IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO"

Transcription

1 ^8 ^,3 ^:,:::^; h.^,,,^^ u,^ti: ^,,, a, ^ ^^^^ ^^^^^ IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO TODD LEOPOLD, et al. v Plaintiffs/Appellants, ACE DORAN HAULING & RIGGING CO., et al. Supreme Court Case No On Appeal from the Cuyahoga County Court of Appeals, Eighth Appellate District Court of Appeals Case No. CA Defendants/Appellees. MOTION OF APPELLEES STEVEN H. STILLWAGON, ACE DORAN BROKERAGE COMPANY AND ACE DORAN HAULING & RIGGING CO. TO STRIKE MERIT BRIEF OF APPELLEES, TODD AND LINDA LEOPOLD Shannon J. George (# ) Ritter, Robinson, McCready & James, Ltd. 405 Madison Ave., Suite 1850 Toledo, Ohio Phone: (419) Fax: (419) Counsel for Appellant Danielle Laurence Bruce S. Goldstein, Esq. (# ) Bruce S. Goldstein Co., L.P.A Ledgewood Trail Lyndhurst, Ohio Phone: (440) Fax: (440) BRIAN D. SULLIVAN (# ) Attorney of Record MARTIN T. GALVIN (# ) KENNETH P. ABBARNO (# ) REMINGER CO., L.P.A. 101 West Prospect Avenue, Suite 1400 Cleveland, Ohio Phone: (216) Fax: (216) Counsel for Defendant-Appellees Steven H. Stillwagon, Ace Doran Brokerage Company and Ace Doran Hauling & Rigging Co. Counsel for Appellant O^^ ^ S ^Q^2 C^,^RK. OF COURT 1^^^` ^:,^ C^X`^^^. ^^^_t.k^ uf ^ URT ^EME COURIOF OyIO

2 Phillip J. Weaver, Jr. (# ) SMITH MARSHALL, LLP 1425 Superior Bldg. 815 Superior Avenue Cleveland, Ohio Phone: (216) Fax: (216) Barbara A. Lum, Esq. (# ) Thompson Hine LLP 3900 Key Center, 127 Public Sq. Cleveland, Ohio Counsel for Ford Motor Company Counsel for Todd Leopold Donald Drinko, Esq. (# ) 1501 Euclid Ave. Sixth Floor, Bulkley Bldg. Cleveland, Ohio Counselfor American Fire & Casualty Co. P.J. Malnar, Esq. (# ) 55 Public Sq., Suite 725 Cleveland, Ohio Counsel for Netherlands Insurance ii

3 Now come Defendants-Appellees, Ace Doran Hauling & Rigging Company, Ace Doran Brokerage Company and Steven H. Stillwagon (collectively referred to as "Ace Doran") and hereby move this Court to strike the merit brief filed by purported Appellees, Todd and Linda Leopold (hereinafter referred to as "Plaintiffs"). Plaintiffs are not a proper party to this appeal and they do not have standing to argue the issues presented before this Court. Furthermore, Plaintiffs position is adverse to Ace Doran and supportive of the Appellant's arguments. Therefore, if Plaintiffs are allowed to participate in the dispute currently before this Court, they should have filing their brief together with Appellant, or as amicus curiae. A brief further supporting Ace Doran's position is attached and incorporated herein as reference. 1

4 BRIEF IN SUPPORT I. INTRODUCTION & SUMMARY OF FACTS This appeal concerns a discovery dispute that arose between two co-defendants in the Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas. The dispute occurred in the course of litigation whereby Plaintiffs, Todd and Linda Leopold, sued multiple parties for bodily injuries Mr. Leopold allegedly sustained as a result of a multiple car accident that occurred on March 6, Among the defendants were the parties to this appeal, Ace Doran and Danielle Laurence. Prior to Plaintiffs' filing their action and naming Ace Doran and Danielle Laurence as defendants, Ms. Laurence had filed her own claim for personal injuries arising out of the March 6, 2008 accident. She sued Steven Stillwagon and Ace Doran Hauling, alleging that those defendants were liable for her injuries. See Laurence v. Stillwagon, Cuyahoga C.P. No. CV (Nov. 13, 2008). During the 2008 litigation, Ms. Laurence voluntarily produced her medical records that contained evidence of statements indicating her liability for the accident. After her deposition, during which Ms. Laurence did not deny making the incriminating statements, she voluntarily dismissed her action against Ace Doran and Steven Stillwagon in April of Plaintiffs were not in any way involved in that litigation. After Plaintiffs filed their action in October of 2009, and included Ms. Laurence as one of the defendants, Ms. Laurence sought a protective order precluding any discovery of her medical records. The trial court denied Ms. Laurence's motion for protective order. (See Aug. 15, 2011 Order Denying Defendant Laurence's Motion for Protective Order, Cuyahoga C.P. CV ) Thereafter, Ms. Laurence appealed the trial court's decision. The appellate court considered the merits of Ms. Laurence's appeal, and affrmed the judgment of the trial court. (Feb. 9, 2012 J. Entry, 8th Dist. No. CA ) Of note, at no point in the appeal process 2

5 did Plaintiffs identify themselves as an interested party. Neither did Plaintiffs participate in the briefing of the issues. When Ms. Laurence submitted her appeal to this Court, Plaintiffs did not join in the jurisdictional argument. Plaintiffs did, however, file a merit brief with this Court in support of Appellant's position, urging reversal of the lower courts' decisions and grant of Ms. Laurence's motion for protective order. Erroneously, Plaintiffs labeled themselves as "appellees," which name indicates parties in support of the judgments of the Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas and the Eighth District Court of Appeals, but against Appellant's case. This situation is problematic because, in addition to being confusing and contrary to the procedural rules, it burdens Ace Doran with the requirement to share the time allotted for their oral argument with a parry advancing a contrary point of view. The proper course of action for Plaintiffs would be to file an amicus brief supporting Ms. Laurence's argument and advocating that this Court overturn the lower courts' holdings. The time for filing briefs in support of the Appellant's argument has expired, however, and Plaintiffs attempt to circumvent the application of deadlines by improperly labeling themselves as "appellees" in this appeal. Because it is improper to allow Plaintiffs to proceed as appellees and because Plaintiffs lack standing to challenge the decisions of the courts below, Ace Doran moves for an order striking Plaintiffs' merit brief and precluding them from participating in this appeal. 3

6 9 II. LAW AND ARGUMENT 1. Plaintiffs do not Qualify as Appellees for the Purpose of this Appeal and their Merit Brief Should be Stricken as Untimely Filed. Plaintiffs' attempt to file a brief as the appellees, with arguments supporting Appellant's position, contradicts the established practice of the appeal process. The rules of practice of the Supreme Court of Ohio require that an appellee presents arguments in support of the judgment from which the appeal is taken. S.Ct.Prac.R. 6.3(B). In particular, the rules state that "[t]he appellee's brief shall *** answer the appellant's contentions, and make any other appropriate contentions as reasons for affirmance of the order or judgment from which the appeal is taken." Id. Therefore, if Plaintiffs intend to appear as appellees, it follows that their arguments have to support the judgment of the Eighth District Court of Appeals. Nonetheless, Plaintiffs' brief urges reversal of the appellate court's decision. Accordingly, Plaintiffs cannot be considered appellees in this case. It would be improper to allow Plaintiffs to circumvent the effect of the rules by using a different label and erroneously identifying themselves as "appellees." Furthermore, it would be inequitable to require Ace Doran to share the time allotted to them in the oral argument with a party advancing the opposing side's contentions. See S.Ct.Prac.R. 9.5(A)(2). In their brief, Plaintiffs clearly stand in support of the position taken by Appellant. In other words, they urge this Court to overturn the lower courts and to mandate the grant of Ms. Laurence's motion for protective order. As such, the appropriate procedure for Plaintiffs' participation in this appeal would be to file an amicus brief on behalf of Appellant. See S.Ct.Frac.R In that regard, their brief should have been filed "within the time for filing allowed to the appellant to file a merit brief." Id. The time for filing merit brief of Appellant expired on July 30, Therefore, even as arnicus, Plaintiffs' brief is untimely. Accordingly, "[t]he Clerk shall refuse to file [it]." S.Ct.Prac.R. 6.6(B). 4

7 , Plaintiffs' merit brief should be stricken as improperly labeled and untimely filed and they should be precluded from participating in this appeal. 2. Plaintiffs Have no Standing to Participate in this Appeal Because their Interests will not be Adversely Affected by its Outcome Plaintiffs have no standing to participate directly in this appeal because they are not a party to the dispute over Ms. Laurence's medical records. "It is fundamental that appeal lies only on behalf of a party aggrieved. Unless an appellant can show that his rights have been invaded, no error is shown to have been committed by the court or body which entered the final order." Ohio Contract Carriers Ass'n v. Public Utilities Corrc., 140 Ohio St. 160, 161, 42 N.E.2d 758 (1942). This Court has previously held that in order to assert an error to a lower court's holding, a person, "must have a present interest in the subject-matter of the litigation and must be aggrieved or prejudiced by the judgment, order or decree." Id. (quoting 2 American Jurisprudence, 941, Section 149.) The Court further noted that the purpose of the appeal is to "correct errors injuriously affecting the appellant." Id. (quoting Section 152.) (Emphasis added.) Plaintiffs have no interest in the subject matter of this appeal. Their interest will not be adversely affected and that they will not be prejudiced by this Court's ruling. In other words, the finding that Ms. Laurence waived her privilege as to her medical records will not deprive Plaintiffs of their legal rights or claims. They will still be able to argue that one or all of the defendants are liable to them for Mr. Leopold's personal injuries and they will be able to pursue their claim under the same iegai theories of liabiiity. Plaintiffs asserted no rights on their own in their merit brief. Additionally, the alleged error of the trial court does not injuriously affect their rights to litigate. Accordingly, Plaintiffs have no standing to this appeal. 5

8 a. Plaintiffs Cannot Assert Physician-Patient Privilege on the Patient's Behalf. Because a patient is the exclusive holder of the physician-patient privilege, third parties cannot assert the privilege on behalf of the patient in order to advance their own goals. State Medical Bd. v. Miller, 44 Ohio St. 3d 136, 141, 541 N.E.2d 602 (Ohio 1989); Progressive Preferred Ins. Co. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London, 11th Dist. No L-242, Ohio-2508, 2008 Ohio App. LEXIS 2114, 2008 WL (May 23); Galbraith v. City of Medina, 2006-Ohio-4410, 2006 Ohio App. LEXIS 4358 (Aug. 28, 2006). The above rule has been universally applied by Ohio courts and its application here bars Plaintiffs from participating in this appeal. An Ohio court in Progressive Preferred Ins. Co., 2008-Ohio-2508, faced a very factually similar issue where the defendant, general liability insurer, moved to quash depositions of medical providers asserting the physician-patient privilege. Prior to that case, a patient's executive filed and settled a wrongful death suit against an assisted living facility. Id. 3. Subsequently, the facility's insurer, Progressive, filed its own suit seeking contribution and/or indemnification from defendant Lloyds. Id. In that second action, Lloyds moved to quash depositions of the patient's medical providers, arguing that the physician-patient privilege precluded the disclosure. Id. 6. The trial court denied Lloyds' motion finding that Lloyds "did not have standing to assert any physician-patient privilege subsisting between Drs. Anschuetz and Rothenberg and [the patient.]" Id. 6. On appeal, the court held that Lloyd's had no standing to appeal the trial court's ruling because it was not the holder of the privilege. Id The court found that Lloyd's would do not suffer an"injury in fact" from the disclosure and therefore, could not benefit from the third-party standing. Id

9 Analogously, in the current case, there was a prior suit, one between Ms. Laurence and Ace Doran. In that case, a patient's medical records (Ms. Laurence's) were at issue. Like Progressive, Ace Doran intends to use the medical records in this subsequent suit. Like Lloyds, Plaintiffs want to appeal the decision of the trial court regarding the issue of physician-patient privilege. Yet, they lack standing to participate in this appeal because the privilege isn't theirs to assert. IV. CONCLUSION WHEREFORE, for the foregoing reasons, Appellees, Ace Doran Hauling & Rigging Company, Ace Doran Brokerage Company and Steven H. Stillwagon move this Court to strike the merit brief filed by Plaintiffs-Appellees, Todd and Linda Leopold. Respe ly mitted, - B. SULLIVAN (# ) Attorney of Record MARTIN T. GALVIN (# ) KENNETH P. ABBARNO (# ) REMINGER CO., L.P.A. 101 West Prospect Avenue, Suite 1400 Cleveland, Ohio Phone: (216) Fax: (216) Counselfor DefendantAppellees Steven H. Stillwagon, Ace Doran Brokerage Company and Ace Doran Hauling & Rigging Co. 7

10 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE A copy of the foregoing Motion to Strike was sent by regular U.S. mail on this ^day of October, 2012 to: Shannon J. George Ritter, Robinson, McCready & James, Ltd. 445 Madison Ave., Suite 1850 Toledo, Ohio Bruce S. Goldstein, Esq. Bruce S. Goldstein Co., L.P.A Ledgewood Trail Lyndhurst, Ohio Phillip J. Weaver, Jr. SMITH MARSHALL, LLP 1425 Superior Bldg. 815 Superior Avenue Cleveland, Ohio Barbara A. Lum, Esq. Thompson Hine LLP 3900 Key Center, 127 Public Sq. Cleveland, Ohio Donald Drinko, Esq Euclid Ave. Sixth Floor, Bulkley Bldg. Cleveland, Ohio P.J. Malnar, Esq. 55 Public Sq., Suite 725 Cleveland, Ohio Counselfor Appellant Danielle Laurence Counsel for Appellant Danielle Laurence Counsel for Todd L. Leopold Counsel for Ford Motor Co. Counsel for American Fire & Casualty Co. Counsel for The Netherlands Insurance ^ AN (# ) 8

AND OPINION DATE OF ANNOUNCEMENT OF DECISION: AUGUST 10, 2006

AND OPINION DATE OF ANNOUNCEMENT OF DECISION: AUGUST 10, 2006 [Cite as Steindler v. Meyers, Lamanna & Roman, 2006-Ohio-4097.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, EIGHTH DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA NO. 86852 SHIRLEY STEINDLER Plaintiff-appellee vs. MEYERS, LAMANNA & ROMAN,

More information

Court of Appeals of Ohio

Court of Appeals of Ohio [Cite as State v. Bohanon, 2013-Ohio-261.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 98217 STATE OF OHIO PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE vs. TAMEKA BOHANON

More information

COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, EIGHTH DISTRICT AND OPINION DATE OF ANNOUNCEMENT OF DECISION: JULY 1, Court, Case No. CV Reversed and remanded.

COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, EIGHTH DISTRICT AND OPINION DATE OF ANNOUNCEMENT OF DECISION: JULY 1, Court, Case No. CV Reversed and remanded. [Cite as Sharp v. Leiendecker, 2004-Ohio-3467.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, EIGHTH DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA NO. 82949 DAVID W. SHARP, ET AL. Plaintiffs-appellees vs. SCOTT G. LEIENDECKER, ET AL. Defendants-appellants

More information

Supreme Court of Ohio Clerk of Court - Filed July 29, Case No IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Supreme Court of Ohio Clerk of Court - Filed July 29, Case No IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Supreme Court of Ohio Clerk of Court - Filed July 29, 2015 - Case No. 2015-1244 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO JENNIFER BAKER, Individually and as Executrix of the Estate of JANET COLSTON, Deceased, v. Appellant,

More information

HARVEST CREDIT MANAGEMENT VII, L.L.C. JANICE L. HARRIS

HARVEST CREDIT MANAGEMENT VII, L.L.C. JANICE L. HARRIS [Cite as Harvest Credit Mgt. VII, L.L.C. v. Harris, 2012-Ohio-80.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 96742 HARVEST CREDIT MANAGEMENT VII,

More information

FREDI GONZALEZ ALCON INDUSTRIES, INC., ET AL. JUDGMENT: REVERSED AND REMANDED

FREDI GONZALEZ ALCON INDUSTRIES, INC., ET AL. JUDGMENT: REVERSED AND REMANDED [Cite as Gonzales v. Alcon Industries, Inc., 2009-Ohio-2587.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 92274 FREDI GONZALEZ PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT

More information

Court of Appeals of Ohio

Court of Appeals of Ohio [Cite as Sheffey v. Flowers, 2013-Ohio-1349.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 98860 NORMA SHEFFEY, ET AL. vs. PLAINTIFFS-APPELLEES ERIC

More information

Court of Appeals of Ohio

Court of Appeals of Ohio [Cite as 2188 Brockway, L.L.C. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Fiscal Officer, 2015-Ohio-109.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 101529 2188 BROCKWAY,

More information

COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, EIGHTH DISTRICT

COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, EIGHTH DISTRICT [Cite as McIntyre v. Rice, 2003-Ohio-3940.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, EIGHTH DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA NO. 81339 ROBERT W. McINTYRE, ET AL. : : Plaintiffs-Appellants : JOURNAL ENTRY : -vs- : AND : NANCY

More information

BARBARA BLATT MERIDIA HEALTH SYSTEM, ET AL.

BARBARA BLATT MERIDIA HEALTH SYSTEM, ET AL. [Cite as Blatt v. Meridia Health Sys., 2008-Ohio-1818.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 89074 BARBARA BLATT PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT vs. MERIDIA

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO CLYDE NORRIS, et al., Appellants, V. RICHARD B. MURRAY, et al., Case No. 2012-0292 On Appeal from the Knox County Court of Appeals, Fifth Appellate District Court of Appeals

More information

GUNTON CORPORATION, DBA PELLA WINDOW & DOOR CO. ARCHITECTURAL CONCEPTS, ET AL.

GUNTON CORPORATION, DBA PELLA WINDOW & DOOR CO. ARCHITECTURAL CONCEPTS, ET AL. [Cite as Gunton Corp. v. Architectural Concepts, 2008-Ohio-693.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 89725 GUNTON CORPORATION, DBA PELLA

More information

Court of Appeals of Ohio

Court of Appeals of Ohio [Cite as CapitalSource Bank FBO Aeon Fin., L.L.C. v. Donshirs Dev., Corp., 2013-Ohio-1563.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 99032 CAPITALSOURCE

More information

Court of Appeals of Ohio

Court of Appeals of Ohio [Cite as Golden Goose Properties, L.L.C. v. Leizman, 2014-Ohio-4384.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 101002 GOLDEN GOOSE PROPERTIES,

More information

[Cite as Nieszczur v. Dir., Ohio Dept. of Job & Family Serv., 2003-Ohio-770.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, EIGHTH DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA NO.

[Cite as Nieszczur v. Dir., Ohio Dept. of Job & Family Serv., 2003-Ohio-770.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, EIGHTH DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA NO. [Cite as Nieszczur v. Dir., Ohio Dept. of Job & Family Serv., 2003-Ohio-770.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, EIGHTH DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA NO. 81643 BRIAN J. NIESZCZUR, : : Plaintiff-Appellant : : JOURNAL

More information

Court of Appeals of Ohio

Court of Appeals of Ohio [Cite as Groening v. Pitney Bowes, Inc., 2009-Ohio-357.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 91394 RAYE H. GROENING PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT vs.

More information

JUPd 0-20^^ CLERK OF COURT SUPREME COURT OF OHIO IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO CASE NO, CA BARBARA ZINDROSKI, ET AL.

JUPd 0-20^^ CLERK OF COURT SUPREME COURT OF OHIO IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO CASE NO, CA BARBARA ZINDROSKI, ET AL. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO S BARBARA ZINDROSKI, ET AL. V. Appellees PARMA CI'tY SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al. CASE NO, CA 08 091124 On Appeal from the Cuyahoga County Court of Appeals, Ninth Appellate District

More information

COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF ARIZONA DIVISION ONE

COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF ARIZONA DIVISION ONE IN THE COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF ARIZONA DIVISION ONE ALMA HOLCOMB, et al., ) Court of Appeals ) Division One Plaintiffs/Appellants, ) No. 1 CA-CV 16-0406 ) v. ) Maricopa County ) Superior Court AMERICAN

More information

Court of Appeals of Ohio

Court of Appeals of Ohio [Cite as Briggs v. Castle, Inc., 2016-Ohio-1548.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 103795 DENNIS BRIGGS PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT vs. CASTLE,

More information

COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, EIGHTH DISTRICT

COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, EIGHTH DISTRICT [Cite as Dickson v. British Petroleum, 2002-Ohio-7060.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, EIGHTH DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA NO. 80908 WENDELL P. DICKSON, ET AL. : : Plaintiff-Appellants: : JOURNAL ENTRY vs. :

More information

Court of Appeals of Ohio

Court of Appeals of Ohio [Cite as Buttner v. Renz, 2014-Ohio-4939.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 101479 DANIEL A. BUTTNER PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT vs. WILLIAM H.

More information

Case 3:03-cv RNC Document 32 Filed 11/13/2003 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT. Defendants.

Case 3:03-cv RNC Document 32 Filed 11/13/2003 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT. Defendants. Case 3:03-cv-00252-RNC Document 32 Filed 11/13/2003 Page 1 of 7 WILLIAM SPECTOR IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT Plaintiff, v. TRANS UNION LLC C.A. NO. 3:03-CV-00252

More information

MAli `! Mf;;1 CLERK OF COURT SUPREME COURT OF OHIO. Plaintiff-Appellant,

MAli `! Mf;;1 CLERK OF COURT SUPREME COURT OF OHIO. Plaintiff-Appellant, IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO JANE DOE A.K.A. LISA PHELPS CASE NO. 0 0 4 ^ Plaintiff-Appellant, V. WILLIAM BARLOCK, Jr. Defendant- Appellee On Appeal from the Cuyahoga County Court of Appeals of Ohio, Eighth

More information

Court of Appeals of Ohio

Court of Appeals of Ohio [Cite as Edwards v. Lopez, 2011-Ohio-5173.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 95860 BRUCE EDWARDS, ET AL. PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS vs. ANNARIEL

More information

Court of Appeals of Ohio

Court of Appeals of Ohio [Cite as Figueroa v. Showtime Builders, Inc., 2011-Ohio-2912.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 95246 MIGUEL A. FIGUEROA, ET AL. PLAINTIFFS-APPELLEES

More information

Court of Appeals of Ohio

Court of Appeals of Ohio [Cite as Bates v. Postulate Invests., L.L.C., 176 Ohio App.3d 523, 2008-Ohio-2815.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 90099 BATES ET AL.,

More information

In the Supreme Court of Ohio

In the Supreme Court of Ohio 82976-112325 96993] Ns 2008-0304 In the Supreme Court of Ohio a 11 SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, P. Plaintiff-Appellant, FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, et ag, Defendants-Appellees. CLAIMED APPEAL OF

More information

COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, EIGHTH DISTRICT MRK TECHNOLOGIES, LTD. : : ACCELERATED DOCKET

COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, EIGHTH DISTRICT MRK TECHNOLOGIES, LTD. : : ACCELERATED DOCKET [Cite as MRK Technologies, Ltd. v. Accelerated Systems Integration, Inc., 2005-Ohio-30.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, EIGHTH DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA NO. 84747 MRK TECHNOLOGIES, LTD. : : ACCELERATED DOCKET

More information

[Cite as Davis v. Daimler Chrysler Corp., 2004-Ohio-4875.] STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF SUMMIT )

[Cite as Davis v. Daimler Chrysler Corp., 2004-Ohio-4875.] STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF SUMMIT ) [Cite as Davis v. Daimler Chrysler Corp., 2004-Ohio-4875.] STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS )ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF SUMMIT ) EARL DAVIS C.A. No. 21985 Appellant v. DAIMLER CHRYSLER

More information

STATE OF OHIO, CARROLL COUNTY IN THE COURT OF APPEALS SEVENTH DISTRICT

STATE OF OHIO, CARROLL COUNTY IN THE COURT OF APPEALS SEVENTH DISTRICT [Cite as FIA Card Servs. v. Marshall, 2010-Ohio-4244.] STATE OF OHIO, CARROLL COUNTY IN THE COURT OF APPEALS SEVENTH DISTRICT FIA CARD SERVICES, N.A. fka ) MBNA AMERICA BANK, N.A., ) ) CASE NO. 10 CA 864

More information

SARAH J. MADDOX, ET AL. CITY OF EAST CLEVELAND, ET AL.

SARAH J. MADDOX, ET AL. CITY OF EAST CLEVELAND, ET AL. [Cite as Maddox v. E. Cleveland, 2009-Ohio-6308.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 92673 SARAH J. MADDOX, ET AL. PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS

More information

COURT OF APPEALS STARK COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

COURT OF APPEALS STARK COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT [Cite as McCoy v. Cicchini Ents., Inc., 2012-Ohio-1182.] COURT OF APPEALS STARK COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT SARAH McCOY, et al., -vs- Plaintiffs-Appellees CICCHINI ENTERPRISES, INC., et al.,

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT HOCKING COUNTY. : Defendant-Appellee. : FILE-STAMPED DATE: : APPEARANCES

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT HOCKING COUNTY. : Defendant-Appellee. : FILE-STAMPED DATE: : APPEARANCES [Cite as Amos v. McDonald's Restaurant, 2004-Ohio-5762.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT HOCKING COUNTY Linda Diane Amos, : : Plaintiff-Appellant, : : Case No. 04CA3 vs. : : McDonald

More information

Court of Appeals of Ohio

Court of Appeals of Ohio [Cite as State v. Castro, 2012-Ohio-2206.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 97451 STATE OF OHIO PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE vs. JOSE CASTRO DEFENDANT-APPELLANT

More information

Court of Appeals of Ohio

Court of Appeals of Ohio [Cite as Hull v. Charter One Bank, 2013-Ohio-2101.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 99308 DOROTHY L. HULL, ET AL. PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS

More information

JAN MARCIA J. MENGEL, CLERK SUPREME COURT OF OHIO IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO. ANDY BUICK, INC. and ANDY CHEVROLET COMPANY,

JAN MARCIA J. MENGEL, CLERK SUPREME COURT OF OHIO IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO. ANDY BUICK, INC. and ANDY CHEVROLET COMPANY, IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO ANDY BUICK, INC. and ANDY CHEVROLET COMPANY, Defendants-Appellants, vs. RICARDO PHILLIPS, et al. Plaintiffs-Appellees. SUPREME COURT CASE NO. 2006-2338 On Appeal from the Lake

More information

Court of Appeals of Ohio

Court of Appeals of Ohio [Cite as Pearson v. Warrensville Hts. City Schools, 2008-Ohio-1102.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 88527 DARNELL PEARSON, ET AL. PLAINTIFFS-APPELLEES

More information

Court of Appeals of Ohio

Court of Appeals of Ohio [Cite as In re T.J., 2013-Ohio-591.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 98942 IN RE: T.J. A Minor Child [APPEAL BY THE CLEVELAND METROPOLITAN

More information

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-14-00546-CV Veronica L. Davis and James Anthony Davis, Appellants v. State Farm Lloyds Texas, Appellee FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY,

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO. DARRELL SAMPSON, Case No Plaintiff-Appellee, On Appeal from the V.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO. DARRELL SAMPSON, Case No Plaintiff-Appellee, On Appeal from the V. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO DARRELL SAMPSON, Case No. 10-1561 Plaintiff-Appellee, On Appeal from the V. Eighth District Court of Appeals Cuyahoga County, Ohio CUYAHOGA METROPOLITAN HOUSING AUTHORITY,

More information

Court of Appeals of Ohio

Court of Appeals of Ohio [Cite as Morana v. Foley, 2015-Ohio-5254.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 102572 CECILIA MORANA PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE vs. JASON W. FOLEY

More information

Court of Appeals of Ohio

Court of Appeals of Ohio [Cite as State v. Jenkins, 2008-Ohio-6149.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 90640 STATE OF OHIO PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE vs. RICHARD B. JENKINS,

More information

Court of Appeals of Ohio

Court of Appeals of Ohio [Cite as State ex rel. Ford v. Adm. Judge of Cuyahoga Cty. Court of Common Pleas, 2013-Ohio-4197.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 100053

More information

STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF SUMMIT ) DECISION AND JOURNAL ENTRY

STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF SUMMIT ) DECISION AND JOURNAL ENTRY [Cite as Abels v. Ruf, 2009-Ohio-3003.] STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS )ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF SUMMIT ) CHERYL ABELS, et al. C.A. No. 24359 Appellants v. WALTER RUF, M.D., et al.

More information

ALLSTATE INSURANCE CO., ELECTROLUX HOME PRODUCTS, INC.,

ALLSTATE INSURANCE CO., ELECTROLUX HOME PRODUCTS, INC., [Cite as Allstate Ins. Co. v. Electrolux Home Prods., Inc., 2012-Ohio-90.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 97065 ALLSTATE INSURANCE CO.,

More information

Court of Appeals of Ohio

Court of Appeals of Ohio [Cite as GrafTech Internatl. Ltd. v. Pacific Emps. Ins. Co., 2016-Ohio-1377.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 103008 GRAFTECH INTERNATIONAL

More information

Court of Appeals of Ohio

Court of Appeals of Ohio [Cite as Huffman v. Cleveland, Parking Violations Bur., 2016-Ohio-496.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 103447 FORDHAM E. HUFFMAN vs.

More information

COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, EIGHTH DISTRICT. For defendant-appellant: : : DATE OF ANNOUNCEMENT OF DECISION : FEBRUARY 10, 2005

COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, EIGHTH DISTRICT. For defendant-appellant: : : DATE OF ANNOUNCEMENT OF DECISION : FEBRUARY 10, 2005 [Cite as State v. Gramlich, 2005-Ohio-503.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, EIGHTH DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA No. 84172 STATE OF OHIO JOURNAL ENTRY Plaintiff-Appellee AND vs. OPINION HELENA GRAMLICH, AKA LISA

More information

LLU) 31n the ^&upreme Court of Yjio. MAY 0120t3. ci_f.nk OF COURT Sl.lPREiViE COURT OF OHIO. Case No EDWIN LUCIANO, NCC SOLUTIONS, INC.

LLU) 31n the ^&upreme Court of Yjio. MAY 0120t3. ci_f.nk OF COURT Sl.lPREiViE COURT OF OHIO. Case No EDWIN LUCIANO, NCC SOLUTIONS, INC. ^ 31n the ^&upreme Court of Yjio EDWIN LUCIANO, V. Plaintiff-Appellant, Case No. 2013-0523 On Appeal from the Cuyahoga County Court of Appeals, Eighth Appellate District, NCC SOLUTIONS, INC., Defendant-Appellee,

More information

Case: 1:16-cv DAP Doc #: 11 Filed: 11/28/16 1 of 6. PageID #: 71 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

Case: 1:16-cv DAP Doc #: 11 Filed: 11/28/16 1 of 6. PageID #: 71 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION Case: 1:16-cv-02325-DAP Doc #: 11 Filed: 11/28/16 1 of 6. PageID #: 71 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION ANTHONY NOVAK, Plaintiff, v. THE CITY OF PARMA, et

More information

Court of Appeals of Ohio

Court of Appeals of Ohio [Cite as Charter One Bank v. Tutin, 2007-Ohio-999.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 88081 CHARTER ONE BANK PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE vs. SANDRA

More information

COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, EIGHTH DISTRICT

COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, EIGHTH DISTRICT [Cite as Dixon v. Ford Motor Co., 2003-Ohio-3959.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, EIGHTH DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA No. 82148 CHARLES V. DIXON JOURNAL ENTRY Plaintiff-Appellee AND vs. OPINION FORD MOTOR COMPANY,

More information

Court of Appeals of Ohio

Court of Appeals of Ohio [Cite as Powell v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 2015-Ohio-2035.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 101662 ELIZABETH POWELL vs. PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT

More information

Court of Appeals of Ohio

Court of Appeals of Ohio [Cite as Cleveland v. Abrams, 2012-Ohio-3957.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 97814 CITY OF CLEVELAND PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE vs. IAN J.

More information

COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, EIGHTH DISTRICT. EBBETS PARTNERS, LTD. : : Plaintiff-Appellee : JOURNAL ENTRY : -vs- : AND : RONALD FOSTER : OPINION

COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, EIGHTH DISTRICT. EBBETS PARTNERS, LTD. : : Plaintiff-Appellee : JOURNAL ENTRY : -vs- : AND : RONALD FOSTER : OPINION [Cite as Ebbets Partners, Ltd. v. Foster, 2002-Ohio-6324.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, EIGHTH DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA NO. 80728 EBBETS PARTNERS, LTD. : : Plaintiff-Appellee : JOURNAL ENTRY : -vs- : AND

More information

COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, EIGHTH DISTRICT

COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, EIGHTH DISTRICT [Cite as Tornstrom v. DeMarco, 2002-Ohio-1102.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, EIGHTH DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA No. 79521 TODD TORNSTROM, ET AL. JOURNAL ENTRY Plaintiffs-Appellants/ Cross-Appellees AND vs.

More information

JOSE C. LISBOA, JR. KIMBERLY LISBOA

JOSE C. LISBOA, JR. KIMBERLY LISBOA [Cite as Lisboa v. Lisboa, 2008-Ohio-3129.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 90105 JOSE C. LISBOA, JR. PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE vs. KIMBERLY

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO. Relators, Respondent.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO. Relators, Respondent. ^ IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO STATE OF OHIO, et rel. CASE NO. MORRIS KINAST, M.D. AND NEUROCARE CENTER, INC. 4105 Holiday St., N.W. P.O. Box 35006 Canton, OH 44375 1 3 O i 5 9 vs. Relators, THE HONORABLE

More information

Court of Appeals of Ohio

Court of Appeals of Ohio [Cite as Cleveland v. Cleveland Assoc. of Rescue Emps., 2011-Ohio-4263.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 96325 CITY OF CLEVELAND PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LAKE COUNTY, OHIO

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LAKE COUNTY, OHIO [Cite as Harris v. MC Sign Co., 2014-Ohio-2888.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LAKE COUNTY, OHIO GARY HARRIS, : O P I N I O N Plaintiff, : (ATTORNEY JOSEPH T. GEORGE, : CASE NO. 2013-L-115

More information

MILLING AWAY LLC UGP PROPERTIES LLC, ET AL.

MILLING AWAY LLC UGP PROPERTIES LLC, ET AL. [Cite as Milling Away, L.L.C. v. UGP Properties, L.L.C., 2011-Ohio-1103.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 95751 MILLING AWAY LLC PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT

More information

DAWN M. HART, ETC., ET AL. ALAMO RENT A CAR, ET AL.

DAWN M. HART, ETC., ET AL. ALAMO RENT A CAR, ET AL. [Cite as Hart v. Alamo Rent A Car, 2011-Ohio-4099.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 95900 DAWN M. HART, ETC., ET AL. PLAINTIFFS-APPELLEES

More information

p L DD 0q^^/41, CLERK OF COURT SUPREME COURT OF OHIO IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO State ex rel., McGRATH Case No

p L DD 0q^^/41, CLERK OF COURT SUPREME COURT OF OHIO IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO State ex rel., McGRATH Case No IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO 0q^^/41, State ex rel., McGRATH V. Relato THE EIGHTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS, Case No. 2010-1860 Original Action in Mandamus and Procedendo Respondent. MOTION TO DISMISS

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO BUTLER COUNTY. : O P I N I O N - vs - : 1/18/2011

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO BUTLER COUNTY. : O P I N I O N - vs - : 1/18/2011 [Cite as Ohio Valley Associated Builders & Contrs. v. Rapier Elec., Inc., 2011-Ohio-160.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO BUTLER COUNTY OHIO VALLEY ASSOCIATED BUILDERS : AND

More information

FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 02/23/ :39 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 64 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/23/2018

FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 02/23/ :39 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 64 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/23/2018 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF KINGS -------------------------------------------------------------------------X â â â â â â â â â â â â -- â â â â â â X DAVID WILLIAMS, Index No.: 507787/2016

More information

STATE OF OHIO RUTH KRAUSHAAR

STATE OF OHIO RUTH KRAUSHAAR [Cite as State v. Kraushaar, 2009-Ohio-3072.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 91765 STATE OF OHIO PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT vs. RUTH KRAUSHAAR

More information

Sirkin, Shawn v. Trans Carriers, Inc.

Sirkin, Shawn v. Trans Carriers, Inc. University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims and Workers' Compensation Appeals Board Law 10-12-2015 Sirkin, Shawn v.

More information

COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, EIGHTH DISTRICT

COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, EIGHTH DISTRICT [Cite as In re Esper, 2002-Ohio-4926.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, EIGHTH DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA No. 81067 ACCELERATED DOCKET IN RE BAILEY COLEMAN ESPER JOURNAL ENTRY CHRISTI S. COLEMAN AND Defendant-Appellant

More information

Court of Appeals of Ohio

Court of Appeals of Ohio [Cite as Brown v. Carlton Harley Davidson, Inc., 2014-Ohio-5157.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 101494 BRUCE ANDREW BROWN, ETC., ET

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT SHELBY COUNTY PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, CASE NO BOB EVANS FARMS, INC., ET AL.

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT SHELBY COUNTY PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, CASE NO BOB EVANS FARMS, INC., ET AL. [Cite as Holland v. Bob Evans Farms, Inc., 2008-Ohio-1487.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT SHELBY COUNTY ROBERT E. HOLLAND, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, CASE NO. 17-07-12 v. BOB EVANS FARMS,

More information

ROBERT A. CHAISSON JUDGE

ROBERT A. CHAISSON JUDGE TERRY COLLINS AND LAINIE COLLINS VERSUS THE HOME DEPOT, U.S.A. INC. NO. 16-CA-516 FIFTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF LOUISIANA ON APPEAL FROM THE TWENTY-FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT PARISH OF JEFFERSON,

More information

THE MIDWESTERN INDEMNITY COMPANY JOHN K. NIERLICH, ET AL.

THE MIDWESTERN INDEMNITY COMPANY JOHN K. NIERLICH, ET AL. [Cite as Midwestern Indemn. Co. v. Nierlich, 2009-Ohio-3472.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 92526 THE MIDWESTERN INDEMNITY COMPANY

More information

Court of Appeals of Ohio

Court of Appeals of Ohio [Cite as Maclin v. Cleveland, 2015-Ohio-2956.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 102417 LISA MACLIN, ET AL. PLAINTIFFS-APPELLEES vs. CITY

More information

STATE OF OHIO GEORGE NAOUM

STATE OF OHIO GEORGE NAOUM [Cite as State v. Naoum, 2009-Ohio-618.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION Nos. 91662 and 91663 STATE OF OHIO PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT vs. GEORGE

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LUCAS COUNTY. Court of Appeals No. L Trial Court No.

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LUCAS COUNTY. Court of Appeals No. L Trial Court No. [Cite as Keel v. Toledo Harley-Davidson/Buell, 184 Ohio App.3d 348, 2009-Ohio-5190.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LUCAS COUNTY Keel, Court of Appeals No. L-09-1057 Appellant,

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs September 21, 2007

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs September 21, 2007 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs September 2, 2007 MAXINE JONES, ET AL. v. MONTCLAIR HOTELS TENNESSEE, LLC, ET AL. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Davidson County

More information

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT CA **********

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT CA ********** NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT CA 14-194 DEVANTE ZENO VERSUS JPS CONTAINERS, LLC, ET AL. ********** APPEAL FROM THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT PARISH

More information

COURT OF APPEALS STARK COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

COURT OF APPEALS STARK COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT [Cite as Seniah Corp. v. Buckingham, Doolittle & Burroughs, LLP, 2014-Ohio-4370.] COURT OF APPEALS STARK COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT SENIAH CORPORATION JUDGES Hon. W. Scott Gwin, P.J. Plaintiff-Appellant

More information

STATE OF OHIO CHARLES WHITE

STATE OF OHIO CHARLES WHITE [Cite as State v. White, 2009-Ohio-4371.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 92056 STATE OF OHIO PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE vs. CHARLES WHITE DEFENDANT-APPELLANT

More information

Court of Appeals of Ohio

Court of Appeals of Ohio [Cite as Henry v. Lincoln Elec. Holdings, Inc., 2008-Ohio-3451.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 90182 DENA HENRY PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE

More information

MADELYN BOHANNON GALLAGHER PIPINO, INC., ET AL.

MADELYN BOHANNON GALLAGHER PIPINO, INC., ET AL. [Cite as Bohannon v. Pipino, Inc., 2009-Ohio-3469.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 92325 MADELYN BOHANNON PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT vs. GALLAGHER

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO. This is a death penalty case.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO. This is a death penalty case. ^^ ^^^^f^^^. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO STATE OF OHIO, Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. MELVIN BONNELL, Defendant-Appellant. Case No. 2011-2164 On Appeal from the Court of Appeals, Eighth Appellate District,

More information

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHIO. This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff, Marathon Hotels, Inc.'s Motion To Disqualify

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHIO. This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff, Marathon Hotels, Inc.'s Motion To Disqualify N THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHIO MARATHON HOTELS, INC. CASE NO.: CV 14 836757 Zfllb MAR f 0 A 0 51 Plaintiff, JUDGE PAMELA A. BARKER CLERK OF COURTS CUYAHOGA COUNTY v. MILLER GOLER FAEGES

More information

Court of Appeals of Ohio

Court of Appeals of Ohio [Cite as State v. Michailides, 2013-Ohio-5316.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 99682 STATE OF OHIO PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE vs. JOHN A. MICHAILIDES

More information

[Cite as Santos v. Admr., Bur. of Workers' Comp., 2002-Ohio ] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, EIGHTH DISTRICT

[Cite as Santos v. Admr., Bur. of Workers' Comp., 2002-Ohio ] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, EIGHTH DISTRICT [Cite as Santos v. Admr., Bur. of Workers' Comp., 2002-Ohio- 2731.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, EIGHTH DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA NO. 80353 ANGEL L. SANTOS, et al. : : JOURNAL ENTRY PLAINTIFFS-APPELLEES

More information

Court of Common Pleas

Court of Common Pleas Motion No. 4578249 NAILAH K. BYRD CUYAHOGA COUNTY CUERK OF COURTS 1200 Ontario Street Cleveland, Ohio 44113 Court of Common Pleas MOTION FOR UEAVE TO FIFE ANSWER INSTANTER March 30, 201714:26 By: NICHOLAS

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO ORIGINAL IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO STATE OF OHIO ex rel. RICHARD F. : Case No. 2013-0295 DAVET P.O. Box 10092 : Original Action in Prohibition and Cleveland, Ohio 44110 : Mandamus Arising From Cuyahoga

More information

BROADVOX, LLC LENS ORESTE, ET AL.

BROADVOX, LLC LENS ORESTE, ET AL. [Cite as Broadvox, L.L.C., v. Oreste, 2009-Ohio-3466.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 92064 BROADVOX, LLC PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE vs. LENS

More information

ADMIRAL HOLDINGS, LLC LOUIS ADAMANY

ADMIRAL HOLDINGS, LLC LOUIS ADAMANY Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 87870 ADMIRAL HOLDINGS, LLC PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT vs. LOUIS ADAMANY DEFENDANT-APPELLEE JUDGMENT: AFFIRMED

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case 1:06-cv-01891-JTC Document 31 Filed 09/12/2006 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ASSOCIATION OF COMMUNITY ORGANIZATIONS FOR REFORM

More information

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 DAVID MILLER Appellant IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA ANTHONY PUCCIO AND JOSEPHINE PUCCIO, HIS WIFE, ANGELINE J. PUCCIO, NRT PITTSBURGH,

More information

COURT OF APPEALS LICKING COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

COURT OF APPEALS LICKING COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS LICKING COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT TONI BARRON (DOTSON) Appellant -vs- RODNEY BARRON Appellee JUDGES Hon. W. Scott Gwin, P.J. Hon. Patricia A. Delaney, J. Hon. Craig R. Baldwin,

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO BUTLER COUNTY. Petitioner-Appellant, : CASE NO. CA

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO BUTLER COUNTY. Petitioner-Appellant, : CASE NO. CA [Cite as Brewer v. State, 2009-Ohio-3157.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO BUTLER COUNTY JARED DUANE BREWER, : Petitioner-Appellant, : CASE NO. CA2009-02-041 : O P I N I O N

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Judge Carr

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Judge Carr IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION THE SANDUSKY COUNTY DEMOCRATIC PARTY, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. J. KENNETH BLACKWELL, Secretary of State, Defendant.

More information

Court of Appeals of Ohio

Court of Appeals of Ohio [Cite as State v. Redd, 2012-Ohio-5417.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 98064 STATE OF OHIO PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE vs. DARNELL REDD, JR.

More information

Case 2:16-cv JHS Document 50 Filed 04/30/18 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 2:16-cv JHS Document 50 Filed 04/30/18 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA Case 2:16-cv-06039-JHS Document 50 Filed 04/30/18 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA JOHN DOE I, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Case No. 2:16-cv-6039 COLONEL

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO [Cite as Haney v. Law, 2008-Ohio-1843.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO CATHY HANEY, vs. Plaintiff-Appellant, KEITH LAW and SOUTHWEST OHIO REGIONAL TRANSIT

More information

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT USCA Case #14-5319 Document #1537233 Filed: 02/11/2015 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT ) In Re, Kellogg, Brown And Root, Inc., ) et al., ) ) Petitioners,

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 04/15/ :21 PM INDEX NO /2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 23 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/15/2016

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 04/15/ :21 PM INDEX NO /2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 23 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/15/2016 FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 04/15/2016 01:21 PM INDEX NO. 150270/2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 23 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/15/2016 PXC/1654028 BU-13-06-04-09-001 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW

More information

NEW RIEGEL LOCAL SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD OF EDUCATION, Plaintiff-Appellee,

NEW RIEGEL LOCAL SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD OF EDUCATION, Plaintiff-Appellee, Supreme Court of Ohio Clerk of Court - Filed February 09, 2018 - Case No. 2018-0189 No. 2018-0189 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO NEW RIEGEL LOCAL SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD OF EDUCATION, Plaintiff-Appellee, v.

More information