The real election and mandate Report on national post-election surveys
|
|
- Letitia Sims
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Date: November 13, 2012 To: From: Friends of Democracy Corps, Greenberg Quinlan Rosner, and Campaign for America s Future Stan Greenberg and James Carville, Democracy Corps Erica Seifert, Greenberg Quinlan Rosner Robert Borosage, Campaign for America s Future The real election and mandate Report on national post-election surveys President Obama won an Electoral College landslide and a 3 or 4-point national victory against the great odds posed by prolonged high unemployment, lack of income gains, a barely perceptible recovery and political gridlock that kept his job approval at just 50 percent at best. He won because he was able to engage the diverse national coalition of Latinos, African Americans and Asians, young people and unmarried women who formed nearly half the electorate, despite the fact that these groups suffered the brunt of recession and have benefited least from the halting recovery. He also succeeded because he waged class war and won. That was how he was able to define the choice, winning back voters who had been hammered by the economy and getting them mobilized again. That he waged class warfare successfully has critical consequences for what is the mandate in the weeks and months ahead. This memo reports the results of the survey that Democracy Corps conducted for Campaign for America s Future on Election Night and the night after so voters were still clear about what was in their head at the time of the election. 1 We will also incorporate results conducted for Women s Voices. Women Vote Action Fund, Economy Media Project, and Human Rights Campaign. The President came back in the race when he centered the choice on the future facing the middle class and equally important, defined Mitt Romney as out-of-touch rich guy who does not care about the 47 percent, shipped jobs overseas as CEO of Bain Capital, wanted to cut taxes for the rich and wanted to reform and change Medicare in major ways. 1 This memo is mostly based on a national post-election survey of 1, presidential voters, conducted November 6-7, 2012 by Greenberg Quinlan Rosner for Democracy Corps and Campaign for America s Future. Unless otherwise noted, margin of error= +/ Survey results were weighted to reflect the National Exit Survey. The memo is also based on a data from a combined set of surveys partnering with several other progressive groups, including Women s Voices. Women Vote Action Fund, Economy Media Project and Human Rights Campaign.
2 Understand that most voters voted to keep Obama in office, despite the fact that majorities thought the country was on the wrong track and wanted change. They have intensely negative feelings about Wall Street and the the richest 1 percent. Romney got voters attention, as this survey shows. By 11 points, they thought he might have a better chance of breaking the gridlock (47 to 36 percent) where Obama was perceived to have failed. And by 5 points, voters thought he had better ideas on creating jobs. Only 44 percent said Obama was better than Romney on jobs a critical gap in an election where economy and jobs were the number one issue and number one priority for the future. The starting point for this election is the near double-digit advantage Obama established on restoring the middle class (51 to 42 percent) the choice the two candidates battled to win right to the end. The advantage was triple Obama s advantage in the vote and tracked his vote at 51 percent. The advantage on the core election choice was reflected in a collection of partisan and ideological factors that put Obama at an 8-point personal advantage over Romney (comparing net favorability), the Democratic Party at a 7-point advantage over the Republican Party, and the Democrats in Congress, a 7-point net advantage over the Republican Congress. Voters most disliked Wall Street and the richest 1 percent, and the Tea Party movement. They felt most warm about Planned Parenthood and Medicare. That contributed directly to the Democrats 6-point advantage in party identification. Bottom line, the voters gave a very clear mandate to the president: address the economy and growth, and protect middle class social insurance. Addressing deficits was important, but further down the priority list. By two-to-one, voters say the top priority should be growing the economy rather than a plan to reduce our deficits. Voters are not looking for Simpson-Bowles, but nearly the opposite tax increases on top earners and protection of Medicare and Social Security. The political class should pay attention, lest they see a TARP-like reaction to what is deemed to be bold change at a critical turning point, with negotiations now beginning in the fiscal showdown. Yes, class warfare won. The President framed this election as a make or break moment for the middle class. That was the starting point in his battle for re-election: in effect, waging class war, standing with the middle class, insisting that everybody pay their fair share and get a fair shake, while advocating higher taxes on the wealthiest as a central plank in his platform. With the country upset with Wall Street and the top 1 percent, Obama defined Romney as out of touch, an outsourcer, and a champion of trickle down who wanted to protect tax cuts for the rich. When Obama and swing voters were asked their three biggest doubts about Romney, being for the rich and out of touch with average people encompass half of the total responses. 2
3 3
4 The volatile voters that Obama consolidated to produce his majority of 51 percent were more populist than those Obama voters who never wavered. They were more likely to mention the 47 percent video and much more likely to site outsourcing at Bain and return to trickle-down economics. Obama s majority was produced by those class attacks on Romney. The Rising American Electorate of unmarried women, minority, and young voters that gave Obama almost as big a percentage as in 2008 were also moved above all by this class characterization of Romney 63 percent of their total reasons given for voting against Romney. Ultimately, Obama won by 9 points on which candidate would restore the middle class the summary of the class battleground in this election. With the election centered on the future of the middle class and Obama s vote shaped by it, the country s real policy agenda for the future looks very different than the elites. We read voters this statement: Both Barack Obama and Mitt Romney said in their campaigns that this election is about the future of the middle class. That was the big choice. Now, that the election is over, which THREE of the following are the most important things for us to focus on? Across the whole electorate, 50 percent said create jobs and get the economy moving well ahead of deficit reduction, protecting middle class retirement benefits, 4
5 and investing in education. But note that the deficit number was produced almost entirely by the Romney voters. Among the certain and swing Obama voters, addressing the deficit ranked 3 rd and 4 th behind other priorities particularly protecting middle class retirement benefits, including Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security. It should not be surprising that voters in this election now prioritize growth over deficit reduction and believe pretty simply that Medicare and Social Security should not be part of any big bi-partisan deficit reduction package. 5
6 In a post-election survey for The Economy Media Project, we contrasted two alternatives one to expand employment and other to protect social insurance against the conservative and elite priority, presented below Given where our economy is, we should cut government spending and reduce the federal deficit that weighs down our economy and give confidence to businesses to invest and create jobs. When given the alternative to invest now in infrastructure, education and technology, and rehiring teachers and firefighters, they opted for growth over deficit reduction by 9 points (52 to 43 percent). When given the alternative of helping the middle class by protecting Medicare and Social Security, they opt for protecting retirement programs over deficit reduction by 9 points (50 to 41 percent). It could not be clearer: this election produced a citizenry educated on how they want to address the economy and the future of the middle class. Since both Democrats and Republicans attacked the other side for cutting Medicare spending and endangering the program, it would be an unpleasant surprise to voters if Medicare were the first casualty of deficit reduction. Elite opinion risks another TARP where voters came to feel the elites of both parties took the wrong lesson from the election and economic crisis. 6
7 The Grand Bargain With Congress beginning to consider a grand bargain on long-term deficit reduction to avoid the so-called fiscal cliff, our survey found that voters have clear and strong priorities and these contrast starkly with the terms discussed in the President s negotiations with House Speaker Boehner in the summer of 2011 and with the recommendations of the co-chairs of the President s deficit commission, Alan Simpson and Erskine Bowles. We asked voters what they would find acceptable and unacceptable in a $4 trillion deficit reduction deal. They overwhelmingly and across the political spectrum want Medicare and Social Security protected. They found unacceptable cuts in domestic programs that failed to protect programs for infants, poor children, schools and college aid. More than two-thirds would find an agreement unacceptable if it did not raise taxes on the rich, or if it lowered top rates on the rich and the corporations. This is not because they oppose all measures to close the deficit. They favor raising taxes on the rich. Three in four found acceptable a plan that would create a higher tax rate on those earning over one million dollars a year (including a majority of Republicans). Seventy percent agreed with the president s call to raise taxes on the top 2 percent, while keeping them low for the middle and working class. More than two-thirds found acceptable shutting down corporate tax havens abroad by imposing a minimum tax on overseas profits (including 71 percent of Republicans). 7
8 Voters want cuts in waste and subsidies to special interests. For example, 89 percent found acceptable savings from negotiating lower drug prices from drug companies. Nearly twothirds (65 percent) favored cuts in subsidies to oil companies, agribusiness and multinational corporations. Nearly three-fourths favored cutting military spending by ending the war in Afghanistan (including 60 percent of conservatives). While voters think deficit reduction is a serious priority although below that of creating jobs and growth they do not believe that Social Security and Medicare need to be cut to address it. We gave voters a choice between two statements one acknowledging the federal deficit as a big problem, but arguing against major spending cuts in Social Security and Medicare and the other arguing deficits are such a national crisis that broad spending cuts must include possible future cuts to Social Security and Medicare. Even with this cautious statement, 60 percent preferred the no cut position (47 percent strongly) to 33 percent who accepted the potential of future cuts. Just as voters will be unpleasantly surprised if a deficit deal costs jobs and slows the economy, they are likely to object to legislators who vote for a deal that includes cuts in Medicare and Social Security, while failing to raise tax rates on the rich and the corporations, or to take on wasteful corporate subsidies. Defeating austerity The debate over Simpson-Bowles or any big bi-partisan budget deal up until now has taken for granted that the first priority for the country is reducing its long-term deficits. But that was before austerity drove much of Europe into recession and before we had an election on the topic. This is a serious debate where progressives have been making gains, despite the elite consensus on the need for restraining spending and deficits. Here is where we stand: On the simple choice between a plan to grow the economy and a plan to reduce the deficit, growth wins 62 to 30 percent among those who voted last week. Voters split evenly on whether the short-term pain is worth it even when conservatives argue that the short-term spending endangers our future. Growth wins the argument in a big way when joined with a commitment to reduce wasteful spending and eliminate special interest loopholes and subsidies. This is a critical part of the progressive argument. Growth plans gain support and win a decisive majority when they are more populist: A new plan must start by closing corporate loopholes and raising taxes on those at the top even as it affirms that any deficit plan must not entertain Medicare or Social Security cuts. 8
9 And the Economic Media Project s research shows increasing support for a liberal economic position that warns against drastic spending cuts and supports serious investments: We should avoid immediate drastic cuts in spending, and instead, we need serious investments that create jobs and make us more prosperous in the long term that will reduce our debt, too. We know that voters are skeptical about short-term stimulus spending that is not grounded in long-term investments for the country that will make us more prosperous with less debt. But serious investments that make us more prosperous in the long-term wins the public argument by 51 to 42 percent and those margins have been growing going into this period of debate about the economy and debt. Those elected last week are in a position to argue for investment-led growth to enrich us long-term, confident that that policy will supersede calls to focus on lower long-term deficits. We need not give into the hysteria over deficits and fiscal cliff. The jobs agenda The president won re-election by making the choice about the middle class and defining Romney as for the rich and out of touch. But on the main issue in voters minds the economy and creating jobs Obama did not gain an edge over Romney. Many of Obama s unwavering voters supported him because of his handling of the crisis and wanting to continue the progress, as well as his rescue of the auto industry. A nearly equal number supported him because of his plans on the economy and to raise taxes on the wealthy. In any case, the economic reasons for supporting Obama form just one-third of the total responses and they are divided between past and future judgments. Romney s positive offer was more focused split evenly between his jobs plans and business experience on the one hand and his intention to cut government spending, repeal Obamacare, and reduce the deficit. For the certain Romney voters, his job plans topped the reasons to vote for him. The result is that on Election Day, Romney enjoyed a 2-point advantage on the economy and was up 5 points on creating jobs: just 44 percent chose Obama on jobs 7 points below his vote. While voters are looking for action on the economy and jobs, Obama did not highlight what he intended to do differently on the economy. His argument for allowing his policy more time appealed largely to his most loyal supporters. We know the voters in this Election night survey responded very warmly to a plan to invest in new industries and rebuild the country and create jobs over the next five years: over two-thirds were very favorable to this idea and this result is 8 points higher than a longterm plan for addressing the deficit. 9
10 We know that Obama got 39 percent of the white vote and over one-third (36 percent) of white non-college voters. Those voters had even more doubts about Romney being for the rich and out-of-touch and perhaps more would have moved to Obama had there been a bigger offer on jobs and long-term economic plans. Voters are still looking for action on the economy and jobs, and there is good reason to believe they are open to serious investments that put America on a track that rescues the middle class. 10
The Big Decisions Ahead on Economic Renewal and Reduced Debt
Date: August 12, 2010 To: From: Friends of Democracy Corps and Campaign for America s Future Stan Greenberg, James Carville, Peyton M. Craighill The Big Decisions Ahead on Economic Renewal and Reduced
More informationThe real mandate and looking forward after this election. November 15, 2012
The real mandate and looking forward after this election November 15, 2012 2 Methodology and Overview This presentation is based on several post-election surveys conducted by Greenberg Quinlan Rosner Research
More informationStan Greenberg and James Carville, Democracy Corps Erica Seifert and Scott Tiell, Greenberg Quinlan Rosner
Date: June 21, 2013 From: Stan Greenberg and James Carville, Democracy Corps Erica Seifert and Scott Tiell, Greenberg Quinlan Rosner Not so fast 2014 Congressional Battleground very competitive First survey
More informationThe Role of the Rising American Electorate in the 2012 Election
Date: November 9, 2012 To: From: Interested Parties Page Gardner, Women s Voices, Women Vote Action Fund; Stanley B. Greenberg, Democracy Corps/GQRR; Erica Seifert, Democracy Corps; David Walker, GQRR
More informationHow unmarried women, youth and people of color defined this election. November 8, 2012
How unmarried women, youth and people of color defined this election November 8, 2012 2 Methodology and Specifications This presentation is based on a survey conducted by Greenberg Quinlan Rosner Research
More informationPresident Obama s Political Project
Date: February 13, 0 To: From: Friends of Democracy Corps and Greenberg Quinlan Rosner Stanley B. Greenberg, James Carville and Andrew Baumann President Obama s Political Project National survey points
More informationState of the Union 2014: At critical juncture, President makes major gains
Date: January 29, 2014 To: Friends of and Women s Voices Women Vote Action Fund From: Stan Greenberg, James Carville, Erica Seifert, and Scott Tiell State of the Union 2014: At critical juncture, President
More informationTen Economic Lessons from President Obama s State of the Union Address
Date: March 7, 2013 To: Friends of and Greenberg Quinlan Rosner From: Stan Greenberg, James Carville, and Erica Seifert Ten Economic Lessons from President Obama s State of the Union Address 1. The economy
More informationFriends of Democracy Corps and Greenberg Quinlan Rosner 1994=2010. Report on the Democracy Corps and Resurgent Republic bipartisan post election poll
Date: November 9, 2010 To: From: Friends of Democracy Corps and Greenberg Quinlan Rosner Stan Greenberg and James Carville 1994=2010 Report on the Democracy Corps and Resurgent Republic bipartisan post
More informationFriends of Democracy Corps and Campaign for America s Future. It s Jobs, Stupid
Date: January 18, 2011 To: From: Friends of Democracy Corps and Campaign for America s Future Stan Greenberg, James Carville, Robert Borosage It s Jobs, Stupid The voters have a clear and dramatic message
More informationThe Budget Battle in the Republican-Obama Battleground
Date: March 28, 2011 To: From: Friends of Democracy Corps Stan Greenberg, James Carville, Andrew Baumann and Erica Seifert The Budget Battle in the Republican-Obama Battleground Budget Debate Moves Voters
More informationThe New Politics and New Mandate
Date: November 12, 2008 To: From: Friends of Democracy Corps and the Campaign for America s Future Stanley Greenberg, James Carville, and Ana Iparraguirre The New Politics and New Mandate Report on the
More informationWinning the Economic Argument Report on October National survey: The Economy
Date: November 3, 2011 To: From: Friends of Democracy Corps and Greenberg Quinlan Rosner Stanley Greenberg, James Carville, and Erica Seifert Winning the Economic Argument Report on October National survey:
More informationDemocracy Corps/Campaign for America s Future Frequency Questionnaire
Democracy Corps/Campaign for America s Future Frequency Questionnaire November 6-7, 2012 1012 Presidential Election Voters Q.3 First of all, are you registered to vote? Yes... 100 No...- (Refused)...-
More informationThe Urgent Policy Agenda for Unmarried Women Unmarried women focused on critical economic issues
The Urgent Policy Agenda for Unmarried Women Unmarried women focused on critical economic issues March 25, 2013 Methodology: cell and demographic change This presentation is based on our latest national
More informationBreakthrough Economic Message Results of major web survey on the economy. July 18, 2011
Breakthrough Economic Message Results of major web survey on the economy July 18, 2011 2 The experiment This presentation is based on a national web survey of 2,000 likely 2012 voters (2,000 weighted)
More informationThe Budget Battle and AIG
The Budget Battle and AIG Democracy Corps The surveys This presentation is based primarily on a national Democracy Corps survey of 1,000 2008 voters (834 landline, 166 cell phone weighted; 880 landline,
More informationObama, Democrats Well Positioned For Budget Debate
Date: March 20, 2009 To: From: Friends of Democracy Corps and Greenberg Quinlan Rosner Stanley B. Greenberg, James Carville and Andrew Baumann Obama, Democrats Well Positioned For Budget Debate National
More informationPublic Opinion Strategies/Greenberg Quinlan Rosner Research October 2010
Project #101309 2 This survey was conducted by Public Opinion Strategies in conjunction with Greenberg Quinlan Rosner Research for National Public Radio and is the 31st survey in the NPR series. These
More informationThe unheard winning and bold economic agenda Findings from the Roosevelt Institute s Election night survey
Date: November 15, 2016 To: The Roosevelt Institute From: Stan Greenberg and Nancy Zdunkewicz, The unheard winning and bold economic agenda Findings from the Roosevelt Institute s Election night survey
More informationState of the Union 2015: Playing offense, President Obama makes gains on critical issues
Date: January 21, 2015 To: Friends of and Women s Voices Women Vote Action Fund and The Voter Participation Center From: Stan Greenberg and James Carville, Missy Egelsky and Ben Winston, Greenberg Quinlan
More informationRevolt against Congress: Game On Survey of the Battleground House Districts
Date: December 13, 2013 To: Friends of and Women s Voices Women Vote Action Fund From: Stan Greenberg, James Carville, and Erica Seifert Revolt against Congress: Game On Survey of the Battleground House
More informationMEMORANDUM. Independent Voter Preferences
MEMORANDUM TO: Interested Parties FROM: Ed Gillespie, Whit Ayres and Leslie Sanchez DATE: November 9, 2010 RE: Post-Election Poll Highlights: Independents Propel Republican Victories in 2010 The 2010 mid-term
More informationCreating a Mandate to Rewrite the Rules of the Economy July 2016
Creating a Mandate to Rewrite the Rules of the Economy July 2016 Methodology National phone survey of 900 likely 2016 voters from July 13-18, 2016. This survey took place July 13-18, 2016. Respondents
More informationObama makes gains among swing voters on critical issues
Date: February 13, 2013 To: From: Friends of, Women s Voices. Women Vote Action Fund, and the Economic Media Project, Women s Voices. Women Vote Action Fund, and the Economic Media Project Obama makes
More informationWhat Next for President Obama and Democrats? Recommended action based on three post-election national surveys
Date: November 19, 2010 To: From: Friends of Democracy Corps and Greenberg Quinlan Rosner Stanley Greenberg and James Carville, Democracy Corps What Next for President Obama and Democrats? Recommended
More informationFraming the 2010 election
September 20, 2010 Page 1 September 20, 2010 Framing the 2010 election Message test using a web-panel experiment September 20, 2010 Page 2 Republican message frameworks The following is a statement by
More informationThe Urgent Economic Narrative for 2014
Date: April 16, 2014 To: From: Friends of Democracy Corps and Greenberg Quinlan Rosner Stan Greenberg, James Carville, Erica Seifert, and Fredrica Mayer, Democracy Corps Page Gardner, Women s Voices Women
More informationThe Changing Presidential Race after the Conventions
Date: September 15, 2008 To: From: Friends of Democracy Corps Stan Greenberg and James Carville The Changing Presidential Race after the Conventions Report on national survey and survey of presidential
More informationPresident Obama Scores With Middle Class Message
Date: January 25, 2012 To: Friends of and GQR Digital From: and GQR Digital President Obama Scores With Middle Class Message But Voters Skeptical That Washington, Including President, Can Actually Get
More informationPost-mortem survey: the historic 2010 election
November 2-3, 2010 Post-mortem survey: the historic 2010 election Campaign for America s Future Democracy Corps Methodology and Overview The results of the following survey are displayed throughout this
More informationThe 2014 Election and Looking Ahead National Survey of 2016 Likely Voters November 7, 2014
The 2014 Election and Looking Ahead National Survey of 2016 Likely Voters November 7, 2014 2 The method: survey of 2014 voters and presidential year voters This presentation is based on this unique survey
More informationThis Rising American Electorate & Working Class Strike Back
Date: November 9, 2018 To: Interest parties From: Stan Greenberg, Greenberg Research Nancy Zdunkewicz, Page Gardner, Women s Voices. Women Vote Action Fund This Rising American Electorate & Working Class
More informationDemocrats embraced strong message on Trump tax cuts and economy & won big in 2018
Date: November 14, 2018 To: Interested parties From: Randi Weingarten, American Federation of Teachers Stanley Greenberg, Greenberg Research Nancy Zdunkewicz, Democracy Corps Democrats embraced strong
More informationWinning with a middle class reform politics and government message Report on a new national survey
Date: December 17, 2015 To: Friends of & WVWVAF From: Stan Greenberg, Page Gardner, Women s Voices, Women Vote Action Fund David Walker, Greenberg Quinlan Rosner Winning with a middle class reform politics
More informationConsolidating Democrats The strategy that gives a governing majority
Date: September 23, 2016 To: Progressive community From: Stan Greenberg, Page Gardner, Women s Voices. Women Vote Action Fund Consolidating Democrats The strategy that gives a governing majority On the
More informationHillary Clinton s strong debate defines closing election choice Clinton gains on honesty, middle class and economy and impacts U.S.
Date: October 21, 2016 To: Progressive community From: Stan Greenberg and Nancy Zdunkewicz, Page Gardner, Women s Voices Women Vote Action Fund Hillary Clinton s strong debate defines closing election
More informationANOTHER CONGRESSIONAL WAVE ELECTION?
Date: June 3, 2008 To: From: Friends of Democracy Corps and Greenberg Quinlan Rosner Stan Greenberg, James Carville and Ana Iparraguirre ANOTHER CONGRESSIONAL WAVE ELECTION? Democrats Improve Advantage
More informationEconomic Agenda for Working Women and Men
Date: July 22, 2014 To: Friends of and WVWVAF From: Stan Greenberg and James Carville, Page Gardner, WVWVAF James Hazzard, GQRR Economic Agenda for Working Women and Men The Difference in the Senate Battleground?
More informationRural America Competitive Bush Problems and Economic Stress Put Rural America in play in 2008
June 8, 07 Rural America Competitive Bush Problems and Economic Stress Put Rural America in play in 08 To: From: Interested Parties Anna Greenberg, Greenberg Quinlan Rosner William Greener, Greener and
More informationA Winning Middle Class Reform Government & Politics Message. December 16, 2015
A Winning Middle Class Reform Government & Politics Message December 16, 2015 Methodology National Survey of 900 Likely 2016 Voters. This survey took place December 5-9, 2015. Respondents who voted in
More informationIn 2008, President Obama and Congressional Democrats
Report MODERATE POLITICS NOVEMBER 2010 Droppers and Switchers : The Fraying Obama Coalition By Anne Kim and Stefan Hankin In 2008, President Obama and Congressional Democrats assembled a broad and winning
More informationThe Rising American Electorate & White Working Class Strike Back: Extended memo from post-election research
Date: November 27, 2018 To: Interested parties From: Stanley Greenberg, Greenberg Research Nancy Zdunkewicz, Page Gardner, Women s Voices. Women Vote Action Fund The Rising American Electorate & White
More informationVoters Support Bold Economic Agenda
Support Bold Economic Agenda Methodology: Demos sponsored an online survey among 1,536 registered voters, conducted June 5 to June 14, 2017. The research included a base sample of registered voters and,
More informationDemocracy Corps/Women's Voices Women Vote Frequency Questionnaire
Democracy Corps/Women's Voices Women Vote Frequency Questionnaire June 10-15, 2014 950 2012 Voters 827 Likely 2014 Voter 463 Rising American Electorate 261 Unmarried Women Q.3 First of all, are you registered
More informationHART RESEARCH ASSOCIATES/PUBLIC OPINION STRATEGIES Study # page 1
HART RESEARCH ASSOCIATES/PUBLIC OPINION STRATEGIES Study #14039 -- page 1 Interviews: 800 Adults, including 240 cell phone only respondents Date: January 22-25, 2014 Study #14039 48 Male 52 Female Please
More information1) They want a bipartisan deal on the federal deficit. The Social Policy & Politics Program. November 2012
The Social Policy & Politics Program November 2012 TO: Interested Parties FROM: Michelle Diggles, Senior Policy Advisor Lanae Erickson Hatalsky, Director of Social Policy & Politics RE: Post-Election Poll:
More informationAFT Frequency Questionnaire
AFT Frequency Questionnaire March 25 - April 2, 2018 1000 Registered Voters 119 Battleground Voters 495 Democratic Voters 414 Republican Voters Q.4 First of all, are you registered to vote at this address?
More informationObama Emerging Ahead in Close Race
Date: May 29, 2008 To: From: Friends of Democracy Corps Stan Greenberg and Ana Iparraguirre Obama Emerging Ahead in Close Race Race begins to take definition in latest Democracy Corps National Survey As
More informationVoters Push Back Against Big Money Politics. November 13, 2012
Voters Push Back Against Big Money Politics November 13, 2012 2 Methodology and Overview This presentation is based on a survey conducted by Greenberg Quinlan Rosner Research for Democracy Corps and Public
More informationLandslide election Potential for Democratic Gains. October 2016
Landslide election Potential for Democratic Gains October 2016 Methodology National phone survey of 900 Likely 2016 Voters. This survey took place October 21-24 among national likely voters. Likely voters
More informationObama Builds Real Lead in Presidential Contest
Obama Builds Real Lead in Presidential Contest Report on post-convention survey September 14, 2012 2 Methodology and Overview This presentation is based on a survey conducted by Greenberg Quinlan Rosner
More informationThe number of Americans identifying as Independents has
MODERATE POLITICS APRIL 2012 Opportunity Trumps Fairness with Swing Independents By Michelle Diggles and Lanae Erickson Report The number of Americans identifying as Independents has reached historic levels,
More information2018 at a breaking point? Impressive gains among base and persuasion targets, and potential for more
Date: January 24, 2018 To: From: Page Gardner, Women s Voices Women Vote Action Fund Stanley Greenberg, Greenberg Research Nancy Zdunkewicz, 2018 at a breaking point? Impressive gains among base and persuasion
More informationRE: Less Spending and More Government: the Conflicting Views of Voters Under 40
MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: Interested Parties Ed Gillespie and Jan van Lohuizen DATE: February 26, 2013 RE: Less Spending and More Government: the Conflicting Views of Voters Under 40 In the first installment
More informationA Powerful Agenda for 2016 Democrats Need to Give Voters a Reason to Participate
Date: June 29, 2015 To: Friends of and WVWVAF From: Stan Greenberg and Nancy Zdunkewicz, Page Gardner, Women s Voices Women Vote Action Fund A Powerful Agenda for 2016 Democrats Need to Give Voters a Reason
More informationIt s the Democrats Turn National Voter Survey of Likely 2016 Voters. January 16, 2015
It s the Democrats Turn National Voter Survey of Likely 2016 Voters January 16, 2015 Methodology This research was a joint project of Democracy Corps, the Women s Voices Women Vote Action Fund, and the
More informationObama and Democrats have clear advantage in 2012 election. July 30, 2012
Obama and Democrats have clear advantage in 2012 election July 30, 2012 Methodology and Overview This presentation is based on a survey conducted by Greenberg Quinlan Rosner Research for Democracy Corps.
More informationTHE TARRANCE GROUP. Interested Parties. Brian Nienaber. Key findings from the Battleground Week 6 Survey
THE TARRANCE GROUP To: From: Re: Interested Parties Ed Goeas Brian Nienaber Key findings from the Battleground Week 6 Survey The Tarrance Group with its partners Lake Research Partners, POLITICO, and George
More informationUNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS U.S. SENATE POLL Sept , ,005 Registered Voters (RVs)
UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS U.S. SENATE POLL Sept. 22-28, 2011-1,005 Registered Voters (RVs) Sampling error on full sample is +/- 3.8 percentage points, larger for subgroups and for
More informationTurnout and the New American Majority
Date: February 26, 2010 To: From: Friends of Democracy Corps and Women s Voices. Women Vote Stan Greenberg and Dave Walker Turnout and the New American Majority A Year-Long Project Tracking Voter Participation
More informationObama Closes the Democrats Historical National Security Gap
Date: May 19, 2009 To: From: Friends of Democracy Corps and Greenberg Quinlan Rosner Stan Greenberg and James Carville, Democracy Corps Jeremy Rosner and Kristi Fuksa, Greenberg Quinlan Rosner Research
More informationA Pivotal Political Moment on Health Care. July 31, 2012
A Pivotal Political Moment on Health Care July 31, 2012 2 Methodology and Overview This presentation is based on a survey conducted by Greenberg Quinlan Rosner Research for Democracy Corps and Women s
More informationDemocracy Corps/ Women's Voices. Women Vote Action Fund Frequency Questionnaire
Democracy Corps/ Women's Voices. Women Vote Action Fund Frequency Questionnaire May 21-25, 2011 1000 Likely Voters 200 Youth Oversample 200 Unmarried Women Oversample 80 Non-white Oversample Q.3 First
More informationThe Democrats Turn First Steps on the Road Back
Date: January 16, 2015 To: Friends of and WVWVAF From: Stan Greenberg, Dave Walker and Angela Kuefler, Greenberg Quinlan Rosner Research Page Gardner, Women s Voices Women Vote Action Fund The Democrats
More informationDemocracy Corps June Survey: Grim Stability Will Require Race-by-Race Fight
July 8, 2010 July Page 8, 20101 July 8, 2010 Democracy Corps June Survey: Grim Stability Will Require Race-by-Race Fight July 8, 2010 July Page 8, 2010 2 Methodology This presentation is based primarily
More informationChange versus more of the same: On-going panel of target voting groups provides path for Democrats in 2018
Date: November 2, 2017 To: Page Gardner, Women s Voices Women Vote Action Fund From: Stan Greenberg, Greenberg Research Nancy Zdunkewicz, Change versus more of the same: On-going panel of target voting
More informationDemocracy Corps Frequency Questionnaire
Democracy Corps Frequency Questionnaire March 15-18, 2010 1,016 2008 Voters 850 Likely Voters (871 unweighted) 1 166 Drop-Off Voters (145 unweighted) 2 Q.3 First of all, are you registered to vote? Likely
More informationSurvey of US Voters Issues and Attitudes June 2014
Survey of US Voters Issues and Attitudes June 2014 Methodology Three surveys of U.S. voters conducted in late 2013 Two online surveys of voters, respondents reached using recruit-only online panel of adults
More informationState of the Union 2018: no sugar high Dial meter research among the Rising American Electorate
Date: February 1, 2018 To: From: Page Gardner, Women s Voices Women Vote Action Fund Stanley Greenberg, Greenberg Research Nancy Zdunkewicz, State of the Union 2018: no sugar high Dial meter research among
More informationEdging toward an earthquake Report on the WVWV March National Survey
Date: April 1, 2016 To: Page Gardner, Women s Voices. Women Vote Action Fund From: Stan Greenberg and Nancy Zdunkewicz, Edging toward an earthquake Report on the WVWV March National Survey new poll on
More informationWomen s Economic Agenda Powerful impact on vote and turnout in Democracy Corps/WVWVAF & VPC National Survey April 8, 2014
Women s Economic Agenda Powerful impact on vote and turnout in 2014 Democracy Corps/WVWVAF & VPC National Survey April 8, 2014 Methodology: cell and demographic change This presentation is based on our
More informationThe Economy Growing at Two Different Speeds
Date: February 2, 2010 To: From: Friends of and Greenberg Quinlan Rosner Stanley B. Greenberg, James Carville and Jesse Contario The Economy Growing at Two Different Speeds Gap between micro and macro
More informationVoters Ready to Act against Big Money in Politics
Date: November 10, 2014 To: Friends of and Every Voice From: Stan Greenberg and James Carville, David Donnelly, Every Voice Ben Winston, GQRR Voters Ready to Act against Big Money in Politics Lessons from
More informationThe 2014 Election in Aiken County: The Sales Tax Proposal for Public Schools
The 2014 Election in Aiken County: The Sales Tax Proposal for Public Schools A Public Service Report The USC Aiken Social Science and Business Research Lab Robert E. Botsch, Director All conclusions in
More informationDemocracy Corps Frequency Questionnaire
Democracy Corps Frequency Questionnaire February 7-9, 2011 1,000 Likely Voters Q.3 First of all, are you registered to vote? Yes... 100 No...- (Refused)...- (ref:screen1) Q.4 Many people weren't able to
More informationUS Mid-Term Elections: Which Implications? November 2014
US Mid-Term Elections: Which Implications? November 214 PERSPECTIVES Paresh Upadhyaya Senior Vice President, Director of Currency Strategy, US Key Insights The Republican Party added to its majority in
More informationDemocracy Corps Frequency Questionnaire
Democracy Corps Frequency Questionnaire October 9-11, 2010 928 Likely Voters 1 Q.3 First of all, are you registered to vote at this address? 1 Yes...100 No... - (Refused)... - (ref:screen1) Q.4 Many people
More information%: Will grow the economy vs. 39%: Will grow the economy.
Villains and Heroes on the Economy and Government Key Lessons from Opinion Research At Our Story The Hub for American Narratives we take the narrative part literally. Including that villains and heroes
More informationNPR/Democracy Corps/Resurgent Republic Frequency Questionnaire
NPR/Democracy Corps/Resurgent Republic Frequency Questionnaire September 26-30, 2012 800 Likely Voters 265 ground Voters (CO, FL, IA, MI, NV, NH, NM, NC, OH, PA, VA, WI) (65 from base, 200 from battleground
More informationHillary Clinton Wins First Round Debate Win Produces Important Shifts to Clinton
Date: September 27, 2016 To: Progressive community From: Stan Greenberg, Page Gardner, Women s Voices. Women Vote Action Fund Hillary Clinton Wins First Round Debate Win Produces Important Shifts to Clinton
More informationA Progressive Comeback?
Date: October 15, 2010 To: From: Interested Parties Page Gardner, s Voices. Vote Action Fund, Stanley B. Greenberg, Democracy Corps/GQRR, Anna Greenberg, GQRR A Progressive Comeback? The Rising American
More informationPresident Obama and the Democrats at Six Months
Date: August 10, 2009 To: From: Friends of Democracy Corps and Greenberg Quinlan Rosner Stanley B. Greenberg, James Carville and Andrew Baumann President Obama and the Democrats at Six Months The last
More informationMapping the Republican Brain
Date: September 17, 2013 To: Friends of From: Stan Greenberg and James Carville Mapping the Republican Brain Six underlying attitudinal dimensions that run through the consciousness of today's Republican
More informationDemocracy Corps/CAF Frequency Questionnaire
Democracy Corps/CAF Frequency Questionnaire January 9-12, 2011 1000 Likely Voters 200 Youth Oversample 200 Unmarried Women Oversample 80 Nonwhite Oversample Q.3 First of all, are you registered to vote
More informationYoung Voters in the 2010 Elections
Young Voters in the 2010 Elections By CIRCLE Staff November 9, 2010 This CIRCLE fact sheet summarizes important findings from the 2010 National House Exit Polls conducted by Edison Research. The respondents
More informationPresident Obama Leads in Florida, Ohio & Pennsylvania September 18-24, 2012
Quinnipiac University/CBS News/New York Times Poll For release: Wednesday, September 26, 2012 3:00 A.M. EDT President Obama Leads in Florida, Ohio & Pennsylvania September 18-24, 2012 Recent national and
More informationNew message platform for 2018 s key battlegrounds Report from phone survey & web-panel in the 12-state battleground
Date: May 3, 2018 To: Friends of WVWVAF and From: Page Gardner, Women s Voices Women Vote Action Fund Stan Greenberg, Greenberg Research Nancy Zdunkewicz, Report from phone survey & web-panel in the 12-state
More informationObama Holds Most Cards in Cliff Talks, But With No Mandate and Risks Aplenty
ABC NEWS/WASHINGTON POST POLL: POLITICS AND THE FISCAL CLIFF EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE AFTER 7:00 a.m. Tuesday, Dec. 18, 2012 Obama Holds Most Cards in Cliff Talks, But With No Mandate and Risks Aplenty President
More informationPost-Election Survey Findings: Americans Want the New Congress to Provide a Check on the White House, Follow Facts in Investigations
To: Interested Parties From: Global Strategy Group, on behalf of Navigator Research Re: POST-ELECTION Navigator Research Survey Date: November 19th, 2018 Post-Election Survey Findings: Americans Want the
More informationNational Security and the 2008 Election
Click to edit Master title style April 3, 2008 National Security and the 2008 Election Democracy Corps Fourth and level Greenberg Quinlan Rosner March 25-27, 2008 1000 likely voters nationwide Click to
More informationNATIONAL: 2018 HOUSE RACE STABILITY
Please attribute this information to: Monmouth University Poll West Long Branch, NJ 07764 www.monmouth.edu/polling Follow on Twitter: @MonmouthPoll Released: Friday, November 2, 2018 Contact: PATRICK MURRAY
More informationWith country angrier, Republicans at edge of even bigger congressional losses
Date: September 29, 2008 To: From: Friends of Democracy Corps Stanley Greenberg, James Carville and Andrew Baumann With country angrier, Republicans at edge of even bigger congressional losses A new poll
More informationWEEKLY LATINO TRACKING POLL 2018: WAVE 1 9/05/18
WEEKLY LATINO TRACKING POLL 2018: WAVE 1 9/05/18 1. Many people are busy and don t get a chance to vote in every election. Thinking ahead to the November 2018 election, what would you say the chances are
More informationStan Greenberg and James Carville, Democracy Corps. Mark Feierstein and Al Quinlan, Greenberg Quinlan Rosner
DEMOCRACY CORPS Date: To: From: Friends of Democracy Corps Stan Greenberg and James Carville, Democracy Corps Mark Feierstein and Al Quinlan, Greenberg Quinlan Rosner WINNING THE IMMIGRATION ISSUE A Report
More informationThe President, Congress and Deficit Battles April 15-20, 2011
CBS NEWS/NEW YORK TIMES POLL For release: Thursday, April 21, 2011 6:30pm (EDT) The President, Congress and Deficit Battles April 15-20, 2011 With the possibility of more spending showdowns between President
More informationNew message platform for 2018 s key battlegrounds Findings from Wave 1 of Battleground web-panel & phone survey. May 2018
New message platform for 2018 s key battlegrounds Findings from Wave 1 of Battleground web-panel & phone survey May 2018 Innovative new research program BATTLEGROUND PHONE POLL ON-GOING RAE+ BATTLEGROUND
More informationDead Heat in Vote Preferences Presages an Epic Battle Ahead
ABC NEWS/WASHINGTON POST POLL: The 2012 Election EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE AFTER 12:01 a.m. Tuesday, July 10, 2012 Dead Heat in Vote Preferences Presages an Epic Battle Ahead Economic discontent and substantial
More informationThe Path to 270 Revisited
THE ASSOCIATED PRESS/Ted S. Warren The Path to 270 Revisited The Role of Demographics, Economics, and Ideology in the 2012 Presidential Election Ruy Teixeira and John Halpin September 2012 www.americanprogress.org
More informationTHE WORKMEN S CIRCLE SURVEY OF AMERICAN JEWS. Jews, Economic Justice & the Vote in Steven M. Cohen and Samuel Abrams
THE WORKMEN S CIRCLE SURVEY OF AMERICAN JEWS Jews, Economic Justice & the Vote in 2012 Steven M. Cohen and Samuel Abrams 1/4/2013 2 Overview Economic justice concerns were the critical consideration dividing
More information