BEFORE THE COMMISSIONER, H.R. & C.E.ADMN.DEPARTMENT, CHENNAI-34.
|
|
- Dennis Gilmore
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 BEFORE THE COMMISSIONER, H.R. & C.E.ADMN.DEPARTMENT, CHENNAI-34. Wednesday the 17 th day of October, Two thousand and Eighteen. Present:Thiru.T.K.Ramachandran, I.A.S., Principal Secretary /Commissioner R.P.27/2018 D2 Between Jayaseelan...Petitioner And 1. The Joint Commissioner H.R&C.E.,Admn Department, Chennai. 2. The Assistant Commissioner H.R&C.E.,Admn Department, Chennai. 3. The Executive officer, Arulmighu Thiruvalleeswarar Temple, Padi, Chennai Respondents In the matter of Arulmighu Thiruvalleeswarar Temple, Padi, Chennai. Petition filed to condone the delay of 34 days in filing the Revision Petition and 286 days in re-presenting the Revision petition filed under Section 21 of the Tamil Nadu H.R. & C.E. Act, 1959 (Tamil Nadu Act 22 of 1959) against the order dated of the Joint Commissioner, HR&CE Admn Department, Chennai in Pro.Rc.No. 5097/2009 passed u/s 78 of the act. Order in R.P.No.27/2018 D2 dated: The above Revision petition came up for final hearing before me on in the presence of Thiru.C.Dharmaraj Counsel for the petitioner. Upon hearing his arguments and having perused the connected records and the matter having stood over for consideration till this day, the following order is passed:- ORDER The above petition was filed u/s.21 of the Act challenging the order dated passed by the Joint Commissioner, Chennai.
2 2 2. The petitioner has stated the he is living in the above said property along with his family for more than 40 years. The land measuring 3200 sq.ft. belonging to the Arulmighu Thiruvalleeswarar Thirukoil, Padi, Chennai in which executed Registered lease deed to and infavour of petitioner by virtue of Deed dated in doc. No.2483/1984 SRO Anna Nagar and he was permitted to occupy and construct the superstructure in the said land subsequently he enjoyed the lease hold rights. From then onwards he has been paying rent regularly to the 3 rd respondent temple and paying the property tax in his name and also paying regularly the increased rent. On the 3 rd respondent had issued notice to the petitioner revising the rent from Rs.2890/- was The petitioner sent his objections on to the all respondents. But it was not considered by the said authorities. On , the 3 rd respondent had again issued notice to the petitioner revised the rent to the said premises based on the report of the fixation of fair rent committee passed as per G.O.456. The said the 3 rd respondent fixed the tent to premises at Rs.1915/- per month and calculated as arrears of rent as Rs.1,68,597/-. The 1 st respondent has issued show cause notice. Immediately on the petitioner sent his reply to the 1 st respondent on but the 1 st respondent did not considered the earlier representation. On , after 6 years, again sent show clause notice to the petitioner to appear on In the meanwhile the petitioner had paid entire arrears and informed the same to the Joint Commissioner on Subsequently on the petitioner sent reminder. But without verifying the above payment and without receiving final report from the 3 rd respondent temple, the 1 st respondent has passed the said impugned order.
3 3 3. In the Counter Affidavit, the 3 rd respondent has stated that the said temple owns landed properties in various survey numbers in and around the area of Padi. Out of the same, a portion of land comprised in Survey No.218/2 admeasuring 3200 sq.ft. bearing door No.34 Jegathambigai Street, Thiruvalleeswar Nagar, Chennai was leased out to one Jeyaseelan for a monthly rent of Rs.10/- and latter the fair rent was fixed with effect from based on the G.Os.353, 456 and 298/2010. The present rent as on the date of was Rs.1915/- per month. The revision petitioner was irregular and chronic defaulter and was not ready to pay the old arrears of Rs.1,68,597/- up to As per the resolution passed by the Hereditary Trustee the lease was terminated with effect from and intimated to the revision petitioner vide notice dated ` On the revision petitioner attended the enquiry and the Joint Commissioner directed the revision petitioner to remit the accrued arrears Rs.69,424/- on or before and posted the matter for orders on , but on that date only the executive officer the 3 rd respondent attended the enquiry and informed that still a sum of Rs was left as arrears and there was no response from the revision petitioner. Based on the statement given by the 3 rd respondent, the 1 st respondent passed the impugned order declaring the revision petitioner as an encroacher under Section 78 of the TH HR&CE Act, inter alia directing the revision petitioner to handover the possession of the demisted property to the 3 rd respondent temple within 15 days from the date of order. He has now remitted the rental arrears up to after the impugned order has been passed on The rent was revised at Rs.10,000/- per month again with effect from and the same was intimated vide notice dated and accordingly, the sum of Rs.1,50,000/- is left
4 4 unpaid up to In respect of the new fixation the revision petitioner has sent in-appropriate objections to the 3 rd respondent directly on without exercising his option of filing appeal under Section 34 (A) (3) of the TN HR&CE Act. 4. The above Revision petition came up for from hearing on and The petitioner and his counsel were called absent on both hearings. I heard Thiru.C.Dharmaraj, counsel for the 3 rd respondent and perused the relevant records. 5. The land measuring about 3200 sq.ft belonging to the above temple was originally leased out to the petitioner. The temple has fixed the fair rent at Rs.1915/- with effect from and sent notice to the 1 st petitioner. As no appeal was filed against the fair rent, it attained finality. As he had failed to pay the fair rent along with the arrears, the tenancy was terminated with effect from and the proceedings u/s.78 was initiated in the year The proceedings u/s.78 was concluded in the year During the pendency of the above said proceedings, the Joint Commissioner had afforded several opportunities to the petitioner to settle the arrears. But the petitioner not appeared before the Joint Commissioner and also failed to pay the arrears as directed by the Joint Commissioner. He has settled the old arrears after passing of the impugned order only. After termination of the lease of the original tenant, the possession of the petitioner is unlawful and in turn amounts to encroachment as contemplated u/s.78 of the Act. Accordingly the Joint Commissioner has rightly ordered eviction of the petitioner from the suit property.
5 5 6. The suit property is endowed for the maintenance of the suit temple. The temple is depending on the income derived from the said property for the performance of daily poojas, festivals, payment of salary to the employees, providing basic amenities to the devotees and to carry out periodical maintenance works. The expenditure towards the above said items have been increased. Further, the value of the land also increased over the years. Hence, the rent should be revised periodically. As per Sec 34A of the Act, the rent is to be fixed once in three years taking into account the prevailing market rental value in the said locality. The suit property is situated in one of the prime localities of Chennai city. The rent fixed by the temple is very low compared to the prevailing market rental value in the said locality. The property has potential to generate more income if the same is leased out in public auction and the temple will get more income. 7. Further, this revision petition was filed against the eviction order passed u/s 78 of the Act. In the eviction proceedings, the petitioner cannot dispute the fixation of fair rent as they have failed to challenge the same as provided under the Act. As a tenant it is the duty of the petitioner to remit the rent every month and it should not be necessary for the temple to keep insisting them for payment of rent for each and every month. Further if the rent fixed by the temple u/s 34(A) of the Act is not affordable by the petitioner, he should quit the property to enable the temple to get maximum income from the said property. 8. During the enquiry on this forum has directed the petitioners to pay the entire arrears of Rs.1,83,000/-(up to June 2018) before within 2 weeks. Thereafter, the above case came up for hearing on and But neither did the
6 6 petitioner pay the arrears as directed by this forum nor appeared for enquiry. This clearly shows his mindset. The petitioner is irregular in payment of rent. The temple cannot run after the tenant every time to collect the rent and spent its funds to defend the litigation initiated by the tenants. Therefore, for the foregoing reasons stated supra, I find no reason to interfere with the order passed by the Joint Commissioner, Chennai and it is liable to be confirmed. Accordingly, the order dated is hereby confirmed and revision petition is dismissed as devoid of merits. /typed to dictation/ /t.c.f.b.o./ Sd./- T.K.Ramachandran Principal Secretary /Commissioner Superintendent To 1. The Petitioner through M/s.G.Devi, Advocate, No.346/161, Thambu Chetty Street, Chennai The 3 rd Respondent through Thiru.C.Dharmaraj, Advocate, M-188, 9 th Cross street, Thiruvalluvar Nagar, Thiruvanmiyur, Chennai -41. Copy to 3. The Joint Commissioner, HR & CE Admn.Dept., Chennai. 4. The Assistant Commissioner, HR & CE Admn.Dept., Chennai. 5. Extra.
2. The petitioner has stated that her father Duraisamy Mudaliyar. purchased the superstructure on from Smt.
BEFORE THE COMMISSIONER, H.R. & C.E.ADMN.DEPARTMENT, CHENNAI-34. Tuesday the 7 th day of February Two thousand and Eighteen. Present: Tmt.R.Jaya, I.A.S., Commissioner. R.P.298/2017 D2 Between 1.Duraisamy
More informationCommon Order in D.Dis.R.P.337 to 339/2017 D2 dated:
1 BEFORE THE COMMISSIONER, H.R. & C.E.ADMN.DEPARTMENT, CHENNAI-34. Monday the 20 th day of August, Two thousand and Eighteen. Present: Tmt.R.Jaya, I.A.S., Commissioner. R.P.337 to 339/2017 D2 Between 1.P.Thiruvengadam
More information...Respondents In the matter of Arulmighu Thanthondreeswarar Temple,
BEFORE THE COMMISSIONER, H.R. & C.E.ADMN.DEPARTMENT, CHENNAI-34. Tuesday the 4 th day of April, Two thousand and Seventeen. Present: Dr.M.Veera Shanmugha Moni, Commissioner. R.P.169/2017 D2 Between Mohanraj...Petitioner
More informationOrder in D.Dis.R.P.301/2016 D2 dated:
BEFORE THE COMMISSIONER, H.R. & C.E.ADMN.DEPARTMENT, CHENNAI-34. Monday the 24 th day of April, Two thousand and Seventeen. Present: Dr.M.Veera Shanmugha Moni, Commissioner. R.P.No.301/2016 D2 Between
More informationThe above Revision Petition was filed under Section 21 of the Act. against the order dated of the Joint Commissioner, Tirunelveli
BEFORE THE COMMISSIONER, H.R. & C.E.ADMN.DEPARTMENT, CHENNAI-34. Thursday the 23 rd day of August Two thousand and Eighteen. Present: Tmt.R.Jaya, I.A.S., Commissioner. R.P.89/2018 D2 Between V.Murugan...Petitioner
More informationThe above Revision petition was filed u/s 21 of the Act against the order dated
BEFORE THE COMMISSIONER, H.R. & C.E.ADMN.DEPARTMENT, CHENNAI-34. Wednesday the 10 th day of October, Two thousand and Eighteen. Present: Thiru.T.K.Ramachandran, I.A.S., Principal Secretary/ Commissioner.
More informationBEFORE THE COMMISSIONER, H.R. & C.E.ADMN.DEPARTMENT, CHENNAI-34.
BEFORE THE COMMISSIONER, H.R. & C.E.ADMN.DEPARTMENT, CHENNAI-34. Friday the 19 th day of May, Two thousand and Seventeen. Present: Dr.M.Veera Shanmugha Moni, Commissioner. A.P.No.30/2016 D2 Between 1.
More informationOrder in D.Dis.R.P.100/2017 D2 dated: The above Revision petition came up for final hearing before me on
1 BEFORE THE COMMISSIONER, H.R. & C.E.ADMN.DEPARTMENT, CHENNAI-34. Monday the 12 th day of June, Two thousand and Seventeen. Present: Dr.M.Veera Shanmugha Moni, Commissioner. R.P.100/2017 D2 Between 1.E.Pari
More information5.R.Ramasamy. 2.M.V.Sellamuthu 3.R.Arunachalam 4.R.Mani
1 BEFORE THE COMMISSIONER, H.R. & C.E.ADMN.DEPARTMENT, CHENNAI-34. Thursday the 24 th day of August, Two thousand and Seventeen. Present: Dr.M.Veera Shanmugha Moni, Commissioner. A.P.No.14/2017 D2 Between
More informationTHE TAMIL NADU ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION
THE TAMIL NADU ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION (Constituted under Section 82(1) of the Electricity Act, 2003) (Central Act 36 of 2003) PRESENT : Thiru S. Kabilan Thiru B. Jeyaraman - Chairman - Member
More informationThe parties to the present dispute are married to each other and the said marriage was solemnized on 17 th February, 2000.
MANU/SC/1193/2013 Equivalent Citation: 2013(14)SCALE370 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Criminal Appeal No. 1999 of 2013 (Arising out of SLP (Crl.) No. 2190 of 2012) Decided On: 25.11.2013 Appellants: Saraswathy
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL No.5903 OF Smt. Sudama Devi & Ors..Appellant(s) VERSUS
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.5903 OF 2012 Smt. Sudama Devi & Ors..Appellant(s) VERSUS Vijay Nath Gupta & Anr. Respondent(s) J U D G M E N T Abhay
More informationPetition for Eviction Based on Non-Payment of Rent
Petition for Eviction Based on Non-Payment of Rent Case No. In the Justice Court of Harris County, Texas Plaintiff vs. Precinct, Place Defendant 1. COMPLAINT. Plaintiff files the complaint against the
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SUIT FOR POSSESSION Date of Judgment: RSA No.251/2008 & CM Nos.17860/2008 & 11828/2010
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SUIT FOR POSSESSION Date of Judgment: 28.4.2011 RSA No.251/2008 & CM Nos.17860/2008 & 11828/2010 UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO.LTD..Appellant Through: Mr.P.K.Seth,
More informationPORTIONS OF ILLINOIS FORCIBLE ENTRY AND DETAINER ACT 735 ILCS 5/9-101 et. seq.
Sec. 9-102. When action may be maintained. (a) The person entitled to the possession of lands or tenements may be restored thereto under any of the following circumstances: (1) When a forcible entry is
More informationThrough Mr. Atul Nigam, Mr. Amit Tiwari, Advs. versus
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE OA 92/2013 & IA Nos. 132/2013, 18787/2012, 218/2013, 1581/2013 in CS(OS) 3081/2012 Reserved on: 29th October, 2013 Decided on:
More information: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA CIRCUIT BENCH, AT DHARWAD BEFORE THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE H.N.NAGAMOHAN DAS. W.P. No /2012 (GM-CPC)
: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA CIRCUIT BENCH, AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 27 TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2012 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE H.N.NAGAMOHAN DAS BETWEEN: W.P. No. 71556-71559/2012 (GM-CPC) VYSHNAVI
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : PUBLIC PREMISES ACT. Reserved on: November 21, Pronounced on: December 05, 2011
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : PUBLIC PREMISES ACT Reserved on: November 21, 2011 Pronounced on: December 05, 2011 W.P.(C) No.3521/2008 AHUJA REFRIGERATION P.LTD. Through:... PETITIONER
More information.. IN HIGH COURT OF DELHI:AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. I.A. No /2006 in C.S.(OS) No.795/2004
.. IN HIGH COURT OF DELHI:AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE I.A. No. 11454/2006 in C.S.(OS) No.795/2004 Judgment Reserved on: 09.08.2011 Judgment Pronounced on: 02.11.2011 MADAN LAL KHANNA
More information* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. + OMP Nos. 495/2007, 496/2007 & 497/2007
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + OMP Nos. 495/2007, 496/2007 & 497/2007 % Reserved on: 7 th January, 2016 Pronounced on: 28 th January, 2016 + O.M.P. No. 495/2007 SHRI DHRUV VARMA... Petitioner
More informationCase No. CGRF(NZ)/91/2018
Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co. Ltd. s Consumer Grievance Redresses Forum Nagpur Zone, Nagpur Case No. CGRF(NZ)/91/2018 Applicant Non applicant : Shri Ramesh Krishnarao Pawar, Usuer Shri
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL No OF 2017 S.L.P.(c) No.27722/2017) (D.No.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No. 16850 OF 2017 (@ S.L.P.(c) No.27722/2017) (D.No.21033/2017) REPORTABLE Himangni Enterprises.Appellant(s) VERSUS Kamaljeet Singh
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. Civil Appeal No of 2019 (Arising out of SLP(C) No of 2018)
1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No. 3873 of 2019 (Arising out of SLP(C) No.32456 of 2018) Sevoke Properties Ltd. Appellant Versus West Bengal State
More informationTHE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : Delhi Rent Control Act R.C.REV.29/2012 Date of Decision: Versus
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : Delhi Rent Control Act R.C.REV.29/2012 Date of Decision: 17.08.2012 SMT. NARENDER KAUR Through: Mr. Adarsh Ganesh, Adv... Petitioner Versus MAHESH CHAND AND
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE A S BOPANNA
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 26 TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2014 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE A S BOPANNA WRIT PETITION No.44222/2013 (GM-PP) A/W WRIT PETITION No.37973/2013 (GM-PP)
More informationNOTICE OF SMALL CLAIM
NOTICE OF SMALL CLAIM PLAINTIFF(S) Name: HENRY CIRCUIT COURT NO. 3 Street: 1215 Race Street City, State, Zip: New Castle, IN 47362 Telephone No: (765) 521-2554 or 529-6401 Email Address: DEFENDANT(S) Name:
More informationEXECUTION PROCEEDINGS FEW POINTS ON LIMITATION TO REMEMBER. Auction Purchase under Order 21 rule 95 CPC
EXECUTION PROCEEDINGS FEW POINTS ON LIMITATION TO REMEMBER For delivery of possession by Court Auction Purchase under Order 21 rule 95 CPC For enforcement of a decree granting Mandatory Injunction under
More informationTAMIL NADU GOVERNMENT GAZETTE
[Regd. No. TN/CCN/467/2009-11. GOVERNMENT OF TAMIL NADU [R. Dis. No. 197/2009. 2009 [Price: Rs. 2.40 Paise. TAMIL NADU GOVERNMENT GAZETTE PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY No. 46] CHENNAI, WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 25,
More informationRule Appeal as Supersedeas.
Rule 1008. Appeal as Supersedeas. A. Receipt by the magisterial district judge of the copy of the notice of appeal from the judgment shall operate as supersedeas, except as provided in subdivisions B and
More informationRain Drops, Chennai. Signature of the bidder
KERALA TOURISM DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LIMITED Re - Notice Inviting Expression of Interest for Licensing of Space at Rain Drops, Chennai Kerala Tourism Development Corporation Ltd., invite Expression of
More informationSupreme Court of India. Prithvichand Ramchand Sablok vs S.Y.Shinde on 13 May, 1993
Supreme Court of India Equivalent citations: 1993 AIR 1929, 1993 SCR (3) 729 Author: Ahmadi Bench: Ahmadi, A.M. (J) PETITIONER: PRITHVICHAND RAMCHAND SABLOK Vs. RESPONDENT: S.Y.SHINDE DATE OF JUDGMENT13/05/1993
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT: SUIT FOR POSSESSION Reserved on: 17th July, 2012 Pronounced on 3rd August, 2012 W.P. (C) No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT: SUIT FOR POSSESSION Reserved on: 17th July, 2012 Pronounced on 3rd August, 2012 W.P. (C) No.865/2000 DIVINE UNITED ORGANISATION Petitioner Through: Mr.
More informationTHE GOA, DAMAN AND DIU BUILDINGS (LEASE, RENT AND EVICTION) CONTROL ACT, 1968
THE GOA, DAMAN AND DIU BUILDINGS (LEASE, RENT AND EVICTION) CONTROL ACT, 1968 1. The Goa, Daman and Diu Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 1968 (Act 2 of 1969) (dated 2-2-1969) published
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SUIT FOR POSSESSION. Date of Decision: W.P.(C) 7097/2010
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SUIT FOR POSSESSION Date of Decision: 10.02.2012 W.P.(C) 7097/2010 USHA KUMAR... Petitioner Through: Mr. A.B.Dial, Senior Advocate with Ms. Sumati Anand,
More informationAGREEMENT FOR AMENITIES
: 1 : AGREEMENT FOR AMENITIES THIS AGREEMENT FOR AMENITIES is made and entered into at Bhuj, Gujarat, this day of May, Two thousand and eight [.05.2008] BETWEEN, a company incorporated and registered under
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Date of Judgment: RSA No.46/2011
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Date of Judgment: 10.3.2011 RSA No.46/2011 VIRENDER KUMAR & ANR. Through: Mr.Atul Kumar, Advocate...Appellants Versus JASWANT RAI
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) WP(C) No. 3307/2005
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) WP(C) No. 3307/2005 Md. Intajur Rahman Laskar, S/o. Md. Siddique Ali Laskar, Vill- Banskandi Part-III, P.O.
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE ON THE 24 TH DAY OF MARCH, 2014 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR JUSTICE K L MANJUNATH AND THE HON BLE MR JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH Writ Petition No. 20807 of 2010 (S-KAT)
More informationDISTRICT OF COLUMBIA OFFICIAL CODE
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA OFFICIAL CODE TITLE 16. PARTICULAR ACTIONS, PROCEEDINGS AND MATTERS. CHAPTER 11. EJECTMENT AND OTHER REAL PROPERTY ACTIONS. 2001 Edition DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA OFFICIAL CODE CHAPTER
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W. P. (C) No of 2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W. P. (C) No. 7504 of 2013 M/s Narayani Fuels Private Limited through its Director, Dhanbad Petitioner Versus 1. Punjab National Bank through its Chairman, New
More informationSri. Alex Soharab. V.F, M/s. Southern Engineering Corporation, V/830-A, Development Area, Edayar, Muppathadom , Aluva.
1 CONSUMER GRIEVANCE REDRESSAL FORUM CENTRAL REGION (Formed under Section 42(5) of the Electricity Act 2003) 220 kv Substation Compound, HMTColony P.O. Kalamasery, Pin 683 503 Phone No. 0484-2556500 Website
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD Special Civil Application No of 2015 AUTOMARK INDUSTRIES (I) LTD Vs STATE OF GUJARAT AND 3 Harsha Deva
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD Special Civil Application No.13641 of 2015 AUTOMARK INDUSTRIES (I) LTD Vs STATE OF GUJARAT AND 3 Harsha Devani & A G Uraizee, JJ Appellants Rep by: Mr SN Soparkar,
More information* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. Date of Reserve: 24 th February, 2010 Date of Order: 19 th April, 2010 CM(M) No. 689/2003 %
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Reserve: 24 th February, 2010 Date of Order: 19 th April, 2010 CM(M) No. 689/2003 % 19.04.2010 Kedar Nath & Anr.... Petitioners Through: Mr. H.C.Sukhija,
More informationTAMIL NADU GOVERNMENT GAZETTE
[Regd. No. TN/CCN/467/2012-14 GOVERNMENT OF TAMIL NADU [R. Dis. No. 197/2009. 2018 [Price : Rs. 5.60 Paise. TAMIL NADU GOVERNMENT GAZETTE PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY No. 16] CHENNAI, WEDNESDAY, APRIL 18, 2018
More informationIn the High Court of Judicature at Madras
In the High Court of Judicature at Madras (Special Original Jurisdiction) W.P. No. of 2017 H. Navas Basha 24/21, Bharathidasan Street Nehru Nagar Velachery Chennai 600 042 vs 1. The Bar Council of India
More informationIN THE THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, STATE OF UTAH COUNTY OF TOOELE, TOOELE DEPARTMENT
Name Address City, State ZIP Telephone Plaintiff IN THE THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, STATE OF UTAH COUNTY OF TOOELE, TOOELE DEPARTMENT, vs. Plaintiff,, Case No.: Judge: Defendant(s). COMES NOW Plaintiff
More informationMaharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co. Ltd. s Consumer Grievance Redressal Forum Nagpur Urban Zone, Nagpur Case No.
Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co. Ltd. s Consumer Grievance Redressal Forum Nagpur Urban Zone, Nagpur Case No. CGRF(NUZ)/71/2014 Applicant Non applicant Quorum Present : M/s. Sanvijay Rolling
More informationTHE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL SOUTHERN ZONE, CHENNAI. M.A. No. 35 of 2013(SZ) in Appeal No. 31 of 2012
THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL SOUTHERN ZONE, CHENNAI Wednesday, the 6 th day of February 2013 M.A. No. 35 of 2013(SZ) in Appeal No. 31 of 2012 Quorum: 1. Hon ble Justice Shri M. Chockalingam (Judicial Member)
More informationLEAVE AND LICENCE AGREEMENT
1 LEAVE AND LICENCE AGREEMENT This agreement of Leave and License made at PUNE, this --------- BETWEEN MR. -----, residing at ------who is / are referred to hereinafter jointly /as THE LICENSOR ( which
More informationJ.S.C X Index No.: DLJ MORTGAGE CAPITAL, INC.
At an IAS Part of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, held in and for the County of Kings at the Supreme Court Building located thereof on the day of, 2015. P R E S E N T: J.S.C. ----------------------------------------------------------------------X
More informationTHE URBAN RENT CONTROL ACT (1948)
THE URBAN RENT CONTROL ACT (1948) [Repealed by the Urban Rent Control Act (1960)] Burma Act VI, 1948 10 January 1948 WHEREAS it is necessary to consolidate and attend the existing Urban Rent Control Act,
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN AND BEFORE THE HONOURABLE MADAME JUSTICE DEAN-ARMORER REASONS
TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Claim No. Cv. 2010-03934 BETWEEN RANDY CHARLES CLAIMANT AND MARION PHILLIPS DEFENDANT BEFORE THE HONOURABLE MADAME JUSTICE DEAN-ARMORER APPEARANCES Ms.
More informationBarnan Assoc., LLC v 25 Park at 1296 Third Ave., LLC 2018 NY Slip Op 33446(U) December 21, 2018 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number:
Barnan Assoc., LLC v 25 Park at 1296 Third Ave., LLC 2018 NY Slip Op 33446(U) December 21, 2018 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 152297/2015 Judge: Melissa A. Crane Cases posted with a "30000"
More informationMOBar CLE Residential Landlord/Tenant Law Part 2 Page 1 B--1
Prepared by Michael T. Carney, Mid-Missouri Legal Services, Corp. I. The Eviction Process a. Rent and Possession i. What is Rent and Possession 1. RSMO 535.101 a. Tenant fails to make a payment of rent
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI L. P. A. No. 511 of 2009
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI L. P. A. No. 511 of 2009 1.State of Bihar 2.Secretary, Home (Special) Department, Government of Bihar, Patna Appellants Versus 1.Ravindra Prasad Singh 2.State of
More informationThe Planning Authority (Levy of infrastructure and amenities charges) Rules, 2007.
DRAFT 1 The Planning Authority (Levy of infrastructure and amenities charges) Rules, 2007. In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (bb) of sub-section (2) of section 122 read with section 63-B of
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 02/17/ :37 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 23 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/17/2017
FILED NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 02/17/2017 0337 PM INDEX NO. 159897/2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 23 RECEIVED NYSCEF 02/17/2017 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK X M & E CHRISTOPHER LLC, Plaintiff,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS OF A. RAJAGOPALAN ETC...Appellant VERSUS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REPORTABLE CIVIL APPEAL NOS.251-256 OF 2015 A. RAJAGOPALAN ETC....Appellant VERSUS THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, THIRUCHIRAPALLI DISTRICT & ORS. & ETC....Respondents
More informationBEFORE THE UTTAR PRADESH ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION Quorum Shri Desh Deepak Verma, Chairman Shri I. B. Pandey, Member
BEFORE THE UTTAR PRADESH ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION Quorum Shri Desh Deepak Verma, Chairman Shri I. B. Pandey, Member In the matter of: Fixation of transmission tariff for 7.2 KM 400 KV dedicated
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA. M/s Raptakos, Brett & Co. Ltd... Appellant(s) J U D G M E N T. 1) The above appeal has been filed against the judgment
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 1464 OF 2008 M/s Raptakos, Brett & Co. Ltd.... Appellant(s) Versus M/s Ganesh Property... Respondent(s) J U D G M
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE PRESENT THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE N.KUMAR AND THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE B.V.PINTO
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE BETWEEN DATED THIS THE 28 TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2012 PRESENT THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE N.KUMAR AND THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE B.V.PINTO Writ Appeal No.597 of 2008
More informationAND WHEREAS the LICENSEE is in need of temporary accommodation for personal residential use only for 11 months period stated further in this Deed.
AGREEMENT FOR LEAVE AND LICENSE This Leave and License Agreement is made and executed at Pune on this 15 day of March 2017 1 MRS. OWNER NAME Age Adult., Occ.- Service, R/at F-401, Iris, Magarpatta city,
More informationBILL NO nd Session, 63rd General Assembly Nova Scotia 67 Elizabeth II, 2018
BILL NO. 38 Government Bill 2nd Session, 63rd General Assembly Nova Scotia 67 Elizabeth II, 2018 An Act to Amend Chapter 401 of the Revised Statutes, 1989, the Residential Tenancies Act CHAPTER 41 ACTS
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. SUBJECT : Companies Act. CS(OS) No. 1439/2008. Date of Decision: April 06, M/s Satya Narain Sharma-HUF.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : Companies Act CS(OS) No. 1439/2008 Date of Decision: April 06, 2009 M/s Satya Narain Sharma-HUF. Through:... Plaintiff Mr. Hemant Chaudhri, Advocate Versus
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI. W.P. (L) No of 2008
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI. W.P. (L) No. 4484 of 2008 Birendra Kumar Singh Petitioner -V e r s u s- Secretary, Foundary Forge Co-operative Society Ltd., Dhurwa, Ranchi CORAM: - HON BLE MR.
More information(i) THE TAMIL NADU HINDU RELIGIOUS AND CHARITABLE ENDOWMENTS ACT, 1959 (Tamil Nadu Act 22 to 1959) Arrangement of sections
(i) THE TAMIL NADU HINDU RELIGIOUS AND CHARITABLE ENDOWMENTS ACT, 1959 (Tamil Nadu Act 22 to 1959) Arrangement of sections SECTION CHAPTER I PRELIMINARY 1. Short title, extent, application and commencement
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO.6 WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.318 OF 2006.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO.6 IN WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.318 OF 2006 National Campaign Committee for Central Legislation on Construction Labour
More informationMOBar CLE Residential Landlord/Tenant Law Part 2 Page 1
Prepared by Michael T. Carney, Mid-Missouri Legal Services, Corp. I. The Eviction Process a. Rent and Possession i. What is Rent and Possession 1. RSMO 535.010 a. Tenant fails to make a payment of rent
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) PRINCIPAL SEAT AT GUWAHATI (CIVIL REVISIONAL JURISDICTION) CRP No. 329 of 2000 On the death of Rajmangal Dubey
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT. Case No: WP(C) 3845/2014
1 IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (The High Court of Assam, Nagaland, Mizoram and Arunachal Pradesh) Case No: WP(C) 3845/2014 Dr. (Capt.) Suchitra Kakoty, W/o Sri Lekhoke Kakoty, R/o House No. 18, Bye Lane No.1,
More informationSection 8 Possession Proceedings
Section 8 Possession Proceedings Miriam Seitler Landmark Chambers 5 th June 2018 1 Section 5, Housing Act 1988 (1) An assured tenancy cannot be brought to an end by the landlord except by (a) obtaining
More informationJUDGMENT. (Hon ble R. Sudhakar, J.)
2012 (Vol. 49)-258 [MADRAS HIGH COURT- MADURAI BENCH] Hon ble R. Sudhakar, J. W.P.(MD)No.5358 of 2011 and W.P.(MD)No.5359 of 2011 and M.P(MD)Nos.1 and 1 of 2011 Emerald Stone Export vs. Assistant Commissioner
More informationThe Uttar Pradesh Urban Planning and Development (Amendment) Bill, 2011 A Bill
The Uttar Pradesh Urban Planning and Development (Amendment) Bill, 2011 A Bill Page 1 of 21 Short Title Amendment of section- 2 of President's Act No.11 of 1973 as re-enacted and amended by U.P. Act 30
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 7843 OF 2009 CHAIRMAN, BOARD OF TRUSTEE, APPELLANT(s) SRI RAM MANDIR JAGTIAL KARIMNAGAR DISTRICT, A.P VERSUS S. RAJYALAXMI
More informationRATING ACT CHAPTER 267 LAWS OF KENYA
LAWS OF KENYA RATING ACT CHAPTER 267 Revised Edition 2012 [1986] Published by the National Council for Law Reporting with the Authority of the Attorney-General www.kenyalaw.org [Rev. 2012] CAP. 267 CHAPTER
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W. P. (C) No of 2015
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W. P. (C) No. 3336 of 2015 M/S CORPORATE ISPAT ALLOYS LIMITED, HAVING ITS UNIT AT TOTATALWADI, P.O. BURUDIH, DISTRICT SARAIKELA KHARSAWAN, JHARKHAND THROUGH ITS
More informationLANDLORD AND TENANT FORMS AND INSTRUCTIONS
LANDLORD AND TENANT FORMS AND INSTRUCTIONS The attached forms are designed for your use in the event of common landlord/tenant disputes. They should be used only for residential leases, if you have a commercial,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL No.5517 OF 2007
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.5517 OF 2007 Nadiminti Suryanarayan Murthy(Dead) through LRs..Appellant(s) VERSUS Kothurthi Krishna Bhaskara Rao &
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NOS OF State of Tamil Nadu.Appellant.
1 Non-Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NOS.423-424 OF 2018 State of Tamil Nadu.Appellant Versus S. Martin Etc.. Respondents J U D G M E N T Uday
More informationTHE TAMIL NADU LIFTS RULES, (G.o.Ms.No.173, Energy (B1), 3rd November 1997)
No.SRO.A/117(c)/97.- THE TAMIL NADU LIFTS RULES, 1997 (G.o.Ms.No.173, Energy (B1), 3rd November 1997) In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of Section 22 of the Tamil Nadu Lifts Act, 1997
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : GRATUITY. WP(C) No.19753/2004. Order reserved on : Date of Decision: August 21, 2006
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : GRATUITY WP(C) No.19753/2004 Order reserved on : 18.7.2006. Date of Decision: August 21, 2006 Delhi Transport Corporation through The Chairman I.P.Estate,
More information****THE SHERIFF S OFFICE MUST BE PAID BY CHECK OR MONEY ORDER. CASH IS NOT ACCEPTED.****
EVICTION CHECK LIST COMPLAINT - Fully Completed WRITTEN NOTICE WRITTEN LEASE (if one exists) NON-MILITARY AFFIDAVIT CONSENT TO CASE CLOSURE AFTER 90 DAYS OF INACTIVITY FILING FEE - CHECK OR MONEY PLUS
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. SUBJECT : Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act, 1995
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act, 1995 WP(C) No.14332/2004 Pronounced on : 14.03.2008 Sanjay Kumar Jha...
More informationCAMELOT ESTATES ASSOCIATION BY-LAWS. ARTICLE I Purpose
CAMELOT ESTATES ASSOCIATION BY-LAWS ARTICLE I Purpose Camelot Estates Association (hereinafter referred to as ("the Association") shall strive to fulfill the following purposes and objectives: To hold,
More informationORDINANCE NO R
ORDINANCE NO. 2006-38 R AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ESCONDIDO, CALIFORNIA ESTABLISHING PENALTIES FOR THE HARBORING OF ILLEGAL ALIENS IN THE CITY OF ESCONDIDO as follows: The City Council of the City of
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO OF 2019 MANTRI CASTLES PVT. LTD & ANR. WITH
1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA REPORTABLE CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 1232 OF 2019 R V PRASANNAKUMAAR & ORS. Appellant(s) VERSUS MANTRI CASTLES PVT. LTD & ANR. Respondent(s) WITH CIVIL
More informationFILING AN EVICTION SUIT IN JUSTICE COURT
Darrell G Longino Justice of the Peace, Precinct One Polk County Judicial Building 101 West Mill Street #152 Livingston, TX 77351 Telephone 9936) 327-6841 Fax: 9936) 327-6884 FILING AN EVICTION SUIT IN
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : TRAI ACT, 1997 WP(C) 617/2013 & CM No.1167/2013 (interim relief) DATE OF ORDER :
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : TRAI ACT, 1997 WP(C) 617/2013 & CM No.1167/2013 (interim relief) DATE OF ORDER : 13.03.2013 IDEA CELLULAR LIMITED & ANR....Petitioners Through: Mr. Maninder
More information* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % Judgment delivered on: Versus CORAM :- HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on: 15.10.2015 + RFA 563/2015 NITIN JAIN...APPELLANT Versus GEETA RAHEJA...RESPONDENT ADVOCATES WHO APPEARED IN THIS CASE: For the Appellant
More informationDate of CAV : Pronounced on 11/2/2014. appellants against the order dated passed by Learned
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Misc Appeal No. 224 of 2011 Abdul Hamid and others... Appellants State of Jharkhand and others Versus Respondents Coram : HON BLE MR. JUSTICE D.N.UPADHYAY For the
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : PUBLIC PREMISES (EVICTION OF UNAUTHORIZED OCCUPANTS) ACT, Date of decision: 8th February, 2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : PUBLIC PREMISES (EVICTION OF UNAUTHORIZED OCCUPANTS) ACT, 1971 Date of decision: 8th February, 2012 WP(C) NO.11374/2006 OCEAN PLASTICS & FIBRES (P) LIMITED
More information*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % Date of decision:1 st December, 2009 M/S ANSAL PROPERTIES & INFRASTRUCTURE. Versus
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CM(M) No.807/2008. % Date of decision:1 st December, 2009 M/S ANSAL PROPERTIES & INFRASTRUCTURE LTD & ANR. Petitioner Through: Mr Prem Kumar and Mr Sharad C.
More informationDISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS. No. 98-CV-1726 FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF CHICAGO, APPELLEE.
Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections
More information(27 November 1998 to date) ALIENATION OF LAND ACT 68 OF 1981
(27 November 1998 to date) [This is the current version and applies as from 27 November 1998, i.e. the date of commencement of the Alienation of Land Amendment Act 103 of 1998 to date] ALIENATION OF LAND
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INDIAN PARTNERSHIP ACT, Judgment Reserved on: Judgment Delivered on:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INDIAN PARTNERSHIP ACT, 1932 Judgment Reserved on: 10.02.2011 Judgment Delivered on: 14.02.2011 RSA No.39/2005 & CM No.1847/2005 SHRI NARAYAN SHAMNANI
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO.224 OF 2010
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 25 th DAY OF MARCH, 2013 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO.224 OF 2010 BETWEEN: SRI GANESH SHENOY, AGED ABOUT
More informationGovernment of Jammu and Kashmir General Administration Department (Services) Civil Secretariat, Srinagar
www.jkgad.nic.in Fax No. 0194-2473664 (S) 0191-2545702 (J) E-mail gad-jk@nic.in Government of Jammu and Kashmir General Administration Department (Services) Civil Secretariat, Srinagar Subject: SWP No.
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD. SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO of 2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 19743 of 2015 FOR APPROVAL AND SIGNATURE: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.V.ANJARIA ==========================================================
More informationALIENATION OF LAND ACT NO. 68 OF 1981
ALIENATION OF LAND ACT NO. 68 OF 1981 [View Regulation] [ASSENTED TO 28 AUGUST, 1981] DATE OF COMMENCEMENT: 19 OCTOBER, 1982] (except s. 26 on 6 December, 1983) (English text signed by the State President)
More informationCase No.06/2016 Date of Grievance : Date of Order :
1 06/2016 CONSUMER GRIEVANCE REDRESSAL FORUM M.S.E.D.C.L., PUNE ZONE, PUNE Case No.06/2016 Date of Grievance : 15.03.2016 Date of Order : 21.04.2016 In the matter of recovery of arrears in the event of
More information