MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF PETITION AND MOTION TO VACATE ARBITRATION AWARD PURSUANT TO CPLR 7511

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF PETITION AND MOTION TO VACATE ARBITRATION AWARD PURSUANT TO CPLR 7511"

Transcription

1 NEW YORK SUPREME COURT COUNTY OF NEW YORK x MARK SAM KOLTA, Petitioner, -against- Index No.: KEITH EDWARD CONDEMI, Respondent x MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF PETITION AND MOTION TO VACATE ARBITRATION AWARD PURSUANT TO CPLR 7511 Barry M. Bordetsky Law Offices of Barry M. Bordetsky 570 Lexington Avenue, 24 th Floor New York, New York Tel. No.: (212) of 14

2 TABLE OF CONTENTS FACTS...1 THE LEGAL STANDARD...5 A. The Award Musts Be Vacated As It Was Procured Through Misconduct By FINRA And The Arbitrator In Manifest Disregarding The Law...6 B. The Arbitrator Exceeded Her Powers...9 CONCLUSION of 14

3 TABLE OF AUTHORITIES CASE PAGE Application of Inyx, Inc. v. Urlich Bartke, WL (Sup. Ct., N.Y. Cty. 2008) DM.C. Const. Corp. v. A. Leo Nash Steel Corp., A.D.2d 1040 (2nd Dept. 1976) rev d other grounds 41 N.Y.2d 855, 362 N.E.2d 260 (1977). Goldfinger v. Lisker, N.Y.2d 225, 508 N.Y.S.2d 159, 161 (1986) Good Samaritan Hospital v National Health & Human Services Employees Union, A.D3d 721, 893 N.Y.S.2d 192 (2 nd Dept. 2010) Matter of Kowaleski...9 (N.Y. State Dept. of Corr. Servs.), 16 N.Y.3d 85, 917 N.Y.S.2d 82 (2010) Rockwell Global Capital, LLC v. Rotman,...6, Slip Op 30921(U) (Sup. Ct., N.Y.Cty, 2013) Salvano v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., N.Y.2d 173, 623 N.Y.S.2d 790 (1995) FINRA RULE PAGE (c) , (e)...9 CPLR PAGE CPLR 7511(b)(1) of 14

4 Petitioner Mark Kolta ( Petitioner ) hereby submits this Memorandum of Law in support of his motion and petition to vacate a Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. ( FINRA ) Dispute Resolution arbitration award rendered by arbitrator Krista Gotlieb (the Arbitrator ) on January 7, 2017 (the Award ) in the proceeding Keith Edward Condemi v. Mark Sam Kolta, (FINRA No ) ( Arbitration ). The Award was rendered in contravention to FINRA Rules on the bare arbitration pleadings without hearing that would have allowed for an evidentiary submission. The Award must be vacated because: (i) it was procured through misconduct by the Arbitrator and is prejudicial to the rights of the Petitioner; (ii) FINRA and the Arbitrator exceeded their power or so imperfectly executed it that a final and definite award upon the subject matter was not made; and (iii) by ignoring FINRA rules, and also by not allowing opportunity for evidence and legal argument to be submitted, the Arbitrator manifestly disregarded the law. FACTS On or about July 27, 2015, respondent initiated the Arbitration by filing with FINRA a statement of claim ( Arbitration Claim ) relating to alleged acts and omissions of Mr. Kolta occurring in New York, New York. Affidavit of Mark Kolta, March 17, 2017 ( Kolta Aff. ) 6. At the time of the alleged acts and omissions, both parties were employed with Cetera Financial Group ( Cetera ). Id. 7. The Arbitration Claim sought damages as follows: (i) actual damages in the amount of $45,500; (ii) attorneys fees in the amount of $25,000; and (iii) filing fees in the amount of $600. Id. 8, Exhibit of 14

5 When this case was received by FINRA, it was identified as a Simplified Arbitration under FINRA Rule because the claim sought damages under $50,000. Id. 6, Exhibit 2; Id. 9. The relevant portions of the FINRA Rule applicable to the petition are: (a) Applicability of Rule This rule applies to arbitrations involving $50,000 or less, exclusive of interest and expenses. Except as otherwise provided in this rule, all provisions of the Code apply to such arbitrations. (e) Increases in Amount in Dispute If any pleading increases the amount in dispute to more than $50,000, the arbitration will no longer be administered under this rule, and the regular provisions of the Code will apply. If an arbitrator has been appointed, that arbitrator will remain on the panel. If a three-arbitrator panel is required or requested under Rule 13401, the remaining arbitrators will be appointed by the Director in accordance with Rule 13406(b). If no arbitrator has been appointed, the entire panel will be appointed in accordance with the Neutral List Selection System. As to 13800(e), FINRA makes it clear in its Arbitrator s Guide (the forums interpretation of the FINRA Code) that arbitrators, when faced with multiple pleadings that bring the dispute above $50,000: If any pleading increases the amount in dispute to more than $50,000, the arbitration will no longer be administered under the simplified rules, and the regular provisions of the Code will apply. Id. 23, Exhibit 8. The Arbitrator s Guide clarifies that the amount of the counterclaim is to be added to the amount of the originating claim to determine if the case is to remain in the Simplified Arbitration track. Id. On October 16, 2015, Mr. Kolta filed an Answer and Counterclaims. Of critical importance to this motion is the fact that the counterclaim sought an award of $35,000. Id. 11, Exhibit 4. With the additional pleading, FINRA had before it a dispute based upon the multiple pleadings that sought compensatory damages in a cumulative amount of $87,500. Id., Exhibits 2 and 4. Pursuant to the FINRA Code, with the addition of Mr. Kolta s counterclaims, the case was no longer permitted to continue as a Simplified Arbitration. Id. 9, Exhibit 3. Rather, pursuant 2 5 of 14

6 to the very arbitration code that serves as the basis for the arbitration agreement, FINRA should have, but did not, remove the case from the Simplified Arbitration track and administer this case under the regular provisions of the FINRA Code. Id., Exhibit 2. To be clear, this is not an instance where the FINRA received the Answer and Counterclaims of Mr. Kolta and indicated there were certain deficiencies, such as the failure to plead damages that was then not cured. Id. 14, Exhibit 5. Indeed, FINRA Rule 13307(c) provides for such an instance: The Director will notify the party making the counterclaim, cross claim or third party claim of any deficiencies in writing. If all deficiencies are not corrected within 30 days from the time the party making the counterclaim, cross claim or third party claim receives notice of the deficiency, the panel will proceed with the arbitration as though the deficient counterclaim, cross claim or third party claim had not been made. FINRA did not issue a deficiency notice to Mr. Kolta, and did not convert the arbitration into a regular arbitration despite the clear mandate of the Code. Id. Pursuant to the FINRA Code, what was required to take place was the following once the counterclaim for $37,000 was filed: (i) a pre-hearing conference call (FINRA Rule 13500) to set hearing dates; (ii) parties have the opportunity to conduct discovery (FINRA Rules ); (iii) a prehearing exchange of documents and witness lists (FINRA Rule 13415); and finally (iv) a hearing on the merits must be held (FINRA Rule 13600). Id. 16, Exhibit 6. None of the required procedures set forth under FINRA Code was followed by FINRA, precluding Mr. Kolta from a fair hearing. Id. 17. There was no pre-hearing conference call. Id. There was no setting of discovery or hearing dates. Id. There was no discovery. Id. There was no pre-hearing exchange of witness and exhibit lists. Id. Nor was there a hearing on the merits. Id. 3 6 of 14

7 Instead, after failing to comply with its mandated procedures, this case sat with FINRA for approximately fourteen months. On January 7, 2017, the Arbitrator issued the Award solely upon the pleadings in contravention to FINRA Code 13800(e). Id. 19. As set forth in the Award, the arbitrator rendered her decision not just on the claims ( Respondent is liable and shall pay to the Claimant... ) but also on the counterclaims ( Respondent s counterclaim is denied in its entirety ). Id., Exhibit 1. After the Award was issued, Mr. Kolta informed FINRA the Award was issued in contravention to FINRA s own rules. Id. 21, Exhibit 7. FINRA s response should be troubling to this Court, as it defines a situation where the proverbial watchdog is not following the very rules it sets as the basis for the arbitration process that the parties are required to follow. The FINRA response, in relevant part, reads: Id. (emphasis added) Please note that the amount of the counterclaim was not added to the total amount of the customer s claim. Therefore, Respondent s counterclaim in the amount of $35, did not preclude the Claimant from continuing to proceed under the simplified rule. This statement from FINRA proves FINRA and the Arbitrator ignored Rule 13800(e) and FINRA s instructions in its Arbitrator s Guide regarding the rule that specifically delineates the fact that the amount sought in a counterclaim is to be added to the amount sought in the moving claim to determine whether cumulative damages figure removes the case from a Simplified Arbitration to one governed by the regular FINRA Code. Id. 23. By its response FINRA conceded it did not comply with its own rule and instruction. FINRA refused to comply with the very rules that it is tasked by the SEC to enforce, and in doing so, manifestly disregarded its own rules and permitted the Arbitrator to exceed her 4 7 of 14

8 authority and render the Award on the pleadings in contravention to the clear and unambiguous FINRA Code. As a result, Mr. Kolta has been prejudiced by FINRA s preclusion of his agreed upon rights afforded under the FINRA Code. FINRA and the Arbitrator removed from Mr. Kolta the opportunity to have a fair hearing to defend the claims and prosecute the counterclaims. The result necessitates the granting of the instant motion and petition. THE LEGAL STANDARD Under New York law a court shall vacate an arbitration award if it finds the rights of the moving party was prejudiced by: (i) corruption, fraud or misconduct in procuring the award; (ii) partiality of the arbitrator; or (iii) where the arbitrator exceeded her power so imperfectly executed it that a final and definite award was not made. N.Y. CPLR 75ll(b)(l). Petitioner recognizes courts normally defer to the decisions of arbitrators. Courts emphasize the goal of preserving the process of arbitration as opposed to second-guessing factual determinations by the arbitrators. Precisely because arbitration awards are subject to such judicial deference, it is imperative that the integrity of the process, as opposed to the correctness of the individual decision, be zealously safeguarded. Goldfinger v. Lisker, 68 N.Y.2d 225, 230, 508 N.Y.S.2d 159, 161 (1986). However, abrogation of an arbitration party s procedural and substantive rights under the agreed upon arbitration rules may be characterized as exceeding the scope of the arbitrator s powers. In such case, the award can be vacated even in the absence of prejudice. See Salvano v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., 85 N.Y.2d 173, 183, 623 N.Y.S.2d 790, 795 (1995). The failure of FINRA and the Arbitrator to apply FINRA s procedural rules is evidence that FINRA and the Arbitrator exceeded their authority and exercised that authority imperfectly. In addition, the Arbitrator failed to allow for a hearing, discovery or the 5 8 of 14

9 submission of other materials and/or briefs, which demonstrates that the Arbitrator manifestly disregarded the law. Such violations of the FINRA Code - - by FINRA and the Arbitrator - - must be corrected by vacatur of the Award. As set forth herein in greater detail, the Award should be vacated because: (i) it was procured through misconduct by the FINRA and the Arbitrator and is prejudicial to the rights of the Petitioner; (ii) FINRA and the Arbitrator exceeded their authority by rendering a decision in contravention to clear rules they are required to follow; and (iii) FINRA and the Arbitrator manifestly disregarded the law. As a result of FINRA s and the Arbitrator s failures, Petitioner due process rights were prejudiced. A. The Award Must Be Vacated As It Was Procured Through Misconduct By FINRA And The Arbitrator In Manifest Disregarding The Law FINRA s and the Arbitrator s inexplicable failure to follow and enforce the FINRA Code forced the Arbitration to be improperly administered in contradiction to the clear and unambiguous arbitration rules agreed upon by the parties. This failure denied Mr. Kolta due process, including by withholding the prehearing procedures required, discovery, and a hearing, all to his substantial prejudice. These failures necessitate vacatur of the Award. This is not a case of first impression for this Court. This Court has previously vacated a FINRA arbitration award on almost identical grounds as presented here, ruling as to FINRA s failure to follow the FINRA Code regarding removing a case from the Simplified Arbitration track, that an Arbitrator s disregard of the fundamental right to be heard as recognized by FINRA s own rules leads this court to conclude that vacatur is warranted. Rockwell Global Capital, LLC v. Rotman, 2013 Slip Op 30921(U) (Sup. Ct., N.Y.Cty, 2013)(Bransten, J) citing Application of Inyx, Inc. v. Urlich Bartke, 2008 WL (Sup. Ct., N.Y. Cty. 2008). 6 9 of 14

10 Affirmation of Barry M. Bordetsky, March 17, 2017 ( Bordetsky Aff. ), Exhibit 1. Rockwell is dispositive and controlling on the motion. Like the instant case, Rockwell was a respondent in a FINRA arbitration. Rockwell Global Capital, LLC, 2013 Slip Op 30921(U) at 1. That arbitration was filed in 2011 against Rockwell seeking $25,000 in damages. Id. Because of the dollar amount FINRA proceeded under the Simplified Arbitration track. 1 Id. p. 2. The respondent Rockwell filed an answer and counterclaim of $100,000. Id. FINRA failed and refused to remove the case from the Simplified Arbitration track, instead submitting the case to the arbitrator to rule on the pleadings. Id. An award was subsequently rendered against Rockwell. Id. p. 4. Rockwell petitioned to vacate the arbitration award on the grounds FINRA and the arbitrator manifestly disregarded the law and exceeded their authority by ignoring the language in the FINRA Code and failing to reclassify the case under the regular FINRA code. Id. p. 5. This Court in Rockwell held a counterclaim falls into the category of any pleading under FINRA rule and the failure to reclassify the arbitration pursuant to the regular provisions of FINRA resulted in FINRA and the Arbitrator exceeding their authority. Id. pp The Rockwell Court rightfully vacated the arbitration award, holding, in relevant part: Had the Arbitrator reclassified the Arbitration, as FINRA rules require, Petitioners would have been afforded the opportunity to conduct discovery, present evidence and have a hearing, rather than have the merits of their claims decided unexpectedly on the pleadings alone... the arbitrators disregard of the fundamental right to be heard as recognized by FINRA s own rules leads this court to conclude that vacatur is warranted.. Id. pp. 6, 7. 1 The Rockwell case involved a customer arbitration, with the Simplified Arbitration rule governing the case. Id. The series FINRA Code governs customer disputes, while the series FINRA Code governs industry disputes. FINRA Code and mirror each other. Bordetsky Aff. Exhibit 2. This Court may take judicial notice of FINRA s rules. See DM.C. Const. Corp. v. A. Leo Nash Steel Corp., 51 A.D.2d 1040, fn. 1 (2nd Dept. 1976) rev d other grounds 41 N.Y.2d 855, 362 N.E.2d 260 (1977) of 14

11 The same result must take place here. Respondent in the Arbitration initiated the arbitration by and through the filing of the Arbitration Claim seeking damages in the amount of $45,500. FINRA preliminarily determined to categorize the arbitration as a simplified arbitration to be administered pursuant to the FINRA Rule FINRA Rule applicable to the petition (emphasis added) are: (a) Applicability of Rule This rule applies to arbitrations involving $50,000 or less, exclusive of interest and expenses. Except as otherwise provided in this rule, all provisions of the Code apply to such arbitrations. (e) Increases in Amount in Dispute If any pleading increases the amount in dispute to more than $50,000, the arbitration will no longer be administered under this rule, and the regular provisions of the Code will apply. If an arbitrator has been appointed, that arbitrator will remain on the panel. If a three-arbitrator panel is required or requested under Rule 13401, the remaining arbitrators will be appointed by the Director in accordance with Rule 13406(b). If no arbitrator has been appointed, the entire panel will be appointed in accordance with the Neutral List Selection System. Petitioner filed an Answer and Counterclaims seeking $37,500 in damages. Kolta Aff. 11. Both the FINRA Code 13800(e) and the Arbitrator s Guide dictates if any of the pleadings raises the amount in controversy in the entire case to over $50,000, the case is to be removed from the Simplified Arbitration track and set in the regular track pursuant to the FINRA Code. Kolta Aff. Exhibit 3. This never took place, because, as conceded by FINRA, the Arbitrator disregarded the amount of the counterclaims in contravention to the FINRA Code. Kolta Aff. Exhibit 7. Mr. Kolta was thus denied a fair hearing based upon the agreed upon terms of the arbitration code. Like Rockwell, here FINRA and the Arbitrator manifestly disregarded and ignored the FINRA Code, the very agreement and rules that govern the Arbitration, prejudicing Mr. Kolta 8 11 of 14

12 by precluding him from conducting discovery and having a hearing on the merits. Like Rockwell, this result necessitates vacatur of the Award. B. The Arbitrator Exceeded Her Powers The Arbitrator exceeded her power and manifestly disregarded the law in issuing the Award. An arbitrator exceeds his power if the award: (i) violates a strong public policy, (ii) is irrational, or (iii) clearly exceeds a specifically enumerated limitation on the arbitrator s power. Matter of Kowaleski (N.Y. State Dept. of Corr. Servs.), 16 N.Y.3d 85, 90, 917 N.Y.S.2d 82, 85 (2010) (award vacated because the arbitrator refused to allow the employee to interpose a defense proscribed by the law); accord Good Samaritan Hospital v National Health & Human Services Employees Union, 69 A.D3d 721, 722, 893 N.Y.S.2d 192 (2 nd Dept. 2010)(vacating arbitration award on grounds arbitrator exceeded its authority by failing to following the parties clear an unambiguous arbitration agreement outside the scope of the arbitrator s specifically enumerated limitations). The procedural provisions governing the classification of arbitrations as set forth in the FINRA Code act as limitations on the arbitrator s power. The Arbitrator had an obligation to comply with FINRA Rule 13800(e) and remove the case from the Simplified Arbitration track. The Arbitrator did not comply with her obligation. The procedural rules at issue are clear, well-defined and applicable to the underlying arbitration. More troubling is the fact that FINRA and the Arbitrator appear to have known the rule, but intentionally disregarded it by not taking into consideration the amount of the counterclaim. Kolta Aff. Exhibit 7. The acts and omissions by FINRA and the Arbitrator resulted in them exceeding their authority based upon their manifest disregard of the law. Both FINRA and the Arbitrator failed 9 12 of 14

13 to comply with the proper procedures agreed upon by the parties, and thereafter, rendered the Award despite such egregious and substantive error necessitating vacatur of the Award. CONCLUSION For the foregoing reasons, the Award against Mr. Kolta must be vacated as it was rendered in clear violation of FINRA rules, constituting misconduct by FINRA and the Arbitrator with prejudice to Mr. Kolta; with FINRA and the Arbitrator exceeding their power and/or so imperfectly executing it that a final and definite award upon the subject matter was not made; and in disregard of the law. Dated: New York, New York March 17, 2017 Respectfully submitted, The Law Offices Of Barry M. Bordetsky By: _/s/ Barry Bordetsky Barry M. Bordetsky Counsel for Petitioner Mark Kolta 570 Lexington Avenue, 24 th Floor New York, NY Tel. No.: (212) barry@bordetskylaw.com of 14

14 NEW YORK SUPREME COURT COUNTY OF NEW YORK x MARK SAM KOLTA, -against- Petitioner, Index No.: KEITH EDWARD CONDEMI., Respondent x NOTICE OF PETITION TO VACATE ARBITRATION AWARD PETITION TO VACATE ARBITRATION AWARD AFFIDAVIT OF MARK KOLTA AFFIRMATION OF BARRY M. BORDETSKY MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO VACATE LAW OFFICES OF BARRY M. BORDETSKY 570 Lexington Avenue, 24 th Floor New York, NY Pursuant to 22 NYCRR , the undersigned, an attorney admitted to practice in the courts of New York State, certifies that, upon information and belief and reasonable inquiry, the conentions contained in the annexed document are not frivolous. Dated: March 17, 2017 Service of a copy of the within Dated: Signature: /s/ Barry M. Bordetsky Barry M. Bordetsky is hereby admitted. Attorney(s) for: Notice of Entry: that the within is a (certified) true copy of a in the office of the clerk of the within named court on duly entered Notice of Settlement: That an order of which the within is a true copy will be presented for settlement to the Hon. One of the judges of the within named court, on the day of 201 at. Dated: Yours, etc. 14 of 14

Tri State Consumer Ins. Co. v High Point Prop. & Cas. Co NY Slip Op 33786(U) June 16, 2014 Supreme Court, Nassau County Docket Number:

Tri State Consumer Ins. Co. v High Point Prop. & Cas. Co NY Slip Op 33786(U) June 16, 2014 Supreme Court, Nassau County Docket Number: Tri State Consumer Ins. Co. v High Point Prop. & Cas. Co. 2014 NY Slip Op 33786(U) June 16, 2014 Supreme Court, Nassau County Docket Number: 602814/13 Judge: Antonio I. Brandveen Cases posted with a "30000"

More information

Kahan Jewelry Corp. v First Class Trading, L.P NY Slip Op 30039(U) January 4, 2019 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /2018

Kahan Jewelry Corp. v First Class Trading, L.P NY Slip Op 30039(U) January 4, 2019 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /2018 Kahan Jewelry Corp. v First Class Trading, L.P. 2019 NY Slip Op 30039(U) January 4, 2019 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 650040/2018 Judge: Saliann Scarpulla Cases posted with a "30000" identifier,

More information

Case 1:14-cv LGS Document 15 Filed 04/08/15 Page 1 of 6. : Petitioner, : : : :

Case 1:14-cv LGS Document 15 Filed 04/08/15 Page 1 of 6. : Petitioner, : : : : Case 114-cv-06327-LGS Document 15 Filed 04/08/15 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK --------------------------------------------------------------X ILAN PREIS, Petitioner,

More information

Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. v Financial Indus. Regulatory Auth., Inc NY Slip Op 30017(U) January 5, 2016 Supreme Court, New York

Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. v Financial Indus. Regulatory Auth., Inc NY Slip Op 30017(U) January 5, 2016 Supreme Court, New York Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. v Financial Indus. Regulatory Auth., Inc. 2016 NY Slip Op 30017(U) January 5, 2016 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 162259/15 Judge: Kathryn E. Freed

More information

Wells Fargo Bank N.A. v Webster Bus. Credit Corp NY Slip Op 33850(U) April 13, 2010 Sup Ct, NY County Docket Number: /2009 Judge: Richard

Wells Fargo Bank N.A. v Webster Bus. Credit Corp NY Slip Op 33850(U) April 13, 2010 Sup Ct, NY County Docket Number: /2009 Judge: Richard Wells Fargo Bank N.A. v Webster Bus. Credit Corp. 2010 NY Slip Op 33850(U) April 13, 2010 Sup Ct, NY County Docket Number: 601680/2009 Judge: Richard B. Lowe III Cases posted with a "30000" identifier,

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/10/ :36 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 72 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/10/2017

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/10/ :36 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 72 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/10/2017 FILED NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/10/2017 0136 PM INDEX NO. 655186/2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 72 RECEIVED NYSCEF 05/10/2017 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK -------------------------------------------------------------------

More information

Country-Wide Ins. Co. v TC Acupuncture, P.C NY Slip Op 32290(U) November 24, 2015 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /2015

Country-Wide Ins. Co. v TC Acupuncture, P.C NY Slip Op 32290(U) November 24, 2015 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /2015 Country-Wide Ins. Co. v TC Acupuncture, P.C. 2015 NY Slip Op 32290(U) November 24, 2015 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 652747/2015 Judge: Joan B. Lobis Cases posted with a "30000" identifier,

More information

FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 02/23/ :39 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 64 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/23/2018

FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 02/23/ :39 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 64 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/23/2018 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF KINGS -------------------------------------------------------------------------X â â â â â â â â â â â â -- â â â â â â X DAVID WILLIAMS, Index No.: 507787/2016

More information

Mannucci v Missionary Sisters of the Sacred Heart of Jesus 2011 NY Slip Op 34250(U) January 4, 2011 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number:

Mannucci v Missionary Sisters of the Sacred Heart of Jesus 2011 NY Slip Op 34250(U) January 4, 2011 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Mannucci v Missionary Sisters of the Sacred Heart of Jesus 2011 NY Slip Op 34250(U) January 4, 2011 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 602284/2008 Judge: Eileen Bransten Cases posted with a

More information

Matter of Port Auth. Field Supervisors Assoc. v Port Auth. of N.Y. & N.J NY Slip Op 33337(U) December 15, 2014 Supreme Court, New York County

Matter of Port Auth. Field Supervisors Assoc. v Port Auth. of N.Y. & N.J NY Slip Op 33337(U) December 15, 2014 Supreme Court, New York County Matter of Port Auth. Field Supervisors Assoc. v Port Auth. of N.Y. & N.J. 2014 NY Slip Op 33337(U) December 15, 2014 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 652683/2014 Judge: Cynthia S. Kern Cases

More information

Larsen & Toubro Limited v Millenium Management, Inc NY Slip Op 30163(U) July 21, 2005 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number:

Larsen & Toubro Limited v Millenium Management, Inc NY Slip Op 30163(U) July 21, 2005 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Larsen & Toubro Limited v Millenium Management, Inc. 2005 NY Slip Op 30163(U) July 21, 2005 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 0106534/2002 Judge: Richard B. Lowe Republished from New York State

More information

Matter of Board of Educ. of the William Floyd Union Free School Dist. v Lemay 2007 NY Slip Op 34309(U) September 27, 2007 Supreme Court, Suffolk

Matter of Board of Educ. of the William Floyd Union Free School Dist. v Lemay 2007 NY Slip Op 34309(U) September 27, 2007 Supreme Court, Suffolk Matter of Board of Educ. of the William Floyd Union Free School Dist. v Lemay 2007 NY Slip Op 34309(U) September 27, 2007 Supreme Court, Suffolk County Docket Number: 0011461/2007 Judge: John J.J. Jones

More information

Matter of Sahni v Prudential Equity Group, Inc NY Slip Op 30597(U) December 15, 2006 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /06

Matter of Sahni v Prudential Equity Group, Inc NY Slip Op 30597(U) December 15, 2006 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /06 Matter of Sahni v Prudential Equity Group, Inc. 2006 NY Slip Op 30597(U) December 15, 2006 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 107536/06 Judge: Walter B. Tolub Republished from New York State

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 02/13/ :25 PM INDEX NO /2012 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 155 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/13/2017

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 02/13/ :25 PM INDEX NO /2012 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 155 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/13/2017 FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 02/13/2017 08:25 PM INDE NO. 650440/2012 v. NOTICE OF MOTION FOR SANCTIONS PURSUANT TO CPLR 3126 MOTION MADE BY: RETURN DATE, TIME and PLACE: SUPPORTING PAPERS: RELIEF REQUESTED:

More information

ORDER TO SHOW. NYCTL TRUST, and THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON as Collateral Agent and Custodian for CAUSE

ORDER TO SHOW. NYCTL TRUST, and THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON as Collateral Agent and Custodian for CAUSE At Part of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, held in and for the County of Kings, at the Courthouse, located at 360 Adams Street, Brooklyn, NY, on the day of April 2018. P R E S E N T: HON. Justice

More information

Matter of Hartford v City of New York 2010 NY Slip Op 32143(U) August 10, 2010 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /10 Judge: Eileen

Matter of Hartford v City of New York 2010 NY Slip Op 32143(U) August 10, 2010 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /10 Judge: Eileen Matter of Hartford v City of New York 2010 NY Slip Op 32143(U) August 10, 2010 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 104116/10 Judge: Eileen A. Rakower Republished from New York State Unified Court

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/21/ :07 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 45 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/21/2016

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/21/ :07 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 45 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/21/2016 FILED NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/21/2016 0507 PM INDEX NO. 651546/2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 45 RECEIVED NYSCEF 09/21/2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK NATIONAL CREDIT UNION ADMINISTRATION

More information

Wisehart v Kiesel 2005 NY Slip Op 30533(U) August 24, 2005 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /05 Judge: Sherry Klein Heitler Cases

Wisehart v Kiesel 2005 NY Slip Op 30533(U) August 24, 2005 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /05 Judge: Sherry Klein Heitler Cases Wisehart v Kiesel 2005 NY Slip Op 30533(U) August 24, 2005 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 101619/05 Judge: Sherry Klein Heitler Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip

More information

Selvi Singapore Trading PTE Ltd. v Harris Freeman Asia Ltd NY Slip Op 31554(U) July 14, 2016 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number:

Selvi Singapore Trading PTE Ltd. v Harris Freeman Asia Ltd NY Slip Op 31554(U) July 14, 2016 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Selvi Singapore Trading PTE Ltd. v Harris Freeman Asia Ltd. 2016 NY Slip Op 31554(U) July 14, 2016 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 650782/2016 Judge: Anil C. Singh Cases posted with a "30000"

More information

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE, that upon the annexed affirmation of JEENA R. BELIL, dated XXXXXXX 4,

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE, that upon the annexed affirmation of JEENA R. BELIL, dated XXXXXXX 4, SURPEME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF KINGS ----------------------------------------------------------------------------X XXXXXXXXXXX AND XXXXXXXXXXX, -against- Plaintiffs XXXXXX and XXXXXXX,

More information

Merchant Cash & Capital, LLC v G&E Asian Am. Enter., Inc NY Slip Op 31592(U) July 29, 2016 Supreme Court, Nassau County Docket Number:

Merchant Cash & Capital, LLC v G&E Asian Am. Enter., Inc NY Slip Op 31592(U) July 29, 2016 Supreme Court, Nassau County Docket Number: Merchant Cash & Capital, LLC v G&E Asian Am. Enter., Inc. 2016 NY Slip Op 31592(U) July 29, 2016 Supreme Court, Nassau County Docket Number: 605800-15 Judge: Jerome C. Murphy Cases posted with a "30000"

More information

Barbizon (2007) Group Ltd. v Barbizon/63 Condominium 2016 NY Slip Op 31973(U) October 17, 2016 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number:

Barbizon (2007) Group Ltd. v Barbizon/63 Condominium 2016 NY Slip Op 31973(U) October 17, 2016 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Barbizon (2007) Group Ltd. v Barbizon/63 Condominium 2016 NY Slip Op 31973(U) October 17, 2016 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 155217/2016 Judge: Manuel J. Mendez Cases posted with a "30000"

More information

Power v O'Brien 2019 NY Slip Op 30066(U) January 8, 2019 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /2018 Judge: Carol R.

Power v O'Brien 2019 NY Slip Op 30066(U) January 8, 2019 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /2018 Judge: Carol R. Power v O'Brien 2019 NY Slip Op 30066(U) January 8, 2019 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 653523/2018 Judge: Carol R. Edmead Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip Op 30001(U),

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 02/21/ :54 PM INDEX NO /2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 20 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/21/2017

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 02/21/ :54 PM INDEX NO /2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 20 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/21/2017 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK --------------------------------------------------------------------X CARINE RAWSON-FISCHER, individually and on behalf of MODA EQUESTRE, LLC,

More information

CHARLES N. INTERNICOLA, ESQ. CASE LITIGATION REPORT

CHARLES N. INTERNICOLA, ESQ. CASE LITIGATION REPORT CHARLES N. INTERNICOLA, ESQ. CASE LITIGATION REPORT For Additional Information, Contact: Charles N. Internicola, Esq. 800.976.4904 cinternicola@dddilaw.com www.businessandfranchiselaw.com * RE: DISMISSAL

More information

Siegel v Engel Burman Senior Hous. at E. Meadow, LLC 2010 NY Slip Op 33833(U) October 21, 2010 Sup Ct, Nassau County Docket Number: 6709/09 Judge:

Siegel v Engel Burman Senior Hous. at E. Meadow, LLC 2010 NY Slip Op 33833(U) October 21, 2010 Sup Ct, Nassau County Docket Number: 6709/09 Judge: Siegel v Engel Burman Senior Hous. at E. Meadow, LLC 2010 NY Slip Op 33833(U) October 21, 2010 Sup Ct, Nassau County Docket Number: 6709/09 Judge: Antonio I. Brandveen Cases posted with a "30000" identifier,

More information

Matter of Community Related Servs., Inc. v New York State Dept. of Health 2010 NY Slip Op 31349(U) May 27, 2010 Sup Ct, NY County Docket Number:

Matter of Community Related Servs., Inc. v New York State Dept. of Health 2010 NY Slip Op 31349(U) May 27, 2010 Sup Ct, NY County Docket Number: Matter of Community Related Servs., Inc. v New York State Dept. of Health 2010 NY Slip Op 31349(U) May 27, 2010 Sup Ct, NY County Docket Number: 113740/2009 Judge: Shirley Werner Kornreich Republished

More information

Case: 5:10-cv SL Doc #: 20 Filed: 07/15/11 1 of 8. PageID #: 626 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

Case: 5:10-cv SL Doc #: 20 Filed: 07/15/11 1 of 8. PageID #: 626 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION Case: 5:10-cv-02691-SL Doc #: 20 Filed: 07/15/11 1 of 8. PageID #: 626 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION HUGUES GREGO, et al., CASE NO. 5:10CV2691 PLAINTIFFS, JUDGE

More information

The following papers numbered 1 to 6 were marked fully submitted on February 21, 2018:

The following papers numbered 1 to 6 were marked fully submitted on February 21, 2018: SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF RICHMOND ----------------------------------------------------------------------X In the Matter of the Application of ROSALIE CARDINALE, Petitioner, -against-

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/08/ :24 AM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 3 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/08/2017

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/08/ :24 AM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 3 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/08/2017 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK ------------------------------------------------------------------------X EFCO PRODUCTS DEFINED CONTRIBUTION NON-UNION PLAN, EFCO PRODUCTS DEFINED

More information

Platinum Equity Advisors, LLC v SDI, Inc NY Slip Op 33993(U) July 18, 2014 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /2013 Judge:

Platinum Equity Advisors, LLC v SDI, Inc NY Slip Op 33993(U) July 18, 2014 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /2013 Judge: Platinum Equity Advisors, LLC v SDI, Inc. 2014 NY Slip Op 33993(U) July 18, 2014 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 653709/2013 Judge: Eileen Bransten Cases posted with a "30000" identifier,

More information

Tamaso v Amica Mut. Ins. Co NY Slip Op 30053(U) January 2, 2014 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /13 Judge: Karen B.

Tamaso v Amica Mut. Ins. Co NY Slip Op 30053(U) January 2, 2014 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /13 Judge: Karen B. Tamaso v Amica Mut. Ins. Co. 2014 NY Slip Op 30053(U) January 2, 2014 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 502063/13 Judge: Karen B. Rothenberg Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013

More information

Arbitration vs. Litigation

Arbitration vs. Litigation Arbitration vs. Litigation Prepared and Presented by: Steve Williams CHAPTER X ARBITRATION vs. LITIGATION Most owners and contractors want to build jobs, not argue about them. But, as most owners and contractors

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/12/ :47 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 110 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/19/2018

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/12/ :47 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 110 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/19/2018 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK X Index No.: 805071/2016 JEANNETTE SWEAT, -against- Plaintiff, NOTICE OF MOTION ELIAS KASSPIDIS, M.D. and LENOX HILL HOSPITAL, Defendants. -------------------------------------

More information

Devlin v Mendes & Mount, LLP 2011 NY Slip Op 33823(U) July 1, 2011 Sup Ct, Queens County Docket Number: 31433/10 Judge: Denis J. Butler Cases posted

Devlin v Mendes & Mount, LLP 2011 NY Slip Op 33823(U) July 1, 2011 Sup Ct, Queens County Docket Number: 31433/10 Judge: Denis J. Butler Cases posted Devlin v Mendes & Mount, LLP 2011 NY Slip Op 33823(U) July 1, 2011 Sup Ct, Queens County Docket Number: 31433/10 Judge: Denis J. Butler Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip Op 30001(U),

More information

FILED: NASSAU COUNTY CLERK 01/12/ :42 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 46 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/12/2018

FILED: NASSAU COUNTY CLERK 01/12/ :42 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 46 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/12/2018 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NASSAU ----------------------------------------------------X LAURA STAGNITTA, Plaintiff ' -against- MANCHESTER I, LLC., X Oh EUMEM REOUESTED REPLY AFFIRMATION

More information

Nagel v Mongelli 2013 NY Slip Op 31339(U) June 19, 2013 Sup Ct, New York County Docket Number: /2013 Judge: Carol R. Edmead Republished from

Nagel v Mongelli 2013 NY Slip Op 31339(U) June 19, 2013 Sup Ct, New York County Docket Number: /2013 Judge: Carol R. Edmead Republished from Nagel v Mongelli 2013 NY Slip Op 31339(U) June 19, 2013 Sup Ct, New York County Docket Number: 650665/2013 Judge: Carol R. Edmead Republished from New York State Unified Court System's E-Courts Service.

More information

Outdoor Media Corp. v Del Mastro 2011 NY Slip Op 33922(U) November 16, 2011 Sup Ct, NY County Docket Number: /11 Judge: Eileen Bransten Cases

Outdoor Media Corp. v Del Mastro 2011 NY Slip Op 33922(U) November 16, 2011 Sup Ct, NY County Docket Number: /11 Judge: Eileen Bransten Cases Outdoor Media Corp. v Del Mastro 2011 NY Slip Op 33922(U) November 16, 2011 Sup Ct, NY County Docket Number: 650837/11 Judge: Eileen Bransten Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/24/ :27 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 65 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/24/2016

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/24/ :27 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 65 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/24/2016 FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/24/2016 12:27 PM INDEX NO. 651454/2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 65 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/24/2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK CRICKET STOCKHOLDER REP,

More information

Deutsche Bank Natl. Trust Co. v Stevens 2016 NY Slip Op 32404(U) December 7, 2016 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /2008 Judge:

Deutsche Bank Natl. Trust Co. v Stevens 2016 NY Slip Op 32404(U) December 7, 2016 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /2008 Judge: Deutsche Bank Natl. Trust Co. v Stevens 2016 NY Slip Op 32404(U) December 7, 2016 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 104120/2008 Judge: Manuel J. Mendez Cases posted with a "30000" identifier,

More information

RICHARD J. MONTELIONE, J.:

RICHARD J. MONTELIONE, J.: CIVIL COURT OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF KINGS: PART 41 Z.M.S. & Y. Acupuncture, P.C., a/a/o Nicola Farauharson, -against- Geico General Insurance Co., Plaintiff, Defendant. RICHARD J. MONTELIONE,

More information

Counterclaim-Plaintiffs, Counterclaim-Defendants. IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the undersigned

Counterclaim-Plaintiffs, Counterclaim-Defendants. IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the undersigned SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK Plaintiffs, Index No. 651989/2010 Assigned to: Barbara Jaffe, J.S.C. Part 12 BDC FINANCE, L.L.C., et al., Defendants. STIPULATION CONSENTING TO

More information

Country-Wide Ins. Co. v Excel Surgery Ctr., LLC 2018 NY Slip Op 33351(U) December 21, 2018 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /2018

Country-Wide Ins. Co. v Excel Surgery Ctr., LLC 2018 NY Slip Op 33351(U) December 21, 2018 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /2018 Country-Wide Ins. Co. v Excel Surgery Ctr., LLC 2018 NY Slip Op 33351(U) December 21, 2018 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 652741/2018 Judge: Eileen A. Rakower Cases posted with a "30000"

More information

York, affmns under the penalties for perjury, the truth of the following statements:

York, affmns under the penalties for perjury, the truth of the following statements: SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK --------------------------------------------------------------------)( Index No. 655430/2016 PAD PARTNERSHIP CORP. and THE MANAGEMENT GROUP OF

More information

Matter of Ames v McDermott 2010 NY Slip Op 31329(U) June 1, 2010 Sup Ct, Greene County Docket Number: 10/295 Judge: Joseph C. Teresi Republished from

Matter of Ames v McDermott 2010 NY Slip Op 31329(U) June 1, 2010 Sup Ct, Greene County Docket Number: 10/295 Judge: Joseph C. Teresi Republished from Matter of Ames v McDermott 2010 NY Slip Op 31329(U) June 1, 2010 Sup Ct, Greene County Docket Number: 10/295 Judge: Joseph C. Teresi Republished from New York State Unified Court System's E-Courts Service.

More information

Sirs: Let the plaintiff, ELRAC LLC d/b/a ENTERPRISE RENT-A- PRESENT: Hon. GERALD LEBOVITS, J.S.C.

Sirs: Let the plaintiff, ELRAC LLC d/b/a ENTERPRISE RENT-A- PRESENT: Hon. GERALD LEBOVITS, J.S.C. At an IAS Part of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, at IAS General Assignment Part 7: Room 345 held in and for the County, City and State of New York, at the Courthouse located at 60 Centre Street,

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/11/ :18 PM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 35 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/11/2017

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/11/ :18 PM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 35 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/11/2017 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK --------------------------------------------------------------------)( 332 EAST 66TH STREET, INC. and 167 BLEECKER HOLDING CORP. -against- Plaintiffs,

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/09/ :53 PM

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/09/ :53 PM FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/09/2015 03:53 PM INDEX NO. 158764/2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 13 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/09/2015 Exhibit B to the Affirmation of Howard I. Elman, Esq. in Support of Defendants Motion

More information

Award FINRA Office of Dispute Resolution. Hearing Site: New York, New York Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC

Award FINRA Office of Dispute Resolution. Hearing Site: New York, New York Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC Award FINRA Office of Dispute Resolution In the Matter of the Arbitration Between: Claimant Nicholas Brine Finn Case Number: 17-01277 vs. Respondent Hearing Site: New York, New York Credit Suisse Securities

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 01/12/ :51 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 33 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/12/2018

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 01/12/ :51 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 33 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/12/2018 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK: I.A.S. PART 8 = BROOK D. WHITMAN, Index No. 160535/2016 Petitioner, For a Judgment pursuant to Article 78 of the NOTICE OF ENTRY Civil Practice

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/22/ :37 PM INDEX NO /2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 318 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/22/2017 DEFENDANTS EXHIBIT B.

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/22/ :37 PM INDEX NO /2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 318 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/22/2017 DEFENDANTS EXHIBIT B. EFENANTS EXHIBIT B 1 of 17 18 MEMORANUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO STRIKE EFENANTS MOTION TO ISMISS THE COMPLAINT, ATE JUNE 3, 2014 [18 33] FILE: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 06/03/2014 INEX NO.

More information

Kolanu Partners LLP v Sparaggis 2016 NY Slip Op 30987(U) May 31, 2016 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /13 Judge: Shlomo S.

Kolanu Partners LLP v Sparaggis 2016 NY Slip Op 30987(U) May 31, 2016 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /13 Judge: Shlomo S. Kolanu Partners LLP v Sparaggis 2016 NY Slip Op 30987(U) May 31, 2016 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 157289/13 Judge: Shlomo S. Hagler Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/09/ :06 PM INDEX NO /2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 50 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/09/2015

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/09/ :06 PM INDEX NO /2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 50 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/09/2015 FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/09/2015 11:06 PM INDEX NO. 850229/2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 50 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/09/2015 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK --------------------------------------------------------------------------------X

More information

Canzona v Atanasio 2012 NY Slip Op 33823(U) August 16, 2012 Supreme Court, Suffolk County Docket Number: Judge: Thomas F. Whelan Cases posted

Canzona v Atanasio 2012 NY Slip Op 33823(U) August 16, 2012 Supreme Court, Suffolk County Docket Number: Judge: Thomas F. Whelan Cases posted Canzona v Atanasio 2012 NY Slip Op 33823(U) August 16, 2012 Supreme Court, Suffolk County Docket Number: 3424-12 Judge: Thomas F. Whelan Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip Op 30001(U),

More information

Transitional Servs. of N.Y. for Long Is., Inc. v New York State Off. of Mental Health 2013 NY Slip Op 33538(U) December 17, 2013 Supreme Court,

Transitional Servs. of N.Y. for Long Is., Inc. v New York State Off. of Mental Health 2013 NY Slip Op 33538(U) December 17, 2013 Supreme Court, Transitional Servs. of N.Y. for Long Is., Inc. v New York State Off. of Mental Health 2013 NY Slip Op 33538(U) December 17, 2013 Supreme Court, Suffolk County Docket Number: 09-32928 Judge: Daniel Martin

More information

M. Slavin & Sons, LTD v Penny Port, LLC 2013 NY Slip Op 32054(U) August 29, 2013 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /2012 Judge:

M. Slavin & Sons, LTD v Penny Port, LLC 2013 NY Slip Op 32054(U) August 29, 2013 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /2012 Judge: M. Slavin & Sons, LTD v Penny Port, LLC 2013 NY Slip Op 32054(U) August 29, 2013 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 157502/2012 Judge: Eileen A. Rakower Cases posted with a "30000" identifier,

More information

Case 2:16-cv Document 20 Filed 02/23/17 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 150 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA

Case 2:16-cv Document 20 Filed 02/23/17 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 150 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA Case 2:16-cv-10696 Document 20 Filed 02/23/17 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 150 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA CHARLESTON DIVISION CMH HOMES, INC. Petitioner, v.

More information

Indo-Med Commodities, Inc. v Wisell 2014 NY Slip Op 33918(U) September 29, 2014 Supreme Court, Nassau County Docket Number: /14 Judge: F.

Indo-Med Commodities, Inc. v Wisell 2014 NY Slip Op 33918(U) September 29, 2014 Supreme Court, Nassau County Docket Number: /14 Judge: F. Indo-Med Commodities, Inc. v Wisell 2014 NY Slip Op 33918(U) September 29, 2014 Supreme Court, Nassau County Docket Number: 600546/14 Judge: F. Dana Winslow Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e.,

More information

Award FINRA Dispute Resolution

Award FINRA Dispute Resolution Award FINRA Dispute Resolution In the Matter of the Arbitration Between: Claimant William Freas Case Number: 14-03775 vs. Respondent Rockwell Global Capital LLC Hearing Site: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/14/ :34 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 10 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/14/2016

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/14/ :34 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 10 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/14/2016 FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/14/2016 11:34 PM INDEX NO. 655323/2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 10 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/14/2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK 426 REALTY ASSOCIATES, LLC

More information

VanHanehan v St. Thomas 2018 NY Slip Op 32971(U) November 30, 2018 Supreme Court, Wayne County Docket Number: Judge: John B.

VanHanehan v St. Thomas 2018 NY Slip Op 32971(U) November 30, 2018 Supreme Court, Wayne County Docket Number: Judge: John B. VanHanehan v St. Thomas 2018 NY Slip Op 32971(U) November 30, 2018 Supreme Court, Wayne County Docket Number: 79398 Judge: John B. Nesbitt Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip Op

More information

Kureha Am., LLC (U.S.A.) v Mercer Tech., Inc. (U.S.A.) 2016 NY Slip Op 30361(U) February 23, 2016 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number:

Kureha Am., LLC (U.S.A.) v Mercer Tech., Inc. (U.S.A.) 2016 NY Slip Op 30361(U) February 23, 2016 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Kureha Am., LLC (U.S.A.) v Mercer Tech., Inc. (U.S.A.) 2016 NY Slip Op 30361(U) February 23, 2016 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 653783/15 Judge: Kathryn E. Freed Cases posted with a "30000"

More information

Mack-Cali Realty Corp. v NGM Ins. Co NY Slip Op 33719(U) January 16, 2013 Sup Ct, Westchester County Docket Number: 50233/2012 Judge: Sam D.

Mack-Cali Realty Corp. v NGM Ins. Co NY Slip Op 33719(U) January 16, 2013 Sup Ct, Westchester County Docket Number: 50233/2012 Judge: Sam D. Mack-Cali Realty Corp. v NGM Ins. Co. 2013 NY Slip Op 33719(U) January 16, 2013 Sup Ct, Westchester County Docket Number: 50233/2012 Judge: Sam D. Walker Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/10/ :42 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 50 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/10/2018

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/10/ :42 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 50 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/10/2018 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK -----------------------------------------------------X ELRAC, LLC d/b/a ENTERPRISE RENT-A-CAR, Index No.: 158466/2015 Plaintiff, AFFIRMATION IN

More information

Kotlyar v Khlebopros NY Slip Op 51185(U) Decided on August 6, Supreme Court, Kings County. Demarest, J.

Kotlyar v Khlebopros NY Slip Op 51185(U) Decided on August 6, Supreme Court, Kings County. Demarest, J. [*1] Kotlyar v Khlebopros 2014 NY Slip Op 51185(U) Decided on August 6, 2014 Supreme Court, Kings County Demarest, J. Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law 431. This

More information

1. The petitioners hereby allege that Respondent erroneously concluded that the

1. The petitioners hereby allege that Respondent erroneously concluded that the SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------------------------------------X Index #: 100814/14 In the Matter of the Application of NEW YORK CITY COALITION

More information

Water Pro Lawn Sprinklers, Inc. v Mt. Pleasant Agency, Ltd NY Slip Op 32994(U) April 15, 2014 Supreme Court, Westchester County Docket Number:

Water Pro Lawn Sprinklers, Inc. v Mt. Pleasant Agency, Ltd NY Slip Op 32994(U) April 15, 2014 Supreme Court, Westchester County Docket Number: Water Pro Lawn Sprinklers, Inc. v Mt. Pleasant Agency, Ltd. 2014 NY Slip Op 32994(U) April 15, 2014 Supreme Court, Westchester County Docket Number: 55382/12 Judge: James W. Hubert Cases posted with a

More information

Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court Local Rules 29.0 ARBITRATION

Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court Local Rules 29.0 ARBITRATION 29.0 ARBITRATION PART I: CASES FOR SUBMISSION (A) A case shall be placed upon the Arbitration List if so ordered by a Judge after a Case Management Conference, pretrial or settlement conference and the

More information

Matrisciano v Metropolitan Transp. Auth NY Slip Op 33435(U) December 24, 2014 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /2014 Judge:

Matrisciano v Metropolitan Transp. Auth NY Slip Op 33435(U) December 24, 2014 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /2014 Judge: Matrisciano v Metropolitan Transp. Auth. 2014 NY Slip Op 33435(U) December 24, 2014 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 153638/2014 Judge: Michael D. Stallman Cases posted with a "30000" identifier,

More information

Mojica-Perez v Schon 2015 NY Slip Op 31737(U) August 17, 2015 Supreme Court, Bronx County Docket Number: /2009 Judge: Julia I.

Mojica-Perez v Schon 2015 NY Slip Op 31737(U) August 17, 2015 Supreme Court, Bronx County Docket Number: /2009 Judge: Julia I. Mojica-Perez v Schon 2015 NY Slip Op 31737(U) August 17, 2015 Supreme Court, Bronx County Docket Number: 350760/2009 Judge: Julia I. Rodriguez Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip

More information

Policy Admin. Solution, Inc. v QBE Holdings, INC NY Slip Op 32193(U) October 21, 2016 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /2014

Policy Admin. Solution, Inc. v QBE Holdings, INC NY Slip Op 32193(U) October 21, 2016 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /2014 Policy Admin. Solution, Inc. v QBE Holdings, INC. 2016 NY Slip Op 32193(U) October 21, 2016 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 652273/2014 Judge: Charles E. Ramos Cases posted with a "30000"

More information

FILED: QUEENS COUNTY CLERK 11/15/ :34 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 3 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/15/2016

FILED: QUEENS COUNTY CLERK 11/15/ :34 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 3 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/15/2016 FILED: QUEENS COUNTY CLERK 11/15/2016 03:34 PM INDEX NO. 713208/2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 3 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/15/2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF QUEENS Our File Number: 42012961 In the

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION WILLARD REED KELLY, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. 3:15-cv-1110 ) Judge Aleta A. Trauger MORGAN STANLEY SMITH BARNEY, ) LLC;

More information

At Last Sportswear, Inc. v North Am. Textile, Co., LLC 2016 NY Slip Op 31492(U) August 3, 2016 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number:

At Last Sportswear, Inc. v North Am. Textile, Co., LLC 2016 NY Slip Op 31492(U) August 3, 2016 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: At Last Sportswear, Inc. v North Am. Textile, Co., LLC 2016 NY Slip Op 31492(U) August 3, 2016 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 651781/2013 Judge: Eileen Bransten Cases posted with a "30000"

More information

Process and Pitfalls of Confirming Piskei Din as Arbitration Awards

Process and Pitfalls of Confirming Piskei Din as Arbitration Awards Process and Pitfalls of Confirming Piskei Din as Arbitration Awards Dr. Michael A. Helfand Conference on American and Jewish Law, Yeshiva University January 17, 2010 Beth Din of America Agreement to Arbitrate

More information

Mastroianni v Battery Park City Auth NY Slip Op 30031(U) January 4, 2019 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /2013 Judge:

Mastroianni v Battery Park City Auth NY Slip Op 30031(U) January 4, 2019 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /2013 Judge: Mastroianni v Battery Park City Auth. 2019 NY Slip Op 30031(U) January 4, 2019 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 161489/2013 Judge: Robert D. Kalish Cases posted with a "30000" identifier,

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 02/28/ :05 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 45 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/28/2017

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 02/28/ :05 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 45 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/28/2017 LA275-032108948-0005 RS:rs SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------------------------------x LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY and THE FIRST LIBERTY INSURANCE

More information

Chubb Ins. Co. v GEICO Ins. Co.

Chubb Ins. Co. v GEICO Ins. Co. Chubb ns. Co. v GECO ns. Co. 2007 NY Slip Op 32356(U) July 20, 2007 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 0105012/2007 Judge: Marcy L. Kahn Republished from New York State Unified Court System's

More information

Spallone v Spallone 2014 NY Slip Op 32412(U) September 11, 2014 Sup Ct, NY County Docket Number: /2013 Judge: Eileen A. Rakower Cases posted

Spallone v Spallone 2014 NY Slip Op 32412(U) September 11, 2014 Sup Ct, NY County Docket Number: /2013 Judge: Eileen A. Rakower Cases posted Spallone v Spallone 2014 NY Slip Op 32412(U) September 11, 2014 Sup Ct, NY County Docket Number: 160061/2013 Judge: Eileen A. Rakower Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip Op 30001(U),

More information

Abroon v Gurwin Home Care Agency, Inc NY Slip Op 31534(U) May 30, 2012 Supreme Court, Nassau County Docket Number: 22249/10 Judge: Roy S.

Abroon v Gurwin Home Care Agency, Inc NY Slip Op 31534(U) May 30, 2012 Supreme Court, Nassau County Docket Number: 22249/10 Judge: Roy S. Abroon v Gurwin Home Care Agency, Inc. 2012 NY Slip Op 31534(U) May 30, 2012 Supreme Court, Nassau County Docket Number: 22249/10 Judge: Roy S. Mahon Republished from New York State Unified Court System's

More information

Country-Wide Ins. Co. v Excel Surgery Ctr., LLC 2018 NY Slip Op 33260(U) December 12, 2018 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /2018

Country-Wide Ins. Co. v Excel Surgery Ctr., LLC 2018 NY Slip Op 33260(U) December 12, 2018 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /2018 Country-Wide Ins. Co. v Excel Surgery Ctr., LLC 2018 NY Slip Op 33260(U) December 12, 2018 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 652611/2018 Judge: William Franc Perry Cases posted with a "30000"

More information

CM Growth Capital Partners v Penn 2018 NY Slip Op 33430(U) January 2, 2018 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /2016 Judge: O.

CM Growth Capital Partners v Penn 2018 NY Slip Op 33430(U) January 2, 2018 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /2016 Judge: O. CM Growth Capital Partners v Penn 2018 NY Slip Op 33430(U) January 2, 2018 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 653264/2016 Judge: O. Peter Sherwood Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e.,

More information

Case 3:09-cv B Document 17 Filed 06/17/10 Page 1 of 9 PageID 411 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Case 3:09-cv B Document 17 Filed 06/17/10 Page 1 of 9 PageID 411 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION Case 3:09-cv-01860-B Document 17 Filed 06/17/10 Page 1 of 9 PageID 411 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION FLOZELL ADAMS, Plaintiff, v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:09-CV-1860-B

More information

State of New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division Third Judicial Department

State of New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division Third Judicial Department State of New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division Third Judicial Department Decided and Entered: July 2, 2009 506301 In the Matter of the Arbitration between MASSENA CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, Respondent,

More information

FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 11/02/ /16/ :25 04:16 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/02/2016

FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 11/02/ /16/ :25 04:16 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/02/2016 FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 11/02/2016 12/16/2016 03:25 04:16 PM INDEX NO. 508589/2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 50 71 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/02/2016 12/16/2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF KINGS

More information

- against - NOTICE OF MOTION

- against - NOTICE OF MOTION SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF SUFFOLK LONG ISLAND ACCIDENT Document ATTORNEY XX and XX, Index #: XXXXXX Plaintiffs, - against - NOTICE OF MOTION XXXXXX and XXXXXX, And, as Escrow Agent,

More information

Power Air Conditioning Corp. v Batirest 229 LLC 2017 NY Slip Op 30750(U) April 13, 2017 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /2016

Power Air Conditioning Corp. v Batirest 229 LLC 2017 NY Slip Op 30750(U) April 13, 2017 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /2016 Power Air Conditioning Corp. v Batirest 229 LLC 2017 NY Slip Op 30750(U) April 13, 2017 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 156497/2016 Judge: Cynthia S. Kern Cases posted with a "30000" identifier,

More information

8/18/2018 Matter of New Brunswick Theol. Seminary v Van Dyke (2018 NY Slip Op 51204(U)) Matter of New Brunswick Theol. Seminary v Van Dyke

8/18/2018 Matter of New Brunswick Theol. Seminary v Van Dyke (2018 NY Slip Op 51204(U)) Matter of New Brunswick Theol. Seminary v Van Dyke [*1] Matter of New Brunswick Theol. Seminary v Van Dyke 2018 NY Slip Op 51204(U) Decided on August 13, 2018 Supreme Court, Suffolk County Emerson, J. Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 01/31/ :33 AM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 42 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/31/2018

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 01/31/ :33 AM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 42 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/31/2018 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------- JFK HOTEL OWNER, LLC, Index No.: 652364/2017 -XX - against - Plaintiff, HON. GERALD LEBOVITS Part 7 TOURHERO,

More information

Mount Sinai Hosp. v 1998 Alexander Karten Annuity Trust 2013 NY Slip Op 31234(U) June 10, 2013 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number:

Mount Sinai Hosp. v 1998 Alexander Karten Annuity Trust 2013 NY Slip Op 31234(U) June 10, 2013 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Mount Sinai Hosp. v 1998 Alexander Karten Annuity Trust 2013 NY Slip Op 31234(U) June 10, 2013 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 652035/11 Judge: Eileen Bransten Republished from New York State

More information

Matter of Social Serv. Empls. Union, Local 371, Dist. Council 37, AFSCME v New York City Health & Hosps. Corp., Harlem Hosp. Ctr.

Matter of Social Serv. Empls. Union, Local 371, Dist. Council 37, AFSCME v New York City Health & Hosps. Corp., Harlem Hosp. Ctr. Matter of Social Serv. Empls. Union, Local 371, Dist. Council 37, AFSCME v New York City Health & Hosps. Corp., Harlem Hosp. Ctr. 2012 NY Slip Op 31641(U) June 15, 2012 Sup Ct, NY County Docket Number:

More information

Amerimax Capital, LLC v Ender 2017 NY Slip Op 30263(U) February 10, 2017 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /2015 Judge: Manuel J.

Amerimax Capital, LLC v Ender 2017 NY Slip Op 30263(U) February 10, 2017 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /2015 Judge: Manuel J. Amerimax Capital, LLC v Ender 2017 NY Slip Op 30263(U) February 10, 2017 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 158057/2015 Judge: Manuel J. Mendez Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e.,

More information

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK. Respondents. The followine papers have been read on these motions:

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK. Respondents. The followine papers have been read on these motions: 5CQ- SHORT FORM ORDER SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK PRESENT: HON. DENISE L. SHER Acting Supreme Cour Justice In the Matter of the Arbitration between MIRO LEISURE CORP TRIAL/IAS PART 32 NASSAU

More information

FILED: QUEENS COUNTY CLERK 04/25/ :50 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 49 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/25/2017

FILED: QUEENS COUNTY CLERK 04/25/ :50 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 49 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/25/2017 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF QUEENS -------------------------------------------------------------------X MIRIAM E. AGURTO, Index No.: 713230-15 Plaintiff, -against- REPLY AFFIRMATION

More information

Case 8:15-cv PWG Document 34 Filed 07/06/17 Page 1 of 6. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND Southern Division

Case 8:15-cv PWG Document 34 Filed 07/06/17 Page 1 of 6. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND Southern Division Case 8:15-cv-03290-PWG Document 34 Filed 07/06/17 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND Southern Division SAMUEL DAVID YOUNG, * Petitioner, * v. * Civil Case No.:

More information

SUPREME COURT - NASSAU COUNTY - IAS PART 56 PART RULES & PROCEDURES

SUPREME COURT - NASSAU COUNTY - IAS PART 56 PART RULES & PROCEDURES SUPREME COURT - NASSAU COUNTY - IAS PART 56 PART RULES & PROCEDURES Justice: HON. THOMAS RADEMAKER Secretary: MARILYN McINTOSH Part Clerk: TRINA PAYNE Phone: (516) 493-3420 Courtroom: (516) 493-3423 Fax:

More information

LaSalle Bank, N.A. v Rodriguez 2011 NY Slip Op 31086(U) April 28, 2011 Sup Ct, Queens County Docket Number: 5129/07 Judge: Allan B.

LaSalle Bank, N.A. v Rodriguez 2011 NY Slip Op 31086(U) April 28, 2011 Sup Ct, Queens County Docket Number: 5129/07 Judge: Allan B. LaSalle Bank, N.A. v Rodriguez 2011 NY Slip Op 31086(U) April 28, 2011 Sup Ct, Queens County Docket Number: 5129/07 Judge: Allan B. Weiss Republished from New York State Unified Court System's E-Courts

More information

Sethi v Singh 2011 NY Slip Op 33814(U) July 18, 2011 Sup Ct, Queens County Docket Number: 4958/11 Judge: Howard G. Lane Cases posted with a "30000"

Sethi v Singh 2011 NY Slip Op 33814(U) July 18, 2011 Sup Ct, Queens County Docket Number: 4958/11 Judge: Howard G. Lane Cases posted with a 30000 Sethi v Singh 2011 NY Slip Op 33814(U) July 18, 2011 Sup Ct, Queens County Docket Number: 4958/11 Judge: Howard G. Lane Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip Op 30001(U), are republished

More information

Benavides v Chase Manhattan Bank 2011 NY Slip Op 30219(U) January 26, 2011 Sup Ct, New York County Docket Number: /09 Judge: Debra A.

Benavides v Chase Manhattan Bank 2011 NY Slip Op 30219(U) January 26, 2011 Sup Ct, New York County Docket Number: /09 Judge: Debra A. Benavides v Chase Manhattan Bank 2011 NY Slip Op 30219(U) January 26, 2011 Sup Ct, New York County Docket Number: 602710/09 Judge: Debra A. James Republished from New York State Unified Court System's

More information

Michael v Schlegel 2015 NY Slip Op 30725(U) May 5, 2015 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /13 Judge: Martin Shulman Cases posted

Michael v Schlegel 2015 NY Slip Op 30725(U) May 5, 2015 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /13 Judge: Martin Shulman Cases posted Michael v Schlegel 2015 NY Slip Op 30725(U) May 5, 2015 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 805388/13 Judge: Martin Shulman Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip Op 30001(U),

More information