LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF MICHIGAN STUDY COMPLETED: 2002 AN OVERVIEW OF MICHIGAN COURTS
|
|
- Hilda Anthony
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF MICHIGAN STUDY COMPLETED: 2002 AN OVERVIEW OF MICHIGAN COURTS There are two judicial systems that affect Michigan citizens. The first is the federal system, which includes federal district courts, bankruptcy courts, circuit courts of appeal and the U.S. Supreme Court. Federal judges are appointed by the President with the advice and consent of the U.S. Senate, for a life term. Some specialized federal judges are appointed by the President for a term of 14 years and the appointments are renewable. No federal judges are elected. The jurisdiction of the federal courts is provided in the U.S. Constitution. The other judicial system is the state courts. The various levels of the courts are set out in Article VI of the Michigan Constitution of Organization of Michigan Courts The highest level of court in Michigan is the Supreme Court. There are seven justices, (1) who serve eight-year terms on a staggered basis. The justices select the Chief Justice among themselves.(2) The Supreme Court hears cases appealed to it from other state courts, primarily the Court of Appeals. The Supreme Court agrees to hear only a small number of cases every year from the thousands that apply to be heard. In 2000, the Court heard just 71 cases,(3) percent of those that had applied to be heard.3 The decision of the lower court stands if the Supreme Court refuses to hear an appeal. Cases are usually heard in Lansing. The Court also supervises the lower courts and establishes rules for practice and procedure in all courts. The Court of Appeals (COA) was not established until the 1963 Constitution. The COA judges are elected from districts and serve six-year terms. Currently there are four districts and twenty-eight judges.(4) The number of COA districts, counties included in each and number of judges in each is left to the legislature to determine. The COA hears appeals in both civil and criminal cases. Because the Supreme Court hears so few decisions on appeal, the COA is the last court of resort for the vast majority of cases and this makes it quite important. There were 7,460 cases filed with the COA in 2000.(5) Cases are heard by a panel of three judges, chosen at random from the twenty-eight. Even though judges are elected by district, they can and do serve on a panel in any of the districts. Cases are heard in Detroit, Grand Rapids, Lansing, and Marquette. Circuit courts are the primary trial courts in Michigan. Each circuit covers at least one county. Currently there are fifty-seven circuits (Michigan has eighty-three counties) and 210 judges, who serve six-year terms.(6) Circuit courts have existed in some form since Michigan was a territory. Currently, they have jurisdiction over all civil cases involving more than $25,000 and over criminal cases involving felonies and serious 1
2 misdemeanors. The new family division (created in 1998) hears divorce cases and related matters, juvenile offenses, abuse and neglect cases, adoptions, etc. Many of these matters were previously heard in probate court. Probate courts also were created in territorial times. Almost every county has its own probate court except for a few areas in central Michigan and northern Michigan. There are seventy-eight probate courts and 106 judges, who serve six-year terms.(7) After the creation of the family division in circuit court in 1998, probate court lost jurisdiction over juvenile offenders and dependents. Today they retain jurisdiction over estates, trusts, guardianships, and involuntary commitment of the mentally ill. In some counties, probate court judges serve in the family division where it is structured as a joint division between circuit and probate court. The 1998 legislation left the organization of the family division up to each circuit to decide for itself. District courts were created by the legislature in 1968, following the mandate in the 1963 Constitution that justices of the peace be eliminated within five years after adoption of the constitution and replaced with something else.(8)8 They have exclusive jurisdiction over civil litigation up to $25,000 and all misdemeanors where the maximum penalty is less than one year in jail. They also handle arraignments, setting of bail and preliminary examinations in felony cases. In addition, they handle minor matters such as tenant//landlord disputes and traffic violations. Currently there are 104 district courts in the state, with 259 judges in all. (9) There are two judicial systems that affect Michigan citizens. The first is the federal system, which includes federal district courts, bankruptcy courts, circuit courts of appeal and the U.S. Supreme Court. Federal judges are appointed by the President with the advice and consent of the U.S. Senate, for a life term. Some specialized federal judges are appointed by the President for a term of 14 years and the appointments are renewable. No federal judges are elected. The jurisdiction of the federal courts is provided in the U.S. Constitution. The other judicial system is the state courts. The various levels of the courts are set out in Article VI of the Michigan Constitution of Current Judicial Selection in Michigan Candidates for judicial office must be registered to vote in Michigan, admitted to the practice of law for at least five years, and under seventy years of age.(10) Judicial elections are held in the even-numbered years when the state elections are held. An incumbent Supreme Court justice may file an affidavit of candidacy, asking to be placed on the ballot. Candidates for an open seat or who want to run against an incumbent on the Supreme Court are nominated at party conventions in the summer of the even-numbered years. Incumbents may follow this procedure, as well, if they desire. Alternatively, a candidate for the Supreme Court may circulate petitions and collect at least 30,000 signatures to get their name on the ballot.(11) However candidates get to the ballot, they then run on the nonpartisan ballot in the November general election. 2
3 Elections for all other levels of court are entirely nonpartisan. Candidates must submit nominating petitions with sufficient signatures to get on the ballot, unless they are the incumbents. In the latter case, they may file an affidavit of candidacy as mentioned above. If there is more than twice the number of candidates as there are openings on a particular court, a primary is held in August. The top two candidates for each seat move on to the November general election. In addition to easy ballot access, incumbent justices and judges enjoy another major advantage over their challengers. The word "INCUMBENT" is placed next to their name on the ballot. This designation is permitted only for judicial offices. Vacancies may occur on the bench through death, resignation or removal from office. Judges may be removed "for conviction of a felony, physical or mental disability which prevents the performance of judicial duties, misconduct in office, persistent failure to perform his duties, habitual intemperance or conduct that is clearly prejudicial to the administration of justice."(12) The Judicial Tenure Commission was created by a 1968 amendment to the Constitution. It is responsible for investigating complaints of alleged incapacity and alleged violations of the Code of Judicial Conduct or the Rules of Personal Responsibility. The Commission recommends appropriate disciplinary action (be it censure, suspension with or without pay, retirement or removal), if any, to the state Supreme Court, which makes the final decision. The Court is not obliged to follow the Commission's recommendation and may impose a greater or lesser penalty. Although there is some concern about the judicial system disciplining its own members, this system does assure judicial independence from the other two branches of government. If a vacancy should occur between elections, the governor appoints a successor who serves until January 1 following the next general election. At that election a successor is elected to the remainder of the term. In 1994, 45 percent of the sitting judges at all levels were originally appointed by the governor.(13) This is the most recent data available. There is no procedure mandated by law for how the governor might choose an appointee. The governor is not obligated to consult with any person or organization and is not required to obtain the advice and consent of the Senate. By tradition, governors have often consulted the Judicial Qualifications Committee of the State Bar of Michigan. This committee reviews the qualifications of each applicant for a judicial vacancy, interviews them and interviews others who have worked with them. The committee then rates the applicants as exceptionally well qualified, well qualified, qualified, not qualified, or not qualified because of lack of experience. History of Judicial Selection in Michigan Judges and justices have been chosen by election for a long time in Michigan--since the 1850 Constitution was adopted. Prior to that, the state's original constitution called for gubernatorial appointment. For ninety years, judges and justices were elected on a partisan basis. In the 1930s there was growing interest in trying to take the politics out of judicial elections. The first attempt to amend the 1908 Constitution to provide for nonpartisan judicial elections occurred in 1934, but was rejected by the voters. Four years later, another proposed amendment called for the nonpartisan nomination and 3
4 appointment of Supreme Court justices. This was defeated by an even larger margin. Finally, in March 1939 the voters approved an amendment calling again for nonpartisan judicial elections. This was reaffirmed in the 1963 Constitution. Since 1908, state law has allowed the political parties to nominate candidates for the Supreme Court at their conventions. Michigan is the only state where Supreme Court candidates are nominated by the parties, but then run on the nonpartisan ballot. The incumbent designation on the ballot also originated in the 1939 amendment to the 1908 Constitution, as another way to take politics out of judicial elections. The rationale was that this would provide stability in the judiciary because the voters would prefer the incumbent. The 1963 Constitution, however, provided that only judicial officials who had been elected could have that designation. In other words, appointed judges and justices would not have the coveted designation. This was consistent with the Convention doing away with gubernatorial appointment for vacancies (see below). The voters reversed this change in 1968 so that once again all incumbent judicial officials have that designation on the ballot. Vacancies have not always been filled by gubernatorial appointment. That method was used until the 1963 Constitution mandated they be filled by special elections. The Constitutional Convention felt strongly that this change was necessary to maintain consistency that the state should have an elected judiciary. Here are some comments from the Convention: The present system of appointment by the governor to fill vacancies, bestowing on the appointee the incumbency designation, has had an overwhelming tendency to insure the election of the appointee. This has created in effect an appointive judiciary. However, voters also reversed this change in the 1968 amendments to the constitution and restored gubernatorial appointment for vacancies. Other reforms that did find their way into the 1963 Constitution, and which remain there today, included * Allowing incumbent Supreme Court justices to bypass party nomination, if they so desire, by filing an affidavit of incumbency (it was hoped this would lessen the partisan nature of the "nonpartisan" Supreme Court elections) * Setting a maximum age (70) for judicial candidates * Moving judicial elections from the spring to the fall general election * Extending the privilege of the affidavit of candidacy to judges at all levels. It is fairly common in Michigan that candidates for elective positions are interviewed, questioned and invited to various forums and panels (many organized by local units of the League of Women Voters) in an effort to provide information to voters. State judicial canons have long prohibited judicial candidates from discussing their views on issues, because they might subsequently have to rule upon a case that involved similar issues. However, in June 2002, the U.S. Supreme Court in deciding the case of Republican Party of Minnesota v. White, held that a rule which prohibited judicial candidates from discussing issues violated the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. The Court made it clear that candidates for judicial appointments (in states which do not elect some or all judges) were not subject to this ruling and thus could be prohibited from issue discussions. The 2002 election will be the first to witness what effect this ruling has on the conduct of judicial candidates. 4
5 Fundraising by Judicial Candidates In addition to following all the rules for fundraising set out in the Michigan Campaign Finance Act,(14) judicial candidates are also expected to follow Canon 7 of the Michigan Code of Judicial Conduct, adopted by the Michigan Supreme Court. If candidates do not, they are subject to judicial discipline. In brief, Canon 7 says that a judicial candidate may not personally solicit or accept campaign contributions, but may establish a committee to solicit and manage campaign funds. This committee may not start soliciting funds until February 15 of election year and cannot solicit after the general election. After the election, any excess funds must be returned to contributors or given to the client security fund of the State Bar of Michigan by January 1 following the election. In summary, unlike other candidates, a judicial candidate has only a ninemonth window in which to raise money before the November election and may not carry over any remaining funds. Although there are no special restrictions on who may contribute to judicial candidates in state law, the Michigan Code of Judicial Conduct has long prohibited judicial campaign committees from soliciting more than $100 from lawyers. Thus, it is quite common for lawyers to make just a $100 contribution to a judicial candidate. Since state law does not require disclosure of occupation/employer for contributions of that size, it is difficult to identify all the contributors who are lawyers, however. Of course, many lawyers voluntarily give much more than that, up to the maximum of $3,400 allowed by state law for appellate court candidates and circuit and probate judicial candidates in the seven largest counties (Genesee, Ingham, Kent, Macomb, Oakland, Washtenaw and Wayne). (1) There were eight justices from the early 1900s until the Constitution of 1963 was adopted. (2) Prior to the 1963 Constitution, the Chief Justice was elected as such by the people. (3) Michigan Manual, MI Legislative Service Bureau. p (Available online at (4) Ibid. p (5) Ibid. p (6) Ibid. p (7) Ibid. p (8) The Constitutional Convention itself could not decide what the new courts should look like. (9) Michigan Manual, p (10) A justice who turns 70 during his or her term is allowed to finish out that term, but may not then run for reelection. (11) Bureau of Elections website: _ ,00.html (12) Michigan Constitution of 1963, Art. VI, Sec. 30. (13) Interim Report of the Standing Committee on Judicial Selection of the State Bar of Michigan, September (14) The MCFA can be found at: 5
6 METHODS OF JUDICIAL SELECTION "No one can reasonably dispute the importance of an independent and qualified judiciary to insure fairness in our justice system and to protect the constitutional rights and liberties of all Americans." (1) Jerome J. Shestack, President American Bar Association ( ) Current Methods (2) "Methods of selection of state court judges vary widely among the states, but fall generally into five broad categories. Some states use different methods to select judges at different court levels. None of these methods has only one form--each state has its own unique variations. Legislative Appointment: Only one state (Virginia) retains this method of judicial selection, in which the legislature has sole appointment power for trial and appellate court judges, with no input from a nominating commission. Once more widely relied upon, the role of state legislatures in most jurisdictions is now either nonexistent, or limited to confirmation of nominees chosen in another manner. Executive Appointment: There are currently a small number of states (3) in which the Governor has virtually unfettered judicial appointment power. In those states, the initial selection is made with no formal input from any source. In most instances, nominees must be confirmed by the legislature or some other body.in many more states, Governors are empowered to fill vacancies on the bench. These are appointments only for unexpired terms. Such appointments, although outside the regular selection process, provide opportunity for control by the executive, as appointees attain the advantages of incumbency as described in greater detail below. Nonpartisan Election: The names of judicial candidates running under a nonpartisan system appear on the ballot without party labels. There may be a primary election, followed by a general election, but in no instance is an individual directly identified with a political party. Partisan Election: In a partisan election, judicial candidates usually run initially in a party primary to gain nomination. Subsequently, voters participate in a general election, in which a candidate's party affiliation is indicated on the ballot. [Note: Michigan is unique is having truly nonpartisan elections for the lower courts and a combination for the Supreme Court. Party conventions nominate candidates for the Supreme Court and they then run on the nonpartisan ballot.] Merit Selection: This method is sometimes referred to as the "Missouri Plan," or the "Modified Missouri Plan." Although there are as many variations as states which employ this general means of selection, certain characteristics are fairly standard. A nominating commission selects several candidates to fill a judicial vacancy, and an elected official (usually the governor) appoints one of the names from that list. There is significant variation regarding the size and composition of nominating commissions. Most include lawyers selected by their peers, and non-lawyers selected by the governor. Judges are part of this body in some instances. In certain states, a specified number of representatives of each political party must be included. Nominating commissions vary 6
7 in size, and the length and limit of commissioners' terms also differ from state to state. Some states have separate commissions for different courts or levels of court. Legislative confirmation of gubernatorial appointees is required in some, but not all, merit selection states. The manner in which nominating commissions receive the names of potential candidates, the time within which they are required to make their selections, and the number of names transmitted to the appointing entity are also details which are not universal. Most merit selection plans include the use of a retention election. After the selected judge has served for a specified period, such an election is held. The incumbent's name is placed on the ballot, and voters are asked to decide whether that judge should remain on the bench--generally through a simple "yes" or "no" vote. There is no opponent--no other name on the ballot. If voters choose not to retain a particular individual, that seat is declared vacant and is usually filled by the same merit selection process as was originally used in that jurisdiction." Advantages and Disadvantages of Each Method (4) Legislative Appointment: One advantage of this method is that it overcomes the problem of voter apathy and provides for indirect accountability: if voters do not approve of the performance of the appointees, they can vote their legislators out of office. On the other hand, it is questionable whether legislators are any better than the electorate at selecting the best judges. Also, former legislators may have the "inside track" when a vacancy occurs. Executive Appointment: (without some kind of nominating commission). This system removes potential judges from the pitfalls of a political campaign. The governor is in a better position to assess potential judges because he/she has access to many sources of information and can make a reasoned decision. On the other hand, the governor may appoint anyone he/she wants, whether or not they are truly qualified. There is a high potential for political cronyism because there are no checks and balances. States that use this system seem to have the highest number of judges being selected from already active politicians. These judges tend to be reappointed, leading essentially to lifetime tenures, with no accountability to the public for the quality of their work. Election: The chief advantage of selecting judges by election is that they are accountable to the people. There are many disadvantages, however. Voters usually have scant information with which to make a reasoned decision as to which candidate is the best. Candidates may win solely because of a familiar-sounding name. In Michigan, candidates with Irish surnames have had great success in judicial elections. In partisan elections, voters know which party the candidate belongs to and may make inferences from that association. However, such elections could then be decided on national issues or candidates that have no bearing on the judicial election itself. In nonpartisan elections, parties may be involved behind the scenes without knowledge of the average voter. In either case, judicial elections usually have a lower turnout than other races on the ballot. Another disadvantage is the time and expense involved for the candidates. Ethical dilemmas arise when lawyers, who may appear before a successful judicial candidate in court, are also large contributors. Finally, incumbent judges have a tremendous advantage in subsequent elections, especially in states such as Michigan 7
8 where they are so designated on the ballot. However, some see the latter as an advantage because it provides more stability in the judiciary and more judicial independence. Merit Selection: This system's major advantage is the greater chance of quality assurance than with the other methods. The nominating commission has the opportunity to learn a lot about the candidates, will probably interview them, and subjects each to a thorough review. Accountability is available through a retention election, although such elections are not usually as expensive or time-consuming as other judicial elections. Overall, there is far less likelihood of political influence in the process. The disadvantages include removing the electorate from the selection process. Voter turnout in retention elections is usually even lower than in other types of judicial elections. Some opponents to the system say there is still too much opportunity for politics to intervene--perhaps not in the selection but in the Governor's appointments to the nominating commission. There is concern by minorities and women that merit selection may result in a less diverse judiciary than with elections, although the research on this is mixed. Finally, retention elections recently have taken on some of the worst characteristics of other judicial elections: the incumbent may have to raise large sums of money, possibly from future litigants and/or their lawyers, and special interest groups may mount nasty, but effective, campaigns to oust an incumbent who has made decisions unfavorable to their interests. Footnotes: (1) Judicial Selection: The Process of Choosing Judges, American Bar Association, p.6. (2) Ibid. pp (verbatim). (3) California, Maine, New Hampshire, New Jersey (4) Judicial Selection: The Process of Choosing Judges, pp Also, Interim Report of the Standing Committee on Judicial Selection of the State Bar of Michigan, September 1996.METHODS OF JUDICIAL SELECTION 8
GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 1997 S 1 SENATE BILL 835* Short Title: Court Improvement Act/Constitution.
GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION S SENATE BILL * Short Title: Court Improvement Act/Constitution. (Public) Sponsors: Senator Ballance. Referred to: Judiciary. April, 0 0 A BILL TO BE ENTITLED
More informationDRAFTING TASK FORCE S NOTES TO THE HOUSE OF DELEGATES
DRAFTING TASK FORCE S NOTES TO THE HOUSE OF DELEGATES Following the Report of the Arkansas Bar Association s Task Force on Maintaining a Fair and Impartial Judiciary, a Drafting Task Force was formed to
More informationIC Application Sec. 1. IC does not apply to this chapter. As added by P.L , SEC.12.
IC 33-33-45 Chapter 45. Lake County IC 33-33-45-1 Application Sec. 1. IC 33-29-1 does not apply to this chapter. IC 33-33-45-2 Judicial circuit Sec. 2. (a) Lake County constitutes the thirty-first judicial
More informationCalifornia Judicial Branch
Page 1 of 7 JUDICIAL COUNCIL OF CALIFORNIA 455 Golden Gate Avenue San Francisco, CA 94102-3688 Tel 415-865-4200 TDD 415-865-4272 Fax 415-865-4205 www.courts.ca.gov FACT SHEET October 2015 California Judicial
More informationMichigan Recall Procedures -- A General Overview --
November 2008 Michigan Recall Procedures -- A General Overview -- A general overview of Michigan s recall procedures is provided below. The overview is intended as a summary of the laws and rulings which
More informationChronology of Successful and Unsuccessful Merit Selection Ballot Measures
Chronology of Successful and Unsuccessful Merit Selection Ballot Measures (NOTE: Unsuccessful efforts are in italics. Chronology does not include constitutional amendments authorizing merit selection for
More informationThe American Judicature Society (AJS) works to maintain the. independence and integrity of the courts and increase public
The American Judicature Society (AJS) works to maintain the independence and integrity of the courts and increase public understanding of the justice system. We are a non-partisan organization with a national
More informationMichigan Bar Journal May Blacks in the Law II. A Diverse Judiciary? By Hon. Cynthia Diane Stephens
36 Blacks in the Law II A Diverse Judiciary? By Hon. Cynthia Diane Stephens May 2015 Michigan Bar Journal 37 Judges ought to be more learned than witty, more reverend than plausible, and more advised than
More informationLWVMD Study Administration of Justice in Maryland - Winter 2009
LWVMD Study Administration of Justice in Maryland - Winter 2009 Introduction: The quality of Maryland s judiciary depends on the administrative and political environment in which judges make their decisions,
More informationJudicial Selection in the States
Judicial S in the States Appellate and General Jurisdiction Courts Initial S, Retention, and Term Length INITIAL Alabama Supreme Court X 6 Re- (6 year term) Court of Civil App. X 6 Re- (6 year term) Court
More informationHB-5152, As Passed House, March 27, 2014HB-5152, As Passed Senate, March 27, 2014 SENATE SUBSTITUTE FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 5152
HB-5152, As Passed House, March 27, 2014HB-5152, As Passed Senate, March 27, 2014 SENATE SUBSTITUTE FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 5152 A bill to amend 1954 PA 116, entitled "Michigan election law," by amending sections
More informationCITY OF SAN DIEGO. (This Measure will appear on the ballot in the following form.)
CITY OF SAN DIEGO (This Measure will appear on the ballot in the following form.) MEASURE E CHARTER AMENDMENT REGARDING QUALIFICATIONS, VACANCY, AND REMOVAL FOR MAYOR, CITY ATTORNEY, AND COUNCIL. Shall
More informationNORTH CAROLINA GENERAL ASSEMBLY Legislative Services Office
NORTH CAROLINA GENERAL ASSEMBLY Legislative Services Office Kory Goldsmith, Interim Legislative Services Officer Research Division 300 N. Salisbury Street, Suite 545 Raleigh, NC 27603-5925 Tel. 919-733-2578
More informationJudging the quality of judicial selection methods: Merit selection, elections, and judicial discipline
Judging the quality of judicial selection methods: Merit selection, elections, and judicial discipline by Malia Reddick The debate over how best to select state court judges has seen a resurgence in recent
More informationREMOVAL OF COURT OFFICIALS
REMOVAL OF COURT OFFICIALS Michael Crowell UNC School of Government January 2015 Constitutional provisions Article IV, Section 17 of the North Carolina Constitution addresses the removal of justices, judges,
More informationSenate Joint Resolution No. 2 of the 74th Session Senators Raggio, Hardy, Care, Coffin, Carlton, Amodei, Mathews, Nolan, Titus and Townsend
Senate Joint Resolution No. 2 of the 74th Session Senators Raggio, Hardy, Care, Coffin, Carlton, Amodei, Mathews, Nolan, Titus and Townsend FILE NUMBER... SENATE JOINT RESOLUTION Proposing to amend the
More informationCandidate Filings and Financial Disclosure Requirements
Candidate Filings and Financial Disclosure Requirements General Filing Information Candidates with Political Party Affiliation Who Seek a Partisan Office: A candidate who is affiliated with a political
More informationGOVERNMENT REFORM PROPOSAL. Changing the rules of politics in Michigan to help Democrats
GOVERNMENT REFORM PROPOSAL Changing the rules of politics in Michigan to help Democrats The problem: A historical view Democrats have not controlled the entire State Legislature in 25 years Democrats have
More informationTestimony before North Carolina Senate Select Committee on Judicial Reform and Redistricting: Judicial Selection in the States and Options for Reform
Testimony before North Carolina Senate Select Committee on Judicial Reform and Redistricting: Judicial Selection in the States and Options for Reform Alicia Bannon Senior Counsel, Brennan Center for Justice
More informationBENTON COUNTY HOME RULE COUNTY CHARTER
BENTON COUNTY HOME RULE COUNTY CHARTER Originally adopted NOVEMBER 1972 Effective JANUARY 1973 Amended NOVEMBER 1974 Amended MAY 1986 Amended NOVEMBER 1986 Amended MAY 1988 Amended MARCH 1992 Amended May
More informationThompson ORGANIZATION bill analysis 5/14/97 (CSHJR 69 by Thompson) Nonpartisan election of appellate judges
HOUSE HJR 69 RESEARCH Thompson ORGANIZATION bill analysis 5/14/97 (CSHJR 69 by Thompson) SUBJECT: COMMITTEE: VOTE: Nonpartisan election of appellate judges Judicial Affairs committee substitute recommended
More informationJUDICIAL SELECTION IN SOUTH CAROLINA THE PROCESS
JUDICIAL SELECTION IN SOUTH CAROLINA THE PROCESS Judicial selection in South Carolina is a complicated multi-step process. Most members of the judiciary are elected by the General Assembly. However, some
More informationAdministrative Office of the Courts Legal Services Reviewed 3/14/18
Administrative Office of the Courts Legal Services Reviewed 3/14/18 LIMITATIONS ON POLITICAL ACTIVITIES OF JUDICIAL EMPLOYEES Canon 4 of the Code of Conduct for Judicial Employees ( employee code ) places
More informationCONSTITUTION OF THE STUDENT BODY. History: Revised by Constitutional Amendment 10, 57 th Senate.
UPDATED: MARCH, 2015 CONSTITUTION OF THE STUDENT BODY ARTICLE I THE STUDENT BODY NAME The name of this organization shall be the Student Body of the Florida State University, hereinafter referred to as
More informationMatthew Miller, Bureau of Legislative Research
Matthew Miller, Bureau of Legislative Research Arkansas (reelection) Georgia (reelection) Idaho (reelection) Kentucky (reelection) Michigan (partisan nomination - reelection) Minnesota (reelection) Mississippi
More informationEthics in Judicial Elections
Ethics in Judicial Elections A guide to judicial election campaigning under the California Code of Judicial Ethics This pamphlet covers the most common questions that arise in the course of judicial elections.
More informationPOLK COUNTY CHARTER AS AMENDED November 4, 2008
POLK COUNTY CHARTER AS AMENDED November 4, 2008 PREAMBLE THE PEOPLE OF POLK COUNTY, FLORIDA, by the grace of God free and independent, in order to attain greater self-determination, to exercise more control
More informationPolk County Charter. As Amended. November 6, 2018
Polk County Charter As Amended November 6, 2018 PREAMBLE THE PEOPLE OF POLK COUNTY, FLORIDA, by the grace of God free and independent, in order to attain greater self-determination, to exercise more control
More informationConstitution (Effective August 21, 2017)
Constitution (Effective August 21, 2017) I. The name of the Association is the American Correctional Association. II. III. The Association is a Type B corporation as defined in Chapter 792, subparagraph
More informationPROMOTING MERIT in MERIT SELECTION. A BEST PRACTICES GUIDE to COMMISSION-BASED JUDICIAL SELECTION
PROMOTING MERIT in MERIT SELECTION A BEST PRACTICES GUIDE to COMMISSION-BASED JUDICIAL SELECTION Released by the U.S. Chamber Institute for Legal Reform, October 2009 All rights reserved. This publication,
More informationCIRCULATOR S AFFIDAVIT
County Page No. It is a class A misdemeanor punishable, notwithstanding the provisions of section 560.021, RSMo, to the contrary, for a term of imprisonment not to exceed one year in the county jail or
More informationA Comparative Analysis of the Michigan Constitution
A Comparative Analysis of the Michigan Constitution Volumes II Articles IX Citizens Research Council of Michigan 1526 David Stott Building 204 Bauch Building Detroit, 26, Michigan Lansing 23, Michigan
More informationReferred to Committee on Legislative Operations and Elections. SUMMARY Creates a modified blanket primary election system.
S.B. SENATE BILL NO. COMMITTEE ON LEGISLATIVE OPERATIONS AND ELECTIONS MARCH, 0 Referred to Committee on Legislative Operations and Elections SUMMARY Creates a modified blanket primary election system.
More informationTHE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF PENNSYLVANIA HOUSE BILL
PRIOR PASSAGE - NONE PRINTER'S NO. THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF PENNSYLVANIA HOUSE BILL No. 1 Session of 01 INTRODUCED BY CUTLER, DEAN, DRISCOLL, KINSEY, MULLERY, GODSHALL, VITALI, MADDEN, LAWRENCE, DAVIS,
More informationA Bill Regular Session, 2017 HOUSE BILL 1766
Stricken language would be deleted from and underlined language would be added to present law. 0 State of Arkansas st General Assembly A Bill Regular Session, HOUSE BILL By: Representatives D. Douglas,
More informationJUDICIAL NOMINATING COMMISSION APPLICATION FOR COLORADO STATE COURT JUDGESHIP
JUDICIAL NOMINATING COMMISSION APPLICATION FOR COLORADO STATE COURT JUDGESHIP NOTE: For the required number of copies to file, please refer to the INSTRUCTION SHEET that corresponds to the specific vacancy
More informationHOUSE BILL NO. HB0040. Sponsored by: Joint Corporations, Elections & Political Subdivisions Interim Committee A BILL. for
0 STATE OF WYOMING LSO-0 HOUSE BILL NO. HB000 Election Code revisions. Sponsored by: Joint Corporations, Elections & Political Subdivisions Interim Committee A BILL for 0 AN ACT relating to elections;
More informationSec moves to amend H.F. No as follows: 1.2 Delete everything after the enacting clause and insert:
1.1... moves to amend H.F. No. 3273 as follows: 1.2 Delete everything after the enacting clause and insert: 1.3 "Section 1. Minnesota Statutes 2016, section 10A.01, subdivision 10, is amended to read:
More informationSTATE OF TENNESSEE EXECUTIVE ORDER BY THE GOVERNOR. No. 54
2D!5M1,Y 19 AMII: 27 SEC f;; E 1,1\ F( Y U F S TATE r UP\ l t1,t! t'1 f 1 4S STATE OF TENNESSEE EXECUTIVE ORDER BY THE GOVERNOR No. 54 AN ORDER AMENDING EXECUTIVE ORDER NO. 41 RELATIVE TO THE GOVERNOR'S
More informationWISCONSIN SUPREME COURT ELECTIONS WITH PARTISANSHIP
The Increasing Correlation of WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT ELECTIONS WITH PARTISANSHIP A Statistical Analysis BY CHARLES FRANKLIN Whatever the technically nonpartisan nature of the elections, has the structure
More informationCITY OF SACRAMENTO MEASURE L
CITY OF SACRAMENTO MEASURE L L Shall the City of Sacramento Charter be amended to establish a redistricting commission that is independent of the city council and that has sole authority for establishing
More informationJudicial Ethics Advisory Committees by State Links at
Judicial Ethics Advisory s by State Links at www.ajs.org/ethics/eth_advis_comm_links.asp Authority Composition Effect of Opinions Website Alabama Judicial Inquiry Commission* Commission Rule 17 9 members:
More informationKNOX COUNTY, TENNESSEE CODE OF ETHICS
Revised 2-26-18 KNOX COUNTY, TENNESSEE CODE OF ETHICS Section 1. Definitions. (1) "County" means Knox County, which includes all boards, committees, commissions, authorities, corporations or other instrumentalities
More informationREPUBLICAN PARTY OF MINNESOTA CONSTITUTION
REPUBLICAN PARTY OF MINNESOTA CONSTITUTION Preamble The Republican Party of Minnesota welcomes into its party all Minnesotans who are concerned with the implementation of honest, efficient, responsive
More informationCHAPTER 5 THE JUDICIAL COUNCIL
CHAPTER 5 THE JUDICIAL COUNCIL 2014 NOTE: This Chapter was added by P.L. 21-147:2 (Jan. 14, 1993), which added Chapters 1 through 10 of Title 7 and reorganized the judicial branch of Guam. Unless otherwise
More informationJUDICIAL QUALIFICATIONS COMMISSION
JUDICIAL QUALIFICATIONS COMMISSION PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD FOR PROPOSED AMENDMENTS The following memo details amendments to the Georgia Code of Judicial Conduct and the Rules of the Georgia Judicial Qualifications
More informationHome Rule Charter. Approved by Hillsborough County Voters September Amended by Hillsborough County Voters November 2002, 2004, and 2012
Home Rule Charter Approved by Hillsborough County Voters September 1983 Amended by Hillsborough County Voters November 2002, 2004, and 2012 P.O. Box 1110, Tampa, FL 33601 Phone: (813) 276-2640 Published
More informationCalifornia State University, Northridge, Inc.CONSTITUTION. Associated Students,
California State University, Northridge, Inc.CONSTITUTION Associated Students, MISSION STATEMENT The Associated Students is the primary advocate for students at California State University, Northridge
More informationSenate Amendment to Senate Bill No. 499 (BDR ) Proposed by: Senate Committee on Legislative Operations and Elections
Session (th) A SB Amendment No. Senate Amendment to Senate Bill No. (BDR -) Proposed by: Senate Committee on Legislative Operations and Elections Amends: Summary: Yes Title: Yes Preamble: No Joint Sponsorship:
More informationCALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION ARTICLE 2 VOTING, INITIATIVE AND REFERENDUM, AND RECALL
SECTION 1. All political power is inherent in the people. Government is instituted for their protection, security, and benefit, and they have the right to alter or reform it when the public good may require.
More informationCITY ATTORNEY S BALLOT TITLE AND SUMMARY OF MEASURE LL
Measure 86333 Measure. Shall Oakland s City Charter be amended to establish: (1) a Police Commission of civilian commissioners to oversee the Police Department by reviewing and proposing changes to Department
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT, STATE OF WYOMING
IN THE SUPREME COURT, STATE OF WYOMING October Term, A.D. 2016 In the Matter of Amendments to ) the Rules Governing the Commission on ) Judicial Conduct and Ethics ) ORDER AMENDING THE RULES GOVERNING
More informationRULES OF THE INDIANA REPUBLICAN STATE COMMITTEE PREAMBLE
This revision contains all changes approved as of March 2, 2016 RULES OF THE INDIANA REPUBLICAN STATE COMMITTEE PREAMBLE To further the rights of its members to freely associate to achieve the goals of
More informationKeeping It Fair and Impartial Judicial Election Reform
Minnesota s Judiciary Keeping It Fair and Impartial Judicial Election Reform Minnesota Lakes - some of our best assets Minnesota s fair and impartial judiciary is another of our state s best assets. Preserving
More informationMICHIGAN S CONSTITUTION
A VOTING RIGHTS AMENDMENT TO MICHIGAN S CONSTITUTION 2/17/2018 LWVMI 1 WHAT IS THE BALLOT PROPOSAL? Amends the Michigan Constitution to make: A voting system that works for all Michigan citizens Voting
More informationMEA Constitution. Article I. Name
MEA Constitution (As amended by the Representative Assembly, May 2001, May 2003, April 2005, May 2009, October 2013, October 2014, April 2015) Preamble We, the professional educators and education support
More informationRepresentative Gabrielle LeDoux
ALASKA STATE LEGISLATURE Interim May-December: 1500 W. Benson Blvd Anchorage, AK 99503 907-269-0216 907-269-0218 (fax) Session January-April: State Capitol, Rm. 118 Juneau, AK 99801 907-465-4998 907-465-4419
More informationCHAPTER 3 ELECTION OF COUNTY OFFICIALS AND REPLACEMENTS
3.01 TERMS CHAPTER 3 ELECTION OF COUNTY OFFICIALS AND REPLACEMENTS Latest Revision November, 2002 All county elected officials are elected to four-year terms in even numbered years. All county elected
More informationSENATE JOINT RESOLUTION
Stricken language would be deleted from and underlined language would be added to the Arkansas Constitution. 0 State of Arkansas st General Assembly Regular Session, SJR By: Senator J. Hutchinson SENATE
More informationTABLE 5.7 Selection and Retention of Trial Court Judges
STATE URTS Selection and Retention of Trial Court Judges or other jurisdiction Name of court Type of court Unexpired term Full term Method of retention Geographic basis for selection (a) Alabama (a) ity
More informationBylaws and Convention Rules Libertarian Party of California
Libertarian Party of California As Amended in Convention April 28-29, 2018 Libertarian Party of California As Amended in Convention April 28-29, 2018 Table of Contents BYLAWS... 1 Bylaw 1: Name... 1 Bylaw
More informationAVMA Bylaws Summer, 2014
AVMA Bylaws Summer, 2014 ARTICLE I NAME AND PURPOSES Section 1. Name. The name of this corporation shall be the American Veterinary Medical Association (hereinafter referred to as the Association ), an
More informationFILLING VACANCIES IN ELECTIVE OFFICES
FILLING VACANCIES IN ELECTIVE OFFICES STATE OFFICIALS Governor In case of a vacancy in the office of governor, the Lieutenant Governor succeeds to the office of Governor. The line of succession to the
More informationCLAY COUNTY HOME RULE CHARTER Interim Edition
CLAY COUNTY HOME RULE CHARTER 2009 Interim Edition TABLE OF CONTENTS PREAMBLE... 1 ARTICLE I CREATION, POWERS AND ORDINANCES OF HOME RULE CHARTER GOVERNMENT... 1 Section 1.1: Creation and General Powers
More informationCandidate s Guide to the Regular City Election
Candidate s Guide to the Regular City Election November 5, 2013 Prepared by the Office of the Iowa Secretary of State (515) 281-0145 sos@sos.iowa.gov http://sos.iowa.gov/elections/candidates/index.html
More informationHOME RULE CHARTER OF UMATILLA COUNTY, OREGON
1 OF UMATILLA COUNTY, OREGON Section 1. Intergovernmental relations Preamble Article I: Name, Nature, Boundaries, County Seat 1. Name 2. Nature and legal capacity 3. County seat Article II: Powers 1. General
More informationThe following documents are explanations for the amendments that voters will be voting on in the 2018 General Election. The explanations of the
The following documents are explanations for the amendments that voters will be voting on in the 2018 General Election. The explanations of the proposed amendments are provided by the North Carolina Secretary
More informationEAST CAROLINA UNIVERSITY FACULTY MANUAL PART II. East Carolina University Organization and Shared Governance
EAST CAROLINA UNIVERSITY FACULTY MANUAL PART II East Carolina University Organization and Shared Governance PART II - EAST CAROLINA UNIVERSITY ORGANIZATION AND SHARED GOVERNANCE CONTENTS Faculty Constitution
More informationRECALL ELECTIONS. Summary. Procedures
RECALL ELECTIONS Summary Wisconsin law permits voters to recall elected officials under certain circumstances. Recall is an opportunity for voters to require elected officials to stand for election before
More informationBYLAWS american society of home inspectors, inc. Amended October 2013 Table of Contents
BYLAWS american society of home inspectors, inc. Amended October 2013 Table of Contents Article 1 - Name, Location, Purpose and Restrictions... 2 Article 2 - Membership... 3 Article 3 - Dues and Other
More informationPolicy Statement. A university is a community of scholars engaged in the free discussion, research and
Policies of the University of North Texas 06.048 Charter of the Faculty Senate of the University of North Texas Chapter 6 Faculty Affairs Policy Statement. A university is a community of scholars engaged
More informationBylaws of the Libertarian Party of North Carolina
Article I. Name Bylaws of the Libertarian Party of North Carolina Adopted in Convention in April 2015; Amended April 2016 The name of this organization shall be the Libertarian Party of North Carolina,
More informationGOVERNANCE PROPOSALS: PRINCIPAL TERMS (September 2014) Current Status Proposal A Proposal B Proposal C Proposal D Proposal E
GOVERNANCE PROPOSALS: PRINCIPAL TERMS (September 2014) DRAFT I. Board Size 30 Voting 2 Non-Voting 32 Total 27 Voting 5 Non-Voting 32 Total* *after end of transition period described below 27 Voting 1 Non-Voting
More informationCHARTER [1] Footnotes: --- (1) --- Section 1 - HOME RULE CHARTER. Page 1
CHARTER [1] Wakulla County Ordinance No. 2008-14. An ordinance of the Board of County Commissioners of Wakulla County, Florida, providing for adoption of a Home Rule Charter; providing for a preamble;
More information63M Creation -- Members -- Appointment -- Qualifications.
63M-7-401 Creation -- Members -- Appointment -- Qualifications. (1) There is created a state commission to be known as the Sentencing Commission composed of 27 members. The commission shall develop by-laws
More informationReferred to Committee on Legislative Operations and Elections. SUMMARY Revises provisions governing elections. (BDR )
* S.B. 0 SENATE BILL NO. 0 SENATOR SETTELMEYER PREFILED FEBRUARY, 0 Referred to Committee on Legislative Operations and Elections SUMMARY Revises provisions governing elections. (BDR -) FISCAL NOTE: Effect
More informationTEXAS ETHICS COMMISSION
TEXAS ETHICS COMMISSION TITLE 15, ELECTION CODE REGULATING POLITICAL FUNDS AND CAMPAIGNS Effective June 15, 2017 (Revised 9/1/2017) Texas Ethics Commission, P.O. Box 12070, Austin, Texas 78711-2070 (512)
More informationAMENDED AND RESTATED BYLAWS REFRIGERATION SERVICE ENGINEERS SOCIETY (Adopted November 2010 Updated 2016) ARTICLE I NAME AND PURPOSES
AMENDED AND RESTATED BYLAWS REFRIGERATION SERVICE ENGINEERS SOCIETY (Adopted November 2010 Updated 2016) ARTICLE I NAME AND PURPOSES Section 1 Name. The name of this corporation shall be the Refrigeration
More informationCONSTITUTION OF THE FACULTY SENATE 3/26/01 (amended 03/07/17)
CONSTITUTION OF THE FACULTY SENATE 3/26/01 (amended 03/07/17) PREAMBLE The faculty of the University of Wisconsin-Superior, acting under its authority in Chapter 36 of the Wisconsin Statutes, hereby adopts
More informationREPUBLICAN PARTY OF DANE COUNTY. Constitution and Bylaws
REPUBLICAN PARTY OF DANE COUNTY Constitution and Bylaws REPUBLICAN PARTY OF DANE COUNTY CONSTITUTION ARTICLE I NAME The name of this organization shall be "The Republican Party of Dane County," and shall
More informationPROPOSED REVISION TO GOVERNING REGULATIONS: EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
ECR 1 Chairman, Board of Trustees September 10, 2013 Members, Board of Trustees: PROPOSED REVISION TO GOVERNING REGULATIONS: EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE Recommendation: that the Board of Trustees receive and vote
More informationBylaws of the Libertarian Party of Ohio
The bylaws of the Libertarian Party of Ohio (the Party ), Ohio s official affiliate of the national Libertarian Party, govern its operating guidelines and promote the cause of liberty. The Constitution
More informationThe Constitution of Minnesota Shade Tree Advisory Committee
The Constitution of Minnesota Shade Tree Advisory Committee We, the members of the Minnesota Shade Tree Advisory Committee, in order to memorialize in written form the principles and procedures under which
More informationBYLAWS of the INTERNATIONAL NEURAL NETWORK SOCIETY
BYLAWS of the INTERNATIONAL NEURAL NETWORK SOCIETY ARTICLE I NAME The name of the Corporation is the International Neural Network Society, also known as INNS. ARTICLE II PURPOSE The purpose of the Corporation
More informationThe Constitution of Minnesota Shade Tree Advisory Committee
The Constitution of Minnesota Shade Tree Advisory Committee We, the members of the Minnesota Shade Tree Advisory Committee, in order to memorialize in written form the principles and procedures under which
More informationCandidate s Handbook for the June 7, Presidential Primary Election
Candidate s Handbook for the June 7, 2016 2016 Presidential Primary Election Orange County Registrar of Voters 1300 S. Grand Avenue, Bldg. C Santa Ana, CA 92705 714-567-7600 Visit ocvote.com/candidates
More informationCONSTITUTION. Associated Students of the University of New Mexico
CONSTITUTION Associated Students of the University of New Mexico Revised 12/07/2017 PREAMBLE We, the students of the University of New Mexico Main Campus, establish this Constitution to preserve and protect
More informationBYLAWS ENVIRONMENT, ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES LAW SECTION NORTH CAROLINA BAR ASSOCIATION ARTICLE I
BYLAWS ENVIRONMENT, ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES LAW SECTION NORTH CAROLINA BAR ASSOCIATION ARTICLE I Name and Purpose Section 1. Name. This Section shall be known as the Environment, Energy and Natural
More informationTexas Elections Part I
Texas Elections Part I In a society governed passively by free markets and free elections, organized greed always defeats disorganized democracy. Matt Taibbi Elections...a formal decision-making process
More informationU.S Presidential Election
U.S Presidential Election The US has had an elected president since its constitution went into effect in 1789. Unlike in many countries, the Presidential election in the US is rather a year-long process
More informationTRAIN COLLECTORS ASSOCIATION BYLAWS
TRAIN COLLECTORS ASSOCIATION BYLAWS Effective November 2, 2009, as amended October, 2015 CONTENTS ARTICLE I SCOPE AND PURPOSE ARTICLE II MEMBERSHIP ARTICLE III OFFICERS, DUTIES, TERMS OF OFFICE ARTICLE
More informationTown of Scarborough, Maine Charter
The University of Maine DigitalCommons@UMaine Maine Town Documents Maine Government Documents 7-1-1993 Town of Scarborough, Maine Charter Scarborough (Me.) Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/towndocs
More informationVNP Policy Overview. Davia Downey, Ph.D Grand Valley State University
VNP Policy Overview Davia Downey, Ph.D Grand Valley State University 1 State Advisory Backup Politician Independent Redistricting in the US Source: http://redistricting.lls.edu/who.php Legislatures: In
More informationThe United States Supreme Court
The United States Supreme Court Highest court in the land and the ONLY one established by Article III of U.S. Constitution. Term: First Monday October- late June Nine Justices: one Chief, eight associate
More informationFilling Vacancies & Cancelling City Council Elections
Filling Vacancies & Cancelling City Council Elections Thursday, May 7, 2015 General Session; 9:00 10:30 a.m. Randy E. Riddle, Renne Sloan Holtzman Sakai DISCLAIMER: These materials are not offered as or
More informationSAMPLE CONSTITUTION AND BYLAWS for LOCAL EDUCATION ASSOCIATIONS IN TENNESSEE. (Amended September 2013)
SAMPLE CONSTITUTION AND BYLAWS for LOCAL EDUCATION ASSOCIATIONS IN TENNESSEE (Amended September 2013) Developed by the Membership and Affiliate Relations Division of the Tennessee Education Association.
More informationRULES OF THE INDIANA REPUBLICAN STATE COMMITTEE
RULES OF THE INDIANA REPUBLICAN STATE COMMITTEE PREAMBLE To further the rights of its members to freely associate to achieve the goals of the Party, the Indiana Republican Party State Committee adopts
More informationBroward College Focused Report August 26, 2013
Broward College Focused Report August 26, 2013 3.2.5 The governing board has a policy whereby members can be dismissed only for appropriate reasons and by a fair process. (Board dismissal) Non-Compliance
More informationTo: Mayor Pat Humphrey and the Clare City Commission From: Ken Hibl, City Manager Date: April 3, 2014 Regarding: City Manager's Report
AGENDA REPORT To: Mayor Pat Humphrey and the Clare City Commission From: Ken Hibl, City Manager Date: April 3, 2014 Regarding: City Manager's Report For the Agenda of April 7, 2014 Depot Update. All remains
More informationUNIFORM JUDICIAL QUESTIONNAIRE
C O N F I D E N T I A L 1. Full Name: Have you ever been known by any other name (other than a recognizable nickname)? Yes No If yes, specify the name(s) and year(s) of name change and/or the years during
More information