( -9. N~kfl082 1OCKETED ONCM. 1 Todd G. Friedland (SBN PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHA 2 PITTMAN LLP 650 Town Center Drive, 7

Transcription

1 Case 8:O5~cv-OO159~CJ~ N jjocurnent 41 FUed OSIO3~O5 Fage I of 7 6 Attoijneys for Plaintiff SHARP CORPORATION ~ 1 j~s~ii?~o:td1continued on nextpagej ~t c~. ~ Ct I~-I~ 7 th ~t t~ 14 SHARP CORPORATION, a/k/a 3 15 SHARP KABUSHIKI KAISHA, ) 3 16 Plaintiff, vs. ) AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION, AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION AMERICA, VIEWSONIC CORPORATION, BENO INC., BENQ) AMERICA CORPORATION, ENVISION PERIPHERALS INC. ) (d/b/a AOC MONITORS, PROVIEW) TECHNOLOGY INC., SCEPTRE TECHNOLOGIES INC., CTX TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION, PRINCETON DIGITAL (USA) CORPORATION and SHUTTLE COMPUTER GROUP INC., ) 25 3 Defendants. 1 Todd G. Friedland (SBN 70 PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHA 2 PITTMAN LLP 650 Town Center Drive, 7 th Floor 3 Costa Mesa, CA (714) (714) Facsimile todd. friedland~pillsbury1aw.com UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - SOUTHERN DIVISION Case No. SACV CJC STIPULATION TO STAY ACTION PENDING PERFORMANCE OF SETTLEMENT TERMS; FPROPOSED] ORDER THEREON Date: Time: Crtmt: Judge: None set None set 9-B Cormac J. Carriey Trial Date: Not set 1OCKETED ONCM BY ( -9 e 4 N~kfl082 vh9xoi! (4) STIPULATION TO STAY ACTION PENDING PERFORMANCE OF SE1TLEMENT TERMS; [PROPOSED] ORDER WON

2 Case 8:O5~cv-OOl59~CJC~AN Document 41 FUed O8IO3P~OO5 Fage 2 of? 1 Adam R. Hess* George M. Sirilla* 2 Kevin T. Kramer* PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW 3 PITTMAN LLP 1600 Tysons Boulevard 4 McLean, Virginia 2 (703) (703) Facsimile adam.hess(~pi1lsburylaw.com 6 gcorge.siril71a~pi11sburylaw.corn kevrn.kramer~pillsburylaw.corn Fusac Nara* 8 PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLP Broadway New York, NY (2) (2) Facsimile 11 tusae.nara~pi1lsbury1aw.com Updeep S. GilPc Joseph S. Presta* NIXON VANDERHY~,P.C. 901 N. Glebe Road, 11 Floor 14 Arlington, VA 3 (703) (703~8i6-4100Facsimile usg(q~nixonvan.com 16 jsp~nixonvan.com Attorneys for Plaintiff SHARP CORPORATION * admitted pro hac vice by order TerryD. GarnettISBN 15) Vincent K. Yip (SBN 0655) Peter J. Wied (SBN 8475) Maxwell A. Fox (SBN 0016) Sang N. Dang (SBN 4558) PAUL, HASTINGS, JANOFSKY & WALKER LLP 515 South Flower Street Twenty-fifth Floor Los Angeles, CA (3) 6g (3) Facsimile Attorneys for Defendants AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION, AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION AMERICA, VIEWSONIC CORPORATION, BENO INC., BENQ AMERICA CORPORATION, ENVISION PERIPHERALS INC. (cl/b/a AOC MONITORS) PROVIEW TECHNOLOGY INC., SdEPTRE TECHNOLOGIES INC. ACER INC., ACER AMERICA CORPORATION Michael Hurey (SBN 9550) Patrick Avakian (SBN 01) KLEINBERG & LERNER, LLP 49 Century Park East, Suite 1080 Los Angeles, CA (310) (310) Facsimile mhurey~k1einberglerner.corn pavakian~kleinberlerner.corn Attorneys for Defendant PRINCETON DIGITAL (USA) CORPORATION vh9xol! (2) STIPULATION TO STAY ACTION PENDING PERFORMANCE OF SEITLEMENT TERMS; fproposeoj ORDER THEREON

3 Case 8:05~cv-00159~CJC~N Document 41 FUed 08I03~ 05 Fage 3 of 7 1 WHEREAS, Plaintiff Sharp Electronics Corporation and Defendants AU 2 Optronics Corporation, AU Optronies Corporation America, Acer Inc., Acer 3 America Corporation, BenQ Inc., BenQ America, Envision Peripherals Inc. 4 (cl/b/a AOC Monitors), Proview Technology Inc., Sceptre Technologies Inc., and 5 ViewSonic Corporation (collectively referred to herein as the Northern District 6 Defendants ), are currently engaged in litigation in the matter entitled Sharp 7 Corporation v. A U Optronics Corporation, et at (Case No: C ), pending 8 in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California ( the 9 Northern District action ); 10 WHEREAS, the Northern District Defendants responses to the First 11 Amended Complaint in this action are due on or before August, 05; WHEREAS, defendant Princeton Digital (USA) Corporation s ( Princeton ) response to the First Amended Complaint is due on or before 14 August,05; 15 WHEREAS, Defendants CTX Technology Corporation and Shuttle 16 Computer Group Inc. have yet to make an appearance in this action or seek an extension on their now overdue response date; WHEREAS, a settlement has been reached in the Northern District action, which, if performed, will result in dismissal of this action; WI-IEREAS, Plaintiff Sharp Electronics Corporation and the Northern District Defendants and Princeton (collectively the Stipulating Defendants ) desire to stay or continue proceedings in this action pending performance of a term of the settlement in the Northern District action, which is expected to occur 24 by September, 05; 25 WHEREAS, the parties desire an opportunity to resolve this matter in advance of further litigation including discovery, as well as potential law and motion practice related to the First Amended Complaint, and desire to avoid such further litigation costs; vi-i9xoii(2) - 1 STIPULATION TO STAYACTION PENDING PERFORMANCE OF SETtLEMENTTERMS; [PROPOSEDJ ORDER THEREON

4 Case 3:05-cv CJ 1 N Document 41 FUed Fage 4 of 7 1 WHEREAS, the parties desire to STAY the present action until Monday, 2 Septernber 15, 05, which would be just after performance of the term of 3 settlement in the Northern District action, which should result in dismissal of this 4 action, 5 NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by 6 and between the parties, that: 7 1. This action be STAYED to September 15, 05; 8 2. In the event this action is not dismissed, responses to the First 9 Amended Complaint by the Stipulating Defendants shall be filed on or before 10 October 1, 05, and 11 /1, / /1/ /1/ /// IL vh9xqi! (2) STiPULATION TO STAY ACTION PENDING PERFORMANCE OF SETtLEMENTTERMS; [PROPOSEDJ ORDER THEREON

5 7 PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PTTTMAN LLP 8 Adam R. J.Iess* George M. Sirilla t 9 Kevin T. Kramert Fusae Nara* 10 Todd 0. Friedland 11 NIXON VANDERHYE,P.C. Updeep S. Gitl ~ Joseph S. Prcsta* By: 14,{/To~ff([Fri ãhd idtomccs for Plaintiff SHARP 15 CORPORATION 16 Case 8:05-cv CJ -AN Document 41 FUed 08/03 ~005 Fage 5 of The Court continue its issuance of a Scheduling Order from 2 August, 05 to October 15, 05, and thereby also continue the early 3 meeting of counsel obligations among the parties. 4 IT IS SO STIPULA~1ED. 5 6 Dated: July, 05 * admitted pro hoc vice by order 24 IT IS SO 0R1)ERED. PAUL, HASTINGS JANOFSKY & WALKER U1~ Terry D. Garnett Vincent K. Yip Peterj. Wied Sang N. Dang By: Maxwell AFox Attorneys for Defendants AU OPIRONICS CORPORATION, At) OPTRONICS CORPORATION AMERICA. VIEWSONIC CORPORATION, I3ENQ INC., BENQ AMERICA CORPORATION, ENVISION PERIPHERALS INC. (dfb/a AOC MONITORS), PROVIEW TECHNOLOGY INC., SCEPTRE TECUNOLOGIES 1NC., ACER INC., ACER AMERICA CORPORATION KLEINBERG & LERNER, LLP Michael Hurey Patrick Avakian MicI1~e1Hurey Attorneys for Defendant PRINCETON DIGITAL (USA) CORPORATION Dated: 4 ysi ~Z~5 ORMACJ. CARNEY U.S. DIS4 RICT COUy JUDGE N_V1RGINIIA_305496v3 STIPULATION TO STAYACTION PENDING PERFORMANCE OF SETtLEMENT TERMS; (PROPOSEDJ ORDER THEREON

6 Case 8:05-cv ~CJaN Doc~ent41 FUed 08/03~05 Fage 6 1 PROOF OF SERVICE 2 I, Yuri Nomiyama, the undersigned, hereby state as follows: 3 1. I am employed in the County of Orange, State of California I am over the age of years and am not a party to the within proceedings My business address is 650 Town Center Drive, 7th Floor, Costa Mesa, 6 California On July 29, 05, I served the following: STIPULATION TO STAY 8 ACTION PENDING PERFORMANCE OF SETTLEMENT TERMS; 9 [FROPOSED1 ORDER THEREON on the interested parties in this 10 action by placing {J the original [X] a true copy thereof, enclosed in sealed 11 envelopes addressed as follows: {X} BY MAIL: I am familiar with my employer s mail collection and 24 processing practices; know that said mail is collected and deposited with 25 the United States Postal Service on the same day it is deposited in interoffice mail; and know that postage thereon is ftilly prepaid. lerryl). (iarnett{sbn 15) Vincent K. Yip ($BN 0655) Peter J. Wied (SBN 8475) Maxwell A. Fox {SBN 0016) Sang N. Dang (SBN 4558) PAUL, HASTINGS, JANOFSKY & WALKER LLP 515 South Flower Street Twenty-fifth Floor Los Angeles, CA Attorneys for Defendants AU OPTRGNICS CORPORATION, AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION AMERICA, VIEWS ONIC CORPORATION, BENQ INC., BENQ AMERICA CORPORATION ENVISION PERIPHERALS INC. (dlbla AOC MONITORS), PROVIEW TECHNOLOGY INC., SCEPTRE TECHNOLOGIES INC., ACER INC., ACER AMERICA CORPORAT1ON Michael Hurey (SUN i39550) Attorneys for L)etendant Patrick Avakian (SBN 01) PRINCETON DIGITAL (USA) KLEINBERG & LERNER, LLP CORPORATION 49 Century Park East, Suite 1080 Los Angeles. CA vh9xoi (S) STIPULATION TO STAY ACTiON PENDING PERFORMANCE OF SETtLEMENTTERMS; [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON

7 Case 8:05-cv CJ 1 N Document 41 FUed 08/03105 Fag; 7 of 1 I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws ofthe United States of 2 America that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed this 29 th day of July, 3 05, at Costa Mesa, California. A Yuri Nomlyama vh9xoi! (5)