IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF KOOTENAI ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
|
|
- Milton Floyd
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 STATE OF IDAHO County of KOOTENAI ss FILED AT O'Clock M CLERK OF THE DISTRICT COURT Deputy IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF KOOTENAI CHRISTOPHER TOBAN RICHEY, Petitioner, vs. STATE OF IDAHO, Respondent. Case No. CV ORDER DISMISSING PETITION FOR POST CONVICTION RELIEF AS UNTIMELY I. BACKGROUND AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY. On October 25, 2004, Richey was sentenced in the underlying criminal matter, Kootenai County Case No. CRF , for the felony crime of rape. Seven witnesses testified. The pre-sentence investigation recommended prison, and the State specifically recommended a ten-year prison sentence, with two years fixed and eight years indeterminate. Richey was sentenced to a twenty-year prison sentence, with three years fixed plus seventeen years indeterminate, but jurisdiction was retained. Richey was granted probation at his jurisdictional review hearing, and was ordered in the court s disposition dated April 15, 2005, in term and condition of ORDER DISMISSING PETITION FOR POST CONVICTION RELIEF Page 1
2 probation number 26 to participate in and complete specialized sex offender therapy as designated by your probation officer. Richey was also ordered in term and condition of probation number 27 to submit to polygraph testing as required by his probation officer. Richey continued on probation for over year until a Report of Probation Violation was filed on May 26, 2006, alleging (4 different violations of probation. In court for his admit/deny hearing on June 22, 2006, Richey admitted three of the allegations: That he failed to attend a polygraph examination, that he entered into a casino repeatedly without permission, and that he committed adultery with an adult female. Richey denied allegation number two, that he was violating probation by contacting the victim of his rape. Richey admitted the same three probation violations in his written response with assistance of appointed counsel. An evidentiary hearing was held on August 1, Richey again admitted the same three probation violations orally in open court. The State withdrew the allegation he denied. The State and Richey s probation officer argued that he be sent to prison. The Court revoked Richey s probation and imposed the previously suspended twenty-year prison sentence (three years fixed and seventeen years indeterminate originally imposed on April 14, 2005, without modification. At no time did Richey file an Idaho Rule of Criminal Procedure 35 motion. ORDER DISMISSING PETITION FOR POST CONVICTION RELIEF Page 2
3 Richey filed an appeal on August 18, He lost his appeal as the Idaho Court of Appeals on April 27, 2007, issued an unpublished opinion number 425. Remittitur was issued May 21, 2007, and filed in Kootenai County case CRF on June 18, In that unpublished opinion the Idaho Court of Appeals wrote: Richey appeals, contending that the district court abused its discretion in revoking probation and in failing to sua sponte reduce his sentence upon revocation of probation Unpublished Opinion No. 425, p. 1. After analysis of case law, the Idaho Court of Appeals then held: Applying the foregoing standards, and having reviewed the record in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion either in revoking probation or in ordering execution of Richey s original sentence without modification. Id., p. 2. The Idaho Court of Appeals then concluded: Therefore, the order revoking probation and directing execution of Richey s previously suspended sentence is affirmed. Id. Richey then filed a Petition and Affidavit for Post-Conviction Relief in the present case, CV , on June 19, Most of the Petition surrounds Richey s claim that he was denied effective assistance of counsel, due to his attorney s failure to object to the requirement of a psychosexual evaluation prior to sentencing, in light of Estrada v. State, 143 Idaho 558, 149 P.3d 833 (2007. The State filed an answer on or about June 28, Richey filed a reply to the State s answer on or about July 9, Richey then submitted an Amended Petition for Post-Conviction Relief on or around July 31, However, the State never ORDER DISMISSING PETITION FOR POST CONVICTION RELIEF Page 3
4 consented to the submission of an amended petition, and the Court has never given Richey leave to amend as set forth in the Idaho Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a. Accordingly, the State argues the proposed amended petition is not properly before the court at this time. On September 21, 2007, the State of Idaho filed Motion for Summary Disposition and a Brief in Support of Motion for Summary Disposition. On October 9, 2007, Richey requested counsel be appointed, and that request was granted as the Court appointed the Kootenai County Public Defender to represent Richey in this Post-Conviction Relief action. On October 31, 2007, counsel filed a List of Petitioner s Claims on behalf of Richey, and oral argument on the State s Motion for Summary Disposition was held on October 31, The State is seeking summary dismissal of Richey s Petition for Post-Conviction Relief arguing the Petition has stated no genuine issue of material fact and the State is entitled to judgment as a matter of law, that the Petition was not timely filed, and that Richey has forfeited the issues he wishes to raise in his petition. Because the Petition for Post-Conviction Relief was not filed within the statutory period provided in I.C , the Court will discuss the timeliness issue first. II. STANDARD OF REVIEW. Idaho Code (c provides that the court may grant a motion for summary disposition of a petition for post-conviction relief when it appears that there is no genuine issue of material fact and the moving party is entitled to ORDER DISMISSING PETITION FOR POST CONVICTION RELIEF Page 4
5 judgment as a matter of law. Larsen v. May, 93 Idaho 602, 468 P.2d 866 (1970. Richey has the burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence the allegations which he contends entitle him to relief. Estes v. State, 111 Idaho 430, 725 P.2d 135 (1986. An application for post-conviction relief is subject to summary dismissal if the applicant has not tendered a factual showing, based upon evidence that would be admissible at an evidentiary hearing, to support his claim for relief. Remington v. State, 127 Idaho 443, 901 P.2d 1344 (Ct.App Bare and conclusory allegations, unsubstantiated by any fact, are inadequate to entitle an applicant to an evidentiary hearing. LaBelle v. State, 130 Idaho 115, 937 P.2d 427(Ct.App An application must be supported by written statements from witnesses who are able to give testimony themselves as to the facts within their knowledge or other verifiable information and, failing such a written statement, the application will not raise material issues of fact sufficient to justify an evidentiary hearing. Nguyen v. State, 126 Idaho 494, 887 P.2d 39 (Ct.App III. ANALYSIS. A. Richey s Petition for Post-Conviction Relief Was Not Filed Within One Year From the Date of Conviction As Required By I.C The State contends that the Petition for Post-Conviction Relief is not timely and therefore should be dismissed as time barred. The statue of limitation for postconviction action, under I.C , provides that a petition for post-conviction relief may be filed at any time within one (1 year from the expiration of the time for appeal or from the determination of appeal or from the determination of a ORDER DISMISSING PETITION FOR POST CONVICTION RELIEF Page 5
6 proceeding following an appeal, whichever is later. When a court has retained jurisdiction, the time for filing a post-conviction application challenging a judgment of conviction or sentence does not start anew from the entry of a probation revocation order. Gonzalez v. State, 139 Idaho 384, 79 P.3d 743 (Ct.App Expanding on the decision in Lake v. State, 124 Idaho 259, 858 P.2d 798 (Ct.App. 1993, where the Court of Appeals had held that the time in which to file for post-conviction relief begins to run upon the revocation of probation, and not upon the earlier imposition of judgment, the Gonzales court further explained, Any post-conviction action filed within the limitations period connected to the probation revocation order, but beyond the limitations period measured from the appeal period for the judgment of conviction, may address only issues that arose from the probation revocation proceeding. Id. at 386 (emphasis added. The State argues that each of the seventeen paragraphs Richey authored in his Petition complains about sentencing or his first conditions of probation, or even earlier stages of the proceedings, and that not one of the complaints goes specifically to his probation violation or the court s imposition of sentence at that point. The State argues the three probation violations to which Richey admitted do not pertain at all to his psychosexual evaluation or treatment. The State argues Richey simply does not complain about any of the conduct of his case that falls within the proper time limits of his petition for post-conviction relief. This Court ORDER DISMISSING PETITION FOR POST CONVICTION RELIEF Page 6
7 agrees for nearly all of Richey s claims. However, the Petition for Post-Conviction Relief alleges in paragraph 7(b: District Court abused it s discretion by failing to sua sponte reduce the previously imposed sentence. Petition for Post-Conviction Relief, p. 2, 7(b. This is the only claim in Richey s petition that survives the statute of limitation analysis. As shown below, there are other problems with this allegation. The State asserts that even if this Court were to consider Richey s proposed amended petition, the outcome would not change. The Court has reviewed that Amended Petition and agrees with the State that Richey merely repeats his erroneous assertion that he can now complain about his sentence and the order for a psychological evaluation at this late date. Since Richey s petition is untimely as to the issues he alleges, the petition, on that basis alone, must be dismissed without reaching the merits. As an aside, the Court notes Richey alleges he filed a Rule 35 motion on August 14, 2006, and the district court denied the motion. Amended Petition, p. 2, 2. The Court has reviewed the file in Kootenai County Case No. CRF , and no such Rule 35 motion was ever filed, let alone ruled upon. Looking at the chronology of the petition in light of the events in the underlying criminal case, the Petition for Post-Conviction Relief was not timely filed. Although Richey did file his petition within one year of his probation violation in which sentence was imposed on or about August 1, 2006, the position ORDER DISMISSING PETITION FOR POST CONVICTION RELIEF Page 7
8 is still untimely to the extent it raises any issues concerning his conviction, initial sentence, retained jurisdiction, or conditions of probation following the retained jurisdiction, as all of those matters were settled over a year before his probation violation was even initiated. Because his judgment and conviction in the underlying criminal case occurred on October 24, 2004, Richey s Petition for Post-Conviction Relief filed June 19, 2007, to the extent that it is alleging ineffective assistance of counsel in connection with the plea agreement and judgment of conviction, is not timely and must be dismissed. B. Law of the Case. As mentioned above, the only claim in Richey s Petition for Post-Conviction Relief that is not barred by the statute of limitation of I.C , is as set forth in paragraph 7(b: District Court abused it s discretion by failing to sua sponte reduce the previously imposed sentence. Petition for Post-Conviction Relief, p. 2, 7(b. That clearly alleges conduct that occurred at the probation violation hearing held August 1, 2006, when Richey had his probation revoked, original sentence imposed and was sent to prison. That is timely under I.C However, that same issue was addressed by the Idaho Court of Appeals and this Court s decision on that issue was affirmed by the Idaho Court of Appeals. As discussed above, Richey lost his appeal as the Idaho Court of Appeals on April 27, 2007, issued an unpublished opinion number 425. In that unpublished opinion the ORDER DISMISSING PETITION FOR POST CONVICTION RELIEF Page 8
9 Idaho Court of Appeals wrote: Richey appeals, contending that the district court abused its discretion in revoking probation and in failing to sua sponte reduce his sentence upon revocation of probation Unpublished Opinion No. 425, p. 1. After analysis of case law, the Idaho Court of Appeals then held: Applying the foregoing standards, and having reviewed the record in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion either in revoking probation or in ordering execution of Richey s original sentence without modification. Id., p. 2. The Idaho Court of Appeals then concluded: Therefore, the order revoking probation and directing execution of Richey s previously suspended sentence is affirmed. Id. This Court is now prohibited from re-deciding in Richey s Post-Conviction Relief claim that same issue that the Idaho Court of Appeals has already decided in Richey s direct appeal. The law of the case doctrine states that when, upon an appeal, the appellate court, in deciding a case presented, states in its opinion a principle or rule of law necessary to the decision, such pronouncement becomes the law of the case, and must be adhered to throughout subsequent proceedings, both in the trial court and upon subsequent appeal. Staurt v. State, 136 Idaho 490, 36 P.3d 1278 (2001; Frazier v. Neilsen, 118 Idaho 104, 106, 794 P.2d 1160, 1162 (Ct.App Where an issue was decided upon direct appeal, and a connected issue is raised in a UPCPA petition and the connected issue can be decided by relying upon the prior appellate decision, relitigation of the issue is barred by law of the case. Post-Conviction Practice and Procedure: A Manual for Dealing With Cases Brought ORDER DISMISSING PETITION FOR POST CONVICTION RELIEF Page 9
10 Under Idaho s Uniform Post-Conviction Procedure Act (UPCPA. I.C , et seq., Third Ed. Revised, 2004, p. 29. IV. CONCLUSION AND ORDER. For the reasons stated above, the State s Motion for Summary Dismissal is GRANTED and the Petition for Post-Conviction Relief is DISMISSED as to Richey s allegations of ineffective assistance of counsel in connection with his judgment and conviction because Richey has failed to provide any basis to avoid the time bar of I.C , and due to the law of the case regarding allegations made regarding revocation of probation and imposition of sentence. IT IS ORDERED that Richey's Petition for Post Conviction Relief be and the same hereby is dismissed as untimely. Dated this 5 th day of November, John T. Mitchell, District Judge CERTIFICATE OF MAILING I hereby certify that on the day of November, 2007, a true and correct copy of the foregoing was mailed, postage prepaid, or sent by interoffice mail or facsimile to: Dennis Reuter Marty Raap Clerk of the District Court KOOTENAI COUNTY By Deputy ORDER DISMISSING PETITION FOR POST CONVICTION RELIEF Page 10
ORDER DENYING RESPONDENT S MOTION FOR SUMMARY DISMISSAL REGARDING PETITION FOR POST-CONVICTION RELIEF
STATE OF IDAHO County of KOOTENAI ss FILED AT O'Clock M CLERK OF THE DISTRICT COURT Deputy IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF KOOTENAI ALVIN
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF KOOTENAI ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
STATE OF IDAHO County of KOOTENAI ss FILED AT O clock M CLERK, DISTRICT COURT Deputy IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF KOOTENAI STATE OF
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON STATE OF WASHINGTON, ) ) No. 67356-4-I Respondent, ) ) DIVISION ONE v. ) ) RODNEY ALBERT SCHREIB, JR., ) UNPUBLISHED OPINION ) Appellant. ) FILED: December
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF KOOTENAI ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
STATE OF IDAHO County of KOOTENAI ss FILED AT O'Clock M CLERK OF DISTRICT COURT Deputy IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF KOOTENAI WINDERMERE/COEUR
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF KOOTENAI ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
STATE OF IDAHO County of KOOTENAI ss FILED AT O'Clock M CLERK OF DISTRICT COURT Deputy IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF KOOTENAI GENE
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF KOOTENAI ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
STATE OF IDAHO County of KOOTENAI ss FILED AT O'Clock M CLERK OF DISTRICT COURT Deputy IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF KOOTENAI HITACHI
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF KOOTENAI ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
STATE OF IDAHO County of KOOTENAI ss FILED AT O'Clock M CLERK OF DISTRICT COURT Deputy IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF KOOTENAI WILLIAM
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF KOOTENAI ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
STATE OF IDAHO County of KOOTENAI ss FILED AT O'Clock M CLERK OF DISTRICT COURT Deputy IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF KOOTENAI DONNA
More informationSTATE OF IDAHO IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF KOOTENAI ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. CV
STATE OF IDAHO County of KOOTENAI ss FILED AT O'Clock M CLERK OF DISTRICT COURT Deputy IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF KOOTENAI RUSSELL
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF BONNER ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
STATE OF IDAHO County of BONNER ss FILED AT O'Clock M CLERK OF DISTRICT COURT Deputy IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF BONNER JEFFREY L.
More information6 California Criminal Law (4th), Criminal Appeal
6 California Criminal Law (4th), Criminal Appeal I. IN GENERAL A. [ 1] Appellate Jurisdiction. B. [ 2] Appellate Rules. C. Extension of Time. 1. [ 3] In General. 2. [ 4] Factors Considered. D. Right of
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF KOOTENAI ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
STATE OF IDAHO County of KOOTENAI ss FILED AT O'Clock M CLERK OF DISTRICT COURT Deputy IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF KOOTENAI GEORGE
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF BONNER ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
STATE OF IDAHO County of BONNER ss FILED AT O'Clock M CLERK OF DISTRICT COURT Deputy IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF BONNER LEON ATKINSON,
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF KOOTENAI
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF KOOTENAI TERRIN D. DRAPEAU, CASE NO. CV-10-4806 vs. Petitioner, MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER ON APPEAL
More informationSTATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF LORAIN ) DECISION AND JOURNAL ENTRY
[Cite as State v. Kiley, 2013-Ohio-634.] STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS )ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF LORAIN ) STATE OF OHIO Appellee C.A. No. 12CA010254 v. THOMAS E. KILEY Appellant
More informationNC General Statutes - Chapter 15A Article 89 1
Article 89. Motion for Appropriate Relief and Other Post-Trial Relief. 15A-1411. Motion for appropriate relief. (a) Relief from errors committed in the trial division, or other post-trial relief, may be
More informationRULES GOVERNING THE COURTS OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY RULE 3:21. SENTENCE AND JUDGMENT; WITHDRAWAL OF PLEA; PRESENTENCE INVESTIGATION; PROBATION
RULES GOVERNING THE COURTS OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY RULE 3:21. SENTENCE AND JUDGMENT; WITHDRAWAL OF PLEA; PRESENTENCE INVESTIGATION; PROBATION Rule 3:21-1. Withdrawal of Plea A motion to withdraw a plea
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF KOOTENAI ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.
STATE OF IDAHO County of KOOTENAI ss FILED AT O'Clock M CLERK OF DISTRICT COURT Deputy IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF KOOTENAI PAUL
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR CLARK COUNTY, OHIO. HENNIS, : (Criminal Appeal from Common Pleas Court) Appellant. :
[Cite as State v. Hennis, 165 Ohio App.3d 66, 2006-Ohio-41.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR CLARK COUNTY, OHIO THE STATE OF OHIO, : Appellee, : C.A. Case No. 2005-CA-65 v. : T.C. Case No. 02-CR-576 HENNIS,
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF BONNER ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
STATE OF IDAHO County of BONNER ss FILED AT O'Clock M CLERK OF DISTRICT COURT Deputy IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF BONNER CITY OF SANDPOINT,
More information17B-005. Civil injunction proceedings. A. Petition for civil injunction. If chief disciplinary counsel or, when necessary, chief disciplinary counsel
17B-005. Civil injunction proceedings. A. Petition for civil injunction. If chief disciplinary counsel or, when necessary, chief disciplinary counsel s designee, determines that civil injunction proceedings
More information**************************************** I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY.
STATE OF IDAHO County of KOOTENAI ss FILED AT O clock M CLERK, DISTRICT COURT Deputy IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF KOOTENAI STATE OF
More informationRules of the Court of Appeals of Virginia (not including forms)
As of June 0 0 0 Rules of the Court of Appeals of Virginia (not including forms) PART FIVE A THE COURT OF APPEALS A. General. Rule A:. Scope, Citation, Applicability and General Provisions. (a) Scope of
More informationRULES GOVERNING THE COURTS OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY RULE 2:9. MISCELLANEOUS PROCEEDINGS PENDING APPEAL
RULES GOVERNING THE COURTS OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY RULE 2:9. MISCELLANEOUS PROCEEDINGS PENDING APPEAL Rule 2:9-1. Control by Appellate Court of Proceedings Pending Appeal or Certification (a) Control
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 107,934. DUANE WAHL, Appellant, STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 107,934 DUANE WAHL, Appellant, v. STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. When the district court summarily denies a K.S.A. 60-1507 motion based
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI MAR OFFICE i)+ ThE CLERK SUPREME COURT COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF MISSISSIPPI
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BOBBY EARL WILSON, JR. VS. FILED MAR 1 9 2008 OFFICE i)+ ThE CLERK SUPREME COURT COURT OF APPEALS APPELLANT NO. 2007-CP-1541-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT. v. Case No. 5D
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT WARREN STAPLES, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED Appellant, v. Case No.
More informationGUIDELINES FOR THE ADMINISTRATION OF BAIL AND BONDS IN THE SIXTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT IN AND FOR BANNOCK COUNTY
GUIDELINES FOR THE ADMINISTRATION OF BAIL AND BONDS IN THE SIXTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT IN AND FOR BANNOCK COUNTY \adm\bailban1.96\revised/7-06 Bond Guidelines Amended 7/06 - Page 1 INDEX INDEX TO FORMS & MISCELLANEOUS
More informationCR ; ORDER DENYING I.c.R. 35 MOTION AND NOTICE 0F g GARY COUNT. To APPEAL STATE 0F IDAHO,
STATE OF IDAHO County of KOOT NAIA 55 IN THE DISTRICTCOURTOF THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICTOFTHE STATEOF IDAHO INAND FORTHECOUNTYOF KOOTENAI STATE 0F IDAHO, Case No. CR28-18-11817 ; P'aintiffl ORDER DENYING
More informationDA IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 2010 MT 202N
September 14 2010 DA 09-0585 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 2010 MT 202N GERALD A. HEITKEMPER, Petitioner and Appellant, v. STATE OF MONTANA, Respondent and Appellee. APPEAL FROM: District
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO. Docket No ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO Docket No. 45476 In the Interest of: JANE DOE (2017-35, A Juvenile Under Eighteen (18 Years of Age. -------------------------------------------------------- STATE
More informationThird District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed August 15, 2018. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. No. 3D17-583 Lower Tribunal No. 13-13688 James Raimondi,
More informationAmended by Order dated June 21, 2013; effective July 1, RULES OF SUPREME COURT OF VIRGINIA PART FIVE THE SUPREME COURT B. ORIGINAL JURISDICTION
Amended by Order dated June 21, 2013; effective July 1, 2013. RULES OF SUPREME COURT OF VIRGINIA PART FIVE THE SUPREME COURT B. ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Rule 5:7B. Petition for a Writ of Actual Innocence.
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF KOOTENAI ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
STATE OF IDAHO County of KOOTENAI ss FILED AT O'Clock M CLERK OF DISTRICT COURT Deputy IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF KOOTENAI WILLIAM
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 117,322. STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, JERRY D. RICE, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 117,322 STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. JERRY D. RICE, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. Interpretation of a sentencing statute is a question of law, and
More informationStanding Practice Order Pursuant to 20.1 of Act Establishing Rules Governing Practice and Procedure in Medical Assistance Provider Appeals
Standing Practice Order Pursuant to 20.1 of Act 2002-142 Establishing Rules Governing Practice and Procedure in Medical Assistance Provider Appeals TABLE OF CONTENTS PART I--PRELIMINARY PROVISIONS Subpart
More informationALABAMA SURFACE MINING COMMISSION ADMINISTRATIVE CODE
ALABAMA SURFACE MINING COMMISSION ADMINISTRATIVE CODE CHAPTER 880-X-5A SPECIAL RULES FOR HEARINGS AND APPEALS SPECIAL RULES APPLICABLE TO SURFACE COAL MINING HEARINGS AND APPEALS TABLE OF CONTENTS 880-X-5A-.01
More informationNOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION. No. 113,286 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. GREGORY SPIGHT, Appellant, MEMORANDUM OPINION
NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION No. 113,286 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS GREGORY SPIGHT, Appellant, v. JAMES HEIMGARTNER, WARDEN EL DORADO CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, et al., Appellees. MEMORANDUM
More informationSelect Post-Conviction Moments in Adult Criminal Cases
Select Post-Conviction Moments in Adult Criminal Cases Icon Abatement ab Initio A legal doctrine that operates to extinguish criminal proceedings and vacate a conviction when the convicted person dies
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF FLORIDA APPEAL NO. 1D AHMAD J. SMITH Appellant-Petitioner,
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF FLORIDA APPEAL NO. 1D11-1226 AHMAD J. SMITH Appellant-Petitioner, v. STATE OF FLORIDA Appellee-Respondent. A DIRECT APPEAL OF AN ORDER OF THE CIRCUIT
More informationThis opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014).
This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A14-1114 Jeremy Shane Zimmermann, petitioner, Appellant,
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CP COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE
E-Filed Document Mar 13 2017 09:59:29 2015-CP-01388-COA Pages: 17 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI DANA EASTERLING APPELLANT VS. NO. 2015-CP-01388-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF KOOTENAI ) ) Case No.
STATE OF IDAHO County of KOOTENAI ss FILED AT O'Clock M CLERK OF DISTRICT COURT Deputy IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF KOOTENAI JACKLIN
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 115,051. STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, DAMON HORTON, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 115,051 STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. DAMON HORTON, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT A motion to correct an illegal sentence, pursuant to K.S.A. 22-3504(1),
More informationTHE JOINT RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE FOR COURTS OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
THE JOINT RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE FOR COURTS OF CRIMINAL APPEALS Effective 1 January 2019 Table of Contents I. General... 1 Rule 1. Courts of Criminal Appeals... 1 Rule 2. Scope of Rules; Title...
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF KOOTENAI
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF KOOTENAI STATE OF IDAHO, vs. JAMES A. EARNEY, Plaintiff, Defendant. CASE NO. CR-02-7144 MEMORANDUM DECISION
More informationRULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE NOTICE
RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE NOTICE Notice is hereby given that the following amendments to the Rules of Appellate Procedure were adopted to take effect on January 1, 2019. The amendments were approved
More informationFlorida Senate SB 170 By Senator Lynn
By Senator Lynn 1 A bill to be entitled 2 An act relating to the sentencing of youthful 3 offenders; amending s. 958.04, F.S.; 4 prohibiting the court from sentencing a person 5 as a youthful offender
More informationALABAMA VICTIMS RIGHTS LAWS1
ALABAMA VICTIMS RIGHTS LAWS1 Constitution Art. I, 6.01 Basic rights for crime victims. (a) Crime victims, as defined by law or their lawful representatives, including the next of kin of homicide victims,
More informationCASE NO IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO COLUMBUS, OHIO STATE OF OHIO9. Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. DOUGLAS EDWARD HADDIX, Defendant-Appellant.
^ CASE NO. 2012-1762 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO COLUMBUS, OHIO STATE OF OHIO9 Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. DOUGLAS EDWARD HADDIX, Defendant-Appellant. ON MOTION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL FROM THE OHIO COURT OF
More informationIN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs March 29, 2006
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs March 29, 2006 JACKIE WILLIAM CROWE v. JAMES A. BOWLEN, WARDEN Direct Appeal from the Criminal Court for McMinn County Nos.
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI GLENN M. KELLY APPELLANT VS. NO.2009-CP-1753-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE APPELLEE DOES NOT REQUEST ORAL ARGUMENT JIM HOOD,
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, UNPUBLISHED February 6, 2007 v No. 263329 Wayne Circuit Court HOWARD D. SMITH, LC No. 02-008451 Defendant-Appellant.
More informationRULES OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS (Revised effective January 1, 2011)
RULES OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS (Revised effective January 1, 2011) TITLE I. INTRODUCTION Rule 1. Title and Scope of Rules; Definitions. 2. Seal. TITLE II. APPEALS FROM JUDGMENTS AND
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 115,739. STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, LAWSON J. WEEKES III, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 115,739 STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. LAWSON J. WEEKES III, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT An appellate court has jurisdiction to review whether the district
More informationIN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs May 11, 2005
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs May 11, 2005 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. RANDALL D. BENNETT Direct Appeal from the Criminal Court for Davidson County No. 99-D-2298
More informationJUVENILE LITIGATION PARALEGAL
JUVENILE LITIGATION PARALEGAL Drafted by Maddie Vines, formerly the Division Manager and Paralegal, Office of the District Attorney for the 4th Judicial District Juvenile Prosecution Unit and Special Assignments
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI
.1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI DEMARIO WALKER APPELLANT VS. NO.2008-CP-1987 STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE APPELLEE DOES NOT REQUEST ORAL ARGUMENT JIM HOOD,
More informationwith one count of Aggravated Murder, O.R.C (B), and two counts of
STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS ) SS. COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA ) CR. 184772 ) ) FINDINGS OF FACT AND ) CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND ) JUDGMENT ENTRY ) STATE OF OHIO, Plaintiff ) ) Vs. ) ) WILLIE LEE JESTER,
More informationSupreme Court of Florida
Supreme Court of Florida No. SC15-290 PER CURIAM. IN RE: AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE. [June 11, 2015] This matter is before the Court for consideration of out-of-cycle amendments
More informationSOUTHWEST INTERTRIBAL COURT OF APPEALS RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE
SOUTHWEST INTERTRIBAL COURT OF APPEALS RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE Accepted and approved, as amended, by the Standing Administrative Committee on June 22, 2001 SOUTHWEST INTERTRIBAL COURT OF APPEALS RULES
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF KOOTENAI ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
STATE OF IDAHO ) County of KOOTENAI ) ss FILED AT O'Clock M CLERK OF DISTRICT COURT Deputy IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF KOOTENAI HEIDI
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI FILED MAY Suprem. Court Court 0' Appeal. BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE
, " ", ~'~fd!\vl IF'\' I'" -,' I' J "~.:;;,,.' L...J J IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI ALVIN D. THOMPSON VS. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI FILED MAY 222008 orno. 0' the Clerk Suprem. Court Court
More informationPART 6 COURT CHAPTER 1 MUNICIPAL COURT
PART 6 COURT CHAPTER 1 MUNICIPAL COURT 6-101 Organization of municipal court. 6-102 Definitions. 6-103 Jurisdiction of court. 6-104 Judge; qualifications. 6-105 Appointment of judge. 6-106 Term of judge.
More informationRULE 82 CRIMINAL APPEAL RULE INTERPRETATION AND DEFINITIONS
RULE 82 CRIMINAL APPEAL RULE INTERPRETATION AND DEFINITIONS 82.01 (1) In this rule, unless the context requires otherwise: "appeal" includes an application for leave to appeal and a crossappeal; (appel)
More informationRULES OF PRACTICE OF THE FRANKLIN COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS GENERAL DIVISION
RULES OF PRACTICE OF THE FRANKLIN COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS GENERAL DIVISION LOCAL RULE 67. BAIL FORFEITURE 67.01 Bail shall be adjudged forfeited upon the nonappearance by a defendant at any scheduled
More information) COURT OF CRIMINAL ) ) 1ST CRIMINAL ) DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS )
WRIT NO. W91-35666-H(B) EX PARTE EDWARD JEROME XXX Applicant ) COURT OF CRIMINAL ) APPEALS OF TEXAS ) ) 1ST CRIMINAL ) DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS ) MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS
More informationALABAMA COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS
Rel: 05/04/2012 Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the advance sheets of Southern Reporter. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Alabama Appellate
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISsOE) PY STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE APPELLEE DOES NOT REQUEST ORAL ARGUMENT LISA L.
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISsOE) PY SHAUN DERRELL SPRATT APPELLANT VS. NO.2007-CA-0791-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE APPELLEE DOES NOT REQUEST ORAL ARGUMENT JIM
More informationCh. 41 MEDICAL ASSISTANCE APPEAL PROCEDURES 55 CHAPTER 41. MEDICAL ASSISTANCE PROVIDER APPEAL PROCEDURES GENERAL PROVISIONS
Ch. 41 MEDICAL ASSISTANCE APPEAL PROCEDURES 55 CHAPTER 41. MEDICAL ASSISTANCE PROVIDER APPEAL PROCEDURES Sec. 41.1. Scope. 41.2. Construction and application. 41.3. Definitions. 41.4. Amendments to regulation.
More informationIC Chapter 6. Release From Imprisonment and Credit Time
IC 35-50-6 Chapter 6. Release From Imprisonment and Credit Time IC 35-50-6-0.1 Application of certain amendments to chapter Sec. 0.1. The following amendments to this chapter apply as follows: (1) The
More informationINSTRUCTIONS - READ CAREFULLY
IN THE COURT OF COUNTY STATE OF INDIANA Full Name of Movant Prison Number (if any) Case No. (To be supplied by the clerk of the court) v. State of Indiana, Respondent. INSTRUCTIONS - READ CAREFULLY In
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA NO:SC STEVE LYNCH, Petitioner, 477 DCA CASE NO: 3D1-61 Vs. L.T. CASE NO: C
.t ON cro G IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA Joy., P, SC NO:SC14-2065 STEVE LYNCH, Sy Petitioner, 477 DCA CASE NO: 3D1-61 Vs. L.T. CASE NO: 01-368-C HON. PAM BONDI-ATTORNEY GENERAL STATE OF FLORIDA, et
More informationLOCAL RULES. Tenth Judicial District - Osage County Oklahoma. Effective July 1, 2012
LOCAL RULES Effective July 1, 2012 Tenth Judicial District - Osage County Oklahoma Hon. Stuart L. Tate- Special Judge Hon. B. David Gambill- Associate District Judge Hon. M. John Kane IV- District Judge
More informationOver 18 Proceedings in Juvenile Court
Over 18 Proceedings in Juvenile Court 19 th ANNUAL JUVENILE LAW CONFERENCE PROFESSOR ROBERT O. DAWSON JUVENILE LAW INSTITUTE February 22 24, 2006 Westin Park Central Hotel Dallas, Texas Gracie G. Lewis
More informationIN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs November 29, 2005
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs November 29, 2005 ROBERT MICHAEL WINTERS v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Direct Appeal from the Criminal Court for Hamilton County No.
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CP COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE
E-Filed Document Sep 15 2015 14:14:52 2015-CP-00265-COA Pages: 13 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI TIMOTHY BURNS APPELLANT VS. NO. 2015-CP-00265-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF
More informationNC General Statutes - Chapter 15A Article 46 1
Article 46. Crime Victims' Rights Act. 15A-830. Definitions. (a) The following definitions apply in this Article: (1) Accused. A person who has been arrested and charged with committing a crime covered
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT, STATE OF WYOMING
IN THE SUPREME COURT, STATE OF WYOMING October Term, A.D. 2016 In the Matter of Amendments to ) the Rules Governing the Commission on ) Judicial Conduct and Ethics ) ORDER AMENDING THE RULES GOVERNING
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF KOOTENAI ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
STATE OF IDAHO County of KOOTENAI ss FILED AT O clock M CLERK, DISTRICT COURT Deputy IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF KOOTENAI STATE OF
More informationMOTION TO SET ASIDE CONVICTION AND DISMISS PROSECUTION
STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS NO. DIV JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT PARISH OF STATE OF LOUISIANA MOTION TO SET ASIDE CONVICTION AND DISMISS PROSECUTION NOW INTO HONORABLE COURT, comes Defendant, OR Defendant through
More informationThe Motion asks the Court to do something in a case that already exists.
Filing a Motion Waiver: These instructions and forms are just information. They are not legal advice. Legal advice depends on the specific circumstances of each situation. The information contained in
More informationCertificates of Rehabilitation in Fresno County Filing Instructions
Certificates of Rehabilitation in Fresno County Filing Instructions 1. You must be a resident of Fresno County to file a certificate of rehabilitation in Fresno County. However, the offense may have occurred
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SECOND JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR LEON COUNTY, FLORIDA PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SECOND JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR LEON COUNTY, FLORIDA KENNETH PURDY, Petitioner, CASE NO.: Not Yet Assigned vs. JULIE L. JONES, SECRETARY OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,
More informationRULE 3. [Reserved] CHAPTER III. PETITION PRACTICE AND PLEADING
PETITION PRACTICE AND PLEADING 231 Rule 3.1 Rule 3.1. [Reserved]. 3.2 3.6. [Reserved]. 3.7. [Reserved]. Rule 3.1. [Reserved]. RULE 3. [Reserved] The provisions of this Rule 3.1 amended December 10, 2013,
More informationIN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs February 2, 2010
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs February 2, 2010 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. CHRISTOPHER JONES Direct Appeal from the Circuit Court for Madison County No. 05-209 Donald
More informationORDER AFFIRMED. Division VII Opinion by JUDGE BERNARD Connelly, J., concurs Lichtenstein, J., dissents. Announced September 2, 2010
COLORADO COURT OF APPEALS Court of Appeals No. 09CA0083 Jefferson County District Court No. 06CR97 Honorable R. Brooke Jackson, Judge The People of the State of Colorado, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Charlotte
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA
Pursuant to Ind.Appellate Rule 65(D, this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collateral
More informationSUPREME COURT OF GEORGIA. Atlanta June 11, The Honorable Supreme Court met pursuant to adjournment. The following order was passed:
SUPREME COURT OF GEORGIA Atlanta June 11, 2015 The Honorable Supreme Court met pursuant to adjournment. The following order was passed: It is ordered that new Uniform Magistrate Court Rule 7.5 (relating
More informationSupreme Court of Florida
Supreme Court of Florida No. SC00-1327 RONALD COTE, Petitioner, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. [August 30, 2001] PER CURIAM. We have for review Cote v. State, 760 So. 2d 162 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000), which
More information2019COA28. In this postconviction case, a division of the court of appeals. must determine whether a parolee who appeals his parole
The summaries of the Colorado Court of Appeals published opinions constitute no part of the opinion of the division but have been prepared by the division for the convenience of the reader. The summaries
More informationADMINISTRATIVE RULES FOR CONTESTED CASE HEARINGS MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF MICHIGAN. Effective June 1, 2016 Amended June 19, 2017
ADMINISTRATIVE RULES FOR CONTESTED CASE HEARINGS MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF MICHIGAN Effective June 1, 2016 Amended June 19, 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS Rule 1 Scope... 3 Rule 2 Construction of
More informationSection 1 - Are You Eligible?
These are the instructions for completing the Orange County Superior Court forms entitled (Form No. L-0408.1), Notice of Filing (Form No. L-0409), Proof of Service- (Form No.L-0801), and the Certificate
More informationIN THE EIGHTEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT MUNICIPAL COURT OF DERBY, KANSAS
SAMPLE MOTION AND ORDER FOR EXPUNGEMENT OF CONVICTION OR DIVERSION AND RELATED ARREST RECORDS (AND ASSOCIATED STATUTE) This form is provided as a guide to assist defendants in preparing a motion to the
More informationCuyahoga County Common Pleas Court Local Rules 33.0 ASSIGNMENT AND COMPENSATION OF COUNSEL TO DEFEND
33.0 ASSIGNMENT AND OF COUNSEL TO DEFEND Due to changes to the Ohio Administrative Code regarding the qualifications of and the process for appointing assigned counsel to indigent clients (OAC:120-1-10),
More informationVIRGIN ISLANDS SUPREME COURT RULES (as amended November 2, 2011)
VIRGIN ISLANDS SUPREME COURT RULES (as amended November 2, 2011) RULE Rule 1. Scope of Rules; Terms; Sessions; Seal; Filing in Superior Court. (a) Title and Citation (b) Scope of Rules (c) Authority for
More informationNo. 118,790 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. In the Matter of J.S.P. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT
No. 118,790 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS In the Matter of J.S.P. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. Whether jurisdiction exists is a question of law over which this court's scope of review is unlimited.
More informationCHAPTER 4. ADJUDICATORY HEARING
ADJUDICATORY HEARING 237 Rule 401 CHAPTER 4. ADJUDICATORY HEARING Rule 401. Introduction to Chapter Four. 404. Prompt Adjudicatory Hearing. 406. Adjudicatory Hearing. 407. Admissions. 408. Ruling on Offenses.
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 110,277 STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. MARCUS D. REED, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 110,277 STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. MARCUS D. REED, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT Registration for sex offenders mandated by the Kansas Offender Registration
More informationDISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS. No. 98-CO-907. Appeal from the Superior Court of the District of Columbia
Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections
More information