Alternatives To Section 524(g)
|
|
- Scot Watson
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 MEALEY S TM LITIGATION REPORT Asbestos Alternatives To Section 524(g) by Philip Bentley and David Blabey Jr. Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP New York, NY A commentary article reprinted from the January 18, 2012 issue of Mealey s Litigation Report: Asbestos
2
3 MEALEY S LITIGATION REPORT: Asbestos Vol. 26, #24 January 18, 2012 Commentary Alternatives To Section 524(g) By Philip Bentley and David Blabey Jr. [Editor s Note: Philip Bentley is a partner and David Blabey is an associate at the law firm of Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP. The authors represented the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Motors Liquidation Company (f/k/a General Motors Corp.) in the contested estimation of General Motors aggregate asbestos liabilities as part of its chapter 11 bankruptcy. The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the members of the General Motors Creditors Committee. Copyright # 2012 by Philip Bentley and David Blabey Jr. Responses are welcome.] The decision to file for bankruptcy is never an easy one. But to companies considering a chapter 11 filing to address their asbestos liabilities, there is often a powerful deterrent not present in other contexts: the looming specter of section 524(g) of the Bankruptcy Code. That section has been commonly understood to confer on asbestos personal injury claimants an effective veto over any plan of reorganization they do not approve. However, it may not in fact be the case that every asbestos debtor need comply with the strict requirements of section 524(g). Section 524(g) permits the district court to issue an injunction typically known as a channeling injunction protecting a reorganized debtor from future asbestos claims by channeling those claims into a specially designated trust created as part of the debtor s plan of reorganization. The section was added to the Bankruptcy Code as part of the Bankruptcy Reform Act of 1994, and was intended to codify the use of this type of trust-and-injunction mechanism in the chapter 11 cases of In re Johns-Manville Corp. 1 The Manville court had accomplished this result through use of the general equitable powers accorded to bankruptcy courts under Bankruptcy Code section 105(a). 2 The subsequent insolvency of the Manville trust, however, had led certain parties to question the lawfulness of the section 105(a) channeling injunction, and in particular whether the Manville court s actions satisfied the constitutional due process rights of so-called future claimants that is, claimants who had been exposed to the debtor s asbestos, but who at the time of the debtor s bankruptcy case had not yet become sick. In view of this history, one of the principal motives behind the codification of a Manville-type channeling injunction was the preservation of future claimants due process protections. 3 Thus, for instance, section 524(g) provides for the designation of a futures representative acting on behalf of these future claimants, and requires the court issuing the channeling injunction to determine that the injunction is fair and equitable to future claimants. 4 In addition, the section requires that 75% of existing claimants voting on a plan of reorganization vote in favor of the plan before it may be confirmed. 5 Following the implementation of section 524(g), it has been widely assumed that that section provides the only permissible basis for managing a debtor s future asbestos liabilities. This assumption derives fromthegeneralrulethat,whereacodesection addresses a specific issue, a court may not use its catch-all equitable authority to circumvent that 1
4 Vol. 26, #24 January 18, 2012 MEALEY S LITIGATION REPORT: Asbestos section. 6 In Combustion Engineering, the Third Circuit Court of Appeals applied this general rule in the specific context of section 524(g), holding that because section 524(g) contained specific requirements for the extension of a channeling injunction to include third parties liability, and because the specific requirements had not been met in that case, the bankruptcy court could not use its general equitable powers to further extend the injunction to third parties in ways not contemplated by section 524(g). 7 The view that section 524(g) is the only basis for managing a debtor s future asbestos liabilities, however, may be misplaced. The origin of the provision, after all, lies in the Manville court s use of its general equitable powers under section 105(a) of the Bankruptcy Code, a use that was never overruled by any court. Even more importantly, the statute enacting section 524(g) expressly stated that the section should not be construed to modify, impair, or supersede any other authority the court has to issue injunctions in connection with an order confirming a plan of reorganization. 8 The House Report contains similar language, 9 and goes on to say that Congress in enacting the section expresses no opinion as to how much authority a bankruptcy court may generally have under its traditional equitable powers to issue an enforceable injunction of this kind. 10 Combustion Engineering, moreover, is distinguishable. The decision addressed only the narrow question of whether a court could use section 105(a) of the Bankruptcy Code to extend the protection of a channeling injunction to a non-debtor. 11 In answering that question in the negative, the Third Circuit was motivated, at least in part, by the inequity of permitting a nondebtor to secure the benefits of bankruptcy without enduring its rigors. 12 At least as important, the Court of Appeals observed that the proposed channeling injunction might jeopardize the rights of future claimants of the non-debtor parties by depriving them of important section 524(g) protections; for example, no separate futures representative had been appointed to act for future claimants of the non-debtors, even though the interests of those future claimants were not necessarily aligned with those of future Combustion Engineering asbestos claimants. 13 Finally, the Third Circuit found it significant that there was a specific Bankruptcy Code provision section 524(e) that imposed a general prohibition on the discharge of debts of non-debtors, subject only to the limited exceptions described in section 524(g)(4)(A)(ii), which exceptions were not broad enough to include the non-debtors whose liability was at issue in Combustion Engineering. 14 In sum, while it is widely assumed that compliance with 524(g) is a prerequisite to the approval of any trust established for the payment of future asbestos claims in bankruptcy, this assumption is not necessarily supported by Combustion Engineering or by any other precedent. The continued vitality of section 105(a) as a basis for the issuance of channeling injunctions diverting future liability away from a reorganized debtor and into a designated trust is perhaps most apparent in the growing number of cases that have addressed debtors silica liability over the past decade. In these cases, courts have used their section 105(a) powers to issue channeling injunctions that are functionally identical to those authorized under 524(g), with the only apparent difference being the toxic substance in question. The Third Circuit recently endorsed the looser requirements of 105(a) in one such silica case, for example, holding that: For the Plan to be approved as designed (i.e., with the inclusion of the Silica Injunction), the debtors needed to show that the Plan s resolution of silica-related claims is necessary or appropriate under 11 U.S.C. 105(a), which, under our precedent, requires showing with specificity that the Silica Injunction is both necessary to the reorganization and fair. In re Global Indus. Techs., 645 F.3d 201, 206 (3d Cir. 2011). As the silica cases show, 105(a) remains a viable and practical basis for the creation of trust-and-channeling mechanisms and the preservation of future claimants rights in mass-tort cases. It may therefore not be implausible particularly outside of the Third Circuit for a court to appoint a futures representative, allow for the creation of a dedicated asbestos trust, and issue an injunction channeling future claims to that trust using section 105(a) rather than section 524(g). It is worth noting, finally, that an asbestos debtor has certain practical options for addressing its asbestos 2
5 MEALEY S LITIGATION REPORT: Asbestos Vol. 26, #24 January 18, 2012 liabilities that avoid section 524(g) entirely. A debtor could, for example, confirm a plan addressing its past, but not its future, asbestos liabilities thereby obviating the need for section 524(g). (The debtor would need to show an ability to satisfy future asbestos liabilities outside of bankruptcy, a showing that may be increasingly viable as the aggregate amount of asbestos liability decreases over time.) The details of these and other practical alternatives are beyond the scope of this article. Together with the discussion of section 524(g), above, however, these alternatives suggest that an asbestos debtor s options in chapter 11 may not be as circumscribed as is commonly believed. Endnotes 1. See H.R. Rep. No (1994); 140 Cong. Rec. H10765 (daily ed. October 4, 1994). 2. In spite of Congress s apparent enthusiasm for the Manville injunction, the Manville trust went insolvent within two years of its first distribution to claimants. As Judge Weinstein of the Eastern District of New York explained in a 1991 opinion relating to the insolvency, within its first two years of operation the Trust faced almost 50% more claims than the highest projection made at the time of confirmation for the total number of claims to be filed during the entire life of the Trust. In re Joint Eastern and Southern District Asbestos Litigation, No , 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7527, at *89-90 (E.D.N.Y. May 16, 1991) (emphasis added). Ultimately, the reorganized Manville Corporation reached a settlement with claimants wherein it agreed to provide the trust with, among other things, as much as $580 million in new financing over the first seven years after the settlement went effective. Id. at * See, e.g., In re Combustion Eng g, Inc., 391 F.3d 190, 234 n. 45 (3d Cir. 2004) (noting that many of the requirements of section 524(g) are specifically tailored to protect the due process rights of future claimants ); see also H.R. Rep. No (1994); 140 Cong. Rec. H10765 (daily ed. October 4, 1994) (noting that the section sought to meet the same kind of high standards with respect to regard for the rights of claimants, present and future, as displayed in the two pioneering cases ) U.S.C. 524(g)(4)(B)(i), 524(g)(4)(B)(ii) U.S.C. 524(g)(2)(B)(ii)(IV)(bb). 6. See Norwest Bank Worthington v. Ahlers, 485 U.S. 197, 206 (U.S. 1988) ( [W]hatever equitable powers remain in the bankruptcy courts must and can only be exercised within the confines of the Bankruptcy Code. ). 7. SeeInreCombustionEng g,inc., 391 F.3d 190, 236 (3d Cir. 2004) (noting that the general powers of 105(a)cannotbeusedtoachievearesult not contemplated by the more specific provisions of 524(g) ). 8. Bankruptcy Reform Act of 1994, Pub L. No , 111(b), 108 Stat. 4106, 4117 (1994) (codified at 11 U.S.C. 524(g)). 9. H.R. Rep. No (1994); 140 Cong. Rec. H10765 (daily ed. October 4, 1994) (noting that the statute is not intended to alter any authority bankruptcy courts may already have to issue injunctions in connection with a plan or reorganization ). 10. Id. 11. Combustion Eng g, 391 F.3d at 234 ( Based on the facts here, we do not believe that 105(a) can be employed to extend a channeling injunction to nondebtors in an asbestos case where the requirements of 524(g) are not otherwise met. ) Id. at Id. at Id. at 237 n. 48. n 3
6
7
8 MEALEY S LITIGATION REPORT: ASBESTOS edited by Bryan Redding The Report is produced twice monthly by 1600 John F. Kennedy Blvd., Suite 1655, Philadelphia, PA 19103, USA Telephone: (215) MEALEYS ( ) mealeyinfo@lexisnexis.com Web site: ISSN
After Stolt-Nielsen, Circuits Split, But AAA Filings Continue
MEALEY S TM International Arbitration Report After Stolt-Nielsen, Circuits Split, But AAA Filings Continue by Gregory A. Litt Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP New York Tina Praprotnik Duke Law
More informationChallenging the Validity and Enforceability of Arbitral Awards is a Risky Endeavor: US Courts Warn That Parties and Counsel Risk Costs and Sanctions
MEALEY S TM International Arbitration Report Challenging the Validity and Enforceability of Arbitral Awards is a Risky Endeavor: US Courts Warn That Parties and Counsel Risk Costs and Sanctions by Elliot
More informationAvailability of Relief for Non-Debtor Entities and Non-Asbestos-Related Liabilities Under the Bankruptcy Code
Availability of Relief for Non-Debtor Entities and Non-Asbestos-Related Liabilities Under the Bankruptcy Code Jeffrey N. Rich Eric T. Moser * * The authors are attorneys in the New York office of Kirkpatrick
More informationEnglish Court Removes Arbitrator For Lack Of Impartiality, Points Out His Tone And Intemperate Language
MEALEY S TM International Arbitration Report English Court Removes Arbitrator For Lack Of Impartiality, Points Out His Tone And Intemperate Language by Elliot E. Polebaum and Helene Gogadze Fried, Frank,
More informationThe Vanishing Right To Federal Jurisdiction In Bad Faith Claims In Florida
MEALEY S TM LITIGATION REPORT Insurance Bad Faith The Vanishing Right To Federal Jurisdiction In Bad Faith Claims In Florida by Julius F. Rick Parker III Butler Pappas Weihmuller Katz Craig LLP A commentary
More informationMEALEY S 1 LITIGATION REPORT ERISA. A commentary article reprinted from the February 2018 issue of Mealey s Litigation Report: ERISA. by Ian S.
MEALEY S 1 LITIGATION REPORT ERISA To Fee, Or Not To Fee. That Is The Question: In Certain Cases, Arbitrating ERISA Benefits Cases May Enable Plan Fiduciaries To Avoid Paying Plaintiffs Attorney s Fees
More informationSingapore Court Should Not Have Set Aside ICC Award Enforcing Dispute Adjudication Board Decision
MEALEY S TM International Arbitration Report Singapore Court Should Not Have Set Aside ICC Award Enforcing Dispute Adjudication Board Decision by Chris Seppälä White & Case LLP Paris A commentary article
More informationIn re Chateaugay Corp.: An Analysis of the Interaction Between the Bankruptcy Code and CERCLA
Brigham Young University Journal of Public Law Volume 6 Issue 2 Article 12 5-1-1992 In re Chateaugay Corp.: An Analysis of the Interaction Between the Bankruptcy Code and CERCLA Thomas L. Stockard Follow
More informationMEALEY S 1 International Arbitration Report. A commentary article reprinted from the February 2017 issue of Mealey s International Arbitration Report
MEALEY S 1 International Arbitration Report Extraordinary Becomes The Ordinary? Commisa Decision Urges Caution In Selecting Seat Of Arbitration As It Indicates Willingness By U.S. Courts To Enforce Arbitral
More informationLITIGATION REPORT. Wall Of Confusion: GEICO General Insurance. Company v. Bottini And Its Ill-Begotten Progeny
MEALEY S TM LITIGATION REPORT Insurance Bad Faith Wall Of Confusion: GEICO General Insurance Company v. Bottini And Its Ill-Begotten Progeny by Julius F. Rick Parker III Butler Pappas Weihmuller Katz Craig
More information11 USC 361. NB: This unofficial compilation of the U.S. Code is current as of Jan. 4, 2012 (see
TITLE 11 - BANKRUPTCY CHAPTER 3 - CASE ADMINISTRATION SUBCHAPTER IV - ADMINISTRATIVE POWERS 361. Adequate protection When adequate protection is required under section 362, 363, or 364 of this title of
More informationQuarella SpA v Scelta Marble Australia Pty Ltd [2012] SGHC 166
MEALEY S TM International Arbitration Report Quarella SpA v Scelta Marble Australia Pty Ltd [2012] SGHC 166 by Andrew Battisson and Sunil Mawkin Allen & Overy LLP Singapore A commentary article reprinted
More information) In re: ) Case No (SMB) ) Chapter 11 QUIGLEY COMPANY, INC. ) ) Dist. Ct. Civil Action No. ) 1:06-cv (KMW) Debtor.
Mark D. Plevin (MP-5788) Leslie A. Epley (LE-5825) Kelly R. Cusick (KC-7965) CROWELL & MORING LLP 1001 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20004 (202) 624-2500 Paul G. Burns (PB-0269) LEVIN & GLASSER,
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT PENNY D. GOUDELOCK, v. SIXTY-01 ASSOCIATION OF APARTMENT OWNERS, Appellant, Appellee. No. 16-35384 D.C. No. 2:15-cv-01413- MJP OPINION
More informationApplication of the Automatic Stay to a Non-Debtor Corporation Joanna Matuza, J.D. Candidate 2017
Application c Stay to a Non-Debtor of the Automatic Corporation Stay to a Non-Debtor Corporation 2016 Volume VIII No. 20 Application of the Automatic Stay to a Non-Debtor Corporation Joanna Matuza, J.D.
More informationClass Actions. Clemens v. DaimlerChrysler The Ninth Circuit Addresses A New Twist In The Law Of Cross-Jurisdictional Tolling
MEALEY S LITIGATION REPORT Class Actions Clemens v. DaimlerChrysler The Ninth Circuit Addresses A New Twist In The Law Of Cross-Jurisdictional Tolling by John P. Phillips and Sean D. Unger Paul, Hastings,
More informationNo. 08"295 IN THE. THE TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY, TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY and TRAVELERS PROPERTY CASUALTY CORP.
No. 08"295 IN THE Supreme Couct, U.S. FILED NOV 7 OFFICE OF THE CLERK THE TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY, TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY and TRAVELERS PROPERTY CASUALTY CORP., Petitioners, PEARLIE
More informationMOTION OF THE OFFICIAL COMMITTEE OF UNSECURED CREDITORS FOR AN ORDER ESTABLISHING PROCEDURES FOR COMPLIANCE WITH 11 U.S.C.
KRAMER LEVIN NAFTALIS & FRANKEL LLP 1177 Avenue of the Americas New York, New York 10036 Telephone: (212) 715-3275 Facsimile: (212) 715-8000 Thomas Moers Mayer Kenneth H. Eckstein Robert T. Schmidt Adam
More informationThe Need for Sneed: A Loophole in the Armed Career Criminal Act
Boston College Law Review Volume 52 Issue 6 Volume 52 E. Supp.: Annual Survey of Federal En Banc and Other Significant Cases Article 15 4-1-2011 The Need for Sneed: A Loophole in the Armed Career Criminal
More informationCommentary. By Jeremy Walton and Anna Gilbert
MEALEY S TM International Arbitration Report The Remedy For Non-payment Of A Contractual Debt: Arbitration Or Winding Up? Conflicting Approaches Taken By The Courts Of The UK, Cayman Islands And The BVI
More informationscc Doc 908 Filed 10/05/12 Entered 10/05/12 15:30:16 Main Document Pg 1 of 8
Pg 1 of 8 Post-Hearing Brief Deadline: October 5, 2012 at 4:00 p.m. (prevailing Eastern Time) KRAMER LEVIN NAFTALIS & FRANKEL LLP Thomas Moers Mayer Adam C. Rogoff P. Bradley O Neill 1177 Avenue of the
More informationCase 1:18-cv RGA Document 52 Filed 06/25/18 Page 1 of 24 PageID #: 6854 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRCT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
Case 1:18-cv-00381-RGA Document 52 Filed 06/25/18 Page 1 of 24 PageID #: 6854 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRCT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE IN RE: ) Civil Action No. 18-00381 (RGA) ) ENERGY FUTURE HOLDING
More informationBAPCPA s Exception to the Absolute Priority Rule for Individual Chapter 11 Debtors
BAPCPA s Exception to the Absolute Priority Rule for Individual Chapter 11 Debtors Christina Kormylo, J.D. Candidate 2010 INTRODUCTION Under the absolute priority rule of 11 U.S.C. 1129(b)(2)(B)(ii), a
More information_._..._------_._ _.._... _..._..._}(
Case 1:12-cv-02626-KBF Document 20 Filed 11/05/12 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ---------------------------.---------------_..._.-..---------------_.}( SDM' DOCUMENT
More informationBRIEF FOR RESPONDENT CHUBB INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY
Nos. 08-295 & 08-307 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States THE TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY, et al., Petitioners, -and- COMMON LAW SETTLEMENT COUNSEL, v. Petitioners, PEARLIE BAILEY, et al., Respondents.
More informationcgm Doc 38 Filed 03/02/15 Entered 03/02/15 16:23:27 Main Document Pg 1 of 9
Pg 1 of 9 FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK --------------------------------------------------------------X : Chapter 13 In re: : : Case No. 14-36831 (CGM) John
More informationEXPERT ANALYSIS High Court Rules Final, Nonconsensual Structured Dismissals Invalid
Westlaw Journal BANKRUPTCY Litigation News and Analysis Legislation Regulation Expert Commentary VOLUME 13, ISSUE 25 / APRIL 20, 2017 EXPERT ANALYSIS High Court Rules Final, Nonconsensual Structured Dismissals
More informationBankruptcy Code, 11 U.S.C.. language applies to the other safe harbor contracts.
The Current State of the Bankruptcy Code Safe Harbor Protections for Financial Contracts By Richard Levin, Partner & Restructuring Practice Chair, Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP The Bankruptcy Code specially
More informationDIRECTORS AND OFFICERS LIABILITY BANKRUPTCY STAYS OF LITIGATION AGAINST NON-DEBTORS JUNE 12, 2003 JOSEPH M. MCLAUGHLIN S IMPSON THACHER & BARTLETT LLP
DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS LIABILITY BANKRUPTCY STAYS OF LITIGATION AGAINST NON-DEBTORS JOSEPH M. MCLAUGHLIN SIMPSON THACHER & BARTLETT LLP JUNE 12, 2003 Most courts have held the insured versus insured exclusion
More information6 Distribution Of The Estate
6 Distribution Of The Estate 6.01 WHAT IS A CLAIM? Whether something is a claim has two important consequences in a bankruptcy case. First, distribution of the assets of the estate is made only to holders
More informationFollow this and additional works at:
2005 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 12-29-2005 In Re: Armstrong Precedential or Non-Precedential: Precedential Docket No. 05-1881 Follow this and additional
More informationTreading Murky Waters: The Third Circuit's Search for When a Claim Arises in In re Grossman's, Inc.
Boston College Law Review Volume 52 Issue 6 Volume 52 E. Supp.: Annual Survey of Federal En Banc and Other Significant Cases Article 4 4-1-2011 Treading Murky Waters: The Third Circuit's Search for When
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Case 1:05-cv-00725-JMS-LEK Document 32 Filed 08/07/2006 Page 1 of 22 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII In re: HAWAIIAN AIRLINES, INC., a Hawaii corporation, Debtor. ROBERT
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN RE: OTIS W. TERRY, JR. : CIVIL ACTION : NO. 14-6195 : : CIVIL ACTION : NO. 15-0913 : : (BANKRUPTCY NO. 13-14780) MEMORANDUM
More informationmg Doc 5847 Filed 11/18/13 Entered 11/18/13 19:33:43 Main Document Pg 1 of 10
Pg 1 of 10 MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 1290 Avenue of the Americas New York, New York 10104 Telephone: (212 468-8000 Facsimile: (212 468-7900 Gary S. Lee Norman S. Rosenbaum Jordan A. Wishnew Counsel for the
More informationEnvironmental Law - In Re Jensen: Determining When a Bankruptcy Claim Arises in the Context of Environmental Liability
Golden Gate University Law Review Volume 23 Issue 1 Ninth Circuit Survey Article 17 January 1993 Environmental Law - In Re Jensen: Determining When a Bankruptcy Claim Arises in the Context of Environmental
More information~n the ~upreme Court o[ t-be ~tniteb ~tates
Suprcm~ Com t, U.S. FILED No. 10-232 OFFICE OF THE CLERK ~n the ~upreme Court o[ t-be ~tniteb ~tates THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON AND THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON CORPORATION, Petitioners, FREDERICK J. GREDE,
More informationmew Doc 3268 Filed 12/14/16 Entered 12/14/16 09:28:23 Main Document Pg 1 of 15
Pg 1 of 15 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK : In re: : Chapter 11 : TRONOX INCORPORATED, et al., : Case No. 09-10156 (MEW) : Jointly Administered Reorganized Debtors. : : MEMORANDUM
More informationUpon consideration of (i) the applications 1 seeking allowance of interim
HEARING DATE AND TIME: October 26, 2010 at 9:45 a.m. (Eastern Time) Harvey R. Miller Stephen Karotkin Joseph H. Smolinsky WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP 767 Fifth Avenue New York, New York 10153 Telephone:
More informationWhen are Debtors and Creditors Bound to the Provisions of Confirmed Reorganization Plans? Gabriella Labita, J.D. Candidate 2018
When are Debtors and Creditors Bound to the Provisions of Confirmed Reorganization Plans? 2017 Volume IX No. 13 When are Debtors and Creditors Bound to the Provisions of Confirmed Reorganization Plans?
More informationThree Provocative Business Bankruptcy Decisions of 2018
Alert Three Provocative Business Bankruptcy Decisions of 2018 June 25, 2018 The appellate courts are usually the last stop for parties in business bankruptcy cases. The courts issued at least three provocative,
More informationCase KJC Doc 597 Filed 11/17/17 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
Case 16-12685-KJC Doc 597 Filed 11/17/17 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE In re: : Chapter 11 : LIMITLESS MOBILE, LLC, : Case No. 16-12685 (KJC) : Debtor.
More informationmg Doc 4031 Filed 06/19/13 Entered 06/19/13 16:26:17 Main Document Pg 1 of 8. x : : : : : : : x. Debtors.
Pg 1 of 8 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------------------------------- In re RESIDENTIAL CAPITAL, LLC, Debtors. ----------------------------------------------------------
More informationSupreme Court Bars Use of Nonconsensual Priority-Violating Structured Dismissals
March 24, 2017 Supreme Court Bars Use of Nonconsensual Priority-Violating Structured Dismissals On March 22, 2017, the United States Supreme Court held that bankruptcy courts cannot approve a structured
More informationThe Battle Over 3rd-Party Releases Continues
Portfolio Media. Inc. 111 West 19 th Street, 5th Floor New York, NY 10011 www.law360.com Phone: +1 646 783 7100 Fax: +1 646 783 7161 customerservice@law360.com The Battle Over 3rd-Party Releases Continues
More informationCategorical Subordination of ESOP Claims Improper. November/December David A. Beck Mark G. Douglas
Categorical Subordination of ESOP Claims Improper November/December 2005 David A. Beck Mark G. Douglas Whether a bankruptcy court can subordinate a claim in a bankruptcy case in the absence of creditor
More informationreg Doc 5700 Filed 02/24/12 Entered 02/24/12 11:37:27 Main Document Pg 1 of 9
Pg 1 of 9 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ) In re: ) Chapter 11 ) CHEMTURA CORPORATION, et al., ) Case No. 09-11233 (REG) ) Reorganized Debtors. ) Jointly Administered ) STIPULATION
More informationCOMMENTARY JONES DAY. One way for a natural gas supply contract to constitute a swap agreement, is for it to be found to be
February 2009 JONES DAY COMMENTARY Fourth Circuit Restores Bankruptcy Safe Harbor Protections for Natural Gas Supply Contracts that Are Commodity Forward Agreements In reversing and remanding a Bankruptcy
More informationClass Actions. Unconscionable Consumer Class Action Waivers And The Federal Arbitration Act MEALEY S LITIGATION REPORT
MEALEY S LITIGATION REPORT Class Actions Unconscionable Consumer Class Action Waivers And The Federal Arbitration Act by Marc J. Goldstein Marc J. Goldstein Litigation and Arbitration Chambers New York,
More informationCase Document 866 Filed in TXSB on 05/25/18 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION
Case 17-36709 Document 866 Filed in TXSB on 05/25/18 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION In re: Chapter 11 COBALT INTERNATIONAL ENERGY INC., et al., 1
More informationBANKRUPTCY AND THE SUPREME COURT by Kenneth N. Klee (LexisNexis 2009)
BANKRUPTCY AND THE SUPREME COURT by Kenneth N. Klee (LexisNexis 2009) Excerpt from Chapter 6, pages 439 46 LANDMARK CASES The Supreme Court cases of the past 111 years range in importance from relatively
More informationAstro v. Lippo: Hong Kong Court Clarifies The Discretion Found In Article V Of The New York Convention, But Holds Firm On Time Limits
MEALEY S 1 International Arbitration Report Astro v. Lippo: Hong Kong Court Clarifies The Discretion Found In Article V Of The New York Convention, But Holds Firm On Time Limits by Chiann Bao Skadden,
More informationUNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION MI PUEBLO SAN JOSE, INC., Debtor, CASE NO. 13-53893-ASW CHAPTER NUMBER: 11 BALLOT FOR ACCEPTING OR REJECTING DEBTOR S FIRST
More informationSBLI - Third Party Releases. Kristopher M. Hansen, Matthew A. Garofalo and Sharon Choi 1. Introduction
SBLI - Third Party Releases Kristopher M. Hansen, Matthew A. Garofalo and Sharon Choi 1 Introduction One of the fundamental purposes of reorganization in bankruptcy is the debtor s ability to obtain a
More informationCase 3:16-cv EMC Document 382 Filed 07/24/18 Page 1 of 7
Case :-cv-0-emc Document Filed 0// Page of Theodore A. Griffinger, Jr. (SBN 0) Ellen A. Cirangle (SBN ) LUBIN OLSON & NIEWIADOMSKI LLP The Transamerica Pyramid 00 Montgomery Street, th Floor San Francisco,
More informationFrom the Bankruptcy Courts: Mortgage Foreclosure Sales as Fraudulent Conveyances-Does the 1984 Act Make a Difference?
Maurice A. Deane School of Law at Hofstra University Scholarly Commons at Hofstra Law Hofstra Law Faculty Scholarship 1985 From the Bankruptcy Courts: Mortgage Foreclosure Sales as Fraudulent Conveyances-Does
More informationNOTICE OF PRESENTMENT OF STIPULATION AND ORDER RESOLVING THE FLEXTRONICS ENTITIES PROOFS OF CLAIM
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------------------------------------x In re Chapter 11 Case No. MOTORS LIQUIDATION COMPANY, et al., 09-50026 (REG)
More informationORDERED in the Southern District of Florida on May 23, 2014.
Case 92-30190-RAM Doc 924 Filed 05/23/14 Page 1 of 20 ORDERED in the Southern District of Florida on May 23, 2014. Robert A. Mark, Judge United States Bankruptcy Court UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN
More informationBullet Proof Guaranties
Bullet Proof Guaranties David M. Mannion, Esq. DMannion@BlakeleyLLP.com Blakeley LLP 54 W. 40th Street New York, NY 10018 V. (917) 472-9587 F. (949) 260-0613 www.blakeleyllp.com New York Los Angeles Orange
More informationNo. 107,763 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. SANFORD R. FYLER, Appellee, SYLLABUS BY THE COURT
No. 107,763 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS SANFORD R. FYLER, Appellee, v. BRUNDAGE-BONE CONCRETE PUMPING, INC., Appellant, SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. The primary purpose of the United States
More informationCase 1:18-cv JSR Document 28 Filed 07/27/18 Page 1 of 23. This appeal arises out of the long-running bankruptcy of
Case 1:18-cv-01228-JSR Document 28 Filed 07/27/18 Page 1 of 23 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -----------------------------------x USDCSDNY DOCUMENT ELECT.RONICALLY FILED DOC
More informationBankruptcy Court Rules a Foreign Insolvency Plan That Extinguishes Claims Against Non-debtor Subsidiaries is Manifestly Contrary to US Public Policy
June 15, 2012 Bankruptcy Court Rules a Foreign Insolvency Plan That Extinguishes Claims Against Non-debtor Subsidiaries is Manifestly Contrary to US Public Policy In a decision further defining when US
More informationExpanding the Reach of the Bankruptcy Code's Automatic Stay Exception: City of New York v. Exxon
Volume 3 Issue 2 Article 7 1992 Expanding the Reach of the Bankruptcy Code's Automatic Stay Exception: City of New York v. Exxon Mark D. Chiacchiere Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/elj
More informationSUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
Cite as: 549 U. S. (2007) 1 SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES No. 05 996 ROBERT LOUIS MARRAMA, PETITIONER v. CITIZENS BANK OF MASSACHUSETTS ET AL. ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
More informationEnvironmental Obligations in United States Bankruptcy Actions: An Analysis of Two Key Issues
6 April 2018 Practice Groups: Environment, Land and Natural Resources; Restructuring & Insolvency Environmental Obligations in United States Bankruptcy Actions: An Analysis By Dawn Monsen Lamparello, Sven
More informationFollow this and additional works at:
2006 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 3-7-2006 In Re: Velocita Corp Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential Docket No. 05-1709 Follow this and additional
More informationmg Doc 7850 Filed 12/10/14 Entered 12/10/14 12:27:11 Main Document Pg 1 of 9
Pg 1 of 9 MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 250 West 55 th Street New York, New York 10019 Telephone: (212 468-8000 Facsimile: (212 468-7900 Norman S. Rosenbaum Erica J. Richards Counsel for the ResCap Liquidating
More informationCase JKO Doc 8954 Filed 11/29/12 Page 1 of 11
Case 08-10928-JKO Doc 8954 Filed 11/29/12 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT LAUDERDALE DIVISION www.flsb.uscourts.gov ) Chapter 11 Cases In re: ) ) Case No.
More informationCase Doc 4618 Filed 05/22/15 Entered 05/22/15 14:15:29 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 18
Document Page 1 of 18 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA Charlotte Division : In re: : : Case No. 10-31607 GARLOCK SEALING TECHNOLOGIES : LLC., et al., : Chapter
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN RE: * BYRON T. BLAND, * Chapter 7 Debtor * * Case No.: 1-03-bk-03337MDF GINA ALBANESE, * Plaintiff * * v. * Adv. No.: 1-04-ap-00238
More information[*529] MEMORANDUM DECISION ON THE MOTIONS OF COLLATERAL TRUSTEE AND SERIES TRUSTEES SEEKING INSTRUCTIONS
134 B.R. 528 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 1991) In re IONOSPHERE CLUBS, INC., EASTERN AIR LINES, INC., and BAR HARBOR AIRWAYS, INC., d/b/a EASTERN EXPRESS, Debtors. FIRST FIDELITY BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, NEW JERSEY
More informationNow come. Section 1. Guaranty
Unconditional Guaranty Agreement Between Professional Employer Organization s and Guarantor Made For the Direct Benefit Of the Commissioner of Insurance In His Official Capacity Now come (each hereinafter
More informationNow come. Section 1. Guaranty
Unconditional Cross Guaranty Agreement Between Professional Employer Organization Group Members Made For the Direct Benefit Of the Commissioner of Insurance In His Official Capacity Now come (each hereinafter
More informationCodifying Bankruptcy Law's Fastpass: New Value and the Absolute Priority Rule
Central Methodist College From the SelectedWorks of David P Hamm Jr September 6, 2011 Codifying Bankruptcy Law's Fastpass: New Value and the Absolute Priority Rule David P Hamm, Jr, Mississippi College
More informationshl Doc 1950 Filed 05/20/14 Entered 05/20/14 11:34:43 Main Document Pg 1 of 10 MEMORANDUM OF DECISION
Pg 1 of 10 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------------------------------------x In re Chapter 11 ARCAPITA BANK B.S.C.(c), et al. Reorganized Debtors.
More informationThe Common Interest Privilege in Bankruptcy: Recent Trends and Practical Guidance
The Common Interest Privilege in Bankruptcy: Recent Trends and Practical Guidance By Elliot Moskowitz* I. Introduction The common interest privilege (sometimes known as the community of interest privilege,
More informationI. Bankruptcy & Creditors' Rights
Washington and Lee Law Review Volume 44 Issue 2 Article 7 3-1-1987 I. Bankruptcy & Creditors' Rights Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarlycommons.law.wlu.edu/wlulr Part of the Bankruptcy
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION. Appellant, v. Case No. 8:12-cv-2498-T-33 Bankr. No. 8:11-bk CPM ORDER
Fish v. Pasco County Florida Traffic Division et al Doc. 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION IN RE: TERRY LEE FISH, Debtor. / TERRY LEE FISH, Appellant, v. Case No.
More informationCase KJC Doc 1305 Filed 01/30/14 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
Case 13-11482-KJC Doc 1305 Filed 01/30/14 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE In re: ) Chapter 11 ) EXIDE TECHNOLOGIES, ) Case No. 13-11482 (KJC) ) Debtor. )
More informationClass Actions MEALEY S LITIGATION REPORT. A commentary article reprinted from the December 17, 2009 issue of Mealey s Litigation Report: Class Actions
MEALEY S LITIGATION REPORT Class Actions The Nation s New Lawsuit Capital? D.C. High Court Eliminates Standing Requirements For Consumer Protection Lawsuits, Threatening Flood Of Abusive Litigation by
More informationAttorneys for Objector-Appellant Patricia Pascale
09-2311-bk UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT In Re: Chrysler LLC, aka Chrysler Aspen, aka Chrysler Town and Country, aka Chrysler 300, aka Chrysler Sebring, aka Chrysler PT Cruiser,
More informationChapter 15 Recognition Mandatory and Fully Encumbered Assets Are Property of the Debtor Protected by Automatic Stay. November/December 2013
Chapter 15 Recognition Mandatory and Fully Encumbered Assets Are Property of the Debtor Protected by Automatic Stay November/December 2013 Pedro A. Jimenez Mark G. Douglas More than eight years after chapter
More informationMOTION OF GENOVEVA BERMUDEZ TO FILE LATE PROOF OF CLAIM OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, TO AMEND INFORMAL PROOF OF CLAIM
Barry E. Bressler (admitted pro hac vice) Richard A. Barkasy (admitted pro hac vice) Benjamin P. Deutsch (BD-5435) SCHNADER HARRISON SEGAL & LEWIS LLP 140 Broadway, Suite 3100 New York, NY 10005-1101 Phone:
More informationCase KLP Doc 558 Filed 10/16/17 Entered 10/16/17 22:03:54 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 6
Document Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division In re: Chapter 11 TOYS R US, INC., et al., Debtors. Case No. 17-34665 (KLP) (Jointly Administered)
More informationThe Eleventh Circuit's Second Shot at Getting It Right: Nonconsensual Nondebtor Releases in Bankruptcy Court
DePaul Business and Commercial Law Journal Volume 15 Issue 2 Winter 2017 Article 1 The Eleventh Circuit's Second Shot at Getting It Right: Nonconsensual Nondebtor Releases in Bankruptcy Court Pierce G.
More informationCase: jtg Doc #:589 Filed: 09/07/17 Page 1 of 25 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN.
Case:17-00612-jtg Doc #:589 Filed: 09/07/17 Page 1 of 25 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN In re: MICHIGAN SPORTING GOODS DISTRIBUTORS, INC., Debtor. Chapter 11 Bankruptcy
More informationFile: 04 Dougan Article.doc Created on: 5/22/ :26:00 AM Last Printed: 5/26/2010 2:02:00 PM
INJURED PLAINTIFFS IN ASBESTOS ACTIONS ARE ENJOINED FROM SUING INSURER OF ASBESTOS MANUFACTURER FOR ALLEGED WRONGDOINGS OF INSURER BASED ON LANGUAGE OF BANKRUPTCY COURT S REORGANIZATION ORDERS: TRAVELERS
More informationClient Alert. Circuit Courts Weigh In on Treatment of Trademark License Agreements in Bankruptcy
Number 1438 December 12, 2012 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Finance Department Circuit Courts Weigh In on Treatment of Trademark License Agreements in Bankruptcy Recent bankruptcy appellate rulings have
More informationIn Re Udell 18 F.3d 403 (7th Cir. 1994) SKINNER, District Judge. A bankruptcy court granted the creditor-appellant relief from the automatic stay
In Re Udell 18 F.3d 403 (7th Cir. 1994) SKINNER, District Judge. A bankruptcy court granted the creditor-appellant relief from the automatic stay prescribed by the Bankruptcy Code, finding that its right
More informationPLEASE TAKE NOTICE that, pursuant to the Order Extending Initial Distribution Date,
Martin J. Bienenstock Timothy Q. Karcher Vincent Indelicato PROSKAUER ROSE LLP Eleven Times Square New York, NY 10036 Tel: (212) 969-3000 Fax: (212) 969-2900 Presentment Date and Time: November 13, 2018
More informationLegal Double Dipping? Why Actions Against Guarantors. Should Not Be Stayed. Pursuant to 11 U.S.C. 362(a)
Legal Double Dipping? Why Actions Against Guarantors Should Not Be Stayed Pursuant to 11 U.S.C. 362(a) Samira Kermani, Esq. Page 1 of 36 I. INTRODUCTION Legal Double Dipping? Why Actions Against Guarantors
More informationCase KJC Doc 572 Filed 01/07/19 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE.
Case 17-12913-KJC Doc 572 Filed 01/07/19 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE In re: Dex Liquidating Co.(f/k/a Dextera Surgical Inc.), 1 Debtor. Chapter 11 Case
More informationSENATE PASSES PATENT REFORM BILL
SENATE PASSES PATENT REFORM BILL CLIENT MEMORANDUM On Tuesday, March 8, the United States Senate voted 95-to-5 to adopt legislation aimed at reforming the country s patent laws. The America Invents Act
More informationCase jal Doc 28 Filed 10/28/16 Entered 10/28/16 13:24:43 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY
Case 16-32803-jal Doc 28 Filed 10/28/16 Entered 10/28/16 13:24:43 Page 1 of 5 PHILLIP WAYNE LOCKHART, JR. CASE NO. 16-32803(1(13 Debtor MEMORANDUM-OPINION This matter came before the Court on the Motion
More informationNOTICE OF PRESENTMENT OF WIND DOWN CO S MOTION FOR ENTRY OF AN ORDER EXTENDING THE CLAIMS OBJECTION BAR DATE
Presentment Date and Time January 10, 2019 at 1100 a.m. (Eastern Time) Objection Deadline January 7, 2019 at 400 p.m. (Eastern Time) Hearing Date and Time (Only if Objection Filed) January 15, 2019 at
More informationPost-Travelers Decisions Continue the Debate Regarding the Allowability of Unsecured Creditors Claims for Postpetition Attorneys Fees
Post-Travelers Decisions Continue the Debate Regarding the Allowability of Unsecured Creditors Claims for Postpetition Attorneys Fees September/October 2007 Ross S. Barr Recently, in Travelers Casualty
More informationCOURT AWARDS ATTORNEYS FEES AGAINST PLAINTIFFS IN MOTOR CARRIER LEASING DISPUTE 1. Richard A. Allen
COURT AWARDS ATTORNEYS FEES AGAINST PLAINTIFFS IN MOTOR CARRIER LEASING DISPUTE 1 Richard A. Allen In an unusual and potentially important ruling, a federal district court has interpreted a statutory provision
More informationNOTICE OF DEADLINE REQUIRING FILING OF PROOF OF CLAIM ON OR BEFORE DECEMBER 5, 2008
APPENDIX 1 14 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK In re Quebecor World (USA) Inc., et al., Debtors. Chapter 11 Case No. 08-10152(JMP) Jointly Administered Honorable James M. Peck
More informationCase Comments B. Bankruptcy Willis V. Celotex Corp
Washington and Lee Law Review Volume 50 Issue 1 Article 13 Winter 1-1-1993 Case Comments B. Bankruptcy Willis V. Celotex Corp Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.wlu.edu/wlulr
More informationLIMITED OBJECTIONS OF THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TOXIC SUBSTANCES CONTROL TO DEBTORS JOINT PLAN
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ----------------------------------------------------------x : Chapter 11 In re : : Case No. 09-50026 (REG) MOTORS LIQUIDATION COMPANY, f/k/a
More information