BEFORE THE DISCIPLINARY BOARD OF THE VIRGINIA STATE BAR IN THE MATTER OF SHERRI ANN THAXTON. VSB DOCKET NO AMENDED MEMORANDUM ORDER
|
|
- Pamela Clarke
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 VIRGINIA: BEFORE THE DISCIPLINARY BOARD OF THE VIRGINIA STATE BAR IN THE MATTER OF SHERRI ANN THAXTON. VSB DOCKET NO AMENDED MEMORANDUM ORDER These matters came to be heard on August 25, 2017 and August 28, 2017 pursuant to the Certification of the Third District Subcommittee, dated May 2, 2017, under Part Six, IV, of the Rules of the Supreme Court of Virginia, to consider whether the Respondent, Sherri Ann Thaxton, ( Respondent ) has violated the Rules of Professional Conduct. The matter was heard before a duly convened panel of the Virginia State Bar ( VSB ) Disciplinary Board (the "Board"), consisting of John A.C. Keith, Chair, presiding; Michael A. Beverly, Anderson Wade Douthat, IV, Bretta M. Z. Lewis, and Sandra M. Rohrstaff. The bar was represented by Assistant Bar Counsel Christine Corey and Bar Counsel Edward Davis. Craig Cooley, Esquire, represented Respondent. Respondent was present in person and was represented by the aforementioned Counsel for both days of the hearing. Court Reporter Tracy J. Stroh, a Certified Court Reporter with Chandler & Halasz, P.O Box 9349, Richmond, Virginia, 23327, (804) after being duly sworn, reported the hearing and transcribed the proceedings. All legal notices of the date and place were timely sent by the Clerk of the Disciplinary System ( Clerk ) in the manner prescribed by the Rules of the Supreme 1
2 Court of Virginia, Part Six, Section IV, Paragraph of the Rules of Court. The Chair opened the hearing by polling the members of the Board for information regarding whether any of the members has a personal or financial interest which would preclude hearing the matter fairly and impartially. Each member, including the Chair, individually responded that he or she has no such conflict or interest. After the witnesses and parties were sworn, the VSB made a motion to exclude witnesses, Respondent s Counsel did not object, and the witnesses were excused and exited the hearing room. The Chair reviewed the pre-hearing motions filed by the parties and made the following rulings; (1) the VSB s Motion in Limine to exclude the testimony of an expert witness was withdrawn; (2) Respondent s Motion to Dismiss was deferred; and (3) the VSB s Motion to Determine the Issue of Attorney Client Privilege for Certain Witnesses was deferred. The Chair also deferred ruling on a Motion to Quash filed on behalf of listed witness, James Maloney. The Board entertained opening statements from the Virginia State Bar and from Counsel for Respondent prior to hearing evidence. The parties stipulated to certain pertinent facts prior to commencement of the proceedings. VSB Exhibits (collectively as VSB Exhibit A ) 13, 15-56, 59, were admitted into evidence by the Chair, without objection from the Respondent. VSB Exhibits 57, 58, 60, 61, 62, 63, 68, 69, 70, 71 were admitted separately due to objections lodged by Counsel. VSB Exhibits were admitted during course of the hearing. Respondent s Exhibits (collectively as Respondent s Exhibit A ) 1-10, 12-23, 25, and 26 were admitted into evidence by the Chair, without objection from the VSB. Respondent s Exhibits were admitted into evidence without objection from the VSB at the hearing. Respondent s Exhibit 34 was admitted over the objection of the 2
3 VSB. The Board heard testimony from the following witnesses presented by the VSB, who were sworn and offered testimony under oath: Sherri Ann Thaxton (identified as a hostile witness), Mike Powell, Coby Kelly, Elizabeth Wright, Coleman Pride, Christina Pride, James Maloney, Amy Austin, Ward Armstrong, Anthony Troy, Ervin J. Mast, Kimberly Hernandez, Laura Griffin. During the testimony of Mr. Armstrong, the Chair ruled that Mr. Morrissey had waived the attorney client privilege and that the witness should testify. Mr. Armstrong respectfully declined to testify on the basis that only a court could compel his testimony. After the close of the Bar s presentation of evidence, Respondent s Counsel moved to strike the Bar s evidence. Counsel for the Bar objected to the Motion to Strike and the panel heard argument by Respondent s Counsel and Bar Counsel. After retiring for and subsequently returning from deliberations, the Board ruled that Motion to Strike was denied as to the allegations that the Respondent violated the following Rules: Rule 1.1 Competence Rule 1.3 (a) Diligence Rule 8.4(c) Misconduct Having found that the evidence presented by the VSB and inferences fairly drawn therefrom, viewed in the light most favorable to the VSB was not sufficient under any circumstances to establish the charges of misconduct, the Motion to Strike was granted as to allegations that the Respondent violated the following Rules: Rule 1.7(a1)(a2)(b1)(b2)(b3)(b4) Conflict of Interests 3
4 Rule 3.1 Meritorious Claims and Contentions Rule 3.4(j) Fairness to Opposing Parties and Counsel Rule 4.1(a) Truthfulness in Statement to Others Rule 4.3(b) Dealing with Unrepresented Persons Rule 4.4 Respect for Rights of Third Persons Rule 8.1 (a) (c) Bar Admission and Disciplinary Matters The Respondent presented evidence as to the remaining allegations after the Board ruled regarding the Motion to Strike. During the Respondent s evidence, the Respondent presented testimony from the following witnesses who testified under oath: Deidre Warren. Rick Withers, Ronald N. Morris. At the conclusion of evidence presented, Bar Counsel and Respondent s Counsel offered closing arguments, after which the members of the Board retired to deliberate. After deliberations and a consideration of all evidence and argument herein, the Board made the following findings: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. At all times relevant hereto, the Respondent was an attorney licensed to practice law in the Commonwealth of Virginia. 2. Respondent testified that she holds herself out as an experienced family law attorney. 3. On August 23, 2013, Myrna Pride, a minor at the time, was discovered in the home of Mr. Joseph D. Morrissey. Morrissey entered an Alford plea to a misdemeanor charge of contributing to the delinquency of a minor (Ms. Pride) 4
5 on December 12, Approximately two weeks after the incident at Mr. Morrissey s house, the Respondent undertook to represent Myrna Pride, in a matter related to a press conference regarding Joseph Morrissey and matters in Henrico County stemming from this relationship. 5. Sometime after the Respondent s representation of Ms. Pride began, Respondent also agreed to represent Ms. Pride and her mother, Deidre Warren, on a financial matter against Ms. Pride s father, Mr. Coleman Pride. Ms. Warren testified that she retained the Respondent to pursue the matter of child support arrears. 6. Respondent sent letters to Mr. Pride claiming that he had failed to pay child support to Ms. Warren in violation of a 2006 child support order entered in Chesterfield County Juvenile and Domestic Relations District Court. 7. No order of child support was entered against Mr. Pride in the Chesterfield County Juvenile and Domestic Relations Court. 8. Respondent testified that she believed that there was a child support order based on approximately 40 pages of documents Ms. Warren gave her and based on what Ms. Warren told her. 9. On or about May 7, 2014, Respondent provided Mr. Morrissey s attorneys with some of the documents she had received from Ms. Warren (the writing ) including the pages that were subsequently submitted to the court at Mr. Morrissey s Alford plea hearing. 10. Respondent testified that she prepared a Show Cause alleging that Mr. Pride 5
6 had violated a Court Order when he failed to make the payments but that she did not file the pleading after she learned from the clerk of court that no such order existed. 11. Respondent admitted that she erroneously characterized the writing embodying the parties alleged agreement as a Child Support Order when she prepared correspondence to Mr. Pride demanding payment. 12. Respondent testified that, after learning that no child support order existed, she filed, on June 3, 2014, a civil matter against Mr. Pride for breach of contract. This case was later nonsuited. 13. In December 2014, at Mr. Morrissey s Alford plea hearing, his attorneys offered a purported child support order into evidence consisting of two unrelated pages drawn from the documents Respondent had previously furnished to Morrissey s team. 14. The Board finds that a family law attorney having the legal knowledge, skill and preparation necessary for the representation in this case should have recognized that the writing was not a Child Support Order and would not have made representations to the contrary to an opposing party or an attorney. 15. The Board finds that a family law attorney exercising the appropriate diligence would have known, or should have promptly taken steps to research whether the writing was a Child Support Order, prior to making representations to an opposing party or attorney regarding the writing. MISCONDUCT Based on the evidence set forth above in the Findings of Fact, the Board hereby 6
7 finds that the Respondent has been proven by clear and convincing evidence to have violated the following Rules: Rule 1.1 Competence. A lawyer shall provide competent representation to a client. Competent representation requires the legal knowledge, skill, thoroughness and preparation reasonably necessary for the representation. Rule 1.3 Diligence (a) A lawyer shall act with reasonable diligence and promptness in representing a client. IMPOSITION OF SANCTION After making findings regarding the Respondent s misconduct, the Board received further evidence and argument in aggravation and mitigation from the Bar and Respondent, including information that Respondent has no prior disciplinary history. The Board recessed to deliberate what sanction to impose upon its findings of misconduct by Respondent. After due deliberation, the Board reconvened to announce the sanction imposed. After due deliberations regarding the matter of sanctions, the Chair announced the sanctions. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Respondent, Sherri Ann Thaxton, shall receive a Public Reprimand and shall be placed on disciplinary probation for twelve (12) months, beginning with the entry of this Order. Respondent will engage in no professional misconduct as defined by the Virginia Rules of Professional Conduct during this 12-month probationary period. Any final determination of misconduct by any District Committee of the Virginia State Bar, the Disciplinary Board, or a three-judge panel to have occurred during the 12-month probationary period will be deemed a violation of the terms and conditions of this Order and will result in the imposition of the alternate sanction, a 90-day suspension of her license to practice law in Virginia. 7
8 . It is further ORDERED that pursuant to Part Six, IV, 13-9 E. of the Rules of the Supreme Court of Virginia, the Clerk of the Disciplinary System shall assess all costs against the Respondent. It is further ORDERED that the Clerk of the Disciplinary System shall mail an attested copy of this order to Respondent at her address of record with the Virginia State Bar, Sherri Ann Thaxton, Esq., Canfield, Wells & Kruck, LLP, 4124 East Parham Road, Henrico, Virginia 23228, by certified mail, return receipt requested, by regular mail to Respondent s Counsel, Craig Cooley, Esquire at 3000 Idlewood Avenue, Richmond, Virginia 23221, and by hand delivery to Christine Corey, Esquire, Virginia State Bar, 1111 East Main Street, Suite 700, Richmond, Virginia This Order was originally entered on September 14, 2017 and is now amended only to properly reflect Bar Counsel s name and title and is entered this 27 th day of September, 2017, effective September 14, 2017, nunc pro tunc. VIRGINIA STATE BAR DISCIPLINARY BOARD By: John A.C. Keith Chair 8
BEFORE THE VIRGINIA STATE BAR DISCIPLINARY BOARD. IN THE MATTER OF VSB Docket No Martin F. McMahon AMENDED ORDER OF SUSPENSION
V I R G I N I A: BEFORE THE VIRGINIA STATE BAR DISCIPLINARY BOARD IN THE MATTER OF VSB Docket No. 17-053-108449 Martin F. McMahon AMENDED ORDER OF SUSPENSION This Matter came to be heard on October 26,
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE CITY OF RICHMOND
VIRGINIA: IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE CITY OF RICHMOND VIRGINIA STATE BAR EX REL THIRD DISTRICT COMMITTEE VSB Docket Nos. 15-033-100800, 15-033-102037 and 16-033-104333 V. Case Nos. CL 17001040-00 CLI
More informationIN THE MATTER OF VSB Docket Nos HENRY A. WHITEHURST ORDER
VIRGINIA: BEFORE THE DISCIPLINARY BOARD OF THE VIRGINIA STATE BAR IN THE MATTER OF VSB Docket Nos. 15-000-101339 HENRY A. WHITEHURST ORDER This matter came to be heard on February 20, 2015, pursuant to
More informationVIRGINIA: BEFORE THE VIRGINIA STATE BAR DISCIPLINARY BOARD IN THE MATTER OF SHELLY RENEE COLLETTE VSB DOCKET NO.: ORDER OF SUSPENSION
VIRGINIA: BEFORE THE VIRGINIA STATE BAR DISCIPLINARY BOARD IN THE MATTER OF SHELLY RENEE COLLETTE VSB DOCKET NO.: 18-000-111181 ORDER OF SUSPENSION THIS MATTER came on to be heard on February 16, 2018,
More informationBEFORE THE DISCIPLINARY BOARD OF THE VIRGINIA STATE BAR. VSB Docket No , , , ORDER OF REVOCATION
VIRGINIA; BEFORE THE DISCIPLINARY BOARD OF THE VIRGINIA STATE BAR IN THE MATTER OF BRYAN JAMES WALDRON VSB Docket No. 17-051-106968, 18-051-109817, 18-051-111305, 18-051-111321 ORDER OF REVOCATION THIS
More informationVIRGINIA: BEFORE THE VIRGINIA STATE BAR DISCIPLINARY BOARD OPINION AND ORDER
VIRGINIA: BEFORE THE VIRGINIA STATE BAR DISCIPLINARY BOARD IN RE: KRISTEN GRIM HUGHES VSB DOCKET NO. 11-052-084557 OPINION AND ORDER This matter came to be heard on March 23, 2012, before a duly convened
More informationVIRGINIA: BEFORE THE VIRGINIA STATE BAR DISCIPLINARY BOARD. IN THE MATTER OF VSB Docket No SAM GARRISON ORDER OF REVOCATION
VIRGINIA: BEFORE THE VIRGINIA STATE BAR DISCIPLINARY BOARD IN THE MATTER OF VSB Docket No. 02-080-3027 SAM GARRISON ORDER OF REVOCATION On April 23, 2004 this matter came on for hearing upon certification
More informationBEFORE THE VIRGINIA STATE BAR DISCIPLINARY BOARD IN THE MATTER OF VSB DOCKET: ELLIOT M. SCHLOSSER ORDER
BEFORE THE VIRGINIA STATE BAR DISCIPLINARY BOARD IN THE MATTER OF VSB DOCKET: 01-010-1990 ELLIOT M. SCHLOSSER ORDER This matter came before a duly constituted Panel of the Virginia State Bar Disciplinary
More informationCASE NO. CL JAMES DANIEL GRIFFITH VSB DOCKET NOS.:
12/27/2018 09:56 (FAX) P.002/003 VIRGINIA: BEFORE THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF FAIRFAX IN THE MATTERS OF CASE NO. CL2018-15409 JAMES DANIEL GRIFFITH VSB DOCKET NOS.: 18-070-110110 18-070-110600
More informationVSB CLERK'S OFFICE BEFORE THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD
) RECEIVED VIRGINIA: MAR 2 3 2017 VSB CLERK'S OFFICE BEFORE THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD IN THE MATTER OF NEIL KUCHINSKY CASE NO. CL-16-3242 VSB DOCKET NO. 16-033-105536 AGREED DISPOSITION
More informationBEFORE THE VIRGINIA STATE BAR DISCIPLINARY BOARD ORDER OF SUSPENSION
VIRGINIA: BEFORE THE VIRGINIA STATE BAR DISCIPLINARY BOARD IN THE MATTER OF THOMAS LEROY JOHNSON, JR. VSB DOCKET NO. 04-000-3403 ORDER OF SUSPENSION On June 25, 2004, this matter came on for a hearing
More informationrepresented by counsel. The Virginia State Bar appeared through its Assistant Bar Counsel, Elizabeth K.
VIRGINIA: BEFORE THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF FAIRFAX IN THE MATTER OF CASE NO. CL2016-12340 CHRISTOPHER DECOY PARROTT VSB DOCKET NO. 16-053-104072 AGREED DISPOSITION MEMORANDUM ORDER This matter
More informationVIRGINIA: BEFORE THE THIRD DISTRICT, SECTION II SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE VIRGINIA STATE BAR
RECEIVED May 21, 2018 VIRGINIA STATE BAR CLERK'S OFFICE VIRGINIA: BEFORE THE THIRD DISTRICT, SECTION II SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE VIRGINIA STATE BAR IN THE MATTER OF Melvin Lorenzo Todd, Jr. VSB Docket No. 17-032-107501
More informationBEFORE THE VIRGINIA STATE BAR DISCIPLINARY BOARD IN THE MATTER OF VSB DOCKET NO KATHRYNE LOUISE WARD
VIRGINIA: BEFORE THE VIRGINIA STATE BAR DISCIPLINARY BOARD IN THE MATTER OF VSB DOCKET NO. 17-000-106772 KATHRYNE LOUISE WARD AGREED DISPOSITION MEMORANDUM ORDER On Wednesday, October 19, 2016 this matter
More informationdisciplinary actions
Disciplinary Actions The following is a list of attorneys who have been publicly disciplined. The orders have been edited. Administrative language has been removed to make the opinions more readable. Respondent
More informationMEMORANDUM ORDER. This matter came on March 11, 201 0, to be heard on the Agreed Disposition of the
VIRGINIA: BEFORE THE VIRGINIA STATE BAR DISCIPLINARY BOARD IN THE MATTER OF WAYNE RICHARD HARTKE VSB Docket No. 05-053-3993 MEMORANDUM ORDER This matter came on March 11, 201 0, to be heard on the Agreed
More informationBEFORE THE FIRST DISTRICT SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE VIRGINIA STATE BAR. IN THE MATTER OF Kevin Peter Shea VSB Docket No
RECEIVED Jun 27, 2016 VIRGINIA: BEFORE THE FIRST DISTRICT SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE VIRGINIA STATE BAR VSB CLERK'S OFFICE IN THE MATTER OF Kevin Peter Shea VSB Docket No. 14-010-099614 SUBCOMMITTEE DETERMINATION
More informationTVSB ). Virginia (1950) as amended, consisting ofthe Honorable Joel C. Cunningham, Retired Judge of
VIRGINIA: BEFORE THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF RICHMOND VIRGINIA S FATE BAR, EX REL. THIRD DISTRICT, SECTION 111 COMMI'ITEE VSB DOCKET NO. 17-033-107835 V. Case No. CL2018-4882-8 ROBERT IUCHARD KAPLAN,
More informationBEFORE THE FOURTH DISTRICT SUBCOMMITTEE SECTION II OF THE VIRGINIA ST ATE BAR
RECEIVED May 31, 2016 VIR G I N I A: VSB CLERK'S OFFICE BEFORE THE FOURTH DISTRICT SUBCOMMITTEE SECTION II OF THE VIRGINIA ST ATE BAR IN THE MATTERS OF ALFRED LJNCOLN ROBERTSON, JR. VSB Docket No. 15-042-10
More informationBEFORE THE SIXTH DISTRICT SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE VIRGINIA STATE BAR
VIRGINIA: BEFORE THE SIXTH DISTRICT SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE VIRGINIA STATE BAR IN THE MATTER OF MICHAEL JAMES GEORGE, ESQUIRE VSB Docket No. 03-060-0264 SUBCOMMITTEE DETERMINATION PUBLIC ADMONITION WITH TERMS
More informationConduct in this or any other jurisdiction where he is admitted to practice, shall not commit
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, : No. 1655 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 Petitioner : No. 57 DB 2009 V. : Attorney Registration No. 85306 DONALD CHISHOLM, II, Respondent
More informationRules for Qualified & Court-Appointed Parenting Coordinators
Part I. STANDARDS Rules 15.000 15.200 Part II. DISCIPLINE Rule 15.210. Procedure [No Change] Any complaint alleging violations of the Florida Rules For Qualified And Court-Appointed Parenting Coordinators,
More informationBEFORE THE FIFTH DISTRICT COMMITTEE SECTION I OF THE VIRGINIA STATE BAR SUBCOMMITTEE DETERMINATION (PUBLIC REPRIMAND WITH TERMS)
V RG N A: BEFORE THE FFTH DSTRCT COMMTTEE SECTON OF THE VRGNA STATE BAR N THE MATTERS OF DAVD GLENN HUBBARD VSB Docket Numbers: 11-051-087779 12-051-088880 SUBCOMMTTEE DETERMNATON (PUBLC REPRMAND WTH TERMS)
More informationRECEIVED. Dec 8, 2017 VIRGINIA STATE BAR CLERK'S OFFICE BEFORE THE FOURTH DISTRICT, SECTION I SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE VIRGINIA STATE BAR
RECEIVED Dec 8, 2017 VIRGINIA STATE BAR CLERK'S OFFICE VIRGINIA: BEFORE THE FOURTH DISTRICT, SECTION I SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE VIRGINIA STATE BAR IN THE MATTER OF TARAELIZABETHSTEINNERD VSB Docket No. 17-041-108074
More informationBEFORE THE VIRGINIA STATE BAR DISCIPLINARY BOARD BRENT LAVELLE BARBOUR VSB DOCKET NO.: ORDER OF REVOCATION
V I R G I N I A: BEFORE THE VIRGINIA STATE BAR DISCIPLINARY BOARD IN THE MATTER OF BRENT LAVELLE BARBOUR VSB DOCKET NO.: 16-102-106014 ORDER OF REVOCATION This matter came on to be heard on February 16,
More informationRecommendations of the Disciplinary Board dated July 29, 2011, it is hereby
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, : No. 1759 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 Petitioner. : No. 78 DB 2010 V. : Attorney Registration No. 58783 MARK D. LANCASTER, Respondent
More informationBEFORE THE FIFTH DISTRICT SECTION I SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE VIRGINIA STATE BAR SUBCOMMITTEE DETERMINATION (PUBLIC REPRIMAND WITH TERMS)
VIRGINIA: RECEIVED May 30, 2018 VIRGINIA STATE BAR CLERK'S OFFICE BEFORE THE FIFTH DISTRICT SECTION I SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE VIRGINIA STATE BAR IN THE MA TIER OF Thomas Brian Haddock VSB Docket No. 17-051-108077
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA THE FLORIDA BAR, Petitioner/Appellant, Supreme Court Case No. SC09-922 v. PETER MARCELLUS CAPUA, Respondent/Appellee. The Florida Bar File No. 2009-71,123(11H-OSC) / THE
More informationORIGINAL LOUISIANA ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY BOARD IN RE: ROY JOSEPH RICHARD, JR. NUMBER: 14-DB-051 RECOMMENDATION TO THE LOUISIANA SUPREME COURT
ORIGINAL LOUISIANA ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY BOARD IN RE: ROY JOSEPH RICHARD, JR. NUMBER: 14-DB-051 RECOMMENDATION TO THE LOUISIANA SUPREME COURT 14-DB-051 1/12/2016 INTRODUCTION This is a disciplinary matter
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before a Referee) Complainant, Case No. SC v. TFB File No ,500(1A)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before a Referee) THE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant, Case No. SC07-226 v. TFB File No. 2005-00,500(1A) ROBERT ANTHONY DEES, Respondent. / REPORT OF THE REFEREE ACCEPTING CONSENT
More informationSTATE OF VERMONT PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY BOARD. Decision No. 194
STATE OF VERMONT PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY BOARD In Re: Norman R. Blais, Esq. PRB File No. 2015-084 Decision No. 194 Norman R. Blais, Esq., Respondent, is publicly Reprimanded and placed on probation
More informationBEFORE THE DISCIPLINARY BOARD OF THE VIRGINIA STATE BAR. IN THE MATTER OF JOHN COURY MACDONALD, ESQUIRE VSB Docket Number ORDER
V I R G I N I A : BEFORE THE DISCIPLINARY BOARD OF THE VIRGINIA STATE BAR IN THE MATTER OF JOHN COURY MACDONALD, ESQUIRE VSB Docket Number 06-051-4245 ORDER THIS MATTER came before the Virginia State Bar
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. No. SC Complainant, The Florida Bar File v. No , 396 (17J) REPORT OF REFEREE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA THE FLORIDA BAR, Supreme Court Case No. SC06-2128 Complainant, The Florida Bar File v. No. 2007-50, 396 (17J) ANDREW ALEXANDER BYER, Respondent. / REPORT OF REFEREE I. SUMMARY
More informationEffective January 1, 2016
RULES OF PROCEDURE OF THE COMMISSION ON CHARACTER AND FITNESS OF THE SUPREME COURT OF MONTANA Effective January 1, 2016 SECTION 1: PURPOSE The primary purposes of character and fitness screening before
More informationArticle IX DISCIPLINE By-Law and Manual of Procedure
NOTICE 10-01-13 The following By-Laws, Manual and forms became effective August 28, 2013, and are to be used in all Disciplinary cases until further notice. Article IX DISCIPLINE By-Law and Manual of Procedure
More informationARTICLE IX DISCIPLINE
ARTICLE IX DISCIPLINE Sec. 901 Discipline of Members. It is the purpose of this Article to provide a procedure whereby a member may be appropriately disciplined while assuring that such member is given
More informationBEFORE THE SEVENTH DISTRICT COMMITTEE OF THE VIRGINIA STATE BAR
VIRGINIA: BEFORE THE SEVENTH DISTRICT COMMITTEE OF THE VIRGINIA STATE BAR IN THE MATTER OF THOMAS K. PLOFCHAN, JR., ESQUIRE VSB Docket No. 02-070-0225 COMMITTEE DETERMINATION PUBLIC REPRIMAND On March
More informationBAR OF GUAM ETHICS COMMITTEE RULES OF PROCEDURE - DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS
BAR OF GUAM ETHICS COMMITTEE RULES OF PROCEDURE - DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS 1 BAR OF GUAM ETHICS COMMITTEE RULES OF PROCEDURE - DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS Rule 1. Purpose of Rules. The purpose of these rules
More informationMedical Staff Bylaws Part 2: INVESTIGATIONS, CORRECTIVE ACTION, HEARING AND APPEAL PLAN
Medical Staff Bylaws Part 2: INVESTIGATIONS, CORRECTIVE ACTION, HEARING AND APPEAL PLAN Medical Staff Bylaws Part 2: INVESIGATIONS, CORRECTIVE ACTION, HEARING AND APPEAL PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION
More informationSUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA NO B-1043 IN RE: MARK G. SIMMONS ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDING
10/16/2017 "See News Release 049 for any Concurrences and/or Dissents." SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA NO. 2017-B-1043 IN RE: MARK G. SIMMONS ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDING PER CURIAM This disciplinary matter
More informationDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals Board on Professional Responsibility. Board Rules
District of Columbia Court of Appeals Board on Professional Responsibility Board Rules Adopted June 23, 1983 Effective July 1, 1983 This edition represents a complete revision of the Board Rules. All previous
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT, STATE OF WYOMING
IN THE SUPREME COURT, STATE OF WYOMING October Term, A.D. 2016 In the Matter of Amendments to ) the Rules Governing the Commission on ) Judicial Conduct and Ethics ) ORDER AMENDING THE RULES GOVERNING
More informationBEFORE THE FIFTH DISTRICT-SECTION III SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE VIRGINIA STATE BAR SUBCOMMITTEE DETERMINATION PUBLIC REPRIMAND, WITH TERMS
VIRGINIA: BEFORE THE FIFTH DISTRICT-SECTION III SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE VIRGINIA STATE BAR IN THE MATTER OF SEUNG OH KANG, ESQUIRE VSB Docket Number 06-053-3768 SUBCOMMITTEE DETERMINATION PUBLIC REPRIMAND,
More information--*L.-S?,4ìžmfw,15]bb, CÉeíiudgL TB- l i VIRGINIA: IN THE MATTER OF AGREED D SPOSITION MEMORANDUM ORDER
A d L, VIRGINIA: MAY 20 2015 f, BEFORE THE'CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE CITY OF ALEXAND
More informationBef ore the Virginia State Bar Disciplinary Board. Commonwealth. By tendering her Consent to Revocation at a time when allegations of
VIRGINIA: Bef ore the Virginia State Bar Disciplinary Board Jn the Matter of Che1yl D. Footman-Banks Attorney at Law VSB Docket Nos.16-022-104335 and 16-022-104602 On March 9, 2017, came Cheryl D. Footman-Banks
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA ORDER PER CURIAM: AND Now, this 9th day of February, 2010, upon consideration of the Report and
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, : No_ 1556 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 Petitioner : No. 135 DB 2008 V. : Attorney Registration No. 66420 ANDREW J. OSTROWSKI, Respondent
More informationDISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS
DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS Respondent s Name Address of Record (City/County) Action Effective Date Page Circuit Court Bruce Patrick Ganey** Ashland, VA Public Reprimand September 20, 2004 2 William P. Robinson
More informationCOURT OF COMMON PLEAS CLERMONT COUNTY, OHIO
COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CLERMONT COUNTY, OHIO : : CASE # PLAINTIFF VS. : CIVIL PRE-TRIAL ORDER (JURY TRIAL) DEFENDANT IT IS ORDERED BY THE COURT AS FOLLOWS: 1. JURY TRIAL: The case is scheduled for a Primary
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA ANSWER AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES AND MOTION FOR MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT
Filing # 45970766 E-Filed 09/01/2016 12:25:05 PM IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA THE FLORIDA BAR, Supreme Court Case No. SC16-1323 v. Complainant, The Florida Bar File No. 2014-70,056 (11G) JOSE MARIA
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before A Referee) v. The Florida Bar File No ,674(15D)FFC JAMES HARUTUN BATMASIAN, REPORT OF REFEREE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before A Referee) THE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant, Supreme Court Case No. SC08-1445 v. The Florida Bar File No. 2008-51,674(15D)FFC JAMES HARUTUN BATMASIAN, Respondent. /
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 117,607. In the Matter of MATTHEW B. WORKS, Respondent. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN DISCIPLINE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 117,607 In the Matter of MATTHEW B. WORKS, Respondent. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN DISCIPLINE Original proceeding in discipline. Opinion filed November 17, 2017.
More informationProposal by Judge Conway to amend various juvenile rules to conform to P.A On 9-17-
Proposal by Judge Conway to amend various juvenile rules to conform to P.A. 18-31. On 9-17- 18, RC tabled the matter to its 10-15-18 meeting in order to review the proposed changes fully. STATE OF CONNECTICUT
More informationLOUISIANA ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY BOARD IN RE: HILLIARD CHARLES FAZANDE III DOCKET NO. 18-DB-055 REPORT OF HEARING COMMITTEE # 37 INTRODUCTION
LOUISIANA ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY BOARD IN RE: HILLIARD CHARLES FAZANDE III DOCKET NO. 18-DB-055 REPORT OF HEARING COMMITTEE # 37 INTRODUCTION This attorney disciplinary matter arises out of formal charges
More information: No Disciplinary Docket No. 3. No. 39 DB : Attorney Registration No : (Philadelphia) ORDER
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA In the Matter of : No. 1150 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 RONALD I. KAPLAN No. 39 DB 2005 : Attorney Registration No. 34822 PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT : (Philadelphia)
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 114,542. In the Matter of BENJAMIN N. CASAD, Respondent. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN DISCIPLINE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 114,542 In the Matter of BENJAMIN N. CASAD, Respondent. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN DISCIPLINE conditions. Original proceeding in discipline. Opinion filed June
More informationDisciplinary Regulations
Disciplinary Regulations 1 Vision Professional financial planning for all. Our Mission The FPI s mission is to advance and promote the pre-eminence and status of financial planning professionals, while
More informationLOUISIANA ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY BOARD IN RE: ANDREW CRAIG CHRISTENBERRY. NUMBER: 03-DB-052 c/w 05-DB-055
LOUISIANA ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY BOARD IN RE: ANDREW CRAIG CHRISTENBERRY NUMBER: 03-DB-052 c/w 05-DB-055 AMENDED RECOMMENDATION TO THE LOUISIANA SUPREME COURT This is a disciplinary proceeding based upon
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before a Referee) The Florida Bar File No ,165(OSC) REPORT OF REFEREE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before a Referee) THE FLORIDA BAR, Petitioner, vs. MITCHELL JAY ZIDEL, Supreme Court Case No. SC10-1086 The Florida Bar File No. 2010-90,165(OSC) Respondent. / REPORT OF
More informationDISCIPLINARY PROCESS of the VIRGINIA STATE BAR
DISCIPLINARY PROCESS of the VIRGINIA STATE BAR Prepared by: Paul D. Georgiadis, Assistant Bar Counsel & Leslie T. Haley, Senior Ethics Counsel Edited and revised by Jane A. Fletcher, Deputy Intake Counsel
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, : No. 1410 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 Petitioner : No. 88 DB 2008 V. : Attorney Registration No. 46472 JEFFRY STEPHEN PEARSON, Respondent
More informationTHE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before a Referee)
THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before a Referee) THE FLORIDA BAR, v. Complainant, SHERRY GRANT HALL, Respondent. / Case No. SC07-863 TFB File No. 2004-01,364(1B) REPORT OF THE REFEREE I. SUMMARY OF PROCEEDINGS
More informationSUPREME COURT OF GEORGIA. Atlanta June 11, The Honorable Supreme Court met pursuant to adjournment. The following order was passed:
SUPREME COURT OF GEORGIA Atlanta June 11, 2015 The Honorable Supreme Court met pursuant to adjournment. The following order was passed: It is ordered that new Uniform Magistrate Court Rule 7.5 (relating
More informationTermination of Guardianship Minor. Forms and Procedures. For Wyoming MOVANT
Packet 16 Termination of Guardianship Minor Forms and Procedures For Wyoming MOVANT Published by Wyoming Supreme Court 2301 Capitol Avenue Supreme Court Building Cheyenne, WY 82002 Termination of Guardianship
More informationSUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA NO. 13-B-2461 IN RE: ANDREW C. CHRISTENBERRY ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS
01/27/2014 "See News Release 005 for any Concurrences and/or Dissents." SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA NO. 13-B-2461 IN RE: ANDREW C. CHRISTENBERRY ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS PER CURIAM This disciplinary
More informationTuesday 28th November, 2006.
Tuesday 28th November, 2006. On November 10, 2005 came the Virginia State Bar, by Phillip V. Anderson, its President, and Thomas A. Edmonds, its Executive Director and Chief Operating Officer, and presented
More informationv. Case No [VSB Docket No.: ] ROBERT W. HAAS,
G; VIRGINIA: IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF FAIRFAX I VIRGINIA STATE BAR EX REL I ' -"". ' \). FIFTH DISTRICT- SECTION 1 COMMITTEE, Complainant, v. Case No. 2007 13872 [VSB Docket No.: 06-051-1284]
More informationRECEIVED DEC Respondent. impaneled pursuant to Section ofthe Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, consisting
. VIRGINIA: RECEIVED DEC 1 1 2017 VSB CLERK'S OFFICE IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE CITY OF NEWPORT NEWS VIRGINIA STATE BAR EX REL FIRST DISTRICT COMMITTEE VSB Docket No. 16-010-104166 Complainant~ V. Case
More informationTHE WASHINGTON COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION FEE DISPUTE COMMITTEE RULES FOR PROCESSING AND CONDUCT OF FEE DISPUTE
THE WASHINGTON COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION FEE DISPUTE COMMITTEE RULES FOR PROCESSING AND CONDUCT OF FEE DISPUTE 1. Agreement of Parties: These Rules shall apply whenever both of the parties have agreed to
More informationTHE RETIREMENT BOARD OF THE FIREMEN S ANNUITY AND BENEFIT FUND OF CHICAGO
THE RETIREMENT BOARD OF THE FIREMEN S ANNUITY AND BENEFIT FUND OF CHICAGO Procedural Rules Established Pursuant to 40 ILCS 5/6-191 Governing Applications for and Administrative Hearings upon Applications
More informationMEDICAL STAFF FAIR HEARING PLAN
Stuart, Florida Last Amended October 25, 2012 Last reviewed in its entirety by Medical Staff Bylaws Committee: 2/07; 7/28/08; 7/14/10; 07/02/12; 7/16/14; 7/11/16 Revised: 5/24/01; 6/28/07; 10/25/12 Reformatted:
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. No. SC Complainant, The Florida Bar File v. Nos ,011(17B) AMENDED REPORT OF REFEREE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA THE FLORIDA BAR, Supreme Court Case No. SC08-1210 Complainant, The Florida Bar File v. Nos. 2007-50,011(17B) 2007-51,629(17B) JANE MARIE LETWIN, Respondent. / AMENDED REPORT
More informationCOMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS JUVENILE COURT DEPARTMENT
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS JUVENILE COURT DEPARTMENT STANDING ORDER 1-07 VIOLATION OF PROBATION PROCEEDINGS I. Scope and Purpose This standing order prescribes procedures in the Juvenile Court to be
More informationMEDICAL STAFF BYLAWS. Part II: Investigations, Corrective Action, Hearing and Appeal Plan
MEDICAL STAFF BYLAWS Part II: Investigations, Corrective Action, Hearing and Appeal Plan Approval Date October 24, 2007 Effective Date January 1, 2008 Formal Review Date August 26, 2015 Amendments Approved:
More information[SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) ARE UNCHANGED]
(Filed - April 3, 2008 - Effective August 1, 2008) Rule XI. Disciplinary Proceedings. Section 1. Jurisdiction. [UNCHANGED] Section 2. Grounds for discipline. [SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) ARE UNCHANGED] (c)
More informationMinnesota Rules of No-Fault Arbitration Procedures
Minnesota Rules of No-Fault Arbitration Procedures Available online at adr.org Rules Amended and Effective January 1, 2018 Table of Contents Minnesota Rules of No-Fault Arbitration Procedures... 4 Rule
More informationRULES OF JUVENILE COURT PROCEDURE DELINQUENCY MATTERS
RULES OF JUVENILE COURT PROCEDURE DELINQUENCY MATTERS PART D [MASTERS]JUVENILE COURT HEARING OFFICERS 182. Qualifications of [Master]Juvenile Court Hearing Officer 185. Appointment to Cases 187. Authority
More informationENGLAND BOXING DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURE
ENGLAND BOXING DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURE DEFINITIONS Code: EB: EB Committee: EB Officer: Procedure: the England Boxing Code of Conduct; England Boxing Limited (RCN: 02817909) whose registered office is The
More informationBefore the Virginia State Bar Disciplinary Board
VIRGINIA: Before the Virginia State Bar Disciplinary Board In the Matter of Jud Andrew Fischel VSB Docket No. 17-070-106687 Attorney at Law On July 10, 2017, came Jud Andrew Fischel and presented to the
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA. OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, : No Disciplinary Docket No. 3 Petitioner. v. : No.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, : No. 1859 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 Petitioner v. : No. 93 DB 2011 KATRINA F. WRIGHT, Respondent : Attorney Registration No. 52233
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before a Referee) v. Case No. SC TFB No ,261(13D) JULIAN STANFORD LIFSEY REPORT OF THE REFEREE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before a Referee) THE FLORIDA BAR Complainant, v. Case No. SC07-747 TFB No. 2004-11,261(13D) JULIAN STANFORD LIFSEY Respondent. / REPORT OF THE REFEREE I. SUMMARY OF PROCEEDINGS
More informationRULES OF SUPREME COURT OF VIRGINIA PART ONE RULES APPLICABLE TO ALL PROCEEDINGS
RULES OF SUPREME COURT OF VIRGINIA PART ONE RULES APPLICABLE TO ALL PROCEEDINGS Rule 1:18. Pretrial Scheduling Order. A. In any civil case the parties, by counsel of record, may agree and submit for approval
More informationRules of Procedure TABLE OF CONTENTS
OSB Rules of Procedure (Revised 1/1/2018) 1 Rules of Procedure (As approved by the Supreme Court by order dated February 9, 1984 and as amended by Supreme Court orders dated April 18, 1984, May 31, 1984,
More informationCORRECTIVE ACTION/FAIR HEARING PLAN FOR HENDRICKS REGIONAL HEALTH DANVILLE, INDIANA
CORRECTIVE ACTION/FAIR HEARING PLAN FOR HENDRICKS REGIONAL HEALTH DANVILLE, INDIANA Revised 2/94 Revised 11/00 Approved 1/05 Revised 3/97 Approved 1/01 Approved 1/06 Revised 9/98 Approved 1/02 Approved
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA OFHCE OF IDISCIPUNARY COUNSEL, : No. 1261 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 Petitioner Nos. 9 DB 2007 and 92 D13 2008 V. : Attorney Registration No. 32154 ROBERT L. FEDERLINE,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before a Referee)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before a Referee) THE FLORIDA BAR, v. Complainant, CASE NO. SC10-1174 TFB NO. 2008-11,083 (6B) MICHAEL ALEX WASYLIK, Respondent. / REPORT OF REFEREE I. Summary of Proceedings:
More informationMaking a Complaint Against Members of the Institute of Certified Public Accountants In Ireland
Making a Complaint Against Members of the Institute of Certified Public Accountants In Ireland INDEX Introduction 3 How the Institute can help you 3 Relationship with your CPA 3 Making a complaint to the
More informationThe court annexed arbitration program.
NEVADA ARBITRATION RULES (Rules Governing Alternative Dispute Resolution, Part B) (effective July 1, 1992; as amended effective January 1, 2008) Rule 1. The court annexed arbitration program. The Court
More informationSTATE OF VERMONT PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY BOARD. Decision No. 131
131 PRB [Filed 17-May-2010] STATE OF VERMONT PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY BOARD In re PRB File No. 2010.143 Decision No. 131 The parties have filed a Stipulation of Facts and Recommended Conclusions of
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before a Referee)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before a Referee) IN RE: PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT Case No. SC08-75 TFB No. 2008-10,835(13B)(HRE) OF PEDRO GILBERTO VELEZ, JR., Petitioner. / REPORT OF REFEREE ON PETITION
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before a Referee)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before a Referee) THE FLORIDA BAR, v. Complainant, JOSEPH THOMAS LANDER, Case No. SC10-385 TFB File No. 2009-00,476(03)NFC Respondent. / REPORT OF THE REFEREE I. SUMMARY
More informationSTATE OF VERMONT PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY BOARD. Decision No. 98
98 PRB [Filed 11-Apr-2007] STATE OF VERMONT PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY BOARD In re: Bradney Griffin, Esq. PRB File No 2007.071 Decision No. 98 Respondent is charged with failure to cooperate with disciplinary
More informationNCTA Disciplinary Procedure
NCTA Disciplinary Procedure The Nebraska College of Technical Agriculture (NCTA) Disciplinary Procedure is adapted for NCTA from Article IV: Student Code of Conduct Disciplinary Procedures of the UNL Student
More informationSUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL PROCEDURAL RULES COMMITTEE
SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL PROCEDURAL RULES COMMITTEE Proposed Recommendation No. 241 Proposed Rescission of Rule 4014, Promulgation of New Rules 4014.1, 4014.2 and 4014.3 Governing Request for
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 118,378. In the Matter of LANCE M. HALEY, Respondent. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN DISCIPLINE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 118,378 In the Matter of LANCE M. HALEY, Respondent. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN DISCIPLINE Original proceeding in discipline. Opinion filed March 2, 2018. One-year
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before a Referee) REPORT OF REFEREE ACCEPTING CONSENT JUDGMENT
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before a Referee) THE FLORIDA BAR, Supreme Court Case No. SC14-1576 Complainant, The F.lorida Bar File v. Nos. 2014-30,298 (18B), 2014-30,843 (09E) LILLIAN CLOVER, Respondent.
More informationORIGINAL LOUISIANA ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY BOARD IN RE: SATRICA WILLIAMS-BENSAADAT NUMBER: 12-DB-046
ORIGINAL LOUISIANA ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY BOARD IN RE: SATRICA WILLIAMS-BENSAADAT NUMBER: 12-DB-046 RULING OF THE LOUISIANA ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY BOARD 12-DB-046 7/27/2015 INTRODUCTION This is a disciplinary
More informationORDER. 2012, the Joint Petition in Support of Discipline on Consent is hereby granted pursuant
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, : No. 1832 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 Petitioner : No. 55 DB 2011 V. : Attorney Registration No. 54506 ALEXANDER Z. TALMADGE, JR., Respondent
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before a Referee) REPORT OF REFEREE. I. SUMMARY OF PROCEEDINGS: Pursuant to the undersigned being duly
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before a Referee) THE FLORIDA BAR, v. Complainant, ALBERTO JOSE XIQUES, Respondent. / Supreme Court Case No. SC07-1329 The Florida Bar Case No. 2007-71,019(11H) REPORT
More informationLOUISIANA ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY BOARD IN RE: GEORGE ALLEN ROTH WALSH NUMBER: 17-DB-008 RULING OF THE LOUISIANA ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY BOARD
LOUISIANA ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY BOARD IN RE: GEORGE ALLEN ROTH WALSH NUMBER: 17-DB-008 17-DB-008 6/21/2018 RULING OF THE LOUISIANA ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY BOARD INTRODUCTION This is an attorney discipline
More informationNEW YORK STATE COMMISSION ON JUDICIAL CONDUCT POLICY MANUAL
NEW YORK STATE COMMISSION ON JUDICIAL CONDUCT POLICY MANUAL DECEMBER 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTORY NOTE 1 SECTION 1: STAFF 1.1 Administrator s Authority; Clerk of the Commission 2 1.2 Court of Appeals
More information