Introducing the Election Technology Framework Critical Infrastructure to Increase Trust and Preserve Democracy
|
|
- Jade Manning
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Introducg the Election Technology Framework Critical Infrastructure to Increase Trust Preserve Democracy Open Source Election Technology Foundation TrustTheVote Project August, 2014
2 Introduction Th book technical overview of the TrustTheVote Project. It begs by describg the election process shows how that process maps to the elections technology framework OSET proposg. The book provides an overview of the framework s ma components then zooms to provide details about each component, sub-components, lks between components, data flows that make possible the planng execution of elections. The TrustTheVote Elections Technology Framework a blue-prt for developg a complete elections system, somethg that has not been developed before. The framework represents a substantial body of work that s already been completed, particularly gatherg put from local elections officials, understg their needs, draftg specifications. In addition, some components are already development. And both the Services Portal the elections results reportg system are alpha release. 2 Introducg the Election Technology Framework Critical Infrastructure to Increase Trust Preserve Democracy
3 Overview The TrustTheVote Project developg the Election Technology Framework, which has six ma buildg blocks: Regterg Data Regterg Data 3 Introducg the Election Technology Framework Critical Infrastructure to Increase Trust Preserve Democracy
4 The Election Process Regterg Election Called Absentee s In-Person s Lt Management Views Regtration 17 1 Devices Ready Devices, Provional Ballots (PBs) Vote Tallies ed Beg Election Night Central Vote Tallies ed of Falize Election Numbers are matched with components the diagram. Data 4 Introducg the Election Technology Framework Critical Infrastructure to Increase Trust Preserve Democracy
5 The data managed by the EDM compres all of the ation about an election, at the level of an dividual jurdiction. Jurdiction defitions: Dtricts, dtrict type, preccts, precct membership dtricts, data for preccts dtricts, a host of precctg ation: precct splits, sub-preccts, precct-parts, per-election consolidations reportg preccts, street segment /or data to support mappg Election defitions: Election (date, type, jurdiction); contests, contest/dtrict, cidates, cidate/contest, referendum, referendum/dtrict, -response, -response/referendum, a host of attributes that determe partanship (or lack thereof) for contests cidates, use (or lack) of write-s, prioritization for orderg, more. Basic specifications: For a given election, for each precct, the lt of contests referenda (cludg cidates, parties, write-, straight-party, etc.) : A manifest or checklt that specifies each precct (or other vote tallyg dtrict) the number of dtct tallies expected for one. For for each countg device used on election day, one tally for central count run of or provional s. The data managed by the BDS wide rangg set of data that describe s from State-Specific Ballot Rules: Requirements for content presentation, for sues such as cidate rotation, straight-party votg, votg structions, as well as presentation-level sues such as the use of basic text ats (mixed case vs. specifications the contests questions defed for each precct lted an election-defition dataset with both metadata the election defition Stylesheets for Paper Ballots Digital Ballots: The BDS s lifecycle starts with the acquition of a per-election combation jurdiction/election defition (either from the EDM or other systems compliant with /or VSSC election defition stards) the conversion of each of the election s basic specifications to a concrete s specification. At th pot, stylesheets become the level elements that defe a s vual presentation, startg with a basele that implements the design stards that were defed by AIGA EAC. s: The end result of design activity twofold: fhed s for h-markg at pollg places or by voters; fhed the result both a set of PDF files for prtg the full set of styles also a set of concrete specifications that clude meta-data that to be used by countg devices to For digitally presented blank s, the result a set of concrete specifications that clude vual style sent to regtration The does not manage data, but rather creates boot images for castg countg devices. These boot images clude both the software that specific to each device the election-specific data needed by each device. Concrete Ballot : The fhed defitions meta-data produced by the. Manager cluded along with concrete specifications by the BDS. 11 The (VSP) teracts with the Regtrar, via its web services, to submit voter record requests to obta voter records related ation. are available as part of the VSP, or stalone. The open stards-based, supports the. voter record request voter record extract tegration similar to VSP tegration for a mobile plat such as voter record request voter record extract to prt The Regtrar manages a voter records database (VRDB) implements a web service for access to the VRDB, either as an tegrated VRDB or as a wrapper around a legacy VRDB. The data the VRDB cludes: Regtration s Requests: personal ation, geographic ation, eligibility, participation htory, membership special voter groups, e.g., military, hicapped, protected/private. Transaction Logs: A log of transactions pertent to each voter, volvg voter requests /or LEO activity. Includes: voter regtration requests, LEO approval/rejection of such requests or of s provional s; voter check- for person votg; mail-out of, receipt of returned. s: A subset of a voter record that uniquely identified each voter s charactertics but without any personal identifyg ation cludg those needed for stattics reportg of voter transactions, e.g.: percentage of total successful military voters out of all military voters, compared to similar success rate the entire votg population. fo request a web user terface for voters to download prt blank s. kit from, which obtas ation from the Regtrar. fo extract provions fleet offloads voter check records LEOs use the BDI to per LEOs use the Regtrar s UI web UI of the EDM the DPB Manager s cludg: reviewg regtration terface for both with several data access ends with a set of s consolidate stards-based requests, voter lt management, proviong data to digital data management options for supportg data: paper data from other components tegration with external services poll books post-election s; data for countg (primarily election defitions such as motor vehicle records, offloadg of poll book data variety of data that defe a devices; data for markg design), to validate support for poll book creation similar data capture from jurdiction an election devices that asst voters held it. markg a. store them on boot media used to run each election defition election defition castg or countg device T voter roll updates The (EDM) stards-based for The consts of a data management core the The aggregates data from other components The Regtrar the voter records core, it supports a set of The DPB Manager s supports the LEO s web terface, which a PC, dplay prter that assts Local election officials provide the with from the web user terface to provide transactions to create, view, update a variety of election transactions for data access data management of voter enables officials to aggregate voter roll data maly from the digital image processg technology used to record a vote for each countg devices, to assess whether all needed data available, if a wide range of data to be the bas of advanced reportg analys. Via an, other stards-based components can submit data to the a admtration data, cludg dtricts preccts geospatial the creates boot images for each castg or TrustTheVote Regtrar or other stards-based voter records system so, to create fal election results basic results reports results Stard reports meet Federal reportg requirements. can data for them; elections, contests, cidates, s. Local state-specific requirements to fhed digital s paper countg device. These images can be validated durg Logic Regtrar, obta elements of specific voter records, for local convert it to poll book records for digital poll books for correlate election results, voter regtration activity, voter election officials access EDM s services via a based on the, s that meet U.S. stards for vual design accessibility. Accuracy Testg, to ensure that only certified systems software election officials update manage record the terpretation as a set of votes for that. T demographics. such as the EDM Interface. election geospatial combed boot image voter transaction log voter election defition demographic record These components are clients of the Regtrar use its s for viewg voter records or submittg requests; there little or no retaed managed data, with the notable Regtration s Requests: Via the Regtrar, these components make voter records requests receive some parts of voter : Via the Regtrar, these components obta the onle submsion of a voter regtration request or onle completion of a to be prted, signed, mailed. sent to 24 2 custodian transports to votg place custodian transports from votg place The DPB Manager stores a copy of the voter roll data obtaed from the Regtrar or other stards-compliant source of voter Each DPB uses th data Regtration s: A voter roll the small subset of the ation a voter record that needed for voter check- usg a used data used a PC, dplay prter that assts custodian transports to votg place custodian transports from votg place selections, but it does use data from the : s: Used to drive the presentation of items Regtrar / One per precct usg options for audio or audio-enhanced presentation, the use The both process paper s create output data of two kds: recorded from that, tended for use rk limitg audits of the countg a develops fed to fed to technology used to record a vote for each mark detected. The voter ed of any sues with the marks or selections, has the The device does not store or manage data, but it does consolidate analyze data: device; used as put for both tally auditg vote totalg. Consolidated to the s output dataset of all vote tallies, s, vote totals. s: Consolidated to the s output dataset. : The uses the manifest created by the Election Manager ( cluded by the the s data) to audit the put set of vote tallies, to ensure that all only the expected tallies are presented accounted for. constg of Each provides, stores, manages the data from the datasets that it receives: Jurdiction Election Defitions: Describe the election as a whole, cludg all items all vote tallyg dtricts, clude data for each. tallies available. Tallyg Device s: That s consolidated output dataset of all fal counts vote totals. The data ats used by (for take of for bulk data export) are stard common data ats. As a result, the data can come from any stards-compliant votg system. We ve also written connectors applications that translate from extg ats to enable to work with extg election systems. personal identifyg ation, but does uniquely identify each voter several charactertics of voters that are needed for stattics reportg of voter Pew VIP or Pew IC near future near future near future near future near future to support T T cludes a vual s can access the data create their own tools republh the data or do their own analys. Regtrar / Numbers are matched with components the diagram below. Designed by Dubberly Design Office Version 5.1 August 19, 2014 mh/hs Full Architecture Diagram Introducg the Election Technology Framework Because We All Deserve a Better Experience The TrustTheVote Project a digital public works project to develop critical democracy frastructure. We are designg developg open-stards-based elections technology collaboration with local election officials from all around the country. The Election Technology Framework freely available for any jurdiction (e.g., a county) to adopt, adapt, deploy for public elections. Typically, each jurdiction would have one copy of each component; though some votg components are deployed to each precct. Open source, open stards, open data are key aspects of the Election Technology Framework, tended to asst election officials conductg election admtration elections operations a process that accurate, secure, transparent, verifiable. Six Ma Buildg Blocks Regterg Data Stards The Election Process Election Called Absentee s In-Person s Lt Management Views Regtration Devices Ready Devices, Provional Ballots (PBs) Vote Tallies ed Beg Election Night Central Vote Tallies ed of Falize Election Regterg Pollg Place Regterg cludes all the people, technology, activities volved voter regtration, voter records management, voter ation services, voter lt management. a web user terface that helps a voter regter, determe eligibility, view update their own voter record, view record pollg place wait time (as ), among other services. cludes all the people, technology, activities volved the processes of castg countg s. that presents a voter with all the contests questions for the voter s specific, creates a mache-countable H- a PC dplay, prter, scanner that reads voter s choices, records the votes. an tegral aspect of the TrustTheVote Project s goal of makg elections wholly transparent, accurate, trustworthy. In the reportg phase, elections data stored, analyzed, prepared for public consumption. (Stalone) Regtration Form cludes all the technology-based activities of election officials for election admtration preparation for a specific for data about electoral jurdictions elections conducted with a jurdiction. Regtrar Election tration Office that defitions, designs, votg system software, votg system components that cast count s. Write-once Boot Media Regtrar that stores manages voter Regtrar of s Office used to provion offload a a PC dplay, prter, high-capacity scanner choices, recordg the votes. a PC dplay prter with tabulation create election results reports. Central Countg Office aggregation, analys, reportg. Data Layer The data layer cludes a set of open stards for election data, defed with the help of local election officials alized through major stards organization. The goal to trans, normalize, aggregate, publh election data to all citizens near real time. Regtrar VSP,, Data Stards EML VSSC OASIS ternational Project developed IEEE 1622 workg group election data stard data stards emergg stards s NIST VIP U.S. National Institute of Ination Project Stards Technology data at Data Formats DL- record requests voter DL- Jurdiction Election The core jurdiction election defition. DL-- DL-- DL-- DL- s DL- DL--T Tallyg Device s results defition to record the DL- Transaction Log regtration admtration, votg admtration, provional DL- Elections technology must be... Lt all voters only eligible voters on voter rolls. Count votes without errors, as they were cast. Ensure voter privacy, data tegrity, system reliability, proper authentication authorization for access. Allow verification of required accuracy. Log all changes to guarantee accountability. Enable everythg that matters about an election to be dependently verified, cludg accuracy security OSET Foundation the TrustTheVote Project All Rights Reserved. 5 Introducg the Election Technology Framework Critical Infrastructure to Increase Trust Preserve Democracy
6 Regterg cludes all the people, technology, activities volved voter regtration, voter records management, voter ation services, voter lt management. cludes all the technology-based activities of election officials for election admtration preparation for a specific The data layer cludes a set of open stards for election data, defed with the help of local election officials alized through major stards organization. The goal to trans, normalize, aggregate, publh election data to all citizens near real time. Elections technology must be... The data managed by the EDM compres all of the ation about an election, at the level of an dividual jurdiction. Jurdiction defitions: Dtricts, dtrict type, preccts, precct membership dtricts, data for preccts dtricts, a host of precctg ation: precct splits, sub-preccts, precct-parts, per-election consolidations reportg preccts, street segment /or data to support mappg Election defitions: Election (date, type, jurdiction); contests, contest/dtrict, cidates, cidate/contest, referendum, referendum/dtrict, -response, -response/referendum, a host of attributes that determe partanship (or lack thereof) for contests cidates, use (or lack) of write-s, prioritization for orderg, more. Basic specifications: For a given election, for each precct, the lt of contests referenda (cludg cidates, parties, write-, straight-party, etc.) : A manifest or checklt that specifies each precct (or other vote tallyg dtrict) the number of dtct tallies expected for one. For for each countg device used on election day, one tally for central count run of or provional s. The data managed by the BDS wide rangg set of data that describe s from State-Specific Ballot Rules: Requirements for content presentation, for sues such as cidate rotation, straight-party votg, votg structions, as well as presentation-level sues such as the use of basic text ats (mixed case vs. specifications the contests questions defed for each precct lted an election-defition dataset with both metadata the election defition Stylesheets for Paper Ballots Digital Ballots: The BDS s lifecycle starts with the acquition of a per-election combation jurdiction/election defition (either from the EDM or other systems compliant with /or VSSC election defition stards) the conversion of each of the election s basic specifications to a concrete s specification. At th pot, stylesheets become the level elements that defe a s vual presentation, startg with a basele that implements the design stards that were defed by AIGA EAC. s: The end result of design activity twofold: fhed s for h-markg at pollg places or by voters; fhed the result both a set of PDF files for prtg the full set of styles also a set of concrete specifications that clude meta-data that to be used by countg devices to For digitally presented blank s, the result a set of concrete specifications that clude vual style Regtration Form sent to regtration The does not manage data, but rather creates boot images for castg countg devices. These boot images clude both the software that specific to each device the election-specific data needed by each device. Concrete Ballot : The fhed defitions meta-data produced by the. Manager cluded along with concrete specifications by the BDS. 11 to prt a web user terface that helps a voter regter, determe eligibility, view update their own voter record, view record pollg place wait time (as ), among other services. The (VSP) teracts with the Regtrar, via its web tegration services, to submit voter record requests to obta voter similar to VSP tegration for a mobile plat such as records related ation. are available as part of the VSP, or stalone. The open stards-based, supports the. voter record request voter record extract voter record voter record fo fo Regtrar The Regtrar manages a voter records database (VRDB) implements a web service for access to the VRDB, either as an tegrated VRDB or as a wrapper around a legacy VRDB. The data the VRDB cludes: Regtration s Requests: personal ation, geographic ation, eligibility, participation htory, membership special voter groups, e.g., military, hicapped, protected/private. Transaction Logs: A log of transactions pertent to each voter, volvg voter requests /or LEO activity. Includes: voter regtration requests, LEO approval/rejection of such requests or of s provional s; voter check- for person votg; mail-out of, receipt of returned. s: A subset of a voter record that uniquely identified each voter s charactertics but without any personal identifyg ation cludg those needed for stattics reportg of voter transactions, e.g.: percentage of total successful military voters out of all military voters, compared to similar success rate the entire votg population. a web user terface for voters to download prt blank s. kit from, which obtas ation from the Regtrar. VSP,, These components are clients of the Regtrar use its s for viewg voter records or submittg requests; there little or no retaed managed data, with the notable Regtration s Requests: Via the Regtrar, these components make voter records requests receive some parts of voter : Via the Regtrar, these components obta the onle submsion of a voter regtration request or onle completion of a to be prted, signed, mailed. cludes all the people, technology, activities volved the processes of castg countg s. sent to s The DPB Manager stores a copy of the voter roll data obtaed from the Regtrar or other stards-compliant source of voter Each DPB uses th data Regtration s: A voter roll the small subset of the ation a voter record that needed for voter check- usg a Pollg Place a PC, dplay prter that assts provions fleet offloads voter check records LEOs use the BDI to per LEOs use the Regtrar s UI web UI of the EDM the DPB Manager s cludg: reviewg regtration terface for both with several data access ends with a set of s consolidate stards-based requests, voter lt management, proviong data to digital data management options for supportg data: paper data from other components tegration with external services poll books post-election s; data for countg (primarily election defitions such as motor vehicle records, offloadg of poll book data variety of data that defe a devices; data for markg design), to validate support for poll book creation similar data capture from jurdiction an election devices that asst voters held it. markg a. store them on boot media used to run each Regtrar election defition election defition castg or countg device for data that a PC dplay, prter, high-capacity scanner a PC dplay prter with tabulation about electoral jurdictions elections defitions, designs, votg system software, that stores manages voter used to provion offload a T conducted with a jurdiction. create election results reports. votg system components that cast count s. choices, recordg the votes. voter roll updates The consts of a data management core the The Regtrar the voter records core, it supports a set of The (EDM) stards-based for The aggregates data from other components The DPB Manager s supports the LEO s web terface, which a PC, dplay prter that assts Local election officials provide the with from transactions for data access data management of voter transactions to create, view, update a variety of election enables officials to aggregate voter roll data maly from the digital image processg technology used to record a vote for each countg devices, to assess whether all needed data available, if Via an, other stards-based components can submit data to the a admtration data, cludg dtricts preccts geospatial the creates boot images for each castg or TrustTheVote Regtrar or other stards-based voter records system so, to create fal election results basic results reports results data for them; elections, contests, cidates, s. Local state-specific requirements to fhed digital s paper countg device. These images can be validated durg Logic Regtrar, obta elements of specific voter records, for local convert it to poll book records for digital poll books for election officials access EDM s services via a based on the, s that meet U.S. stards for vual design accessibility. Accuracy Testg, to ensure that only certified systems software election officials update manage record the terpretation as a set of votes for that. T demographics. such as the EDM Interface. election geospatial combed boot image voter transaction log voter election defition demographic record Regtrar Write-once Boot Media Lt all voters only eligible voters on voter rolls. Count votes without errors, as they were cast. EML OASIS ternational election data stard Project developed data stards VSSC IEEE 1622 workg group emergg stards 24 2 NIST U.S. National Institute of Stards Technology Ensure voter privacy, data tegrity, system reliability, proper authentication authorization for access. VIP Ination Project data at used data used selections, but it does use data from the : s: Used to drive the presentation of items Regtrar / Allow verification of required accuracy. Log all changes to guarantee accountability. develops constg of The TrustTheVote Project The Election Technology Framework Six Ma Buildg Blocks a digital public works project to develop critical democracy freely available for any jurdiction (e.g., a county) to adopt, Regterg frastructure. We are designg developg adapt, deploy for public elections. Typically, each open-stards-based elections technology collaboration jurdiction would have one copy of each component; though with local election officials from all around the country. some votg components are deployed to each precct. Open source, open stards, open data are key aspects Data Stards of the Election Technology Framework, tended to asst election officials conductg election admtration elections operations a process that accurate, secure, transparent, verifiable. an tegral aspect of the TrustTheVote Project s goal of makg elections One per precct wholly transparent, accurate, trustworthy In the reportg phase, elections data stored, fed to analyzed, prepared for public consumption. H- that presents a voter a PC dplay, prter, scanner that reads with all the contests questions for the voter s specific, creates a mache-countable usg options for audio or audio-enhanced presentation, the use The both process paper s create output data of two kds: recorded from that, tended for use rk limitg audits of the countg a fed to voter s choices, records the votes. technology used to record a vote for each mark detected. The voter ed of any sues with the marks or selections, has the The device does not store or manage data, but it does consolidate analyze data: device; used as put for both tally auditg vote totalg. Consolidated to the s output dataset of all vote tallies, s, vote totals. s: Consolidated to the s output dataset. : The uses the manifest created by the Election Manager ( cluded by the the s data) to audit the put set of vote tallies, to ensure that all only the expected tallies are presented accounted for. Each provides, stores, manages the data from the datasets that it receives: Jurdiction Election Defitions: Describe the election as a whole, cludg all items all vote tallyg dtricts, clude data for each. tallies available. Tallyg Device s: That s consolidated output dataset of all fal Enable everythg that matters about an election to be dependently verified, cludg accuracy security. Absentee s In-Person s The data ats used by (for take of for bulk data export) are stard common data ats. As a result, the data can come from any stards-compliant votg system. We ve also written connectors applications that translate from extg ats to enable to work with extg election systems. aggregation, analys, reportg. the web user terface to provide a wide range of data to be the bas of advanced reportg analys. Stard reports meet Federal reportg requirements. can correlate election results, voter regtration activity, voter personal identifyg ation, but does uniquely identify each voter several charactertics of voters that are needed for stattics reportg of voter T DL- DL- DL--T DL- Jurdiction Election Tallyg Device s Transaction Log record requests voter The core jurdiction election results defition to record the defition. DL-- DL-- DL-- DL- regtration admtration, DL- votg admtration, provional s DL- counts vote totals. Pew VIP or Pew IC near future near future near future near future near future to support The Election Process T cludes a vual (Stalone) s can access the data create their own tools republh the data or do their own analys. Regtrar / OSET Foundation the TrustTheVote Project All Rights Reserved. Designed by Dubberly Design Office Version 5.1 August 19, 2014 mh/hs Numbers are matched with components the diagram below. Regterg Regterg cludes all the people, technology, activities volved voter regtration, voter records management, voter ation services, voter lt management. regtration 11 a web user terface that helps a voter regter, determe eligibility, view update their own voter record, view record pollg place wait time (as ), among other services. to prt a web user terface for voters to download prt blank s. Regtration Form sent to The (VSP) teracts with the Regtrar, via its web services, to submit voter record requests to obta voter records related ation. are available as part of the VSP, or stalone. The open stards-based, supports the. tegration similar to VSP tegration for a mobile plat such as kit from, which obtas ation from the Regtrar. voter record request voter record extract voter record request voter record extract fo request fo extract Regtrar Introducg the Election Technology Framework Because We All Deserve a Better Experience Election Called Lt Management Views Regtration Devices Ready Devices, Provional Ballots (PBs) Vote Tallies ed Beg Election Night Central Vote Tallies ed of Falize Election Regterg Election tration Office Regtrar of s Office Central Countg Office Data Layer Data Stards Data Formats 6 Introducg the Election Technology Framework Critical Infrastructure to Increase Trust Preserve Democracy
7 Regterg cludes all the people, technology, activities volved voter regtration, voter records management, voter ation services, voter lt management. cludes all the technology-based activities of election officials for election admtration preparation for a specific The data layer cludes a set of open stards for election data, defed with the help of local election officials alized through major stards organization. The goal to trans, normalize, aggregate, publh election data to all citizens near real time. Elections technology must be... The data managed by the EDM compres all of the ation about an election, at the level of an dividual jurdiction. Jurdiction defitions: Dtricts, dtrict type, preccts, precct membership dtricts, data for preccts dtricts, a host of precctg ation: precct splits, sub-preccts, precct-parts, per-election consolidations reportg preccts, street segment /or data to support mappg Election defitions: Election (date, type, jurdiction); contests, contest/dtrict, cidates, cidate/contest, referendum, referendum/dtrict, -response, -response/referendum, a host of attributes that determe partanship (or lack thereof) for contests cidates, use (or lack) of write-s, prioritization for orderg, more. Basic specifications: For a given election, for each precct, the lt of contests referenda (cludg cidates, parties, write-, straight-party, etc.) : A manifest or checklt that specifies each precct (or other vote tallyg dtrict) the number of dtct tallies expected for one. For for each countg device used on election day, one tally for central count run of or provional s. The data managed by the BDS wide rangg set of data that describe s from State-Specific Ballot Rules: Requirements for content presentation, for sues such as cidate rotation, straight-party votg, votg structions, as well as presentation-level sues such as the use of basic text ats (mixed case vs. specifications the contests questions defed for each precct lted an election-defition dataset with both metadata the election defition Stylesheets for Paper Ballots Digital Ballots: The BDS s lifecycle starts with the acquition of a per-election combation jurdiction/election defition (either from the EDM or other systems compliant with /or VSSC election defition stards) the conversion of each of the election s basic specifications to a concrete s specification. At th pot, stylesheets become the level elements that defe a s vual presentation, startg with a basele that implements the design stards that were defed by AIGA EAC. s: The end result of design activity twofold: fhed s for h-markg at pollg places or by voters; fhed the result both a set of PDF files for prtg the full set of styles also a set of concrete specifications that clude meta-data that to be used by countg devices to For digitally presented blank s, the result a set of concrete specifications that clude vual style Regtration Form sent to regtration The does not manage data, but rather creates boot images for castg countg devices. These boot images clude both the software that specific to each device the election-specific data needed by each device. Concrete Ballot : The fhed defitions meta-data produced by the. Manager cluded along with concrete specifications by the BDS. 11 to prt a web user terface that helps a voter regter, determe eligibility, view update their own voter record, view record pollg place wait time (as ), among other services. The (VSP) teracts with the Regtrar, via its web tegration services, to submit voter record requests to obta voter similar to VSP tegration for a mobile plat such as records related ation. are available as part of the VSP, or stalone. The open stards-based, supports the. voter record request voter record extract voter record voter record fo fo Regtrar The Regtrar manages a voter records database (VRDB) implements a web service for access to the VRDB, either as an tegrated VRDB or as a wrapper around a legacy VRDB. The data the VRDB cludes: Regtration s Requests: personal ation, geographic ation, eligibility, participation htory, membership special voter groups, e.g., military, hicapped, protected/private. Transaction Logs: A log of transactions pertent to each voter, volvg voter requests /or LEO activity. Includes: voter regtration requests, LEO approval/rejection of such requests or of s provional s; voter check- for person votg; mail-out of, receipt of returned. s: A subset of a voter record that uniquely identified each voter s charactertics but without any personal identifyg ation cludg those needed for stattics reportg of voter transactions, e.g.: percentage of total successful military voters out of all military voters, compared to similar success rate the entire votg population. a web user terface for voters to download prt blank s. kit from, which obtas ation from the Regtrar. VSP,, These components are clients of the Regtrar use its s for viewg voter records or submittg requests; there little or no retaed managed data, with the notable Regtration s Requests: Via the Regtrar, these components make voter records requests receive some parts of voter : Via the Regtrar, these components obta the onle submsion of a voter regtration request or onle completion of a to be prted, signed, mailed. cludes all the people, technology, activities volved the processes of castg countg s. sent to s The DPB Manager stores a copy of the voter roll data obtaed from the Regtrar or other stards-compliant source of voter Each DPB uses th data Regtration s: A voter roll the small subset of the ation a voter record that needed for voter check- usg a Pollg Place a PC, dplay prter that assts provions fleet offloads voter check records LEOs use the BDI to per LEOs use the Regtrar s UI web UI of the EDM the DPB Manager s cludg: reviewg regtration terface for both with several data access ends with a set of s consolidate stards-based requests, voter lt management, proviong data to digital data management options for supportg data: paper data from other components tegration with external services poll books post-election s; data for countg (primarily election defitions such as motor vehicle records, offloadg of poll book data variety of data that defe a devices; data for markg design), to validate support for poll book creation similar data capture from jurdiction an election devices that asst voters held it. markg a. store them on boot media used to run each Regtrar election defition election defition castg or countg device for data that a PC dplay, prter, high-capacity scanner a PC dplay prter with tabulation about electoral jurdictions elections defitions, designs, votg system software, that stores manages voter used to provion offload a T conducted with a jurdiction. create election results reports. votg system components that cast count s. choices, recordg the votes. voter roll updates The consts of a data management core the The Regtrar the voter records core, it supports a set of The (EDM) stards-based for The aggregates data from other components The DPB Manager s supports the LEO s web terface, which a PC, dplay prter that assts Local election officials provide the with from transactions for data access data management of voter transactions to create, view, update a variety of election enables officials to aggregate voter roll data maly from the digital image processg technology used to record a vote for each countg devices, to assess whether all needed data available, if Via an, other stards-based components can submit data to the a admtration data, cludg dtricts preccts geospatial the creates boot images for each castg or TrustTheVote Regtrar or other stards-based voter records system so, to create fal election results basic results reports results data for them; elections, contests, cidates, s. Local state-specific requirements to fhed digital s paper countg device. These images can be validated durg Logic Regtrar, obta elements of specific voter records, for local convert it to poll book records for digital poll books for election officials access EDM s services via a based on the, s that meet U.S. stards for vual design accessibility. Accuracy Testg, to ensure that only certified systems software election officials update manage record the terpretation as a set of votes for that. T demographics. such as the EDM Interface. election geospatial combed boot image voter transaction log voter election defition demographic record Regtrar Write-once Boot Media Lt all voters only eligible voters on voter rolls. Count votes without errors, as they were cast. EML OASIS ternational election data stard Project developed data stards VSSC IEEE 1622 workg group emergg stards 24 2 NIST U.S. National Institute of Stards Technology Ensure voter privacy, data tegrity, system reliability, proper authentication authorization for access. VIP Ination Project data at used data used selections, but it does use data from the : s: Used to drive the presentation of items Regtrar / Allow verification of required accuracy. Log all changes to guarantee accountability. develops constg of The TrustTheVote Project The Election Technology Framework Six Ma Buildg Blocks a digital public works project to develop critical democracy freely available for any jurdiction (e.g., a county) to adopt, Regterg frastructure. We are designg developg adapt, deploy for public elections. Typically, each open-stards-based elections technology collaboration jurdiction would have one copy of each component; though with local election officials from all around the country. some votg components are deployed to each precct. Open source, open stards, open data are key aspects Data Stards of the Election Technology Framework, tended to asst election officials conductg election admtration elections operations a process that accurate, secure, transparent, verifiable. an tegral aspect of the TrustTheVote Project s goal of makg elections One per precct wholly transparent, accurate, trustworthy In the reportg phase, elections data stored, fed to analyzed, prepared for public consumption. H- that presents a voter a PC dplay, prter, scanner that reads with all the contests questions for the voter s specific, creates a mache-countable usg options for audio or audio-enhanced presentation, the use The both process paper s create output data of two kds: recorded from that, tended for use rk limitg audits of the countg a fed to voter s choices, records the votes. technology used to record a vote for each mark detected. The voter ed of any sues with the marks or selections, has the The device does not store or manage data, but it does consolidate analyze data: device; used as put for both tally auditg vote totalg. Consolidated to the s output dataset of all vote tallies, s, vote totals. s: Consolidated to the s output dataset. : The uses the manifest created by the Election Manager ( cluded by the the s data) to audit the put set of vote tallies, to ensure that all only the expected tallies are presented accounted for. Each provides, stores, manages the data from the datasets that it receives: Jurdiction Election Defitions: Describe the election as a whole, cludg all items all vote tallyg dtricts, clude data for each. tallies available. Tallyg Device s: That s consolidated output dataset of all fal Enable everythg that matters about an election to be dependently verified, cludg accuracy security. The data ats used by (for take of for bulk data export) are stard common data ats. As a result, the data can come from any stards-compliant votg system. We ve also written connectors applications that translate from extg ats to enable to work with extg election systems. aggregation, analys, reportg. the web user terface to provide a wide range of data to be the bas of advanced reportg analys. Stard reports meet Federal reportg requirements. can correlate election results, voter regtration activity, voter personal identifyg ation, but does uniquely identify each voter several charactertics of voters that are needed for stattics reportg of voter T DL- DL- DL--T DL- Jurdiction Election Tallyg Device s Transaction Log record requests voter The core jurdiction election results defition to record the defition. DL-- DL-- DL-- DL- regtration admtration, DL- votg admtration, provional s DL- counts vote totals. Pew VIP or Pew IC near future near future near future near future near future to support The Election Process Absentee s In-Person s T cludes a vual (Stalone) s can access the data create their own tools republh the data or do their own analys. Regtrar / OSET Foundation the TrustTheVote Project All Rights Reserved. Designed by Dubberly Design Office Version 5.1 August 19, 2014 mh/hs Numbers are matched with components the diagram below. : Place cludes all the people, technology, activities volved the processes of castg countg s sent to a PC, dplay prter that assts custodian transports to votg place custodian transports from votg place custodian transports to votg place custodian transports from votg place Regtrar of s Office Regtrar of s Office Introducg the Election Technology Framework Because We All Deserve a Better Experience Election Called Lt Management Views Regtration Devices Ready Devices, Provional Ballots (PBs) Vote Tallies ed Beg Election Night Central Vote Tallies ed of Falize Election Regterg Election tration Office Regtrar of s Office Central Countg Office Data Layer Data Stards Data Formats 7 Introducg the Election Technology Framework Critical Infrastructure to Increase Trust Preserve Democracy
8 Regterg cludes all the people, technology, activities volved voter regtration, voter records management, voter ation services, voter lt management. cludes all the technology-based activities of election officials for election admtration preparation for a specific The data layer cludes a set of open stards for election data, defed with the help of local election officials alized through major stards organization. The goal to trans, normalize, aggregate, publh election data to all citizens near real time. Elections technology must be... The data managed by the EDM compres all of the ation about an election, at the level of an dividual jurdiction. Jurdiction defitions: Dtricts, dtrict type, preccts, precct membership dtricts, data for preccts dtricts, a host of precctg ation: precct splits, sub-preccts, precct-parts, per-election consolidations reportg preccts, street segment /or data to support mappg Election defitions: Election (date, type, jurdiction); contests, contest/dtrict, cidates, cidate/contest, referendum, referendum/dtrict, -response, -response/referendum, a host of attributes that determe partanship (or lack thereof) for contests cidates, use (or lack) of write-s, prioritization for orderg, more. Basic specifications: For a given election, for each precct, the lt of contests referenda (cludg cidates, parties, write-, straight-party, etc.) : A manifest or checklt that specifies each precct (or other vote tallyg dtrict) the number of dtct tallies expected for one. For for each countg device used on election day, one tally for central count run of or provional s. The data managed by the BDS wide rangg set of data that describe s from State-Specific Ballot Rules: Requirements for content presentation, for sues such as cidate rotation, straight-party votg, votg structions, as well as presentation-level sues such as the use of basic text ats (mixed case vs. specifications the contests questions defed for each precct lted an election-defition dataset with both metadata the election defition Stylesheets for Paper Ballots Digital Ballots: The BDS s lifecycle starts with the acquition of a per-election combation jurdiction/election defition (either from the EDM or other systems compliant with /or VSSC election defition stards) the conversion of each of the election s basic specifications to a concrete s specification. At th pot, stylesheets become the level elements that defe a s vual presentation, startg with a basele that implements the design stards that were defed by AIGA EAC. s: The end result of design activity twofold: fhed s for h-markg at pollg places or by voters; fhed the result both a set of PDF files for prtg the full set of styles also a set of concrete specifications that clude meta-data that to be used by countg devices to For digitally presented blank s, the result a set of concrete specifications that clude vual style Regtration Form sent to regtration The does not manage data, but rather creates boot images for castg countg devices. These boot images clude both the software that specific to each device the election-specific data needed by each device. Concrete Ballot : The fhed defitions meta-data produced by the. Manager cluded along with concrete specifications by the BDS. 11 to prt a web user terface that helps a voter regter, determe eligibility, view update their own voter record, view record pollg place wait time (as ), among other services. The (VSP) teracts with the Regtrar, via its web tegration services, to submit voter record requests to obta voter similar to VSP tegration for a mobile plat such as records related ation. are available as part of the VSP, or stalone. The open stards-based, supports the. voter record request voter record extract voter record voter record fo fo Regtrar The Regtrar manages a voter records database (VRDB) implements a web service for access to the VRDB, either as an tegrated VRDB or as a wrapper around a legacy VRDB. The data the VRDB cludes: Regtration s Requests: personal ation, geographic ation, eligibility, participation htory, membership special voter groups, e.g., military, hicapped, protected/private. Transaction Logs: A log of transactions pertent to each voter, volvg voter requests /or LEO activity. Includes: voter regtration requests, LEO approval/rejection of such requests or of s provional s; voter check- for person votg; mail-out of, receipt of returned. s: A subset of a voter record that uniquely identified each voter s charactertics but without any personal identifyg ation cludg those needed for stattics reportg of voter transactions, e.g.: percentage of total successful military voters out of all military voters, compared to similar success rate the entire votg population. a web user terface for voters to download prt blank s. kit from, which obtas ation from the Regtrar. VSP,, These components are clients of the Regtrar use its s for viewg voter records or submittg requests; there little or no retaed managed data, with the notable Regtration s Requests: Via the Regtrar, these components make voter records requests receive some parts of voter : Via the Regtrar, these components obta the onle submsion of a voter regtration request or onle completion of a to be prted, signed, mailed. cludes all the people, technology, activities volved the processes of castg countg s. sent to s The DPB Manager stores a copy of the voter roll data obtaed from the Regtrar or other stards-compliant source of voter Each DPB uses th data Regtration s: A voter roll the small subset of the ation a voter record that needed for voter check- usg a Pollg Place a PC, dplay prter that assts provions fleet offloads voter check records LEOs use the BDI to per LEOs use the Regtrar s UI web UI of the EDM the DPB Manager s cludg: reviewg regtration terface for both with several data access ends with a set of s consolidate stards-based requests, voter lt management, proviong data to digital data management options for supportg data: paper data from other components tegration with external services poll books post-election s; data for countg (primarily election defitions such as motor vehicle records, offloadg of poll book data variety of data that defe a devices; data for markg design), to validate support for poll book creation similar data capture from jurdiction an election devices that asst voters held it. markg a. store them on boot media used to run each Regtrar election defition election defition castg or countg device for data that a PC dplay, prter, high-capacity scanner a PC dplay prter with tabulation about electoral jurdictions elections defitions, designs, votg system software, that stores manages voter used to provion offload a T conducted with a jurdiction. create election results reports. votg system components that cast count s. choices, recordg the votes. voter roll updates The consts of a data management core the The Regtrar the voter records core, it supports a set of The (EDM) stards-based for The aggregates data from other components The DPB Manager s supports the LEO s web terface, which a PC, dplay prter that assts Local election officials provide the with from transactions for data access data management of voter transactions to create, view, update a variety of election enables officials to aggregate voter roll data maly from the digital image processg technology used to record a vote for each countg devices, to assess whether all needed data available, if Via an, other stards-based components can submit data to the a admtration data, cludg dtricts preccts geospatial the creates boot images for each castg or TrustTheVote Regtrar or other stards-based voter records system so, to create fal election results basic results reports results data for them; elections, contests, cidates, s. Local state-specific requirements to fhed digital s paper countg device. These images can be validated durg Logic Regtrar, obta elements of specific voter records, for local convert it to poll book records for digital poll books for election officials access EDM s services via a based on the, s that meet U.S. stards for vual design accessibility. Accuracy Testg, to ensure that only certified systems software election officials update manage record the terpretation as a set of votes for that. T demographics. such as the EDM Interface. election geospatial combed boot image voter transaction log voter election defition demographic record Regtrar Write-once Boot Media Lt all voters only eligible voters on voter rolls. Count votes without errors, as they were cast. EML OASIS ternational election data stard Project developed data stards VSSC IEEE 1622 workg group emergg stards 24 2 NIST U.S. National Institute of Stards Technology Ensure voter privacy, data tegrity, system reliability, proper authentication authorization for access. VIP Ination Project data at used data used selections, but it does use data from the : s: Used to drive the presentation of items Regtrar / Allow verification of required accuracy. Log all changes to guarantee accountability. develops constg of The TrustTheVote Project The Election Technology Framework Six Ma Buildg Blocks a digital public works project to develop critical democracy freely available for any jurdiction (e.g., a county) to adopt, Regterg frastructure. We are designg developg adapt, deploy for public elections. Typically, each open-stards-based elections technology collaboration jurdiction would have one copy of each component; though with local election officials from all around the country. some votg components are deployed to each precct. Open source, open stards, open data are key aspects Data Stards of the Election Technology Framework, tended to asst election officials conductg election admtration elections operations a process that accurate, secure, transparent, verifiable. an tegral aspect of the TrustTheVote Project s goal of makg elections One per precct wholly transparent, accurate, trustworthy In the reportg phase, elections data stored, fed to analyzed, prepared for public consumption. H- that presents a voter a PC dplay, prter, scanner that reads with all the contests questions for the voter s specific, creates a mache-countable usg options for audio or audio-enhanced presentation, the use The both process paper s create output data of two kds: recorded from that, tended for use rk limitg audits of the countg a fed to voter s choices, records the votes. technology used to record a vote for each mark detected. The voter ed of any sues with the marks or selections, has the The device does not store or manage data, but it does consolidate analyze data: device; used as put for both tally auditg vote totalg. Consolidated to the s output dataset of all vote tallies, s, vote totals. s: Consolidated to the s output dataset. : The uses the manifest created by the Election Manager ( cluded by the the s data) to audit the put set of vote tallies, to ensure that all only the expected tallies are presented accounted for. Each provides, stores, manages the data from the datasets that it receives: Jurdiction Election Defitions: Describe the election as a whole, cludg all items all vote tallyg dtricts, clude data for each. tallies available. Tallyg Device s: That s consolidated output dataset of all fal Enable everythg that matters about an election to be dependently verified, cludg accuracy security. The data ats used by (for take of for bulk data export) are stard common data ats. As a result, the data can come from any stards-compliant votg system. We ve also written connectors applications that translate from extg ats to enable to work with extg election systems. aggregation, analys, reportg. the web user terface to provide a wide range of data to be the bas of advanced reportg analys. Stard reports meet Federal reportg requirements. can correlate election results, voter regtration activity, voter personal identifyg ation, but does uniquely identify each voter several charactertics of voters that are needed for stattics reportg of voter T DL- DL- DL--T DL- Jurdiction Election Tallyg Device s Transaction Log record requests voter The core jurdiction election results defition to record the defition. DL-- DL-- DL-- DL- regtration admtration, DL- votg admtration, provional s DL- counts vote totals. Pew VIP or Pew IC near future near future near future near future near future to support The Election Process Absentee s In-Person s T cludes a vual (Stalone) s can access the data create their own tools republh the data or do their own analys. Regtrar / OSET Foundation the TrustTheVote Project All Rights Reserved. Designed by Dubberly Design Office Version 5.1 August 19, 2014 mh/hs Numbers are matched with components the diagram below. : Place One per precct that presents a voter with all the contests questions for the voter s specific, creates a mache-countable a fed to H- fed to a PC dplay, prter, scanner that reads voter s choices, records the votes. usg options for audio or audio-enhanced presentation, the use technology used to record a vote for each mark detected. The voter ed of any sues with the marks or selections, has the Introducg the Election Technology Framework Because We All Deserve a Better Experience Election Called Lt Management Views Regtration Devices Ready Devices, Provional Ballots (PBs) Vote Tallies ed Beg Election Night Central Vote Tallies ed of Falize Election Regterg Election tration Office Regtrar of s Office Central Countg Office Data Layer Data Stards Data Formats Introducg the Election Technology Framework Critical Infrastructure to Increase Trust Preserve Democracy
Colorado Secretary of State Election Rules [8 CCR ]
Rule 25. Post-election audit 25.1 Definitions. As used in this rule, unless stated otherwise: 25.1.1 Audit Center means the page or pages of the Secretary of State s website devoted to risk-limiting audits.
More informationCase 2:13-cv Document Filed in TXSD on 11/20/14 Page 1 of 5. be temporarily unavailable scheduled. will. due. building We.
Page 5 Case :-cv-009 Document 79-0 Filed TXSD on /0/4 Page 5 Notice Various until Pho D not buildg We affected Navigional Friday ugust 0 from 500 now required menus along wh noncontent any convenience
More informationTrusted Logic Voting Systems with OASIS EML 4.0 (Election Markup Language)
April 27, 2005 http://www.oasis-open.org Trusted Logic Voting Systems with OASIS EML 4.0 (Election Markup Language) Presenter: David RR Webber Chair OASIS CAM TC http://drrw.net Contents Trusted Logic
More informationFew people think of IEEE
The IEEE VSSC/1622: Voting System Standards John Wack, National Institute of Standards and Technology The IEEE Voting System Standards Committee is developing standards and guidelines for voting to create
More informationVolume I Appendix A. Table of Contents
Volume I, Appendix A Table of Contents Glossary...A-1 i Volume I Appendix A A Glossary Absentee Ballot Acceptance Test Ballot Configuration Ballot Counter Ballot Counting Logic Ballot Format Ballot Image
More informationStatement on Security & Auditability
Statement on Security & Auditability Introduction This document is designed to assist Hart customers by providing key facts and support in preparation for the upcoming November 2016 election cycle. It
More informationEstonian National Electoral Committee. E-Voting System. General Overview
Estonian National Electoral Committee E-Voting System General Overview Tallinn 2005-2010 Annotation This paper gives an overview of the technical and organisational aspects of the Estonian e-voting system.
More informationCOMMISSION CHECKLIST FOR NOVEMBER GENERAL ELECTIONS (Effective May 18, 2004; Revised July 15, 2015)
COMMISSION CHECKLIST FOR NOVEMBER GENERAL ELECTIONS (Effective May 18, 2004; Revised July 15, 2015) This checklist is provided by the State Board of Election Commissioners as a tool for capturing and maintaining
More informationGAO ELECTIONS. States, Territories, and the District Are Taking a Range of Important Steps to Manage Their Varied Voting System Environments
GAO United States Government Accountability Office Report to the Chairman, Committee on Rules and Administration, U.S. Senate September 2008 ELECTIONS States, Territories, and the District Are Taking a
More informationMaryland State Board of Elections Comprehensive Audit Guidelines Revised: February 2018
Maryland State Board of Elections Comprehensive Audit Guidelines Revised: February 2018 The purpose of the Comprehensive Audit is ensure that local boards of elections ( local boards ) are adequately performing
More informationColorado Secretary of State Election Rules [8 CCR ]
Rule 2. Voter Registration 2.1 Submission of voter registration forms 2.1.1 An applicant may submit a properly executed voter registration form to the county clerk in person, by mail, by fax, by online
More informationCase Study. MegaMatcher Accelerator
MegaMatcher Accelerator Case Study Venezuela s New Biometric Voter Registration System Based on MegaMatcher biometric technology, the new system enrolls registered voters and verifies identity during local,
More informationThe name or number of the polling location; The number of ballots provided to or printed on-demand at the polling location;
Rule 10. Canvassing and Recount 10.1 Precanvass accounting 10.1.1 Detailed Ballot Log. The designated election official must keep a detailed ballot log that accounts for every ballot issued and received
More informationE- Voting System [2016]
E- Voting System 1 Mohd Asim, 2 Shobhit Kumar 1 CCSIT, Teerthanker Mahaveer University, Moradabad, India 2 Assistant Professor, CCSIT, Teerthanker Mahaveer University, Moradabad, India 1 asimtmu@gmail.com
More informationRisk-limiting Audits in Colorado
National Conference of State Legislatures The Future of Elections Williamsburg, VA June 15, 2015 Risk-limiting Audits in Colorado Dwight Shellman County Support Manager Colorado Department of State, Elections
More informationCOURAGEOUS LEADERSHIP Instilling Voter Confidence in Election Infrastructure
Instilling Voter Confidence in Election Infrastructure Instilling Voter Confidence in Election Infrastructure Today, rapidly changing technology and cyber threats not to mention the constant chatter on
More informationElection Night Results Guide
ENR Media Guide Election Night Results Guide North Carolina State Board of Elections Table of Contents Overview of North Carolina Election Night Results... 3 How do I access Election Night Results?...
More informationINDEX NO. UNASSIGNED NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/06/2018
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF NEW YORK STATE and NICHOLAS D1NNERSTE1N, Platiffs, IndexNo. v. Date Purchased: November 6, 201$ NEW YORK STATE BOARD
More informationThe documents listed below were utilized in the development of this Test Report:
1 Introduction The purpose of this Test Report is to document the procedures that Pro V&V, Inc. followed to perform certification testing of the of the Dominion Voting System D-Suite 5.5-NC to the requirements
More informationGeneral Framework of Electronic Voting and Implementation thereof at National Elections in Estonia
State Electoral Office of Estonia General Framework of Electronic Voting and Implementation thereof at National Elections in Estonia Document: IVXV-ÜK-1.0 Date: 20 June 2017 Tallinn 2017 Annotation This
More informationArthur M. Keller, Ph.D. David Mertz, Ph.D.
Open Source Voting Arthur M. Keller, Ph.D. David Mertz, Ph.D. Outline Concept Fully Disclosed Voting Systems Open Source Voting Systems Existing Open Source Voting Systems Open Source Is Not Enough Barriers
More informationDraft rules issued for comment on July 20, Ballot cast should be when voter relinquishes control of a marked, sealed ballot.
Draft rules issued for comment on July 20, 2016. Public Comment: Proposed Commenter Comment Department action Rule 1.1.8 Kolwicz Ballot cast should be when voter relinquishes control of a marked, sealed
More informationOASIS ELECTION AND VOTER SERVICES TECHNICAL COMMITTEE. ELECTION MARK-UP LANGUAGE (EML): e-voting PROCESS AND DATA REQUIREMENTS
OASIS ELECTION AND VOTER SERVICES TECHNICAL COMMITTEE ELECTION MARK-UP LANGUAGE (EML): e-voting PROCESS AND DATA REQUIREMENTS Version 2 5 September 2002 Page No 1 Document Control Abstract This document
More informationCity of Toronto Election Services Internet Voting for Persons with Disabilities Demonstration Script December 2013
City of Toronto Election Services Internet Voting for Persons with Disabilities Demonstration Script December 2013 Demonstration Time: Scheduled Breaks: Demonstration Format: 9:00 AM 4:00 PM 10:15 AM 10:30
More informationVOTERGA SAFE COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS
VOTERGA SAFE COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS Recommended Objectives, Proposed Requirements, Legislative Suggestions with Legislative Appendices This document provides minimal objectives, requirements and legislative
More informationIf your answer to Question 1 is No, please skip to Question 6 below.
UNIFORM VOTING SYSTEM PILOT ELECTION COUNTY EVALUATION FORM ADAMS CLEAR BALLOT VOTING SYSTEM COUNTY, COLORADO Instructions: In most instances, you will be asked to grade your experience with various aspects
More informationCOMMITMENT INTEGRITY LEADERSHIP. Santa Clara County Registrar of Voters. October 2017
Santa Clara County Registrar of Voters Insufficient Policies and Procedures Have Led to Errors That May Have Reduced Voters Confidence in the Registrar s Office Report 2017 107 COMMITMENT INTEGRITY LEADERSHIP
More informationSECURITY, ACCURACY, AND RELIABILITY OF TARRANT COUNTY S VOTING SYSTEM
SECURITY, ACCURACY, AND RELIABILITY OF TARRANT COUNTY S VOTING SYSTEM Updated February 14, 2018 INTRODUCTION Tarrant County has been using the Hart InterCivic eslate electronic voting system for early
More informationREGISTRAR OF VOTERS. General Fund. FY11/12 Actual
General Government Function REGISTRAR OF VOTERS Mission: Description: Statutory Authority: The mission of the Washoe County Registrar of Voters Department is to provide the means by which all eligible
More informationColorado s Risk-Limiting Audits (RLA) CO Risk-Limiting Audits -- Feb Neal McBurnett
Colorado s Risk-Limiting Audits (RLA) CO Risk-Limiting Audits -- Feb 2018 -- Neal McBurnett Overview of the Journey Post-Election Audits are Important How Traditional Audits Work Why RLA is better Definitions
More informationIN-POLL TABULATOR PROCEDURES
IN-POLL TABULATOR PROCEDURES City of London 2018 Municipal Election Page 1 of 32 Table of Contents 1. DEFINITIONS...3 2. APPLICATION OF THIS PROCEDURE...7 3. ELECTION OFFICIALS...8 4. VOTING SUBDIVISIONS...8
More informationUnion Elections. Online Voting. for Credit. Helping increase voter turnout & provide accessible, efficient and secure election processes.
Online Voting for Credit Union Elections Helping increase voter turnout & provide accessible, efficient and secure election processes. In a time of cyber-security awareness, Federal Credit Unions and other
More informationScott Gessler Secretary of State
STATE OF COLORADO Department of State 1700 Broadway Suite 200 Denver, CO 80290 Scott Gessler Secretary of State Suzanne Staiert Deputy Secretary of State Revised Statement of Basis, Purpose, and Specific
More informationARKANSAS SECRETARY OF STATE
ARKANSAS SECRETARY OF STATE Rules on Vote Centers May 7, 2014 Revised April 6, 2018 1.0 TITLE 1.01 These rules shall be known as the Rules on Vote Centers. 2.0 AUTHORITY AND PURPOSE 2.01 These rules are
More informationAnalysis and Report of Overvotes and Undervotes for the 2014 General Election. January 31, 2015
Analysis and Report of Overvotes and Undervotes for the 2014 General Election Pursuant to Section 101.595, Florida Statutes January 31, 2015 Florida Department of State Ken Detzner Secretary of State Florida
More informationSecretary of State Chapter STATE OF ALABAMA OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE ADMINISTRATIVE CODE
STATE OF ALABAMA OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE ADMINISTRATIVE CODE CHAPTER 820-2-10 PROCEDURES FOR IMPLEMENTING THE UNIFORMED AND OVERSEAS CITIZENS ABSENTEE VOTING ACT ( UOCAVA ) TABLE OF CONTENTS 820-2-10-.01
More informationThe California Voter s Choice Act: Managing Transformational Change with Voting System Technology
The California Voter s Choice Act: Shifting Election Landscape The election landscape has evolved dramatically in the recent past, leading to significantly higher expectations from voters in terms of access,
More informationKey Considerations for Implementing Bodies and Oversight Actors
Implementing and Overseeing Electronic Voting and Counting Technologies Key Considerations for Implementing Bodies and Oversight Actors Lead Authors Ben Goldsmith Holly Ruthrauff This publication is made
More informationEML for Open Voting. Parker Abercrombie com. NIST Voting Data Formats Workshop. Gaithersburg October, 2009
Parker Abercrombie parker@theokorigroup. com EML for Open Voting NIST Voting Data Formats Workshop Gaithersburg October, 2009 Who we are Not-for-profit organization dedicated to the development of open
More informationARKANSAS SECRETARY OF STATE. Rules on Vote Centers
ARKANSAS SECRETARY OF STATE Rules on Vote Centers May 7, 2014 1.0 TITLE 1.01 These rules shall be known as the Rules on Vote Centers. 2.0 AUTHORITY AND PURPOSE 2.01 These rules are promulgated pursuant
More informationRisk-Limiting Audits
Risk-Limiting Audits Ronald L. Rivest MIT NASEM Future of Voting December 7, 2017 Risk-Limiting Audits (RLAs) Assumptions What do they do? What do they not do? How do RLAs work? Extensions References (Assumption)
More informationVoting System Certification Evaluation Report
Report Prepared for the Texas Secretary of State Elections Division Voting System Certification Evaluation Report Hart InterCivic (Hart) Verity Voting System 2.0 Introduction The Hart Verity Voting System
More informationResearch Article. ISSN (Print)
Scholars Journal of Engineering and Technology (SJET) Sch. J. Eng. Tech., 2015; 3(1A):37-41 Scholars Academic and Scientific Publisher (An International Publisher for Academic and Scientific Resources)
More informationTHE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN ENACT:
DRAFT 3 A bill to amend 1954 PA 116, entitled "Michigan election law," by amending sections 321, 576a, 580, 736b, 736c, 736d, 736e, 736f, 764, and 795 (MCL 168.321, 168.576a, 168.580, 168.736b, 168.736c,
More informationDIRECTIVE FOR THE 2018 GENERAL ELECTION FOR ALL ELECTORAL DISTRICTS FOR VOTE COUNTING EQUIPMENT AND ACCESSIBLE VOTING EQUIPMENT
Office of the Chief Electoral Officer of Ontario Bureau du directeur général des élections de l Ontario DIRECTIVE FOR THE 2018 GENERAL ELECTION FOR ALL ELECTORAL DISTRICTS FOR VOTE COUNTING EQUIPMENT AND
More informationSwiss E-Voting Workshop 2010
Swiss E-Voting Workshop 2010 Verifiability in Remote Voting Systems September 2010 Jordi Puiggali VP Research & Development Jordi.Puiggali@scytl.com Index Auditability in e-voting Types of verifiability
More informationBallot Reconciliation Procedure Guide
Ballot Reconciliation Procedure Guide One of the most important distinctions between the vote verification system employed by the Open Voting Consortium and that of the papertrail systems proposed by most
More informationSecure Electronic Voting
Secure Electronic Voting Dr. Costas Lambrinoudakis Lecturer Dept. of Information and Communication Systems Engineering University of the Aegean Greece & e-vote Project, Technical Director European Commission,
More informationCOMPUTING SCIENCE. University of Newcastle upon Tyne. Verified Encrypted Paper Audit Trails. P. Y. A. Ryan TECHNICAL REPORT SERIES
UNIVERSITY OF NEWCASTLE University of Newcastle upon Tyne COMPUTING SCIENCE Verified Encrypted Paper Audit Trails P. Y. A. Ryan TECHNICAL REPORT SERIES No. CS-TR-966 June, 2006 TECHNICAL REPORT SERIES
More informationGlobal Conditions (applies to all components):
Conditions for Use ES&S The Testing Board would also recommend the following conditions for use of the voting system. These conditions are required to be in place should the Secretary approve for certification
More informationSMS based Voting System
IJIRST International Journal for Innovative Research in Science & Technology Volume 4 Issue 11 April 2018 ISSN (online): 2349-6010 SMS based Voting System Dr. R. R. Mergu Associate Professor Ms. Nagmani
More informationM-Vote (Online Voting System)
ISSN (online): 2456-0006 International Journal of Science Technology Management and Research Available online at: M-Vote (Online Voting System) Madhuri Mahajan Madhuri Wagh Prof. Puspendu Biswas Yogeshwari
More informationELECTION VALIDATION PROJECT Increasing Trust in Elections Through Audits, Standards, and Testing
BALLOT RECONCILIATION & CHAIN OF CUSTODY RESOURCE ALLOCATION VRDB AUDITS WHY AUDIT? ELECTION VALIDATION PROJECT Increasing Trust in Elections Through Audits, Standards, and Testing RISK- LIMITING L&A TESTS
More informationVoting System Examination Election Systems & Software (ES&S)
Voting System Examination Election Systems & Software (ES&S) Prepared for the Secretary of State of Texas James Sneeringer, Ph.D. Designee of the Attorney General This report conveys the opinions of the
More informationElectronic Voting Systems
Electronic Voting Systems The Impact of System Actors to the Overall Security Level C. Lambrinoudakis *, V. Tsoumas +, M. Karyda +, D. Gritzalis +, S. Katsikas * * Dept. of Information and Communication
More informationIf further discussion would be of value, we stand by ready and eager to meet with your team at your convenience. Sincerely yours,
March 19, 2018 Honorable Matthew Dunlap Secretary of State Matthew.Dunlap@maine.gov Julie Flynn Deputy Secretary of State Julie.Flynn@maine.gov 148 State House Station Augusta, Maine 04333-0148 Dear Matt
More informationAPPENDIX MODERATOR'S RETURN
APPENDIX MODERATOR'S RETURN The Documents In This Section Will Constitute The Moderator's Return For The Towns Using The Marksense Voting Machine. They Replace All Forms Used With The Lever Voting Machines.
More informationChallenges and Advances in E-voting Systems Technical and Socio-technical Aspects. Peter Y A Ryan Lorenzo Strigini. Outline
Challenges and Advances in E-voting Systems Technical and Socio-technical Aspects Peter Y A Ryan Lorenzo Strigini 1 Outline The problem. Voter-verifiability. Overview of Prêt à Voter. Resilience and socio-technical
More informationSecurity and Election Systems
NCSL Summit Security and Election Systems Chicago, IL August 2016 Merle S. King 2011 In the News In the News In the News In the News Public Service or Panic? Possibility vs. Probability Possibility is
More informationProcedures for the Use of Optical Scan Vote Tabulators
Procedures for the Use of Optical Scan Vote Tabulators (Revised December 4, 2017) CONTENTS Purpose... 2 Application. 2 Exceptions. 2 Authority. 2 Definitions.. 3 Designations.. 4 Election Materials. 4
More informationSecure Voter Registration and Eligibility Checking for Nigerian Elections
Secure Voter Registration and Eligibility Checking for Nigerian Elections Nicholas Akinyokun Second International Joint Conference on Electronic Voting (E-Vote-ID 2017) Bregenz, Austria October 24, 2017
More informationNOTICE OF PRE-ELECTION LOGIC AND ACCURACY TESTING
Doc_01 NOTICE OF PRE-ELECTION LOGIC AND ACCURACY TESTING Notice is hereby given that the Board of Election for the City of Chicago will conduct pre-election logic and accuracy testing ( Pre-LAT ) of Grace
More informationE-Voting, a technical perspective
E-Voting, a technical perspective Dhaval Patel 04IT6006 School of Information Technology, IIT KGP 2/2/2005 patelc@sit.iitkgp.ernet.in 1 Seminar on E - Voting Seminar on E - Voting Table of contents E -
More informationOASIS ELECTION AND VOTER SERVICES TECHNICAL COMMITTEE. ELECTION MARK-UP LANGUAGE (EML): e-voting PROCESS AND DATA REQUIREMENTS 1/5757
OASIS ELECTION AND VOTER SERVICES TECHNICAL COMMITTEE ELECTION MARK-UP LANGUAGE (EML): e-voting PROCESS AND DATA REQUIREMENTS 1/5757 Document Control Abstract Date Version Status 29 Apr 02 1.0 Committee
More informationPrivacy Issues in an Electronic Voting Machine
Privacy Issues in an Arthur M. Keller UC Santa Cruz and Open Voting Consortium David Mertz Gnosis Software Joseph Lorenzo Hall UC Berkeley Arnold Urken Stevens Institute of Technology Outline Secret ballot
More informationColorado Secretary of State Election Rules [8 CCR ]
Rule 7. Elections Conducted by the County Clerk and Recorder 7.1 Mail ballot plans 7.1.1 The county clerk must submit a mail ballot plan to the Secretary of State by email no later than 90 days before
More informationPlease see my attached comments. Thank you.
From: Sent: To: Subject: Attachments: MJ Schillaci Friday, July 12, 2013 12:38 PM Public UVS Panel public comment on Voting System s UVSs-Public.doc Please see my attached
More informationTO: Chair and Members REPORT NO. CS Committee of the Whole Operations & Administration
TO: Chair and Members REPORT NO. CS2014-008 Committee of the Whole Operations & Administration FROM: Lori Wolfe, City Clerk, Director of Clerk s Services DATE: 1.0 TYPE OF REPORT CONSENT ITEM [ ] ITEM
More informationRisk-Limiting Audits for Denmark and Mongolia
Risk-Limiting Audits for Denmark and Mongolia Philip B. Stark Department of Statistics University of California, Berkeley IT University of Copenhagen Copenhagen, Denmark 24 May 2014 Joint work with Carsten
More informationNEWSLETTER MESSAGE FROM DEAN VOTING SYSTEMS ASSESSMENT PROJECT IN THIS ISSUE FUNDING UPDATE JUNE 2015 VOL. 1 ISSUE 1
NEWSLETTER JUNE 2015 VOL. 1 ISSUE 1 MESSAGE FROM DEAN IN THIS ISSUE Message from Dean Engineering Kickoff The Agile Process and System Engineering User Testing Research Committee Events In the News Future
More informationSTATE OF NEW JERSEY. SENATE, No th LEGISLATURE
SENATE, No. STATE OF NEW JERSEY th LEGISLATURE INTRODUCED JANUARY, 0 Sponsored by: Senator NIA H. GILL District (Essex and Passaic) Senator SHIRLEY K. TURNER District (Hunterdon and Mercer) SYNOPSIS Requires
More informationLogic & Accuracy Testing
Maria Matthews, Esq., Director Division of Elections David Drury, Chief Bureau of Voting Systems Certification Ken Detzner Secretary of State Linda Hastings-Ard, Sr. Mgmt. Analyst Bureau of Voting Systems
More informationSecure Electronic Voting: New trends, new threats, new options. Dimitris Gritzalis
Secure Electronic Voting: New trends, new threats, new options Dimitris Gritzalis 7 th Computer Security Incidents Response Teams Workshop Syros, Greece, September 2003 Secure Electronic Voting: New trends,
More informationMARYLAND Maryland MVA Real ID Act - Impact Analysis
MARYLAND Maryland MVA Real ID Act - Impact Analysis REAL ID ACT REQUIREMENT IMPACT ASSUMPTIONS Full Legal Name into Driver Licensing System (DLS) (In Record, on Document) Modify DLS application and databases.
More informationBrittle and Resilient Verifiable Voting Systems
Brittle and Resilient Verifiable Voting Systems Philip B. Stark Department of Statistics University of California, Berkeley Verifiable Voting Schemes Workshop: from Theory to Practice Interdisciplinary
More informationCOUNTY OF SACRAMENTO CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO CALIFORNIA For the Agenda of: January 29, 2019 Timed Item: 10:00 AM To: Through: From: Subject: District(s): Board of Supervisors Navdeep S. Gill, County Executive Courtney Bailey-Kanelos,
More informationSECURE REMOTE VOTER REGISTRATION
SECURE REMOTE VOTER REGISTRATION August 2008 Jordi Puiggali VP Research & Development Jordi.Puiggali@scytl.com Index Voter Registration Remote Voter Registration Current Systems Problems in the Current
More informationPROCEDURES FOR THE USE OF VOTE COUNT TABULATORS
2018 MUNICIPAL ELECTION OCTOBER 22, 2018 PROCEDURES FOR THE USE OF VOTE COUNT TABULATORS OLGA SMITH, CITY CLERK FOR INFORMATION OR ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CONTACT ONE OF THE FOLLOWING: Samantha Belletti, Election
More informationThis page intentionally left blank
This page intentionally left blank Boulder County Elections Boulder County Clerk and Recorder 1750 33rd Street, Suite 200 Boulder, CO 80301 www.bouldercountyvotes.org Phone: (303) 413-7740 AGENDA LOGIC
More informationSECTION 8. ELECTION AND VOTER REGISTRATION RECORDS
Douglas County s Retention Schedule SECTION 8. ELECTION AND VOTER REGISTRATION RECORDS s documenting the registration of voters and the conduct, administration and results of Douglas County elections.
More informationDirect Recording Electronic Voting Machines
Direct Recording Electronic Voting Machines This Act sets standards for direct recording electronic voting machines (DREs). As of July 1, 2005, DREs must, among other things: produce a voter-verified paper
More information2017 Risk-limiting Audit
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine: Committee on the Future of Voting Denver, Colorado December 7, 2017 2017 Risk-limiting Audit Hilary Rudy Deputy Director Colorado Department of
More informationH 8072 S T A T E O F R H O D E I S L A N D
LC00 01 -- H 0 S T A T E O F R H O D E I S L A N D IN GENERAL ASSEMBLY JANUARY SESSION, A.D. 01 A N A C T RELATING TO ELECTIONS -- CONDUCT OF ELECTIONS Introduced By: Representatives Shekarchi, Ackerman,
More informationAudits: an in-depth review of Venezuela s automatic voting
Audits: an in-depth review of Venezuela s automatic voting Automatic voting is available in the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela. From the selection of poll workers and members of electoral boards to the
More information2018 Municipal Election Logic & Accuracy Testing Procedure
2018 Municipal Election Logic & Accuracy Testing Procedure 1. Purpose: 1.1. To develop a procedure for logic and accuracy testing of tabulators to be used in the 2018 municipal and school board elections
More informationOnline Voting System Using Aadhar Card and Biometric
Online Voting System Using Aadhar Card and Biometric Nishigandha C 1, Nikhil P 2, Suman P 3, Vinayak G 4, Prof. Vishal D 5 BE Student, Department of Computer Science & Engineering, Kle s KLE College of,
More informationINSTRUCTIONS AND INFORMATION
STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS INSTRUCTIONS AND INFORMATION FOR CHALLENGERS, WATCHERS, AND OTHER ELECTION OBSERVERS Published by: State Board of Elections Linda H. Lamone, Administrator 151 West Street, Suite
More informationColorado Secretary of State
Colorado Secretary of State Election Rules [8 CCR 1505-1] Rule 1. Rule 2. Rule 3. Rule 4. Rule 5. Rule 6. Rule 7. Rule 8. Rule 9. Rule 10. Rule 11. Rule 12. Rule 13. Rule 14. Rule 15. Rule 16. Rule 17.
More information1S Recount Procedures. (1) Definitions. As used in this rule, the term: (a) Ballot text image means an electronic text record of the content of
1S-2.031 Recount Procedures. (1) Definitions. As used in this rule, the term: (a) Ballot text image means an electronic text record of the content of a touchscreen ballot cast by a voter and recorded by
More informationIC Chapter 7. Municipal Elections in Small Towns Located Outside Marion County
IC 3-10-7 Chapter 7. Municipal Elections in Small Towns Located Outside Marion County IC 3-10-7-1 Application of chapter Sec. 1. (a) This chapter applies to municipal elections in towns having a population
More informationIC Chapter 15. Ballot Card and Electronic Voting Systems; Additional Standards and Procedures for Approving System Changes
IC 3-11-15 Chapter 15. Ballot Card and Electronic Voting Systems; Additional Standards and Procedures for Approving System Changes IC 3-11-15-1 Applicability of chapter Sec. 1. Except as otherwise provided,
More informationAssembly Bill No. 45 Committee on Legislative Operations and Elections
Assembly Bill No. 45 Committee on Legislative Operations and Elections CHAPTER... AN ACT relating to public office; requiring a nongovernmental entity that sends a notice relating to voter registration
More informationAct means the Municipal Elections Act, 1996, c. 32 as amended;
The Corporation of the City of Brantford 2018 Municipal Election Procedure for use of the Automated Tabulator System and Online Voting System (Pursuant to section 42(3) of the Municipal Elections Act,
More informationThe usage of electronic voting is spreading because of the potential benefits of anonymity,
How to Improve Security in Electronic Voting? Abhishek Parakh and Subhash Kak Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA 70803 The usage of electronic
More informationCity of Greater Sudbury 2018 Municipal and School Board Election Voting and Vote Counting Procedures
City of Greater Sudbury 2018 Municipal and School Board Election Voting and Vote Counting Procedures 1 Table of Contents 1.0 General Information Pg. 4 1.1 Overview Pg. 4 1.2 Preamble and Authority Pg.
More informationE-vote 2011 Case no: Version: 3.3 Electronic counting of p-votes Date: 10/9/2009
E-vote 2011 Case no: 3.3 Electronic counting of p-votes Date: 10/9/2009 E-vote 2011 Use case specification: 3.3 Electronic counting of p-votes Project: E-vote 2011 CONTENT 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2 2. PURPOSE
More informationPROCEDURES FOR USE OF VOTE TABULATORS. Municipal Elections Township of Norwich
PROCEDURES FOR USE OF VOTE TABULATORS Municipal Elections 2014 Township of Norwich May 30, 2014 Township of Norwich Vote Tabulator Procedures DEFINITIONS 1. In this procedure, Act means the Municipal Elections
More informationESCAMBIA COUNTY VOTER GUIDE David H. Stafford Supervisor of Elections
ESCAMBIA COUNTY VOTER GUIDE 2018 David H. Stafford Supervisor of Elections 2018 Election Dates Federal, State, and Local Elections Primary: August 28, 2018 Registration and Party Change Deadline: July
More informationEvery electronic device used in elections operates and interacts
MONITORING ELECTRONIC TECHNOLOGIES IN ELECTORAL PROCESSES 13 CHAPTER TWO: Introduction to Electronic Technologies in Elections INTRODUCTION Every electronic device used in elections operates and interacts
More informationNetvote: A Blockchain Voting Protocol
Netvote: A Blockchain Voting Protocol Technical White Paper Jonathan Alexander Steven Landers Ben Howerton jalexander@netvote.io steven@netvote.io ben@netvote.io June 22, 2018 Version 1.12 Abstract This
More information