STATEMENT BY EROL KĐRESEPĐ AT COMMUNICATING TURKEY SEMINAR
|
|
- Mervin Grant
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 STATEMENT BY EROL KĐRESEPĐ AT COMMUNICATING TURKEY SEMINAR Chairmen, Stockholm, 2 December 2009 We came together today to discuss how Turkey s accession to the EU can be better communicated and what kind of role civil society organizations can play in this area. Before presenting my concrete suggestions on the point, I would like to share briefly my views on the state of play of Turkey-EU relations and the problems we are facing today. My purpose in doing this is to stress the importance of the role civil society organizations can play. As you know, Turkey s accession negotiations started in October 2005 which means that the process has been going on for 4 years. However, the current state of play is simply disappointing. So much so that in this period only 11 of the 35 negotiation chapters were opened and just one was provisionally closed. Opening benchmarks were set for 13 chapters while closing benchmarks were defined for 5 chapters. 8 chapters were suspended due to the impasse in Cyprus issue. 5 further chapters have been blocked by France on the grounds that they would eventually lead to membership. These five chapters include agriculture and rural development, economic and monetary policy, education and culture, financial and budgetary provisions and institutions. Just think about it; you start a negotiation with the EU for full membership but some of the negotiation files will be suspended as they may take you to full membership. In such a case, the honest thing to do would change the name of this negotiation process which Turkey would never accept- or remove your veto.
2 Chairmen, I think this short explanation puts very clearly the sad situation of EU- Turkey relations. However, I would like to dwell upon it in a little more detail. In recent years, the negative attitude of some European leaders on Turkey s membership, the current financial crisis, the negative approach of European people to Turkey due mainly to prejudices owing to lack of knowledge, have given rise in Turkey to the impression that even if all membership criteria were met, Turkey would somehow not be admitted and that it was being subject to delaying action. This in turn has led to a rapid decline in the number of Turkish citizens that support EU membership. Last September, the Independent Commission on Turkey which brings together such important European figures as former President of Finland and 2008 Nobel Peace Prize laureate Martti Ahtisaari along with Kurt Biedenkopf, Hans van den Broek and Michel Rocard published its second report with the title Turkey in Europe: Breaking the vicious circle. The report stresses that Deceleration of Turkey s reform process has on one hand strengthened the opposition in Europe against Turkey s full membership While on the other hand this led to loss of motivation for Turkish reformers and thus a vicious circle has been set. This vicious circle came to overshadow many positive steps Turkey took within the framework of adoption of EU acquis. 2
3 The breaking of this vicious circle as soon as possible will be in the interest of both Turkey and the EU. In order to do this, attitudes and approaches must change both in Turkey and in Europe. Europeans must fulfill their commitment on Turkey s accession and adopt a fair and equitable attitude towards Turkey. The proposals of privileged partnership or special relationship by some member states clearly violate the principle of pacta sunt servanda since such a proposal is conflict with all EU decisions and commitments t date taken on this point. In the meantime, Turkey should resume broad based reform process covering the government and the opposition and should encourage its many friends in Europe. Chairmen, At this point, I would like to move more closely to the topic of how to communicate Turkey better in Europe and what kind of roles civil society could assume in this. In this context, I would like to quote, the EC Communication of 29 June 2005 on Civil Society Dialogue Between EU and Candidate Countries. According to this Communication, one of the lessons to be learned from the last enlargement round is that The citizens of EU member states were not sufficiently well informed or prepared. However, we cannot stress enough the need to support future enlargements with a strong and consistent dialogue involving the societies of member and candidate countries and as well as EU institutions. This support should Fill knowledge gaps, Help better mutual understanding, 3
4 Contribute to bringing citizens closer to different cultures, political and economic systems; And help build a stronger awareness about the opportunities and challenges to be brought by future enlargements. In this context, the Commission Recommendation of October 2004 on Turkey s Progress towards accession, it was Proposed that a dialogue be developed whereby the concerns and perceptions between Turkey and Member States would be discussed frankly and openly; And stated that the EU would facilitate this dialogue while civil society should assume important role in the process. The same Communication states the aims of civil society dialogue as follows: - To strengthen the contacts and sharing of experience among all parts of civil society in Member States and candidate countries; - To inform EU countries on opportunities and challenges of future enlargements, - To ensure for this purpose that adequate information on the economies histories and socio-cultural structures of candidate countries is acquired; - And to ensure that the basic values, actions and policies of the EU are well understood in candidate countries. Distinguished participants; We are all aware that in the European public opinion, there is a problem of image and promotion on Turkey s accession due mainly to prejudices and lack of knowledge. We also have misperceptions and misinformation in our country with regard to EU. We should not ignore the fact that communication constitutes the third main column of in EU negotiations and reform process. Therefore the reforms undertaken in Turkey in recent years; 4
5 Have been communicated to EU countries by public and civil society organizations for communication purposes through various events. However, it is also true that Communication activities targeting EU countries are not being implemented in a planned and conscious way, We have not been successful enough in reaching the target audience, Problems were faced in terms of timing of activities, Evaluation and monitoring of activities could not be done effectively, There has been failure in achieving sufficient failure due to the inability to bring communication activities under a single umbrella, And financial sources are weak and existing sources could not be used efficiently. While there are many things that Turkey can do to promote Turkey s image towards EU citizens, there is a limit to it. Because in order to communicate, we need receivers with antennae set to the right frequency that will absorbs the communication waves we will emit. Paradoxically this can be achieved by EU leaders who dare put forward their vision and political capital. Unfortunately the current perception of paradigm is not suitable for this. There is no doubt that Turkey s accession will be one of the most difficult; one does not need to have the insight of a genius to tell this. However, it is Turkey that must do its homework for accession. The difficulty of Turkey s accession stems from the scale of the country and the requirement that the economic and political transformation must be undertaken while the national consensus on European perspective is being maintained. This is Turkey s internal challenge. And Turkey will overcome this challenge through its own dynamics. 5
6 As I have mentioned a few minutes ago, the most important mechanism in EU relations is a well organized COMMUNICATON mechanism. Nonetheless, communication is not a one way street. Turkey needs to give each stakeholder in EU coverage and process messages to calm down their concerns through communication instruments whose main players will be civil society organizations. Our expectation should not be a single-directional one like The EU should keep its promise, but instead Turkey should deserve it by doing its homework. Only when these conditions are fulfilled that it will be the EU s turn to keep its promises. The other key message is that Turkey will work to demonstrate its potential contributions to EU in political and cultural fields. Europe should be aware of what it will give up if it does not prefer Turkey s accession to EU. It should act in line with knowledge of this point. Another key message is that in the Communication process, there should be varying communication strategies for each country and stakeholders in every country. There will evidently be common denominators in these strategies and it will eventually be easier to understand each other. This is the right approach that will create the right image of Turkey for EU citizens. Civil society organizations established by our citizens in EU countries are our Windows of opportunity. These windows should be multiplied equipped with well defined and right messages. At this point, I would like to underline two very important developments. In 2009, a Turkish Season was organized in France and this series of events became a golden opportunity for French citizens to realize the cultural values and richness of Turkey. We believe that this activity will contribute to positive developments in perceptions about Turkey in the Turkish public opinion. As Michel Rocard, Jacques Delors, Luc Ferry, Alain Touraine and Edgar Morin hoped in their article in Le Monde, Turkish Season in France helped interrupt though for a short period the discussion in the French public opinion on Turkey s accession which depend on prejudices rather than knowledge. 6
7 It is necessary and possible to sustain this interruption with the help of Istanbul s year in 2010 as European Culture Capital presents Europe the chance to discover the roots of its own culture and while giving Turkey a magnificent opportunity to understand each other with Europe. With 2010 in Đstanbul, Europe will understand how close The Other of Europe is to itself. Indeed, we should create the environment that will make use of the synergy of 2010 and will increase the momentum. The challenge for Europe is not its capacity to absorb Turkey. The issue is, after 20 full years following the fall of the Berlin Wall, whether Europe will want to be divided along religious and cultural walls. From 11/9 to 9/11, the world failed to bring civilizations together; it instead further divided them and in this process Europe could not play an important role. From now on, the question for Europe is whether it will end this process of division or contribute to its deepening. Distinguished participants, I would like to conclude my remarks by quoting a recent speech by Italian Foreign Minister and former Vice President of European Commission Franco Frattini: The day when Turkey becomes an EU member, Europe s second Berlin Wall will have fallen. 7
8 STATEMENT BY EROL KĐRESEPĐ AT COMMUNICATING TURKEY SEMINAR Chairmen, Stockholm, 2 December 2009 We came together today to discuss how Turkey s accession to the EU can be better communicated and what kind of role civil society organizations can play in this area. Before presenting my concrete suggestions on the point, I would like to share briefly my views on the state of play of Turkey-EU relations and the problems we are facing today. My purpose in doing this is to stress the importance of the role civil society organizations can play. As you know, Turkey s accession negotiations started in October 2005 which means that the process has been going on for 4 years. However, the current state of play is simply disappointing. So much so that in this period only 11 of the 35 negotiation chapters were opened and just one was provisionally closed. Opening benchmarks were set for 13 chapters while closing benchmarks were defined for 5 chapters. 8 chapters were suspended due to the impasse in Cyprus issue. 5 further chapters have been blocked by France on the grounds that they would eventually lead to membership. These five chapters include agriculture and rural development, economic and monetary policy, education and culture, financial and budgetary provisions and institutions. Just think about it; you start a negotiation with the EU for full membership but some of the negotiation files will be suspended as they may take you to full membership. In such a case, the honest thing to do would change the name of this negotiation process which Turkey would never accept- or remove your veto.
9 Chairmen, I think this short explanation puts very clearly the sad situation of EU- Turkey relations. However, I would like to dwell upon it in a little more detail. In recent years, the negative attitude of some European leaders on Turkey s membership, the current financial crisis, the negative approach of European people to Turkey due mainly to prejudices owing to lack of knowledge, have given rise in Turkey to the impression that even if all membership criteria were met, Turkey would somehow not be admitted and that it was being subject to delaying action. This in turn has led to a rapid decline in the number of Turkish citizens that support EU membership. Last September, the Independent Commission on Turkey which brings together such important European figures as former President of Finland and 2008 Nobel Peace Prize laureate Martti Ahtisaari along with Kurt Biedenkopf, Hans van den Broek and Michel Rocard published its second report with the title Turkey in Europe: Breaking the vicious circle. The report stresses that Deceleration of Turkey s reform process has on one hand strengthened the opposition in Europe against Turkey s full membership While on the other hand this led to loss of motivation for Turkish reformers and thus a vicious circle has been set. This vicious circle came to overshadow many positive steps Turkey took within the framework of adoption of EU acquis. 2
10 The breaking of this vicious circle as soon as possible will be in the interest of both Turkey and the EU. In order to do this, attitudes and approaches must change both in Turkey and in Europe. Europeans must fulfill their commitment on Turkey s accession and adopt a fair and equitable attitude towards Turkey. The proposals of privileged partnership or special relationship by some member states clearly violate the principle of pacta sunt servanda since such a proposal is conflict with all EU decisions and commitments t date taken on this point. In the meantime, Turkey should resume broad based reform process covering the government and the opposition and should encourage its many friends in Europe. Chairmen, At this point, I would like to move more closely to the topic of how to communicate Turkey better in Europe and what kind of roles civil society could assume in this. In this context, I would like to quote, the EC Communication of 29 June 2005 on Civil Society Dialogue Between EU and Candidate Countries. According to this Communication, one of the lessons to be learned from the last enlargement round is that The citizens of EU member states were not sufficiently well informed or prepared. However, we cannot stress enough the need to support future enlargements with a strong and consistent dialogue involving the societies of member and candidate countries and as well as EU institutions. This support should Fill knowledge gaps, Help better mutual understanding, 3
11 Contribute to bringing citizens closer to different cultures, political and economic systems; And help build a stronger awareness about the opportunities and challenges to be brought by future enlargements. In this context, the Commission Recommendation of October 2004 on Turkey s Progress towards accession, it was Proposed that a dialogue be developed whereby the concerns and perceptions between Turkey and Member States would be discussed frankly and openly; And stated that the EU would facilitate this dialogue while civil society should assume important role in the process. The same Communication states the aims of civil society dialogue as follows: - To strengthen the contacts and sharing of experience among all parts of civil society in Member States and candidate countries; - To inform EU countries on opportunities and challenges of future enlargements, - To ensure for this purpose that adequate information on the economies histories and socio-cultural structures of candidate countries is acquired; - And to ensure that the basic values, actions and policies of the EU are well understood in candidate countries. Distinguished participants; We are all aware that in the European public opinion, there is a problem of image and promotion on Turkey s accession due mainly to prejudices and lack of knowledge. We also have misperceptions and misinformation in our country with regard to EU. We should not ignore the fact that communication constitutes the third main column of in EU negotiations and reform process. Therefore the reforms undertaken in Turkey in recent years; 4
12 Have been communicated to EU countries by public and civil society organizations for communication purposes through various events. However, it is also true that Communication activities targeting EU countries are not being implemented in a planned and conscious way, We have not been successful enough in reaching the target audience, Problems were faced in terms of timing of activities, Evaluation and monitoring of activities could not be done effectively, There has been failure in achieving sufficient failure due to the inability to bring communication activities under a single umbrella, And financial sources are weak and existing sources could not be used efficiently. While there are many things that Turkey can do to promote Turkey s image towards EU citizens, there is a limit to it. Because in order to communicate, we need receivers with antennae set to the right frequency that will absorbs the communication waves we will emit. Paradoxically this can be achieved by EU leaders who dare put forward their vision and political capital. Unfortunately the current perception of paradigm is not suitable for this. There is no doubt that Turkey s accession will be one of the most difficult; one does not need to have the insight of a genius to tell this. However, it is Turkey that must do its homework for accession. The difficulty of Turkey s accession stems from the scale of the country and the requirement that the economic and political transformation must be undertaken while the national consensus on European perspective is being maintained. This is Turkey s internal challenge. And Turkey will overcome this challenge through its own dynamics. 5
13 As I have mentioned a few minutes ago, the most important mechanism in EU relations is a well organized COMMUNICATON mechanism. Nonetheless, communication is not a one way street. Turkey needs to give each stakeholder in EU coverage and process messages to calm down their concerns through communication instruments whose main players will be civil society organizations. Our expectation should not be a single-directional one like The EU should keep its promise, but instead Turkey should deserve it by doing its homework. Only when these conditions are fulfilled that it will be the EU s turn to keep its promises. The other key message is that Turkey will work to demonstrate its potential contributions to EU in political and cultural fields. Europe should be aware of what it will give up if it does not prefer Turkey s accession to EU. It should act in line with knowledge of this point. Another key message is that in the Communication process, there should be varying communication strategies for each country and stakeholders in every country. There will evidently be common denominators in these strategies and it will eventually be easier to understand each other. This is the right approach that will create the right image of Turkey for EU citizens. Civil society organizations established by our citizens in EU countries are our Windows of opportunity. These windows should be multiplied equipped with well defined and right messages. At this point, I would like to underline two very important developments. In 2009, a Turkish Season was organized in France and this series of events became a golden opportunity for French citizens to realize the cultural values and richness of Turkey. We believe that this activity will contribute to positive developments in perceptions about Turkey in the Turkish public opinion. As Michel Rocard, Jacques Delors, Luc Ferry, Alain Touraine and Edgar Morin hoped in their article in Le Monde, Turkish Season in France helped interrupt though for a short period the discussion in the French public opinion on Turkey s accession which depend on prejudices rather than knowledge. 6
14 It is necessary and possible to sustain this interruption with the help of Istanbul s year in 2010 as European Culture Capital presents Europe the chance to discover the roots of its own culture and while giving Turkey a magnificent opportunity to understand each other with Europe. With 2010 in Đstanbul, Europe will understand how close The Other of Europe is to itself. Indeed, we should create the environment that will make use of the synergy of 2010 and will increase the momentum. The challenge for Europe is not its capacity to absorb Turkey. The issue is, after 20 full years following the fall of the Berlin Wall, whether Europe will want to be divided along religious and cultural walls. From 11/9 to 9/11, the world failed to bring civilizations together; it instead further divided them and in this process Europe could not play an important role. From now on, the question for Europe is whether it will end this process of division or contribute to its deepening. Distinguished participants, I would like to conclude my remarks by quoting a recent speech by Italian Foreign Minister and former Vice President of European Commission Franco Frattini: The day when Turkey becomes an EU member, Europe s second Berlin Wall will have fallen. 7
15 STATEMENT BY EROL KĐRESEPĐ AT COMMUNICATING TURKEY SEMINAR Chairmen, Stockholm, 2 December 2009 We came together today to discuss how Turkey s accession to the EU can be better communicated and what kind of role civil society organizations can play in this area. Before presenting my concrete suggestions on the point, I would like to share briefly my views on the state of play of Turkey-EU relations and the problems we are facing today. My purpose in doing this is to stress the importance of the role civil society organizations can play. As you know, Turkey s accession negotiations started in October 2005 which means that the process has been going on for 4 years. However, the current state of play is simply disappointing. So much so that in this period only 11 of the 35 negotiation chapters were opened and just one was provisionally closed. Opening benchmarks were set for 13 chapters while closing benchmarks were defined for 5 chapters. 8 chapters were suspended due to the impasse in Cyprus issue. 5 further chapters have been blocked by France on the grounds that they would eventually lead to membership. These five chapters include agriculture and rural development, economic and monetary policy, education and culture, financial and budgetary provisions and institutions. Just think about it; you start a negotiation with the EU for full membership but some of the negotiation files will be suspended as they may take you to full membership. In such a case, the honest thing to do would change the name of this negotiation process which Turkey would never accept- or remove your veto.
16 Chairmen, I think this short explanation puts very clearly the sad situation of EU- Turkey relations. However, I would like to dwell upon it in a little more detail. In recent years, the negative attitude of some European leaders on Turkey s membership, the current financial crisis, the negative approach of European people to Turkey due mainly to prejudices owing to lack of knowledge, have given rise in Turkey to the impression that even if all membership criteria were met, Turkey would somehow not be admitted and that it was being subject to delaying action. This in turn has led to a rapid decline in the number of Turkish citizens that support EU membership. Last September, the Independent Commission on Turkey which brings together such important European figures as former President of Finland and 2008 Nobel Peace Prize laureate Martti Ahtisaari along with Kurt Biedenkopf, Hans van den Broek and Michel Rocard published its second report with the title Turkey in Europe: Breaking the vicious circle. The report stresses that Deceleration of Turkey s reform process has on one hand strengthened the opposition in Europe against Turkey s full membership While on the other hand this led to loss of motivation for Turkish reformers and thus a vicious circle has been set. This vicious circle came to overshadow many positive steps Turkey took within the framework of adoption of EU acquis. 2
17 The breaking of this vicious circle as soon as possible will be in the interest of both Turkey and the EU. In order to do this, attitudes and approaches must change both in Turkey and in Europe. Europeans must fulfill their commitment on Turkey s accession and adopt a fair and equitable attitude towards Turkey. The proposals of privileged partnership or special relationship by some member states clearly violate the principle of pacta sunt servanda since such a proposal is conflict with all EU decisions and commitments t date taken on this point. In the meantime, Turkey should resume broad based reform process covering the government and the opposition and should encourage its many friends in Europe. Chairmen, At this point, I would like to move more closely to the topic of how to communicate Turkey better in Europe and what kind of roles civil society could assume in this. In this context, I would like to quote, the EC Communication of 29 June 2005 on Civil Society Dialogue Between EU and Candidate Countries. According to this Communication, one of the lessons to be learned from the last enlargement round is that The citizens of EU member states were not sufficiently well informed or prepared. However, we cannot stress enough the need to support future enlargements with a strong and consistent dialogue involving the societies of member and candidate countries and as well as EU institutions. This support should Fill knowledge gaps, Help better mutual understanding, 3
18 Contribute to bringing citizens closer to different cultures, political and economic systems; And help build a stronger awareness about the opportunities and challenges to be brought by future enlargements. In this context, the Commission Recommendation of October 2004 on Turkey s Progress towards accession, it was Proposed that a dialogue be developed whereby the concerns and perceptions between Turkey and Member States would be discussed frankly and openly; And stated that the EU would facilitate this dialogue while civil society should assume important role in the process. The same Communication states the aims of civil society dialogue as follows: - To strengthen the contacts and sharing of experience among all parts of civil society in Member States and candidate countries; - To inform EU countries on opportunities and challenges of future enlargements, - To ensure for this purpose that adequate information on the economies histories and socio-cultural structures of candidate countries is acquired; - And to ensure that the basic values, actions and policies of the EU are well understood in candidate countries. Distinguished participants; We are all aware that in the European public opinion, there is a problem of image and promotion on Turkey s accession due mainly to prejudices and lack of knowledge. We also have misperceptions and misinformation in our country with regard to EU. We should not ignore the fact that communication constitutes the third main column of in EU negotiations and reform process. Therefore the reforms undertaken in Turkey in recent years; 4
19 Have been communicated to EU countries by public and civil society organizations for communication purposes through various events. However, it is also true that Communication activities targeting EU countries are not being implemented in a planned and conscious way, We have not been successful enough in reaching the target audience, Problems were faced in terms of timing of activities, Evaluation and monitoring of activities could not be done effectively, There has been failure in achieving sufficient failure due to the inability to bring communication activities under a single umbrella, And financial sources are weak and existing sources could not be used efficiently. While there are many things that Turkey can do to promote Turkey s image towards EU citizens, there is a limit to it. Because in order to communicate, we need receivers with antennae set to the right frequency that will absorbs the communication waves we will emit. Paradoxically this can be achieved by EU leaders who dare put forward their vision and political capital. Unfortunately the current perception of paradigm is not suitable for this. There is no doubt that Turkey s accession will be one of the most difficult; one does not need to have the insight of a genius to tell this. However, it is Turkey that must do its homework for accession. The difficulty of Turkey s accession stems from the scale of the country and the requirement that the economic and political transformation must be undertaken while the national consensus on European perspective is being maintained. This is Turkey s internal challenge. And Turkey will overcome this challenge through its own dynamics. 5
20 As I have mentioned a few minutes ago, the most important mechanism in EU relations is a well organized COMMUNICATON mechanism. Nonetheless, communication is not a one way street. Turkey needs to give each stakeholder in EU coverage and process messages to calm down their concerns through communication instruments whose main players will be civil society organizations. Our expectation should not be a single-directional one like The EU should keep its promise, but instead Turkey should deserve it by doing its homework. Only when these conditions are fulfilled that it will be the EU s turn to keep its promises. The other key message is that Turkey will work to demonstrate its potential contributions to EU in political and cultural fields. Europe should be aware of what it will give up if it does not prefer Turkey s accession to EU. It should act in line with knowledge of this point. Another key message is that in the Communication process, there should be varying communication strategies for each country and stakeholders in every country. There will evidently be common denominators in these strategies and it will eventually be easier to understand each other. This is the right approach that will create the right image of Turkey for EU citizens. Civil society organizations established by our citizens in EU countries are our Windows of opportunity. These windows should be multiplied equipped with well defined and right messages. At this point, I would like to underline two very important developments. In 2009, a Turkish Season was organized in France and this series of events became a golden opportunity for French citizens to realize the cultural values and richness of Turkey. We believe that this activity will contribute to positive developments in perceptions about Turkey in the Turkish public opinion. As Michel Rocard, Jacques Delors, Luc Ferry, Alain Touraine and Edgar Morin hoped in their article in Le Monde, Turkish Season in France helped interrupt though for a short period the discussion in the French public opinion on Turkey s accession which depend on prejudices rather than knowledge. 6
21 It is necessary and possible to sustain this interruption with the help of Istanbul s year in 2010 as European Culture Capital presents Europe the chance to discover the roots of its own culture and while giving Turkey a magnificent opportunity to understand each other with Europe. With 2010 in Đstanbul, Europe will understand how close The Other of Europe is to itself. Indeed, we should create the environment that will make use of the synergy of 2010 and will increase the momentum. The challenge for Europe is not its capacity to absorb Turkey. The issue is, after 20 full years following the fall of the Berlin Wall, whether Europe will want to be divided along religious and cultural walls. From 11/9 to 9/11, the world failed to bring civilizations together; it instead further divided them and in this process Europe could not play an important role. From now on, the question for Europe is whether it will end this process of division or contribute to its deepening. Distinguished participants, I would like to conclude my remarks by quoting a recent speech by Italian Foreign Minister and former Vice President of European Commission Franco Frattini: The day when Turkey becomes an EU member, Europe s second Berlin Wall will have fallen. 7
22 STATEMENT BY EROL KĐRESEPĐ AT COMMUNICATING TURKEY SEMINAR Chairmen, Stockholm, 2 December 2009 We came together today to discuss how Turkey s accession to the EU can be better communicated and what kind of role civil society organizations can play in this area. Before presenting my concrete suggestions on the point, I would like to share briefly my views on the state of play of Turkey-EU relations and the problems we are facing today. My purpose in doing this is to stress the importance of the role civil society organizations can play. As you know, Turkey s accession negotiations started in October 2005 which means that the process has been going on for 4 years. However, the current state of play is simply disappointing. So much so that in this period only 11 of the 35 negotiation chapters were opened and just one was provisionally closed. Opening benchmarks were set for 13 chapters while closing benchmarks were defined for 5 chapters. 8 chapters were suspended due to the impasse in Cyprus issue. 5 further chapters have been blocked by France on the grounds that they would eventually lead to membership. These five chapters include agriculture and rural development, economic and monetary policy, education and culture, financial and budgetary provisions and institutions. Just think about it; you start a negotiation with the EU for full membership but some of the negotiation files will be suspended as they may take you to full membership. In such a case, the honest thing to do would change the name of this negotiation process which Turkey would never accept- or remove your veto.
23 Chairmen, I think this short explanation puts very clearly the sad situation of EU- Turkey relations. However, I would like to dwell upon it in a little more detail. In recent years, the negative attitude of some European leaders on Turkey s membership, the current financial crisis, the negative approach of European people to Turkey due mainly to prejudices owing to lack of knowledge, have given rise in Turkey to the impression that even if all membership criteria were met, Turkey would somehow not be admitted and that it was being subject to delaying action. This in turn has led to a rapid decline in the number of Turkish citizens that support EU membership. Last September, the Independent Commission on Turkey which brings together such important European figures as former President of Finland and 2008 Nobel Peace Prize laureate Martti Ahtisaari along with Kurt Biedenkopf, Hans van den Broek and Michel Rocard published its second report with the title Turkey in Europe: Breaking the vicious circle. The report stresses that Deceleration of Turkey s reform process has on one hand strengthened the opposition in Europe against Turkey s full membership While on the other hand this led to loss of motivation for Turkish reformers and thus a vicious circle has been set. This vicious circle came to overshadow many positive steps Turkey took within the framework of adoption of EU acquis. 2
24 The breaking of this vicious circle as soon as possible will be in the interest of both Turkey and the EU. In order to do this, attitudes and approaches must change both in Turkey and in Europe. Europeans must fulfill their commitment on Turkey s accession and adopt a fair and equitable attitude towards Turkey. The proposals of privileged partnership or special relationship by some member states clearly violate the principle of pacta sunt servanda since such a proposal is conflict with all EU decisions and commitments t date taken on this point. In the meantime, Turkey should resume broad based reform process covering the government and the opposition and should encourage its many friends in Europe. Chairmen, At this point, I would like to move more closely to the topic of how to communicate Turkey better in Europe and what kind of roles civil society could assume in this. In this context, I would like to quote, the EC Communication of 29 June 2005 on Civil Society Dialogue Between EU and Candidate Countries. According to this Communication, one of the lessons to be learned from the last enlargement round is that The citizens of EU member states were not sufficiently well informed or prepared. However, we cannot stress enough the need to support future enlargements with a strong and consistent dialogue involving the societies of member and candidate countries and as well as EU institutions. This support should Fill knowledge gaps, Help better mutual understanding, 3
25 Contribute to bringing citizens closer to different cultures, political and economic systems; And help build a stronger awareness about the opportunities and challenges to be brought by future enlargements. In this context, the Commission Recommendation of October 2004 on Turkey s Progress towards accession, it was Proposed that a dialogue be developed whereby the concerns and perceptions between Turkey and Member States would be discussed frankly and openly; And stated that the EU would facilitate this dialogue while civil society should assume important role in the process. The same Communication states the aims of civil society dialogue as follows: - To strengthen the contacts and sharing of experience among all parts of civil society in Member States and candidate countries; - To inform EU countries on opportunities and challenges of future enlargements, - To ensure for this purpose that adequate information on the economies histories and socio-cultural structures of candidate countries is acquired; - And to ensure that the basic values, actions and policies of the EU are well understood in candidate countries. Distinguished participants; We are all aware that in the European public opinion, there is a problem of image and promotion on Turkey s accession due mainly to prejudices and lack of knowledge. We also have misperceptions and misinformation in our country with regard to EU. We should not ignore the fact that communication constitutes the third main column of in EU negotiations and reform process. Therefore the reforms undertaken in Turkey in recent years; 4
26 Have been communicated to EU countries by public and civil society organizations for communication purposes through various events. However, it is also true that Communication activities targeting EU countries are not being implemented in a planned and conscious way, We have not been successful enough in reaching the target audience, Problems were faced in terms of timing of activities, Evaluation and monitoring of activities could not be done effectively, There has been failure in achieving sufficient failure due to the inability to bring communication activities under a single umbrella, And financial sources are weak and existing sources could not be used efficiently. While there are many things that Turkey can do to promote Turkey s image towards EU citizens, there is a limit to it. Because in order to communicate, we need receivers with antennae set to the right frequency that will absorbs the communication waves we will emit. Paradoxically this can be achieved by EU leaders who dare put forward their vision and political capital. Unfortunately the current perception of paradigm is not suitable for this. There is no doubt that Turkey s accession will be one of the most difficult; one does not need to have the insight of a genius to tell this. However, it is Turkey that must do its homework for accession. The difficulty of Turkey s accession stems from the scale of the country and the requirement that the economic and political transformation must be undertaken while the national consensus on European perspective is being maintained. This is Turkey s internal challenge. And Turkey will overcome this challenge through its own dynamics. 5
27 As I have mentioned a few minutes ago, the most important mechanism in EU relations is a well organized COMMUNICATON mechanism. Nonetheless, communication is not a one way street. Turkey needs to give each stakeholder in EU coverage and process messages to calm down their concerns through communication instruments whose main players will be civil society organizations. Our expectation should not be a single-directional one like The EU should keep its promise, but instead Turkey should deserve it by doing its homework. Only when these conditions are fulfilled that it will be the EU s turn to keep its promises. The other key message is that Turkey will work to demonstrate its potential contributions to EU in political and cultural fields. Europe should be aware of what it will give up if it does not prefer Turkey s accession to EU. It should act in line with knowledge of this point. Another key message is that in the Communication process, there should be varying communication strategies for each country and stakeholders in every country. There will evidently be common denominators in these strategies and it will eventually be easier to understand each other. This is the right approach that will create the right image of Turkey for EU citizens. Civil society organizations established by our citizens in EU countries are our Windows of opportunity. These windows should be multiplied equipped with well defined and right messages. At this point, I would like to underline two very important developments. In 2009, a Turkish Season was organized in France and this series of events became a golden opportunity for French citizens to realize the cultural values and richness of Turkey. We believe that this activity will contribute to positive developments in perceptions about Turkey in the Turkish public opinion. As Michel Rocard, Jacques Delors, Luc Ferry, Alain Touraine and Edgar Morin hoped in their article in Le Monde, Turkish Season in France helped interrupt though for a short period the discussion in the French public opinion on Turkey s accession which depend on prejudices rather than knowledge. 6
28 It is necessary and possible to sustain this interruption with the help of Istanbul s year in 2010 as European Culture Capital presents Europe the chance to discover the roots of its own culture and while giving Turkey a magnificent opportunity to understand each other with Europe. With 2010 in Đstanbul, Europe will understand how close The Other of Europe is to itself. Indeed, we should create the environment that will make use of the synergy of 2010 and will increase the momentum. The challenge for Europe is not its capacity to absorb Turkey. The issue is, after 20 full years following the fall of the Berlin Wall, whether Europe will want to be divided along religious and cultural walls. From 11/9 to 9/11, the world failed to bring civilizations together; it instead further divided them and in this process Europe could not play an important role. From now on, the question for Europe is whether it will end this process of division or contribute to its deepening. Distinguished participants, I would like to conclude my remarks by quoting a recent speech by Italian Foreign Minister and former Vice President of European Commission Franco Frattini: The day when Turkey becomes an EU member, Europe s second Berlin Wall will have fallen. 7
29 STATEMENT BY EROL KĐRESEPĐ AT COMMUNICATING TURKEY SEMINAR Chairmen, Stockholm, 2 December 2009 We came together today to discuss how Turkey s accession to the EU can be better communicated and what kind of role civil society organizations can play in this area. Before presenting my concrete suggestions on the point, I would like to share briefly my views on the state of play of Turkey-EU relations and the problems we are facing today. My purpose in doing this is to stress the importance of the role civil society organizations can play. As you know, Turkey s accession negotiations started in October 2005 which means that the process has been going on for 4 years. However, the current state of play is simply disappointing. So much so that in this period only 11 of the 35 negotiation chapters were opened and just one was provisionally closed. Opening benchmarks were set for 13 chapters while closing benchmarks were defined for 5 chapters. 8 chapters were suspended due to the impasse in Cyprus issue. 5 further chapters have been blocked by France on the grounds that they would eventually lead to membership. These five chapters include agriculture and rural development, economic and monetary policy, education and culture, financial and budgetary provisions and institutions. Just think about it; you start a negotiation with the EU for full membership but some of the negotiation files will be suspended as they may take you to full membership. In such a case, the honest thing to do would change the name of this negotiation process which Turkey would never accept- or remove your veto.
30 Chairmen, I think this short explanation puts very clearly the sad situation of EU- Turkey relations. However, I would like to dwell upon it in a little more detail. In recent years, the negative attitude of some European leaders on Turkey s membership, the current financial crisis, the negative approach of European people to Turkey due mainly to prejudices owing to lack of knowledge, have given rise in Turkey to the impression that even if all membership criteria were met, Turkey would somehow not be admitted and that it was being subject to delaying action. This in turn has led to a rapid decline in the number of Turkish citizens that support EU membership. Last September, the Independent Commission on Turkey which brings together such important European figures as former President of Finland and 2008 Nobel Peace Prize laureate Martti Ahtisaari along with Kurt Biedenkopf, Hans van den Broek and Michel Rocard published its second report with the title Turkey in Europe: Breaking the vicious circle. The report stresses that Deceleration of Turkey s reform process has on one hand strengthened the opposition in Europe against Turkey s full membership While on the other hand this led to loss of motivation for Turkish reformers and thus a vicious circle has been set. This vicious circle came to overshadow many positive steps Turkey took within the framework of adoption of EU acquis. 2
31 The breaking of this vicious circle as soon as possible will be in the interest of both Turkey and the EU. In order to do this, attitudes and approaches must change both in Turkey and in Europe. Europeans must fulfill their commitment on Turkey s accession and adopt a fair and equitable attitude towards Turkey. The proposals of privileged partnership or special relationship by some member states clearly violate the principle of pacta sunt servanda since such a proposal is conflict with all EU decisions and commitments t date taken on this point. In the meantime, Turkey should resume broad based reform process covering the government and the opposition and should encourage its many friends in Europe. Chairmen, At this point, I would like to move more closely to the topic of how to communicate Turkey better in Europe and what kind of roles civil society could assume in this. In this context, I would like to quote, the EC Communication of 29 June 2005 on Civil Society Dialogue Between EU and Candidate Countries. According to this Communication, one of the lessons to be learned from the last enlargement round is that The citizens of EU member states were not sufficiently well informed or prepared. However, we cannot stress enough the need to support future enlargements with a strong and consistent dialogue involving the societies of member and candidate countries and as well as EU institutions. This support should Fill knowledge gaps, Help better mutual understanding, 3
32 Contribute to bringing citizens closer to different cultures, political and economic systems; And help build a stronger awareness about the opportunities and challenges to be brought by future enlargements. In this context, the Commission Recommendation of October 2004 on Turkey s Progress towards accession, it was Proposed that a dialogue be developed whereby the concerns and perceptions between Turkey and Member States would be discussed frankly and openly; And stated that the EU would facilitate this dialogue while civil society should assume important role in the process. The same Communication states the aims of civil society dialogue as follows: - To strengthen the contacts and sharing of experience among all parts of civil society in Member States and candidate countries; - To inform EU countries on opportunities and challenges of future enlargements, - To ensure for this purpose that adequate information on the economies histories and socio-cultural structures of candidate countries is acquired; - And to ensure that the basic values, actions and policies of the EU are well understood in candidate countries. Distinguished participants; We are all aware that in the European public opinion, there is a problem of image and promotion on Turkey s accession due mainly to prejudices and lack of knowledge. We also have misperceptions and misinformation in our country with regard to EU. We should not ignore the fact that communication constitutes the third main column of in EU negotiations and reform process. Therefore the reforms undertaken in Turkey in recent years; 4
tepav EU-Turkey Relations and the New Political Context Oya Memişoğlu June 8, 2007, Ankara economic policy research foundation of turkey
tepav economic policy research foundation of turkey EU-Turkey Relations and the New Political Context Oya Memişoğlu June 8, 2007, Ankara EU-Turkey Relations Slide 2 A shortened long history 1963: Association
More informationTURKISH CYPRIOTS EXPECTATIONS FROM THE EUROPEAN UNION
TURKISH CYPRIOTS EXPECTATIONS FROM THE EUROPEAN UNION It has been more than a year that the Turkish Cypriots, responding to the calls of the international community and embracing the values of the EU integration
More informationHOW TO NEGOTIATE WITH THE EU? THEORIES AND PRACTICE
HOW TO NEGOTIATE WITH THE EU? THEORIES AND PRACTICE In the European Union, negotiation is a built-in and indispensable dimension of the decision-making process. There are written rules, unique moves, clearly
More informationTHE ENLARGEMENT OF THE UNION
THE ENLARGEMENT OF THE UNION On 1 July 2013, Croatia became the 28th Member State of the European Union. Croatia s accession, which followed that of Romania and Bulgaria on 1 January 2007, marked the sixth
More informationA comparative study on the role of EU perspective upon the Europeanisation of Croatia and Turkey
A comparative study on the role of EU perspective upon the Europeanisation of Croatia and Turkey Dr.Yeşim Özer Istanbul University E-mail: yozer@istanbul.edu.tr Track: The Strength of NATO and EU conditionality
More informationCouncil conclusions on enlargment/stabilisation and association process. 3060th GENERAL AFFAIRS Council meeting Brussels, 14 December 2010
COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION Council conclusions on enlargment/stabilisation and association process 3060th GERAL AFFAIRS Council meeting Brussels, 14 December 2010 The Council adopted the following conclusions:
More informationSwedish Presidency with the EU Expectations for the Western Balkans
On the 1 st of July 2009, Sweden took over the Presidency of the EU for the next six months. As each member state of the European Union takes its turn in presiding with the European Council for a period
More informationINPS - 30 ottobre 2014 Intervento Villani- China Project
INPS - 30 ottobre 2014 Intervento Villani- China Project At first, let me thank all of you for your kind participation today and for the very inspiring contributions we heard in the previous speeches.
More informationEurope and Russia on the eve of the 21st century
SPEECH/97/166 Hans van den Broek Member of the European Commission Europe and Russia on the eve of the 21st century Check Against Delivery Seul le texte prononcé fait foi Es gilt das gesprochene wort The
More informationEuropean Integration Forum Summary report of the first meeting April 2009
European Integration Forum Summary report of the first meeting 20-21 April 2009 The inaugural meeting of the European Integration Forum took place on 20-21 April 2009. More than fifty civil society organisations
More informationEUROPEAN COMMISSION Employment, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities DG ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON FREE MOVEMENT OF WORKERS
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Employment, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities DG Social Protection and Integration Coordination of Social Security Schemes, Free Movement of Workers ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON FREE
More informationAgreed Conclusions of the third Euro-Mediterranean Conference of Ministers of Culture Athens, May 2008
PARTENARIAT EUROMED DOC. DE SÉANCE N : 139/08 EN DATE DU: 30.05.2008 ORIGINE: GSC Agreed Conclusions of the third Euro-Mediterranean Conference of Ministers of Culture Athens, 29 30 May 2008 1. The Ministers
More informationTurkey and the EU: a Common Future?
SPEECH/04/466 Olli Rehn Commissioner-designate for Enlargement Turkey and the EU: a Common Future? Group meeting of the Greens/EFA of the European Parliament Istanbul, 20 October 2004 Rt.Hon. Ministers
More informationGovernment Response to House of Lords EU Committee Report: The future of EU enlargement, published 6 March 2013
Government Response to House of Lords EU Committee Report: The future of EU enlargement, published 6 March 2013 Chapter 1: Introduction 1. The Government welcomes this report and its conclusions. It provides
More informationepp european people s party
EU-Western Balkan Summit EPP Declaration adopted at the EPP EU-Western Balkan Summit, Sofia 16 May 2018 01 Fundamentally united by our common EPP values, based on this shared community of principles and
More informationEUROBAROMETER 64 PUBLIC OPINION IN THE EUROPEAN UNION AUTUMN
Standard Eurobarometer European Commission EUROBAROMETER 64 PUBLIC OPINION IN THE EUROPEAN UNION AUTUMN 2005 Standard Eurobarometer 64 / Autumn 2005 TNS Opinion & Social NATIONAL REPORT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
More informationWhat will determine the success of the New Partnership for Africa s
1 Introduction: NEPAD A New Vision SALEH M. NSOULI AND NORBERT FUNKE What will determine the success of the New Partnership for Africa s Development (NEPAD)? Which policies and measures envisaged under
More informationTURKEY AND THE EUROPEAN NEIGHBORHOOD POLICY
TURKEY AND THE EUROPEAN NEIGHBORHOOD POLICY There is clear scope for Turkey and the EU to further develop cooperation and to intensify policy coordination in the Southern Mediterranean and Black Sea regions.
More informationTURKEY AND THE EU: A WIN-WIN GAME
TURKEY AND THE EU: A WIN-WIN GAME The Georgia crisis this summer highlighted the strategic importance of Turkish-EU cooperation to ensure stability and security in our common neighborhood. One of the most
More information- specific priorities for "Democratic engagement and civic participation" (strand 2).
Priorities of the Europe for Citizens Programme for 2018-2020 All projects have to be in line with the general and specific objectives of the Europe for Citizens programme and taking into consideration
More informationProf. Pasquale Saccà Jean Monnet Chair ad personam European Commission President Scientific Committee I Mediterranei South/East dialogue
Prof. Pasquale Saccà Jean Monnet Chair ad personam European Commission President Scientific Committee I Mediterranei South/East dialogue Europe opened to dialogue: a common voice for a political and democratic
More informationItalian Report / Executive Summary
EUROBAROMETER SPECIAL BUREAUX (2002) Italian Report / Executive Summary Survey carried out for the European Commission s Representation in ITALY «This document does not reflect the views of the European
More informationFordham International Law Journal
Fordham International Law Journal Volume 22, Issue 6 1998 Article 7 Social Policy and Employment Aspects of the Treaty of Amsterdam Patrick Venturini Copyright c 1998 by the authors. Fordham International
More informationInterview With Neoklis Sylikiotis, Minister of the Interior of the Republic of Cyprus
3174 Long March to the West 16/4/07 2:55 pm Page 228 Interview With Neoklis Sylikiotis, Minister of the Interior of the Republic of Cyprus People say there are between 80,000 and 100,000 non-cypriots in
More informationUNITED NATIONS EDUCATIONAL, SCIENTIFIC AND CULTURAL ORGANIZATION. Address by Mr Koïchiro Matsuura
DG/2001/128 Original: English UNITED NATIONS EDUCATIONAL, SCIENTIFIC AND CULTURAL ORGANIZATION Address by Mr Koïchiro Matsuura Director-General of the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural
More informationConference of Speakers of the European Union Parliaments
Conference of Speakers of the European Union Parliaments 8 9 April 2019, Vienna Conclusions of the Presidency Preliminary Remarks The Conference of Speakers of the European Union Parliaments was held in
More informationAccession of Bulgaria and Romania to the EU- a debate in the Bundestag
SPEECH/06/607 Mr Olli Rehn Member of the European Commission, responsible for Enlargement Accession of Bulgaria and Romania to the EU- a debate in the Bundestag EU Committee of the German Bundestag Berlin,
More informationFrom a continent of war to one of and prosperity
peace From a continent of war to one of and prosperity The European Union was constructed from the devastation of two world wars. Today, after decades of division, both sides of the European continent,
More informationEnlargement as an instrument of the EU s soft power
SPEECH/07/642 Olli Rehn EU Commissioner for Enlargement Enlargement as an instrument of the EU s soft power Anna Lindh Award Ceremony 19 October 2007 Regards from Lisbon. I am glad to return to Brussels
More informationDECISION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 20.7.2012 COM(2012) 407 final 2012/0199 (COD) Proposal for a DECISION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCILestablishing a Union action for the European Capitals of
More information2007 progress report on the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia
P6_TA-PROV(2008)0172 2007 progress report on the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia European Parliament resolution of 23 April 2008 on the 2007 Progress Report on the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia
More informationTHE EU AND THE SECURITY COUNCIL Current Challenges and Future Prospects
THE EU AND THE SECURITY COUNCIL Current Challenges and Future Prospects H.E. Michael Spindelegger Minister for Foreign Affairs of Austria Liechtenstein Institute on Self-Determination Woodrow Wilson School
More informationFrom Washington Consensus to Istanbul Decisions : Where do we go?
From Washington Consensus to Istanbul Decisions : Where do we go? Güven Sak TEPAV Director Esen Çağlar Economic Policy Analyst TEPAV Policy Note September 2009 From Washington Consensus to Istanbul Decisions
More informationDRAFT REPORT. European Parliament 2016/2308(INI) on the 2016 Commission Report on Turkey (2016/2308(INI)) Rapporteur: Kati Piri
European Parliament 2014-2019 Committee on Foreign Affairs 2016/2308(INI) 18.4.2017 DRAFT REPORT on the 2016 Commission Report on Turkey (2016/2308(INI)) Committee on Foreign Affairs Rapporteur: Kati Piri
More informationThe Relevance of Democracy, Human Rights, Civic Liberties and Social Justice for the G20 Process
The Relevance of Democracy, Human Rights, Civic Liberties and Social Justice for the G20 Process Yaşar Yakış 1. Introduction The G20 is mainly an economic forum while democracy, human rights, civic liberties,
More informationUkraine s Integration in the Euro-Atlantic Community Way Ahead
By Gintė Damušis Ukraine s Integration in the Euro-Atlantic Community Way Ahead Since joining NATO and the EU, Lithuania has initiated a new foreign policy agenda for advancing and supporting democracy
More informationThese are just a few figures to demonstrate to you the significance of EU-Australian relations.
Germany and the enlargement of the European Union Ladies and Gentlemen: Let me begin by expressing my thanks to the National Europe Centre for giving me the opportunity to share with you some reflections
More informationDanish positions on key developments in the European Union
DANISH INSTITUTE FOR INTERNATIONAL STUDIES STRANDGADE 56 1401 Copenhagen K +45 32 69 87 87 diis@diis.dk www.diis.dk DIIS Brief Danish positions on key developments in the European Union Summarised by Gry
More informationTHE STABILITY PACT AND LESSONS FROM A DECADE OF REGIONAL INITIATIVES
THE STABILITY PACT AND LESSONS FROM A DECADE OF REGIONAL INITIATIVES September 1999 Background In the 1990s, every historical turning point led to the creation of regional organisations in South Eastern
More informationJOINT CONSULTATIVE COMMITTEE
REX/219 21st meeting of the EU-Turkey Joint Consultative Committee Kayseri, 14 July 2006 JOINT DECLARATION by Mr Jan Olsson (co-chair) and Mr Şemsi Bayraktar (acting co-chair), at the 21st meeting of the
More informationEU statement on Doha negotiations at the WTO Trade Negotiations Committee in Geneva
EU statement on Doha negotiations at the WTO Trade Negotiations Committee in Geneva Mr Chairman, Thank you for the assessment that you have provided both in writing last week and orally today on the state
More informationTHE SOLUTION OF THE CYPRUS PROBLEM: THE KEY TO TURKEY S RELATIONS WITH THE EU
THE SOLUTION OF THE CYPRUS PROBLEM: THE KEY TO TURKEY S RELATIONS WITH THE EU The lack of trust of Turkey is the main obstacle to both the solution of the Cyprus Problem and Turkey s eventual accession
More informationFIFTH MEETING OF THE KOSOVO SAP TRACKING MECHANISM - STM Brussels, 17 September 2004
FIFTH MEETING OF THE KOSOVO SAP TRACKING MECHANISM - STM Brussels, 17 September 2004 The fifth meeting of the Kosovo Stabilisation and Association Tracking Mechanism took place in Brussels on 17 September
More informationPrague Process CONCLUSIONS. Senior Officials Meeting
Prague Process CONCLUSIONS Senior Officials Meeting Berlin, 28 29 October 2014 The Prague Process Senior Officials Meeting (SOM) took place in Berlin on 28 29 October 2014, gathering 84 participants at
More informationArab Human Development Report 2016 Youth and the Prospects for Human Development in a Changing Reality
1 2 Arab Human Development Report 2016 Youth and the Prospects for Human Development in a Changing Reality Published for the United Nations Development Programme Regional Bureau for Arab States 3 Copyright
More informationIntegrated Project of the European Social Partner Organisations. Social partners participation in the European social dialogue
Integrated Project of the European Social Partner Organisations Social partners participation in the European social dialogue... what are the social partner s needs? Report of the Romanian National Seminar
More informationProject Fiche No. 2. Turkey
Project Fiche No. 2 Civil Society Facility - Partnership Actions between: 1. Socio-Economic Partners, 2. Minorities/Vulnerable Group Organisations and 3. Cultural Organisations 1. Basic information 1.1
More informationEUROBAROMETER 65 PUBLIC OPINION IN THE EUROPEAN UNION SPRING
Standard Eurobarometer European Commission EUROBAROMETER 65 PUBLIC OPINION IN THE EUROPEAN UNION SPRING 2006 NATIONAL REPORT Standard Eurobarometer 65 / Spring 2006 TNS Opinion & Social EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
More informationPUBLIC PERCEPTIONS OF SCIENCE, RESEARCH AND INNOVATION
Special Eurobarometer 419 PUBLIC PERCEPTIONS OF SCIENCE, RESEARCH AND INNOVATION SUMMARY Fieldwork: June 2014 Publication: October 2014 This survey has been requested by the European Commission, Directorate-General
More information10168/13 KR/tt 1 DG D 2B
COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION Brussels, 29 May 2013 10168/13 NOTE from: to: Cion. report: No. prev. doc. Subject: I. INTRODUCTION FREMP 73 JAI 430 COHOM 99 JUSTCIV 139 EJUSTICE 53 SOC 386 CULT 65 DROIP
More informationTo the President of the House of Representatives of the States General Binnenhof 4 Den Haag
To the President of the House of Representatives of the States General Binnenhof 4 Den Haag Sub-Saharan Africa Department Central and East Africa Division Bezuidenhoutseweg 67 2594 AC Den Haag Date 1 September
More informationPRE-CONFERENCE SEMINAR FOR ELECTED WOMEN LOCAL GOVERNMENT LEADERS
PRE-CONFERENCE SEMINAR FOR ELECTED WOMEN LOCAL GOVERNMENT LEADERS Decentralized governance and Women s Presence in Leadership Positions Ms Dede Ekoue, Deputy Resident Representative UNDP Cameroon May 26,
More informationGermany in Europe: Franco-Czech Reflections
Germany in Europe: Franco-Czech Reflections Thursday, October 18, 2012 Mirror Hall, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Prague, Czech Republic Introduction/Welcome Speeches Petr Drulák, Director, Institute of
More informationAwareness on the North Korean Human Rights issue in the European Union
Awareness on the North Korean Human Rights issue in the European Union December 2015 Andras Megyeri 1 This paper discusses the issue of awareness raising in the European Union concerning the topic of North
More informationCouncil conclusions on Enlargement and Stabilisation and Association Process. General Affairs Council meeting Brussels, 16 December 2014
Council of the European Union PRESS EN COUNCIL CONCLUSIONS Brussels, 16 December 2014 Council conclusions on Enlargement and Stabilisation and Association Process The Council adopted the following conclusions:
More informationCompetition and EU policy-making
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Joaquín Almunia Vice President of the European Commission responsible for Competition Policy Competition and EU policy-making Minda de Gunzburg Center for European Studies Harvard University,
More informationProjet de discours de M. Arnold Migus ERC-PFUE 7 octobre 2008 Collège de France
Projet de discours de M. Arnold Migus ERC-PFUE 7 octobre 2008 Collège de France Madame la Ministre, Mister Commissioner, Honourable Members of the European Parliament, Mister President of the European
More informationReport Template for EU Events at EXPO
Report Template for EU Events at EXPO Event Title : Territorial Approach to Food Security and Nutrition Policy Date: 19 October 2015 Event Organiser: FAO, OECD and UNCDF in collaboration with the City
More informationFOURTH GEORGIAN-GERMAN STRATEGIC FORUM. Policy Recommendations and Observations
FOURTH GEORGIAN-GERMAN STRATEGIC FORUM Policy Recommendations and Observations KONRAD-ADENAUER-STIFTUNG REGIONAL PROGRAM POLITICAL DIALOGUE SOUTH CAUCASUS Fourth Georgian-German Strategic Forum: Policy
More informationCheck against delivery
Check against delivery Jorge Sampaio UN HIGH REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE ALLIANCE OF CIVILIZATIONS Mediation in the Mediterranean: developing capacities and synergies Spanish-Moroccan Initiative Madrid, 12
More informationA PERSPECTIVE ON THE ROLE OF THE EUROPEAN NEIGHBORHOOD POLICY IN THE PAN-EUROPEAN INTEGRATION
A PERSPECTIVE ON THE ROLE OF THE EUROPEAN NEIGHBORHOOD POLICY IN THE PAN-EUROPEAN INTEGRATION Pascariu Gabriela Carmen University Al. I. Cuza Iasi, The Center of European Studies Adress: Street Carol I,
More informationopinion piece Public opinion in Member States as a factor in the debate on Turkey s EU membership South East European Studies at Oxford
opinion piece South East European Studies at Oxford Public opinion in Member States as a factor in the debate on Turkey s EU membership Angelos Giannakopoulos St Antony s College University of Oxford Public
More informationIssued by the PECC Standing Committee at the close of. The 13th General Meeting of the Pacific Economic Cooperation Council
PECC 99 STATEMENT Issued by the PECC Standing Committee at the close of The 13th General Meeting of the Pacific Economic Cooperation Council 23 October 1999 As we look to the 21st century and to PECC s
More informationREPORT OF The First Ministerial Conference On Women s Role In The Development Of Oic Member States
1 االله الرحمن الرحيم بسم O IC /1-W / C O D /2006/R E P.F IN A L REPORT OF The First Ministerial Conference On Women s Role In The Development Of Oic Member States Istanbul, Republic of Turkey 29-30 Shawwal,
More informationHALFWAY BETWEEN PORTO AND MAASTRICHT. Excellencies, ladies and gentlemen,
Speech by H.E. Jaap de Hoop Scheffer, Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Netherlands and Chairman-in-Office of the OSCE, at the 12th Annual Session of the OSCE Parliamentary Assembly, Rotterdam, 5 July
More informationPolicy Paper on the Future of EU Youth Policy Development
Policy Paper on the Future of EU Youth Policy Development Adopted by the European Youth Forum / Forum Jeunesse de l Union européenne / Forum des Organisations européennes de la Jeunesse Council of Members,
More informationILO/Japan Managing Cross-Border Movement of Labour in Southeast Asia
ILO/Japan Managing Cross-Border Movement of Labour in Southeast Asia Quick Facts Countries: Cambodia, Indonesia, Lao PDR, Thailand Final Evaluation: November 2010 Mode of Evaluation: independent Technical
More informationTrade and Economic relations with Western Balkans
P6_TA(2009)0005 Trade and Economic relations with Western Balkans European Parliament resolution of 13 January 2009 on Trade and Economic relations with Western Balkans (2008/2149(INI)) The European Parliament,
More informationThe European Perspective of Iceland
SPEECH/09/373 Olli Rehn Eu Commissioner for Enlargement The European Perspective of Iceland University of Iceland Reykjavik, 9 September 2009 Foreign Minister, Ladies and Gentlemen, Dear Friends, It is
More informationTHE THIRD MEETING OF THE ARAB-JAPAN DIALOGUE FORUM January 8-9, 2005, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia OVERVIEW. Background
FINAL THE THIRD MEETING OF THE ARAB-JAPAN DIALOGUE FORUM January 8-9, 2005, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia OVERVIEW Background The member of the Japan-Arab Dialogue Forum met in the shadow of the enormous tragedy
More informationInternational Council on Social Welfare Global Programme 2016 to The Global Programme for is shaped by four considerations:
International Council on Social Welfare Global Programme 2016 to 2020 1 THE CONTEXT OF THE 2016-2020 GLOBAL PROGRAMME The Global Programme for 2016-2020 is shaped by four considerations: a) The founding
More informationTHE BALTIC SEA REGION: A REGION WITH DECENT AND MODERN JOBS
THE BALTIC SEA REGION: A REGION WITH DECENT AND MODERN JOBS Summary of the deliberations and proposals from the report of The Joint Baltic Sea Group. Content: - The Baltic Sea region: A region with decent
More informationEC Communication on A credible enlargement perspective for and enhanced EU engagement with the Western Balkans COM (2018) 65
Position Paper May 2018 EC Communication on A credible enlargement perspective for and enhanced EU engagement with the Western Balkans COM (2018) 65 EUROCHAMBRES and the Western Balkans Six Chambers Investment
More informationIIRC Stakeholder Feedback Survey
IIRC Stakeholder Feedback Survey The Survey Summary of approach The IIRC Stakeholder Feedback Survey was sent on 25 May 2016 to around 10,000 stakeholders taken from the IIRC s central database. It was
More informationTURKEY S IMAGE AND THE ARMENIAN QUESTION
TURKEY S IMAGE AND THE ARMENIAN QUESTION Turkey can justifiably condemn the policies and actions of previous regimes or governments while still asserting pride in its history, the author argues. He subsequently
More informationGender Thematic Group (GTG) Meeting
Gender Thematic Group (GTG) Meeting 26-27 May 2014 Tsakhkadzor, Russia Hotel Summary of Discussion Outcomes A. GTG priority context: New Issues, Challenges and Key Players in the Area of Gender Equality
More informationBackground paper. Facility for Refugees in Turkey
Background paper Facility for Refugees in Turkey March 2018 1 The European Court of Auditors is currently examining whether the Facility for Refugees in Turkey is providing effective support to refugees
More informationNOBEL PRIZE The EU is a unique economic and political partnership between 27 European countries that together cover much of the continent.
Factsheet: the European Union Factsheet: the European Union The EU is a unique economic and political partnership between 27 European countries that together cover much of the continent. It was created
More informationContribution of the Chambers to the EU-Turkey Positive Agenda. EU-Turkey Chamber Forum Partnership Projects Kick-off Meeting
Contribution of the Chambers to the EU-Turkey Positive Agenda EU-Turkey Chamber Forum Partnership Projects Kick-off Meeting Tuesday, January 15 th 2012 Ankara Draft speech by Mr. Arnaldo Abruzzini Secretary
More informationCommittee on Foreign Affairs Committee on Culture and Education. on Towards an EU strategy for international cultural relations (2016/2240(INI))
European Parliament 204-209 Committee on Foreign Affairs Committee on Culture and Education 206/2240(INI) 22.2.207 DRAFT REPORT on Towards an EU strategy for international cultural relations (206/2240(INI))
More informationReflections on Americans Views of the Euro Ex Ante. I am pleased to participate in this session on the 10 th anniversary
Reflections on Americans Views of the Euro Ex Ante Martin Feldstein I am pleased to participate in this session on the 10 th anniversary of the start of the Euro and the European Economic and Monetary
More informationTURKISH FOREIGN POLICY AND THE EU IN 2010
TURKISH FOREIGN POLICY AND THE EU IN 2010 While Turkey pursues a policy of constructive engagement in its neighborhood and beyond, full integration with the EU is and will remain the priority. Membership
More informationWORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION
WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION WT/MIN(11)/11 17 December 2011 (11-6661) MINISTERIAL CONFERENCE Eighth Session Geneva, 15-17 December 2011 EIGHTH MINISTERIAL CONFERENCE Chairman's Concluding Statement My statement
More informationEnlargement policy and Public health
Enlargement policy and Public health Katja de Sadeleer DG Enlargement katja.de-sadeleer@ec.europa.eu http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/index_en.htm The current enlargement agenda How to get in: conditions
More informationSecurity Council Unanimously Adopts Resolution 2282 (2016) on Review of United Nations Peacebuilding Architecture
SC/12340 Security Council Unanimously Adopts Resolution 2282 (2016) on Review of United Nations Peacebuilding Architecture 7680th Meeting (AM) Security Council Meetings Coverage Expressing deep concern
More informationEUROBAROMETER SPECIAL BUREAUX (2002) Executive Summary. Survey carried out for the European Commission s Representation in Germany
EUROBAROMETER SPECIAL BUREAUX (2002) Executive Summary Survey carried out for the European Commission s Representation in Germany «This document does not reflect the views of the European Commission. Any
More informationTURKEY-EU RELATIONS. Ayselin YILDIZ
TURKEY-EU RELATIONS Ayselin YILDIZ STORY BEGINS MUCH BEFORE... Turkey is the only pluralist secular democracy in the Muslim world Turkish culture has had a profound impact over much of Eastern and Southern
More informationINTRODUCTION. Perceptions from Turkey
Perceptions from Turkey Ahmet İçduygu (Koç University) Ayşen Ezgi Üstübici (Koç University) Deniz Karcı Korfalı (Koç University) Deniz Şenol Sert (Koç University) January 2013 INTRODUCTION New knowledge,
More informationTEN YEARS AFTER ROMANIA'S ACCESSION TO THE EUROPEAN UNION: COSTS, BENEFITS AND PERSPECTIVES
TEN YEARS AFTER ROMANIA'S ACCESSION TO THE EUROPEAN UNION: COSTS, BENEFITS AND PERSPECTIVES Dan VĂTĂMAN * Abstract This year we celebrate ten years since Romania became full-fledged Member of the European
More informationEUROPEAN CITIZENSHIP
Standard Eurobarometer 78 Autumn 2012 EUROPEAN CITIZENSHIP REPORT Fieldwork: November 2012 This survey has been requested and co-ordinated by the European Commission, Directorate-General for Communication.
More informationPoland s Integration with the European Union
Maria Celina Błaszczyk Institute of Sociology University of Łódź Poland s Integration with the European Union 1. Introduction to the development of relations between Poland and European Union The development
More informationA need to incorporate civil society actors as domestic forces to establish durable positive
A need to incorporate civil society actors as domestic forces to establish durable positive peace in power-sharing regimes: the Case of Cyprus Peace Process Gül Pinar Erkem Gülboy (Istanbul University)
More informationSpeech outline for. Mr Tibor Váradi Deputy Head of EU Delegation in Ankara. 15 September 2011, Istanbul
Speech outline for Mr Tibor Váradi Deputy Head of EU Delegation in Ankara At the 29 th Meeting of the EU Turkey Joint Consultative Committee 15 September 2011, Istanbul Distinguished members of the EU
More informationStandard Summary Project Fiche IPA decentralised National Programmes. 1.2 Title: Civil Society Facility - Parliamentary Exchange and Dialogue
Standard Summary Project Fiche IPA decentralised National Programmes 1. Basic Information 1.1 CRIS Number: TR080301 1.2 Title: Civil Society Facility - Parliamentary Exchange and Dialogue 1.3 Sector: 35-
More informationResolution adopted by the General Assembly. [on the report of the Fifth Committee (A/60/831)]
United Nations A/RES/60/260 General Assembly Distr.: General 16 May 2006 Sixtieth session Agenda items 46, 118, 120, 122, 124, 128, 129 and 136 Resolution adopted by the General Assembly [on the report
More informationEEA Consultative Committee
EEA Consultative Committee REX/086 EEA-CC ORIGINAL ENGLISH Egilsstadir, Iceland, 26 June 2002 RESOLUTION on ENLARGEMENT AND THE FUTURE OF THE EEA Rapporteurs: Jon Ivar Nålsund (EFTA-Consultative Committee,
More informationEuropean Neighbourhood Policy
European Neighbourhood Policy Page 1 European Neighbourhood Policy Introduction The EU s expansion from 15 to 27 members has led to the development during the last five years of a new framework for closer
More informationCOMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE COUNCIL AND THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT
COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES Brussels, 19.6.2008 COM(2008) 391 final COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE COUNCIL AND THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT REPORT ON THE FIRST YEAR OF IMPLEMENTATION OF
More informationCOUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 17 December 2013 (OR. en) 17952/13 ELARG 176 COWEB 190
COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION Brussels, 17 December 2013 (OR. en) 17952/13 ELARG 176 COWEB 190 OUTCOME OF PROCEEDINGS From: General Secretariat of the Council On: 17 December 2013 To: Delegations No. prev.
More informationDG MIGRATION AND HOME AFFAIRS (DG HOME)
DG MIGRATION AND HOME AFFAIRS (DG HOME) Last update: 01.09.2016 Initiative Develop a comprehensive and sustainable European migration and asylum policy framework, as set out in Articles 78 and 79 TFEU,
More information