SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE LAMOREAUX JUSTICE CENTER ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
|
|
- Emerald Willis
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 ATTORNEY LAW OFFICES OF ATTORNEY 123 Main St. Suite 1 City, CA Telephone: ( Facsimile: ( attorney@law.com Attorney for Respondent ABE Y. SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE LAMOREAUX JUSTICE CENTER SONDRA R. Y., Petitioner, vs. ABE Y., Respondent. Case No.: 12D RESPONDENT'S MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN OPPOSITION TO PETITIONER'S REQUEST FOR ORDER; DECLARATION OF ATTORNEY A. Date: 1/16/13 Time: 1:45 p.m. Dept: Respondent Abe Y. respectfully submits for this Court's consideration the following Opposition to Petitioner's Request for Order as filed with the Court on December 13, STATEMENT OF FACTS This legal separation (without children action was initiated by Petitioner Sara R. Y. in the Riverside Superior Court (Indio Larson Justice Center, case number IND on October 17, The case was transferred to this jurisdiction on January 26, /// Page 1
2 Petitioner's current counsel, Attorney Z., is Ms. Y.'s fourth attorney in this matter 1. Petitioner dismissed her first attorney (Attorney H. on January 19, Petitioner then substituted in Attorney K. to represent her. On July 22, 2011, Petitioner dismissed Attorney K, substituting in yet a third attorney, Attorney P.. This court scheduled an Order to Show Cause hearing for July 2, That hearing was continued by Petitioner's attorney so that she could file a motion to be relieved as counsel. Attorney P. was subsequently relieved. Following Attorney P.'s withdrawal as counsel, Respondent's attorney, Attorney A., contacted Petitioner, who was without representation, to request an address where he could send the documents required pursuant to Family Code Petitioner told Attorney A. not to serve the papers as she had been evicted from her residence and she did not have an address or location where she could be served. A trial date had been set for September 4, 2012; however, Petitioner had no counsel and requested a continuance in order to hire an attorney. The Court ordered the trial continued to November 13, On November 13, Attorney Z. made a special appearance for the petitioner and at that time filed a Notice of Limited Scope Representation. This was Respondent's first opportunity to serve Petitioner with the final declaration of disclosure and current income and expense declaration, which was served on Petitioner at the time of the hearing. (See attached Declaration of Attorney A.. On December 13, 2012, Attorney Z. requested ex parte emergency relief for a continuance of the trial "to get up to speed on this case." (Petitioner's Request for Order, Memorandum of Points and Authorities, 1st page 2. Petitioner's counsel argued that the issues in this case are complicated and that his ability to represent his client is hindered by the respondent's alleged lack complete and accurate disclosure. (Petitioner's Request for Order, item Respondent has been represented by current counsel since his first appearance in this matter. 2 The Memorandum is not paginated. Page 2
3 Specifically, Attorney Z. contends that the respondent's Preliminary/Final Declaration of Disclosure is "completely deficient." (Petitioner's Request for Order, item 10. In support of this allegation, Petitioner's attorney notes that: Respondent did not list the names and numbers for his retirement accounts; Respondent provided no documentation to support the values stated on his declaration of disclosure; Respondent claimed tax liabilities for the years 2004 and 2005 even though the Tax Court found Petitioner not liable under innocent spouse relief; and Respondent has failed to produce documentation requested in discovery by prior attorneys. (Petitioner's Request for Order, item 10. Attorney Z. acknowledges that he has up to three boxes of documentation that he has inherited in this case, which he has yet to fully review and which includes deposition transcripts and legal pleadings. (Petitioner's Request for Order, item 10. The Court denied Attorney Z.'s request for a continuance of the trial but did grant Petitioner's request regarding sufficiency of Respondent's filings and documentation prior to trial. Petitioner has requested that this Court order Respondent to augment his Final Declaration of Disclosure with information sufficient to comply with the statutory requirements. 3 Petitioner's Request for Order has also requested an order for sanctions 4 33 This is Respondent's interpretation of the confusingly worded statement: "The document is wholly deficient, and Ludwig Law Center, Inc., request this Court order Respondent to Augment his Final Declaration of Disclosure the provide the required information with sufficient particularity, prepare of supplement the appropriate disclosure[sic]." (Petitioner's Request for Order, Memorandum of Points and Authorities, 1st page. 4 Although the wording is ambiguous, it appears as though the petitioner is requesting monetary sanctions with an additional request for issue sanctions if Respondent fails to augment his final declaration of disclosure. Page 3
4 against Respondent for Respondent's alleged failure to comply with Family Code sections 2106 and ARGUMENT I. Respondent Served Petitioner With the Final Declarations on November 13, Family Code section 2105 requires, each party to serve on the other, no later than 45 days before trial, a final declaration of disclosure and current income and expense declaration, executed under penalty of perjury. Respondent served these declarations on Petitioner on November 13, 2012, which was the first available day in which Respondent could do so. Respondent was unable to serve the declarations earlier because Petitioner told Respondent's attorney not to serve her at the address he had for her and she did not provide any other location and/or address where she could be served. Since Petitioner was without legal representation from August 2012 until November 13, 2012 and provided no address, Respondent had no way of serving these documents on Petitioner. (See attached Declaration of Attorney A.. II. Sufficiency of Respondent's Disclosure Family Code section 2107 provides that if a party "fails to provide the information required in the [final declaration of disclosure under Section 2105] with sufficient particularity, and if the other party has served the respective declaration of disclosure on the noncomplying party, the complying party may... request preparation of the appropriate declaration of disclosure or further particularity." (Family Code section 2107(a. Petitioner, by this Request for Order, presumably is making a request pursuant to this section, or more specifically, a request that this Court order Respondent to augment his final declaration with sufficient particularity. The deficiencies in Respondent's final disclosure as claimed by Petitioner can be found in Item 10 ("Facts in Support" on the Request for Order. Petitioner, through counsel, declares that the respondent's final declaration of disclosure does not list the 5 Respondent cites only these two code sections. Page 4
5 names, account numbers, and values of Respondent's retirement accounts; has no documentation to support values 6 ; and claims tax liabilities for which the petitioner is not liable (as an innocent spouse. Retirement Accounts Respondent allows that he has not provided complete information 7 regarding his retirement accounts, of which he has two. The total value of both accounts was disclosed in Respondent's Final Declaration of Disclosure served on Petitioner on November 13, Respondent has served an amended Final Declaration of Disclosure on Petitioner with the information regarding his retirement accounts. Values Attorney Z. declares in Item 10 that "no documents at all were attached to support his values...." By this Respondent understands Petitioner to mean the values Respondent assigned to the real estate (described in Respondent's disclosure as 123 Street, City, CA, household furniture, jewelry and antiques, vehicles (described in Respondent's disclosure as 2003 Cadillac Escalade, 1999 Ford Explorer, 1997 Safari, and Limo, the interest in the land in San Dimas, tax refunds, proceeds from note, proceeds from sale of land, and bank account withdrawal (by Petitioner. As to the Lakeview Trail property, Respondent has been in the real estate business for many years and has expertise in the valuations of properties. Furthermore, he consulted other real estate agents regarding the value of the Lakeview Trail property. His valuation of this property is based on both his expertise and that of those real estate agents with whom he has consulted. Likewise, the value of the San Dimas land, of which 21% is jointly owned by the petitioner and the respondent, is based upon Respondent's real estate expertise. The household furniture, which has a minimal value, is a reasonable estimate based upon Respondent's knowledge of its value. The jewelry and antiques are in 6 The declaration is unclear on which values this is in reference to. 7 Names and account numbers. Page 5
6 Petitioner's possession; therefore, Respondent was only able to estimate the value of these items and, in any event, Respondent has no expectation that he will receive any of these items. The value of the vehicles are the Respondent's estimated values and can be easily confirmed by consulting Kelly Blue Book or a similar vehicle valuation service. Regarding the value of the tax refunds (2007 and 2008, proceeds from note and sale of land, and the petitioner's withdrawal of bank funds, the petitioner is well-aware of those values as it was she who has enjoyed the benefits thereof. All of these items are items of which the petitioner alone received (or took and 2005 Tax Liabilities Respondent accurately valued the tax liabilities in his final disclosure as he is required to do. He acknowledges that pursuant to the United States Tax Court Memo , filed on September 4, 2012, these liability are his alone. III. PETITIONER HAS FAILED TO COMPLY WITH THE APPLICABLE DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS AND THEREFORE, AS A NONCOMPLYING PARTY, SHE CANNOT REQUEST SANCTIONS AGAINST RESPONDENT. Petitioner's points and authorities in support of her Request for Order, cites one case, Marriage of Fong ( Cal. App. 4th 278, by quoting seven consecutive paragraphs directly from that case as the only support for her request. (Petitioner's Request for Order, Memorandum of Points and Authorities, 4th, 5th and 6th pages The extended citation that Petitioner's argument apparently rests upon as support for her request is wholly concerned with whether, under Family Code section 2107, a noncomplying party can request sanctions of the other party for noncomplying. The Fong authority that Petitioner cites makes an argument against the very remedy she seeks herein. Family Code 2107(a provides that if one party "fails to provide the information required in the respective declarations [of disclosure] 8 with sufficient particularity and if the other party has served the respective declaration of disclosure on the noncomplying 8 (As relevant here, in the final declaration of disclosure under Section 2105 Page 6
7 party, the complying party may, within a reasonable time, request preparation of the appropriate declaration of disclosure or further particularity." (Family Code 2107(a. The statute further provides that a noncomplying party who "fails to comply with any provisions of this chapter [ ]" shall be, with certain exceptions, subject to monetary sanctions. (Family Code 2107(c. The Fong Court construed section 2107, subdivision (c to mean that only a complying party "is entitled to seek an award of monetary sanctions against the other party for failure to comply with the applicable disclosure requirements." (Fong, supra, 193 Cal. App. 4th at p Here, Petitioner is guilty of the same noncompliance for which she seeks sanctions against Respondent. Section 2105(b lists the information that should be included in the final declaration of disclosure, to wit: (1 All material facts and information regarding the characterization of all assets and liabilities. (2 All material facts and information regarding the valuation of all assets that are contended to be community property or in which it is contended the community has an interest. (3 All material facts and information regarding the amounts of all obligations that are contended to be community obligations or for which it is contended the community has liability. (4 All material facts and information regarding the earnings, accumulations, and expenses of each party that have been set forth in the income and expense declaration. (Family Code 2105(b. The petitioner's final declaration of disclosure 9 served on the respondent and dated September 30, 2011 is not only out of date, but fails to include the material facts required by section 2105(b. While Petitioner seeks an order for sanctions against Respondent for "failure to comply with Family Code 2106 & 2107 [sic]" (Petitioner's Request for Order, Memorandum of Points and Authorities, 2nd page, Petitioner has herself failed to comply. 9 Attached herein as Exhibit A. Page 7
8 For example, Petitioner substantiates her allegations that Respondent has not complied by stating that Respondent has not provided the names and numbers for his retirement accounts or documentation to support the values stated on his declaration of disclosure. On Petitioner's final declaration, she simply lists, under items 12 and 13 "Petitioner's Retirement/Pension" and "Petitioner's IRA" all with a current gross fair market value of "TBD." (See attached Exhibit A. Nowhere in her disclosure is the value of her retirement/pension or IRA disclosed; nor does she provide any names or numbers or attach any copies of the latest statement for any of these accounts. Her final declaration also entirely fails to provide any support for those assets or debts on which she does state a value and many assets are valued as simply "TBD." (See attached Exhibit A. CONCLUSION For the reasons stated above, the respondent respectfully requests that the Court deny the petitioner's request for order. Dated:, 2012 By: ATTORNEY A. Attorney for Abe Y. Page 8
JOINT APPLICATION TO WAIVE FEES AND COSTS F-6JP
Do Not File Or Copy This Page JOINT APPLICATION TO WAIVE FEES AND COSTS F-6JP Self Help Center 1 South Sierra St., First Floor Reno, NV 89501 775-325-6731 www.washoecourts.com Do Not File Or Copy This
More informationLegal 145b FINAL EXAMINATION. Prepare a Motion to Quash Subpoena.
A. Motion to Quash Assignment Legal 145b FINAL EXAMINATION Prepare a Motion to Quash Subpoena. Recently you prepared a subpoena. Look at the front of the subpoena where it tells you how to oppose a subpoena.
More informationAPPLICATION FOR WAIVER OF FEES AND COSTS F-6. The District Court Filing Office is located on the first floor at: 75 Court Street Reno, NV 89501
APPLICATION FOR WAIVER OF FEES AND COSTS F-6 The District Court Filing Office is located on the first floor at: 7 Court Street Reno, NV 890 APPLICATION TO WAIVE FEES AND COSTS PACKET F-6 Do Not Copy Or
More informationFor Preview Only - Please Do Not Copy
Form: Attorney Fee Agreement for Hourly Clients 1. The following form is a longer written fee contract. It may be used to employ the attorney. Use this fee agreement for transactions that require a more
More informationLOCAL RULES SUPERIOR COURT of CALIFORNIA, COUNTY of ORANGE DIVISION 7 FAMILY LAW
DIVISION 7 FAMILY LAW Rule Effective 700. Subject Matter of the Family Law Court 07/01/2014 700.5 Attorneys and Self Represented Parties 07/01/2011 700.6 Family Law Filings 01/01/2012 701. Assignment of
More informationPetitioner,, In Pro Per, and Respondent,, has been retained by Petitioner to advise and counsel Petitioner during the course of the
Self Represented NEVADA COUNTY COURTS IN AND FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 1 1 1 1 In re Matter of: Petitioner, and Respondent. Case No. STIPULATION TO DESIGNATE MATTER AS COLLABORATIVE PROCEEDING AND ORDER
More informationReasons for change. Proposed rule. Application. [No change] Time for Production of Documents. [No. change]
Proposed rule Reasons for change RULE 12.285. MANDATORY DISCLOSURE (a) (b) change] Application. [No change] Time for Production of Documents. [No (c) Disclosure Requirements for Temporary Financial Relief.
More informationPREVIEW PLEASE DO NOT COPY THIS DOCUMENT THANK YOU
Information & Instructions: Motion and Order for deposit of costs n order to secure attorney s fees for the attorney or guardian ad litem 1. Frequently a court appointed attorney, in order to secure attorney's
More informationSTATE OF WISCONSIN TAX APPEALS COMMISSION. Petitioner, RULING AND ORDER JENNIFER E. NASHOLD, CHAIRPERSON:
STATE OF WISCONSIN TAX APPEALS COMMISSION TITAN INTERNATIONAL, INC., DOCKET NO. 04-T-204 Petitioner, vs. RULING AND ORDER WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, Respondent. JENNIFER E. NASHOLD, CHAIRPERSON:
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES CHAPTER FIVE FAMILY DIVISION RULES...124
CHAPTER FIVE FAMILY DIVISION RULES...124 5.1 APPLICABILITY OF RULES; SANCTIONS...124 (a) Applicability of Rules...124 (b) Sanctions...124 5.2 MATTERS ASSIGNED TO FAMILY LAW DIVISION; COVER SHEET...124
More informationCOURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF
Innocence Legal Team 1600 S. Main St., Suite 195 Walnut Creek, CA 94596 Tel: 925 948-9000 Attorney for Defendant COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE Case No. OF CALIFORNIA, Plaintiff,
More informationSTATE OF VERMONT. Defendant. v. FINAL STIPULATION Property, Debts and Spousal Support
STATE OF VERMONT SUPERIOR COURT Unit Plaintiff FAMILY DIVISION Docket No. Defendant v. FINAL STIPULATION Property, Debts and Spousal Support We, the parties in this action, agree to the following provisions
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT. Gregory Pellerin, Petitioner. vs. Superior Court for Nevada County, Respondent,
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT Gregory Pellerin, Petitioner vs. Superior Court for Nevada County, Respondent, The People of the State of California, Real Party in Interest.
More informationBack to previous page: [LETTERHEAD] [DATE] MEET AND CONFER LETTER
Back to previous page: http://legalrequest.net/2013/05/31/draft-correspondence/ [LETTERHEAD] Sondra A. 123 Street City, CA 12345 [DATE] Re: A. v. G. Case No. 30-2011-0012345 MEET AND CONFER LETTER Dear
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES Address of courthouse or district:
NAME, ADDRESS AND PHONE OF ATTORNEYS OR SELF REPRESENTED PARTIES: SPACE FOR COURT USE ONLY SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES Address of courthouse or district: Petitioner/Plaintiff: Respondent/Defendant:
More informationGeneral Rules. Adoption, Scope and Construction of Rules
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO LOCAL RULES OF PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE OF THE DOMESTIC RELATIONS DIVISION OF THE MAHONING COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS Effective March 1, 1998 Including Amendments Effective April
More informationJOINT APPLICATION TO WAIVE FEES AND COSTS F-6JP
Do Not File Or Copy This Page JOINT APPLICATION TO WAIVE FEES AND COSTS F-6JP Self Help Center South Sierra St., First Floor Reno, NV 8950 775-325-673 www.washoecourts.com Do Not File Or Copy This Page
More informationIN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
1 1 1 1 1 0 1 (Firm BY: (Attorney CSB# Attorney for (FATHER, FATHER In the matter of: CASE NO. (MINOR NOTICE OF MOTION TO QUASH Minor. NOTICE TO APPEAR; DECLARATION; POINTS AND AUTHORITIES DATE: X, 00
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, CENTRAL DIVISION CASE NO. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
RICHARD L. DUQUETTE Attorney at Law P.O. Box 2446 Carlsbad, CA 92018 2446 SBN 108342 Telephone: (760 730 0500 Attorney for Petitioner CHRISTINA HARRIS SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF
More informationSuperior Court of California, County of Contra Costa. Fee Waiver Packet. (Guardianship and Conservatorship) What you will find in this packet:
Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa Fee Waiver Packet (Guardianship and Conservatorship) What you will find in this packet: Information Sheet on Waiver of Court Fees and Costs (FW-001-INFO)
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN MATEO
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN MATEO Hall of Justice and Records 400 County Center Redwood City, California 94063-0965 JOHN C. FITTON (650) 363-4516 COURT EXECUTIVE OFFICER FAX (650) 363-4698
More informationCOURT FACILITATED PROCEDURE FOR DOMESTIC RELATIONS CASES
DISTRICT COURT EL PASO COUNTY STATE OF COLORADO 270 South Tejon, Post Office Box 2980 Colorado Springs, CO 80901 (719) 448-7700 Petitioner: COURT USE ONLY Case Number: Respondent / Co-Petitioner: DOMESTIC
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE-CENTRAL JUSTICE CENTER ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Back to previous page: http://legalrequest.net/0/0/0/draft-discovery-requests-and-responses/ 0 ATTORNEY LAW OFFICES OF ATTORNEY Main St. Suite City, CA Telephone: ( - Facsimile: ( - Email: attorney@law.com
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Back to previous page: http://legalrequest.net/0/0/0/draft-pleadings-criminal-or-civil/ Law Offices Attny, SBN # Street City, CA 0000 Telephone: (- Fax: (- Attorney for Defendant, XXX Est. Time 0 0 SUPERIOR
More informationUtah Court Rules on Exhibits Francis J. Carney
Utah Court Rules on Exhibits Francis J. Carney 1. Foundations Utah Evidence Rule 104(a) makes clear that foundational matters are not subject to the rules of evidence, such as hearsay, leading, etc. Rule
More informationROWAN COUNTY DISTRICT 19-C
ROWAN COUNTY DISTRICT 19-C LOCAL RULES FAMILY FINANCIAL CASES Rule 1 Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) 1.1 These rules are intended to implement a series of events that are designed to focus the parties
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
Patricia Ihara SBN 180290 PMB 139 4521 Campus Drive Irvine, CA 92612 (949)733-0746 Attorney on Appeal for Defendant/Appellant SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
More informationAPPEAL A FORCIBLE DETAINER JUDGMENT
MARICOPA COUNTY JUSTICE COURT How to APPEAL A FORCIBLE DETAINER JUDGMENT Justice Court in Maricopa County June 23, 2005 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED FORM (# MARICOPA COUNTY JUSTICE COURT Either party may appeal
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO. Case No. [redacted]
1 0 1 [attorney name redacted], Esq. (CSBN ///////////) ////////////// ////////////// ////////////// ////////////// Attorneys for Plaintiff GFH PROPERTIES, a California General Partnership Names have been
More informationNC General Statutes - Chapter 52C 1
Chapter 52C. Uniform Interstate Family Support Act. Article 1. General Provisions. 52C-1-100. Short title. This Chapter may be cited as the Uniform Interstate Family Support Act. (1995, c. 538, s. 7(c).)
More informationSUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO UNLIMITED JURISDICTION
CRAIG C. DANIEL () DAVID T. WEI (0) AXCEL LAW PARTNERS LLP Telephone 1-0-00 Facsimile 1-0-0 Email cdaniel@ax-law.com Attorneys for PLAINTIFF CORPORATE CONCEPTS SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
More informationbeing preempted by the court's criminal calendar.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF «County» «PlaintiffName», vs. «DefendantName», Plaintiff, Defendant. Case No. «CaseNumber» SCHEDULING
More informationCOURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE STATE OF CALIFORNIA D058284
Filed 7/19/11; pub. order 8/11/11 (see end of opn.) COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE STATE OF CALIFORNIA In re the Marriage of DELIA T. and ISAAC P. RAMIREZ DELIA T. RAMIREZ, Respondent,
More informationState your full name, social security number, date of birth, residence address, and telephone number.
Name of Petitioner/Plaintiff Address of Petitioner/Plaintiff City, State, Zip Phone IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR COUNTY, STATE OF FLORIDA YOUR NAME, PLAINTIFF'S FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES PROPOUNDED,Petitioner/Plaintiff
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
1 1 1 1 1 0 1 Firm, Attorney at Law State Bar Number: Address: Telephone: Facsimile: Attorneys for Defendant SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES THE PEOPLE OF
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 GREEN & HALL, A Professional Corporation MICHAEL J. PEPEK, State Bar No. 178238 mpepek@greenhall.com SAMUEL M. DANSKIN, State Bar No. 136044 sdanskin@greenhall.com MICHAEL A. ERLINGER,
More informationJUDGMENT AND ORDER UPON STIPULATION FOR UNREIMBURSED HEALTH CARE EXPENSES
JUDGMENT AND ORDER UPON STIPULATION FOR UNREIMBURSED HEALTH CARE EXPENSES Packet IMPORTANT THIS PACKET IS IN NO WAY INTENDED TO SUBSTITUTE FOR THE ADVICE OF A PRIVATE ATTORNEY. IMPORTANT If either party
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION In re, No. A On Habeas Corpus. Related Appeal No. A County Superior Court No. PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS [Attorney
More informationThese rules shall be known as the Local Rules for Columbia and Montour Counties, the 26 th Judicial District, and shall be cited as L.R. No.
BUSINESS OF THE COURT L.R. No. 51 TITLE AND CITATION OF RULES These rules shall be known as the Local Rules for Columbia and Montour Counties, the 26 th Judicial District, and shall be cited as L.R. No.
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY AT FRANKFORT CIVIL ACTION NO.: KKC MEMORANDUM ORDER
Case 3:05-cv-00018-KKC Document 96 Filed 12/29/2006 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY AT FRANKFORT CIVIL ACTION NO.: 05-18-KKC AT ~ Q V LESLIE G Y cl 7b~FR CLERK u
More informationLOCAL RULES OF THE SUPERIOR COURT OF GUAM. GENERAL RULES (Promulgation Order No , Eff. June 1, 2007)
GENERAL RULES (Promulgation Order No. 06-006-02, Eff. June 1, 2007) COL 05312007 Rule GR 1.1. GR 2.1. GR 3.1. GR 4.1. GR 5.1. GR 6.1. GR 7.1. GENERAL RULES Effective June 1, 2007 Title; Effective Date;
More informationDURABLE POWER OF ATTORNEY FOR FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
RECORDING REQUESTED BY WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO Space above this line for recorder's use DURABLE POWER OF ATTORNEY FOR FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT (NAME), Principal to (NAME), Agent Notice to Person Executing Durable
More information1. Wife: Name Address Address City State Zip Date of birth Gross monthly income $ Employer name Address of payroll office City State Zip
PRINT in BLACK ink Enter the name of the county in which you are filing this case. STATE OF ISCONSIN, CIRCUIT COURT, COUNTY For Official Use Enter the name of the petitioner. If joint petitioners, enter
More informationFlorida Family Law Rules of Procedure RULE MANDATORY DISCLOSURE. (a) Application.
Florida Family Law Rules of Procedure RULE 12.285. MANDATORY DISCLOSURE (a) Application. (1) Scope. This rule shall apply to all proceedings within the scope of these rules except proceedings involving
More informationrbk Doc#81-1 Filed 09/14/17 Entered 09/14/17 14:55:48 Exhibit A Pg 1 of 8 EXHIBIT A
17-51926-rbk Doc#81-1 Filed 09/14/17 Entered 09/14/17 14:55:48 Exhibit A Pg 1 of 8 EXHIBIT A 17-51926-rbk 17-51926-rbk Doc#81-1 Claim#1-1 Filed 09/14/17 Filed 09/11/17 Entered 09/14/17 Main Document 14:55:48
More informationUNIFORM INTERSTATE FAMILY SUPPORT ACT Act 310 of The People of the State of Michigan enact:
UNIFORM INTERSTATE FAMILY SUPPORT ACT Act 310 of 1996 AN ACT to make uniform the laws relating to interstate family support enforcement; and to repeal acts and parts of acts. The People of the State of
More informationBOTH SIGNATURES MUST BE IN BLUE INK
PROCEDURE FOR ASSOCIATION OF COUNSEL PURSUANT TO SCR 42 BOTH SIGNATURES MUST BE IN BLUE INK THIS APPLICATION IS NOT FOR USE IN FEDERAL COURTS. DO NOT CHANGE OR OMIT ANY WORDING ON THE APPLICATION. Original
More informationSAMPLE FORM F NOTICE DESIGNATING RECORD ON APPEAL
SAMPLE FORM F NOTICE DESIGNATING RECORD ON APPEAL NOTICE DESIGNATING RECORD ON APPEAL - INSTRUCTIONS After filing your notice of appeal you have 10 days to tell the Superior Court what you want in the
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN MATEO
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN MATEO LOCAL COURT RULES As Amended Effective January 1, 2018 SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN MATEO Hall of Justice and Records 400 County Center,
More informationI Have A Case in Court, Now What? San Mateo County Superior Court
I Have A Case in Court, Now What? San Mateo County Superior Court DISCLOSURE Please note that all of the information contained in this workshop/slideshow is purely general information and should NOT be
More informationLOCAL RULES SUPERIOR COURT of CALIFORNIA, COUNTY of ORANGE DIVISION 3 CIVIL RULES
DIVISION 3 CIVIL RULES Rule Effective Chapter 1. Civil Cases over $25,000 300. Renumbered as Rule 359 07/01/09 301. Classification 07/01/09 302. Renumbered as Rule 361 07/01/09 303. All-Purpose Assignment
More informationCourt of Common Pleas Tuscarawas County, Ohio General Trial Division : : : : : : : : : : : : : : Case No. Judge
Court of Common Pleas Tuscarawas County, Ohio General Trial Division Name Address Phone and Plaintiff, Name Address Phone Defendant. Case No. Judge Separation Agreement (No Minor Children) This Separation
More informationHave you received a request for discovery?
Have you received a request for discovery? *What is it? -Discovery simply is asking for more information from you. This type of request is a general document and its form is not tailored to individual
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL
2 Civil 2 Civil B194120 IN THE COURT OF APPEAL IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT (DIVISION 4) 4) HUB HUB CITY SOLID WASTE SERVICES,
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT. DIVISION [Number]
Parts in blue print are instructions to user, not to be included in filed document unless as noted. [NOTE: This sample may be helpful when documents have been sealed by the trial court, appellate counsel
More informationBEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Andrade & Associates, a Professional Law Corporation, vs. Complainant, Southern California Edison Company, Defendant. Case No. 07-05-014
More informationANAHEIM CAMPAIGN REFORM. Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 1.09
ANAHEIM CAMPAIGN REFORM Anaheim Municipal Code, 1.09.010 NAME. This chapter shall be known and may be cited as the "City of Anaheim Campaign Reform Law." (Ord. 5704 2 (part); October 19, 1999; Ord. 5858
More informationAttorney for Defendant LAGUNA WHOLESALE SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF ORANGE 700 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE WEST, SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92701
1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 David V. Jafari, SBN: 01 JAFARI LAW GROUP, INC. Vantis Drive, Suite 0 Aliso Viejo, California, Telephone: ( -00 Facsimile: ( -01 djafari@jafarilawgroup.com Attorney for Defendant LAGUNA
More informationINSTRUCTIONS FOR FLORIDA FAMILY LAW RULES OF PROCEDURE FORM , CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE WITH MANDATORY DISCLOSURE (01/12)
INSTRUCTIONS FOR FLORIDA FAMILY LAW RULES OF PROCEDURE FORM 12.932, CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE WITH MANDATORY DISCLOSURE When should this form be used? Mandatory disclosure requires each party in a dissolution
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES UNLIMITED JURISDICTION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
C. D. Michel - S.B.N. 1 Sean A. Brady - S.B.N. MICHEL & ASSOCIATES, LLP E. Ocean Boulevard, Suite 00 Long Beach, CA 00 Telephone: -1- Facsimile: -1- Attorneys for Proposed Relator SUPERIOR COURT OF THE
More informationLIMITED JURISDICTION
Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa LIMITED JURISDICTION Civil Actions PACKET What you will find in this packet: Notice To Plaintiffs (CV-659a-INFO) Notice To Defendants (CV-659b-INFO)
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF ORANGE CENTRAL JUSTICE CENTER
JOE JARED 1 N. Emerald Dr. Orange, CA (1 - Defendant In Pro Per SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF ORANGE CENTRAL JUSTICE CENTER 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 PALLORIUM, INC., a Texas
More informationIf you are applying for a government-issued license, certificate, or permit, you must disclose your conviction and expungement.
What is an expungement? An expungement reopens your criminal case, dismisses and sets aside the conviction, and re-closes the case without a conviction. In effect, you are no longer a convicted person.
More information<Text of form effective January 1, 2006> IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR COUNTY, FLORIDA
Form 12.932. Certificate of Compliance With Mandatory Disclosure IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR COUNTY, FLORIDA, Petitioner, and, Respondent.
More informationDISTRICT COURT APPEALS INSTRUCTIONS CIVIL AND CRIMINAL CASES
DISTRICT COURT APPEALS INSTRUCTIONS CIVIL AND CRIMINAL CASES These instructions are intended to give you an overview of the procedures to follow to appeal your case. You should also consult the Rules for
More informationSTATE OF VERMONT FINAL STIPULATION
SUPERIOR COURT Unit Plaintiff Name STATE OF VERMONT DOB FAMILY DIVISION Docket No. Defendant Name DOB V. FINAL STIPULATION Property, Debts and Spousal Support (for use in nonresident divorce/dissolution
More informationINSTRUCTIONS FOR FLORIDA FAMILY LAW RULES OF PROCEDURE FORM (c), STANDARD FAMILY LAW INTERROGATORIES FOR MODIFICATION PROCEEDINGS (09/12)
INSTRUCTIONS FOR FLORIDA FAMILY LAW RULES OF PROCEDURE FORM 12.930(c), STANDARD FAMILY LAW INTERROGATORIES FOR MODIFICATION PROCEEDINGS (09/12) When should this form be used? This form should be used to
More informationCHAPTER 200. RULES OF CONSTRUCTION; GENERAL PROVISIONS
RULES OF CONSTRUCTION 246 Rule 201 CHAPTER 200. RULES OF CONSTRUCTION; GENERAL PROVISIONS Rule 201. Citation of Rules. 202. Definitions. 203. Computation of Time. 204. Purpose and Intent of Rules. 205.
More informationNC General Statutes - Chapter 30 1
Chapter 30. Surviving Spouses. ARTICLE 1. Dissent from Will. 30-1 through 30-3: Repealed by Session Laws 2000-178, s. 1. Article 1A. Elective Share. 30-3.1. Right of elective share. (a) Elective Share.
More informationDodge County. 1) Rules of Decorum. (Sixth Judicial District)
Dodge County (Sixth Judicial District) 1. Rules of Decorum 2. Civil Practice 3. Rules of Criminal Procedure 4. Rules of Family Court Procedure 5. Filing of Papers by Electronic Filing and Facsimile Transmission
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL DISTRICT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
William C. Kuhs, State Bar No. 39217 Robert G. Kuhs, State Bar No. 160291 Kuhs & Parker P. O. Box 2205 1200 Truxtun Avenue, Suite 200 Bakersfield, CA 93303 Telephone: (661 322-4004 Facsimile: (661 322-2906
More information, Judgment Debtor CITATION TO DISCOVER ASSETS
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE THIRD JUDICIAL CIRCUIT vs., Judgment Creditor Case No. (Collections), Judgment Debtor CITATION TO DISCOVER ASSETS YOU ARE COMMANDED to appear before the Judge presiding in
More informationARTICLE 19: CHANCERY, EMINENT DOMAIN, ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEWS AND MISCELLANEOUS REMEDIES
ARTICLE 19: CHANCERY, EMINENT DOMAIN, ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEWS AND MISCELLANEOUS REMEDIES 19.00 RESERVED 19.01 APPEARANCES - TIME TO PLEAD - WITHDRAWAL (a) Written Appearances: If a written appearance, general
More informationEX PARTE PETITION FOR ORDER TO OPEN SAFE DEPOSIT BOX PR 1
EX PARTE PETITION FOR ORDER TO OPEN SAFE DEPOSIT BOX PR 1 The District Court Filing Office is located on the first floor at: 75 Court Street Reno, NV 89501 EX PARTE PETITION FOR ORDER TO OPEN SAFE DEPOSIT
More information1. Intent. 2. Definitions. OCERS Board Policy Administrative Hearing Procedures
1. Intent OCERS Board Policy The Board of Retirement of the Orange County Employees Retirement System ( OCERS ) specifically intends that this policy shall apply to and shall govern in each administrative
More informationARTICLE 1 GENERAL PROVISIONS
CHAPTER 35 UNIFORM INTERSTATE FAMILY SUPPORT ACT SOURCE: This Chapter was formerly codified in the Code of Civil Procedure as the Uniform Reciprocal Enforcement of Support Act. It was repealed and reenacted
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON. Case No.:
Kirk D. Miller, WSBA #00 Kirk D. Miller, P.S. 1 W. Riverside Ave., Ste 0 Spokane, WA 1 (0) - Telephone (0) - Facsimile IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON KRISTINE ORLOB-RADFORD,
More informationPROBATE COURT OF THE TOWN OF LITTLE COMPTON ADMINISTRATIVE RULES
PROBATE COURT OF THE TOWN OF LITTLE COMPTON ADMINISTRATIVE RULES Pursuant to Rhode Island General Laws 33-22-29 the Probate Court of the Town of Little Compton hereby establishes and adopts the following
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
MARY CUMMINS Defendant W. 9th St. #110-10 Los Angeles, CA 9001 In Pro Per Telephone: (10-0 Email: mmmaryinla@aol.com SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES BAT WORLD SANCTUARY, AMANDA LOLLAR
More informationSuperior Court of California, County of Contra Costa. Fee Waiver Packet. What you will find in this packet:
Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa Fee Waiver Packet What you will find in this packet: Information Sheet on Waiver of Court Fees and Costs (FW-001-INFO) Request to Waive Court Fees (FW-001)
More informationAsset Forfeiture Model State Law April 9, 2011
Asset Forfeiture Model State Law April 9, 2011 Table of Contents GENERAL PROVISIONS 100.01 Definitions 100.02 Purpose 100.03 Exclusivity 100.04 Criminal asset forfeiture 100.05 Conviction required; standard
More informationUnited States Small Business Administration Office of Hearings and Appeals
Cite as: Matter of Science & Technology Solutions, Inc., SBA No. BDP-329 (2009) United States Small Business Administration Office of Hearings and Appeals IN THE MATTER OF: Science & Technology Solutions,
More informationPRE-DECREE OR PRE-FINAL ORDERS
District Court El Paso County, Colorado Court Address: 270 S. Tejon, PO Box 2980, Colorado Springs, CO 80901 (719) 448-7650 Petitioner: COURT USE ONLY Case Number: Respondent / Co-Petitioner: DOMESTIC
More informationCOHABITATION AGREEMENT
COHABITATION AGREEMENT BETWEEN Patty Plaintiff and Danny Defendant Dated: THIS AGREEMENT made and executed on the day of, 2007, by and between Patty Plaintiff (hereinafter referred to as " "), presently
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR MARION COUNTY, FLORIDA. vs. Case No: ORDER ESTABLISHING MOTION PRACTICE PROCEDURE
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR MARION COUNTY, FLORIDA Plaintiff, vs. Case No: 2017- Defendant. / ORDER ESTABLISHING MOTION PRACTICE PROCEDURE THIS CAUSE is before the Court
More informationChapter 6 MOTIONS. 6.1 Vocabulary Introduction Regular Motions 7
Chapter 6 MOTIONS 6.1 Vocabulary 3 6.2 Introduction 6 6.3 Regular Motions 7 6.3.1 "Notice of Motion 8 6.3.1.1 Setting the Hearing 8 6.3.1.2 Preparing the Notice 8 6.3.2 Memorandum of Points and Authorities
More information(e) Appearance of Attorney. An attorney may appear in a proceeding in any of the following ways:
RULE 2.505. ATTORNEYS (a) Scope and Purpose. All persons in good standing as members of The Florida Bar shall be permitted to practice in Florida. Attorneys of other states who are not members of The Florida
More informationSTATE OF WYOMING ) IN THE DISTRICT COURT ) ss COUNTY OF ) JUDICIAL DISTRICT. AFFIDAVIT FOR DIVORCE WITHOUT APPEARANCE OF PARTIES (With Minor Children)
STATE OF WYOMING ) IN THE DISTRICT COURT ) ss COUNTY OF ) JUDICIAL DISTRICT Plaintiff:, ) (Print name of person filing) ) ) vs. ) ) Defendant:. ) (Spouse) (Print name) Civil Action Case No. AFFIDAVIT FOR
More informationHOUSE BILL lr1288 A BILL ENTITLED. Maryland Power of Attorney Form and Oversight Act
N HOUSE BILL lr By: Delegates Simmons and Kramer Introduced and read first time: February, 00 Assigned to: Judiciary A BILL ENTITLED 0 0 AN ACT concerning Maryland Power of Attorney Form and Oversight
More informationInformation or instructions: Motion Consent of Client & Order to substitute counsel PREVIEW
Information or instructions: Motion Consent of Client & Order to substitute counsel 1. This motion allows attorneys to substitute on a case. 2. See TRCP 8, which states that the leading counsel shall be
More informationOffice of the Register of Wills Anne Arundel County, Maryland
Audit Report Office of the Register of Wills Anne Arundel County, Maryland August 2007 OFFICE OF LEGISLATIVE AUDITS DEPARTMENT OF LEGISLATIVE SERVICES MARYLAND GENERAL ASSEMBLY This report and any related
More informationRULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE NOTICE
RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE NOTICE Notice is hereby given that the following amendments to the Rules of Appellate Procedure were adopted to take effect on January 1, 2019. The amendments were approved
More informationAttorney for Petitioners RICHARD SANDER and JOE HICKS COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
1 3 1 SHEPPARD, MULLIN, RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP A Limited Liability Partnership Including Professional Corporations JAMES M. CHADWICK, Cal. Bar No. 1 jchadwick@sheppardmullin.com GUYLYN R. CUMMINS, Cal.
More informationPETITION FOR EMERGENCY TEMPORARY PROTECTIVE ORDER
PETITION FOR EMERGENCY TEMPORARY PROTECTIVE ORDER IN THE COMANCHE NATION TRIBAL COURT DISTRICT COURT (Note: This form is for use when the Court is NOT open for business) Petitioner First Middle Last and/or
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA FAMILY LAW DIVISION
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA FAMILY LAW DIVISION IN RE:, and Petitioner/Father,, Case No.: Division: Respondent/Mother. / ORDER SETTING
More informationUnderstanding Guardianship Presented by Angela Lassiter Video Transcript
This educational video may have been ordered or recommended to help you better understand the roles and responsibilities of Guardians in North Carolina. The following information is not intended as legal
More informationSo, You re Thinking of Filing A Lawsuit? San Mateo County Superior Court
So, You re Thinking of Filing A Lawsuit? San Mateo County Superior Court DISCLOSURE Please note that all of the information contained in this workshop/slideshow is purely general information and should
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT. DIVISION [Number]
Parts in blue print are instructions to user, not to be included in filed document unless so noted. [Parts and references in green font, if any, refer to juvenile proceedings. See Practice Note, this web
More informationPART FAMILY LAW
11.01 Scope 11.02 Affidavit of Parties and Production of Documents 11.03 Interrogatories 11.04 Attorney for the Child 11.05 Conciliation, Mediation, Advice to Court, Investigations and Reports 11.06 Case
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA
GREEN & HALL, LLP MICHAEL J. PEPEK, State Bar No. 1 mpepek@greenhall.com SAMUEL M. DANSKIN, State Bar No. 10 sdanskin@greenhall.com MICHAEL A. ERLINGER, State Bar No. 1 merlinger@greenhall.com 11 East
More information