USA (1) Mélida Hodgson Anna Toubiana. Foley Hoag LLP
|
|
- Russell Beasley
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 USA (1) Mélida Hodgson Anna Toubiana Foley Hoag LLP
2 1717 K Street, NW Washington, DC main fax Memo Date: March 31, 2015 To: cc: Pascal Hollander, IBA Sub-Committee on Recognition and Enforcement of Awards From: Mélida Hodgson Anna Toubiana Regarding: IBA Public Policy Project Country Report, USA I. Introduction The purpose of this Country Report is to examine how the concept of public policy is defined by domestic courts and applied in the context of enforcement and setting aside of arbitral awards under the New York Convention in the United States. In particular, this Report discusses the concept of public policy generally as a ground for refusal of the enforcement of awards in the United States legal framework (Section II) and provides an overview of U.S. case law where the concept of public policy was used to deny enforcement of arbitral awards under the New York Convention (Section III). II. The Concept of Public Policy as Defined by the United States Legal Framework In general, in the United States there is a strong public policy favoring arbitration and the enforcement of arbitral awards, as demonstrated by the recent BG Group v. Argentina ATTORNEYS AT LAW BOSTON WASHINGTON PARIS FOLEYHOAG.COM
3 Supreme Court decision (not a New York Convention case). 1 An action to enforce an arbitral award can be brought under the 1958 United Nations Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (the New York Convention or NYC ) Inter-American Convention on International Commercial Arbitration (the Panama Convention ) 3, and the domestic U.S. Federal Arbitration Act (the FAA ) 4. It should be noted that when the award involves States that are both parties to the Panama and the New York Conventions, 305 of the FAA provides that if a majority of parties to an arbitration agreement are citizens of a State or States that have ratified or acceded to the Panama Convention and are member States of the Organization of American States, the Panama Convention will apply. In all other cases the New York Convention is applicable. The concept of public policy as a ground for refusal of confirmation, recognition or enforcement of foreign awards under the New York Convention is codified in 207 of the FAA which states that the court shall confirm the award unless it finds one of the grounds for refusal or deferral of recognition or enforcement of the award specified in the [New York] Convention. Thus, this section serves to implement Article V of the New York Convention. Accordingly, the concept of public policy as expressed in Article V(2) (b) of the New York Convention is directly applicable in the United States. Article V(2)(b) states that: 2. Recognition and enforcement of an arbitral award may also be refused if the competent authority in the country where recognition and enforcement is sought finds that: (b) The recognition or enforcement of the award would be contrary to the public policy of that country. 1 March 2014, Argentina apparently argued its public policy grounds under the Federal Arbitration Act itself rather than the New York Convention (see Annex for a discussion of the lower court case). 2 9 U.S.C U.S.C U.S.C When the litigious arbitral award is not subject to either the Panama or the New York Convention, the domestic FAA will apply. -2-
4 As discussed in the section below, the concept of this public policy is narrowly construed by U.S. courts, implementing their own national public policy which clearly favors recognition and enforcement of foreign awards. In the United States, this provision has generally been expressed as contrary to the most basic notions of morality and justice or repugnant to fundamental notions of what is decent and just in the United States. 5 Although U.S. litigants may try to borrow concepts from national public policy grounds for vacating arbitral awards, in the applicable cases courts generally will only consider the New York Convention bases for recognition or enforcement. III. Overview of United States Case Law The body of work from which we highlight specific cases was presented in an October 10, 2014 report prepared by our colleagues Virginia Allan and Nicolette Ward, which is annexed to this report. We see from a number of 11th Circuit (Federal appeals court covering Florida) 6 cases arising either out of cruise ship labor disputes or personal injury cases, that U.S. courts have sometimes been asked, and agreed, to apply the NYC public policy exceptions to stages of an arbitration earlier than confirmation, recognition and enforcement. 7 But it is now uniform across the United States that courts will only consider these exceptions after an award has been rendered. 5 See Corporación Mexicana de Mantenimiento Integral v. Pemex Exploración y Producción at page 4 of Annex (not an Article V(2)(b) case, but notions were borrowed in refusing to enforce an award annulled by a Mexican court decree. This Second Circuit decision was remanded to the District Court, which upheld its prior conclusion confirming the award because it held that a law not in existence at the time of parties contract was applied by the Mexican court and that this was repugnant to fundamental notions of what is decent and just. ) 6 Without entering into too much detail, on a very basic level there are three levels of federal courts in the United States - the Supreme Court (which of course also has jurisdiction over State Courts subject to the U.S. Constitution); federal appeals courts which are called circuit courts of appeal covering regions of the country and numbered (from First to Eleventh ) as well as the District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals, and the specialized court Circuit Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit; and district courts, which are courts of first instance for federal question cases. Issues related to the enforcement of a foreign arbitral award will almost exclusively be handled by the federal courts (except for the Federal Circuit). 7 See for example discussions in the Annex on pp.1,7-8,
5 Not surprisingly, what constitutes contrary to the most basic notions of morality and justice or is repugnant to notions of what is decent and just is not easily defined or uniform - nevertheless it cannot be said that it has been used broadly. In the Ameropa AG v. Havi Ocean Co. case 8, Havi Ocean argued against enforcement of the arbitral award because it claimed that the award violated U.S. sanctions. The federal court for the Southern District of New York enforced nonetheless held that implications of foreign policy disputes do not satisfy the threshold of most basic notions of morality and justice. Moreover, Ameropa was a Swiss company and this not subject to U.S. sanctions. 9 Some cases do shed light on what would offend U.S. notions of morality and justice - for revealing the narrow scope of the exception by what kinds of awards will be enforced. For example, the tribunal s consideration of results of foreign criminal proceedings in arriving at the award does not offend this notion because it not a finding criminal liability (see AO Techsnabexport v. Globe Nuclear Services and Supply GNSS Lmt. on page 11 of Annex A). Other situations that do not constitute a public policy exception include: i) an award requiring specific performance (NTT Docomo Inc. v. Ultra D.O.O. at page 11 of Annex A); ii) ex-parte hearings (China Nat l Bank v. BNK at page 14 of Annex); iii) dueling proceedings (Steel Corp v. Int l Steel at page 14 of Annex); 10 iv) cases involving allegations of abuse of rights which is not a U.S. legal concept (Karaha Bodas v. Pertamina at page 24 of Annex); v) where the public policy exception is domestic (manifest disregard for the law) and v) does not contravene Article V of the NYC (Int l Standard Electric v. Bridas Sociedad Anónima at page 29 of Annex). There are cases where enforcement will be denied not on the basis of Art. V(2)(b) but on the basis of V(1), with courts using the public policy analysis while explaining that Art. 8 See p. 9 of Annex. 9 See also Iran v. Cubic Defense Systems, Inc. at p. 8 of Annex. 10 Including dual criminal and civil proceedings (see Consorcio v. Briggs at p. 25 of Annex). -4-
6 V(1) has a public policy gloss. 11 So for example, in TermoRio S.A. v. Electranta S.P., the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals refused enforcement because the award had been set aside by a competent authority (courts of Colombia)(see page 2 of Annex). Similarly, the Second Circuit affirmed a decision of the SDNY not to enforce an award that had been set aside by the Nigerian Federal Court (see Baker Marine v. Danos and Curole Marine at page 3 of Annex). Part Two: Table of Cases Denying Enforcement of Arbitral Awards on Public Policy Grounds Not surprisingly then, there situations in which U.S. courts will deny enforcement on Art. V(2)(b) public policy grounds are extremely rare. This table is duplicative of the Annex to highlight the rarity of enforcement being refused ( and enforcement being accepted is covered in Annex A). Four cases are noted in the table and two could be considered substantive public policy cases 12 - Puliyurumpil Mathew v. Carnival and In Lamirois- Trefileries v. Southwire. But only In Lamirois-Trefileries is a true enforcement case, since Puliyurumpil Mathew, the most recent case, was at a motion to compel stage. We note the previously discussed cases of TermoRio and Baker Marine where a public policy gloss analysis was used in refusing enforcement under Art. V(1). Identification of the decision Puliyurumpil Mathew Thomas v. Carnival Corporation, CV- Summary of the public policy argument The Court considered Article V(2)(b) of the NYC to create an affirmative public policy defense that could be used at the motion to compel stage to find an arbitration clause unenforceable because it requires a Subs tanti ve Proce dural Enforc ement denied Enforceme nt accepted 11 NYC Art. V(1) allows non-enforcement on grounds generally of incapacity(a), procedural unfairness (b), the award is outside the scope of the terms of reference (c), the proceedings were inconsistent with the parties agreement, and the award has been set aside or suspended by a competent authority (e). 12 We note that in the landmark Mitsubishi Motors v. Soler Chrysler case, discussed at page 31 of the Annex, antitrust claims were held to not be automatically non-arbitrable, but courts may refuse to enforce such awards on public policy grounds. -5-
7 JAL, 11th Circuit, July 1, In Laminoirs- Trefileries- Cableries de Lens, S.A. v. Southwire Co, 484 F. Supp. 1063, 1067 (N.D. Ga. 1980). TermoRio S.A. E.S.P. (Colombia) v. Electranta S.P. (Colombia), , Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia Circuit, May 25, 2007 prospective waiver of [Thomas s] rights to pursue statutory remedies without the assurance of a subsequent opportunity for review. The Court determined that the dispute was not capable of settlement by arbitration. Southwire alleged that the arbitrators adopted a French legal rate of interest on the amounts due that violated the enforcing forum s public policy because the interest rate was excessive. The court agreed and refused to enforce that part of the award, holding that an award of interest that is penal in nature clearly violates public policy. Recognition and enforcement must be refused if the award has been set aside by a competent authority in the country of origin of the award. The Court found that the Consejo de Estado was a competent authority in Colombia, and accordingly, the arbitral award was lawfully nullified and the Appellants had no cause of action in the U.S. to seek enforcement of the award. The Court dismissed the argument that proceedings before the Consejo de Estado or the judgment of that Court violated any basic notions of morality and justice, and noted that there was no public policy ground on Enforcement partially denied. -6-
8 which to refuse enforcement under Article V(2)(b) of the NYC. 14 Baker Marine (Nigeria) Ltd. v. Chevron (Nigeria) Ltd. v. Danos and Curole Marine Contractors, , , 2nd Circuit, August 12, The Second Circuit affirmed the decision of the District Court and declined to enforce the arbitration awards because they had been set aside by a competent authority of the country in which, or under the law of which, the award was made, in accordance with Article V(1)(e) of the NYC. Baker Marine did not deny that the contract was governed by Nigerian law and the awards were set aside by a competent Nigerian Court. As such, the Second Circuit declined to confirm the awards. 15 IV. Conclusion Enforcement of arbitral awards under the New York Convention Article V(2)(b) public policy exception is almost never denied. 14 Enforcement denied because a competent Court in the country of origin of the award had set aside the decision. Enforcement NOT denied on V(2)(b) grounds. This has a public policy gloss. 15 The Court did not cite Article V(b)(2) s public policy exception as the basis for refusing to enforce the arbitral awards. However, there is a public policy gloss to Article V(1)(e) based in principles of comity. -7-
9 -8-
Client Update U.S. Second Circuit Affirms Decision Enforcing Annulled Arbitral Award
1 Client Update U.S. Second Circuit Affirms Decision Enforcing Annulled Arbitral Award NEW YORK Donald F. Donovan dfdonovan@debevoise.com Mark W. Friedman mwfriedman@debevoise.com Ina C. Popova ipopova@debevoise.com
More informationUSA (2) Virginia Allan Nicolette Ward. Allen & Overy
USA (2) Virginia Allan Nicolette Ward Allen & Overy Review of Public Policy Cases Citing Article V(2)(b) of the New York Convention To Either Enforce or Nullify an Arbitral Award in the United States Nicolette
More informationMEALEY S 1 International Arbitration Report. A commentary article reprinted from the February 2017 issue of Mealey s International Arbitration Report
MEALEY S 1 International Arbitration Report Extraordinary Becomes The Ordinary? Commisa Decision Urges Caution In Selecting Seat Of Arbitration As It Indicates Willingness By U.S. Courts To Enforce Arbitral
More information10th Anniversary Edition The Baker McKenzie International Arbitration Yearbook. United States
10th Anniversary Edition 2016-2017 The Baker McKenzie International Arbitration Yearbook United States 2017 Arbitration Yearbook United States United States Edward Teddy Baldwin, 1 J.P. Duffy 2 and Brandon
More informationCV. IN THE United States Court of Appeals FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT
13-4022-CV IN THE United States Court of Appeals FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT CORPORACIÓN MEXICANA DE MANTENIMIENTO INTEGRAL, S. DE R. L. DE C.V., Petitioner-Appellee, v. PEMEX-EXPLORACIÓN Y PRODUCCIÓN, Respondent-Appellant.
More informationThe U.S. Approach to Recognition and Enforcement of Awards After Set-Asides: The Impact of the Pemex Decision
NELLCO NELLCO Legal Scholarship Repository New York University Public Law and Legal Theory Working Papers New York University School of Law Summer 6-2017 The U.S. Approach to Recognition and Enforcement
More informationCase 1:19-cv BAH Document 1 Filed 01/30/19 Page 1 of 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:19-cv-00255-BAH Document 1 Filed 01/30/19 Page 1 of 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA PLATINUM BLACKSTONE PTY LTD, formerly known as NEXBIS PTY LTD, Kordamentha, Level
More informationSteel Corp of the Philippines v. Intl Steel Ser Inc
2009 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 11-19-2009 Steel Corp of the Philippines v. Intl Steel Ser Inc Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential Docket
More informationEnforcement of International Arbitral Awards in Canada
McCarthy Tétrault LLP PO Box 48, Suite 5300 Toronto-Dominion Bank Tower Toronto ON M5K 1E6 Canada Tel: 416-362-1812 Fax: 416-868-0673 Enforcement of International Arbitral Awards in Canada DAVID I. W.
More informationCase 1:18-cv CMA Document 47 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/07/2018 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Case 1:18-cv-20859-CMA Document 47 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/07/2018 Page 1 of 6 CAPORICCI U.S.A. CORP., UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA v. Plaintiff, PRADA S.p.A., et al., Defendants.
More informationThe Hegemonic Arbitrator Replaces Foreign Sovereignty: A Comment on Chevron v. Republic of Ecuador
Arbitration Law Review Volume 8 Yearbook on Arbitration and Mediation Article 10 5-1-2016 The Hegemonic Arbitrator Replaces Foreign Sovereignty: A Comment on Chevron v. Republic of Ecuador Camille Hart
More informationCase 0:12-cv WPD Document 22 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/18/2012 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Case 0:12-cv-61322-WPD Document 22 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/18/2012 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA GEOVANY QUIROZ, CASE NO. 12-61322-CIV-DIMITROULEAS Plaintiff,
More informationCase 1:07-cv JAL Document 49 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/04/2008 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Case 1:07-cv-21867-JAL Document 49 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/04/2008 Page 1 of 8 PULIYURUMPIL MATHEW THOMAS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 07-21867-CIV-LENARD/TORRES
More informationCase 2:04-cv AJS Document 63 Filed 03/06/06 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Case 2:04-cv-00593-AJS Document 63 Filed 03/06/06 Page 1 of 9 R.M.F. GLOBAL, INC., INNOVATIVE DESIGNS, INC., IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA Plaintiffs, 04cv0593
More informationEnforcement of International Arbitration Awards
In the U.S. By Richard N. Sheinis and Chad A. Wingate Enforcement of International Arbitration Awards Navigating a mixture of international and domestic law, with a conflict among federal courts sometimes
More informationSupreme Court of the United States
No. 16- IN THE Supreme Court of the United States PEMEX-EXPLORACIÓN Y PRODUCCIÓN, Petitioner, v. CORPORACIÓN MEXICANA DE MANTENIMIENTO INTEGRAL, S. DE R.L. DE C.V., Respondent. On Petition for a Writ of
More informationCase 1:10-cv UU Document 29 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/15/2010 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Case 1:10-cv-20296-UU Document 29 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/15/2010 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA SIVKUMAR SIVANANDI, Case No. 10-20296-CIV-UNGARO v. Plaintiff,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION. v. CIVIL ACTION NO. H MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
Case 4:11-cv-00585 Document 41 Filed in TXSD on 05/12/11 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION TAMIMI GLOBAL COMPANY LIMITED, Petitioner,
More informationCase 8:18-cv SDM-TGW Document 18 Filed 06/08/18 Page 1 of 11 PageID 650 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION
Case 818-cv-01126-SDM-TGW Document 18 Filed 06/08/18 Page 1 of 11 PageID 650 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION -------------------------------------------------------------
More informationDigital Touro Law Center
Digital Commons @ Touro Law Center Scholarly Works Faculty Scholarship 2008 "Arbitration as a Final Award: Challenges and Enforcement" published as Chapter 10 in International Sales Law and Arbitration:
More informationJOHN G. KOELTL, District Judge: This action arises out of an arbitration between the. petitioner, InterDigital Communications, Inc.
InterDigital Communications, Inc. et al v. Huawei Investment & Holding Co., Ltd. et al Doc. 75 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK INTERDIGITAL COMMUNICATIONS, INC., ET AL., Petitioners,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
HARDY EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION (INDIA), INC. v. GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, MINI...ETROLEUM AND NATURAL GAS Doc. 42 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA HARDY EXPLORATION & : PRODUCTION (INDIA),
More informationIn the Supreme Court of the United States
No. 15-830 In the Supreme Court of the United States GOVERNMENT OF BELIZE, PETITIONER v. BELIZE SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT LIMITED ON PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MEMORANDUM OPINION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA HULLEY ENTERPRISES LTD. et al., Petitioners, v. THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION, Civil Action No. 14-1996 (BAH) Chief Judge Beryl A. Howell Respondent.
More informationThe Battle Over Class Action: Second Circuit Holds that Class Action Waiver for Antitrust Actions Unenforceable Under the Federal Arbitration Act
Arbitration Law Review Volume 4 Yearbook on Arbitration and Mediation Article 24 7-1-2012 The Battle Over Class Action: Second Circuit Holds that Class Action Waiver for Antitrust Actions Unenforceable
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. v. Civil Action No (JDB) MEMORANDUM OPINION
VENCO IMTIAZ CONSTRUCTION COMPANY v. SYMBION POWER LLC Doc. 26 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA VENCO IMTIAZ CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, Plaintiff. SYMBION POWER LLC, Defendant. v. Civil
More informationIn The Supreme Court of the United States
No. 16-135 ================================================================ In The Supreme Court of the United States --------------------------------- --------------------------------- GOVERNMENT OF BELIZE,
More informationCase 1:10-cv AJ Document 23 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/09/2011 Page 1 of 8
Case 1:10-cv-24089-AJ Document 23 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/09/2011 Page 1 of 8 KAUSTUBH BADKAR, vs. Plaintiff NCL (BAHAMAS LTD., Defendant UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI
More informationCase 3:16-cv L Document 9 Filed 10/27/16 Page 1 of 7 PageID 48 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Case 3:16-cv-02430-L Document 9 Filed 10/27/16 Page 1 of 7 PageID 48 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION SHEBA COWSETTE, Plaintiff, V. No. 3:16-cv-2430-L FEDERAL
More informationYear in Review: Three Noteworthy Decisions of 2017 under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act
LITIGATION CLIENT ALERT JANUARY 2018 Year in Review: Three Noteworthy Decisions of 2017 under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act In the United States, the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA) governs
More informationOF FLORIDA THIRD DISTRICT
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DISPOSED OF. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA THIRD DISTRICT JANUARY TERM, A.D. 2004 AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL ** GROUP, INC.,
More informationI. INTRODUCTION. * Lea Haber Kuck is a partner in the International Litigation and Arbitration Group of
VACATING AN INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION AWARD RENDERED IN THE UNITED STATES: DOES THE NEW YORK CONVENTION, THE FEDERAL ARBITRATION ACT OR STATE LAW APPLY? By Lea Haber Kuck and Amanda Raymond Kalantirsky
More informationThe Supreme Court will shortly be considering
Arbitration at a Cross Road: Will the Supreme Court Hold the Federal Arbitration Act Trumps Federal Labor Laws? By John Jay Range and Bryan Cleveland The Supreme Court will shortly be considering three
More informationOF FLORIDA THIRD DISTRICT JULY TERM, A.D. 2001
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DISPOSED OF. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA THIRD DISTRICT JULY TERM, A.D. 2001 WORLD VACATION TRAVEL, S.A., de C.V., et
More informationagreements generally are enforceable, a party who commences litigation
NAVIGATING Muddy Waters Anti-Foreign Suit Injunctions in Aid of Compelling Arbitration By Chris Karagheuzoff and Eric Epstein Chris Karagheuzoff and Eric Epstein are, respectively, partner and associate
More informationPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. No
PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-2107 NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY L.P., Defendant - Appellant. Appeal
More informationCase 1:17-cv NT Document 17 Filed 05/14/18 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 61 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Case 1:17-cv-00422-NT Document 17 Filed 05/14/18 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 61 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE EMMA CEDER, V. Plaintiff, SECURITAS SECURITY SERVICES USA, INC., Defendant. Docket
More informationClass Actions. Unconscionable Consumer Class Action Waivers And The Federal Arbitration Act MEALEY S LITIGATION REPORT
MEALEY S LITIGATION REPORT Class Actions Unconscionable Consumer Class Action Waivers And The Federal Arbitration Act by Marc J. Goldstein Marc J. Goldstein Litigation and Arbitration Chambers New York,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Snyder v. CACH, LLC Doc. 39 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII MARIA SNYDER, vs. Plaintiff, CACH, LLC; MANDARICH LAW GROUP, LLP; DAVID N. MATSUMIYA; TREVOR OZAWA, Defendants.
More informationFull of Sound and Fury, Signifying Nothing: Second Circuit Chides Employer's Unfair Arbitration Terms, Tet Still Enforces Agreement
Arbitration Law Review Volume 3 Yearbook on Arbitration and Mediation Article 19 7-1-2011 Full of Sound and Fury, Signifying Nothing: Second Circuit Chides Employer's Unfair Arbitration Terms, Tet Still
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BCB HOLDINGS LIMITED and THE BELIZE BANK LIMITED, Petitioners/Plaintiffs v. Civil Action No. 14-1123 (CKK) THE GOVERNMENT OF BELIZE, Respondent/Defendant.
More informationPetitioners, 10 Civ (KMW) (DCF) -against- OPINION and ORDER GOVERNMENT OF THE LAO PEOPLE S DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC, Respondent.
Thai-Lao Lignite (Thailand) Co. Ltd. et al v. Government of the LAO People...9;s Democratic Republic Doc. 262 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------------------------------------X
More informationInternational Commercial Arbitration
International Commercial Arbitration Mag. Martin Platte, LL.M. Introduction Art 35 (1) ML An arbitral award, irrespective of the country in which it was made, shall be recognized as binding Presumptive
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JANUARY TERM v. Case No. 5D
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JANUARY TERM 2007 CHARLES BOYD CONSTRUCTION INC., Appellant, v. Case No. 5D06-2168 VACATION BEACH, INC., Appellee. / Opinion filed
More informationCase 1:18-cv TSC Document 18-1 Filed 10/16/18 Page 1 of 45 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Case 1:18-cv-01148-TSC Document 18-1 Filed 10/16/18 Page 1 of 45 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA NOVENERGIA II ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT (SCA), v. Petitioner, THE KINGDOM OF SPAIN,
More informationCase 6:14-cv CEM-TBS Document 31 Filed 01/16/15 Page 1 of 10 PageID 1331
Case 6:14-cv-01400-CEM-TBS Document 31 Filed 01/16/15 Page 1 of 10 PageID 1331 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION MARRIOTT OWNERSHIP RESORTS, INC., MARRIOTT VACATIONS
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. August Term, 2012
1-1-cv Bakoss v. Lloyds of London 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term, 01 (Submitted On: October, 01 Decided: January, 01) Docket No. -1-cv M.D.
More informationCommencing the Arbitration
Chapter 6 Commencing the Arbitration David C. Singer* 6:1 Procedural Rules Governing Commencement of Arbitration 6:1.1 Revised Uniform Arbitration Act 6:2 Applicable Rules of Arbitral Institutions 6:2.1
More informationENFORCING ANNULLED ARBITRAL AWARDS: A COMPARISON OF APPROACHES IN THE UNITED STATES AND IN THE NETHERLANDS
V. LAZIĆ-SMOLJANIĆ, Enforcing annulled arbitral awards: a comparison of... Zbornik Pravnog fakulteta Sveučilišta u Rijeci, vol. 39, br. 1, 215-240 (2018) 215 ENFORCING ANNULLED ARBITRAL AWARDS: A COMPARISON
More informationCase 3:17-cv EDL Document 53 Filed 11/17/17 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case :-cv-0-edl Document Filed // Page of UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA MARCELLA JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. ORACLE AMERICA, INC., Defendant. Case No.-cv-0-EDL ORDER GRANTING
More informationInternational Litigation
International Litigation February 2014 Recognition of Foreign Country Judgments in the United States: A Primer Oleg Rivkin Transnational litigation is an expanding field, fueled by globalization, cross-border
More informationTelephone Seminar/Audio Webcast International Arbitration: Developments From A U.S. Perspective June 11, 2008 Telephone Seminar / Live Webcast
131 Telephone Seminar/Audio Webcast International Arbitration: Developments From A U.S. Perspective June 11, 2008 Telephone Seminar / Live Webcast Injunctions Protecting the Arbitral Process: Karaha Bodas
More informationCase 1:14-cv CRC Document 1 Filed 11/14/14 Page 1 of 24 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:14-cv-01921-CRC Document 1 Filed 11/14/14 Page 1 of 24 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA LLC ENERGOALLIANCE, 2/19 Simirenka Str. Kyiv, Ukraine 03134 v. Petitioner, Civil
More informationCase 2:08-cv JSR Document 85 Filed 07/27/10 Page 1 of 14
Case 2:08-cv-02875-JSR Document 85 Filed 07/27/10 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK... X LARYSSA JOCK, et al., Plaintiffs, 08 Civ. 2875 (JSR) STERLING JEWELERS, INC.,
More informationFour Seasons Hotels and Resorts, BV v. Consorcio Barr, SA, 267 F. Supp. 2d US: Dist. Court, SD Florida, Miami Div. 2003
Four Seasons Hotels and Resorts, BV v. Consorcio Barr, SA, 267 F. Supp. 2d 1335 - US: Dist. Court, SD Florida, Miami Div. 2003 267 F.Supp.2d 1335 (2003) FOUR SEASONS HOTELS AND RESORTS, B.V., Four Seasons
More informationFees (Doc. 8), as well as the Memorandum In Opposition to Motion to Dismiss and
Smith-Varga v. Royal Caribbean Cruises, Ltd. Doc. 23 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION TASHE SMITH-VARGA Plaintiff, v. Case No.: 8:13-cv-00198-EAK-TBM ROYAL CARIBBEAN
More informationSANLUIS DEVELOPMENTS v. CCP SANLUIS, LLC, 556 F. Supp. 2d Dist. Court, SD New York 2008
SANLUIS DEVELOPMENTS v. CCP SANLUIS, LLC, 556 F. Supp. 2d 329 - Dist. Court, SD New York 2008 556 F.Supp.2d 329 (2008) SANLUIS DEVELOPMENTS, L.L.C., Sanluis Investments, L.L.C., and Sanluis Corporación,
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER
--cv TradeComet.com LLC v. Google, Inc. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON
More informationJay G. Safer-Locke Lord LLP. I. The Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards Under the New York Convention in the United States
HOT TOPICS YOU SHOULD KNOW ABOUT IN INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION AND INTERNATIONAL LITIGATION, WHAT S NEW IN INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION IN THE COURTS IN THE UNITED STATES, THE NEW YORK CONVENTION, AND THE
More informationCase 4:17-cv Document 21 Filed in TXSD on 11/21/17 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION ORDER
Case 4:17-cv-00178 Document 21 Filed in TXSD on 11/21/17 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION United States District Court Southern District of Texas ENTERED
More informationCase 1:16-cv ARR-RLM Document 34 Filed 10/31/16 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 438
Case 116-cv-01185-ARR-RLM Document 34 Filed 10/31/16 Page 1 of 7 PageID # 438 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------------------------------------------
More informationArbitration Agreements and Class Actions
Supreme Court Enforces Arbitration Agreement with Class Action Waiver, Narrowing the Scope of Ability to Avoid Such Agreements SUMMARY The United States Supreme Court yesterday continued its rigorous enforcement
More informationCZARINA, LLC v. WF Poe Syndicate, 358 F. 3d US: Court of Appeals, 11th Circuit 2004
CZARINA, LLC v. WF Poe Syndicate, 358 F. 3d 1286 - US: Court of Appeals, 11th Circuit 2004 358 F.3d 1286 (2004) CZARINA, L.L.C., as assignee of Halvanon Insurance Co. Ltd., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. W.F.
More informationCase 1:10-cv LBS -JCF Document 73 Filed 07/07/11 Page 1 of 14
Case 1:10-cv-06950-LBS -JCF Document 73 Filed 07/07/11 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK H. CRISTINA CHEN-OSTER; LISA PARISI; and SHANNA ORLICH, - against - Plaintiffs,
More informationDefending Actions for the Enforcement of Foreign Money Judgments in New York: Developments and Strategic Considerations
Defending Actions for the Enforcement of Foreign Money Judgments in New York: Developments and Strategic Considerations May 3, 2018 Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP Presented by Frances E. Bivens Antonio J. Perez-Marques
More informationCase: Document: Page: 1 03/21/ (Argued: November 7, 2012 Decided: March 21, 2013) Plaintiffs-Appellees,
Case: - Document: - Page: 0//0 0 0 0 0 - Parisi v. Goldman, Sachs & Co. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term, 0 (Argued: November, 0 Decided: March, 0) Docket No. --cv LISA
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. No PAUL GREEN SCHOOL OF ROCK MUSIC FRANCHISING, LLC. JIM R. SMITH, Appellant.
NOT PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT No. 09-2718 PAUL GREEN SCHOOL OF ROCK MUSIC FRANCHISING, LLC. v. JIM R. SMITH, Appellant. ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT
More informationChallenging the Validity and Enforceability of Arbitral Awards is a Risky Endeavor: US Courts Warn That Parties and Counsel Risk Costs and Sanctions
MEALEY S TM International Arbitration Report Challenging the Validity and Enforceability of Arbitral Awards is a Risky Endeavor: US Courts Warn That Parties and Counsel Risk Costs and Sanctions by Elliot
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Case No. SC Third DCA Case No. 3D
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA Case No. SC03-1269 Third DCA Case No. 3D02-2385 DISCOVERY SUN PARTNERSHIP, DISCOVERY DAWN PARTNERSHIP, SUN HOLIDAY CRUISE SERVICES, INC. and APOLLO SHIP CHANDLERS, INC.,
More informationEXPLANATORY NOTES B I L L. No. 97. An Act to amend The Arbitration Act, 1992
EXPLANATORY NOTES B I L L No. 97 An Act to amend The Arbitration Act, 1992 Clause of Bill 1 The Arbitration (Family Dispute Resolution) Amendment Act, 2017. 2 The Arbitration Act, 1992 3 Existing Provision
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. No D.C. Docket No. 0:16-cv JIC
Case: 16-13477 Date Filed: 10/09/2018 Page: 1 of 14 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 16-13477 D.C. Docket No. 0:16-cv-60197-JIC MICHAEL HISEY, Plaintiff
More informationIntellectual Ventures Wins Summary Judgment to Defeat Capital One s Antitrust Counterclaims
Intellectual Ventures Wins Summary Judgment to Defeat Capital One s Antitrust Counterclaims News from the State Bar of California Antitrust, UCL and Privacy Section From the January 2018 E-Brief David
More informationCase 1:16-cv KMM Document 18 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/05/2016 Page 1 of 11
Case 1:16-cv-20507-KMM Document 18 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/05/2016 Page 1 of 11 BRIAN LEIGHTON, v. Plaintiff, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ROYAL CARIBBEAN
More informationSpier v. Calzaturificio Tecnica, SpA, 71 F. Supp. 2d US: Dist. Court, SD New York 1999
Spier v. Calzaturificio Tecnica, SpA, 71 F. Supp. 2d 279 - US: Dist. Court, SD New York 1999 71 F.Supp.2d 279 (1999) Martin I. SPIER, Petitioner, v. CALZATURIFICIO TECNICA, S.p.A., Respondent. No. 86 CIV.
More information2008 International Arbitration Report
2008 International Arbitration Report I s s u e 2 This issue includes: Most Favored Nation Treatment in International Investment Law Anti-suit Injunctions and West Tankers Trends in Enforcement of Annulled
More informationClient Alert. Background on Discovery Requests under Section 1782
Number 1383 August 13, 2012 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Litigation Department Eleventh Circuit Holds That Parties to Private International Commercial Arbitral Tribunals May Seek Discovery Assistance
More informationArbitration Agreements v. Wage and Hour Class Actions
Arbitration Agreements v. Wage and Hour Class Actions Brought to you by Winston & Strawn s Labor and Employment Practice Group 2013 Winston & Strawn LLP Today s elunch Presenters Monique Ngo-Bonnici Labor
More informationPascal Hollander, IBA Sub-Committee on Recognition and Enforcement of Awards
1717 K Street, NW Washington, DC 20006-5350 202 223 1200 main 202 785 6687 fax Memo Date: May 31, 2016 To: Pascal Hollander, IBA Sub-Committee on Recognition and Enforcement of Awards From: Regarding:
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN BRETT DANIELS and BRETT DANIELS PRODUCTIONS, INC., Plaintiffs, v. Case No. 15-CV-1334 SIMON PAINTER, TIMOTHY LAWSON, INTERNATIONAL SPECIAL ATTRACTIONS,
More informationBuckeye Check Cashing, Inc. v. Cardegna*
RECENT DEVELOPMENTS Buckeye Check Cashing, Inc. v. Cardegna* I. INTRODUCTION In a decision that lends further credence to the old adage that consumers should always beware of the small print, the United
More informationApril 2009 JONES DAY COMMENTARY
April 2009 JONES DAY COMMENTARY Developments in U.S. Law Regarding a More Liberal Approach to Discovery Requests Made by Foreign Litigants Under 28 U.S.C. 1782 In these times of global economic turmoil,
More informationCountry Author: Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP
Country Author: Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP The Legal 500 & The In-House Lawyer Comparative Legal Guide United States: Arbitration This country-specific Q&A provides an overview of the legal framework
More informationDA Nolt Inc v. United Union of Roofers, Water
2016 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 9-23-2016 DA Nolt Inc v. United Union of Roofers, Water Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2016
More informationCase 2:18-cv LMA-KWR Document 21 Filed 06/28/18 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA. VERSUS No.
Case 2:18-cv-02804-LMA-KWR Document 21 Filed 06/28/18 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA THE MCDONNEL GROUP LLC CIVIL ACTION VERSUS No. 18-2804 CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. No D. C. Docket No CV-WCO-1. versus
[PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 06-15516 D. C. Docket No. 05-03315-CV-WCO-1 FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT SEPTEMBER 4, 2007 THOMAS K. KAHN CLERK
More informationROBERT H. SMIT SIMPSON THACHER & BARTLETT LLP
INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION OF INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECT DISPUTES AND THE ENFORCEMENT REGIME UNDER THE NEW YORK CONVENTION ROBERT H. SMIT JUNE 6, 2003 As traditional hostility towards arbitration has waned
More informationAfter Stolt-Nielsen, Circuits Split, But AAA Filings Continue
MEALEY S TM International Arbitration Report After Stolt-Nielsen, Circuits Split, But AAA Filings Continue by Gregory A. Litt Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP New York Tina Praprotnik Duke Law
More informationINTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION AND ENFORCEMENT IN U.S. FEDERAL COURTS
INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION AND ENFORCEMENT IN U.S. FEDERAL COURTS I. INTRODUCTION... 371 II. ENFORCEMENT OF ARBITRAL AWARD IN THE UNITED STATES... 375 A. The Federal Arbitration Act... 375 B. The New York
More informationUnited States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 16-2189 MOUNTAIN VALLEY PROPERTY, INC., Plaintiff, Appellee, v. APPLIED RISK SERVICES, INC.; APPLIED UNDERWRITERS, INC.; APPLIED UNDERWRITERS CAPTIVE
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
Case: 09-10355 Document: 00511232038 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/13/2010 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS United States Court of Appeals FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Fifth Circuit F I L E D September 13, 2010
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION
Case 3:15-cv-05448-EDL Document 26 Filed 11/24/15 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION : : RICKY R. FRANKLIN, : : Plaintiff, : : v. : CIVIL
More informationCase 1:10-cv DPW Document 27 Filed 03/01/11 Page 1 of 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
Case 1:10-cv-10113-DPW Document 27 Filed 03/01/11 Page 1 of 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS PAUL PEZZA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. ) 10-10113-DPW INVESTORS CAPITAL
More informationSupreme Court of the United States
No. 14-1168 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States ROGER L. SMITH, v. Petitioner, AEGON COMPANIES PENSION PLAN, Respondent. On Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals
More informationCongressional Consent and other Legal Issues
Congressional Consent and other Legal Issues While a host of legal issues exist for interstate compacts, state officials have traditionally been most concerned with two areas: 1) congressional consent
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. August Term, (Argued: November 20, 2014 Decided: August 2, 2016) Docket No.
Case 13-4022, Document 222-1, 08/02/2016, 1830557, Page1 of 43 13 4022 Corporación Mexicana De Mantenimiento Integral, S. De R.L. De C.V. v. Pemex Exploración Y Producción UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
More informationCase: 4:15-cv JAR Doc. #: 21 Filed: 08/05/16 Page: 1 of 13 PageID #: 302
Case: 4:15-cv-01361-JAR Doc. #: 21 Filed: 08/05/16 Page: 1 of 13 PageID #: 302 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION TIMOTHY H. JONES, Plaintiff, v. No. 4:15-cv-01361-JAR
More informationSupreme Court of the United States
No. 15-698 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States HELMERICH & PAYNE INTERNATIONAL DRILLING CO. AND HELMERICH & PAYNE DE VENEZUELA, C.A., Petitioners, v. BOLIVARIAN REPUBLIC OF VENEZUELA, PETRÓLEOS DE
More informationArbitration Provisions in Employment Contract May Be Under Fire
Labor and Employment Law Notes Arbitration Provisions in Employment Contract May Be Under Fire The United States Supreme Court recently heard oral argument in the case of Hall Street Associates, L.L.C.
More informationCase 2:07-cv RSM Document 33 Filed 11/20/2007 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE
Case :0-cv-00-RSM Document Filed /0/00 Page of 0 0 ROMEO BALEN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, v. Plaintiff, HOLLAND AMERICA LINE, INC., Defendant. Plaintiff s motion for
More informationCase 1:12-cv CM Document 50 Filed 10/26/12 Page 1 of 12
Case 1:12-cv-04873-CM Document 50 Filed 10/26/12 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, SUCCESSOR TO WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., SUCCESSOR
More information