DALAM MAHKAMAH TINGGI MALAYA DI KOTA BHARU DALAM NEGERI KELANTAN DARUL NAIM DI DALAM KES BICARA JENAYAH NO: 45SO-21-10/2016 BETWEEN PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
|
|
- Felicity Dorsey
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 DALAM MAHKAMAH TINGGI MALAYA DI KOTA BHARU DALAM NEGERI KELANTAN DARUL NAIM DI DALAM KES BICARA JENAYAH NO: 45SO-21-10/2016 BETWEEN PUBLIC PROSECUTOR AND AMINUDIN BIN MUSA (I/C. NO: ) GROUNDS OF JUDGMENT A. BACKGROUND [1] The Accused/Respondent was charged for transporting migrants who were smuggled into the country, an offence under section 26J of the Anti- Trafficking of Persons and Anti Smuggling of Migrant Act 2007 (ATIPSOM) ( The Act ). [2] After the charge was read and explained to the Accused/Respondent and after having understood the charge, the Accused/Respondent pleaded guilty. After he was explained of the consequences of his plea and understood them, the accused maintained his plea of guilty. 1
2 [3] After the facts of the case were read and explained and after having understood them, the accused admitted to those facts, the court thereafter convicted him. [4] Upon hearing submissions from both parties, this court sentenced him to 2 years and 5 months imprisonment from the date of arrest. As the car did not belong to him, this court did not make any order as to the forfeiture of the car. [5] Dissatisfied, the Public Prosecutor/Appellant filed an appeal to the Court of Appeal. These are the grounds for the decision. B. THE CHARGE [6] The charge reads as follows: Bahawa kamu pada 8/8/2016 jam lebih kurang pagi, bertempat di hadapan Masjid Kg. Lemal, di dalam Daerah Pasir Mas, di dalam Negeri Kelantan, didapati telah mengangkut 06 orang migran warganegara Myanmar yang diseludup iaitu penama (1) Kyaw Htet, (2) Moe Htet, (3) Salai Phone, (4) Kyaw Naing, (5) Aung Than dan (6) Tin Maung dengan menggunakan kereta jenis Proton Saga warna hijau, nombor pendaftaran NAA Oleh yang demikian kamu telah melakukan kesalahan di bawah Seksyen 26J Akta Anti Pemerdagangan Orang dan Anti Penyeludupan Migran 2007 dan boleh dihukum di bawah seksyen yang sama. 2
3 C. THE FACTS OF THE CASE [7] The facts of the case can be gleaned from the ground of judgment of the trial judge which extracts are reproduced below: 1) Pada 08/08/2016 jam lebih kurang 6.05 pagi, pengadu RF Norazuaman bin Mohd Lazim bersama anggota semasa bertugas menjalankan Risikan dan Pemantauan Ops Penguatkuasaan Risikan Sempadan Malaysia-Thailand (Kelantan) telah mengekori sebuah motorkar jenis Proton Saga nombor pendaftaran NAA 6615 warna hijau dari Jalan Tanah Merah-Pasir Mas Kelantan. 2) Setibanya di hadapan Masjid Kg Lemal. Pasir Mas, Kelantan, kereta Proton Saga tersebut telah memberhentikan keretanya. Pengadu nampak 2 lelaki warga asing sedang berada di tepi jalan. Pemandu iaitu 1 lelaki Melayu telah keluar dari kereta tersebut dan membuka bonet keretanya untuk memasukkan beg yang diambil daripada 2 lelaki warga asing tadi. 3) Semasa itu, Kpl Ismail telah menahan kereta tersebut dan pengadu block di belakang kereta tersebut. Pengadu dan anggota yang lain keluar dari kereta dan menuju ke arah lelaki tersebut. Pengadu mengeluarkan kad kuasa dan memperkenalkan diri polis. Kpl Ismail telah memegang tangan untuk digari tangan lelaki terebut, tetapi dia cuba melarikan diri, melawan dan telah menumbuk muka Kpl Ismail. Kemudian 3
4 dibantu oleh L/Kpl Fadli, Nazuan dan Akmal berjaya menangkap lelaki Melayu tersebut. Pemeriksaan dapati nama pemandu motorkar tersebut adalah Aminuddin bin Musa (Tertuduh), No KP: ). 4) Pengadu tangkap (2) lelaki warga asing yang berada di luar kereta. Kemudian pemeriksaan lanjut dibuat di dalam motorkar tersebut mendapati terdapat (4) lelaki warganegara asing. Hasil semakan mendapati kesemua mereka tiada memiliki sebarang dokumen perjalanan yang sah. Kesemua 6 warga asing adalah seperti berikut:- 4.1 Kyaw Htet, 31 thn, Lelaki, Myanmar. 4.2 Moe Htet, 19 thn, Lelaki, Myanmar. 4.3 Salai Phone, 25 thn, Lelaki, Myanmar. 4.4 Kyaw Naing, 33 thn, Lelaki, Myanmar. 4.5 Aung Than, 24 thn, Lelaki, Myanmar. 4.6 Tin Maung, 41 thn, Lelaki, Myanmar 5) Pengadu telah menahan pemandu dan kesemua warga asing Myanmar dan telah merampas sebuah kereta Proton Saga NAA D. PLEA IN MITIGATION BY THE ACCUSED [8] The learned counsel for the Accused/Respondent submitted that the Accused/Respondent was 41 years old and a bachelor at the time of his arrest. 4
5 [9] The Accused/Respondent has 6 siblings including himself of whom 2 are still small and schooling. Both of them were being taken care of by him since their parents death. [10] The counsel further submitted that the Accused/Respondent is a first offender for this offence and that the guilty plea at the first instance had saved the court s time and that he had repented and remorseful. [11] The Accused/Respondent had also given full cooperation to the authorities whilst under investigation. [12] Regarding the car, the learned counsel submitted that it was not his as it was not registered under his name. E. SUBMISSION BY THE PROSECUTION [13] The learned DPP submitted that this is a serious offence, and that public interest warrants that the sentence imposed should reflect the seriousness of the offence accordingly. [14] Further, submitted the learned DPP, it involved the security of the country as the Accused/Respondent had contributed to the influx of smuggled migrants into the country, and that Malaysia is now ranked in the third tier of the United Nation s Watch List in so far as trafficking in persons are concerned. 5
6 [15] The learned DPP further confirmed that he is a first offender and that the car used was not his and that it was registered under the mother s name. F. ANALYSIS AND FINDING OF THE COURT [16] The offending and the sentencing provision is fused in a single provision and is reproduced below which reads: Offence of conveyance of smuggled migrants 26J: Any person being the owner, operator or master of any conveyance who engages in the conveyance of smuggled migrants commits an offence and shall, on conviction, be punished with imprisonment for a term not exceeding five years and shall also be liable to a fine not exceeding two hundred and fifty thousand ringgit, or to both. [17] It is patently clear from the provision, that the maximum sentence that this court can impose will be 5 years imprisonment. In so far as fine is concerned, it is not mandatory, because of the word shall also be liable. (See the Federal Court case of Jayanathan v PP (infra); Goh Kheng Seong v PP (infra) and PP v Man Bin Ismail (1939) MLJ 207. [18] It is trite that whilst the court has a wide discretion in imposing sentence, the court is guided by certain sentencing principles of which public interest is of paramount importance and should superceede the 6
7 personal interest of the Accused/Respondent. [see R v Ball (25 CR) APPR 164] and [PP v Loo Choon Fatt (1976) 2 MLJ 256]. Hence the court cannot willy nilly embark on some unauthorized or extraneous exercise of discretion before meting out the sentence. [19] This court had considered the public interest element in this case in the sense that the sentence imposed should be deterrent in nature as this offence involved the security and also the reputation of the country as Malaysia is now ranked in the third tier of the United Nation Watch List on human trafficking. [20] This court on the other hand, did not disregard the rights of the Accused/Respondent i.e. to have his personal interest considered by this court as well (see Tan Sri Abdul Rahim bin Mohd Noor v PP (2001) 1 MLJ 193. There are circumstances in which public interest itself warrants that the Accused should not be put behind bars for far too long as that will do more harm than good as it might cause a crushing effect on him, and could turn him into a hardened criminal. [21] Hence a sentence that should be imposed should be one that could induce him to turn from a criminal to an honest life. In the words of Hashim Yeop Sani, High Court Judge Malaya as he then was in the case of Loo Choo Fatt (supra) who said: The public interest is indeed served, and best served, if the offender is induced to turn from criminal ways to honest living. 7
8 [22] Hence this court needs to strike a balance in order to do justice to the Accused/Respondent and to the public. Towards that end, this court had embarked on a balancing exercise, balancing the public interest with that of the fact that the Accused/Respondent had repented and remorseful, had promised to turn over a new leaf upon completing his time in prison, and that he had been supporting his 2 young siblings who are school going children after their parents death, amongst others. After embarking on a balancing exercise this court ruled that, in so far as the circumstances of this case were concerned, public interest will be best served by imposing a sentence of 2 years and 5 months, effective from the date of arrest. [23] This court had also considered that the Accused/Respondent had pleaded guilty at the first instance. There are a plethora of authorities to suggest that this factor should also be considered as much public time and money will be spared if an accused person admits his guilt, thus avoiding a prolonged and unnecessary trial [PP Vs Ravindran and Others (1992) 1 LNS 47] and Sau Soon Kim Vs PP (1975) 2 MLJ 134]. [24] The Accused/Respondent is not a habitual criminal as the learned DPP confirmed that this was his first offence. It is an established principle of law of sentencing that a first offender should be given some leniency, save where the offence committed, even though for the first time, were so serious that there was no reason or basis to give concession to this fact. Cases that fall into this category are for example, heneious crimes like taking away one s life, armed robbery where victim was shot, grevious hurt or having in possession of dangerous drugs in extraordinary large quantity [see PP Vs Tia Ah Leng (infra)]. 8
9 [25] Nothing of this sort happened in this case. [26] This court also had followed the sentencing trend of this type of offence under the Act. Admittedly there is a dearth of reported cases on sentencing especially under this section. However, for the more serious case of trafficking in persons by means of force or threat pursuant to section 13 this Act, the courts had sentenced offenders between 7 and 8 years imprisonment after a full trial as can be seen in the case of Kwong Tuck Choy & Anor v PP (2013) 1 LNS 1440 and Chang Choi v PP (2013) 7 CLJ 166 respectively. The offence under section 13 carries the maximum prison sentence of 20 years with a minimum prison sentence of 3 years. Whereas the prison sentence for the offence at hand (i.e. sect 26J) is a maximum of 5 years only. [27] As a guide, in the case of Mohd Karim Bujang v PP (2014) 2 CLJ 755, the High Court affirmed the sentence of 2 years imprisonment imposed by the Session s Court upon conviction after a full trial. In PP v Ngan Chea (2015) 1 LNS 711, the High Court imposed only a fine upon conviction after a full trial. [28] Even in the case of PP v Rahman Mojibur (2016) 1 LNS 290 where the accused was charged under section 26H of the Act (concealing or harboring smuggled migrants) which carries a maximum prison sentence of 10 years, the High Court imposed a prison sentence of only 2 years. [29] Further it is not uncommon for the court to use a mechanism or a formula of giving half of the maximum prison sentence allowed or a 9
10 discount of about 1/4 or 1/3 of the imprisonment sentence that would have been imposed had the accused been found guilty and convicted after a full trial. (see Mohamad Abdullah Ang Swee Kang v PP (1988) 1 MLJ 168. [30] Hence, based on the reasonings above, this court found that the appropriate sentence should be 2 years and 5 months imprisonment which was about half of the maximum imprisonment allowed. [31] In so far as the conveyance used in the commission of the crime was concerned, i.e. the car with the registration number NAA 6615, no order for forfeiture under section 36 of the Act was given, primarily because there was no iota of evidence to show that the car was his. [32] Section 36 of the Act reads as follows: (1) All conveyance, moveable property, book, record, report or document, or any human organ seized in the exercise of any power conferred under this Act are liable to forfeiture. (2) The Court trying any person accused of an offence under this Act may at the conclusion of the trial, whether he is convicted or not, order that the conveyance, moveable property, book, record, report or document or any human organ seized from that person be forfeited. [33] This court noted that the word liable to forfeiture was employed in sub section (1) to section 36, and the word may, at the conclusion of the 10
11 trial was employed in subsection (2) to section 36 of the Act. It is trite that the words may or liable to denote that the provisions are not mandatory but discretionary or directory in nature, as affirmed in cases like Jayanathan v PP (1973) 2 MLJ 68; Darus v PP (1964) MLJ 322; Mahrus v PP (1992) 1 MLJ 561; Goh Kheng Seong v PP (1993) 1 MLJ 103 and PP v Man Bin Ismail (1939) MLJ 161. Hence a discretion is given to this court as to whether to adhere to that requirement or otherwise. [34] In exercising this court s discretion not to order forfeiture of the car in question, this court took into consideration that the car was not registered under the accused s name but under the mother s. To put it in another fashion, the car did not belong to him. [35] Further, this court was of the considered opinion that the car can be best utilized by other members of the family especially the other elder siblings who are to relieve the accused of taking care of the 2 young siblings i.e. transporting them to and from school and also for the usage of other members of the family for their daily chores, during the Accused s absence. G. CONCLUSION [36] In the upshot, and for the foregoing reasons, this court had sentenced the Accused/Respondent to 2 years and 5 months imprisonment from the date of arrest. Further, no order of forfeiture of the car was to be given. 11
12 Dated: 30 September 2017 (DATO AHMAD BIN BACHE) Pesuruhjaya Kehakiman Mahkamah Tinggi Kota Bharu Kelantan. Pendakwa Raya/Perayu: TPR Wong Siew Mun Pejabat Penasihat Undang-Undang Negeri Kelantan, Blok 5, Tingkat Bawah, Kota Darulnaim, Kota Bharu, Kelantan Peguamcara/Responden: Puan Azwani binti Abdul Rahman Tetuan Azwani Rahman & Norfaruqi, Peguambela & Peguamcara, Lot 2731A, Wisma Haminah, Jalan Wakaf Stan, Kubang Kerian Kota Bharu, Kelantan. 12
BETWEEN KAMARUSHAM BIN ZAKARIA... APPELLANT AND PUBLIC PROSECUTOR... RESPONDENT. GROUNDS OF JUDGMENT (On Sentence)
DALAM MAHKAMAH TINGGI MALAYA DI KOTA BHARU DALAM NEGERI KELANTAN DARUL NAIM DI DALAM KES RAYUAN JENAYAH NO: 42S-58-10/2016 (DALAM MAHKAMAH SESYEN PASIR MAS, KELANTAN NO. SPM(A)62-41-09/2016) BETWEEN KAMARUSHAM
More informationMALAYSIA IN HIGH COURT IN SABAH AND SARAWAK AT KOTA KINABALU BETWEEN PUBLIC PROSECUTOR APPELLANT AND JUHINOL BIN LIMBUIS RESPONDENT
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 MALAYSIA IN HIGH COURT IN SABAH AND SARAWAK AT KOTA KINABALU BETWEEN PUBLIC PROSECUTOR APPELLANT AND JUHINOL BIN LIMBUIS RESPONDENT 10 11 12 13 (KOTA KINABALU SESSIONS COURT CRIMINAL
More informationBETWEEN BUDIMAN BIN CHE MAMAT... APPELLANT AND PUBLIC PROSECUTOR... RESPONDENT. GROUNDS OF JUDGMENT (On Sentence)
DALAM MAHKAMAH TINGGI MALAYA DI KOTA BHARU DALAM NEGERI KELANTAN DARUL NAIM DI DALAM KES RAYUAN JENAYAH NO: 42S-62-12/2016 (DALAM MAHKAMAH SESYEN GUA MUSANG, NO: 62-09-11/2016) BETWEEN BUDIMAN BIN CHE
More informationHeld: Per Abdul Hamid Mohamad JCA
1 PP v. HO HUAH TEONG COURT OF APPEAL, KUALA LUMPUR LAMIN MOHD YUNUS, PCA; ABDUL HAMID MOHAMAD, JCA; ABDUL KADIR SULAIMAN, JCA CRIMINAL APPEAL NO: P09-3-97 3 AUGUST 2001 [2001] 3 CLJ 722 CRIMINAL PROCEDURE:
More informationBETWEEN NIK ADIB BIN NIK MAT... APPELLANT AGAINST PUBLIC PROSECUTOR... RESPONDENT GROUNDS OF JUDGEMENT (ON SENTENCE)
DALAM MAHKAMAH TINGGI MALAYA DI KOTA BHARU DALAM NEGERI KELANTAN, MALAYSIA RAYUAN JENAYAH NO: 42S(A)-39-7/16 (MAHKAMAH SESYEN KOTA BHARU, KELANTAN [NO. SKB(A):61-11-09/16] BETWEEN NIK ADIB BIN NIK MAT...
More informationSetem (Pindaan) 1 D.R. 14/2010 RANG UNDANG-UNDANG. b e r n a m a. Suatu Akta untuk meminda Akta Setem Tajuk ringkas dan permulaan kuat kuasa
Setem (Pindaan) 1 D.R. 14/2010 RANG UNDANG-UNDANG b e r n a m a Suatu Akta untuk meminda Akta Setem 1949. [ ] DIPERBUAT oleh Parlimen Malaysia seperti yang berikut: Tajuk ringkas dan permulaan kuat kuasa
More informationBETWEEN AND GROUNDS OF JUDGEMENT
DALAM MAHKAMAH TINGGI MALAYA DI KOTA BHARU DALAM NEGERI KELANTAN, MALAYSIA RAYUAN JENAYAH NO: 42S-43-8/2016 (MAHKAMAH SESYEN KOTA BHARU, KELANTAN NO. SKB(A)62JS-138-8/2014) BETWEEN MOHD ASHRAF BIN IBRAHIM...
More informationD.R. 48/96 RANG UNDANG-UNDANG. Suatu Akta untuk meminda Kanun Prosedur Jenayah.
D.R. 48/96 Naskhah Sahih Bahasa Inggeris RANG UNDANG-UNDANG b e r n a m a Suatu Akta untuk meminda Kanun Prosedur Jenayah. [ ] MAKA INILAH DIPERBUAT UNDANG-UNDANG oleh Seri Paduka Baginda Yang di-pertuan
More informationKAEDAH-KAEDAH MAHKAMAH TINGGI (PINDAAN) 2011 RULES OF THE HIGH COURT (AMENDMENT) 2011 DISIARKAN OLEH/ JABATAN PEGUAM NEGARA/ PUBLISHED BY
WARTA KERAJAAN PERSEKUTUAN 29 Jun 2011 29 June 2011 P.U. (A) 210 FEDERAL GOVERNMENT GAZETTE KAEDAH-KAEDAH MAHKAMAH TINGGI (PINDAAN) 2011 RULES OF THE HIGH COURT (AMENDMENT) 2011 DISIARKAN OLEH/ PUBLISHED
More informationKAEDAH-KAEDAH MAHKAMAH PERSEKUTUAN (PINDAAN) 2011 RULES OF THE FEDERAL COURT (AMENDMENT) 2011 DISIARKAN OLEH/ JABATAN PEGUAM NEGARA/ PUBLISHED BY
WARTA KERAJAAN PERSE EKUTUAN 29 Jun 2011 29 June 2011 P.U. (A) 208 FEDERAL GOVERNMENT GAZETTE KAEDAH-KAEDAH MAHKAMAH PERSEKUTUAN (PINDAAN) 2011 RULES OF THE FEDERAL COURT (AMENDMENT) 2011 DISIARKAN OLEH/
More informationPROPOSED DRAFT IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF MALAYSIA (APPELLATE JURISDICTION) CRIMINAL APPEAL NO: J /2014 & J /2010 BETWEEN AND
PROPOSED DRAFT IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF MALAYSIA (APPELLATE JURISDICTION) CRIMINAL APPEAL NO: J-05-290-10/2014 & J-05-303-10/2010 BETWEEN PUBLIC PROSECUTOR APPELLANT AND YAP KIM WANG RESPONDENT [In the
More informationKanun Tatacara Jenayah (Pindaan) (No. 2) 1 D.R. 17/2012 RANG UNDANG-UNDANG. b e r n a m a. Suatu Akta untuk meminda Kanun Tatacara Jenayah.
Kanun Tatacara Jenayah (Pindaan) (No. 2) 1 D.R. 17/2012 RANG UNDANG-UNDANG b e r n a m a Suatu Akta untuk meminda Kanun Tatacara Jenayah. [ ] DIPERBUAT oleh Parlimen Malaysia seperti yang berikut: Tajuk
More informationD.R. 13/2007 RANG UNDANG-UNDANG. b e r n a m a. Suatu Akta untuk meminda Akta Kanun Keseksaan (Pindaan) 2006.
D.R. 13/2007 RANG UNDANG-UNDANG b e r n a m a Suatu Akta untuk meminda Akta Kanun Keseksaan (Pindaan) 2006. DIPERBUAT oleh Parlimen Malaysia seperti yang berikut: Tajuk ringkas dan permulaan kuat kuasa
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL MALAYSIA (APPELLATE JURISDICTION) CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.D-05(S)-77-03/2015 BETWEEN PUBLIC PROSECUTOR APPELLANT AND
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEAL MALAYSIA (APPELLATE JURISDICTION) CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.D-05(S)-77-03/2015 BETWEEN PUBLIC PROSECUTOR APPELLANT AND MOHD FAZELAN BIN MD KHUZEH RESPONDENT (IN THE HIGH COURT OF MALAYA
More informationFEDERAL GOVERNMENT GAZETTE
WARTAKERAJAAN PERSEKUTUAN 12 Oktober 2017 12 October 2017 P.U. (A) 314 FEDERAL GOVERNMENT GAZETTE PERINTAH KAWALAN HARGA DAN ANTIPENCATUTAN (PENANDAAN HARGA BARANGAN HARGA TERKAWAL) (NO. 6) 2017 PRICE
More informationDALAM MAHKAMAH TINGGI MALAYA DI PULAU PINANG RAYUAN JENAYAH KES NO : 42S ANTARA KHOR SOCK KHIM LAWAN PENDAKWA RAYA JUDGMENT
DALAM MAHKAMAH TINGGI MALAYA DI PULAU PINANG RAYUAN JENAYAH KES NO : 42S-4-02-2016 ANTARA KHOR SOCK KHIM LAWAN PENDAKWA RAYA JUDGMENT INTRODUCTION 1. This is an appeal by the Appellant against the decision
More informationD.R. 41/94. b er nama. Suatu Akta untuk meminda Kanun Prosedur Jenayah [ ]
D.R. 41/94 Naskhah Sahih Bahasa Inggeris RANG UNDANG-UNDANG b er nama Suatu Akta untuk meminda Kanun Prosedur Jenayah [ ] MAKA INILAH DIPERBUAT UNDANG-UNDAN oleh Seri Paduka Baginda Yang di-pertuan Agong
More informationMohamad Ridzuan Bin Zamhor v Pendakwa Raya
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF MALAYSIA Coram: Mohtarudin Baki, JCA; Ahmadi Asnawi, JCA; Kamardin Hashim, JCA Mohamad Ridzuan Bin Zamhor v Pendakwa Raya Citation: [2018] MYCA 30 Suit Number: Rayuan Jenayah
More informationDALAM MAHKAMAH TINGGI MALAYA DI SHAH ALAM DALAM NEGERI SELANGOR DARUL EHSAN, MALAYSIA KES KEBANKRAPAN NO: 29NCC /2015
DALAM MAHKAMAH TINGGI MALAYA DI SHAH ALAM DALAM NEGERI SELANGOR DARUL EHSAN, MALAYSIA KES KEBANKRAPAN NO: 29NCC-10794-12/2015 BERKENAAN : KAMALASAN A/L TANGARAJOO (NO. K/P: 850522-08-6763). PENGHUTANG
More informationVigneswaran A/L Rajamanikam v Public Prosecutor and Another Appeal
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF MALAYSIA Coram: Mohd Zawawi Salleh, JCA; Ahmadi Asnawi, JCA; Kamardin Hashim, JCA Vigneswaran A/L Rajamanikam v Public Prosecutor and Another Appeal Citation: [2018] MYCA 83 Suit
More informationPERATURAN-PERATURAN PERLINDUNGAN DATA PERIBADI (PENGKOMPAUNAN KESALAHAN) 2016 PERSONAL DATA PROTECTION (COMPOUNDING OF OFFENCES) REGULATIONS 2016
WARTA KERAJAAN PERSEKUTUAN 14 Mac 2016 14 March 2016 P.U. (A) 60 FEDERAL GOVERNMENT GAZETTE PERATURAN-PERATURAN PERLINDUNGAN DATA PERIBADI (PENGKOMPAUNAN KESALAHAN) 2016 PERSONAL DATA PROTECTION (COMPOUNDING
More informationPROFILE OF CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTUAL CLAIMS NUR JAZLIANNA BINTI SAMSUDIN UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MALAYSIA
PROFILE OF CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTUAL CLAIMS NUR JAZLIANNA BINTI SAMSUDIN UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MALAYSIA PROFILE OF CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTUAL CLAIMS NUR JAZLIANNA BINTI SAMSUDIN A master s project report submitted
More informationDALAM MAHKAMAH RAYUAN MALAYSIA DI PUTRAJAYA BIDANGKUASA RAYUAN RAYUAN JENAYAH NO: J-05(LB)-54-01/2016 ANTARA TAN CHOW CHEANG PERAYU DAN
DALAM MAHKAMAH RAYUAN MALAYSIA DI PUTRAJAYA BIDANGKUASA RAYUAN RAYUAN JENAYAH NO: J-05(LB)-54-01/2016 ANTARA TAN CHOW CHEANG PERAYU DAN PENDAKWA RAYA RESPONDEN (Dalam Perkara Mahkamah Tinggi Malaya di
More informationDALAM MAHKAMAH TINGGI MALAYA DI KUALA LUMPUR DALAM WILAYAH PERSEKUTUAN, MALAYSIA [GUAMAN SIVIL NO: S ] (NO 2) ANTARA
DALAM MAHKAMAH TINGGI MALAYA DI KUALA LUMPUR DALAM WILAYAH PERSEKUTUAN, MALAYSIA [GUAMAN SIVIL NO: S-22-868-2008] (NO 2) ANTARA PALM SPRING JMB (SIJIL NO: 0046) Suatu badan yang ditubuhkan di bawah Akta
More informationPERINTAH UNIVERSITI DAN KOLEJ UNIVERSITI (PERLEMBAGAAN UNIVERSITI TUN HUSSEIN ONN MALAYSIA) (PINDAAN) 2012
WARTA KERAJAAN PERSEKUTUAN 22 November 2012 22 November 2012 P.U. (A) 401 FEDERAL GOVERNMENT GAZETTE PERINTAH UNIVERSITI DAN KOLEJ UNIVERSITI (PERLEMBAGAAN UNIVERSITI TUN HUSSEIN ONN MALAYSIA) (PINDAAN)
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL, MALAYSIA AT PUTRAJAYA (APPELLATE JURISDICTION) CRIMINAL APPEAL NO: B-05(LB) /2015 (IND) BETWEEN AND AND
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL, MALAYSIA AT PUTRAJAYA (APPELLATE JURISDICTION) CRIMINAL APPEAL NO: B-05(LB)-285-10/2015 (IND) BETWEEN PUBLIC PROSECUTOR APPELLANT AND NI KOMANG YUNINGSIH RESPONDENT AND [IN THE
More informationDALAM MAHKAMAH RAYUAN MALAYSIA (BIDANG KUASA RAYUAN) [RAYUAN SIVIL NO: W-02(NCVC)(W) /2013] ANTARA DAN
DALAM MAHKAMAH RAYUAN MALAYSIA (BIDANG KUASA RAYUAN) [RAYUAN SIVIL NO: W-02(NCVC)(W)-143-01/2013] ANTARA 1. MUAFAKAT KEKAL SDN BHD 2. PERBADANAN PENGURUSAN PALM SPRING @ DAMANSARA... PERAYU DAN 1. PESURUHJAYA
More informationD.R. 40/2006 RANG UNDANG-UNDANG. b e r n a m a. Suatu Akta untuk meminda Akta Kastam DIPERBUAT oleh Parlimen Malaysia seperti yang berikut:
D.R. 40/2006 RANG UNDANG-UNDANG b e r n a m a Suatu Akta untuk meminda Akta Kastam 1967. [ ] DIPERBUAT oleh Parlimen Malaysia seperti yang berikut: Tajuk ringkas dan permulaan kuat kuasa 1. (1) Akta ini
More informationCIRCULAR 2017/02. Tick ( ) where applicable. Please reply to any of Sara Worldwide Vacations Berhad Member Service Centres by 20 September 2017.
CIRCULAR 2017/02 Dear Valued Members, Warmest greetings from Easturia Vacation Club! 1. EASTURIA VACATION CLUB 6 th MEMBERS ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING We are pleased to inform that the 6 th Members Annual
More informationUNDANG-UNDANG MALAYSIA
Maktab Kerjasama (Perbadanan) (Pindaan) 1 UNDANG-UNDANG MALAYSIA Akta A1398 akta MAKTAB KERJASAMA (PERBADANAN) (PINDAAN) 2011 2 Undang-Undang Malaysia Akta A1398 Tarikh Perkenan Diraja...... 5 Ogos 2011
More informationUNIVERSITI SAINS MALAYSIA. Peperiksaan Semester Pertama Sidang Akademik 2000/2001
Angka Giliran... No. Tempat Duduk... UNIVERSITI SAINS MALAYSIA Peperiksaan Semester Pertama Sidang Akademik 2000/2001 September 2000 HBT203/3 - BAHASA, UNDANG-UNDANG DAN PENTERJEMAHAN II (Language, Law
More informationDALAM MAHKAMAH RAYUAN MALAYSIA (BIDANGKUASA RAYUAN) RAYUAN SIVIL NO: P ANTARA SAUL HAMID B. PAKIR MOHAMAD... PERAYU DAN
1 DALAM MAHKAMAH RAYUAN MALAYSIA (BIDANGKUASA RAYUAN) RAYUAN SIVIL NO: P-01-61-1999 ANTARA SAUL HAMID B. PAKIR MOHAMAD... PERAYU DAN 1. INSPEKTOR ABDUL FATAH B. ABDUL RAHMAN RESPONDEN- 2. KERAJAAN MALAYSIA
More informationPendakwa Raya v Okwuhoa Edozie Stephen (NGA)
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF MALAYSIA Coram: Mohtarudin Baki, JCA; Kamardin Hashim, JCA; Yaacob Md Sam, JCA Pendakwa Raya v Okwuhoa Edozie Stephen (NGA) Citation: [2018] MYCA 111 Suit Number: Rayuan Jenayah
More informationDALAM MAHKAMAH RAYUAN MALAYSIA (BIDANG KUASA RAYUAN) [RAYUAN JENAYAH NO. B /2014 (IRN)] ANTARA MORTEZA HOSSEINKHANI MOSTAFA DAN
DALAM MAHKAMAH RAYUAN MALAYSIA (BIDANG KUASA RAYUAN) [RAYUAN JENAYAH NO. B-05-267-09/2014 (IRN)] ANTARA MORTEZA HOSSEINKHANI MOSTAFA PERAYU DAN PENDAKWA RAYA RESPONDEN [DIDENGAR BERSEKALI DENGAN RAYUAN
More informationDALAM MAHKAMAH TINGGI MALAYA DI PULAU PINANG RAYUAN JENAYAH KES NO : MT-42S-10-07/2016 ANTARA
DALAM MAHKAMAH TINGGI MALAYA DI PULAU PINANG RAYUAN JENAYAH KES NO : MT-42S-10-07/2016 ANTARA 1. SYED MOHAMMAD YASER BIN SYED SOPIAN 2. SHAIFUL FAREZZUAN BIN RAMLI - PERAYU-PERAYU LAWAN PENDAKWA RAYA -
More informationD.R. 18/2012 RANG UNDANG-UNDANG. b e r n a m a. Suatu Akta untuk meminda Kanun Keseksaan. DIPERBUAT oleh Parlimen Malaysia seperti yang berikut:
Kanun Keseksaan (Pindaan) 1 D.R. 18/2012 RANG UNDANG-UNDANG b e r n a m a Suatu Akta untuk meminda Kanun Keseksaan. [ ] DIPERBUAT oleh Parlimen Malaysia seperti yang berikut: Tajuk ringkas dan permulaan
More informationUNCONSCIONABLE CALL OF PERFORMANCE BOND WAN NOOR SOLEHHA BINTI WAN NIK FACULTY OF BUILT ENVIRONMENT UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MALAYSIA
ii UNCONSCIONABLE CALL OF PERFORMANCE BOND WAN NOOR SOLEHHA BINTI WAN NIK FACULTY OF BUILT ENVIRONMENT UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MALAYSIA iii UNCONSCIONABLE CALL OF PERFORMANCE BOND WAN NOOR SOLEHHA BINTI WAN
More informationMOK YONG KONG & ANOR v MOK YONG CHUAN
Page 1 Malayan Law Journal Reports/2002/Volume 2/MOK YONG KONG & ANOR v MOK YONG CHUAN - [2002] 2 MLJ 718-20 February 2002 [2002] 2 MLJ 718 MOK YONG KONG & ANOR v MOK YONG CHUAN COURT OF APPEAL (KUALA
More informationD.R. 5/94 RANG UNDANG-UNDANG. b e r n a m a. Suatu Akta untuk meminda Ordinan Perkapalan Saudagar 1952.
D.R. 5/94 Naskhah Sahih Bahasa Inggeris RANG UNDANG-UNDANG b e r n a m a Suatu Akta untuk meminda Ordinan Perkapalan Saudagar 1952. MAKA INILAH DIPERBUAT UNDANG-UNDANG oleh Seri Paduka Baginda Yang di-pertuan
More informationVALID AND INVALID VARIATION OMISSION OF WORKS MOTHILAL A/L MUNIANDY
VALID AND INVALID VARIATION OMISSION OF WORKS MOTHILAL A/L MUNIANDY A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the award of the degree of Master of Science (Construction Contract
More informationKhairul Bin Nordin v Pendakwa Raya
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF MALAYSIA Coram: Rohana Yusuf, JCA; Yaacob Md Sam, JCA; Rhodzariah Bujang, JCA Khairul Bin Nordin v Pendakwa Raya Citation: [2018] MYCA 97 Suit Number: Rayuan Jenayah No. M 06(M)
More informationKumanaan A/L Anthony Vincent v Pendakwa Raya and Another Appeal
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF MALAYSIA Coram: Mohd Zawawi Salleh, JCA; Ahmadi Asnawi, JCA; Kamardin Hashim, JCA Kumanaan A/L Anthony Vincent v Pendakwa Raya and Another Appeal Citation: [2018] MYCA 177 Suit
More informationSTATE OF SABAH. Yang di-pertua Negeri. No.14 of ENACTED by the Legislature of the State of Sabah as follows:
STATE OF SABAH I assent, LS TUN DATUK SERI PANGLIMA HAJI AHMADSHAH BIN ABDULLAH, Yang di-pertua Negeri. 31 ST DECEMBER, 2004. No.14 of 2004 An Enactment to make ammend the Environment Protection Enactment
More informationDIDALAM MAHKAMAH TINGGI JENAYAH 4 KUALA LUMPUR DIDALAM WILAYAH PERSEKUTUAN KUALA LUMPUR PERMOHONAN JENAYAH NO: /2016
1 DIDALAM MAHKAMAH TINGGI JENAYAH 4 KUALA LUMPUR DIDALAM WILAYAH PERSEKUTUAN KUALA LUMPUR PERMOHONAN JENAYAH NO: 44-103-08/2016 MOHD FAHMI REDZA BIN MOHD ZARIN LAWAN PENDAKWA RAYA PERMOHONAN JENAYAH NO:
More informationDALAM MAHKAMAH TINGGI MALAYA DI KUALA LUMPUR (BAHAGIAN RAYUAN DAN KUASA-KUASA KHAS) PERMOHONAN SEMAKAN KEHAKIMAN: WA /2017
DALAM MAHKAMAH TINGGI MALAYA DI KUALA LUMPUR (BAHAGIAN RAYUAN DAN KUASA-KUASA KHAS) PERMOHONAN SEMAKAN KEHAKIMAN: WA-25-193-07/2017 Dalam perkara sesuatu keputusan Ketua Pengarah Kastam dan Eksais yang
More informationDALAM MAHKAMAH RAYUAN MALAYSIA DI PUTRAJAYA RAYUAN JENAYAH NO J /2014 BETWEEN AND DALAM MAHKAMAH RAYUAN MALAYSIA DI PUTRAJAYA
DALAM MAHKAMAH RAYUAN MALAYSIA DI PUTRAJAYA RAYUAN JENAYAH NO J-09-27-01/2014 BETWEEN AZMI BIN OSMAN APPELLANT AND PENDAKWA RAYA RESPONDENT DALAM MAHKAMAH RAYUAN MALAYSIA DI PUTRAJAYA RAYUAN JENAYAH NO
More informationDALAM MAHKAMAH TINGGI MALAYA DI SHAH ALAM DALAM NEGERI SELANGOR DARUL EHSAN, MALAYSIA KES KEBANKRAPAN NO: /2013
DALAM MAHKAMAH TINGGI MALAYA DI SHAH ALAM DALAM NEGERI SELANGOR DARUL EHSAN, MALAYSIA KES KEBANKRAPAN NO: 29-3300-03/2013 PER : YASMIN PEREMA BINTI ABDULLAH (NO. K/P: 730427-05-5030). PERAYU/ PENGHUTANG
More informationBETWEEN AND KHAFASLIZA BINTI SHAFII... RESPONDENT (IC.NO: ) GROUNDS OF JUDGEMENT
DALAM MAHKAMAH TINGGI MALAYA DI KOTA BHARU DALAM NEGERI KELANTAN, MALAYSIA RAYUAN JENAYAH NO: 42LB(A)-2-1/2016 (MAHKAMAH SESYEN KOTA BHARU, KELANTAN NO. SKB(A)61-08-12/2013) BETWEEN PUBLIC PROSECUTOR...
More informationA RELATION BETWEEN TUDUNG SAJI WEAVING PATTERNS AND GROUP THEORY SITI NORZIAHIDAYU AMZEE ZAMRI UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MALAYSIA
A RELATION BETWEEN TUDUNG SAJI WEAVING PATTERNS AND GROUP THEORY SITI NORZIAHIDAYU AMZEE ZAMRI UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MALAYSIA A RELATION BETWEEN TUDUNG SAJI WEAVING PATTERNS AND GROUP THEORY SITI NORZIAHIDAYU
More informationDIDALAM MAHKAMAH TINGGI JENAYAH 4 KUALA LUMPUR DIDALAM WILAYAH PERSEKUTUAN KUALA LUMPUR ROSE HANIDA BINTI LONG LAWAN PENDAKWA RAYA PENGHAKIMAN
1 DIDALAM MAHKAMAH TINGGI JENAYAH 4 KUALA LUMPUR DIDALAM WILAYAH PERSEKUTUAN KUALA LUMPUR RAYUAN JENAYAH NO: 42K (115 124)-09/2016 ROSE HANIDA BINTI LONG LAWAN PENDAKWA RAYA PENGHAKIMAN Latarbelakang 1.
More informationDALAM MAHKAMAH TINGGI MALAYA DI SEREMBAN DALAM NEGERI SEMBILAM DARUL KHUSUS, MALAYSIA PERMOHONAN JENAYAH NO : NA /2017 ANTARA
DALAM MAHKAMAH TINGGI MALAYA DI SEREMBAN DALAM NEGERI SEMBILAM DARUL KHUSUS, MALAYSIA PERMOHONAN JENAYAH NO : NA-44-29-08/2017 ANTARA AL FAITOURI BIN KAMAL PEMOHON DAN PENDAKWA RAYA RESPONDEN PENGHAKIMAN
More informationSTATUTORY INTERPRETATION
1 YONG TECK LEE v. HARRIS MOHD SALLEH & ANOR COURT OF APPEAL, KUALA LUMPUR ABDUL HAMID MOHAMAD, JCA; MOHD SAARI YUSOFF, JCA; K C VOHRAH, JCA CIVIL APPEAL NO: S-04-75-2001 6 JUNE 2002 [2002] 3 CLJ 422 CIVIL
More informationPERMOHONAN PEMBAHARUAN PERMIT APPLICATION FOR A RENEWAL OF PERMIT
Borang SPAN/P/2 JADUAL KEEMPAT [subkaedah 8(2)/subrule 8(2)] AKTA INDUSTRI PERKHIDMATAN AIR 2006 WATER SERVICES INDUSTRY ACT 2006 KAEDAH-KAEDAH INDUSTRI PERKHIDMATAN AIR (PERMIT) 2007 WATER SERVICES INDUSTRY
More informationHBT Bahasa, Undang-Undang Dan Penterjemahan II (Language, Law and Translation II)
UNIVERSITI SAINS MALAYSIA Peperiksaan Semester Pertama Sidang Akademik 2001/2002 September 2001 HBT 203 - Bahasa, Undang-Undang Dan Penterjemahan II (Language, Law and Translation II) Masa : 2½ jam Sila
More informationDALAM MAHKAMAH TINGGI MALAYA DI SHAH ALAM DALAM NEGERI SELANGOR DARUL EHSAN RAYUAN SIVIL NO.: 11ANCVC-44-08/2016 ANTARA
DALAM MAHKAMAH TINGGI MALAYA DI SHAH ALAM DALAM NEGERI SELANGOR DARUL EHSAN RAYUAN SIVIL NO.: 11ANCVC-44-08/2016 ANTARA YEOH LIANG CHUAN (No. K/P: 481027-07-5351). PERAYU DAN JAGJIT SINGH (mendakwa sebagai
More informationDALAM MAHKAMAH RAYUAN MALAYSIA (BIDANG KUASA RAYUAN) RAYUAN SIVIL NO.: W-01(NCVC)(W) /2016 ANTARA
DALAM MAHKAMAH RAYUAN MALAYSIA (BIDANG KUASA RAYUAN) RAYUAN SIVIL NO.: W-01(NCVC)(W)-308-08/2016 ANTARA 1. KERAJAAN MALAYSIA 2. KEMENTERIAN PERDAGANGAN DALAM NEGERI KOPERASI DAN KEPENGGUNAAN.. PERAYU-
More informationDALAM MAHKAMAH RAYUAN MALAYSIA (BIDANGKUASA RAYUAN) RAYUAN SIVIL NO: J /2012 ANTARA
DALAM MAHKAMAH RAYUAN MALAYSIA (BIDANGKUASA RAYUAN) RAYUAN SIVIL NO: J-02-2627-11/2012 ANTARA MILLENNIUM MEDICARE SERVICES Mendakwa sebagai firma PERAYU DAN NAGADEVAN A/L MAHALINGAM RESPONDEN (Dalam Perkara
More informationEQUITABLE REMEDY: SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE THEN LEE LIAN UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MALAYSIA
EQUITABLE REMEDY: SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE THEN LEE LIAN UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MALAYSIA EQUITABLE REMEDY: SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE THEN LEE LIAN A project report submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF MALAYSIA (APPELLATE JURISDICTION) CIVIL APPEAL NO: K-01(NCVC)(W)-10-01/2014 BETWEEN
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF MALAYSIA (APPELLATE JURISDICTION) CIVIL APPEAL NO: K-01(NCVC)(W)-10-01/2014 BETWEEN PERBADANAN KEMAJUAN NEGERI KEDAH APPELLANT AND CBH RUBBER SDN. BHD. (COMPANY NO: 945835-A)
More informationSETTING ASIDE AN AWARD: ARBITRATOR S MISCONDUCT LEE SEE KIM MB UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MALAYSIA
SETTING ASIDE AN AWARD: ARBITRATOR S MISCONDUCT LEE SEE KIM MB 091119 UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MALAYSIA SETTING ASIDE AN AWARD: ARBITRATOR S MISCONDUCT LEE SEE KIM A project report submitted in partial fulfillment
More informationWooing Whipping Sentence: The Tales Between Two Codes of Criminal Procedures
Wooing Whipping Sentence: The Tales Between Two Codes of Criminal Procedures Dr. Siti Zubaidah Ismail Lecturer, Shariah and Law Dept, Academy of Islamic Studies University of Malaya 50603 KL szubaida@um.edu.my
More information1. Overseas Union Bank Ltd. v. Chuah Ah Sai [1989] 1 LNS 2; [1989] 3 MLJ En. Paul Chin (Tetuan Gan Teik Chee & Ho) bagi pihak Plaintif.
1 LOO CHEONG FOO BERNIAGA SEBAGAI SHARIKAT LOO BROTHERS v. MOHAMED ABDUL KADER A/L SHAUKAT ALI HIGH COURT, PULAU PINANG ABDUL HAMID MOHAMAD J SAMAN PEMULA NO. 24-1077-95 24 SEPTEMBER 1996 [1996] 1 LNS
More informationCONSTRUING CONTRACT CLAUSE: THE LITERAL RULE CHAI SIAW HIONG UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MALAYSIA
CONSTRUING CONTRACT CLAUSE: THE LITERAL RULE CHAI SIAW HIONG UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MALAYSIA CONSTRUING CONTRACT CLAUSE: THE LITERAL RULE CHAI SIAW HIONG A master s project report submitted in fulfillment
More informationDALAM MAHKAMAH RAYUAN MALAYSIA DI PUTRAJAYA [BIDANGKUASA RAYUAN] [RAYUAN JENAYAH NO. B /2014] ANTARA DAN
DALAM MAHKAMAH RAYUAN MALAYSIA DI PUTRAJAYA [BIDANGKUASA RAYUAN] [RAYUAN JENAYAH NO. B-05-133-05/2014] ANTARA PENDAKWA RAYA PERAYU DAN MOHAMMAD JAVAD SABERI GHOLAMREZA RESPONDEN [Dalam Perkara Mahkamah
More informationHeld: Per Abdul Hamid Mohamad JCA
1 M/S LAKSAMANA REALTY SDN BHD v. GOH ENG HWA COURT OF APPEAL, KUALA LUMPUR ABDUL HAMID MOHAMAD, JCA; MOHD NOOR AHMAD, JCA; ABDUL AZIZ MOHAMAD, JCA CIVIL APPEAL NOS: M-02-347-2001, M-02-388-2001 & M-02-530-2001
More informationMAHKAMAH TINGGI MALAYA DI SHAH ALAM DALAM NEGERI SELANGOR DARUL EHSAN GUAMAN SIVIL NO: 22C-20-09/2014 ANTARA PERBADANAN KEMAJUAN NEGERI SELANGOR DAN
MAHKAMAH TINGGI MALAYA DI SHAH ALAM DALAM NEGERI SELANGOR DARUL EHSAN GUAMAN SIVIL NO: 22C--09/14 ANTARA PERBADANAN KEMAJUAN NEGERI SELANGOR PLAINTIF DAN 1. PROJEK LEBUHRAYA USAHASAMA BERHAD (No. Syarikat
More informationHeld (dismissing the application)
1 SIA CHENG SOON & ANOR v. TENGKU ISMAIL TENGKU IBRAHIM FEDERAL COURT, PUTRAJAYA ABDUL HAMID MOHAMAD, CJ; ZAKI TUN AZMI, PCA; ARIFFIN ZAKARIA, FCJ CIVIL APPLICATION NO: 08-151-2007 (N) 15 MAY 2008 [2008]
More informationWARTA KERAJAAN PERSEKUTUAN
WARTA KERAJAAN PERSEKUTUAN 1 Ogos 2012 P.U. (A) 232 KAEDAH-KAEDAH MAHKAMAH (PINDAAN) 2012 DISIARKAN OLEH/ JABATAN PEGUAM NEGARA/ AKTA MAHKAMAH KEHAKIMAN 1964 AKTA KAEDAH-KAEDAH MAHKAMAH RENDAH 1955 KAEDAH-KAEDAH
More informationEMPLOYMENT APPLICATION FORM ABX CORPORATION SDN BHD ( V) & UTS GROUP OF COMPANIES
INSTRUCTIONS: 1. Please read the application form carefully and complete it in BLOCK LETTERS. 2. Please return the completed application form together with one (1) recent passport size photograph and photocopy
More informationTAWARAN MENGISI JAWATAN SECRETARY GENERAL (SG) OF AFRO-ASIAN RURAL DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION (AARDO)
Ketua Eksekutif FELCRA Berhad Wisma FELCRA Lot PT 4780, Jalan Rejang 50722 KUALA LUMPUR Lembaga Kemajuan Johor Tenggara (KEJORA) Ibu Pejabat KEJORA Jalan Dato' ann, Bandar Penawar 81900 Kota Tinggi,. JOHOR.
More informationStatutory Declarations 1 LAWS OF MALAYSIA. Act 783 STATUTORY DECLARATIONS ACT (Revised 2016)
Statutory Declarations 1 STATUTORY DECLARATIONS ACT 1960 (Revised 2016) REVISED BY THE COMMISSIONER OF LAW REVISION, MALAYSIA UNDER THE AUTHORITY OF THE REVISION OF LAWS ACT 1968 2016 2 Laws of Malaysia
More informationPERKHIDMATAN UTAMA. Kod Dokumen: SOK/PIC/SS10 CHECKLIST FOR IKHTISAS APPLICATION PLEASE USE CAPITAL LETTERS. Name:
PERKHIDMATAN UTAMA PUTRA INTERNATIONAL (PUSAT ANTARABANGSA) UNIVERSITI PUTRA MALAYSIA 43400 UPM Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia Tel: 603-8946 6048 / 6198 E-mail: intl@upm.edu.my Kod Dokumen: SOK/PIC/SS10 CHECKLIST
More informationAttestation of Registrable Instruments (Mining) LAWS OF MALAYSIA REPRINT. Act 387 ATTESTATION OF REGISTRABLE INSTRUMENTS (MINING) ACT 1960
Attestation of Registrable Instruments (Mining) 1 LAWS OF MALAYSIA REPRINT Act 387 ATTESTATION OF REGISTRABLE INSTRUMENTS (MINING) ACT 1960 Incorporating all amendments up to 1 January 2006 PUBLISHED BY
More informationHeld (dismissing the appeal): Per Abdul Hamid Mohamad FCJ:
1 SEJAHRATUL DURSINA v. KERAJAAN MALAYSIA & ORS FEDERAL COURT, PUTRAJAYA ABDUL HAMID MOHAMAD, FCJ; PAJAN SINGH GILL, FCJ; ALAUDDIN MOHD SHERIFF, FCJ; RICHARD MALANJUM, FCJ; AUGUSTINE PAUL, FCJ CRIMINAL
More informationD.R. 40/95 RANG UNDANG-UNDANG. Suatu Akta untuk meminda Kanun Tanah Negara.
D.R. 40/95 Naskhah Sahih Bahasa Inggeris RANG UNDANG-UNDANG b e r n a m a Suatu Akta untuk meminda Kanun Tanah Negara. [ ] BAHAWASANYA adalah suaimanfaat hanya bagi maksud memastikan keseragaman undang-undang
More information563 COMPUTER CRIMES ACT
Computer Crimes 1 LAWS OF MALAYSIA REPRINT Act 563 COMPUTER CRIMES ACT 1997 Incorporating all amendments up to 1 January 2006 PUBLISHED BY THE COMMISSIONER OF LAW REVISION, MALAYSIA UNDER THE AUTHORITY
More informationJUDGMENT (Court enclosure no. 4)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MALAYA AT KUALA LUMPUR (COMMERCIAL DIVISION) IN THE FEDERAL TERRITORY OF KUALA LUMPUR, MALAYSIA CIVIL SUIT NO: WA-22IP-37-09/2017 BETWEEN DARUL FIKIR (Business Registration No.: 000624088-H)
More informationBETWEEN MOHAMAD SHAKIR ZUFAYRI BIN ARIFFIN... APPELLANT (IC.NO: ) AND PUBLIC PROSECUTOR... RESPONDENT GROUNDS OF JUDGEMENT
DALAM MAHKAMAH TINGGI MALAYA DI KOTA BHARU DALAM NEGERI KELANTAN, MALAYSIA RAYUAN JENAYAH NO: 42H-15-4/2016 (MAHKAMAH SESYEN KOTA BHARU, KELANTAN NO. SKB(A)62JS-144-09/2014) BETWEEN MOHAMAD SHAKIR ZUFAYRI
More informationPENYERTAAN SOSIAL Social Participation
Perarakan Hari Kebangsaan (National Day Parade) PENYERTAAN SOSIAL Social Participation Penyertaan sosial boleh meningkatkan kualiti hidup kerana ia mencerminkan komitmen dan kerelaan orang ramai untuk
More information015e.fm Page 1 Monday, March 27, :41 AM LAWS OF MALAYSIA REPRINT. Act 15 SEDITION ACT Incorporating all amendments up to 1 January 2006
015e.fm Page 1 Monday, March 27, 2006 11:41 AM LAWS OF MALAYSIA REPRINT Act 15 SEDITION ACT 1948 Incorporating all amendments up to 1 January 2006 PUBLISHED BY THE COMMISSIONER OF LAW REVISION, MALAYSIA
More informationSYARIAH COURT CRIMINAL PROCEDURE ENACTMENT OF SELANGOR (AMENDMENT) 2003.
SYARIAH COURT CRIMINAL PROCEDURE ENACTMENT OF SELANGOR (AMENDMENT) 2003. CONTENTS INTRODUCTION JURISDICTION INTERPRETATION GENERAL PROVISIONS ARREST CONCLUSION Flow Chart For Criminal Procedure Registration
More informationAzwan Bin Abd Rahaman v Pendakwa Raya and 2 Other Appeals
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF MALAYSIA Coram: Mohtarudin Baki, JCA; Zakaria Sam, JCA; Abdul Karim Abdul Jalil, JCA Azwan Bin Abd Rahaman v Pendakwa Raya and 2 Other Appeals Citation: [2018] MYCA 118 Suit Number:
More informationUNIVERSITI PUTRA MALAYSIA LABOUR FORCE PARTICIPATION IN MALAYSIA BY GENDER AND LOCALITY PERSPECTIVES
UNIVERSITI PUTRA MALAYSIA LABOUR FORCE PARTICIPATION IN MALAYSIA BY GENDER AND LOCALITY PERSPECTIVES NOR AMNA A LIAH BINTI MOHAMMAD NOR FEP 2014 11 LABOUR FORCE PARTICIPATION IN MALAYSIA BY GENDER AND
More informationDALAM MAHKAMAH RAYUAN MALAYSIA DI PUTRAJAYA (BIDANG KUASA RAYUAN) RAYUAN SIVIL NO: T-01(NCVC)(W)-13-01/2017 ANTARA
DALAM MAHKAMAH RAYUAN MALAYSIA DI PUTRAJAYA (BIDANG KUASA RAYUAN) RAYUAN SIVIL NO: T-01(NCVC)(W)-13-01/2017 ANTARA 1. KETUA POLIS DAERAH MARANG 2. KERAJAAN MALAYSIA... PERAYU-PERAYU DAN HASMALIZZA BINTI
More informationPossession - Exclusive possession. CRIMINAL LAW: Dangerous Drugs Act Section 39(B)(1)(a) - Knowledge, how inferred
1 GUNALAN RAMACHANDRAN & ORS v. PP COURT OF APPEAL, PUTRAJAYA DENIS ONG, JCA; ABDUL HAMID MOHAMAD, JCA; ABDUL AZIZ MOHAMAD, JCA CRIMINAL APPEAL NOS: W-05-26-2002, W-05-27-2002 & W-05-28-2002 6 AUGUST 2004
More informationMarch IR Law Free Newsletter. IR Law provides the following advisory/consultation services to Members and Non-Members*: Disciplinary proceedings
IRLaw CORPORATE INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS CONSULTANCY Dear Readers, This is our Free Newsletter, examining some updates on the new Public Holiday for Sarawak, Personal Data Protection Act (PDPA) and our usual
More informationDALAM MAHKAMAH RAYUAN MALAYSIA (BIDANG KUASA RAYUAN) RAYUAN JENAYAH NO: N-06B-55-09/2016 [RAYUAN JENAYAH NEGERI SEMBILAN : 42LB(A)-21 & 22-04/2015]
DALAM MAHKAMAH RAYUAN MALAYSIA (BIDANG KUASA RAYUAN) RAYUAN JENAYAH NO: N-06B-55-09/2016 [RAYUAN JENAYAH NEGERI SEMBILAN : 42LB(A)-21 & 22-04/2015] ANTARA PENDAKWA RAYA PERAYU DAN SUBBARAU @ KAMALANATHAN
More informationALAUDDIN MOHD. SHERIF, FCJ ARIFIN ZAKARIA, FCJ NIK HASHIM NIK AB. RAHMAN, FCJ ABDUL AZIZ MOHAMAD, FCJ AZMEL MAAMOR, FCJ
DALAM MAHKAMAH PERSEKUTUAN MALAYSIA (BIDANG KUASA RAYUAN) RAYUAN JENAYAH NO: 05-67-2005 (J) & 05-68-2005(J) ANTARA 1. LEE AH SENG PERAYU 2. LEE KWAI HEONG PERAYU DAN PENDAKWA RAYA RESPONDEN [ Dalam Mahkamah
More informationFEDERAL SUBSIDIARY LEGISLATION REGISTRATION OF BUSINESSES ACT 1956 [ACT 197] L.N. 282/57
FEDERAL SUBSIDIARY LEGISLATION REGISTRATION OF BUSINESSES ACT 1956 [ACT 197] L.N. 282/57 REGISTRATION OF BUSINESSES RULES 1957 Incorporating latest amendments - P.U.(A) 141/2002 Date of coming into operation
More informationPART XVII COURT PROCEEDINGS
226. Appeals to High Court. PART XVII COURT PROCEEDINGS (1) A party who is dissatisfied with a decision of the Commission under this Act, may appeal to the High Court against any decision of the Commission
More informationHeld: Per Abdul Hamid Mohamad JCA (dissenting)
IN RE GEOFFREY ROBERTSON COURT OF APPEAL, KUALA LUMPUR HAIDAR MOHD NOOR, JCA; ABDUL HAMID MOHAMAD, JCA; ABDUL KADIR SULAIMAN, JCA CIVIL APPEAL NOS: W-02-810-1999, W-02-811-1999, W-02-812-1999 & W-02-813-1999
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL MALAYSIA (APPELLATE JURISDICTION) CRIMINAL APPEAL NO : K-05(M) /2015 BETWEEN AND HEARD TOGETHER WITH
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEAL MALAYSIA (APPELLATE JURISDICTION) CRIMINAL APPEAL NO : K-05(M)-338-12/2015 BETWEEN GOBINATHAN A/L VALAYLAM APPELLANT AND PENDAKWA RAYA RESPONDENT HEARD TOGETHER WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL
More informationHBT 203 Bahasa, Undang-Undang dan Penterjemahan II
No. Tempat Duduk UNIVERSITI SAINS MALAYSIA Peperiksaan Semester Kedua Sidang Akademik 2003/2004 Februari/Mac 2004 HBT 203 Bahasa, Undang-Undang dan Penterjemahan II Masa : 3 jam ARAHAN KEPADA CALON: 1.
More informationPREVENTIVE DETENTION PREVENTIVE DETENTION PREVENTIVE DETENTION PREVENTIVE DETENTION PREVENTIVE DETENTION PREVENTIVE DETENTION
1 LEE KEW SANG v. TIMBALAN MENTERI DALAM NEGERI, MALAYSIA & ORS FEDERAL COURT, PUTRAJAYA AHMAD FAIRUZ, CJ; SITI NORMA YAAKOB, CJ (MALAYA); ABDUL HAMID MOHAMAD, FCJ CRIMINAL APPEAL NO: 05-23-2004 (J) 2
More informationHeld: Per Abdul Hamid Mohamad JCA
1 DATO' SAMSUDIN ABU HASSAN v. ROBERT KOKSHOORN COURT OF APPEAL, KUALA LUMPUR ABDUL HAMID MOHAMAD, JCA; ARIFFIN ZAKARIA, JCA; MOHD GHAZALI YUSOFF, JCA CIVIL APPEAL NO: W-02-387-02 28 MAY 2003 [2003] 3
More informationINDUSTRIAL COURT OF MALAYSIA 6(12)/4-584/14 BETWEEN RADZI BIN MD. TAP AND FELDA GLOBAL VENTURES PLANTATIONS (M) SDN. BHD. AWARD NO: 1148 OF 2018
INDUSTRIAL COURT OF MALAYSIA 6(12)/4-584/14 BETWEEN RADZI BIN MD. TAP AND FELDA GLOBAL VENTURES PLANTATIONS (M) SDN. BHD. AWARD NO: 1148 OF 2018 Before Venue : Y.A. TUAN GULAM MUHIADDEEN BIN ABDUL AZIZ
More informationDALAM MAHKAMAH RAYUAN MALAYSIA (BIDANGKUASA RAYUAN) RAYUAN SIVIL NO. W ANTARA DAN
DALAM MAHKAMAH RAYUAN MALAYSIA (BIDANGKUASA RAYUAN) RAYUAN SIVIL NO. W 02 1329 2005 ANTARA UNITED OVERSEAS BANK (MALAYSIA) SDN BHD DAN UJA SDN BHD PERAYU RESPONDEN (Dalam perkara Saman Pemula No. S3-24-2162-2004
More informationSelva Kumar A/L Supramaniam v Pendakwa Raya and Another Appeal
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF MALAYSIA Coram: Mohd Zawawi Salleh, JCA; Ahmadi Asnawi, JCA; Kamardin Hashim, JCA Selva Kumar A/L Supramaniam v Pendakwa Raya and Another Appeal Citation: [2018] MYCA 75 Suit
More informationINDUSTRIAL COURT MALAYSIA CASE NO: 7/4-1077/13 BETWEEN ZAINAL ABIDIN BIN ABU BAKAR AND PANASONIC MANUFACTURING MALAYSIA BERHAD AWARD NO: 466 OF 2018
INDUSTRIAL COURT MALAYSIA CASE NO: 7/4-1077/13 BETWEEN ZAINAL ABIDIN BIN ABU BAKAR AND PANASONIC MANUFACTURING MALAYSIA BERHAD AWARD NO: 466 OF 2018 BEFORE : Y.A. PUAN JAMHIRAH ALI CHAIRMAN VENUE : Industrial
More informationINCORPORATING THE UNITED NATIONS PROTOCOL ON TRAFFICKING IN PERSONS IN THE MALAYSIAN LEGAL FRAMEWORK. Khairil Azmin bin Mokhtar Zuraini binti Ab Hamid
24 (2) 2016 IIUMLJ 377-395 INCORPORATING THE UNITED NATIONS PROTOCOL ON TRAFFICKING IN PERSONS IN THE MALAYSIAN LEGAL FRAMEWORK Khairil Azmin bin Mokhtar Zuraini binti Ab Hamid ABSTRACT The international
More information