INDUSTRIAL COURT OF MALAYSIA CASE NO: 18(12)/4-411/15 ZAKARIA BIN ISMAIL DAN EASTERN PACIFIC INDUSTRIAL CORPORATION BERHAD AWARD NO: 857 OF 2017
|
|
- Lorraine Preston
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 INDUSTRIAL COURT OF MALAYSIA CASE NO: 18(12)/4-411/15 ZAKARIA BIN ISMAIL DAN EASTERN PACIFIC INDUSTRIAL CORPORATION BERHAD AWARD NO: 857 OF 2017 Before : Y.A. TUAN GULAM MUHIADDEEN BIN ABDUL AZIZ CHAIRMAN Award Issued at : Industrial Court of Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur. Date of Reference : 26 March 2015 Dates of Mention : 8 July 2015, 10 August 2015, 10 September 2015, 19 October 2015, 26 November 2015, 17 December 2015, 14 January 2016, 19 February 2016, 4 March 2016, 21 March 2016, 4 April 2016, 6 September 2016, 26 September 2016, 2 December 2016, 13 December 2016, 16 January 2017, 13 February 2017 & 13 March 2017 Dates of Hearing : 5 October 2016 & 6 October 2016, Company s Written Submission : 6 December 2016 Claimant s Written Submission : 13 February 2017 Representation : Mr. A. Sivananthan Malaysia Trades Unions Congress (Representative for the Claimant) Miss Teoh Alvare & Miss K.C. Wong Messrs Zul Rafique & Partners (Learned Counsel for the Respondent) 1
2 AWARD The parties before this Court are Zakaria bin Ismail ( the Claimant ) and Eastern Pacific Industrial Corporation Berhad (EPIC) ( the Company ). The dispute is over the termination of the Claimant from the services of the Company with effect from 1 November It is a reference made by the Honourable Minister of Human Resources to the Industrial Court pursuant to Section 20 of the Industrial Relations Act 1967 ( the Act ). Facts of the Case The Claimant commenced employment as the Senior Manager, Operation (Grade 39) with the subsidiary of the Company, Pangkalan Bekalan Kemaman Sdn. Bhd. ( PBKSB ) on 17 August By a letter dated 11 November 2008, the Claimant was appointed as the Acting General Manager of PBKSB, with effect from 15 November By a letter dated 21 April 2009, the Claimant was informed that he has been promoted as General Manager of PBKSB with effect from 1 April The Claimant was informed that his new terms and conditions of employment shall be in line with his new position grade as stipulated in the Company s Terms and Conditions of Service. By a letter dated 3 January 2011, the Claimant wrote to the Company to inform that he was due to attain his mandatory retirement from service with the Company at the age of 55 on 8 April As such, the Claimant applied to the Company to consider extending his term of service until he attained the age of 58 on 8 April
3 3
4 By a letter dated 19 January 2011, the Company informed the Claimant that the management of the Company had reviewed and approved the Claimant s application. 4
5 In the circumstances, the Claimant s term of service after his mandatory retirement age was extended till the Claimant attain the age of 58. The extended term was for a period of 3 years from 9 April 2011 to 8 April By a letter dated 8 April 2014 the Claimant was informed that effective from 9 April 2014 his services with the Company was on a month to month basis until his employment contract is terminated ( the Monthly Contract ). 5
6 By a letter dated 14 August 2014, the Claimant was informed, amongst others, the he would be re-designated as General Manager, West Wharf with effect from 15 August The West Wharf is owned and operated by Sukma Samudra Sdn. Bhd., a member of the EPIC Group. By a letter dated 20 October 2014, the Claimant was informed that his contract of service with the Company would be terminated with effect from 1 November The Claimant was further informed that the Company was agreeable to the Claimant s early release from service effective 23 October
7 By a memo dated 23 October 2014, the Claimant was reminded to return the following Company s equipment / assets in order to expedite payment of the Claimant s salary for the month of October 2014: (a) Apple iphone 5s; (b) Petrol Card for Vehicle No. TAX 1148; (c) Apple ipad Air; (d) Toshiba Laptop (Protégé Z830); and (e) HP Computer Desktop. Notwithstanding the reminder by the Company vide its memo dated 23 October 2014, the Claimant failed to return any of the Company s equipment / assets listed therein. By a letter dated 20 November 2014, the Company referred to its memo dated 20 October 2014 and requested that the Claimant return all of the Company s equipment/ assets listed therein on or before 23 November Notwithstanding the second reminder by the Company vide its letter dated 20 November 2014, the Claimant failed and/or refused to return any of the other Company s equipment/ assets, save and except for the Petrol Card for Vehicle No. TAX By a letter dated 9 December 2014, the Company informed the Claimant that his salary for the month of October 2014 had been credited into his bank account with Affin Bank Berhad on 9 December The Claimant was further informed that the amount credited had included deductions for the Company s equipment/ assets which the Claimant had not returned, namely the Apple iphone 5S, Apple ipad Air, Toshiba Laptop (Protégé Z830) and HP Computer Desktop. 7
8 The issues The main issues before this Court are: 1. Whether the Claimant was dismissed by the Company or whether upon his retirement he was placed on a genuine fixed term contract (inclusive of the Monthly Contract and the said fixed term of 3 years). If there is a finding that there was a genuine fixed term contract then the issue of whether the Claimant was dismissed with just cause or excuse does not arise. 2. If the Claimant was in fact dismissed by the Company then the question that needs to be determined is whether the said dismissal was with just cause or excuse. The Law on Fixed Term Contract It is necessary for this Court to decide firstly whether the Claimant s contract of employment is a genuine fixed term contract or one which is permanent in nature but dressed up as a fixed term contract. If it is a genuine fixed term contract, following the case of M. Vasagam Muthusamy v Kesatuan Pekerja-Pekerja Resorts World, Pahang & Anor [2003] 5 CLJ 448, the Court need not have to go into the question of whether there was a dismissal with just cause or excuse. Once it is established that it is a fixed term contract, the dissolution of the contract upon reaching the expiry date of the fixed term would clearly spell the end of the worker s tenure. 8
9 Faiza Tamby Chik J, the High Court held as follows: I am of the opinion that the Industrial Court had correctly addressed the issue in this case by determining first whether or not the contract in question was a genuine fixed term contract (see pp. 3 and 4 of the said award). If the Industrial Court made a finding that it was not a genuine fixed term contract but was really a contract of employment, then only would the Industrial Court be required to ask whether there was a dismissal or not and that if so whether it was with just cause or excuse. In the instant case, since a finding was reached that the contract concerned was indeed a genuine fixed term contract, the question of there being a dismissal or not does not arise. Once it was established that there is a genuine fixed term contract, the dissolution of the contract upon reaching the expiry date of the fixed term would clearly spell the end of the worker s tenure with the relevant company. [Emphasis Added] The decision of the High Court in M. Vasagam was reinforced by the Court of Appeal in the case of M. Vasagam Muthusamy v Kesatuan Pekerja-Pekerja Resorts World, Pahang & Anor [2005] 4 CLJ 93 Evaluation and Findings Before proceeding on the merits of the case, it is pertinent to note that the Claimant s representative had filed the Statement of Case on 10 September A scrutiny of the Statement of Case clearly shows that the Claimant had failed to raise any issues in regard to the case except by stating that the termination of service is baseless unwarranted and without just cause or excuse. The Court is unable to determine the issues or to narrow the area of conflict based on the Statement of Case. 9
10 The importance of the Claimant s Statement of Case pleaded in this Court makes it immensely important to reproduce it in extenso as follows : 1. The dispute before this Honourable Court is by way of reference by the Honourable Minister of Human Resource under Section 20(3) of the Industrial Relation Act 1967 for adjudication and award. 2. Whereas the dispute is over the termination of service of Zakaria bin Ismail (hereinafter referred to as the Claimant ) by Eastern Pacific Industrial Corporation Berhad (EPIC) (hereinafter referred to as the Company ) with effect from 1 November The Claimant avers that he joined the Company from 17 August 2008 as the General Manager based at Pengkala Bekalan kemaman Sdn. Bhd. The last drawn salary at the time of termination of service is RM17, per month. 4. Via letter dated 30 May 2013, the Claimant s position is redesignated with effect from 1 June 2013 as General Manager Infrastructure & Development, EPIC reporting to the Managing Director / Chief Executive Officer, EPIC. Again via letter dated 14 August 2014 the Claimant s position was redesignated with effect from General Manager, West Wharf, EPIC reporting to the Managing Director / Chief Executive Officer, EPIC. 5. Vide letter dated 20 October 2014, the service of the Claimant was terminated with effect from 1 November 2014 and further the Company agrees to release him early that is 23 October The Claimant avers that no reason was given for the termination of the service and put the Company to strict proof. 6. By way of letter dated 9 December 2014, the Company credited the salary payment for the month of October 2014 less the necessary deduction into the Claimant s account at Affin Bank Berhad. 10
11 7. The Claimant states that the termination of service is baseless, unwarranted and without just cause or excuse. 8. The Claimant states and will establish during the hearing that the termination or service is without just cause or excuse. 9. The Claimant humbly pray that the Honourable Court will hand down an Award finding dismissal wrongful, void and inoperative and further order reinstatement without any loss of wages, seniority and such other benefits earned or any other relief which this Honourable Court deems fir and proper to grant. Dated : In the Federal Court judgement of Ranjit Kaur a/p S. Gopal Singh v Hotel Excelsior (M) Sdn. Bhd., [2010] 8 CLJ 629, it was held that the parties are bound by the basic rules of pleading. The Industrial Court must confine itself to the four corners of the pleading and Section 30(5) of the IRA could not be used to override or circumvent the basic rules of pleading. It further states : Pleading in the Industrial Court are as important as in the Civil Courts. The appellant must plead its case and the Industrial Court must decide on the appellant s pleaded case. This is important in order to prevent element of surprise and provide room for the other party to adduce evidence once the fact or an issue is pleaded. Thus, the Industrial Court s duty, to act according to equity, good conscience and substantial merits of the case without regard to technicalities and legal form under s 30(5), does not give the Industrial Court the right to ignore the Industrial Court Rules 1967 made under the principle Act. [Emphasis Added] 11
12 The Industrial Court has no jurisdiction to take evidence or rely on an enpleaded fact to justify its decision. This issue was specifically addressed by the Federal Court in R.Rama Chandran v The Industrial Court of Malaysia & Anor [1997] 1 CLJ 147: It is trite law that a party is bound by its pleadings. The Industrial Court must scrutinise the pleadings and identify the issue, take evidence, hear the parties arguments and finally pronounce its judgement having strict regard to the issues. It is true that the Industrial Court is not bound by all technicalities of a civil court (s 30 of the Industrial Relations Act 1967) but the object of pleadings is to determine what are the issues and to narrow the area of conflict. The Industrial Court cannot ignore the pleading and treat them as mere pedantry or formalism, because if it does so, it may lose sight of the issues, admit evidence irrelevant to the issues or reject evidence to the issues and come to the wrong conclusion. The Industrial Court must at all time keep itself alert to the issues and attend to the matters it is bound to consider. [Emphasis Added] Based on the above authorities, it is obvious that the Claimant has failed to raise the necessary issues or material facts to show that he was dismissed without just cause or excuse. Further, the Claimant had not filed any Rejoinder in this case and thereby failed to address and reply the various facts and issues raised in the Statement in Reply. Be that as it may the Court will still proceed to consider the merit of the case. The terms and conditions of the Claimant s employment were governed by his employment contract and also the Company s Terms and Conditions of Service ( TACOS ). The retirement clause under TACOS which was applicable to the Claimant at the material time expressly states that : 12
13 Article 11 : Retirement 11.1 An employee is considered to retire from service with the Company upon: (a) Attaining the age of fifty-five (55) years as mandatory retirement; (b) Further, the Claimant during cross-examination admits that the retirement clause under TACOS was applicable to the Claimant and his mandatory retirement age at the material time was 55 years which he has attained on 8 April S : Sila rujuk m/s 8 Encik Zakaria Ini adalah TACOS pada masa itu. Terms and Conditions of Services. Setuju dengan saya pada masa itu TACOS yang terpakai menyatakan umur persaraan adalah pada umur 55 tahun? J : Betul. Further, the Claimant had voluntarily written to the Company vide a letter dated 3 January 2011 whereby he acknowledged that his mandatory retirement age was 55 years old which he would attain on 8 April The Claimant then applied to the Company to consider extending his term of service until he attained the age of 58 on 8 April as follows: The salient passages of the Claimant s letter dated 3 January 2011 is reproduced Pada 8 hb April 2011, genap umur saya 55 tahun untuk bersara wajib untuk jawatan saya sekarang. Dengan itu, amatlah besar harapan saya agar dapat kiranya tuan mempertimbangkan untuk meluluskan permohonan saya 13
14 bagi melanjutkan tempoh perkhidmatan saya sehingga umur saya mencapai 58 tahun. (2014). During cross-examination, the Claimant testified as follows: S: Setuju dengan saya anda telah membuat permohonan ini sebab anda telah mencapai 55 tahun persaraan wajib? J: Betul.. S: Encik Zakaria, sekarang sila rujuk m/s 12. Setuju ini adalah surat daripada Syarikat membenarkan permohonan anda untuk melanjutkan tempoh perkhidmatan? J: Betul S: Mengikut surat ini tempoh perkhidmatan anda selepas umur persaraan wajib telah dilanjutkan selama tempoh tetap 3 tahun iaitu semasa anda mencapai 58 tahun? J: Betul S: Setuju tempoh tetap perkhidmatan anda telah tamat pada 8 April 2014? J: Betul Based on the above evidence, it is clear that the Company had reviewed and approved the Claimant s application and the Claimant s term of service after his mandatory retirement age was extended period of 3 years until the age of 58 i.e. from 9 April 2011 to 8 April Further, the fact that the Claimant had written to the Company to apply for an extension of employment until the age of 58 showed that the Claimant acknowledged that he was not entitled to permanent or indefinite employment beyond his retirement age. 14
15 Therefore, the Claimant knew at all material times, that the Fixed Term would come to its natural end after 3 years on 8 April Thus, by reason of this postretirement employment and his consent to be employed for another 3 years, the Claimant was employed on a genuine fixed term contract. Upon expiry of the Claimant s Fixed Term of 3 years on 8 April 2014, the Company had vide its letter dated 8 April 2014 continued employing the Claimant on a month to month basis, to which the Claimant never raised any objections. The salient wordings in the said letter is clear and unambiguous and it is reproduced as follows: Please be informed that effective from 9 th April 2014 your performance assessment will be based on the monthly basis until your contract is terminated. The Claimant in his evidence-in chief testified that after the expiry of his 3 years Fixed Term, he was on Monthly Contract: S: Soalannya 8 April 2014 Encik telah genap tahun 58? J: Betul S: Lepas itu Syarikat bagi secara kontrak bulanan? J: Seperti yang telah diberitahu. ya. After the issuance of the above letter dated 8 April 2014, the Company by its letter dated 14 August 2014 re-designated the Claimant as the General Manager of West Wharf with effect from 15 August The Claimant had never made any objections to the Monthly Contract as per letter dated 8 April 2014 nor the redesignation. Instead, he had abided with the letter of redesignation and continued to perform his duties without any objections. 15
16 The Claimant at all material times, knew that his post-retirement employment was not permanent and/or never meant to be indefinite and that his contract could be terminated at the expiry of the fixed term. The determination of the Claimant s month to month contract, including its extension or termination were matters within the management prerogative of the Company as the Claimant had already retired from service without any possibility or permanent or long term employment. The Claimant had been employed by the Company on a Monthly Contract subsequent to the expiration of the Fixed Term. The Claimant cannot now be allowed to claim that his status of employment be reverted back to a permanent staff. In the case of Thavaratnam Thambipillay v OM Education Sdn. Bhd. [2010] 2 ILR 201, the Industrial Court held that: (the Claimant) having received the benefit of gainful employment past the age of retirement under these contracts, he cannot now be heard to say that he is actually entitled to permanency of employment. This Court, as a Court of equity and good conscience cannot allow the Claimant to approbate and reprobate in this manner. [Emphasis Added] In addition, once the employee passes retirement age (i.e. 55 years), the Claimant no longer has lien to the job and he is liable to be released at any time. Since the Claimant had been employed by the Company on a month to month contract subsequent to the expiration of the Fixed Term, there had not been any necessity for the Company to give reasons for the termination and/or non-extension of 16
17 the Claimant s month to month contract. This is because the Claimant was on a genuine fixed term contract which expired by effluxion of time. In the light of the above, the Court held that the Claimant was not dismissed without just cause or excuse. Conclusion For reasons adumbrated and having regards to the evidence in its totality the Court is of the considered view that the Company has provided on a balance of probability that the Claimant s termination was perfectly reasonable and justified. It was carried out in good faith and in accordance to fair labour practice. Based on equity and good conscience and the substantial merit of the case without regard to technicality and legal form, the Court finds that the Claimant s termination was carried out with just cause and excuse. The claim is hereby dismissed. HANDED DOWN AND DATED THIS 16 th DAY OF JUN (GULAM MUHIADDEEN BIN ABDUL AZIZ) CHAIRMAN INDUSTRIAL COURT OF MALAYSIA PENANG BRANCH AT GEORGE TOWN 17
INDUSTRIAL COURT OF MALAYSIA CASE NO : 15/4-173/02 BETWEEN MALAYSIAN AIRLINE SYSTEM BHD. AND KARTHIGESU A/L V. CHINNASAMY AWARD NO : 2230 OF 2005
INDUSTRIAL COURT OF MALAYSIA CASE NO : 15/4-173/02 BETWEEN MALAYSIAN AIRLINE SYSTEM BHD. AND KARTHIGESU A/L V. CHINNASAMY AWARD NO : 2230 OF 2005 Before : N. RAJASEGARAN - Chairman (Sitting Alone) Venue:
More informationMarch IR Law Free Newsletter. IR Law provides the following advisory/consultation services to Members and Non-Members*: Disciplinary proceedings
IRLaw CORPORATE INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS CONSULTANCY Dear Readers, This is our Free Newsletter, examining some updates on the new Public Holiday for Sarawak, Personal Data Protection Act (PDPA) and our usual
More informationABDUL AZIZ ISMAIL & ORS v. ROYAL SELANGOR CLUB
Abdul Aziz Ismail & Ors [2015] 2 MELR v. Royal Selangor Club 325 ABDUL AZIZ ISMAIL & ORS v. ROYAL SELANGOR CLUB Industrial Court, Kuala Lumpur Eddie Yeo Soon Chye Award No: 327 of 2015 [Case No: 13(25)(22)(25)/4-1255/2011]
More informationINDUSTRIAL COURT OF MALAYSIA CASE NO. : 1/1-8/18 BETWEEN NATIONAL UNION OF HOTEL, BAR & RESTAURANT WORKERS, PENINSULAR MALAYSIA AND
INDUSTRIAL COURT OF MALAYSIA CASE NO. : 1/1-8/18 BETWEEN NATIONAL UNION OF HOTEL, BAR & RESTAURANT WORKERS, PENINSULAR MALAYSIA AND ALOR SETAR HOLIDAY VILLA SDN. BHD. AWARD NO. : 1375 OF 2018 CORAM: YA
More informationINDUSTRIAL COURT OF MALAYSIA CASE NO: 15/4-388/14 BETWEEN YASMIN BINTI HARON AND EXTOL CORPORATION (M) SDN. BHD. AWARD NO: 342 OF 2017
INDUSTRIAL COURT OF MALAYSIA CASE NO: 15/4-388/14 BETWEEN YASMIN BINTI HARON AND EXTOL CORPORATION (M) SDN. BHD. AWARD NO: 342 OF 2017 Before : Y.A. PUAN REIHANA BTE ABD.RAZAK CHAIRMAN (SITTING ALONE)
More informationINDUSTRIAL COURT OF MALAYSIA CASE NO : 2/4-346/15 BETWEEN MOHAMED HASLAM BIN ABDUL RAZAK AND PERUSAHAAN OTOMOBIL NASIONAL SDN BHD
INDUSTRIAL COURT OF MALAYSIA CASE NO : 2/4-346/15 BETWEEN MOHAMED HASLAM BIN ABDUL RAZAK AND PERUSAHAAN OTOMOBIL NASIONAL SDN BHD AWARD NO. 552 OF 2018 Before : Y.A. PUAN ROSENANI BINTI ABD RAHMAN - Chairman
More informationADAM ABDULLAH v. MALAYSIAN OXYGEN BHD
353 ADAM ABDULLAH v. MALAYSIAN OXYGEN BHD Industrial Court, Kuala Lumpur Mary Shakila G Azariah Award No: 521 of 2012 [Case No: 24/4-906/10] 24 April 2012 Dismissal: Retrenchment - Redundancy - Company
More informationLEE PEI SZE v. SWIFTLET GARDEN SDN BHD
482 LEE PEI SZE v. SWIFTLET GARDEN SDN BHD Industrial Court, Johor Duncan Sikodol Award No: 167 of 2017 [Case No: 16/4-664/16] 23 January 2017 Dismissal: Probationer Pleadings Allegations of misconduct
More informationAWARD NO. : 1614 OF 2018
INDUSTRIAL COURT OF MALAYSIA CASE NO. : BETWEEN NAZREEN BEGUM BINTI MOHAMED YAACOB AND PETRONAS / PETRONAS CHEMICALS GROUP BERHAD AWARD NO. : 1614 OF 2018 Before Venue : PUAN ANNA NG FUI CHOO - Chairman
More informationINDUSTRIAL COURT OF MALAYSIA CASE NO : 15/4-3029/04 BETWEEN TETUAN B. S. SIDHU & CO. AND SHAMSIAH BINTI ASRI AWARD NO : 227 OF 2006
INDUSTRIAL COURT OF MALAYSIA CASE NO : 15/4-3029/04 BETWEEN TETUAN B. S. SIDHU & CO. AND SHAMSIAH BINTI ASRI AWARD NO : 227 OF 2006 Before : N. RAJASEGARAN - CHAIRMAN (Sitting Alone) Venue : Industrial
More informationDALAM MAHKAMAH TINGGI MALAYA DI SHAH ALAM DALAM NEGERI SELANGOR DARUL EHSAN, MALAYSIA KES KEBANKRAPAN NO: 29NCC /2015
DALAM MAHKAMAH TINGGI MALAYA DI SHAH ALAM DALAM NEGERI SELANGOR DARUL EHSAN, MALAYSIA KES KEBANKRAPAN NO: 29NCC-10794-12/2015 BERKENAAN : KAMALASAN A/L TANGARAJOO (NO. K/P: 850522-08-6763). PENGHUTANG
More informationTHE ROLE, FUNCTIONS AND POWERS OF THE INDUSTRIAL COURT IN RELATION TO RETRENCHMENT, TERMINATION AND DISMISSAL TREVOR GEORGE DE SILVA 14TH JANUARY 2009
THE ROLE, FUNCTIONS AND POWERS OF THE INDUSTRIAL COURT IN RELATION TO RETRENCHMENT, TERMINATION AND DISMISSAL TREVOR GEORGE DE SILVA 14TH JANUARY 2009 JW MARRIOT 1 The long title of the Industrial Relations
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF MALAYSIA (APPELLATE JURISDICTION) CIVIL APPEAL NO.: W-02(IM)(NCC) /2014 BETWEEN
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF MALAYSIA (APPELLATE JURISDICTION) CIVIL APPEAL NO.: W-02(IM)(NCC)-676-04/2014 BETWEEN ZAMIL STEEL VIETNAM BUILDINGS CO. LTD. - APPELLANT AND G.T.K. BERHAD (Company No.: 198500-P)
More informationAttestation of Registrable Instruments (Mining) LAWS OF MALAYSIA REPRINT. Act 387 ATTESTATION OF REGISTRABLE INSTRUMENTS (MINING) ACT 1960
Attestation of Registrable Instruments (Mining) 1 LAWS OF MALAYSIA REPRINT Act 387 ATTESTATION OF REGISTRABLE INSTRUMENTS (MINING) ACT 1960 Incorporating all amendments up to 1 January 2006 PUBLISHED BY
More informationCIRCULAR 2017/02. Tick ( ) where applicable. Please reply to any of Sara Worldwide Vacations Berhad Member Service Centres by 20 September 2017.
CIRCULAR 2017/02 Dear Valued Members, Warmest greetings from Easturia Vacation Club! 1. EASTURIA VACATION CLUB 6 th MEMBERS ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING We are pleased to inform that the 6 th Members Annual
More informationINDUSTRIAL COURT OF MALAYSIA 6(18)/4-1353/12 BETWEEN SHANMUGAM A/L SUPRAMANIAM AND MALAYSIAN AIRLINES SYSTEM BERHAD AWARD NO: 819 OF 2018
INDUSTRIAL COURT OF MALAYSIA 6(18)/4-1353/12 BETWEEN SHANMUGAM A/L SUPRAMANIAM AND MALAYSIAN AIRLINES SYSTEM BERHAD AWARD NO: 819 OF 2018 Before Venue : Y.A. TUAN GULAM MUHIADDEEN BIN ABDUL AZIZ - CHAIRMAN
More informationTHE INDUSTRIAL COURT OF MALAYSIA CASE NO: 5/4-1546/05 BETWEEN ENCIK SAIFUL NAFIS BIN SHARIFF AND AIRASIA SDN BHD AWARD NO: 2239 OF 2007
THE INDUSTRIAL COURT OF MALAYSIA CASE NO: 5/4-1546/05 BETWEEN ENCIK SAIFUL NAFIS BIN SHARIFF AND AIRASIA SDN BHD AWARD NO: 2239 OF 2007 Before : TUAN CHEW SOO HO - CHAIRMAN Venue : The Industrial Court
More informationINDUSTRIAL COURT OF MALAYSIA CASE NO. 4(23)/4-772/13 BETWEEN KAMAL AZIZUL BIN AZIZ AND AMBANK (M) BERHAD AWARD NO : 475 OF 2017
INDUSTRIAL COURT OF MALAYSIA CASE NO. 4(23)/4-772/13 BETWEEN KAMAL AZIZUL BIN AZIZ AND AMBANK (M) BERHAD AWARD NO : 475 OF 2017 BEFORE: VENUE: Y.A. PUAN SAROJINI A/P KANDASAMY Chairman (Sitting alone)
More informationTAWARAN MENGISI JAWATAN SECRETARY GENERAL (SG) OF AFRO-ASIAN RURAL DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION (AARDO)
Ketua Eksekutif FELCRA Berhad Wisma FELCRA Lot PT 4780, Jalan Rejang 50722 KUALA LUMPUR Lembaga Kemajuan Johor Tenggara (KEJORA) Ibu Pejabat KEJORA Jalan Dato' ann, Bandar Penawar 81900 Kota Tinggi,. JOHOR.
More informationGUIDELINES FOR DISPUTE RESOLUTION
MALAYSIAN COMMUNICATIONS AND MULTIMEDIA COMMISSION GUIDELINES FOR DISPUTE RESOLUTION JULY 2003 Malaysian Communications and Multimedia Commission Level 11, Menara Dato Onn PWTC, Jalan Tun Ismail 50480
More informationWong Kian Wah v Ng Kien Boon
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF MALAYSIA Coram: Hamid Sultan Abu Backer, JCA; Abdul Rahman Sebli, JCA; Mary Lim, JCA Wong Kian Wah v Ng Kien Boon Citation: [2018] MYCA 230 Suit Number: Civil Appeal No. W 02(NCVC)(W)
More informationPERINTAH UNIVERSITI DAN KOLEJ UNIVERSITI (PERLEMBAGAAN UNIVERSITI TUN HUSSEIN ONN MALAYSIA) (PINDAAN) 2012
WARTA KERAJAAN PERSEKUTUAN 22 November 2012 22 November 2012 P.U. (A) 401 FEDERAL GOVERNMENT GAZETTE PERINTAH UNIVERSITI DAN KOLEJ UNIVERSITI (PERLEMBAGAAN UNIVERSITI TUN HUSSEIN ONN MALAYSIA) (PINDAAN)
More informationINDUSTRIAL COURT OF MALAYSIA CASE NO : 15/4-1046/02 BETWEEN METROD (MALAYSIA) BHD. AND SURADI BIN MD RUSDI AWARD NO : 1299 OF 2005
INDUSTRIAL COURT OF MALAYSIA CASE NO : 15/4-1046/02 BETWEEN METROD (MALAYSIA) BHD. AND SURADI BIN MD RUSDI AWARD NO : 1299 OF 2005 Before : N. RAJASEGARAN - Chairman (Sitting Alone) Venue : Industrial
More informationPERATURAN-PERATURAN PERTUBUHAN
PERSATUAN HOTEL BUDGET MALAYSIA (Malaysia Budget Hotel Association) PERATURAN-PERATURAN PERTUBUHAN Rules &Regulation ''\ PPM/WP 434/01(2) PPP/WP (128/01 (PERTUBUHAN 3) MALAYSIA AKTA PERTUBUHAN 1966 PERATURAN-PERATURAN
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF MALAYSIA (APPELLATE JURISDICTION) CIVIL APPEAL NO: K-01(NCVC)(W)-10-01/2014 BETWEEN
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF MALAYSIA (APPELLATE JURISDICTION) CIVIL APPEAL NO: K-01(NCVC)(W)-10-01/2014 BETWEEN PERBADANAN KEMAJUAN NEGERI KEDAH APPELLANT AND CBH RUBBER SDN. BHD. (COMPANY NO: 945835-A)
More informationMMC Engineering Group Bhd & Anor v Wayss & Freytag (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd
CIDB Construction Law Report 2015 MMC Engineering Group Bhd & Anor v Wayss & Freytag (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd HIGH COURT, KUALA LUMPUR ORIGINATING SUMMONS NO: 24C(ARB) 2 05/2013 MARY LIM THIAM SUAN J 11 MAY
More informationDALAM MAHKAMAH TINGGI MALAYA DI KUALA LUMPUR (BAHAGIAN RAYUAN DAN KUASA-KUASA KHAS) PERMOHONAN SEMAKAN KEHAKIMAN: WA /2017
DALAM MAHKAMAH TINGGI MALAYA DI KUALA LUMPUR (BAHAGIAN RAYUAN DAN KUASA-KUASA KHAS) PERMOHONAN SEMAKAN KEHAKIMAN: WA-25-193-07/2017 Dalam perkara sesuatu keputusan Ketua Pengarah Kastam dan Eksais yang
More informationMAHKAMAH TINGGI MALAYA DI SHAH ALAM DALAM NEGERI SELANGOR DARUL EHSAN GUAMAN SIVIL NO: 22C-20-09/2014 ANTARA PERBADANAN KEMAJUAN NEGERI SELANGOR DAN
MAHKAMAH TINGGI MALAYA DI SHAH ALAM DALAM NEGERI SELANGOR DARUL EHSAN GUAMAN SIVIL NO: 22C--09/14 ANTARA PERBADANAN KEMAJUAN NEGERI SELANGOR PLAINTIF DAN 1. PROJEK LEBUHRAYA USAHASAMA BERHAD (No. Syarikat
More informationEMPLOYMENT APPLICATION FORM ABX CORPORATION SDN BHD ( V) & UTS GROUP OF COMPANIES
INSTRUCTIONS: 1. Please read the application form carefully and complete it in BLOCK LETTERS. 2. Please return the completed application form together with one (1) recent passport size photograph and photocopy
More informationPRESS SUMMARY BETWEEN AND JUSTICES: ARIFIN ZAKARIA (CJ), RAUS SHARIF (PCA), HASAN LAH, ZAINUN ALI AND ABU SAMAH NORDIN (FCJJ)
PRESS SUMMARY 25 FEBRUARY 2016 BETWEEN 1. PALM SPRING JOINT MANAGEMENT BODY 2. PERBADANAN PENGURUSAN PALM SPRING @ DAMANSARA APPELLANTS AND 1. MUAFAKAT KEKAL SDN BHD 2. PESURUHJAYA BANGUNAN MAJLIS BANDARAYA
More informationZELAN BERHAD (Company No: V) (Incorporated in Malaysia)
MINUTES OF THE FORTY-FIRST (41 ST ) ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING ( AGM OR MEETING ) OF ZELAN BERHAD ( ZELAN OR COMPANY ) HELD AT MAHKOTA II, BR LEVEL, HOTEL ISTANA, 73, JALAN RAJA CHULAN, 50250 KUALA LUMPUR
More informationMALAYSIA IN THE HIGH COURT IN SABAH AND SARAWAK AT KUCHING SUIT NO II BETWEEN AND
MALAYSIA IN THE HIGH COURT IN SABAH AND SARAWAK AT KUCHING SUIT NO. 22-74-08-II BETWEEN CMS ENERGY SDN BHD (Company No.34309-A) Level 6, Wisma Mahmud Jalan Sungai Sarawak 930 Kuching, Sarawak Plaintiff
More informationHeld: Per Abdul Hamid Mohamad JCA
1 M/S LAKSAMANA REALTY SDN BHD v. GOH ENG HWA COURT OF APPEAL, KUALA LUMPUR ABDUL HAMID MOHAMAD, JCA; MOHD NOOR AHMAD, JCA; ABDUL AZIZ MOHAMAD, JCA CIVIL APPEAL NOS: M-02-347-2001, M-02-388-2001 & M-02-530-2001
More informationINDUSTRIAL COURT OF MALAYSIA CASE NO : 15/1-154/02 BETWEEN AMPAC MARKETING SDN. BHD. AND. JULIUS A/L J. ANTHONYSAMY (deceased) AWARD NO : 40 OF 2006
INDUSTRIAL COURT OF MALAYSIA CASE NO : 15/1-154/02 BETWEEN AMPAC MARKETING SDN. BHD. AND JULIUS A/L J. ANTHONYSAMY (deceased) AWARD NO : 40 OF 2006 Before : N. RAJASEGARAN - CHAIRMAN LIM WENG KHUAN - EMPLOYERS
More informationINDUSTRIAL COURT OF MALAYSIA CASE NO : 15/4-629/01 BETWEEN SHARIKAT PERMODALAN KEBANGSAAN BERHAD AND MOHAMED JOHARI BIN ABDUL RAHMAN
INDUSTRIAL COURT OF MALAYSIA CASE NO : 15/4-629/01 BETWEEN SHARIKAT PERMODALAN KEBANGSAAN BERHAD AND MOHAMED JOHARI BIN ABDUL RAHMAN AWARD NO : 921 OF 2004 Before : N. RAJASEGARAN - Chairman (Sitting Alone)
More informationINDUSTRIAL COURT OF MALAYSIA CASE NO: 18/4-352/2008 TEOH CHYE LYN ALLSTAFF OUTSOURCING SDN. BHD. AWARD NO: 577 OF 2010
INDUSTRIAL COURT OF MALAYSIA CASE NO: 18/4-352/2008 TEOH CHYE LYN V. ALLSTAFF OUTSOURCING SDN. BHD. AWARD NO: 577 OF 2010 Before : Y.A. RAJENDRAN NAYAGAM CHAIRMAN (Sitting Alone) Venue : Industrial Court
More informationINDUSTRIAL COURT OF MALAYSIA CASE NO: 25/4-278/06 ENCIK RAVINDAR SINGH A/L JESWANT SINGH AND ISLAND AIR SDN BHD AWARD NO: 175 OF 2009
INDUSTRIAL COURT OF MALAYSIA CASE NO: 25/4-278/06 ENCIK RAVINDAR SINGH A/L JESWANT SINGH AND ISLAND AIR SDN BHD AWARD NO: 175 OF 2009 BEFORE VENUE : DATO JALALDIN HJ. HUSSAIN CHAIRMAN (Sitting Alone) :
More informationPROFILE OF CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTUAL CLAIMS NUR JAZLIANNA BINTI SAMSUDIN UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MALAYSIA
PROFILE OF CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTUAL CLAIMS NUR JAZLIANNA BINTI SAMSUDIN UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MALAYSIA PROFILE OF CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTUAL CLAIMS NUR JAZLIANNA BINTI SAMSUDIN A master s project report submitted
More informationUNCONSCIONABLE CALL OF PERFORMANCE BOND WAN NOOR SOLEHHA BINTI WAN NIK FACULTY OF BUILT ENVIRONMENT UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MALAYSIA
ii UNCONSCIONABLE CALL OF PERFORMANCE BOND WAN NOOR SOLEHHA BINTI WAN NIK FACULTY OF BUILT ENVIRONMENT UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MALAYSIA iii UNCONSCIONABLE CALL OF PERFORMANCE BOND WAN NOOR SOLEHHA BINTI WAN
More informationAWARD NO. : 1089 OF 2016
INDUSTRIAL COURT OF MALAYSIA CASE NO. : 3/4-106/15 BETWEEN INTAN SOFIA BINTI ZAINUDDIN AND TOI TOI SERVICES SDN. BHD. AWARD NO. : 1089 OF 2016 Before Venue : PUAN ANNA NG FUI CHOO - Chairman (Sitting Alone)
More informationPERMOHONAN PEMBAHARUAN PERMIT APPLICATION FOR A RENEWAL OF PERMIT
Borang SPAN/P/2 JADUAL KEEMPAT [subkaedah 8(2)/subrule 8(2)] AKTA INDUSTRI PERKHIDMATAN AIR 2006 WATER SERVICES INDUSTRY ACT 2006 KAEDAH-KAEDAH INDUSTRI PERKHIDMATAN AIR (PERMIT) 2007 WATER SERVICES INDUSTRY
More informationKAEDAH-KAEDAH MAHKAMAH PERSEKUTUAN (PINDAAN) 2011 RULES OF THE FEDERAL COURT (AMENDMENT) 2011 DISIARKAN OLEH/ JABATAN PEGUAM NEGARA/ PUBLISHED BY
WARTA KERAJAAN PERSE EKUTUAN 29 Jun 2011 29 June 2011 P.U. (A) 208 FEDERAL GOVERNMENT GAZETTE KAEDAH-KAEDAH MAHKAMAH PERSEKUTUAN (PINDAAN) 2011 RULES OF THE FEDERAL COURT (AMENDMENT) 2011 DISIARKAN OLEH/
More informationDALAM MAHKAMAH TINGGI MALAYA DI KUALA LUMPUR DALAM WILAYAH PERSEKUTUAN, MALAYSIA [GUAMAN SIVIL NO: S ] (NO 2) ANTARA
DALAM MAHKAMAH TINGGI MALAYA DI KUALA LUMPUR DALAM WILAYAH PERSEKUTUAN, MALAYSIA [GUAMAN SIVIL NO: S-22-868-2008] (NO 2) ANTARA PALM SPRING JMB (SIJIL NO: 0046) Suatu badan yang ditubuhkan di bawah Akta
More information2. The following group of persons shall not be eligible to participate in this Contest:
MAYBELLINE MALAYSIA #MAYBELLINETOPSPENDER CONTEST Eligibility 1. This MAYBELLINE MALAYSIA #MAYBELLINETOPSPENDER CONTEST [ Contest ] is organised by L Oreal Malaysia Sdn. Bhd. [328418-A] [ the Organiser
More informationIN THE INDUSTRIAL COURT OF MALAYSIA CASE NO: 9/4-2260/06 BETWEEN KHOO EE PENG AND GALAXY AUTOMATION SDN BHD AWARD NO: 656 OF 2009
IN THE INDUSTRIAL COURT OF MALAYSIA CASE NO: 9/4-2260/06 BETWEEN KHOO EE PENG AND GALAXY AUTOMATION SDN BHD AWARD NO: 656 OF 2009 Before : MOHD AMIN FIRDAUS ABDULLAH - CHAIRMAN Venue : INDUSTRIAL COURT
More informationINDUSTRIAL COURT OF MALAYSIA CASE NO: 26(18)/4-2404/2004 BETWEEN SYARIKAT MALAYSIA WOOD INDUSTRIES SDN BHD AND KANAPADDY GOPAL AWARD NO: 897 OF 2009
INDUSTRIAL COURT OF MALAYSIA CASE NO: 26(18)/4-2404/2004 BETWEEN SYARIKAT MALAYSIA WOOD INDUSTRIES SDN BHD AND KANAPADDY GOPAL AWARD NO: 897 OF 2009 Before Venue : AHMAD TERRIRUDIN BIN MOHD SALLEH CHAIRMAN
More informationDALAM MAHKAMAH RAYUAN MALAYSIA (BIDANGKUSASA RAYUAN) RAYUAN SIVIL NO: W
DALAM MAHKAMAH RAYUAN MALAYSIA (BIDANGKUSASA RAYUAN) RAYUAN SIVIL NO: W-02-2133-2011 ANTARA BOUNTY DYNAMICS SDN BHD (dahulunya dikenali sebagai MEDA DEVELOPMENT SDN BHD) PERAYU DAN CHOW TAT MING DAN 175
More informationMajlis Perbandaran Seremban v Era Baru Sdn Bhd and Another Appeal
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF MALAYSIA Coram: Tengku Maimun Tuan Mat, JCA; Abdul Rahman Sebli, JCA; Suraya Othman, JCA Majlis Perbandaran Seremban v Era Baru Sdn Bhd and Another Appeal Citation: [2018] MYCA
More informationATLAN HOLDINGS BHD. ( W) (Incorporated in Malaysia)
Extract of Minutes of the Twenty-Eighth Annual General Meeting of the Company held at the Lily Room, 1st Floor, The Zon All Suites Residences On The Park, 161-D, Jalan Ampang, 50450 Kuala Lumpur on Wednesday,
More informationMALAYSIA IN THE HIGH COURT IN SABAH AND SARAWAK AT FEDERAL TERRITORY, LABUAN. CIVIL CASE NO: LBN-24NCvC-6/ BETWEEN SEJATI SDN. BHD..
MALAYSIA IN THE HIGH COURT IN SABAH AND SARAWAK AT FEDERAL TERRITORY, LABUAN CIVIL CASE NO: LBN-24NCvC-6/8-2016 BETWEEN SEJATI SDN. BHD.. PLAINTIFF AND DIRECTOR OF LANDS AND SURVEYS.. 1 ST DEFENDANT SABAH
More informationIN THE FEDERAL COURT OF MALAYSIA (APPELLATE JURISDICTION) CIVIL APPEAL NO: 01(i)-15-04/2014(C) BETWEEN SERUAN GEMILANG MAKMUR SDN BHD AND SUMMARY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF MALAYSIA (APPELLATE JURISDICTION) CIVIL APPEAL NO: 01(i)-15-04/2014(C) BETWEEN SERUAN GEMILANG MAKMUR SDN BHD.. APPELLANT AND 1. KERAJAAN NEGERI PAHANG DARUL MAKMUR 2. PENGARAH
More informationINDUSTRIAL COURT OF MALAYSIA CASE NO:15/4-399/01 BETWEEN CAPETRONIC (MALAYSIA) CORPORATION SDN. BHD. AND ALAN NG LI HONG AWARD NO.
INDUSTRIAL COURT OF MALAYSIA CASE NO:15/4-399/01 BETWEEN CAPETRONIC (MALAYSIA) CORPORATION SDN. BHD. AND ALAN NG LI HONG AWARD NO.: 400 OF 2004 Before : N. RAJASEGARAN - Chairman (Sitting Alone) Venue
More informationADMISSION APPLICATION FORM (FOR INTERNATIONAL STUDENT
DK119(W) Please return the duly completed form & required documents to Registry Malaysian Institute of Art (535370-K) No. 294-299, Jalan Bandar 11, Taman Melawati, 53100 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia +603 4108
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF MALAYA AT SHAH ALAM IN THE STATE OF SELANGOR DARUL EHSAN [CIVIL SUIT NO: ] BETWEEN
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MALAYA AT SHAH ALAM IN THE STATE OF SELANGOR DARUL EHSAN [CIVIL SUIT NO: 22-510-2003] BETWEEN A & AT ADVANCED POWER SYSTEMS SDN BHD... PLAINTIFF AND PERNEC CORPORATION BHD (NO SYARIKAT:
More informationKAEDAH-KAEDAH MAHKAMAH TINGGI (PINDAAN) 2011 RULES OF THE HIGH COURT (AMENDMENT) 2011 DISIARKAN OLEH/ JABATAN PEGUAM NEGARA/ PUBLISHED BY
WARTA KERAJAAN PERSEKUTUAN 29 Jun 2011 29 June 2011 P.U. (A) 210 FEDERAL GOVERNMENT GAZETTE KAEDAH-KAEDAH MAHKAMAH TINGGI (PINDAAN) 2011 RULES OF THE HIGH COURT (AMENDMENT) 2011 DISIARKAN OLEH/ PUBLISHED
More informationLAWS OF MALAYSIA. Act A1140
LAWS OF MALAYSIA Act A1140 INDUSTRIAL DESIGNS (AMENDMENT) ACT 2002 2 Laws of Malaysia ACT A1140 Date of Royal Assent... 14 January 2002 Date of publication in the Gazette......... 24 January 2002 Publisher
More informationthe court has jurisdiction to grant a mandatory injunction on an ex parte application in urgent and exceptional cases;
[1986] 1 MLJ 256 BANK ISLAM MALAYSIA BHD v TINTA PRESS SDN BHD & ORS OCJ KUALA LUMPUR ZAKARIA YATIM J CIVIL SUIT NO C2518 OF 1984 20 August 1985 Practice and Procedure Interlocutory mandatory injunction
More informationDALAM MAHKAMAH TINGGI MALAYA DI SHAH ALAM DALAM NEGERI SELANGOR DARUL EHSAN, MALAYSIA KES KEBANKRAPAN NO: /2013
DALAM MAHKAMAH TINGGI MALAYA DI SHAH ALAM DALAM NEGERI SELANGOR DARUL EHSAN, MALAYSIA KES KEBANKRAPAN NO: 29-3300-03/2013 PER : YASMIN PEREMA BINTI ABDULLAH (NO. K/P: 730427-05-5030). PERAYU/ PENGHUTANG
More informationPENYERTAAN SOSIAL Social Participation
Perarakan Hari Kebangsaan (National Day Parade) PENYERTAAN SOSIAL Social Participation Penyertaan sosial boleh meningkatkan kualiti hidup kerana ia mencerminkan komitmen dan kerelaan orang ramai untuk
More informationILANGOVAN KRISHNAN v. SHIYA SDN BHD
374 ILANGOVAN KRISHNAN v. SHIYA SDN BHD Industrial Court, Johor Mohd Azari Harun Award No: 515 of 2016 [Case No: 16/4-157/15] 27 April 2016 Dismissal: Misconduct due to poor performance Claimant dismissed
More informationANCOM LOGISTICS BERHAD (6614-W) (Incorporated in Malaysia)
(Incorporated in Malaysia) MINUTES OF THE 52 ND ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING OF THE COMPANY HELD AT SELANGOR BALLROOM 1, DORSETT GRAND SUBANG, JALAN SS12/1, 47500 SUBANG JAYA SELANGOR DARUL EHSAN ON THURSDAY,
More informationPERKHIDMATAN UTAMA. Kod Dokumen: SOK/PIC/SS08 CHECKLIST FOR SPECIAL PASS APPLICATION. Name: Passport No: Expiry Date of passport: d d / m m / y y y y
PERKHIDMATAN UTAMA PUTRA INTERNATIONAL (PUSAT ANTARABANGSA) UNIVERSITI PUTRA MALAYSIA 43400 UPM Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia Tel: 603-8946 6048 / 6198 E-mail: intl@upm.edu.my Kod Dokumen: SOK/PIC/SS08 CHECKLIST
More informationNotice 0f Annual General Meeting
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT the 49 th Annual General Meeting of the Company will be held at Concorde Ballroom 1, Lobby Level, Concorde Hotel, Jalan Sultan Ismail, 50250 Kuala Lumpur on Friday, 21 April
More informationIREKA CORPORATION BERHAD
Page 1 of 7 IREKA CORPORATION BERHAD (Co. No. 25882A) (Incorporated in Malaysia) EXTRACT OF THE MINUTES OF THE FORTYFIRST ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING OF THE COMPANY HELD AT DEWAN BERJAYA, BUKIT KIARA EQUESTRIAN
More information(Company No D) (Incorporated in Malaysia)
(Company No. 132493-D) (Incorporated in Malaysia) SUMMARY RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE EXTRAORDINARY GENERAL MEETING IN ACCORDANCE WITH PARAGRAPH 9.21(2) OF BURSA MALAYSIA MAIN MARKET LISTING REQUIREMENTS
More information294 GOODS VEHICLE LEVY ACT
Goods Vehicle Levy 1 LAWS OF MALAYSIA REPRINT Act 294 GOODS VEHICLE LEVY ACT 1983 Incorporating all amendments up to 1 January 2006 PUBLISHED BY THE COMMISSIONER OF LAW REVISION, MALAYSIA UNDER THE AUTHORITY
More informationATLAN HOLDINGS BHD. ( W) (Incorporated in Malaysia)
Extract of Minutes of the Twenty-Ninth Annual General Meeting of the Company held at the Meeting Room, Wisma Atlan, 8 Persiaran Kampung Jawa, 11900 Bayan Lepas, Penang on Tuesday, 28 August 2018 at 11:00
More informationBETWEEN. LAI CHENG OOI (f) (the executrix of the estate of Lee Tain Lee Thien Chiung, deceased) AND
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL, MALAYSIA AT PUTRAJAYA (APPELLATE JURISDICTION) CIVIL APPEAL NO. S-01(IM)(NCVC)-145-04/2016 [Kota Kinabalu High Court OS No. BKI-24NCVC-44/5-2015] BETWEEN LAI CHENG OOI (f) (the
More informationJUDGMENT. Low Hop Bing JCA:
DANCOM TELECOMMUNICATION (M) SDN BHD v. UNIASIA GENERAL INSURANCE BHD COURT OF APPEAL, PUTRAJAYA LOW HOP BING JCA, HELILIAH YUSOF JCA, ABDUL MALIK ISHAK JCA [CIVIL APPEAL NO: W-02-259-2005] 1 AUGUST 2008
More informationNOTICE OF THE 19 TH ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT the 19 th Annual General Meeting (AGM) of Malaysia Airports Holdings Berhad (MAHB or the Company) will be held at Gateway Ballroom, Level 1, Sama-Sama Hotel, KL International
More informationDALAM MAHKAMAH RAYUAN MALAYSIA (BIDANGKUASA RAYUAN) RAYUAN SIVIL NO. W ANTARA DAN
DALAM MAHKAMAH RAYUAN MALAYSIA (BIDANGKUASA RAYUAN) RAYUAN SIVIL NO. W 02 1329 2005 ANTARA UNITED OVERSEAS BANK (MALAYSIA) SDN BHD DAN UJA SDN BHD PERAYU RESPONDEN (Dalam perkara Saman Pemula No. S3-24-2162-2004
More informationECM LIBRA FINANCIAL GROUP BERHAD ( ECM or the Company ) (Company No K) (Incorporated in Malaysia)
ECM LIBRA FINANCIAL GROUP BERHAD ( ECM or the Company ) (Company No. 713570-K) (Incorporated in Malaysia) MINUTES of the Thirteenth Annual General Meeting of ECM Libra Financial Group Berhad held at Dewan
More informationNotice of Annual General Meeting
Annual Report 2018 233 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT the Tenth of MAXIS BERHAD ( the Company ) will be held on Thursday, 25 April 2019 at 10.00 a.m. at Connexion Conference & Event Centre, Grand Nexus (Level
More information(Company No T) (Incorporated in Malaysia) AMENDMENTS. To: The Shareholders of Affin Bank Berhad
(Company No. 25046-T) (Incorporated in Malaysia) AMENDMENTS To: The Shareholders of Affin Bank Berhad Dear Sir/Madam Reference is made to the 2017 Annual Report of Affin Bank Berhad. We wish to inform
More informationEQUITABLE REMEDY: SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE THEN LEE LIAN UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MALAYSIA
EQUITABLE REMEDY: SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE THEN LEE LIAN UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MALAYSIA EQUITABLE REMEDY: SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE THEN LEE LIAN A project report submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements
More informationINDUSTRIAL COURT OF MALAYSIA CASE NO : 15/4-166/02 BETWEEN BINA GOODYEAR BERHAD AND SUBRAMANIAM A/L KANAIAPPAN AWARD NO : 773 OF 2004
INDUSTRIAL COURT OF MALAYSIA CASE NO : 15/4-166/02 BETWEEN BINA GOODYEAR BERHAD AND SUBRAMANIAM A/L KANAIAPPAN AWARD NO : 773 OF 2004 Before : N. RAJASEGARAN - Chairman (Sitting Alone) Venue: : Industrial
More informationSUNWAY CONSTRUCTION GROUP BERHAD (Company No W) (Incorporation in Malaysia)
SUNWAY CONSTRUCTION GROUP BERHAD (Company No. 1108506-W) (Incorporation in Malaysia) EXTRACT OF THE MINUTES OF THE THIRD ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING OF SUNWAY CONSTRUCTION GROUP BERHAD HELD AT GRAND BAHAMAS,
More information356 MARRIED WOMEN AND CHILDREN (ENFORCEMENT OF MAINTENANCE) ACT
LAWS OF MALAYSIA REPRINT Act 356 MARRIED WOMEN AND CHILDREN (ENFORCEMENT OF MAINTENANCE) ACT 1968 Incorporating all amendments up to 1 January 2006 PUBLISHED BY THE COMMISSIONER OF LAW REVISION, MALAYSIA
More informationProposed Amendment in Section 28 of The Contract Act, 1872
Introduction Proposed Amendment in Section 28 of The Contract Act, 1872 Any undertaking between two individuals or groups of individuals results in a contract. From morning till evening, day in and day
More informationNotice of Annual General Meeting
MAXIS BERHAD (Company No. 867573-A) (Incorporated in Malaysia) Notice of Annual General Meeting NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT the Ninth Annual General Meeting of MAXIS BERHAD ( the Company ) will be held
More informationBANKRUPTCY (AMENDMENT) ACT
Bankruptcy (Amendment) 1 LAWS OF MALAYSIA BANKRUPTCY (AMENDMENT) ACT 2017 2 Laws of Malaysia Date of Royal Assent...... 10 May 2017 Date of publication in the Gazette......... 18 May 2017 Publisher s Copyright
More informationPilecon Engineering Bhd ABDUL KADIR SULAIMAN, JCA ARIFIN ZAKARIA, JCA NIK HASHIM NIK AB. RAHMAN, JCA 23 FEBRUARY 2007
COURT OF APPEAL, MALAYSIA Bintulu Development Authority - vs - Coram Pilecon Engineering Bhd ABDUL KADIR SULAIMAN, JCA ARIFIN ZAKARIA, JCA NIK HASHIM NIK AB. RAHMAN, JCA 23 FEBRUARY 2007 Judgment of the
More informationDecision of the Dispute Resolution Chamber
Decision of the Dispute Resolution Chamber passed in Zurich, Switzerland, on 21 May 2015, in the following composition: Geoff Thompson (England), Chairman Damir Vrbanovic (Croatia), member Alejandro Marón
More informationPROGRAM PERTUKARAN PELAJAR DAN JARINGAN PENDIDIKAN ANTARABANGSA 2016
PROGRAM PERTUKARAN PELAJAR DAN JARINGAN PENDIDIKAN ANTARABANGSA 2016 Sila Tanda Program yang anda ingin sertai; Program Ke Jepun Siri ( ) Program Ke Korea Siri ( ) London Siri ( ) Australia Siri ( ) Europe
More informationD.R. 40/2006 RANG UNDANG-UNDANG. b e r n a m a. Suatu Akta untuk meminda Akta Kastam DIPERBUAT oleh Parlimen Malaysia seperti yang berikut:
D.R. 40/2006 RANG UNDANG-UNDANG b e r n a m a Suatu Akta untuk meminda Akta Kastam 1967. [ ] DIPERBUAT oleh Parlimen Malaysia seperti yang berikut: Tajuk ringkas dan permulaan kuat kuasa 1. (1) Akta ini
More informationDALAM MAHKAMAH RAYUAN MALAYSIA (BIDANG KUASA RAYUAN) [RAYUAN SIVIL NO: W-02(NCVC)(W) /2013] ANTARA DAN
DALAM MAHKAMAH RAYUAN MALAYSIA (BIDANG KUASA RAYUAN) [RAYUAN SIVIL NO: W-02(NCVC)(W)-143-01/2013] ANTARA 1. MUAFAKAT KEKAL SDN BHD 2. PERBADANAN PENGURUSAN PALM SPRING @ DAMANSARA... PERAYU DAN 1. PESURUHJAYA
More informationSetem (Pindaan) 1 D.R. 14/2010 RANG UNDANG-UNDANG. b e r n a m a. Suatu Akta untuk meminda Akta Setem Tajuk ringkas dan permulaan kuat kuasa
Setem (Pindaan) 1 D.R. 14/2010 RANG UNDANG-UNDANG b e r n a m a Suatu Akta untuk meminda Akta Setem 1949. [ ] DIPERBUAT oleh Parlimen Malaysia seperti yang berikut: Tajuk ringkas dan permulaan kuat kuasa
More information381 REGISTRATION OF GUESTS ACT
Registration of Guests 1 LAWS OF MALAYSIA REPRINT Act 381 REGISTRATION OF GUESTS ACT 1965 Incorporating all amendments up to 1 January 2006 PUBLISHED BY THE COMMISSIONER OF LAW REVISION, MALAYSIA UNDER
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No. 298 of 2013 ------- Md. Rizwan Akhtar son of Late Md. Suleman, resident of Ahmad Lane, Azad Basti, Gumla, P.O, P.S. and District: Gumla... Petitioner
More informationAPPLICATION OF ENGLISH LAW IN MALAYSIA 3.1Introduction The application of English Law in Malaysia is restricted under the Civil law Act 1956.
APPLICATION OF ENGLISH LAW IN MALAYSIA 3.1Introduction The application of English Law in Malaysia is restricted under the Civil law Act 1956. The common law of English and rules of equity is only applicable
More information(RD/T&C/SDB/ENG/JUN2016) Page 1 of 5
Setem Hasil Revenue CIMB BANK BERHAD (13491-P) Stamp PERJANJIAN SEWA PETI SIMPANAN KESELAMATAN / AGREEMENT FOR HIRE OF SAFE DEPOSIT BOX No.: CIMB Bank Berhad (13491-P) (selepas ini dirujuk sebagai Bank
More informationDistr. LIMITED. AT/DEC/968 3 August 2000 ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL. Judgement No. 968
United Nations AT Administrative Tribunal Distr. LIMITED AT/DEC/968 3 August 2000 ORIGINAL: ENGLISH ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL Judgement No. 968 Case No. 1074: ABDUL RAHIM Against: The Commissioner-General
More informationWhistleblower Protection 1 LAWS OF MALAYSIA. Act 711 WHISTLEBLOWER PROTECTION ACT 2010
Whistleblower Protection 1 LAWS OF MALAYSIA Act 711 WHISTLEBLOWER PROTECTION ACT 2010 2 Laws of Malaysia ACT 711 Date of Royal Assent...... 2 June 2010 Date of publication in the Gazette......... 10 June
More informationBRIGHT PACKAGING INDUSTRY BERHAD
THIS CIRCULAR IS IMPORTANT AND REQUIRES YOUR IMMEDIATE ATTENTION. If you are in any doubt as to the course of action to be taken, you should consult your stockbroker, bank manager, solicitor, accountant
More information015e.fm Page 1 Monday, March 27, :41 AM LAWS OF MALAYSIA REPRINT. Act 15 SEDITION ACT Incorporating all amendments up to 1 January 2006
015e.fm Page 1 Monday, March 27, 2006 11:41 AM LAWS OF MALAYSIA REPRINT Act 15 SEDITION ACT 1948 Incorporating all amendments up to 1 January 2006 PUBLISHED BY THE COMMISSIONER OF LAW REVISION, MALAYSIA
More informationLand Conservation LAWS OF MALAYSIA REPRINT. Act 385 LAND CONSERVATION ACT 1960
Land Conservation 1 LAWS OF MALAYSIA REPRINT Act 385 LAND CONSERVATION ACT 1960 Incorporating all amendments up to 1 January 2006 PUBLISHED BY THE COMMISSIONER OF LAW REVISION, MALAYSIA UNDER THE AUTHORITY
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL NO Of 2011 SRI MAHABIR PROSAD CHOUDHARY...APPELLANT(S) VERSUS
1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA REPORTABLE CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 8320 Of 2011 SRI MAHABIR PROSAD CHOUDHARY...APPELLANT(S) VERSUS M/S. OCTAVIUS TEA AND INDUSTRIES LTD. AND ANR....RESPONDENT(S)
More informationINDUSTRIAL COURT OF MALAYSIA CASE NO : 15/4-864/02 BETWEEN MALAYSIAN WETLANDS FOUNDATION AND DEVENDIRAN S.T. MANI AWARD NO : 917 OF 2005
INDUSTRIAL COURT OF MALAYSIA CASE NO : 15/4-864/02 BETWEEN MALAYSIAN WETLANDS FOUNDATION AND DEVENDIRAN S.T. MANI AWARD NO : 917 OF 2005 Before : N. RAJASEGARAN - Chairman (Sitting Alone) Venue : Industrial
More information159 EMPLOYMENT INFORMATION ACT
LAWS OF MALAYSIA REPRINT Act 159 EMPLOYMENT INFORMATION ACT 1953 Incorporating all amendments up to 1 January 2006 PUBLISHED BY THE COMMISSIONER OF LAW REVISION, MALAYSIA UNDER THE AUTHORITY OF THE REVISION
More informationINDUSTRIAL COURT OF MALAYSIA CASE NO : 15/4-170/02 BETWEEN SEMANGAT RAKYAT SDN. BHD. AND
INDUSTRIAL COURT OF MALAYSIA CASE NO : 15/4-170/02 BETWEEN SEMANGAT RAKYAT SDN. BHD. AND JESUMARAN ANTHONY A/L J. MARIADASS @ MUHAMAD ADAM JESU ABDULLAH AWARD NO : 766 OF 2004 Before : N. RAJASEGARAN -
More information