W.P.(C) No of 2013

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "W.P.(C) No of 2013"

Transcription

1 W.P.(C) No of 2013 BEFORE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE MANASH RANJAN PATHAK Heard Mr. Bhaskar Dev Konwar, learned senior counsel assisted by Ms. Sheema Bhuyan, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. Narayan Sarma, learned Standing Counsel, Education Department for the Respondent Nos. 1 and 2, Mr. Chandra Baruah, learned Standing Counsel, APSC, for the Respondent No. 3, Mr. B.C. Pathak, learned counsel for the respondent nos. 4 & 5, Mr. N.U.K. Nair, learned senior counsel assisted by Mr. A. S. Sarma, learned counsel for the Respondent Nos. 8 to 13 and 17 and Mr. Sunandan Khound, learned counsel for the Respondent No It is submitted that since the petitioner herein served as Lecturer in Physical Science in the Government Banikanta College of Teacher Education, Guwahati; now known as the Institution of Advance Studies in Education. Initially the State Government in the Education (Personnel) Department vide Notification dated appointed the petitioner as a Lecturer of the said College under Regulation 3(1) of the Assam Public Service (Ad-hoc) Appointment Rules, 1986, for a period of 1 (one) year with effect from the date of taking over of charge or till regularization of her service by APSC, whichever is earlier. She accepted her said appointment, joined her service in said college as a Lecturer, which was extended from time to time. 3. By a subsequent Notification dated , the State Government in the Education (Personnel) Department appointed the petitioner under Regulation 3(f) of the APSC (Limitation of Functions) Regulations, 1951 as a Lecturer in Physical Education in said Banikanta College of Teacher Education, Guwahati for a period of 4 (four) months with effect from which was again extended from time to time. Later, the APSC on issued a Call Letter directing her to appear for the interview on before the APSC, in which she appeared. WP(C) No of 2013 Page 1 of 10

2 4. The APSC, on , published the result of said selection of candidates for the post of Lecturers in Government B.T. & Provincialised Colleges in the State under the Higher Education Department and in the said Select List the petitioner was recommended at merit position No. 2 for the three posts of lecturers in Physical Science and, on the basis of the same, the State Government in the Education (Elementary) Department vide Notification dated regularised the services of the petitioner with effect from , the date on which the APSC published the select list, observing that the inter-se-seniority will be determined as per the recommendation of the APSC. 5. In the meanwhile, before the aforesaid of publication of result by the APSC, the State Government in the Education (Higher) Department vide Notification dated , regularized the services of the Respondents No. 4, 5, 6, 7 and 9 others, who were serving as Lecturers of B.T. Colleges in the State under Regulation 3(f) of the APSC. 6. On , the State Government in the Elementary Education department published a draft gradation list of the Lecturers of Government and Provincialised B.Ed. Colleges of the State as on , informing all concerned, inviting objections from the incumbents concerned on the said seniority list that observing that the aggrieved may file his/her objection if any to be submitted within 15 days from the date of issuance of the said list. 7. The petitioner submitted objection regarding fixation of her seniority in the said draft gradation list of lecturers in Government and Provincialised B.Ed. Colleges of the State stating that she is senior to the candidates including the present respondent Nos. 8 to 12 who were appointed only on , whereas as per the Government Notification dated she has been continuously serving since 1989 working under Regulations 3(i) and 3(f) of APSC for the period of 1991 till 1998, appeared in the interview before the APSC on and was selected by the APSC, result of which was declared by APSC on However, without any change, the respondents in the State Government in the Education Department published the Final Gradation List on in which, the petitioner was placed at Seniority Position No. 20, maintaining the seniority positions of the private respondent Nos. 4 to 17 above the petitioners, though from WP(C) No of 2013 Page 2 of 10

3 the said gradation list dated , it clearly reflects that the respondent Nos. 8 to 17 all joined in the service as lecturers in Government & Provincialised B.T. Colleges of the State in February 1998, May 1994, October, 1992, July, 1999 and October 1999 respectively, whereas the petitioner joined her service Claiming that her seniority has not been considered, the petitioner preferred a writ petition before this Hon ble Court, being W.P.(C) No of 2004 and the Court after hearing the parties, by order dated disposed of the same, directing the Commissioner and Secretary to the Government of Assam in the Education Department to dispose of the representation of the petitioner dated and in accordance of law, within a period of one month, from the date of furnishing the certified copy of the said order before him, along with the copy of the writ petition and its enclosures and further directed the respondents therein that for the limited period of said one month, no action in furtherance of the impugned gradation list shall be taken. 9. In pursuance of the said order dated passed in W.P.(C) No. 2079/2004 the State Government in the Elementary Education Department by order dated disposed of the said representation of the petitioner dated with a speaking order that the petitioner s seniority was fixed from the date of announcement of the APSC s result along with other similarly situated persons as per the provisions of Rule 23 of the Assam Public Service Rules, 1982 which do not permit the regularisation of service covering the period under Regulation 3(f) of APSC and that there is no scope to review the petitioner s prayer for her seniority at that stage. 10. Though the State Government in the Elementary Education Department by an order dated subsequently allowed the petitioner to hold the charge of the Principal of Government Banikanta College of Teacher Education at Guwahati w.e.f that was extended from time to time, but the said Department by its notification dated promoted the respondent Nos. 4 to 15, Lecturers of Government & Provincialised B.Ed. and B.T. Colleges of the State to the posts of Professors in Government & Provincialised B.Ed. and B.T. Colleges on officiating capacity for a period of one year under Regulation 4(b) of the APSC (Limitation of Functions) Regulation, 1951 w.e.f. the date of taking over their charge and posted WP(C) No of 2013 Page 3 of 10

4 them at respective Government & Provincialised B.Ed. and B.T. Colleges shown against their names. 11. Being aggrieved with such promotions of the said respondent Nos. 4 to 15 to the post of Professors on officiating capacity disregarding her claim, the petitioner has preferred this writ petition for quashing the said notification dated promoting the private respondent Nos. 4 to 15 to the post of Professors in Government & Provincialised B.Ed. & B.T. Colleges of the State and also prayed to recast the final gradation list of Lecturers in the Government & Provincialised B.Ed. & B.T. Colleges of the State from Serial No. 1 to 20 by considering their seniority on the basis of their initial date of joining in service and with a further prayer to direct the respondents to promote her to the post of Professor in Government & Provincialised Colleges of Teacher Education including the said institutions of Advanced Studies in Education as per the recast gradation list and accordingly, to make further promotions to the post of Principals in such institutions. 12. The petitioner contended that though she joined her service as lecturer in a Government B.T. College on , but because of different methods and different dates of regularisation, i.e , , and (Cabinet Decision), four different groups of lectures of Government & Provincialised Colleges of Teacher Education in the State, who are juniors to her in service, joined later than her, have become seniors to her. 13. She further submitted that though she appeared in the interview before APSC on for regularization her service, but the APSC declared the result of said interview only on , more than after three years and due to no fault of her she cannot lose her seniority. The petitioner further contended that without waiting for the regularization of services of 13 such lecturers of Government & Provincialised B.Ed. Colleges of the State, by the APSC who were appointed under Regulation 3(f) of the APSC (L of F) Rules, the State Government by the notification dated regularized such lecturers including the private Respondents No.4 to 7 but without following the same procedure with regard to the petitioner. The petitioner, in addition to that, contended that the State Government w.e.f provincialised the Mangaldai College of Teacher WP(C) No of 2013 Page 4 of 10

5 Education as well as Tezpur College of Teacher Education and, accordingly, provincialized the services of the respondents No.8 to 12 serving in the said two colleges w.e.f and only after exercise of those two process of regularization by the State Government, The state respondents carried out the process of provincialization of such lecturers working in Government/Provincialised Colleges of Teachers Education through APSC and the APSC by its result dated also regularized the services of the Respondent Nos.7, 9, 13, 14, 16 and 17 out of which the services of Respondent nos. 9 was already provincialised by provincialization order dated But, in the seniority list the seniority of the respondent Nos. 8 to 15 were considered on the date of provincialization of their services and not from the date of regularization of services by the ASPC and all these affected the seniority position of the petitioner though she joined her service as lecturer in the Government College Teacher of Education almost nine years prior to them. The petitioner submitted that if the inter-se-seniority of the lecturer of such Government/Provincialised Colleges of Teachers Education was considered on the basis of length of continuous service, she would have been at second position of the gradation list of seniority of lecturers of such College Teachers of Education. According to the petitioner, she has been deprived not only from her seniority position, but also from the promotion to the post of professors though she is having the qualification of M.Sc. in Physics with a Degree of Master of Education and Ph.D. in education and belongs to reserved community of OBC. 14. The respondent Nos. 4 and 5 submitted that though in pursuance of the notification dated , of the State Government in the Education Department, they have been serving as Lecturers in Kokrajhar College of Teacher Education under w.e.f and respectively under Regulation 3(f) of the APSC (Limitation of Functions) Regulation, 1951, but they along with five others in a Writ petition being Civil Rule No. 2020/1994 approached this Court for a direction to the official respondents therein to regularise their service and on finding that they were appointed under Regulation 3(f) of the ASPC (L&F) Regulation, 1951, whose appointments were extended from time to time and are serving for about 10 years in various B.T. Colleges of the State, the Court by order dated passed in said C.R. No. 2020/1994 directed the State WP(C) No of 2013 Page 5 of 10

6 Government to take steps for regularization of the services of the petitioners of the said writ petition, including the Respondent Nos. 4 and 5, without referring their cases to the APSC and to pass necessary orders of regularization. It is seen that pursuant to said order dated passed in Civil Rule No. 2020/1994, the State Government by notification dated regularized the services of the writ petitioner of said matter including respondent Nos. 4 and The Respondent Nos. 8 to 13 and 17 as well as the Respondent No. 14 contended that it is a fact that the petitioner was initially appointed under Regulation 3(i) and subsequently under Regulation 3(f) of APSC (Ad-hoc) Appointment Rules, 1986 and was finally regularized by the State Government on the basis of selection made by the APSC on and, in the meanwhile, two batches of lecturers of Government and Provincialised B.T & B.Ed. Colleges of the State were regularized by the State Government vide notification dated as well as provincialised their services w.e.f The said Respondents also contended that the final gradation list of the lecturers of Government and Provincialised B.T. & B.Ed. Colleges of the State on was already assailed by the petitioner in her writ petition before this Court in W.P.(C) No. 2079/2004, in which she made prayer for quashing of the said gradation list and that the Court after considering the matter, directed the Commissioner and Secretary to the Government of Assam in the Education Department to dispose of the representation of the petitioner with regard to the said final gradation list as on , pursuant to which the State Government in the Elementary Education Department by a speaking order dated disposed of the petitioner s representation dated clarifying that the provisions of Rule 23 of the Assam Public Service Rules, 1982 do not permit regularization of service covering the period under Regulation 3(f) of APSC and that there is no scope to review the petitioner s prayer for her seniority in the said final seniority list and that as the said order has now attained finality, not being challenged by the petitioner, now at such a belated stage, after nine years, she cannot unsettle the seniority position of the respondents by filing this writ petition, since the same cannot be re-opened for judicial scrutiny in the present proceeding as the same is barred by the principles of resjudicata. The said respondents further submitted that they are senior to the WP(C) No of 2013 Page 6 of 10

7 petitioner and the State Respondents have promoted them to the posts of Professors. 16. The petitioner also filed her replies to the affidavits of the respondents as well as an additional affidavit in this wit petition and relied upon the judgment of this Court passed on in W.P.(C) No.2913 of 2012, wherein this Hon ble Court considered the judgment of the Hon ble Supreme Court in the case of Direct Recruit Class-II Engineering Officers Association -Vs- State of Maharashtra reported in (1990) 2 SCC 715 as well as State of West Bengal -Vs- Aghori Nath Dey reported in (1993) 3 SCC 371 wherein the Hon ble Supreme Court observed that to enable seniority to be counted from the date of initial appointment and not according to the date of confirmation, the incumbent of the post has to be initially appointed according to the Rules and that when the initial appointment is only on ad-hoc and not according to rules and made as a stop gap arrangement, the service on such officiating basis in said post cannot be taken into account for considering the seniority. 17. It is seen that the State Government in the Education (Personnel) Department by notification No. EPG.726/87/Pt/9 dated subject to discharge without any notice and without assigning any reasons thereof, the petitioner and six others were appointed temporarily and until further orders a Lecturer of B.T. Colleges for one year w.e.f. the date of taking over charge or till regularisation by APSC, whichever is earlier, under Regulation 3(1) of the APSC (Adhoc) Appointment Rules, 1986 in the specified scale of pay and allowances as admissible under the Rules and was posted against the post of Physical Science at the erstwhile Banikanta College of Teacher s Education, Guwahati, which the petitioner accepted and joined her service in the said capacity on which was extended from time to time. 18. It is also seen that after the said Assam Public Service Commission (Adhoc) Appointment Rules, 1986 was repealed by the State Government by its notification dated , by another notification No. B(2)H.259/92/128 dated the State Government in the Education (Personnel) Department appointed the petitioner as Lecturer in Physical Science at said Banikanta College of Teacher s Education, Guwahati, under Regulation 3(f) of the APSC (Limitation of Functions) WP(C) No of 2013 Page 7 of 10

8 Regulations, 1951 for a period of 4 (four) months with effect from in the specified scale of pay and allowances as admissible under the Rule, under Notification No. and Date of original appointment No. EPG.725/27/Pt/123 dated , which was extended from time to time till her service in the said post of Lecturer in Physical Science in the said Banikanta College of Teacher s Education, Guwahati was regularised by APSC on in terms of an interview held on , conducted by the APSC. 19. The petitioner accepted her both appointments, (i) dated under Regulation 3(1) of the APSC (Adhoc) Appointment Rules, 1986 and the other (ii) dated under Regulation 3(f) of the APSC (Limitation of Functions) Regulations, 1951, which was issued after repealing the said 1986 Rules. 20. The Assam Public Service Commission (Adhoc) Appointment Rules, 1986 came into force w.e.f , the date when it was published in the State Gazette and it was framed to regulate the ad-hoc appointment in public services under the Government of Assam and Regulation 3(1) of said APSC (Adhoc) Appointment Rules, 1986 provided for Ad-hoc appointment, which read as : 3. Ad-hoc appointment (1) Notwithstanding anything contained in any Service Rules, ad-hoc appointment by direct recruitment to a temporary post created under the Government may be made, if it is necessary in public interest that the appointment should be made immediately and reference to the Commission (APSC) would cause undue delay: Provided that if the post has been sanctioned for or is likely to last for more than four months, the Commission shall, as possible, be consulted for making the appointment on regular basis, as provided for in Clause (c) of subrule (2) of the said Rule (1986 Rules). 21. The Assam Public Service Commission (Limitation of Functions) Regulations, 1951 is a regulation specifying the matters in which it shall not be necessary to consult the Public Service Commission and Clause 3 (f) of said 1951 Regulation provides that 3. It shall not be necessary for the Commission to be consulted in matters relating to methods of recruitment to civil services and post or the suitability of the candidates for such appointments, in the following cases, namely (a).. (b).. (c).. (d).. WP(C) No of 2013 Page 8 of 10

9 (e).. (f) when an appointment is to be made by direct recruitment to a temporary post created in a service if it is necessary in the public interest that the appointment should be made immediately and reference to the Commission would cause undue delay; provided that if the post has been sanctioned for, or is likely to last for more than four months, the Commission shall as soon as possible, be consulted in all matters mentioned in sub-clause (3) of Article 320 of the Constitution. 22. In the case of Direct Recruit Class II Engg. Officers Assn. -Vs- State of Maharashtra, reported in (1990) 2 SCC 715 placed by the petitioner in her support, the Hon ble Supreme Court have held We were taken through the judgment by the learned counsel for the parties more than once and we are in complete agreement with the ratio decidendi, that the period of continuous officiation by a government servant, after his appointment by following the rules applicable for substantive appointments, has to be taken into account for determining his seniority; and seniority cannot be determined on the sole test of confirmation, for, as was pointed out, confirmation is one of the inglorious uncertainties of government service depending neither on efficiency of the incumbent nor on the availability of substantive vacancies. The principle for deciding inter se seniority has to conform to the principles of equality spelt out by Articles 14 and 16. If an appointment is made by way of stop-gap arrangement, without considering the claims of all the eligible available persons and without following the rules of appointment, the experience on such appointment cannot be equated with the experience of a regular appointee, because of the qualitative difference in the appointment. To equate the two would be to treat two unequals as equal which would violate the equality clause. But if the appointment is made after considering the claims of all eligible candidates and the appointee continues in the post uninterruptedly till the regularisation of his service in accordance with the rules made for regular substantive appointments, there is no reason to exclude the officiating service for purpose of seniority. Same will be the position if the initial appointment itself is made in accordance with the rules applicable to substantive appointments as in the present case. To hold otherwise will be discriminatory and arbitrary. Where the initial appointment is only ad hoc and not according to rules and made as a stop-gap arrangement, the officiation in such post cannot be taken into account for considering the seniority. 23. In the present case, it is noticed that the petitioner did not challenge the speaking order dated passed by the State Government in the Education (Elementary) Department pursuant to the order dated passed by this Court in W.P.(C) No. 2079/2004, wherein the State Government explained its inability to review her seniority position in the final gradation list of lecturers of Government and Provincialised Teachers Training (B.Ed.) Colleges of the State as on observing that the period under Regulation 3(f) of the APSC (L of F) WP(C) No of 2013 Page 9 of 10

10 Regulations, 1951 is not covered for the purpose of seniority and by efflux of time said order dated has attained finality, as the petitioner did not challenge the same before any Court of law, except filing of this writ petition on As such the Court is of the view that it cannot exercise its power under the writ jurisdiction at a distant time after more than 8 (eight) years 8 (eight) months to determine the seniority of the petitioner above the respondents so as to unsettle a settled thing. 24. Further, the seniority position of the Respondent Nos. 4 and 5 were determined as the State Government by notification dated regularized their services in terms of an order dated passed by the Court in Civil Rule No. 2020/1994, where the Court considering their long tenure of service under Regulation 3(f) of the APSC (L of F) Regulations, 1951, directed the State Government to regularise their service without the consideration to be made by the APSC. 25. Moreover, with regard to other private respondents, when the colleges they were serving, were brought under provincialization by the State Government w.e.f , therefore, their services were also brought under provincialisation from the same date i.e. from itself. 26. Furthermore, vide notification dated , the private respondent Nos. 4 to 15 were promoted to the posts of Professors under Regulation 4(d) of the APSC (L of F) Regulations, 1951 on officiating basis against vacant posts only on the basis of their seniority above the petitioner as Lecturers, who are senior to the petitioner. 27. For the reasons above, this writ petition being devoid of merit, stands dismissed. JUDGE ISINGH WP(C) No of 2013 Page 10 of 10

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT ( THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH ) WRIT PETITION (C) NO. 2973/2006 Sri Ajit Kumar Kakoti Lecturer, Son of Late Padmadhar Kakoti, Assam Textile

More information

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT Page 1 of 15 IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) WP(C) NO.4448/2007 1. Sri Abhiram Pegu, S/o Damodar Pegu, R/O- Nalipipar, P.O & P.S- Dhemaji, District-

More information

WP(C) No.810/2015 BEFORE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE UJJAL BHUYAN

WP(C) No.810/2015 BEFORE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE UJJAL BHUYAN 14.05.2015 WP(C) No.810/2015 BEFORE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE UJJAL BHUYAN Heard Mr. SK Goswami, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. P Roy, learned Addl. Advocate General, Assam assisted by Ms. B Hazarika,

More information

Writ Appeal No.45 of 2014

Writ Appeal No.45 of 2014 IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, ARUNACHAL PRADESH AND MIZORAM) Writ Appeal No.45 of 2014 Appellant: The State of Assam represented by the Commissioner and Secretary to the

More information

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM & ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM & ARUNACHAL PRADESH) IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM & ARUNACHAL PRADESH) WP(C) No. 3305 of 2009 Bharati Devi Vs..Petitioner The State of Assam and Ors. Respondents WP(C) No. 2758 of 2009

More information

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) PRINCIPAL SEAT AT GUWAHATI (EXTRAORDINARY WRIT JURISDICTION) WP(C) No.2855 of 2010 Ramesh Goswami Writ Petitioner

More information

WP(C) No.4529 of 2016 B E F O R E HON BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMAN SHYAM

WP(C) No.4529 of 2016 B E F O R E HON BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMAN SHYAM WP(C) No.4529 of 2016 B E F O R E HON BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMAN SHYAM 20.01.2017 Heard S. K. Talukdar, learned counsel for the writ petitioner. Also heard Mr. K. N. Choudhury, learned senior counsel assisted

More information

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT. Case No: WP(C) 3845/2014

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT. Case No: WP(C) 3845/2014 1 IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (The High Court of Assam, Nagaland, Mizoram and Arunachal Pradesh) Case No: WP(C) 3845/2014 Dr. (Capt.) Suchitra Kakoty, W/o Sri Lekhoke Kakoty, R/o House No. 18, Bye Lane No.1,

More information

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM: NAGALAND: MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM: NAGALAND: MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) 1 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM: NAGALAND: MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Sri Rajesh Jaiswal, S/o Sri Radha Raman Jaiswal, Resident of Thana Back Road, Ward No. 11, New Amolapatty, Golaghat-785621.

More information

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) WRIT PETITION No. 4807/2012 Sri Bipul Chandra Barman S/O Late Ananta Barman Vill Mohkhali & P.O. Gopalthan PS-Belsor,

More information

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) WP (C) NO. 2017/2009 Sri Swapan Kr. Biswas S/o Late Anil Kr. Biswas, Vill- Basugaon P.O. Basugaon, Dist. Chirang,

More information

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (The High Court of Assam, Nagaland, Mizoram and Arunachal Pradesh) Small Industries Development Bank of India ( SIDBI)

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (The High Court of Assam, Nagaland, Mizoram and Arunachal Pradesh) Small Industries Development Bank of India ( SIDBI) Review Petition No. 73/2013 (Arising out of Misc. Case No. 705/2013 In FAO 6/2013) IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (The High Court of Assam, Nagaland, Mizoram and Arunachal Pradesh) Small Industries Development

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No. 298 of 2013 ------- Md. Rizwan Akhtar son of Late Md. Suleman, resident of Ahmad Lane, Azad Basti, Gumla, P.O, P.S. and District: Gumla... Petitioner

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF. (The High Court of Assam, Nagaland, Meghalaya, Manipur, Tripura, Mizoram and Arunachal Pradesh) W.P. (C) No.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF. (The High Court of Assam, Nagaland, Meghalaya, Manipur, Tripura, Mizoram and Arunachal Pradesh) W.P. (C) No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF (The High Court of Assam, Nagaland, Meghalaya, Manipur, Tripura, Mizoram and Arunachal Pradesh) W.P. (C) No. 1343/2012 Shri Sanjib Saikia, S/o. Late Muhiram Saikia R/o. House No. 12,

More information

THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % Judgment delivered on: M/S MITSUBISHI CORPORATION INDIA P. LTD Petitioner.

THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % Judgment delivered on: M/S MITSUBISHI CORPORATION INDIA P. LTD Petitioner. THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on: 30.07.2010 + WP (C) 11932/2009 M/S MITSUBISHI CORPORATION INDIA P. LTD Petitioner - versus THE VALUE ADDED TAX OFFICER & ANR... Respondent

More information

COURT NO. 2, ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI O.A. NO. 140 OF 2009

COURT NO. 2, ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI O.A. NO. 140 OF 2009 COURT NO. 2, ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI O.A. NO. 140 OF 2009 O.A. No. 140/2009 IN THE MATTER OF:...Applicant Through : Mr. P.D.P. Deo with Ms. Monica Nagi, counsels for the Applicant

More information

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Petitioner : WP(C) NO.992 OF 2014 1. Sri Bijit Saikia, S/o Sri Tilak Saikia, R/o Deodia-Ati, P.O.-Bengena Ati

More information

1. Writ Petition (C) No.3638 of 2015

1. Writ Petition (C) No.3638 of 2015 IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM & ARUNACHAL PRADESH) 1. Writ Petition (C) No.3638 of 2015 1. Bahari Reserve Gaon Min Samabai Samity Limited, Village & PO- Bahari, PS-

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI : NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SERVICE MATTER W.P.(C) No.9681/2009 Judgment decided on:

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI : NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SERVICE MATTER W.P.(C) No.9681/2009 Judgment decided on: IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI : NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SERVICE MATTER W.P.(C) No.9681/2009 Judgment decided on: 11.03.2011 RAJEEV KUMAR MISHRA...Petitioner Through: Mr Rakesh Kumar Khanna, Sr. Adv. with Mr Piyush

More information

PRADEEP KUMAR MASKARA & ORS. Vs. STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS.

PRADEEP KUMAR MASKARA & ORS. Vs. STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS. PRADEEP KUMAR MASKARA & ORS. Vs. STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REPORTABLE CIVIL APPEAL NOS.9844-9846 OF 2014 (Arising out of Special Leave Petition

More information

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT KOHIMA BENCH

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT KOHIMA BENCH IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM & ARUNACHAL PRADESH) KOHIMA BENCH W.P (C) No. 232 (K) of 2015 1. Shri Ailong Phom, Forest Ranger, Office of the Range Forest Officer,

More information

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 7262/2014

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 7262/2014 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 7262/2014 Pronounced on: 03.02.2015 PRINCE KUMAR & ORS.... Appellant Through: Mr.Anil Sapra, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Tarun Kumar Tiwari, Mr.Mukesh Sukhija, Ms.Rupali

More information

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) WP(C) No. 3307/2005

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) WP(C) No. 3307/2005 IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) WP(C) No. 3307/2005 Md. Intajur Rahman Laskar, S/o. Md. Siddique Ali Laskar, Vill- Banskandi Part-III, P.O.

More information

Government of Jammu and Kashmir General Administration Department (Services) Civil Secretariat, Srinagar

Government of Jammu and Kashmir General Administration Department (Services) Civil Secretariat, Srinagar www.jkgad.nic.in Fax No. 0194-2473664 (S) 0191-2545702 (J) E-mail gad-jk@nic.in Government of Jammu and Kashmir General Administration Department (Services) Civil Secretariat, Srinagar Subject: SWP No.

More information

An Act to regulate the appointment of persons to, and the terms and conditions of Service of persons in, the service of Pakistan.

An Act to regulate the appointment of persons to, and the terms and conditions of Service of persons in, the service of Pakistan. The Civil Servants Act, 1973. Civil Servants Act, 1973 (Act No.LXXI of 1973) An Act to regulate the appointment of persons to, and the terms and conditions of Service of persons in, the service of Pakistan.

More information

THE WEST BENGAL COLLEGE SERVICE COMMISSION REGULATION NO. 1

THE WEST BENGAL COLLEGE SERVICE COMMISSION REGULATION NO. 1 THE WEST BENGAL COLLEGE SERVICE COMMISSION REGULATION NO. 1 Regulations regarding manner of selection of Persons for Appointment to the posts of Assistant Professors, Principals and Librarians in Government

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : RECRUITMENT MATTER. W.P.(C) No. 8347/2010. Date of Decision: Versus

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : RECRUITMENT MATTER. W.P.(C) No. 8347/2010. Date of Decision: Versus IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : RECRUITMENT MATTER W.P.(C) No. 8347/2010 Date of Decision: 10.02.2011 MRS. PRERNA Through Mr. Ashok Agarwal, Advocate with Mr. Raunak Jain, Advocate and

More information

1. The State of Assam, represented by the Commissioner & Secretary to the Govt. of Assam, Education Department, Dispur, Guwahati-6.

1. The State of Assam, represented by the Commissioner & Secretary to the Govt. of Assam, Education Department, Dispur, Guwahati-6. IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) WRIT PETITION (C) NO. 4717/2007. 1. Md. Alauddin Mondal, Son of Late Hazrat Ali Mondal, A resident of village-kaimari

More information

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) PRINCIPAL SEAT AT GUWAHATI (EXTRAORDINARY WRIT JURISDICTION) WP(C) No.2171 of 2017 Moizuddin Ahmed.. Petitioner

More information

Heard Mr. AM Mazumdar, learned senior counsel for the petitioner and Mr. C. Baruah, learned Standing Counsel, Assam Public Service Commission.

Heard Mr. AM Mazumdar, learned senior counsel for the petitioner and Mr. C. Baruah, learned Standing Counsel, Assam Public Service Commission. WP(C) No. 2377 of 2010 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE RANJAN GOGOI THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE B.P. KATAKEY DATE OF ORDER : 06/05/2010 (Ranjan Gogoi, J) Heard Mr. AM Mazumdar, learned senior counsel for the

More information

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. Judgment delivered on: December 11, 2014

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. Judgment delivered on: December 11, 2014 $~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on: December 11, 2014 + W.P.(C) 8200/2011 RAJENDER SINGH... Petitioner Represented by: Mr.Rajiv Aggarwal and Mr. Sachin Kumar, Advocates.

More information

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 7 th January, W.P.(C) 5472/2014, CM Nos /2014, 12873/2015, 16579/2015

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 7 th January, W.P.(C) 5472/2014, CM Nos /2014, 12873/2015, 16579/2015 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 7 th January, 2016 + W.P.(C) 5472/2014, CM Nos. 10868-69/2014, 12873/2015, 16579/2015 ASHFAQUE ANSARI... Petitioner Through: Mr. V. Shekhar,

More information

GOVERNMENT OF KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA

GOVERNMENT OF KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA 0 For official use GOVERNMENT OF KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA THE KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA CIVIL SERVANTS ACT, 973 (Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Act No. XVIII of 973) Compiled by: O&M SECTION, REGULATION WING ESTABLISHMENT & ADMINISTRATION

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD DISTRICT: AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO OF 2008 AND AND AND AND AND. In the matter between;

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD DISTRICT: AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO OF 2008 AND AND AND AND AND. In the matter between; IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD DISTRICT: AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 14664 OF 2008 In the matter of a petition under Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India; AND In the matter

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL NO OF 2018 (Arising out of S.L.P. (Civil) No of 2018) VERSUS

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL NO OF 2018 (Arising out of S.L.P. (Civil) No of 2018) VERSUS 1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 5710 OF 2018 (Arising out of S.L.P. (Civil) No. 1395 of 2018) Meena Verma Appellant(s) VERSUS State of Himachal

More information

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) WP(C) 1140/2015 & WP(C) 2945/2015. Sri Vidyut Bikash Bora

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) WP(C) 1140/2015 & WP(C) 2945/2015. Sri Vidyut Bikash Bora IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) WP(C) 1140/2015 & WP(C) 2945/2015 Sri Vidyut Bikash Bora -Vs-...Petitioner M/s. Indian Oil Corporation Ltd.

More information

Arrangement of Sections

Arrangement of Sections 317 KARNATAKA ORDINANCE NO. 2 OF 2002 THE KARNATAKA DETERMINATION OF SENIORITY OF THE GOVERNMENT SERVANTS PROMOTED ON THE BASIS OF RESERVATION (TO THE POSTS IN THE CIVIL SERVICES OF THE STATE) ORDINANCE,

More information

W.P.(C) No.5740 of 2001 P R E S E N T HON BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA NATH TIWARI

W.P.(C) No.5740 of 2001 P R E S E N T HON BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA NATH TIWARI BY COURT: 1 W.P.(C) No.5740 of 2001 (In the matter of an application under Articles 226 and 226 of the Constitution of India) Parmanand Pandey & Anr.. Petitioners. Versus The State of Jharkhand & Ors.....

More information

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM; NAGALAND; MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM; NAGALAND; MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Page 1 IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM; NAGALAND; MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Writ Petition (C) No. 1961 of 2010 Smt. Padma Rani Mudai Hazarika - Versus - - Petitioner Union of India

More information

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT AT GUWAHATI

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT AT GUWAHATI THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT AT GUWAHATI (The High Court of Assam, Nagaland, Mizoram and Arunachal Pradesh) PRINCIPAL SEAT AT GUWAHATI WP(C) No. 4088/2014 Sri Dibyajyoti Kaushik, Son of Sri Santanu Baruaha,

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL Nos OF 2017 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (CIVIL) Nos.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL Nos OF 2017 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (CIVIL) Nos. 1 Non-Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL Nos. 691-693 OF 2017 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (CIVIL) Nos. 21462-64 OF 2013) State of Tripura & Ors..Appellants Versus

More information

THE SINDH CIVIL SERVANTS ACT, 1973

THE SINDH CIVIL SERVANTS ACT, 1973 THE SINDH CIVIL SERVANTS ACT, 1973 Sindh Act No. 14 of 1973. 5th December, 1973 (First published after having received the assent of the Governor of Sindh in the Gazette of Sindh (Extra-Ordinary dated

More information

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM: NAGALAND: MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Writ Petition (C) No OF 2010

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM: NAGALAND: MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Writ Petition (C) No OF 2010 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM: NAGALAND: MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Writ Petition (C) No. 4667 OF 2010 SHRI SURAJEET DAS, SON OF SHRI CHITTA RANJAN DAS, RESIDENT OF PANJABARI (BOTAHGULI),

More information

KARNATAKA ACT NO. 21 OF 2018

KARNATAKA ACT NO. 21 OF 2018 KARNATAKA ACT NO. 21 OF 2018 THE KARNATAKA EXTENSION OF CONSEQUENTIAL SENIORITY TO GOVERNMENT SERVANTS PROMOTED ON THE BASIS OF RESERVATION (TO THE POSTS IN THE CIVIL SERVICES OF THE STATE) ACT, 2017 Sections:

More information

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM: NAGALAND: MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Writ Petition (C) No. 946 OF 2009

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM: NAGALAND: MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Writ Petition (C) No. 946 OF 2009 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM: NAGALAND: MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Writ Petition (C) No. 946 OF 2009 1. SRI PRAMOD KUMAR KEDIA, S/O. LATE BISWANATH KEDIA. 2. SRI SMTI. NIMAWATI KEDIA,

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No. 506 of 2013 With W.P.(S) No. 509 of 2013 With W.P.(S) No. 512 of 2013

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No. 506 of 2013 With W.P.(S) No. 509 of 2013 With W.P.(S) No. 512 of 2013 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No. 506 of 2013 With W.P.(S) No. 509 of 2013 With W.P.(S) No. 512 of 2013 MariyamTirkey Petitioner (in WPS No. 506/13) Sudarshan Khakha Petitioner (in

More information

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) WRIT PETITION (C) NO.4555/2013 Petitioner : Smti. Runumi Gogoi, Daughter of late Puneswar Gogoi, Chairperson

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (C) No of Bokaro Steel Workers Union 2. N.M.D.C. Mines Workers' Union Petitioners

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (C) No of Bokaro Steel Workers Union 2. N.M.D.C. Mines Workers' Union Petitioners 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (C) No. 3996 of 2006 1. Bokaro Steel Workers Union 2. N.M.D.C. Mines Workers' Union Petitioners Versus Steel Authority of India Limited and others Respondents

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE ON THE 24 TH DAY OF MARCH, 2014 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR JUSTICE K L MANJUNATH AND THE HON BLE MR JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH Writ Petition No. 20807 of 2010 (S-KAT)

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS OF 2019

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS OF 2019 1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 73-74 OF 2019 HIGH COURT OF HYDERABAD FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, THROUGH ITS REGISTRAR

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI : NEW DELHI. SUBJECT : Bihar Shops and Establishment Act, W.P.(C) No. 5114/2005. Judgment decided on:

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI : NEW DELHI. SUBJECT : Bihar Shops and Establishment Act, W.P.(C) No. 5114/2005. Judgment decided on: IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI : NEW DELHI SUBJECT : Bihar Shops and Establishment Act, 1956 W.P.(C) No. 5114/2005 Judgment decided on: 14.02.2011 C.D. SINGH Through: Mr Ranjan Mukherjee, Advocate....Petitioner

More information

WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO(S). 71/2019

WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO(S). 71/2019 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ORIGINAL JURISDICTION REPORTABLE WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO(S). 71/2019 RAHUL DUTTA & ORS. PETITIONER(S) VERSUS THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS. RESPONDENT(S) WITH W.P.(C) No. 92/2019

More information

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (The High Court of Assam, Nagaland, Meghalaya, Manipur, Tripura, Mizoram and Arunachal Pradesh) 1. The Director General, Boarder Roads Organisation, Seema Sadak Bhavan, Ring Road,

More information

AZAD JAMMU AND KASHMIR CIVIL SERVANTS ACT, 1976 (ACT VI OF 1976)

AZAD JAMMU AND KASHMIR CIVIL SERVANTS ACT, 1976 (ACT VI OF 1976) AZAD JAMMU AND KASHMIR CIVIL SERVANTS ACT, 1976 Muzaffarabad Dated: 20 th April, 1976 No.1504/SL/76. The following Act of the Legislative Assembly received the assent of the President on the 18 th of April,

More information

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT ( THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH ) WP(C) No of Versus-

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT ( THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH ) WP(C) No of Versus- IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT ( THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH ) WP(C) No. 5648 of 2009 Sri Swapan Kumar Dey S/o late Jogesh Chandra Dey, R/o Nagadolong, P.O. & P.S. Namrup,

More information

PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 32 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. 1. The petitioner is filing the present Writ Petition under Article 32 of the

PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 32 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. 1. The petitioner is filing the present Writ Petition under Article 32 of the PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 32 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA TO, HON BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE OF INDIA AND HIS COMPANION JUDGES OF THE HON BLE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA. The humble petition of the Petitioner above

More information

% W.P.(C) No. 5513/2004

% W.P.(C) No. 5513/2004 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Judgment delivered on: November 27, 2015 % W.P.(C) No. 5513/2004 M/S MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI... Petitioner Through: Ms. Saroj Bidawat, Advocate. versus

More information

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (High Court of Assam, Nagaland, Mizoram and Arunachal Pradesh) Writ Petition (C) No. 4612 of 2011 1) Abdul Gofur Mondal, Son of Late Nalu Mondal Village Boyzeralga part-iv, P.O-

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF J HARKHAND AT RANCHI. W.P.(C) No of Rajendra Tudu 2. Ramesh Turi 3. Prafulla Chandra Das...

IN THE HIGH COURT OF J HARKHAND AT RANCHI. W.P.(C) No of Rajendra Tudu 2. Ramesh Turi 3. Prafulla Chandra Das... IN THE HIGH COURT OF J HARKHAND AT RANCHI. W.P.(C) No. 7472 of 2013 1. Rajendra Tudu 2. Ramesh Turi 3. Prafulla Chandra Das..... Petitioners Versus 1. State of Jharkhand 2. Principal Secretary, Ministry

More information

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MEGHALAYA, MANIPUR,

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MEGHALAYA, MANIPUR, IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MEGHALAYA, MANIPUR, TRIPURA, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) WP (C) No. 3522/2000 1. Dhansiri Valley Project Oil and Natural Gas Commission

More information

Prof. Krishnapada Dash & Ors. -Versus- The State of West Bengal & Ors. Mr. L. C. Bihani, Mr. N. C. Bihani. For the petitioner.

Prof. Krishnapada Dash & Ors. -Versus- The State of West Bengal & Ors. Mr. L. C. Bihani, Mr. N. C. Bihani. For the petitioner. 1 11th June, 2014 (Sm) W. P.26356 (W) of 2013 Prof. Krishnapada Dash & Ors. -Versus- The State of West Bengal & Ors. Mr. L. C. Bihani, Mr. N. C. Bihani. For the petitioner. Mr. Sadananda Ghanguly, Mr.

More information

THE WEST BENGAL LAND REFORMS AND TENANCY TRIBUNAL ACT, 1997 (WEST BENGAL ACT 25 OF

THE WEST BENGAL LAND REFORMS AND TENANCY TRIBUNAL ACT, 1997 (WEST BENGAL ACT 25 OF THE WEST BENGAL LAND REFORMS AND TENANCY TRIBUNAL ACT, 1997 (WEST BENGAL ACT 25 OF 1997) [Passed by the West Bengal Legislature] [Assent of the Governor was first published in the Calcutta Gazette, Extraordinary,

More information

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (The High Court of Assam, Nagaland, Meghalaya, Manipur, Tripura, Mizoram & Arunachal Pradesh) WP(C) Nos. 835/2009 and 2465/2009

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (The High Court of Assam, Nagaland, Meghalaya, Manipur, Tripura, Mizoram & Arunachal Pradesh) WP(C) Nos. 835/2009 and 2465/2009 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (The High Court of Assam, Nagaland, Meghalaya, Manipur, Tripura, Mizoram & Arunachal Pradesh) WP(C) Nos. 835/2009 and 2465/2009 (I) WP(C) No.835/2009 Smt. Lakhimi Hazarika, W/O Shri

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : DELHI LAND REFORMS ACT, 1954 Date of Reserve : Date of Decision :

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : DELHI LAND REFORMS ACT, 1954 Date of Reserve : Date of Decision : IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : DELHI LAND REFORMS ACT, 1954 Date of Reserve : 14.02.2013 Date of Decision : 28.05.2013 LPA 858/2004 BANWARI LAL SHARMA Through: Mr. P.S. Bindra, Advocate....

More information

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MEGHALAYA, MANIPUR, TRIPURA AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) W.P(C) 2085/2004

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MEGHALAYA, MANIPUR, TRIPURA AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) W.P(C) 2085/2004 IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MEGHALAYA, MANIPUR, TRIPURA AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) W.P(C) 2085/2004 Sri Amarendra Kumar Singh Son of Sri M.M.P. Singh Technical Assistant,

More information

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Writ Petition No of 2016

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Writ Petition No of 2016 IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Writ Petition No. 1246 of 2016 Shri Abdul Kadir Mazumdar, Son of late Basir Uddin Mazumdar, Village Uttar Krishnapur,

More information

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM : NAGALAND : MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Writ Petition (C) No OF 2010

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM : NAGALAND : MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Writ Petition (C) No OF 2010 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM : NAGALAND : MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Writ Petition (C) No. 4716 OF 2010 1. SRI SARIF UDDIN CHOUDHURY, SON OF SRI HABIB ALI CHOUDHURY, VILLAGE KALINAGAR,

More information

W.P.(C) No. 61 of 2013

W.P.(C) No. 61 of 2013 IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) AIZAWL BENCH: AIZAWL W.P.(C) No. 61 of 2013 1. Dawrpui Vengthar Pig Producer Co-operative Society Ltd., B-2

More information

The petitioner in W.P.No.7724/2018 has assailed. Rule 5 of the Karnataka Selection of Candidates for. Admission to Government Seats in Professional

The petitioner in W.P.No.7724/2018 has assailed. Rule 5 of the Karnataka Selection of Candidates for. Admission to Government Seats in Professional 1 BVNJ: 22/02/2018 W.P.No.7724/2018 C/W. W.P. Nos.8182, 8184, 8204, 8206, 8207, 8507, 8508, 8509, 8556, 8569, 8571, 8573 & 8698 of 2018 The petitioner in W.P.No.7724/2018 has assailed Rule 5 of the Karnataka

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : APPOINTMENT MATTER Date of decision: 11th July, 2012 W.P.(C) No.1343/1998.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : APPOINTMENT MATTER Date of decision: 11th July, 2012 W.P.(C) No.1343/1998. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : APPOINTMENT MATTER Date of decision: 11th July, 2012 W.P.(C) No.1343/1998 SRI GURU TEGH BAHADUR KHALSA POST GRADUATE EVENING COLLEGE Through: None....

More information

RESPONDENT: D.S. Mathur, Secretary,Department of Telecommunications

RESPONDENT: D.S. Mathur, Secretary,Department of Telecommunications SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CASE NO.: Contempt Petition (civil) 248 of 2007 PETITIONER: Promotee Telecom Engineers Forum & Ors. RESPONDENT: D.S. Mathur, Secretary,Department of Telecommunications DATE OF JUDGMENT:

More information

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT. Writ Petition (C) No.606 of 2016

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT. Writ Petition (C) No.606 of 2016 IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Writ Petition (C) No.606 of 2016 Sri Bhabesh Das Son of Late Dhruba Das Vill Kulhati, No.2 Hidalghurisupa Police

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI L. P. A. No. 511 of 2009

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI L. P. A. No. 511 of 2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI L. P. A. No. 511 of 2009 1.State of Bihar 2.Secretary, Home (Special) Department, Government of Bihar, Patna Appellants Versus 1.Ravindra Prasad Singh 2.State of

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : THE ARCHITECTS ACT, 1972 Date of decision: 4th January, 2012 WP(C) NO.8653/2008

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : THE ARCHITECTS ACT, 1972 Date of decision: 4th January, 2012 WP(C) NO.8653/2008 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : THE ARCHITECTS ACT, 1972 Date of decision: 4th January, 2012 WP(C) NO.8653/2008 INSTITUTE OF TOWN PLANNERS, INDIA... Petitioner Through: Mr. Rakesh Kumar

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 4 TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2015 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE K.N.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 4 TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2015 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE K.N. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 4 TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2015 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE K.N. PHANEENDRA W.P. Nos. 63936/2012 & 64365/2012 (S-REG) BETWEEN: 1. RAMA S/O. NARAYAN

More information

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % Date of decision: WP(C) No. 416 of 2011 and CM Nos /2011. Versus

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % Date of decision: WP(C) No. 416 of 2011 and CM Nos /2011. Versus * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision: 21.01.2011 + WP(C) No. 416 of 2011 and CM Nos.839-840/2011 DINESH KUMAR & ANR. PETITIONERS Through: Mr.S.N.Khanna, Advocate Versus DELHI COOPERATIVE

More information

THE PUNJAB CIVIL SERVANTS ACT, 1974 (VIII of 1974)

THE PUNJAB CIVIL SERVANTS ACT, 1974 (VIII of 1974) THE PUNJAB CIVIL SERVANTS ACT, 1974 (VIII of 1974) CONTENTS 1. Short title, application and commencement CHAPTER - 1 PRELIMINARY 2. Definitions CHAPTER - II TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF SERVICE OF CIVIL SERVANTS

More information

Writ Appeal No.43 of 2016

Writ Appeal No.43 of 2016 IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, ARUNACHAL PRADESH AND MIZORAM) Writ Appeal No.43 of 2016 Appellant: State of Assam, represented by its Commissioner and Special Secretary to

More information

THE PUNJAB CIVIL SERVANTS ACT, 1974 (VIII OF 1974)

THE PUNJAB CIVIL SERVANTS ACT, 1974 (VIII OF 1974) THE PUNJAB CIVIL SERVANTS ACT, 1974 (VIII OF 1974) CONTENTS 1. Short title, application and commencement CHAPTER - I PRELIMINARY 2. Definitions CHAPTER - II TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF SERVICE OF CIVIL SERVANTS

More information

3. The Senior Divisional Personnel Officer South Western Railway Hubli Division, Hubli PETITIONERS

3. The Senior Divisional Personnel Officer South Western Railway Hubli Division, Hubli PETITIONERS IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 17 TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2014 PRESENT THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAN M. SHANTANAGOUDAR AND THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE K.N. PHANEENDRA WRIT PETITION NOS.

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : ADMISSION MATTER W.P.(C) 5941/2015 DATE OF DECISION : JUNE 12, 2015

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : ADMISSION MATTER W.P.(C) 5941/2015 DATE OF DECISION : JUNE 12, 2015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : ADMISSION MATTER W.P.(C) 5941/2015 DATE OF DECISION : JUNE 12, 2015 JAMIA HAMDARD (DEEMED UNIVERSITY) & ANR.... Petitioners Through: Mr. Parag Tripathi,

More information

*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + WP(C) NO.4707/2010. % Date of decision: 6 th December, Versus MAHAVIR SR. MODEL SCHOOL & ORS.

*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + WP(C) NO.4707/2010. % Date of decision: 6 th December, Versus MAHAVIR SR. MODEL SCHOOL & ORS. *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + WP(C) NO.4707/2010 % Date of decision: 6 th December, 2010 SRISHTI SOLKAR & ANR. Through:... Petitioners Mr. U.M. Tripathi, Advocate Versus MAHAVIR SR. MODEL

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS OF A. RAJAGOPALAN ETC...Appellant VERSUS

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS OF A. RAJAGOPALAN ETC...Appellant VERSUS IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REPORTABLE CIVIL APPEAL NOS.251-256 OF 2015 A. RAJAGOPALAN ETC....Appellant VERSUS THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, THIRUCHIRAPALLI DISTRICT & ORS. & ETC....Respondents

More information

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (The High Court of Assam, Nagaland, Mizoram & Arunachal Pradesh)

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (The High Court of Assam, Nagaland, Mizoram & Arunachal Pradesh) 1 IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (The High Court of Assam, Nagaland, Mizoram & Arunachal Pradesh) Review. Pet. 155/2013 In WP(C) 3838/10 With WP(C) 520/11 1. Sri Ghana Pegu Son of late Gomeswar Pegu Resident

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION TRANSFERRED CASE (CIVIL) NO(S). 11 OF Versus

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION TRANSFERRED CASE (CIVIL) NO(S). 11 OF Versus 1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION REPORTABLE TRANSFERRED CASE (CIVIL) NO(S). 11 OF 2017 LT. CDR. M. RAMESH...PETITIONER(S) Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. RESPONDENT(S) (WITH I.A.

More information

MC (WA) No. 27 of 2015 IN WA No. of BEFORE THE HON BLE MR JUSTICE UMA NATH SINGH, CHIEF JUSTICE THE HON BLE MR JUSTICE T NANDAKUMAR SINGH

MC (WA) No. 27 of 2015 IN WA No. of BEFORE THE HON BLE MR JUSTICE UMA NATH SINGH, CHIEF JUSTICE THE HON BLE MR JUSTICE T NANDAKUMAR SINGH MC (WA) No. 27 of 2015 IN WA No. of THE HON BLE MR JUSTICE UMA NATH SINGH, THE HON BLE MR JUSTICE T NANDAKUMAR SINGH 16.04.2015 applicants. Mr SC Shyam, learned senior counsel, appears for the Mr PN Nongbri,

More information

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM: NAGALAND:: MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) WP(C) No of 2012

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM: NAGALAND:: MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) WP(C) No of 2012 IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM: NAGALAND:: MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) WP(C) No. 2284 of 2012 Monomohan Sarma, S/o Late Kama Dev Sarmah, Village- Belsor, P.O.- Belsor, District-

More information

BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA NATH SINGH, CHIEF JUSTICE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R. SEN

BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA NATH SINGH, CHIEF JUSTICE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R. SEN PIL No. 3 of 2014 THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R. SEN Mr Pradeep Rai and Mr N Syngkon, learned Amicus Curiae appear for the petitioner. Mr KS Kynjing, learned Advocate General, represents the State respondents.

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SERVICE MATTER W.P.(C) No.7886/2011 DATE OF DECISION : 15th July, 2013

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SERVICE MATTER W.P.(C) No.7886/2011 DATE OF DECISION : 15th July, 2013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SERVICE MATTER W.P.(C) No.7886/2011 DATE OF DECISION : 15th July, 2013 KAMLESH KUMAR SINGH & ANR.... Petitioners Through: Mr. C. Hari Shankar, Advocate

More information

THE PUNJAB CIVIL SERVANTS ACT, 1974

THE PUNJAB CIVIL SERVANTS ACT, 1974 1 of 7 18/03/2011 10:09 THE PUNJAB CIVIL SERVANTS ACT, 1974 (Pb Act VIII of 1974) C O N T E N T S SECTION HEADING CHAPTER I PRELIMINARY 1. Short title, application and commencement. 2. Definitions. 3.

More information

J U D G M E N T. 2. These two appeals have been filed against. the identically worded judgments of High Court. of Madhya Pradesh dated

J U D G M E N T. 2. These two appeals have been filed against. the identically worded judgments of High Court. of Madhya Pradesh dated 1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.871 OF 2018 arising out of SLP (C)No. 26528 of 2013 THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & ORS....APPELLANT(S) VERSUS MANOJ

More information

CORAM: - HON BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD

CORAM: - HON BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W. P. (S) No. 3737 of 2008 with W. P. (S) No. 3753 of 2008 With W. P. (S) No. 3733 of 2008 With W. P. (S) No. 2666 of 2008... 1. Chhote Lal Yadav 2. Umesh Yadav

More information

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. versus. % Date of Decision: 9 th February, J U D G M E N T

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. versus. % Date of Decision: 9 th February, J U D G M E N T $~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI #37 + W.P.(C) 9340/2015 D.K. BHANDARI Through... Petitioner Mr. Rakesh Malviya with Mr. Karanveer Choudhary and Mr. Saurabh, Advocates versus GOVT. OF NCT OF

More information

Arrangement of Sections

Arrangement of Sections 341 KARNATAKA ORDINANCE 5 OF 2002 THE KARNATAKA DETERMINATION OF SENIORITY OF THE GOVERNMENT SERVANTS PROMOTED ON THE BASIS OF RESERVATION (TO THE POSTS IN THE CIVIL SERVICES OF THE STATE) ORDINANCE (NO.2)

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE DECIDED ON: W.P. (C) 8494/2014

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE DECIDED ON: W.P. (C) 8494/2014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE DECIDED ON: 05.12.2014 W.P. (C) 8494/2014 MANPREET SINGH POONAM... Petitioner versus UOI AND ORS... Respondents W.P. (C) 8516/2014

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SERVICE MATTER W.P.(C) No.33/2013 DATE OF DECISION : 12th December, 2013

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SERVICE MATTER W.P.(C) No.33/2013 DATE OF DECISION : 12th December, 2013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SERVICE MATTER W.P.(C) No.33/2013 DATE OF DECISION : 12th December, 2013 DR. ATUL BHARDWAJ Through: Mr. Rajpal Singh, Advocate.... Petitioner Versus GOVERNMENT

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO OF 2017 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO OF 2015 VERSUS

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO OF 2017 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO OF 2015 VERSUS 1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA REPORTABLE CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 3938 OF 2017 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 23723 OF 2015 UNION OF INDIA & ORS.... APPELLANTS VERSUS RAKESH KUMAR &

More information

Case No. 135 of Shri Vijay L. Sonavane, Member Smt. Chandra Iyengar, Member. (1) M/s B.S.Channabasappa & Sons...Petitioner 1

Case No. 135 of Shri Vijay L. Sonavane, Member Smt. Chandra Iyengar, Member. (1) M/s B.S.Channabasappa & Sons...Petitioner 1 Before the MAHARASHTRA ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION World Trade Centre, Centre No1, 13th Floor, Cuffe Parade, Mumbai 400 005 Tel No 022 22163964/65/69 Fax 022 22163976 E-mail mercindia@mercgovin Website:

More information

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Page 1 of 15 PETITIONER: R. N. NANJUNDAPPA

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Page 1 of 15 PETITIONER: R. N. NANJUNDAPPA http://judis.nic.in SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Page 1 of 15 PETITIONER: R. N. NANJUNDAPPA Vs. RESPONDENT: T. THIMMIAH & ANR. DATE OF JUDGMENT08/12/1971 BENCH: RAY, A.N. BENCH: RAY, A.N. PALEKAR, D.G. CITATION:

More information

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % Date of Decision: Through: Mr. P. Kalra, Advocate. Versus. Through: Mr. R.V.

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % Date of Decision: Through: Mr. P. Kalra, Advocate. Versus. Through: Mr. R.V. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P. (C.) No. 5359/2008 % Date of Decision: 18.01.2010 RAM KRISHNA SHARMA. Petitioner Through: Mr. P. Kalra, Advocate Versus U.O.I. & Ors.. Respondents Through:

More information