Attorney-Client Privilege for the Compliance Officer:
|
|
- Louise Franklin
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Attorney-Client Privilege for the Compliance Officer: Who has it? When do you have it? How do you keep it? April 22, 2014 Marsha Gerber (Moderator) Partner Norton Rose Fulbright (713) Panelists Steven Smart Associate General Counsel Israel Chemical, Ltd. Advocacy Chairperson ACC Compliance & Ethics Committee (314) Michael Kallens Associate General Counsel Booz Allen Hamilton Inc. (703)
2 Agenda v v v v The Attorney-Client Privilege in the US Application to In-House Counsel Exceptions The Attorney-Client Privilege Abroad The European Union Countries Outside of the European Union The Role of the Compliance Officer Understanding the Differences Between the General Counsel and Compliance Officer Compliance Personnel Serving a Legal Function The Attorney-Client Privilege as Applied to the Compliance Officer When Does the Privilege Arise? When do Compliance Personnel Communications Allow the Privilege to be Invoked? How is the Privilege Protected? 2
3 The Attorney-Client Privilege in the US
4 The Attorney-Client Privilege in the US Attorney-Client Privilege v Generally, the attorney-client privilege protects: (1) communications; (2) made between attorney and client; (3) in confidence; (4) for the purpose of seeking, obtaining, or providing legal advice or services. v Acts to encourage full and frank communication between attorneys and their clients and thereby promote broader public interests in the observance of law and administration of justice. Upjohn Co. v. United States, 449 U.S. 383, 389 (1981). 4
5 The Attorney-Client Privilege in the US Cont d. Attorney-Client Privilege (Cont d.) v Protects only communications, and not underlying facts, which may be discoverable. v Agents of an attorney The privilege also protects communications made to and from an agent of an attorney, that is an individual acting at the direction of an attorney to assist in seeking, obtaining, or providing legal advice. 5
6 The Attorney-Client Privilege in the US Cont d. Work Product Privilege v Protects from disclosure: v (1) documents and other tangible things; v (2) prepared in anticipation of litigation or enforcement action; v (3) by or for another party or its representative. 6
7 Application to In-House Counsel v v v Because outside counsels business communications with corporate clients almost always relate to seeking, obtaining, or providing legal advice or services, the attorney-client privilege is broadly applied to their communications. However, courts scrutinize the application of the privilege to inhouse counsels communications with corporate clients because these individuals often perform both legal and business functions, so communications may be for purposes other than providing legal advice. As a result, courts have held that although communications with in-house counsel may be privileged, the privilege does not attach to communications simply because they are made by or to a person who happens to be a lawyer. Diversified Industries Inc. v. Meredith, 572 F.2d 596, 602 (8th Cir. 1977). 7
8 Application to In-House Counsel Cont d. v For communications with counsel (both inhouse and outside counsel) to be protected by the attorney-client privilege, the corporate client asserting that privilege applies must show the communications were: Made for the primary purpose of seeking, obtaining, or providing legal advice; and Intended to be, and were in fact, kept confidential. 8
9 Application to In-House Counsel Cont d. v Seeking, obtaining, or providing legal advice Communications containing solely business discussions or advice are not privileged. For communications that contain both legal and business discussion, courts are split as to what standard applies: In some jurisdictions, the legal communication must be the but for purpose of the communication. That is, the communications are not privileged unless the corporate client can show the communications would not have been made but for the contemplation of legal services. In other jurisdictions, the corporate client must show that one of the significant or primary purposes of the communication was seeking, obtaining, or providing legal advice. 9
10 Application to In-House Counsel Cont d. v Seeking, obtaining, or providing legal advice (Cont d.) Generally, the communication should be made between the corporate client and its attorney (or agent acting at the attorney s direction). Which employees are covered as part of the corporate client? The attorney-client privilege protects covered communications between counsel and all employees, not just executive management, so long as the communication is within the scope of the employee s responsibility ( Covered Employees ). Communications between employees that carbon copy the attorney to keep him or her in the loop are often not privileged. Some courts have held that these communications weigh in favor of a conclusion that the discussion is business related, and not legal, and therefore not privileged. 10
11 Application to In-House Counsel Cont d. v Confidential By permitting certain individuals access to a privileged communication, a corporate client may waive its right to assert the attorney-client privilege. These individuals include those other than: The attorney (and his or her agents); The employees of the corporate client that are essential to the matter; and Agents or representatives of the corporate client that are essential to the matter. Communications should be disseminated only to those employees that need to know the information to assist counsel in seeking, obtaining, or providing legal advice. Similarly, some courts have held that communications concerning legal advice that carbon copy a non-essential employee raise a question as to the confidentiality of the communications. Although documents should be marked as confidential or privileged, such a marking will not guarantee the document becomes or remains privileged. 11
12 Exceptions v Exceptions to the attorney-client privilege have arisen that may impact the privilege. v The Crime-Fraud Exception The United States Supreme Court has held that the attorneyclient and work product privileges do not apply to communications in which a client seeks legal advice or services from an attorney, whether outside or internal, for the purpose of engaging in a crime or fraud. See Clark v. United States, 289 U.S. 1, 15 (1933); United States v. Zolin, 491 U.S. 554 (1989). 12
13 Exceptions Cont d. v The Crime-Fraud Exception (Cont d.) A party seeking to invoke the crime-fraud exception must provide prima facie evidence that: (1) The client was committing or intending to commit a crime or fraud at the time he or she consulted the attorney; and (2) The client used the legal advice or services in furtherance of the intended crime or fraud. 13
14 Exceptions Cont d. The Crime-Fraud Exception (Cont d.) v Courts are split on what constitutes prima facie evidence. Some courts have held that the evidence must be sufficient to allow the court to require the privilege holder to come before the court with an explanation for the evidence offered against the privilege. Other courts have sought to determine whether the evidence, if believed by a fact-finder, would establish the elements of an imminent or ongoing crime or fraud. 14
15 Exceptions Cont d. The Crime-Fraud Exception (Cont d.) v Other courts, including the Third Circuit Court of Appeals, have held that to invoke the crime-fraud exception, a party must offer evidence providing a reasonable basis to suspect that the attorney's advice or services were used by the client to commit a crime or fraud. v Applying this test, the Third Circuit has held that the crime-fraud exception can apply even when the attorney, whether outside or in-house, does not have knowledge of, and is not implicated in, the alleged crime or fraud. 15
16 Exceptions Cont d. The Crime-Fraud Exception (Cont d.) v Case analysis: In re Grand Jury, Nos & (3d Cir. Dec. 11, 2012). Facts: ABC Corp. (a pseudonym used by the court) and two of its principals were subjects of an ongoing grand jury investigation into an illegal tax scheme. As part of its investigation, the federal government subpoenaed three former ABC Corp. in-house attorneys to obtain communications and testimony related to advice the attorneys had provided ABC Corp. regarding the acquisition of certain companies. After using the attorneys advice to acquire such companies, ABC Corp. then, without informing the attorneys, engaged in the illegal acts. ABC Corp. and its former in-house attorneys asserted attorney-client and work-product privileges, and the government invoked the crimefraud exception in response. 16
17 Exceptions Cont d. The Crime-Fraud Exception (Cont d.) v Case analysis: In re Grand Jury, (Cont d.) Holding: The court held that although the advice the attorneys provided concerned the acquisition of certain companies, which was not a criminal act in and of itself, and the attorneys did not have knowledge of the illegal tax scheme at the time the advice was given, the crime-fraud exception applied to ABC Corp. s assertion of attorney-client privilege because: The advice concerned acts that were an essential component of ABC Corp. s illegal tax scheme; ABC Corp. intended to execute the scheme when it sought advice from the attorneys; and ABC Corp. used the attorneys advice in furtherance of the scheme. 17
18 Exceptions Cont d. The Crime-Fraud Exception (Cont d.) v Case analysis: In re Grand Jury, (Cont d.) Although the court did not address ABC Corp. s work product claims, it noted that there may be circumstances in which an attorney, without knowledge of his client's illegal activity, might properly claim and prevail in asserting a work-product privilege even when his client cannot. 18
19 Exceptions Cont d. The Garner Exception The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals created a fiduciary exception to the attorney-client privilege, finding that shareholders of a corporation may invade the corporation's attorney-client privilege to prove fiduciary breaches by those in control of the corporation upon a showing of good cause. Garner v. Wolfinbarger, 430 F.2d 1093, (5th Cir. 1970). Some courts have expanded this holding to apply to ERISA fiduciaries as well. 19
20 Exceptions Cont d. The Garner Exception (Cont d.) v Case analysis: Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Indiana Electrical Workers Pension Trust Fund IBEW, NO. 614, 2013., 2014 WL , Supreme Court of Delaware (July 23, 2014). Facts: Under title 8, section 220 of the Delaware Code, which grants shareholders the right to inspect the books and records of a company, plaintiff shareholders requested inspection of various categories of Wal-Mart s books and records relating to an internal investigation into bribery allegations. Following that request, Wal-Mart declined to produce certain documents that were protected by attorney-client privilege and the workproduct doctrine. 20
21 Exceptions Cont d. The Garner Exception (Cont d.) v Case analysis: Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (Cont d.) Holding: Finding that the Garner exception to the attorneyclient privilege also applies to plenary shareholder proceedings and proceedings under title 8, section 220 of the Delaware Code, the court required Wal-Mart to produce the privileged documents because: The documents were necessary and essential to the plaintiffs claim as evidence suggested that the internal investigation was conducted by individuals in audit and legal who should have been subjects of the investigation; and The plaintiffs showed good cause to order the privileged documents to be produced. 21
22 Exceptions Cont d. Other Exceptions That May Apply The Self-Defense Exception: Some courts have determined that the attorney-client privilege does not apply when the attorney is sued for malpractice or ineffective assistance of counsel, charged with misconduct by a client or former client, or brings suit to recover a fee. Longo v. Premo, 326 P.3d 1152, (Or. May 30, 2014). The Joint Client Exception: Although it appears to be the minority view, some courts have held that in litigation between a corporation and a former officer of the corporation, the corporation cannot assert the attorney-client privilege to protect communications that the former officer had access to while employed by the corporation. Rush v. Sunrise Sr. Living, Inc., 2008 WL (Va. Cir. Ct. Feb 12, 2008). 22
23 The Attorney-Client Privilege Abroad
24 The Attorney-Client Privilege Abroad v Although some countries recognize some concept of privilege or confidentiality concerning communications between attorney and client, many do not. v Of the countries that do recognize some privilege, many do not extend such privilege to in-house attorneys. In some countries, such as France, outside and in-house attorneys are members of separate professions that carry different rights and responsibilities. In many countries, the issue has recently arisen or is expected to arise in the near future due to important discussion concerning the growing trend of robust internal legal departments. 24
25 European Union v Broadly speaking, the legal professional privilege, is the European equivalent to the US attorney-client privilege. Because the relevant EU treaty does not address the privilege, the boundaries of the privilege have been developed through case law, and thus differ between the jurisdictions of the EU s member states. v At the EU regulatory level, communications between lawyer and client are protected only if the communications: Were made for the purposes, and the interests of, the client s right to defense; and Emanate from an independent lawyer who is entitled to practice in Europe. 25
26 European Union Cont d. v As applied to EU regulatory investigations, the privilege does not protect communications between in-house attorneys and corporate clients. In Akzo Nobel Chemicals Ltd and Akcros Chemicals Ltd v. Commission, Case C-550/07 P (September 14, 2010), the European Court of Justice has held that in-house lawyers do not have the ability to exercise the proper level of professional independence from their corporate client required to assert the privilege because: v As employees of their corporate client, in-house attorneys are economically dependent on their client to an extent greater than outside counsel; and In-house attorneys cannot ignore the commercial strategies pursued by their employer. Nevertheless, EU member states are not bound by the Akzo decision in framing privilege rules in their own respective jurisdictions. Member state jurisdictions differ on whether the privilege is extended to inhouse communications. 26
27 European Union Cont d. v A majority of EU countries recognize some sort of confidentiality obligation for communications between outside lawyer and client, but do not recognize a privilege for in-house counsel. These Include: Austria Bulgaria Czech Republic Finland France Greece Italy Poland Sweden 27
28 European Union Cont d. v Other member states do recognize such a privilege for in-house counsel. These include Germany, UK, Netherlands, Denmark, Belgium, Spain, and Portugal. v UK The UK s privilege covers confidential communications between in-house attorney and client that come into existence for the purpose of giving or receiving legal advice, in respect to the client s legal rights and obligations. However, because client is narrowly defined, the privilege does not extend to communications between in-house counsel and many classes of the corporate client s employees, nor does it extend to in-house counsel s communications with third parties associated with the corporate client. 28
29 European Union Cont d. v Germany Parties are permitted to withhold facts detrimental to their case if such information does not change the facts presented to the court. v Parties have no duty to produce documents. Attorneys can refuse to testify concerning confidential information that was received during the attorney-client relationship. This refusal can also cover in-house attorneys if acting in their authority as a legal advisor. Belgium Legal advice, whether provided by in-house or outside counsel, is confidential from production, even in investigations of national competition proceedings. The Brussels Court of Appeals expressly rejected the applicability of the EU s Akzo case. The confidentiality extends to requests for advice, related communications, and preparation materials. However, the confidentiality only protects in-house attorneys if they are members of the Belgian Institute for Company Lawyers. 29
30 Countries Outside of the European Union v Many other countries do not recognize an attorney-client privilege, or do recognize such a privilege, but do not extend that privilege to in-house attorneys. These include: Russia & India Recognize an attorney-client privilege, but do not extend that privilege to inhouse attorneys. China Does not recognize an attorney-client privilege. 30
31 Countries Outside of the European Union Cont d. v Other countries do recognize a privilege for in-house counsel, but to different degrees. These include: Canada Similar to the US, Canada protects confidential communications between an employee and an individual acting within his or her capacity as an attorney, whether outside or in-house. South Africa Recognizes a privilege for counsel, whether inhouse or outside, when (a) the adviser was acting in his or her capacity as a lawyer, (b) the communication was made in confidence, and (c) the communication was not made for the purpose of committing a crime or fraud. Brazil Enacted a statutory provision addressing privilege that protects communications between attorney and client, including in-house attorneys. 31
32 The Role of the Compliance Officer
33 The Role of the Compliance Officer v v The increasing complexity of laws, regulations, licensing and permits increases the need for compliance officers and employees (collectively Compliance Personnel), who design and implement business processes intended to ensure organizations are adhering to internal policies and regulatory requirements. Duties of the Compliance Department Compliance Personnel serve a very unique and important role within organizations. Their duties may include: Preventing corporate misconduct by creating, managing, and updating policies and procedures for employees to ensure compliance with laws and regulations; Investigating corporate misconduct, legal or ethical, as a neutral finder of fact and reporting findings to the board; and Reviewing and responding to investigative allegations of non-compliance. 33
34 Understanding the Differences Between the General Counsel and Compliance Officer v Because the roles of the General Counsel and Compliance Officer overlap to some extent, there has been much discussion over the autonomy of the two positions. The ABA has stated that the General Counsel should have the primary responsibility for assuring the implementation of an effective legal compliance system under the board s oversight. v There is no legal requirement that the General Counsel and the Compliance Officer be two different individuals, and many companies have combined the positions. 34
35 Understanding the Differences Between the General Counsel and Compliance Officer Cont d. v Many arguments have been advanced in support of combining the two positions, including: The General Counsel, with the legal department, has substantive expertise in the regulatory requirements that form the basis of a compliance program; In order for the General Counsel to provide advice to management and the Board on compliance related matters as they arise, he or she must be familiar with the business processes that ensure compliance; and In smaller organizations in unregulated industries, the cost of having two positions and departments is not justified. 35
36 Understanding the Differences Between the General Counsel and Compliance Officer Cont d. v Critics of combining the two positions argue: Legal and compliance represent two distinct viewpoints, both of which need to be represented in the executive suite at the same level; Combining the roles of General Counsel and Compliance Officer creates a conflict of interest, because the General Counsel defends the organization s interests whereas the Compliance Officer ensures compliance with laws; Compliance Personnel need functional independence in order to be able to perform their duties without interference; and The Federal Sentencing Guidelines for Organizations require that the Compliance Officer have direct access to and communication with the maximum governing authority of an organization. 36
37 Understanding the Differences Between the General Counsel and Compliance Officer Cont d. v Surveys indicate that compliance practitioners believe the two positions should be separate. In January 2013, the Society of Corporate Compliance and Ethics surveyed 800 compliance and ethics professionals and discovered: 80 percent responded that Compliance Personnel should not report to the General Counsel s office; and 88 percent felt that the General Counsel should not try to also serve as the Compliance Officer. 37
38 Compliance Personnel Serving a Legal Function v v v There is no legal requirement that Compliance Personnel be attorneys. Compliance Personnel may come from many fields including audit, accounting, finance, management, law, etc. Compliance Personnel are commonly attorneys because these individuals possess skills that may assist in the effective creation, implementation, and management of compliance programs. These skills may include: A knowledge of laws, regulations, and common fact patterns of violations; and A familiarity with regulatory enforcement authorities and actions. 38
39 The Attorney-Client Privilege as Applied to the Compliance Officer
40 When Does the Privilege Arise? v Under what circumstances would Compliance Personnel benefit from the attorney-client privilege? Similar to in-house counsel, Compliance Personnel who are attorneys or working at the direction of an attorney may seek to invoke the attorney-client privilege, as they may be conducting investigations into matters that may spawn future litigation or a future regulatory investigation. In providing these services, Compliance Personnel may find themselves: Interviewing witnesses and making determinations regarding credibility; Communicating with individuals concerning potential claims and defenses should litigation or an enforcement action arise; Conducting other tasks to assist in providing of legal services or advice. 40
41 When Does the Privilege Arise? Cont d. v Under US law, only Compliance Personnel who are acting in a professional legal capacity may qualify to have communications privileged as providing legal advice to the corporate client. That is, either: An individual who is an attorney, and is providing legal advice to a Covered Employee; or An individual who is acting at the direction of an attorney to assist the attorney in providing legal advice to a Covered Employee. 41
42 When Does the Privilege Arise? Cont d. v In determining whether Compliance Personnel are acting in a professional legal capacity, some courts have considered: The company s organizational structure, including whether the Compliance Person reports to the legal department or attends the legal department s meetings; Whether the Compliance Person indicated to others that he or she is acting in a legal capacity; Whether the Compliance Person was explicitly instructed to assist an attorney in providing legal advice; and The extent of the authorizing attorney s oversight regarding the Compliance Person. 42
43 When do Compliance Personnel Communications Allow the Privilege to be Invoked? v Compliance Personnel acting in a professional legal capacity may qualify to have communications privileged only when providing legal advice is: In some jurisdictions, the but-for purpose of the communication; or In other jurisdictions, a significant or primary purpose of the communication. v A communication may be privileged even if it was made for both legal and business purposes. v Exceptions In certain actions involving a breach of a fiduciary duty by those in control of a company, the privilege may not apply. The privilege will not apply if the client uses the advice in furtherance of an intended crime or fraud. 43
44 When do Compliance Personnel Communications Allow the Privilege to be Invoked? Cont d. v Significant or primary purpose test The significant or primary purpose test was recently upheld by the Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit in In re Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc. This test provides a lower threshold to protect communications than the but for test, as a communication may be protected even though it has multiple purposes that are both legal and nonlegal. 44
45 When do Compliance Personnel Communications Allow the Privilege to be Invoked? Cont d. v Case analysis: In re Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc., No. 14-CV-5055 (D.C. Cir. June 27, 2014). Facts: Arguing attorney-client privilege and work product protection, KBR refused to produce 89 documents to a False Claims Act relator. These documents related to internal audits and investigations conducted by KBR s Code of Business Conduct Department, allegedly under the oversight of its internal legal department. Holding: Reversing the district court s finding that the documents must be produced because the primary purpose of the investigation was to comply with federal defense contractor regulations, the court held that the documents were protected by the attorney-client privilege since one of the significant purposes of the COBC department s investigation was to assist the legal department in providing legal advice. 45
46 When do Compliance Personnel Communications Allow the Privilege to be Invoked? Cont d. v Significant or primary purpose test (Cont d.) Applying this test, courts have held that the following communications are protected by attorney-client privilege: Communications between a Compliance Person and another employee undertaken in internal investigations that were conducted, at least in part, for the purpose of providing legal advice. Interview notes taken by a Compliance Person during the course of an investigation that was done at the request of counsel. Notes and Memoranda created by outside counsel during an internal investigation, even though the purpose of the investigation was not exclusively legal. 46
47 When do Compliance Personnel Communications Allow the Privilege to be Invoked? Cont d. v But-for purpose test This test applies a stricter standard than the significant or primary purpose test. Under this test, courts have applied greater scrutiny to communications and required that the legal purpose of the communications be the sole purpose. 47
48 When do Compliance Personnel Communications Allow the Privilege to be Invoked? Cont d. v Applying the but-for purpose test, courts have refused to protect the following communications: s and attachments arising out of audits conducted by Compliance Personnel that did not have an attorney in the to or from fields. Unsolicited allegations of violation of a compliance policy sent from an employee to Compliance Personnel. Documents that indicated they were drafted to facilitate the provision of compliance advice. Documents prepared for simultaneous review by legal and non-legal personnel. Preexisting forms that were not privileged in their own right, but were tendered through a lawyer. A compliance department s log of compliance issues that needed to be investigated, which was sent between Compliance Personnel and another employee and did not discuss previous legal advice. 48
49 When do Compliance Personnel Communications Allow the Privilege to be Invoked? Cont d. Shared considerations between the tests v Courts that have applied the significant or primary purpose test have considered some of the same factors as courts applying the but-for purpose test, including: Whether the communication from the employee to Compliance Personnel explicitly sought legal advice and comment; The extent of the legal purpose of the communications, and the relation of that purpose to the business purpose of the communications; Whether the communication was sent to or from the individual acting in legal authority or whether that individual was merely incidentally carbon copied; and The breadth of the recipient list in assessing the centrality of potential legal advice generated by the communication. 49
50 How is the Privilege Protected? v As discussed above, the attorney-client privilege is frequently extended to communications made to or from individuals, other than in-house counsel, that are acting at the direction of an attorney to provide legal advice or services. v Because attorney-client privilege determinations are fact specific, and even more so when involving individuals that are not outside or in-house counsel, Compliance Personnel should take proper steps to preserve and strengthen their ability to claim the attorney-client privilege in the future. 50
51 How is the Privilege Protected? Cont d. v When acting in a professional legal capacity (or at the direction of an attorney) to provide legal advice or services, Compliance Personnel should: Formalize such in writing and, if necessary, obtain a signature from the authorizing attorney; Clearly indicate such in every communication with other employees concerning the matter for which the legal services are being provided; If interviewing individuals pursuant to the matter for which the legal services are being provided, inform the interviewee, in writing, that the interview is being conducted for the purpose of providing legal advice; Mark all communications relevant to the matter for which the legal services are being provided as privileged and confidential, and keep those communications separate from other non-privileged communications; If the matter involves an internal investigation, ensure that the employees conducting the investigation are completely independent from the conduct being investigated; When advice is provided regarding whether future conduct under consideration may be in violation of law, in appropriate circumstances, inform the client that if the advice being provided is interpreted to have been used in furtherance of a crime, the crime-fraud exception may negate the privilege; 51
52 How is the Privilege Protected? Cont d. v v v v Instruct employees to take care in cc ing Compliance Personnel on communications that do not have a legal purpose, as this may call into question other communications for which privilege is sought; Ensure that a clear distinction is made on communications to Compliance Personnel that are for business purpose rather than legal purpose; Communicate with a supervising attorney in writing, periodically providing updates of the matter for which the legal services are being provided; and Consider involving outside counsel: When the legal purpose of the matter is unclear; To hire third-party representatives (such as accountants, auditors, etc ) to ensure that communications with those representatives are cloaked in attorney-client privilege as representatives of outside counsel; and When the matter for which the legal services are being provided is of sufficient scope to invoke an analysis of the fiduciary responsibility of corporate officers or directors. 52
53 Special Thank You! For assisting in preparation of these materials, the panelists wish to thank: Cristina Lunders, Christian Menefee, and Ilana Sinkin. Cristina Lunders is a Senior Associate at Norton Rose Fulbright s Houston office who focuses her practice on international anti-corruption compliance and investigations, including Foreign Corrupt Practices Act investigations, as well as litigation matters. Christian Menefee is an Associate at Norton Rose Fulbright s Houston office who also focuses his practice on international anti-corruption compliance and investigations, and litigation matters. Ilana Sinkin is an Associate at Norton Rose Fulbright s Washington, D.C. office who focuses her practice on government investigations and white collar crime. 53
1. Why do third-country audit entities have to register with authorities in Member States?
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) Form A Annex to the Common Application Form for Registration of Third-Country Audit Entities under a European Commission Decision 2008/627/EC of 29 July 2008 on transitional
More informationFollow this and additional works at:
2010 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 7-1-2010 USA v. Steven Trenk Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential Docket No. 09-2486 Follow this and additional
More informationIN-HOUSE COUNSEL AND PRIVILEGE ISSUES. B. John Pendleton, Jr. DLA Piper LLP (US) 21 September 2012
IN-HOUSE COUNSEL AND PRIVILEGE ISSUES B. John Pendleton, Jr. DLA Piper LLP (US) 21 September 2012 Objective The goal of the company is to take maximum advantage of the attorneyclient privilege and related
More informationThe attorney-client privilege
BY TIMOTHY J. MILLER AND ANDREW P. SHELBY TIMOTHY J. MILLER is partner and general counsel at Novack and Macey LLP. As co-chair of the firm s legal malpractice defense group, he represents law firms and
More informationPRESERVING THE ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE AND ATTORNEY WORK PRODUCT PROTECTION IN INTERNAL AND GOVERNMENT INVESTIGATIONS. Chief Counsel, Investigations
PRESERVING THE ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE AND ATTORNEY WORK PRODUCT PROTECTION IN INTERNAL AND GOVERNMENT INVESTIGATIONS Eric J. Gorman Partner Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP Lawrence Oliver,
More informationQ233 Grace Period for Patents
1 Q233 Grace Period for Patents Introduction Plenary Session September 9, 2013 Responsible reporter: John Osha 2 Aippi has considered the grace period in previous scientific work: Q75 Prior disclosure
More informationIdentification of the respondent: Fields marked with * are mandatory.
Towards implementing European Public Sector Accounting Standards (EPSAS) for EU Member States - Public consultation on future EPSAS governance principles and structures Fields marked with are mandatory.
More informationPrivileges and In-House Counsel: A User s Guide
Privileges and In-House Counsel: A User s Guide William M. Bosch, Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer Thomas C. Indelicarto, VeriSign Inc. Robert N. Weiner, Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer January 11, 2017 apks.com
More informationThe Trusted Advisor's Dilemma: Maintaining the Attorney Client Privilege as In-House Counsel. The Attorney-Client Privilege
The Trusted Advisor's Dilemma: Maintaining the Attorney Client Privilege as In-House Counsel Labor & Employment Law Seminar June 9, 2011 Linda Walton Chelsea Dwyer Petersen The Attorney-Client Privilege
More informationARTICLES OF ASSOCIATION OF THE COUNCIL OF EUROPEAN ELECTRICITY REGULATORS ASBL - CONSOLIDATED ON 15 SEPTEMBER 2015
ARTICLES OF ASSOCIATION OF THE COUNCIL OF EUROPEAN ELECTRICITY REGULATORS ASBL - CONSOLIDATED ON 15 SEPTEMBER 2015 CHAPTER 1 NAME, REGISTERED OFFICE, PURPOSE, DURATION Article 1 - Name A not-for-profit
More informationAccess to the Legal Services Market Post-Brexit
1 Access to the Legal Services Market Post-Brexit Summary The UK legal services market generated 3.3bn of our net export revenue in 2015. More importantly, our exporters confidence in doing business abroad
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE I. INTRODUCTION
Kenny v. Pacific Investment Management Company LLC et al Doc. 0 1 1 ROBERT KENNY, Plaintiff, v. PACIFIC INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT COMPANY LLC, a Delaware limited liability company; PIMCO INVESTMENTS LLC, Defendants.
More informationMINISTERIAL DECLARATION
1 MINISTERIAL DECLARATION The fight against foreign bribery towards a new era of enforcement Preamble Paris, 16 March 2016 We, the Ministers and Representatives of the Parties to the Convention on Combating
More informationTRANSFER OF PRIORITY RIGHTS PARIS CONVENTION ARTICLE 4A(1)
TRANSFER OF PRIORITY RIGHTS PARIS CONVENTION ARTICLE 4A(1) BACKGROUND This report describes the results of a study carried out to identify the various national requirements for the effective transfer of
More informationLegal Ethics Issues for Compliance Officers
Legal Ethics Issues for Compliance Officers April 26, 2018 Hruska Law Center Lincoln, NE This page intentionally left blank. Faculty Bios Paul McGreal, J.D., joined Creighton University School of Law on
More informationDavid J. Bright MAINTAINING THE ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE DURING COMMUNICATIONS BETWEEN IN-HOUSE COUNSEL AND CORPORATE EMPLOYEES
MAINTAINING THE ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE DURING COMMUNICATIONS BETWEEN IN-HOUSE COUNSEL AND CORPORATE EMPLOYEES David J. Bright Direct Number: (515) 286-7015 Facsimile: (515) 286-7050 E-Mail: djbright@nyemaster.com
More informationMANAGING COMPETITION LAW RISK
MANAGING COMPETITION LAW RISK EFFECTIVE COMPLIANCE AND REGULATORY ENGAGEMENT Akira Inoue Craig Lee Nicola Northway Francesca Richmond Bob Tarun The challenge Managing competition law risk 0 dawn raids
More informationFIGHTING THE CRIME OF FOREIGN BRIBERY. The Anti-Bribery Convention and the OECD Working Group on Bribery
FIGHTING THE CRIME OF FOREIGN BRIBERY The Anti-Bribery Convention and the OECD Working Group on Bribery l PARTIES TO THE ANTI-BRIBERY CONVENTION Argentina Australia Austria Belgium Brazil Bulgaria Canada
More informationLEGAL REVIEW: ANTI-CORRUPTION TOOLS IN SOUTH AFRICA
LEGAL REVIEW: ANTI-CORRUPTION TOOLS IN SOUTH AFRICA Presented at the Black Management Forum Conference, October 2012 Why should we care? Because corruption kills. Misappropriation of public funds steal
More informationThe SEC proposes to codify the rule as a new Part 205 to Chapter 17 of the Code of Federal Regulations.
SEC PROPOSES RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT FOR ATTORNEYS APPEARING AND PRACTICING BEFORE THE SEC SIMPSON THACHER & BARTLETT LLP DECEMBER 16, 2002 On November 21, 2002, the Securities and Exchange Commission
More informationManaging a Corporate Crisis:
Managing a Corporate Crisis: Strategies for Containing a Crisis and Controlling the Public Narrative While Meeting Ethical Obligations and Maintaining Privilege June 15, 2017 Vincent Cohen Hector Gonzalez
More informationExtended Findings. Finland. ecfr.eu/eucoalitionexplorer. Question 1: Most Contacted
Extended Findings Finland Preferences Question 1: Most Contacted Finland (2%) is not amongst the most contacted countries within the EU: Germany (22%), France (13%), the UK (11%), Poland (7%), Italy (6%),
More informationIssues in International Employment Law
Issues in International Employment Law November 10, 2011 Manesh K. Rath Partner Keller and Heckman LLP 1001 G Street, N.W. Washington, DC 20001 202-434-4182 Rath@khlaw.com www.khlaw.com Washington, D.C.
More informationCorporate Governance Statement
Corporate Governance Statement INTRODUCTION The board of directors (the Board ) of Driver Group PLC (the Company ) recognises the importance of good corporate governance and has elected to adopt the QCA
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA. No. MDL PHX DGC. IN RE: Bard IVC Filters Products Liability Litigation,
Case :-md-0-dgc Document Filed 0// Page of 0 WO IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT IN RE: Bard IVC Filters Products Liability Litigation, FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA No. MDL -0-PHX DGC ORDER The Court
More informationWhistleblowers: Brief Overview of Bio-Rad and Its Implications for. Corporate Counsel and Their Employers
Whistleblowers: Brief Overview of Bio-Rad and Its Implications for Corporate Counsel and Their Employers WHISTLEBLOWER LITIGATION AND THE BIO-RAD CASE: ETHICS RULES PRE-EMPTION AND OTHER ISSUES American
More informationSoup to Nuts: the Inception and Destruction of the Attorney-Client Privilege and Attorney Work Product Protections
Soup to Nuts: the Inception and Destruction of the Attorney-Client Privilege and Attorney Work Product Protections Hennepin County Bar Association Professionalism and Ethics Section April 10, 2015 George
More informationINTERNAL INVESTIGATIONS: AVOIDING PITFALLS. Sherilyn Pastor, McCarter & English, LLP (and) Rosemary Stewart, Hollingsworth LLP
INTERNAL INVESTIGATIONS: AVOIDING PITFALLS Sherilyn Pastor, McCarter & English, LLP (and) Rosemary Stewart, Hollingsworth LLP I. The use of internal investigations has increased significantly. Based on
More informationANTI-BRIBERY POLICY. 1. Purpose
ANTI-BRIBERY POLICY 1. Purpose The purpose of this policy is to establish controls to ensure compliance with all applicable anti-bribery and corruption regulations, and to ensure that the Company s business
More informationCase 3:16-cv JAM Document 50 Filed 01/12/17 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT ORDER RE DISCOVERY DISPUTE
Case 3:16-cv-00054-JAM Document 50 Filed 01/12/17 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT SUPREME FOREST PRODUCTS, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. MICHAEL KENNEDY and FERRELL WELCH,
More informationLegal Ethics of Metadata or Mining for Data About Data
Legal Ethics of Metadata or Mining for Data About Data Peter L. Ostermiller Attorney at Law 239 South Fifth Street Suite 1800 Louisville, KY 40202 peterlo@ploesq.com www.ploesq.com Overview What is Metadata?
More informationEUROPEAN MODEL COMPANY ACT (EMCA) CHAPTER 3 REGISTRATION AND THE ROLE OF THE REGISTRAR
EUROPEAN MODEL COMPANY ACT (EMCA) CHAPTER 3 REGISTRATION AND THE ROLE OF THE REGISTRAR Section 1 Section 2 Section 3 Section 4 Section 5 Section 6 Section 7 Section 8 Section 9 Section 10 Section 11 Section
More informationPUBLIC PROCUREMENT AND ILLEGAL SETTLEMENTS
Scottish Procurement Scottish Procurement Policy Note SPPN 4/2014 Date 22 August 2014 PUBLIC PROCUREMENT AND ILLEGAL SETTLEMENTS Purpose 1. The purpose of this Scottish Procurement Policy Note ( SPPN )
More informationExplanatory Report to the European Convention on the Exercise of Children's Rights *
European Treaty Series - No. 160 Explanatory Report to the European Convention on the Exercise of Children's Rights * Strasbourg, 25.I.1996 I. Introduction In 1990, the Parliamentary Assembly, in its Recommendation
More informationTHE NEW EUROPEAN UNIFIED PATENT COURT & THE UNITARY PATENT
THE NEW EUROPEAN UNIFIED PATENT COURT & THE UNITARY PATENT November 2015 Washington Kevin Mooney Simmons & Simmons LLP The Current Problems with enforcement of European patents European Patent Convention
More informationThe McNulty Memorandum Principles of Federal Prosecution of Business Organizations
The McNulty Memorandum Principles of Federal Prosecution of Business Organizations Gabriel L. Imperato, Esq.//Broad and Cassel Fort Lauderdale, Florida Judith Waltz, Esq.//Foley and Lardner LLP San Francisco,
More informationPracticing Ethically in Rule-of-Law Challenged Countries. Cristina K. Lunders Senior Associate Fulbright & Jaworski LLP October 3, 2014
Practicing Ethically in Rule-of-Law Challenged Countries Cristina K. Lunders Senior Associate Fulbright & Jaworski LLP October 3, 2014 Hypothetical You are working with an attorney in the United States
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS
Case 6:08-cv-01159-JTM -DWB Document 923 Filed 12/22/10 Page 1 of 17 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 08-1159-JTM
More informationThe benefits of a pan-european approach: the EU and foreign perspective from the Netherlands point of view
The benefits of a pan-european approach: the EU and foreign perspective from the Netherlands point of view Leon Kanters, Trade & Customs, Chairman Europe Middle East Africa Region, KPMG Eindhoven The Netherlands
More informationAntitrust Litigation: Observations from the Bench, Bar, and Clients
Antitrust Litigation: Observations from the Bench, Bar, and Clients 1 Moderator: Hon. James Donato, N.D. Cal. Panelists: Rachel S. Brass, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher Brendan Glackin, Lieff Cabraser, Heimann
More informationINVESTIGATIONS, ATTORNEYS & PRIVILEGED COMMUNICATIONS
INVESTIGATIONS, ATTORNEYS & PRIVILEGED COMMUNICATIONS Wes Bearden, CEO Attorney & Licensed Investigator Bearden Investigative Agency, Inc. www.beardeninvestigations.com PRIVILEGE KEY POINTS WE ALL KNOW
More informationEthical Issues Facing In-House Legal Counsel
Ethical Issues Facing In-House Legal Counsel 2017 ACC Fall Symposium October 6, 2017 Today s Presenter(s): Lynn W. Hartman Member Simmons Perrine Moyer Bergman, PLC Phone: 319-896-4083 Email: lhartman@spmblaw.com
More informationCase 2:13-cv MMB Document 173 Filed 02/13/15 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Case 2:13-cv-05101-MMB Document 173 Filed 02/13/15 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA TALBOT TODD SMITH CIVIL ACTION v. NO. 13-5101 UNILIFE CORPORATION,
More informationIn the performance of the judicial duties the judge is subject only to the law and must consider only the law.
THE UNIVERSAL CHARTER OF THE JUDGE Preamble. Judges from around the world have worked on the drafting of this Charter. The present Charter is the result of their work and has been approved by the member
More informationJury Awards Ousted General Counsel Nearly $11 Million in Whistleblower Retaliation Action Key Takeaways
AL E R T M E MOR AN D U M Jury Awards Ousted General Counsel Nearly $11 Million in Whistleblower Retaliation Action Key Takeaways February 21, 2017 Earlier this month, following three hours of deliberation,
More informationCase: 1:13-cv Document #: 138 Filed: 03/31/15 Page 1 of 13 PageID #:2059
Case: 1:13-cv-01418 Document #: 138 Filed: 03/31/15 Page 1 of 13 PageID #:2059 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION LISLEWOOD CORPORATION, v. AT&T CORPORATION, AT&T
More informationAttorney/Client Privilege Waiver Requests: Charging Corporations Under The McNulty Memorandum KIRSTEN V. MAYER
Attorney/Client Privilege Waiver Requests: Charging Corporations Under The McNulty Memorandum KIRSTEN V. MAYER Companies facing federal investigations have difficult decisions to make, including whether
More informationLittle Rascals Pre-school Anti-Bribery Policy
Little Rascals Pre-school Anti-Bribery Policy Purpose The purpose of this policy is to establish controls to ensure compliance with all applicable antibribery and corruption regulations, and to ensure
More informationCase 1:15-cv PKC Document 20 Filed 03/07/16 Page 1 of 10. Plaintiffs, 15 Civ (PKC) DECLARATION OF PAUL P. COLBORN
Case 1:15-cv-09002-PKC Document 20 Filed 03/07/16 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION and AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION, v.
More informationReport from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament EU Anti-Corruption Report. Brussels,
Report from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament EU Anti-Corruption Report Brussels, 3.2.2014 EuropeanCommission Corruption remains one of the biggest challenges for all societies,
More informationand have agreed as follows: Article I. Purpose of Cooperation and Statement
STATEMENT OF PROTOCOL BETWEEN THE PUBLIC COMPANY ACCOUNTING OVERSIGHT BOARD OF THE UNITED STATES AND THE AUDITING BOARD OF THE CENTRAL CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF FINLAND The Public Company Accounting Oversight
More informationWORLDWIDE DISTRIBUTION OF PRIVATE FINANCIAL ASSETS
WORLDWIDE DISTRIBUTION OF PRIVATE FINANCIAL ASSETS Munich, November 2018 Copyright Allianz 11/19/2018 1 MORE DYNAMIC POST FINANCIAL CRISIS Changes in the global wealth middle classes in millions 1,250
More informationPrompt Remedial Action and Waiver of Privilege
Prompt Remedial Action and Waiver of Privilege by Monica L. Goebel and John B. Nickerson Workplace Harassment In order to avoid liability for workplace harassment, an employer must show that it exercised
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA WESTERN DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA WESTERN DIVISION THE JOHN ERNST LUCKEN REVOCABLE TRUST, and JOHN LUCKEN and MARY LUCKEN, Trustees, Plaintiffs, No. 16-CV-4005-MWB vs.
More informationINFORMATION LEAFLET - Cross-border placement of children Placement of children abroad by German courts and authorities general advice
INFORMATION LEAFLET - Cross-border placement of children Placement of children abroad by German courts and authorities general advice 1. EU Member States a) Consultation and consent procedure If the German
More informationNavigating today s complex business risks
Navigating today s complex business risks Europe, Middle East, India and Africa Fraud Survey findings for Finland May 2013 Page 2 Presentation title Survey approach and participant profile Between November
More informationCONSUMER PROTECTION IN EU ONLINE GAMBLING REGULATION
CONSUMER PROTECTION IN EU ONLINE GAMBLING REGULATION Review of the implementation of selected provisions of European Union Commission Recommendation 2014/478/EU across EU States. Prepared by Dr Margaret
More informationPreparing the Lawyer to Be the Witness
Preparing the Lawyer to Be the Witness Presented by Sam Ramer (Counsel and VP, Government Relations, Symplicity Corporation), Leslie B. Kiernan (Partner, Akin Gump), Kristine L. Sendek-Smith (Partner,
More informationEvaluating the Demand Letter
Evaluating the Demand Letter and What To Do After You Receive It May 15, 2018 Christine B. Lucy, Associate General Counsel, Booz Allen Hamilton Deborah Kelly, Partner, Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP Nigel
More informationTHE ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE AROUND THE WORLD
THE ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE AROUND THE WORLD Jennifer Poppe, Chris Popov and Amy Tankersley 1 With the increasing globalization of companies operations comes a corresponding increase in the use of foreign
More informationWHISTLE BLOWING POLICY
WHISTLE BLOWING POLICY CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2 2. PURPOSE ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
More informationlegal ethics opinions
LEGAL ETHICS OPINION 1783 IN CONTEXT OF (A) FORECLOSURE SALE OR (B) A COMMERCIAL CLOSING, MAY ATTORNEY DISBURSE TO LENDER COLLECTED ATTORNEYS FEES IN EXCESS OF THOSE NECESSARY TO REIMBURSE LENDER FOR PAYMENT
More informationPrivileges Associated with Product Safety Teams
Privileges Associated with Product Safety Teams February 12, 2015 Attorney Advertising Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome Models used are not clients but may be representative of clients
More information231 F.R.D. 343 United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division.
231 F.R.D. 343 United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. 1 Definition No. 5 provides that identify when used in regard to a communication includes providing the substance of the communication.
More informationResponding to Government Investigations: What to do when the Government Knocks. Gabriel Colwell Partner Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Responding to Government Investigations: What to do when the Government Knocks Gabriel Colwell Partner Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP Today s Agenda Corporate Criminal Liability Enforcement Environment General
More informationBrown & Brown, Inc. AUDIT COMMITTEE CHARTER
Brown & Brown, Inc. AUDIT COMMITTEE CHARTER I. Organization and Purpose of the Audit Committee The Audit Committee (the "Committee") is a committee of the Board of Directors ("Board") of Brown & Brown,
More informationCORPORATE GOVERNANCE & PUBLIC INTEREST DISCLOSURE
SECTION 15 CORPORATE GOVERNANCE & PUBLIC INTEREST DISCLOSURE CONTENTS CORPORATE GOVERNANCE GENERAL BACKGROUND 3 THE COUNCIL - BACKGROUND 3 ACCOUNTABLE OFFICER 4 GOVERNING BODY: THE COUNCIL 5 SCHEME OF
More informationINTERNATIONAL CO-ORDINATING COMMITTEE OF NATIONAL INSTITUTIONS FOR THE PROMOTION AND PROTECTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS (ICC)
Review of OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises: 2nd Submission of International Coordinating Committee of National Institutions for the Promotion and Protection of Human Rights March 2011 EXECUTIVE
More information2015 Data on Enforcement of the Anti-Bribery Convention
05 Data on Enforcement of the Anti-Bribery OECD Working Group on Bribery November 06 HIGHLIGHTS 397 individuals and 33 entities have been sanctioned in criminal proceedings for foreign bribery in 7 Parties
More informationAMENDED RULE 26 EXPERT WITNESS DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS
CONSTRUCTION H. JAMES WULFSBERG, ESQ. Wulfsberg Reese Colvig & Fristman Professional Corporation DAVID J. HYNDMAN, ESQ. Wulfsberg Reese Colvig & Fristman Professional Corporation navigant.com About Navigant
More informationInvestigating privilege: asserting and maintaining legal privilege over corporate internal investigations. Wednesday, February 1, 2017
Investigating privilege: asserting and maintaining legal privilege over corporate internal investigations Wednesday, February 1, 2017 Join the conversation Tweet using #NLawMotion and connect with @NLawGlobal
More informationSUPPLEMENTARY EVIDENCE BAR COUNCIL HOUSE OF LORDS EU INTERNAL MARKET SUB-COMMITTEE INQUIRY BREXIT: FUTURE TRADE BETWEEN THE UK AND EU IN SERVICES
SUPPLEMENTARY EVIDENCE BAR COUNCIL HOUSE OF LORDS EU INTERNAL MARKET SUB-COMMITTEE INQUIRY BREXIT: FUTURE TRADE BETWEEN THE UK AND EU IN SERVICES Introduction 1. This submission from the Bar Council Brexit
More informationConflicts of Interest Issues in Simultaneous Representation of Employers and Employees in Employment Law. Janet Savage 1
Conflicts of Interest Issues in Simultaneous Representation of Employers and Employees in Employment Law Janet Savage 1 Plaintiffs suing their former employers for wrongful discharge or employment discrimination
More informationConsultation on Remedies in Public Procurement
1 of 10 20/07/2015 16:09 Case Id: b34fff26-cd71-4b22-95b2-c0a7c38a00be Consultation on Remedies in Public Procurement Fields marked with * are mandatory. There are two Directives laying down remedies in
More informationASSOCIATION OF EUROPEAN JOURNALISTS (AEJ)
ASSOCIATION OF EUROPEAN JOURNALISTS (AEJ) International non profit association Registered under Business No. 0458 856 619 Established by an act dated 23 February 1996 Published in the Annexes to the Moniteur
More informationVALEANT PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
VALEANT PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONAL, INC. 1. PURPOSE CHARTER OF THE AUDIT AND RISK COMMITTEE The (the Committee ) of Valeant Pharmaceuticals International, Inc. ( Valeant ) is appointed by the board
More informationQuestion Q204P. Liability for contributory infringement of IPRs certain aspects of patent infringement
Summary Report Question Q204P Liability for contributory infringement of IPRs certain aspects of patent infringement Introduction At its Congress in 2008 in Boston, AIPPI passed Resolution Q204 Liability
More informationIN THE IOWA DISTRICT COURT FOR POLK COUNTY : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :
E-FILED 2014 JAN 02 736 PM POLK - CLERK OF DISTRICT COURT IN THE IOWA DISTRICT COURT FOR POLK COUNTY BELLE OF SIOUX CITY, L.P., v. Plaintiff Counterclaim Defendant MISSOURI RIVER HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT,
More informationIS 2016 THE FINAL STRETCH BEFORE THE ENTRY IN FORCE OF
IS 2016 THE FINAL STRETCH BEFORE THE ENTRY IN FORCE OF THE UNITARY PATENT AND THE UNIFIED PATENT COURT? By Christian TEXIER Partner, REGIMBEAU European & French Patent Attorney texier@regimbeau.eu And
More informationSARBANES OXLEY ATTORNEY RESPONSIBILITY STANDARDS
SARBANES OXLEY ATTORNEY RESPONSIBILITY STANDARDS DEBRA G. HATTER, Houston Haynes & Boone State Bar Of Texas 2 ND ANNUAL ADVANCED IN-HOUSE COUNSEL COURSE August 14-15, 2003 San Antonio, Texas CHAPTER 9
More informationCase 8:12-cv JDW-EAJ Document 112 Filed 10/25/13 Page 1 of 8 PageID 2875 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION
Case 8:12-cv-00557-JDW-EAJ Document 112 Filed 10/25/13 Page 1 of 8 PageID 2875 BURTON W. WIAND, as Court-Appointed Receiver for Scoop Real Estate, L.P., et al. Plaintiff, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE
More informationNew technologies applied to travel facilitation airport controls and visa issuance
New technologies applied to travel facilitation airport controls and visa issuance Christabel Silva Head Business Development & Special Solutions VFS Global Convenience & Security Getting it Right - convenience
More informationPublic consultation on the EU s labour migration policies and the EU Blue Card
Case Id: a37bfd2d-84a1-4e63-8960-07e030cce2f4 Date: 09/07/2015 12:43:44 Public consultation on the EU s labour migration policies and the EU Blue Card Fields marked with * are mandatory. 1 Your Contact
More informationAlert Memo. New York Court of Appeals Reaffirms In Pari Delicto Defense for Outside Professionals
Alert Memo NOVEMBER 5, 2010 New York Court of Appeals Reaffirms In Pari Delicto Defense for Outside Professionals When corporate fraud or other misdeeds are disclosed, investment banks, auditors and other
More informationThis document is meant purely as a documentation tool and the institutions do not assume any liability for its contents
2006L0043 EN 16.06.2014 003.001 1 This document is meant purely as a documentation tool and the institutions do not assume any liability for its contents B DIRECTIVE 2006/43/EC OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT
More informationThis Webcast Will Begin Shortly
This Webcast Will Begin Shortly If you have any technical problems with the Webcast or the streaming audio, please contact us via email at: accwebcast@commpartners.com Thank You! Pitfalls and Potholes
More informationWorking Group on Bribery: 2014 Data on Enforcement of the Anti-Bribery Convention
Working Group on Bribery: 2014 Data on Enforcement of the Anti-Bribery Convention Highlights from the Working Group on Bribery Enforcement Data, as of December 2014 361 individuals and 126 entities have
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. TOYO TIRE U.S.A. CORP., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Case No: 14 C 206 )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS TOYO TIRE & RUBBER CO., LTD., and TOYO TIRE U.S.A. CORP., Plaintiffs, v. Case No: 14 C 206 ATTURO TIRE CORP., and SVIZZ-ONE Judge
More informationPRIVILEGES AND ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS
PRIVILEGES AND ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS March 27, 2015 ISBA Government Practice Seminar Timothy J. Hill Copyright 2014 Bradley & Riley PC - All rights reserved. Privileges and Ethical Considerations 1. Attorney-Client
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION
Case: 4:14-cv-01421-AGF Doc. #: 75 Filed: 06/23/15 Page: 1 of 15 PageID #: 574 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION KIRBY PEMBERTON, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v.
More informationCharter Audit and Finance Committee Time Warner Inc.
Charter Audit and Finance Committee Time Warner Inc. The Board of Directors of Time Warner Inc. (the Corporation ; Company refers to the Corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries) has adopted this
More informationTHE BANK OF NOVA SCOTIA. Corporate Governance Policies
Corporate Governance Policies June 2017 PAGE 1 Introduction Corporate governance refers to the oversight mechanisms and the way in which The Bank of Nova Scotia (the Bank ) is governed. The Board of Directors
More informationAnti-Bribery Policy WHC reserves the right to amend this policy at its discretion. The most up-to-date version can be downloaded from our website.
ANTI-BRIBERY POLICY ELT manager Director of Finance Responsible officer Director of Finance Date first approved by BoM 29 th March 2012 Date review approved by BoM 4 th October 2017 Next Review Date October
More informationAll Party Parliamentary Group Art, Craft & Design Education
Jane Sillis Director, engage The National Association for Gallery Education All Party Parliamentary Group Art, Craft & Design Education 14 December 2016 International engage members European based members
More informationProtecting the Privilege When the Government Executes a Search Warrant
Protecting the Privilege When the Government Executes a Search Warrant By Sara Kropf, Law Office of Sara Kropf PLLC Government investigative techniques traditionally reserved for street crime cases search
More informationAUDIT COMMITTEE CHARTER
AUDIT COMMITTEE CHARTER Purpose The Audit Committee ( Committee ) shall assist the Board of Directors (the Board ) in the oversight of (1) the integrity of the financial statements of the Company, (2)
More informationAttorney-Client Privilege Tips for In-house Counsel
Attorney-Client Privilege Tips for In-house Counsel Christos Yatrakis Arrow Electronics, Inc. John A. Basinger Saul Ewing LLP July 19, 2017 Attorney-Client Privilege: The Basics Elements An attorney-client
More informationANNEX. to the. Proposal for a Council Decision
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 17.5.2018 COM(2018) 295 final ANNEX 1 ANNEX to the Proposal for a Council Decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the Union of the Agreement between the European Union and
More informationCase 1:17-mc DAB Document 28 Filed 06/22/17 Page 1 of 20
Case 1:17-mc-00105-DAB Document 28 Filed 06/22/17 Page 1 of 20 Case 1:17-mc-00105-DAB Document 28 Filed 06/22/17 Page 2 of 20 but also DENIES Jones Day s Motion to Dismiss in its entirety. Applicants may
More informationCurrent Ethics Issues Relating to Opinions:
Current Ethics Issues Relating to Opinions: The Attorney-Client Privilege, the Work-Product Protection, and Rules of Professional Conduct 1.6 & 2.3 Presenters: John K. Villa & Charles Davant Williams &
More information