Case 3:16-cv N Document 1 Filed 02/09/16 Page 1 of 11 PageID 1
|
|
- Griffin McBride
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Case 3:16-cv N Document 1 Filed 02/09/16 Page 1 of 11 PageID 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION NAUTILUS HYOSUNG INC., Plaintiff, v. DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND DIEBOLD SELF- SERVICE SYSTEMS, Civil Action No. 3:16-cv-364 Jury Trial Demanded Defendants. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT Plaintiff Nautilus Hyosung Inc. for their complaint allege as follows: THE PARTIES 1. Plaintiff Nautilus Hyosung Inc. ( NHS ) is a corporation organized under the laws of South Korea, having a principal place of business at 281 Gwangpyeong-ro, Gangnam-Gu, Seoul, South Korea. NHS is a global technology company that is a leader in the design, development, manufacture and support of a wide range of self-service banking solutions including ATMs and modules thereof. 2. On information and belief, Defendant Diebold, Incorporated is an Ohio corporation having a principal place of business at 5995 Mayfair Road, North Canton, OH According to its website ( Diebold, Incorporated offers a broad range of ATMs, ATM modules, and components thereof, including but not limited to the Enhanced Note Acceptor ("ENA") module, the ActivMedia module, the ActivRecycle module, the ActivCash module, and ATMs containing the same. On information and belief, Diebold ATMs incorporate OEM modules
2 Case 3:16-cv N Document 1 Filed 02/09/16 Page 2 of 11 PageID 2 manufactured by Wincor Nixdorf AG in Germany, including Cash/Check Deposit Module ( CCDM ). 3. On information and belief, Defendant Diebold Self-Service Systems is a New York general partnership having a principal place of business at 5995 Mayfair Road, North Canton, OH On information and belief, Diebold Self-Service System is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Diebold, Incorporated. JURISDICTION AND VENUE 4. This action arises under the patent laws of the United States, 35 U.S.C. 1 et seq., and thus this Court has subject matter jurisdiction over this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C and 1338(a). 5. This Court has personal jurisdiction over each Defendant for at least the following reasons: (i) each Defendant has committed acts of patent infringement and/or contributed to or induced acts of patent infringement by others in this District and continues to do so; (ii) each Defendant regularly does business or solicits business, engages in other persistent courses of conduct, and/or derives substantial revenue from products and/or services provided to individuals in this District and in this State; and (iii) each Defendant has purposefully established substantial, systematic and continuous contacts with this District and expects or should reasonably expect to be subjected to this Court s jurisdiction. 6. Venue is proper in this District under 28 U.S.C and 1400(b) because Defendants are subject to personal jurisdiction in this District and have committed acts of patent infringement in this District. Moreover, Nautilus Hyosung America Inc. ( NHA ) a wholly-owned subsidiary of Nautilus Hyosung Inc. has its principal place of business in this district. 2
3 Case 3:16-cv N Document 1 Filed 02/09/16 Page 3 of 11 PageID 3 GENERAL ALLEGATIONS 7. For more than thirty years since its founding in 1979, Nautilus Hyosung has been known as a total financial solutions provider in the market. In particular, it has designed, developed, manufactured and supported a wide range of self-service banking solutions, including automatic teller machines ( ATMs ) and modules and components thereof. Nautilus Hyosung retains numerous intellectual property rights covering hardware, software, and mechatronics technologies relating to financial automation solutions. 8. Among Nautilus Hyosung s innovative ATM technologies are enhanced deposit automation, efficient cash handling, and simplified paper media transport. Nautilus Hyosung s ATM modules that implement its enhanced deposit technology include, but are not limited to, the Cash and Check in Module ( CCiM ) that is capable of accepting cash and checks in a bundle together and the Bulk Note Acceptor ( BNA ) that allows for a deposit of bulk notes. Nautilus Hyosung s ATMs that implement its efficient cash handling technology include, but are not limited to, the Bill Recycling Machine ( BRM ) that is capable of reusing deposited cash for dispensing and the Cash Dispenser Unit ( CDM ) that is capable of dispensing cash for use. As a result of these innovations, Nautilus Hyosung s ATMs have enjoyed success in the global marketplace. 9. Plaintiff NHS owns all rights, titles, and interests in and to United States Patent Nos. 7,891,551 ( the 551 Patent ), 7,950,655 ( the 655 Patent ); 8,152,165 ( the 165 Patent ), and 8,523,235 ( the 235 Patent ) (collectively the Asserted Patents ). The 551, 655, 165, and 235 Patents are valid and enforceable. 10. The Asserted Patents relate generally to various aspects of an automated teller machine, and in particular are directed to features that improve the capability of detecting abnormal paper media, prevent user injuries while resolving a paper jam, enhance the deposit automation 3
4 Case 3:16-cv N Document 1 Filed 02/09/16 Page 4 of 11 PageID 4 experience for users and financial institutions, and/or simplify paper media transport. 11. Defendants directly infringe at least claims 1, 2, 3, and 5 of the 551 Patent; at least claims 1 and 6 of the 655 Patent; at least claims 1-4, 6, and 7 of the 165 Patent; and at least claims 1, 2, 3, 6, 8, and 9 of the 235 Patent (collectively the Asserted Claims ), by acting without authority to make, have made, use, offer to sell, sell within the United States, or import into the United States, Diebold s or Wincor Nixdorf s ATMs, ATM modules and components thereof, and products containing the same, including but not limited to Diebold s ActivMedia module, ActivCash module, ActivRecycle module, ENA module, other cash handling modules, and cassettes thereof, and Wincor Nixdorf s CCDM module, and Diebold s or Wincor Nixdorf s ATMs containing the same (collectively the Accused Products ). 12. Defendants also induce, and continue to induce, infringement of the Asserted Patents with the specific intent that these acts infringe the Asserted Patents. On information and belief, Defendants actively induce others to infringe one or more of the Asserted Claims through their sale of the Accused Products to customers in the United States. Defendants encourage and facilitate the infringement of the Asserted Patents by offering and distributing directions, demonstrations, guides, manuals, training for use, and other materials with the Accused Products that encourage the infringing use of the Accused Products. 13. Defendants induced such infringing acts and knew or should have known that their actions would induce actual infringement of the Asserted Patents. Upon information and belief, Defendants had actual notice of the Asserted Patents no later than February 9, 2016 when Nautilus Hyosung provided Defendants with copies of the Asserted Patents and provided claim charts for each of the Asserted Patents explaining how Defendants infringed and/or induced their customers and users to infringe the Asserted Patents. 4
5 Case 3:16-cv N Document 1 Filed 02/09/16 Page 5 of 11 PageID Defendants also contributorily infringe certain Asserted Claims through their sale and offers to sell within the United States and/or import into the United States components of the Accused Products, constituting a material part of the Asserted Claims, knowing the same to be especially made or especially adapted for use in an infringement of the Asserted Patent, and not a staple article or commodity of commerce suitable for substantial noninfringing use. For example, on information and belief, the Accused Products and/or components thereof are specifically designed for automated banking transactions such as a deposit or withdrawal of paper money. Due to their specific designs, the Accused Products and/or components thereof do not have any substantial noninfringing uses. 15. Defendants sell the Accused Products with the knowledge that the devices infringe. Upon information and belief, Defendants had actual notice of the Asserted Patents no later than February 9, 2016 when Nautilus Hyosung provided Respondents with copies of the Asserted Patents and provided claim charts for each of the Asserted Patents explaining how Defendants infringed and/or induced their customers and users to infringe the Asserted Patents. FIRST CLAIM FOR RELIEF Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,891, Plaintiff incorporates by reference the allegations set forth in paragraphs 1 through 16 above as if specifically set forth herein. 17. The 551 Patent is entitled Two-stage Lock Structure of Automatic Teller Machine and duly and legally issued on February 22, The 551 Patent issued from U.S. Patent Application Serial No. 11/747,522, filed May 11, The inventors of the 551 Patent are Jin Hwan Cha and Sung Chang Hur. A true and correct copy of the 551 Patent is attached to this Complaint as Exhibit A. 18. Plaintiff NHS is the owner, by valid assignment, of the entire right, title and interest 5
6 Case 3:16-cv N Document 1 Filed 02/09/16 Page 6 of 11 PageID 6 in and to the 551 Patent. This assignment is recorded at the United States Patent and Trademark Office at Reel/Frame /0588. The 551 Patent is valid, enforceable, and is currently in full force and effect. 19. Defendants have directly infringed at least claims 1, 2, 3, and 5 of the 551 Patent, literally and/or under the doctrine of equivalents, in violation of 35 U.S.C The infringing products include, but are not limited to, Diebold s ATMs including Opteva 720, Opteva 740, Opteva 750, Opteva 760, and other models containing Diebold s ENA module. The infringement remains ongoing. 20. In addition to its direct infringement, Defendants have been and are now indirectly infringing by way of inducing infringement and/or contributing to the infringement of one or more claims of the 551 Patent. 21. As a consequence of the Diebold Defendants infringement, Plaintiff is entitled to recover damages adequate to compensate it for the injuries complained of therein, but in no event less than a reasonable royalty. 22. On information and belief, Defendants infringement is willful, deliberate, and intentional because they have had actual and/or constructive knowledge of the 551 Patent before the filing of this Complaint, and they have no good faith belief in non-infringement. SECOND CLAIM FOR RELIEF Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,950, Plaintiff incorporates by reference the allegations set forth in paragraphs 1 through 16 above as if specifically set forth herein. 24. The 655 Patent is entitled Apparatus and Method for Controlling Various Kinds of Paper Media with Skew Sensing and duly and legally issued on May 31, The 655 Patent issued from U.S. Patent Application Serial No. 11/965,987, filed December 28, The inventors 6
7 Case 3:16-cv N Document 1 Filed 02/09/16 Page 7 of 11 PageID 7 of the 655 Patent are Chang Ho Park and Jin Yong Hwang. A true and correct copy of the 655 Patent is attached to this Complaint as Exhibit B. 25. Plaintiff NHS is the owner, by valid assignment, of the entire right, title and interest in and to the 655 Patent. This assignment is recorded at the United States Patent and Trademark Office at Reel/Frame /0299. The 655 Patent is valid, enforceable, and is currently in full force and effect. 26. Defendants have directly infringed at least claims 1 and 6 of the 655 Patent, literally and/or under the doctrine of equivalents, in violation of 35 U.S.C The infringing products include, but are not limited to, Diebold s or Wincor Nixdorf s ATMs including Diebold 3550, Diebold 3700, Diebold 7700, Diebold 7750, Diebold 7780, Diebold 7790, Diebold 9900, Opteva 328, Opteva 368, Opteva 378, Opteva 828, Opteva 868, and other models containing Diebold s ActivMedia module or ActivRecycle module, or Wincor Nixdorf s CCDM module, or other cash recycling modules. The infringement remains ongoing. 27. In addition to its direct infringement, Defendants have been and are now indirectly infringing by way of inducing infringement and/or contributing to the infringement of one or more claims of the 655 Patent. 28. As a consequence of Defendants infringement, Plaintiff is entitled to recover damages adequate to compensate it for the injuries complained of therein, but in no event less than a reasonable royalty. 29. On information and belief, Defendants infringement is willful, deliberate, and intentional because they have had actual and/or constructive knowledge of the 655 Patent before the filing of this Complaint, and they have no good faith belief in non-infringement. 7
8 Case 3:16-cv N Document 1 Filed 02/09/16 Page 8 of 11 PageID 8 THIRD CLAIM FOR RELIEF Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 8,152, Plaintiff incorporates by reference the allegations set forth in paragraphs 1 through 16 above as if specifically set forth herein. 31. The 165 Patent is entitled Apparatus for Transferring Paper Media and Automatic Teller Machine Having the Same and duly and legally issued on April 10, The 165 Patent issued from U.S. Patent Application Serial No. 12/747,879, filed on December 12, The inventors of the 165 Patent are Jin Hwan Cha, Won Joon Lee, Young Il Choi. A true and correct copy of the 165 Patent is attached to this Complaint as Exhibit C. 32. Plaintiff NHS is the owner, by valid assignment, of the entire right, title and interest in and to the 165 Patent. This assignment is recorded at the United States Patent and Trademark Office at Reel/Frame /0468. The 165 Patent is valid, enforceable, and is currently in full force and effect. 33. Defendants have directly infringed at least claims 1-4, 6, and 5 of the 165 Patent, literally and/or under the doctrine of equivalents, in violation of 35 U.S.C The infringing products include, but are not limited to, Diebold s ATMs including Diebold 2330, Diebold 3700, Diebold 9900, Opteva 328, Opteva 368, Opteva 378, Opteva 828, Opteva 868, and other models containing Diebold s ActivRecycle module, ActivCash module, or other cash handling modules. The infringement remains ongoing. 34. In addition to its direct infringement, Defendants have been and are now indirectly infringing by way of inducing infringement and/or contributing to the infringement of one or more claims of the 165 Patent. 35. As a consequence of Defendants infringement, Plaintiff is entitled to recover damages adequate to compensate it for the injuries complained of therein, but in no event less than a 8
9 Case 3:16-cv N Document 1 Filed 02/09/16 Page 9 of 11 PageID 9 reasonable royalty. 36. On information and belief, Defendants infringement is willful, deliberate, and intentional because they have had actual and/or constructive knowledge of the 165 Patent before the filing of this Complaint, and they have no good faith belief in non-infringement. FOURTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 8,523, Plaintiff incorporates by reference the allegations set forth in paragraphs 1 through 16 above as if specifically set forth herein. 38. The 235 Patent is entitled Cash and Cheque Automatic Depositing Apparatus and duly and legally issued on September 3, The 235 Patent issued from U.S. Patent Application Serial No. 11/588,357, filed on October 27, The inventors of the 235 Patent are Jae Hoon Kwak and Woo Ho Lee. A true and correct copy of the 235 Patent is attached to this Complaint as Exhibit D. 39. Plaintiff NHS is the owner, by valid assignment, of the entire right, title and interest in and to the 235 Patent. This assignment is recorded at the United States Patent and Trademark Office at Reel/Frame /0680. The 235 Patent is valid, enforceable, and is currently in full force and effect. 40. Defendants have directly infringed at least claims 1, 2, 3, 6, 8, and 9 of the 235 Patent, literally and/or under the doctrine of equivalents, in violation of 35 U.S.C The infringing products include, but are not limited to, Diebold s or Wincor Nixdorf s ATMs including Diebold 7700, Diebold 7750, Diebold 7780, Diebold 7790, Diebold 9900, and other models containing Diebold s ActivMedia module, Wincor Nixdorf s CCDM module, or other cash and check depositing modules. The infringement remains ongoing. 41. In addition to its direct infringement, Defendants have been and are now indirectly 9
10 Case 3:16-cv N Document 1 Filed 02/09/16 Page 10 of 11 PageID 10 infringing by way of inducing infringement and/or contributing to the infringement of one or more claims of the 235 Patent. 42. As a consequence of Defendants infringement, Plaintiff is entitled to recover damages adequate to compensate it for the injuries complained of therein, but in no event less than a reasonable royalty. 43. On information and belief, Defendants infringement is willful, deliberate, and intentional because they have had actual and/or constructive knowledge of the 235 Patent before the filing of this Complaint, and they have no good faith belief in non-infringement. PRAYER FOR RELIEF WHEREFORE, Plaintiff respectfully requests that this Court enter judgment in Plaintiff s favor against Defendants and issue an order that includes: A. Enter judgment that Defendants have infringed one or more claims of the 551, 655, 165, and 235 patents; B. Enter judgment that Defendants infringement of the patents-in-suit has been willful, deliberate, and intentional; C. Enter an order, pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 284, awarding to Plaintiff damages adequate to compensate for Defendants infringement of the Asserted Patents in an amount to be determined at trial, but not less than a reasonable royalty; D. Enter an order, pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 284, trebling damages awarded to Plaintiff to the extent Defendants infringement of the patents-in-suit is determined to have been willful; E. Enter an order, pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 285, deeming this to be an exceptional case and thereby awarding to Plaintiff its reasonable attorneys fees, costs, and expenses; 10
11 Case 3:16-cv N Document 1 Filed 02/09/16 Page 11 of 11 PageID 11 F. Enter an order that Defendants account for and pay to Plaintiff the damages to which Plaintiff is entitled as a consequence of the infringement, including any damages not covered by the jury verdict; G. Enter an order awarding to Plaintiff pre- and post-judgment interest at the maximum allowable rates allowable under the law; and H. A permanent injunction enjoining Defendants, their officers agents, servants, employees, attorneys, and those persons in active concert or participation with any of them, from infringing in any manner the patents-in-suit; I. Enter an order awarding to Plaintiff such other and further relief, whether at law or in equity, that this Court deems just and proper. JURY DEMAND Plaintiff hereby demands a trial by jury for all issues so triable. Dated: February 9, 2016 Respectfully submitted, By: /s/ Thomas H. Reger II Thomas H. Reger II Texas Bar No reger@fr.com Jane Du Texas Bar No du@fr.com FISH & RICHARDSON P.C Main Street, Suite 5000 Dallas, Texas Telephone: (214) Facsimile: (214) Attorneys for Plaintiff Nautilus Hyosung Inc. 11
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS VICTORIA DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS VICTORIA DIVISION MARK N. CHAFFIN Plaintiff, Civil Action No. v. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED MICHAEL R. BRADEN and LBC MANUFACTURING Defendants.
More informationCase 2:15-cv Document 1 Filed 05/29/15 Page 1 of 15 PageID #: 1
Case 2:15-cv-00898 Document 1 Filed 05/29/15 Page 1 of 15 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION AUTOMATION MIDDLEWARE SOLUTIONS, INC., v. Plaintiff,
More informationCase 6:17-cv Document 1 Filed 04/05/17 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1
Case 6:17-cv-00203 Document 1 Filed 04/05/17 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION FALL LINE PATENTS, LLC, Plaintiff, v. CINEMARK
More informationCase 6:15-cv Document 1 Filed 01/13/15 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION COMPLAINT
Case 6:15-cv-00042 Document 1 Filed 01/13/15 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION ADAPTIX, INC., Plaintiff, v. ERICSSON, INC., TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Plaintiff Case No.: 1:17-cv-6236 COMPLAINT
Case 1:17-cv-06236 Document 1 Filed 08/17/17 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK THE GREEN PET SHOP ENTERPRISES, LLC, Plaintiff Case No.: 1:17-cv-6236
More informationCase 1:16-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 04/19/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT
Case 1:16-cv-00275-UNA Document 1 Filed 04/19/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE Boston Scientific Corporation and Boston Scientific Scimed, Inc.,
More informationCase 4:16-cv Document 1 Filed 11/15/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1
Case 4:16-cv-00876 Document 1 Filed 11/15/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION WILLIAM R. RASSMAN, Plaintiff, v. NEOGRAFT SOLUTIONS,
More informationCOMPLAINT. Plaintiff, The Green Pet Shop Enterprises, LLC ( Green Pet Shop or. Plaintiff ), by and through its attorneys, THE RANDO LAW FIRM P.C.
Case 1:18-cv-04526 Document 1 Filed 08/09/18 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1 Attorneys for Plaintiff: THE RANDO LAW FIRM P.C. 6800 Jericho Turnpike Suite 120W Syosset, NY 11791 (516) 799-9800 CARLSON, GASKEY
More informationCase 3:16-cv Document 1 Filed 12/26/16 Page 1 of 6
Case :-cv-0 Document Filed // Page of 0 Kris LeFan, Esq., SBN kris@lowelaw.com LOWE & ASSOCIATES, P.C. 00 Olympic Blvd., Suite 0 Los Angeles, CA 00 Telephone: (0) - Facsimile: (0) - Hao Ni (pro hac vice
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE. Plaintiff, Civil Action No. COMPLAINT
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE BEACON NAVIGATION GMBH, v. Plaintiff, Civil Action No. HYUNDAI MOTOR COMPANY; HYUNDAI MOTOR AMERICA; AND HYUNDAI MOTOR MANUFACTURING ALABAMA,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK COMPLAINT
Case 1:14-cv-08423-GBD Document 2 Filed 10/22/14 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Marshall Feature Recognition, LLC Plaintiff, V. Terra Holdings, LLC, 14-civ-8423
More informationCase 2:18-cv Document 1 Filed 05/09/18 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1
Case 2:18-cv-00198 Document 1 Filed 05/09/18 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION SEMCON IP INC., Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL KORS
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TEXARKANA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT
Case 5:07-cv-00156-DF-CMC Document 1-1 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TEXARKANA DIVISION ESN, LLC, v. Plaintiff, CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.,
More informationCase 6:15-cv Document 1 Filed 04/06/15 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1
Case 6:15-cv-00380 Document 1 Filed 04/06/15 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1 POWER REGENERATION, LLC, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION v. Plaintiff, SIEMENS
More informationCase 2:15-cv Document 1 Filed 04/14/15 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION
Case 2:15-cv-00503 Document 1 Filed 04/14/15 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1 INTUITIVE BUILDING CONTROLS, INC., IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION Plaintiff, Case
More informationCase 1:14-cv Document 1 Filed 02/18/14 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION
Case 1:14-cv-00149 Document 1 Filed 02/18/14 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION CROSSROADS SYSTEMS, INC., Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:14-cv-00149
More informationCase 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 12/05/16 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1
Case 2:16-cv-01358 Document 1 Filed 12/05/16 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1 AXCESS INTERNATIONAL, INC., IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION v. Plaintiff, DUAL
More informationCase 1:99-mc Document 417 Filed 05/23/12 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
Case 1:99-mc-09999 Document 417 Filed 05/23/12 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 26760 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE FLASHPOINT TECHNOLOGY, INC., CIVIL ACTION NO. Plaintiff, v.
More informationCase 1:17-cv LY Document 1 Filed 03/17/17 Page 1 of 22 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
Case 1:17-cv-00242-LY Document 1 Filed 03/17/17 Page 1 of 22 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS Synergy Drone, LLC, Civil Action No. 1:17-cv-00242 v. Plaintiff, The Honorable
More informationCase 2:13-cv RAJ Document 1 Filed 08/30/10 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION
Case 2:13-cv-00157-RAJ Document 1 Filed 08/30/10 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION TRITON TECH OF TEXAS, LLC, v. Plaintiff, NINTENDO OF
More informationCase 3:17-cv AJB-KSC Document 1 Filed 05/23/17 PageID.1 Page 1 of 8
Case :-cv-00-ajb-ksc Document Filed 0// PageID. Page of 0 DAVID M. BECKWITH (CSB NO. 0) davidbeckwith@sandiegoiplaw.com TREVOR Q. CODDINGTON, PH.D. (CSB NO. 0) trevorcoddington@sandiegoiplaw.com JAMES
More informationCase 1:16-cv JMS-MJD Document 1 Filed 01/26/16 Page 1 of 15 PageID #: 1
Case 1:16-cv-00215-JMS-MJD Document 1 Filed 01/26/16 Page 1 of 15 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION CUMMINS LTD. and CUMMINS INC. vs. Plaintiffs
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
Case 2:13-cv-01106-UNAS-AKK Document 1 Filed 06/12/13 Page 1 of 152 FILED 2013 Jun-12 PM 02:40 U.S. DISTRICT COURT N.D. OF ALABAMA IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION ORIGINAL COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION LakeSouth Holdings, LLC, Plaintiff, v. Ace Hardware Corporation, Defendant. Civil Action No. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED ORIGINAL
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION. Civil Action No: HON. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT
2:14-cv-10207-SFC-LJM Doc # 1 Filed 01/16/14 Pg 1 of 7 Pg ID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION RGIS, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company, Plaintiff, vs.
More informationCase 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 03/04/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1
Case 1:16-cv-00065 Document 1 Filed 03/04/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS BEAUMONT DIVISION PRAXAIR, INC., PRAXAIR TECHNOLOGY, INC. Plaintiffs,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION ILIFE TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Plaintiff, v. NINTENDO OF AMERICA, INC., Defendant. Civil Action No. 3:13-cv-4987 Jury Trial Demanded PLAINTIFF
More informationCase 1:11-cv REB Document 1 Filed 12/15/11 Page 1 of 5
Case 1:11-cv-00636-REB Document 1 Filed 12/15/11 Page 1 of 5 Lane M. Chitwood, ISB No. 8577 lchitwood@parsonsbehle.com Peter M. Midgley, ISB No. 6913 pmidgley@parsonsbehle.com John N. Zarian, ISB No. 7390
More informationCase 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 12/09/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1
Case 2:16-cv-01388 Document 1 Filed 12/09/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION MICOBA LLC Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. v. JURY
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT
Case 1:99-mc-09999 Document 186 Filed 04/29/11 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 17113 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE AUGME TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Plaintiff, Civil Action No. v. PANDORA MEDIA,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS BEIJING CHOICE ELECTRONIC TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD., v. Plaintiff, CONTEC MEDICAL SYSTEMS USA INC. and CONTEC MEDICAL SYSTEMS CO., LTD.,
More informationCase 2:15-cv Document 1 Filed 04/14/15 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION
Case 2:15-cv-00501 Document 1 Filed 04/14/15 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1 INTUITIVE BUILDING CONTROLS, INC., IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION Plaintiff, Case No.
More informationCase5:14-cv PSG Document1 Filed10/10/14 Page1 of 10. Attorneys for Plaintiff ENPHASE ENERGY, INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Case:-cv-0-PSG Document Filed0/0/ Page of 0 0 DANIEL JOHNSON, JR. (State Bar No. 0) MICHAEL J. LYONS (State Bar No. 0) DION M. BREGMAN (State Bar No. 0) Palo Alto Square 000 El Camino Real, Suite 00 Palo
More informationCase: 1:17-cv Doc #: 1 Filed: 11/15/17 1 of 12. PageID #: 1
Case: 1:17-cv-02403 Doc #: 1 Filed: 11/15/17 1 of 12. PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION ETi SOLID STATE LIGHTING, INC., ) CASE NO. 1:17-cv-2403
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case :-cv-00 Document Filed 0// Page of 0 Page ID #: 0 Randall J. Sunshine (SBN ) rsunshine@linerlaw.com Ryan E. Hatch (SBN ) rhatch@linerlaw.com Jason L. Haas (SBN 0) jhaas@linerlaw.com LINER LLP 00 Glendon
More informationCase 1:16-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 10/20/16 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
Case 1:16-cv-00975-UNA Document 1 Filed 10/20/16 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1 GODO KAISHA IP BRIDGE 1, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE Plaintiff, Case No. v. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
More informationCase 2:18-cv JRG Document 1 Filed 04/24/18 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 1
Case 2:18-cv-00167-JRG Document 1 Filed 04/24/18 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION MARINER IC INC., v. Plaintiff, HUAWEI DEVICE
More informationCase 1:10-cv CMH -TRJ Document 1 Filed 09/08/10 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
Case 1:10-cv-01007-CMH -TRJ Document 1 Filed 09/08/10 Page 1 of 9 'ILED IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION 01 COMMUNIQUE LABORATORY, INC. ) Cvf^
More informationCase 1:10-cv GMS Document 1-3 Filed 06/21/10 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 71 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
Case 1:10-cv-00544-GMS Document 1-3 Filed 06/21/10 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 71 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE APPLE INC., vs. Plaintiff, High Tech Computer Corp., a/k/a
More informationCase 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 11/30/18 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1
Case 1:18-cv-00608 Document 1 Filed 11/30/18 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS BEAUMONT DIVISION DRONE LABS LLC ) Plaintiffs, ) ) CASE NO. v.
More informationCase 9:16-cv RLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/15/2016 Page 1 of 6
Case 9:16-cv-80588-RLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/15/2016 Page 1 of 6 SHIPPING and TRANSIT, LLC, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA vs. Plaintiff, STATE
More informationCase 2:14-cv Document 1 Filed 10/10/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION
Case 2:14-cv-00945 Document 1 Filed 10/10/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION TRAXXAS LP v. Plaintiff, HOBBY PRODUCTS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
More informationCase 2:15-cv Document 1 Filed 03/11/15 Page 1 of 52
Case 2:15-cv-00366 Document 1 Filed 03/11/15 Page 1 of 52 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 INTELLICHECK MOBILISA, INC., a Delaware
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION. Plaintiffs, Defendants. COMPLAINT
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION BAXTER INTERNATIONAL INC., BAXTER HEALTHCARE CORPORATION, AND BAXTER HEALTHCARE S.A, v. Plaintiffs, JOHNSON &
More informationCase 2:18-cv JRG Document 1 Filed 05/09/18 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1
Case 2:18-cv-00193-JRG Document 1 Filed 05/09/18 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION SEMCON IP INC., Plaintiff, v. ASUSTEK COMPUTER
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION
Case 6:10-cv-00068-LED Document 1 Filed 02/27/2010 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION SONIX TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD v. Plaintiff, VTECH ELECTRONICS NORTH AMERICA,
More informationCase 6:18-cv ADA Document 26 Filed 01/11/19 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS WACO DIVISION
Case 6:18-cv-00055-ADA Document 26 Filed 01/11/19 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS WACO DIVISION RETROLED COMPONENTS, LLC, Plaintiff, v. PRINCIPAL LIGHTING
More informationCase 2:14-cv JRG Document 1 Filed 09/12/14 Page 1 of 14 PageID #: 1 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) JURY TRIAL DEMANDED COMPLAINT
Case 2:14-cv-00892-JRG Document 1 Filed 09/12/14 Page 1 of 14 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION INDUSTRIAL PRINT TECHNOLOGIES LLC, a Texas
More informationCase 1:18-cv YK Document 1 Filed 06/07/18 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Case 1:18-cv-01161-YK Document 1 Filed 06/07/18 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA TECHNICAL LED INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, LLC., Plaintiff, Civil Action
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION RIDDELL, INC., v. Plaintiff, RAWLINGS SPORTING GOODS COMPANY, INC., Defendant. Civil Action No.: Jury Trial Demanded
More informationCase 5:16-cv Document 1 Filed 11/07/16 Page 1 of 7
Case :-cv-0 Document Filed /0/ Page of 0 0 MARK W. GOOD (Bar No. 0) TERRA LAW LLP 0 W. San Fernando St., # San Jose, California Telephone: 0--00 Facsimile: 0-- Email: mgood@terra-law.com JONATHAN T. SUDER
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. Case No. 3:13-cv N
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION EMPLOYMENT LAW COMPLIANCE, INC., Plaintiff, vs. Case No. 3:13-cv-04197-N EMPOWER SOFTWARE SOFTWARE Jury Trial Demanded
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION INTEX RECREATION CORP.,
Case :-cv-0 Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0 FAEGRE BAKER DANIELS LLP Tarifa B. Laddon (SBN 0) 0 S. Bundy Dr., Suite Los Angeles, CA 00 Telephone: 0-00- Fax: 0-00- Tarifa.laddon@faegrebd.com R.
More informationCase 8:17-cv EAK-JSS Document 114 Filed 07/30/18 Page 1 of 11 PageID 2433 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION
Case 8:17-cv-01346-EAK-JSS Document 114 Filed 07/30/18 Page 1 of 11 PageID 2433 STEVEN J. KANIADAKIS Plaintiff, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION v. Case No: 8:17-cv-1346-T-17-JSS
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION POWERLINE INNOVATIONS, LLC, Plaintiff, v. (1) ELK PRODUCTS, INC.; (2) HOME AUTOMATION INC.; (3) HOMESEER TECHNOLOGIES,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY. Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. v. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT
Vincent E. McGeary Gibbons P.C. One Gateway Center Newark, New Jersey 07102-5310 Phone: 973-596-4500 Fax: 973-596-0545 Of Counsel: Michael W. Shore Alfonso Garcia Chan Patrick J. Conroy Justin Kimble Ari
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. Plaintiff, Case No: COMPLAINT
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION INNOVATIONS LLC Plaintiff, Case No: vs. PATENT CASE MICHAEL S STORES, INC., Defendant. COMPLAINT
More informationCase 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 12/09/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1
Case 2:16-cv-01392 Document 1 Filed 12/09/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION MICOBA LLC Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. v. JURY
More informationCase 1:11-cv LPS Document 14 Filed 01/30/12 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 59 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
Case 1:11-cv-00916-LPS Document 14 Filed 01/30/12 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 59 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF DELAWARE Digital CBT, LLC Plaintiff, C.A. No. 11-cv-00916 (LPS) v. Southwestern Bell
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION. Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:15-cv-50
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION WETRO LAN LLC, v. Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:15-cv-50 D-LINK SYSTEMS, INCORPORATED, Defendant. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
More informationCase 1:14-cv JEI-KMW Document 1 Filed 09/23/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Case 1:14-cv-05919-JEI-KMW Document 1 Filed 09/23/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID: 1 Lawrence C. Hersh Attorney at Law 17 Sylvan Street Suite 102B Rutherford, New Jersey 07070 Telephone: (201)507-6300 Fax: (201)507-6311
More informationCase 2:14-cv JRG-RSP Document 9 Filed 08/08/14 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 227
Case 2:14-cv-00799-JRG-RSP Document 9 Filed 08/08/14 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 227 ECLIPSE IP LLC, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION Plaintiff, v. LUXI
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION
Case 6:10-cv-00302-LED Document 1 Filed 06/17/10 Page 1 of 19 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION LANDMARK TECHNOLOGY, LLC, Plaintiff, v. BLOCKBUSTER INC.,
More informationCase 2:14-cv Document 1 Filed 03/11/14 Page 1 of 15 PageID #: 1
Case 2:14-cv-00208 Document 1 Filed 03/11/14 Page 1 of 15 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION CPUMATE INC. and GOLDEN SUN NEWS TECHNIQUES
More informationCase 2:15-cv JRG Document 1 Filed 07/08/15 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1
Case 2:15-cv-01240-JRG Document 1 Filed 07/08/15 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1 TURN IP LLC, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION v. Plaintiff, Civil Action
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION PETER SAVENOK, PAUL SAVENOK AND ) SERGEY SAVENOK, ) ) COMPLAINT FOR PLAINTIFFS, ) PATENT INFRINGMENT ) VS. ) CIVIL
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION CHARLES C. FREENY III, BRYAN E. FREENY, and JAMES P. FREENY, Plaintiffs, Case No. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED v. HTC AMERICA,
More informationCase 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 04/25/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1
Case 2:16-cv-00436 Document 1 Filed 04/25/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION MARINER IC INC., v. Plaintiff, TOSHIBA CORPORATION,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION HIGH QUALITY PRINTING ) INVENTIONS, LLC, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) Civil Action No. v. ) ) JURY TRIAL DEMANDED PRINTOGRAPH,
More informationCase 1:16-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 12/08/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
Case 1:16-cv-01159-UNA Document 1 Filed 12/08/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE BLACKBIRD TECH LLC d/b/a BLACKBIRD TECHNOLOGIES, v. Plaintiff,
More informationCase 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed 10/26/17 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1
Case 2:17-cv-00713 Document 1 Filed 10/26/17 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION VERASEAL LLC, v. Plaintiff, COSTCO WHOLESALE
More informationCase: 1:16-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 11/15/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #:1
Case: 1:16-cv-10629 Document #: 1 Filed: 11/15/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #:1 Gaelco S.A., a Spanish Corporation, and IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case :-cv-0 Document Filed 0/0/ Page of Page ID #: Ronald P. Oines (State Bar No. 0) roines@rutan.com Benjamin C. Deming (State Bar No. ) bdeming@rutan.com RUTAN & TUCKER, LLP Anton Boulevard, Fourteenth
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT
Aloft Media LLC v. Yahoo!, Inc. et al Doc. 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION ALOFT MEDIA, LLC, v. Plaintiff, YAHOO!, INC., AT&T, INC., and AOL LLC,
More informationCourthouse News Service
-\ IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA PICTURE PATENTS, LLC, ) ) \.L Plaintiff, ) ) Civil Case No. j.'o&cv o?&>4' MONUMENT REALTY LLC, ) JURY TRIAL DEMANDED ) Defendant.
More informationCase 6:14-cv JDL Document 1 Filed 01/21/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1
Case 6:14-cv-00035-JDL Document 1 Filed 01/21/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION PROPERTY DISCLOSURE TECHNOLOGIES LLC, v. Plaintiff,
More informationCase 3:13-cv M Document 60 Filed 12/19/14 Page 1 of 20 PageID 1778
Case 3:13-cv-04987-M Document 60 Filed 12/19/14 Page 1 of 20 PageID 1778 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION ILIFE TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Plaintiff, v. NINTENDO
More informationCase 6:14-cv JDL Document 1 Filed 01/15/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1
Case 6:14-cv-00018-JDL Document 1 Filed 01/15/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION PROPERTY DISCLOSURE TECHNOLOGIES LLC, v. Plaintiff,
More informationTHE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION Case No: 5:11-cv ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION Case No: 5:11-cv-00296 VEOLIA WATER SOLUTIONS & TECHNOLOGIES SUPPORT, v. Plaintiff, SIEMENS INDUSTRY, INC.,
More informationCase 2:16-cv JRG-RSP Document 1 Filed 10/19/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
Case 2:16-cv-01186-JRG-RSP Document 1 Filed 10/19/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SPIN MASTER, LTD., Plaintiff, v. HELLODISCOUNTSTORE.COM,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Case :-cv-0 Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0 JAMES C. YOON, State Bar jyoon@wsgr.com ALBERT SHIH, State Bar ashih@wsgr.com WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI Professional Corporation 0 Page Mill Road
More informationCase: 5:09-cv DDD Doc #: 1 Filed: 06/04/09 1 of 5. PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
Case: 5:09-cv-01274-DDD Doc #: 1 Filed: 06/04/09 1 of 5. PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION PDS ELECTRONICS, INC. d/b/a DX Engineering CASE NO.: 5:09 cv
More informationTHE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION Case No: 5:15-cv-590 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION Case No: 5:15-cv-590 VEOLIA WATER SOLUTIONS & TECHNOLOGIES SUPPORT, v. Plaintiff, WESTECH ENGINEERING, INC.,
More informationCase 2:13-cv RJS Document 2 Filed 03/06/13 Page 1 of 16
Case 2:13-cv-00166-RJS Document 2 Filed 03/06/13 Page 1 of 16 TERRENCE J. EDWARDS (Utah State Bar No. 9166 TECHLAW VENTURES, PLLC 3290 West Mayflower Way Lehi, Utah 84043 Telephone: (801 805-3684 Facsimile:
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION Advanced Processor Technologies LLC Plaintiff, v. Marvell Semiconductor, Inc. Defendant. Civil Action No. 2:12-cv-155
More informationCase 2:16-cv JRG-RSP Document 44 Filed 06/15/17 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 457
Case 2:16-cv-01096-JRG-RSP Document 44 Filed 06/15/17 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 457 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION JOE ANDREW SALAZAR, Plaintiff, vs.
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION
Case 1:18-cv-05640-SCJ Document 1 Filed 12/11/18 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION TECHNICAL LED INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, LLC, a Delaware limited liability
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION. Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. v. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH INSTITUTE, Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. v. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED LG CORPORATION, LG ELECTRONICS,
More informationFILED 2015 Mar-25 PM 03:41 U.S. DISTRICT COURT N.D. OF ALABAMA
Case 2:15-cv-00489-KOB Document 1 Filed 03/25/15 Page 1 of 15 FILED 2015 Mar-25 PM 03:41 U.S. DISTRICT COURT N.D. OF ALABAMA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION
More informationCase 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed 01/12/17 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1
Case 2:17-cv-00038 Document 1 Filed 01/12/17 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION SOMALTUS LLC, Plaintiff, Case No: vs. PATENT
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE APPLE INC., vs. Plaintiff, High Tech Computer Corp., a/k/a HTC Corp., HTC (B.V.I. Corp., HTC America, Inc., Exedea, Inc., Defendants. CA
More informationCase 1:07-cv MRB Document 6 Filed 11/06/2007 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Case 1:07-cv-00852-MRB Document 6 Filed 11/06/2007 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION ESCORT, INC., Plaintiff, V. COBRA ELECTRONICS CORPORATION,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN GREEN BAY DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN GREEN BAY DIVISION ORION ENERGY SYSTEMS, INC. v. Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 16-cv-1250 JURY TRIAL DEMANDED ENERGY BANK, INC.,
More informationCase 2:13-cv JRG Document 18 Filed 01/06/14 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 105
Case 2:13-cv-00750-JRG Document 18 Filed 01/06/14 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 105 Babbage Holdings, LLC, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISON Plaintiff, v. Activision
More informationCase 1:13-cv GMS Document 23 Filed 03/12/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 117 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
Case 1:13-cv-01883-GMS Document 23 Filed 03/12/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 117 MESSAGE NOTIFICATION TECHNOLOGIES LLC, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE Plaintiff, C.A. No. 13-1883-GMS
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION T-REX PROPERTY AB, Plaintiff, v. CBS Corporation, Defendant. CIVIL ACTION NO. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL
More informationPLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT. Plaintiff Newthink, LLC ( Plaintiff ), by and through its undersigned counsel, files this
1 PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT Plaintiff Newthink, LLC ( Plaintiff ), by and through its undersigned counsel, files this Original Complaint against Defendant Viewsonic Corporation ( Defendant or Viewsonic
More informationPlaintiff Privacy Pop, LLC ( Plaintiff ) complains and alleges as follows against Defendant Gimme Gimme, LLC ( Defendant ).
0 0 Robert J. Lauson (,) bob@lauson.com Edwin P. Tarver, (0,) edwin@lauson.com LAUSON & TARVER LLP 0 Apollo St., Suite. 0 El Segundo, CA 0 Tel. (0) -0 Fax (0) -0 Attorneys for Plaintiff Privacy Pop, LLC
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION HITACHI CONSUMER ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Case No. ) TOP VICTORY ELECTRONICS (TAIWAN)
More informationCase 2:17-cv JRG Document 1 Filed 04/13/17 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 1
Case 2:17-cv-00308-JRG Document 1 Filed 04/13/17 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION DOCUMENT SECURITY SYSTEMS, INC., v. Plaintiff,
More information