LICENSED ATTORNEYS AND THE UNAUTHORIZED PRACTICE OF LAW Practical Tips to Avoid the Unauthorized Practice of Law by Yourself and Others

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "LICENSED ATTORNEYS AND THE UNAUTHORIZED PRACTICE OF LAW Practical Tips to Avoid the Unauthorized Practice of Law by Yourself and Others"

Transcription

1 LICENSED ATTORNEYS AND THE UNAUTHORIZED PRACTICE OF LAW Practical Tips to Avoid the Unauthorized Practice of Law by Yourself and Others By Lee M. Smithyman SMITHYMAN & ZAKOURA, CHARTERED Overland Park, Kansas 1. There is no easier way to undertake unauthorized practice than failing to pay your annual registration fee. Each year, the Kansas Supreme Court will send registration forms to each attorney charging the $175 registration fee, which is used in substantial part to fund the Kansas Office of the Disciplinary Administrator. Each year, approximately 200 attorneys do not register by the July 1 deadline. In one particularly bad year, almost 1,000 attorneys did not register and pay their fees by July 1. In the majority of situations, the attorneys changed their practice and/or home addresses without updating their address registration with the Kansas Supreme Court. The Supreme Court's registration reminders did not follow the attorneys to their new addresses, and those attorneys, having previously relied upon the invoice reminders, failed to make payment. This problem is most easily avoided by updating the Kansas Supreme Court change of address form online. If a $175 fee is not received by July 1, the Kansas Supreme Court sends an blast to each attorney who failed to pay. If payments are not received thereafter, for any reason to include the fact that the registered addresses or addresses have not been updated or were incorrect, the attorney practicing after July 1 of that year is practicing law while not registered with the Kansas Supreme Court. If payment is not received by July 30, an additional $100 penalty is added pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 208. Those that do not pay the additional payment and penalty fee (now $275) by September 30 are named in orders Justice Nuss issues suspending unregistered attorneys. Attorneys who now enter the courtroom or provide legal advice to clients are committing the unauthorized practice of law while suspended. After a suspension order, an additional $100 payment is required to be paid to the CLE Commission. (Supreme Court Rule 208) Thus, failure to pay the $175 payment by July 1 can add up to the following:

2 $175 Registration Fee $100 Penalty for Late Payment $100 Penalty for CLE Suspension $100 Penalty for Supreme Court Suspension $475 Total Under Supreme Court Rule 5.5, Justice Nuss sends notices to the Chief Administrative Judges of each of the counties, to identify those attorneys who are no longer authorized to practice law. Judges within those counties are required to prohibit the practice thereafter. This is logical. Criminal cases could be appealed for lack of a registered or licensed attorney to assist in the defense. Kansas Supreme Court Rule 208(e) also requires that other attorneys (such as attorneys within your firm) report the unauthorized practice of law. In certain situations, attorneys have been indefinitely suspended from the practice of law for repeated failures to pay registration fees on time. See, In re Johnson, 300 Kan. 851 (2014). There, the Kansas Supreme Court indefinitely suspended Brian Johnson (although a minority of the Court would have disbarred Mr. Johnson) for "accumulating a number of suspensions for failing to comply with the administrative responsibilities required of every attorney." Id. at The second easiest way to promote unauthorized practice -- improper pro hac vice sponsorships. A. Do not attend hearing with your sponsored attorney. In the Matter of Gary Riebschlager, 2015 WL , the Kansas Supreme Court noted that pursuant to Kansas Supreme Court Rule 116(b), a Kansas attorney of record must be present throughout all court and administrative proceedings. Because Rachel Mackey sponsored a verified (but untrue) application pro hac vice by Gary Riebschlager and failed to attend the hearing in which Mr. Riebschlager was to present argument, Rachel Mackey was disqualified by the court from further participation of any type in the litigation. Kansas Supreme Court Rule 116(b)(3). Because Mr. Riebschlager's application was inaccurate, he was indefinitely prohibited from practicing before any Kansas court, tribunal or agency. B. Request pro hac vice status while administratively suspended. Kenton Hall was admitted to practice law in Kansas in 1988 and in Missouri in In 1990, Hall changed the status of his Kansas law license to inactive but did not pay the inactive fee. In 1996, the Kansas Supreme Court suspended his license for failure to pay fees. He remained suspended through

3 Kenton Hall practiced law in Missouri and Kansas federal court through When he desired to represent a criminal defendant in Johnson County, he filed a verified application to appear pro hac vice in which he stated that he was a member of the Missouri Bar and in which he did not list his Kansas Bar admission. In the pro hac vice application he further stated: "I swear and affirm I am a member in good standing of each bar referenced in paragraph 4." "I have not been the subject of prior public discipline in any jurisdiction." Kenton Hall believed that his suspension, for failure to pay the inactive fee required by the Kansas Supreme Court, was an "administrative suspension," hence not of the type which he would consider to be "subject to public discipline." Although the Kansas Supreme Court has not yet heard Kenton Hall's discipline case, the disciplinary panel recommended censure and that the censure be published in the Kansas Reports, to provide clarity on Mr. Hall's mistake to the practicing bar of Kansas. 3. Assisting with the unauthorized practice of others violates KRPC 5.5(a). Kansas Supreme Court Rule 208 states: It shall be the duty of each member of the bar and judiciary to report to the Disciplinary Administrator any attempt by an attorney to practice law after his or her suspension. The practice of law after suspension constitutes a violation of Kansas Rule of Professional Conduct 5.5. KRPC 5.5(a) states: "A lawyer shall not practice law in a jurisdiction in violation of the regulation of the legal profession in that jurisdiction, or assist another in doing so." Lawyers who continue in firms, while on a suspended basis, jeopardize all other attorneys in that firm. KRPC 7.5(d) states: "Lawyers may state or imply that they practice in a partnership or other organization only when that is the fact." 3

4 In In the Matter of Wilkinson, 251 Kan. 546 (1992), the Kansas Supreme Court addressed the issue of what a suspended attorney could or could not do. There, the Kansas Supreme Court stated: Kansas law is consistent with other jurisdictions cited in that an attorney suspended from the practice of law cannot hold himself or herself out to be an attorney, either through signing letters and pleadings or appearing in court; cannot counsel clients about legal matters; and cannot maintain or retain clients. The suspended attorney remains a member of the Kansas bar, subject to the provisions of the [KRPC], and thus subject to being disciplined or disbarred by the court if he or she exceeds or abuses her employment. Any attorney working near or around a suspended attorney who is working as a paralegal should be most careful. The Wilkinson court also stated: Just as every lawyer should avoid even the appearance of professional impropriety, a suspended attorney should avoid the appearance of failure to comply with the court's order. The Nebraska Supreme Court has suggested that this means he must refrain from the things which he did as an attorney even though he might legally do them as a layman.... A suspended lawyer will not be heard to say that services recognized as within the service of law were performed in some other capacity when he was called to account. (Id. at 549.) Examples of recently suspended attorneys attempting to continue the practice of law, arguing that they are undertaking the activity in a different capacity, and thereby violating the Kansas Supreme Court's pronouncement in Wilkinson, include: (1) taking an assignment of a contract claim from a client, and arguing that the suspended attorney is now pursuing the contract claim pro se on his own behalf; (2) taking an estate client and, instead of representing the estate, asking that the estate appoint the attorney as executor, such that all actions are taken as the executor of the estate rather than its attorney; (3) continuing to prepare and sign letters to opposing attorneys on a firm letterhead; (4) continuing use of terms "attorney, lawyer, or counselor" on letterheads or on signs outside the office door. 4

5 In the case of In re Schumacher, 214 Kan. 1 (1974), the Kansas Supreme Court adopted the following statement with regard to suspended attorneys: Attorneys... are required to comply with the terms of the decree suspending them in such a manner that there will be no ground for [suspicion] on the part of the bar or the public that the decree of the court is not being exactly observed in its letter and spirit. (Id. at 10.) The suspended lawyer should not undertake any actions which provide the appearance of practicing law, even if the undertaking could be conducted as a layman. Thus, even if a layman activity was appropriate, the following actions of a disbarred or suspended attorney would be considered the unauthorized practice of law: (1) obtaining clients; (2) retaining former clients; (3) serving clients with the connivance of another attorney and through the use of another attorney's name; or fees. (4) receiving a law clerk's salary which is really a surrogate for legal That said, the Kansas Supreme Court would encourage suspended attorneys to maintain their connection with the law through employment as a law clerk, providing certain limitations were observed. The Wilkinson Supreme Court stated: Regarding limitations, we are persuaded the better rule is that an attorney who has been disbarred or suspended from the practice of law is permitted to work as a law clerk, investigator, paralegal, or in any capacity as a lay person for a licensed attorney-employer if the suspended lawyer's functions are limited exclusively to work of a preparatory nature under the supervision of a licensed attorney-employer and does not involve client contact. Any contact with a client is prohibited. Although not an inclusive list, the following restrictions apply: a suspended or disbarred attorney may not be present during conferences with clients, talk to clients either directly or on the telephone, sign correspondence to them, or contact them directly or indirectly. (Id. at 553.) Note that a lay paralegal could undertake any or all of the restricted activities. Thus, should any of you have a disbarred or suspended attorney within your firm or assisting you, you must be absolutely careful to ensure that the restrictions described in Wilkinson are observed. 5

1. Admission to the Bar. A lawyer is qualified for admission to the bar of the district if the lawyer meets the following requirements:

1. Admission to the Bar. A lawyer is qualified for admission to the bar of the district if the lawyer meets the following requirements: LR 83 LAWYERS a. Roll of Lawyers. The bar of each court consists of counsel admitted to practice before the court who have taken the oath or affirmation prescribed by the rules in force when they were

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 118,378. In the Matter of LANCE M. HALEY, Respondent. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN DISCIPLINE

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 118,378. In the Matter of LANCE M. HALEY, Respondent. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN DISCIPLINE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 118,378 In the Matter of LANCE M. HALEY, Respondent. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN DISCIPLINE Original proceeding in discipline. Opinion filed March 2, 2018. One-year

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 103,492. In the Matter of CHRISTOPHER R. MILLER, Respondent. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN DISCIPLINE

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 103,492. In the Matter of CHRISTOPHER R. MILLER, Respondent. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN DISCIPLINE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 103,492 In the Matter of CHRISTOPHER R. MILLER, Respondent. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN DISCIPLINE Original proceeding in discipline. Opinion filed August 13,

More information

Rules 1.9, 1.9A (New Rule), and 2.1 of the Rules of the Supreme Court of the State of Hawai#i

Rules 1.9, 1.9A (New Rule), and 2.1 of the Rules of the Supreme Court of the State of Hawai#i RE: Rules 1.9, 1.9A (New Rule), and 2.1 of the Rules of the Supreme Court of the State of Hawai#i CHANGES TO PRO HAC VICE PRACTICE AND DUTIES The Supreme Court of the State of Hawai#i seeks public comment

More information

Rule 5.5 Unauthorized Practice Of Law; Multijurisdictional Practice Of Law

Rule 5.5 Unauthorized Practice Of Law; Multijurisdictional Practice Of Law Rule 5.5 Unauthorized Practice Of Law; Multijurisdictional Practice Of Law [ABA Version] (a) A lawyer shall not practice law in a jurisdiction in violation of the regulation of the legal profession in

More information

The Anatomy of a Complaint

The Anatomy of a Complaint The Anatomy of a Complaint Stanton A. Hazlett, Disciplinary Administrator The Kansas Disciplinary Administrator s Office Return to Green 2016 Friday, April 22, 2016 9:30 am - 4:00 pm Stinson Leonard Street

More information

RULE UNLICENSED PRACTICE OF LAW; MULTIJURISDICTIONAL PRACTICE OF LAW

RULE UNLICENSED PRACTICE OF LAW; MULTIJURISDICTIONAL PRACTICE OF LAW RULE 4-5.5 UNLICENSED PRACTICE OF LAW; MULTIJURISDICTIONAL PRACTICE OF LAW (a) Practice of Law. A lawyer shall not practice law in a jurisdiction other than the lawyer s home state, in violation of the

More information

AMEMDMENTS TO COMMENTS 5 AND 13 OF RULE 5.5 PROPOSED BY VIRGINIA STATE BAR S MULTIJURISDICTIONAL PRACTICE TASK FORCE ON MAY 21, 2013

AMEMDMENTS TO COMMENTS 5 AND 13 OF RULE 5.5 PROPOSED BY VIRGINIA STATE BAR S MULTIJURISDICTIONAL PRACTICE TASK FORCE ON MAY 21, 2013 AMEMDMENTS TO COMMENTS 5 AND 13 OF RULE 5.5 PROPOSED BY VIRGINIA STATE BAR S MULTIJURISDICTIONAL PRACTICE TASK FORCE ON MAY 21, 2013 Rule 5.5. Unauthorized Practice Of Law; Multijurisdictional Practice

More information

Indiana Rules of Court Rules for Admission to the Bar and the Discipline of Attorneys

Indiana Rules of Court Rules for Admission to the Bar and the Discipline of Attorneys Indiana Rules of Court Rules for Admission to the Bar and the Discipline of Attorneys Rule 5. Foreign Legal Consultants (1) General Regulation as to Licensing. In its discretion, the Supreme Court may

More information

The court will accept comment on the proposed rule changes until 5 p.m. Monday, August 17, Comment may be made to

The court will accept comment on the proposed rule changes until 5 p.m. Monday, August 17, Comment may be made to The Kansas Supreme Court is considering proposed changes to Rules 708, 709A, and 712 to allow new attorneys to take their oaths following one procedure, regardless of whether they are admitted under Rule

More information

REPUBLIC OF THE MARSHALL ISLANDS RULES FOR ADMISSION TO AND FOR THE PRACTICE OF LAW

REPUBLIC OF THE MARSHALL ISLANDS RULES FOR ADMISSION TO AND FOR THE PRACTICE OF LAW REPUBLIC OF THE MARSHALL ISLANDS RULES FOR ADMISSION TO AND FOR THE PRACTICE OF LAW (Effective ) REPUBLIC OF THE MARSHALL ISLANDS RULES FOR ADMISSION TO AND FOR THE PRACTICE OF LAW TABLE OF CONTENTS Rule

More information

RULE CHANGE 2015(02) COLORADO RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE CHAPTER 18 Rules 205.3, 205.5, 205.6, 224, and 227. CHAPTER 20 Rules 251.1, 260.2, and

RULE CHANGE 2015(02) COLORADO RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE CHAPTER 18 Rules 205.3, 205.5, 205.6, 224, and 227. CHAPTER 20 Rules 251.1, 260.2, and RULE CHANGE 2015(02) COLORADO RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE CHAPTER 18 Rules 205.3, 205.5, 205.6, 224, and 227. CHAPTER 20 Rules 251.1, 260.2, and 260.6. Rule 205.3. Pro Hac Vice Authority Before State Courts

More information

Steven M. Mezrow, you stand before the Disciplinary Board, your

Steven M. Mezrow, you stand before the Disciplinary Board, your BEFORE THE DISCIPLINARY BOARD OF THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL Petitioner v. No. 152 DB 2014 Attorney Registration No. 437 46 STEVEN M. MEZROW Respondent (Philadelphia)

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 113,928. In the Matter of ELIZABETH ANNE HUEBEN, Respondent. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN DISCIPLINE

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 113,928. In the Matter of ELIZABETH ANNE HUEBEN, Respondent. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN DISCIPLINE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 113,928 In the Matter of ELIZABETH ANNE HUEBEN, Respondent. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN DISCIPLINE Original proceeding in discipline. Opinion filed October 30,

More information

The Supreme Court of South Carolina

The Supreme Court of South Carolina Page 1 of 22 Court News Amendments to South Carolina Appellate Court Rules Effective January 1, 2013, Rules 405, 409, 410, 414, 415, 419 and 424 of the South Carolina Appellate Court Rules will be amended.

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 105,257. In the Matter of JAMES M. ROSWOLD, Respondent. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN DISCIPLINE

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 105,257. In the Matter of JAMES M. ROSWOLD, Respondent. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN DISCIPLINE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 105,257 In the Matter of JAMES M. ROSWOLD, Respondent. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN DISCIPLINE Original proceeding in discipline. Opinion filed April 22, 2011.

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 109,512. In the Matter of SUSAN L. BOWMAN, Respondent. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN DISCIPLINE

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 109,512. In the Matter of SUSAN L. BOWMAN, Respondent. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN DISCIPLINE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 109,512 In the Matter of SUSAN L. BOWMAN, Respondent. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN DISCIPLINE Original proceeding in discipline. Opinion filed October 18, 2013.

More information

CHAPTER 16. FOREIGN LEGAL CONSULTANCY RULE RULE PURPOSE RULE GENERAL CERTIFICATION REGULATIONS

CHAPTER 16. FOREIGN LEGAL CONSULTANCY RULE RULE PURPOSE RULE GENERAL CERTIFICATION REGULATIONS CHAPTER 16. FOREIGN LEGAL CONSULTANCY RULE RULE 16-1.1 PURPOSE The purpose of this chapter is to permit a person who is admitted to practice in a foreign country as an attorney, counselor at law, or the

More information

208.4 Inquiry Panel Review. applicant has established that he or she possesses the character and fitness necessary to practice law in

208.4 Inquiry Panel Review. applicant has established that he or she possesses the character and fitness necessary to practice law in 208.4 Inquiry Panel Review (6) Determination by Inquiry Panel. The inquiry panel shall make a finding whether the applicant has established that he or she possesses the character and fitness necessary

More information

UNAUTHORIZED PRACTICE OF LAW OPINIONS

UNAUTHORIZED PRACTICE OF LAW OPINIONS VIRGINIA STATE BAR COUNCIL TO REVIEW UNAUTHORIZED PRACTICE OF LAW OPINION 213 Pursuant to Part Six: Section IV, Paragraph 10(c)(iv) of the Rules of the Supreme Court of Virginia, the Virginia State Bar

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA. OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, : No Disciplinary Docket No. 3 Petitioner. v. : No.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA. OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, : No Disciplinary Docket No. 3 Petitioner. v. : No. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, : No. 1859 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 Petitioner v. : No. 93 DB 2011 KATRINA F. WRIGHT, Respondent : Attorney Registration No. 52233

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 107,751. In the Matter of DAVID K. LINK, Respondent. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN DISCIPLINE

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 107,751. In the Matter of DAVID K. LINK, Respondent. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN DISCIPLINE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 107,751 In the Matter of DAVID K. LINK, Respondent. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN DISCIPLINE probation. Original proceeding in discipline. Opinion filed July 6,

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 113,200. In the Matter of LARRY D. EHRLICH, Respondent. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN DISCIPLINE

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 113,200. In the Matter of LARRY D. EHRLICH, Respondent. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN DISCIPLINE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 113,200 In the Matter of LARRY D. EHRLICH, Respondent. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN DISCIPLINE Original proceeding in discipline. Opinion filed June 12, 2015.

More information

Legal Ethics: Unauthorized Practice of Law. CONTACT US

Legal Ethics: Unauthorized Practice of Law. CONTACT US Legal Ethics: Unauthorized Practice of Law CONTACT US info@paralegaleducationgroup.com Lecture Agenda Basic Paralegal No-No s Ethical Rules Pertaining to Non-Lawyer Assistants Defining the Practice of

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 119,254. In the Matter of JOHN M. KNOX, Respondent. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN DISCIPLINE

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 119,254. In the Matter of JOHN M. KNOX, Respondent. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN DISCIPLINE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 119,254 In the Matter of JOHN M. KNOX, Respondent. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN DISCIPLINE Original proceeding in discipline. Opinion filed January 11, 2019. Disbarment.

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 114,829. In the Matter of RICHARD HAITBRINK, Respondent. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN DISCIPLINE

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 114,829. In the Matter of RICHARD HAITBRINK, Respondent. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN DISCIPLINE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 114,829 In the Matter of RICHARD HAITBRINK, Respondent. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN DISCIPLINE Original proceeding in discipline. Opinion filed June 3, 2016.

More information

CHAPTER 17. AUTHORIZED HOUSE COUNSEL RULE GENERALLY RULE PURPOSE RULE DEFINITIONS

CHAPTER 17. AUTHORIZED HOUSE COUNSEL RULE GENERALLY RULE PURPOSE RULE DEFINITIONS CHAPTER 17. AUTHORIZED HOUSE COUNSEL RULE 17-1. GENERALLY RULE 17-1.1 PURPOSE The purpose of this chapter is to facilitate the relocation of persons employed by or to be employed by any business organization,

More information

2018: No. 2 June. Filing: File the amended pages in your Member s Manual as follows:

2018: No. 2 June. Filing: File the amended pages in your Member s Manual as follows: 2018: No. 2 June Law Society Rules 2015:* Substantive rule amendments implement the regulation of law firms by the Law Society, including the appointment of designated representatives, information sharing

More information

LOSS OF LICENSE: Rules Governing Suspension or Disbarment. by Dorothy Anderson, Assistant Bar Counsel February 2010

LOSS OF LICENSE: Rules Governing Suspension or Disbarment. by Dorothy Anderson, Assistant Bar Counsel February 2010 LOSS OF LICENSE: Rules Governing Suspension or Disbarment by Dorothy Anderson, Assistant Bar Counsel February 2010 A. WHAT TO DO WHEN YOU HAVE JUST BEEN SUSPENDED OR DISBARRED The vast majority of lawyers

More information

(e) Appearance of Attorney. An attorney may appear in a proceeding in any of the following ways:

(e) Appearance of Attorney. An attorney may appear in a proceeding in any of the following ways: RULE 2.505. ATTORNEYS (a) Scope and Purpose. All persons in good standing as members of The Florida Bar shall be permitted to practice in Florida. Attorneys of other states who are not members of The Florida

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 114,542. In the Matter of BENJAMIN N. CASAD, Respondent. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN DISCIPLINE

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 114,542. In the Matter of BENJAMIN N. CASAD, Respondent. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN DISCIPLINE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 114,542 In the Matter of BENJAMIN N. CASAD, Respondent. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN DISCIPLINE conditions. Original proceeding in discipline. Opinion filed June

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 109,886. In the Matter of DANIEL R. BECK, Respondent. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN DISCIPLINE

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 109,886. In the Matter of DANIEL R. BECK, Respondent. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN DISCIPLINE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 109,886 In the Matter of DANIEL R. BECK, Respondent. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN DISCIPLINE Original proceeding in discipline. Opinion filed February 7, 2014.

More information

Proposed Rule Change to Kan. Sup. R Registration of Attorneys.

Proposed Rule Change to Kan. Sup. R Registration of Attorneys. Proposed Rule Change to Kan. Sup. R. 208. Registration of Attorneys. Amendments to Supreme Court Rule 208 relating to attorney registration have been proposed to require registered attorneys to certify

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 118,310. In the Matter of CURTIS N. HOLMES, Respondent. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN DISCIPLINE

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 118,310. In the Matter of CURTIS N. HOLMES, Respondent. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN DISCIPLINE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 118,310 In the Matter of CURTIS N. HOLMES, Respondent. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN DISCIPLINE Original proceeding in discipline. Opinion filed May 4, 2018. One-year

More information

People v. Kolhouse. 13PDJ001. August 13, Attorney Regulation. The Presiding Disciplinary Judge suspended Nicole M. Kolhouse (Attorney

People v. Kolhouse. 13PDJ001. August 13, Attorney Regulation. The Presiding Disciplinary Judge suspended Nicole M. Kolhouse (Attorney People v. Kolhouse. 13PDJ001. August 13, 2013. Attorney Regulation. The Presiding Disciplinary Judge suspended Nicole M. Kolhouse (Attorney Registration Number 33291) from the practice of law for three

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before a Referee) AMENDED REPORT OF REFEREE (As to Font Type Only)

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before a Referee) AMENDED REPORT OF REFEREE (As to Font Type Only) IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before a Referee) THE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant, v. Case No. SC10-718 [TFB Case No. 2010-31,202(05A)(OSC)] SUZANNE MARIE HIMES, Respondent. / AMENDED REPORT OF REFEREE (As

More information

RULES OF THE STATE BAR OF YAP. Table of Contents. Statement of Purpose and Policy 1

RULES OF THE STATE BAR OF YAP. Table of Contents. Statement of Purpose and Policy 1 RULES OF THE STATE BAR OF YAP Table of Contents Statement of Purpose and Policy 1 Rule 1. Establishment of State Bar 1 Rule 2. Authority of State Court 1 Rule 3. Membership and Annual Dues Required 1 (a)

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO Disciplinary Counsel, Relator, CASE NO. 2012-1107 vs. Joel David Joseph Respondent. RELATOR'S REPLY TO RESPONDENT'S RESPONSE TO THE COURT'S ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Jonathan E.

More information

Disciplinary Summary

Disciplinary Summary Disciplinary Summary The following compilation of disciplinary action taken by the Board of Professional Responsibility collects cases arising since 2002, along with some earlier cases published in Pacific

More information

NC General Statutes - Chapter 84 Article 1 1

NC General Statutes - Chapter 84 Article 1 1 Chapter 84. Attorneys-at-Law. Article 1. Qualifications of Attorney; Unauthorized Practice of Law. 84-1. Oaths taken in open court. Attorneys before they shall be admitted to practice law shall, in open

More information

MISSOURI S LAWYER DISCIPLINE SYSTEM

MISSOURI S LAWYER DISCIPLINE SYSTEM MISSOURI S LAWYER DISCIPLINE SYSTEM Discipline System Clients have a right to expect a high level of professional service from their lawyer. In Missouri, lawyers follow a code of ethics known as the Rules

More information

Tri-State Regional Special Education Law Conference November 2, 2017 Omaha, Nebraska

Tri-State Regional Special Education Law Conference November 2, 2017 Omaha, Nebraska Tri-State Regional Special Education Law Conference November 2, 2017 Omaha, Nebraska Legal Ethics and Special Education Disputes Part I: Recent Attorney Discipline Cases from the Tri-State Region Thomas

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 117,607. In the Matter of MATTHEW B. WORKS, Respondent. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN DISCIPLINE

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 117,607. In the Matter of MATTHEW B. WORKS, Respondent. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN DISCIPLINE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 117,607 In the Matter of MATTHEW B. WORKS, Respondent. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN DISCIPLINE Original proceeding in discipline. Opinion filed November 17, 2017.

More information

Disciplinary Summary

Disciplinary Summary Disciplinary Summary The following compilation of disciplinary action taken by the Board of Professional Responsibility collects cases arising since 2002, along with some earlier cases published in Pacific

More information

TEXAS MCLE REGULATIONS. 1.1 The definitions set forth in Article XII, State Bar Rules, Section 2, shall apply to these Texas MCLE Regulations.

TEXAS MCLE REGULATIONS. 1.1 The definitions set forth in Article XII, State Bar Rules, Section 2, shall apply to these Texas MCLE Regulations. TEXAS MCLE REGULATIONS 1.0 MCLE COMPLIANCE YEAR 1.1 The definitions set forth in Article XII, State Bar Rules, Section 2, shall apply to these Texas MCLE Regulations. 1.2 Each member's initial MCLE compliance

More information

Marc Bressler appeared on behalf of the District VIII Ethics Committee. To the Honorable Chief Justice and Associate Justices of

Marc Bressler appeared on behalf of the District VIII Ethics Committee. To the Honorable Chief Justice and Associate Justices of SUPREMECOURT OF NEW JERSEY Disciplinary Review Board Docket No. DRB 08-237 District Docket No. VIII-07-10E IN THE MATTER OF NEAL M. POMPER AN ATTORNEY AT LAW Decision Argued: November 20, 2008 Decided:

More information

Tuesday 28th November, 2006.

Tuesday 28th November, 2006. Tuesday 28th November, 2006. On November 10, 2005 came the Virginia State Bar, by Phillip V. Anderson, its President, and Thomas A. Edmonds, its Executive Director and Chief Operating Officer, and presented

More information

CHAPTER 20 FLORIDA REGISTERED PARALEGAL PROGRAM SUBCHAPTER 20-1 PREAMBLE RULE PURPOSE

CHAPTER 20 FLORIDA REGISTERED PARALEGAL PROGRAM SUBCHAPTER 20-1 PREAMBLE RULE PURPOSE CHAPTER 20 FLORIDA REGISTERED PARALEGAL PROGRAM SUBCHAPTER 20-1 PREAMBLE RULE 20-1.1 PURPOSE The purpose of this chapter is to set forth a definition that must be met in order to use the title paralegal,

More information

CHAPTER 13. AUTHORIZED LEGAL AID PRACTITIONERS RULE GENERALLY RULE PURPOSE RULE DEFINITIONS

CHAPTER 13. AUTHORIZED LEGAL AID PRACTITIONERS RULE GENERALLY RULE PURPOSE RULE DEFINITIONS CHAPTER 13. AUTHORIZED LEGAL AID PRACTITIONERS RULE 13-1. GENERALLY RULE 13-1.1 PURPOSE The purpose of this chapter is to expand the delivery of legal services to poor people. This chapter authorizes attorneys

More information

RULES OF SUPREME COURT OF VIRGINIA PART ONE A FOREIGN ATTORNEYS. Rule 1A:5. Virginia Corporate Counsel & Corporate Counsel Registrants.

RULES OF SUPREME COURT OF VIRGINIA PART ONE A FOREIGN ATTORNEYS. Rule 1A:5. Virginia Corporate Counsel & Corporate Counsel Registrants. RULES OF SUPREME COURT OF VIRGINIA PART ONE A FOREIGN ATTORNEYS Rule 1A:5. Virginia Corporate Counsel & Corporate Counsel Registrants. Introduction Notwithstanding any rule of this Court to the contrary,

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 114,097. In the Matter of TIMOTHY CLARK MEYER, Respondent. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN DISCIPLINE

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 114,097. In the Matter of TIMOTHY CLARK MEYER, Respondent. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN DISCIPLINE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 114,097 In the Matter of TIMOTHY CLARK MEYER, Respondent. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN DISCIPLINE Original proceeding in discipline. Opinion filed December 18,

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 108,207. In the Matter of CHRISTOPHER Y. MEEK, Respondent. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN DISCIPLINE

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 108,207. In the Matter of CHRISTOPHER Y. MEEK, Respondent. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN DISCIPLINE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 108,207 In the Matter of CHRISTOPHER Y. MEEK, Respondent. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN DISCIPLINE Original proceeding in discipline. Opinion filed December 7,

More information

REMOVAL OF COURT OFFICIALS

REMOVAL OF COURT OFFICIALS REMOVAL OF COURT OFFICIALS Michael Crowell UNC School of Government January 2015 Constitutional provisions Article IV, Section 17 of the North Carolina Constitution addresses the removal of justices, judges,

More information

Supreme Court of the State of New York Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department D47806 T/htr

Supreme Court of the State of New York Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department D47806 T/htr Supreme Court of the State of New York Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department D47806 T/htr AD3d RANDALL T. ENG, P.J. WILLIAM F. MASTRO REINALDO E. RIVERA MARK C. DILLON RUTH C. BALKIN, JJ. 2013-06432

More information

BOTH SIGNATURES MUST BE IN BLUE INK

BOTH SIGNATURES MUST BE IN BLUE INK PROCEDURE FOR ASSOCIATION OF COUNSEL PURSUANT TO SCR 42 BOTH SIGNATURES MUST BE IN BLUE INK THIS APPLICATION IS NOT FOR USE IN FEDERAL COURTS. DO NOT CHANGE OR OMIT ANY WORDING ON THE APPLICATION. Original

More information

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL PROCEDURAL RULES COMMITTEE

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL PROCEDURAL RULES COMMITTEE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL PROCEDURAL RULES COMMITTEE Proposed Recommendation No. 236 Proposed Amendment of Rule 1012.1 Governing Motions for Admission Pro Hac Vice The Civil Procedural Rules

More information

PROPOSED NEW RULE OF THE RULES OF THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I ALLOWING LIMITED ADMISSION OF MILITARY-SPOUSE ATTORNEYS

PROPOSED NEW RULE OF THE RULES OF THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I ALLOWING LIMITED ADMISSION OF MILITARY-SPOUSE ATTORNEYS RE: PROPOSED NEW RULE OF THE RULES OF THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I The Supreme Court of Hawai i seeks public comment regarding a new PROPOSED RULE OF THE RULES OF. The proposal would allow

More information

Andrea Fonseca-Romen appeared on behalf of the Office of Attorney Ethics. To the Honorable Chief Justice and Associate Justices of

Andrea Fonseca-Romen appeared on behalf of the Office of Attorney Ethics. To the Honorable Chief Justice and Associate Justices of SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY Disciplinary Review Board Docket No. DRB 15-404 District Docket No. IV-2013-0330E IN THE MATTER OF CHONG S. KIM AN ATTORNEY AT LAW Decision Argued: February 18, 2016 Decided:

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE. ) IN RE: EMPLOYMENT OF ) No. M2008- DISBARRED, SUSPENDED, ) AND DISABLED LAWYERS ) )

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE. ) IN RE: EMPLOYMENT OF ) No. M2008- DISBARRED, SUSPENDED, ) AND DISABLED LAWYERS ) ) IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE ) IN RE: EMPLOYMENT OF ) No. M2008- DISBARRED, SUSPENDED, ) AND DISABLED LAWYERS ) ) PETITION OF THE TENNESSEE BAR ASSOCIATION The Tennessee Bar Association

More information

AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION

AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION COMMISSION ON ETHICS 20/20 STANDING COMMITTEE ON CLIENT PROTECTION STANDING COMMITTEE ON ETHICS AND PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY STANDING COMMITTEE ON PROFESSIONAL DISCIPLINE STANDING

More information

To the Honorable Chief Justice and Associate Justices of the Supreme Court of New Jersey. This matter was before us on a certification of default,

To the Honorable Chief Justice and Associate Justices of the Supreme Court of New Jersey. This matter was before us on a certification of default, SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY Disciplinary Review Board Docket No. DRB 15-246 District Docket No. IV-2014-0035E IN THE MATTER OF MICHAEL DENNIS BOLTON AN ATTORNEY AT LAW Decision Decided: May 3, 2016 To

More information

RULE VIII ADMISSION OF FOREIGN ATTORNEYS AS AUTHORIZED HOUSE COUNSEL

RULE VIII ADMISSION OF FOREIGN ATTORNEYS AS AUTHORIZED HOUSE COUNSEL RULE VIII ADMISSION OF FOREIGN ATTORNEYS AS AUTHORIZED HOUSE COUNSEL A. Purpose. This rule is intended to facilitate the relocation of persons employed by or to be employed by any business organization,

More information

TITLE 27 - THE NORTH CAROLINA STATE BAR CHAPTER 1 - RULES AND REGULATIONS OF THE NORTH CAROLINA STATE BAR

TITLE 27 - THE NORTH CAROLINA STATE BAR CHAPTER 1 - RULES AND REGULATIONS OF THE NORTH CAROLINA STATE BAR TITLE 27 - THE NORTH CAROLINA STATE BAR CHAPTER 1 - RULES AND REGULATIONS OF THE NORTH CAROLINA STATE BAR SUBCHAPTER 1A - ORGANIZATION OF THE NORTH CAROLINA STATE BAR SECTION.0100 - FUNCTIONS 27 NCAC 01A.0101

More information

Lee A. Gronikowski appeared on behalf of the Office of Attorney Ethics. Respondent waived appearance for oral argument.

Lee A. Gronikowski appeared on behalf of the Office of Attorney Ethics. Respondent waived appearance for oral argument. SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY Disciplinary Review Board Docket No. DRB 10-441 District Docket No. IV-2010-0026E IN THE MATTER OF QUEEN E. PAYTON AN ATTORNEY AT LAW Decision Argued: March 17, 2011 Decided:

More information

Unauthorized Practice of Law Matrix Revised 2015

Unauthorized Practice of Law Matrix Revised 2015 Unauthorized Practice of Law Matrix Revised 2015 National Center on Protection Orders and Full Faith & Credit 1901 North Fort Myer Drive, Suite 1011 Arlington, Virginia 22209 Toll Free: (800) 903-0111,

More information

ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF PARTNERS, SUPERVISORY, AND SUBORDINATE LAWYERS

ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF PARTNERS, SUPERVISORY, AND SUBORDINATE LAWYERS ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF PARTNERS, SUPERVISORY, AND SUBORDINATE LAWYERS THE LOUISIANA RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT RULE 5.1 The Louisiana Supreme Court adopted Louisiana Rules of Professional Conduct

More information

REPORT TO BENCHERS ON DELEGATION AND QUALIFICATIONS OF PARALEGALS. April 2006

REPORT TO BENCHERS ON DELEGATION AND QUALIFICATIONS OF PARALEGALS. April 2006 REPORT TO BENCHERS ON DELEGATION AND QUALIFICATIONS OF PARALEGALS April 2006 2 Purpose of Report: Discussion and Decision Prepared by: Paralegal Task Force - Brian J. Wallace, Q.C., Chair Ralston S. Alexander,

More information

[ ]Primary Registration [ ]Secondary Registration Name of Primary County:

[ ]Primary Registration [ ]Secondary Registration Name of Primary County: County of Santa Clara Office of the County Clerk-Recorder Business Division County Government Center 70 West Hedding Street, E. Wing, 1 st Floor San Jose, CA 95110 (408) 299-5688 Space above for County

More information

BRIEF OVERVIEW OF RULES GOVERNING MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL PRACTICE. B.J. Chisholm, Altshuler Berzon LLP

BRIEF OVERVIEW OF RULES GOVERNING MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL PRACTICE. B.J. Chisholm, Altshuler Berzon LLP BRIEF OVERVIEW OF RULES GOVERNING MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL PRACTICE B.J. Chisholm, Altshuler Berzon LLP Issue 1: What ethical rules apply to lawyers who are licensed in more than one jurisdiction or who are

More information

Decision. Richard J. Engelhardt appeared on behalf of the Office of Attorney Ethics. To the Honorable Chief Justice and Associate Justices of

Decision. Richard J. Engelhardt appeared on behalf of the Office of Attorney Ethics. To the Honorable Chief Justice and Associate Justices of SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY Disciplinary Review Board Docket No. DRB 07-026 District Docket No. IV-06-469E IN THE MATTER OF NATHANIEL MARTIN DAVIS AN ATTORNEY AT LAW Decision Argued: March 15, 2007 Decided:

More information

S17Y1439. IN THE MATTER OF DAVID R. SICAY-PERROW. Following this Court s remand of this reciprocal disciplinary matter, see

S17Y1439. IN THE MATTER OF DAVID R. SICAY-PERROW. Following this Court s remand of this reciprocal disciplinary matter, see In the Supreme Court of Georgia Decided: June 30, 2017 S17Y1439. IN THE MATTER OF DAVID R. SICAY-PERROW. PER CURIAM. Following this Court s remand of this reciprocal disciplinary matter, see In the Matter

More information

IN THE MATTER OF THE LEGAL PROFESSIONS ACT, 1990 AND AN APPLICATION FOR REINSTATEMENT BY MICHAEL NOLIN BETWEEN: MICHAEL DEAN NOLIN

IN THE MATTER OF THE LEGAL PROFESSIONS ACT, 1990 AND AN APPLICATION FOR REINSTATEMENT BY MICHAEL NOLIN BETWEEN: MICHAEL DEAN NOLIN 1 IN THE MATTER OF THE LEGAL PROFESSIONS ACT, 1990 AND AN APPLICATION FOR REINSTATEMENT BY MICHAEL NOLIN BETWEEN: MICHAEL DEAN NOLIN AND (APPLICANT) THE LAW SOCIETY OF SASKATCHEWAN REASONS FOR THE DECISION

More information

Upon the filing of an Application for Registration, the applicant shall be deemed to have agreed with the University of Alabama that:

Upon the filing of an Application for Registration, the applicant shall be deemed to have agreed with the University of Alabama that: University of Alabama -- Policy on Agents. THE UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA POLICY CONCERNING STUDENT-ATHLETES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AND AGENTS The University of Alabama hereby adopts the following policy

More information

NASHVILLE BAR ASSOCIATION LAWYER REFERRAL AND INFORMATION SERVICE PLAN

NASHVILLE BAR ASSOCIATION LAWYER REFERRAL AND INFORMATION SERVICE PLAN NASHVILLE BAR ASSOCIATION LAWYER REFERRAL AND INFORMATION SERVICE PLAN I. PURPOSE 1.1 The purposes of the Lawyer Referral and Information Service (hereinafter, The Service ) are: (c) (d) (e) To make legal

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS Misc. Docket No. 17-9161 ORDER AMENDING ARTICLES IV AND XIII OF THE STATE BAR RULES AND RULE 8.04 OF THE TEXAS DISCIPLINARY RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT ORDERED that: 1.

More information

Rule 1.8 Service Methods. (a) Except as provided in Rule 4.2 and Rule 8.9, any pleading or document required under these rules to be served on an

Rule 1.8 Service Methods. (a) Except as provided in Rule 4.2 and Rule 8.9, any pleading or document required under these rules to be served on an Rule 1.8 Service Methods. (a) Except as provided in Rule 4.2 and Rule 8.9, any pleading or document required under these rules to be served on an accused, or applicant, or attorney shall be (1) sent to

More information

State of New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division Third Judicial Department

State of New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division Third Judicial Department State of New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division Third Judicial Department Decided and Entered: June 21, 2018 D-74-18 In the Matter of RONALD LEONARD DAIGLE JR., an Attorney. ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE

More information

RULES AND REGULATIONS OF THE ALAMEDA COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION. CRIMINAL COURT APPOINTED ATTORNEYS PROGRAM (Effective May 1, 2013)

RULES AND REGULATIONS OF THE ALAMEDA COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION. CRIMINAL COURT APPOINTED ATTORNEYS PROGRAM (Effective May 1, 2013) RULES AND REGULATIONS OF THE ALAMEDA COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION CRIMINAL COURT APPOINTED ATTORNEYS PROGRAM (Effective May 1, 2013) A. Preamble The purpose of the Criminal Court Appointed Attorneys Program

More information

ARDC SENIOR COUNSEL AUGUST 16-17, 2013

ARDC SENIOR COUNSEL AUGUST 16-17, 2013 SCOTT KOZLOV ARDC SENIOR COUNSEL AUGUST 16-17, 2013 AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION 1 ST UPL SCHOOL STURM COLLEGE OF LAW UNIVERSITY OF DENVER The ARDC and Investigation/Prosecution of UPL Matters I. Unauthorized

More information

MODEL CODE OF ETHICS AND PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY AND GUIDELINES FOR ENFORCEMENT

MODEL CODE OF ETHICS AND PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY AND GUIDELINES FOR ENFORCEMENT NATIONAL FEDERATION OF PARALEGAL ASSOCIATIONS, INC. MODEL CODE OF ETHICS AND PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY AND GUIDELINES FOR ENFORCEMENT PREAMBLE The National Federation of Paralegal Associations, Inc.

More information

Mental Health Litigation Division Civil Commitment Certification Training. Nov. 2, 3 and 17, 2017

Mental Health Litigation Division Civil Commitment Certification Training. Nov. 2, 3 and 17, 2017 Mental Health Litigation Division Civil Commitment Certification Training Nov. 2, 3 and 17, 2017 The CPCS Mental Health Litigation Division is now accepting applications for its 3 day Civil Commitment

More information

State of New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division Third Judicial Department

State of New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division Third Judicial Department State of New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division Third Judicial Department Decided and Entered: December 6, 2018 In the Matter of LORI JO SKLAR, an Attorney. D-150-18 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON MOTION

More information

S17Y0531. IN THE MATTER OF DAVID J. FARNHAM. This disciplinary matter is before the Court on the report and

S17Y0531. IN THE MATTER OF DAVID J. FARNHAM. This disciplinary matter is before the Court on the report and In the Supreme Court of Georgia Decided: February 27, 2017 S17Y0531. IN THE MATTER OF DAVID J. FARNHAM. PER CURIAM. This disciplinary matter is before the Court on the report and recommendation of special

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 117,361. In the Matter of LAWRENCE E. SCHNEIDER, Respondent. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN DISCIPLINE

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 117,361. In the Matter of LAWRENCE E. SCHNEIDER, Respondent. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN DISCIPLINE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 117,361 In the Matter of LAWRENCE E. SCHNEIDER, Respondent. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN DISCIPLINE Original proceeding in discipline. Opinion filed November 9,

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA ORDER. 24, 2012, the Joint Petition in Support of Discipline on Consent is hereby granted

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA ORDER. 24, 2012, the Joint Petition in Support of Discipline on Consent is hereby granted IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, Petitioner v. JENNIFER LYNCH JACKSON, Respondent No. 1889 Disciplinary Docket No.3 No. 107 DB 2012 Attorney Registration No. 92274 (Allegheny

More information

S18Y0833, S18Y0834, S18Y0835, S18Y0836, S18Y0837. IN THE MATTER OF S. QUINN JOHNSON (five cases).

S18Y0833, S18Y0834, S18Y0835, S18Y0836, S18Y0837. IN THE MATTER OF S. QUINN JOHNSON (five cases). In the Supreme Court of Georgia Decided: June 4, 2018 S18Y0833, S18Y0834, S18Y0835, S18Y0836, S18Y0837. IN THE MATTER OF S. QUINN JOHNSON (five cases). PER CURIAM. This Court rejected the first petition

More information

CHAPTER 12. EMERITUS ATTORNEYS PRO BONO PARTICIPATION PROGRAM GENERALLY RULE PURPOSE RULE DEFINITIONS

CHAPTER 12. EMERITUS ATTORNEYS PRO BONO PARTICIPATION PROGRAM GENERALLY RULE PURPOSE RULE DEFINITIONS CHAPTER 12. EMERITUS ATTORNEYS PRO BONO PARTICIPATION PROGRAM 12-1. GENERALLY RULE 12-1.1 PURPOSE Individuals admitted to the practice of law in Florida have a responsibility to provide competent legal

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 104,199. In the Matter of MICHAEL A. MILLETT, Respondent. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN DISCIPLINE

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 104,199. In the Matter of MICHAEL A. MILLETT, Respondent. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN DISCIPLINE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 104,199 In the Matter of MICHAEL A. MILLETT, Respondent. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN DISCIPLINE Original proceeding in discipline. Opinion filed October 15, 2010.

More information

LAW STUDENT PRACTICE RULES (USA) ORGANIZED BY MINIMUM SEMESTERS REQUIRED*

LAW STUDENT PRACTICE RULES (USA) ORGANIZED BY MINIMUM SEMESTERS REQUIRED* LAW STUDENT PRACTICE RULES (USA) ORGANIZED BY MINIMUM SEMESTERS REQUIRED* The International Forum on Teaching Legal Ethics and Professionalism www.teachinglegalethics.org As of October 2, 2013 A. Clinic

More information

APPLICATION FOR CERTIFICATION TO PRACTICE PENDING ADMISSION PURSUANT TO C.R.C.P

APPLICATION FOR CERTIFICATION TO PRACTICE PENDING ADMISSION PURSUANT TO C.R.C.P APPLICATION FOR CERTIFICATION TO PRACTICE PENDING ADMISSION PURSUANT TO C.R.C.P. 205.6 Please type or print 1. Name: Please complete the information in item 1 by providing your full legal name for the

More information

ENFORCEMENT RULES & DISCIPLINARY BOARD RULES RELATING TO REINSTATEMENT

ENFORCEMENT RULES & DISCIPLINARY BOARD RULES RELATING TO REINSTATEMENT ENFORCEMENT RULES & DISCIPLINARY BOARD RULES RELATING TO REINSTATEMENT PENNSYLVANIA RULES OF DISCIPLINARY ENFORCEMENT (Contains Amendments Through July 14, 2011) Rule 218. Reinstatement. (a) An attorney

More information

CORPORATION or PARTNERSHIP REGISTRATION AS LEGAL DOCUMENT ASSISTANT CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO

CORPORATION or PARTNERSHIP REGISTRATION AS LEGAL DOCUMENT ASSISTANT CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Primary Registration Secondary Registration County of Primary Registration in Information below to be entered by County Clerk. Reg. #: If a renewal, a new # must be assigned if there is any lapse in the

More information

TO THE APPELLATE DIVISION OF THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK:

TO THE APPELLATE DIVISION OF THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK: APPLICATION FOR ADMISSION TO PRACTICE AS AN ATTORNEY AND COUNSELOR-AT-LAW IN THE STATE OF NEW YORK APPLICATION FOR ADMISSION QUESTIONNAIRE (Please see the General Instructions for guidance on filing complete

More information

PUBLISHED AS A PUBLIC SERVICE BY THE OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL

PUBLISHED AS A PUBLIC SERVICE BY THE OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL This information has been prepared for persons who wish to make or have made a complaint to The Lawyer Disciplinary Board about a lawyer. Please read it carefully. It explains the disciplinary procedures

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 118,204. In the Matter of MATTHEW EDGAR HULT, Respondent. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN DISCIPLINE

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 118,204. In the Matter of MATTHEW EDGAR HULT, Respondent. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN DISCIPLINE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 118,204 In the Matter of MATTHEW EDGAR HULT, Respondent. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN DISCIPLINE Original proceeding in discipline. Opinion filed February 16,

More information

[Cite as Columbus Bar Assn. v. Dugan, 113 Ohio St.3d 370, 2007-Ohio-2077.]

[Cite as Columbus Bar Assn. v. Dugan, 113 Ohio St.3d 370, 2007-Ohio-2077.] [Cite as Columbus Bar Assn. v. Dugan, 113 Ohio St.3d 370, 2007-Ohio-2077.] COLUMBUS BAR ASSOCIATION v. DUGAN. [Cite as Columbus Bar Assn. v. Dugan, 113 Ohio St.3d 370, 2007-Ohio-2077.] Attorney misconduct

More information

SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA NO B-1208 IN RE: DOUGLAS KENT HALL ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDING

SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA NO B-1208 IN RE: DOUGLAS KENT HALL ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDING 09/18/2015 "See News Release 045 for any Concurrences and/or Dissents." SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA NO. 2015-B-1208 IN RE: DOUGLAS KENT HALL ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDING PER CURIAM This disciplinary

More information

John Blum, Acting General Counsel Executive Office for Immigration Review 5107 Leesburg Pike, Suite 2600 Falls Church, VA 22041

John Blum, Acting General Counsel Executive Office for Immigration Review 5107 Leesburg Pike, Suite 2600 Falls Church, VA 22041 September 29, 2008 John Blum, Acting General Counsel Executive Office for Immigration Review 5107 Leesburg Pike, Suite 2600 Falls Church, VA 22041 Re: Comments on the Proposed Rule by the Executive Office

More information

CHAPTER 20 RULE DISCIPLINE AND DISABILITY: POLICY JURISDICTION

CHAPTER 20 RULE DISCIPLINE AND DISABILITY: POLICY JURISDICTION PROPOSED CHANGES TO COLORADO RULES OF PROCEDURE REGARDING ATTORNEY DISCIPLINE AND DISABILITY PROCEEDINGS, COLORADO ATTORNEYS FUND FOR CLIENT PROTECTION, AND COLORADO RULE OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT 1.15 The

More information

6/9/2015 THE NORTH CAROLINA STATE BAR NORTH CAROLINA STATE BAR. What is it? NORTH CAROLINA STATE BAR MEMBERS

6/9/2015 THE NORTH CAROLINA STATE BAR NORTH CAROLINA STATE BAR. What is it? NORTH CAROLINA STATE BAR MEMBERS 2015 Superior Court Judges Summer Conference Friday, June 26, 2015 THE NORTH CAROLINA STATE BAR NORTH CAROLINA STATE BAR What is it? State regulatory agency Formed in 1933 by the Legislature Mission: to

More information