Supreme Court of the United States
|
|
- Kathryn Dickerson
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Youth Movements: Protest! Power! Progress? Supreme Court of the United States Morse v. Frederick (2007) Director: Eli Liebell-McLean Assistant Director: Lucas Sass
2 CJMUNC Highland Park Model United Nations/Congress(HPMUNC). This document was created solely for the use of Central Jersey Model United Nations and Congress (CJMUNC) Other uses are not permitted without explicit permission from HPMUNC. Please contact us at hpmunc@gmail.com.
3 CJMUNC INDEX POLICY DILEMMA. 3 CHRONOLOGY. 3-5 ACTORS AND INTERESTS 5 PROJECTIONS AND IMPLICATIONS 6 JUSTICE OPINIONS GOALS OF COMMITTEE 7 DISCUSSION QUESTIONS.8 BIBLIOGRAPHY....9
4 CJMUNC Policy Dilemma Ever since the Bill of Rights was passed into law, freedom of speech has been an integral part of American political culture. However, there are situations where freedom of speech is limited. Such incidents include shouting fire in a crowded theatre or threatening to kill the president. Some of the most contentious restrictions on freedom of speech are found in our nation s public school system. As the Supreme Court of the United States, we will be discussing Morse v Frederick. Justices will determine whether or not Frederick s banner, stating bong hits 4 Jesus, is protected speech under the first amendment, or whether the school has the right to limit such speech because it encourages illicit behavior. The Court will also be assessing whether or not the school board s policy goes too far in general in terms of exercising control over student behavior. Chronology West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette (West Virginia v. Barnette) West Virginia v. Barnette is a 1943 case that concerns the constitutionality of a daily mandatory salute to the U.S. Flag. Students Marie and Gathie Barnette were expelled for insubordination after refusing to salute the flag along with all the other students. In a 6-3 decision the Court ruled in favor of Barnette and held that such mandatory activities promoted the compulsory unification of opinion, and flew in the face of the spirit of the First Amendment. Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District (Tinker v. Des Moines) Tinker v. Des Moines is a landmark case in regards to free speech in public schools from Christopher Eckhardt, Mary Beth Tinker, and John Tinker planned a protest at their school against the Vietnam War. They planned to wear black armbands to school. The principal, after catching wind of the planned protest, issued an order that anyone found wearing an armband would be sent home. After being sent home because of their protest; the students sued the school through their parents on the grounds that their freedom of speech was being unconstitutionally restricted. The Court decided 7-2 in favor of Tinker; stating that students did not shed their constitutional rights to freedom of speech or expression at the schoolhouse gate. However, the Court did say that the school could suppress speech if and only if the activity in question would materially and substantially interfere with school operations. Bethel School District No. 403 v. Fraser (Bethel v. Fraser) Bethel v. Fraser was a 1986 case where Bethel High School suspended Matthew Fraser for two days after he gave a speech that many observers believe was a graphic sexual metaphor. His suspension was given on the ground that his speech broke school policy which prohibited conduct that "substantially interferes with the educational process... including the use of
5 CJMUNC obscene, profane language or gestures." In a 7-2 decision, the Supreme Court held that it was appropriate for Bethel High School to censor vulgar and offensive speech. The court specified Tinker v. Des Moines did not protect Fraser s speech because Fraser s speech was not political speech. Hazelwood School District v. Kuhlmeier (Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier) Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier was a 1987 case in which The Spectrum--Hazelwood East High School's school newspaper--wished to publish two articles that the principal, Robert E. Reynold, deemed unfit for the paper. Cathy Kuhlmeier and two other students sued the school on the grounds that refusing to publish those articles was a form of censorship that violated their constitutional rights to freedom of speech. The Court came to a 5-3 decision in favor of the school. They held that schools were allowed to refuse to sponsor speech that was inconsistent with the shared values of a civilized social order, and that there was no 1st amendment violation. Texas v. Johnson Texas v. Johnson is a 1989 case in which Gregory Lee Johnson burned an American flag in front of the Dallas City Hall in order to protest Reagan administration policies. For his actions, he was arrested and sentenced to 1 year in jail and a $2,000 fine (about $4,900 adjusted for inflation). After the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals reversed his conviction, the case went to the Supreme Court. In a 5-4 decision, the Supreme Court held that the flag-burning was protected under the 1st Amendment because it could be categorized as expressive conduct of a distinctively political nature. The Court held that if there is a bedrock principle underlying the First Amendment, it is that the Government may not prohibit the expression of an idea simply because society finds the idea itself offensive or disagreeable. Bong Hits 4 Jesus On January 24th, 2002, the Students of Juneau-Douglas High School, were let out of school to see the Olympic Torch Relay in Juneau, Alaska. At the event, Joseph Frederick--a senior at Juneau-Douglas High School--and some of his friends, unfurled a banner reading Bong Hits 4 Jesus. Soon after, Deborah Morse, the school principal told Frederick to put away the banner, her reasoning being that the contents of the banner could be interpreted to be advocating for the use of illicit drugs. After Frederick refused to comply with Morse s request, Morse grabbed the banner and crumpled it up. Following the incident, Frederick was given a 10-day suspension for displaying the sign and for acting rudely towards the principal and school staff after they confronted him. Procedure Frederick sued Juneau-Douglas High School on the grounds that the confiscation of his banner and his subsequent suspension were violations of his freedom of speech. The federal district court agreed with Morse, and said that Frederick s right to speech was not unfairly violated. Frederick appealed, and the 9th Circuit Court overturned the federal district court by
6 CJMUNC siding with Frederick. The 9th Circuit Court held that the school could not punish and censor non-disruptive, off-campus speech by students during school-authorized activities because the speech promotes a social message contrary to the one favored by the school. The Court maintained that this case was different from Bethel v. Fraser because the banner was not plainly offensive. The Court also maintained that this case was different from Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier because the school was not being compelled to endorse the message Bong Hits for Jesus. Morse appealed again and now it is the duty of the Supreme Court of the United States to determine the constitutionality of the matter. Actors and Interests Deborah Morse Morse s main argument is that this case is fundamentally about illegal drug use and discouraging the promotion of such illegal drug use. Morse posits that the banner went against school policy by promoting the use of illicit drugs. Since the banner was unfurled at a school-sponsored event, school speech doctrine still applied despite the banner not technically being on school grounds. Morse believes that the 9th Circuit Court s ruling might be problematic because it could compromise [the school district s] ability to send a consistent message against the use of illegal drugs. Morse Additionally, Morse holds that if the case is decided for Frederick, then teachers would lose significant power in schools since they wouldn t want to reprimand students for anything in fear of being sued for their actions. Morse also maintains that this case is different from Tinker v. Des Moines because Tinker v. Des Moines concerns standardless suppression of speech since there were no prior rules regarding black armbands. In this case, however, there was prior school policy against the advocacy of drug use. Therefore the suppression of the banner was not standardless. Joseph Frederick Frederick believes that this case is fundamentally about freedom of Speech. Frederick holds that the confiscation of his banner and his subsequent suspension are violations of his 1st Amendment rights. Frederick submits that school speech doctrine does not apply because he was not on school grounds when he unfurled the banner. Frederick also believes the classification of the event as school-sponsored is fallacious because the school did not require the students to be at the event. Additionally since Joseph did not attend school that morning, and did not intend on attending the rest of the day, he was there as a public citizen and not a student. Frederick also holds that he chose to go to the spot in front of the school not to see his friends, but because it was the only place where he knew the torch would be passing. According to Frederick, even if the speech did fall under school doctrine, it was protected under the precedent set by Tinker v Des Moines and falls under the exemptions set forth in Bethel v Fraser and H azelwood v Kuhlmeier because the speech was neither explicitly vulgar nor school-sponsored. Furthermore, Frederick holds that his prime motive in unfurling the banner
7 CJMUNC was to grab public attention by appearing on television. And that the message bong hits 4 Jesus was therefore not promoting the use of drugs but only used in order to seek attention. Projections and Implications The potential implications of this case are far reaching. If the Court decides that Morse was correct in her confiscation of the banner and subsequent suspension of Frederick, then this case will set a precedent for much more wide-reaching suppressions of freedom of speech in schools. If the Court rules in favor of Frederick, then schools might lose significant power when it comes to disciplining students. The importance of this case for the freedom of speech of students cannot be understated, and the outcome of this case decides how the future leaders of our country choose to express themselves and how they get things done. The Opinions of the Justices Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Jr. Justice Roberts believes that it is important that schools be able to have some disciplinary power over their students, and that teachers are now afraid to reprimand students for fear of being sued. Justice John Paul Stevens Justice Stevens strongly believes that First Amendment rights need to be protected. Stevens presided over Bethel v. Fraser and was one of the two dissenting votes in favor of Fraser. He also presided over Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier and concurred in favor of Hazelwood. Justice Justice Antonin Scalia Justice Scalia is a constitutional purist, who believes in following the Constitution to the letter and is very anti-drug. Justice Scalia presided over Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier and concurred in favor of Hazelwood. Justice Anthony M. Kennedy Justice Kennedy has, for a long time, been the swing vote on the Supreme Court. In terms of this case, he could really go either way depending on how convinced he is by the lawyers and by his fellow justices. Justice David H. Souter Justice Souter strongly believes that political speech must be protected at all costs, and that students have as much of a right to freedom of speech as any adult. He also further agrees that freedom of speech is one of the most important American values. Justice Clarence Thomas
8 CJMUNC Justice Thomas is the most staunchly conservative justice on the Court. He makes his decisions based on old-fashioned values, based off of older historical precedents. Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg Ruth Bader Ginsburg has consistently voted liberally on the court since her confirmation. She believes strongly in protecting the First Amendment for all people. Justice Stephen G. Breyer Justice Breyer believes strongly in the importance of free speech and cares about whether or not the location of where the banner was unfurled counted as taking place on school grounds. Justice Samuel A. Alito, Jr. Justice Alito is in strong protector of political speech. He also strongly opposes the use of drugs and believes that school policy against drugs is completely reasonable. Goals for Committee During committee each justice should able to accurately portray their justices based on their passed rulings and political ideology. It is expected that each justice carefully examines the precedent outlined in this brief, and will be able to use that precedent to inform their decisions. Every justice should critically examine the case and come to a solution that takes into account both sides of the argument. More importantly than the outcome of the case, however, is that, in the process of deciding on a solution, there is cooperation between justices. Even if justices are of different points of view, it is of utmost importance that committee sessions stay civil and have intelligent discourse.
9 CJMUNC Discussion Questions: 1. How can the Court define political speech? Should the bong hits 4 jesus banner be protected as political speech? Why or why not? 2. If the banner is not considered political speech, what would it have to say in order for it to be political? 3. If the banner were political speech, what would have to be on it for it to no longer qualify? 4. Is the banner disruptive? If so, what would have to be different for it not to be disruptive? And if not, what changes would have to be made to the scenario for it to be disruptive? 5. Should the intent of the speaker matter when defining political speech? 6. Should the school be allowed to have policy that restricts the advocacy for illegal drugs?
10 CJMUNC Bibliography "Bethel School District No. 403 v. Fraser." Oyez, 26 Apr. 2018, "'Bong Hits 4 Jesus' case limits student rights - CNN.com." 26 Jun. 2007, Accessed 26 Apr "Hazelwood School District v. Kuhlmeier." Oyez, 26 Apr. 2018, "Texas v. Johnson." Oyez, 26 Apr. 2018, "Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District." Oyez, 26 Apr. 2018, "Morse v. Frederick." Oyez, 26 Apr. 2018, "Morse v. Frederick, :: 551 U.S. 393 (2007) :: Justia US Supreme Court..." 25 Jun. 2007, Accessed 5 May "Morse v. Frederick - National Coalition Against Censorship." 26 Apr. 2007, Accessed 26 Apr "West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette." Oyez, 26 Apr. 2018, "Facts and Case Summary - Morse v. Frederick United States Courts." mary-morse-v-frederick. Accessed 26 Apr
First Amendment Civil Liberties
You do not need your computers today. First Amendment Civil Liberties How has the First Amendment's freedoms of speech and press been incorporated as a right of all American citizens? Congress shall make
More informationMorse v. Frederick, 551 U. S. (2007)
Morse v. Frederick, 551 U. S. (2007) On January 24, 2002, the Olympic Torch Relay passed through Juneau, Alaska, on its way to the Winter Games in Salt Lake City. The event was scheduled to pass along
More informationName: Date: Gallery Walk: Landmark Court Cases. Case #1. Brief Summary (2-3 sentences) Amendment in Question? Predict the. Supreme Court Ruling:
Name: Date: Gallery Walk: Landmark Court Cases Case #1 Brief Summary (2-3 sentences) Amendment in Question? Predict the Supreme Court ruling. Draw a Picture: Supreme Court Ruling: Case #2 Brief Summary
More informationJudicial Decision-making and the First Amendment
Judicial Decision-making and the First Amendment This activity will introduce students to the First Amendment through the case study method. Students will define speech and explore case precedent in the
More informationAMERICAN CONSTITUTIONALISM VOLUME II: RIGHTS AND LIBERTIES Howard Gillman Mark A. Graber Keith E. Whittington. Supplementary Material
AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONALISM VOLUME II: RIGHTS AND LIBERTIES Howard Gillman Mark A. Graber Keith E. Whittington Supplementary Material Chapter 11: The Contemporary Era Democratic Rights/Free Speech/Public
More informationThe Supreme Court s 2007 Decision in Morse v. Frederick
The Supreme Court s 2007 Decision in Morse v. Frederick: The Majority Opinion Revealed Sharp Ideological Differences on Student Speech Rights Among the Court s Five Justice Majority JOSHUA AZRIEL, PHD
More informationDEBORAH MORSE, et al., PETITIONERS v. JOSEPH FREDERICK, RESPONDENT
DEBORAH MORSE, et al., PETITIONERS v. JOSEPH FREDERICK, RESPONDENT 551 U.S. 393 (2007) Chief Justice Roberts delivered the opinion of the Court. At a school-sanctioned and school-supervised event, a high
More informationSUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
Cite as: 551 U. S. (2007) 1 NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the preliminary print of the United States Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of
More informationLandmark Supreme Court Cases Tinker v. Des Moines (1969)
Landmark Supreme Court Cases Tinker v. Des Moines (1969) The 1969 landmark case of Tinker v. Des Moines affirmed the First Amendment rights of students in school. The Court held that a school district
More informationNo PAUL T. PALMER, by and through his parents and legal guardians, PAUL D. PALMER and DR.
No. 09-409 IN THE uprem aurt ei lniteb tatee PAUL T. PALMER, by and through his parents and legal guardians, PAUL D. PALMER and DR. SUSAN GONZALEZ BAKER, Vo Petitioner, WAXAHACHIE INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT,
More informationPREVIEW 10. Parents Constitution
PREVIEW 10 Follow along as your teacher reads the Parents Constitution aloud. Then discuss the questions with your partner and record answers. Be prepared to share your answers. Parents Constitution WE,
More informationLooking Back: History of American Media
Looking Back: History of American Media Learn these things Understand how printed press developed How the concept of freedom of press came into being Look at impact of radio, TV, and internet Recognize
More informationFREEDOM OF SPEECH. A relatively recent idea in Western history
FREEDOM OF SPEECH A relatively recent idea in Western history JOHN MILTON Published Areopagitica in 1644, a pamphlet arguing for more freedom of speech, at the height of the English Civil Wars in the conflict
More informationBill of Rights Scenarios Unit 5//Government
Bill of Rights Scenarios Unit 5//Government Do They Have the Right? 1 st Amendment Case: Read about the case and discuss the issue in your group. The United States is involved in a controversial war. To
More informationSUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
Cite as: 551 U. S. (2007) 1 SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES No. 06 278 DEBORAH MORSE, ET AL., PETITIONERS v. JOSEPH FREDERICK ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH
More informationMarbury v. Madison (1803)
Court Decisions Marbury v. Madison (1803) Background:Outgoing President John Adams appoints several judges the night before leaving office. Incoming President Thomas Jefferson is angered by the appointments
More informationN A T I O N A L C O N S T I T U T I O N D A Y
N A T I O N A L C O N S T I T U T I O N D A Y September 17, 2007 TEACHING MODULE Morse v. Frederick: The Bong Hits for Jesus Case and the First Amendment Rights of America s Students WRITTEN BY PROFESSOR
More informationCh.9: The Judicial Branch
Ch.9: The Judicial Branch Learning Goal Students will be able to analyze the structure, function, and processes of the judicial branch as established in Article III of the Constitution; the judicial branches
More informationFreedom of Expression in the Schools
STUDENT NEWSPAPER CENSORED Freedom of Expression in the Schools Indiana Close Up A Jefferson Meeting on the Indiana Constitution Issue Book Number 4 Copyright 1995 Indiana Historical Bureau Indianapolis
More informationHOW WILL MORSE V. FREDERICK BE APPLIED?
HOW WILL MORSE V. FREDERICK BE APPLIED? by Erwin Chemerinsky * In 2007, the Supreme Court decided Morse v. Frederick, a 5-4 decision in which Chief Justice Roberts, writing for the majority, decided that
More informationFlag Protection: A Brief History and Summary of Supreme Court Decisions and Proposed Constitutional Amendments
: A Brief History and Summary of Supreme Court Decisions and Proposed Constitutional Amendments John R. Luckey Legislative Attorney February 7, 2012 CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees
More informationREMEDYING THE DECLINE OF TINKER: EXPANDING STUDENTS FREE SPEECH RIGHTS THROUGH STATE AVENUES
REMEDYING THE DECLINE OF TINKER: EXPANDING STUDENTS FREE SPEECH RIGHTS THROUGH STATE AVENUES Wellington Lyons 1 Robust freedom of speech protections in schools advance student learning in ways that planned
More information1. In a Law system, judges base their decisions on previous rulings in similar cases. Write your answer here. Letter:
Landmark Cases Name Directions: Each page in the Student Center ends with a Student Challenge. Click the red Start button to begin each challenge. This worksheet will guide you through the challenges in
More informationSupremeCourt. Debates. Student Speech MAY 2007 VOL. 10 NO. 5
MAY 2007 VOL. 10 NO. 5 SupremeCourt A Pro & Con Monthly A Congressional Digest Publication Debates Student Speech The First Amendment at School Does the First Amendment Allow Public Schools to Prohibit
More informationStudent & Employee 1 st Amendment Rights
Student & Employee 1 st Amendment Rights Gerry Kaufman, ASBSD Director of Policy and Legal Services Randall Royer, ASBSD Leadership Development Director In school speech cases, there are 3 recognized categories
More informationDOCUMENT A DOCUMENT B
DOCUMENT A The First Amendment, 1791 Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or
More informationBracelets and the Scope of Student Speech Rights in B.H. ex rel. Hawk v. Easton Area School District
Boston College Journal of Law & Social Justice Volume 34 Issue 3 Electronic Supplement Article 4 March 2014 Bracelets and the Scope of Student Speech Rights in B.H. ex rel. Hawk v. Easton Area School District
More informationRECENT CASES. listing McGonigle s interests as hitting on students and their
RECENT CASES FIRST AMENDMENT STUDENT SPEECH THIRD CIRCUIT APPLIES TINKER TO OFF-CAMPUS STUDENT SPEECH. J.S. ex rel. Snyder v. Blue Mountain School District, 650 F.3d 915 (3d Cir. 2011) (en banc). Since
More informationQuarter Two: Unit One
SS.7.C.2.4 ****At the end of this lesson, I will be able to do the following: recognize that the Bill of Rights comprises the first ten amendments to the U.S. Constitution. recognize the five freedoms
More informationSIMPSON v. BEACON SCHOOL DISTRICT AND DAVID KORESH, PRINCIPAL. Amendment to the United States Constitution and M.G.L c.71 S 82.
SIMPSON v. BEACON SCHOOL DISTRICT AND DAVID KORESH, PRINCIPAL This case comes to us as an appeal from the trial court that granted summary judgment in favor of the defendants. The sole issue in the case
More informationBRIEF OF AMICI AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION AND AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF TENNESSEE IN SUPPORT OF APPELLANTS' PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC
No. 09-6080 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT TOM DEFOE et ai., Plaintif-Appellants, v. SID SPIVA et al., Defendants-Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
More informationNo IN THE Supreme Court of the United States. On Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
No. 06-278 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States DEBORAH MORSE; JUNEAU SCHOOL BOARD, v. Petitioners, JOSEPH FREDERICK, On Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
More informationFLREA Lesson Packet. Created and Provided by: The Florida Law Related Education Association, Inc. 2012
1 Section 7: Judicial Review and Landmark Cases FLREA Lesson Packet Created and Provided by: 2930 Kerry Forest Parkway, Suite 202 Tallahassee, Florida 32309 Website: www.flrea.org Phone: (850) 386-8223
More informationTOPIC CASE SIGNIFICANCE
TOPIC CASE SIGNIFICANCE Elections and Campaigns 1. Citizens United v. FEC, 2010 In a 5-4 decision, the Court struck down parts of the Bipartisan Campaign Finance Reform Act of 2002 (BCRA), holding that
More informationInterpreting the Constitution
Interpreting the Constitution Now that we have learned about the contents of the United States Constitution, we must now look at how it is used. The Founding Fathers knew the world would change in ways
More informationThe Hazelwooding of the First Amendment: The Deference to Authority
University of California, Irvine School of Law UCI Law Scholarly Commons Faculty Scholarship 2013 The Hazelwooding of the First Amendment: The Deference to Authority Erwin Chemerinsky UC Irvine School
More informationFreedom of Expression
Freedom of Expression For each photo Determine if the image of each photo is protected by the first amendment. If yes are there limits? If no, why not? The First Amendment Congress shall make no
More informationUnit 2: The US Constitution CE Notes 43: The Judicial Branch
Unit 2: The US Constitution CE Notes 43: The Judicial Branch SWBAT (Students Will Be Able To ) Understand the qualifications for being a Supreme Court Justice Understand the organization and structure
More informationConstitution Day Play: The Tinker Case Study
Source: University of Northern Iowa Constitution Day Play: The Tinker Case Study This play could be used in the following way: You could do it as a readers theater, radio theater, or a regular play with
More informationThe Bill of Rights CHAPTER 6. Table of Contents. ESSENTIAL QUESTION: How do societies balance individual and community rights?
CHAPTER 6 The Bill of Rights ESSENTIAL QUESTION: How do societies balance individual and community rights? Table of Contents SS.7.C.2.3 Experience the responsibilities of citizens at the local, state,
More informationVisions of Public Education In Morse v. Frederick
Journal of Educational Controversy Volume 3 Number 1 Schooling as if Democracy Matters Article 21 2008 Visions of Public Education In Morse v. Frederick Aaron H. Caplan Loyola Law School in Los Angeles,
More informationFirst Amendment Issues in K-12 Education Richard P. Clem Continuing Legal Education May 5, 2015
First Amendment Issues in K-12 Education Richard P. Clem Continuing Legal Education May 5, 2015 Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof;
More informationNinth Circuit Decision on School Speech
Brigham Young University Prelaw Review Volume 30 Article 18 4-1-2016 Ninth Circuit Decision on School Speech William Glade Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/byuplr Part
More informationMarbury vs. Madison 1803
Supreme Court Cases Marbury vs. Madison 1803 Established the power of Judicial Review Declared part of the Judiciary Act of 1789 unconstitutional,, because it gave the Supreme Court original jurisdiction
More informationCitizens United v. Federal Election Commission (2010)
Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission (2010) Petitioner: Citizens United Respondent: Federal Election Commission Petitioner s Claim: That the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act violates the First
More informationFIRST AMENDMENT UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION. Congress shall make no law respecting an
FIRST AMENDMENT UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press;
More informationREPORTING CATEGORY 2: ROLES, RIGHTS & RESPONSIBILITIES OF CITIZENS
REPORTING CATEGORY 2: ROLES, RIGHTS & RESPONSIBILITIES OF CITIZENS SS.7.C.2.1: Define the term "citizen," and identify legal means of becoming a United States citizen. Citizen: a native or naturalized
More informationTHE CONSTITUTION IN THE CLASSROOM
THE CONSTITUTION IN THE CLASSROOM TEACHING MODULE: Tinker and the First Amendment Description: Objectives: This unit was created to recognize the 40 th anniversary of the Supreme Court s decision in Tinker
More informationThe Emerging Dichotomy of the Educational Institution: Expression and Authority in Public Schools under Morse v. Frederick, 127 S. Ct.
Nebraska Law Review Volume 88 Issue 1 Article 4 2009 The Emerging Dichotomy of the Educational Institution: Expression and Authority in Public Schools under Morse v. Frederick, 127 S. Ct. 2618 (2007) JoAnna
More informationAP Government Chapter 15 Reading Guide: The Judiciary
AP Government Chapter 15 Reading Guide: The Judiciary 1. According to Federalist 78, what s Hamilton s argument for why the SCOTUS is the weakest of the branches? Do you agree? 2. So the court has the
More informationC-SPAN SUPREME COURT SURVEY March 23, 2012
C-SPAN SUPREME COURT SURVEY March 23, 2012 ROBERT GREEN, PRINCIPAL 1110 VERMONT AVE SUITE 1200 WASHINGTON, DC 20005 202-842-0500 Methodology Penn Schoen Berland (PSB) conducted online interviews on March
More informationTinker is relatively straightforward. It is this: a school may not suppress or punish student
Speech, Free Speech, School Speech 1 Matthew Steilen September 2015 Introduction We are here today to talk about free speech in public schools. Perhaps you already knew that the Constitution guaranteed
More informationAP Gov Chapter 15 Outline
Law in the United States is based primarily on the English legal system because of our colonial heritage. Once the colonies became independent from England, they did not establish a new legal system. With
More informationU.S. Court System. The U.S. Supreme Court Building in Washington D. C. Diagram of the U.S. Court System
http://www.maxwell.syr.edu/plegal/scales/court.html Page 1 of 5 10/10/011 U.S. Court System The U.S. Supreme Court Building in Washington D. C. Diagram of the U.S. Court System U.S. Supreme Court Federal
More informationThe Roberts Court and Freedom of Speech
Federal Communications Law Journal Volume 63 Issue 3 Article 2 5-2011 The Roberts Court and Freedom of Speech Erwin Chemerinsky University of California, Irvine School of Law Follow this and additional
More information3 BRANCHES OF GOVERNMENT
3 BRANCHES OF GOVERNMENT EXECUTIVE BRANCH President, Vice President, Cabinet QUALIFICATIONS Written Qualifications 35 years old Lived in country for 14 years Natural-born citizen Unwritten Qualifications
More informationNorthGreneUnitDistrictNo.3 7:190-AP8 Page1of5. Students
Page1of5 Students Administrative Procedure North Greene Junior High School Student Discipline Grades 6, 7, and 8 The following discipline procedures are used to attempt to have students correct their behavior
More information37400 Dodge Park Road AND Sterling Heights, MI 48312
State Headquarters 2966 Woodward Avenue Detroit, MI 48201 Phone 313.578.6800 Fax 313.578.6811 E-mail aclu@aclumich.org www.aclumich.org Legislative Office 115 West Allegan Street Lansing, MI 48933 Phone
More informationApril 5, 1989 ATTORNEY GENERAL OPINION NO
ROBERT T. STEPHAN ATTORNEY GENERAL April 5, 1989 ATTORNEY GENERAL OPINION NO. 89-39 George Anshutz Superintendent Wabaunsee East U.S.D. No. 330 P.O. Box 158 Eskridge, Kansas 66423-0158 Re: Schools -- General
More informationCivil Liberties and Civil Rights. Government
Civil Liberties and Civil Rights Government Civil Liberties Protections, or safeguards, that citizens enjoy against the abusive power of the government Bill of Rights First 10 amendments to Constitution
More information6. The First Amendment prevents the government from restricting expression base on its a. ideas.
Type: E 1. Explain the doctrine of incorporation. *a. Through the Fourteenth Amendment, the states are bound by the Bill of Rights. This is known as the doctrine of incorporation. @ Type: SA; Learning
More informationUnit 4C STUDY GUIDE. The Judiciary. Use the Constitution to answer questions #1-9. Unless noted, all questions are based on Article III.
Unit 4C STUDY GUIDE The Judiciary Use the Constitution to answer questions #1-9. Unless noted, all questions are based on Article III. 1. What power is vested in the courts? 2. The shall extend to all
More informationMorse v. Frederick One Year Later: New Limitations on Student Speech and the Columbine Factor
Morse v. Frederick One Year Later: New Limitations on Student Speech and the Columbine Factor Caroline B. Newcombe 1 INTRODUCTION When Justice Samuel Alito agreed with other members of the Supreme Court
More informationBy David L. Hudson, Jr. 1
CLEVELAND STATE LAW REVIEW ET CETERA VOLUME 66 MARCH 4, 2018 PAGES 1-11 LOSING THE SPIRIT OF TINKER V. DES MOINES AND THE URGENT NEED TO PROTECT STUDENT SPEECH By David L. Hudson, Jr. 1 Nearly fifty (50)
More informationA Conservative Rewriting Of The 'Right To Work'
A Conservative Rewriting Of The 'Right To Work' The problem with talking about a right to work in the United States is that the term refers to two very different political and legal concepts. The first
More informationPatterson, Chapter 14. The Federal Judicial System Applying the Law. Chapter Quiz
Patterson, Chapter 14 The Federal Judicial System Applying the Law Chapter Quiz 1. Federal judges are a) nominated by the Senate and approved by both houses of Congress. b) nominated by the president and
More information2007 Annenberg Public Policy Center Judicial Survey Exact Question Wording, By Category
2007 Annenberg Public Policy Center Judicial Survey Exact Question Wording, By Category Prepared by Princeton Survey Research Associates International for the Annenberg Foundation Trust at Sunnylands n
More informationFreedom of Speech on Public College Campuses: Legally Uncertain and Legally Contested Space
Freedom of Speech on Public College Campuses: Legally Uncertain and Legally Contested Space Item Type text; Electronic Thesis Authors Jackson, Troy Martin Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright
More informationFIRST AMENDMENT DECISIONS FROM THE OCTOBER 2006 TERM
FIRST AMENDMENT DECISIONS FROM THE OCTOBER 2006 TERM Erwin Chemerinsky * Marci A. Hamilton ** PROFESSOR CHEMERINSKY: There were four First Amendment cases this term. 1 Three were about speech 2 and one
More informationCivil Liberties and Civil Rights. Government
Civil Liberties and Civil Rights Government Civil Liberties Protections, or safeguards, that citizens enjoy against the abusive power of the government Bill of Rights First 10 amendments to Constitution
More informationCHAPTER 9. The Judiciary
CHAPTER 9 The Judiciary The Nature of the Judicial System Introduction: Two types of cases: Criminal Law: The government charges an individual with violating one or more specific laws. Civil Law: The court
More informationCitizenship in the United States
Citizenship in the United States Rights & Responsibilities of Citizenship Citizenship jus soli law of the soil jus sanguinis law of the blood Naturalization National government controls citizenship 14
More informationThe Courts CHAPTER. Criminal Justice: A Brief Introduction, 7E by Frank Schmalleger
CHAPTER 7 The Courts 1 America s Dual Court System The United States has courts on both the federal and state levels. This dual system reflects the state s need to retain judicial autonomy separate from
More informationExam 4 Notes Civil Liberties
Exam 4 Notes Civil Liberties Amendment I (1) Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the
More information(Model) UNITED STATES v. VIRGINIA
(Model) UNITED STATES v. VIRGINIA The Virginia Military Institute (VMI) boasted a long and proud tradition as Virginia's only exclusively male public undergraduate higher learning institution. The United
More informationIn the Weeds with Thomas: Morse, in loco parentis, Corporal Punishment, and the Narrowest View of Student Speech Rights
Brigham Young University Education and Law Journal Volume 2014 Number 2 Article 5 Summer 6-1-2014 In the Weeds with Thomas: Morse, in loco parentis, Corporal Punishment, and the Narrowest View of Student
More informationTinker v. Des Moines (1969) TABLE OF CONTENTS
(1969)... In the absence of a specific showing of constitutionally valid reasons to regulate their speech, students are entitled to freedom of expression of their views. Justice Fortas, speaking for the
More informationTinker v. Des Moines (1969)
Tinker v. Des Moines (1969) "... In the absence of a specific showing of constitutionally valid reasons to regulate their speech, students are entitled to freedom of expression of their views." TABLE OF
More informationReconciling Morse with Brandenburg
Fordham Law Review Volume 77 Issue 1 Article 6 2008 Reconciling Morse with Brandenburg Steven Penaro Recommended Citation Steven Penaro, Reconciling Morse with Brandenburg, 77 Fordham L. Rev. 251 (2008).
More informationThe Judicial Branch. CP Political Systems
The Judicial Branch CP Political Systems Standards Content Standard 4: The student will examine the United States Constitution by comparing the legislative, executive, and judicial branches of government
More informationCivil Liberties and Public Policy
Civil Liberties and Public Policy Chapter 4 The Bill of Rights Then and Now Civil Liberties Definition: The legal constitutional protections against the government. The Bill of Rights and the States The
More informationNo. IN THE Supreme Court of the United States. On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
No. IN THE Supreme Court of the United States JUNEAU SCHOOL BOARD; DEBORAH MORSE, v. Petitioners, JOSEPH FREDERICK, On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth
More informationAmendment Review 1-27
Amendment Review 1-27 First 10 Amendments make-up the Bill of Rights. Anti-federalist would not approve the Constitution until a Bill of Rights was added. First Amendment: RAPPS 5 Basic Freedoms R: Religion
More informationRIGHTS GUARANTEED IN ORIGINAL TEXT CIVIL LIBERTIES VERSUS CIVIL RIGHTS
CIVIL LIBERTIES VERSUS CIVIL RIGHTS Both protected by the U.S. and state constitutions, but are subtly different: Civil liberties are limitations on government interference in personal freedoms. Civil
More informationThe Court's Missed Opportunity in Harper v. Poway
Brigham Young University Education and Law Journal Volume 2008 Number 1 Article 5 Spring 3-1-2008 The Court's Missed Opportunity in Harper v. Poway Andrew Canter Gabriel Pardo Follow this and additional
More informationFree to be You. Author: National Constitution Center staff
Free to be You Author: staff About this Lesson This lesson, which includes a pre-lesson and post-lesson, is intended to be used in conjunction with the s Free to be You program. Together, they provide
More informationAs a young lawyer for the ACLU, Professor Joel Gora argued before the U.S. Supreme
A Landmark of Political Freedom By Joel Gora As a young lawyer for the ACLU, Professor Joel Gora argued before the U.S. Supreme Court in the landmark Buckley v. Valeo case. Here he reflects on the history
More informationJune 27, 2008 JUSTICES, RULING 5-4, ENDORSE PERSONAL RIGHT TO OWN GUN
June 27, 2008 JUSTICES, RULING 5-4, ENDORSE PERSONAL RIGHT TO OWN GUN By LINDA GREENHOUSE The Supreme Court on Thursday embraced the long-disputed view that the Second Amendment protects an individual
More informationFrom Fraser to Frederick: Bong Hits and the Decline of Civic Culture
From Fraser to Frederick: Bong Hits and the Decline of Civic Culture Kenneth W. Starr * Student speech in public schools has again been thrust into the limelight with the Supreme Court s recent Morse v.
More informationLandmark Supreme Court Cases
Landmark Supreme Court Cases Learning Target: JB 5.1 I can demonstrate or explain how Landmark Supreme Court Cases have been defined and interpreted rights over time. Tinker v. Des Moines (1969) Right
More informationTopic 7 The Judicial Branch. Section One The National Judiciary
Topic 7 The Judicial Branch Section One The National Judiciary Under the Articles of Confederation Under the Articles of Confederation, there was no national judiciary. All courts were State courts Under
More informationUnited States Judicial Branch
United States Judicial Branch Role of the Courts Resolving disputes Setting precedents Interpreting the law Strict or loose constructionists Jurisdiction -right to try and decide a case. Exclusive jurisdiction
More informationThe United States Supreme Court
The United States Supreme Court The Supreme Court Justices The main job of the nation s top court is to decide whether laws are allowable under the Constitution. The Supreme Court has original jurisdiction
More informationSupreme Court Survey Agenda of Key Findings
Supreme Court Survey Agenda of Key Findings August 2018 Robert Green, Principal rgreen@ps-b.com Adam Rosenblatt, Senior Strategist arosenblatt@ps-b.com PSB 1110 VERMONT AVENUE, NW SUITE 1200 WASHINGTON,
More informationUNRAVELING TINKER: THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT LEAVES STUDENT SPEECH HANGING BY A THREAD
UNRAVELING TINKER: THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT LEAVES STUDENT SPEECH HANGING BY A THREAD MARCIA E. POWERS Cite as: Marcia E. Powers, Unraveling Tinker: The Seventh Circuit Leaves Student Speech Hanging by a Thread,
More informationU.S. Supreme Court Key Findings
U.S. Supreme Court Key Findings Prepared for C-SPAN July 14, 2015 Robert Green, Principal Adam Rosenblatt, Director 1110 Vermont Avenue NW Suite 1200 Washington, DC 20005 202-842-0500 Methodology Penn
More informationNESHAMINY SCHOOL DISTRICT TITLE: PUBLICATIONS
SECTION: 600 TITLE: PUBLICATIONS NESHAMINY SCHOOL DISTRICT 1 I. General Subject to the terms, conditions and limitations set forth herein, it is the policy 1 2 of the School District to offer one or more
More informationCase 2:06-cv TFM Document 9 Filed 01/31/2006 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Case 2:06-cv-00116-TFM Document 9 Filed 01/31/2006 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA JUSTIN LAYSHOCK, a minor, by and through his parents, DONALD
More informationHow Sacred is Old Glory?
How Sacred is Old Glory? Purpose: Students will examine First Amendment free speech issues as they relate to the inclusion of symbolic speech as a protected right. The landmark decision of Texas v. Johnson,
More informationFrom Texas v. Johnson
From Texas v. Johnson This selection consists of two opinions (both excerpted here) from the famous US Supreme Court flag-burning case of 1989, in which a split court (5 4) held that burning an American
More information