IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. RAFAEL SANCHEZ-DOPAZO, Petitioner, -vs- CHARLES CRIST, ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF FLORIDA. Respondent.
|
|
- Albert Derek Horton
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. RAFAEL SANCHEZ-DOPAZO, Petitioner, -vs- CHARLES CRIST, ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF FLORIDA Respondent. ON PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW AMENDED PETITIONER S BRIEF ON JURISDICTION MARISA TINKLER MENDEZ, P.A. MARISA TINKLER MENDEZ, ESQ. 901 Ponce deleon Blvd. Suite 304 Coral Gables, Florida Florida Bar No (305) Counsel for Petitioner
2 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE(s) TABLE OF CONTENTS... i TABLE OF CITATIONS... iii INTRODUCTION... 1 STATEMENT OF THE CASE... 1 STATEMENT OF JURISDICTION OF THIS COURT... 5 I. THIS CASE SHOULD BE REVIEWED GIVEN THE DIRECT CONFLICT WITH THE DECISION OF THE SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL IN NULPH V. STATE, 838 SO.2D 1244 (FLA. 2D DCA 2003), WHICH IS RESULTING IN DISPARATE APPLICATION OF THE FLORIDA SUPREME COURT STANDARD TO BE APPLIED IN EVALUATING FOURTH AMENDMENT CLAIMS OF UNREASONABLE SEARCHES AND SEIZURES, LEADING TO FURTHER CONCERNS WARNED OF IN THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT CASE OF WHREN V. UNITED STATES, 517 U.S. 806 (1996) ARGUMENT... 5 I. A CLEAR CONFLICT EXISTS IN THIS CASE WITH THE DECISION OF THE SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL IN NULPH V. STATE, 838 SO. 2D 1244 (FLA. 3D DCA 2003), SINCE THERE HAS BEEN A CLEAR MISAPPLICATION OF THE FLORIDA SUPREME COURT STANDARD IN EVALUATING FOURTH AMENDMENT CLAIMS OF UNREASONABLE SEARCHES AND SEIZURES, LEADING TO FURTHER CONCERNS WARNED OF IN THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT CASE OF WHREN V. UNITED STATES, 517 U.S. 806 (1996)
3 i CONCLUSION CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE CERTIFICATE OF TYPE SIZE APPENDICES... A-1, A-2
4 ii TABLE OF CITATIONS CASES PAGE(s) Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968)ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ.. 6 Whren v. United States, 517 U.S. 806, 116 S.Ct. 1769, 135 L.Ed.2d 89 (1996)ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ 5,7,8,9 Borys v. State, 824 So.2d 204 (Fla. 2 nd DCA 2002)ÿÿÿÿÿ 7 Holland v. State, 696 So.2d 757 (Fla. 1997)ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ 8,9 Nulph v. State, 838 So.2d 1244 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003)ÿÿÿÿ 5,6 State v. Daniel, 665 So.2d 1040 (Fla. 1995)ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ 7 OTHER AUTHORITIES Article V sec.3 of the Florida Constitutionÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ 5 Rule 9.030(a)(2)(iv), Fla.R.App.Proÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ.. 5 U.S.Const.Amend.IVÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ.... 8
5 iii IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. RAFAEL SANCHEZ-DOPAZO, Petitioner, -vs- CHARLIE CRIST, ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF FLORIDA Respondent. ON PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW AMENDED PETITIONER S BRIEF ON JURISDICTION INTRODUCTION This case is presented to this Court for discretionary review from the decision from the Fourth District Court of Appeal entered on May 21, 2003, rehearing denied on July 3, STATEMENT OF THE CASE On May 21, 2003 the Fourth District Court of Appeal entered its four page order, affirming the Circuit Court order denying his dispositive motion to suppress, and further affirming his convictions and sentence for possession of cocaine, trafficking in cocaine, and possession of a firearm by a convicted felon. Petitioner filed a timely motion for rehearing and clarification, which was denied by the Court by order dated July 3, The direct appeal was based on the underlying legality of the police actions in this case, and the subversion of Petitioner s Fourth Amendment rights. On or about August 27, 1999, Miami Police undercover narcotics investigator Roberto Solar was assigned by his supervisor, Sergeant Castro, to investigate Rafael Sanchez. Solar explained that Castro had received
6 information from an unverified, anonymous caller 1 that Rafael Sanchez was transporting cocaine from Miami up North two or three times a week. Police set up intermittent surveillance of Sanchez at his home and place of work. On November 3, 1999 the police decided to surveil Sanchez for the entire day. Sanchez left his house and drove North on the highway. Sanchez was stopped by Officer Greco only after traveling almost seventy (70) miles. The police involved had agreed and planned to stop Sanchez and search his car with a narcotics dog. [R.4:21-3] While en route following Sanchez, Solar radioed ahead to Florida Highway Patrol Officers to be on the lookout for Sanchez vehicle, and attempt to stop the vehicle. Solar explained that the police, in toto had a pre-arranged plan to follow Sanchez as he drove North, stop his vehicle, and search it for drugs with K-9 drug sniffing dogs. Solar searched jurisdictions in order to find some officer to stop Sanchez to allow the drug search of Sanchez vehicle.[tr.9-10,20-22] It was Florida Highway Patrol Officer Salvatore Greco who, after receiving information about Sanchez vehicle description and tag number, ultimately stopped Sanchez vehicle. Greco admitted that he made a decision to stop Sanchez vehicle once he was advised by his supervisor that the vehicle described was possibly carrying drugs.[r.4:35] This decision to stop Sanchez was made well before Greco actually located the vehicle. Greco located Sanchez vehicle approximately one-half (1/2) an hour later at mile marker 128 on the Turnpike. He said he pace clocked the vehicle, and his (Greco s) speedometer read 78 miles per hour. 2 3 Greco agreed that this was not an ordinary traffic stop where he would stop a vehicle and issue a citation.[r.4:43-4] Greco said that when he stopped Sanchez he asked for his license and registration, and Sanchez promptly produced the requested documents. He noticed that Sanchez had a business restriction on his license, and he ran a check on the license. Greco questioned him about the business restriction and other matters relating to his travel. Sanchez promptly answered his questions.[r.4:46-8] Greco acknowledged that Trooper Benevedez showed up some time later (he could not recall how long after he had stopped Sanchez). Greco contradicted himself on a very important point that is regarding the writing of a traffic citation for speeding which, according to Greco, was supposedly the basis for the stop. Greco first claimed that when the K-9 trooper Rodriguez arrived with the dog, he was still writing Sanchez a ticket; then admitted that when Rodriguez arrived he had not yet written Sanchez a ticket for speeding; then, his third version of events was that he was speaking with Sanchez when Rodriguez arrived (some twenty or so minutes after the stop), and, was only going to give Sanchez a warning for speeding rather than issue a ticket, but, after speaking with Rodriguez, Rodriguez told him to issue Sanchez a speeding citation, which he ultimately did. [Tr.30-31;43-48] FHP Trooper Benevedez appeared at the scene of the stop. When she arrived she saw that Trooper Greco and Mr. Sanchez were already standing outside of their vehicles. Greco told Trooper Benevedez that he wanted to search Sanchez car, and was waiting for the K-9 unit to 1 The police had no information as to the identity of the anonymous person, and did not otherwise have information to verify the tip. 2 Since the State never established that the trooper s speedometer had been properly and timely calibrated, Greco s testimony about speed was only an opinion and estimation of his speed at the time he pace clocked Mr. Sanchez.[R.4:29] 3 Greco also agreed that he usually only writes speeding citations for people who travel fifteen (15) miles per hour over the speed limit.[r.4:38]
7 arrive. [R.4:91-93] Thereafter, 4 canine Officer Rodriguez arrived at the stop site with his dog Lex. Greco said that he was still writing a speeding ticket for Sanchez when Rodriguez showed up. [R.4:31-2] Greco engaged Sanchez in more conversation while Rodriguez and his drug-sniffing dog searched Sanchez car. [R.4:49-50] There was no evidence presented when Officer Greco actually wrote the traffic ticket for speeding.[r.4:52-4] This timely request for discretionary review and brief on jurisdiction follows. STATEMENT OF JURISDICTION OF THIS COURT The discretionary jurisdiction of this Court is invoked pursuant to Rule 9.030(a)(2)(iv) of the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure, and Article V sec.3 of the Florida Constitution. ARGUMENT IN SUPPORT OF THIS COURT S JURISDICTION I. A CONFLICT EXISTS IN THIS CASE WITH THE DECISION OF THE SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL IN NULPH V. STATE, 838 SO. 2D 1244 (FLA. 2D DCA 2003), SINCE THERE HAS BEEN A CLEAR MISAPPLICATION OF THE FLORIDA SUPREME COURT STANDARD IN EVALUATING FOURTH AMENDMENT CLAIMS OF UNREASONABLE SEARCHES AND SEIZURES, LEADING TO FURTHER CONCERNS WARNED OF IN WHREN V. UNITED STATES, 517 U.S. 806 (1996) The basis premise of Fourth Amendment Constitutional law, as followed by the State s is that all persons must be protected from unlawful and unreasonable searches and seizures. While a police officer may, under certain circumstances, stop a person for the purpose of investigating what is possible criminal activity, if the officer has reasonable suspicion that the person is engaged in criminal activity. see Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968), the police cannot stop a person without some probable cause to believe that a traffic violation has occurred or there is criminal activity afoot. Notably, when the police stop a driver based on sufficient, probable cause to believe that a traffic infraction has occurred, the State that bears the burden of establishing that the infraction did indeed occur. Beyond this, even if the traffic stop was lawful, the traffic stop in this case, and detention here lasted well beyond the time necessary to write the citation. 1 Sanchez should have been free to leave once sufficient time had passed for issuance of the citation. See e.g. Nulph v. State, It was never clear actually how much time passed from the time Sanchez was first stopped to the time that the narcotics dog arrived. Trooper Greco could not recall how long he waited for Trooper Rodriguez, but, given his testimony that he was waiting so that Sanchez car could be searched, the motivation was clear that Greco would do what was necessary to intentionally stall the process.
8 So.2d 1244 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003)(detention unreasonably long where police intended to stop car in which defendant a passenger, ran driver s license and registration check, and was standing at back of police vehicle when canine unit arrived to conduct pre-planned search of car); Borys v. State, 824 So.2d 204 (Fla. 2 nd DCA 2002)(detention after point where police officer learned that initial, lawful stop for apparent temporary tag violation was resolved, became illegal stop, requiring suppression of all information learned from the subsequent improper inquiry). The case at bar, warranting this Court s intervention given the conflict in District s, is exactly the type of case the Supreme Court warned of in Whren v. United States, 517 U.S. 806, 116 S.Ct. 1769, 135 L.Ed.2d 89 (1996). The stop here was the type of pre-textual stop that must not be tolerated, even if there existed probable cause to stop Sanchez vehicle based on a traffic violation. The reason is clear -allowing the objective standard to be skewed to allow the police to follow a person for more than 120 miles, lying in wait until a traffic infraction is witnessed, must require more proof that a traffic violation occurred. The traffic stop was not legal, and only a pretext to create probable cause to search the vehicle. The test to be applied to determine the validity of a traffic stop was set forth by the United States Supreme Court in Whren, supra. 5 There, the Supreme Court held that, under the Fourth Amendment, an officer s reasons for a stop of an automobile are immaterial as long as the officer has probable cause to believe that a traffic violation has occurred. Id. at 808. see Holland v. State, 696 So.2d 757 (Fla. 1997)(adopting objective test Whren ). However, as the Supreme Court in Whren recognized, the leniency afforded police officers in making traffic stops must still necessarily be balanced against the Fourth Amendment guarantees of persons to...be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures. U.S.Const.Amend.IV. 6 As such, Whren automobile traffic stops are valid and permissible under the Fourth Amendment for only the temporary detention of the violator, and for the limited purpose of assessing the traffic violation. Our Constitution still continues to protects even those persons properly stopped from excessive detention and unreasonable searches and seizures The fear, of course, is that the police will use traffic stops as a means of investigating other law violations, for which there is no probable cause or even existing articulable suspicion of a law violation. There still must exist the traditional justification of probable cause to validate a traffic stop. In this case, the stop of Sanchez vehicle was not a random stop; it was a specifically calculated and pre-arranged stop made by police who followed Sanchez vehicle on the highway for over seventy (70) miles and was under direction from his superiors to make the stop. The record below is clear the speeding allegation and citation were merely a pretext used to create a probable cause justification to stop Sanchez, this to fit within the objectively reasonable standard of Whren. The traffic stop conducted in this case by Florida Highway Patrol Officer Grecco was not legally authorized, and was merely a ruse to detain Mr. Sanchez and conduct an illegal search. This Court should address the matters presented in this case and the conflict that has resulted in the District Court s of Appeal in attempting to apply the objectively reasonable standard of Whren to police traffic stops and detentions. A clear standard must be set and complied with in all circumstances. The intentional delay in issuing the traffic citation in our case 5 Whren overruled the Florida Supreme Court determination in State v. Daniel, 665 So.2d 1040 (Fla. 1995) that a reasonable officer test was to be applied to determine the validity and legality of an automobile stop. 6 The Fourth Amendment protections are guaranteed to the citizens of States through the Fourteenth Amendment.
9 proves that the stop was only based on the desire to search Mr. Sanchez vehicle for drugs, and, was calculated in a way to circumvent the Fourth Amendment and hide behind the objectively reasonable standard. Our case presents the exact scenario warned of in Whren. While there no longer exists a reasonable officer standard for automobile stops, the police here abused their power, in order to circumvent the protections required under the Fourth Amendment. A conflict in the District Court s of this State exists, and a clear and unequivocal standard for police traffic stops and temporary detentions must be followed to ensure uniformity in the Court s of Appeal and to further insure protection of Fourth Amendment rights. CONCLUSION The Petitioner urges this Court to accept discretionary review of this case. Respectfully submitted, MARISA TINKLER MENDEZ, P.A. MARISA TINKLER MENDEZ, ESQ. 901 Ponce deleon Blvd. Suite 304 Coral Gables, Florida (305) By MARISA TINKLER MENDEZ, ESQ. Florida Bar No CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing Petitioner s brief on jurisdiction was delivered by mail to the Office of the Attorney General, The Capitol PL-01, Tallahassee, Florida this 26 th day of August, By MARISA TINKLER MENDEZ, ESQ CERTIFICATE OF TYPE SIZE I hereby certify that this brief is printed in 12 point Courier New, DOS WordPerfect, By MARISA TINKLER MENDEZ, ESQ.
10 APPENDIX 1. The evidence at the suppression hearing showed that the citation was only finally issued as an afterthought, while Sanchez sat handcuffed in the rear of a police car, and well after he had been stopped, questioned by several officers and his car searched.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC WILLIE L. CLARK, Petitioner, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC05-1248 WILLIE L. CLARK, Petitioner, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. RESPONDENT'S AMENDED BRIEF ON JURISDICTION CHARLES J. CRIST, JR Attorney General
More informationIN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE October 18, 2016 Session
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE October 18, 2016 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. COREY FOREST Appeal from the Circuit Court for Maury County No. 24034 Robert Jones, Judge No. M2016-00463-CCA-R3-CD
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JANUARY TERM v. Case No. 5D12-392
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JANUARY TERM 2013 STATE OF FLORIDA, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED Appellant,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Petitioner/Appellant, CASE NO. vs. DCA CASE NO. 4D PETITIONER S BRIEF ON DISCRETIONARY JURISDICTION
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA COREY STUDEMIRE, Petitioner/Appellant, CASE NO. vs. DCA CASE NO. 4D05-4019 STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent/Appellee. / PETITIONER S BRIEF ON DISCRETIONARY JURISDICTION CAREY
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA
FOR PUBLICATION ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT: ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE: E. THOMAS KEMP STEVE CARTER Richmond, Indiana Attorney General of Indiana GEORGE P. SHERMAN Deputy Attorney General Indianapolis, Indiana
More informationThe STATE of Ohio, Appellee, RAMOS, Appellant. [Cite as State v. Ramos, 155 Ohio App.3d 396, 2003-Ohio-6535.] Court of Appeals of Ohio,
[Cite as State v. Ramos, 155 Ohio App.3d 396, 2003-Ohio-6535.] The STATE of Ohio, Appellee, v. RAMOS, Appellant. [Cite as State v. Ramos, 155 Ohio App.3d 396, 2003-Ohio-6535.] Court of Appeals of Ohio,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA PETITIONER S BRIEF ON DISCRETIONARY JURISDICTION
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA GAYNOR EARL TEDDER, JR., v. Petitioner, CASE NO. SC08-1055 DCA CASE NO. 2D05-3424 STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. PETITIONER S BRIEF ON DISCRETIONARY JURISDICTION
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA Eric Sinns, CASE NO.: 2016-CA-977-O v. Petitioner, State of Florida, Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles,
More informationThird District Court of Appeal State of Florida, January Term, A.D. 2013
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida, January Term, A.D. 2013 Opinion filed, June 12, 2013. No. 3D12-2313 Lower Tribunal No. 09-234 State of Florida Department of Highway Safety, etc., Petitioner,
More informationMICHAEL EUGENE JONES OPINION BY v. Record No JUSTICE LEROY F. MILLETTE, JR. April 15, 2010 COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA
PRESENT: Hassell, C.J., Keenan, 1 Millette, JJ., and Lacy, S.J. Koontz, Lemons, Goodwyn, and MICHAEL EUGENE JONES OPINION BY v. Record No. 091539 JUSTICE LEROY F. MILLETTE, JR. April 15, 2010 COMMONWEALTH
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF CHAMPAIGN COUNTY, OHIO. Plaintiff-Appellee : C.A. CASE NO. 2011CA10. vs. : T.C. CASE NO. 2010CR218
[Cite as State v. Haynes, 2011-Ohio-5020.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF CHAMPAIGN COUNTY, OHIO STATE OF OHIO : Plaintiff-Appellee : C.A. CASE NO. 2011CA10 vs. : T.C. CASE NO. 2010CR218 BENNY E. HAYNES, JR.
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JANUARY TERM v. Case No. 5D
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JANUARY TERM 2007 STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellant, v. Case No. 5D06-2993 AARON TYRONE LEE, Appellee. / Opinion filed May 11, 2007 Appeal
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. ROBERT KOENEMUND, Petitioner, v. CASE NO. SC DCA No. 5D
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA ROBERT KOENEMUND, Petitioner, v. CASE NO. SC10-844 DCA No. 5D09-4443 STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. DISCRETIONARY REVIEW OF A DECISION OF THE SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA. Lower Case No.: 2012-TR A-W
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA MICHELLE ANN GLASS, Appellant, CASE NO.: 2013-CV-000038-A-O Lower Case No.: 2012-TR-027060-A-W v. STATE OF FLORIDA,
More informationNo. 117,571 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. STATE OF KANSAS, ex rel., GEARY COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, Appellant, and
No. 117,571 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS STATE OF KANSAS, ex rel., GEARY COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, Appellant, v. ONE 2008 TOYOTA TUNDRA, VIN: 5TBBV54158S517709; $84,820.00 IN U.S.
More informationCourt of Appeals. First District of Texas
Opinion issued May 20, 2010 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas NO. 01-08-00866-CR JAMES ERSKIN, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 262nd District Court Harris
More information2005 High School Appellate Competition Bench Brief
2005 High School Appellate Competition Bench Brief INDEX Case Summary 1-3 Issues 4 Sample Arguments 4-7 Sample Questions 8-10 Summaries of Authority 11-15 Case Summary TONI MENENDEZ, Petitioner, v. STATE
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. v. CASE NO.: SC STATE OF FLORIDA, DCA case no.: 5D
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA LORENZO GOLPHIN, Petitioner, v. CASE NO.: SC03-554 STATE OF FLORIDA, DCA case no.: 5D02-1848 Respondent. / ON DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
More informationSTATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF MEDINA ) DECISION AND JOURNAL ENTRY
[Cite as State v. Miller, 2013-Ohio-985.] STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS )ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF MEDINA ) STATE OF OHIO Appellant C.A. No. 12CA0070-M v. KYLE MILLER Appellee APPEAL
More informationSTATE OF OHIO ANTHONY FEARS
[Cite as State v. Fears, 2011-Ohio-930.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 94997 STATE OF OHIO PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE vs. ANTHONY FEARS DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
More informationNo. 51,450-KA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * versus * * * * *
Judgment rendered August 9, 2017. Application for rehearing may be filed within the delay allowed by Art. 992, La. C. Cr. P. No. 51,450-KA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * STATE
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO. : O P I N I O N - vs - 11/9/2009 :
[Cite as State v. Moore, 2009-Ohio-5927.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO PREBLE COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : CASE NO. CA2009-02-005 : O P I N I O N - vs - 11/9/2009
More informationThird District Court of Appeal State of Florida, January Term, A.D. 2010
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida, January Term, A.D. 2010 Opinion filed June 30, 2010. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. No. 3D09-1346 Lower Tribunal No.
More informationCOURT OF APPEALS THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT HANCOCK COUNTY STATE OF OHIO CASE NUMBER v. O P I N I O N
[Cite as State v. Shoulders, 2005-Ohio-4749.] COURT OF APPEALS THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT HANCOCK COUNTY STATE OF OHIO CASE NUMBER 5-05-05 PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE v. O P I N I O N EMANUEL L. SHOULDERS DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
More informationCommonwealth Of Kentucky. Court of Appeals
RENDERED: MAY 21, 2004; 2:00 p.m. TO BE PUBLISHED Commonwealth Of Kentucky Court of Appeals NO. 2003-CA-000584-MR EDWARD LAMONT HARDY APPELLANT APPEAL FROM FAYETTE CIRCUIT COURT v. HONORABLE SHEILA R.
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 73,780 THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Petitioner, vs. ROBERTO PASTOR, Respondent. ...
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 73,780 THE STATE OF FLORIDA, 'a Petitioner, vs. ROBERTO PASTOR, Respondent.... ON PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW... INITIAL BRIEF OF PETITIONER ROBERT A. BUTTERWORTH
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA. CASE NO. SC: 4 th DCA CASE NO: 4D STATE OF FLORIDA, Petitioner, vs. SALVATORE BENNETT,
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC: 4 th DCA CASE NO: 4D04-4825 STATE OF FLORIDA, Petitioner, vs. SALVATORE BENNETT, Respondent. PETITIONER'S BRIEF ON JURISDICTION CHARLES J. CRIST,
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT. Alfonso C. Mendoza, : (REGULAR CALENDAR) Michael O. Champagnie, : (REGULAR CALENDAR)
[Cite as State v. Mendoza, 2009-Ohio-1182.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT State of Ohio, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : No. 08AP-645 v. : (C.P.C. No. 07CR-09-6625) Alfonso C. Mendoza,
More informationCase 2:12-cr RJS Document 51 Filed 02/26/13 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH CENTRAL DIVISION
Case 2:12-cr-00261-RJS Document 51 Filed 02/26/13 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH CENTRAL DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER vs. RAMON
More informationNOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED OF FLORIDA
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT SHEDDRICK JUBREE BROWN, JR., Appellant, v. Case No. 2D15-3855
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY, OHIO. Plaintiff-Appellant : C.A. CASE NO vs. : T.C. CASE NO. 06CR4007
[Cite as State v. Watts, 2007-Ohio-2411.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY, OHIO STATE OF OHIO : Plaintiff-Appellant : C.A. CASE NO. 21982 vs. : T.C. CASE NO. 06CR4007 ASHANTA WATTS : (Criminal
More informationThe Dog Sniff Case Fourth Amendment United States Constitution
Fourth Amendment United States Constitution The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NUMBER D.C.A. CASE NO RONALD LEE CRAIG, Petitioner, THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NUMBER D.C.A. CASE NO. 04-125 RONALD LEE CRAIG, Petitioner, v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. *********************************************************** ON PETITION
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JANUARY TERM v. CASE NO. 5D
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JANUARY TERM 2001 DARIN LLOYD HILGEMAN, Appellant, v. CASE NO. 5D00-1054 STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. Opinion filed June 8, 2001 Appeal
More informationCOURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, EIGHTH DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA No STATE OF OHIO, : Plaintiff-Appellant : JOURNAL ENTRY. vs.
[Cite as State v. Ely, 2006-Ohio-459.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, EIGHTH DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA No. 86091 STATE OF OHIO, Plaintiff-Appellant JOURNAL ENTRY vs. AND KEITH ELY, OPINION Defendant-Appellee
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. v. CASE NO. SC L.T. NO. 1D STATE OF FLORIDA,
Filing # 11092791 Electronically Filed 03/07/2014 02:35:35 PM RECEIVED, 3/7/2014 14:38:38, John A Tomasino, Clerk, Supreme Court IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA NOEL PLANK, Petitioner, v CASE NO SC14-414
More informationNOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION. No. 116,492 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee,
NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION No. 116,492 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. ABIGAIL KRISTINE BROWN, Appellant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Appeal from Saline District
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC DCA CASE NO. 3D VINCENT MARGIOTTI. Petitioner, -vs- STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC03-2290 DCA CASE NO. 3D02-2862 VINCENT MARGIOTTI Petitioner, -vs- STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. ON PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF
More informationv No Berrien Circuit Court
S T A T E O F M I C H I G A N C O U R T O F A P P E A L S PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, UNPUBLISHED February 27, 2018 v No. 339239 Berrien Circuit Court JAMES HENNERY HANNIGAN, LC
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. ROBERTO CASTANEDA, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) vs. ) CASE NO. SC ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Respondent.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA ROBERTO CASTANEDA, Petitioner, vs. CASE NO. SC11-1337 STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. JURISIDICTIONAL BRIEF OF PETITIONER On Review from the District Court of Appeal, Fourth
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. CASE NO. SC Second District Case No. 2D
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC03-1734 Second District Case No. 2D02-3972 JARROD S. DOUDS, FRANKLIN M. DREES, VICTOR M. GOMEZ, SALVATORE S. MAZZA, KEVIN J. PETRY, CHARLES A. TRIGO, and JOHN
More informationIN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs July 21, 2010
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs July 21, 2010 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. KEVIN M. FRIERSON Direct Appeal from the Criminal Court for Davidson County No. 2007-C-2329
More informationJOSELYN S. KELLY Lancaster, Ohio ASSISTANT PROSECUTORS 239 West Main Street, Suite 101 Lancaster, Ohio 43130
[Cite as State v. Hawkins, 2012-Ohio-3137.] COURT OF APPEALS FAIRFIELD COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT STATE OF OHIO Plaintiff-Appellant -vs- SEAN HAWKINS Defendant-Appellee JUDGES: Hon. W. Scott
More informationCourt of Appeals of Ohio
[Cite as State v. Geiter, 190 Ohio App.3d 541, 2010-Ohio-6017.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 94015 The STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v.
More informationNON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P
NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA Appellee IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA v. JOHN GANT AND JEREMIAH DARYLE GANT Appellant No. 596 WDA 2015
More informationCourt of Appeals of Ohio
[Cite as State v. Hamilton, 2011-Ohio-3835.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 95720 STATE OF OHIO DEFENDANT-APPELLANT vs. CHRISTOPHER
More informationThird District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed September 10, 2014. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. No. 3D13-1796 Lower Tribunal No. 12-3833 The State of
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Petitioner, L.T. Case No. 4D ON DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE FOURTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA OLIVER BOZEMAN, CASE NO. SC06-1463 Petitioner, L.T. Case No. 4D04-2232 vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. ****************************************************************
More informationNOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT JOEY VILLANUEVA, Appellant, v. Case No. 2D15-1422 STATE OF FLORIDA,
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS SEVENTH DISTRICT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
[Cite as State v. Haslam, 2009-Ohio-696.] STATE OF OHIO, MONROE COUNTY IN THE COURT OF APPEALS SEVENTH DISTRICT STATE OF OHIO, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, VS. JEFFREY R. HASLAM, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. CASE NO. 08-MO-4
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellant, v. Case No.
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellant, v. Case No.
More informationSupreme Court of Louisiana
Supreme Court of Louisiana FOR IMMEDIATE NEWS RELEASE NEWS RELEASE # 3 FROM: CLERK OF SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA The Opinions handed down on the 21st day of January, 2009, are as follows: PER CURIAM: 2008-KK-1002
More informationSUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA DANIEL L. MURRAY & JAMES L. BRINK, Petitioners, v. District Court Case No. 5D10-1376 STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF OF PETITIONERS J. BRIAN PAGE Florida
More informationFINAL ORDER AFFIRMING TRIAL COURT. Motion to Suppress, rendered November 30, This Court has jurisdiction pursuant
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA APPELLATE CASE NO: 07-AP-83 LOWER COURT CASE NO: 2007-CT-113028-O STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellant, vs. AMANDA SUE SCOTT,
More informationCOURT OF COMMON PLEAS CLERMONT COUNTY, OHIO. Plaintiff : CASE NO CR 00091
COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CLERMONT COUNTY, OHIO STATE OF OHIO : Plaintiff : CASE NO. 2016 CR 00091 vs. : Judge McBride DANIEL N. HARP : DECISION/ENTRY Defendant : Thomas W. Scovanner, assistant prosecuting
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Case No.: Lower Case No.: ID PETITIONER S JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF. On Review from the District Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA PAULA GORDON, Petitioner, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES Respondent. Case No.: Lower Case No.: ID03-449 PETITIONER S JURISDICTIONAL
More informationOF FLORIDA. Judson Chapman, General Counsel, and Jason Helfant, Assistant General Counsel, for petitioner.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DISPOSED OF. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA THIRD DISTRICT JANUARY TERM, A.D. 2006 STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JANUARY TERM v. CASE NO. 5D
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JANUARY TERM 2003 ROOSEVELT GLOVER, Appellant, v. CASE NO. 5D01-3555 STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. Opinion Filed March 7, 2003 Appeal
More informationCourt of Appeals of Ohio
[Cite as State v. Lopez, 2010-Ohio-2462.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 93197 STATE OF OHIO PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE vs. ROBERTO LOPEZ DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
More information2016 PA Super 91. OPINION BY OTT, J.: Filed: April 28, Anthony Stilo appeals from the July 23, 2014, judgment of sentence
2016 PA Super 91 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA v. ANTHONY STILO Appellant No. 2838 EDA 2014 Appeal from the Judgment of Sentence July 23, 2014 In the Court of Common
More informationIN SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA PETITIONER S REPLY BRIEF
Electronically Filed 08/28/2013 03:49:42 PM ET RECEIVED, 8/28/2013 15:53:32, Thomas D. Hall, Clerk, Supreme Court IN SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA STATE OF FLORIDA, Petitioner, v. KERRICK VAN TEAMER, Case No.
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC09-1115 DISTRICT CASE NOS. 4D07-3703 and 4D07-4641 (Consolidated) L.T. CASE NO. 50 2005 CA 002721 XXXX MB SHEILA M. HULICK and THE REYNOLDS AND REYNOLDS
More informationThird District Court of Appeal State of Florida, January Term, A.D., 2007
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida, January Term, A.D., 2007 Opinion filed July 5, 2007. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. No. 3D06-2532 Lower Tribunal No.
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC DCA CASE NO. 3D FRANTZY JEAN-MARIE, Petitioner, -vs- THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC07-531 DCA CASE NO. 3D04-2570 FRANTZY JEAN-MARIE, Petitioner, -vs- THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. ON PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE DISTRICT COURT
More informationv. CASE NO.: 2009-CA O WRIT NO.: 09-30
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA AARON KATZMAN, Petitioner, v. CASE NO.: 2009-CA-10779-O WRIT NO.: 09-30 STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY
More informationDISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT J.H., a child, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. No. 4D17-2466 [October 31, 2018] Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC LEONARDO DIAZ, Petitioner, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC03-1031 LEONARDO DIAZ, Petitioner, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ON PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, UNPUBLISHED December 28, 2010 v No. 290094 Ingham Circuit Court KENNETH DEWAYNE ROBERTS, LC No. 08-000838-FH Defendant-Appellee.
More informationIN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE June 29, 2005 Session
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE June 29, 2005 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. JUSTIN PAUL BRUCE Appeal from the Criminal Court for Anderson County No. A3CR0301 James B. Scott,
More informationDISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT DESMOND EUGENE OWENS, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. No. 4D17-3504 [December 19, 2018] Appeal from the Circuit Court for the
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY, OHIO. v. : T.C. NO. 08 CR CURTIS, : (Criminal appeal from Common Pleas Court) Appellant.
[Cite as State v. Curtis, 193 Ohio App.3d 121, 2011-Ohio-1277.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY, OHIO The STATE OF OHIO, : Appellee, : C.A. CASE NO. 23895 v. : T.C. NO. 08 CR 1518 CURTIS,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. a juvenile, Petitioner, -vs- THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. BRIEF OF PETITIONER ON JURISDICTION
N THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORDA CASE NO. L.C., a juvenile, Petitioner, \ "\ \ '- \ -vs- THE STATE OF FLORDA, Respondent. BREF OF PETTONER ON JURSDCTON ON PETTON FOR DSCRETONARY REVEW FROM THE DSTRCT COURT
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ALFREDO ENOS LANDEROS, Defendant-Appellant. No. 17-10217 D.C. No. 4:16-cr-00855- RCC-BGM-1
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA. CASE NO. (4th DCA Case No. 4D ) STATE OF FLORIDA, Petitioner, vs. JESSIE HILL, Respondent.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO. (4th DCA Case No. 4D02-3362) STATE OF FLORIDA, Petitioner, vs. JESSIE HILL, Respondent. PETITIONER'S BRIEF ON JURISDICTION CHARLES J. CRIST JR., Attorney
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. v. Case No. 93,784 RESPONDENT'S MERITS BRIEF
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA STANLEY SHADLER, Petitioner, v. Case No. 93,784 STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. / RESPONDENT'S MERITS BRIEF On Review from the District Court of Appeal of the State of Florida
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA. No. COA Filed: 7 November 2017
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA No. COA17-108 Filed: 7 November 2017 Guilford County, No. 14 CRS 67272 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. BYRON JEROME PARKER Appeal by defendant from order entered 18
More informationIN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LYCOMING COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LYCOMING COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA : : CR-1340-2016 v. : : WILLIAM WEST, : SUPPRESSION Defendant : OPINION AND ORDER On September 29, 2016, the Defendant
More informationPUBLISH UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS TENTH CIRCUIT. Plaintiff - Appellee, v. No TRACEY RICHARD MOORE,
FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit July 30, 2015 PUBLISH Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS TENTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA. No. 194A16. Filed 3 November 2017
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA No. 194A16 Filed 3 November 2017 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. MICHAEL ANTONIO BULLOCK Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the
More informationJudicial Decision-Making and the Constitution
Judicial Decision-Making and the Constitution Florida v. J.L. Overview: The goal of this activity is to understand how judges make decisions through the interpretation and application of law. In this lesson,
More informationCASE NO. 1D The evidence at the suppression hearing showed that asset-protection
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA STATE OF FLORIDA, v. Appellant, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED CASE NO. 1D14-577
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL THIRD DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL THIRD DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA RECEIVED, 12/21/2016 10:21 AM, Mary Cay Blanks, Third District Court of Appeal SOLO AERO CORP., a Florida corporation, vs. Petitioner, AMERICA-CV
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. v. Case No. SC- IAN MANUEL L.T. No. 2D ON PETITION FOR REVIEW FROM THE SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA STATE OF FLORIDA, Petitioner, v. Case No. SC- IAN MANUEL L.T. No. 2D08-3494 Respondent. ON PETITION FOR REVIEW FROM THE SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA
More informationCase Survey: Menne v. State 2012 Ark. 37 UALR Law Review Published Online Only
THE SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS HOLDS THAT REASONABLE SUSPICION OF CRIMINAL ACTIVITY BASED ON FACTORS NOT DEVELOPED DURING A TRAFFIC STOP NEVERTHELESS SUPPORT PROLONGING THE STOP. In Menne v. State 1, the
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC ALVIN LEWIS, Petitioner. vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondents. PETITIONER'S BRIEF ON JURISDICTION
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC05-1605 ALVIN LEWIS, Petitioner vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondents. PETITIONER'S BRIEF ON JURISDICTION Seeking Discretionary Review from the District Court of
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA MICHAEL M. ROMAN, STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT'S BRIEF ON JURISDICTION
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC08-905 MICHAEL M. ROMAN, Petitioner, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. RESPONDENT'S BRIEF ON JURISDICTION BILL MCCOLLUM Attorney General Tallahassee,
More informationBill McCollum, Attorney General, and Bryan Jordan, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellant.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA STATE OF FLORIDA, v. Appellant, DEMETRIUS ANTHONY WILLIAMS, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF
More informationCommonwealth Of Kentucky Court of Appeals
RENDERED: May 5, 2006; 2:00 P.M. NOT TO BE PUBLISHED Commonwealth Of Kentucky Court of Appeals NO. 2005-CA-000790-MR WARD CARLOS HIGHTOWER APPELLANT APPEAL FROM FAYETTE CIRCUIT COURT v. HONORABLE PAMELA
More informationPETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI
E-Filed Document Jul 3 2018 15:44:32 2016-KA-01456-COA Pages: 5 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI VANESSA LYNN PAGE PETITIONER v. No. 2016-KA-1456 STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE PETITION
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellant/Cross-Appellee, UNPUBLISHED February 15, 2002 v No. 224761 Berrien Circuit Court NINETY-SIX THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JULY TERM v. Case No. 5D
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JULY TERM 2005 KERVINCE OSLIN, Appellant, v. Case No. 5D04-2951 STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. / Opinion filed October 14, 2005 Appeal
More informationLEXSEE 37 OHIO ST. 3D 177, 180. THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLANT, v. BOBO, APPELLEE. No Supreme Court of Ohio
Page 1 LEXSEE 37 OHIO ST. 3D 177, 180 THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLANT, v. BOBO, APPELLEE No. 87-664 Supreme Court of Ohio 37 Ohio St. 3d 177; 524 N.E.2d 489; 1988 Ohio LEXIS 163 February 3, 1988, Submitted
More informationALABAMA COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
REL 2/01/2008 Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the advance sheets of Southern Reporter. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Alabama Appellate
More informationv. CASE NO.: 2009-CA O WRIT NO.: ORDER GRANTING IN PART PETITIONER S MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION AND REHEARING
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA CAITLIN CLARK, Petitioner, v. CASE NO.: 2009-CA-19417-O WRIT NO.: 09-19 STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. v. CASE NO. SC On Discretionary Review From the District Court of Appeal First District of Florida
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA MICHAEL JOHN SIMMONS, Petitioner, v. CASE NO. SC04-2375 STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. / On Discretionary Review From the District Court of Appeal First District of Florida
More informationTraffic Stop Scenario Jeff Welty October 2016
Traffic Stop Scenario Jeff Welty October 2016 Officer Ollie Ogletree is on patrol one Saturday night at about 10:00 p.m. He s driving along a major commercial road in a lower middle class section of town
More informationIN THE COMMON PLEAS COURT OF FAIRFIELD COUNTY, OHIO. Plaintiff, : Case No. 12 CR 110
IN THE COMMON PLEAS COURT OF FAIRFIELD COUNTY, OHIO THE STATE OF OHIO, : Plaintiff, : Case No. 12 CR 110 v. : Judge Berens CHARLES W. FURNISS, : ENTRY Overruling in Part and Sustaining in Part Defendant
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO: 10-XXXXXXXX v. CM DIVISION: HON. XXXX XXXXX MOTION TO SUPPRESS COMES NOW, Defendant
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, vs. Plaintiff/Respondent, MARLON JULIUS KING, et al., Defendants/Petitioners. Supreme Court No. S044061 [First District
More information