(CORAM: LUBUVA, J.A., MROSO, J.A. And MUNUO, J.A.)
|
|
- William Briggs
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM (CORAM: LUBUVA, J.A., MROSO, J.A. And MUNUO, J.A.) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 152 OF 2004 VICTOR FRANK ISHEBABI (a person of weak mind by his next friend) MAHAMOUD ISHEBABI... APPELLANT VERSUS 1. LEISURE TOURS AND HOLIDAYS LTD. 2. SAID MOHAMED 3. NATIONAL INSURANCE CORPORATION LTD. 4. PRESIDENTIAL PARASTATAL SECTOR RESPONDENTS REFORM COMMISSION 5. RICHARD TARIMO 6. THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE 7. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL (Appeal from the Ruling of the High Court of Tanzania at Dar es Salaam) (Massati, J.) dated the 12 th day of March, 2004 in Civil Case No. 183 of RULING OF THE COURT 5 May & 3 June, 2008 MROSO, J.A.: This was an appeal by one Victor Frank Ishebabi, said to be a person of weak mind, by his next friend, Mahamoud Ishebabi, against seven respondents. On the hearing date Dr. Mvungi appeared for the appellant. Mr. Buberwa and Mr. Msemwa, learned counsel, appeared
2 2 respectively for the first and second respondents and for the third and fourth respondents in that order. The fifth respondent was not served with the notice of hearing and, therefore, did not appear. Ms Otaru, learned State Attorney, appeared for the Inspector General of Police and the Attorney General who are the sixth and seventh respondents respectively. Mr. Buberwa, Mr. Msemwa and Ms Otaru each had filed a Notice of Preliminary Objection under Rule 100 of the Court of Appeal Rules, 1979 on behalf of their respective clients. The substance of objection in all the three notices of objection is that the appeal is incompetent because the record of appeal does not contain a valid copy of the decree. The Court, therefore, could not proceed with the hearing of the appeal and had to deal with the preliminary objections first. With the consent of his colleagues, Mr. Buberwa addressed the Court on behalf of the other counsel on the ground of objection. He explained that the copy of the decree in the record of appeal was incurably defective in that it had a date which differed from the date of the judgment against which it was intended to appeal, and besides, it was not signed by the judge. On 12 th March, 2004 the High Court, Massati, J. (as he then was), read out a ruling in which he upheld a preliminary objection to the effect that a suit which was before him was time-barred and, consequently dismissed it. The decree which was subsequently drawn was however dated 5 th August, 2004, which was not the date of the judgment and it was signed by a District Registrar and not by the judge. That was contrary to the requirements of Order 20 Rule 7 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1966 which reads as under: The decree shall bear the date of the day on which the judgment was pronounced, and when the judge or magistrate has satisfied himself that the decree has been drawn up in accordance with the judgment, he shall sign the decree. In view of the defective decree, Mr. Buberwa submitted that the record of appeal which contained an invalid decree did not satisfy the mandatory requirements of Rule 89(1)(h) of the Court of Appeal Rules, 1979 and the appeal was therefore incompetent and should be struck out with costs. He cited in support of that submission the cases of Olam Uganda Limited suing through its Attorney -United Youth Shipping Company Limited v Tanzania Harbours Authority, Civil Appeal No. 57 of 2002 (unreported), and also Dhow Merchantile (EA) Limited and Two
3 Others v Registrar of Companies and 4 Others, Civil Appeal No. 86 of 2004 (unreported). He maintained that the defects go to the root of the appeal and are incurable. Dr. Mvungi conceded that the decree in the record of appeal was defective but argued that the defects were a technicality and that the Court should take cognizance of Article 107A(2)(e) of the Constitution of the United Republic of Tanzania which enjoins the courts to administer substantive justice and not to be encumbered unduly by technicalities. For that reason, he submitted that the appeal was competent and the defective decree could be corrected. He referred to a recent order of this Court Kapinga and Company Advocates v National Bank of Commerce Limited, Civil Appeal No. 42 of He said a similarly irregular decree was in issue and the Court did not strike out the appeal. Dr. Mvungi urged, therefore, that the appeal was not incompetent and the appellant be given time to correct the defective decree. The legal status of a decree which does not conform with the provisions of Order 20 rule 7 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1966 has been discussed in many decisions of this Court, including those which the respondents cited in these proceedings. For example, in Olam Uganda Limited suing through (sic) its Attorney United Youth Shipping Company Limited v Tanzania Harbours Authority, Civil Appeal No. 57 of 2002 (unreported) an order dismissing a suit was construed to be a decree. The drawn order which formed part of a record of appeal was signed by a Deputy Registrar. This Court, after referring to several of its previous decisions in which the appeals were held to be incompetent and, consequently, struck out because each of the records of appeal contained a decree which had been signed by a registrar instead of a judge, also struck out the appeal but, contrary to those other decisions, declined to grant leave to the appellant to re-institute the appeal. The Court said It is true, as argued by Mr. Magafu, that in the cases he referred to us, the Court had struck out the appeals and proceeded to direct the appellants to re-institute their appeals within a given time. But we can now safely say that that is all history. We said in that decision that the case of Tanganyika Cheap Store v National Insurance Corporation (T) Limited, Civil Appeal No. 37 of 2001 had warned that the earlier decisions giving leave to appellants to re-institute their appeals were wake-up-calls. By that phrase the Court was saying that no further indulgence would be granted in the future for 3
4 4 similar errors. The Tanganyika Cheap Store decision was given on 27 th January, 2005 and the Olam Uganda decision on 11 th June, Notwithstanding the categorical pronouncement from the Court in Olam Uganda that it was no longer current to grant leave to an appellant to refile an appeal which is struck out because of a defective decree, some subsequent decisions from the Court have continued to direct appellants to re-institute such appeals. In Haruna Mpangos and 902 Others v Tanzania Portland Cement Company Limited, Civil Appeal No. 10 of 2007, the Court on 10 th March, 2008 when dealing with an appeal which, when it was filed, contained a decree which was wrongly dated, allowed the appellants to re-institute the appeal if they so wished, without payment of fresh fees. The Court said it was following its previous decision in Robert John Mugo (as Administrator of the Estate of Late John Mugo Maina) v Adam Mollel, Civil Appeal No. 2 of In Robert John Mugo this Court was faced with a decree in appeal which did not conform with Order 39 Rule 35(4) of the Civil Procedure Code, The decree had not been signed by a judge. The Court held that the decree was invalid and struck out the appeal but made the following observation and direction: But bearing in mind the fact that practically all judges of the High Court have consistently omitted to comply with the requirements of Order 39 Rule 35 (4) (of the Civil Procedure Code, 1966) and that the Court of Appeal has also consistently until now failed to notice this omission since it was established over ten years ago, thereby encouraging members of the legal profession to believe that all was in order with the decree in appeal, we think that justice demands that the appellants be put in a position to re-institute the appeal easily in this Court, should he so wish. It is apparent that since Robert John Mugo three different situations are discernible. One situation relates to the decisions which are typified by Robert John Mugo, that if the decree in the record of appeal is defective because it was not signed by a judge, the appeal is incompetent and, consequently, struck out. However, depending on certain peculiar circumstances, the Court directs or grants leave to the appellant to re-institute the appeal under given conditions. Haruna Mpangos is a recent example of that category of cases. The second situation comprises that category of appeals in which this Court said that once it is found that a record of appeal contains a defective
5 5 decree (because it was not signed by the judge or the magistrate who decided the case, or it bears the wrong date, (or no date at all), the appeal is incompetent and, consequently struck out. It is no longer appropriate to grant leave or to direct the appellant to re-institute the appeal under given conditions specified by the Court. Examples of such decisions are the Tanganyika Cheap Store case and Tanzania Sewing Machines Company Limited v Njake Enterprises Limited, Civil Appeal No. 28 of In the last cited case in which the decision was given on 5 th June, 2006 the Court said: A decree which has not been signed by a judge is not a decree but merely a purported decree and that an appeal based on such a decree is incompetent. The appeal was struck out and no direction or leave to re-institute the appeal was given. Olam Uganda Limited typifies this category. The third situation comprises the category of decisions of this Court in which it was held inter alia that if a record of appeal contains a defective decree which is not signed by the judge or magistrate who passed judgment or is undated or wrongly dated, the appeal is not incompetent and, therefore, not struck out and that the appellant can be allowed time to rectify the defect in the decree and the same appeal is subsequently set down for hearing normally. In Anjum Vicar Saleem Abdi v Naseem Akhtar Saleem Zangie, Civil Appeal No. 73 of 2003, a decision given on 17 th November, 2005, the Court upheld a Preliminary Objection to a decree which was found to be invalid but proceeded to say As in previous instances we do not strike out the appeal but allow the appellant to amend the record of appeal. The appellant is given 30 days to do so from the delivery of this ruling. The approach in Anjum Vicar Saleem was apparently adopted in a recent order of the Court (dated 24 th April, 2008) in Kapinga and Company Advocates v National Bank of Commerce, Civil Appeal No. 42 of The Order reads as follows The appellants to correct the irregularity in the extracted order with respect to the date and they are given 14 days to do so from today. Reasons for the order to be given later. The Registrar to fix the appeal in the next Sessions.
6 6 We have highlighted the three situations to acknowledge that there are apparent inconsistencies; but notwithstanding that appearance which may have been occasioned by certain peculiar and extenuating circumstances, the predominant view of this Court is that a defective decree under Order 20 Rule 7 or Order 39 Rule 35(4) in a record of appeal renders the appeal incompetent and such appeal is struck out. We think that once an appeal is struck out, normally that is the end of the proceedings relating to it and it will not be appropriate to make orders or directions relating to the struck out appeal in that same record. It will be up to the appellant thereafter to take what legal course they consider is permissible, whether to re-institute the appeal or abandon the idea. Following from that position it will not be correct to argue that the defect is a mere technicality which could be rectified, and Article 107A(2)(e) of the Constitution to which Dr. Mvungi referred the Court does not apply to a case like the one now before it. We uphold the preliminary objections and strike out the appeal with costs to all the respondents, save the fifth respondent who did not appear and was not party to the preliminary objections. DATED AT DAR ES SALAAM this 16 th day of May, D. Z. LUBUVA JUSTICE OF APPEAL J. A. MROSO JUSTICE OF APPEAL E. N. MUNUO JUSTICE OF APPEAL I certify that this is a true copy of the original.
7 (S.A.N. WAMBURA) REGISTRAR 7
1 ST ADILI BANCORP LIMITED.APPELLANT VERSUS ISSA HUSSEIN SAMMA...RESPONDENT
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM (CORAM: LUBUVA, J.A., MROSO, J.A. And MUNUO, J.A.) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 78 OF 2006 1 ST ADILI BANCORP LIMITED.APPELLANT VERSUS ISSA HUSSEIN SAMMA....RESPONDENT
More informationCivil Appeal No 4 of 2003 in the court of Appeal of Tanzania at Dar es Salaam
1 Civil Appeal No 4 of 2003 in the court of Appeal of Tanzania at Dar es Salaam DAHABURALI E. SHAMJI TADEMA OVERSEAS LIMITED Vs. 1. The Treasury Registrar Ministry of Finance Tanzania. 2. The Attorney
More informationThe appellants, through the services of the Women's Legal Aid. Centre (WLAC) lodged the present appeal to challenge the dismissal of
1 IN THE COURTOF APPEALOF TANZANIA AT OAR ESSALAAM (CORAM: RAMAOHANI, C.l., MUNUO, l.a., RUTAKANGWA, l.a., KIMARO, l.a., And BWANA, l.a.) CIVIL APPEAL NO.4 OF 2007 ELIZABETH STEPHEN 1ST APPELLANT SALOME
More informationRAMADHANI, C.J., LUBUVA, J.A. And NSEKELA, J.A.) KAPINGA & COMPANY ADVOCATES... APPELLANT VERSUS NATIONAL BANK OF COMMERCE LIMITED...
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM (CORAM: RAMADHANI, C.J., LUBUVA, J.A. And NSEKELA, J.A.) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 42 OF 2007 KAPINGA & COMPANY ADVOCATES... APPELLANT VERSUS NATIONAL BANK OF
More informationThis is an application for revision in terms of the provisions of
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT DAR ESSALAAM (CORAM: LUBUVA, l.a., MROSO, l.a., And MSOFFE, l.a.) CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 183 OF 2005 1. ABBAS SHERALLY ] 2. MEHRUNISSA ABBAS SHERALLY ]................
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM
Citation Parties Legal Principles Discussed TANZANIA SEWING MACHINES COMPANY LIMITED Vs. CIVIL APPLICATION NO.56 of 2007 Court of Appeal of Tanzania at Dar es Salaam. Munuo, J.A MJAKE ENTERPRISES LIMITED.
More informationJOHN NAIMAN MUSHI APPELLANT VERSUS KOMBO RURAL COOPERATIVE SOCIETY LIMITED RESPONDENT
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT ARUSHA (CORAM KAJI,J.A., KILEO,J.A., And KIMARO,J.A.) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 45 OF 2006 JOHN NAIMAN MUSHI APPELLANT VERSUS KOMBO RURAL COOPERATIVE SOCIETY LIMITED RESPONDENT
More informationRULING OF THE COURT. The third respondent herein, Elias K. Musiba, used to be an employee
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM (CORAM: RUTAKANGWA, J.A., MBAROUK, J.A., And MASSATI, J.A.) CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 97 OF 2010 TANZANIA TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMPANY LTD... APPLICANT VERSUS
More informationSELEMANI RAJABU MIZINO... APPLICANT VERSUS 1. SHABIR EBRAHIM BHAIJEE 2. FAYEZA SHABIR BHAIJEE... RESPONDENTS 3. HUZAIRA SHABIR BHAIJEE
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 80 OF 2007 In the Matter of an Intended Appeal SELEMANI RAJABU MIZINO... APPLICANT VERSUS 1. SHABIR EBRAHIM BHAIJEE 2. FAYEZA SHABIR
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL Of TANZANIA AT ZANZIBAR
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL Of TANZANIA AT ZANZIBAR 1. SALUM ABASS SALUM } 2. ABDALLA HDA SHAMTE... RESPONDENTS 3. ALl SElF AU :. (Appeal from the Judgment and Decree of the High Court of Zanzibar at Vuga)
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM. MROSO, J.A., NSEKELA, J.A. And MSOFFE, J.A. CIVIL REFERENCE NO. 3 OF 2007
Citation Parties Legal Principles Discussed CIVIL REFERENCE NO. 3 OF 2007- COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM- MROSO, J.A., NSEKELA, J.A. And MSOFFE, J.A. HARUNA MPANGAOS AND OTHERS Vs. TANZANIA
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM (CORAM: SAMATTA, C.J, MUNUO,J, A, AND RUTAKANGWA, J, A.)
Citation Parties Legal Principles Discussed SULTAN S/O Non-compliance with the MOHAMED VS provisions of section 240 (3) of the THE REPUBLIC. Criminal Procedure Act, Cap 20 (Appeal from the R.E 2002 is
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM. (CORAM: MROSO, J. A, MSOFFE, J. A. AND KAJI, J. A.) CIVIL REFERECE NO.
1 Civil Reference No 14 of 2005 Court of Appeal of Tanzania at Dar es Salaam. Mroso, J.A, Msoffe, J.A and Kaji, J.A Philip Chumbuka VS. Masudi Ally Kasele (Appeal from the Judgement Decision of the Appeal
More informationIn this application made under Rule 11 (2) (b) of the Court of. Appeal Rules, 2009, the applicant, Indian Ocean Hotels Ltd. t/a
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM (CORAM: RUTAKANGWA, J.A., MBAROUK, J.A., And MASSATI, J.A.) CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 82 A OF 2010 INDIAN OCEAN HOTELS LTD. t/a GOLDEN TULIP DAR ES SALAAM
More informationELIGI EDWARD MASSAWE AND THREE OTHERS (On behalf of 104 others)..applicants ATTORNEY GENERAL AND TWO OTHERS...RESPONDENTS
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM (CORAM: MUNUO, J.A., MSOFFE, J.A. And KAJI, J.A.) CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 75 OF 2006 ELIGI EDWARD MASSAWE AND THREE OTHERS (On behalf of 104 others)..applicants
More information(CORAM: MUNUO, J.A., KILEO, J.A. And LUANDA, J.A.) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 75 OF 2008
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM (CORAM: MUNUO, J.A., KILEO, J.A. And LUANDA, J.A.) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 75 OF 2008 1. MIRE ARTAN ISMAIL....1 ST APPELLANT 2. ZAINABU MZEE...2 ND APPELLANT
More informationSTAY OF EXECUTION-whether the application has been overtakenusually,
Citation Parties Legal Principles Discussed 1. SHABIR EBRAHIM BHAIJEE 2. FAZA SHABIR BHAIJEE 3. HUZAIRA SHABIR BHAIJEE Vs. 1. SELEMANI RAJABU MIZINO, 2. REGISTRAR OF TITLES- CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 40 OF
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM CIVIL REFERENCE NO.12 OF 2004 DAVID MWAKIKUNGA. APPELANT VERSUS
1 Civil reference No.12 of 2004 Court of Appeal of Tanzania at Dar es Salaam. Munuo, J.A, Kaji, J.A and Kimaro. David Mwakikunga Vs Mzumbe University (inccessor of the title of IDM Mzumbe) (Reference from
More information(CORAM: RAMADHANI, C.J., MROSO, J.A. And RUTAKANGWA, J.A.)
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT ARUSHA (CORAM: RAMADHANI, C.J., MROSO, J.A. And RUTAKANGWA, J.A.) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 73 OF 2003 MR. ANJUM VICAR SALEEM ABDI.. APPELLANT VERSUS MRS. NASEEM AKHTAR SALEEM
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM CORAM: RAMADHANI, J. A. NSEKELA, J. A. AND KAJI, J. A. CIVIL APPLICATION NO.
1 In the Court of Appeal of Tanzania at Dar es Salaam Civil Application No. 173 of 2004 KAJI, J.A STELLA TEMU VS TANZANIA REVENUE AUTHORITY (Application for Revenue from the judgement of the Court of Appeal
More informationCitation Parties Legal Principles Discussed
1 Citation Parties Legal Principles Discussed CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 20 OF 2007- COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM- MSOFFE, J.A, KAJI, J. A; and RUTAKANGWA, J. A. 1. NATIONAL INSURANCE CORPORATION
More informationAT DAR ES SALAAM CIVIL APPEAL NO. 145 OF 2002 MATHEW MBATA...APPLICANT VERSUS DENIS CATHELESS...RESPONDENT RULING
IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM CIVIL APPEAL NO. 145 OF 2002 MATHEW MBATA...APPLICANT VERSUS DENIS CATHELESS...RESPONDENT Date of last order - 29/2/2008 Date of Ruling - 31/03/2008 RULING
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM CIIVIL APPLICATION NO.111 OF 2006 STANBIC BANK TANZANIA LTD.. APPLICANT VERSUS
1 Civil Application No 111 of 2006 court of Appeal of Tanzania at Dar es Salaam Msoffe, J.A Stanbic Bank Tanzania Ltd Vs Plexus Cotton Ltd (Application for stay of execution from decision of High Court
More information(CORAM: RAMADHANI, C.J., MROSO, J.A. And KAJI, J.A.) 1. JOSEPH CHUWA 2. HASHIM MOTTO.. APPELLANTS VERSUS THE REPUBLIC.RESPONDENT
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT ARUSHA (CORAM: RAMADHANI, C.J., MROSO, J.A. And KAJI, J.A.) CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 75 OF 2006 1. JOSEPH CHUWA 2. HASHIM MOTTO.. APPELLANTS VERSUS THE REPUBLIC.RESPONDENT
More informationCitation Parties Legal Principles Discussed. Valambhia, Civil Application No.18 of 1993 (Unreported). J.A, NSEKELA, - that it has inherent J.
1 Citation Parties Legal Principles Discussed CRIMINAL ROBERT EDWARD The Court may only review APPLICATION MORINGE@KADOGOO its decisions as spelt out in NO.9 OF 2005 VS THE REPUBLIC- Chandrakand Joshubhai
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT ARUSHA (CORAM: RAMADHANI, J.A., NSEKELA. J.A., And KAJI,J.A.) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 77 OF 2002 BETWEEN
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT ARUSHA (CORAM: RAMADHANI, J.A., NSEKELA. J.A., And KAJI,J.A.) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 77 OF 2002 BETWEEN TANGA CEMENT COMPANY LIMITED...APPELLANT AND CHRISTOPHERSON COMPANY
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM ALLAN T. MATERU APPELLANT / APPLICANT VERSUS AKIBA COMMERCIAL BANK... RESPONDENT
..... --...,:. IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM ALLAN T. MATERU APPELLANT / APPLICANT VERSUS AKIBA COMMERCIAL BANK... RESPONDENT The applicant, Allan Materu, sued his former employer, Akiba
More informationThis is an application for extension of time within which to lodge an. application for leave to appeal against the decision of the High Court sitting
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM (CORAM: MSOFFE, J.A., RUTAKANGWA, J.A., And LUANDA, J.A.) CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 182 A OF 2007 SELINA CHIBAGO... APPLICANT VERSUS FINIHAS CHIBAGO... RESPONDENT
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 28 OF 2014 URSINO PALMS ESTATE LIMITED... APPLICANT VERSUS 1. KYELA VALLEY FOODS LTD.................... lst RESPONDENT 2. THE
More information1. YUSUFU SAME 2. HAWA DADA APPELLANTS VERSUS
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM CORAM: MUNUO, J,A. KAJI. J.A. AND KIMARO, J.A.) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 1 OF 2002 1. YUSUFU SAME 2. HAWA DADA APPELLANTS VERSUS HADIJA YUSUFU RESPONDENT (Appeal
More informationAR CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4 OF COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT ARUSHA- RUTAKANGWA, J.A.
1 AR CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4 OF 2006- COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT ARUSHA- RUTAKANGWA, J.A. ROBERT LESKAR Vs. SHIBESH ABEBE (Application to set aside the Dismissal Order of 15/09/2006 and restore AR
More information(CORAM: NSEKELA, J.A., KILEO, J.A. And BWANA, J.A.) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 26 OF 2008
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM (CORAM: NSEKELA, J.A., KILEO, J.A. And BWANA, J.A.) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 26 OF 2008 AGNESS SIMBAMBILI GABBA. APPELLANT VERSUS DAVID SAMSON GABBA RESPONDENT
More informationTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF NATIONAL PROVIDENT FUND (ESTABLISHMENT) ACT, 1975 PART I
THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF NATIONAL PROVIDENT FUND (ESTABLISHMENT) ACT, 1975 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS PART I PRELIMINARY Section Title 1. Short title and Commencement. 2. Construction. 3. Interpretation.
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT ZANZIBAR
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT ZANZIBAR (AppHq~tij)_nfQrJeave to appeal to The Court of Appeal of Tanzania from the Ruling and Order of the High Court of.~~!1zibar at Vuga) dated the 9 th day of
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT OAR ES SALAAM. (CORAM: KIMARO,J.A., MASSATI,J.A., And MUGASHA,J.A.) CIVIL APPLICATION NO.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT OAR ES SALAAM (CORAM: KIMARO,J.A., MASSATI,J.A., And MUGASHA,J.A.) CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 171 OF 2015 1. JOHN PAUL SHIBUDA ~ 2.TANZANIAINTERNATIONA AGRI INPUT CO-L
More informationappeal, it is desirable to state the following, albeit briefly.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM (CORAM: MSOFFE, J.A.; BWANA, J.A. AND MANDIA, J.A.) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 9 OF 2008 SHENGENA LTD...... APPELLANT VERSUS 1. NATIONAL INSURANCE CORPORATION
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA (OAR ES SALAAM DISTRICT REGISTRY) AT OAR ES SALAAM MISC. CIVIL CAUSE NO.157 OF 2005 ELIZABETH AUGUSTINO SAID PETITIONER
IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA (OAR ES SALAAM DISTRICT REGISTRY) AT OAR ES SALAAM MISC. CIVIL CAUSE NO.157 OF 2005 ELIZABETH AUGUSTINO SAID PETITIONER VERSUS 1. OYSTERBAY PROPERTIES LTD 1 st RESPONDENT
More informationIn the High Court of Tanzania at Mwanza the appellant and two. others were charged with murder c/s 196 of the Penal Code. It was
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT MWANZA (CORAM: SAMATTA, C.J., MSOFFE, J.A., And KAJI, J.A.) CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 42 OF 2001 JUMA LYAMWIWE THE REPUBLIC VERSUS APPELLANT RESPONDENT 16/2/2005 & 28/4/2006
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA AT OAR ES SALAAM RULING
IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA AT OAR ES SALAAM 1. ATTORNEY GENERAL} 2. T.R.A RULING Mlay, J. This ruling is on a preliminary objection on points of law to an application for leave to apply for the orders
More information2 October, & 16 November, 2006.
THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM ( RAMADHANL J. A,: MUNUO. J. A.: And KILEO, J. A.) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 55 OF 2000 SALIMA HUSSEIN... APPELLANT VERSUS HUSSEIN IBRAHIM SADIKI & SONS... RESPONDENT
More informationMROSO, J.A., NSEKELA, J.A. And RUTAKANGWA, J.A.) FRANCISCA MBAKILEKI... APPLICANT VERSUS TANZANIA HARBOURS CORPORATION RESPONDENT
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM (CORAM: MROSO, J.A., NSEKELA, J.A. And RUTAKANGWA, J.A.) CIVIL REFERENCE NO. 14 OF 2004 FRANCISCA MBAKILEKI. APPLICANT VERSUS TANZANIA HARBOURS CORPORATION
More informationLUBUVA, J.A., MUNUO, J.A. And NSEKELA, J.A.) RAHEL MBUYA... APPELLANT VERSUS 1. MINISTER FOR LABOUR AND YOUTH
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM (CORAM: LUBUVA, J.A., MUNUO, J.A. And NSEKELA, J.A.) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 121 OF 2005 RAHEL MBUYA..... APPELLANT VERSUS 1. MINISTER FOR LABOUR AND YOUTH
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA (DAR ES SALAAM DISTRICT REGISTRY) JUDGMENT
IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA (DAR ES SALAAM DISTRICT REGISTRY) JUDGMENT the demolition Notice cis 12(2) and 64 of the township Rules Cap. 101. district and Dar es Salaam Region, erecting a Dwelling house
More informationREGIONAL MANAGER, TANROADS KAGERA.. APPLICANT VERSUS RUAHA CONCRETE COMPANY LIMITED... RESPONDENT
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 96 OF 2007 REGIONAL MANAGER, TANROADS KAGERA.. APPLICANT VERSUS RUAHA CONCRETE COMPANY LIMITED.... RESPONDENT (Application for
More informationRULING OF THE COURT. The appellant, John s/o Ayoub was charged in the District. Court of Tunduru in Ruvuma Region with two economic offences;
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT IRINGA (CORAM: MBAROUK, J.A., MMILLA,J.A., And MWARIJA,J.A.) CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 196 OF 2014 JOHN IKLAND @ AYOUB APPELLANT VERSUS THE REPUBLIC. RESPONDENT (Appeal
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM RULING
IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM CIVIL REVISION NO. 57 OF 2004 MAH MUD SHAMTE APPLICANT VERSUS MARY SHAMTE RESPONDENT RULING A. Shangwa,J. On 14 th May, 2004, learned counsel for the applicant
More informationTHE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH AFRICA
THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH AFRICA In the matter between: CASE NUMBER: 4/95 ENSIGN-BICKFORD (SOUTH AFRICA) (PTY) LIMITED BULK MINING EXPLOSIVES (PTY) LIMITED DANTEX EXPLOSIVES (PTY) LIMITED 1st
More informationTHE VILLAGES AND UJAMAA VILLAGES (REGISTRATION, DESIGNATION AND ADMINISTRATION) ACT, 1975 ARRANGEMENT OF, SECTIONS PART I PRELIMINARY Title
THE VILLAGES AND UJAMAA VILLAGES (REGISTRATION, DESIGNATION AND ADMINISTRATION) ACT, 1975 ARRANGEMENT OF, SECTIONS PART I PRELIMINARY Title Section 1. Short title. 2. Interpretation. 3. Registrar Assistant
More information(Application for stay of execution from the decision of the High Court of Tanzania at Dar es Salaam)
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM CIVIL APPLICATION NO 82 OF 2008 NATIONAL HOUSING CORPORATION. APPLICANT AND HAMISI LUSWAGA... 1 ST RESPONDENT PETER KASIDI..2 ND RESPONDENT CHRISTOPHER
More information(CORAM: LUBUVA, J.A., MROSO, J.A., And RUTAKANGWA, J.A.)
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT MWANZA (CORAM: LUBUVA, J.A., MROSO, J.A., And RUTAKANGWA, J.A.) CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 5 OF 2004 RAMADHANI SALUM... APPELLANT VERSUS THE REPUBLIC..... RESPONDENT (Appeal
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT MWANZA LUBUVA, J.A., MROSO, J.A. AND RUTAKANGWA, J.A.) CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3 OF 2005
jj (CORAM: IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT MWANZA LUBUVA, J.A., MROSO, J.A. AND RUTAKANGWA, J.A.) CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3 OF 2005 (Application for Review from the Judgment/Decision of the Court
More informationIN THE EAST AFRICAN COURT OF JUSTICE AT ARUSHA FIRST INSTANCE DIVISION. (Coram: Johnston Busingye, PJ, John Mkwawa, J, Isaac Lenaola, J.
IN THE EAST AFRICAN COURT OF JUSTICE AT ARUSHA FIRST INSTANCE DIVISION (Coram: Johnston Busingye, PJ, John Mkwawa, J, Isaac Lenaola, J.) APPLICATION NO. 1 OF 2013 (ARISING FROM APPLICATION NO. 12 OF 2012)
More informationTHE NATIONAL EXAMINATIONS COUNCIL OF TANZANIA ACT, 1973 PART I. Title PART II
THE NATIONAL EXAMINATIONS COUNCIL OF TANZANIA ACT, 1973 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS Section Title PART I PRELIMINARY 1. Short title and commencement. 2. Interpretation. PART II THE NATIONAL EXAMINATIONS COUNCIL
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM RULING
/".1", IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM CIVIL CASE NO. 311 OF 1999 MWENGE GAS AND LUB OIL LTD PLAINTIFF VERSUS UNIVERSITY OF DAR ES SALAAM DEFENDANT RULING A.Shangwa,J. On 17/8/1999, DR.
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OFT AN ZAN IA (COMMERCIAL DIVTSfON) AT DAR ES SALAAM
IN THE HIGH COURT OFT AN ZAN IA (COMMERCIAL DIVTSfON) AT DAR ES SALAAM MISC COMMERCIAL CAUSE NO 70 OF 2017 (ARISING FROM COMMERCIAL CASE NO. 127 OF 2016) BETWEEN MAN TRAC T ANZANTA LIMITED --------------------------------------------A
More informationTHE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA IN THE HIGH COURT OF UGANDA AT KAMPALA CIVIL DIVISION MISC. CAUSE NO. 321 OF 2013
THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA IN THE HIGH COURT OF UGANDA AT KAMPALA CIVIL DIVISION MISC. CAUSE NO. 321 OF 2013 1. ATTORNEY GENERAL 2. HON. NYOMBI PETER ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: APPLICANTS VERSUS
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA COMMERCIAL DIVISION AT OAR ES SALAAM MISC.COMMERCIAL CAUSE NO.70 OF 2013 VERSUS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA COMMERCIAL DIVISION AT OAR ES SALAAM MISC.COMMERCIAL CAUSE NO.70 OF 2013 1. ANDREW WISTON KALELA NDIMBO 1 st APPLICANT 2. CHRISTINA ANDREW NDIMBO 2 nd APPLICANT VERSUS 1.
More informationTHE UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA THE LAW REFORM COMMISSION OF TANZANIA REPORT ON PRIVATE LEGAL PRACTICE
THE UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA THE LAW REFORM COMMISSION OF TANZANIA REPORT ON PRIVATE LEGAL PRACTICE PRESENTED TO THE ATTORNEY- GENERAL AND MINISTER FOR JUSTICE The Law Reform Commission of' Tanzania
More informationTANZANIA ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO. LTD...APPLICANT/J.DEBTOR INTEREBEST INVESTMENT CO. LIMITED.RESPONDENT/D. HOLDER
IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA (DAR ES SALAAM DISTRICT REGISTRY) AT DAR ES SALAAM CIVIL CASE NO. 68 OF 2000 TANZANIA ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO. LTD....APPLICANT/J.DEBTOR VERSUS INTEREBEST INVESTMENT CO. LIMITED.RESPONDENT/D.
More informationIN THE MATTER OF ANA PPLIATION FOR PREROGATIVE ORDERS OFCERTIORARI AND MANDAMUS BY ADELINA CHUGULU AND 99 OTHERS
IN THE MATTER OF ANA PPLIATION FOR PREROGATIVE ORDERS OFCERTIORARI AND MANDAMUS BY ADELINA CHUGULU AND 99 OTHERS IN THE MATTER OF REVISION OF THE DECISION OF THE NATIONAL EXAMINATION COUNCIL OF TANZANIA
More informationCHAPTER 1:04 NATIONAL ASSEMBLY (VALIDITY OF ELECTIONS) ACT ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS
National Assembly (Validity of Elections) 3 CHAPTER 1:04 NATIONAL ASSEMBLY (VALIDITY OF ELECTIONS) ACT ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS SECTION 1. Short title. 2. Interpretation. 3. Method of questioning validity
More informationEstate Agents (Amendment) Act 1994
No. 86 of 1994 Section 1. Purpose 2. Commencement 3. Part II substituted TABLE OF PROVISIONS PART 1 PRELIMINARY PART 2 RESTRUCTURING PART IIA THE ESTATE AGENTS COUNCIL 6. Estate Agents Council 6A. Objectives
More informationJUDGMENT OF THE COURT. The appellants were charged in the High Court of Tanzania, at
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA ATTABORA (CORAM: MASSATI, J.A., MUSSA, J.A. And MWARIJA, J.A.) CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 371 OF 2015 1. HAMISI CHUMA @ HANDO MHOJA} 2. MANYERI KUYA APPELLANTS VERSUS THE REPUBLIC................................
More informationIN THE EAST AFRICAN COURT OF JUSTICE AT ARUSHA
IN THE EAST AFRICAN COURT OF JUSTICE AT ARUSHA (Coram: Moijo M. ole Keiwua P, Joseph Mulenga VP, Augustino S. L. Ramadhani J, Kasanga Mulwa J, Joseph S. Warioba J) REFERENCE NO. 1 OF 2006 PROF. PETER ANYANG
More informationPART I PELIMINARY PROVISIONS. PART II ADMINISTRA non
PART I PELIMINARY PROVISIONS 1. Short title and commencement. 2. Application. 3. Interpretation. PART II ADMINISTRA non 4. Judiciary Service. 5. Judicial Scheme. 6. Divisions and Units of the Service.
More informationSCHEDULE CHAPTER 117 THE REGISTRATION OF DOCUMENTS ACT An Act relating to the registration of documents. [1st January, 1924]
SCHEDULE CHAPTER 117 THE REGISTRATION OF DOCUMENTS ACT An Act relating to the registration of documents. [1st January, 1924] R.L. Cap. 334 Ords. Nos. 14 of 1923 16 of 1926 11 of 1932 38 of 1939 33 of 1941
More informationBE it enacted by Parliament in the Fifty-sixth Year of the Republic of India as follows:-
~ THE PATENTS (AMENDMENT) ACT, 2005 # NO. 15 OF 2005 $ [4th April, 2005] + An Act further to amend the Patents Act, 1970. BE it enacted by Parliament in the Fifty-sixth Year of the Republic of India as
More informationTHE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA IN THE SUPREME COURT OF UGANDA AT KAMPALA CIVIL APPEAL NO. 013 OF 2014 BETWEEN
5 THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA IN THE SUPREME COURT OF UGANDA AT KAMPALA (Coram: Katureebe; C.J., Tumwesigye; Arach-Amoko; Mwangusya; Mwondha; JJ.S.C.) 10 CIVIL APPEAL NO. 013 OF 2014 BETWEEN 15 KAMPALA CAPITAL
More informationDate of last Order. Date of Ruling
Date of last Order Date of Ruling TIMA HAJI through the services of K. MWITTAWAISSAKA ADVOCATE,has made an application by Chamber Summons under the Civil Procedure Code 1966 seeking from this court, the
More informationTHE UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA THE TAX REVENUE APPEALS ACT CHAPTER 408 REVISED EDITION 2006
THE UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA THE TAX REVENUE APPEALS ACT CHAPTER 408 REVISED EDITION 2006 This edition of the Tax Revenue Appeals Act, Cap. 408 incorporates all amendments up to 30th November, 2006
More informationSouth Australian Employment Tribunal Bill 2014
6.8.2014 (4) South Australian Employment Tribunal Bill 2014 REPORT Today I am introducing a Bill to establish the South Australian Employment Tribunal, with jurisdiction to review certain decisions arising
More informationThe Patents (Amendment) Act,
!"# The Patents (Amendment) Act, 2005 1 [NO. 15 OF 2005] CONTENTS [April 4, 2005] Sections Sections 1. Short title and commencement 40. Amendment of Section 57 2. Amendment of Section 2 41. Substitution
More informationTHE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA IN THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF UGANDA AT KAMPALA CONSTITUTIONAL PETITION NO. 8/98
THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA IN THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF UGANDA AT KAMPALA CONSTITUTIONAL PETITION NO. 8/98 CORAM: HON. MR. JUSTICE ST. MANYINDO, DCJ; 10 HON. MR. JUSTICE CM. KATO, J.A; HON. MR. JUSTICE G.M.
More informationTHE TANZANIA CENTRAL FREIGHT BUREAU ACT, 1981 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS. Title 1. Short title and commencement. 2. Interpretation.
THE TANZANIA CENTRAL FREIGHT BUREAU ACT, 1981 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS PART I PRELIMINARY Section Title 1. Short title and commencement. 2. Interpretation. PART II THE TANZANIA CENTRAL FREIGHT BUREAU 3.
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM CIVIL APPEAL NO. 36 OF 2003 JUDGMENT
IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM CIVIL APPEAL NO. 36 OF 2003 (From the Ruling of The Court of the Resident Magistrate at Kisutu in Civil Case No.78 of 1997 Mgetta, ISSA. H. NANGUPECHI. SRM)
More information2yh August, Supplement No THE BASIC RIGHTS AND DUTIES ENFORCEMENT (CAP.
ISSN 0856-034X Supplement No. 34 SUBSIDIARY LEGISLATION 2yh August, 2014 to the Gazette of the United Republic of Tanzania No. 35 Vol 95 dated 2cjh August, 2014 Printed by the Government Printer, Dar es
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA LABOUR DIVISION AT DAR ES SALAAM REVISION NO 305 OF 2010
IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA LABOUR DIVISION AT DAR ES SALAAM REVISION NO 305 OF 2010 TANZANIA BUILDING WORKS LTD. APPLICANT VERSUS ALLY MGOMBA & 4 OTHERS RESPONDENTS (Original CMA/DSM/TEM/337/09) 17/09/2012
More information(1) JOHN CHIKURA N.O. (2) DEPOSIT PROTECTION CORPORATION v AL SHAM S GLOBAL BVI LIMITED
1 REPORTABLE (11) (1) JOHN CHIKURA N.O. (2) DEPOSIT PROTECTION CORPORATION v AL SHAM S GLOBAL BVI LIMITED SUPREME COURT OF ZIMBABWE ZIYAMBI JA, GOWORA JA & HLATSHWAYO JA HARARE, NOVEMBER 15 & FEBRUARY
More informationknown as plot number 13 Glynham, Masvingo ( the property ). It formed part of the estate
1 DISTRIBUTABLE (29) ALFRED MUCHINI v (1) ELIZABETH MARY ADAMS (2) SHEPHERD MAKONYERE N.O (3) ESTATE LATE ALVIN ROY ADAMS (4) REGISTRAR OF DEEDS (5) MASTER OF THE HIGH COURT SUPREME COURT OF ZIMBABWE ZIYAMBI
More informationDIFC COURT LAW. DIFC LAW No.10 of 2004
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ DIFC COURT LAW DIFC LAW No.10 of 2004 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
More informationCOURT OF APPEAL RULES 2009
COURT OF APPEAL RULES 2009 Court of Appeal Rules 2009 Arrangement of Rules COURT OF APPEAL RULES 2009 Arrangement of Rules Rule PART I - PRELIMINARY 7 1 Citation and commencement... 7 2 Interpretation....
More informationTHE SUMATRA (COMPLAINTS AND REVIEW PROCEDURE) RULES, 2008
THE UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA THE SUMATRA (COMPLAINTS AND REVIEW PROCEDURE) RULES, 2008 [GN. No. 15 OF 2008] PRINTED BYTHE GOVERNMENT PRINTER, DAR ES SALAAM-TANZANIA ANDAND THE SUMATRA (COMPLAINTS AND
More informationEMPLOYMENT AND DISCRIMINATION TRIBUNAL (PROCEDURE) ORDER 2016
Arrangement EMPLOYMENT AND DISCRIMINATION TRIBUNAL (PROCEDURE) ORDER 2016 Arrangement Article PART 1 3 INTRODUCTORY AND GENERAL 3 1 Interpretation... 3 2 Overriding objective... 4 3 Time... 5 PART 2 5
More informationCIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY REGULATIONS 1972
CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY REGULATIONS 1972 JERSEY REVISED EDITION OF THE LAWS 03.875 APPENDIX 3 Jersey R & O 5717 Civil Aviation Act 1971. CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY REGULATIONS 1972. (Registered on the
More informationTHE TANZANIA NEWS AGENCY ACT, 1976
THE TANZANIA NEWS AGENCY ACT, ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS Section Title PART I PRELIMINARY 1. Short title and commencement. 2. Interpretation. PART II TANZANIA NEWS AGENCY 3. Establishment of the Agency. 4.
More informationTHE UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA. No. 47 OF 1968
THE UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA No. 47 OF I ASSENT, 25TH JULY, An Act to make provision for the Enfranchisement of certain lands held under Customary Land Tenure, to provide for the grant of such lands
More informationCHAPTER 3:04 SUMMARY JURISDICTION (APPEALS) ACT ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS
Summary Jurisdiction (Appeals) 3 CHAPTER 3:04 SUMMARY JURISDICTION (APPEALS) ACT ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS SECTION 1. Short title. 2. Interpretation. MAKING OF APPEAL 3. (1) Right of appeal. (2) Appeals
More informationPART II ESTABLISHMENT 3. Establishment of Tanganyika Law Society. 4. Objects. 5. Dissolution and vesting of assets of Former Society.
CHAPTER 307 THE TANGANYIKA LAW SOCIETY ACT [PRINCIPAL LEGISLATION] ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS Section. Title PART I PRELIMINARY PROVISIONS 1. Short title. 2. Interpretation. PART II ESTABLISHMENT 3. Establishment
More informationCHAPTER 28:04 VALUATION FOR RATING PURPOSES ACT ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS PART I PART II
Valuation for Rating Purposes 3 CHAPTER 28:04 VALUATION FOR RATING PURPOSES ACT ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS PART I PRELIMINARY SECTION 1. Short title. 2. Interpretation. 3. Chief Valuation Officer etc. PART
More informationIn the District court of Moshi, the appellant Omary Majid was. charged with and convicted of Armed Robbery contrary to sections
".. IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT ARUSHA (CORAM: MSOFFE, J.A., KILEO, J.A. And ORIYO, J.A.) CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 288 OF 2007 OMARY MAllO............ VERSUS TH E REPUBLIC.........................
More informationCOURT OF APPEAL RULES, 1997 (C.I 19)
COURT OF APPEAL RULES, 1997 (C.I 19) IN exercise of the powers conferred on the Rules of Court Committee by Article 157(2) of the Constitution these Rules are made this 24th day of July, 1997. PART I-GENERAL
More informationSUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND
SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND CITATION: Eyears v Zufic [2016] QCA 40 PARTIES: MARINA EYEARS (applicant) v PETER ZUFIC as trustee for the PETER AND TANYA ZUFIC FAMILY TRUST trading as CLIENTCARE SOLICITORS
More informationTHE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH AFRICA CRONIMET CHROME PROPERTIES (PTY) LTD
THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH AFRICA JUDGMENT Case No: 851/12 Not reportable In the matter between: CRONIMET CHROME MINING SA (PTY) LTD FIRST APPELLANT CRONIMET CHROME SA (PTY) LTD SECOND APPELLANT
More informationVIANINI LAVORI S.P.A. v THE HONG KONG HOUSING AUTHORITY - [1992] HKCU 0463
1 VIANINI LAVORI S.P.A. v THE HONG KONG HOUSING AUTHORITY - [1992] HKCU 0463 High Court (in Chambers) Kaplan, J. Construction List No. 4 of 1992 6 March 1992, 27 May 1992 Kaplan, J. This matter raises
More informationIN THE EAST AFRICAN COURT OF JUSTICE APPELLATE DIVISION AT ARUSHA APPEAL NO. 2 OF 2011 BETWEEN ALCON INTERNATIONAL LIMITED...
IN THE EAST AFRICAN COURT OF JUSTICE APPELLATE DIVISION AT ARUSHA APPEAL NO. 2 OF 2011 BETWEEN ALCON INTERNATIONAL LIMITED... APPELLANT AND THE STANDARD CHARTERED BANK OF UGANDA... 1ST RESPONDENT THE ATTORNEY
More informationRules for the Conduct of an administered Arbitration
Rules for the Conduct of an administered Arbitration EXPLANATORY STATEMENT 1.1 These Rules govern disputes which are international in character, and are referred by the parties to AFSA INTERNATIONAL for
More informationCHARTERED PROFESSIONAL ACCOUNTANTS OF ONTARIO RULES OF PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE MADE UNDER SECTION 25.1 OF THE STATUTORY POWERS PROCEDURE ACT
CHARTERED PROFESSIONAL ACCOUNTANTS OF ONTARIO RULES OF PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE MADE UNDER SECTION 25.1 OF THE STATUTORY POWERS PROCEDURE ACT TABLE OF CONTENTS RULE 1 GENERAL RULES... 2 RULE 2 COMPLIANCE
More informationGOVERNMENT NOTICE NO published on. THE APPELLATE JURISDICTION ACT (CAP.141) RULES. (fv1ade under section 12) THE TANZANI COURT OF APPEAL RULES, 2009
GOVERNMENT NOTICE NO published on. THE APPELLATE JURISDICTION ACT (CAP.141) RULES (fv1ade under section 12) THE TANZANI COURT OF APPEAL RULES, 2009 ARRANGEMENT OF RULES CITATION PART 1 AND INTERPRET ATION
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM VICTOR SUNGURA TOKE... APPLICANT VERSUS P.S.R.C & BOARD OF INTERNAL TRADE
IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM VICTOR SUNGURA TOKE...... APPLICANT VERSUS P.S.R.C & BOARD OF INTERNAL TRADE RESPONDENT Date of last Order: Date of Ruling : 09/04/2008 The PSRC and the BOARD
More informationTHE CHARTERED INSURANCE INSTITUTE Disciplinary Procedure Rules
THE CHARTERED INSURANCE INSTITUTE Disciplinary Procedure Rules Part 1 General Authority and Purpose 1.1 These Rules are made pursuant to The Chartered Insurance Institute Disciplinary Regulations 2015.
More information