbury v. Madison, the court explained that it is e~.,.,_r\.-\o...rl(~~ ( empathicall)fthe province of the court to say what the law is, i.e. the power of judicial review. Once the court has interpreted the Constitution to provide a right, Congress lacks the power to remove that right except by a Constitutional amendment. The supremacy clause provides that the US Constitution is supreme over all other laws. Thus, even if Congress had the source of power to enact such legislation, the CPA would still fail because its an unconstitutional attempt to circumvent a Supreme Court interpretation of constitutional law. AISJ: J.-~ VtrJv,~f. tala pv)}ctm 'ts)(j-<c N.. p.-v\o,i.,tt~ ;._1-e-GAt:X.. Ct;v--<MPuc_ (.c-/./v-o,...jfu.-.\1vj<-ic.w\ + V c-s lr'l l ~!H--1\ { thjv-uvv-} ""' I' S'l c 1' lv w I 2. Challenges to the Columbia amendments to the Corporations Code Do the Columbia amendments impermissibly violate the 1st amendment's freedom of speech by conditioning a benefit on consent to forego the fundamental right to free speech? The 1st amendment protects the right to free speech. Free speech is violated where the government conditions receipt of benefits on waiving speech rights. In order to determine what standard of review the court will apply to a regulation infringing on free speech, the primary inquiry is on whether the law regulates based on the agreement or disagreement with the :~~t~-~t of the speech or otherwise silences one side of the debate. if the law is_~cj~_t!l!:ll::~-a~el~' the state must show a compelling state interest in regulating the speech which is narrowly ~ ~ tailored to achieve that objective. If it is found to be content-neutral, the state need only show an important state interest in maintaining the regulation ~ ~----- The state will argue that this is not a content-based regulation because it does not regulate Page 2 of 5
6 (Question 2 continued) what corporations say, but rather the regulation regulates corporations as a whole, equally, and ireespective of what their position is on any issue. The plaintiffs will! argue that this is a viewpoint-based content-based regulation because it silences all corporations from exercising free speech, or any other rights afforded to humans under the first amendment. Thus, the court will likely find that this is a viewpoint based regulation, and thus, strict scrutiny applies. The state may argue that they passed the law to comply with the Federal CPA, but given the fact that the CPA is likely unconstitutional, this will hardly amount to a compelling state interest The state will also argue that protecting their citizens fundamental right to have their vote counted equally and participate in the election process is a compelling state interest which allowing corporate speech interferes with. In light of the Congressional findings that corporations are unduly influencing election and threaten voting rights, the state was compelled to act. However, the plaintiff's will argue that even if this was a compelling interest, the law here is r:j~ narrowly tailore~d to meet the specific interest in preventing the dilution of individual's voting power and influence in the election process because the law prohibits ALL first amendment activity by corporations. Thus, the court will likely find that conditioning corporate status upon an express waiver of 1st amendment rights cannot be sustained by a compelling state interest because it is...rl_c>!_n~rro~ly tailored. ~------~... Is Section 100 unduly vague because a reasonable person would not know what "any rights secured to human persons" would entail? A law will be deemed unconstitutional on its face if a reasonable person of ordinary intelligence would not know what actions/speech was prohibited and what was permissible. The plaintiff will argue that a reasonable person would not know what a corporation could or could not permissibly do under this law. Does the law prohibit them from advertising for their business? Can they post a sign at the entrance of their establishment or does this also violate the first amendment? Trying to figure out what "any rights secured to human persons" would Page 3 of 5
7 (Question 2 continued) likely lead to a~ng_eff~t on corporations engaging in any speech whatsoever, whether related to elections or not, because they would be afraid to have their corporate status revoked_ Further, the fact that the anti-abortion corporation was permitted to erect a billboard tends to suggest that there are some permissible exercises of speech that the state will permit, thus, leading to unfettered discretion by state officials. This further confuses a reasonable person in , trying to determine what is an is not permitted. Thus, the court will likely find that this law is unconstitutional because it is unduly vague. Is Section 100 substantially overbroad? A law is unconstitutional if it is overbroad, that is, it prohibits substantially more speech than is necessary, thus causing a chilling effect on free expression. The plaintiffs will argue that the law here is not narrowly tailored and sweeps in a lot of ~ protected speech (at least according to the Supreme Courts recent holding) because the law prohibits ALL first amendment activity by corporations. Given the fact that corporations do have 1st amendment protection, a law that prohibits all first amendment speech upon penalty of losing corporate status is unconstitutionally overbroad. fllf >i v-~ ;'ii--\t""'-~- Do the Columbia amendments deprive Tireco and Reprorights of their property without due ~---- process of law because they were never afforded an notice and opportunity to respond before a neutral decision maker before they were prevented from engaging in interstate commerce and having their corporate status revoked> Due process requires that notice and opportunity to be heard at a meaningful time and in a meaningful manner before a neutral decisionmaker to prevent erroneous deprivation of life, liberty or property. Here, the statute provides no procedural due process for corporations to ' ~ challenge the revocation of their corporate status as a penalty for exercising their 1st amendment rights. Thus, Section 101 likely violates due process. Did the State of Columbia have a compelling state interest to justify the prohibition of Reprorights billboard promoting abortion in a area zoned for billboards? In order to determine what standard of review the court will apply to a regulation infringing on free speech, the primary inquiry is on whether the law regulates based on the agreement or Page 4 of5
8 (Question 2 continued) disagreement with the~entpf the speech or otherwise silences one side of the debate.. if the law is content-based, the state must show a compelling state interest in regulating the speech which is narrowly tailored to achieve that objective. If it is found to be content-neutral, the state need only show an important state interest in maintaining the regulation. Here, the state prohibited Reprorights from erecting a billboard advocating reproductive rights including abortion, while they permitted an anti-abortion group to place a billboard along the same highway. This is a content based decision, thus, strict scrutiny applies. ----~ ~ The facts make clear that the area in which the billboard was sought to be erected was zoned for billboards, so it is unlikely that the court will find this is a reasonable time, place and manner restriction (which wouldn't apply anyway because this is content-based, not content-neutral). V-1\ 1 Thus, it is likely that the state can show a compelling state interest in prohibiting the billboard, and thus, this state action was unconstitutional under the 1st amendment. 3. How is the Supreme Court likely to rule and why The Court will likely find that both the federal and state laws are unconstitutional. Y ' la- c{ IS( ("f( r- CVv). V/).1/~v, ~<. 115 K; 0-..,...A f-c-~ l-<:_ v<m C (Tr ") /Lt_ [.Jy"y{ LA. V vvu..-1\, j Ce"-p 1' \LL 5, o d l-"11 "'- 1h ov7 \S) v:\ v'v' I)':l \Ali<--, fv--> (;-{._ (/) J., Av-c.,.,L<. ~ "'As/,. v-~~t '/l<-'1: -\'TviCo lr"''' r, 0t:1 1t f'zh<a-- r:c.~,;. fu-..-\'1r" (tjvfvn--{-c. S'ri/Tl.v.o y-\ epsc,,iye) Vt<.c.u(J (),\\0vr,~1;\. tv (/Vvo.e;-..,At-' S'f ''vc l 6c.-T / ~) 'f 1 I \ C-(} \r "jc--\r"{,. b!l J.C1~.\_) Page 5 of 5
US CONSTITUTION PREAMBLE
US CONSTITUTION PREAMBLE We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare,
More information-- 1
Constitutional Law I. Steps In Con Law analysis a. Threshold Issues i. Standing, mootness, ripeness, state action (abstention) b. Applicable Amendment i. Look for issue pairings ii. If this a property
More informationCalifornia Bar Examination
California Bar Examination Essay Question: Constitutional Law And Selected Answers The Orahte Group is NOT affiliated with The State Bar of California PRACTICE PACKET p.1 Question State X amended its anti-loitering
More informationQuestion 1. State X is the nation s largest producer of grain used for making ethanol. There are no oil wells or refineries in the state.
Question 1 A State X statute prohibits the retail sale of any gasoline that does not include at least 10 percent ethanol, an alcohol produced from grain, which, when mixed with gasoline, produces a substance
More informationUNWRITTEN PARK TRESPASS POLICY UNCONSTITUTIONAL
UNWRITTEN PARK TRESPASS POLICY UNCONSTITUTIONAL James C. Kozlowski, J.D., Ph.D. 2007 James C. Kozlowski In the case of Anthony v. State, No. 06-05-00133-CR. (Tex.App. 6 th Dist. 2006), plaintiff Lamar
More informationCONSTITUTIONAL LAW PROFESSOR ERWIN CHEMERINSKY. Copyright 2017 by BARBRI, Inc.
CONSTITUTIONAL LAW PROFESSOR ERWIN CHEMERINSKY Copyright 2017 by BARBRI, Inc. CONSTITUTIONAL LAW by Erwin Chemerinsky OVERVIEW OF ORGANIZATION I. The federal judicial power II. The federal legislative
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF HAWAII FOUNDATION LOIS K. PERRIN # 8065 P.O. Box 3410 Honolulu, Hawaii 96801 Telephone: (808) 522-5900 Facsimile: (808) 522-5909 Email: lperrin@acluhawaii.org Attorney
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION CARL W. HEWITT and PATSY HEWITT ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) vs. ) Case No. ) CITY OF COOKEVILLE, TENNESSEE, ) ) Defendant.
More informationFLOW CHARTS. Justification for the regulation
FLOW CHARTS When you have a regulation of speech is the regulation of speech content-based? [or content-neutral] Look to the: Text of the regulation Justification for the regulation YES Apply strict-scrutiny
More informationBy: Mariana Gaxiola-Viss 1. Before the year 2002 corporations were free to sponsor any
Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002 Violates Free Speech When Applied to Issue-Advocacy Advertisements: Fed. Election Comm n v. Wisconsin Right to Life, Inc., 127 S. Ct. 2652 (2007). By: Mariana Gaxiola-Viss
More informationOur American federalism creatively unites states with unique cultural, political, and
COMMITTEE: POLICY: TYPE: LAW AND CRIMINAL JUSTICE FEDERALISM DEBATE Our American federalism creatively unites states with unique cultural, political, and social diversity into a strong nation. The Tenth
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
1 0 1 David A. Cortman, AZ Bar No. 00 Tyson Langhofer, AZ Bar No. 0 Alliance Defending Freedom 0 N. 0th Street Scottsdale, AZ 0 (0) -000 (0) -00 Fax dcortman@adflegal.org tlanghofer@adflegal.org Kenneth
More informationCERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS
AOOq- C T - o~r'l- sc.. Tfs CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS The undersigned counsel of record certifies that the following listed persons have an interest in the outcome of this case. These representations
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. Case No.
Case 3:17-cv-01160 Document 1 Filed 10/25/17 Page 1 of 27 Page ID #1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS College Republicans of SIUE, Plaintiff, vs. Randy J. Dunn,
More informationCRS Report for Congress
CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web Order Code RS22199 July 19, 2005 Federalism Jurisprudence: The Opinions of Justice O Connor Summary Kenneth R. Thomas and Todd B. Tatelman Legislative
More information2.2 The executive power carries out laws
Mr.Jarupot Kamklai Judge of the Phra-khanong Provincial Court Chicago-Kent College of Law #7 The basic Principle of the Constitution of the United States and Judicial Review After the thirteen colonies,
More informationThe Constitution in One Sentence: Understanding the Tenth Amendment
January 10, 2011 Constitutional Guidance for Lawmakers The Constitution in One Sentence: Understanding the Tenth Amendment In a certain sense, the Tenth Amendment the last of the 10 amendments that make
More informationMBE Constitutional Law Sample
MBE Constitutional Law Sample Approximately 50% of the Constitutional Law questions for each MBE will be based on Individual Rights such as due process, equal protections, and state action. "State Action"
More informationLibrary Meeting Rooms: Crafting Policies that Keep You In Charge and Out of Court
Library Meeting Rooms: Crafting Policies that Keep You In Charge and Out of Court Deborah Caldwell-Stone, Deputy Director American Library Association Office for Intellectual Freedom The Problem Conservative
More informationA QUICK OVERVIEW OF CONSTITTUTIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL LAW ISSUES IN THE UNITED STATES
A QUICK OVERVIEW OF CONSTITTUTIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL LAW ISSUES IN THE UNITED STATES 2012 Environmental, Energy and Resources Law Summit Canadian Bar Association Conference, Vancouver, April 26-27, 2012 Robin
More informationSecond Look Series CONSTITUTIONAL LAW TABLE OF CONTENTS
CONSTITUTIONAL LAW TABLE OF CONTENTS I. JUSTICIABLE CASE OF CONTROVERSY......1 A. JUSTICIABLE CASE......1 B. STANDING.. 1 C. STANDING TEST... 1 1. Components..1 2. Third Party Standing...2 3. Limited Taxpayer
More informationCon law Outline Basic Formula for Analysis: -- Make flow chart for each test Overview C. Congress s Authority
Con law Outline Basic Formula for Analysis: -- Make flow chart for each test Is the federal statute within the federal legislative power? If so, Does it offend individual rights? Overview A. Article 1,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Case Case 1:09-cv-05815-RBK-JS 1:33-av-00001 Document Document 3579 1 Filed Filed 11/13/09 Page Page 1 of 1 of 26 26 Michael W. Kiernan, Esquire (MK-6567) Attorney of Record KIERNAN & ASSOCIATES, LLC One
More informationResponses of the Christian Civic League of Maine, Inc. to Defendants First Set of Interrogatories
Case 1:06-cv-00614-LFO Document 26-5 Filed 04/21/2006 Page 1 of 10 United States District Court District of Columbia The Christian Civic League of Maine, Inc. 70 Sewall Street Augusta, ME 04330, Plaintiff,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Case No.
FREDERICK BOYLE, -against- Plaintiff, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ROBERT W. WERNER, Director, Office of Foreign Assets Control of the United States Department of
More informationThe Six Basic Principles
The Constitution The Six Basic Principles The Constitution is only about 7000 words One of its strengths is that it does not go into great detail. It is based on six principles that are embodied throughout
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Mónica M. Ramírez* Cecillia D. Wang* AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION IMMIGRANTS RIGHTS PROJECT Drumm Street San Francisco, CA 1 Telephone: (1) -0 Facsimile: (1) -00 Email: mramirez@aclu.org Attorneys
More informationNarrowing the Drone Zone: The Constitutionality of Idaho Code
Narrowing the Drone Zone: The Constitutionality of Idaho Code 21-213 Jeremiah Hudson Nicholas Warden Drones are beginning to occupy the skies across the United States by both citizens and federal, state,
More informationCase: 4:18-cv Doc. #: 1 Filed: 01/02/18 Page: 1 of 8 PageID #: 1
Case: 4:18-cv-00003 Doc. #: 1 Filed: 01/02/18 Page: 1 of 8 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION LAWRENCE WILLSON, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) Case
More informationCalifornia Bar Examination
California Bar Examination Essay Question: Constitutional Law And Selected Answers The Orahte Group is NOT affiliated with The State Bar of California PRACTICE PACKET p.1 Question The Legislature of State
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
CATO INSTITUTE 1000 Massachusetts Avenue, NW UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Washington, DC 20001 Plaintiff, v. Civil Case No. UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION,
More informationFULL OUTLINE. Bar Exam Doctor BAREXAMDOCTOR.COM. CONSTITUTIONAL LAW
FULL OUTLINE www.barexamdoctor.com CONSTITUTIONAL LAW I. FEDERAL JUDICIAL POWER a. Requirement for cases and controversies. 4 justiciability doctrines: i. Standing 1. Definition: issue is whether P is
More informationCOMMITTEE NO. 308 Robert J. Kasunic, Chair
1999-2000 ANNUAL REPORT COMMITTEE NO. 308 Robert J. Kasunic, Chair GOVERNMENT RELATIONS TO COPYRIGHTS Scope of Committee: (1) The practices of government agencies and private publishers concerning the
More informationThe S e cope o e f f Congressi essi nal al P ower w s
The Scope of Congressional Powers What are the three types of congressional power? How does strict construction of the U.S. Constitution on the subject of congressional power compare to liberal construction?
More informationAmerican Government. C H A P T E R 11 Powers of Congress
American Government C H A P T E R 11 Powers of Congress C H A P T E R 11 Powers of Congress SECTION 1 The Scope of Congressional Powers SECTION 2 The Expressed Powers of Money and Commerce SECTION 3 Other
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION Rev. MARKEL HUTCHINS ) ) Plaintiff, ) v. ) ) CIVIL ACTION HON. NATHAN DEAL, Governor of the ) FILE NO. State of Georgia,
More informationCase 2:16-at Document 1 Filed 05/26/16 Page 1 of 10
Case :-at-00 Document Filed 0// Page of 0 0 BENBROOK LAW GROUP, PC BRADLEY A. BENBROOK (SBN ) STEPHEN M. DUVERNAY (SBN 0) 00 Capitol Mall, Suite 0 Sacramento, CA Telephone: () -00 Facsimile: () -0 brad@benbrooklawgroup.com
More informationFEDERALISM. As a consequence, rights established under deeds, wills, contracts, and the like in one state must be recognized by other states.
FEDERALISM Federal Government: A form of government where states form a union and the sovereign power is divided between the national government and the various states. The Privileges and Immunities Clause:
More informationThe Judicial System (cont d)
The Judicial System (cont d) Alexander Hamilton in Federalist #78: Executive: Holds the sword of the community as commander-in-chief. Congress appropriates money ( commands the purse ) and decides the
More informationChapter 3: The Constitution
Chapter 3: The Constitution United States Government Week on October 2, 2017 The Constitution: Structure Pictured: James Madison Structure Preamble: introduction that states why the Constitution was written
More informationNo Sn t~e ~uprem~ (~ourt of the i~tnit~l~
No. 09-154 Sn t~e ~uprem~ (~ourt of the i~tnit~l~ FILED ALIG 2 8 200 FLORIDA ASSOCIATION OF PROFESSIONAL LOBBYISTS, INC., a Florida Not for Profit Corporation; GUY M. SPEARMAN, III, a Natural Person; SPEARMAN
More informationNOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO
Filed 6/16/11 In re Jazmine J. CA1/2 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for
More informationLAND USE AND ENVIRONMENTAL WORKSHOP ACREL SPRING, 1997 MEETING SCOTTSDALE, ARIZONA
LAND USE AND ENVIRONMENTAL WORKSHOP ACREL SPRING, 1997 MEETING SCOTTSDALE, ARIZONA I. Commerce Clause Limitations A. Pre-Lopez cases 1. U.S. v. Riverside Bayview Homes, Inc., 474 U.S. 121, 106 S.Ct. 455
More informationTHE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF THE CLIMATE STABILIZATION ACT CAMBRIDGE DRY CLEANING V. UNITED STATES
THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF THE CLIMATE STABILIZATION ACT CAMBRIDGE DRY CLEANING V. UNITED STATES John Halloran Constitutional Law: Structures of Power and Individual Rights March 10, 2013 1 Halloran 2 A
More informationCONSTITUTIONAL LAW I (LAW ) SPRING SEMESTER STETSON UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF LAW Gulfport, Florida GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
STETSON UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF LAW Gulfport, Florida GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS THE ATTENTION OF ALL STUDENTS IS CALLED TO THE FOLLOWING INSTRUCTIONS: 1. The answers and the pledge are to be identified by examination
More informationCase: 3:14-cv wmc Document #: 7 Filed: 02/28/14 Page 1 of 13
Case: 3:14-cv-00157-wmc Document #: 7 Filed: 02/28/14 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN MADISON VIGIL FOR LIFE, INC., GWEN FINNEGAN, JENNIFER DUNNETT,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA MICHAEL SALMAN in Custody at the Maricopa County Jail, PETITIONER, v. JOSEPH M. ARPAIO, Sheriff of Maricopa County, in his official capacity, Case No. Prisoner No. P884174
More informationCase 1:10-cv RFC -CSO Document 1 Filed 10/28/10 Page 1 of 29
Case 1:10-cv-00135-RFC -CSO Document 1 Filed 10/28/10 Page 1 of 29 John E. Bloomquist James E. Brown DONEY CROWLEY BLOOMQUIST PAYNE UDA P.C. 44 West 6 th Avenue, Suite 200 P.O. Box 1185 Helena, MT 59624
More informationThe Scope of Congressional Powers. Congressional Power. Strict Versus Liberal Construction
The Scope of Congressional Powers What are the three types of congressional power? How does strict construction of the U.S. Constitution on the subject of congressional power compare to liberal construction?
More informationCase: 1:10-cv TSB Doc #: 8 Filed: 10/19/10 Page: 1 of 22 PAGEID #: 369 IN THE U.S. DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Case: 1:10-cv-00720-TSB Doc #: 8 Filed: 10/19/10 Page: 1 of 22 PAGEID #: 369 IN THE U.S. DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION SUSAN B. ANTHONY LIST Plaintiff v. CASE NO. 1:10-cv-00720
More informationCase 2:09-cv NBF Document 52 Filed 08/16/10 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Case 2:09-cv-00951-NBF Document 52 Filed 08/16/10 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ASSOCIATION OF COMMUNITY ORGANIZATIONS FOR REFORM NOW (ACORN,
More informationCase 1:14-cv CMA Document 15 Filed 03/21/14 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 10
Case 1:14-cv-00809-CMA Document 15 Filed 03/21/14 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Philip A. Brimmer Civil Action No. 14-cv-00809-CMA DEBRA
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) CALIFORNIA DEMOCRATIC PARTY ) 1401 21 st Street, Suite 100 ) Sacramento, CA 95814; ) ) ART TORRES ) 1401 21 st Street, Suite 100 ) Sacramento,
More informationCase 9:09-cv DWM-JCL Document 32 Filed 04/09/10 Page 1 of 10
Case :0-cv-00-DWM-JCL Document Filed 0/0/0 Page of 0 0 Scharf-Norton Ctr. for Const. Litigation GOLDWATER INSTITUTE Nicholas C. Dranias 00 E. Coronado Rd. Phoenix, AZ 00 P: (0-000/F: (0-0 ndranias@goldwaterinstitute.org
More informationcase 1:14-cv document 1 filed 04/07/14 page 1 of 45 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA FORT WAYNE DIVISION
case 1:14-cv-00107 document 1 filed 04/07/14 page 1 of 45 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA FORT WAYNE DIVISION WOMEN S HEALTH LINK, INC., v. Plaintiff, FORT WAYNE PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA, MISSOULA DIVISION
MARK L. SHURTLEFF Utah Attorney General PO Box 142320 Salt Lake City, Utah 84114-2320 Phone: 801-538-9600/ Fax: 801-538-1121 email: mshurtleff@utah.gov Attorney for Amici Curiae States UNITED STATES DISTRICT
More informationXxxxxxx: Fact Pattern:
Xxxxxxx: Overall, good work, especially considering that you are still 6 weeks away from the bar exam. If you did this without referencing any notes, it is very impressive. It seems to me that you spotted
More informationSolutions Manual for The Legal Environment of Business A Managerial Approach Theory to Practice 2nd Edition by Melvin
Solutions Manual for The Legal Environment of Business A Managerial Approach Theory to Practice 2nd Edition by Melvin Link download full: http://testbankair.com/download/solutions-manual-for-the-legal-environment-ofbusiness-a-managerial-approach-theory-to-practice-2nd-edition-by-melvin/
More informationJUNE 1999 NRPA LAW REVIEW COUNTY DESIGNATED NON-PUBLIC FORUM FOR RESIDENTS ONLY
COUNTY DESIGNATED NON-PUBLIC FORUM FOR RESIDENTS ONLY (NOTE The opinion described below was subsequently VACATED BY THE COURT on October 19, 1999 in Warren v. Fairfax County, 196 F.3d 186; 1999 U.S. App.
More informationIN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
1 Charles W. Hokanson (State BarNo. 1) 01 Atlantic Ave, Suite 0 Long Beach, California 00 Telephone:.1.1 Facsimile:.. Email: CWHokanson@TowerLawCenter.com Attorney for Defendant Exile Machine, LLC IN THE
More informationMontana Cannabis Industry Association v. State: Feeling the Effects of Medical Marijuana on Montana s Rational Basis Test
Montana Law Review Online Volume 76 Article 22 10-28-2015 Montana Cannabis Industry Association v. State: Feeling the Effects of Medical Marijuana on Montana s Rational Basis Test Luc Brodhead Alexander
More informationIntroduction to US business law III. US Court System / Jurisdiction
Introduction to US business law III. US Court System / Jurisdiction FS 2018 Prof. Dr. Andreas Kellerhals Overview I. Repetition - Last week II. What left from previous session III. US Court System IV.
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION VERIFIED COMPLAINT (INJUNCTIVE AND DECLARATORY RELIEF SOUGHT)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION Kimberly Gilio, as legal guardian on behalf of J.G., a minor, Plaintiff, v. Case No. The School Board of Hillsborough
More informationCase 1:14-cr Document 99 Filed in TXSD on 06/05/15 Page 1 of 14
Case 1:14-cr-00876 Document 99 Filed in TXSD on 06/05/15 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS BROWNSVILLE DIVISION Stotjs
More informationUniversity of Colorado Student Union Appellate Court Case Number 1999-F-05
Amanda BREEDEN, Petitioner v. David DEMARCO, Election Commissioner and UCSU Elections Commission, Respondents University of Colorado Student Union Appellate Court Case Number 1999-F-05 Argued November
More informationCalifornia Bar Examination
California Bar Examination Essay Question: Constitutional Law And Selected Answers The Orahte Group is NOT affiliated with The State Bar of California PRACTICE PACKET p.1 Question Paul, a student at Rural
More informationORDINANCE PROHIBITING NIGHTTIME LOITERING IN CITY PARK CONSTITUTIONAL
ORDINANCE PROHIBITING NIGHTTIME LOITERING IN CITY PARK CONSTITUTIONAL James C. Kozlowski, J.D., Ph.D. 1993 James C. Kozlowski As illustrated by the Trantham opinion described herein, vagrancy statutes
More informationORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE BOROUGH OF CHAMBERSBURG CODE OF ORDINANCES, CHAPTER 204, PARADES AND PUBLIC GATHERINGS
ORDINANCE NO. 2007-14 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE BOROUGH OF CHAMBERSBURG CODE OF ORDINANCES, CHAPTER 204, PARADES AND PUBLIC GATHERINGS Be it ordained by the Mayor and Town Council of the Borough of Chambersburg,
More informationCourt of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont NO. 09-17-00366-CR NO. 09-17-00367-CR EX PARTE JOSEPH BOYD On Appeal from the 1A District Court Tyler County, Texas Trial Cause Nos. 13,067 and
More informationLaura Brown Chisolm. Prepared for National Center on Philanthropy and the Law Conference Political Activities: Nonprofit Speech October 29-30, 1998
A BRIEF AND SELECTIVE SURVEY OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK RELEVANT TO RESTRICTIONS ON THE POLITICAL ACTIVITIES OF TAX EXEMPT ORGANIZATIONS Laura Brown Chisolm Prepared for National Center on Philanthropy
More informationAPRIL 2017 LAW REVIEW PARK PERMIT FOR COMMERCIAL WEDDING PHOTOS
PARK PERMIT FOR COMMERCIAL WEDDING PHOTOS James C. Kozlowski, J.D., Ph.D. 2017 James C. Kozlowski The First Amendment prohibits laws "abridging the freedom of speech" and is applicable to the states through
More information2:09-cv GER-PJK Doc # 58 Filed 10/18/12 Pg 1 of 13 Pg ID 1145 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
2:09-cv-14190-GER-PJK Doc # 58 Filed 10/18/12 Pg 1 of 13 Pg ID 1145 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN JOHN SATAWA, v. Plaintiff, Case No. 2:09-cv-14190 Hon. Gerald
More informationAPGAP Unit 3 Midterm Exam
APGAP Unit 3 Midterm Exam Mr. Steven Anderson, I Think Hawthorne Passed The Learning Free School Zone Act THE CONSTITUTION & FEDERALISM Part 2: Free-Response 1. Of those listed, which of the following
More informationFEDERALISM! APGAP Reading Quiz 3C #2. O Connor, Chapter 3
APGAP Reading Quiz 3C #2 FEDERALISM! O Connor, Chapter 3 1. Federal programs and federal officials perceptions of national needs came to dominate the allocation of federal grants to the states during the
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
1 1 1 LAW OFFICES OF KERMITT L. WATERS Kermitt L. Waters, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 1 0 South Ninth Street Las Vegas, Nevada 1 Telephone: (0) - Facsimile: (0) 1- Attorney for Plaintiffs UNITED STATES DISTRICT
More informationThe Courts. Chapter 15
The Courts Chapter 15 The Nature of the Judicial System Introduction: Two types of cases: Criminal Law: The government charges an individual with violating one or more specific laws. Civil Law: The court
More informationCase 1:12-cv Document 1 Filed 04/03/12 Page 1 of 22 PageID #: 1
Case 1:12-cv-00158 Document 1 Filed 04/03/12 Page 1 of 22 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS BEAUMONT DIVISION N.M. a minor, by and through his next friend,
More informationCONSTITUTIONAL LAW. Professor Ronald Turner A.A. White Professor of Law Fall 2018
CONSTITUTIONAL LAW Professor Ronald Turner A.A. White Professor of Law Fall 2018 The United States Constitution Article I: All legislative powers shall be vested in a Congress of the United States... Article
More informationCase: 1:17-cv Doc #: 1 Filed: 02/28/17 1 of 14. PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
Case: 1:17-cv-00410 Doc #: 1 Filed: 02/28/17 1 of 14. PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO JOHN MANCINI, and NORTHEAST OHIO COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS, Plaintiffs,
More informationSENATE BILL No AN ACT concerning postsecondary educational institutions; establishing the campus free speech protection act.
Session of 0 SENATE BILL No. 0 By Committee on Federal and State Affairs -0 0 0 0 AN ACT concerning postsecondary educational institutions; establishing the campus free speech protection act. Be it enacted
More informationObjectives : Objectives (cont d): Sources of US Law. The Nature of the Law
The Nature of the Law Martha Dye-Whealan RPh, JD Pharm 543 Objectives : Identify and distinguish the sources of law in the United States. Understand the hierarchy of laws, and how federal and state law
More informationHealth Care Reform Where Will We Be at the End of 2012? Penn-Ohio Regional Health Care Alliance
Health Care Reform Where Will We Be at the End of 2012? Penn-Ohio Regional Health Care Alliance Crystal Kuntz, Senior Director Government Policy Coventry Health Care February 23, 2012 Overview of Presentation
More informationLEGAL SERVICES DIVISION OF LEGAL AND RESEARCH SERVICES LEGISLATIVE AFFAIRS AGENCY STATE OF ALASKA
(907) 465-3867 or 465-2450 FAX (907) 465-2029 Mail Stop 31 01 LEGAL SERVICES DIVISION OF LEGAL AND RESEARCH SERVICES LEGISLATIVE AFFAIRS AGENCY STATE OF ALASKA State Capitol Juneau, Alaska 99801-1182 Deliveries
More informationThe Commission on Judicial Conduct sustained four. charges of misconduct and determined that petitioner, a justice
================================================================= This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York Reports. -----------------------------------------------------------------
More informationOCTOBER 2006 LAW REVIEW CARDBOARD HOMELESS SHELTER IN PARK. James C. Kozlowski, J.D., Ph.D James C. Kozlowski
CARDBOARD HOMELESS SHELTER IN PARK James C. Kozlowski, J.D., Ph.D. 2006 James C. Kozlowski As described by the U.S. Supreme Court, the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment requires that laws
More informationCase 2:12-cv Document 1 Filed 09/21/12 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA JUDGE:. Defendants.
Case 2:12-cv-02334 Document 1 Filed 09/21/12 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA KELSEY NICOLE MCCAULEY, a.k.a. KELSEY BOHN, Versus Plaintiff, NUMBER: 12-cv-2334 JUDGE:.
More informationConstitutional Law Spring 2018 Hybrid A+ Answer. Part 1
Constitutional Law Spring 2018 Hybrid A+ Answer Part 1 Question #1 (a) First the Constitution requires that either 2/3rds of Congress or the State Legislatures to call for an amendment. This removes the
More informationMagruder s American Government
Presentation Pro Magruder s American Government C H A P T E R 11 Powers of Congress 2001 by Prentice Hall, Inc. C H A P T E R 11 Powers of Congress SECTION 1 The Scope of Congressional Powers SECTION 2
More informationBusiness Law 210: Unit 2 Chapter 4: Constitutional Authority to Regulate Business
Business Law 210: Unit 2 Chapter 4: Constitutional Authority to Regulate Business [Professor Scott Bergstedt]: This is Chapter 4 constitutional law, the authority under the Constitution to regulate business.
More informationCase 3:16-cv WHB-JCG Document 236 Filed 03/21/18 Page 1 of 11
Case 3:16-cv-00356-WHB-JCG Document 236 Filed 03/21/18 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI NORTHERN DIVISION CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU PLAINTIFF
More informationCHAPTER 3: Federalism
CHAPTER 3: Federalism MULTIPLE CHOICE 1. has called for the reconsideration of U.S. drinking-age laws. a. Mothers Against Drunk Driving (MADD) b. The Amethyst Initiative c. The National Safety Transportation
More informationFEDERAL GOVERNMENT GOVT Limited Government & Representative Government September 18, Dr. Michael Sullivan. MoWe 5:30-6:50 MoWe 7-8:30
Limited Government & Representative Government September 18, 2017 FEDERAL GOVERNMENT GOVT 2305 MoWe 5:30-6:50 MoWe 7-8:30 Dr. Michael Sullivan TODAY S AGENDA Current Events Limited Government Representative
More informationNORTH CAROLINA GENERAL ASSEMBLY Legislative Services Office
NORTH CAROLINA GENERAL ASSEMBLY Legislative Services Office George R. Hall, Legislative Services Officer Research Division 300 N. Salisbury Street, Suite 545 Raleigh, NC 27603-5925 Tel. 919-733-2578 Fax
More informationChp. 4: The Constitution
Name: Date: Period: Chp 4: The Constitution Filled In Notes Chp 4: The Constitution 1 Objectives about The Constitution The student will demonstrate knowledge of the Constitution of the United States by
More informationCase 4:13-cv JAJ-RAW Document 1 Filed 04/15/13 Page 1 of 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA CENTRAL DIVISION
Case 4:13-cv-00170-JAJ-RAW Document 1 Filed 04/15/13 Page 1 of 17 JACOB DAGEL, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA CENTRAL DIVISION v. Plaintiff, DES MOINES AREA COMMUNITY COLLEGE; TERRY
More informationBusiness Law Fundamentals Exam #1 Page 1 of 7
Business Law Fundamentals Exam #1 Page 1 of 7 PRINT name as your signature 1. This Exam #1 must be completed within the allocated time (i.e., 75 minutes). Audible time warnings of 2 minutes, 1 minute,
More informationlaws created by legislative bodies.
THE AP AMERICAN GOVERNMENT STUDY GUIDE CLASSIFICATION OF LEGAL ISSUES TYPE OF CASE CIVIL CASES CRIMINAL CASES covers issues of claims, suits, contracts, and licenses. covers illegal actions or wrongful
More informationa) test the strength of the opposing positions and encourage the parties to reach a compromise b) ensure that all documents are in order before trial
Question 1 The purpose of discovery is to a) test the strength of the opposing positions and encourage the parties to reach a compromise b) ensure that all documents are in order before trial c) ensure
More informationPlaintiffs, by way of complaint against defendant, 1. In this suit, plaintiffs seek declaratory and. injunctive relief from a municipal ordinance that
Frank L. Corrado, Esquire (FC 9895) BARRY, CORRADO, GRASSI & GIBSON, P.C. Edward Barocas, Esquire (EB 8251) J.C. Salyer, Esquire (JS 4613) American Civil Liberties Union of New Jersey Foundation P.O. Box
More informationRECEIVED by MCOA 4/2/ :15:22 AM
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, STATE OF MICHIGAN IN THE COURT OF APPEALS vs. Plaintiff/Appellee, KEITH ERIC WOOD, COA Case No. 342424 Circuit Ct. No. 17-24073-AR District Ct. No. 15-45978-FY Defendant/Appellant.
More information