Judges, Parliament and the Government the new relationship Transcript of a lecture by Rt Hon Lord Woolf
|
|
- Phebe Stone
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Judges, Parliament and the Government the new relationship Transcript of a lecture by Rt Hon Lord Woolf Thank you very much for that over-generous introduction. I m afraid I don t share your confidence in my powers as a negotiator and I can verify that fact because I ve just finished a week of training provided by CEDA for people who want to act as negotiators or are involved in mediation and I feel that I would have done a much better job now as a result of that training than I was able to do at the time. I do, however, feel very pleased to be invited to your Committee. It is one of the parts of the new relationship between at least the judiciary and parliament that you should have asked me to be here; I understood there might have been more representatives of the Government, but I do note there is at least a Permanent Secretary here who I m delighted to see; indeed, old friends outnumber the people I was expecting to see by a considerable degree, but they are very loyal. There has been, in my view, a new relationship established as a result of the recent constitutional changes. It s true that, as yet, it has not been fully experienced. Indeed, a majority of the provisions don t come into force until next month, but a tremendous amount of work has been taking place and that is having an influence on that relationship. I don t want to dwell on what happened on that Thursday afternoon that precipitated the constitutional changes, because that is only history. It is interesting to observe that the date of that Thursday is identified in relation to the Lord Chancellor s Oath which is now required. It s not the date of the Act. The division is between Lord Chancellors sworn in before June and Lord Chancellors sworn in after that date. Historically, of course, the Lord Chancellor s role evolved so that, in my view, his office became the cement that bound the different arms of Government together. Once that cement was to be dissolved there had to be new arrangements put in its place if the Constitution was not to be disadvantaged. Our Constitution had, never previously, reduced the three relationships referred to in the title that you gave me to talk to you about tonight in writing, but we have it now done so in the form of legislation by the 2005 Act and in the form of the Concordat. It seems to me very significant that the legislation, like any other legislation, can be repealed and amended. The Concordat is not even legislation, but it has a special status because it was a document which was produced as a result of a consensus between the Lord Chancellor representing the Government and myself representing the judiciary which, thereafter, was fully examined during the parliamentary process. It was never the subject of any dissent. That is of real significance: if someone wants to depart from the Concordat hereafter, or to amend the legislation. They will require good reason to do so. Otherwise it will be thought that someone is tampering with our constitution, which in its evolving and un-entrenched form is very important to us all. The announcement that the Lord Chancellor was no longer to be a judge had an immediate effect on the judiciary. Rightly or wrongly, the judges supported my view that if someone is not a judge he could not be head of the judiciary. Furthermore, if he was not going to be a judge and was going to be a Secretary of State he was doubly unsuited to be the head of the judiciary. As you know, as a result of the changes, one of
2 the roles of the Lord Chancellor that fell away was that he ceased to be the head of the judiciary. This had very significant consequences. It was only as both the Lord Chancellor s department and the Judiciary (it wasn t my efforts, I emphasise, alone but a very valuable committee who supported me in this) worked at what was involved in that change that we realised just how significant it was. The changes meant that for the first time there was being introduced into our system the separation of powers, as this is known in many other countries between the judiciary and the other arms of government. The process is not immediate: the law lords still remain members of the House of Lords but that was to end when the legislation takes effect. That again is of importance. It meant that the role of the Chief Justice was defined in a way that it had never been defined before. The role of the Chief Justice as President of the Courts both civil and criminal - had never been identified in legislation and, indeed, I can remember times when I was a judge when the most distinguished Master of the Rolls, Lord Denning, would have taken grave exception, if it were to have been said to him, that the Lord Chief Justices, he saw one or two off their patch as he continued in office, were superior to him. So far as the Court of Appeal was concerned, Lord Denning was king. He exercised the powers of a supreme sovereign over that court in a way I suspect that no other Master of the Rolls has done. Now there in black and white that the Chief Justice is the head of the judiciary. It is fair to say that that wasn t something that was immediately conceded in the course of the negotiations; it was conceded fairly regularly that the role of the Lord Chancellor had changed but the actual words head of the Judiciary being attached to the Lord Chief Justice was something which stuck in some politicians and ministers gullet. I can understand that, because it might give the Lord Chief Justice of the day impressions that he was really grander than he is. Now, we have the changes that we would expect if there was to be a significant change of this nature. But when you look at the Act what you find in Part 1, Section 1, a clear statement that the Act does not adversely affect: a) the existing constitutional principle of the rule of law; and b) the Lord Chancellor s existing constitutional role in relation to that principle. Now this again is quite an extraordinary proposition. There are able people here who ll correct me immediately if I am wrong, but I am not aware of any legislation that refers to the rule of law before the 2005 Act. It may be that there is, but my belief is that it is the first statement. It is not without interest that what is meant by the rule of law does not have a definition. If you travel round the globe in the way that I have been fortunate to do in the last few years, you ll find that different jurisdictions have very different ideas of what is meant by the rule of law. Certainly there is no country whose leadership is more committed to the rule of law now than China. But they talk about rule of law for a social democracy and what they mean by the rule of law is evolving. It has a real element of human rights but it is a very different concept from what we have. I saw for myself, with my own eyes, in the Kremlin, President Putin no less talking about the importance of the rule of law when he announced that because Russia was now part of the Council of Europe they were no longer to have capital punishment. If this audience will allow me to do so, I ll try and demonstrate how he did it very effectively with the television cameras blazing down upon him. He said people who commit crimes which deserved execution in his view needed to be taken by the throat and throttled. And he demonstrated. But, he said, we are now part of the Council of Europe and we observe the rule of law and from now on we will have no more capital punishment - I must
3 confess I don t know whether that promise has in fact been fully implemented but I don t know anything to the contrary. But it is significant that the Act does refer to both those concepts. Then Section 3 says: the Lord Chancellor and other ministers of the Crown and all those with duties relating to the judiciary or otherwise with the administration of justice must uphold the continued independence of the judiciary. Section 3, it seems to me, is very important because it says that although the Lord Chancellor is no longer the head of the judiciary he clearly still has special responsibilities. He is the person in government primarily responsible for upholding the continued independence of the judiciary. Then sub-section 5 says: The Lord Chancellor and other Ministers of the Crown must not seek to influence particular judicial decisions through any special access to the judiciary. The special access to the judiciary is a phrase which has caused me some wonderment. But I just merely record it without seeking to explain it. I m very impressed by the oath of the Lord Chancellor, to which I referred earlier. When the next Lord Chancellor is appointed he will have to swear that in the office of the Lord High Chancellor of this country he will respect the rule of law, defend the independence of the judiciary and discharge his duty to ensure the provision of resources for the efficient and effective support of Courts for which he is responsible. So he will be taking on a number of really important commitments when he takes office. I point out that that oath is in addition to the ordinary oath that he would have taken otherwise. It does highlight the importance attached both to the rule of law and the independence of the judiciary. The Chief Justice is also and this is very relevant to our subject this evening required to represent the view of the judiciary to Parliament, to the Lord Chancellor and to ministers of the Crown generally. He s also responsible for the deployment and allocation of work within the Courts. That is, again, a very important matter, If you re a government, anxious to achieve improvements in the efficiency of the Court service, it is very tempting, if you are in a position to try to influence which cases are taken and in which order in the courts, not from any improper motive, but to further what the government thinks is most important in the interests of the proper disposal of criminal cases. I am delighted that there is now that statement in the Act because it makes it clear, I believe it always should be, that the deployment and allocation of work within the courts is a judicial function. This goes to the very heart of the proper role of the judiciary. And there it is in the Statute. Now, both the Lord Chancellor and myself have attached importance to the ability of the Chief Justice of the day to go to the House of Lords and make a speech in the House of Lords drawing attention to matters of particular importance to the judiciary. Rightly or wrongly I regard that as the most powerful weapon available in the Lord Chief Justice s armoury to achieve matters which are in the interests of the judiciary. That power has gone under the Act, but he is given an express power to make written representations, an express power which is extended to the Chief Justice in the other jurisdictions in the United Kingdom. Again I think that s very important and it does show that, although we have separation of powers, that the parliament has been wise enough not to isolate the judiciary and enable them to speak to the legislature in a way which is consistent with the new separation of powers.
4 The development of committees which take an interest in these matters in parliament is also important. If I may say so, particularly under your chairmanship, this Committee has been very sympathetic and constructive. The very fact that you call upon the judiciary to assist you on various matters is very helpful for the proper co-operation between the judiciary and the legislature which we must ensure exists. Of course, we ve now have also the Constitution Committee of the House of Lords whose energetic Chairman is foolish enough to come and hear me talk on this subject on more occasions than he should. But, again, we have a sympathetic audience who is interested in the working of the Constitution; interested in what is happening to it, and to whom we can address with complete propriety our concerns. It s a two-way traffic, as I appreciate. You, equally, can tell the judiciary through this mechanism about concerns that you have about the way things are happening within the judiciary. I feel that it is all to the good. It is becoming more and more frequent for reports to Parliament to be required of committees or commissioners whose activities effect the Constitution and, that again, is a very good way for communication to take part between the different arms of government. So it seems to me that, notwithstanding the changes that have taken place, the legislation, together with the Concordat, are building up new structures and new ways of dealing with the tensions that could otherwise exist between the different arms of government. These arrangements, if they do not act as cement should act as a cartridge to absorb unnecessary tensions and ensure the flexibility that should exist in the relationships between the different arms of government. Finally, the Concordat, as I already indicated its status is not that of legislation but it s interesting that in the explanatory notes to the Constitutional Reform Act it is said in terms that Parts 2 and 4 of that Act are to give substantial effect to the Concordat. So the Concordat derives its energy, and it s significance from the way it is handled in the legislative framework provided by the Act. So, the objectives have been achieved. The Lord Chancellor no longer performs judicial functions or functions previously performed as head of the judiciary, unless, and I emphasise this, the manner of performance is consistent with the continued independence of the judiciary. Secondly, if you look at the Concordat there are three classes of decisions. This is because, in the system we have, the Lord Chancellor is responsible for the proper running of the courts and the judges preside in those courts. They have mutual interests which require a means of expression. And if some of the matters are to be dealt with by the Lord Chancellor alone, some matters are to be dealt with by the Chief Justice, but many of them have to be dealt by them together. There are even important decisions where there can be no action taken unless both the Lord Chancellor of the day and the Chief Justice agree. I again think that this is a formula that should work. But much more important, it seems to me, is the situation with regard to appointments. Now I think that our appointments system in the last decade has always worked very well. But then I ve been a party to it for a long period of time and so I m unlikely to say otherwise. But I do think it has produced good judges and I believe there has been a public acceptance of the quality of those judges. Perhaps most important of all and perhaps most remarkably, with very isolated exceptions, no one suggests that there has been any political interference with appointments. That applies from the most senior appointments down to most junior appointments in the judiciary. This is a great
5 achievement. In the new appointments process one of the reasons why it should work well is that it provides absolutely copper-bottomed protection from interference of an inappropriate nature by the Executive. The need for this is particularly linked with the creation of the Supreme Court and with the developments in the nature of the cases which the judiciary are being required to decide, which include cases involving the carrying out of an evaluation as to where the balance lies in relation to human rights, It is time that that should be the position as to appointments. This is in part because I thought Lord Mackay, who spoke from with great experience, was right when he warned that the Human Rights Act could have the effect, in his opinion it would have the effect, of politicising the judiciary. It s my belief that the new appointments system will help prevent this happening. I happened to be in the States recently when they were appointing a new member of the Supreme Court and I can see that a democratic process of the sort that took place can be very good in some ways, but I feel it can only be a disadvantage in our system to have our senior judges in particular identified with a political party. It is extraordinary that as an onlooker from this country, when you watch television you observe the extent to which the whole process is linked to the Democratic Party s interests and the Republican Party s interests. Of course it gets huge exposure. They seems remarkable. The British papers gave very, very little coverage either to my retirement I think there were one or two papers who rejoiced or my successor s appointment. At the same time Justice Sandra O Connor had retired and that was given a full front-page cover. There was far more interest here in the media in what was happening in the States than was happening in this country in relation to judicial appointments. I think our treatment is absolutely right and proper. It is extremely healthy and I would not want to see imported from the States even a flavour of what now happens there with regard to their most senior judicial appointments. This is without going into questions of the desirability of electing judges, which does happen of course within the State system. So I believe we are now in a much better position as a result of these steps that are the result of the combination of the Concordat and the legislation. I have not focussed as yet on the Supreme Court. It is logical that if you are introducing the separation of powers that you should have a separate Supreme Court. I know there are different views on this. Personally, I was persuaded that we should have a Supreme Court. There were two things that helped me to reach my conclusion. First of all, a significant number of my colleagues in the House of Lords were against the present arrangements. It cannot be healthy to have a court in a situation with which its members are not comfortable. So that was one reason. The second reason that influenced me very substantially was the hunting case; because it involved Parliament asking the courts (to my surprise when I heard the case in the Court of Appeal), to adjudicate on the validity of, in effect, an Act of Parliament which was passed in My instincts were: this is not a subject on which judges should be trespassing; this is a matter for Parliament. If Parliament wanted to treat it as valid legislation, who were the courts to interfere? It seemed to me that that was in accord with the sovereignty of Parliament. But we were urged by the Attorney General to hear the case. We heard it and the House of Lords heard it. And in both cases it was clearly beneficial that the courts should have a role in regard to an issue of that nature. If the courts didn t decide it, who else could decide it? And that really was what influenced both the Court of Appeal and the House of Lords. We described it as a matter involving
6 interpretation of Acts of Parliament, but I do think that it went deeper than that and the principle behind our decision was that it had to be the responsibility of the Courts, particularly if the Attorney General was asking us to do so, to give the final decision. Those matters, in combination, suggested to me that the time had come for a Supreme Court. I don t believe that the effects of having a Supreme Court will be restricted to the re-housing, in different premises, of the 12 judges who are members of the Court. I believe that there is bound to be chemistry at work in consequence of there being a Supreme Court. Judges from different jurisdictions meet and talk and most of the judges who meet are Supreme Court judges and I believe that the very chemistry of their meeting together and our judges having the title of Supreme Court judges will mean that there will develop a different culture from what existed before. I don t believe that we should be worried about that. I think it may only act as a catalyst. What have happened would probably have happened anyway. When you consider the nature of some of the cases that are going before the House of Lords it does seem to me, in retrospect, it is inappropriate for cases of this nature to continue to be resolved finally in a chamber of the Legislature. Well, there you are. I ve come to the end of what I want to say but, of course, I will answer questions. But I would like to put on record, in this setting if I may, the fact that I do believe that the Constitutional Reform Act is, by its existence on the Statute Book now, a very good example of Parliament at its best. Your Committee made recommendations about the matter. There was then a process in the House of Lords and there is no doubt at all that the consultation and discussion process that was needed for this legislation could so very easily not have happened if Parliament had not been on its best behaviour. I think it was on its best behaviour and I think we can be proud of the result. From now on, we will without doubt have as a result of that legislation, a judiciary which is independent and, I hope, not isolated. They will have enough methods of communicating with Parliament to ensure that there is the necessary connection between the two arms of Government. What I can say, and I know that this is in fact due to those on both sides of the fence, on the Lord Chancellor s side and the judiciary s side, is that there is a much closer cooperation today, in relation to the matters where they should be working closely together, between the judiciary and the Executive in regard to the running of the courts. That is something that I think we should applaud. A partnership that I still believe exists is entirely constructive and is of benefit to all. One result already of the changes is that the judiciary have now the support which they did no always have from, mainly if not exclusively, members of the Department of Constitutional Affairs who come and work loyally for the judiciary when they re holding office, which enables the judiciary to play its proper role in a constructive way. This would not have been possible but for the changes which are now taking place. So, for this I say, three cheers. 8 February 2006
The programme for this conference has a full list of topics on the law of privacy and defamation. That is what you have all come to hear about.
MR JUSTICE TUGENDHAT KEYNOTE ADDRESS 5RB CONFERENCE 2012 27 SEPTEMBER 2012 The programme for this conference has a full list of topics on the law of privacy and defamation. That is what you have all come
More informationSant'Anna Legal Studies
Sant'Anna Legal Studies STALS Research Paper n. 9/2008 Sir Robert Carnwath Constitutional Revolution in the English Legal system Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies Department of Law http://stals.sssup.it
More informationWhat happens at a Crown Court trial - The prosecution case.
What happens at a Crown Court trial - The prosecution case. Please note that in the Crown Court you can be represented by either a barrister or a solicitor advocate. Representation is the single most important
More informationJUNIOR BAR POINT OF VIEW: THE FUTURE OF THE INDEPENDENT REFERRAL BAR A NORTHERN IRELAND PERSPECTIVE
JUNIOR BAR POINT OF VIEW: THE FUTURE OF THE INDEPENDENT REFERRAL BAR A NORTHERN IRELAND PERSPECTIVE Introduction 1. Given we are at the World Bar Conference, I thought I would open by quoting from an American,
More informationIMMIGRATION LAW PRACTITIONERS' ASSOCIATION
IMMIGRATION LAW PRACTITIONERS' ASSOCIATION ILPA response to the Proposal to amend the First-tier Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Chamber President s Direction regarding use of non-legal members
More informationANDREW MARR SHOW 6 TH NOVEMBER 2016 JEREMY HUNT
1 ANDREW MARR SHOW 6 TH NOVEMBER 2016 AM: Mr Hunt, welcome. JH: Morning, Andrew. AM: A very straightforward choice here in a sense: three judges have come under pretty sustained attack for their judgement
More informationIntroduction. Andrew Leggatt, March 2001, Chapter 2 paragraph 2.18
Lord Justice Carnwath, Lord Justice of Appeal Senior President of Tribunals CCAT 4 th International Conference Administrative Justice Without Borders - Developments in the United Kingdom Tuesday, 8 May
More informationDelegated Powers Memorandum. Courts and Tribunals (Judiciary and Functions of Staff) Bill. Prepared by the Ministry of Justice
Delegated Powers Memorandum Courts and Tribunals (Judiciary and Functions of Staff) Bill Prepared by the Ministry of Justice Introduction 1. This memorandum has been prepared for the Delegated Powers and
More informationTHE ENGLISH LEGAL SYSTEM
THE ENGLISH LEGAL SYSTEM Seventh Edition Gary Slapper, LLB, LLM, PhD, PGCE (Law) Professor of Law, and Director of the Centre for Law, The Open University David Kelly, BA, BA (Law), PhD Principal Lecturer
More informationThe Nature and Sources of UK Constitutional Law. Aims of this Chapter. Sample
Chapter 2: The Nature and Sources of UK Constitutional Law Outline 2.1 Introduction 2.2 Parliamentary sovereignty 2.3 Rule of law 2.4 Separation of powers 2.5 Sources of constitutional law 2.6 Summary
More informationTHE FUTURE OF THE PAROLE BOARD RESPONSE OF THE CRIMINAL SUB COMMITTEE OF THE COUNCIL OF HM CIRCUIT JUDGES
THE FUTURE OF THE PAROLE BOARD RESPONSE OF THE CRIMINAL SUB COMMITTEE OF THE COUNCIL OF HM CIRCUIT JUDGES 1 The Council of Her Majesty s Circuit Judges represents the Circuit Bench in England and Wales.
More informationConference on The Paradox of Judicial Independence Held at Institute of Government 22nd June 2015
Conference on The Paradox of Judicial Independence Held at Institute of Government 22nd June 2015 This is a note of a conference to mark the publication by Graham Gee, Robert Hazell, Kate Malleson and
More informationGUIDE TO PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE IMMIGRATION DIVISION
GUIDE TO PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE IMMIGRATION DIVISION Legal Services Table of Contents About the Guide to Proceedings Before the Immigration Division ii, iii Notes and references..iv Chapter 1... POWERS
More informationJudiciary and Courts (Scotland) Act 2008
Judiciary and Courts (Scotland) Act 2008 (asp 6) Section Judiciary and Courts (Scotland) Act 2008 2008 asp 6 CONTENTS PART 1 JUDICIAL INDEPENDENCE 1 Guarantee of continued judicial independence 2 Head
More informationBEHAVIOURS IN SUPPORT OF THE RULE OF LAW
180 ESSAY BEHAVIOURS IN SUPPORT OF THE RULE OF LAW By Anthony Inglese Author LLM, Cambridge University, 1975 The Bar of England and Wales, 1976 and Formerly member of the UK Government Legal Service (but
More informationTHE RIGHT HON. THE LORD BURNETT OF MALDON
THE RIGHT HON. THE LORD BURNETT OF MALDON LEGAL WALES 12 OCTOBER 2018 1. It is a great pleasure to be invited to speak at the 2018 Legal Wales Conference in Aberystwyth. It is an even greater pleasure
More informationThe cornerstone of Hong Kong's success rule of law Rule of Law The rule of law the rule of law
The cornerstone of Hong Kong's success (Relevant to AAT Examination Paper 6 -- Fundamental of Business Law) CK Chang, KW Sin and LP Chan, Hong Kong Institute of Vocational Education There are many crucial
More informationTRIBUNALS, COURTS AND ENFORCEMENT ACT 2007
TRIBUNALS, COURTS AND ENFORCEMENT ACT 2007 INTRODUCTION EXPLANATORY NOTES 1. These explanatory notes relate to the Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007. They have been prepared by the Ministry of
More informationParliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe. Speech by Federal Foreign Minister Dr. Frank-Walter Steinmeier. Strasbourg 13 October 2016
Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe Speech by Federal Foreign Minister Dr. Frank-Walter Steinmeier Strasbourg 13 October 2016 Mr President, Members of Parliament, Secretary General, Excellencies,
More informationShort Guide 04. Edward Jacobs, Judge of the Upper Tribunal. The ABC of Effective Procedural Applications The Basics of Tribunal Representation
Short Guide 04 The ABC of Effective Procedural Applications The Basics of Tribunal Representation Edward Jacobs, Judge of the Upper Tribunal Public Law Project Contents The Public Law Project (PLP) is
More informationKowtowing to the Chinese Emperor
Kowtowing to the Chinese Emperor Critical Challenge Critical Question What advice would you give to Britain s ambassador to China in 1816 on the matter of the British trade delegation kowtowing to the
More informationB e f o r e: MR JUSTICE BURTON. Between: THE QUEEN ON THE APPLICATION OF ASSOCIATION FOR INDIVIDUAL AND GROUP PSYCHOTHERAPY & OTHERS Claimant
Neutral Citation Number: [2010] EWHC 3702 (Admin) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE QUEEN'S BENCH DIVISION THE ADMINISTRATIVE COURT CO/3229/10 Royal Courts of Justice Strand London WC2A 2LL Friday, 10th December
More information2015 HIGH SCHOOL MOOTING COMPETITION
Bond University High Schools Mooting Competition 2 FACULTY OF LAW 2015 HIGH SCHOOL MOOTING COMPETITION PREPARATION MATERIALS 2 Table of Contents COMPETITION OVERVIEW.... 3 MOOTING TOOL KIT... 3 WHAT IS
More informationJudicial Misbehaviour and Incapacity (Parliamentary Commissions) Bill 2012 and Courts Legislation Amendment (Judicial Complaints) Bill 2012
The Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia Advisory report: Judicial Misbehaviour and Incapacity (Parliamentary Commissions) Bill 2012 and Courts Legislation Amendment (Judicial Complaints) Bill 2012
More informationRegional Autonomies and Federalism in the Context of Internal Self-Determination
Activating Nonviolence IX UNPO General Assembly 16 May 2008, European Parliament, Brussels, Belgium Regional Autonomies and Federalism in the Context of Internal Self-Determination Report by Michael van
More information(valid until )
Bar Association Act (valid until 31.12.2005) Passed 21 March 2001 (RT 1 I 2001, 36, 201), entered into force 19 April 2001, amended by the following Acts: 28.06.2004 entered into force 01.03.2005 - RT
More informationACT OF CONSTITUTION OF TONGA (AMENDMENT) (NO. 3) ACT 2010
C T ACT OF CONSTITUTION OF TONGA (AMENDMENT) (NO. 3) ACT 2010 Act No. 39 of 2010 Act of Constitution of Tonga (Amendment) (No. 3) Act 2010 Arrangement of Sections C T ACT OF CONSTITUTION OF TONGA (AMENDMENT)
More informationNational Quali cations
H 2018 X758/76/11 National Quali cations Politics MONDAY, 4 JUNE 1:00 PM 3:15 PM Total marks 60 SECTION 1 POLITICAL THEORY 20 marks Attempt EITHER question 1(a) OR question 1(b). SECTION 2 POLITICAL SYSTEMS
More informationCommon law reasoning and institutions
Common law reasoning and institutions England and Wales Common law reasoning and institutions I. The English legal system and the common law tradition II. Courts, tribunals and other decision-making bodies
More informationI shall deal first of all with the amendments to the fees in Magistrates Courts work in a series of bullet points.
Criminal Defence Service (Funding)(Amendment) Order 2011 The most important event of this month, by a measured mile, was the laying before parliament of the Criminal Defence Service (Funding)(Amendment)
More informationGENERAL CLOSING INSTRUCTIONS. Members of the jury, it is now time for me to tell you the law that applies to
GENERAL CLOSING INSTRUCTIONS Members of the jury, it is now time for me to tell you the law that applies to this case. As I mentioned at the beginning of the trial, you must follow the law as I state it
More informationGuidance to the judiciary on engagement with the Executive
Guidance to the judiciary on engagement with the Executive Contents Summary 2 Engagement and comment the conventions 3 Why engage 4 Who should engage... 4 When to engage. 6 Categories where engagement
More informationCzech Republic - Constitution Adopted on: 16 Dec 1992
Czech Republic - Constitution Adopted on: 16 Dec 1992 Preamble We, the citizens of the Czech Republic in Bohemia, Moravia, and Silesia, at the time of the renewal of an independent Czech state, being loyal
More informationCOMMONWEALTH JUDICIAL COLLOQUIUM ON COMBATTING CORRUPTION WITHIN THE JUDICIARY LIMASSOL CONCLUSIONS
COMMONWEALTH JUDICIAL COLLOQUIUM ON COMBATTING CORRUPTION WITHIN THE JUDICIARY LIMASSOL CONCLUSIONS 1. Commonwealth Judicial Officers, including heads of judiciary, judges from a range of courts and magistrates,
More informationWhat do you know about the US political system? Brainstorm as many facts as you can in note form.
1 Warmer What do you know about the US political system? Brainstorm as many facts as you can in note form. 2 Key words Find the key words in the article and write them next to the definitions below. The
More informationConducting Effective Meetings
Conducting Effective Meetings Lon Garrison, AASB Vern Carlson, President Denali Borough School Board Conducting an effective meeting Why is it important? Because... You are a locally elected board member
More informationINTERVIEWING JURORS CASEWORK POLICY. Table of Contents
INTERVIEWING JURORS CASEWORK POLICY Table of Contents Introduction... 1 Section 20D Juries Act 1974... 2 Section 8(1) Contempt of Court Act 1981... 3 The Court of Appeal... 4 Procedure to be followed when
More informationSubmission to the Legislative Council Panel On Administration of Justice and Legal Services
Submission to the Legislative Council Panel On Administration of Justice and Legal Services Response of the Hong Kong Bar Association on Briefing-out in civil and criminal cases by the Department of Justice
More informationSPEAK UP!: FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION AND MEDIA IN THE WESTERN BALKANS AND TURKEY, Brussels, May
The Role of Public Broadcasters in a changing Media Environment Speech by William Horsley, Media Freedom Representative of the Association of European Journalists (AEJ) SPEAK UP!: FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION
More informationNational Judicial Outreach Week March 4-10, 2018 INFORMATION PACKET
National Judicial Outreach Week March 4-10, 2018 INFORMATION PACKET American Bar Association Judicial Division Judicial Outreach Network National Judicial Outreach Week 2018 March 4-10, 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS
More informationNGOS, GOVERNMENTS AND THE WTO
John R. Magnus November 6, 2000 Dewey Ballantine LLP Presentation to Global Business Dialogue: NGOS, GOVERNMENTS AND THE WTO -- Speaking Notes -- Greetings to you all, and hearty thanks to Judge for including
More informationBefore: LORD CARLILE OF BERRIEW QC Sitting as a Deputy Judge of the High Court Between:
Neutral Citation Number: [2009] EWHC 443 (Admin) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE QUEEN'S BENCH DIVISION ADMINISTRATIVE COURT Case No: CO/8217/2008 Royal Courts of Justice Strand, London, WC2A 2LL Date: 10
More informationReport of a Complaint Handling Review in relation to Police Scotland
Report of a Complaint Handling Review in relation to Police Scotland independent and effective investigations and reviews independent and effective investigations and reviews Index 1. Role of the PIRC
More informationSpeech to SOLACE National Elections Conference 16 January 2014 Peter Wardle
Opening remarks Thank you. Speech to SOLACE National Elections Conference 16 January 2014 Peter Wardle It s good to have the chance to speak to the SOLACE Elections Conference again. I will focus today
More informationINFORMATION PACK - VACANCIES FOR APPOINTMENT AS A JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT
INFORMATION PACK - VACANCIES FOR APPOINTMENT AS A JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT Introduction Following the forthcoming retirements of Lord Carnwath in March 2020 and Lord Wilson in May 2020, applications
More informationLEE S SUMMIT CHARTER REVIEW COMMISSION DECEMBER 11, 2006
Notice was given of a meeting to be held by the Charter Review Commission for the City of Lee s Summit, Missouri, on Monday, December 11, 2006, at 7:00 p.m. in the City Council Committee Room at City Hall,
More information1.2 Distinguish between common law and equity. 1.3 Distinguish between civil law and criminal law
Tech Level Unit 1 Title: Level: Level 3 Credit Value: 10 INTRODUCTION TO LAW AND THE LEGAL SYSTEM IN ENGLAND AND WALES Guided Learning Hours 60 Learning outcomes Assessment criteria Knowledge, understanding
More informationThe Trial of Mr. Charles Ingalls (author unknown)
1: Trial Script The Trial of Mr. Charles Ingalls (author unknown) Issue: Mr. Charles Ingalls settled on Indian land in 1872, before the land was officially opened for white settlement. Did he recklessly
More informationLord Carnwath at the Commonwealth Magistrates and Judges Conference, Zambia Discipline and Removal of Senior Judges 9 September 2014
Lord Carnwath at the Commonwealth Magistrates and Judges Conference, Zambia Discipline and Removal of Senior Judges 9 September 2014 The principle that judges of the High Court and above were entitled
More informationHi, my name is (NAME) and today we re going to talk about voting rights and the
Issues GV322 Activity Introduction Hi, my name is (NAME) and today we re going to talk about voting rights and the evolution of voting rights throughout U.S history. Then we ll look into how participation
More informationTHE JERSEY LAW COMMISSION
THE JERSEY LAW COMMISSION CONSULTATION PAPER CORROBORATION OF EVIDENCE IN CRIMINAL TRIALS JERSEY LAW COMMISSION CONSULTATION PAPER No 3/2008/CP December 2008 The Jersey Law Commission was set up by a Proposition
More informationSuite RE: Investigating Improper White House Influence on Specific Investigations
January 4, 2018 The Honorable Michael E. Horowitz Inspector General Office of the Inspector General U.S. Department of Justice 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W Suite 4706 Washington, DC 20530 BY FAX: (202)
More informationDelegation of Statutory Functions Issue No. 2 of 2015
Delegation of Statutory Functions Issue No. 2 of 2015 Introduction The Lord Chief Justice has a number of statutory functions, the exercise of which may be delegated to a nominated judicial office holder
More informationTHE ANSWER BOOK FOR JURY SERVICE
THE ANSWER BOOK FOR JURY SERVICE Message from the Chief Justice You have been requested to serve on a jury. Service on a jury is one of the most important responsibilities that you will exercise as a citizen
More informationUNION PARLIAMENT (CIVICS)
UNION PARLIAMENT (CIVICS) 1. Name the three constituents of the Union Legislature? The President and the two Houses of Parliament; Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha. 2. Define the term: Parliament; Federal System
More informationJUDICIARY AND COURTS (SCOTLAND) BILL
This document relates to the Judiciary and Courts (Scotland) Bill (SP Bill 6) as introduced in the JUDICIARY AND COURTS (SCOTLAND) BILL POLICY MEMORANDUM INTRODUCTION 1. This document relates to the Judiciary
More informationCHINA IN THE WORLD PODCAST. Host: Paul Haenle Guest: Su Hao
CHINA IN THE WORLD PODCAST Host: Paul Haenle Guest: Su Hao Episode 14: China s Perspective on the Ukraine Crisis March 6, 2014 Haenle: You're listening to the Carnegie Tsinghua China in the World Podcast,
More informationCASE COMMENTS CONSTITUTIONAL LAW - PARLIAMENTARY SOVEREIGNTY - CAN PARLIAMENT BIND ITS SUCCESSORS?
154 (1965) 4 ALBERTA LAW REVIEW CASE COMMENTS CONSTITUTIONAL LAW - PARLIAMENTARY SOVEREIGNTY - CAN PARLIAMENT BIND ITS SUCCESSORS? The recent decision of the Privy Council in The Bribery Commissioner v.
More information1.1 DEFINITION AND TYPES OF LAW
1 English legal system The following topics are covered in this chapter: Definition and types of law Court system Sources of law Legislation Rules of statutory interpretation Human Rights Act 1998 1.1
More informationBritish Irish RIGHTS WATCH SUBMISSION TO THE UNITED NATIONS HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL S UNIVERSAL PERIODIC REVIEW MECHANISM CONCERNING THE UNITED KINGDOM
British Irish RIGHTS WATCH SUBMISSION TO THE UNITED NATIONS HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL S UNIVERSAL PERIODIC REVIEW MECHANISM CONCERNING THE UNITED KINGDOM NOVEMBER 2007 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 British Irish RIGHTS
More informationThe Danish Courts an Organisation in Development
The Danish Courts an Organisation in Development Introduction The Danish Courts are going through a period of structural upheaval. Currently the Danish judicial system is undergoing sweeping reforms that
More informationACT OF CONSTITUTION OF TONGA (AMENDMENT) (NO.2) ACT 2010
C T ACT OF CONSTITUTION OF TONGA (AMENDMENT) (NO.2) ACT 2010 Act No. 20 of 2010 Act of Constitution of Tonga (Amendment) (No.2) Act 2010 Arrangement of Sections C T ACT OF CONSTITUTION OF TONGA (AMENDMENT)
More informationversion 1.1 General Certificate of Education Law 1161 System Mark Scheme 2009 examination - June series
version 1.1 General Certificate of Education Law 1161 Unit 1 (LAW1) Law Making and the Legal System Mark Scheme 29 examination - June series This mark scheme uses the new numbering system which is being
More informationOMBUDSMAN BILL, 2017
Arrangement of Sections Section PART I - PRELIMINARY 3 1. Short title...3 2. Interpretation...3 3. Application of Act...4 PART II OFFICE OF OMBUDSMAN 5 ESTABLISHMENT AND FUNCTIONS OF OFFICE OF OMBUDSMAN
More informationPART I THE SCOTTISH PARLIAMENT
An Act to provide for the establishment of a Scottish Parliament and Administration and other changes in the government of Scotland; to provide for changes in the constitution and functions of certain
More informationBefore: MR RECORDER BERKLEY MISS EASHA MAGON. and ROYAL & SUN ALLIANCE INSURANCE PLC
IN THE COUNTY COURT AT CENTRAL LONDON Case No: B53Y J995 Court No. 60 Thomas More Building Royal Courts of Justice Strand London WC2A 2LL Friday, 26 th February 2016 Before: MR RECORDER BERKLEY B E T W
More informationAffidavit - General (Three Page)
Affidavit - General (Three Page) An Affidavit is used to to tell the court all of the relevant facts that are necessary to explain your position in the application. When filling out the Affidavit, make
More informationDISCUSSION REPORT 24 TALKING ASEAN. Challenges of Raising ASEAN Awareness: Multi-sector Perspectives THE HABIBIE CENTER
THE HABIBIE CENTER DISCUSSION REPORT No. 13/August 2015 th 24 TALKING ASEAN Challenges of Raising ASEAN Awareness: Multi-sector Perspectives The Habibie Center, Jakarta August 26, 2015 INTRODUCTION JAKARTA
More informationJUDGMENT. R v Varma (Respondent)
Michaelmas Term [2012] UKSC 42 On appeal from: [2010] EWCA Crim 1575 JUDGMENT R v Varma (Respondent) before Lord Phillips Lord Mance Lord Clarke Lord Dyson Lord Reed JUDGMENT GIVEN ON 10 October 2012 Heard
More informationConstitutional Principles
Where Power Comes From The First of Its Kind It may sound dramatic to say the U.S. Constitution revolutionized the world, but that s exactly what it has done. Since the Constitution was adopted in 1791
More informationThe Constitutional Reform Act 2005-the role of the Lord Chancellor
The Constitutional Reform Act 2005-the role of the Lord Chancellor Standard Note: SN/PC/3792 Last updated: 14 November 2005 Author: Oonagh Gay Parliament and Constitution Centre This Note is designed to
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE CHANCERY DIVISION. Before: MR. JUSTICE LIGHTMAN. - and -
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE CHANCERY DIVISION HC0C00 [001] EWHC 1 (CH) Royal Courts of Justice Thursday, th May 00 Before: MR. JUSTICE LIGHTMAN B E T W E E N: HURST Claimant - and - LEEMING Defendant
More informationSpeech to the Supreme Court of The Netherlands 18 November 2016
Speech to the Supreme Court of The Netherlands 18 November 2016 President Feteris, Members of the Supreme Court, I would like first of all to thank you for the invitation to come and meet with you during
More informationSpeech to the Supreme Court of The Netherlands
Speech to the Supreme Court of The Netherlands Guido Raimondi, President of the European Court of Human Rights 18 November 2016 President Feteris, Members of the Supreme Court, I would like first of all
More informationLord Ashcroft Polls EU Referendum Poll May 2016
Lord Ashcroft Polls EU Referendum Poll May 2016 5,009 adults were interviewed online between 13 and 18 May 2016. Results have been weighted to be representative of all adults in the United Kingdom. Full
More informationSPEECH BY SHRI NAVIN B.CHAWLA AS ELECTION COMMISSIONER OF INDIA
SPEECH BY SHRI NAVIN B.CHAWLA AS ELECTION COMMISSIONER OF INDIA ON THE OCCASION OF THE INTERNATIONAL SEMINAR ON MEDIA AND ELECTIONS AT MEXICO, October, 17-19, 2005 India s constitutional and electoral
More informationIn the practice of diplomacy, as seen from the perspective
2 Best Practices A Personal Narrative ARJUN ASRANI Member, National Security Advisory Board & Chairman, India-Japan Partnership Forum Ambassador to Japan (1988-1992) In the practice of diplomacy, as seen
More informationSPEECH. The Honourable Jarrod Bleijie MP Attorney-General and Minister for Justice
SPEECH The Honourable Jarrod Bleijie MP Attorney-General and Minister for Justice Welcome Ceremony for Chief Justice, the Honourable Tim Carmody and Justice Peter Flanagan Supreme Court of Queensland 9:15am
More informationConstitutional Principles. Step by Step
Teacher Guide Time Needed: 2 Class Periods Materials: Projector w/powerpoint (optional) Scissors/Glue Blank Paper Pages to Copy: Brain Dump (1/2 page; class set) Reading (4 pages; class set) Barebones
More informationJustice Reinvestment Forum National Centre for Indigenous Studies, ANU, 2 August 2012
Professor Michael Levy So I ll welcome Vivien Stern now to the podium. OK. Baroness Vivien Stern CBE Good afternoon everybody, it s lovely to be here. Wouldn t you rather be in Canberra with this lovely
More informationIntroduction. Australian Constitution. Federalism. Separation of Powers
Introduction Australian Constitution Commonwealth of Australia was formed on 1st January 1901 by the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act (Imp) Our system is a hybrid model between: United Kingdom
More informationUNDERCOVER POLICING INQUIRY
COUNSEL TO THE INQUIRY S SUPPLEMENTARY NOTE ON THE REHABILITATION OF OFFENDERS ACT 1974 AND ITS IMPACT ON THE INQUIRY S WORK Introduction 1. In our note dated 1 March 2017 we analysed the provisions of
More informationStiglitz: Europe's View on Inequality
Stiglitz: Europe's View on Inequality June 17, 2014 by Marianne Brunet When you approach a crowd conversing over coffee at an economics conference, you don t normally expect to hear them giddily saying:
More information3 Appended to this paper are two flow charts showing how the new appeals system works as contrasted with the old one.
Briefing Paper 8.2 AN UPDATE ON THE IMMIGRATION APPEALS SYSTEM 1 A summary of the way the appeals system works under the provisions of the Asylum and Immigration (Treatment of Claimants etc.) Act 2004
More informationHEARING PARTLY HEARD IN PRIVATE
HEARING PARTLY HEARD IN PRIVATE The Committee has made a determination in this case that includes some private information. That information has been omitted from the text. ROBERTSON, Harry Gordon Registration
More informationToronto - January Tribunal Reform in the UK: a Quiet Revolution. by Lord Justice Carnwath
Toronto - January 2008 Tribunal Reform in the UK: a Quiet Revolution by Lord Justice Carnwath Background 1. Tribunals constitute a substantial part of the UK justice system. They deal with a wide range
More information1.1 Common Law vs. Civil Law INTRODUCTION: Warm-up: Exercise 1: reading exercise: the common law and the civil law system
Unit 1 Introduction INTRODUCTION: This unit will provide you with a general introduction to Legal English. The unit briefly explores the differences between civil law and common law systems. This enables
More informationThank you David (Johnstone) for your warm introduction and for inviting me to talk to your spring Conference on managing land in the public interest.
! 1 of 22 Introduction Thank you David (Johnstone) for your warm introduction and for inviting me to talk to your spring Conference on managing land in the public interest. I m delighted to be able to
More informationSIR DAVID JAMES TYSON KITCHIN TO SWEAR HIS OATH OF ALLEGIANCE AND JUDICIAL OATH AS A JUDGE OF THE COURT OF APPEAL
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL Royal Courts of Justice Strand, London, WC2A 2LL Date: 6th October 2011 Before: THE LORD CHIEF JUSTICE OF ENGLAND AND WALES THE MASTER OF THE ROLLS THE CHANCELLOR OF THE HIGH COURT
More informationThe Scope of the Rule of Law and the Prosecutor some general principles and challenges
The Scope of the Rule of Law and the Prosecutor some general principles and challenges It gives me great pleasure to speak today at the 18 th Annual Conference and General Meeting of the International
More information6.0 ENSURING SAFETY AND JUSTICE
6.0 ENSURING SAFETY AND JUSTICE 44 2036 WILL MARK SOUTH AUSTRALIA S BICENTENARY. Obviously, we have much to be proud of and grateful for, but I think most South Australians feel things could be a lot better.
More informationAmendment 1 Lawsuit Explained By David Fowler, FACT President
Amendment 1 Lawsuit Explained By David Fowler, FACT President If you have not heard, a lawsuit has been filed in federal court to have the vote on Amendment 1 declared invalid as a violation of the state
More informationYour address: University Registry, King Edward VII Avenue, Cathays Park, Cardiff CF10 3NS
Interpreting Welsh law: an interpretation act for Wales Consultation response form Your name: The Learned Society of Wales Organisation (if applicable): The Learned Society of Wales e-mail/telephone number:
More informationWhat are term limits and why were they started?
What are term limits and why were they started? The top government office of the United States is the presidency. You probably already know that we elect a president every four years. This four-year period
More informationindependent and effective investigations and reviews [PIRC/00479/17] [MAY 2018] Report of a Complaint Handling Review in relation to Police Scotland
independent and effective investigations and reviews [PIRC/00479/17] [MAY 2018] Report of a Complaint Handling Review in relation to Police Scotland What we do We obtain all material information from Police
More informationTRANSCRIPT Protecting Our Judiciary: What Judges Do and Why it Matters
TRANSCRIPT Protecting Our Judiciary: What Judges Do and Why it Matters Slide 1 Thank you for joining us for Protecting Our Judiciary: What Judges Do and Why it Matters. Protecting fair, impartial courts
More informationALTERNATIVES TO ADJUDICATION. Toby Randle. 9 May 2005 THE SAVOY HOTEL, LONDON
ALTERNATIVES TO ADJUDICATION 11 TH ADJUDICATION UPDATE SEMINAR Toby Randle 9 May 2005 THE SAVOY HOTEL, LONDON Here I am, at the 11 th Fenwick Elliott adjudication seminar, in a room full of people closely
More informationAdministrative Sanctions: imposing warnings and fines
Administrative Sanctions: imposing warnings and fines Introduction This leaflet provides an overview of the Bar Standards Board s (BSB s) use of administrative sanctions as one of the tools available to
More informationEast-West and North-South: Northern Ireland s relationship with the UK and Ireland
East-West and North-South: Northern Ireland s relationship with the UK and Ireland Professor Tom Mullen School of Law 21 st June 2017 Outline of presentation 1 The basic question 2 The changing context
More informationVacancy for President of The Supreme Court of The United Kingdom
Information Pack Vacancy for President of The Supreme Court of The United Kingdom Role Justices of The Supreme Court of the United Kingdom comprise the final Court of Appeal for all civil cases in England
More information