Save the Children Submission to the EC Public Consultation Towards a post-2015 development framework
|
|
- Kellie Bell
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Save the Children Submission to the EC Public Consultation Towards a post-2015 development framework Save the Children is the world s leading independent organisation for children. We work in 120 countries. We save children s lives; we fight for their rights; we help them fulfil their potential. We work together with our partners to inspire breakthroughs in the way the world treats children and to achieve immediate and lasting change in their lives. We have consulted widely across Save the Children members in order to bring as complete a response as possible to this consultation. As an organisation with children s rights, values and principles at the core, we believe that a post-2015 development framework must be based on universal and equitable development, with the human rights principles of universality, equality and inalienability underpinning it. Furthermore, unlike with the MDGs, these principles must be visible in the objectives established. It is also important to note that Save the Children as a global organisation is in the process of formulating its official position on the most appropriate post-2015 framework. The views expressed in this answer reflect the current consensus among Save the Children members, and may evolve as we develop our official positions. Save the Children is a participating organisation in the Beyond 2015 campaign and as such has contributed to, and in places drawn on, the submission of the campaign s European Task Force. A. The MDGs: benefits and limitations 1. To what extent has the MDG framework influenced policies in the country/ies or sectors you work in/with? As a development NGO focusing on children s rights, the emphasis of the MDGs on human development via the social sectors was welcome. It provided a counterbalance to the emphasis some placed on infrastructure, rule of law and macroeconomics. Furthermore, at least six of the MDGs have immediate relevance for children, while the remaining two (MDGs 7 and 8) would have indirect impacts. The MDGs have also prompted a number of subsequent multilateral initiatives such as Every Woman Every Child. Based on a survey earlier this year 1, Save the Children staff believe that the MDGs impacted most particularly on some donors policies, with Official Development Assistance (ODA) being channelled increasingly to social development issues, such as education and health. The degree to which the MDGs influenced developing country governments policies was less clear and rather depended on the country concerned, although a number of staff noted that there was greater openness to discuss these issues since they were now linked to a global agenda. Some Save the Children staff observed that the extent of a government s alignment with the MDGs was proportional to its dependence on foreign aid. 2 However, some countries, such as Vietnam or Rwanda, did localise the targets of the MDGs into their national strategies. Save the Children also works in many policy areas that have not been covered by the MDGs, such as child protection, and from which the MDGs may in fact have drawn attention away. Moreover, we 1 The responses to this section draw considerably on an internal report commissioned by Save the Children US, Aspirations for a post-mdg Framework, based on the Experiences and Perceptions of Save the Children, Carlisle Levine, April ibid Save the Children Submission to the EC Public Consultation Towards a post-2015 development framework Page 1
2 work to fulfil children s rights, whereas the lack of a rights-based approach to the Goals may have made it more difficult to use rights language in conversations with governments. This is regrettable given the obligations that rights impose on governments, and others, and the opportunities they offer to children and their caretakers, to claim their rights. Lastly, Save the Children would like to highlight the fact that the MDGs have influenced our own internal policies quite considerably. Most notably, our 5-year global campaign, Every One, is entirely geared to helping to meet MDG4 on child mortality, with a secondary aim of contributing to MDG5. Our previous global campaign, Rewrite the Future, was linked to but not built exclusively on, MDG2 focusing on universal primary education. Furthermore, Save the Children country offices have found that the MDGs helped them to align their own strategies with those of governments. Case Examples In Bolivia, the government was reluctant to include family planning in the Safe Birth and Motherhood Plan. But when Save the Children pointed to the MDG indicator on contraceptives, the government accepted Save the Children s recommendation. In Nepal and Pakistan, Save the Children staff use MDG-related data to show government officials where the country currently stands and what needs to happen before 2015 in order to achieve the MDGs. These charts capture the governments attention and spur conversations about how, working together, they can help their countries advance toward the MDG targets. 2. To what extent has the MDG framework been beneficial for the poor in the country/ies or sectors in/with which you work? At a global level, there has been major progress in reducing poverty, and the MDGs have contributed to that by marshalling international efforts behind common goals. Indeed, MDG1 s target on poverty is hailed as one of the few that have already been met. But since in fact most of the progress has occurred in major emerging countries, and especially in China, it is hard to say to what extent the MDGs have had substantial added value in this regard elsewhere. According to Andy Sumner, if one looks at poverty reduction having removed China from the equation, global poverty did not fall much. 3 Yet, the recent report of the UN System Task Team on the post-2015 UN development agenda stresses, the historic contribution of the MDG framework in providing a common worldwide cause to address poverty. It also states that, (i)mportant progress has been made in most countries, particularly towards the goals of eradicating poverty and improving access to primary education. Yet trends have been uneven within and across countries and regions. The poorest and most discriminated against on the basis of gender, age, disability, ethnicity or otherwise have often been the most disadvantaged. We very much agree with the latter part of that analysis. The way the MDG framework was conceived led to countries pursuing low-hanging fruit that is, achieving progress for those who were the easiest to reach. Our analysis has shown that less than 30% of countries are making equitable progress towards MDG 4. 4 The benefits of MDG progress accrued least to those who are poorest and most marginalised. On the contrary, the most disadvantaged have seen few or no improvements and the disparities between them and others have only increased. One could therefore conclude that the MDGs were equity blind and did little to tackle the root causes of 3 Where will the world s poor live?, Andy Sumner, Presentation to the OECD, June A Fair Chance at Life, Save the Children, 2010 Save the Children Submission to the EC Public Consultation Towards a post-2015 development framework Page 2
3 poverty and marginalisation, such as discrimination, which are embedded in social, political and economic processes and which impact on the achievement of all the Goals. The MDG framework s focus on poverty did help to prioritise to a certain extent development efforts on Lower Income Countries (LICs). However, it has more recently become clear that the majority of the world s poor currently live in Middle Income Countries (MICs). 5 In the future, however, as the LICs gradually pull their poorest out of poverty, and others enter the MIC category, the poor might, according to one theory, reside about 50:50 in MICs and in LICs (including conflict affected and fragile states). 6 These trends regarding where poverty lies have considerable implications for donor policies towards MICs and conflict-affected fragile states (CAFS) particularly, in order for those policies to achieve pro-poor outcomes. This is especially the case given that in the former aid is being cut, while donors hesitate to plough too much money into the latter. These poverty trends therefore have implications for the issues to be included in the future framework and how they may best be included. 3. What features and elements of the MDG framework have been particularly valuable in the fight against poverty? The MDGs have a specific emphasis on poverty, which was welcome. They also focus on a number of other aspects, such as health and education, which impact considerably on efforts to eradicate poverty. The Goals have led to more focus and priority-setting in the debates and, to a lesser extent, actions of the international community, particularly as regards human development and social policy. In a number of countries, some of the goals were made explicit in national development policies and in bilateral development cooperation agreements. That said, the focus on social development and poverty - would have been still more valuable were the MDGs to have addressed livelihoods. A key added value was the fact that the MDG framework was built on a set of concrete goals and predominantly quantifiable targets that were relatively simple and straightforward to understand, explain and monitor. These factors have no doubt contributed to the remarkable longevity that the MDGs have known: now twelve years later and the MDGs are still high on the development agenda. The framework may have been still more valuable should greater effort have been made to communicate it to the wider public, including local civil society organisations. In sum, the MDG framework features that were particularly valuable include: their simplicity and limited number; their time bound and measurable character with operational indicators; their emphasis on objectives rather than policy prescriptions to achieve those objectives; and their emphasis on children. 4. What features and elements of the MDG framework have been problematic, in your view? Some of the strengths of the MDG framework also proved to be risks and weaknesses. For example, the narrow focus on a select number of social issues and the fact that progress in these field has been measured by even narrower indicators has led to only late inclusion, undervaluation or even total omission of some important aspects of development such as freedom from violence and insecurity, equality, governance and anti-corruption, decent work and social protection, environmental sustainability, disaster risk reduction etc. Nonetheless each one of these is critical for a human development approach to produce optimal results. 5 Global Poverty and the New Bottom Billion: What if Three-Quarters of the World s Poor Live in Middle-Income Countries? Andy Sumner, Institute of Development Studies, September Sources: Aid workers are doing themselves out of a job, but..., Andrew Rogerson, ODI Blog Posts, 10 July 2012; Where do the world s poor live? Where will they live in 2020 and 2030?, Andy Sumner, IDS, upcoming 2012 Save the Children Submission to the EC Public Consultation Towards a post-2015 development framework Page 3
4 Similarly, the focus on specific areas and narrow targets led to policies to achieve those, but did not sufficiently emphasise the importance of building the necessary local and national capacity to sustain those policies going forward without external support. Save the Children staff have commented that the MDGs focus on access not quality, on surviving not thriving. The MDGs also tend to reinforce the siloing of issues, rather than building on the links and synergies between goals and targets. There is therefore an inherent danger in the MDG approach, that it reduces development to progress on some of the basic needs, and development policy to development assistance to the most poor and problematic countries. The emphasis on aggregate measurements and national averages has meant that a country might be on track to meet a particular goal but that huge disparities exist within a country which are totally masked, for example between geographic locations, population sectors, genders, or income quintiles etc. In Burkina Faso, just to cite one example, an overall reduction in child mortality rates at the aggregate level masks an actual increase in child mortality among the poorest 20% of the population. 7 Similarly, while child mortality may have been brought down in global terms, in fact the improvements are less significant for girl child mortality than for boys. 8 And this despite the Goal on gender equality (which highlights the previous point regarding siloing ). As mentioned in response to Question 2, since there were no targets dedicated to reaching the most marginalised (such as the poorest quintile), or indeed all population groups, countries focused on pursuing low-hanging fruit and unwittingly contributed to greater inequality and discrimination. Other instances have been noted in which the Goals have created perverse incentives that may have exacerbated inequality. For example, in Uganda the Government and donors have been criticised for investing in health and education only in the most stable parts of the country, thereby ignoring the people living in the north of the country, who are already suffering the effects of civil war. That in turn serves to exacerbate the sense of exclusion among northerners which had itself contributed to the war. 9 In certain circumstances, the MDGs have been criticised for having lowered the standard of what states are obliged to deliver on under human rights law. For example, in taking measures to achieve MDG2, many governments have not set targets on other aspects of the right to education, notably that primary education should be free and compulsory. 10 Greater use should also have been made of more qualitative targets in order to encompass a more comprehensive approach to development and poverty and especially to capture the more extensive notion of childhood poverty. Save the Children would have wished, for example, to see a greater use of age-disaggregated indicators and qualitative vulnerability measurements. The Goals themselves were not formulated in a participatory way, even at the level of participation of national governments. This has remained a problem subsequently and is reflected in a lack of southern ownership. An approach was taken that one size fits all at the global level, whereas this is far from the truth at a national level. In some cases this approach contributed to a lack of ambition at national level where the goals seemed to be unreachable anyway. Indeed, some governments are wary of agreements that they perceive as being imposed on them by the North. 7 A Fair Chance at Life, Save the Children, An Equal Start, Save the Children, Working with the grain to change the grain: Moving beyond the Millennium Development Goals, Phil Vernon and Deborrah Baksh, International Alert, Sept. 2012, cited in Growing Gaps, Narrowing Opportunities: Tackling inequality to give our children a better future, Save the Children, upcoming Save the Children internal paper on child rights governance, the MDGs and post-2015, August 2012 Save the Children Submission to the EC Public Consultation Towards a post-2015 development framework Page 4
5 Lastly, the weakness of the accountability, monitoring and follow up mechanisms and instruments has been a major drawback in the MDG framework. This is closely linked to the lack of accountability of national governments, international institutions and other actors that will be addressed in the next question and Question In your view, what are the main gaps, if any, in the MDG framework? The MDGs do not provide a framework for development in its broader sense, owing to the lack of comprehensiveness in thematic coverage. It is well-known that the framework is not even as comprehensive as the original Millennium Declaration, so issues such as climate change, insecurity, fragility and conflict, governance and human rights are missing. The framework also failed to measure the equality of progress within a country. Very often the progress experienced by the lowest income quintile in a population is far behind the national average, on a range of indicators. This kind of disparity also exists for many other non-income-related parameters, such as gender. Less often spoken about is the lack of attention paid to policy coherence for development in the MDG framework and its implementation. Policy coherence in this context refers to the need to ensure that no policies negatively impact on people s perspectives for development in any country and preferably support their goals of development. Policy coherence is fundamental to the success of any development framework. There is limited value in ploughing in huge quantities of ODA to reduce poverty if with a few trade and/or agriculture policies (for example) one can undo the good that has been done, or cause harm to people and their livelihoods in other ways. Accountability is also central to democratic governance and the respect for human rights, both of which, as has been noted, were lacking from the MDG framework. To date, whenever accountability has been discussed, the issue has mainly referred to the accountability of recipients of aid and their need to meet to certain standards for implementation and results. The new post-2015 framework must establish relationships based on genuine mutual accountability of all actors (please see our response to Question 7 for further details). B. Feasibility of a future framework 6. In your view, in what way, if at all, could a future framework have an impact at global level in terms of global governance, consensus building, cooperation, etc.? The Millennium Declaration contained an entire paragraph on the importance of improving global governance, for example it refers to the importance of good governance at the international level and on transparency in the financial, monetary and trading systems. We are committed to an open, equitable, rule-based, predictable and non-discriminatory multilateral trading and financial system. Unfortunately, these principles were largely lost when the Declaration was translated into the set of eight Goals, except for a few vague references in MDG 8. MDG 8 which potentially could have had an impact on global governance - is the Goal that has received the least focus and attention, has the least tangible targets and was essentially limited to assisting developing countries in achieving the seven other Goals through the classic channels of aid, trade and financial liberalisation, and in achieving debt sustainability. The world has changed since There are ever more pressing challenges that require effective global governance, including climate change, resource scarcity, increasing movements of people and goods across borders, and population growth. The heightened need for effective global governance comes at the same time that the world is seeing shifting global power dynamics (including the rise of emerging economies, low or stagnating growth in a number of large advanced economies, pockets of high economic growth in some low income countries and the proliferation of actors engaged in Save the Children Submission to the EC Public Consultation Towards a post-2015 development framework Page 5
6 development including government, the private sector, civil society organisations, foundations, universities and religious institutions. For all of these reasons, the success of any future framework relies on getting global governance right. If there were ever a time when the development dynamic could be defined simply as one of donor-recipient relations, that time has passed. The post-2015 framework should recognise that there are many issues and challenges that affect all countries, be they climate change or income inequality, as well as the wider range of actors involved. The post-2015 agenda should take the opportunity to further development-specific goals around global governance. These should have specific targets/indicators (which may include non-quantitative measures, but must be explicit and precise) and be backed up by an accountability mechanism so that actors can be held to account for their commitments. To have an impact on global governance, a future framework must deliver, or commit to change which will deliver, legitimate and adequate systems of global responsibility, accountability and transparency which apply to all countries and all actors. This makes it doubly important, therefore, that the future framework is a global one, in which all countries commit to cooperate to making change, rather than focusing on improving the development situation of LICs. 7. To what extent is a global development framework approach necessary or useful to improve accountability with regard to poverty reduction policies in developing countries? As a preface, it is essential to consider poverty reduction not just as a developing country prerogative. Based on national poverty lines, 170m people live in poverty in high income countries 11 and 27% of children (more than one in four) are at risk of poverty or social exclusion in Europe. 12 The global development framework must address poverty, and accountability with regard to poverty reduction, in all countries. However, higher income countries should simultaneously continue and increase efforts to assist lower income countries to eradicate poverty through international cooperation. In times of globalisation and growing global interrelationships between societies, economies and people, poverty eradication and, more holistically, the progressive and universal realisation of human rights, are a universal responsibility and would bring universal benefits. A global framework which incorporates global accountability mechanisms, as well as working to reinforce national ones, would therefore be of value. The fact of the future framework being a global one will provide a number of necessary elements for accountability to be meaningful, such as the creation of global commitments and obligations. If the framework focuses only on developing countries, the mistakes of the past (as outlined in response to Question 4) will be repeated, such as a lack of ownership by southern countries, a North-South dichotomy being created and donors, the private sector and other actors not being held to account in any meaningful way, if at all. Broadly-speaking, accountability refers to policy-makers and power-holders being held to transparent performance standards against which they are answerable, through democratic institutions and processes, most particularly at national level (eg. through a democratically elected parliament, or an independent judiciary). It ensures that corruption and misconduct do not go unpunished and that good governance principles are upheld. 11 What Do National Poverty Lines Tell Us About Global Poverty?, Ugo Gentilini and Andy Sumner, IDS, June Eurostat, 2010 Save the Children Submission to the EC Public Consultation Towards a post-2015 development framework Page 6
7 Post-2015, accountability must be addressed at four levels: the accountability of the international community vis-à-vis poorer countries (regarding policies and activities in areas such as trade, tax and financial regulation etc.); the accountability of governments to their citizens as well as to external donors; the ability of a population to hold its own government to account for lack of progress and to demand transparency in funding decisions and allocations (which necessitates an enabling environment including the freedom of speech); the accountability of other actors (eg. private sector) for the effects of their activities. Mechanisms are therefore needed at multiple levels (supranational through to sub-national) and a mix of accountability mechanisms will be required. Where the future framework addresses issues with respect to which international standards or norms already exist, the focus should be on strengthening those existing mechanisms (such as Human Rights Monitoring and Reporting, Peer Review Mechanism, reports on implementation of Multilateral Environmental Agreements). Where the framework covers issues where there is a gap in effective mandatory accountability mechanisms, such as in the area of corporate transparency and accountability, new mechanisms will need to be put in place. A decision will need to be taken on the best level for accountability mechanisms nationally or supranationally on a case-by-case basis, depending on the issue. 8. What could be the advantages and disadvantages of a global development framework for your organisation/sector, including how you work effectively with your partners? Save the Children could not imagine how the future framework could be successful in tackling the global challenges we face, such as climate change, the effects of financial and economic crises etc, if the future framework were not global and mutually beneficial, ie. applying to and binding on all countries but based on the principle of common-but-differentiated responsibility. This is quite apart from the fact that a future framework would likely be rejected by lower income countries if it only focused on them and not on higher income countries and the effects of their policies and actions as well. Such a framework should also aim to build the capacity of all countries government and civil society together to own and drive their own agenda. The future development consensus will provide great benefit if it reframes and redefines human progress and sets out the key areas which need to be addressed in order for people s rights to be achieved, together with measures to do so, even if the framework is not drafted using human rights language. The framework must be conceived in such a way that global goals can be meaningful and beneficial in national contexts, for example through differentiated targets and using different types of targets, in order to more likely gain the buy-in of countries which could be reticent of a global framework. In terms of our work with our partners, provided an ambitious and comprehensive framework is agreed upon, and that this is better communicated on the ground, this will generally mean that civil society organisations (CSOs) will attempt to align themselves with the aims of the framework, within their domain. This again will act as a unifying force for CSO action. The risk is that in trying to be ambitious, negotiations for a global framework could flounder as a result of one or several countries positions on certain issues, or that the framework could end up too complex and unmanageable. These risks must be avoided by building alliances early on with key strategic partners (such as emerging countries), by focusing on addressing the root causes of poverty and human rights violations and identifying those areas which will provide the most benefit to the poor and marginalised, and reduce inequalities across a range of indicators. A global framework will necessarily involve compromise. However, discussions about the content of the future framework must not be allowed to endanger progress on areas where there is considerable consensus. Save the Children Submission to the EC Public Consultation Towards a post-2015 development framework Page 7
8 C. The potential scope of a future framework 9. In your view, what should be the primary purpose of a future framework? The primary purpose of a future framework should be to create an equitable and sustainable world in which every child can realise their rights. Based on the Millennium Declaration and informed by the strengths and weaknesses of the MDGs, the framework needs to achieve this purpose - to articulate a set of clear, concrete, binding objectives which have been agreed upon through a participatory process, which are time-bound and universal in nature, and which have the capacity to capture and maintain appropriate and adequate support at public and political levels. They must embody a commitment to equality, environmental, economic and social sustainability, poverty eradication, peace and security, good governance and policy coherence for development. The framework must have accountability at its core and the commitments must be measurable, with associated indicators which are both quantitative and qualitative, and which better reflect the multidimensional nature of poverty and how people experience it. The framework must reflect a move towards the principle of universality and must harness and build on commitments made at international fora by the international community which seek to address contemporary challenges faced in particular - by the poorest and most vulnerable children, such as discrimination, violence and insecurity, lack of participation, undernutrition and climate change. The framework must enshrine national ownership of the development agenda and be geared to developing sustainable national capacity to realise those goals. 10. In your view, should its scope be global, relevant for all countries? The scope of the new framework must be global if it is to truly address the global challenges faced by people in low, middle and high income countries. It should be guided by the principle of commonbut-differentiated responsibility whereby every country has obligations, but that those obligations may differ to reflect the country context and the nature of what is being achieved. People around the world continue to suffer poverty, inequality and insecurity. Therefore, all countries should be committed to making development progress, both individually and collectively. And those who are poorest and most vulnerable should be prioritised regardless of where they live. A global framework will enjoy greater legitimacy and acceptance than one which is not. It would ensure global recognition of global responsibilities, and contribute to ending the antiquated North- South dichotomy. The fact of the future framework being global in nature will reinforce accountability. Countries must be accountable both to their citizens and to the international community, in line with our response to Question 7. Quantitative and qualitative measures will need to be developed at a global level which can be applied nationally. Specifically, the measures must go beyond GDP as a means of assessing progress and focus on human rights, equality, justice and respect for planetary boundaries. The framework should be global to make a reality of policy coherence for development. High and middle income countries have obligations towards low income countries in their trade relations, their financial, energy, agricultural policies and so on, that they will do no harm to the development perspectives of other countries. And all governments have similar obligations towards their own populations to ensure equitable progress between income quintiles, population groups, gender etc. Mechanisms will need to be established to this end including a monitoring mechanism and a means for redress. Some of these mechanisms should be global, while others may be national or local. Save the Children Submission to the EC Public Consultation Towards a post-2015 development framework Page 8
9 11. To what extent should a future framework focus on the poorest and most fragile countries, or also address development objectives relevant in other countries? A future framework should certainly focus on the poorest and most fragile countries but it also needs to address appropriately and adequately development objectives in other countries. Furthermore, while a focus on the poorest countries is necessary, since the demographics of global poverty have shifted and a large proportion of poor people now live in middle income countries, and will continue to do so in the future, it is outdated and inappropriate to imagine that a post-2015 framework should only apply to low income countries. As Sumner has stated, extreme poverty is gradually changing from a question of poor people in absolute poor countries to questions about domestic inequality. 13 This therefore begs the question as to the nature of the appropriate response. International aid becomes less relevant and domestic policies much more so. This is yet another reason why a focus in the future framework on issues such as policy coherence, governance and so on is so important. Priority should therefore be given to the poorest and most vulnerable people in a country, independent of the development status the country has been attributed. The future framework should address the key global challenges not just development objectives in the traditional sense - faced by the world today, ie. challenges that do not pertain only to low, or even middle, income countries, such as climate change and issues of sustainability. Hence the need for a global framework. Nonetheless, it should be acknowledged that the poorest and most fragile countries do need a special focus as they experience the most difficulty in making progress on any number of indicators. According to the World Bank s 2011 World Development Report, fragile and conflict-affected states account for 47% of the world population, but 60% of undernourished people, 61% of impoverished people, 77% of children not in primary school, 65% of people without access to safe water and 70% of infant deaths. No single fragile or conflict affected state is on track to attain a single MDG. Therefore these countries do need specific attention, which must include sustainable and consistent development financing and a better transition from humanitarian aid to development cooperation (linking relief, rehabilitation and development, or LRRD). 12. How could a new development agenda involve new actors, including the private sector and emerging donors? All actors organisations, companies, countries etc - should work together to apply the aid effectiveness principles, and in doing so deliver effective development co-operation. As regards the private sector, it should be noted that it is not a monolithic bloc and ranges from micro, small and medium enterprises (MSMEs) through to large multinational corporations (MNCs). Furthermore, involving the private sector could take many forms. In our response to this question, we will focus on including MNCs in achieving development objectives for the following reasons: the need to address globalisation and global challenges in the future framework; their size and wide-ranging, potential impacts (both positive and negative) at global and national levels; the need for an element of global coordination and oversight. This in no way negates the very important role of all other companies, especially MSMEs, for example in providing jobs and incomes to people, contributing to economic growth and helping to lift people out of poverty, thereby contributing to development. The role of the private sector has been growing exponentially in importance over recent years. For this reason, private sector buy-in will contribute to the success of the new framework. However, evidence is lacking on the real impact of businesses contribution to development. Much is based on 13 Where do the world s poor live? Where will they live in 2020 and 2030?, Andy Sumner, 2012 Save the Children Submission to the EC Public Consultation Towards a post-2015 development framework Page 9
10 case studies and proof can be found of both a positive impact (such as in research and development) and negative (environmental pollution, depletion of natural resources, buying up huge swathes of quality land in developing countries for profit). It will therefore be critical that a future development agenda engage and involve the private sector in order to address both its positive and negative impacts in the multitude of areas in which it is active or which suffer spill-over effects, as well as its responsibilities, for example in terms of transparency and accountability. Improved reporting on companies impacts on development, including social and environmental aspects, as well as on human rights, would be a highly beneficial result of the framework. The social and environmental impacts of the private sector could be improved through integrated reporting (such as the proposal put forward by Aviva in advance of Rio +20), in which they are accounted for alongside financial accounts. The post-2015 agenda should play an important role in pushing forward global action on integrated reporting and could even envisage a new convention, or similar measure, on private sector transparency. Certainly an accountability mechanism, including a means for redress, should be foreseen. There are wide-ranging definitions of what constitutes responsible corporate behaviour but a lack of consistent global frameworks to guide this. Indeed, Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) as a notion has become tainted by misunderstanding. At a minimum, companies should run responsible businesses that maximise decent work, economic development and tax revenue opportunities in developing countries. While many companies are beginning to accept that producing in a sustainable manner, using local producers and relying on responsibly sourced raw materials is in their longerterm interest, the sustainability factor is yet to be embedded in all core business operations. And despite the existence of a plethora of codes of conduct, standards and principles in a variety of different areas (such as fair labour standards, the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, the UN Protect, Respect and Remedy Framework and the Sustainability Reporting Guidelines), these are voluntary and difficult to monitor, relying as one does on companies own reporting structures. They are therefore insufficient. So issues of tax avoidance and evasion (for example through mispricing) remain to be resolved, but could be, for example through country-bycountry reporting. Binding regulation for minimum standards in key areas should be considered, thereby combining a CSR approach with a corporate accountability approach. Given the huge impact of the activities of large corporations (for instance in the financial sector, but also in food, energy etc) and their potential to cause or trigger major crises with global ripple effects which massively undermine progress in terms of poverty eradication, the realisation of human rights etc, such accountability must be incorporated into or be an outcome of the new development agenda. As regards the involvement of other actors such as emerging donors, since Save the Children believes that the future development framework should establish global goals of relevance to all countries, it goes without saying that emerging donors must be involved going forward. The buy-in of emerging donors will be one of the most important determinants of the strength and results of the post-2015 framework. Their involvement should take several forms: Dialogue on human development since they have important experience to share on what their development processes have been. Commitments to delivering on the goals set out in the framework, as well as as future donors to less well-off countries. Influencing other governments with whom consensus will need to be forged. Reinforcing adherence to ethical principles, such as non-violation of people s human rights. Save the Children Submission to the EC Public Consultation Towards a post-2015 development framework Page 10
11 13. How could a future framework support improved policy coherence for development (PCD), at global, EU and country levels? The principle of Policy Coherence for Development (PCD) must be placed at very heart of the post development agenda. It will be absolutely fundamental to achieving real, lasting, positive change, especially given the shifting nature of poverty, and the links between and impact of all policy areas on the achievement of development objectives. As recently stressed in the UN System Task Force in their report on post-2015, to realize the future we want for all, a high degree of policy coherence at the global, regional, national and sub-national levels will be required. 14 Since the current MDG framework was adopted, globalisation has advanced to a stage where it is no longer sensible or possible for political leaders to ignore the global impacts of domestic policy. Nowhere is this as evident as in the field of development cooperation. The ongoing economic, hunger and climate crises clearly demonstrate the impact of policies and actions of some countries on the poorest. Yet, there are currently no robust institutional mechanisms that prevent a country s policies (or those of the private sector) from having a negative impact on the world s poorest people, or oblige it to alter course. Save the Children believes that establishing a PCD mechanism could address this critical global accountability gap more than any other policy instrument by applying a do no harm principle across policies and by holding actors responsible for implementing it. PCD must apply at national and international levels to all policy areas and all actors, including in the realms of trade, tax and financial regulation, agriculture, energy etc. The crux of policy coherence however lies in implementation, once an agreement has been reached and principles (or other means) drawn up. If one just takes the EU as an example, one can see to what extent goodwill in one Directorate General (DG) can be overridden by the actions of another DG. And this despite a legal obligation to apply the principles of PCD across all policy areas. Establishing a complaints procedure which can trigger a revision of harmful policy provisions and which is linked to a redress mechanism to provide remedies for the negative effects of policies and actions on poor people will be crucial to the effectiveness of the PCD mechanism. The complaints procedure must be open to governments, civil society organisations and local communities. 14. How could a new framework improve development financing? In order to make progress in the financing for development agenda, the new framework will have to build upon the existing agenda: the Monterrey Consensus of Financing for Development, the subsequent Doha Declaration on Financing for Development, the Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness, the Accra Agenda for Action and the very recent Busan Global Partnership for Effective Development Cooperation. It is crucial that all donors - traditional and emerging - live up to their commitments on aid volumes and aid effectiveness. Global public financial transfers are crucial in a world where most developing countries still have average national GNIs which are a fraction of those of advanced economies. However, given increasingly constrained aid budgets, greater attention needs to be placed on domestic resource mobilisation: Domestic revenues must be strengthened through effective taxation. The fact that revenue collection levels are low in developing countries is due both to poor national tax systems but also to illicit financial flows through multinational companies tax evasion and fraud (amounting to approximately eight times the size of ODA, and resulting in a tax loss of 14 Realizing the Future We Want for All, UN System Task Team on the Post-2015 UN Development Agenda Report to the Secretary-General, June 2012 Save the Children Submission to the EC Public Consultation Towards a post-2015 development framework Page 11
12 USD160 bn a year). Regulatory measures such as transparent beneficial ownership or country-by-country reporting by MNCs could help to curb tax evasion and avoidance. These measures should be accompanied by fair and progressive tax systems allowing for redistribution of income and wealth, raising revenue to finance public goods and services, and re-pricing good and services in order to internalise ecological and social costs. In addition, increasing constraints on aid budgets are leading to the use of new financing modalities, such as blending grants and loans and using public development finance to leverage private finance or private sector investments. The post-2015 framework should set clear rules for how public development finance that supports private sector investments should be used for the public good. These could include: Capping the level of finance that development agencies and institutions may give to the private sector in order to keep an appropriate balance between public and private sector financing. Preferring loans, guarantees and risk management instruments to support private sector investments; aid should only exceptionally be used to subsidise private sector investments. Setting clear conditions when supporting private investments with public finance, including: o Financial and developmental additionality: this means that public finance should only support projects that would have otherwise not taken place; and that these projects need to show through ex-ante assessments and ex-post evaluations that they are contributing positively to the achievement development goals. o Support for domestic private sectors, preferably through national and regional development finance institutions rather than international financial institutions. o Full operational transparency in decision-making processes and spending allocations. Ideally a future framework could also: Propose regulation to contain corporate excesses, including ending speculation, regulating commodity markets etc. The financial crisis has amply demonstrated the costs of inadequate financial sector regulation and an opaque financial system. Include measures to strengthen a country s ability to counter crisis. Unsustainable sovereign debt situations have invariably forced countries to adopt regressive and anti-social policies that undermine their ability to fulfil their human rights obligations. Securing international monetary stability, fair, predictable and transparent treatment of sovereign debt crises, reforming the system of Special Drawing Rights and allowing countries to put in place measures to regulate capital flows are important measures to strengthen countries ability to weather crises. Look to embedding the use of innovative financing mechanisms. Save the Children Submission to the EC Public Consultation Towards a post-2015 development framework Page 12
13 D. The potential shape of a future framework 15. What do you consider to be the "top 3" most important features or elements which should be included in or ensured by any future development agenda? Firstly, Save the Children believes that a number of overarching principles should guide the development of a meaningful, global framework. These principles include: Applying a human rights-based approach which puts human rights principles at the heart of the framework and delivers equitable results, focusing particularly on the most marginalised communities and groups of people. An unequal distribution of development outcomes is neither inevitable nor acceptable. 15 Of particular note is the fact that, in addition to being more subject to inequality, children are also more vulnerable to inequality than adults owing to their unique life stage: even short-term deprivations can have lifelong consequences (such as a poor diet). 16 The principle of non-discrimination must be applied across the objectives of the post-2015 development agenda, for example through using absolute targets where possible. Improving security and protection violence and abuse, insecurity and conflict blight the lives of hundreds of millions of children every year. To be meaningful, a future framework must address the interlinked challenges of conflict, insecurity and poverty, since progress is fundamentally held back in countries where insecurity is high. The framework should therefore address the root causes of insecurity, enhancing governance and increasing people s resilience. o Furthermore, inequalities increase the risk of children experiencing violence, abuse, exploitation and neglect. Children from stigmatised groups are more vulnerable to physical and sexual abuse and to the harmful impact of institutionalization for example. Increasing sustainability - the future development agenda must ensure environmental, social and economic sustainability. It must ensure the sustainable management of scarce resources, respecting planetary boundaries, sustainable consumption and production patterns, promote domestic resource mobilisation and the redistribution of wealth, and address people s wellbeing and quality of life (in addition to more traditional areas of social sustainability). Ensuring the participation of all stakeholders, including children, in decision-making processes as well as in the monitoring of the implementation of the future framework will be fundamental for improving governance and accountability and transparency. Secondly, in designing a global framework which will necessarily focus on issues of global concern, it will also be important to retain a focus on human development via the social sectors, such as health, education, food security and nutrition, with clear, measurable targets. A clear focus on livelihoods, including decent work and supportive measures such as social protection, should be included in the future framework. Social protection systems are fundamental to reducing inequalities (for example, through improving access for disadvantaged groups to basic services, as well as through redistributing income from richer to poorer people, particularly when combined with progressive taxation). Thirdly, accountability and transparency must be addressed: as discussed in Section A, transparency and accountability for results at all levels was lacking in the MDG framework. The future framework must include accountability mechanisms which hold governments and all other actors (such as the 15 After the Millennium Development Goals: setting out the options and must haves for a new development framework in 2015, Save the Children, April GROWING GAPS, NARROWING OPPORTUNITIES: Tackling inequality to give our children a better future, Save the Children, forthcoming 2012 Save the Children Submission to the EC Public Consultation Towards a post-2015 development framework Page 13
CONCORD Submission to the EC Public Consultation Towards a post-2015 development framework
CONCORD Submission to the EC Public Consultation Towards a post-2015 development framework 14.09.12 CONCORD is the European NGO confederation for Relief and Development. Its 27 national associations, 18
More informationBeyond 2015 Submission to the EC Public Consultation Towards a post-2015 development framework
Beyond 2015 Submission to the EC Public Consultation Towards a post-2015 development framework A. The MDGs: benefits and limitations 1. To what extent has the MDG framework influenced policies in the country/ies
More informationVIA Don Bosco Submission to the EC Public Consultation Towards a post 2015 development framework. Version
VIA Don Bosco Submission to the EC Public Consultation Towards a post 2015 development framework Version 1 03.09.2012 VIA Don Bosco is a Belgian NGO, with more than four decades of experience in supporting
More information16827/14 YML/ik 1 DG C 1
Council of the European Union Brussels, 16 December 2014 (OR. en) 16827/14 DEVGEN 277 ONU 161 ENV 988 RELEX 1057 ECOFIN 1192 NOTE From: General Secretariat of the Council To: Delegations No. prev. doc.:
More information11559/13 YML/ik 1 DG C 1
COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION Brussels, 25 June 2013 11559/13 DEVGEN 168 ENV 639 ONU 68 RELEX 579 ECOFIN 639 NOTE From: To: Subject: General Secretariat of the Council Delegations The Overarching Post
More informationThe Overarching Post 2015 Agenda - Council conclusions. GE ERAL AFFAIRS Council meeting Luxembourg, 25 June 2013
COU CIL OF THE EUROPEA U IO EN The Overarching Post 2015 Agenda - Council conclusions The Council adopted the following conclusions: GERAL AFFAIRS Council meeting Luxembourg, 25 June 2013 1. "The world
More informationPUTTING PEOPLE AND PLANET FIRST BUSINESS AS USUAL IS NOT AN OPTION!
PUTTING PEOPLE AND PLANET FIRST 01 BUSINESS AS USUAL IS NOT AN OPTION! PUTTING PEOPLE AND PLANET FIRST Concord Beyond 2015 European Task Force Recommendations for the Post-2015 Framework 02 PUTTING PEOPLE
More informationREPORT ON THE CONSULTATION PROCESS ON "TOWARDS A POST-2015 DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK. Letter of Contract N 2012/ FINAL REPORT
The European Union s EDF Programme REPORT ON THE CONSULTATION PROCESS ON "TOWARDS A POST-2015 DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK Letter of Contract N 2012/294488 FINAL REPORT Prepared by Alexei Jones November 2012
More informationCONCORD Response to the Communication on the proposed Joint Declaration on the EU Development Policy CONCORD Policy Working Group September 2005
CONCORD Response to the Communication on the proposed Joint Declaration on the EU Development Policy CONCORD Policy Working Group September 2005 On 13 July, the European Commission presented its Communication
More informationIreland in the World:
Dóchas Submission to Irish Political Parties General Election Manifestos Ireland in the World: An international development agenda for the next Irish Government August 2015 The next General election will
More informationMajor Group Position Paper
Major Group Position Paper Gender Equality, Women s Human Rights and Women s Priorities The Women Major Group s draft vision and priorities for the Sustainable Development Goals and the post-2015 development
More informationCONCORD s alternatives to five EU narratives on the EU-Africa Partnership
CONCORD s alternatives to five EU narratives on the EU-Africa Partnership September 2017 Ahead of the Africa-EU Summit CONCORD recommends that the future Africa-EU Partnership build a long-term strategy
More informationSouth-South and Triangular Cooperation in the Development Effectiveness Agenda
South-South and Triangular Cooperation in the Development Effectiveness Agenda 1. Background Concept note International development cooperation dynamics have been drastically transformed in the last 50
More informationJoint Civil society submission to the 2017 High Level Meeting of the OECD Development Assistance Committee
Joint Civil society submission to the 2017 High Level Meeting of the OECD Development Assistance Committee 1. Introduction 1.1 This submission has been prepared collectively by a group of civil society
More informationCOUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 14 May /12 DEVGEN 110 ACP 66 FIN 306 RELEX 390
COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION Brussels, 14 May 2012 9369/12 DEVGEN 110 ACP 66 FIN 306 RELEX 390 NOTE From: General Secretariat Dated: 14 May 2012 No. prev. doc.: 9316/12 Subject: Increasing the impact
More informationInternational Trade Union Confederation Statement to UNCTAD XIII
International Trade Union Confederation Statement to UNCTAD XIII Introduction 1. The current economic crisis has caused an unprecedented loss of jobs and livelihoods in a short period of time. The poorest
More informationEconomic and Social Council
United Nations E/CN.6/2010/L.5 Economic and Social Council Distr.: Limited 9 March 2010 Original: English Commission on the Status of Women Fifty-fourth session 1-12 March 2010 Agenda item 3 (c) Follow-up
More informationDEVELOPMENT ASSISTANCE COMMITTEE REFLECTION EXERCISE Investing in Development: A Common Cause in a Changing World
DEVELOPMENT ASSISTANCE COMMITTEE REFLECTION EXERCISE Investing in Development: A Common Cause in a Changing World DEVELOPMENT CO-OPERATION DIRECTORATE DEVELOPMENT ASSISTANCE COMMITTEE Table of Contents
More informationReducing vulnerability and building resilience what does it entail? Andrew Shepherd, Chronic Poverty Advisory Network, Overseas Development
Reducing vulnerability and building resilience what does it entail? Andrew Shepherd, Chronic Poverty Advisory Network, Overseas Development Institute, London Expert Group Meeting on Strengthening Social
More informationTENTATIVE CHAIR S NOTE POST-MDGS CONTACT GROUP -SUMMARY & FRAMING QUESTIONS- SEPTEMBER 2012
TENTATIVE CHAIR S NOTE POST-MDGS CONTACT GROUP -SUMMARY & FRAMING QUESTIONS- SEPTEMBER 2012 The following is the summary of the Tentative Chair s Note of the Post-MDGs Contact Group (CG). The CG is a forum
More informationHalve, between 1990 and 2015, the proportion of people whose income is less than $1 a day
6 GOAL 1 THE POVERTY GOAL Goal 1 Target 1 Indicators Target 2 Indicators Eradicate extreme poverty and hunger Halve, between 1990 and 2015, the proportion of people whose income is less than $1 a day Proportion
More informationDevelopment Cooperation Instrument (DCI) Final compromise text reflecting the outcome of the trilogue on 2 December 2013
ANNEX to the letter Development Cooperation Instrument (DCI) Final compromise text reflecting the outcome of the trilogue on 2 December 2013 REGULATION (EU) /20.. OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE
More informationAfrica-EU Civil Society Forum Declaration Tunis, 12 July 2017
Africa-EU Civil Society Forum Declaration Tunis, 12 July 2017 1. We, representatives of African and European civil society organisations meeting at the Third Africa-EU Civil Society Forum in Tunis on 11-13
More informationThe Reality of Aid 2014 Report Theme Statement: Partnerships and the Post-MDGs
The Reality of Aid 2014 Report Theme Statement: Partnerships and the Post-MDGs I. Background New sources of financing to achieve the MDGs 1. Official Development Assistance (ODA) has played a crucial role
More informationChristian Aid Ireland's Submission to the Review of Ireland s Foreign Policy and External Relations
Christian Aid Ireland's Submission to the Review of Ireland s Foreign Policy and External Relations 4 February 2014 Christian Aid Ireland welcomes the opportunity to make a submission to the review of
More informationAdvancing gender equality and the empowerment of women: role of development cooperation
Preparing for the 2014 Development Cooperation Forum Vienna Policy Dialogue Conference Room M2 UN Office in Vienna - 13 and 14 December 2012 Advancing gender equality and the empowerment of women: role
More informationEuropean Commission contribution to An EU Aid for Trade Strategy Issue paper for consultation February 2007
European Commission contribution to An EU Aid for Trade Strategy Issue paper for consultation February 2007 On 16 October 2006, the EU General Affairs Council agreed that the EU should develop a joint
More informationCivil Society Priority Policy Points. G7 Sherpa Meeting
Civil Society Priority Policy Points G7 Sherpa Meeting 27 January, Rome Environment/Climate The impact of climate change is already affecting citizens, communities and countries all over the world. The
More informationEU input to the UN Secretary-General's report on the Global Compact for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration
EU input to the UN Secretary-General's report on the Global Compact for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration The future Global Compact on Migration should be a non-legally binding document resulting from
More informationREPORT. EN United in diversity EN A8-0037/ on the EU and the global development framework after 2015 (2014/2143(INI))
EUROPEAN PARLIAMT 2014-2019 Plenary sitting 17.11.2014 A8-0037/2014 REPORT on the EU and the global development framework after 2015 (2014/2143(INI)) Committee on Development Rapporteur: Davor Ivo Stier
More informationE/ESCAP/FSD(3)/INF/6. Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific Asia-Pacific Forum on Sustainable Development 2016
Distr.: General 7 March 016 English only Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific Asia-Pacific Forum on Sustainable Development 016 Bangkok, 3-5 April 016 Item 4 of the provisional agenda
More informationINTERACTIVE EXPERT PANEL. Challenges and achievements in the implementation of the Millennium Development Goals for women and girls
United Nations Nations Unies United Nations Commission on the Status of Women Fifty-eighth session 10 21 March 2014 New York INTERACTIVE EXPERT PANEL Challenges and achievements in the implementation of
More informationDraft declaration on the right to international solidarity a
Draft declaration on the right to international solidarity a The General Assembly, Guided by the Charter of the United Nations, and recalling, in particular, the determination of States expressed therein
More informationSida s activities are expected to contribute to the following objectives:
Strategy for development cooperation with Myanmar, 2018 2022 1. Direction The objective of Sweden s international development cooperation is to create opportunities for people living in poverty and oppression
More informationRepublic of Korea's Comments on the Zero Draft of the Post-2015 Outcome Document
Republic of Korea's Comments on the Zero Draft of the Post-2015 Outcome Document I. Preamble Elements of dignity and justice, as referenced in the UN Secretary-General's Synthesis Report, should be included
More informationDÓCHAS STRATEGY
DÓCHAS STRATEGY 2015-2020 2015-2020 Dóchas is the Irish Association of Non-Governmental Development Organisations. It is a meeting place and a leading voice for organisations that want Ireland to be a
More informationConcluding Remarks by the President of ECOSOC
Special High-Level Meeting of ECOSOC with the Bretton Woods institutions, the World Trade Organization and the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (New York, ECOSOC Chamber (NLB), 12-13
More informationEuropean Neighbourhood Instrument (ENI) Summary of the single support framework TUNISIA
European Neighbourhood Instrument (ENI) Summary of the 2017-20 single support framework TUNISIA 1. Milestones Although the Association Agreement signed in 1995 continues to be the institutional framework
More informationCOMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES
EN EN EN COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES Brussels, 17.10.2008 COM(2008)654 final COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE COUNCIL, THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE
More informationTHE EUROPEAN CONSENSUS ON DEVELOPMENT
JOINT STATEMENT BY THE COUNCIL AND THE REPRESENTATIVES OF THE GOVERNMENTS OF THE MEMBER STATES MEETING WITHIN THE COUNCIL, THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COMMISSION THE EUROPEAN CONSENSUS ON DEVELOPMENT
More informationCSOs on the Road to Busan: Key Messages and Proposals. January 2011
CSOs on the Road to Busan: Key Messages and Proposals January 2011 CSOs on the Road to Busan: An Executive Summary of CSO Key Messages and Proposals CSOs in the BetterAid Platform, with the Open Forum
More informationPost-2015 Development Goals: Oxfam International Position
Post-2015 Development Goals: Oxfam International Position This sets out Oxfam s proposals for a successor framework to the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) for the period after 2015. At this early stage
More informationThe Way Forward: Pathways toward Transformative Change
CHAPTER 8 We will need to see beyond disciplinary and policy silos to achieve the integrated 2030 Agenda. The Way Forward: Pathways toward Transformative Change The research in this report points to one
More informationPromoting equality, including social equity, gender equality and women s empowerment. Statement on behalf of France, Germany and Switzerland
8 th session of the Open Working Group on Sustainable Development Goals, New York, 3.-7.2.2014 Promoting equality, including social equity, gender equality and women s empowerment Statement on behalf of
More informationLinking Aid Effectiveness to Development Outcomes: A Priority for Busan
Linking Aid Effectiveness to Development Outcomes: A Priority for Busan Tony Addison and Lucy Scott UNU-WIDER Helsinki November 2011 The forthcoming fourth High-Level Forum (HLF4) on aid effectiveness,
More informationDEVE POLICY PAPER FOR DEVELOPMENT AND HUMANITARIAN AID PRIORITIES
POSITION PAPER DEVE POLICY PAPER FOR DEVELOPMENT AND HUMANITARIAN AID PRIORITIES 2014-2019 EUROPE IN THE WORLD: PROMOTING SOLIDARITY, FREEDOM, JUSTICE AND EQUALITY The EU on the world stage Date: 01/12/2014
More informationThe key building blocks of a successful implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals
The key building blocks of a successful implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals June 2016 The International Forum of National NGO Platforms (IFP) is a member-led network of 64 national NGO
More informationTHE WAY FORWARD CHAPTER 11. Contributed by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development and the World Trade Organization
CHAPTER 11 THE WAY FORWARD Contributed by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development and the World Trade Organization Abstract: Much has been achieved since the Aid for Trade Initiative
More informationPolicy on Social Protection
Policy on Social Protection i Summary. Concern will work with host and donor governments to increase acceptance of people s right to social protection and to ensure official recognition and funding of
More informationSave the Children s Response to the European Commission s Discussion Paper Migration and Mobility for Development Towards a migrant-centred approach
Save the Children s Response to the European Commission s Discussion Paper Migration and Mobility for Development Towards a migrant-centred approach Save the Children welcomes the opportunity to contribute
More informationH.E. Mr Ban Ki-moon Secretary-General United Nations 760 United Nations Plaza New York, New York 10017
H.E. Mr Ban Ki-moon Secretary-General United Nations 760 United Nations Plaza New York, New York 10017 Mr Sam Kutesa President of the General Assembly United Nations 760 United Nations Plaza New York,
More informationWOMEN AND GIRLS IN EMERGENCIES
WOMEN AND GIRLS IN EMERGENCIES SUMMARY Women and Girls in Emergencies Gender equality receives increasing attention following the adoption of the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Issues of gender
More informationDecent work at the heart of the EU-Africa Strategy
Decent work at the heart of the EU-Africa Strategy 20 February 2009 1. General Contents 1. General... 2. The Decent Work Agenda a pillar of the EU-Africa Strategy... 3. An approach to migration based on
More informationSYNOPSIS. Introduction. A vision for change
SYNOPSIS Introduction Our remit, the Social Dimension of Globalization, is a vast and complex one. As a Commission we were broadly representative of the diverse and contending actors and interests that
More informationThematic Workshop on Migration for Development: a roadmap to achieving the SDGs April, 2018
Thematic Workshop on Migration for Development: a roadmap to achieving the SDGs 18-19 April, 2018 Mohammed Rabat VI Convention International Center Conference Mohammed Center VI, Skhirat, Morocco 1. Framing
More informationPOST-2015: BUSINESS AS USUAL IS NOT AN OPTION Peacebuilding, statebuilding and sustainable development
POST-2015: BUSINESS AS USUAL IS NOT AN OPTION Peacebuilding, statebuilding and sustainable development Chris Underwood KEY MESSAGES 1. Evidence and experience illustrates that to achieve human progress
More informationOxfam believes the following principles should underpin social protection policy:
Oxfam International response to the concept note on the World Bank Social Protection and Labour Strategy 2012-2022; Building Resilience and Opportunity Background Social protection is a basic right for
More informationDevelopment Goals and Strategies
BEG_i-144.qxd 6/10/04 1:47 PM Page 123 17 Development Goals and Strategies Over the past several decades some developing countries have achieved high economic growth rates, significantly narrowing the
More informationCountry programme for Thailand ( )
Country programme for Thailand (2012-2016) Contents Page I. Situation analysis 2 II. Past cooperation and lessons learned.. 2 III. Proposed programme.. 3 IV. Programme management, monitoring and evaluation....
More informationConsultation on Civil Society Organisations in Development - Glossary - March 2012
Consultation on Civil Society Organisations in Development - Glossary - March 2012 List of terms Accra Agenda for Action Agenda for Change Busan partnership for Effective Development Cooperation Alignment
More informationOxfam position on the Review of the European Consensus on Development
Oxfam position on the Review of the European Consensus on Development 1. Introduction Why is a revision of the European Consensus on Development needed? The policies that set the European framework on
More informationEPP Policy Paper 2 A Europe for All: Prosperous and Fair
EPP Policy Paper 2 A Europe for All: Prosperous and Fair Creating a Dynamic Economy The economy should serve the people, not the other way around. Europe needs an ambitious, competitive and growth-orientated
More informationThank you Simon and good afternoon ladies and. It is a delight to speak on an ODI platform again and to
ODI: multilateral aid and the EU s contribution to meeting the MDGs Thank you Simon and good afternoon ladies and gentlemen. It is a delight to speak on an ODI platform again and to share it today with
More informationKenya. Strategy for Sweden s development cooperation with MFA
MINISTRY FOR FOREIGN AFFAIRS, SWEDEN UTRIKESDEPARTEMENTET Strategy for Sweden s development cooperation with Kenya 2016 2020 MFA 103 39 Stockholm Telephone: +46 8 405 10 00, Web site: www.ud.se Cover:
More informationWhat are Goal 16 and the peaceful, just and inclusive societies commitment, and why do
Peace, Justice and Inclusion: what will it take?. Remarks at the third annual symposium on the role of religion and faith-based organizations in international affairs: Just, Inclusive and Sustainable Peace.
More informationHMG EU Balance of Competences: Development Cooperation and Humanitarian Aid Report
HMG EU Balance of Competences: Development Cooperation and Humanitarian Aid Report Submission by researchers from the Overseas Development Institute 1 Mikaela Gavas, Simon Levine, Simon Maxwell, Andrew
More informationMinisterial declaration of the 2007 High-level Segment
Ministerial declaration of the 2007 High-level Segment Strengthening efforts to eradicate poverty and hunger, including through the global partnership for development We, the Ministers and Heads of Delegations
More informationCONSULTATION SUBMISSION: Child Poverty (Scotland) Bill. March 2017
CONSULTATION SUBMISSION: Child Poverty (Scotland) Bill March 2017 The Scottish Human Rights Commission (SHRC) was established by The Scottish Commission for Human Rights Act 2006, and formed in 2008. The
More informationOxfam Education
Background notes on inequality for teachers Oxfam Education What do we mean by inequality? In this resource inequality refers to wide differences in a population in terms of their wealth, their income
More informationDeclaration of Civil Society Organizations from the Arab Region on the Post 2015 framework
General Background In the year 2000, the Millennium Declaration (MD) put forward a set of challenges to global development efforts and that outlined a "collective responsibility to uphold the principles
More informationCOMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE COUNCIL, THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE AND THE COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS
EN EN EN EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 31.3.2010 COM(2010)128 final COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE COUNCIL, THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE AND THE COMMITTEE
More informationLecture 1. Introduction
Lecture 1 Introduction In this course, we will study the most important and complex economic issue: the economic transformation of developing countries into developed countries. Most of the countries in
More informationINTERNATIONAL ISSUES ARAB WOMEN AND GENDER EQUALITY IN THE POST-2015 DEVELOPMENTAGENDA. Summary
UNITED NATIONS ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COUNCIL E Distr. LIMITED E/ESCWA/ECW/2013/IG.1/5 25 October 2013 ORIGINAL: ENGLISH Economic and Social Commission for Western Asia (ESCWA) Committee on Women Sixth session
More informationBern, 19 September 2017
Federal Department of Foreign Affairs FDFA Bern, 19 September 2017 Switzerland s response to the request on 17 July 2017 for input into the UN Secretary-General s report on the global compact for safe,
More informationGLOBAL GOALS AND UNPAID CARE
EMPOWERING WOMEN TO LEAD GLOBAL GOALS AND UNPAID CARE IWDA AND THE GLOBAL GOALS: DRIVING SYSTEMIC CHANGE We are determined to take the bold and transformative steps which are urgently needed to shift the
More informationSTATE OF THE WORLD S VOLUNTEERISM REPORT STATE OF THE WORLD S VOLUNTEERISM REPORT
A Volunteering New New Zealand Zealand Summary Summary Report Report STATE OF THE WORLD S VOLUNTEERISM REPORT STATE OF THE WORLD S VOLUNTEERISM REPORT 2016 1 Author: Amy Duxfield, Policy and Research Advisor
More informationCOMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES
EN EN EN COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES Brussels, 24 May 2006 COM (2006) 249 COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE COUNCIL, THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE
More informationHaving regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 179(1) thereof,
27.12.2006 L 378/41 REGULATION (EC) No 1905/2006 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 18 December 2006 establishing a financing instrument for development cooperation THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMT AND
More informationPRETORIA DECLARATION FOR HABITAT III. Informal Settlements
PRETORIA DECLARATION FOR HABITAT III Informal Settlements PRETORIA 7-8 APRIL 2016 Host Partner Republic of South Africa Context Informal settlements are a global urban phenomenon. They exist in urban contexts
More informationThe Future of Development Cooperation: from Aid to Policy Coherence for Development?
The Future of Development Cooperation: from Aid to Policy Coherence for Development? Niels Keijzer, ECDPM April 2012 English translation of the original paper written in Dutch 1. Development cooperation:
More informationAIN STRATEGIC PLAN FOR
AIN STRATEGIC PLAN FOR 2014-2016 AIN STRATEGIC PLAN FOR 2014-2016 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Association of International INGOs, AIN, founded in 1996 is a Network of international nongovernmental organizations.
More informationWHO DISCUSSION PAPER
WHO DISCUSSION PAPER Draft Shanghai Declaration on Health Promotion in the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development: Ensuring sustainable health and well-being for all Draft declaration (under development)
More informationEliminating World Poverty: a consultation document
Eliminating World Poverty: a consultation document January 2006 Have your say Did we make poverty history in 2005? No. But did we take a big step in the right direction? Yes. Last year development took
More informationTST Issue Brief: Global Governance 1. a) The role of the UN and its entities in global governance for sustainable development
TST Issue Brief: Global Governance 1 International arrangements for collective decision making have not kept pace with the magnitude and depth of global change. The increasing interdependence of the global
More informationE#IPU th IPU ASSEMBLY AND RELATED MEETINGS. Sustaining peace as a vehicle for achieving sustainable development. Geneva,
138 th IPU ASSEMBLY AND RELATED MEETINGS Geneva, 24 28.03.2018 Sustaining peace as a vehicle for achieving sustainable development Resolution adopted unanimously by the 138 th IPU Assembly (Geneva, 28
More informationA rough guide to emerging consensus and divergence in post-2015 goal areas
Annexes A rough guide to emerging consensus and divergence in post-2015 goal areas Gina Bergh and Jonathan Couturier November 2013 To read the summary analysis based on these Annexes please see A rough
More informationCOMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE COUNCIL
COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES Brussels, 14.7.2006 COM(2006) 409 final COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE COUNCIL Contribution to the EU Position for the United Nations' High Level Dialogue
More informationPUBLIC LIMITE EN COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 3 October /06. Interinstitutional File: 2004/0220 (COD) LIMITE
Conseil UE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION Brussels, 3 October 2006 Interinstitutional File: 2004/0220 (COD) PUBLIC 13412/06 LIMITE DEVGEN 235 NIS 120 PESC 913 RELEX 633 FIN 441 ACP 149 CADREFIN 283 CODEC
More informationOn the Move for Equality Education International s First World Women s Conference Ambassador Hotel, Bangkok, January, 2011
Women Femmes Mujeres On the Move for Equality Education International s First World Women s Conference Ambassador Hotel, Bangkok, 19-23 January, 2011 Friday 21 January DAY 1 Theme: Taking Stock of the
More informationDPA/EAD input to OHCHR draft guidelines on effective implementation of the right to participation in public affairs May 2017
UN Department of Political Affairs (UN system focal point for electoral assistance): Input for the OHCHR draft guidelines on the effective implementation of the right to participate in public affairs 1.
More informationFinal Statement. - Regarding the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development:
Final Statement For a Global Partnership Towards Effective Development Cooperation that Contributes to Achieving the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development Goals We, representatives of Civil Society Organizations
More information2011 HIGH LEVEL MEETING ON YOUTH General Assembly United Nations New York July 2011
2011 HIGH LEVEL MEETING ON YOUTH General Assembly United Nations New York 25-26 July 2011 Thematic panel 2: Challenges to youth development and opportunities for poverty eradication, employment and sustainable
More informationAccra : a defining moment. Why making aid effective matters to every citizen
Why making aid effective matters to every citizen A World Vision brief in preparation for the OECD-DAC Third High-level Forum on Aid Effectiveness Accra, Ghana September 2008 Copyright 2008 World Vision
More informationStrategy for Sweden s development cooperation with Burkina Faso
Strategy for Sweden s development cooperation with Burkina Faso 2018 2022 Strategy for Sweden s development cooperation with Burkina Faso 2018 2022 1 1. Focus The objective of Sweden s international development
More informationHuman Rights: Key to Keeping the MDG Promise of 2015
OFFICE OF THE HIGH COMMISSIONER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS Human Rights: Key to Keeping the MDG Promise of 2015 Key Human Rights messages for the MDGs Review Summit New York, 20-22 September 2010 I. Background on
More informationHuman Rights Council. Resolution 7/14. The right to food. The Human Rights Council,
Human Rights Council Resolution 7/14. The right to food The Human Rights Council, Recalling all previous resolutions on the issue of the right to food, in particular General Assembly resolution 62/164
More informationAt the meeting on 17 November 2009, the General Affairs and External Relations Council adopted the Conclusions set out in the Annex to this note.
COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION Brussels, 18 November 2009 16081/09 DEVGEN 331 COHOM 261 RELEX 1079 ACP 268 COEST 418 COLAT 36 COASI 207 COAFR 363 COMAG 22 NOTE from : General Secretariat dated : 18 November
More informationConcluding Remarks of Co- Chairs 6 th Session of Open Working Group on Sustainable Development Goals Friday, 13 December 2013
Excellencies, colleagues, Ladies and gentlemen, Concluding Remarks of Co- Chairs 6 th Session of Open Working Group on Sustainable Development Goals Friday, 13 December 2013 We are now in the home stretch
More informationAn informal aid. for reading the Voluntary Guidelines. on the Responsible Governance of Tenure. of Land, Fisheries and Forests
An informal aid for reading the Voluntary Guidelines on the Responsible Governance of Tenure of Land, Fisheries and Forests An informal aid for reading the Voluntary Guidelines on the Responsible Governance
More informationCivil Society Reaction to the Joint Communication A Partnership for Democracy and Shared Prosperity
Civil Society Reaction to the Joint Communication A Partnership for Democracy and Shared Prosperity Submitted by the Arab NGO Network for Development (ANND) Eurostep and Social Watch Arab NGO Network for
More information