Congressional Gridlock: The Effects of the Master Lever
|
|
- Timothy Shields
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Congressional Gridlock: The Effects of the Master Lever Olga Gorelkina Max Planck Institute, Bonn Ioanna Grypari Max Planck Institute, Bonn Preliminary & Incomplete February 11, 2015 Abstract This paper accounts for the effects of the master lever, aka the Straight-Ticket Voting Option, on policy making, by focusing on the positions of elected US congress members from 1952 to The master lever is an option offered in some US states allowing voters to vote for a specific party for all offices listed on a ballot by selecting a box at the top, as opposed to filling out each office individually. We build a novel theory of pre-election competition where parties select their candidates (and equivalently their positions) for state elections by trading off the probability of winning against the party bliss point. The presence of the master lever makes voters less sensitive to candidates positions and more focused on their party affiliation. This changes the parties tradeoff. For example the party favored in a partisan state will become more extreme in the presence of the master lever and the other party more moderate in order to attract the (even stronger now) partisans. By allowing for two-dimensional politician positions, we are able to get predictions for swing states, where voters have conflicting interests across parties and dimensions. We use data from the American National Election Survey, Poole and Rosenthal s two-dimensional congress member positions, and the exogenous variation with respect to the existence of a master lever across states and congresses to test the predictions of the model. We then parameterize the legislative process and using data on congressional bills from the Policy Agendas Project we calibrate an extended version of the model. We quantify the effects of the master lever on congressional gridlock, where the tradeoff arises from the benefit of having less extreme politicians in congress and the disadvantage (in terms of gridlock) of having more unified parties. The authors thank Derek Stemple and attendees of the Max Planck Institute s joint seminar, as well as Georg Treuter for valuable research assistance. 1
2 1 Introduction 2 Master Lever and Politician Selection 2.1 Theory Fix state s, election period t and a voter i s. The voter s position on the set of issues {1, 2,...N} is described by the vector: x it = (x it1, x it2,...x itn ) (1) x jt is j s preferred point in the policy space. Candidate j representing party P (P {R, D}) is running for state s at t. The candidate s position on the set of issues is given by: y jt = (y jt1, y jt2,...y jtn ) (2) The position of the Democratic party at time t is denoted Y Dt and the position of the Republican party at time t is denoted Y Rt. Voter i s utility from politician j s term in office depends on the difference in their positions on the set of issues: u j i = n (x itn y jtn ) 2 (3) On the election day, the voter receives an imperfect signal of her true utility. The signal is affected by (i) the candidate s party affiliation P, if the voter is a partisan of P, and (ii) a candidate-specific preference shock δ j common to all voters 1 ũ j i = uj i + µip i + (1 µ) δ j (4) where: 1 It is possible to include the voter-specific idiosyncratic noise in equation (4). If the noise term has mean zero, such change will have no implication on (5) and the following results. 2
3 δ j follows a uniform distribution on ( 1 2, 1 2) and denotes a random advantage over the opponent; I P i = 1 if voter i is a partisan of P, and I P i = 0 otherwise; µ > 0 is the weight of the politician s party affiliation in the utility of a partisan voter. The positions x jt of voters in a specific state are distributed according to an exogenous function f st (x it ) (or f s (x it )). This distribution function reflects the political climate in a state. Fat tails imply a large fraction of extreme views, positive or negative mean imply leaning towards the right or the left, respectively, in the state (in period t). Looking at aggregate levels, we assume that there is mass 1 of voters in state s and denote the voters aggregate utility from assigning the seat to politician j P by Ũ j : Ũ j = = ũ j i di u j i di + µπp + (1 µ) δ j, (5) where π P is the fraction of P -partisan voters in state s. Consider d D, and r R: two candidates representing the Democratic and the Republican parties, respectively. The probability of winning the seat in state s depends on the difference between the total voter satisfaction from each candidate subject to a random noise. To fix ideas, think of candidate d from the Democratic party. Her winning probability is given by: 0, if U 1 µ 1 2 Pr (Ũ d > Ũ r) = U 1 µ, if 1 2 < U 1 µ 1, (6) 2 1, if U 1 µ > 1 2 where U = u d i di + µπd ( u r i di + µπr) is the difference in aggregate utilities between parties, excluding the random preference bias. 3
4 Each party maximizes the probability of winning the seat in the election. At the same time, the parties incur a cost when the chosen candidate s position is too different from the party position (the party cares about the implemented policies after the election). For example, the Democratic party; it chooses a candidate whose position solves the optimization problem: max y dtn Pr (Ũ d > Ũ r) c Y Dtn y dtn, (7) n where n Y Dtn y dtn is the cost of departing from the party s bliss point. If Y Dtn > x stn n, that is, the Democratic party is on the right from the average voter on every issue, then the interior solution has to satisfy the following first order condition: y dn x sn 1 µ = c m n (Y Dn y dn ) (8) for all n. For example, if there are two issues, 8 is equivalent to the following: y d1 x 1 = c (1 µ) (Y D2 y d2 ) y d2 x 2 = c (1 µ) (Y D1 y d1 ) We use these first order conditions to analyze the effect of the master lever on the party s choice. In our model, the master lever translates into the parameter µ. When the master lever is present, partisan voters are more likely to vote for the party s candidate. This implies that the parameter µ is higher in those states than in the states without the master lever. Figure 1 illustrates what the different levels of µ imply for the solution. Consider a state that starts as a master lever state. The first order conditions are represented by two solid lines with the negative slope c(1 µ) and 1 c(1 µ). Here, µ corresponds to a higher level of partisanship effect due to the master lever. The intersection of the solid lines gives us the solution ȳ to the party s optimization problem. Next, suppose that the state abandons the master lever. The first order conditions corresponding to the new level of 4
5 µ = µ are represented by the dashed lines. The new solution y is located to the right and above the master-lever solution ȳ. This implies that abandoning the master lever induced the party to make the choice of a more extreme candidate. Or, in the other direction, master lever leads to more moderate candidates chosen in the state. Y 2 y 2 c(1 µ)y 1 c(1 µ)y 1 ȳ y x = 0 c(1 µ)y 2 c(1 µ)y 2 Y 1 y 1 Figure 1: The effect of the master lever on policy choice. However, the master lever may also have an ambiguous effect, leading to the choice of candidates that are more moderate in one dimension, while becoming more extreme in the other. Figure 2 illustrates this point. Here, we start with a constellation of parameters c, µ where ȳ is the choice under the master lever. Abandoning the master lever corresponds to decreasing µ to the level µ. As in Figure 1, this shifts the lines outwards, and leads to a new intersection point y. Similarly to Figure 1, the new solution y lies above the master-lever solution y, corresponding to a more extreme position in dimension 2. However, in dimension 1 we observe the opposite effect: removing the master lever induced the party to choose a candidate that is more moderate on the first issue. 5
6 Y 2 y 2 c(1 µ)y 1 y c(1 µ)y 1 ȳ x = 0 c(1 µ)y 2 c(1 µ)y 2 Y 1 y 1 Figure 2: The effect of the master lever on policy choice. 2.2 Empirics Data We use data from the 83rd (1953) to the 112th (2012) congresses and their preceding elections on voters, congress members and parties by state and congress. Voter data on self-declared bliss points, split tickets, 2 interest in the election and other controls, was constructed from the National Election Studies. As data was not available for every state and congress, we used other characteristics to impute the missing observations. Data of vote shares by state for presidential elections is taken from the US Elections Atlas. Congress member data comes from Poole and Rosenthal s DW-Nominate scores that offer a two dimensional mapping of a politician s position based on their voting history in congress. The two dimensions are economics and ideology. To construct party bliss points we use two measures: 1. the average two-dimensional position of all elected members of that party and 2. the party position from the Manifesto Project database. The latter is constructed using content analysis of party political platforms issued in the presidential nominating conventions. Lastly, a binary variable of the presence of the master lever by state and congress was constructed by hand by researching individual states. For now, in everything that follows we use data for the US Senate only. 2 Voting for a different party for the presidential and congressional elections. 6
7 2.2.2 Summary Statistics The number of states with a master lever has changed from 20 in the 1952 election to 13 in the 2010 midterm election. Figure 3 shows the evolution of the average position of the Republican and Democratic parties, averaging over states depending on their master lever status. Overall Senators of both parties have become more extreme in terms of economics (dimension 1) and more moderate in ideology (dimension 2). In Figure 4, showing the standard deviation from party averages, one can see that parties are more unified in economics and more dispersed in ideology. On the flip side, figure 5 showing voter bliss points, constructed using their self-declared partisanship where 1 is strongly Democratic and 1 is strongly Republican, indicates that on average voters are becoming more moderate. Evolution of Party Averages Dimension 1 Dimension 2 Average Position Average Position Congress Congress Dems with ML Reps with ML Dems w/o ML Reps w/o ML Dems with ML Reps with ML Dems w/o ML Reps w/o ML Figure 3 7
8 Evolution of St.Dev. from Party Average Dimension 1 Dimension 2 StDev from Average StDev from Average Congress Congress Dems with ML Reps with ML Dems w/o ML Reps w/o ML Dems with ML Reps with ML Dems w/o ML Reps w/o ML Figure 4 Average Voter Bliss Points Congress Voter Bliss Points Figure Results In the following regressions we run the master lever variable (binary) on the absolute positions of elected senators, controlling for the average voter bliss point in that state. 3 A 3 So that a Democratic state, for example, denotes one where the average voter is more than one standard deviation below the swing voter. 8
9 negative (positive) effect implies senators are more moderate (extreme) when there is a master lever. We include state trends in all specifications. These results are robust to including congress and state fixed effects, which we have excluded from the main specification as we use other congress and state controls. Table 1: ML on Dimension 1 Positions Republican States Swing States Democratic States Democrats Republicans Democrats Republicans Democrats Republicans Regression (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) ML on Dim ML on Dim Senators only. Controls: general or midterm, average party position in both dimensions The results in Table 1 confirm the dynamics in the theory. Specifically in column (1) we see that Democratic candidates become more moderate in the presence of the master lever in Republican states. This is because the master lever only strengthens the Republican partisanship of the state and thus for a Democratic candidate to win they have to be even closer to the state average voter bliss point. The opposite is true for the party that is favored in the partisan state. In columns (2) and (5) we see that Republicans and Democrats respectively become more extreme in the presence of the ML. In this case the strengthening of the effect of parties works in their favor as they can go closer to the party bliss point. In columns (3) and (4) we observe that in swing states the results vary depending on party and dimension. This is because swing voters have by definition conflicting interests, preferring one party in one dimension and one in other, therefore it is not clear how the presence of the master lever would affect states. In order to understand this we must first examine how the effect of changes depending on the bliss point of the party as seen in figures 1 and 2 in the theory. 9
10 2.2.4 Endogeneity of Master Lever In this section, we consider empirically the potential endogeneity of the master lever. We start by allowing states that have the same master lever status (always had, never had, had and removed) to have common unobserved characteristics and by clustering errors at that level to redo the above estimation. 3 Congressional Gridlock In this section, we estimate the effects of the master lever on congressional gridlock which we define as the difficulty of passing laws in the legislature due to the individual positions of US congress members. As shown in the previous section, on aggregate, more states having a master lever implies a more moderate congress thus facilitating the legislative process. On the other hand, it also implies more unified parties which could increase gridlock. First, we extend the theory from Section 2 to include a parameterized version of the legislative process that follows the elections. Then, using data from the Policy Agendas Project on congressional bills we calibrate the model and quantify the effect of the master lever on congressional gridlock and thus policy making in the US, through politician selection. 10
One Tick and You re Out: The Effects of the. Master Lever on Senator Positions
One Tick and You re Out: The Effects of the Master Lever on Senator Positions Olga Gorelkina University of Liverpool, Liverpool Ioanna Grypari Max Planck Institute, Bonn This Version: October 2016 Abstract
More informationOne Tick and You re Out: The Effects of the. Master Lever on Senators Positions
One Tick and You re Out: The Effects of the Master Lever on Senators Positions Olga Gorelkina University of Liverpool, Liverpool Ioanna Grypari Max Planck Institute, Bonn This Version: December 2016 Abstract
More informationPolitical Economics II Spring Lectures 4-5 Part II Partisan Politics and Political Agency. Torsten Persson, IIES
Lectures 4-5_190213.pdf Political Economics II Spring 2019 Lectures 4-5 Part II Partisan Politics and Political Agency Torsten Persson, IIES 1 Introduction: Partisan Politics Aims continue exploring policy
More informationAppendices for Elections and the Regression-Discontinuity Design: Lessons from Close U.S. House Races,
Appendices for Elections and the Regression-Discontinuity Design: Lessons from Close U.S. House Races, 1942 2008 Devin M. Caughey Jasjeet S. Sekhon 7/20/2011 (10:34) Ph.D. candidate, Travers Department
More informationModel of Voting. February 15, Abstract. This paper uses United States congressional district level data to identify how incumbency,
U.S. Congressional Vote Empirics: A Discrete Choice Model of Voting Kyle Kretschman The University of Texas Austin kyle.kretschman@mail.utexas.edu Nick Mastronardi United States Air Force Academy nickmastronardi@gmail.com
More informationOnline Appendix: Robustness Tests and Migration. Means
VOL. VOL NO. ISSUE EMPLOYMENT, WAGES AND VOTER TURNOUT Online Appendix: Robustness Tests and Migration Means Online Appendix Table 1 presents the summary statistics of turnout for the five types of elections
More informationThe Impact of Unions on Municipal Elections and Fiscal Policies in U.S. Cities
The Impact of Unions on Municipal Elections and Fiscal Policies in U.S. Cities Holger Sieg University of Pennsylvania and NBER Yu Wang University of Pennsylvania Prepared for the Carnegie-NYU-Rochester
More informationThe Case of the Disappearing Bias: A 2014 Update to the Gerrymandering or Geography Debate
The Case of the Disappearing Bias: A 2014 Update to the Gerrymandering or Geography Debate Nicholas Goedert Lafayette College goedertn@lafayette.edu May, 2015 ABSTRACT: This note observes that the pro-republican
More informationThe League of Women Voters of Pennsylvania et al v. The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania et al. Nolan McCarty
The League of Women Voters of Pennsylvania et al v. The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania et al. I. Introduction Nolan McCarty Susan Dod Brown Professor of Politics and Public Affairs Chair, Department of Politics
More informationThe Case of the Disappearing Bias: A 2014 Update to the Gerrymandering or Geography Debate
The Case of the Disappearing Bias: A 2014 Update to the Gerrymandering or Geography Debate Nicholas Goedert Lafayette College goedertn@lafayette.edu November, 2015 ABSTRACT: This note observes that the
More informationForecasting the 2018 Midterm Election using National Polls and District Information
Forecasting the 2018 Midterm Election using National Polls and District Information Joseph Bafumi, Dartmouth College Robert S. Erikson, Columbia University Christopher Wlezien, University of Texas at Austin
More informationParty Labels and Information: The Implications of Contagion in Coelection Environments
Party Labels and Information: The Implications of Contagion in Coelection Environments Yosh Halberstam B. Pablo Montagnes March 13, 2009 Preliminary and Incomplete Abstract In related empirical work, we
More informationData Models. 1. Data REGISTRATION STATUS VOTING HISTORY
Cambridge Analytica offers a range of enhanced audience segments drawn from our national database of over 220 million Americans. These segments can be used individually or together to power highly targeted
More informationFollowing the Leader: The Impact of Presidential Campaign Visits on Legislative Support for the President's Policy Preferences
University of Colorado, Boulder CU Scholar Undergraduate Honors Theses Honors Program Spring 2011 Following the Leader: The Impact of Presidential Campaign Visits on Legislative Support for the President's
More informationWomen as Policy Makers: Evidence from a Randomized Policy Experiment in India
Women as Policy Makers: Evidence from a Randomized Policy Experiment in India Chattopadhayay and Duflo (Econometrica 2004) Presented by Nicolas Guida Johnson and Ngoc Nguyen Nov 8, 2018 Introduction Research
More informationDO VOTERS AFFECT OR ELECT POLICIES? EVIDENCE FROM THE U. S. HOUSE*
EVIDENCE FROM THE U. S. HOUSE* DAVID S. LEE ENRICO MORETTI MATTHEW J. BUTLER There are two fundamentally different views of the role of elections in policy formation. In one view, voters can affect candidates
More informationApplying Ranked Choice Voting to Congressional Elections. The Case for RCV with the Top Four Primary and Multi-Member Districts. Rob Richie, FairVote
Applying Ranked Choice Voting to Congressional Elections The Case for RCV with the Top Four Primary and Multi-Member Districts Rob Richie, FairVote American Exceptionalism: Inescapable Realities for Reformers
More informationMedian voter theorem - continuous choice
Median voter theorem - continuous choice In most economic applications voters are asked to make a non-discrete choice - e.g. choosing taxes. In these applications the condition of single-peakedness is
More informationA positive correlation between turnout and plurality does not refute the rational voter model
Quality & Quantity 26: 85-93, 1992. 85 O 1992 Kluwer Academic Publishers. Printed in the Netherlands. Note A positive correlation between turnout and plurality does not refute the rational voter model
More informationThe Effects of Incumbency Advantage in the U.S. Senate on the Choice of Electoral Design: Evidence from a Dynamic Selection Model
The Effects of Incumbency Advantage in the U.S. Senate on the Choice of Electoral Design: Evidence from a Dynamic Selection Model Gautam Gowrisankaran Matthew F. Mitchell Andrea Moro November 12, 2006
More informationSupporting Information Political Quid Pro Quo Agreements: An Experimental Study
Supporting Information Political Quid Pro Quo Agreements: An Experimental Study Jens Großer Florida State University and IAS, Princeton Ernesto Reuben Columbia University and IZA Agnieszka Tymula New York
More informationThe Provision of Public Goods Under Alternative. Electoral Incentives
The Provision of Public Goods Under Alternative Electoral Incentives Alessandro Lizzeri and Nicola Persico March 10, 2000 American Economic Review, forthcoming ABSTRACT Politicians who care about the spoils
More informationWISCONSIN SUPREME COURT ELECTIONS WITH PARTISANSHIP
The Increasing Correlation of WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT ELECTIONS WITH PARTISANSHIP A Statistical Analysis BY CHARLES FRANKLIN Whatever the technically nonpartisan nature of the elections, has the structure
More informationUC Davis UC Davis Previously Published Works
UC Davis UC Davis Previously Published Works Title Constitutional design and 2014 senate election outcomes Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8kx5k8zk Journal Forum (Germany), 12(4) Authors Highton,
More informationChapter 7 Political Parties: Essential to Democracy
Key Chapter Questions Chapter 7 Political Parties: Essential to Democracy 1. What do political parties do for American democracy? 2. How has the nomination of candidates changed throughout history? Also,
More informationAMERICAN JOURNAL OF UNDERGRADUATE RESEARCH VOL. 3 NO. 4 (2005)
, Partisanship and the Post Bounce: A MemoryBased Model of Post Presidential Candidate Evaluations Part II Empirical Results Justin Grimmer Department of Mathematics and Computer Science Wabash College
More informationThe Outlook for the 2010 Midterm Elections: How Large a Wave?
The Outlook for the 2010 Midterm Elections: How Large a Wave? What is at stake? All 435 House seats 256 Democratic seats 179 Republican seats Republicans needs to gain 39 seats for majority 37 Senate seats
More informationThe Seventeenth Amendment, Senate Ideology, and the Growth of Government
The Seventeenth Amendment, Senate Ideology, and the Growth of Government Danko Tarabar College of Business and Economics 1601 University Ave, PO BOX 6025 West Virginia University Phone: 681-212-9983 datarabar@mix.wvu.edu
More informationThe relative importance of cultural and economic issues for the polarization of the U.S. electorate,
The relative importance of cultural and economic issues for the polarization of the U.S. electorate, 1972 2008 Stefan Krasa Mattias Polborn May 10, 2011 Abstract We develop a simple model in which voters
More informationParty Ideology and Policies
Party Ideology and Policies Matteo Cervellati University of Bologna Giorgio Gulino University of Bergamo March 31, 2017 Paolo Roberti University of Bologna Abstract We plan to study the relationship between
More information1 Electoral Competition under Certainty
1 Electoral Competition under Certainty We begin with models of electoral competition. This chapter explores electoral competition when voting behavior is deterministic; the following chapter considers
More informationAP US GOVERNMENT: CHAPER 7: POLITICAL PARTIES: ESSENTIAL TO DEMOCRACY
AP US GOVERNMENT: CHAPER 7: POLITICAL PARTIES: ESSENTIAL TO DEMOCRACY Before political parties, candidates were listed alphabetically, and those whose names began with the letters A to F did better than
More information1. The Relationship Between Party Control, Latino CVAP and the Passage of Bills Benefitting Immigrants
The Ideological and Electoral Determinants of Laws Targeting Undocumented Migrants in the U.S. States Online Appendix In this additional methodological appendix I present some alternative model specifications
More informationParticipatory Democracy
Participatory Democracy Enriqueta Aragonès (Institut d Anàlisi Econòmica-CSIC) Main references Aragones and Sanchez-Pages A theory of Participatory Democracy based on the real case of Porto Alegre, EER
More informationThis journal is published by the American Political Science Association. All rights reserved.
Article: National Conditions, Strategic Politicians, and U.S. Congressional Elections: Using the Generic Vote to Forecast the 2006 House and Senate Elections Author: Alan I. Abramowitz Issue: October 2006
More information3 Electoral Competition
3 Electoral Competition We now turn to a discussion of two-party electoral competition in representative democracy. The underlying policy question addressed in this chapter, as well as the remaining chapters
More informationCross-District Variation in Split-Ticket Voting
Cross-District Variation in Split-Ticket Voting Daniel J. Lee Robert Lupton Department of Political Science Michigan State University January 10, 2014 Abstract We test hypotheses on split-ticket voting
More informationDo Individual Heterogeneity and Spatial Correlation Matter?
Do Individual Heterogeneity and Spatial Correlation Matter? An Innovative Approach to the Characterisation of the European Political Space. Giovanna Iannantuoni, Elena Manzoni and Francesca Rossi EXTENDED
More informationD A T A D I C T I O N A R Y D2 D A T A D I C T I O N A R Y
DATA DICTIONARY i360 joined forces with Media Sales, a joint venture between DIRECTV and DISH, to provide voter behavior data to aligned campaigns and organizations. i360 s voter data has been pre-matched
More informationIntra-Party Disagreement and Inter-Party Polarization
Intra-Party Disagreement and Inter-Party Polarization Mattias Polborn James M. Snyder January 13, 2016 Abstract We develop a theory of legislative competition in which voters care about national party
More informationIn The Supreme Court of the United States
No. 14-232 ================================================================ In The Supreme Court of the United States WESLEY W. HARRIS, et al., v. Appellants, ARIZONA INDEPENDENT REDISTRICTING COMMISSION,
More informationPrimary Elections and Partisan Polarization in the U.S. Congress
Primary Elections and Partisan Polarization in the U.S. Congress The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters. Citation Published
More informationThe choice E. NOTA denotes None of These Answers. Give exact answers unless otherwise specified. Good luck, and have fun!
The choice denotes None of These Answers. Give exact answers unless otherwise specified. Good luck, and have fun! 1. Senator Chuck Grassley (R-IA) tosses a fair coin until he gets tails three times. In
More informationEXTENDING THE SPHERE OF REPRESENTATION:
EXTENDING THE SPHERE OF REPRESENTATION: THE IMPACT OF FAIR REPRESENTATION VOTING ON THE IDEOLOGICAL SPECTRUM OF CONGRESS November 2013 Extend the sphere, and you take in a greater variety of parties and
More informationDo Political Parties Matter? Evidence from U.S. Cities
Do Political Parties Matter? Evidence from U.S. Cities October 11, 2007 Fernando Ferreira The Wharton School University of Pennsylvania Joseph Gyourko The Wharton School University of Pennsylvania & NBER
More informationCongressional Elections, 2018 and Beyond
Congressional Elections, 2018 and Beyond Robert S. Erikson Columbia University 2018 Conference by the Hobby School of Public Affairs, University of Houston Triple Play: Election 2018; Census 2020; and
More informationDo two parties represent the US? Clustering analysis of US public ideology survey
Do two parties represent the US? Clustering analysis of US public ideology survey Louisa Lee 1 and Siyu Zhang 2, 3 Advised by: Vicky Chuqiao Yang 1 1 Department of Engineering Sciences and Applied Mathematics,
More informationTrump s Approval Improves, Yet Dems Still Lead for the House
ABC NEWS/WASHINGTON POST POLL: Trump and the Midterms EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE AFTER 12:01 a.m. Sunday, Oct. 14, 2018 Trump s Approval Improves, Yet Dems Still Lead for the House Donald Trump s job approval
More informationExperiments in Election Reform: Voter Perceptions of Campaigns Under Preferential and Plurality Voting
Experiments in Election Reform: Voter Perceptions of Campaigns Under Preferential and Plurality Voting Caroline Tolbert, University of Iowa (caroline-tolbert@uiowa.edu) Collaborators: Todd Donovan, Western
More informationThe Economics of Split-Ticket Voting in Representative Democracies
Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis Research Department The Economics of Split-Ticket Voting in Representative Democracies V. V. Chari, Larry E. Jones, and Ramon Marimon* Working Paper 582D June 1997 ABSTRACT
More informationThe University of Akron Bliss Institute Poll: Baseline for the 2018 Election. Ray C. Bliss Institute of Applied Politics University of Akron
The University of Akron Bliss Institute Poll: Baseline for the 2018 Election Ray C. Bliss Institute of Applied Politics University of Akron Executive Summary The 2018 University of Akron Bliss Institute
More informationTable A.2 reports the complete set of estimates of equation (1). We distinguish between personal
Akay, Bargain and Zimmermann Online Appendix 40 A. Online Appendix A.1. Descriptive Statistics Figure A.1 about here Table A.1 about here A.2. Detailed SWB Estimates Table A.2 reports the complete set
More informationThe California Primary and Redistricting
The California Primary and Redistricting This study analyzes what is the important impact of changes in the primary voting rules after a Congressional and Legislative Redistricting. Under a citizen s committee,
More informationVolume 35, Issue 1. An examination of the effect of immigration on income inequality: A Gini index approach
Volume 35, Issue 1 An examination of the effect of immigration on income inequality: A Gini index approach Brian Hibbs Indiana University South Bend Gihoon Hong Indiana University South Bend Abstract This
More informationTHE POLICY CONSEQUENCES OF POLARIZATION: EVIDENCE FROM STATE REDISTRIBUTIVE POLICY
THE POLICY CONSEQUENCES OF POLARIZATION: EVIDENCE FROM STATE REDISTRIBUTIVE POLICY Elizabeth Rigby George Washington University Gerald Wright Indiana University Prepared for presentation at the Conference
More informationCALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
DIVISION OF THE HUMANITIES AND SOCIAL SCIENCES CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY PASADENA, CALIFORNIA 91125 Policy Moderation Qr Conflicting Expectations? Testing The Intentional Models of Split-Ticket
More informationAccountability, Divided Government and Presidential Coattails.
Presidential VS Parliamentary Elections Accountability, Divided Government and Presidential Coattails. Accountability Presidential Coattails The coattail effect is the tendency for a popular political
More informationNEW JERSEY: DEM HAS SLIGHT EDGE IN CD11
Please attribute this information to: Monmouth University Poll West Long Branch, NJ 07764 www.monmouth.edu/polling Follow on Twitter: @MonmouthPoll Released: Wednesday, 27, Contact: PATRICK MURRAY 732-979-6769
More informationThe Interdependence of Sequential Senate Elections: Evidence from
The Interdependence of Sequential Senate Elections: Evidence from 1946-2002 Daniel M. Butler Stanford University Department of Political Science September 27, 2004 Abstract Among U.S. federal elections,
More informationCandidate Citizen Models
Candidate Citizen Models General setup Number of candidates is endogenous Candidates are unable to make binding campaign promises whoever wins office implements her ideal policy Citizens preferences are
More informationconnect the people to the government. These institutions include: elections, political parties, interest groups, and the media.
Overriding Questions 1. How has the decline of political parties influenced elections and campaigning? 2. How do political parties positively influence campaigns and elections and how do they negatively
More informationExplaining Variation in the Degree of Electoral Competition in a Mature Democracy: U.S. Senate Elections, *
This is a work in progress. Please do not cite. Comments are welcome. Explaining Variation in the Degree of Electoral Competition in a Mature Democracy: U.S. Senate Elections, 1922 2005* Stanley L. Winer
More informationSocially Optimal Districting: An Empirical Investigation
Preliminary Draft September 2005 Socially Optimal Districting: An Empirical Investigation Abstract This paper provides an empirical exploration of the potential gains from socially optimal districting.
More informationPublic Preference for a GOP Congress Marks a New Low in Obama s Approval
ABC NEWS/WASHINGTON POST POLL: Obama and 2014 Politics EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE AFTER 12:01 a.m. Tuesday, April 29, 2014 Public Preference for a GOP Congress Marks a New Low in Obama s Approval Weary of waiting
More informationBenefit levels and US immigrants welfare receipts
1 Benefit levels and US immigrants welfare receipts 1970 1990 by Joakim Ruist Department of Economics University of Gothenburg Box 640 40530 Gothenburg, Sweden joakim.ruist@economics.gu.se telephone: +46
More informationRick Santorum has erased 7.91 point deficit to move into a statistical tie with Mitt Romney the night before voters go to the polls in Michigan.
Rick Santorum has erased 7.91 point deficit to move into a statistical tie with Mitt Romney the night before voters go to the polls in Michigan. February 27, 2012 Contact: Eric Foster, Foster McCollum
More informationPractice Questions for Exam #2
Fall 2007 Page 1 Practice Questions for Exam #2 1. Suppose that we have collected a stratified random sample of 1,000 Hispanic adults and 1,000 non-hispanic adults. These respondents are asked whether
More informationCongruence in Political Parties
Descriptive Representation of Women and Ideological Congruence in Political Parties Georgia Kernell Northwestern University gkernell@northwestern.edu June 15, 2011 Abstract This paper examines the relationship
More informationThe Behavioral Foundations of the Midterm Effect
The Behavioral Foundations of the Midterm Effect John Wiggs Patty Department of Social and Decision Sciences Carnegie Mellon University October 5, 2004 Abstract This paper provides a theory of political
More informationThe Robustness of Herrera, Levine and Martinelli s Policy platforms, campaign spending and voter participation
The Robustness of Herrera, Levine and Martinelli s Policy platforms, campaign spending and voter participation Alexander Chun June 8, 009 Abstract In this paper, I look at potential weaknesses in the electoral
More informationIncumbency Punishment in U.S. National Politics
Incumbency Punishment in U.S. National Politics Satyajit Chatterjee and Burcu Eyigungor Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia August 16, 2016 Abstract We document that postwar U.S. national elections show
More informationThe Effect of Electoral Geography on Competitive Elections and Partisan Gerrymandering
The Effect of Electoral Geography on Competitive Elections and Partisan Gerrymandering Jowei Chen University of Michigan jowei@umich.edu http://www.umich.edu/~jowei November 12, 2012 Abstract: How does
More informationBLISS INSTITUTE 2006 GENERAL ELECTION SURVEY
BLISS INSTITUTE 2006 GENERAL ELECTION SURVEY Ray C. Bliss Institute of Applied Politics The University of Akron Executive Summary The Bliss Institute 2006 General Election Survey finds Democrat Ted Strickland
More informationPENNSYLVANIA: SMALL LEAD FOR SACCONE IN CD18
Please attribute this information to: Monmouth University Poll West Long Branch, NJ 07764 www.monmouth.edu/polling Follow on Twitter: @MonmouthPoll Released: Thursday, 15, Contact: PATRICK MURRAY 732-979-6769
More informationSantorum loses ground. Romney has reclaimed Michigan by 7.91 points after the CNN debate.
Santorum loses ground. Romney has reclaimed Michigan by 7.91 points after the CNN debate. February 25, 2012 Contact: Eric Foster, Foster McCollum White and Associates 313-333-7081 Cell Email: efoster@fostermccollumwhite.com
More informationElectoral Rules and Public Goods Outcomes in Brazilian Municipalities
Electoral Rules and Public Goods Outcomes in Brazilian Municipalities This paper investigates the ways in which plurality and majority systems impact the provision of public goods using a regression discontinuity
More informationForecasting Elections: Voter Intentions versus Expectations *
Forecasting Elections: Voter Intentions versus Expectations * David Rothschild Yahoo! Research David@ReseachDMR.com www.researchdmr.com Justin Wolfers The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania Brookings,
More informationClassical papers: Osborbe and Slivinski (1996) and Besley and Coate (1997)
The identity of politicians is endogenized Typical approach: any citizen may enter electoral competition at a cost. There is no pre-commitment on the platforms, and winner implements his or her ideal policy.
More informationGender preference and age at arrival among Asian immigrant women to the US
Gender preference and age at arrival among Asian immigrant women to the US Ben Ost a and Eva Dziadula b a Department of Economics, University of Illinois at Chicago, 601 South Morgan UH718 M/C144 Chicago,
More informationComponents of party polarization in the US House of Representatives
Article Components of party polarization in the US House of Representatives Journal of Theoretical Politics 1 27 ÓThe Author(s) 215 Reprints and permissions: sagepub.co.uk/journalspermissions.nav DOI:
More informationPavel Yakovlev Duquesne University. Abstract
Ideology, Shirking, and the Incumbency Advantage in the U.S. House of Representatives Pavel Yakovlev Duquesne University Abstract This paper examines how the incumbency advantage is related to ideological
More informationAnalyzing the Legislative Productivity of Congress During the Obama Administration
Western Michigan University ScholarWorks at WMU Honors Theses Lee Honors College 12-5-2017 Analyzing the Legislative Productivity of Congress During the Obama Administration Zachary Hunkins Western Michigan
More informationALABAMA: TURNOUT BIG QUESTION IN SENATE RACE
Please attribute this information to: Monmouth University Poll West Long Branch, NJ 07764 www.monmouth.edu/polling Follow on Twitter: @MonmouthPoll Released: Monday, 11, Contact: PATRICK MURRAY 732-979-6769
More informationSPECIALIZED LEARNING AND POLITICAL POLARIZATION
SPECIALIZED LEARNING AND POLITICAL POLARIZATION Sevgi Yuksel New York University December 24, 2014 For latest version click on https://files.nyu.edu/sy683/public/jmp.pdf ABSTRACT This paper presents a
More informationElite Polarization and Mass Political Engagement: Information, Alienation, and Mobilization
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL AND AREA STUDIES Volume 20, Number 1, 2013, pp.89-109 89 Elite Polarization and Mass Political Engagement: Information, Alienation, and Mobilization Jae Mook Lee Using the cumulative
More informationPartisan Accountability and Economic Voting
Evidence from Exchange Rate Fluctuations L. Jason Anastasopoulos 1 Aaron Chalfin 2 1 Department of Political Science UC Berkeley 2 Goldman School of Public Policy UC Berkeley November 16, 2011 Congressional
More informationState of the Facts 2018
State of the Facts 2018 Part 2 of 2 Summary of Results September 2018 Objective and Methodology USAFacts conducted the second annual State of the Facts survey in 2018 to revisit questions asked in 2017
More information14.770: Introduction to Political Economy Lectures 4 and 5: Voting and Political Decisions in Practice
14.770: Introduction to Political Economy Lectures 4 and 5: Voting and Political Decisions in Practice Daron Acemoglu MIT September 18 and 20, 2017. Daron Acemoglu (MIT) Political Economy Lectures 4 and
More information- Bill Bishop, The Big Sort: Why the Clustering of Like-Minded America is Tearing Us Apart, 2008.
Document 1: America may be more diverse than ever coast to coast, but the places where we live are becoming increasingly crowded with people who live, think and vote like we do. This transformation didn
More informationWhy Are The Members Of Each Party So Polarized Today
Why Are The Members Of Each Party So Polarized Today The study also suggests that in America today, it is virtually impossible to live in an Are more likely to follow issue-based groups, rather than political
More informationWomen and Power: Unpopular, Unwilling, or Held Back? Comment
Women and Power: Unpopular, Unwilling, or Held Back? Comment Manuel Bagues, Pamela Campa May 22, 2017 Abstract Casas-Arce and Saiz (2015) study how gender quotas in candidate lists affect voting behavior
More informationDoes Residential Sorting Explain Geographic Polarization?
Does Residential Sorting Explain Geographic Polarization? Gregory J. Martin * Steven Webster March 13, 2017 Abstract Political preferences in the US are highly correlated with population density, at national,
More informationIt s Democrats +8 in Likely Voter Preference, With Trump and Health Care on Center Stage
ABC NEWS/WASHINGTON POST POLL: The 2018 Midterm Elections EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE AFTER 12:00 a.m. Sunday, Nov. 4, 2018 It s Democrats +8 in Likely Voter Preference, With Trump and Health Care on Center
More informationSurvey of US Voters Candidate Smith June 2014
Survey of US Voters Candidate June 2014 Methodology Three surveys of U.S. voters conducted in late 2013 Two online surveys of voters, respondents reached using recruit-only online panel of adults nationwide,
More informationThe 2010 Election and Its Aftermath John Coleman and Charles Franklin Department of Political Science University of Wisconsin-Madison
The 2010 Election and Its Aftermath John Coleman and Charles Franklin Department of Political Science University of Wisconsin-Madison Wisconsin Credit Union League January 25, 2011 Seat Change in States
More informationThe Optimal Allocation of Campaign Funds. in House Elections
The Optimal Allocation of Campaign Funds in House Elections Devin Incerti October 22, 2015 Abstract Do the Democratic and Republican parties optimally allocate resources in House elections? This paper
More informationDoes Residential Sorting Explain Geographic Polarization?
Does Residential Sorting Explain Geographic Polarization? Gregory J. Martin Steven W. Webster March 23, 2018 Abstract Political preferences in the US are highly correlated with population density, at national,
More informationThe Role of Political Parties in the Organization of Congress
JLEO, V18 N1 1 The Role of Political Parties in the Organization of Congress John R. Boyce University of Calgary Diane P. Bischak University of Calgary This article examines theory and evidence on party
More informationThird Party Voting: Vote One s Heart or One s Mind?
Third Party Voting: Vote One s Heart or One s Mind? Emekcan Yucel Job Market Paper This Version: October 30, 2016 Latest Version: Click Here Abstract In this paper, I propose non-instrumental benefits
More informationSelf-Selection and the Earnings of Immigrants
Self-Selection and the Earnings of Immigrants George Borjas (1987) Omid Ghaderi & Ali Yadegari April 7, 2018 George Borjas (1987) GSME, Applied Economics Seminars April 7, 2018 1 / 24 Abstract The age-earnings
More information