WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 2635/15E
|
|
- Sophia Welch
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 2635/15E BEFORE: S. Peckover: Vice-Chair HEARING: December 4, 2015 at Toronto Written DATE OF DECISION: December 7, 2015 NEUTRAL CITATION: 2015 ONWSIAT 2781 APPLICATION BY WORKER FOR ORDER EXTENDING THE TIME TO APPEAL APPEARANCES: For the worker: For the employer: Interpreter: J. Bartolomeo, Lawyer Not participating Not required Workplace Safety and Insurance Appeals Tribunal Tribunal d appel de la sécurité professionnelle et de l assurance contre les accidents du travail 505 University Avenue 7 th Floor 505, avenue University, 7 e étage Toronto ON M5G 2P2 Toronto ON M5G 2P2
2 Decision No. 2635/15E REASONS (i) Introduction [1] The worker appeals a decision of the ARO dated October 2, 2014, which allowed entitlement for a cervical and trapezius strain from the date of accident (May 23, 2009) to July 20, 2009, the date on which the worker was deemed to have recovered. Entitlement was denied for the low back, bilateral knees, and a head injury. [2] The worker filed the notice of appeal (NOA) on April 7, 2014, five days after the April 2, 2014 expiry of the six-month statutory time limit for appealing this decision. [3] In his submissions dated July 7, 2014, Mr. Bartolomeo stated that the time limit was missed by one business day, since April 2, 2014 was the Thursday before Easter; Friday and Monday were holidays; and Tuesday, April 7, 2014 was the date on which the NOA was filed. He submitted that the failure to file within the time limit was a result of an error in the office tickler system used to keep track of files. He argued that it would be punitive to deny the worker the opportunity to appeal his decision because of an administrative oversight that was not his responsibility. [4] Mr. Bartolomeo indicated that the worker was represented by a legal clinic staffed by law students, with two lawyers supervising their work. The worker had come to expect that all communication and filing expectations would be handled by his representatives. He stated that even before the Appeals Services Division appeal, the worker had expressed the desire to pursue an appeal to the Tribunal, if unsuccessful. He noted that, in a debriefing meeting following the hearing on September 26, 2014, the worker had again expressed his desire to appeal if necessary. [5] Following issuance of the ARO decision on October 2, 2014, the worker again expressed his desire to appeal. One of the two law students assigned to his file advised him that the file would be reviewed. The worker thought the legal clinic was handling the matter. [6] The worker s former representative was one of the two staff lawyers at the clinic. He was hired on a temporary basis as of January 19, He held a meeting with the law student to review the file on February 4, Although he was supposed to review the file, he did not do so. He was not aware of, or did not appreciate, the impending time limit. [7] Mr. Bartolomeo then described the tickler system within the legal clinic, based on sworn affidavits from the former representative and the law student. He noted that responsibility for the worker s file had been listed erroneously as being with the other staff lawyer, who, upon receiving the tickler reminder, mistakenly believed that the appeal had been filed in accordance with the usual practice at the clinic. The representative was not in the office on April 2, When he learned of the error the following Tuesday, April 7, 2015, he immediately took steps to rectify the error. The NOA was filed the next business day after the six-month time limit, while the fully-completed NOA was filed on April 28, [8] Mr. Bartolomeo argued that the delay was minimal, and was too short to have impacted the staleness of the evidence or its reliability. The explanation for the delay was an administrative oversight in the clinic s tickler system. The lawyer responsible for the file did not get the reminder for the worker s file. He therefore was not aware of the impending time limit. Further, the worker had always had the intention to appeal an unfavourable decision, as demonstrated on three separate occasions. Further, the worker was not a sophisticated client, as
3 Page: 2 Decision No. 2635/15E this was his first claim. Mr. Bartolomeo argued that the worker should not be penalized for the actions of his representative. He submitted that the issues under appeal were of fundamental importance to the worker, as they will impact his ability to obtain loss of earnings (LOE) benefits and retraining. The financial consequences to the worker were significant. While there was a statutory time limit in place, it should not be used to punish a worker for the oversight of their representative. There was no prejudice to the employer, as he was not participating. [9] Mr. Bartolomeo also submitted that like cases should be decided alike, and he cited Decision No. 599/14E as authority for allowing an extension in similar circumstances. (ii) Issue [10] The issue on this application is whether the worker s request to extend the time to appeal should be granted. (iii) Law and policy [11] On January 1, 1998, section 125(2) of the Workplace Safety & Insurance Act, 1997 (the WSIA) came into effect. It provides that notice of appeal shall be filed with the Workplace Safety and Insurance Appeals Tribunal (the Tribunal) within six months of the Workplace Safety and Insurance Board s (the Board) decision or such longer period as the Tribunal may permit. [12] Section 125(2) applies to appeals of Board decisions made on or after January 1, For Board decisions made prior to January 1, 1998, section 112(3) of the WSIA provides that the appeal must be filed with the Tribunal by June 30, 1998, or such longer time as the Tribunal may permit. [13] The Tribunal s Practice Direction: Time Extension Applications indicates that the Tribunal generally counts the six months from the date on the Board decision to the date the notice of appeal is received by the Tribunal. Where there is a Board decision and a Board reconsideration of that decision, the date of the original decision is generally used. The date of the Board reconsideration decision will be used where the Board considered significant new evidence on the reconsideration or has changed the result of the original decision. [14] In determining time extension applications, Tribunal decisions have considered the following factors (see, for example, Decision No. 1493/98I ): The lapse of time between the expiration of the six months and the date the appeal was filed and any explanation for the delay; Whether there is evidence to show an intention to appeal prior to the expiry of the six months; Whether the applicant ought to have known of the time limit; Whether the applicant acted diligently; Whether there is prejudice to a respondent; Whether the case is so stale that it cannot reasonably be adjudicated; Whether the issue is so connected to another appeal that the Tribunal cannot reasonably adjudicate the other appeal without considering it;
4 Page: 3 Decision No. 2635/15E Whether a refusal to hear the appeal could result in a substantial miscarriage of justice due to defects in prior process or clear and manifest errors; Whether there are exceptional circumstances. [15] The purpose and gravity of statutory time limits has been cogently summarized in Decision No. 972/99E: Time limits are often in legislation for a number of reasons, including the need to ensure appeals are brought in a timely fashion, while the evidence, including the memories of witnesses involved in the case are fresh, to prevent prejudice to the other parties who may act on the basis of the prior decision, and to generally establish finality and certainty in the appeal system. The Tribunal's decision to extend time therefore must be exercised with a view to also ensuring the effective and consistent application of this provision. (iv) Analysis [16] With respect to the lapse of time between the appeal deadline and the Tribunal s receipt of the appeal documentation, the following excerpt from Decision No. 669/14E outlines the Tribunal s current position with respect to appeal deadlines: [5] Since January 1, 1998, all decisions emanating from the Board have made specific reference to the time limits in effect. All Tribunal correspondence similarly makes reference to the six month time limit. While some leniency was applied in the early transition days when the time limits came into effect and people were not as knowledgeable as they currently are, it is now generally presumed that practitioners in the area of compensation are familiar with both the time limits and the consequences of not meeting them. Accordingly, the presumption at this point should be that compelling reasons must exist not to enforce the time limits. There cannot be a presumption that an extension should be granted as a matter of course. [17] The purpose and gravity of statutory time limits has been summarized in Tribunal Decision No. 972/99E: Time limits are often in legislation for a number of reasons, including the need to ensure appeals are brought in a timely fashion, while the evidence, including the memories of witnesses Involved in the case are fresh, to prevent prejudice to the other parties who may act on the basis of the prior decision, and to generally establish finality and certainty in the appeal system. The Tribunal's decision to extend time therefore must be exercised with a view to also ensuring the effective and consistent application of this provision. Mr. King has also submitted such a brief delay [it was four days] should not be a bar to proceeding with an appeal. I am not persuaded that this leniency should be applied as a matter of course. The statutory time limit has been in effect for over 15 years and I find that, in general, if an appeal could be filed one or two days after the expiry of the statutory time limit, it could have been filed two days before the deadline. The time limit is not an optional requirement: it was deliberately inserted in the legislation some ten years ago, signalling a profound change in the manner in which appeals can proceed. The gravity of the statutory time limit is not acknowledged if the parties do not abide by it when it is feasible to do so. Even where the delay is minimal there should be consideration given as to whether there was any rational reason for the failure to comply with the deadline. A real difficulty with allowing a few day s grace on a routine basis is that there will still need to be a cut off point (whether one day, or 5 days, or 7 days, or whatever period of time is chosen), beyond which compelling reasons will
5 Page: 4 Decision No. 2635/15E need to be provided for the Tribunal to grant a time extension. In my view, the cut-off point might reasonably be seen to be the statutory time limit itself. Any other point for a general granting of a time extension could be perceived as arbitrary compared to the one set out in the legislation. There are a number of Tribunal decisions adopting this view and I find them to be persuasive. [18] Thus, since the statutory deadline has been in place for 17 years now, there must be compelling reasons not to enforce the deadline, and grant an extension. [19] In the case before me, the appeal deadline was missed by five days, or, as Mr. Bartolomeo points out, one business day, given the Easter long weekend. While this is not a lengthy delay, I agree with the above quotation, in that any point other than the time limit itself can be viewed as arbitrary compared to the one set out in the legislation. [20] Further, Mr. Bartolomeo cited Decision No. 599/14E, and argued that cases decided on similar facts must be decided in a similar manner. In this regard, I note the following quotation from that decision: (iii) Analysis For the reasons which follow I find that the application for a time extension should be allowed. While the representative s explanation for the delay, that his office failed to properly diarize the appeal deadline, is not usually accepted by the Tribunal as sufficient grounds to grant a time extension, I note that the delay between the expiry of the time limit and the subsequent notification is relatively minor: approximately three weeks. I find that the representative acted diligently upon learning that the time limit had expired. In addition, I note that the employer account has closed and would therefore not be prejudiced. Given the relatively short delay it cannot be said that the case is so stale that it cannot reasonably be adjudicated. [21] With respect, although this decision allows the time extension application, it does so while acknowledging that a representative s failure to properly diarize an appeal deadline is not usually accepted by the Tribunal as sufficient grounds to grant a time extension. This has been the predominant view at the Tribunal since at least 2000, as reflected in the following excerpt from Decision No. 3350/00E: Generally speaking, without more, the failure of a representative is not, in my view, a sufficient basis to extend the time for appeal. The prejudice that results for the worker as a result of this failure is one factor to consider in the light of other factors. However, for the Tribunal to routinely allow an extension of the time for appeal because of the failure of a representative to meet the statutory deadline would be to invite abuse of process, and would not be consistent with the intent of the legislature in introducing time limits for appeal. There is prejudice to a worker if the representative does not act with diligence in meeting the time limits, in any event, not only because the right to appeal is put at risk, but also because an application must be made for an extension of time. This results in delay even if the extension of time is granted. The need for this determination also creates an added burden for the Tribunal s scarce resources.
6 Page: 5 Decision No. 2635/15E Therefore, it is essential that representatives act professionally in complying with the statutory deadline. The time period for appeal is only properly extended in special circumstances. [22] I agree with that reasoning, and adopt it in adjudicating the case before me. I therefore find that, in the absence of any other extenuating circumstances, a representative s failure to file a NOA on time is not grounds for extending the time to appeal. In this case, the deadline was missed because the wrong lawyer was listed as having responsibility for the file when it was entered into the tickling system, with the result that the representative was unaware of the impending deadline. There are no other grounds for exercising my discretion to allow the time limit application. [23] The application therefore is denied.
7 Page: 6 Decision No. 2635/15E DISPOSITION [24] The application is denied. The worker is not granted an extension of time under section 125(2), and the appeal may not be heard by the Tribunal. DATED: December 7, 2015 SIGNED: S. Peckover
WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 1882/15
WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 1882/15 BEFORE: M. C. Smith : Vice-Chair B. Wheeler : Member Representative of Employers C. Salama : Member Representative of Workers HEARING:
More informationWORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 1464/16
WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 1464/16 BEFORE: V. Marafioti : Vice-Chair M. Christie : Member Representative of Employers A. Grande : Member Representative of Workers HEARING:
More informationWORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 1945/10
WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 1945/10 BEFORE: HEARING: J. P. Moore : Vice-Chair B. Davis : Member Representative of Employers A. Grande : Member Representative of Workers
More informationWORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 1086/15
WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 1086/15 BEFORE: R. McCutcheon: Vice-Chair HEARING: May 28, 2015 at Toronto Oral hearing Post-hearing activity completed on September 10, 2015
More informationWORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 1806/09
WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 1806/09 BEFORE: J. P. Moore : Vice-Chair HEARING: June 17, 2010 at Toronto Oral DATE OF DECISION: July 27, 2010 NEUTRAL CITATION: 2010 ONWSIAT
More informationPractice Directions Directives de procédure
Practice Directions Directives de procédure Workplace Safety and Insurance Appeals Tribunal Tribunal d appel de la sécurité professionnelle et de l assurance contre les accidents du travail PRACTICE DIRECTIONS
More informationWORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 955/09
WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 955/09 BEFORE: J. Josefo: Vice-Chair HEARING: May 13, 2009 at Ottawa Oral DATE OF DECISION: June 16, 2009 NEUTRAL CITATION: 2009 ONWSIAT 1450
More informationWORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 194/16
WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 194/16 BEFORE: S. Martel: Vice-Chair HEARING: January 21, 2016 at Toronto Oral DATE OF DECISION: March 23, 2016 NEUTRAL CITATION: 2016 ONWSIAT
More informationWORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 808/15
WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 808/15 BEFORE: J. Josefo: Vice-Chair HEARING: April 23, 2015 at Toronto Oral DATE OF DECISION: May 13, 2015 NEUTRAL CITATION: 2015 ONWSIAT 1038
More informationTable of Contents. Injury Manual Insurer s Decisions and Appeals. Division Summary Information
Table of Contents Division 11 11.0 Insurer s Decisions and Appeals 11.1 Summary Information 11.1.1 Division 11 Legislation Section 188 - Insurer s decisions final Section 189 - Insurer to give written
More informationAssessment Review Board
Assessment Review Board RULES OF PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE (made under section 25.1 of the Statutory Powers Procedure Act) INDEX 1. RULES Application and Definitions (Rules 1-2) Interpretation and Effect
More informationRULES OF THE TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF INTELLECTUAL AND DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES OFFICE OF GENERAL COUNSEL
RULES OF THE TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF INTELLECTUAL AND DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES OFFICE OF GENERAL COUNSEL CHAPTER 0465-03 OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TABLE OF CONTENTS 0465-03-.01 Appeals Generally
More informationBritish Columbia. Health Professions Review Board. Rules of Practice and Procedure for Reviews under the Health Professions Act, R.S.B.C. 1996, c.
British Columbia Health Professions Review Board Rules of Practice and Procedure for Reviews under the Health Professions Act, R.S.B.C. 1996, c. 183 These rules for reviews to the Health Professions Review
More informationGENERAL CLOSING INSTRUCTIONS. Members of the jury, it is now time for me to tell you the law that applies to
GENERAL CLOSING INSTRUCTIONS Members of the jury, it is now time for me to tell you the law that applies to this case. As I mentioned at the beginning of the trial, you must follow the law as I state it
More informationIN THE MATTER OF MARGARET ANNE DAVIES, solicitor - AND - IN THE MATTER OF THE SOLICITORS ACT
No. 8544/2002 IN THE MATTER OF MARGARET ANNE DAVIES, solicitor - AND - IN THE MATTER OF THE SOLICITORS ACT 1974.. Mr. RJC Clitheroe (in the chair) Mr. SN Jones Mr. DE Marlow Date of Hearing: 27th June
More informationPAY EQUITY HEARINGS TRIBUNAL RULES OF PRACTICE
PAY EQUITY HEARINGS TRIBUNAL RULES OF PRACTICE MARCH 2018 MISSION STATEMENT The purpose of the Pay Equity Act is to redress systemic gender discrimination in compensation. Its implementation will contribute
More informationTRIBUNAL D APPEL EN MATIÈRE DE PERMIS
LICENCE APPEAL TRIBUNAL Safety, Licensing Appeals and Standards Tribunals Ontario TRIBUNAL D APPEL EN MATIÈRE DE PERMIS Tribunaux de la sécurité, des appels en matière de permis et des normes Ontario Tribunal
More informationHUDSON S BAY COMPANY ACCOUNTING AND AUDITING COMPLAINTS POLICY
HUDSON S BAY COMPANY ACCOUNTING AND AUDITING COMPLAINTS POLICY APRIL 14, 2009 1 HUDSON S BAY COMPANY ACCOUNTING AND AUDITING COMPLAINTS POLICY 1. Purpose of the Policy The audit committee (the Audit Committee
More informationFINAL JURISDICTION DECISION
FINAL JURISDICTION DECISION consumers Name of business complaint reference Mr and Mrs X Firm date of final decision: 25 April 2008 complaint Mr and Mrs X s complaint concerns a mortgage endowment policy
More informationThe Duty to Assist: A Comparative Study
Office of the Information Commissioner of Canada Commissariat à l'information du Canada The Duty to Assist: A Comparative Study Legal Services May 2008 Table of Contents Summary Chart Comparative Research
More informationANNE ELIZABETH HARDY NOVEMBER 1, 2011 Law Society of Saskatchewan v. Anne Elizabeth Hardy, 2011 LSS 6
ANNE ELIZABETH HARDY NOVEMBER 1, 2011 Law Society of Saskatchewan v. Anne Elizabeth Hardy, 2011 LSS 6 C A N A D A ) PROVINCE OF SASKATCHEWAN ) T O W I T ) IN THE MATTER OF THE LEGAL PROFESSION ACT, 1990
More informationCode of Procedure for Matters under the Personal Health
HEALTH MARCH 2017 Code of Procedure for Matters under the Personal Health Information Protection Act, 2004 CONTENTS PART I INTRODUCTION...1 1. Application...1 2. Purpose and Interpretation...1 3. Definitions...2
More informationRULES OF PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE. May 14, 2015
RULES OF PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE May 14, 2015 INDEX PART 1 INTRODUCTION... 1 PART 2 GENERAL RULES... 2 Rule 1 How the Rules are Applied... 2 Applying the Rules... 2 Conflict with the Act... 2 Rule 2 Consequences
More informationUPS ACADEMIC APPEALS
University Policy Statement California State University, Fullerton ACADEMIC APPEALS A. APPEALS REGARDING ACADEMIC DISHONESTY When a faculty member(s) has alleged that a student, individually or as part
More informationCourtroom Guidelines, Procedures and Expectations for Civil Cases Assigned to Judge Gary L. Sweet Courtroom B Okeechobee County Courthouse
Courtroom Guidelines, Procedures and Expectations for Civil Cases Assigned to Judge Gary L. Sweet Courtroom B Okeechobee County Courthouse HEARINGS 1. Special set hearing time (including Foreclosure Summary
More informationBETWEEN: The Complainant COMPLAINANT. AND: A Dentist REGISTRANT. BEFORE: William R. Cottick, Panel Chair REVIEW BOARD
Health Professions Review Board Suite 900, 747 Fort Street, Victoria, BC V8W 3E9 Complainant v. College of Dental Surgeons of BC DECISION NO. 2018-HPA-047(a) August 15, 2018 In the matter of an application
More informationDISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS. No. 07-BG A Member of the Bar of the District of Columbia Court of Appeals (Bar Registration No.
Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections
More informationCourtroom Guidelines, Procedures and Expectations for Civil Cases Assigned to Judge Elizabeth A. Metzger Courtroom B, Okeechobee County Courthouse
Courtroom Guidelines, Procedures and Expectations for Civil Cases Assigned to Judge Elizabeth A. Metzger Courtroom B, Okeechobee County Courthouse HEARINGS 1. Special set hearing time: Special set hearing
More informationPuri v Viss Group Pty Ltd trading as La Vie Homes (Domestic Building) [2014] VCAT 502
VICTORIAN CIVIL AND ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL CIVIL DIVISION DOMESTIC BUILDING LIST VCAT REFERENCE NO. D61/2012 CATCHWORDS Adjournment, s98 of the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 1998, alleged
More informationConsultation on TLAB Rules of Practice and Procedures and Related Documents
Consultation on TLAB Rules of Practice and Procedures and Related Documents Date: April 2018 Submitted to: Toronto Local Appeal Body Submitted by: Ontario Bar Association Table of Contents Introduction...
More informationTHE FLORIDA BAR CRIMINAL PROCEDURE RULES COMMITTEE SUBCOMMITTEE ACTION REPORT. WILLIAM C. VOSE Chair, Florida Bar Criminal Procedure Rules Committee
THE FLORIDA BAR CRIMINAL PROCEDURE RULES COMMITTEE SUBCOMMITTEE ACTION REPORT TO: WILLIAM C. VOSE Chair, Florida Bar Criminal Procedure Rules Committee FROM: H. SCOTT FINGERHUT Vice Chair, Florida Bar
More informationSMALL CLAIMS PROCEDURE I
1 SMALL CLAIMS PROCEDURE I IS IT A SMALL CLAIMS CASE? The law authorizes you to decide small claims cases assigned by your chief district court judge. Amount in controversy Certain kinds of cases only
More informationThe Quarterly Report... 1 Key Tribunal Activities... 2 A) Highlights of Decided Cases... 2 B) Judicial Review Activity... 4 C) Administration...
Workplace Safety and Insurance Appeals Tribunal QUARTERLY REPORT Production and Activity For the Period April 1 through June 30, 2002 Table of Contents The Quarterly Report... 1 Key Tribunal Activities...
More informationChapter 7: The VA Claims Process
Chapter 7: The VA Claims Process The VA claims process is often complicated and frustrating. To confuse matters further, veterans law is not static. Statutes and regulations are amended, and decisions
More informationReviving Lapsed Patents: Differences Across Jurisdictions and Suggestions for Harmonization Bloomberg Law Reports August 9, 2010
Reviving Lapsed Patents: Differences Across Jurisdictions and Suggestions for Harmonization Bloomberg Law Reports August 9, 2010 REBECCA M. MCNEILL 617.489.0002 rebecca.mcneill@mcneillbaur.com ADAM M.
More informationFREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS REGARDING FILING APPEALS IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF GEORGIA
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS REGARDING FILING APPEALS IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF GEORGIA NOTE: (1) This information is intended for pro-se parties. There are significant filing differences between attorneys
More informationIMMIGRATION APPEAL TRIBUNAL
AK others (Tribunal Appeal- out of time) Bulgaria * [2004] UKIAT 00201 IMMIGRATION APPEAL TRIBUNAL Date of Hearing: 24 th February 2004 Date Determination notified: 23 rd June 2004 Before: Mr C M G Ockelton
More informationLAW SOCIETY OF ALBERTA IN THE MATTER OF THE LEGAL PROFESSION ACT; AND IN THE MATTER OF A HEARING REGARDING THE CONDUCT OF R.
LAW SOCIETY OF ALBERTA IN THE MATTER OF THE LEGAL PROFESSION ACT; AND IN THE MATTER OF A HEARING REGARDING THE CONDUCT OF R. FRANK LLEWELLYN, A MEMBER OF THE LAW SOCIETY OF ALBERTA Hearing Committee: Gillian
More informationRULES OF PROCEDURE OF THE DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF REGISTERED PSYCHOTHERAPISTS AND REGISTERED MENTAL HEALTH THERAPISTS OF ONTARIO INDEX
RULES OF PROCEDURE OF THE DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF REGISTERED PSYCHOTHERAPISTS AND REGISTERED MENTAL HEALTH THERAPISTS OF ONTARIO INDEX RULE 1 - INTERPRETATION AND APPLICATION... 3 1.01 Definitions...
More informationBeyond Briefs: Motion Practice in Civil Appeals in The Tenth Circuit
Beyond Briefs: Motion Practice in Civil Appeals in The Tenth Circuit By Marcy G. Glenn, Esq. There is no question that briefing and oral argument are the main events in any appeal. It is also generally
More informationMISCONDUCT. Committee Opinion May 11, 1993
LEGAL ETHICS OPINION 1528 OBLIGATION TO REPORT ATTORNEY MISCONDUCT. You have presented a hypothetical situation in which Attorney (P) is employed by a law firm and is contacted by a client to represent
More informationER 904 is Scary - Five Practice Tips for Using and Opposing ER 904 Submissions Robert Dawson
Top of Form Volume: 39-1 Date: Sep 1 2003 TRIAL NEWS WASHINGTON STATE TRIAL LAWYERS ASSOCIATION ER 904 is Scary - Five Practice Tips for Using and Opposing ER 904 Submissions Robert Dawson ER 904 was supposed
More informationIntroductory Guide to Civil Litigation in Ontario
Introductory Guide to Civil Litigation in Ontario Table of Contents INTRODUCTION This guide contains an overview of the Canadian legal system and court structure as well as key procedural and substantive
More informationPerfecting Civil Appeals in the New York State Appellate Division: Which of the Three Available Methods is Perfect for Your Case?
Perfecting Civil Appeals in the New York State Appellate Division: Which of the Three Available Methods is Perfect for Your Case? Settling the Transcript in the New York Appellate Division How to determine
More informationHOMICIDE POLICIES AND PROCEDURES STATE ATTORNEY S OFFICE, FOURTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, FLORIDA
OFFICE OF THE STATE ATTORNEY FOURTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT 311 W. Monroe Street Jacksonville, Florida 32202 HOMICIDE POLICIES AND PROCEDURES STATE ATTORNEY S OFFICE, FOURTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, FLORIDA 1.010 Purposes
More informationMILLENIUM CHALLENGE ACCOUNT NIGER INTERIM BID CHALLENGE SYSTEM
REPUBLIQUE DU NIGER PRESIDENCE DE LA REPUBLIQUE MILLENIUM CHALLENGE ACCOUNT NIGER INTERIM BID CHALLENGE SYSTEM Effective Date: October 201 BACKGROUND On July 29, 2016 the United States of America, acting
More information[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Broschak, 118 Ohio St.3d 236, 2008-Ohio-2224.]
[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Broschak, 118 Ohio St.3d 236, 2008-Ohio-2224.] DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. BROSCHAK. [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Broschak, 118 Ohio St.3d 236, 2008-Ohio-2224.] Attorneys
More informationDISPUTE RESOLUTION RULES
DISPUTE RESOLUTION RULES First Issued: March 1998 Amended: November 1999 Amended: July 2000 Amended: September 2001 Amended: September 2003 Amended: October 2004 Amended: May 2005 Amended: September 2005
More informationIV. Protocol 5 to the ESA/Court Agreement on the Statute of the EFTA Court
IV. Protocol 5 to the ESA/Court Agreement on the Statute of the EFTA Court IV. Protocol 5 to the ESA/Court Agreement on the Statute of the EFTA Court Article 1 The EFTA Court established by Article 27
More informationPROCEDURE UNDER THE NEBRASKA PROBATE CODE
PROCEDURE UNDER THE NEBRASKA PROBATE CODE ROBERT C. McGowAN* INTRODUCTION The new system introduced by the Nebraska Probate Code will be of great value and utility to the practitioner. In order to help
More informationFreedom of Information Act 2000 (FOIA) Decision notice
Freedom of Information Act 2000 (FOIA) Decision notice Date: 10 May 2017 Public Authority: Address: London Borough of Lewisham Second Floor Lewisham Town Hall Catford Road London SE6 4RU Decision (including
More informationTHE PROVINCIAL AUDITOR AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE JUSTICE SYSTEM
THE ADMINISTRATIVE JUSTICE WORKING GROUP THE PROVINCIAL AUDITOR AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE JUSTICE SYSTEM This paper has been written in response to a concern amongst members of the Administrative Justice
More informationLegal Drafting Skills: Make it Clear, Concise, Compelling
CIVIL LITIGATION BASICS FOR LEGAL SUPPORT STAFF 2007 UPDATE PAPER 7.1 Legal Drafting Skills: Make it Clear, Concise, Compelling These materials were prepared by David Goult of Bull, Housser & Tupper LLP,
More informationBY-LAW NO. 44 ONTARIO COLLEGE OF SOCIAL WORKERS AND SOCIAL SERVICE WORKERS - RULES OF PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE OF THE DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE
BY-LAW NO. 44 OF ONTARIO COLLEGE OF SOCIAL WORKERS AND SOCIAL SERVICE WORKERS - RULES OF PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE OF THE DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OCSWSSW - Discipline Committee Rules of Procedure Index Page
More informationBY-LAWS OF THE ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE BOROUGH OF SOUTH PLAINFIELD. Table of Contents
BY-LAWS OF THE ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE BOROUGH OF SOUTH PLAINFIELD Table of Contents ARTICLE I ANNUAL REORGANIZATION MEETING; SELECTION OF OFFICERS; ORDER OF VOTING... 2 ARTICLE II DUTIES OF
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN AND. (POLICE CONSTABLE) EDGAR BAIRD THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO Defendants.
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE NO. CV 2009-00642 BETWEEN OTIS JOBE Claimant AND (POLICE CONSTABLE) EDGAR BAIRD THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO Defendants BEFORE
More informationTrial Preparation for Family Firms 101 Desk Reference Manual
Trial Preparation for Family Firms 101 Desk Reference Manual Section A: Introduction, Object of the Rules and Trial Basics Notes Section A Introduction, Object of the Rules and Trial Basics Introduction
More informationPRACTICE AND PROCEDURE BEFORE THE DUBLIN COUNTY REGISTRAR
PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE BEFORE THE DUBLIN COUNTY REGISTRAR Functions of the County Registrar Tomás Keys 1 1. This paper will focus on the most common applications that practitioners make in the Dublin County
More informationCHAPTER Senate Bill No. 1960
CHAPTER 2012-123 Senate Bill No. 1960 An act relating to the state judicial system; amending s. 27.40, F.S.; authorizing the chief judge of the circuit to limit the number of attorneys on the circuit registry
More informationSARBANES OXLEY ATTORNEY RESPONSIBILITY STANDARDS
SARBANES OXLEY ATTORNEY RESPONSIBILITY STANDARDS DEBRA G. HATTER, Houston Haynes & Boone State Bar Of Texas 2 ND ANNUAL ADVANCED IN-HOUSE COUNSEL COURSE August 14-15, 2003 San Antonio, Texas CHAPTER 9
More informationCanterbury & District Soccer Football Association Incorporated. Judiciary Disciplinary & Appeals Regulations 2017 (Version 1 19 th December 2016)
Canterbury & District Soccer Football Association Incorporated. Judiciary Disciplinary & Appeals Regulations 2017 (Version 1 19 th December 2016) 1 Contents 1. INTRODUCTION... 5 2. CORRESPONDENCE, PRESCRIBED
More informationAdministrative Appeal Procedures. Effective July 1, 2015
Administrative Appeal Procedures Effective July 1, 2015 PERSONNEL BOARD OF JEFFERSON COUNTY, ALABAMA ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL PROCEDURES Adopted May 12, 2015 Revised April 10, 2018 Table of Contents A. INTRODUCTION...
More informationPENNSYLVANIA BAR ASSOCIATION LEGAL ETHICS AND PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY COMMITTEE RESOLUTION
PENNSYLVANIA BAR ASSOCIATION LEGAL ETHICS AND PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY COMMITTEE RESOLUTION WHEREAS, it is the charge of the PBA Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility Committee to review and
More informationRULES OF PROCEDURE BEFORE THE COWLITZ COUNTY HEARINGS EXAMINER
RULES OF PROCEDURE BEFORE THE COWLITZ COUNTY HEARINGS EXAMINER INTRODUCTION The following Rules of Procedure have been adopted by the Cowlitz County Hearing Examiner. The examiner and deputy examiners
More informationPolk County Zoning Board of Adjustment Rules of Procedure for Quasi-Judicial Proceedings. A. General Provisions
Revision of April 4, 2011 Polk County Zoning Board of Adjustment Rules of Procedure for Quasi-Judicial Proceedings A. General Provisions Rule 1. Applicability. These rules apply to all quasi-judicial proceedings
More informationSTATUS HEARINGS UNDER RULE 48.14
Volume 20, No. 4 June 2012 Civil Litigation Section STATUS HEARINGS UNDER RULE 48.14 Philip Cho Although entirely replaced in the 2010 amendments, unlike the transition provision under Rule 48.15, 1 status
More informationENTRY ORDER 2017 VT 8 SUPREME COURT DOCKET NO JANUARY TERM, 2017
ENTRY ORDER 2017 VT 8 SUPREME COURT DOCKET NO. 2017-007 JANUARY TERM, 2017 In re PRB No. 2013-145 } APPEALED FROM: } } Professional Responsibility Board } } DOCKET NO. 2013-145 In the above-entitled cause,
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT LAW DIVISION JUDGE RAYMOND W. MITCHELL STANDING ORDER.
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT LAW DIVISION JUDGE RAYMOND W. MITCHELL STANDING ORDER March 29, 2012 This Standing Order supercedes all prior Standing Orders regarding pending
More informationPROTECTION FOR PERSONS IN CARE (MINISTERIAL) REGULATION
Province of Alberta PROTECTION FOR PERSONS IN CARE ACT PROTECTION FOR PERSONS IN CARE (MINISTERIAL) REGULATION Alberta Regulation 104/2010 Extract Published by Alberta Queen s Printer Alberta Queen s Printer
More informationPRACTICE NOTE 4/2015
IMMIGRATION AND PROTECTION TRIBUNAL PRACTICE NOTE 4/2015 (DEPORTATION NON-RESIDENT) NOTE TO ASSIST READERS This Practice Note takes effect shortly after the coming into force of the Immigration Amendment
More informationGas Compliance Reporting Manual. Energy Coordination Act 1994
Gas Compliance Reporting Manual Energy Coordination Act 1994 January 2017 This document is available at the Economic Regulation ERA s website at www.erawa.com.au. For further information, contact: Economic
More informationTOWN OF MERRIMAC. A Guide to Posting Meetings, Agendas & Minutes
TOWN OF MERRIMAC A Guide to Posting Meetings, Agendas & Minutes This is intended to be a guide for chairs of multiple-member bodies, and their associated members, responsible for posting meetings and filing
More informationMinnesota Rules of No-Fault Arbitration Procedures
Minnesota Rules of No-Fault Arbitration Procedures Available online at adr.org Rules Amended and Effective January 1, 2018 Table of Contents Minnesota Rules of No-Fault Arbitration Procedures... 4 Rule
More informationThe Wilson Moot Official Rules 2018
W M ilson oot The Wilson Moot Official Rules 2018 Table of Contents Page I. INTERPRETATION... - 1 - A. Purposes and Objectives...- 1 - B. Interpretation of Rules...- 1-1. Referees... - 1-2. Rules...- 1-3.
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS JENNIFER GAGERN, Plaintiff-Appellant, UNPUBLISHED December 2, 2014 v No. 317732 Oakland Circuit Court DR. IAN MCLAREN, M.D., and NORTHLAND LC No. 2012-125804-NH ANESTHESIA
More informationCity of Tacoma Protest Policy. Excerpt from Purchasing Policy Manual
City of Tacoma Protest Policy Excerpt from Purchasing Policy Manual May 27, 2011 XVII. PROTESTS A. Purpose and Overview 1. The purpose of the following protest rules, standards, and procedures is to promote
More informationMay 9, 2015 Election Law Calendar
May 9, 2015 Election Law Calendar Notes: 1. Download Outlook or PDF version of Calendar 2. Note on Campaign Information 3. Note on Submissions to the U.S. Department of Justice 4. Note on Statutory References
More informationBEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL. An Appeal under Section 111 of the Real Estate Agents Act Appellant
BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2017] NZREADT 77 READT 021/17 IN THE MATTER OF An Appeal under Section 111 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 BETWEEN GEORGE LANCASTER Appellant AND
More informationHow to File a Canada Pension Plan Appeal (General Division)
How to File a Canada Pension Plan Appeal (General Division) 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Who We Are and What We Do... 1 1.1. Who can appeal... 1 2. Canada Pension Plan Appeal Process at the General Division...
More informationLegal Referral Service Rules for Panel Membership
Legal Referral Service Rules for Panel Membership Joint Committee on Legal Referral Service New York City Bar Association and The New York County Lawyers Association Amended as of May 1, 2015 Table of
More informationINVESTIGATION REPORT LOBBYIST: Dana Hayden. May 2, 2016
INVESTIGATION REPORT 16-06 LOBBYIST: Dana Hayden May 2, 2016 SUMMARY: A consultant lobbyist filed a return to register as a lobbyist on behalf of a client after the deadline required by the Lobbyists Registration
More informationRTA Post Jackson How to deal with them 3 months on what have we learned?
www.clerksroom.com Administration: Equity House Blackbrook Park Avenue Taunton Somerset TA1 2PX DX: 97188 Taunton Blackbrook T: 0845 083 3000 F: 0845 083 3001 mail@clerksroom.com www.clerksroom.com RTA
More informationRULES OF PROCEDURE OF THE DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE & FITNESS TO PRACTISE COMMITTEE
RULES OF PROCEDURE OF THE DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE & FITNESS TO PRACTISE COMMITTEE October 2015 RULES OF PROCEDURE Table of Contents RULE 1 INTERPRETATION AND APPLICATION... 4 1.01 DEFINITIONS... 4 1.02 GENERAL
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS Misc. Docket No. 16-9033 APPROVAL OF LOCAL RULES FOR THE BEXAR COUNTY CIVIL DISTRICT COURTS ORDERED that: Pursuant to Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 3a, the Supreme Court approves
More informationAmerican Public Health Association POLICY STATEMENT DEVELOPMENT PROCESS
Page 1 American Public Health Association Guidelines For the Preparation, Submission, Review, Revision, Consideration, And Adoption Of Proposed Policy Statements Introduction The policy statement development
More informationINVESTIGATION REPORT LOBBYIST: Keltie Gale. May 23, 2018
INVESTIGATION REPORT 18-04 LOBBYIST: Keltie Gale May 23, 2018 SUMMARY: A consultant lobbyist was found to be in contravention of section 3(1) of the Lobbyist Registration Act for failing to file a return
More informationFinancial Services Tribunal. Practice Directives and Guidelines
Financial Services Tribunal Practice Directives and Guidelines Revised October 2012 Financial Services Tribunal Practice Directives and Guidelines 1.0 Introduction The purpose of these Practice Directives
More informationEffective January 1, 2016
RULES OF PROCEDURE OF THE COMMISSION ON CHARACTER AND FITNESS OF THE SUPREME COURT OF MONTANA Effective January 1, 2016 SECTION 1: PURPOSE The primary purposes of character and fitness screening before
More informationChapter SECTION OPENER / CLOSER: INSERT BOOK COVER ART. Section 2.1 A Dual Court System
Chapter 2 SECTION OPENER / CLOSER: INSERT BOOK COVER ART Section 2.1 Chapter 2 A Dual The Court Court System System Section 2.1 Section 2.2 Trial Procedures Why It s Important Learning the structure of
More informationINVESTIGATION REPORT Gateway Casinos & Entertainment Limited. DESIGNATED FILER: Tony Santo. July 6, 2017
INVESTIGATION REPORT 17-05 Gateway Casinos & Entertainment Limited DESIGNATED FILER: Tony Santo July 6, 2017 SUMMARY: Gateway Casinos & Entertainment Limited (Gateway) employs in-house lobbyists. The organization
More informationThe Federation of the Royal Colleges of Physicians of the United Kingdom
The Federation of the Royal Colleges of Physicians of the United Kingdom Examination Appeals Regulations 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 These Regulations apply to all candidates for examinations run by MRCP(UK) on
More informationADMINISTRATIVE RULES FOR CONTESTED CASE HEARINGS MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF MICHIGAN. Effective June 1, 2016 Amended June 19, 2017
ADMINISTRATIVE RULES FOR CONTESTED CASE HEARINGS MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF MICHIGAN Effective June 1, 2016 Amended June 19, 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS Rule 1 Scope... 3 Rule 2 Construction of
More informationLegal Business. Overview Of Court Procedure. Memoranda on legal and business issues and concerns for multiple industry and business communities
Memoranda on legal and business issues and concerns for multiple industry and business communities Overview Of Court Procedure 1 Rajah & Tann 4 Battery Road #26-01 Bank of China Building Singapore 049908
More information19 th Judicial Circuit Court Judge Janet Croom Guidelines and Procedures. Circuit Civil Jury Division (Updated: September, 2017)
19 th Judicial Circuit Court Judge Janet Croom Guidelines and Procedures Circuit Civil Jury Division (Updated: September, 2017) PLEASE REVIEW ALL PROCEDURES PRIOR TO CONTACTING THE JUDGE S OFFICE Page
More information1999. The card is signed by "P. Clemmons." The regular mail was not returned.
SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY DISCIPLINARY REVIEW BOARD DOCKET NO. DRB 99-445 IN THE MATTER OF PATIENCE R. CLEMMONS, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW Decision Default [_R_R. 1:20-4(0(1)] Decided: May 2 2, 2 0 0 0 To the
More informationCivil Justice Improvements (CJI) Committee. Update #2
A Brief Re-cap from Update #1 Civil Justice Improvements (CJI) Committee Update #2 CJI Committee members recognize that many factors, including the resources available to each court system, influence the
More informationOrder F05-21 LAND AND WATER BRITISH COLUMBIA INC.
Order F05-21 LAND AND WATER BRITISH COLUMBIA INC. Celia Francis, Adjudicator July 12, 2005 Quicklaw Cite: [2005] B.C.I.P.C.D. No. 29 Document URL: http://www.oipc.bc.ca/orders/orderf05-21.pdf Office URL:
More informationSenate Committee Rules in the 115 th Congress: Key Provisions
Senate Committee Rules in the 115 th Congress: Key Provisions Valerie Heitshusen Specialist on Congress and the Legislative Process December 6, 2017 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov R44901
More informationExpedited Procedures in the House: Variations Enacted into Law
Expedited Procedures in the House: Variations Enacted into Law Christopher M. Davis Analyst on Congress and the Legislative Process September 16, 2015 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov
More information1.1. Activation Key or "Authorisation Code" means the key required to enable
DEFINITIONS 1.1. Activation Key or "Authorisation Code" means the key required to enable Initial Registration and Use of the Software; 1.2. Agreement means the terms and conditions set out in this document
More information