MINUTES APPELLATE COURT RULES COMMITTEE FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 15, :30 am to 12:00 pm TAMPA AIRPORT MARRIOTT HOTEL Tampa, Florida
|
|
- Sibyl Moore
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 MINUTES APPELLATE COURT RULES COMMITTEE FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 15, :30 am to 12:00 pm TAMPA AIRPORT MARRIOTT HOTEL Tampa, Florida I. CALL TO ORDER Chair Mullins called the meeting to order at 8:35 a.m. welcoming members, new members, and introducing the new Vice Chairs, Parliamentarian, Secretary and Joanna Mauer, Florida Bar liaison to the ACRC. He circulated the attendance sheet, sheets, subcommittee sign in sheets, and the conference call-in information. II. CHAIR S REPORT A. Approval of minutes of January The minutes of the January 2006 meeting in Miami were approved. B. Announcements Elimination of Amicus Curiae Special Subcommittee. Chair Mullins announced that the executive committee eliminated the Amicus Curiae Special Subcommittee. Orientation. The Orientation meeting for new members will follow the regular meeting. All members invited to join. Florida Supreme Court s Committee on ADR Rules and Policies, Voluntary Trial Resolution Subcommittee. Vice Chair and Parliamentarian Kristy Gavin will attend the Florida Supreme Court s Committee on ADR Rules and Policies, Voluntary Trial Resolution Subcommittee meeting on September 28, 2006 on behalf of the ACRC. 1
2 New Bar Rule on Attorney Misconduct. Chair Mullins reported that that there is a proposed new rule to the Rules Regulating the Florida Bar which would allow judges to fine attorneys who exhibit unprofessional conduct. Since the proposed Rule provides a mechanism for appealing the fine, Chair Mullins will request a subcommittee to review the proposal for comments. III. STANDING SUBCOMMITTEE ISSUES AND REPORTS a. Administrative Law Practice Subcommittee Chair David Miller presented the issue of whether Rule 9.310(b)(2) should be amended to eliminate an inconsistency in the Administrative Procedure Act, and summarized the memoranda that have been drafted on the issue. He explained that the Rule conflicts with the Administrative Procedure Act by allowing an automatic stay when the government seeks review of an administrative agency s decision. The memoranda cite to cases interpreting Rule 9.310(b)(2) that hold either that the Rule supersedes the Act, or hold that Rule 9.310(b)(2) is in conformity with Act. The issue arises occasionally, especially in cases relating to land use and permitting, personnel and challenges to agency rules. The subcommittee unanimously decided to amend Rule 9.310(b)(2) as follows, and to present the amendment to the full committee for a vote: ****************************************************************** RULE STAY PENDING REVIEW (b) Exceptions. (2) Public Bodies; Public Officers. The timely filing of a notice shall automatically operate as a stay pending review, except in criminal cases or in administrative actions pursuant to the Administrative Procedure Act, when the 2
3 state, any public officer in an official capacity, board, commission, or other public body seeks review; provided that an automatic stay shall exist for 48 hours after the filing of the notice of appeal for public records and public meeting cases. On motion, the lower tribunal or the court may extend a stay, impose any lawful conditions, or vacate the stay. ****************************************************************** Chair Mullins presented the issue to a vote. John Mills explained that the Legislature got it right and supports amending the Rule. The vote carried b. Civil Practice Subcommittee Subcommittee Chair Jennifer Carroll reported that the subcommittee received a letter from Tom Hall requesting an analysis on the need to amend Rule to be consistent with HB 841 (creating Fla. Stat ), which sets a limit on supersedeas bonds to $50 million in civil cases (except certified class actions). The subcommittee originally received the request by fast track procedure, but got an extension until February 2007 to address the issue. The Executive Committee directed the subcommittee to address the following issues: 1. Constitutionality of Whether a rule change is needed 3. Whether or not a rule change is needed, to recommend amended language. The subcommittee worked throughout the summer on the issues and decided not take a position on the constitutionality of the statute because it felt that it was not in its place to take a side. By a 5-5 vote, the subcommittee was split as to the constitutionality of the statute, as well as whether a rule change was needed. It nevertheless believed collectively that Rule and the statute should be brought in conformity with each other to ensure consistency. 3
4 Dorothy Easley summarized her research on the constitutionality of the The central question is whether the statute affects procedural versus substantive rights. Based on her analysis, the statute is constitutional because, although it contains procedural components by dictating the cap of the bond and elements for judicial determination as to amount of the bond, it does not create or modify a procedural rule of court. Rather, the focus of the Rule is to expand the following substantive rights: (1) a right to appeal for putative appellants facing money judgments who cannot post any bond; (2) a right to appeal for putative appellants facing money judgments who cannot post a full bond; (3) a right to discretionary review in the Supreme Court of Florida with a guaranteed stay of proceedings beyond the appellate courts; (4) a right of putative appellees to engage in discovery to determine scope of protected assets; (5) a right of putative appellees to obtain appellate review of a lower tribunal determination on whether assets are protected; and (6) a right of putative appellees to other remedies and sanctions for appellant s violation of the statute by dissipating or diverting assets. Referring to Supreme Court of Florida precedent, e.g., Caple v. Tuttle s Design-Build, Inc., 735 So. 2d 49 (Fla. 2000), Easley noted that the intertwining of substantive and procedural rights does not necessarily render a statute unconstitutional. Patrice Talisman submitted a memorandum on the unconstitutionality of , which John Mills presented. He explained that his personal beliefs on constitutionality of 4
5 statute should not sway others, since the constitutionality of the statute is for the courts to decide, not the committee. Chair Mullins reminded the full committee that the constitutionality of the statute is only relevant to determine the appropriate Rule amendment to propose, but that the committee will not be voting on whether statute is constitutional. Mills explained the difference between the state and federal rules, noting that in Florida there is a separation of powers in the Constitution that says only the Supreme Court can adopt procedure not the Legislature. He summarized the research on definitions of procedure v. substantive law and noted that if it relates to procedure it falls within the judicial power. If it is substantive it falls within the legislative power. In Wait v. Florida Power & Light Co., 372 So. 2d 420 (Fla. 1979) and City of Jacksonville Beach v. Public Employees Relations Comm n, 359 So. 2d 578 (Fla. 1 st DCA 1978), the courts expressly held that the obtaining of a stay order to prevent enforcement of a judgment is procedural law. Mills further noted that the right of appeal is not dependent on the posting of a bond, and that even if the stay provision affects the right to appeal, it affects the core judicial power that should be left to the courts. Mills distinguished the cases in Easley s memo as not addressing the simple question of whether the statute is procedural or substantive, and argued that the statute only comes into play when a final judgment is entered and the substantive rights of parties have been determined. What happens between the final judgment and the appeal are procedural matters, not substantive. 5
6 Chair Mullins explained that even though subcommittee vote was only 5-5 to change Rule 9.310, he decided, and the executive committee decided, to present the following two issues to the full committee: 1. Should Rule be amended in light of If so, should Rule be amended in the form as suggested by the subcommittee? If the committee voted to amend Rule 9.310, the subcommittee proposed the following amendment: ********************************************************************* RULE STAY PENDING REVIEW (a) Application. Except as provided by general law and in subdivision (b) of this rule, a party seeking to stay a final or non-final order pending review shall file a motion in the lower tribunal, which shall have continuing jurisdiction, in its discretion, to grant, modify, or deny such relief. A stay pending review may be conditioned on the posting of a good and sufficient bond, other conditions, or both. (b) Exceptions. (1) Money Judgments. If the order is a judgment solely for the payment of money, a party may obtain an automatic stay of execution pending review, without the necessity of a motion or order, by posting a good and sufficient bond equal to the principal amount of the judgment plus twice the statutory rate of interest on judgments on the total amount on which the party has an obligation to pay interest. Multiple parties having common liability may file a single bond satisfying the above criteria. (2) Reduction or Limitation on Bond Amount. Except in class actions subject to section , Florida Statutes, the amount of the supersedeas bond in subdivision (b)(1) is subject to modification as set forth in subdivisions (a) and (b) below: 6
7 (a) Reduction. A party seeking to stay execution of a judgment pending review may move the lower tribunal to reduce the amount of a supersedeas bond required to obtain such a stay. The lower tribunal, in the interest of justice and for good cause shown, may reduce the supersedeas bond or may set other conditions for the stay with or without a bond. The lower tribunal may not reduce the supersedeas bond if the party seeking_ a stay has an insurance or indemnification policy applicable to the case. (b) Limitation. Regardless of the amount of the judgment appealed, the supersedeas bond amount necessary to obtain an automatic stay in any civil action shall not exceed $50 million for each appellant. The $50 million amount shall be adjusted annually for inflation as provided by general law. (3) Protection for Party Opposing Stay. If a party seeking to stay execution of a judgment pending review has posted a supersedeas bond for an amount less than that required for an automatic AM pursuant to subsection (b)(1), the opposing_ party may engage in discovery for the limited purpose of determining whether the party seeking the stay has dissipated or diverted assets outside the course of its ordinary business or is in the process of doing so. If the lower tribunal determines that the party seeking a stay has dissipated or diverted assets outside the course of its ordinary business or is in the process of doing so, the lower tribunal may enter orders necessary to protect the opposing_ party, require the party seeking a stay to post a bond in the amount up to, but not more than, the amount required for an automatic stay pursuant to subdivision (b)(1), and impose other appropriate remedies and sanctions. (4) Public Bodies; Public Officers. The timely filing of a notice shall automatically operate as a stay pending review, except in criminal cases, when the state, any public officer in an official capacity, board, commission, or other public body seeks review; provided that an automatic stay shall exist for 48 hours after the filing of the notice of appeal for public records and public meeting cases. On motion, the lower tribunal or the court may extend a stay, impose any lawful conditions, or vacate the stay. ********************************************************************* 7
8 Mullins again emphasized that the constitutionality of the statute is not the committee s decision, and that the only reason it was briefed was because members believed it may affect their decision to amend the Rule. Mullins thanked Easley, Talisman and Mills for their hard work and research. Subcommittee Chair Carroll made a motion to amend Rule to conform with Mills seconded the motion. Mullins asked for opposition to the amendment. Mills expressed that the Rule needs to be amended because of the conflict in the Rule and the statute, but did not advocate the amendment to the Rule that was being presented by the subcommittee. He reminded the committee of the close vote two years to amend Rule to give courts discretion relating to posting supersedeas bonds, and the split of the appellate courts on the issue. He recommended that, if the position is to not resolve the conflict, then members should vote not to amend Rule But if members believed that some change to the Rule is appropriate, then to vote yes, adding that a vote to amend the Rule does not mean that it has to be amended to conform to the statute. Carroll added that the motion is only whether the Rule should be amended not how. She argued that the issue is whether the current Rule can co-exist with the statute, and that it cannot. Edward Guedes agreed with John Mills and noted he is troubled by the statute because it is not well drafted and that the ACRC mechanism should not be used to correct it. Judge Alan Schwartz argued that voting in favor of a Rule change would moot the issue of whether the statute is procedural are substantive. If it is substantive it takes precedence over the conflicting Rule. The Supreme Court of Florida will decide whether the 8
9 substantive nature of the statute will overrule the Rule, and recommended that the committee vote not to amend the Rule. Carroll added that the subcommittee recommended new language to give the Florida Supreme Court some guidance if and when it addressed the issue. Mullins explained that if the committee decided not to amend Rule 9.310, it would provide our work product and memoranda to the Florida Supreme Court to resolve the issues if it wished to resolve them. Mills argued that the committee must respect the Legislature and defer to it on substantive matters, and that we should not moot out this issue by conforming Rule to the statute. Easley noted that, although the committee did not pass the prior amendment to broaden discretion, she recommended to amend the Rule. Mullins explained that there is no reason to revisit the prior vote to not amend the bond rule and reiterated that the only issue for vote is whether an amendment is necessary in light of the statute, not whether an amendment is necessary to conform to the statute. Andrew Berman was concerned that if we amended a rule every time the Legislature passed a statute, the courts will lose their autonomy. Judge David Monaco argued that if the Florida Supreme Court rules that the statute affects substantive rights, that the committee should vote no on a rule amendment, but send a recommended Rule change to the Court if they want to amend the Rule. Thomas Hall clarified that the fast track letter advised the committee that an amendment may be required. Therefore, if the committee believes that no amendment is required, then the court would want a reason why. 9
10 Chair Mullins called the question whether Rule should be amended in light of the Vote failed Chair Mullins asked whether the committee wanted to talk about sending proposed language to the Supreme Court, or leave the record as it was. Mullins stated he would entertained any motions as to what the committee wants to do. Michael Korn asked that if member have concerns about the drafting of the Rule how do members relay that concern to the subcommittee. Mills made a motion to expressly disprove a Rule change. Celene Humphries seconded the motion. Mills explained that there are 2 constitutional questions as to the cap on the bond and that the proposed Rule reflected a lot of the poor drafting of the statute because it is trying to conform to the statute. Robert Biasotti argued that if the statute is substantive then the amended Rule is proper. Judge Schwartz argued that Mills s motion was out of order because the committee agreed not to propose an amendment to Rule Mills withdrew the motion to disprove a Rule change. c. Criminal Practice Subcommittee Subcommittee Chair Calianne Lantz reported that the subcommittee is addressing two issues: (1) whether Rule should be amended relating to waiver of counsel in capital cases and (2) whether the rules relating to the record on appeal in death penalty cases should be amended. The subcommittee was not ready for a vote, but currently monitoring whether 10
11 any changes need to be made to the Rules. The subcommittee requested someone from the Criminal Rules Committee to aid them on the issues. Since the second issue came as a referral from the Supreme Court by letter from Thomas Hall, Lantz asked Hall whether the Court was looking for anything specific. Hall explained that the record that is created from a Rule hearing is very limited. Rule for death penalty cases refers to the complete record, but it is not specific as to what constitutes the record. Thus, the Court wanted the subcommittee to clarify what should go in the record on appeal in post conviction cases. The subcommittee hopes to have a proposal to the issues in January. d. Orientation Subcommittee Subcommittee Chair Dorothy Easley reported that the Orientation meeting was being conducted immediately after the full committee meeting and that the subcommittee is debating whether next year s Orientation meeting should be moved earlier in the year, to June. Chair Mullins called for a 5-minute break. e. Family Law Practice Subcommittee Subcommittee Chair Denise Powers had nothing to report, other than the subcommittee is dealing with the issue from the last ACRC meeting of providing the Florida Supreme Court with statistics regarding dependency proceedings in the various appellate courts as requested by the Court at oral argument on June 5,
12 f. General Practice Subcommittee Chair John Mills encouraged members to sign up for subcommittee because there are many issues pending and a lot of work to be done. He reported that the subcommittee reviewed new Rule governing advisory opinions to the attorney general to determine whether comments by the ACRC would be helpful to the Florida Supreme Court, but that it agreed that no change to the rule was necessary. The subcommittee is also reviewing whether the Rules should be amended to address the issue of number of briefs per side when multiple parties have aligned interests on appeal and are being represented by the same party. In response to a request from the Florida Supreme Court to the ACRC, the subcommittee will be proposing a Rule amendment to prohibit Supreme Court review of PCA s. The subcommittee is also reviewing whether Rule should be amended to conform with the 21-say safe-harbor provision in Edward Guedes noted that the Civil Rules Subcommittee already addressed the issue and recommended not to amend Rule Robert Biasotti responded that the issue addressed by the Civil Rules Subcommittee is slightly different and that their efforts would not be duplicative. Chair Mullins added that the General Practice Subcommittee and the Record on Appeal Subcommittee are very busy and need assistance, and that the specialized subcommittees such as criminal and family law, need members who work in that area of law. g. Record on Appeal Subcommittee Subcommittee Chair Robert Biasotti reported that it is reviewing the Rules in response to the Florida Supreme Court s Report on Privacy and Court Records to avoid the 12
13 unnecessary filing of personal information. He noted that the subcommittee s response needs to be done between now and the January meeting so there is a lot to be done. h. Workers Compensation Practice Rules Subcommittee The subcommittee had nothing to report. IV. SPECIAL SUBCOMMITTEE ISSUES AND REPORTS a. Internal Operating Procedures Subcommittee Subcommittee Chair Kristy Gavin reported that the subcommittee is reviewing three issues. The first issue is whether the IOP should be amended to clarify whether non-acrc members of subcommittees or ad hoc members could serve as chairs or have voting rights. The subcommittee decided not to allow ad hoc members to vote or serve as chairs. Motion is made by subcommittee to amend Section III of IOP as follows: ********************************************************************* III. Subcommittees... The chair shall have the discretion to appoint non-committee members to Standing, Special and Executive Subcommittees when special expertise is needed to assist with an issue being considered by a subcommittee. Such non-committee members may attend, and participate, and vote on issues at the subcommittee level and may attend and participate at the Committee level but shall have no voting rights at the subcommittee or committee level(s) and shall not serve as chair or vice chair of the subcommittee. ********************************************************************* Chair Mullins added that the issue came up based on concerns and comments from the June meeting on the role of ad hoc members. 13
14 Judge Lazzara opposed the motion, noting that the Worker Compensation Practice Rules Subcommittee has relied heavily on ad hoc members for years. Judge Lazzara made a friendly amendment to bifurcate vote as to whether amendment should apply to only certain subcommittees. Robert Pritt asked whether there can be an exception to allow ad hoc members to vote on just some subcommittees, instead of all. Chair Mullins noted his concern that, as Chair, he can appoint any one to be an ad hoc member and therefore, Chairs can select a group of ad hoc members not appointed by the Florida Bar president to sway a vote. John Crabtree added that ad hoc members do influence members voting. Robert Biasotti did not agree to the proposed amendment, noting that if you do not accept a vote from the ad hoc members, it affects the quorum. Chair Mullins clarified that ad hoc members do not count towards the quorum. Fran Toomey questioned whether there is anything in the IOPs regarding a quorum on subcommittee sections. Mullins referred the issue to the subcommittee for clarification. Dorothy Easley added to the friendly motion that many consideration should go to the size of the subcommittee. Veronica Donnelly argued that ad hoc members were specifically created to create a balance on the committee. In light of the comments, Subcommittee Chair Gavin withdrew the motion and submitted another motion to only amend Section III of the IOP by deleting subcommittee or from the language: 14
15 ********************************************************************* III. Subcommittees... The chair shall have the discretion to appoint non-committee members to Standing, Special and Executive Subcommittees when special expertise is needed to assist with an issue being considered by a subcommittee. Such non-committee members may attend, and participate, and vote on issues at the subcommittee level and may attend and participate at the Committee level but shall have no voting rights at the committee level(s) and shall not serve as chair or vice chair of the subcommittee. ********************************************************************* Michael Korn seconded the motion. The motion carried The subcommittee is also in the process of reviewing whether the IOP s should be amended to clarify procedures on committee notes to the Rules. The subcommittee also reviewed the issue of whether special committee chairs should be included as members of the executive committee. It made a motion to amend the IOPs to state that they should not be included as members of the executive committee because special committees are usually created only for a brief period: ********************************************************************* III. Subcommittees c. Executive Subcommittee. The Executive Subcommittee shall consist of the Chair, the Vice Chair, the Secretary, all standing Subcommittee Chairs, and the immediate past-chair if still on the Committee.... ********************************************************************* 15
16 Kathleen O Connor opposed the motion. Chair Mullins expressed his concern that special subcommittees are created at the whim of the Chair. John Mills asked whether the Chair can appoint as many special committees as it wants to pack the Executive Committee. John Crabtree questioned whether special subcommittee chairs had ever staged a coup against the other Executive Committee members. Fran Toomey added that the concern is having a quorum at the Executive Committee level, noting the larger the committee, the harder it is to get a quorum. Roberta Mandel asked how many special committee chairs there were, to which Chair Mullins answered two, and clarified that the issues did not affect current special committee chairs. Celene Humphries asked how many Executive Committee members there were, to which Chair Mullins answered approximately 10, and noted that one was eliminated today. John Mills argued that consistency is the key. Former Chair Jack Reiter added that special subcommittees are very important because they may ultimately become standing committees, and thought it was helpful to invite those members on to the Executive Committee. In light of the comments, Subcommittee Chair Gavin withdrew the motion. b. Special Subcommittee on Electronic Filing and Service Subcommittee Chair John Crabtree reported that the subcommittee prepared proposed revisions to the Rules relating to the new electronic filing requirements and explained that the state filing system would be akin to the federal system where service is completed electronically in real time. Since the Florida Supreme Court pushed back the roll out for 16
17 electronic filing, the subcommittee has more time to consider its revisions and asked for feedback from the full Committee. Crabtree asked Thomas Hall as to the Florida Supreme Court s pulse on the issue. Hall explained that the Court was ready to begin, but that the system had to be modified because it learned that Section 508 of the Americans with Disability Act, which provides that anything one makes electronic over the internet must be ADA compliant, applied to electronic filing. Hall added that the electronic filing project in Manatee County had been approved and was not a pilot project any more. There was also a recommendation to approve the Broward County electronic system. Hall further stated that there was an issue regarding allowing for electronic records on appeal. Crabtree explained that the proposed Rule amendments anticipated that the record would be allowed electronically. Chair Mullins encouraged members to join the subcommittee and to direct any comments on the proposed new language directly to the subcommittee. c. Original Proceedings Subcommittee Chair Kathleen O Connor had nothing to report. V. ADJOURNMENT Chair Mullins adjourned the meeting and requested that new members and those invited to speak at Orientation to take a break and return for the Orientation meeting. 17
Jennifer Carroll, Chair Civil Rules Subcommittee of the Appellate Court Rules Committee
TO: CC: FROM: Ed Mullins, Chair Appellate Court Rules Committee Joanna Mauer, Legal Editor Florida Bar Jennifer Carroll, Chair Civil Rules Subcommittee of the Appellate Court Rules Committee DATE: August
More informationThird District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed April 18, 2018. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. No. 3D18-300 Lower Tribunal No. 16-9731 The Waves of Hialeah,
More informationThird District Court of Appeal State of Florida, July Term, A.D. 2009
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida, July Term, A.D. 2009 Opinion filed August 12, 2009. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. No. 3D07-2472 Consolidated: 3D07-2746,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA THREE-YEAR CYCLE AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA IN RE: AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE (THREE-YEAR CYCLE) Case No. SC11- / THREE-YEAR CYCLE AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE
More informationMeeting Minutes Appellate Section Executive Council Mid-Year Meeting January 20, 2005, Miami, Florida
Meeting Minutes Appellate Section Executive Council Mid-Year Meeting January 20, 2005, Miami, Florida Attendance: John Crabtree Tom Hall Siobhan Shea Susan Fox Steve Brannock Dorothy Easley Jack Aiello
More informationFLORIDA RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE TABLE OF CONTENTS
FLORIDA RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE TABLE OF CONTENTS CITATIONS TO OPINIONS ADOPTING OR AMENDING RULES... 4 RULE 9.010. EFFECTIVE DATE AND SCOPE... 6 RULE 9.020. DEFINITIONS... 7 RULE 9.030. JURISDICTION
More information4.5 No Notice of Judgment or Order of Appellate Court; Effect on Time to File Certain Documents * * * * * *
Rule 4. Time and Notice Provisions 4.5 No Notice of Judgment or Order of Appellate Court; Effect on Time to File Certain Documents Additional Time to File Documents. A party may move for additional time
More informationFLORIDA RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE
FLORIDA RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 2008 Edition Rules reflect all changes through 969 So.2d 357. Subsequent amendments, if any, can be found at www.floridasupremecourt.org/decisions/rules.shtml. THE
More informationRULES GOVERNING THE COURTS OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY RULE 2:9. MISCELLANEOUS PROCEEDINGS PENDING APPEAL
RULES GOVERNING THE COURTS OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY RULE 2:9. MISCELLANEOUS PROCEEDINGS PENDING APPEAL Rule 2:9-1. Control by Appellate Court of Proceedings Pending Appeal or Certification (a) Control
More informationSupreme Court of Florida
Supreme Court of Florida No. SC09-118 IN RE: AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE AND THE FLORIDA RULES FOR CERTIFIED AND COURT-APPOINTED MEDIATORS. QUINCE, J. [July 1, 2010] This matter
More informationMINUTES OF THE APPELLATE PRACTICE SECTION EXECUTIVE COUNCIL and ANNUAL SECTION MEETING THURSDAY, JUNE 22, 2006 BOCA RATON RESORT & CLUB, FLORIDA
MINUTES OF THE APPELLATE PRACTICE SECTION EXECUTIVE COUNCIL and ANNUAL SECTION MEETING THURSDAY, JUNE 22, 2006 BOCA RATON RESORT & CLUB, FLORIDA I. Call to Order Tom Hall, Chair II. Introductions Alan
More informationAppealing Temporary Injunctive Relief In Texas. By David F. Johnson
Appealing Temporary Injunctive Relief In Texas By David F. Johnson Introduction Author has practiced civil trial and appellate law for twenty years. Author has a blog: http://www.txfiduciar ylitigator.com
More informationTHE FLORIDA BAR CRIMINAL LAW SECTION EXECUTIVE COUNCIL MEETING MIAMI, FLORIDA JANUARY 18, 2008
THE FLORIDA BAR CRIMINAL LAW SECTION EXECUTIVE COUNCIL MEETING MIAMI, FLORIDA JANUARY 18, 2008 1. CALL TO ORDER Chair Ann Finnell called the meeting to order at 10:06 a.m. on Friday, January 18, 2008.
More informationPROPOSED RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE AMENDMENT APPEAL PROCEEDINGS IN CRIMINAL CASES
PROPOSED RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE AMENDMENT RULE 9.140. APPEAL PROCEEDINGS IN CRIMINAL CASES (a) Applicability. Appeal proceedings in criminal cases shall be as in civil cases except as modified by
More informationBy-Laws and Rules of the Citizens Police Review Board of the City of Albany, New York
By-Laws and Rules of the Citizens Police Review Board of the City of Albany, New York The Citizens Police Review Board (hereinafter referred to as the Board ) shall seek to fulfill the purpose and goals
More informationHISTORY and PREAMBLE GENERAL REFERENCES. Adoption of Code See Ch. 1.
[HISTORY: Adopted by referendum on November 3, 2009. Editor's Note: This Charter supersedes the provisions of the former Charter, adopted 11-3-1992, as amended. Amendments noted where applicable.] Adoption
More informationThird District Court of Appeal State of Florida, January Term, A.D. 2012
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida, January Term, A.D. 2012 Opinion filed June 27, 2012. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. No. 3D11-2974 Lower Tribunal No.
More information3RD CIRCUIT LOCAL APPELLATE RULES Proposed amendments Page 1
3RD CIRCUIT LOCAL APPELLATE RULES Proposed amendments 2008 - Page 1 1 L.A.R. 1.0 SCOPE AND TITLE OF RULES 2 1.1 Scope and Organization of Rules 3 The following Local Appellate Rules (L.A.R.) are adopted
More informationBY-LAWS. Of SANTA CRUZ COUNTY INTERGROUP (CALIFORNIA NON-PROFIT CORPORATION) WITH AMENDMENTS AS ADOPTED BY THE INTERGROUP COUNCIL THROUGH
BY-LAWS Of SANTA CRUZ COUNTY INTERGROUP 2017-2018 (CALIFORNIA NON-PROFIT CORPORATION) WITH AMENDMENTS AS ADOPTED BY THE INTERGROUP COUNCIL THROUGH 10/19/2016 ` ORIGINALLY FILED WITH STATE 1984 TABLE OF
More informationTHE FLORIDA BAR CRIMINAL PROCEDURE RULES COMMITTEE SUBCOMMITTEE ACTION REPORT
THE FLORIDA BAR CRIMINAL PROCEDURE RULES COMMITTEE SUBCOMMITTEE ACTION REPORT To: George Tragos, Chair, Criminal Procedure Rules Committee From: H. Scott Fingerhut, Chair, Fast Track Subcommittee Date:
More informationThird District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed May 11, 2018. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. No. 3D17-2112 Lower Tribunal No. 15-24308 Tashara Love, Petitioner,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: SC
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: SC07-1672 PETER SPOREA, ET AL., Petitioners, vs. CITY OF POMPANO BEACH, FLORIDA, Respondent. RESPONDENT S AMENDED ANSWER BRIEF ON JURISDICTION On Appeal from the
More informationORDER ESTABLISHING MOTION PRACTICE PROCEDURE. THIS COURT, having determined the need to facilitate an orderly progression of
ORDER ESTABLISHING MOTION PRACTICE PROCEDURE THIS COURT, having determined the need to facilitate an orderly progression of certain civil matters before this Court, finds as follows: A. Discovery motions
More informationPART IX. ENVIRONMENTAL HEARING BOARD
PART IX. ENVIRONMENTAL HEARING BOARD Chap. Sec. 1021. PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE... 1021.1 CHAPTER 1021. PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE PRELIMINARY PROVISIONS GENERAL Sec. 1021.1. Scope of chapter. 1021.2. Definitions.
More informationBankruptcy/UCC Committee of Business Law Section of the Florida Bar Attn: Carlos Sardi, Esq., Chair, and Stephanie Lieb, Esq.
DATE: March 15, 2018 TO: FROM: Bankruptcy/UCC Committee of Business Law Section of the Florida Bar Attn: Carlos Sardi, Esq., Chair, and Stephanie Lieb, Esq., Vice Chair Andrew Layden, Esq. Christopher
More informationArbitration Rules. Administered. Effective July 1, 2013 CPR PROCEDURES & CLAUSES. International Institute for Conflict Prevention & Resolution
International Institute for Conflict Prevention & Resolution CPR PROCEDURES & CLAUSES Administered Arbitration Rules Effective July 1, 2013 30 East 33rd Street 6th Floor New York, NY 10016 tel +1.212.949.6490
More informationThe Florida Bar- Criminal Law Section Executive Council Meeting Boca Raton, Florida Friday, June 25, :00 a.m. - 12:00 noon
I. Call To Order The Florida Bar- Criminal Law Section Executive Council Meeting Boca Raton, Florida Friday, June 25, 2010 9:00 a.m. - 12:00 noon The meeting was called to order at 9:23 am, by the Chair,
More informationSupreme Court of Florida
Supreme Court of Florida No. SC04-2487 IN RE: AMENDMENTS TO FLORIDA RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 9.140(c)(1). [April 7, 2005] PER CURIAM. The Florida Bar's Appellate Court Rules Committee (Committee) has
More informationLOCAL RULES OF THE COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH CIRCUIT SUPPLEMENTING AND/OR SUPERSEDING UNIFORM RULES OF LOUISIANA COURTS OF APPEAL
LOCAL RULES OF THE COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH CIRCUIT SUPPLEMENTING AND/OR SUPERSEDING UNIFORM RULES OF LOUISIANA COURTS OF APPEAL Adopted October 1982 Including Amendments Last Revision: March 14, 2018 Table
More informationSupreme Court of Florida
Supreme Court of Florida No. SC05-950 IN RE: AMENDMENTS TO THE RULES OF JUVENILE PROCEDURE FORMS FOR USE WITH RULES OF JUVENILE PROCEDURE; AND THE FLORIDA RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE JUDICIAL WAIVER OF
More informationTentative Report of May 23, 2013
To: Commission From: Vito J. Petitti Re: Multiple Extended-Term Sentences Date: September 8, 2014 Since the release of the Tentative Report, dated May 23, 2013, several commenters provided feedback, some
More informationCHECKLIST FOR RULE 61 APPEALS TO AN APPEAL DIVISION I N D E X Certificate or Agreement Respecting Evidence
CHECKLIST FOR RULE 61 APPEALS TO AN APPEAL DIVISION I N D E X 61.02 Leave to Appeal 61.03 Commencement of Appeals 61.04 Certificate or Agreement Respecting Evidence 61.05 Cross-Appeals 61.06 Amendment
More informationThird District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed January 8, 2014. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. Nos. 3D13-2122 & 13-490 Lower Tribunal No. 08-11213 Arthur
More informationThird District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed December 13, 2017. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. No. 3D17-2293 Lower Tribunal No. 13-7027A Oscar Rua-Torbizco,
More informationSupreme Court of Ohio Clerk of Court - Filed January 08, Case No IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO
Supreme Court of Ohio Clerk of Court - Filed January 08, 2015 - Case No. 2014-0485 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO SRMOF 2009-1 Trust, : : Case No. 2014-0485 Plaintiff-Appellee, : : On Appeal from the Butler
More informationMINUTES University of Florida Board of Trustees Committee on Governance September 21, 2012 Lake Wauberg
MINUTES University of Florida Board of Trustees Committee on Governance September 21, 2012 Lake Wauberg 1. Call to Order Chair Cameron welcomed the Committee members and other Trustees attending the meeting,
More informationParliamentary Procedure
Parliamentary Procedure Rule 1 -- Date of Meeting The General Assembly and the Economic and Social Council shall meet every year in regular session. Rule 2 -- Emergency Session Emergency sessions invoked
More informationPRESENTATION 7 MANAGING ENVIRONMENTAL CASES
UNEP GLOBAL JUDGES PROGRAMME APPLICATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL LAW BY NATIONAL COURTS AND TRIBUNALS PRESENTATION 7 MANAGING ENVIRONMENTAL CASES OUTLINE OF PRESENTATION Case Management Generally Common Complaints
More informationAPPROVED. VERMONT SUPREME COURT ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Minutes of Meeting June 24, 2016
APPROVED VERMONT SUPREME COURT ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Minutes of Meeting June 24, 2016 The meeting was called to order at 9:15 a.m. in the Hoff Lounge, Vermont Law School, by Allan
More informationThird District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed June 7, 2017. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. No. 3D16-4 Lower Tribunal No. 15-17911 Travelers Casualty and
More informationMARYLAND RULES OF PROCEDURE TITLE 17 ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION TABLE OF CONTENTS
MARYLAND RULES OF PROCEDURE TITLE 17 ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 100 GENERAL PROVISIONS CHAPTER 200 - PROCEEDINGS IN CIRCUIT COURT CHAPTER 300 - PROCEEDINGS IN THE DISTRICT
More informationFlorida Rules of Judicial Administration. Table of Contents
Florida Rules of Judicial Administration Table of Contents CITATIONS TO OPINIONS ADOPTING OR AMENDING RULES ORIGINAL ADOPTION, effective 7-1-78: 360 So.2d 1076.... 4 PART I. GENERAL PROVISIONS... 7 RULE
More informationCRIMINAL COURT STEERING COMMITTEE HONORABLE JAY P. COHEN, CHAIR SC
Filing # 35626342 E-Filed 12/16/2015 03:44:38 PM AMENDED APPENDIX A RECEIVED, 12/16/2015 03:48:30 PM, Clerk, Supreme Court CRIMINAL COURT STEERING COMMITTEE HONORABLE JAY P. COHEN, CHAIR SC15-2296 RULE
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA IN RE: IMPLEMENTATION OF COMMISSION ON DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL PERFORMANCE AND ACCOUNTABILITY RECOMMENDATIONS CASE NO.: SC08-1724 APPELLATE COURT RULES COMMITTEE S RESPONSE
More informationMINUTES OF COMMISSION MEETING. December 10, J. David Ramsey, Esq., of Becker & Poliakoff, was also in attendance. Minutes
MINUTES OF COMMISSION MEETING December 10, 2015 Present at the New Jersey Law Revision Commission meeting held at 153 Halsey Street, 7th Floor, Newark, New Jersey, were Chairman Vito A. Gagliardi, Jr.
More informationCIRCUIT AND CHANCERY COURTS:
. CIRCUIT AND CHANCERY COURTS: Advice for Persons Who Want to Represent Themselves Read this booklet before completing any forms! Table of Contents INTRODUCTION... 1 THE PURPOSE OF THIS BOOKLET... 1 SHOULD
More informationInternal Operating Procedures of the Supreme Court
Internal Operating Procedures of the Supreme Court 1. Introduction. 2. Preamble. 3. Decisional Procedures: Argued and Submitted Cases. 4. Opinions. 5. Non-Capital Direct Appeals. 6. [Allocaturs] Allowance
More informationARTICLE 5.--ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE ACT GENERAL PROVISIONS. K.S.A through shall be known and may be cited as the Kansas
ARTICLE.--ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE ACT GENERAL PROVISIONS December, 00-0. Title. K.S.A. -0 through - - shall be known and may be cited as the Kansas administrative procedure act. History: L., ch., ; July,.
More informationNCSL Rules of Procedure RULE I RULES OF PROCEDURE
NCSL Rules of Procedure RULE I RULES OF PROCEDURE [A] These rules of procedure shall be construed in conformity with the Bylaws of the National Conference of State Legislatures. [B] On any issue not covered
More informationPLANNING COMMISSION BYLAWS Adopted As of May 17, 2010
PLANNING COMMISSION BYLAWS Adopted As of May 17, 2010 As amended through June 7, 2011 1. Name Purpose The name shall be the City of New Buffalo Planning Commission, hereafter known as the Commission. A.
More informationThe Florida Courts E-Filing Authority Minutes
The Florida Courts E-Filing Authority Minutes Florida Courts E-Filing Authority Board of Directors held a regular meeting on March 10, 2014, at 1:00 p.m., EST, at 3544 Maclay Blvd, Tallahassee, 32312 and
More informationFLORIDA RULES OF WORKERS COMPENSATION PROCEDURE TABLE OF CONTENTS PART I. TRIAL PROCEEDINGS GENERAL PROVISIONS [NO CHANGE]
FLORIDA RULES OF WORKERS COMPENSATION PROCEDURE TABLE OF CONTENTS PART I. TRIAL PROCEEDINGS 4.010. GENERAL PROVISIONS 4.020. DEFINITIONS [AMENDED] Committee vote: 21-3 4.022. PLEADINGS AND PROPOSED ORDERS
More informationAPPEAL A FORCIBLE DETAINER JUDGMENT
MARICOPA COUNTY JUSTICE COURT How to APPEAL A FORCIBLE DETAINER JUDGMENT Justice Court in Maricopa County June 23, 2005 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED FORM (# MARICOPA COUNTY JUSTICE COURT Either party may appeal
More informationReport of the. Supreme Court. Criminal Practice Committee Term
Report of the Supreme Court Criminal Practice Committee 2007-2009 Term February 17, 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page A. Proposed Rule Amendments Recommended for Adoption... 1 1. Post-Conviction Relief Rules...
More informationREPORT OF THE FLORIDA RULES OF WORKERS COMPENSATION PROCEDURE COMMITTEE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA SUPREME COURT NO. IN RE: AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA RULES OF WORKERS COMPENSATION PROCEDURE / REPORT OF THE FLORIDA RULES OF WORKERS COMPENSATION PROCEDURE COMMITTEE COME
More informationSupreme Court of the State of New York County of Nassau IAS Trial Part 22 Part Rules Updated: January 25, 2018
Supreme Court of the State of New York County of Nassau IAS Trial Part 22 Part Rules Updated: January 25, 2018 Justice: Law Secretary: Secretary: Part Clerk: Hon. Sharon M.J. Gianelli, J.S.C. Karen L.
More informationPUBLIC AGENCY RISK SHARING AUTHORITY. Adopted May 27, 2015
BYLAWS PUBLIC AGENCY RISK SHARING AUTHORITY OF CALIFORNIA ( PARSAC ) Adopted May 27, 2015 Adopted May 27, 2015 14 INDEX ARTICLE I PURPOSES... 1 ARTICLE II OFFICES... 1 ARTICLE III BOARD OF DIRECTORS...
More informationBylaws of the Osceola County Planning Commission
Bylaws of the Osceola County Planning Commission As Approved by the Osceola County Board of Commissioners September 2010 Incorporates changes approved by the Osceola County Planning Commission at its January
More informationNOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED OF FLORIDA
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT CITIZENS PROPERTY INSURANCE ) CORPORATION, a Florida government
More informationCouncil members absent: Charles Bartlett, Patricia E. Lowry, Kimberly A. Ashby,
Minutes of the Meeting of the Trial Lawyers Executive Council Friday, November 16, 2012 Location: The Westin Key West Resort & Marina 245 Front Street, Key West, FL 33040 Room Sunrise 9:00 a.m. 12:00 p.m.
More informationELY SHOSHONE RULES OFAPPELLATE PROCEDURE
[Rev. 10/10/2007 2:43:59 PM] ELY SHOSHONE RULES OFAPPELLATE PROCEDURE I. APPLICABILITY OF RULES RULE 1. SCOPE, CONSTRUCTION OF RULES (a) Scope of Rules. These rules govern procedure in appeals to the Appellate
More informationThird District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed October 7, 2015. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. No. 3D15-221 Lower Tribunal No. 14-15931 Lester Garcia,
More informationNHSMUN RULES OF PROCEDURE
Rule 1 Date of Meeting The 2013 National High School Model United Nations NHSMUN RULES OF PROCEDURE The General Assembly and the Economic and Social Council shall meet every year in regular session. Rule
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF FLORIDA. CASE NO. SC08- Fourth District Court of Appeal Case No. 4D JAN DANZIGER, Petitioner,
IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC08- Fourth District Court of Appeal Case No. 4D06-5070 JAN DANZIGER, Petitioner, v. ALTERNATIVE LEGAL, INC., Respondent. ON DISCRETIONARY REVIEW OF A DECISION
More informationSupreme Court of Florida
Supreme Court of Florida No. 86,895 IN RE: AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA SMALL CLAIMS RULES [October 10, 1996] PER CURIAM. The Florida Bar Small Claims Rules Committee has submitted its quadrennial report
More informationSupreme Court of Florida
Supreme Court of Florida 89,005 AMENDMENT TO FLORIDA RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 9.020(a) AND ADOPTION OF FLORIDA RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 9.190. [September 27, 1996] PER CURIAM. The Appellate Rules
More informationBYLAWS KAIROS PRISON MINISTRY INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION, INC. ARTICLE I. Offices
BYLAWS OF KAIROS PRISON MINISTRY INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION, INC. ARTICLE I Offices The principal office of KAIROS PRISON MINISTRY INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION, INC. (the Corporation ) in the State of Florida
More informationCITY COUNCIL RULES OF PROCEDURE CITY OF DALLAS, TEXAS
CITY COUNCIL RULES OF PROCEDURE CITY OF DALLAS, TEXAS Adopted August 11, 1993 Amended by Resolution Nos. 94-0297, 94-2571, 94-3328, 94-3675, 95-1545, 95-2450, 95-2451, 95-2760, 95-4204, 96-0713, 98-3005,
More informationFLORIDA RULES OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROCEDURE
FLORIDA RULES OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROCEDURE 2001 CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION PUBLICATIONS THE FLORIDA BAR TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 32399-2300 International Standard Book Number 0-327-15578-7 Library of
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT LAW DIVISION JUDGE RAYMOND W. MITCHELL STANDING ORDER.
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT LAW DIVISION JUDGE RAYMOND W. MITCHELL STANDING ORDER March 29, 2012 This Standing Order supercedes all prior Standing Orders regarding pending
More informationStaff Report to the North Ogden City Planning Commission
Staff Report to the North Ogden City Planning Commission May 20, 2015 To: North Ogden City Planning Commission From: Robert O. Scott, AICP Subject: Rules of Procedure BACKGROUND Title 11-3 Planning Commission,
More informationBylaw No The Procedures and Committees Bylaw, Codified to Bylaw No (September 25, 2018)
Bylaw No. 9170 The Procedures and Committees Bylaw, 2014 Codified to Bylaw No. 9532 (September 25, 2018) Table of Contents Preamble... 1 PART I Short Title and Interpretation 1. Short Title... 1 2. Definitions...
More informationIn the Supreme Court of Florida
In the Supreme Court of Florida In the matter of use by the trial courts of the Supreme Court Standard Jury Instructions Committee in Criminal Cases / Case No. SC Report No. 2006-01 of the Supreme Court
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS ORDER OF THE COURT
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS IN RE: ) ) ADOPTION OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS ) SMALL CLAIMS RULES. ) ) PROMULGATION No. 2017-009 ORDER OF THE COURT Pursuant to its inherent authority and the authority
More informationSAN JOSE CAPITAL OF SILICON VALLEY
COUNCIL AGENDA: 6-21-16 ITEM: 3.7 CITY OF SAN JOSE CAPITAL OF SILICON VALLEY Memorandum TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SUBJECT: APPROVE POLICY AND MUNICIPAL CODE UPDATES FOR BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
More informationSupreme Court of Florida
Supreme Court of Florida No. SC15-290 PER CURIAM. IN RE: AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE. [June 11, 2015] This matter is before the Court for consideration of out-of-cycle amendments
More informationOath of Admission to The Florida Bar, The Florida Bar Creed of Professionalism, The Florida Bar
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINETEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR INDIAN RIVER, MARTIN, OKEECHOBEE & ST. LUCIE COUNTIES, FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER NO. 2015-06 RE: NINETEENTH CIRCUIT PROFESSIONALISM
More informationCOMMERCIAL CALENDAR N (Effective February 8, 2013)
COMMERCIAL CALENDAR N (Effective February 8, 2013) JUDGE MARGARET ANN BRENNAN 2307 RICHARD J. DALEY CENTER CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60602 Case Coordinator: Ann Ostrowski 312-603-4804 Law Clerk: Andrew Cook 312-603-7259
More informationBYLAWS OF THE ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION SECTION
BYLAWS OF THE ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION SECTION ARTICLE I NAME AND PURPOSE Section 1.1. Name. The name is Alternative Dispute Resolution Section of The Florida Bar. Section 1.2. Purposes. The purposes
More informationOF FLORIDA. An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Celeste Hardee Muir, Judge.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DISPOSED OF. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA THIRD DISTRICT JULY TERM, A.D. 2005 ILEANA MORALES, ** Appellant, ** vs. GILDA
More informationSherri L. Johnson and R. Laine Wilson of Dent & Johnson, Chartered, Sarasota, for Appellant.
ED CRAPO, as Property Appraiser of Alachua County, Florida, v. Appellant, HCA, INC., a Delaware corporation, Appellee. / Opinion filed October 10, 2007. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT,
More informationSupreme Court of Florida
Supreme Court of Florida LABARGA, C.J. No. SC15-359 CITY OF FORT LAUDERDALE, Appellant, vs. JUNE DHAR, Appellee. [February 25, 2016] The City of Fort Lauderdale appeals the decision of the Fourth District
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT. Appellant, v. Case No. 4D L.T. No.: MM000530A STATE OF FLORIDA,
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT DALE LEE NORMAN, Appellant, v. Case No. 4D12-3525 L.T. No.: 562012MM000530A STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. / APPELLEE S SECOND MOTION
More informationDISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT LAURA M. WATSON, STEPHEN RAKUSIN, and THE RAKUSIN LAW FIRM, Appellants, v. STEWART TILGHMAN FOX & BIANCHI, P.A., WILLIAM C. HEARON, P.A.,
More informationSENTENCING HEARING TO CONSIDER THE IMPOSITION OF A LIFE SENTENCE FOR JUVENILE OFFENDERS
Filing # 39501698 E-Filed 03/28/2016 10:39:45 AM RULE 3.781. SENTENCING HEARING TO CONSIDER THE IMPOSITION OF A LIFE SENTENCE FOR JUVENILE OFFENDERS (a) Application. The courts shall use the following
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA IN RE: AMENDMENTS TO FLORIDA RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE AND FLORIDA RULES FOR CERTIFIED AND COURT-APPOINTED MEDIATORS CASE NO. SC09- PETITION OF THE COMMITTEE ON ALTERNATIVE
More informationSUPREME COURT - NASSAU COUNTY - IAS PART 56 PART RULES & PROCEDURES
SUPREME COURT - NASSAU COUNTY - IAS PART 56 PART RULES & PROCEDURES Justice: HON. THOMAS RADEMAKER Secretary: MARILYN McINTOSH Part Clerk: TRINA PAYNE Phone: (516) 493-3420 Courtroom: (516) 493-3423 Fax:
More informationTHE COLLEGE OF EDUCATION (COE) CONGRESS AND SENATE BYLAWS
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 1. General THE COLLEGE OF EDUCATION (COE) CONGRESS AND SENATE BYLAWS 1.1 Meetings. The Senate Chair shall schedule meetings
More informationSupreme Court of Florida
Supreme Court of Florida CORRECTED OPINION No. SC00-731 AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA RULES OF WORKERS COMPENSATION PROCEDURE PER CURIAM. [October 12, 2000] We have for consideration the quadrennial report
More informationSupreme Court of Florida
Supreme Court of Florida LAWSON, J. No. SC18-323 LAVERNE BROWN, Petitioner, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. December 20, 2018 We review the Fifth District Court of Appeal s decision in Brown v. State,
More informationStanding Practice Order Pursuant to 20.1 of Act Establishing Rules Governing Practice and Procedure in Medical Assistance Provider Appeals
Standing Practice Order Pursuant to 20.1 of Act 2002-142 Establishing Rules Governing Practice and Procedure in Medical Assistance Provider Appeals TABLE OF CONTENTS PART I--PRELIMINARY PROVISIONS Subpart
More informationNOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT JULIANNE HOLT, Public Defender for the Thirteenth Judicial Circuit,
More informationJOINT RULES of the Florida Legislature
JOINT RULES of the Florida Legislature Pursuant to SCR 2-Org., Adopted November 2012 JOINT RULE ONE LOBBYIST REGISTRATION AND COMPENSATION REPORTING 1.1 Those Required to Register; Exemptions; Committee
More informationLOS ANGELES COUNTY CHILDREN AND FAMILIES FIRST- PROPOSITION 10 COMMISSION (FIRST 5 LA) (Amended as of 07/10/2014) BYLAWS. ARTICLE I Authority
LOS ANGELES COUNTY CHILDREN AND FAMILIES FIRST- PROPOSITION 10 COMMISSION (FIRST 5 LA) (Amended as of 07/10/2014) BYLAWS ARTICLE I Authority The Los Angeles County Children and Families First - Proposition
More informationFaculty Association of Northern Lakes College. Constitution. Compiled December 20, 2008
Faculty Association of Northern Lakes College Constitution Compiled December 20, 2008 Amended August 19, 2016 Table of Contents 1. Terminology... 1 2. Objectives... 2 3. Membership... 2 4. Executive Committee...
More informationFlorida Senate CS for SB 360
By the Committee on Community Affairs and Senators Bennett, Gaetz, Ring, Pruitt, Haridopolos, Richter, Hill, and King 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 A bill
More informationWASHINGTON STATE MEDICAID FRAUD FALSE CLAIMS ACT. This chapter may be known and cited as the medicaid fraud false claims act.
Added by Chapter 241, Laws 2012. Effective date June 7, 2012. RCW 74.66.005 Short title. WASHINGTON STATE MEDICAID FRAUD FALSE CLAIMS ACT This chapter may be known and cited as the medicaid fraud false
More informationDISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY, Appellant, v. JAN GROSSMAN, as Personal Representative of the Estate of LAURA GROSSMAN, deceased, Appellee.
More informationUNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA SUMMARY OF BANKRUPTCY LOCAL RULE CHANGES The United States Bankruptcy Court s local rules were updated on January 1, 2016 pursuant to General Order 2015-04.
More informationChapter II BAY MILLS COURT OF APPEALS
Chapter II BAY MILLS COURT OF APPEALS 201. CREATION OF THE BAY MILLS COURT OF APPEALS. There shall be a Bay Mills Court of Appeals consisting of the three appeals judges. Any number of judges may be appointed
More information