Criminal Procedure - Three-Year Prescription on Indictments

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Criminal Procedure - Three-Year Prescription on Indictments"

Transcription

1 Louisiana Law Review Volume 16 Number 1 December 1955 Criminal Procedure - Three-Year Prescription on Indictments William J. Doran Jr. Repository Citation William J. Doran Jr., Criminal Procedure - Three-Year Prescription on Indictments, 16 La. L. Rev. (1955) Available at: This Note is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Reviews and Journals at LSU Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Louisiana Law Review by an authorized editor of LSU Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact kayla.reed@law.lsu.edu.

2 LOUISIANA LAW REVIEW [Vol. XVI have refused to tamper with the Florida judgment and yet refrained from holding the statute unconstitutional. The result of the decision might be that similar suits will be precluded even where the facts present a desirable case for modification. By holding the statute unconstitutional, it appears that the Colorado Supreme Court has unnecessarily limited the power of its state's courts to adjudicate matters involving recognition of foreign judgments. Patrick T. Caffery CRIMINAL PROCEDURE - THREE-YEAR PRESCRIPTION ON INDICTMENTS On September 21, 1951, a bill of information was filed a,;ainst defendants charging them with unlawful possession of narcotics. The arraignment was held on October 15, 1951, but the case was not set for trial until September 30, On the date of the trial, defendants filed a plea of prescription based upon article 8 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.' They contended that since more than three years had elapsed without trial since the date of the filing of the bill of information, the charge should be dismissed. The state contended, on the other hand, that under article 9 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 2 the arraignment of defendants was a prosecutive step which started a new three-year prescriptive period and that the date set for trial was within the new period. The trial court rejected the state's contention and sustained defendant's plea of prescription. On appeal, held, affirmed. Articles 8 and 9 of the Code of Criminal Procedure establish separate three-year prescriptive periods. Under article 8, if three years elapse in a felony case invoked in the instant case) a Texas decree ordering a husband to support a daughter in his wife's custody until the age of sixteen, was not a final judgment and not entitled to full faith and credit. It ordered the husband to pay additional future alimony. 1. LA. R.S. 15:8 (1950). The pertinent provisions of article 8 state: "In felony cases when three years elapse from the date of finding an indictment, or filing an information,... it shall be the duty of the district attorney to enter a nolle prosequi if the accused has not been tried, and if the district attorney fail or neglect to do so, the court may on motion of the defendant or his attorney cause such nolle prosequi to be entered." 2. LA. R.S. 15:9 (1950) : "Whenever it shall have been established to the satisfaction of any court in which any criminal prosecution shall be pending that the prescriptive periods as herein provided have elapsed since the last date upon which any steps shall have been taken by the state in such prosecution, and that the district attorney has not entered his nolle prosequi, the court shall order the dismissal of said prosecution... "

3 1955] NOTES from the date of filing the bill of information without trial of an accused or without interruption of prescription by an act of the accused, the court may cause a nolle prosequi to be entered. State v. Bradley, 227 La. 421, 79 So.2d 561 (1955). The Louisiana Constitution 3 guarantees the accused in a criminal prosecution the right to a speedy trial. Articles 8 and 9 of the Code of Criminal Procedure are designed to assure the accused in a felony 4 case that this right will be protected by providing that, except for certain interrupting circumstances, the accused must be tried within three years of the date of the charge. Until the instant case, the possibility of there being two distinct prescriptive periods of three years under articles 8 and 9 does not seem to have been considered by the Supreme Court.6 In previous holdings the Supreme Court treated article 8 as establishing the prescription of three years on dormant charges, and article 9 as setting forth the procedure by which a defendant could obtain a judicial nolle prosequi. 6 In two of these earlier cases, the court characterized the period within which the accused must be brought to trial under articles 8 and 9 as "the prescriptive period. ' 'T The instant case, however, placed before the Supreme Court for the first time the problem of interpreting the language of article 9 to the effect that "whenever... the prescriptive periods... have elapsed since the last date upon which any steps shall have been taken by the state in such prosecution" the prosecution shall be ordered dismissed. The state relied upon this language to support its contention that a new prescriptive period had begun on the filing of the arraignment, which constituted the last prosecutive step. 8 Under this interpretation, however, 3. LA. CONST. art. I, Articles 8 and 9 also provide for a prescriptive period of two years from the indictment in non-felony cases. Only the three-year period applicable to felony cases will be discussed in this note, but the discussion is equally applicable to the two-year period in non-felony cases. 5. For a discussion prior to the instant case of the three-year prescription, see Comment, Prescription of Criminal Prosecutions in Louisiana, 15 LOUISIANA LAW RmEEw 192, 196 (1954). 6. Comment, Prescription of Criminal Prosecutions, 6 LOUISIANA LAW REVIEW 274, 279 (1945). 7. State v. Shushan, 204 La. 672, 681, 16 So.2d 227, 230 (1943) ; State v. Gunter, 188 La. 314, 317, 177 So. 60, 61 (1937). 8. See State v. Edrington, 11 Orl. App. 288, 289 (La. App. 1914) for a definition of prosecutive step as "some formal move before the court, intended to hasten the judgment." It is defined in a civil case, Augusta Sugar v. Haley, 163 La. 814, 816, 112 So. 731, 732 (1927) as "something more than a mere passive effort to keep the suit on the docket of the court." See Note, 16 LOUISIANA LAW REVIEW 199 (1955) for a discussion of this problem in civil cases.

4 LOUISIANA LAW REVIEW (Vol. XVI it would be within the power of the district attorney to keep a charge pending indefinitely, simply by taking a step in the prosecution whenever the three-year period was about to elapse. The court appears to have alluded to this problem in the recent case of State v. Murray. 9 There the court indicated that the right to be tried within three years of an indictment is absolute, unless the delay results from the accused's own action or inability to stand trial. This interpretation of article 8 would preclude any idea that article 9 provides a second prescriptive period. It would also constitute a rejection of the contention that article 9 provides the state with a method of interrupting prescription. The decision in the instant case in effect constitutes a rejection of the approach suggested in the Murray case. Although the court gave no reason for doing so, a possible explanation would be that the approach of the Murray case would render-the relevant portions of article 9 ineffective. By holding that articles 8 and 9 provide for two prescriptive periods the court apparently felt that it had given effect to the language of both articles. It is submitted, however, that the interpretation given in the instant case also fails to present a complete solution to the problem. In the instant case, the court concluded that the two articles were drawn to provide two separate and unrelated prescriptive periods; the period under article 8 running from the date of the charge, and that under article 9 from the date of the last prosecutive step. The court found support for this distinction in the fact that articles 8 and 9 are couched in different language. Article 8 states that the court "may... cause such nolle prosequi to be entered," while article 9 states "the court shall order dismissal of said prosecution." (Emphasis added.) Thus, if the accused is not brought to trial within three years from the date of the charge, the trial judge may, in his discretion, enter a nolle La. 950, 64 So.2d 230 (1953). In discussing the possibility that, in a theft case, the state could reduce the original charge by one dollar each year and file a new bill, thus keeping the charge hanging over the accused for many years, the court said: "But, apart from this, there is no reason to suppose that the courts would permit the State to indulge in the practice feared by counsel as LSA-R.S. 15:8 also provides that, in felony cases, the accused must be bfought to trial within 3 years from the date of finding an indictment or filing an information, and, if he is not, the court may cause the charge to be nolle prosequied. Accordingly, any use of the privilege accorded the State to recharge a defendant with crime based on the same facts is specially limited by this requirement that he be tried within three years from the date of the original charge." Id. at 956, 64 So.2d at 232. The problem is also discussed in the subject case. State v. Bradley, 79 So.2d 561, 564 (La. 1955).

5 1955] NOTES prosequi. On the other hand, if the accused is not brought to trial within three years of the last prosecutive step, the trial judge must enter a nolle prosequi. This interpretation could prove troublesome. By holding the language of article 8 to be permissive, the Supreme Court seems to have granted the trial judge power to defeat the purpose of the three-year prescriptive rule, which is to assure the accused the right to a speedy trial. Under this interpretation, the trial judge could refuse to nolle prosequi an indictment despite the fact that the accused has been available for prosecution during the entire three-year period. It is improbable, however, that the Supreme Court would permit the trial judge to exercise his powers in such arbitrary fashion 0 and would no doubt find the refusal to nolle prosequi the indictment to be an abuse of discretion." This would raise a further question as to whether the second prescriptive period provided for in article 9 would ever be applicable. To hold it to be an abuse of discretion to refuse to nolle prosequi an indictment in such case would in effect prevent application of the second prescriptive period, since the first period would, in most cases, expire before the second. There are other practical problems presented by the Supreme Court's designation of two separate prescriptive periods. Notable among these is the question whether or not the mandatory prescriptive period from the last prosecutive step, as set out in 10. In the instant case the court stated: "It is conceivable that three years could elapse after the filing of a bill of information without the defendant's being brought to trial, and that the district attorney would refuse to enter a nolle prosequi because he felt that there was a valid reason for the State's delay. If the trial judge on motion of the defendant rules the district attorney to show cause why a nolle prosequi should not be entered, and after hearing decides that the trial of the accused has been delayed for a justifiable reason, the court can refuse to enter a nolle prosequi." State v. Bradley, 79 So.2d 561, 563 (La. 1955). The court does not indicate what would be a justifiable reason for delaying the trial beyond three years. However, in light of the purpose of the prescriptive period, and the opinion in the case of State v. Murray, 222 La. 950, 64 So.2d 230 (1953), it is submitted that the only justifiable reasons for a delay in excess of three years would be acts of the accused which prevent his being brought to trial, or the occurrence of circumstances beyond the control of the state which prevent the accused from being brought to trial. See note 14 infra. 11. In other areas where the trial judge has been granted discretionary powers, the court has held that these powers must be reasonably exercised. See, e.g., State v. Pearson, 224 La. 393, 69 So.2d 512 (1953) and State v. Leming, 217 La. 257, 46 So.2d 262 (1950) (trial judge's refusal to grant a change of venue will be reversed if an abuse of discretion is shown) ; State v. Verdin, 192 La. 275, 187 So. 666 (1939) and State v. Soileau, 173 La. 531, 138 So. 92 (1931) (refusal of a trial judge to allow a change in plea held to be an abuse of discretion) ; State v. Wilson, 181 La. 61, 158 So. 621 (1935) and State v. Martin, 145 La. 35, 81 So. 747 (1919) (refusal of the trial judge to grant a continuance held to be an abuse of discretion).

6 LOUISIANA LAW REVIEW [Vol. XVI article 9, can be interrupted or suspended. Article 8 expressly provides the methods by which the period set forth in that article can be interrupted, 2 but the only provision of article 9 which mentions interruption of prescription refers to the period established in article This may give rise to the argument that the mandatory period cannot be interrupted by acts of the accused. If this position were taken, an accused who absconds from justice after a step is taken in his prosecution would be entitled as of right to a nolle prosequi after three years has expired. It is unlikely that the Supreme Court would allow such a result to occur. To avoid this anomaly, the court could apply article 8 by analogy to article 9 by holding that the mandatory period can be interrupted by acts of the accused which prevent his being brought to trial within the prescriptive period. A similar result could be achieved by application of the principle established by the jurisprudence, that the accused must have been amenable to prosecution at all times during the period for the prescription to run. 4 Nevertheless, the action of the court in the instant case, in dismissing the prosecution, appears to be correct under either interpretation of articles 8 and 9. If the articles provide for two prescriptive periods, it was within the trial judge's discretion to enter a nolle prosequi under article 8. The same result would be reached under the concept of a single period. As pointed out previously, a prosecutive step taken by the state should not be allowed to interrupt a period which has been established to insure the defendant's being brought to trial with reasonable promptness. 12. "Nothing in this article shall apply or extend to an accused person who has absconded, or -who is a fugitive from justice or who has escaped trial through dilatory pleas, or continuances obtained by him or in his behalf." 13. "[Tlhat unless the defendant has posted requisite appearance bond, the prescription established in Art. 8 hereof shall be interrupted by the absence of the defendant from the jurisdiction of said court without the written consent of the court first obtained and entered upon the minutes, or filed in the records of the cause." 14. The decision in State v. Theard, 212 La. 1022, 34 So.2d 248 (1948) is an illustration of this principle. In the Theard case, the accused was charged with the crime on September 1, In December of 1937, he applied for the appointment of a lunacy commission, and on April 20, 1938, he was adjudged insane. On May 11, 1944, the accused was adjudged to be presently sane, but he was not arraigned until March 11, The court held that the prescriptive period was suspended by the Insanity of the accused, since his insanity was a circumstance beyond his control. The action was held to be prescribed since the time between the charge and the decree of insanity together with the time that had expired from the judgment of sanity exceeded three years. In arriving at the decision the court pointed out the fact that the defendant was not amenable to prosecution during the time of his Insanity, and thus prescription could not continue to run.

7 1955] NOTES Much of the confusion in the present law relating to prescription of criminal prosecutions results from the cumbersome structure of these two articles. Article 8 contains provisions relating to three different prescriptive periods, 15 and article 9 either supplements article 8 or adds a fourth prescriptive period. Although the decision in the subject case was an attempt to bring order to this confusion, it does not appear to have improved upon the original situation. It is submitted that the most logical remedy to the situation is corrective legislation. In order to avoid the present confusion in structure and language, the prescriptive period for charging the crime and the period for bringing the defendant to trial after the charge is filed should be stated in separate articles, each including its own provisions as to interruption and suspension. The provision for the three-year period should include the following: (1) The period should begin to run from the date of the charge. (2) After the lapse of three years, an accused should have an absolute right to a nolle prosequi if he can show that nothing has occurred that would cause the period to be interrupted or suspended. (3) Interruption of the period should be limited to acts of the accused as now provided in articles 8 and 9. (4) A provision for suspension -of the period by occurrences not within the control of the state or the accused should also be included in order to codify the rules developed by the courts on the subject. 10 William J. Doran, Jr. LABOR LAW - RIGHT TO WORK ACT - RESTRAINT OF PEACEFUL PICKETING Plaintiff was engaged in the business of operating a supermarket. Two of its employees, both of whom were meatcutters 15. Article 8 provides for a one-year prescription upon the filing of the indictment running from the time the offense has been made known to the authorities. It also provides for a prescription of six months from the date of the offense on prosecutions for any fine or forfeiture. 16. E.g., concerning the insanity of the accused, see State v. Theard, 212 La. 1022, 34 So.2d 248 (1948). For a general discussion see Annot., 30 A.L.R.2d 462 (1953).

Prescription of Criminal Prosecutions in Louisiana

Prescription of Criminal Prosecutions in Louisiana Louisiana Law Review Volume 15 Number 1 Survey of 1954 Louisiana Legislation December 1954 Prescription of Criminal Prosecutions in Louisiana Mary Ellen Caldwell Repository Citation Mary Ellen Caldwell,

More information

Louisiana Practice - Waiver of Right to Claim Abandonment

Louisiana Practice - Waiver of Right to Claim Abandonment Louisiana Law Review Volume 16 Number 1 December 1955 Louisiana Practice - Waiver of Right to Claim Abandonment Jerry G. Jones Repository Citation Jerry G. Jones, Louisiana Practice - Waiver of Right to

More information

Criminal Procedure - Defense of Insanity - An Appraisal of State v. Watts

Criminal Procedure - Defense of Insanity - An Appraisal of State v. Watts Louisiana Law Review Volume 16 Number 3 April 1956 Criminal Procedure - Defense of Insanity - An Appraisal of State v. Watts Jessie Anne Lennan Repository Citation Jessie Anne Lennan, Criminal Procedure

More information

STATE OF LOUISIANA NO KA-0415 VERSUS COURT OF APPEAL RODERICK WEST FOURTH CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * * *

STATE OF LOUISIANA NO KA-0415 VERSUS COURT OF APPEAL RODERICK WEST FOURTH CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * * * STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS RODERICK WEST NO. 2014-KA-0415 COURT OF APPEAL FOURTH CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA APPEAL FROM CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT ORLEANS PARISH NO. 499-261, SECTION J Honorable Darryl A.

More information

Constitutional Law - Judicial Review - Legalized Gambling - Louisiana State Racing Commission

Constitutional Law - Judicial Review - Legalized Gambling - Louisiana State Racing Commission Louisiana Law Review Volume 16 Number 2 The Work of the Louisiana Supreme Court for the 1954-1955 Term February 1956 Constitutional Law - Judicial Review - Legalized Gambling - Louisiana State Racing Commission

More information

Criminal Procedure - Right to Bill of Particulars After Arraignment

Criminal Procedure - Right to Bill of Particulars After Arraignment Louisiana Law Review Volume 22 Number 3 April 1962 Criminal Procedure - Right to Bill of Particulars After Arraignment Edward C. Abell Jr. Repository Citation Edward C. Abell Jr., Criminal Procedure -

More information

Criminal Procedure - Pleas of Guilty Not Responsive to Bill of Information - Right of State to Correct Proceedings

Criminal Procedure - Pleas of Guilty Not Responsive to Bill of Information - Right of State to Correct Proceedings Louisiana Law Review Volume 21 Number 4 June 1961 Criminal Procedure - Pleas of Guilty Not Responsive to Bill of Information - Right of State to Correct Proceedings Bernard E. Boudreaux Jr. Repository

More information

Criminal Procedure - Short Form Indictment - Constitutionality

Criminal Procedure - Short Form Indictment - Constitutionality Louisiana Law Review Volume 17 Number 1 Survey of 1956 Louisiana Legislation December 1956 Criminal Procedure - Short Form Indictment - Constitutionality Thomas D. Hardeman Repository Citation Thomas D.

More information

Criminal Procedure - Prescription of Prosecutions - Commencement of the Prescriptive Period

Criminal Procedure - Prescription of Prosecutions - Commencement of the Prescriptive Period Louisiana Law Review Volume 20 Number 2 The Work of the Louisiana Supreme Court for the 1958-1959 Term February 1960 Criminal Procedure - Prescription of Prosecutions - Commencement of the Prescriptive

More information

FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA AMENDED ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER GOVERNING THE CRIMINAL TRAFFIC WRITTEN PLEA BUREAU IN ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA

FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA AMENDED ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER GOVERNING THE CRIMINAL TRAFFIC WRITTEN PLEA BUREAU IN ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER NO. 2009-01-01 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA AMENDED ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER GOVERNING THE CRIMINAL TRAFFIC WRITTEN PLEA BUREAU

More information

Civil Procedure - Abandonment of Suit

Civil Procedure - Abandonment of Suit Louisiana Law Review Volume 26 Number 3 The Work of the Louisiana Appellate Courts for the 1965-1966 Term: A Faculty Symposium Symposium: Administration of Criminal Justice April 1966 Civil Procedure -

More information

States - Amenability of State Agency to Suit

States - Amenability of State Agency to Suit Louisiana Law Review Volume 16 Number 4 A Symposium on Legislation June 1956 States - Amenability of State Agency to Suit Billy H. Hines Repository Citation Billy H. Hines, States - Amenability of State

More information

Civil Procedure - Filing Suit In Court of Incompetent Jurisdiction

Civil Procedure - Filing Suit In Court of Incompetent Jurisdiction Louisiana Law Review Volume 25 Number 4 June 1965 Civil Procedure - Filing Suit In Court of Incompetent Jurisdiction Charles S. McCowan Jr. Repository Citation Charles S. McCowan Jr., Civil Procedure -

More information

Employment Contracts - Potestative Conditions

Employment Contracts - Potestative Conditions Louisiana Law Review Volume 13 Number 3 March 1953 Employment Contracts - Potestative Conditions Charles W. Howard Repository Citation Charles W. Howard, Employment Contracts - Potestative Conditions,

More information

Corporations - Voting Rights - Classification of Board to Defeat Cumulative Voting

Corporations - Voting Rights - Classification of Board to Defeat Cumulative Voting Louisiana Law Review Volume 16 Number 3 April 1956 Corporations - Voting Rights - Classification of Board to Defeat Cumulative Voting James M. Dozier Repository Citation James M. Dozier, Corporations -

More information

Criminal Law - Simple Rape as a Responsive Verdict Under an Indictment for Aggravated Rape

Criminal Law - Simple Rape as a Responsive Verdict Under an Indictment for Aggravated Rape Louisiana Law Review Volume 20 Number 3 April 1960 Criminal Law - Simple Rape as a Responsive Verdict Under an Indictment for Aggravated Rape J. C. Parkerson Repository Citation J. C. Parkerson, Criminal

More information

Louisiana Practice - Effect of Application for Supervisory Writs on Trial Court Proceedings

Louisiana Practice - Effect of Application for Supervisory Writs on Trial Court Proceedings Louisiana Law Review Volume 14 Number 3 April 1954 Louisiana Practice - Effect of Application for Supervisory Writs on Trial Court Proceedings Neilson Jacobs Repository Citation Neilson Jacobs, Louisiana

More information

Honorable Janice Clark, Judge Presiding

Honorable Janice Clark, Judge Presiding STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL FIRST CIRCUIT 2013 CA 1803 CAPITAL CITY PRESS, L.L.C. D/B/A THE ADVOCATE AND KORAN ADDO VERSUS LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY SYSTEM BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AND HANK DANOS,

More information

Corporate Law - Restrictions on Alienability of Stock

Corporate Law - Restrictions on Alienability of Stock Louisiana Law Review Volume 25 Number 4 June 1965 Corporate Law - Restrictions on Alienability of Stock Marshall B. Brinkley Repository Citation Marshall B. Brinkley, Corporate Law - Restrictions on Alienability

More information

Constitutional Law - Applicability of the Fifth Amendment to the Federal Constitution to State Proceedings

Constitutional Law - Applicability of the Fifth Amendment to the Federal Constitution to State Proceedings Louisiana Law Review Volume 16 Number 2 The Work of the Louisiana Supreme Court for the 1954-1955 Term February 1956 Constitutional Law - Applicability of the Fifth Amendment to the Federal Constitution

More information

Criminal Law - Insanity - Burden of Proof

Criminal Law - Insanity - Burden of Proof Louisiana Law Review Volume 20 Number 4 June 1960 Criminal Law - Insanity - Burden of Proof Bernard E. Boudreaux Jr. Repository Citation Bernard E. Boudreaux Jr., Criminal Law - Insanity - Burden of Proof,

More information

STATE OF LOUISIANA NO KA-0945 VERSUS COURT OF APPEAL MATSUKATA J. KEELING FOURTH CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * * *

STATE OF LOUISIANA NO KA-0945 VERSUS COURT OF APPEAL MATSUKATA J. KEELING FOURTH CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * * * STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS MATSUKATA J. KEELING * * * * * * * * * * * NO. 2011-KA-0945 COURT OF APPEAL FOURTH CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA APPEAL FROM CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT ORLEANS PARISH NO. 502-139, SECTION

More information

Reconventional Demand

Reconventional Demand Louisiana Law Review Volume 21 Number 1 Law-Medicine and Professional Responsibility: A Symposium Symposium on Civil Procedure December 1960 Reconventional Demand Hillary J. Crain Repository Citation Hillary

More information

Criminal Neglect of Family

Criminal Neglect of Family Louisiana Law Review Volume 10 Number 4 May 1950 Criminal Neglect of Family Gillis W. Long Repository Citation Gillis W. Long, Criminal Neglect of Family, 10 La. L. Rev. (1950) Available at: http://digitalcommons.law.lsu.edu/lalrev/vol10/iss4/6

More information

Criminal Law - Constitutionality of Drug Addict Statute

Criminal Law - Constitutionality of Drug Addict Statute Louisiana Law Review Volume 24 Number 2 The Work of the Louisiana Appelate Courts for the 1962-1963 Term: A Symposium February 1964 Criminal Law - Constitutionality of Drug Addict Statute James S. Holliday

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. v. Case No. SC Lower Tribunal No. 2D

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. v. Case No. SC Lower Tribunal No. 2D IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA STATE OF FLORIDA, Petitioner, v. Case No. SC00-1905 Lower Tribunal No. 2D00-2978 LATUNDRA WILLIAMS, Respondent. / DISCRETIONARY REVIEW OF DECISION OF THE DISTRICT COURT

More information

Jurisdiction Ratione Materiae et Personae - Suits Against Insolvent Corporations in Receivership

Jurisdiction Ratione Materiae et Personae - Suits Against Insolvent Corporations in Receivership Louisiana Law Review Volume 7 Number 3 March 1947 Jurisdiction Ratione Materiae et Personae - Suits Against Insolvent Corporations in Receivership Cecil C. Lowe Repository Citation Cecil C. Lowe, Jurisdiction

More information

Donations - Revocation For Non-Fulfillment of Condition

Donations - Revocation For Non-Fulfillment of Condition Louisiana Law Review Volume 22 Number 3 April 1962 Donations - Revocation For Non-Fulfillment of Condition John Schwab II Repository Citation John Schwab II, Donations - Revocation For Non-Fulfillment

More information

Mineral Rights - Unitization - Prescription

Mineral Rights - Unitization - Prescription Louisiana Law Review Volume 21 Number 2 The Work of the Louisiana Supreme Court for the 1959-1960 Term February 1961 Mineral Rights - Unitization - Prescription Bernard E. Boudreaux Jr. Repository Citation

More information

Civil Procedure - Reconventional Demand - Amount in Dispute

Civil Procedure - Reconventional Demand - Amount in Dispute Louisiana Law Review Volume 28 Number 4 June 1968 Civil Procedure - Reconventional Demand - Amount in Dispute James R. Pettway Repository Citation James R. Pettway, Civil Procedure - Reconventional Demand

More information

The Assignment of Error

The Assignment of Error Louisiana Law Review Volume 35 Number 3 Highlights of the 1974 Regular Session: Legislative Symposium Spring 1975 The Assignment of Error Cheney C. Joseph Jr. Louisiana State University Law Center Repository

More information

Judicial Mortgage Rights: Recordation of Non- Executory Judgments

Judicial Mortgage Rights: Recordation of Non- Executory Judgments Louisiana Law Review Volume 35 Number 4 Writing Requirements and the Parol Evidence Rule: A Student Symposium Summer 1975 Judicial Mortgage Rights: Recordation of Non- Executory Judgments Stephen K. Peters

More information

Private Law: Property

Private Law: Property Louisiana Law Review Volume 11 Number 2 The Work of the Louisiana Supreme Court for the 1949-1950 Term January 1951 Private Law: Property Joseph Dainow Repository Citation Joseph Dainow, Private Law: Property,

More information

COURT OF APPEALS THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT WYANDOT COUNTY STATE OF OHIO CASE NUMBER v. O P I N I O N STATE OF OHIO CASE NUMBER

COURT OF APPEALS THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT WYANDOT COUNTY STATE OF OHIO CASE NUMBER v. O P I N I O N STATE OF OHIO CASE NUMBER [Cite as State v. Koester, 2003-Ohio-6098.] COURT OF APPEALS THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT WYANDOT COUNTY STATE OF OHIO CASE NUMBER 16-03-07 PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE v. O P I N I O N ROBERT A. KOESTER DEFENDANT-APPELLANT

More information

FLORIDA FISH AND WILDLIFE CONSERVATION COMMISSION DIVISION OF LAW ENFORCEMENT

FLORIDA FISH AND WILDLIFE CONSERVATION COMMISSION DIVISION OF LAW ENFORCEMENT In the County Court in and for County, Florida of Arrest: of Arrest: WITNESS TO DISPOSAL/DESTRUCTION NE: Date Type of Court of Court IFWCDLE 025 (09/09) COURT ORIGINAL Signature of Defendant CASE NO. TRIAL

More information

Natural Gas Act - Changes in Rates Under Section 4(d)

Natural Gas Act - Changes in Rates Under Section 4(d) Louisiana Law Review Volume 19 Number 3 April 1959 Natural Gas Act - Changes in Rates Under Section 4(d) Philip E. Henderson Repository Citation Philip E. Henderson, Natural Gas Act - Changes in Rates

More information

Conflict of Laws - Jurisdiction Over Foreign Corporations - What Constitutes Doing Business

Conflict of Laws - Jurisdiction Over Foreign Corporations - What Constitutes Doing Business Louisiana Law Review Volume 16 Number 2 The Work of the Louisiana Supreme Court for the 1954-1955 Term February 1956 Conflict of Laws - Jurisdiction Over Foreign Corporations - What Constitutes Doing Business

More information

Criminal Law - Intoxication and Specific Intent in Homicide Prosecution

Criminal Law - Intoxication and Specific Intent in Homicide Prosecution Louisiana Law Review Volume 19 Number 2 The Work of the Louisiana Supreme Court for the 1957-1958 Term February 1959 Criminal Law - Intoxication and Specific Intent in Homicide Prosecution Allen B. Pierson

More information

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs at Knoxville August 24, 2010

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs at Knoxville August 24, 2010 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs at Knoxville August 24, 2010 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. JEFFREY S. ZARNIK Appeal from the Circuit Court for Lincoln County No. S0600025

More information

STATE OF LOUISIANA NO KA-0946 VERSUS COURT OF APPEAL MELVIN WILLIAMS FOURTH CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * * *

STATE OF LOUISIANA NO KA-0946 VERSUS COURT OF APPEAL MELVIN WILLIAMS FOURTH CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * * * STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS MELVIN WILLIAMS * * * * * * * * * * * NO. 2011-KA-0946 COURT OF APPEAL FOURTH CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA APPEAL FROM CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT ORLEANS PARISH NO. 500-929, SECTION

More information

Criminal Law and Procedure - Unconstitutionality of Statutes

Criminal Law and Procedure - Unconstitutionality of Statutes Louisiana Law Review Volume 9 Number 3 March 1949 Criminal Law and Procedure - Unconstitutionality of Statutes Robert T. Jordan Repository Citation Robert T. Jordan, Criminal Law and Procedure - Unconstitutionality

More information

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs June 19, 2007

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs June 19, 2007 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs June 19, 2007 RONNIE KERR v. GIL MATHIS, WARDEN Direct Appeal from the Circuit Court for Davidson County No. 06C-3361 Amanda

More information

Criminal Procedure - Court Consent to Plea Bargains

Criminal Procedure - Court Consent to Plea Bargains Louisiana Law Review Volume 23 Number 4 June 1963 Criminal Procedure - Court Consent to Plea Bargains Willie H. Barfoot Repository Citation Willie H. Barfoot, Criminal Procedure - Court Consent to Plea

More information

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY STATE OF DELAWARE, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 0910012063 ) KAYLA J. HATCHER, ) ) Defendant. ) Submitted: December 13, 2010 Decided:

More information

Effective of Responsive Verdict Statute - Indictments - Former Jeopardy

Effective of Responsive Verdict Statute - Indictments - Former Jeopardy Louisiana Law Review Volume 11 Number 4 May 1951 Effective of Responsive Verdict Statute - Indictments - Former Jeopardy Winfred G. Boriack Repository Citation Winfred G. Boriack, Effective of Responsive

More information

No. 107,070 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. STATE OF KANSAS, Appellant, SAMANTHA THOMPSON COTY, Appellee. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT

No. 107,070 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. STATE OF KANSAS, Appellant, SAMANTHA THOMPSON COTY, Appellee. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT No. 107,070 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS STATE OF KANSAS, Appellant, v. SAMANTHA THOMPSON COTY, Appellee. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. An appellate court has unlimited review of whether a

More information

Joinder of Criminal Offenses in Louisiana

Joinder of Criminal Offenses in Louisiana Louisiana Law Review Volume 4 Number 1 November 1941 Joinder of Criminal Offenses in Louisiana Gilbert Dupre Litton Repository Citation Gilbert Dupre Litton, Joinder of Criminal Offenses in Louisiana,

More information

Exceptions. Louisiana Law Review. Aubrey McCleary

Exceptions. Louisiana Law Review. Aubrey McCleary Louisiana Law Review Volume 21 Number 1 Law-Medicine and Professional Responsibility: A Symposium Symposium on Civil Procedure December 1960 Exceptions Aubrey McCleary Repository Citation Aubrey McCleary,

More information

Evidence - Applicability of Dead Man's Statute to Tort Action

Evidence - Applicability of Dead Man's Statute to Tort Action Louisiana Law Review Volume 22 Number 4 Symposium: Louisiana and the Civil Law June 1962 Evidence - Applicability of Dead Man's Statute to Tort Action Graydon K. Kitchens Jr. Repository Citation Graydon

More information

Public Law: Criminal Law

Public Law: Criminal Law Louisiana Law Review Volume 26 Number 3 The Work of the Louisiana Appellate Courts for the 1965-1966 Term: A Faculty Symposium Symposium: Administration of Criminal Justice April 1966 Public Law: Criminal

More information

STATE V. INDIE C., 2006-NMCA-014, 139 N.M. 80, 128 P.3d 508 STATE OF NEW MEXICO, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. INDIE C., Child-Appellant.

STATE V. INDIE C., 2006-NMCA-014, 139 N.M. 80, 128 P.3d 508 STATE OF NEW MEXICO, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. INDIE C., Child-Appellant. 1 STATE V. INDIE C., 2006-NMCA-014, 139 N.M. 80, 128 P.3d 508 STATE OF NEW MEXICO, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. INDIE C., Child-Appellant. Docket No. 25,309 COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO 2006-NMCA-014, 139

More information

Criminal Law - The Felony Manslaughter Doctrine in Louisiana

Criminal Law - The Felony Manslaughter Doctrine in Louisiana Louisiana Law Review Volume 20 Number 4 June 1960 Criminal Law - The Felony Manslaughter Doctrine in Louisiana Robert Butler III Repository Citation Robert Butler III, Criminal Law - The Felony Manslaughter

More information

LITIGATING JUVENILE TRANSFER AND CERTIFICATION CASES IN THE JUVENILE AND CIRCUIT COURTS

LITIGATING JUVENILE TRANSFER AND CERTIFICATION CASES IN THE JUVENILE AND CIRCUIT COURTS LITIGATING JUVENILE TRANSFER AND CERTIFICATION CASES IN THE JUVENILE AND CIRCUIT COURTS I. OVERVIEW Historically, the rationale behind the development of the juvenile court was based on the notion that

More information

Criminal Law and Procedure, and Penal Institutions

Criminal Law and Procedure, and Penal Institutions Louisiana Law Review Volume 15 Number 1 Survey of 1954 Louisiana Legislation December 1954 Criminal Law and Procedure, and Penal Institutions Dale E. Bennett Repository Citation Dale E. Bennett, Criminal

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI & IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI 2016-CA-188-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI & IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI 2016-CA-188-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI E-Filed Document Nov 16 2016 22:34:38 2016-CA-00188-COA Pages: 9 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI & IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI 2016-CA-188-COA LAVERN JEFFREY MORAN APPELLANT

More information

Labor Law - Unfair Labor Practices - Union Duty to Bargain in Good Faith - "Harassing Tactics"

Labor Law - Unfair Labor Practices - Union Duty to Bargain in Good Faith - Harassing Tactics Louisiana Law Review Volume 16 Number 3 April 1956 Labor Law - Unfair Labor Practices - Union Duty to Bargain in Good Faith - "Harassing Tactics" John S. White Jr. Repository Citation John S. White Jr.,

More information

Criminal Law - Bill of Particulars

Criminal Law - Bill of Particulars Louisiana Law Review Volume 24 Number 4 June 1964 Criminal Law - Bill of Particulars David L. French Repository Citation David L. French, Criminal Law - Bill of Particulars, 24 La. L. Rev. (1964) Available

More information

Civil Code and Related Subjects: Sale

Civil Code and Related Subjects: Sale Louisiana Law Review Volume 8 Number 2 The Work of the Louisiana Supreme Court for the 1946-1947 Term January 1948 Civil Code and Related Subjects: Sale Alvin B. Rubin Repository Citation Alvin B. Rubin,

More information

Obligations - Offer and Acceptance

Obligations - Offer and Acceptance Louisiana Law Review Volume 17 Number 1 Survey of 1956 Louisiana Legislation December 1956 Obligations - Offer and Acceptance William H. Cook Jr. Repository Citation William H. Cook Jr., Obligations -

More information

Supreme Court of Florida

Supreme Court of Florida Supreme Court of Florida No. SC00-1905 HARDING, J. STATE OF FLORIDA, Petitioner, vs. LATUNDRA WILLIAMS, Respondent. [July 13, 2001] We have for review a decision of a district court of appeal on the following

More information

Court of Appeals of Ohio

Court of Appeals of Ohio [Cite as State v. Bohanon, 2013-Ohio-261.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 98217 STATE OF OHIO PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE vs. TAMEKA BOHANON

More information

Criminal Law - Article 27 of the Criminal Code - Attempted Perjury

Criminal Law - Article 27 of the Criminal Code - Attempted Perjury Louisiana Law Review Volume 15 Number 4 June 1955 Criminal Law - Article 27 of the Criminal Code - Attempted Perjury Edwin L. Blewer Jr. Repository Citation Edwin L. Blewer Jr., Criminal Law - Article

More information

TITLE 3 MUNICIPAL COURT 1 CHAPTER 1 CITY COURT

TITLE 3 MUNICIPAL COURT 1 CHAPTER 1 CITY COURT 3-1 Rev 1/2003 TITLE 3 MUNICIPAL COURT 1 CHAPTER 1. CITY COURT. 2. CITY JUDGE. 3. COURT ADMINISTRATION. 4. WARRANTS, SUMMONSES AND SUBPOENAS. 5. BONDS AND APPEALS. 3-101. Established. CHAPTER 1 CITY COURT

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA. STATE OF FLORIDA, Petitioner, v. Case No. SC JASON RAY ROBBINS, 5 th DCA No.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA. STATE OF FLORIDA, Petitioner, v. Case No. SC JASON RAY ROBBINS, 5 th DCA No. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA STATE OF FLORIDA, Petitioner, v. Case No. SC02-2583 JASON RAY ROBBINS, 5 th DCA No. 5D02-261 Respondent. ON DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE FIFTH DISTRICT COURT

More information

Criminal Law - Felony-Murder - Killing of Co- Felon

Criminal Law - Felony-Murder - Killing of Co- Felon Louisiana Law Review Volume 16 Number 4 A Symposium on Legislation June 1956 Criminal Law - Felony-Murder - Killing of Co- Felon William L. McLeod Jr. Repository Citation William L. McLeod Jr., Criminal

More information

Civil Code and Related Subjects: Prescription

Civil Code and Related Subjects: Prescription Louisiana Law Review Volume 14 Number 1 The Work of the Louisiana Supreme Court for the 1952-1953 Term December 1953 Civil Code and Related Subjects: Prescription Joseph Dainow Repository Citation Joseph

More information

Sales - Litigious Redemption - Partial Transfer

Sales - Litigious Redemption - Partial Transfer Louisiana Law Review Volume 20 Number 4 June 1960 Sales - Litigious Redemption - Partial Transfer Jerry W. Millican Repository Citation Jerry W. Millican, Sales - Litigious Redemption - Partial Transfer,

More information

STATE OF LOUISIANA NO KA-1370 VERSUS COURT OF APPEAL COURTNEY THOMAS FOURTH CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * * *

STATE OF LOUISIANA NO KA-1370 VERSUS COURT OF APPEAL COURTNEY THOMAS FOURTH CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * * * STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS COURTNEY THOMAS * * * * * * * * * * * NO. 2013-KA-1370 COURT OF APPEAL FOURTH CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA APPEAL FROM CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT ORLEANS PARISH NO. 450-679, SECTION

More information

Public Law: Local Government Law

Public Law: Local Government Law Louisiana Law Review Volume 19 Number 2 The Work of the Louisiana Supreme Court for the 1957-1958 Term February 1959 Public Law: Local Government Law Henry G. McMahon Repository Citation Henry G. McMahon,

More information

Louisiana Practice - Application of the Exception of Res Judicata in Petitory Actions

Louisiana Practice - Application of the Exception of Res Judicata in Petitory Actions Louisiana Law Review Volume 15 Number 4 June 1955 Louisiana Practice - Application of the Exception of Res Judicata in Petitory Actions David M. Ellison Jr. Repository Citation David M. Ellison Jr., Louisiana

More information

Corporations - Right of a Stockholder to Inspect the Corporate Books

Corporations - Right of a Stockholder to Inspect the Corporate Books Louisiana Law Review Volume 18 Number 2 February 1958 Corporations - Right of a Stockholder to Inspect the Corporate Books William L. McLeod Jr. Repository Citation William L. McLeod Jr., Corporations

More information

Evidence - Unreasonable Search and Seizure - Pre- Trial Motion To Suppress

Evidence - Unreasonable Search and Seizure - Pre- Trial Motion To Suppress Louisiana Law Review Volume 22 Number 4 Symposium: Louisiana and the Civil Law June 1962 Evidence - Unreasonable Search and Seizure - Pre- Trial Motion To Suppress James L. Dennis Repository Citation James

More information

Security Devices - Mortgages on Immovables - When Effective Against Third Persons

Security Devices - Mortgages on Immovables - When Effective Against Third Persons Louisiana Law Review Volume 25 Number 3 April 1965 Security Devices - Mortgages on Immovables - When Effective Against Third Persons Carl H. Hanchey Repository Citation Carl H. Hanchey, Security Devices

More information

Louisiana Practice - Declaratory Judgment Action As Substitute for Bill In Nature of Interpleader and As Alternative Remedy

Louisiana Practice - Declaratory Judgment Action As Substitute for Bill In Nature of Interpleader and As Alternative Remedy Louisiana Law Review Volume 14 Number 1 The Work of the Louisiana Supreme Court for the 1952-1953 Term December 1953 Louisiana Practice - Declaratory Judgment Action As Substitute for Bill In Nature of

More information

Constitutional Law - Felon Registration Requirement as Violative of Due Process

Constitutional Law - Felon Registration Requirement as Violative of Due Process Louisiana Law Review Volume 18 Number 4 June 1958 Constitutional Law - Felon Registration Requirement as Violative of Due Process Lamar E. Ozley Jr. Repository Citation Lamar E. Ozley Jr., Constitutional

More information

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JULY TERM v. Case No. 5D

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JULY TERM v. Case No. 5D IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JULY TERM 2004 S.K. AND S.K., PARENTS OF R.K. MINOR VICTIM, Appellant, v. Case No. 5D03-1599 STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. Opinion filed

More information

Criminal Procedure - Comment on Defendant's Failure to Testify

Criminal Procedure - Comment on Defendant's Failure to Testify Louisiana Law Review Volume 8 Number 3 March 1948 Criminal Procedure - Comment on Defendant's Failure to Testify Roland Achee Repository Citation Roland Achee, Criminal Procedure - Comment on Defendant's

More information

Sales - Automobiles - Bona Fide Purchaser Doctrine

Sales - Automobiles - Bona Fide Purchaser Doctrine Louisiana Law Review Volume 17 Number 4 June 1957 Sales - Automobiles - Bona Fide Purchaser Doctrine T. Wilson Landry Repository Citation T. Wilson Landry, Sales - Automobiles - Bona Fide Purchaser Doctrine,

More information

ICAOS Rules. General information

ICAOS Rules. General information ICAOS Rules General information Effective Date: March 01, 2018 Introduction The Interstate Commission for Adult Offender Supervision is charged with overseeing the day-to-day operations of the Interstate

More information

Civil Code and Related Subjects: Negotiable Instruments and Banking

Civil Code and Related Subjects: Negotiable Instruments and Banking Louisiana Law Review Volume 14 Number 1 The Work of the Louisiana Supreme Court for the 1952-1953 Term December 1953 Civil Code and Related Subjects: Negotiable Instruments and Banking Paul M. Hebert Repository

More information

TEXAS CRIMINAL DEFENSE FORMS ANNOTATED

TEXAS CRIMINAL DEFENSE FORMS ANNOTATED TEXAS CRIMINAL DEFENSE FORMS ANNOTATED 1.1 SURETY S AFFIDAVIT TO SURRENDER PRINCIPAL Order By Daniel L. Young PART ONE STATE PROCEEDINGS CHAPTER 1. BAIL 1.2 SURETY S AFFIDAVIT TO SURRENDER PRINCIPAL CURRENTLY

More information

IN THE COMMON PLEAS COURT OF DARKE COUNTY, OHIO

IN THE COMMON PLEAS COURT OF DARKE COUNTY, OHIO IN THE COMMON PLEAS COURT OF DARKE COUNTY, OHIO STATE OF OHIO, : CASE NO. 07-CR-13898 Plaintiff : vs. : Jonathan P. Hein, Judge LOUIS RODRIGUEZ : JUDGMENT ENTRY - Defendant. : Dismissal of Indictment This

More information

NO CA-0168 JILL TRUXILLO, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF HER DECEASED MOTHER TERRIE ANN TRUXILLO COURT OF APPEAL FOURTH CIRCUIT VERSUS

NO CA-0168 JILL TRUXILLO, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF HER DECEASED MOTHER TERRIE ANN TRUXILLO COURT OF APPEAL FOURTH CIRCUIT VERSUS JILL TRUXILLO, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF HER DECEASED MOTHER TERRIE ANN TRUXILLO VERSUS DR. MICHAEL THOMAS, DR. ROY KITE, DR. FRANK VOELKER AND FAIRWAY MEDICAL CENTER, LLC * * * * * * * * * * * NO.

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO Opinion Number: 2014-NMCA-037 Filing Date: January 21, 2014 Docket No. 31,904 STATE OF NEW MEXICO, v. Plaintiff-Appellee, STEVEN SEGURA, Defendant-Appellant.

More information

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE April 18, 2007 Session

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE April 18, 2007 Session IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE April 18, 2007 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. KENNETH BRYAN HARRIS Direct Appeal from the Criminal Court for Wilson County No. 96-0710 John D.

More information

ROBERT A. CHAISSON JUDGE Panel composed ofjudges Clarence E. McManus, Fredericka Homberg Wicker, and Robert A. Chaisson

ROBERT A. CHAISSON JUDGE Panel composed ofjudges Clarence E. McManus, Fredericka Homberg Wicker, and Robert A. Chaisson ~'" t"'i '").:" \) (. NO. 11-KA-ll07 VERSUS CEVERA J. BREAUX, III FIFTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF LOUISIANA ON APPEAL FROM THE TWENTY-FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT PARISH OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF

More information

General Sessions Court

General Sessions Court CTAS Private Acts - Madison June 28, 2018 General Sessions Court Published on CTAS Private Acts (http://privateacts.ctas.tennessee.edu) 2018-06-28 Page 1 of 6 Table of Contents General Sessions Court...

More information

Williams v. Winn Dixie: In Consideration of a Compromise's Clause

Williams v. Winn Dixie: In Consideration of a Compromise's Clause Louisiana Law Review Volume 46 Number 2 November 1985 Williams v. Winn Dixie: In Consideration of a Compromise's Clause Brett J. Prendergast Repository Citation Brett J. Prendergast, Williams v. Winn Dixie:

More information

* * * * * * * APPEAL FROM CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT ORLEANS PARISH NO , SECTION J Honorable Darryl A. Derbigny, Judge

* * * * * * * APPEAL FROM CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT ORLEANS PARISH NO , SECTION J Honorable Darryl A. Derbigny, Judge STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS LADERIKA SMITH * * * * * * * * * * * NO. 2014-KA-0213 COURT OF APPEAL FOURTH CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA APPEAL FROM CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT ORLEANS PARISH NO. 516-604, SECTION

More information

Reservation of Rights to Personal Jurisdiction

Reservation of Rights to Personal Jurisdiction Louisiana Law Review Volume 28 Number 2 February 1968 Reservation of Rights to Personal Jurisdiction Judith Arnette Repository Citation Judith Arnette, Reservation of Rights to Personal Jurisdiction, 28

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON April 5, 2005 Session

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON April 5, 2005 Session IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON April 5, 2005 Session JERRY W. PECK v. WILLIAM B. TANNER and TANNER-PECK, LLC Extraordinary appeal by permission from the Court of Appeals, Western Division

More information

[Bail] Pretrial release. A. Hearing. (1) Time. The court shall conduct a hearing under this rule and issue an order setting conditions of

[Bail] Pretrial release. A. Hearing. (1) Time. The court shall conduct a hearing under this rule and issue an order setting conditions of 6-401. [Bail] Pretrial release. A. Hearing. (1) Time. The court shall conduct a hearing under this rule and issue an order setting conditions of release as soon as practicable, but in no event later than

More information

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT **********

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT ********** STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT MOON VENTURES, L.L.C., ET AL. VERSUS KPMG, L.L.P., ET AL. 06-1520 ********** APPEAL FROM THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT PARISH OF LAFAYETTE, DOCKET

More information

Mineral Rights - Servitudes - Interruption of Prescription

Mineral Rights - Servitudes - Interruption of Prescription Louisiana Law Review Volume 11 Number 3 March 1951 Mineral Rights - Servitudes - Interruption of Prescription John V. Parker Repository Citation John V. Parker, Mineral Rights - Servitudes - Interruption

More information

Louisiana Practice - Deficiency Judgment Act - Applicability to Surety on Mortgage Note

Louisiana Practice - Deficiency Judgment Act - Applicability to Surety on Mortgage Note Louisiana Law Review Volume 14 Number 1 The Work of the Louisiana Supreme Court for the 1952-1953 Term December 1953 Louisiana Practice - Deficiency Judgment Act - Applicability to Surety on Mortgage Note

More information

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs February 1, 2005

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs February 1, 2005 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs February 1, 2005 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. JOHN H. PARKER Direct Appeal from the Circuit Court for Madison County No. C-03-371 Roy

More information

EXPUNGEMENT PROCEDURES Act Effective August 1, 2014

EXPUNGEMENT PROCEDURES Act Effective August 1, 2014 EXPUNGEMENT PROCEDURES Act 145 - Effective August 1, 2014 Costs At Time of Filing (These fees are nonrefundable) 1. $200.00 money order payable to Clerk of Court 2. $250.00 money order payable to Louisiana

More information

APPLICATION FOR COMMERCIAL TELEPHONE SALES LICENSE CONSUMER PROTECTION

APPLICATION FOR COMMERCIAL TELEPHONE SALES LICENSE CONSUMER PROTECTION APPLICATION FOR COMMERCIAL TELEPHONE SALES LICENSE CONSUMER PROTECTION 501 Washington Avenue Post Office Box 300152 Montgomery, Alabama 36130-0152 Telephone: (334) 242-7335 Fax: (334) 242-2433 www.ago.alabama.gov

More information

No. 49,130-CA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * Versus * * * * *

No. 49,130-CA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * Versus * * * * * Judgment rendered October 1, 2014. Application for rehearing may be filed within the delay allowed by art. 2166, La. C.C.P. No. 49,130-CA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * ACROSS

More information

HRS Examination of defendant with respect to physical or mental disease, disorder, or defect. (1) Whenever the defendant has filed a notice

HRS Examination of defendant with respect to physical or mental disease, disorder, or defect. (1) Whenever the defendant has filed a notice HRS 704-404 Examination of defendant with respect to physical or mental disease, disorder, or defect. (1) Whenever the defendant has filed a notice of intention to rely on the defense of physical or mental

More information