Case 3:12-cv SI Document 153 Filed 01/07/13 Page 1 of 23

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Case 3:12-cv SI Document 153 Filed 01/07/13 Page 1 of 23"

Transcription

1 Case 3:12-cv SI Document 153 Filed 01/07/13 Page 1 of 23 Steven A. Kraemer, OSB No Gregory R. Roberson, OSB No Of Attorneys for Defendants IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PRISON LEGAL NEWS, a project of the HUMAN RIGHTS DEFENSE CENTER, v. Plaintiffs, COLUMBIA COUNTY; COLUMBIA COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE; JEFF DICKERSON, individual and in his capacity as Columbia County Sheriff, No. 3:12-cv-0071-SI DEFENDANTS PROPOSED JURY Defendants. Defendants respectfully request the Court give the following instructions to the jury. Defendants reserve the right to modify, supplement, or withdraw these instructions based upon the evidence at trial. Pursuant to LR 51.1 and the Court s Civil Trial Management Order, the following is an index of proposed jury instructions, followed by a complete version of each proposed instruction. Respectfully submitted this 7th day of January, By: /s/ Steven A. Kraemer Steven A. Kraemer, OSB No Of Attorneys for Defendants Page 1 DEFENDANTS PROPOSED JURY

2 Case 3:12-cv SI Document 153 Filed 01/07/13 Page 2 of 23 DEFENDANTS REQUESTED JURY 1. Summary of Claims and Defenses Ninth Circuit Model Civil Jury Instruction No. 1.2 (2007) (modified) 2. Burden of Proof Preponderance of the Evidence Ninth Circuit Model Civil Jury Instruction No. 1.3 (2007) (modified) 3. Two or More Parties Different Legal Rights Ninth Circuit Model Civil Jury Instruction No. 1.5 (2007) (modified) 4. Conduct of the Jury Ninth Circuit Model Civil Jury Instruction No (2007) (modified) 5. Impeachment Evidence - Witness Ninth Circuit Model Civil Jury Instruction No. 2.8 (2007) (modified) 6. Expert Opinion Ninth Circuit Model Civil Jury Instruction No (2007) (modified) 7. Equal Treatment of Parties Municipal Entities Ninth Circuit Model Civil Jury Instruction No. 4.1 (2007) (modified) 8. Section 1983 Claim Against Defendant Sheriff Jeff Dickerson in Individual Capacity Elements and Burden of Proof Ninth Circuit Model Civil Jury Instruction No. 9.2 (2007) (modified) 9. Section 1983 Claim Against Local Governing Body Defendants Based on Act of Final Policymaker Elements and Burden of Proof Ninth Circuit Model Civil Jury Instruction No. 9.5 (2007) (modified) 10. Fourteenth Amendment - Procedural Due Process Inmate Mail U.S. Const. Am. XIV; Procunier v. Martinez, 416 U.S. 396, (1974), overruled on other grounds by Thornburgh v. Abbott, 490 U.S. 401 (1989); Krug v. Lutz, 329 F.3d 692, (9th Cir. 2003); Prison Legal News v. Cook, 238 F.3d 1145, 1152 (9th Cir. 2001). 11. First Amendment Ninth Circuit Model Jury Instruction No (2007) (modified) 12. Damages Causation Ninth Circuit Model Civil Jury Instruction No. 9.8 (2007) (modified) 13. Damages Proof Ninth Circuit Model Civil Jury Instruction Nos. 5.1 and 5.2 (2007) (modified) 14. Damages Mitigation Ninth Circuit Model Civil Jury Instruction No. 5.3 (2007) (modified) Page 2 DEFENDANTS PROPOSED JURY

3 Case 3:12-cv SI Document 153 Filed 01/07/13 Page 3 of Damages Avoidance of Double Recovery Stringer v. Dilger, 313 F.2d 536, 541 (10th Cir. 1963); Bender v. City of New York, 78 F.3d 787, 793 (2d Cir. 1996); Greenwood Ranches, Inc. v. Skie Const. Co., Inc., 629 F.2d 518, 522 (9 th Cir. 1980); Ham Marine, Inc. v. Dresser Indus., Inc., 72 F.3d 454, 462 (5 th Cir. 1995); MidAmerica Fed. Sav. & Loan Assoc. v. Shearson/American Express, Inc., 962 F.2d 1470, 1473 (10 th Cir. 1992). 16. Damages Nominal Damages Ninth Circuit Model Civil Jury Instruction No. 5.6 (2007) (modified) ALTERNATIVE INSTRUCTION Should the Court determine that plaintiff has met its burden in proving that Sheriff Jeff Dickerson s conduct was malicious, oppressive or in reckless disregard of plaintiff s First and/or Fourteenth rights, defendants request the following additional instruction: 17. Damages Punitive Damages Ninth Circuit Model Civil Jury Instruction No. 5.5 (2007) (modified) Page 3 DEFENDANTS PROPOSED JURY

4 Case 3:12-cv SI Document 153 Filed 01/07/13 Page 4 of 23 DEFENDANTS REQUESTED JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 1 Summary of Claims and Defenses To help you follow the evidence, I will give you a brief summary of the positions of the parties: Plaintiff is Prison Legal News, a project of the Human Rights Defense Center, a Washington Non-Profit Corporation. Plaintiff publishes and distributes a monthly magazine and certain books about the criminal justice system and legal issues affecting prisoners. Defendants are Columbia County Sheriff s Office (CCSO) and Sheriff Jeff Dickerson. Sheriff Dickerson became the elected sheriff of CCSO on January 1, 2009, and he was re-elected on November 6, Defendant CCSO manages the Columbia County Jail. Beginning in December, 2010, Plaintiff mailed its monthly magazine, informational brochures, fundraising letters, and advertising material (subscription forms, book catalogs, book offers) to inmates at the Columbia County Jail in envelopes addressed to individual inmates. Plaintiff and Defendants agree that CCSO staff rejected many of the pieces of mail and did not provide Plaintiff or inmates notice of their appeal rights. Plaintiff claims that Defendants rejection of the mail and lack of notice of their appeal rights violated the United States Constitution s free speech clause in the First Amendment and the due process clause in the Fourteenth Amendment. Defendants have admitted in the Answer they filed in this case the rejection of the mail and lack of notice of their appeal rights did violate the United States Constitution as claimed by Plaintiff and defendants changed their practices and policies immediately after receiving a copy of Plaintiff s Complaint. Plaintiff claims that it suffered damages as a result of the constitutional violations. Defendants deny Plaintiff suffered any damages, but also contend that if Plaintiff did suffer any damages, it was caused by Plaintiff s own actions in continuing to send material to the jail after Plaintiff knew the material would be rejected and in not notifying Jail administrative staff or Page 4 DEFENDANTS PROPOSED JURY

5 Case 3:12-cv SI Document 153 Filed 01/07/13 Page 5 of 23 other County officials of Plaintiff s concerns about the constitutional violations or by not filing this lawsuit sooner. Plaintiff has the burden of proving damages, if any. Defendants assert an affirmative defense to Plaintiff s claim for damages on the basis that Plaintiff failed to mitigate any damages. Plaintiff denies that it failed to mitigate its damages. Defendants have the burden of proof of on their affirmative defense. Ninth Circuit Model Civil Jury Instruction No. 1.2 (2007) (modified) Page 5 DEFENDANTS PROPOSED JURY

6 Case 3:12-cv SI Document 153 Filed 01/07/13 Page 6 of 23 DEFENDANTS REQUESTED JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 2 Burden of Proof Preponderance of the Evidence When a party has the burden of proof on any claim or affirmative defense by a preponderance of the evidence, it means you must be persuaded by the evidence that the claim or affirmative defense is more probably true than not true. You should base your decision on all of the evidence, regardless of which party presented it. Ninth Circuit Model Civil Jury Instruction No. 1.3 (2007) (modified) Page 6 DEFENDANTS PROPOSED JURY

7 Case 3:12-cv SI Document 153 Filed 01/07/13 Page 7 of 23 DEFENDANTS REQUESTED JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 3 Two or More Parties Different Legal Rights You should decide the case as to each party separately. Unless otherwise stated, the instructions apply to all parties. Ninth Circuit Model Civil Jury Instruction No. 1.5 (2007) (modified) Page 7 DEFENDANTS PROPOSED JURY

8 Case 3:12-cv SI Document 153 Filed 01/07/13 Page 8 of 23 DEFENDANTS REQUESTED JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 4 Conduct of the Jury I will now say a few words about your conduct as jurors. First, keep an open mind throughout the trial, and do not decide what the verdict should be until you and your fellow jurors have completed your deliberations at the end of the case. Second, because you must decide this case based only on the evidence received in the case and on my instructions as to the law that applies, you must not be exposed to any other information about the case or to the issues it involves during the course of your jury duty. Thus, until the end of the case or unless I tell you otherwise: Do not communicate with anyone in any way and do not let anyone else communicate with you in any way about the merits of the case or anything to do with it. This includes discussing the case in person, in writing, by phone or electronic means, via , text messaging, or any Internet chat room, blog, Web site or other feature. This applies to communicating with your fellow jurors until I give you the case for deliberation, and it applies to communicating with everyone else including your family members, your employer, and the people involved in the trial, although you may notify your family and your employer that you have been seated as a juror in the case. But, if you are asked or approached in any way about your jury service or anything about this case, you must respond that you have been ordered not to discuss the matter and to report the contact to the court. Because you will receive all the evidence and legal instruction you properly may consider to return a verdict: do not read, watch, or listen to any news or media accounts or commentary about the case or anything to do with it; do not do any research, such as consulting dictionaries, searching the Internet or using any other reference materials; and do not make any investigation or in any other way try to learn about the case on your own. The law requires these restrictions to ensure the parties have a fair trial based on the same evidence that each party has had an opportunity to address. A juror who violates these restrictions jeopardizes the fairness of these proceedings, and a mistrial could result that would require the Page 8 DEFENDANTS PROPOSED JURY

9 Case 3:12-cv SI Document 153 Filed 01/07/13 Page 9 of 23 entire trial process to start over. If any juror is exposed to any outside information, please notify the court immediately. Ninth Circuit Model Civil Jury Instruction No (2007) (modified) Page 9 DEFENDANTS PROPOSED JURY

10 Case 3:12-cv SI Document 153 Filed 01/07/13 Page 10 of 23 DEFENDANTS REQUESTED JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 5 Impeachment Evidence -- Witness The evidence that a witness has been convicted of a crime on a prior occasion may be considered, along with all other evidence, in deciding whether or not to believe the witness and how much weight to give to the testimony of the witness and for no other purpose. Ninth Circuit Model Civil Jury Instruction No. 2.8 (2007) (modified). Page 10 DEFENDANTS PROPOSED JURY

11 Case 3:12-cv SI Document 153 Filed 01/07/13 Page 11 of 23 DEFENDANTS REQUESTED JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 6 Expert Opinion Some witnesses, because of education or experience, are permitted to state opinions and the reasons for those opinions. Opinion testimony should be judged just like any other testimony. You may accept it or reject it, and give it as much weight as you think it deserves, considering the witness s education and experience, the reasons given for the opinion, and all the other evidence in the case. Ninth Circuit Model Civil Jury Instruction No (2007) (modified) Page 11 DEFENDANTS PROPOSED JURY

12 Case 3:12-cv SI Document 153 Filed 01/07/13 Page 12 of 23 DEFENDANTS REQUESTED JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 7 Equal Treatment of Parties Municipal Entities The fact that a defendant is a municipal entity should not affect your decision. All persons are equal before the law and municipal entities such as Columbia County and the Columbia County Sheriff s Office are entitled to the same fair and conscientious consideration by you as any party. Ninth Circuit Model Civil Jury Instruction No. 4.1 (2007) (modified) Page 12 DEFENDANTS PROPOSED JURY

13 Case 3:12-cv SI Document 153 Filed 01/07/13 Page 13 of 23 DEFENDANTS REQUESTED JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 8 Section 1983 Claim Against Defendant Sheriff Jeff Dickerson in Individual Capacity Elements and Burden of Proof In order to prevail on Plaintiff s Section 1983 claim against Defendant Sheriff Jeff Dickerson, Plaintiff must prove each of the following elements by a preponderance of the evidence: 1. Defendant Sheriff Jeff Dickerson acted under color of law; and 2. Defendant Sheriff Jeff Dickerson s acts or failures to act deprived Plaintiff of its particular rights under the United States Constitution as explained in Instruction Nos. 10 and 11. A person acts under color of law when the person acts or purports to act in the performance of official duties under any state, county, or municipal law, ordinance, or regulation. I instruct you that the Defendant Sheriff Jeff Dickerson acted under color of law. Ninth Circuit Model Civil Jury Instruction No. 9.2 (2007) (modified) Page 13 DEFENDANTS PROPOSED JURY

14 Case 3:12-cv SI Document 153 Filed 01/07/13 Page 14 of 23 DEFENDANTS REQUESTED JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 9 Section 1983 Claim Against Local Governing Body Defendants Based on Act of Final Policymaker Elements and Burden of Proof In order to prevail on Plaintiff s Section 1983 claim against Defendant Columbia County Sheriff s Office alleging liability based on the act of a final policymaker, Plaintiff must prove each of the following elements by a preponderance of the evidence: 1. Defendant Sheriff Jeff Dickerson acted under color of law; 2. The acts of Defendant Sheriff Jeff Dickerson deprived Plaintiff of its particular rights under the United States Constitution as explained in Instruction Nos. 10 and Defendant Sheriff Jeff Dickerson had final policymaking authority from Defendant Columbia County Sheriff s Office concerning these acts; and 4. When Defendant Sheriff Jeff Dickerson engaged in these acts, he was acting as a final policymaker for Defendant Columbia County Sheriff s Office. A person acts under color of law when the person acts or purports to act in the performance of official duties under any state, county, or municipal law, ordinance, or regulation. I instruct you that Defendant Sheriff Jeff Dickerson acted under color of law. I instruct you that Defendant Sheriff Jeff Dickerson had final policymaking authority from Defendant Columbia County Sheriff s Office concerning the acts at issue and, therefore, the third and fourth elements require no proof. Ninth Circuit Model Civil Jury Instruction No. 9.5 (2007) modified. Page 14 DEFENDANTS PROPOSED JURY

15 Case 3:12-cv SI Document 153 Filed 01/07/13 Page 15 of 23 DEFENDANTS PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 10 Fourteenth Amendment Procedural Due Process Inmate Mail Plaintiff alleges that the Defendants deprived it of its right to Procedural Due Process under the Fourteenth Amendment. The fundamental requirement of procedural due process is the opportunity to be heard at a meaningful time and in a meaningful manner. In this case, Plaintiff alleges Defendants deprived it of its rights to procedural due process under the Fourteenth Amendment when Defendants did not give notice to Plaintiff of the reason for the rejection of its mail and an option to request an appeal of Defendants decision to reject the mail. In their Answer Defendants have admitted to depriving Plaintiff of its Procedural Due Process rights. U.S. Const. Am. XIV; Procunier v. Martinez, 416 U.S. 396, (1974), overruled on other grounds by Thornburgh v. Abbott, 490 U.S. 401 (1989); Krug v. Lutz, 329 F.3d 692, (9th Cir. 2003); Prison Legal News v. Cook, 238 F.3d 1145, 1152 (9th Cir. 2001). Page 15 DEFENDANTS PROPOSED JURY

16 Case 3:12-cv SI Document 153 Filed 01/07/13 Page 16 of 23 DEFENDANTS PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 11 First Amendment Plaintiff alleges that the defendants deprived it of its First Amendment rights. Under the First Amendment a publisher has the right to communicate with inmates. In this case, plaintiff alleges defendants deprived it of that right when it rejected the magazines and other material described to you previously. In their Answer, defendants have admitted to depriving plaintiff of its First Amendment rights. Ninth Circuit Model Jury Instruction No (2007) (modified) Page 16 DEFENDANTS PROPOSED JURY

17 Case 3:12-cv SI Document 153 Filed 01/07/13 Page 17 of 23 DEFENDANTS PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 12 Damages Causation In order to establish that the acts of the defendants deprived plaintiff of its particular rights under the United States Constitution as explained in later instructions, the plaintiff must prove by a preponderance of the evidence that the acts were so closely related to the deprivation of the plaintiff s rights as to be the moving force that caused the ultimate injury. Ninth Circuit Model Civil Jury Instruction No. 9.8 (2007) modified. Page 17 DEFENDANTS PROPOSED JURY

18 Case 3:12-cv SI Document 153 Filed 01/07/13 Page 18 of 23 DEFENDANTS REQUESTED JURY INSTRUCTION NO.13 Damages - Proof It is the duty of the Court to instruct you about the measure of damages. In this case, I have instructed you that Defendants are liable to Plaintiff. Accordingly, you must determine Plaintiff s damages, if any. Plaintiff has the burden of proving damages by a preponderance of the evidence. Damages means the amount of money that will reasonably and fairly compensate Plaintiff for any injury you find was caused by Defendants. You should consider the following: 1. The reasonable value of Plaintiff s alleged economic loss, if any. It is for you to determine what damages, if any, have been proved. Your award must be based upon evidence and not upon speculation, guesswork or conjecture. Ninth Circuit Civil Jury Instruction Nos. 5.1 and 5.2 (2007) (modified) Page 18 DEFENDANTS PROPOSED JURY

19 Case 3:12-cv SI Document 153 Filed 01/07/13 Page 19 of 23 DEFENDANTS REQUESTED JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 14 Damages -- Mitigation The Plaintiff has a duty to use reasonable efforts to mitigate damages after it first suffers an injury caused by Defendants. To mitigate means to avoid or reduce damages. Defendants have the burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence: 1. That Plaintiff failed to use reasonable efforts to mitigate damages; and 2. The amount by which damages would have been mitigated. Ninth Circuit Civil Jury Instruction No. 5.1 (2007) (modified); 999 v. CIT Corp., 776 F.2d 866, 871 (9th Cir. 1985); Commodity Credit Corp v. Resenberg Bros. & Co., 243 F.2d 504, 511 (9th Cir. 1957). Page 19 DEFENDANTS PROPOSED JURY

20 Case 3:12-cv SI Document 153 Filed 01/07/13 Page 20 of 23 DEFENDANTS REQUESTED JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 15 Damages Avoidance of Double Recovery Plaintiff is entitled to be compensated only for the injuries Plaintiff actually suffered. Plaintiff is to be made whole, but not entitled to be put in a better condition than it would be in had the wrong not been committed. In this matter, Plaintiff s First and Fourteenth Amendment rights were violated by Defendants. Plaintiff, however, is not entitled to a separate damage award for the violations of the First and Fourteenth Amendment rights. Rather, only one recovery may be obtained. I instruct you that if you determine Plaintiff is entitled to damages, you must award only one amount. Stringer v. Dilger, 313 F.2d 536, 541 (10th Cir. 1963); Bender v. City of New York, 78 F.3d 787, 793 (2d Cir. 1996); Greenwood Ranches, Inc. v. Skie Const. Co., Inc., 629 F.2d 518, 522 (9 th cir. 1980) (plaintiff not entitled to a separate compensatory damage award under each legal theory seeking the same relief); Ham Marine, Inc. v. Dresser Indus., Inc., 72 F.3d 454, 462 (5 th Cir. 1995) ( Even though recovery is premised on two different theories, a plaintiff cannot recover the same damages twice, so allowing damages for tortious interference on top of damages for breach of contract would result in a double recovery ); MidAmerica Fed. Sav. & Loan Assoc. v. Shearson/American Express, Inc., 962 F.2d 1470, 1473 (10 th Cir. 1992) ( It is well established that double recovery is precluded when alternative theories seeking the same relief are pled and tried together. ). Page 20 DEFENDANTS PROPOSED JURY

21 Case 3:12-cv SI Document 153 Filed 01/07/13 Page 21 of 23 DEFENDANTS REQUESTED JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 16 Nominal Damages The law which applies to this case authorizes an award of nominal damages. If you find that Plaintiff has failed to prove damages as defined in these instructions, you must award nominal damages. Nominal damages may not exceed one dollar. Ninth Circuit Civil Jury Instruction No. 5.6 (2007) Page 21 DEFENDANTS PROPOSED JURY

22 Case 3:12-cv SI Document 153 Filed 01/07/13 Page 22 of 23 DEFENDANTS REQUESTED JURY INSTRUCTION NO ALTERNATIVE Damages Punitive Damages Plaintiff seeks punitive damages against Defendant Sheriff Jeff Dickerson. You may, but are not required, to award punitive damages. The purposes of punitive damages are to punish a defendant and to deter similar acts in the future. Punitive damages may not be awarded to compensate Plaintiff. Plaintiff has the burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence that punitive damages should be awarded, and, if so, the amount of any such damages. You may award punitive damages only if you find that Defendant Sheriff Jeff Dickerson s conduct that harmed Plaintiff was malicious, oppressive or in reckless disregard of Plaintiff s rights. Conduct is malicious if it is accompanied by ill will, or spite, or if it is for the purpose of injuring Plaintiff. Conduct is in reckless disregard of Plaintiff s rights if, under the circumstances, it reflects complete indifference to Plaintiff s safety or rights, or if Defendant Sheriff Jeff Dickerson acts in the face of a perceived risk that his actions will violate Plaintiff s rights under the Constitution. An act or omission is oppressive if Defendant Sheriff Jeff Dickerson injures or damages or otherwise violates the rights of Plaintiff with unnecessary harshness or severity, such as by the misuse or abuse of authority or power or by the taking advantage of some weakness or disability or misfortune of Plaintiff. If you find that punitive damages are appropriate, you must use reason in setting the amount. Punitive damages, if any, should be in an amount sufficient to fulfill their purposes but should not reflect bias, prejudice or sympathy toward any party. In considering the amount of any punitive damages, consider the degree of reprehensibility of Defendant Sheriff Jeff Dickerson s conduct, including whether the conduct that harmed Plaintiff was particularly reprehensible because it also caused actual harm or posed a substantial risk of harm to people who are not parties to this case. You may not, however, set the amount of any punitive damages in order to punish Defendant Sheriff Jeff Dickerson for harm to anyone other than Plaintiff in this case. Page 22 DEFENDANTS PROPOSED JURY

23 Case 3:12-cv SI Document 153 Filed 01/07/13 Page 23 of 23 In addition, you may consider the relationship of any award of punitive damages to any actual harm inflicted on Plaintiff. Punitive damages may not be awarded against Defendant Columbia County Sheriff s Office. Punitive damages may be awarded even if you award Plaintiff only nominal, and not compensatory damages. Ninth Circuit Civil Jury Instruction No. 5.5 (2007) (modified) Page 23 DEFENDANTS PROPOSED JURY

Case 3:16-md VC Document 2940 Filed 03/07/19 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 3:16-md VC Document 2940 Filed 03/07/19 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case 3:16-md-02741-VC Document 2940 Filed 03/07/19 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA IN RE: ROUNDUP PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITGATION This document relates to: Hardeman

More information

PRETRIAL INSTRUCTIONS. CACI No. 100

PRETRIAL INSTRUCTIONS. CACI No. 100 PRETRIAL INSTRUCTIONS CACI No. 100 You have now been sworn as jurors in this case. I want to impress on you the seriousness and importance of serving on a jury. Trial by jury is a fundamental right in

More information

2:16-cv EIL # 106 Page 1 of 20

2:16-cv EIL # 106 Page 1 of 20 2:16-cv-02222-EIL # 106 Page 1 of 20 E-FILED Friday, 18 May, 2018 03:51:00 PM Clerk, U.S. District Court, ILCD Members of the jury, you have seen and heard all the evidence and will hear the arguments

More information

Case 3:01-cv PCD Document 57 Filed 03/23/2004 Page 1 of 81 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT

Case 3:01-cv PCD Document 57 Filed 03/23/2004 Page 1 of 81 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT Case 3:01-cv-02205-PCD Document 57 Filed 03/23/2004 Page 1 of 81 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT LYNN BALDONI, : CIVIL ACTION NO: PLAINTIFF : 3:01 CV2205(PCD) v. : THE CITY OF MIDDLETOWN,

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA Case :-cv-0-gms Document Filed 0/0/ Page of 0 0 ERNEST GALVAN (CA Bar No. 0)* KENNETH M. WALCZAK (CA Bar No. )* ROSEN, BIEN & GALVAN, LLP Montgomery Street, 0th Floor San Francisco, California 0- Telephone:

More information

6.1 Jones Act - Unseaworthiness General Instruction (Comparative Negligence Defense) The Plaintiff seeks to recover under a federal statute known as

6.1 Jones Act - Unseaworthiness General Instruction (Comparative Negligence Defense) The Plaintiff seeks to recover under a federal statute known as 6.1 Jones Act - Unseaworthiness General Instruction (Comparative Negligence Defense) The Plaintiff seeks to recover under a federal statute known as the Jones Act. The Jones Act provides a remedy to a

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND GREGORY SMITH Plaintiff, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 1350 Pennsylvania Ave NW Washington, DC 20004 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JEANETTE MYRICK, in her individual capacity, 1901

More information

GENERAL CLOSING INSTRUCTIONS. Members of the jury, it is now time for me to tell you the law that applies to

GENERAL CLOSING INSTRUCTIONS. Members of the jury, it is now time for me to tell you the law that applies to GENERAL CLOSING INSTRUCTIONS Members of the jury, it is now time for me to tell you the law that applies to this case. As I mentioned at the beginning of the trial, you must follow the law as I state it

More information

Case 2:11-cv EFS Document 52 Filed 12/01/ journal of corrections news and analysis, and offers and sells books about the

Case 2:11-cv EFS Document 52 Filed 12/01/ journal of corrections news and analysis, and offers and sells books about the 1 Jesse Wing, WSBA #27751 JesseW~nrrhb.conrr 2 Katherine C. Chanrrberlain, WSBA #40014 KatherineC~nrrhb.conrr 3 MacDonald Hoague & Bayless 4 Seattle, Washington 98104-1745 206-622-1604 5 -iw8r. Ror,cr

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA. Plaintiff, Number:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA. Plaintiff, Number: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA Nicholas Conners, in his capacity as father and natural tutor of Nilijah Conners, Civil Action Plaintiff, Number: versus Section: James Pohlmann,

More information

Case 1:17-cv WYD-SKC Document 150 Filed 02/19/19 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 32 JURY INSTRUCTIONS

Case 1:17-cv WYD-SKC Document 150 Filed 02/19/19 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 32 JURY INSTRUCTIONS Case 1:17-cv-00844-WYD-SKC Document 150 Filed 02/19/19 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 32 Civil Action No. 17-cv-00844-WYD-SKC BRANDON FRESQUEZ, v. Plaintiff, BNSF RAILWAY CO., Defendant. IN THE UNITED STATES

More information

Case 1:07-cv NLH-AMD Document 1 Filed 08/10/2007 Page 1 of 12

Case 1:07-cv NLH-AMD Document 1 Filed 08/10/2007 Page 1 of 12 Case 1:07-cv-03792-NLH-AMD Document 1 Filed 08/10/2007 Page 1 of 12 BY: Brian M. Puricelli, Esquire KRAVITZ AND PURICELLI 691 Washington Crossing Road Newtown PA 18940 (215) 504-8115 ATTORNEY ID # 5146

More information

Case 1:17-cv RDB Document 1 Filed 03/06/17 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND (NORTHERN DIVISION)

Case 1:17-cv RDB Document 1 Filed 03/06/17 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND (NORTHERN DIVISION) Case 1:17-cv-00628-RDB Document 1 Filed 03/06/17 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND (NORTHERN DIVISION) DELVON L. KING * 2021 Brooks Drive District Heights, MD

More information

Case 3:17-cv DJH Document 3 Filed 02/06/17 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 13

Case 3:17-cv DJH Document 3 Filed 02/06/17 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 13 Case 3:17-cv-00071-DJH Document 3 Filed 02/06/17 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY LOUISVILLE DIVISION [Filed Electronically] JACOB HEALEY and LARRY LOUIS

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION Destiny Payne, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No. 4:17-cv-01769 ) City of St. Louis, Vernon Betts, ) Charlene Deeken, Kimberly

More information

REVISED February 4, 2011 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

REVISED February 4, 2011 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS REVISED February 4, 2011 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D January 13, 2011 MARK DUVALL No. 09-10660 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. Plaintiff, Civ. No (RHK/JJK) v. JURY INSTRUCTIONS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. Plaintiff, Civ. No (RHK/JJK) v. JURY INSTRUCTIONS CASE 0:12-cv-00472-RHK-JJK Document 362 Filed 07/22/14 Page 1 of 22 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Jesse Ventura a/k/a James G. Janos, Plaintiff, Civ. No. 12-472 (RHK/JJK) v. JURY INSTRUCTIONS

More information

* * * * * * * * Members of the Jury Panel [or Ladies and Gentlemen of the Jury Panel]:

* * * * * * * * Members of the Jury Panel [or Ladies and Gentlemen of the Jury Panel]: Misc. Docket No. 11-9047 AMENDMENTS TO TEXAS RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 281 AND 284 AND TO THE JURY INSTRUCTIONS UNDER TEXAS RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 226A ORDERED that: 1. Pursuant to Section 22.004 of the

More information

LAUREL COUNTY, KENTUCKY

LAUREL COUNTY, KENTUCKY Case 6:06-cv-003be-DCR Document 1 Filed 08/16/2006 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY LONDON DIVISION [FILED ELECTRONICALLy] LESTER NAPIER, Individually and on behalf

More information

3:05-cv MBS Date Filed 05/08/13 Entry Number 810 Page 1 of 16

3:05-cv MBS Date Filed 05/08/13 Entry Number 810 Page 1 of 16 3:05-cv-02858-MBS Date Filed 05/08/13 Entry Number 810 Page 1 of 16 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA COLUMBIA DIVISION United States of America, ex rel. ) Michael

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Hartstein v. Pollman et al Doc. 95 KAREN HARTSTEIN, Plaintiff, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS v. Case No. 13-cv-1232-JPG-PMF L. POLLMAN, DR. D. KRUSE and WARDEN OF GREENVILLE

More information

Case 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 12/12/17 Page 1 of 10

Case 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 12/12/17 Page 1 of 10 Case 2:17-cv-00377 Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 12/12/17 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION DEVON ARMSTRONG vs. CIVIL ACTION NO.

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION GOVERNMENT'S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTIONS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION GOVERNMENT'S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTIONS IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 12-00075-01-CR-W-DW MARCUS D. GAMMAGE, Defendant. GOVERNMENT'S

More information

MINNESOTA JUDICIAL TRAINING UPDATE

MINNESOTA JUDICIAL TRAINING UPDATE MINNESOTA JUDICIAL TRAINING UPDATE CAUTIONARY JURY INSTRUCTIONS DURING TRIAL Problem: You re In The Middle Of Trial And Something Occurs (Usually An Evidentiary Issue) That Requires A Cautionary Instruction

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION 2:17-cv-13241-BAF-DRG Doc # 1 Filed 10/03/17 Pg 1 of 20 Pg ID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION SHARON STEIN, as Personal Representative of the Estate of JOHN

More information

Case 1:11-cv JHM-HBB Document 1 Filed 12/12/11 Page 1 of 15 PageID #: 1

Case 1:11-cv JHM-HBB Document 1 Filed 12/12/11 Page 1 of 15 PageID #: 1 Case 1:11-cv-00189-JHM-HBB Document 1 Filed 12/12/11 Page 1 of 15 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY BOWLING GREEN DIVISION [Filed Electronically] STUART COLE and LOREN

More information

Case 3:15-cv AJB-KSC Document 1 Filed 10/16/15 PageID.1 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 3:15-cv AJB-KSC Document 1 Filed 10/16/15 PageID.1 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case :-cv-0-ajb-ksc Document Filed 0// PageID. Page of 0 0 Daniel M. Gilleon (SBN 00) The Gilleon Law Firm 0 Columbia Street, Suite 00 San Diego, CA 0 Tel:.0./Fax:.0. dmg@mglawyers.com Steve Hoffman (SBN

More information

JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 1. Members of the jury, the instructions I gave at the. instructions I gave you earlier, as well as those I give

JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 1. Members of the jury, the instructions I gave at the. instructions I gave you earlier, as well as those I give Case 0:06-cv-01497-MJD-RLE Document 97 Filed 10/04/2007 Page 1 of 30 JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 1 Members of the jury, the instructions I gave at the beginning of the trial and during the trial remain in effect.

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case :-cv-0-cab-blm Document 0 Filed 0// Page of UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ABIGAIL TALLEY, a minor, through her mother ELIZABETH TALLEY, Plaintiff, vs. ERIC CHANSON et

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA SHREVEPORT DIVISION JUDGE:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA SHREVEPORT DIVISION JUDGE: Case 3:09-cv-01264-RGJ-KLH Document 1 Filed 07/29/09 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA SHREVEPORT DIVISION RENEE STRINGER Plaintiff, V. CIVIL ACTION NO: JUDGE: WESLEY

More information

CAUSE NO CHARGE OF THE COURT

CAUSE NO CHARGE OF THE COURT P-22 CAUSE NO. 2011-36476 MARYELLEN WOLF AND DAVID WOLF IN THE DISTRICT FolR~E D Chris Daniel District Clerk v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., AS TRUSTEE FOR CARRINGTON MORTGAGE LOAN TRUST, TOM CROFT, NEW CENTURY

More information

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JAMES CLEM, G. LOMELI, No. 07-16764 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. v. CV-05-02129-JKS Defendant-Appellee. OPINION Appeal from the United

More information

Case3:05-cv WHA Document1 Filed02/14/05 Page1 of 5

Case3:05-cv WHA Document1 Filed02/14/05 Page1 of 5 Case:0-cv-00-WHA Document Filed0//0 Page of Wayne Johnson, SBN: Law Offices of Wayne Johnson P.O. Box 0 Oakland, CA 0 (0) - Attorney for Plaintiffs 0 LYNART COLLINS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN

More information

Ninth Circuit Manual of. Model Jury Instructions. Civil

Ninth Circuit Manual of. Model Jury Instructions. Civil Ninth Circuit Manual of Model Jury Instructions Civil 2007 INTRODUCTION This Manual of Model Civil Jury Instructions ( Manual ) has been prepared to help judges communicate effectively with juries. The

More information

MODEL MOTOR VEHICLE NEGLIGENCE CHARGE AND VERDICT SHEET. MOTOR VEHICLE VOLUME REPLACEMENT JUNE

MODEL MOTOR VEHICLE NEGLIGENCE CHARGE AND VERDICT SHEET. MOTOR VEHICLE VOLUME REPLACEMENT JUNE Page 1 of 25 100.00 MODEL MOTOR VEHICLE NEGLIGENCE CHARGE AND VERDICT SHEET. NOTE WELL: This is a sample only. Your case must be tailored to fit your facts and the law. Do not blindly follow this pattern.

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PANAMA CITY DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PANAMA CITY DIVISION Case 5:17-cv-00299-RH-GRJ Document 1 Filed 12/12/17 Page 1 of 7 PATRICIA LYNN GOTHARD, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PANAMA CITY DIVISION vs. Plaintiff, Case No. 5:17-CV-299

More information

Case4:07-cv PJH Document1171 Filed05/29/12 Page1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case4:07-cv PJH Document1171 Filed05/29/12 Page1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case:0-cv-0-PJH Document Filed0// Page of UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 0 0 ORACLE INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, Plaintiff, No. C 0- PJH v. FINAL PRETRIAL ORDER SAP AG, et al.,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 0 0 STEVEN EDWARDS, v. Plaintiff, A. DESFOSSES, et al., Defendants. Plaintiff Steven Edwards is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this

More information

Courtesy of RosenfeldInjuryLawyers.com (888)

Courtesy of RosenfeldInjuryLawyers.com (888) Jury Instructions Now that the evidence has concluded, I will instruct you as to the law and your duties. The law regarding this case is contained in the instructions I will give to you. You must consider

More information

Case 3:12-cv SI Document 47 Filed 03/07/12 Page 1 of 14 Page ID#: 1507

Case 3:12-cv SI Document 47 Filed 03/07/12 Page 1 of 14 Page ID#: 1507 Case 3:12-cv-00071-SI Document 47 Filed 03/07/12 Page 1 of 14 Page ID#: 1507 Lynn S. Walsh, OSB #924955 email: walsh@europa.com 209 SW Oak Street, Suite 400 Portland, Oregon 97204 Telephone: Facsimile:

More information

case 2:14-cv PPS-JEM document 15 filed 09/21/14 page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA HAMMOND DIVISION

case 2:14-cv PPS-JEM document 15 filed 09/21/14 page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA HAMMOND DIVISION case 2:14-cv-00234-PPS-JEM document 15 filed 09/21/14 page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA HAMMOND DIVISION NICHOLAS KINCADE, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) NO: 2:14-CV-234-PPS-JEM

More information

Case 5:12-cv FPS-JES Document 117 Filed 05/15/14 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1973

Case 5:12-cv FPS-JES Document 117 Filed 05/15/14 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1973 Case 5:12-cv-00126-FPS-JES Document 117 Filed 05/15/14 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1973 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA JAMES G. BORDAS and LINDA M. BORDAS, Plaintiffs,

More information

)(

)( Case 1:07-cv-03339-MGC Document 1 Filed 04/26/07 Page 1 of 20 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -----------------------------------------------------------)( LUMUMBA BANDELE, DJIBRIL

More information

Second, you must not be influenced by sympathy, passion or prejudice in favor of any party or against any of the parties.

Second, you must not be influenced by sympathy, passion or prejudice in favor of any party or against any of the parties. CLOSING INSTRUCTIONS Members of the jury, we now come to that part of the case where I must give you the instructions on the law. If you cannot hear me, please raise your hand. It is important that you

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION. Plaintiff, FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION. Plaintiff, FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION PRISON LEGAL NEWS, a project of the HUMAN RIGHTS DEFENSE CENTER, Case No.: 3:12-cv-00071-SI v. Plaintiff, FINDINGS OF FACT

More information

2:10-cv SB-BM Date Filed 10/06/10 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 17

2:10-cv SB-BM Date Filed 10/06/10 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 17 2:10-cv-02594-SB-BM Date Filed 10/06/10 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 17 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA CHARLESTON DIVISION PRISON LEGAL NEWS and Case No.: HUMAN RIGHTS

More information

3:14-cv SEM-TSH # 1 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS SPRINGFIELD DIVISION

3:14-cv SEM-TSH # 1 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS SPRINGFIELD DIVISION 3:14-cv-03087-SEM-TSH # 1 Page 1 of 10 E-FILED Wednesday, 26 March, 2014 02:37:15 PM Clerk, U.S. District Court, ILCD IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS SPRINGFIELD

More information

3:14-cv CSB-DGB # 1 Page 1 of 8 IN THE U.S. DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS SPRINGFIELD DIVISION. Plaintiff, No.: Defendants.

3:14-cv CSB-DGB # 1 Page 1 of 8 IN THE U.S. DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS SPRINGFIELD DIVISION. Plaintiff, No.: Defendants. 3:14-cv-03055-CSB-DGB # 1 Page 1 of 8 E-FILED Wednesday, 12 February, 2014 10:30:29 AM Clerk, U.S. District Court, ILCD IN THE U.S. DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS SPRINGFIELD DIVISION RICHARD

More information

JUDGE DENISE POSSE LINDBERG STOCK CIVIL JURY INSTRUCTIONS TABLE OF CONTENTS

JUDGE DENISE POSSE LINDBERG STOCK CIVIL JURY INSTRUCTIONS TABLE OF CONTENTS JUDGE DENISE POSSE LINDBERG STOCK CIVIL JURY INSTRUCTIONS TABLE OF CONTENTS Stock Opening Instructions Introduction and General Instructions... 1 Summary of the Case... 2 Role of Judge, Jury and Lawyers...

More information

Courthouse News Service

Courthouse News Service Case 1:09-cv-00155-JRH-WLB Document 1 Filed 12/09/09 Page 1 of 22 DUSTIN MYERS and RODNEY MYERS. Plaintiffs, VS. MURRY BOWMAN, Individually, and as the Chief Magistrate of Jefferson County, Georgia; WILEY

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION Case 8:10-cv-02411-JDW-EAJ Document 1 Filed 10/27/10 Page 1 of 10 PageID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION BELINDA BROADERS, AS PARENT, NATURAL GUARDIAN AND FOR AND

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS, WESTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS, WESTERN DIVISION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS, WESTERN DIVISION KIRK CHRZANOWSKI, ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) No. 12 CV 50020 ) LOUIS A. BIANCHI, individually and in ) Judge: his

More information

Mendez and 1983 WILLIAM W. KRUEGER III BENJAMIN J. GIBBS

Mendez and 1983 WILLIAM W. KRUEGER III BENJAMIN J. GIBBS Mendez and 1983 WILLIAM W. KRUEGER III BENJAMIN J. GIBBS Roadmap Overview of 1983 1983 Causation Examples: Municipal Liability Claims, First Amendment Retaliation Ninth Circuit s Provocation Rule The County

More information

Case 5:08-cv GTS-GJD Document 1 Filed 11/10/2008 Page 1 of 15

Case 5:08-cv GTS-GJD Document 1 Filed 11/10/2008 Page 1 of 15 Case 5:08-cv-01211-GTS-GJD Document 1 Filed 11/10/2008 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK JAMES DEFERIO, v. Plaintiff, CITY OF ITHACA; EDWARD VALLELY, individually

More information

9 of their attorneys you have learned the conclusion which 10 each party believes should be drawn from the evidence

9 of their attorneys you have learned the conclusion which 10 each party believes should be drawn from the evidence 6 THE COURT: Thank you very much, Mr. Kelly. 7 Members of the jury, you have now heard all the 8 evidence Introduced by the parties and through the arguments 9 of their attorneys you have learned the conclusion

More information

Case 1:15-cv SCY-KBM Document 8-4 Filed 02/06/15 Page 1 of 10 EXHIBIT 2. Protecting Your. Health & Safety A LITIGATION GUIDE FOR INMATES

Case 1:15-cv SCY-KBM Document 8-4 Filed 02/06/15 Page 1 of 10 EXHIBIT 2. Protecting Your. Health & Safety A LITIGATION GUIDE FOR INMATES Case 1:15-cv-00107-SCY-KBM Document 8-4 Filed 02/06/15 Page 1 of 10 EXHIBIT 2 Protecting Your Health & Safety A LITIGATION GUIDE FOR INMATES Written by Robert E. Toone Edited by Dan Manville Case 1:15-cv-00107-SCY-KBM

More information

2:16-cv EIL # 26 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS ORDER

2:16-cv EIL # 26 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS ORDER 2:16-cv-02153-EIL # 26 Page 1 of 7 E-FILED Thursday, 20 April, 2017 04:06:30 PM Clerk, U.S. District Court, ILCD IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS LUIS BELLO, Plaintiff,

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Chief Judge Wiley Y. Daniel

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Chief Judge Wiley Y. Daniel Civil Action No. 10-cv-02242-WYD-KLM IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Chief Judge Wiley Y. Daniel MICHAEL JASON MARTINEZ; ELIZABETH FRITZ; THOMAS TRUJILLO; AMBER HUGENOT;

More information

Case 1:19-cv PKC Document 25 Filed 02/22/19 Page 1 of 16

Case 1:19-cv PKC Document 25 Filed 02/22/19 Page 1 of 16 Case 1:19-cv-01066-PKC Document 25 Filed 02/22/19 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK EXPEDIA, INC., Index No.: 19-cv-01066 (PKC) Plaintiff, - against - ANSWER TO COMPLAINT

More information

Recent Developments in Punitive Damages

Recent Developments in Punitive Damages Recent Developments in Punitive Damages Clinton C. Carter Beasley, Allen, Crow, Methvin, Portis & Miles, P.C. 272 Commerce Street Montgomery, Alabama 36104 February 13, 2004 The recent development with

More information

Case 4:16-cv JSW Document 32 Filed 12/05/16 Page 1 of 7 NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 4:16-cv JSW Document 32 Filed 12/05/16 Page 1 of 7 NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case :-cv-0-jsw Document Filed /0/ Page of NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 0 0 DAVID R. REED, v. Plaintiff, KRON/IBEW LOCAL PENSION PLAN, et al., Defendants.

More information

Case: 1:15-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 01/23/15 Page 1 of 10 PageID #:1

Case: 1:15-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 01/23/15 Page 1 of 10 PageID #:1 Case: 1:15-cv-00720 Document #: 1 Filed: 01/23/15 Page 1 of 10 PageID #:1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS, EASTERN DIVISION MALIA KIM BENDIS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. )

More information

Case 5:14-cr M Document 27 Filed 05/04/15 Page 1 of 32 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

Case 5:14-cr M Document 27 Filed 05/04/15 Page 1 of 32 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA Case 5:14-cr-00318-M Document 27 Filed 05/04/15 Page 1 of 32 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) -vs- ) No. 5:14-cr-00318

More information

NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 03 2014 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ALFONSO W. JANUARY, an individual, No. 12-56171 and Plaintiff-Appellee,

More information

Case: 1:13-cv Document #: 15 Filed: 01/27/14 Page 1 of 16 PageID #:29

Case: 1:13-cv Document #: 15 Filed: 01/27/14 Page 1 of 16 PageID #:29 Case: 1:13-cv-04152 Document #: 15 Filed: 01/27/14 Page 1 of 16 PageID #:29 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION KEVIN CZAJA ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v.

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI ST. JOSEPH DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI ST. JOSEPH DIVISION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI ST. JOSEPH DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. No. 09-00121-01-CR-SJ-DGK GILBERTO LARA-RUIZ, a/k/a HILL Defendant.

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA CASE 0:12-cv-00738-MJD-AJB Document 3 Filed 03/29/12 Page 1 of 21 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Melissa Hill, v. Plaintiff, Civil File No. 12-CV-738 MJD/AJB AMENDED COMPLAINT AND DEMAND

More information

Preliminary Statement

Preliminary Statement 2:11-cv-13460-DPH-MAR Doc # 1 Filed 08/09/11 Pg 1 of 7 Pg ID 1 PRISON LEGAL NEWS, a project of the Human Rights Defense Center, Plaintiff, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS GALVESTON DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS GALVESTON DIVISION Case 3:10-cv-00252 Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 06/29/10 Page 1 of 16 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS GALVESTON DIVISION HUNG MICHAEL NGUYEN NO. an individual; On

More information

Case 3:17-cv MO Document 1 Filed 09/27/17 Page 1 of 10

Case 3:17-cv MO Document 1 Filed 09/27/17 Page 1 of 10 Case 3:17-cv-01528-MO Document 1 Filed 09/27/17 Page 1 of 10 Michael Fuller, OSB No. 09357 Lead Attorney for Plaintiffs Olsen Daines PC US Bancorp Tower 111 SW 5th Ave., Suite 3150 Portland, Oregon 97204

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case :-cv-0 Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0 0 LAW OFFICES OF DALE K. GALIPO Dale K. Galipo, Esq. (SBN 0) dalekgalipo@yahoo.com 00 Burbank Boulevard, Suite 0 Woodland Hills, California Telephone:

More information

Case 2:17-cv GJQ-TPG ECF No. 1 filed 01/25/17 PageID.1 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION

Case 2:17-cv GJQ-TPG ECF No. 1 filed 01/25/17 PageID.1 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION Case 2:17-cv-00018-GJQ-TPG ECF No. 1 filed 01/25/17 PageID.1 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION DARREN FINDLING, as Personal Representative for The

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge William J. Martínez

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge William J. Martínez King v. Allstate Insurance Company Doc. 242 Civil Action No. 11-cv-00103-WJM-BNB IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge William J. Martínez DENNIS W. KING, Colorado resident

More information

Case 6:18-cv MC Document 1 Filed 01/04/18 Page 1 of 12

Case 6:18-cv MC Document 1 Filed 01/04/18 Page 1 of 12 Case 6:18-cv-00028-MC Document 1 Filed 01/04/18 Page 1 of 12 Michael Fuller, OSB No. 09357 Lead Attorney for Plaintiff Olsen Daines PC US Bancorp Tower 111 SW 5th Ave., Suite 3150 Portland, Oregon 97204

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Case 2:16-cv-02814-JFB Document 9 Filed 02/27/17 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 223 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK N o 16-CV-2814 (JFB) RAYMOND A. TOWNSEND, Appellant, VERSUS GERALYN

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON Case :-cv-000-tor Document Filed 0// UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON NICHOLAS CRISCUOLO, Plaintiff, v. GRANT COUNTY, et al., Defendants. NO: -CV-00-TOR ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS

More information

RESPONDENT S BRIEF IN OPPOSITION

RESPONDENT S BRIEF IN OPPOSITION No, 10-1468 ~ OFFICE OF THE CI ERK IN THE ~upreme ~eurt e[ the ~tniteb ~tate~ DALLAS COUNTY TEXAS, Vo Petitioner, MARK DUVALL, Respondent. On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court

More information

Case 3:17-cv AC Document 1 Filed 11/09/17 Page 1 of 15

Case 3:17-cv AC Document 1 Filed 11/09/17 Page 1 of 15 Case 3:17-cv-01795-AC Document 1 Filed 11/09/17 Page 1 of 15 Michael Fuller, OSB No. 09357 Lead Attorney for Plaintiff Olsen Daines PC US Bancorp Tower 111 SW 5th Ave., Suite 3150 Portland, Oregon 97204

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case :-cv-0-gmn-vcf Document 0 Filed 0// Page of UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA RAYMOND JAMES DUENSING, JR. individually, vs. Plaintiff, DAVID MICHAEL GILBERT, individually and in his

More information

Case 2:06-cv FSH-PS Document 20 Filed 01/10/08 Page 1 of 7

Case 2:06-cv FSH-PS Document 20 Filed 01/10/08 Page 1 of 7 Case 2:06-cv-05977-FSH-PS Document 20 Filed 01/10/08 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY -------------------------------------------------------X SALEEM LIGHTY, -against- Plaintiff,

More information

In the Supreme Court of the United States

In the Supreme Court of the United States NO. 11-651 In the Supreme Court of the United States PERRY L. RENIFF, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS SHERIFF OF THE COUNTY OF BUTTE, CALIFORNIA, Petitioner, v. RAY HRDLICKA, AN INDIVIDUAL; CRIME, JUSTICE

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Case :0-cv-000-DGC Document Filed 0//0 Page of Steven E. Harrison, Esq. (No. 00) N. Patrick Hall, Esq. (No. 0) WALLIN HARRISON PLC South Higley Road, Suite 0 Gilbert, Arizona Telephone: (0) 0-0 Facsimile:

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 18-cv-02593 MICKEY HOWARD v. Plaintiff, THE CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, COLORADO Defendant. COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND Plaintiff

More information

Summons SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF WAYNE X

Summons SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF WAYNE X SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF WAYNE --------------------------------------------------------------------X JANET E. ENOCH, STEVE O. HINDI, AND MICHAEL KOBLISKA, - against Plaintiff(s),

More information

Courthouse News Service

Courthouse News Service UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------------------------------------X JANE DOE, -against- Plaintiff, COUNTY OF ULSTER, ULSTER COUNTY SHERIFF S DEPARTMENT,

More information

JUROR INSTRUCTIONS ALONG W/ QUESTIONS & ANSWERS FOR POTENTIAL JURORS

JUROR INSTRUCTIONS ALONG W/ QUESTIONS & ANSWERS FOR POTENTIAL JURORS JUROR INSTRUCTIONS ALONG W/ QUESTIONS & ANSWERS FOR POTENTIAL JURORS As a Juror, there are certain responsibilities you will be asked to fulfill. A Juror must be prompt. A trial cannot begin or continue

More information

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS CURTIS TOWNE and JOYCE TOWNE, Plaintiffs-Appellees, UNPUBLISHED April 8, 2003 v No. 231006 Oakland Circuit Court GREGORY HOOVER and MIDWEST LC No. 99-013718-CK FIBERGLASS

More information

2:17-cv AC-APP Doc # 31 Filed 12/27/17 Pg 1 of 5 Pg ID 628 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

2:17-cv AC-APP Doc # 31 Filed 12/27/17 Pg 1 of 5 Pg ID 628 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION 2:17-cv-10195-AC-APP Doc # 31 Filed 12/27/17 Pg 1 of 5 Pg ID 628 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ERVIN DIXON and ELSA DIXON, Plaintiffs, v. Case No. 17-10195

More information

8.50 INVASION OF PRIVACY DAMAGES (01/2016) NOTE TO JUDGE

8.50 INVASION OF PRIVACY DAMAGES (01/2016) NOTE TO JUDGE CHARGE 8.50 Page 1 of 19 8.50 INVASION OF PRIVACY DAMAGES (01/2016) NOTE TO JUDGE A plaintiff who has established a cause of action for invasion of privacy is entitled to recover damages for (1) the harm

More information

Instruction, Note (Civ) RULES GOVERNING JUROR CONDUCT DURING TRIAL

Instruction, Note (Civ) RULES GOVERNING JUROR CONDUCT DURING TRIAL 1.180 * 53 Instruction, Note 1.180 (Civ) RULES GOVERNING JUROR CONDUCT DURING TRIAL This case is very important to all the parties. The parties are entitled to your full attention throughout the trial

More information

Case 1:15-cv WJM-NYW Document 45 Filed 10/28/15 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 7

Case 1:15-cv WJM-NYW Document 45 Filed 10/28/15 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 7 Case 1:15-cv-00166-WJM-NYW Document 45 Filed 10/28/15 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 7 Civil Action No. 15-cv-0166-WJM-NYW TAMMY FISHER, v. Plaintiff, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE ORDER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE ORDER 0 0 MARY MATSON, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE Plaintiff, UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC., Defendant. HONORABLE RICHARD A. JONES CASE NO. C0- RAJ ORDER On November,

More information

Case 1:12-cv WGY Document 6 Filed 10/04/12 Page 1 of 30 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRCT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Case 1:12-cv WGY Document 6 Filed 10/04/12 Page 1 of 30 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRCT OF MASSACHUSETTS Case 1:12-cv-40120-WGY Document 6 Filed 10/04/12 Page 1 of 30 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRCT OF MASSACHUSETTS ) ROBERTO CARLOS DOMINGUEZ, ) Plaintiff ) ) v. ) ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I. In the Matter of the Publication and Distribution. of the

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I. In the Matter of the Publication and Distribution. of the Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCMF-11-0000655 07-SEP-2011 08:58 AM IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I In the Matter of the Publication and Distribution of the Hawai i Pattern Jury Instructions

More information

Case: 3:17-cv TMR Doc #: 1 Filed: 05/24/17 Page: 1 of 7 PAGEID #: 1

Case: 3:17-cv TMR Doc #: 1 Filed: 05/24/17 Page: 1 of 7 PAGEID #: 1 Case 317-cv-00183-TMR Doc # 1 Filed 05/24/17 Page 1 of 7 PAGEID # 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON DARYL WALLACE C/O Gerhardstein & Branch Co.

More information

THE LAW OFFICES OF JOHN BURTON

THE LAW OFFICES OF JOHN BURTON THE LAW OFFICES OF JOHN BURTON ON THE WEB AT WWW.JOHNBURTONLAW.COM 414 SOUTH MARENGO AVENUE PASADENA, CALIFORNIA 91101 Telephone: (626) 449-8300 Facsimile: (626) 449-4417 W RITER S E-MAIL: OFFICE@JOHNBURTONLAW.COM

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION Case 2:08-cv-00016-LED-RSP Document 567 Filed 09/18/13 Page 1 of 39 PageID #: 24019 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION RETRACTABLE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

More information

Response To Motions In Limine, Knuth v. City of Lincoln et al, Docket No. 3:11-cv (C.D. Ill. Jul 01, 2011)

Response To Motions In Limine, Knuth v. City of Lincoln et al, Docket No. 3:11-cv (C.D. Ill. Jul 01, 2011) The John Marshall Law School The John Marshall Institutional Repository Court Documents and Proposed Legislation 7-1-2011 Response To Motions In Limine, Knuth v. City of Lincoln et al, Docket No. 3:11-cv-03185

More information

Case 3:15-cv JLS-JMA Document 1 Filed 06/26/15 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA JURISDICTION AND VENUE

Case 3:15-cv JLS-JMA Document 1 Filed 06/26/15 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA JURISDICTION AND VENUE Case :-cv-0-jls-jma Document Filed 0// Page of Andrew C. Schwartz (State Bar No. ) A Professional Corporation North California Blvd., Walnut Creek, California Telephone: () - Facsimile: () - schwartz@cmslaw.com

More information

~------~-----) IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Case No. CO? ~ V

~------~-----) IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Case No. CO? ~ V 1 ROSEN, BIEN & GALVAN, LLP Sanford Jay Rosen, Bar No. 62566 2 Meghan Lang, Bar No. 221156 Amy Whelan, Bar No. 215675 3 315 Montgomery Street, 10th Floor San Francisco, California 94104 4 Telephone: (415

More information